Next Article in Journal
A Ketoconazole Susceptibility Test for Malassezia pachydermatis Using Modified Leeming–Notman Agar
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in the Use of Galleria mellonella Model to Study Immune Responses against Human Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Development of an Improved Carotenoid Extraction Method to Characterize the Carotenoid Composition under Oxidative Stress and Cold Temperature in the Rock Inhabiting Fungus Knufia petricola A95
Previous Article in Special Issue
Caenorhabditis elegans as a Model Host to Monitor the Candida Infection Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Invertebrate Host to Study Fungal Infections, Mycotoxins and Antifungal Drugs: Tenebrio molitor

by
Patrícia Canteri de Souza
1,
Carla Custódio Caloni
1,
Duncan Wilson
2 and
Ricardo Sergio Almeida
1,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Center of Biological Science, State University of Londrina, Rodovia Celso Garcia Cid, Pr 445, Km 380, Londrina 86.057-970, Brazil
2
Aberdeen Fungal Group, Institute of Medical Sciences, 4.15 ext. 7162, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, Scotland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(4), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4040125
Submission received: 10 October 2018 / Revised: 3 November 2018 / Accepted: 7 November 2018 / Published: 12 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alternative Models for the Study of Fungal Host-Pathogen Interactions)

Abstract

:
Faced with ethical conflict and social pressure, researchers have increasingly chosen to use alternative models over vertebrates in their research. Since the innate immune system is evolutionarily conserved in insects, the use of these animals in research is gaining ground. This review discusses Tenebrio molitor as a potential model host for the study of pathogenic fungi. Larvae of T. molitor are known as cereal pests and, in addition, are widely used as animal and human feed. A number of studies on mechanisms of the humoral system, especially in the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides, which have similar characteristics to vertebrates, have been performed. These studies demonstrate the potential of T. molitor larvae as a model host that can be used to study fungal virulence, mycotoxin effects, host immune responses to fungal infection, and the action of antifungal compounds.

Graphical Abstract

1. Alternative Methods of Infection

Vertebrate animals, such as mice, are widely used in basic scientific and medical research for studies of microbial pathogenicity, testing of substances of pharmacological interest, the production of vaccines, evaluation of the effectiveness of antibiotics, and in the development of new therapies [1,2]. However, the pain, distress, and sacrifice of animals during scientific experiments has been questioned by researchers and society [3]. Thus, the ethics of this practice began to be reformulated since the nineteenth century [4], which determined the approval of laws and actions to control the use of animals in research.
In addition to ethical concerns, the use of animals in research requires a high economic investment, skilled labor, and time-consuming protocols [5,6]. In this context, several industrial sectors and regulators of product quality are increasingly being pressured to replace, or reduce, animal experimentation with alternative methodologies. Alternative proposals are based on the principle of the 3Rs, which was introduced to the scientific community in 1959 by Willian Russell and Rex Burch in the book Principles of Humane Experimental Technique [5]. The acronym stands for “Refinement”, which proposes to better plan the procedures performed on animals, with the aim of minimizing pain and/or stress; “Reduction” of the number of animals in the experiments, using alternative techniques to obtain reliable results; and “Replacement”, which advocates the replacement of vertebrate use by non-sentient animals. Indeed, the use of invertebrate animals as alternative model hosts has increased dramatically in the last decade, in order to avoid and/or reduce the use of vertebrates in experiments [6].
Insects have been increasingly chosen as a model host to study microbial infections [7]. This is due to the presence of an innate immune system similar to vertebrates. Although the responses of the insect’s immune system are not specific, because they do not produce antibodies, they possess a complex innate immune system with both cellular and humoral elements [8,9]. The innate humoral response of insects is orchestrated by processes that inhibit the proliferation of pathogens and assist in their elimination, such as melanization, hemolymph coagulation, induction of the synthesis of reactive species, and antimicrobial peptides [10,11]. Cellular responses are mediated by cells called hemocytes, which play an important role in defense, as they are involved in phagocytosis, nodule formation, and encapsulation [12].
The use of insects as an alternative model also provides other advantages, such as the absence of ethical restriction. In addition, when compared to traditional mammalian models, breeding is inexpensive and easy to maintain, as it does not require a sophisticated laboratory. In addition, the lifecycle is short, allowing large-scale experiments in a short period of time. Thus, several insects have been widely used, notably, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, and some species of Lepidoptera and Coleoptera [13,14].
Here, we will discuss the use of Tenebrio molitor larvae (mealworm) as an alternative host model in the study of pathogenic fungi, including the biological characteristics of the animal, particularities regarding its immunity, as well as the first studies involving medically important fungi.

2. Tenebrio molitor

Tenebrio molitor (Linnaeus, 1758), popularly known as the mealworm, belongs to the order Coleoptera and family Tenebrionidae. It is found worldwide, however, it has climatic preferences for temperate regions of the northern hemisphere [15,16]. This insect exhibits holometabolism (complete metamorphosis), in which its lifecycle is composed of 4 stages: embryo stage (eggs), larval phase, pupa phase, and adult phase (Figure 1). In addition, the larval phase presents a series of stages or instars, which is reached after the ecdysis process [15,16]. According to Park et al. [17], T. molitor presents up to 20 instars.
Normally, the larval phase occurs during spring, which is the pupation season. At the beginning of summer, beetles begin to appear, which represent the adult phase of the insect [18]. However, lifecycle stages may increase or decrease depending on environmental conditions. A number of studies have demonstrated that the number of instars of T. molitor varies in response to different factors [19], such as temperature [20,21], humidity [22], oxygen concentration [23], quality of nutrients [24], and populational density [25].
The feeding of the larvae is based on cereals or milled grains. Thus, this insect is considered to be a pest of stored grain and bran [26,27]. Larvae are also considered an excellent source of animal protein, and are used as feed [28] for several domestic or zoo animals, including fish [29], lizards [30], birds [31], and bats [32]. In many countries, these larvae are also used for human consumption [33,34].

3. Cellular and Humoral Immunology of T. molitor as a Tool to Study Human Immunity

In order to protect against potentially pathogenic microbes, the integument and digestive tract represent the first line of defense, which plays an important role against infections. However, when these barriers are overcome, the invading pathogen is exposed to a range of cellular and humoral mechanisms (Figure 2) [35].
In a study carried out by Urbański and collaborators [36], four hemocyte types were observed: granulocytes, plasmatocytes, oenocytoids, and prohemocytes, according to their size and morphology. Prohemocytes have been considered to be stem cells, with the ability to differentiate into other cell types [12]. In addition, granulocytes and plasmatocytes are the most abundant types in hemolymph, the only ones with adherent properties, and are the cells responsible for phagocytic activity (Figure 3), encapsulation, and nodulation [37,38]. The enzyme phenoloxidase (PO) plays a key role in mediating this important defense mechanism. This enzyme is the main component responsible for the melanization process of hemocytes attached to the pathogen [39]. Studies indicate that prophenoloxidase (proPO) is predominantly synthesized by granulocyte and oenocytoid hemocytes, and depends on the insect species [40].
The process of phagocytosis refers to the internalization of foreign bodies by a single hemocyte through the formation of pseudopods (Figure 3) [41]. The similarity of phagocytic activity between hemocytes and neutrophils in vertebrates has been noted [42]. In addition, autophagy, which is another evolutionary mechanism conserved in insects, has already been demonstrated in T. molitor [43]. This autophagic response assists in cellular homeostasis, and also plays an important role in cellular innate immune responses because it contributes to the phagocytic elimination of pathogens [41,43,44].
When the pathogen burden is too large to be phagocytosed, nodulation and encapsulation processes occur. These mechanisms, unlike phagocytosis, refer to the multiple actions of hemocytes, which aggregate around the target [12]. These processes are complex and exhibit cellular and humoral immune reactions, including activators of a complex enzyme system, termed prophenoloxidase (proPO) [45]. In the process of melanization, the isolation of pathogens usually occurs through encapsulation. In addition, the microorganisms that are involved in a melanized layer of hemocytes die from lack of oxygen or from the release of compounds produced by phenoloxidase activity [46], such as reactive oxygen species [11]. It has been demonstrated that melanin is crucial for T. molitor immunity, including cuticular melanization, which results in a resistance to pathogen infection [47]. Barnes and Siva-Jothy [48] observed that larvae with higher degrees of cuticular melanization showed greater resistance when exposed to the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae.
Beyond melanization, the synthesis of peptides with antimicrobial activity (PAMs), is one of the main mechanisms of humoral immunity against pathogens, both in insects and vertebrates [49,50]. In T. molitor, 4 different types of PAMs are known: tenecins 1, 2, 3, and 4. Tenecin 2, which acts against Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, is a molecule similar to coleoptericin and holotricin, which are PAMs produced by the coleopterae Zophobas atratus and Holotrichia diomphalia, respectively [51,52]. Tenecin 3 is a glycine-rich peptide which targets fungi [53,54,55,56], whereas tenecins 1 and 4 have activity only against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively [56,57].
Immunogenic molecules of microorganisms, such as fungi β-1,3-glucan, or lipopolysaccharides of Gram-negative bacteria and peptidoglycans of Gram-positive bacteria, can induce the synthesis of PAMs in insects through the activation of two main signaling pathways: the Toll-like pathway and the immunodeficiency pathway (Imd) [56,58]. Toll-like membrane receptors are an evolutionarily conserved receptor family, and the Imd pathway is analogous to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway in humans [59]. It is known that tenecins 1 and 2 are activated mainly by the Toll signaling pathway [52]. Tenecin 4 is activated by both the Toll pathway and the Imd pathway [56]. Tenecin 3, on the other hand, is constitutively produced (without the need for induction) and the molecular mechanisms involved in its synthesis have not yet been determined [56,60].
In addition, a recent study has discovered a novel membrane receptor produced by T. molitor. This receptor is a class C hijacker, which plays a key role in phagocytosis of fungi and Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [61].
Although insects do not have an adaptive immune response, studies with T. molitor larvae and entomopathogenic fungi have demonstrated that the innate immune response of this insect can be long-lasting, even when the immunogenic agent no longer present. The process has been termed as immune priming, and is known to provide a prophylactic effect, being functionally similar to the adaptive immune response of vertebrates [62]. For example, a previous exposure of larvae to a nylon monofilament increased insect protection when challenged by Beauveria bassiana after a week after the first exposure. The material injected into the animal apparently induced the encapsulation response, indicated by darkening of the body of the insect due to melanization [63]. Another study showed that larvae that were pre-challenged with lipopolysaccharides also presented greater resistance to M. anisopliae infection [62].
Another important attribute related to immune priming is its species-specific character. Larvae that were exposed two times to the same pathogen (M. anisopliae) presented a higher survival rate than larvae that were challenged with this fungus and later exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis and Serratia marcescens [64]. In addition, immune priming has the ability to be transmitted between generations. Immune-challenged mothers can improve their offspring immunity through transgenerational immune priming. It has been proven that enhancement of offspring immunity increases egg hatching success and larval survival [65].
Thus, despite the lack of a true adaptive immune system, T. molitor exhibits complex immune responses with evidence of recall, demonstrating its potential as an alternative infection model.

4. T. molitor as an Alternative Host in the Study of Human Pathogenic Fungi

When compared to other alternative host models used in the study of human fungal pathogens, T. molitor has some major advantages. The mealworm can be incubated at 37 °C which, for many pathogens, is a critical environmental cue for the expression of virulence factors. For example, physiological temperature stimulates the production of invasive hyphal filaments by C. albicans. Other models, however, do not support such high temperatures. D. melanogaster survives at a temperature of 18 °C to 30 °C, and the best temperature to perform tests with the Caenorhabditis elegans worm is 15 °C to 25 °C [66].
A second important feature is the size of the larva. Since T. molitor larvae are relatively large, this allows the extraction of a considerable volume of hemolymph (5–10 μL/larva of the 12th instar) to analyze. This represents an advantage over other model organisms, such as the fruit fly, since its size allows the extraction of only small volumes of hemolymph (0.05–0.3 μL/larva of 3rd instar) [67]. Another advantage is that the inoculum is administered by injection, allowing direct introduction into the hemolymph of the animal [68]. Additionally, dead larvae are easily identified because they turn brown through melanization, as illustrated in Figure 4.
Another widely used model is the wax moth larva Galleria mellonella. This insect has similar characteristics as T. molitor as an alternative host, since it can be incubated at 37 °C, the inoculum can be supplied by injection [66], and it also has a substantial volume of hemolymph. However, its breeding in laboratory conditions is more laborious, and G. mellonella is not marketed in some countries, forcing institutions to maintain their own supply. This raises the costs of the experiments, and requires the technical manpower responsible for their maintenance. In Brazil, there are several commercial suppliers of T. molitor.

5. Investigating Physiological Changes Due to Ingestion of Mycotoxins

In 1973, Reiss [69] published the first work involving the use of T. molitor in the investigation of diseases caused by fungi. Beetle larvae were used as an animal model to understand the physiological changes that occurred after ingestion of food contaminated with mycotoxin-producing fungi. In this study, the larvae were fed with bread contaminated with Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium expansum, Cladosporium herbarum, and Neurospora sitophila, and their masses were measured daily. It was observed that all isolates, except for N. sitophila, presented toxicity. A. flavus had the greatest inhibitory effect on larval development. These findings demonstrated the similarity of the physiological response of the insect to mammals, since exposure to aflatoxin (FA), produced by A. flavus, is associated with weight loss and reduced stature in children [70,71]. In addition, it is also related to economic losses due to the reduction of the body mass of pigs and cattle [72,73,74].
Similarly, insect feeding with cereals colonized by species of the genus Fusarium also leads to a reduction of growth [75], and even death of the larvae [76]. These findings, again, correlate with research on vertebrates. Fumonisin (FM), the mycotoxin produced by Fusarium spp., is associated with reduced food consumption and weight in pigs [77]. In addition, Kimanya et al. [78] showed that children who ingested FM in more than the maximum provisional daily dose, grew less and were lighter than children who did not exceed this limit.
On the other hand, Bosh et al. (2017) demonstrated that T. molitor larvae fed with an aflatoxin B1-contaminated diet did not present alterations in survival rate and body weight, nor was there an accumulation of the substance in the animal [79]. An explanation for these findings is based on the ability of fungi to produce different types of mycotoxins. In the studies cited above, the fungus was mixed into the diet, and was then heat inactivated, leaving the mycotoxins secreted by it in the samples [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78]. Thus, these findings suggest that their toxic effects are due to a combination of toxins, rather than the action of an isolated mycotoxin.

6. Studying Infections Caused by Fungi of Clinical Interest and Evaluating the Antifungal Activity of Compounds

Yeasts are the primary fungi isolated from disseminated infections, with Candida and Cryptococcus species being the most frequently isolated. Both of these species are dimorphic, however, C. albicans hyphae have the invasive morphology and are associated with virulence, whilst Cryptococcus grow as yeast during infection [80,81,82,83]. In this context, our research group showed, for the first time, the utility of T. molitor as a model host to study infections caused by Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans [84]. In this work, T. molitor larvae were infected with different concentrations of C. albicans and C. neoformans, and the mortality was determined. We found that the larval survival decreased proportionally to the increase in inoculum concentration [84], similar to that of G. mellonella and mice when challenged with these yeasts [85].
In addition, histological sections of the infected tissue demonstrated the formation of C. albicans hyphae and mycelia [84], similar to what is observed in other models, including mice [86], hemoperfused porcine liver [87], chicken chorioallantoic membrane [88], and G. mellonella [85]. In the tissue infected with C. neoformans, the pathogenic yeast morphology was observed, as in Galleria and mice models, and clinically [85,89].
This insect was also recently chosen to study the virulence of Malassezia furfur. It was shown that yeasts cultivated under conditions of nutrients scarcity were more virulent to T. molitor larva than those cultivated in complete medium [90]. Nutritional stress leads to a change in microorganism metabolism which, in order to adapt to these conditions, can express their virulence factors [91]. The authors obtained similar results using C. elegans as an animal model and concluded that, in this sense, the methodology using T. molitor was efficient [90].
T. molitor can also be used to study infections caused by filamentous fungi. [92] infected T. molitor larvae with Fonsecaea species (etiological agents responsible for human chromoblastomycosis, a granulomatous and chronic skin infection) [93] and found structures similar to muriform cells in the tissue infected with Fonsecaea pedrosoi. In an earlier study performed with G. mellonella, this event was not observed [94]. However, conidia of F. pedrosoi presenting this morphology are common in histological samples of mice previously infected by the fungus [95,96].
Given the utility of the mealworm as an alternative model in the evaluation of different anthelmintic compounds [97], Morey and collaborators [98] used this model to verify the efficacy of a potential antifungal agent. In this work, the larvae of T. molitor were infected with Candida tropicalis, and treated with a tannin-rich fraction from a Stryphnodendron adstringens extract. The survival of the insects that received the inoculum containing the fraction of the plant extract was significantly higher compared to the group without treatment, indicating not only that the larvae are sensitive to C. tropicalis infection, but can also be used as an alternative host model to evaluate the activity of potential antifungal compounds [98].

7. Conclusions

T. molitor has a complex innate immune system, consisting of humoral and cellular responses and, because it is sensitive to infection with a range of medically important microorganisms, its use as an alternative host in the study of pathogenic fungi is now being recognized. As discussed here, T. molitor represents a potential invertebrate host that could be used to study the virulence of fungi, toxicity due to the ingestion of mycotoxin-producing fungi, the host’s immune responses to fungal infections, and the action of antifungal compounds. However, the current number of studies is limited. In addition, there is a need to standardize the tests using T. molitor larvae in the study of pathogenic fungi.

Author Contributions

P.C.d.S. and C.C.C.: literature search, manuscript writing; D.W.: graphical abstract design, manuscript revision; R.S.A.: manuscript formatting, writing, figure design, and manuscript revision.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior —Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. C.C.C. and P.C.S. were financed by CAPES scholarships.

Acknowledgments

We thank Junqueira J.C. and Mylonakis E. for the invitation to participate in this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hendriksen, C.F. Replacement, reduction and refinement alternatives to animal use in vaccine potency measurement. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2009, 8, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Giacomotto, J.; Segalat, L. High-throughput screening and small animal models, where are we? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 160, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rollin, B.E. Toxicology and new social ethics for animals. Toxicol. Pathol. 2003, 31, 128–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Franco, N.H. Animal experiments in biomedical research: A historical perspective. Animals (Basel) 2013, 19, 238–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Balls, M. Replacement of animal procedures: Alternatives in research, education and testing. Lab. Anim. 1994, 28, 193–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Doke, S.K.; Dhawale, S.C. Alternatives to animal testing: A review. Saudi Pharm. J. 2015, 23, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Trevijano-Contador, N.; Zaragoza, O. Expanding the use of alternative models to investigate novel aspects of immunity to microbial pathogens. Virulence 2014, 15, 454–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vilmos, P.; Kurucz, E. Insect immunity: Evolutionary roots of the mammalian innate immune system. Immunol. Lett. 1998, 62, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Browne, N.; Heelan, M.; Kavanagh, K. An analysis of the structural and functional similarities of insect hemocytes and mammalian phagocytes. Virulence 2013, 1, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tokura, A.; Fu, G.S.; Sakamoto, M.; Endo, H.; Tanaka, S.; Kikuta, S.; Tabunoki, H.; Sato, R. Factors functioning in nodule melanization of insects and their mechanisms of accumulation in nodules. J. Insect Physiol. 2014, 60, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dubovskii, I.M.; Grizanova, E.V.; Chertkova, E.A.; Slepneva, I.A.; Komarov, D.A.; Vorontsova, Y.L.; Glupov, V.V. Generation of reactive oxygen species and activity of antioxidants in hemolymph of the moth larvae Galleria mellonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Piralidae) at development of the process of encapsulation. Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol. 2010, 46, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lavine, M.D.; Strand, M.R. Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 1295–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lionakis, M.S. Drosophila and Galleria insect model hosts: New tools for the study of fungal virulence, pharmacology and immunology. Virulence 2011, 2, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wilson-Sanders, S.E. Invertebrate models for biomedical research, testing, and education. ILAR J. 2011, 52, 126–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hill, D.S. Pests: Class Insecta. Pests of Stored Foodstuffs and Their Control; Kluwer Academic Publishers: New York, NY, USA; Boston, MA, USA; Dordrecht, The Netherlands; London, UK; Moscow, Russia, 2003; pp. 135–315. ISBN 0-306-48131-6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ghaly, A.E.; Alkoaik, F.N. The Yellow Mealworm as a Novel Source of Protein. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2009, 4, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, J.B.; Choi, W.H.; Kim, S.H.; Jin, H.J.; Han, Y.S.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, N.J. Developmental characteristics of Tenebrio molitor larvae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in different instars. Int. J. Ind. Entomol. 2014, 28, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cotton, R.T. Notes on the biology of the meal worms Tenebrio molitor Linne and T. obscures Fab. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1927, 20, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morales-Ramos, J.A.; Kay, S.; Rojas, M.G.; Shapiro-Ilan, D.I.; Tedders, W.L. Morphometric Analysis of Instar Variation in Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ludwig, D. Effect of temperature and parental age in the life cycle of the mealworm, Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1956, 49, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bjørge, J.D.; Overgaard, J.; Malte, H.; Gianotten, N.; Heckmann, L.H. Role of temperature on growth and metabolic rate in the tenebrionid beetles Alphitobius diaperinus and Tenebrio molitor. J. Insect Physiol. 2018, 107, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Urs, K.C.D.; Hopkins, T.L. Effect of moisture on growth rate and development of two strains of Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 1973, 8, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Loudon, C. Development of Tenebrio molitor in low oxygen levels. J. Insect Physiol. 1988, 34, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Morales-Ramos, J.A.; Rojas, M.G.; Shapiro-Ilan, D.I.; Tedders, W.L. Developmental plasticity in Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Analysis of instar variation in number and development time under different diets. J. Entomol. Sci. 2010, 45, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Connat, J.L.; Delbecque, J.P.; Glitho, I.; Delachambre, J. The onset of metamorphosis on Tenebrio molitor larvae (Insecta, Coleoptera) under grouped, isolated, and starved conditions. J. Insect Physiol. 1991, 37, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cotton, R.T. Pests of Stored Grain and Grain Products; Burgess Publishing Company: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 1963; p. 318. [Google Scholar]
  27. Philips, T.W.; Throne, J.E. Biorational Approaches to Managing Stored-Product Insect. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2010, 55, 375–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Grau, T.; Vilcinskas, A.; Joop, G. Sustainable farming of the mealworm Tenebrio molitor for the production of food and feed. Z. Naturforsch. 2017, 72, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ng, W.K.; Liew, F.L.; Ang, L.P.; Wong, K.W. Potential of mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) as an alternative protein source in practical diets for African catfish, Clarias gariepinus. Aquac. Res. 2001, 32, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Font, E.; Molina-Borja, M. Ultraviolet reflectance of color patches in Gallotia galloti lizards from Tenerife, Canary Islands. In The Biology of Lacertid Lizards: Evolutionary and Ecological Perspectives; Mellado, V.P., Ed.; Institut Menorquí d’Estudis: Balearic Islands, Spain, 2004; Volume 8, pp. 201–221. ISBN 978-8495718204. [Google Scholar]
  31. Martinson, T.J.; Flaspohler, D.J. Winter bird feeding and localized predation on simulated bark-dwelling arth. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2003, 31, 510–516. [Google Scholar]
  32. McCartney, J.; Stringer, I.A.N.; Potter, M.A. Feeding activity in captive New Zealand lesser short-tailed bats (Mystacina tuberculata). N. Z. J. Zool. 2007, 34, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, H.W.; Setyabrata, D.; Lee, Y.J.; Jones, O.G.; Kim, Y.H.B. Pre-treated mealworm larvae and silkworm pupae as a novel protein ingredient in emulsion sausages. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 38, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adámková, A.; Mlček, J.; Kouřimská, L.; Borkovcová, M.; Bušina, T.; Adámek, M.; Bednářová, M.; Krajsa, J. Nutritional Potential of Selected Insect Species Reared on the Island of Sumatra. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Anggraeni, T.; Ratcliffe, N.A. Studies on cell-cell co-operation during phagocytosis by purified haemocyte populations of the wax moth, Galleria mellonella. J. Insect Physiol. 1991, 37, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Urbański, A.; Adamski, Z.; Rosiński, G. Developmental changes in haemocyte morphology in response to Staphylococcus aureus and latex beads in the beetle Tenebrio molitor L. Micron 2018, 104, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ratcliffe, N.A. Cellular defense responses of insects: Unresolved problems. In Parasites and Pathogens of Insects; Beckage, N.E., Thompson, S.N., Federici, B.A., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1993; Volume 1, pp. 267–304. ISBN 9780080916491. [Google Scholar]
  38. Strand, M.R.; Pech, L.L. Immunological basis for compatibility in parasitoid–host relationships. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1995, 40, 31–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Pech, L.L.; Strand, M.R. Plasmatocyte from the moth Pseudoplusia includens induce apoptosis of granular cells. J. Insect Physiol. 2000, 42, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ribeiro, C.; Brehelin, M. Insect hemocytes: What type of cell is that? J. Insect Physiol. 2006, 52, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Oczypok, E.A.; Oury, T.D.; Chu, C.T. It’s a cell-eat-cell world, Autophagy and phagocytosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Strand, M.R. The insect cellular immune response. Insect Sci. 2008, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. .Tindwa, H.; Jo, Y.H.; Patnaik, B.B.; Lee, Y.S.; Kang, S.S.; Han, Y.S. Molecular cloning and characterization of autophagy-related gene TmATG8 in Listeria-invaded hemocytes of Tenebrio molitor. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2015, 51, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yuk, J.-M.; Yoshimori, T.; JO, E.-K. Autophagy and bacterial infectious diseases. Exp. Mol. Med. 2012, 44, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dubovskiy, I.M.; Kryukova, N.A.; Glupov, V.V.; Ratcliffe, N.A. Encapsulation and nodulation in insects. Invertebr. Surviv. J. 2016, 13, 229–246. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sugumaran, H. Comparative biochemistry of eumelanogenesis and the protective roles of phenoloxidase and melanin in insects. Pigment Cell Res. 2002, 15, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Armitage, S.A.O.; Siva-Jothy, M.T. Immune function responds to selection for cuticular colour in Tenebrio molitor. Heredity (Edinb.) 2005, 94, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Barnes, A.I.; Siva-Jothy, M.T. Density-dependent prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Cuticular melanization is an indicator of investment in immunity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2000, 22, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bulet, P.; Hetru, C.; Dimarcq, J.L.; Hoffmann, D. Antimicrobial peptides in insects; structure and function. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 1999, 23, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Auvynet, C.; Rosenstein, Y. Multifunctional host defense peptides: Antimicrobial peptides, the small yet big players in innate and adaptive immunity. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 6497–6508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Lee, S.Y.; Moon, H.J.; Kurata, S.; Kurama, T.; Natori, S.; Lee, B.L. Purification and molecular cloning of cDNA for an inducible antibacterial protein of larvae of a coleopteran insect, Holotrichia diomphalia. J. Biochem. 1994, 115, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Roh, K.B.; Kim, C.H.; Lee, H.; Kwon, H.M.; Park, J.W.; Ryu, J.H.; Kurokawa, K.; Ha, N.C.; Lee, W.J.; Lemaitre, B.; et al. Proteolytic cascade for the activation of the insect toll pathway induced by the fungal cell wall component. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 19474–19481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, Y.J.; Chung, T.J.; Park, C.W.; Hahn, Y.; Chung, J.H.; Lee, B.L.; Han, D.M.; Jung, Y.H.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y. Structure and expression of the tenecin 3 gene in Tenebrio molitor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 218, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lee, Y.-T.; Kim, D.H.; Suh, J.Y.; Chung, J.H.; Lee, B.L.; Lee, Y.; Choi, B.S. Structural characteristics of tenecin 3, an insect antifungal protein. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 1999, 47, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Kim, D.H.; Lee, D.G.; Kim, K.L.; Lee, Y. Internalization of tenecin 3 by a fungal cellular process is essential for its fungicidal effect on Candida albicans. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 4449–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chae, J.H.; Kurokawa, K.; So, Y.I.; Hwang, H.O.; Kim, M.S.; Park, J.W.; Jo, Y.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, B.L. Purification and characterization of tenecin 4, a new anti-Gram-negative bacterial peptide, from the beetle Tenebrio molitor. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012, 36, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Moon, H.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kurata, S.; Natori, S.; Lee, B.L. Purification Antibacterial molitorl and Molecular Protein from Cloning Larvae of cDNA for an Inducible of the Coleopteran, Tenebrio molitor. J. Biochem. 1994, 116, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, D.H.; Patnaik, B.B.; Seo, G.W.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, B.L.; Han, Y.S. Identification and expression analysis of a novel R-type lectin from the coleopteran beetle, Tenebrio molitor. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2013, 114, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Chamilos, G.; Lionakis, M.S.; Lewis, R.E.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Role of mini-host models in the study of medically important fungi. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 42–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Maistrou, S.; Paris, V.; Jensen, A.B.; Rolff, J.; Meyling, N.V.; Zanchi, C. A constitutively expressed antifungal peptide protects Tenebrio molitor during a natural infection by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 86, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kim, S.G.; Jo, Y.H.; Seong, J.H.; Park, K.B.; Noh, M.Y.; Cho, J.H.; Ko, H.J.; Kim, C.E.; Tindwa, H.; Patnaik, B.B.; et al. TmSR-C, scavenger receptor class C, plays a pivotal role in antifungal and antibacterial immunity in the coleopteran insect Tenebrio molitor. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 89, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Moret, Y.; Siva-Jothy, M.T. Adaptive innate immunity? Responsive-mode prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 2475–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Krams, I.; Daukste, J.; Kivleniece, I.; Krama, T.; Rantala, M.J. Previous encapsulation response enhances within individual protection against fungal parasite in the mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Gomez, H.M.; Rivas, G.A.; Hernández-Quintero, A.; Hernández, A.G.; Guzmán, J.C.T.; Mendoza, H.L.; Contreras-Garduño, J. The occurrence of immune priming can be species-specific in entomopathogens. Microb Pathog. 2018, 118, 361–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dhinaut, J.; Chogne, M.; Moret, Y. Trans-generational immune priming in the mealworm beetle protects eggs through pathogen-dependent mechanisms imposing no immediate fitness cost for the offspring. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2018, 79, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Desalermos, A.; Fuchs, B.B.; Mylonakis, E. Selecting an invertebrate model host for the study of fungal pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Piyankarage, S.C.; Augustin, H.; Grosjean, Y.; Featherstone, D.E.; Shippy, S.A. Hemolymph amino acid analysis of individual Drosophila larvae. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1201–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Oppert, B.; Dowd, S.E.; Bouffard, P.; Li, L.; Conesa, A.; Lorenzen, M.D.; Toutges, M.; Marshall, J.; Huestis, D.L.; Fabrick, J.; et al. Transcriptome profiling of the intoxication response of Tenebrio molitor larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa protoxin. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Reiss, J. Toxicity of molds to the larvae of Tenebrio molitor. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1973, 21, 112–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gong, Y.Y.; Cardwell, K.; Hounsa, A.; Egal, S.; Turner, P.C.; Hall, A.J.; Wild, C.P. Dietary aflatoxin exposure and impaired growth in young children from Benin and Togo: Cross sectional study. BMJ 2002, 325, 20–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Gong, Y.; Hounsa, A.; Egal, S.; Turner, P.C.; Sutcliffe, A.E.; Hall, A.J.; Cardwell, K.; Wild, C.P. Postweaning exposure to aflatoxin results in impaired child growth: A longitudinal study in Benin, West Africa. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 1334–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Helferich, W.G.; Garrett, W.N.; Hsieh, D.P.H.; Baldwin, R.L. Feedlot performance and tissue residues of cattle consuming diets containing aflatoxins. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 62, 691–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Panangala, V.S.; Giambrone, J.J.; Diener, U.L.; Davis, N.D.; Hoerr, F.J.; Mitra, A.; Schultz, R.D.; Wilt, G.R. Effects of aflatoxin on the growth, performance, and imune responses of weanling swine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1986, 47, 2062–2067. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Choudhary, P.L.R.; Sharmn, S.; Borkhatarin, V.N.; Desaii, M.C. Effect of feeding aflatoxin B1 on feed consumption through naturally contaminated feeds. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 68, 400–401. [Google Scholar]
  75. Davis, G.R.F.; Smith, J.D.; Schiefer, B.; Loew, F.M. Screening for mycotoxins with larvae of Tenebrio molitor. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1975, 26, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Guo, Z.; Döll, K.; Dastjerdi, R.; Karlovsky, P.; Dehne, H.W.; Altincicek, B. Effect of fungal colonization of wheat grains with Fusarium spp. on food choice, weight gain and mortality of meal beetle larvae (Tenebrio molitor). PLoS ONE 2014, 16, e100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dilkin, P.; Zorzete, P.; Mallmann, C.A.; Gomes, J.D.; Utiyama, C.E.; Oetting, L.L.; Corrêa, B. Toxicological effects of chronic low doses of aflatoxin b-1 and fumonisin b-1 containing Fusarium mondiforme culture material in weaned piglets. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2003, 41, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kimanya, M.E.; De Meulenaer, B.; Roberfroid, D.; Lachat, C.; Kolsteren, P. Fumonisin exposure through maize in complementary foods is inversely associated with linear growth of infants in Tanzania. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2010, 54, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bosch, G.; van der Fels-Klerx, H.J.; Rijk, T.C.D.; Oonincx, D.G. Aflatoxin B1 Tolerance and Accumulation in Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens) and Yellow Mealworms (Tenebrio molitor). Toxins 2017, 9, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Magalhães, Y.C.; Bomfim, M.R.; Melônio, L.C.; Ribeiro, P.C.; Cosme, L.M.; Rhoden, C.R.; Marques, S.G. Clinical significance of the isolation of Candida species from hospitalized patients. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 31, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pfaller, M.A.; Messer, S.A.; Jones, R.N.; Castanheira, M. Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida, Cryptococcus neoformans and Aspergillus fumigatus from the Asia and Western Pacific region: Data from the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program (2010–2012). J. Antibiot. 2015, 68, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chen, M.; Xu, Y.; Hong, N.; Yang, Y.; Lei, W.; Du, L.; Zhao, J.; Lei, X.; Xiong, L.; Cai, L.; et al. Epidemiology of fungal infections in China. Front. Med. 2018, 12, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Klingspor, L.; Ullberg, M.; Rydberg, J.; Kondori, N.; Serrander, L.; Swanberg, J.; Nilsson, K.; Jendle Bengtén, C.; Johansson, M.; Granlund, M.; et al. Epidemiology of fungaemia in Sweden: A nationwide retrospective observational survey. Mycoses 2018, 61, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. de Souza, P.C.; Morey, A.T.; Castanheira, G.M.; Bocate, K.P.; Panagio, L.A.; Ito, F.A.; Furlaneto, M.C.; Yamada-Ogatta, S.F.; Costa, I.N.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; et al. Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) as an alternative host to study fungal infections. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 118, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Fuchs, B.B.; O’Brien, E.; Khoury, J.B.; Mylonakis, E.; Mylonakis, E. Methods for using Galleria mellonella as a model host to study fungal pathogenesis. Virulence 2010, 1, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wilson, D.; Thewes, S.; Zakikhany, K.; Fradin, C.; Albrecht, A.; Almeida, R.; Brunke, S.; Grosse, K.; Martin, R.; Mayer, F.; et al. Identifying infection-associated genes of Candida albicans in the postgenomic era. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Thewes, S.; Reed, H.K.; Grosse-Siestrup, C.; Groneberg, D.A.; Meissler, M.; Schaller, M.; Hube, B. Haemoperfused liver as an ex vivo model for organ invasion of Candida albicans. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jacobsen, I.D.; Grosse, K.; Berndt, A.; Hube, B. Pathogenesis of Candida albicans infections in the alternative chorio-allantoicmembrane chicken embryo model resembles systemic murine infections. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Eastman, A.J.; He, X.; Qiu, Y.; Davis, M.J.; Vedula, P.; Lyons, D.M.; Park, Y.D.; Hardison, S.E.; Malachowski, A.N.; Osterholzer, J.J.; et al. Cryptococcal Heat Shock Protein 70 Homolog Ssa1 Contributes to Pulmonary Expansion of Cryptococcus neoformans during the Afferent Phase of the Immune Response by Promoting Macrophage M2 Polarization. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 5999–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Silva, A.P.R.; Valerio, A.D.; Viana, R.O.; Ricoy, A.C.S.; Johann, S.; Alves, V. Caenorhabditis elegans and Tenebrio molitor—New tools to investigate Malassezia species. Preprints 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Brown, A.J.P.; Brown, G.D.; Netea, M.G.; Gow, N.A.R. Metabolism impacts upon Candida immunogenicity and pathogenicity at multiple levels. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Fornari, G.; Gomes, R.R.; Degenhardt-Goldbach, J.; dos Santos, S.S.; de Almeida, S.R.; dos Santos, G.D.; Muro, M.D.; Bona, C.; Scola, R.H.; Trindade, E.S.; et al. A Model for Trans-Kingdom Pathogenicity in Fonsecaea Agents of Human Chromoblastomycosis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gomes, R.R.; Vicente, V.A.; de Azevedo, C.M.; Salgado, C.G.; da Silva, M.B.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Marques, S.G.; Santos, D.W.; de Andrade, T.S.; Takagi, E.H.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of agents of human chromoblastomycosis in Brazil with the description of two novel species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0005102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Vicente, V.A.; Najafzadeh, M.J.; Sun, J.; Gomes, R.R.; Robl, D.; Marques, S.G.; Azevedo, C.M.P.S.; De Hoog, G.S. Environmental siblings of black agents of human chromoblastomycosis. Fungal Divers. 2013, 65, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sousa Mda, G.; Reid, D.M.; Schweighoffer, E.; Tybulewicz, V.; Ruland, J.; Langhorne, J.; Yamasaki, S.; Taylor, P.R.; Almeida, S.R.; Brown, G.D. Restoration of pattern recognition receptor costimulation to treat chromoblastomycosis, a chronic fungal infection of the skin. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Siqueira, I.M.; Castro, R.J.A.; Leonhardt, L.C.M.; Jeronimo, M.S.; Soares, A.C.; Raiol, T.; Nishibe, C.; Almeida, N.; Tavares, A.H.; Hoffmann, C.; et al. Modulation of the immune response by Fonsecaea pedrosoi morphotypes in the course of experimental chromoblastomycosis and their role on inflammatory response chronicity. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Dhakal, S.; Meyling, N.V.; Williams, A.R.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Fryganas, C.; Kapel, C.M.; Fredensborg, B.L. Efficacy of condensed tannins against larval Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda) in vitro and in the intermediate host Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera) in vivo. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 207, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Morey, A.T.; de Souza, F.C.; Santos, J.P.; Pereira, C.A.; Cardoso, J.D.; de Almeida, R.S.; Costa, M.A.; de Mello, J.C.; Nakamura, C.V. Pinge-Filho, P.; et al. Antifungal Activity of Condensed Tannins from Stryphnodendron adstringens: Effect on Candida tropicalis Growth and Adhesion Properties. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2016, 17, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Lifecycle of the beetle Tenebrio molitor: (A) larval stage, (B) pupal stage, and (C) adult stage.
Figure 1. Lifecycle of the beetle Tenebrio molitor: (A) larval stage, (B) pupal stage, and (C) adult stage.
Jof 04 00125 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of T. molitor immune response to pathogenic fungi.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of T. molitor immune response to pathogenic fungi.
Jof 04 00125 g002
Figure 3. Plasmatocyte (A) and granulocyte (B) phagocytizing Candida albicans. May-GrünwaldGiemsa staining and 2 h of co-incubation. Cytoplasmic projections (pseudopodium—red arrow) towards the fungus (arrowhead) is observed. 100× objective lens.
Figure 3. Plasmatocyte (A) and granulocyte (B) phagocytizing Candida albicans. May-GrünwaldGiemsa staining and 2 h of co-incubation. Cytoplasmic projections (pseudopodium—red arrow) towards the fungus (arrowhead) is observed. 100× objective lens.
Jof 04 00125 g003
Figure 4. T. molitor larva infected with 106 C. albicans yeasts. (A) 24 h after infection. (B) 30 h after infection.
Figure 4. T. molitor larva infected with 106 C. albicans yeasts. (A) 24 h after infection. (B) 30 h after infection.
Jof 04 00125 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Canteri de Souza, P.; Custódio Caloni, C.; Wilson, D.; Sergio Almeida, R. An Invertebrate Host to Study Fungal Infections, Mycotoxins and Antifungal Drugs: Tenebrio molitor. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4040125

AMA Style

Canteri de Souza P, Custódio Caloni C, Wilson D, Sergio Almeida R. An Invertebrate Host to Study Fungal Infections, Mycotoxins and Antifungal Drugs: Tenebrio molitor. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(4):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4040125

Chicago/Turabian Style

Canteri de Souza, Patrícia, Carla Custódio Caloni, Duncan Wilson, and Ricardo Sergio Almeida. 2018. "An Invertebrate Host to Study Fungal Infections, Mycotoxins and Antifungal Drugs: Tenebrio molitor" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 4: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4040125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop