Next Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Journal of Fungi in 2019
Next Article in Special Issue
Contributions of the Biofilm Matrix to Candida Pathogenesis
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Oral Candidiasis: A Disease of Opportunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 6
Issue 1
10.3390/jof6010016
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

On Commensalism of Candida

by
Jesus A. Romo
and
Carol A. Kumamoto
*
Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2020, 6(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010016
Submission received: 30 November 2019 / Revised: 13 January 2020 / Accepted: 15 January 2020 / Published: 17 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pathogenesis of Candidiasis)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida species are both opportunistic fungal pathogens and common members of the human mycobiome. Over the years, the main focus of the fungal field has been on understanding the pathogenic potential and disease manifestation of these organisms. Therefore, understanding of their commensal lifestyle, interactions with host epithelial barriers, and initial transition into pathogenesis is less developed. In this review, we will describe the current knowledge on the commensal lifestyle of these fungi, how they are able to adhere to and colonize host epithelial surfaces, compete with other members of the microbiota, and interact with the host immune response, as well as their transition into opportunistic pathogens by invading the gastrointestinal epithelium.

1. Introduction

Candida species are opportunistic fungal pathogens and common members of the human mycobiome [1,2,3]. Candida species, primarily Candida albicans, are early colonizers acquired at or near birth primarily by physical contact [4,5]. These organisms are able to colonize the skin [6], as well as the gastrointestinal [7,8], and reproductive tracts of humans [9,10]. C. albicans is the most studied member of the genus with most of the research focused on its ability to cause disease [7,11,12,13,14,15]. Indeed, C. albicans is responsible for an unacceptably high number of symptomatic infections yearly that range from superficial (i.e., skin and mucous membranes) to invasive (i.e., internal organs) [7,16,17]. Most of these infections occur in immunocompromised individuals and originate from the gastrointestinal tract [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Therefore, it is crucial to narrow the gap in knowledge involving colonization, commensal lifestyle, and transition into a pathogenic state by Candida species. Interestingly, Candida species also appear to carry out functions that benefit the host. These include playing a role in the development of mucosal immune responses [24,25] and protection from Clostridioides difficile infection in a murine model [26]. Candida species have clearly developed an intimate relationship with the host, which benefits the fungus and the host under certain circumstances. When this relationship is disturbed by antibiotic treatment or immune suppression however, the results can be catastrophic to the host. Below, we describe the current knowledge of Candida colonization and commensal lifestyle, with a brief discussion of invasion of epithelial barriers, primarily in the gastrointestinal tract.

2. Candida Gastrointestinal Colonization

As mentioned above, Candida species are acquired during or near birth [4,5] and become a significant part of the host mycobiome [1,2,3,27,28,29,30]. In order to cement their place in the host, they must be able to adhere to host epithelial cells and mucosal surfaces, resist and interact with host immune responses, and compete or cooperate with other members of the host microbiota. Additionally, C. albicans possesses the ability to undergo filamentation, a morphogenetic change from yeast to hyphae in response to an array of environmental signals, many of which are found in the host gastrointestinal tract [31]. Hyphae are composed of elongated cells that do not separate after division and are the pathogenic form due to their ability to invade tissues. Hyphae are also required for proper biofilm formation of C. albicans, which allows it to endure environmental insults (e.g., antifungal treatment) [31,32,33,34,35]. Therefore, in order to successfully colonize the gastrointestinal tract, C. albicans must also successfully orchestrate morphogenetic transitions without harming the host and being eliminated by the subsequent immune response.

2.1. Adhesion

To date, there are no detailed studies of Candida species in the intestinal environment that strictly focus on commensalism. Moreover, knowledge of the role of adhesins during Candida colonization of the intestinal tract is minimal [36,37]. In this sub-section we will discuss the current knowledge of adhesins and their role in other niches that Candida species occupy and their potential role during intestinal colonization. The most studied adhesins utilized by C. albicans belong to the agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) gene family [38,39,40], which encode a group of GPI-anchored proteins with adhesive properties. These proteins have previously been shown to be present on the surface of the fungal cell wall [41,42], a structure composed mainly of chitin, glucans (β-1,3 and β-1,6), and mannans [43,44,45,46,47,48]. The ALS gene family consists of eight members (ALS1-ALS7 and ALS9), with ALS1 and ALS3 being the most studied. Distinct members of the ALS family are expressed during the yeast and hyphal morphologies of C. albicans [49,50,51]. ALS3 and the non-ALS adhesin Hyphal Wall Protein 1 (HWP1) are expressed mainly by hyphae [39,49,50,52,53,54]. Indeed, the distinct array of adhesins might be required for adaptation to distinct niches occupied by Candida species (i.e., oral, intestinal, and vaginal mucosal surfaces). Early studies have shown that C. albicans exhibits a greater ability to adhere to buccal epithelial cells (BECs) [55,56], vaginal epithelial cells (VECs) [57,58,59], uroepithelial cells [60], epithelium derived cell monolayers [61,62,63], and intestinal epithelial cells in vitro compared to other Candida species [64,65,66]. Although these studies did not directly address the role of specific adhesins, more recent studies have begun to elucidate specific roles [39,49,52,64,67,68,69,70,71,72]. Zakikhany et al., showed that the hyphal specific adhesin, ALS3, is highly upregulated during epithelial infection in vitro and that deletion of ALS3 decreases this adhesion [73]. Similarly, deletion of ALS2, decreases adhesion [74,75]. Importantly, deletion of ALS5, ALS6, or ALS7 resulted in an increase in adhesion highlighting the complex roles of adhesins [76]. Studies with HWP1 have also demonstrated that this hyphal specific adhesin is highly expressed during colonization and infection of the oral epithelium and its deletion attenuates virulence in a murine model of oropharyngeal candidiasis [51,73,77]. The current knowledge of the role of adhesins in tissue culture systems and animal models is summarized in Table 1. These observations combined with the fact that C. albicans is able to very successfully colonize the gastrointestinal tract of humans [8,78,79,80], suggest that indeed distinct adhesins are required to successfully interact with the different environmental niches encountered by C. albicans and that multiple adhesins might be required for intestinal colonization.
C. albicans morphogenetic states might play distinct roles during colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. C. albicans cells in the yeast state display decreased adhesion to enterocytes compared to oral epithelial cells in vitro [87]. Moreover, in these studies, most C. albicans cells underwent morphological transitions into hyphae, which enhanced their adhesive properties, as well as their virulence due to hyphal invasion into the host epithelial surfaces [50,87]. C. albicans invasion of epithelial surfaces occurs via two well characterized mechanisms, active penetration and endocytosis, both briefly described below. These in vitro studies suggest that C. albicans initial adhesion triggers filamentation and expression of virulence factors which lead to invasion of an epithelium. C. albicans must establish a relationship with the host in which none or minimal damage is caused in order to establish itself as a long-term colonizer [88]. When C. albicans is acquired early in life there could be some initial damage due to filamentation, which could be overcome after the host immune response is able to mature and control pathogenic fungal populations.
C. albicans hyphal specific transcripts have been detected in several studies of murine models of gastrointestinal colonization [36,89]. The role of hyphae in intestinal commensalism however is still enigmatic since some studies have reported that yeast is the predominant morphology colonizing the gastrointestinal tract (~90%) [89,90]. More recently, Witchley and co-workers were able to show that yeast and hyphae morphologies co-occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract in a murine model. More importantly, they were able to identify a regulatory program involved in balancing commensal and pathogenic lifestyles of C. albicans [37]. The authors demonstrated that a master regulator of C. albicans filamentation, Ume6, reduced intestinal colonization fitness by activating the expression of the secreted aspartic proteinase 6 (Sap6) as well as the adhesin Hyr1, which triggered a pro-inflammatory response and subsequent clearance of the fungus by the host immune response. These results highlight the role of the environmental pressure coming from the host immune response and the ability of C. albicans populations to adapt to this stress.
To date, the majority of the studies involving adhesion and morphological states of C. albicans have been performed using in vitro models and primarily host niches other than the lower gastrointestinal tract. Clearly, the role of morphogenetic states along with specific adhesins expressed has not been fully addressed in the context of intestinal colonization and more studies are required in order to fully understand the role of these distinct morphologies, in addition to adhesins in interactions with host epithelial barriers.
In the last few decades, isolation of non-Candida albicans Candida (NCAC) species has significantly increased [5,13,91,92,93,94]. Less is known about NCAC as colonizers of the gastrointestinal tract. C. glabrata is another opportunistic pathogenic yeast and successful colonizer of the human gastrointestinal tract [1,2,3,28]. Although it is classified under the genus Candida, it is not a member of the CUG clade and is more closely related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to C. albicans [95]. C. glabrata is the second most commonly isolated Candida species from human samples in clinical laboratories behind C. albicans [91,96,97,98,99,100,101]. C. glabrata is unable to form true hyphae, but it is capable of adhering to host epithelial surfaces [102]. The adhesin repertoire utilized by C. glabrata consists of Epithelial Adhesin (Epa) and Epa-like proteins. Of this adhesin family, Epa1p has been shown to mediate adhesion to host epithelial cells (human laryngeal carcinoma, Hep2) [102] and macrophages [103]. Moreover, Epa6 and Epa7 have been shown to moderate adhesion to epithelial and endothelial cells [104,105]. In the case of the intestinal tract, a previous study identified adhesion properties of specific adhesins of C. glabrata expressed in S. cerevisiae to human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (Caco2). The authors found that the adhesive properties of different adhesins ranged from significant to very weak adherence with Epa1, 6, and 7 displaying significant to moderate adhesion and Epa19-21 displaying weak adhesion [106]. C. glabrata colonization of the gastrointestinal tract is not well understood. Previous findings suggest that C. glabrata may require C. albicans for colonization and invasion of the oral cavity. Tati and co-workers demonstrated that C. albicans Als1 and Als3 were required for in vitro C. glabrata adhesion to C. albicans hyphae and to establish oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) in a murine model [107]. Moreover, C. glabrata cell wall protein genes EPA8, EPA19, AWP2, AWP7 and CAGL0F00181, were required for adhesion to C. albicans. These studies demonstrate that C. glabrata might be dependent on C. albicans for adhesion and invasion in the oral environment. Are these examples of fungal interactions that are important in the intestinal tract? In a recent interesting study, Gonia and co-workers demonstrated that another NCAC, C. parapsilosis, which is primarily a fungal pathogen of neonates, was able to protect premature intestinal epithelial cells (pIECs) from C. albicans invasion and damage [108]. More importantly, this protection was correlated with the adhesiveness of C. parapsilosis to C. albicans and to pIECs. These studies demonstrate that NCACs might play distinct roles during C. albicans colonization, invasion, and pathogenesis and further studies are required to begin to understand the complex ecosystem in which these fungi exist and interact with each other.

2.2. Specialized Morphotype for Survival in the Gastrointestinal Tract

More recently, C. albicans Gastrointestinally indUced Transition (GUT) cells were identified by allowing wild type C. albicans to pass through the mammalian gastrointestinal tract [109]. These cell types underwent a phenotypic switch due to the expression of WOR1, a master switch transcription factor of white-opaque phenotypic switching in C. albicans [110,111]. White-opaque switching has been well characterized [112]. White and opaque cells have distinct gene expression of a large variety of processes [113,114]. Moreover, opaque cells have been identified as the mating competent phase [115,116]. Interestingly, GUT cells proved to be hypercompetitive and more fit in gastrointestinal colonization models as well as less virulent in a bloodstream murine model relative to white cells [109]. These observations indicate that yeast and hyphae are not the only morphogenetic states involved in colonization and commensalism of the host gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, GUT cells also express an array of transcripts optimized for lower gastrointestinal tract colonization. Among these, genes involved in the use of fatty acids and N-acetyl-glucosamine were upregulated, while genes involved in adhesion, glucose utilization, and iron uptake were downregulated. These patterns indicate that GUT cells are highly adapted to the nutrients available in the host lower gastrointestinal tract. Interestingly, GUT cells share similar metabolic characteristics with opaque cells, which are attenuated for commensalism [113]. These novel morphotypes require more investigation in order to truly understand their role in gastrointestinal colonization. What role do GUT cells play in C. albicans colonization and commensalism and do other Candida species have specialized cell types that promote gastrointestinal colonization?

2.3. Effects of C. albicans Colonization during Bacterial Infection

As mentioned earlier, most of the research on Candida species has focused on their pathogenic potential and there is a gap in knowledge about potential benefits provided to the host. One interesting example comes from murine studies performed by our group [26]. In these studies, antibiotic treated mice were either not colonized or pre-colonized with C. albicans. The animals were then challenged with the bacterial pathogen Clostridioides difficile. Surprisingly, the mice that were pre-colonized with C. albicans displayed a higher survival rate of a lethal C. difficile infection compared to the non-colonized mice. Moreover, one mechanism by which this protection was conferred was by the upregulation of IL-17A during C. albicans colonization.
Several groups have identified and characterized the interactions between C. albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in distinct niches [117,118,119]. The interactions between these two organisms appear to be primarily antagonistic [117,120,121,122]. Previously, Lopez-Medina and co-workers used a neutropenic murine model to investigate the effect of C. albicans gastrointestinal colonization on P. aeruginosa pathogenesis [123]. Surprisingly, C. albicans specifically inhibited P. aeruginosa virulence without affecting the bacterium’s colonization capabilities. The authors were able to determine that C. albicans inhibited P. aeruginosa virulence by suppressing gene expression of the siderophores pyochelin and pyoverdine. Moreover, the inhibition of these two siderophores by C. albicans increased mouse survival and decreased P. aeruginosa dissemination highlighting the importance of mycobiome in host health and disease. Thus, C. albicans colonization reduced disease caused by different bacterial pathogens.
Conversely, C. tropicalis has been shown to play a role in the exacerbation of Crohn’s disease (CD) [124]. Hoarau and co-workers analyzed the micro- and mycobiota of patients with CD and their healthy relatives and found the bacteria Serratia marcescens and Escherichia coli elevated in CD patients. Interestingly, C. tropicalis was also elevated in CD patients and its abundance positively correlated with S. marcescens and E. coli, suggesting potential interactions between these three organisms. In subsequent experiments, the authors described an in vitro biofilm composed of all three organisms, which showed enhanced biomass, a distinct morphology of C. tropicalis in contrast to C. tropicalis only biofilms, and physical interactions between the organisms.
These examples indicate that related fungi may occupy distinct ecological roles in the host gastrointestinal tract. There is a need for further examination of the role of fungal commensals during host health and disease.

2.4. Host Immune Response

The host is constantly surveying mucosal surfaces for pathogens and commensals such as C. albicans. Previous studies have demonstrated that the host is able to distinguish between yeast and filamentous C. albicans and therefore is able to identify commensalism or pathogenic infections [125]. Additionally, the host is able to sense increased fungal burdens, which could indicate an active infection, and respond [126]. For a review on specific receptors utilized by the host to sense fungi, see references [8,127]. Among these, Dectin-1 has been shown to be crucial for controlling fungal populations and both mice and humans either lacking or having a distinct polymorphism are highly prone to ulcerative colitis presumably triggered by fungal overgrowth [128]. Previous studies have suggested that C. albicans is able to select populations for colonization based on the immune status of the host [36,89]. In these studies, the authors demonstrated that C. albicans expression of the transcription factor Efh1p is upregulated in cells colonizing the murine gastrointestinal tract. Interestingly, expression of EFH1 is associated with reduced colonization efficiency of the intestinal tract in animal models. In these models, cells lacking EFH1 are able to successfully colonize the intestinal tract at higher levels than wild type, which displays intermediate colonization capabilities, while overexpression of EFH1, resulted in poor colonization of the intestinal tract. These studies suggest that C. albicans might be able to regulate population size in the host by modifying its gene expression, which could prevent strong immune responses by the host and subsequent antifungal effects. Another interesting adaptation of C. albicans in order to colonize the intestinal tract, is the expression of the transcription factor EFG1. This major regulator of C. albicans morphogenesis regulates the yeast to hyphal transition by responding to a variety of stimuli [84,129,130,131,132,133]. Previous studies demonstrated that expression of EFG1 by C. albicans in the intestinal tract differed depending on the immune status of the host [134]. In contrast to the studies performed with EFH1, C. albicans efg1− null mutant proved to be hypersusceptible to the host immune response and therefore a poor colonizer. Both of these studies demonstrate that C. albicans gene expression is intimately connected to host immune status and this ability to accurately and effectively sense the host allows C. albicans to be a successful colonizer.

2.5. Host Microbiota

In the host, Candida also has to compete for space and nutrients with other microorganisms in the ecosystem. Previous studies showed that anaerobes suppress C. albicans growth in the gastrointestinal tract of Syrian hamsters and that the removal of those anaerobes by treatment with penicillin allowed C. albicans to adhere, colonize, and disseminate from the gastrointestinal tract [135,136]. More recently, there is emerging evidence that members of the host microbiota affect C. albicans colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. One such study demonstrated that Lactobacillus species are antagonistic to C. albicans by producing indole-3-aldehyde (IAld), which stimulated IL-22 production resulting in antifungal activity [137]. Cruz and co-workers identified a EntV, a peptide secreted by Enterococcus faecalis, which was shown to inhibit C. albicans filamentation and virulence in a nematode infection model [138,139]. In these studies, the authors demonstrated that co-infection of a nematode with E. faecalis and C. albicans resulted in less pathology and less mortality than infection with either organism alone. The author hypothesizes that this phenomenon promotes a mutually beneficial association with the host, leading to a commensal lifestyle [140]. More recently, the same group demonstrated that EntV alone reduces invasion, inflammation, and fungal burden in a murine model of oropharyngeal candidiasis [139]. Lastly, Fan and co-workers were interested in factors that allow mice to exhibit C. albicans colonization resistance [141]. The authors identified a key role for commensal anaerobic bacteria, mainly clostridial Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, in which the bacteria are able to activate the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). This activation led to the induction of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 (CRAMP), which in murine models, resulted in significant reduction of C. albicans intestinal colonization and a 50% decrease in mortality from invasive disease. These studies are outstanding examples of the complex interactions that C. albicans has to negotiate in order to colonize the host intestinal tract and highlight how dynamic and adaptable C. albicans must be in order to colonize distinct host niches.
Although Candida can establish an intimate and primarily benign relationship with the host, disturbances caused by antibiotics [21,142], damage of host epithelial barriers (e.g., due to bacterial toxins, trauma, or surgery) [143,144,145], or immune suppression [16] can lead to Candida overgrowth, invasion, and a transition to a pathogenic state.

3. Invasion

C. albicans invasion of epithelial surfaces leads to pathogenesis and is dependent on the yeast to hypha transition [146]. Interestingly, non-filamentous fungi such as C. glabrata have been shown to cross epithelial barriers in vitro [147]. Conversely, an efg1- null mutant displays a reduced ability to cross an epithelial Caco2 monolayer compared to the wild type and complemented strain [148]. These two observations highlight potentially distinct mechanisms of transepithelial migration and invasion. C. albicans invasion has been well characterized and two main mechanisms have emerged. These include epithelial-driven endocytosis [50,73,87,149] and C. albicans active penetration of epithelial surfaces by hyphae [12,87,150]. In vitro models have demonstrated that active penetration is the primary method of invading enterocytes during early stages of interaction [87]. Interestingly, recent studies have suggested that endocytosis occurs at a later time after C. albicans adheres to cells and this could be a potential mechanism for translocation through the gut barrier [151]. Both of these mechanisms have been extensively reviewed by Basmaciyan and co-workers [152]. Interestingly, Als3p has been reported to play a role in both endocytosis, active penetration, and overall invasion [146]. Results from these studies demonstrate that C. albicans as a commensal can interact with host epithelial barriers in distinct ways which allow it to colonize, invade, or both.

4. Concluding Remarks

During colonization, C. albicans interacts with its bacterial co-colonizers, the host epithelium and effectors of the host immune system. The outcome of these many interactions determines whether C. albicans will colonize as a benign commensal or become an invasive pathogen. Future work will reveal more details of these interactions, shedding light on the impact of C. albicans on the gastrointestinal tract ecosystem.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.K. and J.A.R.; Original Draft Preparation, J.A.R.; Writing-Review and Editing, J.A.R. and C.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research in our laboratory was supported by grant R01AI118898 (to C.A.K.) from the National Institutes of Health. J.A.R. is a Postdoctoral Scholar supported by the Tufts University MERGE-ID training grant (T32AI007329).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hallen-Adams, H.E.; Suhr, M.J. Fungi in the healthy human gastrointestinal tract. Virulence 2017, 8, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mukherjee, P.K.; Sendid, B.; Hoarau, G.; Colombel, J.F.; Poulain, D.; Ghannoum, M.A. Mycobiota in gastrointestinal diseases. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nash, A.K.; Auchtung, T.A.; Wong, M.C.; Smith, D.P.; Gesell, J.R.; Ross, M.C.; Stewart, C.J.; Metcalf, G.A.; Muzny, D.M.; Gibbs, R.A.; et al. The gut mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort. Microbiome 2017, 5, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reef, S.E.; Lasker, B.A.; Butcher, D.S.; McNeil, M.M.; Pruitt, R.; Keyserling, H.; Jarvis, W.R. Nonperinatal nosocomial transmission of Candida albicans in a neonatal intensive care unit: Prospective study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 1255–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kondori, N.; Nowrouzian, F.; Ajdari, M.; Hesselmar, B.; Saalman, R.; Wold, A.E.; Adlerberth, I. Candida species as commensal gut colonizers: A study of 133 longitudinally followed Swedish infants. Med. Mycol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kuhbacher, A.; Burger-Kentischer, A.; Rupp, S. Interaction of Candida Species with the Skin. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Odds, F.C. Candida infections: An overview. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1987, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Neville, B.A.; d’Enfert, C.; Bougnoux, M.E. Candida albicans commensalism in the gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Fidel, P.L., Jr. Vaginal candidiasis: Review and role of local mucosal immunity. AIDS Patient Care STDS 1998, 12, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barousse, M.M.; Van Der Pol, B.J.; Fortenberry, D.; Orr, D.; Fidel, P.L., Jr. Vaginal yeast colonisation, prevalence of vaginitis, and associated local immunity in adolescents. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2004, 80, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kojic, E.M.; Darouiche, R.O. Candida infections of medical devices. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Naglik, J.R.; Challacombe, S.J.; Hube, B. Candida albicans secreted aspartyl proteinases in virulence and pathogenesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 400–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Odds, F.C. Pathogenesis of Candida infections. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1994, 31, S2–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Spellberg, B.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Filler, S.G. Mice with disseminated candidiasis die of progressive sepsis. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Patel, P.K.; Kirkpatrick, W.R.; Westbrook, S.D.; Berg, D.; Erlandsen, J.; Redding, S.W.; Patterson, T.F. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in the era of antiretroviral therapy. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2010, 109, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: A persistent public health problem. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 133–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nucci, M.; Anaissie, E. Revisiting the source of candidemia: Skin or gut? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, 1959–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miranda, L.N.; van der Heijden, I.M.; Costa, S.F.; Sousa, A.P.I.; Sienra, R.A.; Gobara, S.; Santos, C.R.; Lobo, R.D.; Pessoa, V.P., Jr.; Levin, A.S. Candida colonisation as a source for candidaemia. J. Hosp. Infect. 2009, 72, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cole, G.T.; Lynn, K.T.; Seshan, K.R.; Pope, L.M. Gastrointestinal and systemic candidosis in immunocompromised mice. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 1989, 27, 363–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ekenna, O.; Sherertz, R.J. Factors affecting colonization and dissemination of Candida albicans from the gastrointestinal tract of mice. Infect. Immun. 1987, 55, 1558–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Mellado, E.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Regadera, J.; Gonzalez, M.; Diaz-Guerra, T.M.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L. Sustained gastrointestinal colonization and systemic dissemination by Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis and Candida parapsilosis in adult mice. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000, 38, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Koh, A.Y.; Kohler, J.R.; Coggshall, K.T.; Van Rooijen, N.; Pier, G.B. Mucosal damage and neutropenia are required for Candida albicans dissemination. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Atarashi, K.; Tanoue, T.; Ando, M.; Kamada, N.; Nagano, Y.; Narushima, S.; Suda, W.; Imaoka, A.; Setoyama, H.; Nagamori, T.; et al. Th17 Cell Induction by Adhesion of Microbes to Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Cell 2015, 163, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ifrim, D.C.; Quintin, J.; Meerstein-Kessel, L.; Plantinga, T.S.; Joosten, L.A.; van der Meer, J.W.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Netea, M.G. Defective trained immunity in patients with STAT-1-dependent chronic mucocutaneaous candidiasis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 181, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Markey, L.; Shaban, L.; Green, E.R.; Lemon, K.P.; Mecsas, J.; Kumamoto, C.A. Pre-colonization with the commensal fungus Candida albicans reduces murine susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection. Gut. Microbes 2018, 9, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Witherden, E.A.; Shoaie, S.; Hall, R.A.; Moyes, D.L. The Human Mucosal Mycobiome and Fungal Community Interactions. J. Fungi. 2017, 3, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Huffnagle, G.B.; Noverr, M.C. The emerging world of the fungal microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Huseyin, C.E.; Rubio, R.C.; O‘Sullivan, O.; Cotter, P.D.; Scanlan, P.D. The Fungal Frontier: A Comparative Analysis of Methods Used in the Study of the Human Gut Mycobiome. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Oever, J.T.; Netea, M.G. The bacteriome-mycobiome interaction and antifungal host defense. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 44, 3182–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sudbery, P.E. Growth of Candida albicans hyphae. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sudbery, P.; Gow, N.; Berman, J. The distinct morphogenic states of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2004, 12, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sudbery, P.E. The germ tubes of Candida albicans hyphae and pseudohyphae show different patterns of septin ring localization. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 41, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bonhomme, J.; d’Enfert, C. Candida albicans biofilms: Building a heterogeneous, drug-tolerant environment. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2013, 16, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chandra, J.; Kuhn, D.M.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Hoyer, L.L.; McCormick, T.; Ghannoum, M.A. Biofilm Formation by the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans: Development, Architecture, and Drug Resistance. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 5385–5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Rosenbach, A.; Dignard, D.; Pierce, J.V.; Whiteway, M.; Kumamoto, C.A. Adaptations of Candida albicans for growth in the mammalian intestinal tract. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Witchley, J.N.; Penumetcha, P.; Abon, N.V.; Woolford, C.A.; Mitchell, A.P.; Noble, S.M. Candida albicans Morphogenesis Programs Control the Balance between Gut Commensalism and Invasive Infection. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hoyer, L.L. The ALS gene family of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hoyer, L.L.; Payne, T.L.; Bell, M.; Myers, A.M.; Scherer, S. Candida albicans ALS3 and insights into the nature of the ALS gene family. Curr. Genet. 1998, 33, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hoyer, L.L.; Scherer, S.; Shatzman, A.R.; Livi, G.P. Candida albicans ALS1: Domains related to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae sexual agglutinin separated by a repeating motif. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 15, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hoyer, L.L.; Clevenger, J.; Hecht, J.E.; Ehrhart, E.J.; Poulet, F.M. Detection of Als proteins on the cell wall of Candida albicans in murine tissues. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 4251–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hoyer, L.L.; Payne, T.L.; Hecht, J.E. Identification of Candida albicans ALS2 and ALS4 and localization of als proteins to the fungal cell surface. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 5334–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Arana, D.M.; Prieto, D.; Roman, E.; Nombela, C.; Alonso-Monge, R.; Pla, J. The role of the cell wall in fungal pathogenesis. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Cabib, E.; Bowers, B.; Sburlati, A.; Silverman, S.J. Fungal cell wall synthesis: The construction of a biological structure. Microbiol. Sci. 1988, 5, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Fradin, C.; Bernardes, E.S.; Jouault, T. Candida albicans phospholipomannan: A sweet spot for controlling host response/inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol. 2015, 37, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Free, S.J. Fungal cell wall organization and biosynthesis. Adv. Genet. 2013, 81, 33–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gow, N.A.R.; Latge, J.P.; Munro, C.A. The Fungal Cell Wall: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Hubbard, M.J.; Sullivan, P.A.; Shepherd, M.G. Morphological studies of N-acetylglucosamine induced germ tube formation by Candida albicans. Can. J. Microbiol. 1985, 31, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Almeida, R.S.; Brunke, S.; Albrecht, A.; Thewes, S.; Laue, M.; Edwards, J.E.; Filler, S.G.; Hube, B. the hyphal-associated adhesin and invasin Als3 of Candida albicans mediates iron acquisition from host ferritin. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Phan, Q.T.; Myers, C.L.; Fu, Y.; Sheppard, D.C.; Yeaman, M.R.; Welch, W.H.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Filler, S.G. Als3 is a Candida albicans invasin that binds to cadherins and induces endocytosis by host cells. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Sundstrom, P.; Balish, E.; Allen, C.M. Essential role of the Candida albicans transglutaminase substrate, hyphal wall protein 1, in lethal oroesophageal candidiasis in immunodeficient mice. J. Infect. Dis. 2002, 185, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Ene, I.V.; Bennett, R.J. Hwp1 and related adhesins contribute to both mating and biofilm formation in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2009, 8, 1909–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Staab, J.F.; Bradway, S.D.; Fidel, P.L.; Sundstrom, P. Adhesive and mammalian transglutaminase substrate properties of Candida albicans Hwp1. Science 1999, 283, 1535–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Argimon, S.; Wishart, J.A.; Leng, R.; Macaskill, S.; Mavor, A.; Alexandris, T.; Nicholls, S.; Knight, A.W.; Enjalbert, B.; Walmsley, R.; et al. Developmental regulation of an adhesin gene during cellular morphogenesis in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 682–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. King, R.D.; Lee, J.C.; Morris, A.L. Adherence of Candida albicans and other Candida species to mucosal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 1980, 27, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sandin, R.L.; Rogers, A.L.; Patterson, R.J.; Beneke, E.S. Evidence for mannose-mediated adherence of Candida albicans to human buccal cells in vitro. Infect. Immun. 1982, 35, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lee, J.C.; King, R.D. Characterization of Candida albicans adherence to human vaginal epithelial cells in vitro. Infect. Immun. 1983, 41, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Segal, E.; Lehrer, N.; Ofek, I. Adherence of Candida albicans to human vaginal epithelial cells: Inhibition by amino sugars. Exp. Cell Biol. 1982, 50, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sobel, J.D.; Myers, P.G.; Kaye, D.; Levison, M.E. Adherence of Candida albicans to human vaginal and buccal epithelial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 1981, 143, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Centeno, A.; Davis, C.P.; Cohen, M.S.; Warren, M.M. Modulation of Candida albicans attachment to human epithelial cells by bacteria and carbohydrates. Infect. Immun. 1983, 39, 1354–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Farrell, S.M.; Hawkins, D.F.; Ryder, T.A. Scanning electron microscope study of Candida albicans invasion of cultured human cervical epithelial cells. Sabouraudia 1983, 21, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Samaranayake, L.P.; MacFarlane, T.W. The adhesion of the yeast Candida albicans to epithelial cells of human origin in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 1981, 26, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Samaranayake, L.P.; MacFarlane, T.W. Factors affecting the in-vitro adherence of the fungal oral pathogen Candida albicans to epithelial cells of human origin. Arch. Oral Biol. 1982, 27, 869–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Modrzewska, B.; Kurnatowski, P. Adherence of Candida sp. to host tissues and cells as one of its pathogenicity features. Ann. Parasitol. 2015, 61, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Falgier, C.; Kegley, S.; Podgorski, H.; Heisel, T.; Storey, K.; Bendel, C.M.; Gale, C.A. Candida species differ in their interactions with immature human gastrointestinal epithelial cells. Pediatr. Res. 2011, 69, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sandin, R.L.; Rogers, A.L. Inhibition of adherence of Candida albicans to human epithelial cells. Mycopathologia 1982, 77, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Calderone, R.A.; Fonzi, W.A. Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hoyer, L.L.; Green, C.B.; Oh, S.H.; Zhao, X. Discovering the secrets of the Candida albicans agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) gene family—A sticky pursuit. Med. Mycol. 2008, 46, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Kumamoto, C.A.; Vinces, M.D. Contributions of hyphae and hypha-co-regulated genes to Candida albicans virulence. Cell. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1546–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nobile, C.J.; Andes, D.R.; Nett, J.E.; Smith, F.J.; Yue, F.; Phan, Q.T.; Edwards, J.E.; Filler, S.G.; Mitchell, A.P. Critical role of Bcr1-dependent adhesins in C. albicans biofilm formation in vitro and in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cleary, I.A.; Reinhard, S.M.; Miller, C.L.; Murdoch, C.; Thornhill, M.H.; Lazzell, A.L.; Monteagudo, C.; Thomas, D.P.; Saville, S.P. Candida albicans adhesin Als3p is dispensable for virulence in the mouse model of disseminated candidiasis. Microbiology 2011, 157, 1806–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Martin, R.; Albrecht-Eckardt, D.; Brunke, S.; Hube, B.; Hunniger, K.; Kurzai, O. A core filamentation response network in Candida albicans is restricted to eight genes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zakikhany, K.; Naglik, J.R.; Schmidt-Westhausen, A.; Holland, G.; Schaller, M.; Hube, B. In vivo transcript profiling of Candida albicans identifies a gene essential for interepithelial dissemination. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2938–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhao, X.; Oh, S.H.; Cheng, G.; Green, C.B.; Nuessen, J.A.; Yeater, K.; Leng, R.P.; Brown, A.J.; Hoyer, L.L. ALS3 and ALS8 represent a single locus that encodes a Candida albicans adhesin; functional comparisons between Als3p and Als1p. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2415–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Zhao, X.; Oh, S.H.; Yeater, K.M.; Hoyer, L.L. Analysis of the Candida albicans Als2p and Als4p adhesins suggests the potential for compensatory function within the Als family. Microbiology 2005, 151, 1619–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Zhao, X.; Oh, S.H.; Hoyer, L.L. Deletion of ALS5, ALS6 or ALS7 increases adhesion of Candida albicans to human vascular endothelial and buccal epithelial cells. Med. Mycol. 2007, 45, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Naglik, J.R.; Fostira, F.; Ruprai, J.; Staab, J.F.; Challacombe, S.J.; Sundstrom, P. Candida albicans HWP1 gene expression and host antibody responses in colonization and disease. J. Med Microbiol. 2006, 55, 1323–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Perez, J.C.; Kumamoto, C.A.; Johnson, A.D. Candida albicans commensalism and pathogenicity are intertwined traits directed by a tightly knit transcriptional regulatory circuit. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Pierce, J.V.; Dignard, D.; Whiteway, M.; Kumamoto, C.A. Normal adaptation of Candida albicans to the murine gastrointestinal tract requires Efg1p-dependent regulation of metabolic and host defense genes. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Shao, T.Y.; Ang, W.X.G.; Jiang, T.T.; Huang, F.S.; Andersen, H.; Kinder, J.M.; Pham, G.; Burg, A.R.; Ruff, B.; Gonzalez, T.; et al. Commensal Candida albicans Positively Calibrates Systemic Th17 Immunological Responses. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 404–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cheng, G.; Wozniak, K.; Wallig, M.A.; Fidel, P.L., Jr.; Trupin, S.R.; Hoyer, L.L. Comparison between Candida albicans agglutinin-like sequence gene expression patterns in human clinical specimens and models of vaginal candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 1656–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Sheppard, D.C.; Yeaman, M.R.; Welch, W.H.; Phan, Q.T.; Fu, Y.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Filler, S.G.; Zhang, M.; Waring, A.J.; Edwards, J.E., Jr. Functional and structural diversity in the Als protein family of Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 30480–30489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Alberti-Segui, C.; Morales, A.J.; Xing, H.; Kessler, M.M.; Willins, D.A.; Weinstock, K.G.; Cottarel, G.; Fechtel, K.; Rogers, B. Identification of potential cell-surface proteins in Candida albicans and investigation of the role of a putative cell-surface glycosidase in adhesion and virulence. Yeast 2004, 21, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sascha, T.; Marianne, K.; Hyunsook, P.; Martin, S.; Filler, S.G.; Bernhard, H. In vivo and ex vivo comparative transcriptional profiling of invasive and non-invasive Candida albicans isolates identifies genes associated with tissue invasion. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1606–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wilson, D.; Thewes, S.; Zakikhany, K.; Fradin, C.; Albrecht, A.; Almeida, R.; Brunke, S.; Grosse, K.; Martin, R.; Mayer, F.; et al. Identifying infection-associated genes of Candida albicans in the postgenomic era. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Fradin, C.; Kretschmar, M.; Nichterlein, T.; Gaillardin, C.; d’Enfert, C.; Hube, B. Stage-specific gene expression of Candida albicans in human blood. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 1523–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Dalle, F.; Wachtler, B.; L’Ollivier, C.; Holland, G.; Bannert, N.; Wilson, D.; Labruere, C.; Bonnin, A.; Hube, B. Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 248–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Casadevall, A.; Pirofski, L.A. Host-pathogen interactions: Basic concepts of microbial commensalism, colonization, infection, and disease. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 6511–6518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. White, S.J.; Rosenbach, A.; Lephart, P.; Nguyen, D.; Benjamin, A.; Tzipori, S.; Whiteway, M.; Mecsas, J.; Kumamoto, C.A. Self-regulation of Candida albicans population size during GI colonization. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Vautier, S.; Drummond, R.A.; Chen, K.; Murray, G.I.; Kadosh, D.; Brown, A.J.; Gow, N.A.; MacCallum, D.M.; Kolls, J.K.; Brown, G.D. Candida albicans colonization and dissemination from the murine gastrointestinal tract: The influence of morphology and Th17 immunity. Cell. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Fidel, P.L., Jr.; Vazquez, J.A.; Sobel, J.D. Candida glabrata: Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Gilfillan, G.D.; Sullivan, D.J.; Haynes, K.; Parkinson, T.; Coleman, D.C.; Gow, N.A. Candida dubliniensis: Phylogeny and putative virulence factors. Microbiology 1998, 144 Pt 4, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Martinez, M.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L.; Kirkpatrick, W.R.; Coco, B.J.; Bachmann, S.P.; Patterson, T.F. Replacement of Candida albicans with C. dubliniensis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis treated with fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 3135–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Gibbs, D.L.; Newell, V.A.; Ellis, D.; Tullio, V.; Rodloff, A.; Fu, W.; Ling, T.A.; Global Antifungal Surveillance, G. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: A 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida Species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 1366–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Butler, G.; Rasmussen, M.D.; Lin, M.F.; Santos, M.A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Munro, C.A.; Rheinbay, E.; Grabherr, M.; Forche, A.; Reedy, J.L.; et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 2009, 459, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Bassetti, M.; Righi, E.; Costa, A.; Fasce, R.; Molinari, M.P.; Rosso, R.; Pallavicini, F.B.; Viscoli, C. Epidemiological trends in nosocomial candidemia in intensive care. BMC Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Colombo, A.L.; Guimaraes, T.; Silva, L.R.; de Almeida Monfardini, L.P.; Cunha, A.K.; Rady, P.; Alves, T.; Rosas, R.C. Prospective observational study of candidemia in Sao Paulo, Brazil: Incidence rate, epidemiology, and predictors of mortality. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2007, 28, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chakrabarti, A.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Rao, K.L.; Zameer, M.M.; Shivaprakash, M.R.; Singhi, S.; Singh, R.; Varma, S.C. Recent experience with fungaemia: Change in species distribution and azole resistance. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 41, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hasan, F.; Xess, I.; Wang, X.; Jain, N.; Fries, B.C. Biofilm formation in clinical Candida isolates and its association with virulence. Microbes Infect. 2009, 11, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Fenn, J.P.; Billetdeaux, E.; Segal, H.; Skodack-Jones, L.; Padilla, P.E.; Bale, M.; Carroll, K. Comparison of four methodologies for rapid and cost-effective identification of Candida glabrata. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3387–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, H.; Schnitzler, N.; Lutticken, R.; Haase, G. Rapid identification of Candida glabrata by using a dipstick to detect trehalase-generated glucose. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Cormack, B.P.; Ghori, N.; Falkow, S. An adhesin of the yeast pathogen Candida glabrata mediating adherence to human epithelial cells. Science 1999, 285, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Kuhn, D.M.; Vyas, V.K. The Candida glabrata adhesin Epa1p causes adhesion, phagocytosis, and cytokine secretion by innate immune cells. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12, 398–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Domergue, R.; Castano, I.; De Las Penas, A.; Zupancic, M.; Lockatell, V.; Hebel, J.R.; Johnson, D.; Cormack, B.P. Nicotinic acid limitation regulates silencing of Candida adhesins during UTI. Science 2005, 308, 866–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zupancic, M.L.; Frieman, M.; Smith, D.; Alvarez, R.A.; Cummings, R.D.; Cormack, B.P. Glycan microarray analysis of Candida glabrata adhesin ligand specificity. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 547–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Diderrich, R.; Kock, M.; Maestre-Reyna, M.; Keller, P.; Steuber, H.; Rupp, S.; Essen, L.O.; Mosch, H.U. Structural Hot Spots Determine Functional Diversity of the Candida glabrata Epithelial Adhesin Family. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 19597–19613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Tati, S.; Davidow, P.; McCall, A.; Hwang-Wong, E.; Rojas, I.G.; Cormack, B.; Edgerton, M. Candida glabrata Binding to Candida albicans Hyphae Enables Its Development in Oropharyngeal Candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Gonia, S.; Archambault, L.; Shevik, M.; Altendahl, M.; Fellows, E.; Bliss, J.M.; Wheeler, R.T.; Gale, C.A. Candida parapsilosis Protects Premature Intestinal Epithelial Cells from Invasion and Damage by Candida albicans. Front. Pediatr. 2017, 5, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Pande, K.; Chen, C.; Noble, S.M. Passage through the mammalian gut triggers a phenotypic switch that promotes Candida albicans commensalism. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1088–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Huang, G.; Wang, H.; Chou, S.; Nie, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, H. Bistable expression of WOR1, a master regulator of white-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12813–12818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Srikantha, T.; Borneman, A.R.; Daniels, K.J.; Pujol, C.; Wu, W.; Seringhaus, M.R.; Gerstein, M.; Yi, S.; Snyder, M.; Soll, D.R. TOS9 regulates white-opaque switching in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1674–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Slutsky, B.; Staebell, M.; Anderson, J.; Risen, L.; Pfaller, M.; Soll, D.R. “White-opaque transition”: A second high-frequency switching system in Candida albicans. J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Lan, C.Y.; Newport, G.; Murillo, L.A.; Jones, T.; Scherer, S.; Davis, R.W.; Agabian, N. Metabolic specialization associated with phenotypic switching in Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 14907–14912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Tuch, B.B.; Mitrovich, Q.M.; Homann, O.R.; Hernday, A.D.; Monighetti, C.K.; De La Vega, F.M.; Johnson, A.D. The transcriptomes of two heritable cell types illuminate the circuit governing their differentiation. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Lockhart, S.R.; Pujol, C.; Daniels, K.J.; Miller, M.G.; Johnson, A.D.; Pfaller, M.A.; Soll, D.R. In Candida albicans, white-opaque switchers are homozygous for mating type. Genetics 2002, 162, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Miller, M.G.; Johnson, A.D. White-opaque switching in Candida albicans is controlled by mating-type locus homeodomain proteins and allows efficient mating. Cell 2002, 110, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Hogan, D.A.; Kolter, R. Pseudomonas-Candida interactions: An ecological role for virulence factors. Science 2002, 296, 2229–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hogan, D.A.; Vik, A.; Kolter, R. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 1212–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Morales, D.K.; Hogan, D.A. Candida albicans interactions with bacteria in the context of human health and disease. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bandara, H.M.; Yau, J.Y.; Watt, R.M.; Jin, L.J.; Samaranayake, L.P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibits in-vitro Candida biofilm development. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Holcombe, L.J.; McAlester, G.; Munro, C.A.; Enjalbert, B.; Brown, A.J.P.; Gow, N.A.R.; Ding, C.; Butler, G.; O’Gara, F.; Morrissey, J.P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa secreted factors impair biofilm development in Candida albicans. Microbiology 2010, 156, 1476–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Bandara, H.M.; BP, K.C.; Watt, R.M.; Jin, L.J.; Samaranayake, L.P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide inhibits Candida albicans hyphae formation and alters gene expression during biofilm development. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2013, 28, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lopez-Medina, E.; Fan, D.; Coughlin, L.A.; Ho, E.X.; Lamont, I.L.; Reimmann, C.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, A.Y. Candida albicans Inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence through Suppression of Pyochelin and Pyoverdine Biosynthesis. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hoarau, G.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Gower-Rousseau, C.; Hager, C.; Chandra, J.; Retuerto, M.A.; Neut, C.; Vermeire, S.; Clemente, J.; Colombel, J.F.; et al. Bacteriome and Mycobiome Interactions Underscore Microbial Dysbiosis in Familial Crohn’s Disease. mBio 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Naglik, J.R.; Moyes, D.L.; Wachtler, B.; Hube, B. Candida albicans interactions with epithelial cells and mucosal immunity. Microbes Infect. 2011, 13, 963–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Moyes, D.L.; Shen, C.; Murciano, C.; Runglall, M.; Richardson, J.P.; Arno, M.; Aldecoa-Otalora, E.; Naglik, J.R. Protection against epithelial damage during Candida albicans infection is mediated by PI3K/Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 1816–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Plato, A.; Hardison, S.E.; Brown, G.D. Pattern recognition receptors in antifungal immunity. Semin. Immunopathol. 2015, 37, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Iliev, I.D.; Funari, V.A.; Taylor, K.D.; Nguyen, Q.; Reyes, C.N.; Strom, S.P.; Brown, J.; Becker, C.A.; Fleshner, P.R.; Dubinsky, M.; et al. Interactions between commensal fungi and the C-type lectin receptor Dectin-1 influence colitis. Science 2012, 336, 1314–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Hameed, S.; Prasad, T.; Banerjee, D.; Chandra, A.; Mukhopadhyay, C.K.; Goswami, S.K.; Lattif, A.A.; Chandra, J.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Ghannoum, M.A.; et al. Iron deprivation induces EFG1-mediated hyphal development in Candida albicans without affecting biofilm formation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 744–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Doedt, T.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Bockmuhl, D.P.; Tebarth, B.; Stempel, C.; Russell, C.L.; Brown, A.J.; Ernst, J.F. APSES proteins regulate morphogenesis and metabolism in Candida albicans. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 3167–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Nantel, A.; Dignard, D.; Bachewich, C.; Harcus, D.; Marcil, A.; Bouin, A.P.; Sensen, C.W.; Hogues, H.; van het Hoog, M.; Gordon, P.; et al. Transcription profiling of Candida albicans cells undergoing the yeast-to-hyphal transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 3452–3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Setiadi, E.R.; Doedt, T.; Cottier, F.; Noffz, C.; Ernst, J.F. Transcriptional response of Candida albicans to hypoxia: Linkage of oxygen sensing and Efg1p-regulatory networks. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 361, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Walker, L.A.; Maccallum, D.M.; Bertram, G.; Gow, N.A.; Odds, F.C.; Brown, A.J. Genome-wide analysis of Candida albicans gene expression patterns during infection of the mammalian kidney. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Pierce, J.V.; Kumamoto, C.A. Variation in Candida albicans EFG1 expression enables host-dependent changes in colonizing fungal populations. MBio 2012, 3, e00117-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Kennedy, M.J. Regulation of Candida albicans populations in the gastrointestinal tract: Mechanisms and significance in GI and systemic candidiasis. Curr. Top. Med. Mycol. 1989, 3, 315–402. [Google Scholar]
  136. Kennedy, M.J.; Volz, P.A. Ecology of Candida albicans gut colonization: Inhibition of Candida adhesion, colonization, and dissemination from the gastrointestinal tract by bacterial antagonism. Infect. Immun. 1985, 49, 654–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Zelante, T.; Iannitti, R.G.; Cunha, C.; De Luca, A.; Giovannini, G.; Pieraccini, G.; Zecchi, R.; D’Angelo, C.; Massi-Benedetti, C.; Fallarino, F.; et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity 2013, 39, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Cruz, M.R.; Graham, C.E.; Gagliano, B.C.; Lorenz, M.C.; Garsin, D.A. Enterococcus faecalis inhibits hyphal morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Graham, C.E.; Cruz, M.R.; Garsin, D.A.; Lorenz, M.C. Enterococcus faecalis bacteriocin EntV inhibits hyphal morphogenesis, biofilm formation, and virulence of Candida albicans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4507–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Garsin, D.A.; Lorenz, M.C. Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis in the gut: Synergy in commensalism? Gut Microbes 2013, 4, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Fan, D.; Coughlin, L.A.; Neubauer, M.M.; Kim, J.; Kim, M.S.; Zhan, X.; Simms-Waldrip, T.R.; Xie, Y.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, A.Y. Activation of HIF-1alpha and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Samonis, G.; Gikas, A.; Anaissie, E.J.; Vrenzos, G.; Maraki, S.; Tselentis, Y.; Bodey, G.P. Prospective evaluation of effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on gastrointestinal yeast colonization of humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993, 37, 51–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Pasqualotto, A.C.; Nedel, W.L.; Machado, T.S.; Severo, L.C. Risk factors and outcome for nosocomial breakthrough candidaemia. J. Infect. 2006, 52, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ott, S.J.; Kuhbacher, T.; Musfeldt, M.; Rosenstiel, P.; Hellmig, S.; Rehman, A.; Drews, O.; Weichert, W.; Timmis, K.N.; Schreiber, S. Fungi and inflammatory bowel diseases: Alterations of composition and diversity. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 43, 831–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sokol, H.; Leducq, V.; Aschard, H.; Pham, H.P.; Jegou, S.; Landman, C.; Cohen, D.; Liguori, G.; Bourrier, A.; Nion-Larmurier, I.; et al. Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD. Gut 2017, 66, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Wachtler, B.; Wilson, D.; Haedicke, K.; Dalle, F.; Hube, B. From attachment to damage: Defined genes of Candida albicans mediate adhesion, invasion and damage during interaction with oral epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Perez-Torrado, R.; Querol, A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae show low levels of traversal across human endothelial barrier in vitro. F1000Res 2017, 6, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Weide, M.R.; Ernst, J.F. Caco-2 monolayer as a model for transepithelial migration of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Mycoses 1999, 42 (Suppl. 2), 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Park, H.; Myers, C.L.; Sheppard, D.C.; Phan, Q.T.; Sanchez, A.A.; E. Edwards, J.; Filler, S.G. Role of the fungal Ras-protein kinase A pathway in governing epithelial cell interactions during oropharyngeal candidiasis. Cell. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Felk, A.; Kretschmar, M.; Albrecht, A.; Schaller, M.; Beinhauer, S.; Nichterlein, T.; Sanglard, D.; Korting, H.C.; Schafer, W.; Hube, B. Candida albicans hyphal formation and the expression of the Efg1-regulated proteinases Sap4 to Sap6 are required for the invasion of parenchymal organs. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 3689–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Goyer, M.; Loiselet, A.; Bon, F.; L’Ollivier, C.; Laue, M.; Holland, G.; Bonnin, A.; Dalle, F. Intestinal Cell Tight Junctions Limit Invasion of Candida albicans through Active Penetration and Endocytosis in the Early Stages of the Interaction of the Fungus with the Intestinal Barrier. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Basmaciyan, L.; Bon, F.; Paradis, T.; Lapaquette, P.; Dalle, F. Candida Albicans Interactions With The Host: Crossing The Intestinal Epithelial Barrier. Tissue Barriers 2019, 7, 1612661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. C. albicans adhesin profile in distinct niches.
Table 1. C. albicans adhesin profile in distinct niches.
AdhesinCell CultureHuman Samples and Animal Models (Gene Expression)References
Gene expression studies aAdhesion assays bHuman samples aAnimal studies a
ALS1Reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (RHVE) from A431 cell line; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial cells (HUVEC)FaDu (pharynx carcinoma); Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial cells (HUVEC); Oral reconstituted human epithelium (TR146 cell line) Vaginal candidiasis; Intestinal colonization (cecum);[36,74,81,82,83]
ALS2Reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (RHVE) from A431 cell lineHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial cells (HUVEC); Oral reconstituted human epithelium (TR146 cell line) Vaginal candidiasis[75,81,83]
ALS3Pig liver infection (ex vivo); Oral reconstituted human epithelium (TR146 cell line);
Reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (RHVE) from A431 cell line; Blood		FaDu (pharynx carcinoma); Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC); Buccal epithelial cells (BEC); Buccal reconstituted human epithelium (RHE) model of oral candidiasisBloodIntraperitoneal infection model (liver); Vaginal candidiasis; Tail vein (blood infection model); Colonization model (stomach, cecum, and large Intestine)[37,73,74,81,82,84,85,86]
ALS4 Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial cells (HUVEC); [75]
ALS5 FaDu (pharynx carcinoma) [82,83]
ALS8Blood [86]
ALS9Reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (RHVE) from A431 cell line; Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) Intraperitoneal infection model (liver); Vaginal candidiasis[75,81]
HWP1Pig liver infection (ex vivo); Oral reconstituted human epithelium (TR146 cell line); Blood, Enterocytes BloodIntraperitoneal infection model (liver); Blood, Colonization model (stomach, cecum, and large Intestine)[37,73,81,84,86]
HYR1Oral reconstituted human epithelium (TR146 cell line); Blood Colonization model (stomach, cecum, and large Intestine)[37,73,86]
Table lists a adhesins highly expressed in distinct model systems (e.g., cell culture vs. in vivo) as well as b adhesins required for binding to specific cell types in adhesion assays.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romo, J.A.; Kumamoto, C.A. On Commensalism of Candida. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010016

AMA Style

Romo JA, Kumamoto CA. On Commensalism of Candida. Journal of Fungi. 2020; 6(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romo, Jesus A., and Carol A. Kumamoto. 2020. "On Commensalism of Candida" Journal of Fungi 6, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6010016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop