Next Article in Journal
Acidification and Nutrient Imbalances Drive Fusarium Wilt Severity in Banana (Musa spp.) Grown on Tropical Latosols
Previous Article in Journal
Changing Climate, Changing Candida: Environmental and Social Pressures on Invasive Candidiasis and Antifungal Resistance in Latin America
Previous Article in Special Issue
Talaromyces pinophilus Strain HD25G2 as a Novel Biocontrol Agent of Fusarium culmorum, the Causal Agent of Root and Crown Rot of Soft Wheat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

4-Propylphenol Alters Membrane Integrity in Fungi Isolated from Walnut Anthracnose and Brown Spot

1
Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yantai 265500, China
2
Yantai Key Laboratory of Wheat Resources Precise Evaluation and Biological Breeding, Yantai 265500, China
3
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
4
Qilu College, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Fungi 2025, 11(9), 610; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090610
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Revised: 15 August 2025 / Accepted: 20 August 2025 / Published: 22 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Pathogens and Mycotoxins)

Abstract

Walnut anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and C. siamense) and brown spot (Alternaria alternata) cause severe yield losses globally. Conventional fungicides face the challenges of pathogen resistance and environmental toxicity. This study evaluates 4-propylphenol, a plant-derived phenolic compound, as an eco-friendly alternative against key fungal pathogens of walnut. In vitro assays determined EC50 values against target pathogens (29.11–31.89 mg·L−1) via mycelial growth inhibition and conidial germination suppression (EC50 = 55.04–71.85 mg·L−1). Mechanistic analyses confirmed membrane disruption through propidium iodide staining (9.5-to-14.0-fold fluorescence intensity increase), DNA leakage (77.82–85.15% at 250 mg·L−1), and protein efflux (58.10–66.49%). In field trials, we implemented a phenology-driven strategy: 100 mg·L−1 ground/canopy spray at flowering to reduce primary inoculum, followed by 400 mg·L−1 canopy application at fruiting. This protocol achieved 86.67% control efficacy against disease complexes with negligible phytotoxicity (SPAD variation < 5%). 4-propylphenol provides a sustainable solution through membrane-targeting action, effectively overcoming fungicide resistance in woody crops.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Walnut (Juglans regia L.), a woody oilseed crop with significant economic value and ecological benefits, holds a prominent position in global agricultural trade due to its edible nuts and oil [1]. Fungal diseases have emerged as a critical constraint to sustainable walnut industrialization, with anthracnose representing one of the most devastating phytopathologies. The anthracnose pathogen complex (Colletotrichum godetiae, C. gloeosporioides, C. fioriniae, C. nymphaeae, and C. siamense) can infect up to 50% of fruits [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Disease onset typically occurs in early July, followed by exponential spread during August, culminating in over 35% infected fruits by early September [8]. Brown spot disease (alternatively termed brown apical necrosis), caused by Alternaria fungi, induces fruit browning, rot, and premature abscission, accounting for 30% of yield losses [9,10]. Alternaria alternata has been confirmed as the dominant pathogenic species in Shandong and Sichuan provinces of China [11,12].
Chemical control remains the predominant management strategy, but prolonged reliance on benzimidazoles and triazoles has precipitated a triple crisis: evolution of pathogen resistance [13], collateral damage to non-target organisms [14,15,16], and persistent environmental contamination [17]. This predicament underscores the urgent need for innovative green control technologies. Plant-derived fungicides, characterized by biodegradability, target specificity, and slower resistance development, have emerged as a pivotal strategy to overcome current control limitations [18,19,20]. Notably, existing research predominantly focuses on broad-spectrum antimicrobial secondary metabolites such as chitooligosaccharides [21], zedoary oil [22], and phenolic/terpenoid compounds [23], while systematic screening of plant-based agents against walnut-specific pathogens remains unexplored.
This study established a tripartite screening system for plant-derived fungicides against walnut fungal diseases, integrating activity-guided screening, membrane-targeted mechanism elucidation, and field-adaptive optimization. In vitro antimicrobial assays first revealed that 4-propylphenol exhibits significant inhibitory activity against Shandong’s predominant walnut pathogens: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (EC50 = 31.89 ± 1.26 mg·L−1, half-maximal effective concentration), the newly identified C. siamense (EC50 = 31.06 ± 2.23 mg·L−1), and A. alternata (EC50 = 29.11 ± 1.88 mg·L−1). As a volatile plant secondary metabolite [24,25], this phenolic compound not only demonstrates previously reported antimicrobial spectra [26,27] but also disrupts pathogen membrane integrity [28,29], as mechanistically elucidated herein. A phenology-driven precision application protocol was implemented in field trials: whole-plant and ground spray (100 mg·L−1) during flowering to reduce primary inoculum, followed by canopy-directed application (400 mg·L−1) at the fruiting stage. This strategy achieved 86.67% control efficacy in combined anthracnose–brown spot incidence (p < 0.05), with chlorophyll SPAD analysis confirming negligible phytotoxicity (<5% variation vs. control). This work pioneers a comprehensive technical framework for plant-derived fungicide development in walnut protection, spanning in vitro screening, mechanistic validation, and field efficacy evaluation. The findings not only address critical gaps in eco-friendly walnut disease management but also establish a replicable paradigm for creating botanical pesticides in woody oilseed crops, advancing sustainable practices for specialty forest product industries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fungal Pathogens

The C. gloeosporioides strain (isolated from anthracnose-infected walnut fruits in Chongqing, China, 2019) was provided by Dr. Jian Gao (College of Plant Protection, Southwest University). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene was amplified with primers GDF1/GDR1 [30] and confirmed as C. gloeosporioides by BLASTn analysis (Query cover 100%, Ident 99.66% to GenBank accession KM053198.1).
The A. alternata strain (isolated from brown spot lesions on walnut fruits in Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2020) was provided by Prof. Hongyan Wang (College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University). The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was amplified with primers ITS4/ITS5 [31] and confirmed as A. alternata by BLASTn analysis (Query cover 100%, Ident 99.81% to GenBank accession OK036715.1).
The C. siamense strain HQ21 (GenBank accession: PV929873) was isolated from symptomatic anthracnose fruits in Tai’an, Shandong, China, 2021. Molecular characterization of C. siamense HQ21 is described in Section 2.2 and Section 2.3.
Partial sequences of molecular markers for all strains were deposited in Supplementary File S1, including: the GAPDH gene fragment for C. gloeosporioides, the ITS region for A. alternata, and the calmodulin (CAL) gene fragment for C. siamense HQ21.
All strains were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants at 4 °C in darkness with subculturing performed biannually.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of Pathogen HQ21 from Walnut Anthracnose Fruits

Symptomatic anthracnose fruits were collected and transported at 4 °C within 4 h. After surface sterilization with 75% ethanol (1 min), 1 cm2 tissue fragments from lesion margins were excised, treated with 1% NaClO (30 s), rinsed three times with sterile water, and cultured on PDA plates containing 100 mg·L−1 streptomycin (25 °C, 5–7 days in darkness). Pathogens were purified through three rounds of single-spore isolation on potato dextrose agar (PDA), yielding strain HQ21.

2.3. Pathogenicity Validation and Characterization of HQ21

Pathogenicity assay: Detached leaves of Juglans regia ‘Xiangling’ were needle-inoculated with HQ21 mycelial plugs (5 mm, 7-day-old PDA). Controls received sterile plugs. The leaves were maintained at 25 °C/85% RH for 5 days. Pathogens were re-isolated from lesions to fulfill Koch’s postulates.
Morphological characterization: Purified isolates were cultured on PDA plates at 25 °C for 7 days. Colony morphology and pigmentation were recorded, and conidioma dimensions were measured microscopically (Nexcope NE910-FLNingbo Yongxin Optics Co., Ltd., Ningbo, China, 400×).
Molecular identification: Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB protocol [32]. DNA purity was verified by the A260/A280 ratio (1.93) and A260/A230 ratio (1.86) using a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). The CAL locus was amplified with primers CL1C (5′-GAATTCAAGGAGGCCTTCTC-3′) and CL2C (5′-CTTCTGCATCATGAGCTGGAC-3′), designed by Weir BS et al. [33], in 20 μL reactions containing 2× Rapid Taq Master Mix (Vazyme) 10 μL, Primers 0.5 μM each, and Template DNA 50 ng.
Thermocycling parameters: Amplifications were performed in a Bio-Rad T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) with the following profile: initial denaturation at 94 °C (5 min); 35 cycles of 94 °C (30 s), 55 °C (45 s), and 72 °C (1 min); final extension at 72 °C (10 min). CAL DNA was purified using the SanPrep Column DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and sequenced bidirectionally (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).
Phylogenetic reconstruction: CAL sequences were BLASTN-searched against NCBI GenBank (GenBank accession: PV929873). Reference sequences from type strains were aligned using ClustalW in MEGA 11. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates.

2.4. Dose–Response Analysis of 4-Propylphenol on Mycelial Growth

Based on preliminary screening of plant-derived phenolics against walnut pathogens, 4-propylphenol was selected for mechanistic and applied evaluation due to its superior antifungal potency and environmental safety profile. The compound (purity ≥ 98%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in methanol to prepare a 10,000 mg·L−1 stock solution (stored at 4 °C in darkness). Serial dilutions were performed to obtain amended PDA media with final concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mg·L−1 (methanol concentration ≤ 1% v/v). Sterile methanol-amended PDA served as solvent control.
Mycelial plugs (5 mm diameter) from actively growing cultures of C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata were inoculated onto amended plates. After 5 days of incubation at 25 °C in darkness, colony diameters were measured using the cross-hair method [34]. Mycelial growth inhibition was calculated as
Inhibition (%) = [(DcDt)/(Dc − 5)] × 100
where Dc and Dt represent colony diameters (mm) in control and treatment groups, respectively.
Probit regression analysis (SPSS 22.0) was employed to establish toxicological equations by correlating log-transformed concentrations (X) with inhibition probability units (Y). Half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50) and 95% confidence intervals were derived from the dose–response relationships.

2.5. Effects of 4-Propylphenol on Conidial Germination

Conidial suspension preparation: Conidia from C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata were harvested by scraping sporulating cultures into 10 mL sterile water containing 0.05% Tween-80, vortexed for 30 s, and filtered through quadruple-layer sterile gauze. After centrifugation (4 °C, 3000× g, 10 min), pellets were resuspended and adjusted to 1 × 105 CFU mL−1 using a hemocytometer.
Germination inhibition assay: 4-propylphenol was incorporated into 1.5% water agar (WA) at final concentrations of 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1. Aliquots (100 μL) of conidial suspensions were spread evenly on WA plates, with methanol-equivalent controls. Following 24 h incubation (25 °C, darkness), germination rates were assessed by counting germinated conidia. For each replicate, ≥50 spores were counted across five random fields (400×, Olympus CX23, Evident Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Germination rate (%) = (Germinated spores/Total spores) × 100, where germination was defined by germ tube length ≥ spore diameter. Three replicates per treatment (total ≥ 150 spores) were evaluated.

2.6. Membrane Integrity Assessment

Membrane integrity was assessed by propidium iodide (PI) staining according to Stocks, S.M. [35]. Mycelial blocks of C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata were cultured in potato dextrose broth (PDB) containing 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol for 72 h at 25 °C. Hyphae were collected, washed thrice with PBS (pH 7.4), and stained with 10 µg·mL−1 propidium iodide (PI; Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min. Control groups received equivalent 4-propylphenol-free PDB treatments. Membrane integrity was visualized under fluorescence microscopy (Nexcope NE910-FL; excitation 535 nm; emission 615 nm). Three hyphal segments per treatment were randomly selected for fluorescence intensity quantification using ImageJ v1.53.

2.7. Quantification of Mycelial DNA Leakage

Mycelial suspensions (5 mL, 20 mg·mL−1 dry weight) of C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata were homogenously dispersed in 100 mL PDB containing 4-propylphenol (15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, and 250 mg·L−1) and incubated at 25 °C with shaking (120 rpm) for 24 h. After centrifugation (8000× g, 10 min, 4 °C), supernatants were filtered through 0.22 μm membranes. DNA leakage was quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm (A260) using a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA), with sterile PDB as blank control.
DNA leakage (%) = (AtAc)/(AmAc) × 100
At: Absorbance of treatment group;
Ac: Absorbance of negative control (mycelia in 4-propylphenol-free PDB);
Am: Maximum leakage absorbance from mechanically disrupted mycelia (sonicated at 20 kHz for 5 min).
Three replicates per group were analyzed via nonlinear regression (SPSS 22.0).

2.8. Protein Leakage from Conidia

Hemocytometer-calibrated conidial suspensions (1 × 105 conidia·mL−1) of C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata were aliquoted (5 mL) into 100 mL PDB containing 4-propylphenol (15.625–250 mg·L−1, 2-fold dilution series). Following shaking incubation (25 °C, 150 rpm, 24 h), samples were centrifuged (8000× g, 10 min, 4 °C). Filtered supernatants (0.22 μm) were analyzed at 280 nm (A280) using a NanoDrop 2000c.
Protein leakage (%) = (AtAc)/(AmAc) ×100
At: Absorbance of treated conidia;
Ac: Absorbance of untreated control (conidia in 4-propylphenol-free PDB);
Am: Maximum leakage from sonicated conidia (20 kHz, 5 min).
Triplicate biological replicates were subjected to nonlinear regression analysis (SPSS 22.0).

2.9. Leaf Treatment and Pathogen Inoculation

Mature detached leaves (30 ± 2 days old) of Juglans regia ‘Xiangling’ were collected from field-grown trees. Three biological replicates per treatment group were established, with each replicate consisting of one leaf. Leaves were treated with 4-propylphenol solutions (15.625–500 mg·L−1, containing 0.1% Tween-80 surfactant) via foliar spray. Negative controls received sterile water with 0.1% Tween-80. After air-drying, each leaf was needle-inoculated at midribs with 5 mm mycelial plugs of C. siamense (7-day-old cultures) and incubated in a humidity chamber (25 °C, 90% RH) for 7 days. To enhance lesion visibility by removing chlorophyll, leaves were decolorized by immersion in 75% (v/v) aqueous ethanol within a water bath maintained at 60 °C until complete chlorophyll removal was achieved. After rinsing with distilled water and blotting dry, lesion diameters (mm) were measured.
Inhibition (%) = (DcDt)/Dc × 100,
where Dc and Dt denote lesion diameters (mm) in control and treated groups, respectively. Data from three biological replicates were pooled, and dose–response curves were fitted using SPSS 22.0 to determine EC50 values and 95% confidence intervals. Significant differences were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test (α = 0.01).

2.10. Field Safety Evaluation

Field trials were conducted on 5 June 2022 (early fruit expansion stage) using ten-year-old Juglans regia ‘Xiangling’ trees with uniform growth characteristics. A randomized complete block design was employed with three replicates. Each replicate consisted of one experimental tree, serving as an individual block, resulting in three total trees. On each tree, twelve branches with uniform growth status (similar age, orientation, and diameter) were selected and randomly allocated into four treatment groups, with three branches per group. Treatments consisted of three concentrations of 4-propylphenol (100, 200, and 400 mg·L−1) and a water-treated control. Directional foliar spraying was applied specifically to the assigned branch groups using a knapsack electric sprayer (0.3 MPa pressure, 0.4 mm nozzle diameter). The spray volume was calibrated to 500 L·ha−1 based on pre-trial optimization, ensuring complete leaf coverage on treated branches without runoff and implementing physical isolation to prevent spray drift between treatments. At 30 days post-treatment, chlorophyll SPAD values were measured on a total of 30 mature leaves per treatment group (i.e., 10 leaves/replicate) using a handheld SPAD-502 m (Konica Minolta, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Significant differences among treatments were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s multiple range test (α = 0.05) in SPSS 22.0.

2.11. Optimization of Field Application Strategies

Given that the key pathogens causing walnut fruit diseases—C. gloeosporioides and C. siamense (anthracnose), and A. alternata (brown spot)—primarily infect fruits and collectively result in direct economic losses, this trial shifted the evaluation focus from leaf lesions to comprehensive fruit disease assessment. A randomized block trial (3 replicates) was conducted in 2023 at Huangqian Town’s standardized walnut orchard using Juglans regia ‘Xiangling’ trees. Three treatment regimens were evaluated (Table 1): T1: Initial infection control (100 mg·L−1 canopy spray at flowering; water spray at fruiting); T2: T1 protocol + ground spray (100 mg·L−1 canopy + ground application at flowering; water spray at fruiting); T3: T2 protocol + enhanced fruiting-stage treatment (400 mg·L−1 canopy spray at fruiting); CK: Water-only controls for both stages.
Applications were performed using a knapsack electric sprayer (0.3 MPa, 0.4 mm nozzle) with ~500 L·ha−1 volume for full coverage. n = 3 biological replicates per treatment.
Disease assessment: Fifteen days post-treatment, 30 fruits per group were graded:
0: No lesions;
1: 1–2 lesions;
2: 3–5 lesions;
3: >5 lesions or coalesced necrosis.
Disease index (DI) = Σ(Disease grade × fruit count)/(3 × total fruits) × 100.
Control efficacy (%) = (DICKDItreatment)/DICK × 100.
Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 with significance thresholds at α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation, Identification, and Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum siamense in Huangqian Walnut Orchards

Walnut fruits exhibiting anthracnose symptoms were collected from Huangqian Town, Tai’an City (Figure 1A). Strain HQ21, isolated through single-spore purification, formed circular colonies (78.3 ± 1.5 mm diameter) on PDA after 5 days at 25 °C. Colonies displayed dense aerial mycelia with dark gray centers and cream-colored margins on the obverse side (Figure 1B), while reverse sides exhibited gray-green central pigmentation (Figure 1C). Hyphae appeared cylindrical with septa (Figure 1D), producing hyaline, aseptate conidia measuring (14.2 ± 1.3) × (4.2 ± 0.6) μm (Figure 1E). Pathogenicity assays induced characteristic anthracnose lesions on inoculated leaves within 5 days, mirroring field symptoms (Figure 1F), while the controls remained asymptomatic (Figure 1G). Re-isolation from diseased tissues yielded morphologically identical colonies to HQ21, fulfilling Koch’s postulates. Phylogenetic analysis of concatenated CAL sequences placed HQ21 within a highly supported C. siamense clade (Bootstrap = 98%; genetic distance ≤ 0.002) (Figure 2). Integrated morphological and molecular evidence confirmed HQ21 as C. siamense Prihastuti, L. Cai & K.D. Hyde. The CAL gene sequence is available in GenBank under accession number PV929873.

3.2. Virulence Analysis of 4-Propylphenol Against Target Pathogens

4-propylphenol exhibited significant dose-dependent inhibition of mycelial growth across all three pathogens. Serial dilutions (20–100 mg·L−1) demonstrated significant dose–response relationships across all pathogens (R2 = 0.827–0.948), with EC50 values of 31.893, 31.063, and 29.111 mg·L−1 for C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata, respectively. Steep concentration–response profiles were evidenced by toxicity equation slopes (3.02–3.81) (Table 2 and Figure 3).

3.3. Inhibitory Effects of 4-Propylphenol on Conidial Germination

As shown in Table 3 and Figure 4, 4-propylphenol exhibited significant concentration-dependent inhibition (p < 0.01) on conidial germination across all three pathogens. After 24 h treatment, the germination rates for C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata were 80.00 ± 2.23%, 84.75 ± 2.91%, and 85.39 ± 3.18%, respectively. At 500 mg·L−1, the germination rates decreased to 5.4 ± 1.7%, 7.5 ± 1.47%, and 9.2 ± 0.5%, corresponding to 89.22–93.25% suppression compared to controls. The EC50 values for conidial germination inhibition were 55.037, 71.854, and 64.414 mg·L−1 for C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata, respectively.

3.4. Membrane Disruption Effects of 4-Propylphenol on Target Pathogens

Propidium iodide (PI) staining revealed significant membrane damage in 4-propylphenol-treated hyphae (Figure 5). The treatment groups exhibited intense red fluorescence signals (fluorescence intensity: C. gloeosporioides 55.74 ± 3.04 a.u., C. siamense 55.18 ± 6.54 a.u., and A. alternata 61.01 ± 8.13 a.u.), which were markedly higher than those in untreated controls (C. gloeosporioides: 3.98 ± 1.41 a.u.; C. siamense: 4.01 ± 1.00 a.u.; A. alternata: 6.45 ± 5.68 a.u.) (p < 0.001), representing 14.0-fold fluorescence intensity increases for C. gloeosporioides, 13.8-fold for C. siamense, and 9.5-fold for A. alternata compared to untreated controls. These results confirm that 4-propylphenol induces significant alterations in membrane permeability.

3.5. Dose-Dependent Induction of DNA Leakage by 4-Propylphenol

As illustrated in Figure 6, 4-propylphenol significantly increased DNA leakage from C. gloeosporioides, C. siamense, and A. alternata hyphae in a concentration-dependent manner (R2 = 0.802–0.924). At 250 mg·L−1, DNA leakage reached 77.82–85.15% of maximum saturation values achieved through mechanical disruption.

3.6. Protein Leakage Induced by 4-Propylphenol

As demonstrated in Figure 7, 4-propylphenol significantly compromised fungal membrane permeability, inducing dose-dependent protein leakage. Leakage levels exhibited strong positive correlations with compound concentrations (R2 = 0.974–0.991). At 250 mg·L−1, protein leakage reached 58.10–66.49% of maximum saturation values: C. gloeosporioides (65.02 ± 0.53%), C. siamense (58.10 ± 0.44%), and A. alternata (66.49 ± 1.05%).

3.7. Protective Effects of 4-Propylphenol Against C. siamense Infection in Detached Walnut Leaves

Detached walnut leaves treated with 4-propylphenol (15.625–500 mg·L−1) showed significant concentration-dependent suppression of C. siamense infection (R2 = 0.99903). Visual assessment of disease progression revealed distinct phenotypic differences across treatment concentrations (Figure 8A), with complete inhibition of pathogen colonization observed at the highest concentration of 500 mg·L−1. The dose–response relationship demonstrated progressive efficacy, achieving 47.52 ± 3.97% disease inhibition at 62.5 mg·L−1, 84.67 ± 3.25% at 250 mg·L−1, and 100% at 500 mg·L−1 (Figure 8C). Quantitative analysis through probit modeling determined the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) as 96.54 mg·L−1 (Figure 8B). Statistical comparison of inhibition rates across concentrations revealed significant differential efficacy (p < 0.01, Duncan’s test), with distinct effectiveness groupings indicated by letter annotations in the histogram (Figure 8C). This comprehensive analysis confirms 4-propylphenol’s potent capacity to protect foliar tissues against anthracnose pathogenesis, achieving complete pathogen suppression at the maximum tested concentration.

3.8. Field Safety Evaluation of 4-Propylphenol on Walnut Trees

Field trials evaluating the physiological safety of different 4-propylphenol concentrations on walnut trees demonstrated the following results (Figure 9): Foliar applications at 100, 200, and 400 mg·L−1 maintained leaf SPAD values at 43.6 ± 1.18, 44.4 ± 1.87, and 43.84 ± 1.96, respectively (Figure 9A). Compared to the water-treated control group (44.55 ± 1.39; Figure 9B), no significant differences (p > 0.05) in SPAD values were observed across treatments. Moreover, the 400 mg·L−1 treatment group (Figure 9C) exhibited no visible phytotoxicity symptoms. Based on comprehensive safety evaluation parameters (SPAD stability and foliar phenotypic integrity) and the potential enhancement of disease control efficacy at higher concentrations, 400 mg·L−1 is recommended as the optimal application concentration to balance phytological safety and field efficacy.

3.9. Integrated Application Strategies for Disease Control Efficacy

As shown in Figure 10E, 4-propylphenol demonstrated significant field efficacy against walnut fruit diseases. The T1 treatment (100 mg·L−1 canopy spray at flowering + water spray at fruiting; Figure 10B) achieved 47.78 ± 5.09% control efficacy with 28.89% diseased fruits. The T2 treatment (100 mg·L−1 canopy + ground spray at flowering + water spray at fruiting; Figure 10C) significantly enhanced overall efficacy to 80.00 ± 6.67% (p < 0.01; Figure 10E), reducing disease incidence to 12.22%. The T3 treatment (T2 + 400 mg·L−1 canopy spray at fruiting; Figure 10D) achieved optimal performance with 7.78% diseased fruits and 86.67 ± 3.33% control efficacy, significantly surpassing T1/T2 (p < 0.01; Figure 10E). Untreated controls (CK, Figure 10A) exhibited 56.67% disease incidence (Figure 10E).

4. Discussion

The pathogen diversity of walnut anthracnose and brown spot, coupled with their cross-host transmission characteristics, poses a persistent threat to the global walnut industry. Over 10 species of Colletotrichum spp. have been confirmed to infect walnuts [36,37,38,39], among which C. siamense has emerged as a critical pathogen due to its broad host adaptability and geographical dispersal capacity. The pathogenic strain of C. siamense identified in Tai’an, Shandong Province, further validates the expansion of this species in temperate woody crops. Notably, C. siamense exhibits a host range spanning at least 15 genera across seven plant families, including Cornus spp. [40], Ixora chinensis [41], Persea Americana [42], and Citrus spp. [43]. This polyphagous trait suggests potential cross-species transmission through host plant networks within agroecosystems, significantly amplifying the epidemiological complexity and control challenges of the disease.
This study is the first to elucidate the molecular mechanism by which 4-propylphenol exerts antifungal effects via targeted disruption of pathogen membrane integrity. Fluorescence staining revealed significant membrane damage, evidenced by 9.5-to-14.0-fold increases in propidium iodide (PI) staining intensity following treatment, consistent with the classical mode of phenolic compounds that alter membrane potential to induce ion homeostasis imbalance [44,45]. Unlike conventional fungicides (e.g., triazoles targeting enzyme inhibition) [46,47], this nonspecific membrane-targeting mechanism may theoretically reduce the risk of resistance development [48]. However, potential fungal adaptive mechanisms, such as MAPK signaling pathway-mediated dynamic regulation of membrane composition, warrant further investigation [49,50].
In bioactivity assessments, 4-propylphenol demonstrated EC50 values of 29.11–31.89 mg·L−1 against plant pathogens, comparable to the optimal eugenol derivative against Botrytis cinerea (EC50 = 31 mg·L−1) [51] and superior to 1-sulfonyloxy/acyloxy eugenol analogs against Phytophthora capsica (EC50 = 70.8 mg·L−1) [52]. Notably, its inhibition of conidial germination (EC50 = 55.04–71.85 mg·L−1) exhibited approximately 55-fold greater efficacy than ginseng stem-leaf total saponins (EC50 = 3037.7 mg·L−1) [53] and outperformed commercial biofungicides such as Bacillus subtilis lipopeptides (EC50 > 100 mg·L−1) [54]. The compound also displayed rapid (>90% inhibition within 24 h) and sustained antifungal activity, highlighting its unique advantages in plant disease management systems.
The proposed gradient application strategy (100 mg·L−1 ground spray (canopy and soil application) at the flowering stage; 400 mg·L−1 targeted canopy spraying at the fruiting stage) demonstrated high field efficacy in disease control while aiming at suppressing primary inoculum sources. This approach shares conceptual similarities with grape anthracnose management protocols (e.g., copper-based agents at bud break and microbial agents at flowering) [55], yet simplifies operational complexity through optimized concentration gradients of a single active ingredient. However, soil drenching may exert non-target effects on microbial communities. Metagenomic analysis is recommended to systematically evaluate impacts on soil microbial network structure and functional gene expression, thereby informing the development of ecologically sustainable application protocols.

5. Conclusions

This study established an integrated system encompassing membrane-targeting mechanism analysis and phenology-adapted application technology, providing an innovative framework for sustainable disease management in woody oil crops. Key findings include the following: (1) Novel antimicrobial mechanism: 4-propylphenol triggers cellular content leakage through membrane lipid disruption, demonstrating a resistance-avoidance mode that circumvents the mutation risks inherent in conventional fungicides targeting specific molecular sites. (2) Application strategy innovation: A hierarchical management strategy, integrating flowering-stage ground disinfection and fruit-development-stage canopy protection, showed significant efficacy against walnut anthracnose, enabling chemical input reduction while maintaining eco-friendly orchard operations. Future research should prioritize three directions: molecular-level characterization of 4-propylphenol’s specific binding sites with membrane lipids, establishment of regional pathogen resistance surveillance networks, and development of nano-encapsulated formulations to enhance residual activity. This integrated approach not only addresses critical challenges in walnut disease control but also provides replicable solutions for sustainable cultivation of other woody oil crops, including Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis) and oil-tea camellia (Camellia oleifera). Through mechanism-driven technological innovation, this work achieves effective synergy between ecological safety and pathogen control, advancing the development of green control technologies in agricultural phytopathology.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof11090610/s1. File S1: Fungal DNA sequences in FASTA format.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.W. and X.S.; methodology, X.Y., P.S. and S.Y.; validation, Y.L. and H.B.; formal analysis, X.P. and S.Y.; investigation, X.Y., P.S. and Y.L.; resources, Q.W. and X.S.; data curation, H.B. and X.P.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, P.S., Q.W. and X.S.; visualization, X.P. and Y.L.; supervision, Q.W. and X.S.; project administration, Q.W.; funding acquisition, Q.W., X.S., X.P. and X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (the Agricultural Variety Improvement Project): 2023LZGC002; the Taishan Scholar Project, grant number tsqn202211093; the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 32172387, 32172049 and 31701751; the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, grant numbers ZR2024MC195, ZR2021YQ20, and ZR2024QC267; and the Shandong Province First-class Discipline Construction “811” Project, grant numbers SKL81121 and SKL81127. The Metabonomics Platform, Agronomy College of SDAU and Shandong Guocangjian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., provided technical support and suggestions for this research work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study complied with institutional guidelines for plant pathogen research. No endangered species were involved.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Jian Gao (College of Plant Protection, Southwest University) for providing C. gloeosporioides strains, and the research group of Hongyan Wang (College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University) for supplying A. alternata isolates. We acknowledge the technical support from the Metabonomics Platform of Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, and Shandong Guocangjian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., for their analytical assistance and scientific suggestions. The authors alone are responsible for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Shandong Guocangjian Biotechnology Co., Ltd., provided analytical assistance and scientific suggestions but had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Food and Agriculture Data. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare (accessed on 15 January 2025).
  2. Lio, D.D.; Cobo-Díaz, J.F.; Masson, C.; Chalopin, M.; Kebe, D.; Giraud, M.; Verhaeghe, A.; Nodet, P.; Sarrocco, S.; Floch, G.L.; et al. Combined Metabarcoding and Multi-locus approach for Genetic characterization of Colletotrichum species associated with common walnut (Juglans regia) anthracnose in France. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, F.X.; Chen, J.W.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Z.Y.; Sun, J.Y.; Yan, Y.T.; Zhang, H.X.; Bi, Y. Identification, Pathogenicity, and Sensitivity to Fungicide of Colletotrichum Species That Causes Walnut Anthracnose in Beijing. Agronomy 2023, 13, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Savian, L.G.; Muniz, M.F.B.; Poletto, T.; Maculan, L.G.; Rabuske, J.E.; Blume, E.; Sarzi, J.S. First Report of Colletotrichum nymphaeae Causing Anthracnose on Juglans regia Fruits in Southern Brazil. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 3287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.X.; Xu, X.W.; Cai, F.; Huang, F.X.; Chen, W.S.; Wang, Q.Z. First Report of Colletotrichum nymphaeae Causing Walnut Anthracnose in China. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, F.H.; Liu, C.; Zeng, Q.; Zhou, Y.J.; Liu, F.; Xu, X.L.; Yang, H.B.; Liu, Y.G.; Yang, C.L. Identification and pathogenicity analysis of leaf brown spot of Juglans regia in China. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luongo, L.; Galli, M.; Garaguso, I.; Petrucci, M.; Vitale, S. First Report of Colletotrichum fioriniae and C. nymphaeae as Causal Agents of Anthracnose on Walnut in Italy. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Q.H.; Li, G.Q.; Liu, X.H.; Duan, C.H.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, S.G.; Zhu, W.C.; Qi, Y.K. Seasonal Epidemic Dynamics and Control Measurement of Walnut Anthracnose in Shandong Province. J. West China For. Sci. 2017, 46, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Belisario, A.; Maccaroni, M.; Coramusi, A.; Corazza, L.; Pryor, B.M.; Figuli, P. First Report of Alternaria Species Groups Involved in Disease Complexes of Hazelnut and Walnut Fruit. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Belisario, A.; Maccaroni, M.; Corazza, L.; Balmas, V.; Valier, A. Occurrence and etiology of brown apical necrosis on Persian (English) walnut fruit. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, L.; Yang, S.Y.; Ma, W.J.; Zhou, J.H. Identification of Pathogen of Walnut Brown Spot and Investigation of the Disease Occurrence. For. Res. 2017, 30, 1004–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qu, W.W.; Yang, K.Q.; Liu, H.X.; Wang, J.Y. Main diseases of walnut and integrated management in Shandong. Plant Prot. 2011, 37, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chechi, A.; Stahlecker, J.; Dowling, M.E.; Schnabel, G. Diversity in species composition and fungicide resistance profiles in Colletotrichum isolates from apples. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 158, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cheng, S.H.; Lin, R.H.; Wang, L.M.; Qiu, Q.Y.; Qu, M.M.; Ren, X.D.; Zong, F.L.; Jiang, H.; Yu, C.H. Comparative susceptibility of thirteen selected pesticides to three different insect egg parasitoid Trichogramma species. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 166, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leite, F.G.; Sampaio, C.F.; Pires, J.A.C.; Oliveira, D.P.d.; Dorta, D.J. Toxicological impact of strobilurin fungicides on human and environmental health: A literature review. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2024, 59, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Theenoor, R.; Ghosh, A.; Venkatesan, R. Harmonising control: Understanding the complex impact of pesticides on parasitoid wasps for enhanced pest management. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2024, 65, 101236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiao, C.; Chen, L.; Sun, C.; Jiang, Y.; Zhai, L.M.; Liu, H.B.; Shen, Z.Y. Evaluating national ecological risk of agricultural pesticides from 2004 to 2017 in China. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 259, 113778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brauer, V.S.; Rezende, C.P.; Pessoni, A.M.; Paula, R.G.D.; Rangappa, K.S.; Nayaka, S.C.; Gupta, V.K.; Almeida, F. Antifungal Agents in Agriculture: Friends and Foes of Public Health. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shuping, D.S.S.; Eloff, J.N. The Use of Plants to Protect Plants and Food Against Fungal Pathogens: A Review. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 14, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ayilara, M.S.; Adeleke, B.S.; Akinola, S.A.; Fayose, C.A.; Adeyemi, U.T.; Gbadegesin, L.A.; Omole, R.K.; Johnson, R.M.; Uthman, Q.O.; Babalola, O.O. Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: A case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1040901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Z.C.; Li, Q.L.; Zhang, J.W.; Sun, Z.H.; Wu, H.F.; Liang, H.Q.; Ma, M.; Huang, L.F.; Xu, X.D.; Ma, G.X. Phenolic constituents with antibacterial activity from Eleutherine bulbosa. Fitoterapia 2024, 172, 105787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, B.; Liu, F.; Li, Q.; Xu, S.; Zhao, X.Z.; Xue, P.L.; Feng, X. Antifungal activity of zedoary turmeric oil against Phytophthora capsici through damaging cell membrane. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019, 159, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zacchino, S.A.; Butassi, E.; Liberto, M.D.; Raimondi, M.; Postigo, A.; Sortino, M. Plant phenolics and terpenoids as adjuvants of antibacterial and antifungal drugs. Phytomedicine 2017, 37, 27–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Füllemann, D.; Steinhaus, M. Characterization of Odorants Causing Smoky Off-Flavors in Cocoa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10833–10841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lukić, I.; Jedrejčić, N.; Ganić, K.K.; Staver, M.; Peršurić, Đ. Phenolic and Aroma Composition of White Wines Produced by Prolonged Maceration and Maturation in Wooden Barrels. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohammed, M.A.; Saeed, Y.S.; Ali, J.F. Antibacterial activity of phenolic compounds of Teucrium polium L. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 36, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, S.F.; Tang, N.W.; Han, K.; You, J.H.; Liu, A.R.; Wang, Q.Q.; Xu, Q. Antifungal Activity and Mechanism of 4-Propylphenol Against Fusarium graminearum, Agent of Wheat Scab, and Its Potential Application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 5258–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wan, Y.L.; Wang, X.W.; Yang, L.; Li, Q.H.; Zheng, X.T.; Bai, T.Y.; Wang, X. Antibacterial Activity of Juglone Revealed in a Wound Model of Staphylococcus aureus Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anek, P.; Kumpangcum, S.; Roytrakul, S.; Khanongnuch, C.; Saenjum, C.; Phannachet, K. Antibacterial Activities of Phenolic Compounds in Miang Extract: Growth Inhibition and Change in Protein Expression of Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Templeton, M.D.; Rikkerink, E.H.A.; Solon, S.L.; Crowhurst, R.N. Cloning and molecular characterization of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-encoding gene and cDNA from the plant pathogenic fungus Glomerella cingulata. Gene 1992, 122, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schoch, C.L.; Seifert, K.A.; Huhndorf, S.; Robert, V.; Spouge, J.L.; Levesque, C.A.; Chen, W. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6241–6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Allen, G.C.; Flores-Vergara, M.A.; Krasynanski, S.; Kumar, S.; Thompson, W.F. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2320–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Weir, B.S.; Johnston, P.R.; Damm, U. The Colletotrichum gloeosporioides species complex. Stud. Mycol. 2012, 73, 115–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Edgington, L.V. Fungitoxic Spectrum of Benzimidazole Compounds. Phytopathology 1971, 61, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stocks, S.M. Mechanism and use of the commercially available viability stain, BacLight. Cytom. Part A J. Int. Soc. Anal. Cytol. 2004, 61, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhang, L.; Zhao, L.L.; Liang, C.; Yu, L.H.; Zhang, Y. Colletotrichum species (Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) causing walnut anthracnose in China. MycoKeys 2024, 108, 95–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cho, S.E.; Oh, J.Y.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, C.W. First Report of Anthracnose on Juglans regia Caused by Colletotrichum siamense in Korea. Plant Dis. 2022, 107, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, Y.X.; Lin, L.; Cao, J.; Gan, M.X.; Fan, X.L. Three new species of Colletotrichum (Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with walnut (Juglans regia) anthracnose from China. MycoKeys 2024, 108, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, L.; Yin, Y.Q.; Zhao, L.L.; Xie, Y.Q.; Han, J.; Zhang, Y. Two new species of Colletotrichum (Glomerellaceae, Glomerellales) causing walnut anthracnose in Beijing. MycoKeys 2023, 99, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, T.N.; Lv, B.S.; Zhang, T.; Luan, F.G. First Report of Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum siamense and C. gloeosporiodes on Cornus hongkongensis in China. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qin, R.Y.; Zhang, Y.M.; Li, Q.L.; Huang, S.P.; Chen, X.L.; Guo, T.X.; Tang, L.H. Leaf Spot Caused by Colletotrichum siamense, C. fructicola, and C. aeschynomenes on Ixora chinensis in Guangxi, China. Plant Dis. 2023, 108, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hofer, K.M.; Braithwaite, M.; Braithwaite, L.J.; Sorensen, S.; Siebert, B.; Pather, V.; Goudie, L.; Williamson, L.; Alexander, B.J.R.; Toome-Heller, M. First report of Colletotrichum fructicola, C. perseae, and C. siamense causing anthracnose disease of avocado (Persea americana) in New Zealand. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pérez-Mora, J.L.; Mora-Romero, G.A.; Beltrán-Peña, H.; García-León, E.; Lima, N.B.; Camacho-Tapia, M.; Tovar-Pedraza, J.M. First Report of Colletotrichum siamense and C. gloeosporioides Causing Anthracnose of Citrus spp. in Mexico. Plant Dis. 2020, 105, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, Y.Y.; Xue, Y.; Bi, Q.Q.; Qin, D.K.; Du, Q.Z.; Jin, P. Enhanced antibacterial activity of eugenol-entrapped casein nanoparticles amended with lysozyme against gram-positive pathogens. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 130036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nogueira, J.O.E.; Campolina, G.A.; Batista, L.R.; Alves, E.; Caetano, A.R.S.; Brandão, R.M.; Nelson, D.L.; Cardoso, M.D.G. Mechanism of action of various terpenes and phenylpropanoids against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2021, 368, fnab052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liang, Q.L.; Wei, L.X.; Xu, B.L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S.W.; Liu, L.L. Induction of resistance of Podosphaera xanthii (hull-less pumpkin powdery mildew) to triazole fungicides and its resistance mechanism. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, F.Y.; Yao, S.J.; Cao, D.T.; Ju, C.; Yu, S.M.; Xu, S.J.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y.L. Increased triazole-resistance and cyp51A mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus after selection with a combination of the triazole fungicides difenoconazole and propiconazole. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, X.L.; Li, H.; Qi, G.B.; Qian, Y.Y.; Li, B.W.; Shi, L.L.; Liu, B. Combating Fungal Infections and Resistance with a Dual-Mechanism Luminogen to Disrupt Membrane Integrity and Induce DNA Damage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 31656–31664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Huang, Z.C.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Huang, P.Y.; Cai, Y.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Liu, X.H.; Lin, F.C.; et al. The endosomal-vacuolar transport system acts as a docking platform for the Pmk1 MAP kinase signaling pathway in Magnaporthe oryzae. New Phytol. 2025, 245, 722–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gao, X.Q.; Gao, G.G.; Zheng, W.F.; Liu, H.B.; Pan, W.B.; Xia, X.; Zhang, D.M.; Lin, W.W.; Wang, Z.H.; Feng, B.M. PARylation of 14-3-3 proteins controls the virulence of Magnaporthe oryzae. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Olea, A.F.; Bravo, A.; Martínez, R.; Thomas, M.; Sedan, C.; Espinoza, L.; Zambrano, E.; Carvajal, D.; Silva-Moreno, E.; Carrasco, H. Antifungal Activity of Eugenol Derivatives against Botrytis Cinerea. Molecules 2019, 24, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, G.Q.; Zhu, L.N.; He, J.X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.H.; Guo, X.L.; Sun, D.; Tian, Y.E.; Liu, S.M.; Huang, X.B.; et al. Combinatorial Synthesis of Novel 1-sulfonyloxy/acyloxyeugenol Derivatives as Fungicidal Agents. Comb. Chem. High. Throughput Screen. 2022, 25, 1545–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Salehan, N.M.; Meon, S.; Ismail, I.S. Antifungal activity of Cosmos caudatus extracts against seven economically important plant pathogens. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 864–870. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, J.; Guo, Q.G.; Su, Z.H.; Dong, L.H.; Wang, P.P.; Zhang, X.Y.; Lu, X.Y.; Zhao, W.S.; Qu, Y.H.; Li, S.Z.; et al. Effect of Fengycin Produced by Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 on the Conidial Germination and Microsclerotia Formation of Verticillium dahliae. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2020, 50, 739–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mochizuki, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Aoki, Y.; Suzuki, S. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S13-3 as a biological control agent for anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Isolation and pathogenicity determination of walnut anthracnose pathogen. (A): Field symptoms of walnut anthracnose on fruits. (B,C): Morphology of strain HQ21 on PDA, 5 days after inoculation (front and reverse view). (D): Hypha structure. (E): Conidia. (F): Disease progression in artificial inoculation assay (5 dpi). (G): Control leaf on PDA block inoculation. Scale bars: (D,F) = 20 μm.
Figure 1. Isolation and pathogenicity determination of walnut anthracnose pathogen. (A): Field symptoms of walnut anthracnose on fruits. (B,C): Morphology of strain HQ21 on PDA, 5 days after inoculation (front and reverse view). (D): Hypha structure. (E): Conidia. (F): Disease progression in artificial inoculation assay (5 dpi). (G): Control leaf on PDA block inoculation. Scale bars: (D,F) = 20 μm.
Jof 11 00610 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of strain HQ21 based on CAL gene sequences. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA 11 software with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sequences of reference strains (indicated by GenBank accession numbers) were retrieved from NCBI.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of strain HQ21 based on CAL gene sequences. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed using MEGA 11 software with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Sequences of reference strains (indicated by GenBank accession numbers) were retrieved from NCBI.
Jof 11 00610 g002
Figure 3. Dose-dependent inhibition of 4-propylphenol (0–100 mg·L−1) on mycelial growth of C. gloeosporioides (Cg), C. siamense (Cs), and A. alternata (Aa).
Figure 3. Dose-dependent inhibition of 4-propylphenol (0–100 mg·L−1) on mycelial growth of C. gloeosporioides (Cg), C. siamense (Cs), and A. alternata (Aa).
Jof 11 00610 g003
Figure 4. Inhibitory effects of 4-propylphenol on conidial germination of three pathogens. Column colors represent concentrations: 0, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 4. Inhibitory effects of 4-propylphenol on conidial germination of three pathogens. Column colors represent concentrations: 0, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Jof 11 00610 g004
Figure 5. Effects of 4-propylphenol on membrane integrity of three pathogens. (A): C. gloeosporioides hyphae under bright-field (left) and PI fluorescence (right): (i) untreated control; (ii) 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol treatment. (B): C. siamense hyphae under bright-field (left) and PI fluorescence (right): (i) untreated control; (ii) 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol treatment. (C): A. alternata hyphae under bright-field (left) and PI fluorescence (right): (i) untreated control; (ii) 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol treatment. (D): Quantitative analysis of PI fluorescence intensity showing 9.5-to-14.0-fold increases in treated hyphae. Scale bar = 200 μm (applicable to (AC)). *** denote significant differences (p < 0.001, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 5. Effects of 4-propylphenol on membrane integrity of three pathogens. (A): C. gloeosporioides hyphae under bright-field (left) and PI fluorescence (right): (i) untreated control; (ii) 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol treatment. (B): C. siamense hyphae under bright-field (left) and PI fluorescence (right): (i) untreated control; (ii) 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol treatment. (C): A. alternata hyphae under bright-field (left) and PI fluorescence (right): (i) untreated control; (ii) 40 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol treatment. (D): Quantitative analysis of PI fluorescence intensity showing 9.5-to-14.0-fold increases in treated hyphae. Scale bar = 200 μm (applicable to (AC)). *** denote significant differences (p < 0.001, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Jof 11 00610 g005
Figure 6. Dose-effect of 4-propylphenol on DNA leakage of three pathogens. Column colors represent concentrations: 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, and 250 mg·L−1. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 6. Dose-effect of 4-propylphenol on DNA leakage of three pathogens. Column colors represent concentrations: 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, and 250 mg·L−1. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Jof 11 00610 g006
Figure 7. Dose-dependent protein leakage induced by 4-propylphenol in three pathogens. Column colors represent concentrations: 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, and 250 mg·L−1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 7. Dose-dependent protein leakage induced by 4-propylphenol in three pathogens. Column colors represent concentrations: 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, and 250 mg·L−1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Jof 11 00610 g007
Figure 8. Protective effect of 4-propylphenol against C. siamense infection on detached walnut leaves. (A): Phenotypic comparison of detached walnut leaves treated with 4-propylphenol at different concentrations (0, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1) and inoculated with C. siamense. Images were captured 5 days post-inoculation after chlorophyll removal via ethanol decolorization. Scale bar = 2 cm. (B): Dose–response curve of C. siamense inhibition by 4-propylphenol. (C): Histogram of inhibition rates at tested concentrations. Columns labeled with different lowercase letters show statistically significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 8. Protective effect of 4-propylphenol against C. siamense infection on detached walnut leaves. (A): Phenotypic comparison of detached walnut leaves treated with 4-propylphenol at different concentrations (0, 15.625, 31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, and 500 mg·L−1) and inoculated with C. siamense. Images were captured 5 days post-inoculation after chlorophyll removal via ethanol decolorization. Scale bar = 2 cm. (B): Dose–response curve of C. siamense inhibition by 4-propylphenol. (C): Histogram of inhibition rates at tested concentrations. Columns labeled with different lowercase letters show statistically significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Jof 11 00610 g008
Figure 9. Evaluation of 4-propylphenol phytotoxicity in field-grown walnut trees (Juglans regia). (A): Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD values) across experimental treatments (mean ± SD, n ≥ 30 leaves/treatment). (B): Representative foliage from water-treated control plants. (C): Foliar phenotype following 400 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol application. Scale bar = 5 cm (applicable to (B,C)).
Figure 9. Evaluation of 4-propylphenol phytotoxicity in field-grown walnut trees (Juglans regia). (A): Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD values) across experimental treatments (mean ± SD, n ≥ 30 leaves/treatment). (B): Representative foliage from water-treated control plants. (C): Foliar phenotype following 400 mg·L−1 4-propylphenol application. Scale bar = 5 cm (applicable to (B,C)).
Jof 11 00610 g009
Figure 10. Field efficacy of 4-propylphenol application strategies against walnut diseases. (A). Untreated control (CK; water spray at both stages). (B). T1 treatment (100 mg·L−1 flowering canopy spray). (C). T2 treatment (100 mg·L−1 flowering canopy + ground spray). (D). T3 treatment (T2 + 400 mg·L−1 fruiting canopy spray). (E). Comparative disease incidence and control efficacy across treatments. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Figure 10. Field efficacy of 4-propylphenol application strategies against walnut diseases. (A). Untreated control (CK; water spray at both stages). (B). T1 treatment (100 mg·L−1 flowering canopy spray). (C). T2 treatment (100 mg·L−1 flowering canopy + ground spray). (D). T3 treatment (T2 + 400 mg·L−1 fruiting canopy spray). (E). Comparative disease incidence and control efficacy across treatments. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences (p < 0.01, Duncan’s multiple range test).
Jof 11 00610 g010
Table 1. Field application strategies of 4-propylphenol.
Table 1. Field application strategies of 4-propylphenol.
TreatmentMay 5 (Flowering)June 10 (Fruiting)
T1100 mg·L−1 canopyWater spray
T2100 mg·L−1 canopy + groundWater spray
T3100 mg·L−1 canopy + ground400 mg·L−1 canopy
CKWater sprayWater spray
Table 2. Virulence regression parameters of 4-propylphenol against walnut pathogens.
Table 2. Virulence regression parameters of 4-propylphenol against walnut pathogens.
PathogenToxicity Regression EquationR2EC50
(mg·L−1)
95% Confidence Interval
(mg·L−1)
C. gloeosporioidesY = −5.69 + 3.81X0.82731.898.16–49.25
C. siamenseY = −4.80 + 3.22X0.94831.0617.75–41.67
A. alternataY = −4.41 + 3.02X0.88229.119.52–42.63
Y: Inhibition probability units; X: Log-transformed concentrations. EC50 values derived from Probit analysis.
Table 3. Virulence regression parameters of 4-propylphenol against walnut pathogen conidial germination.
Table 3. Virulence regression parameters of 4-propylphenol against walnut pathogen conidial germination.
PathogenToxicity Regression EquationR2EC50
(mg·L−1)
95% Confidence Interval
(mg·L−1)
C. gloeosporioidesY = −2.31 + 1.33X0.96655.03744.148–67.138
C. siamenseY = −2.82 + 1.52X0.98371.85460.220–85.194
A. alternataY = −2.72 + 1.49X0.95664.41441.959–93.571
Y: Inhibition probability units; X: Log-transformed concentrations. EC50 derived from Probit analysis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, X.; Yang, S.; Su, P.; Bi, H.; Li, Y.; Peng, X.; Sun, X.; Wang, Q. 4-Propylphenol Alters Membrane Integrity in Fungi Isolated from Walnut Anthracnose and Brown Spot. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090610

AMA Style

Yu X, Yang S, Su P, Bi H, Li Y, Peng X, Sun X, Wang Q. 4-Propylphenol Alters Membrane Integrity in Fungi Isolated from Walnut Anthracnose and Brown Spot. Journal of Fungi. 2025; 11(9):610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Xiaoli, Shuhan Yang, Panhong Su, Haiyao Bi, Yaxuan Li, Xingxing Peng, Xiaohui Sun, and Qunqing Wang. 2025. "4-Propylphenol Alters Membrane Integrity in Fungi Isolated from Walnut Anthracnose and Brown Spot" Journal of Fungi 11, no. 9: 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090610

APA Style

Yu, X., Yang, S., Su, P., Bi, H., Li, Y., Peng, X., Sun, X., & Wang, Q. (2025). 4-Propylphenol Alters Membrane Integrity in Fungi Isolated from Walnut Anthracnose and Brown Spot. Journal of Fungi, 11(9), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090610

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop