Longitudinal Pilot Study of Progressive Urethral Sub-Obstruction in a Canine Model: Bladder Functional and Structural Changes and Exploratory Evaluation of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
- To induce a progressive urethral sub-obstruction in two dogs and to describe the functional and structural modifications of the urinary bladder over time: at different time scales, we aimed to describe bladder functional changes through urodynamic and clinical assessments, as well as morphological changes through macroscopic (ultrasonography), microscopic (histology, transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemistry) and molecular (RT-qPCR, bulk RNA sequencing, oxidative stress markers) assessments.
- To describe, in one of those two dogs, the functional and structural changes observed following the administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Dogs
2.2. Study Design
2.3. Autologous Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
2.4. Urodynamic Telemetric Study
2.5. Urethral Pressure Profilometry
2.6. Ultrasonographic Study
2.7. Post-Voiding Residual Urine
2.8. Samples
2.8.1. Histological Assessment and Transmission Electronic Microscopy of Bladder Samples
2.8.2. RNA Extraction, Transcriptome and Gene Analysis
2.8.3. Assessment of CCL2, CCR2, GFAP, VEGF and HGF mRNA Expression in Bladder Samples by Reverse Transcriptase Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
2.8.4. CCL2, CCR2, GFAP and VEGF Immunohistochemistry on Bladder Samples
2.9. Oxidative Stress Status
2.10. Data Interpretation
3. Results
3.1. Dogs
3.2. Autologous Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
3.3. Urodynamic Telemetric Study
- Threshold detrusor pressure was minimal at the start of the study and maximal at the time of maximal sub-obstruction and then decreased after AUS removal;
- Urinary flow was maximal at the start of the study, decreased to minimal value at the time of maximal sub-obstruction, and then increased after AUS removal;
- Urethral resistance showed an opposite trend to urinary flow: it was minimal at the start of the study, then increased to maximal value at the time of maximal sub-obstruction, and finally decreased after AUS removal;
- Bladder compliance decreased during the sub-obstruction period, from baseline value at the start of the study, reached minimal value at the time of maximal sub-obstruction, and then increased after AUS removal;
- Micturition duration increased during the sub-obstruction, starting from minimal value at the beginning of the study, to reach maximal value either at the time of maximal sub-obstruction in dog 1, or during the sub-obstruction period in dog 2. After AUS removal, micturition duration decreased in both dogs.
- Maximal and mean abdominal pressures were
- ○
- maximal at the start of the study in dog 1, whereas they were maximal at the time of maximal urethral sub-obstruction in dog 2;
- ○
- minimal at the end of the study in dog 1 whereas the minimum was reached during the sub-obstructive period in dog 2.
- Maximal and mean detrusor pressures were maximal during the sub-obstruction period in dog 1 and at the time of maximal sub-obstruction in dog 2. In dog 2, they were minimal at the end of the study. In dog 1, Pdetmax was minimal at the start of the study, while Pdetmean was minimal after AUS removal.
3.4. Urethral Pressure Profilometry
3.5. Ultrasonographic Study
3.6. Post-Voiding Residual Urine Volume
3.7. Histological and Transmission Electronic Microscopy Observations of Bladder Samples
3.8. Reverse Transcriptase Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis and RNA Sequencing
- in dog 1: upregulation of ccl2 and ccr2 (1.6 and 1.7 fold, respectively, in RT-qPCR),
- in dog 2: upregulation of hgf, vegf-a, vegf-c and vegf-d (5.4 fold in RNA sequencing for hgf and 1.6, 1.9 and 1.9 fold in RT-qPCR for vegf-a, vegf-c and vegf-d, respectively).
- in dog 1: upregulation of ccr2 and downregulation of gfap and vegf-a (3.4 fold, 0.1 fold and ~0 fold, respectively, in RT-qPCR),
- in dog 2: upregulation of gfap and vegf-c (1.5 fold and 38.8 fold, respectively, in RT-qPCR).
3.9. Immunohistochemistry
3.10. Oxidative Stress Status
3.11. Summary of the Results
4. Discussion
4.1. Functional Study
4.2. Structural Study
4.3. Limitations
5. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BOO | Bladder outlet obstruction |
| AUS | Artificial urethral sphincter |
| RNA | Ribonucleic acid |
| mRNA | Messenger ribonucleic acid |
| ADMSCs | Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells |
| BPH | Benign prostate hyperplasia |
| VEGF | Vascular endothelial growth factor |
| ROS | Reactive oxygen species |
| GFAP | Glial acidic fibrillary protein |
| CCL2 | Chemokine C-C motif ligand 2 |
| TEM | Transmission electronic microscopy |
| RT-qPCR | Reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction |
| HE | Hematoxylin-eosin |
| CCR2 | C-C chemokine receptor type 2 |
| HGF | Hepatocyte growth factor |
| AEC | 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole |
| UPP | Urethral pressure profilometry |
| MUP | Maximal urethral pressure |
| MUCP | Maximum urethral closure pressure |
| IP | Integrated pressure |
| LbMUP | Length before maximal urethral pressure |
| Pdet | Detrusor pressure |
| Pabdo | Abdominal pressure |
| Pblad | Bladder pressure |
| V | Bladder volume |
| C | Bladder compliance |
References
- D’Ancona, C.; Haylen, B.; Oelke, M.; Abranches-Monteiro, L.; Arnold, E.; Goldman, H.; Hamid, R.; Homma, Y.; Marcelissen, T.; Rademakers, K.; et al. On behalf of the Standardisation Steering Committee ICS and the ICS Working Group on Terminology for Male Lower Urinary Tract & Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Dysfunction. The International Continence Society (ICS) Report on the Terminology for Adult Male Lower Urinary Tract and Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2019, 38, 433–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dmochowski, R.R. Bladder Outlet Obstruction: Etiology and Evaluation. Rev. Urol. 2005, 7, S3–S13. [Google Scholar]
- Roehrborn, C.G. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Overview. Rev. Urol. 2005, 7, S3–S14. [Google Scholar]
- Fusco, F.; Creta, M.; De Nunzio, C.; Iacovelli, V.; Mangiapia, F.; Li Marzi, V.; Finazzi Agrò, E. Progressive Bladder Remodeling Due to Bladder Outlet Obstruction: A Systematic Review of Morphological and Molecular Evidences in Humans. BMC Urol. 2018, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burgu, B.; Aydogdu, O. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Bladder from a Different Perspective: Not Only an Angiogenic Factor. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, A.T.; Yang, C.H.; Chen, K.; Chang, L.S. Detrusor Mitochondrial Lipid Peroxidation and Superoxide Dismutase Activity in Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction of Rabbits. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2005, 24, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cumming, J.A.; Chisholm, G.D. Changes in Detrusor Innervation with Relief of Outflow Tract Obstruction. Br. J. Urol. 1992, 69, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triolo, D.; Dina, G.; Lorenzetti, I.; Malaguti, M.; Morana, P.; Del Carro, U.; Comi, G.; Messing, A.; Quattrini, A.; Previtali, S.C. Loss of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) Impairs Schwann Cell Proliferation and Delays Nerve Regeneration after Damage. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 3981–3993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jessen, K.R.; Morgan, L.; Stewart, H.J.S.; Mirsky, R. Three Markers of Adult Non-Myelin-Forming Schwann Cells, 217c(Ran-1), A5E3 and GFAP: Development and Regulation by Neuron–Schwann Cell Interactions. Development 1990, 109, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speakman, M.J. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): More Than Treating Symptoms? Eur. Urol. Suppl. 2008, 7, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asseldonk, B.V.; Barkin, J.; Elterman, D.S. Medical Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Review. Can. J. Urol. 2015, 22, 7–17. [Google Scholar]
- Levanovich, P.E.; Diokno, A.; Hasenau, D.L.; Lajiness, M.; Pruchnic, R.; Chancellor, M.B. Intradetrusor Injection of Adult Muscle-Derived Cells for the Treatment of Underactive Bladder: Pilot Study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2015, 47, 465–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilleran, J.; Diokno, A.C.; Ward, E.; Sirls, L.; Hasenau, D.; Giordano, J.; Shea, E.; Bartolone, S.N.; Lamb, L.E.; Chancellor, M.B. Improved Global Response Outcome after Intradetrusor Injection of Adult Muscle-Derived Cells for the Treatment of Underactive Bladder. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2021, 53, 1331–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, H.R.S.; Neves, S.C.D.; Da Silva Menezes, J.N.; Antoniolli-Silva, A.C.M.B.; Oliveira, R.J. Autologous Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy Reverses Detrusor Underactivity: Open Clinical Trial. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023, 14, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.H.; Lee, S.-R.; Song, Y.S.; Lee, H.J. Stem Cell Therapy in Bladder Dysfunction: Where Are We? And Where Do We Have to Go? BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 930713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, J.H.; Ryu, C.-M.; Yu, H.Y.; Shin, D.-M.; Choo, M.-S. Current and Future Directions of Stem Cell Therapy for Bladder Dysfunction. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2020, 16, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, G.; Jin, X.; Gao, X.; Ai, J.; Luo, D.; Zhou, L.; Xiao, K.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, K. Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 Regulates Proliferation and Contractility of Human Bladder Smooth Muscle Cells Under Hydrostatic Pressure. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2020, 40, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woo, L.L.; Tanaka, S.T.; Anumanthan, G.; Pope, J.C.; Thomas, J.C.; Adams, M.C.; Brock, J.W.; Bhowmick, N.A. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Recruitment and Improved Bladder Function After Bladder Outlet Obstruction: Preliminary Data. J. Urol. 2011, 185, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phillips, H.; Colopy, S. Urinary Obstruction: Urethral Obstruction. In Small Animal Surgical Emergencies; Aronson, L.R., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 237–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shikh Alsook, M.K.; Gabriel, A.; Piret, J.; Waroux, O.; Tonus, C.; Connan, D.; Baise, E.; Antoine, N. Tissues from Equine Cadaver Ligaments up to 72 Hours of Post-Mortem: A Promising Reservoir of Stem Cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2015, 6, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.C.; Krause, D.S.; Deans, R.J.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.J.; Horwitz, E.M. Minimal Criteria for Defining Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy Position Statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takemitsu, H.; Zhao, D.; Yamamoto, I.; Harada, Y.; Michishita, M.; Arai, T. Comparison of Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue-Derived Canine Mesenchymal Stem Cells. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kisiel, A.H.; McDuffee, L.A.; Masaoud, E.; Bailey, T.R.; Esparza Gonzalez, B.P.; Nino-Fong, R. Isolation, Characterization, and in Vitro Proliferation of Canine Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Bone Marrow, Adipose Tissue, Muscle, and Periosteum. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012, 73, 1305–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, N.M.; Brandalise, V.; Zucconi, E.; Secco, M.; Strauss, B.E.; Zatz, M. Isolation, Characterization, and Differentiation Potential of Canine Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Cell Transplant. 2010, 19, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noël, S.M.; Farnir, F.; Hamaide, A.J. Urodynamic and Morphometric Characteristics of the Lower Urogenital Tracts of Female Beagle Littermates during the Sexually Immature Period and First and Second Estrous Cycles. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2012, 73, 1657–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamaide, A.J.; Verstegen, J.P.; Snaps, F.R.; Onclin, K.; Balligand, M.H. Validation and Comparison of the Use of Diuresis Cystometry and Retrograde Filling Cystometry at Various Infusion Rates in Female Beagle Dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2003, 64, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bankhead, P.; Loughrey, M.; Fernandez, J.; Dombrowski, Y.; McArt, D.; Dunne, P.; McQuaid, S.; Gray, R.; Murray, L.; Coleman, H.; et al. QuPath: Open Source Software for Digital Pathology Image Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieto, C.; Barrios, D. RaNA-Seq: Interactive RNA-Seq Analysis from FASTQ Files to Functional Analysis. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 1955–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patro, R.; Duggal, G.; Love, M.I.; Irizarry, R.A.; Kingsford, C. Salmon Provides Fast and Bias-Aware Quantification of Transcript Expression. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 417–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, C.; Lin, D.; Wang, H.; Qiao, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, T. Quantification of VEGF-C Expression in Canine Mammary Tumours. Aust. Vet. J. 2008, 86, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, C.; Lin, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, L. Expression and Significance of PTEN in Canine Mammary Gland Tumours. Res. Vet. Sci. 2008, 85, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riddell, D.O.; Hildyard, J.C.W.; Harron, R.C.M.; Hornby, N.L.; Wells, D.J.; Piercy, R.J. Serum Inflammatory Cytokines as Disease Biomarkers in the DE50-MD Dog Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Dis. Model. Mech. 2022, 15, dmm049394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.-H.; Koh, S.; Thomas, R.; Breen, M.; Olby, N.J. Evaluation of Gene Expression and DNA Copy Number Profiles of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Cells and Consecutive Neurosphere-like Cells Generated from Dogs with Naturally Occurring Spinal Cord Injury. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2017, 78, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.-G.; Lim, G.-H.; An, J.-H.; Park, S.-M.; Seo, K.-W.; Youn, H.-Y. In Vitro Evaluation of the Antitumor Activity of Axitinib in Canine Mammary Gland Tumor Cell Lines. J. Vet. Sci. 2024, 25, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spee, B.; Penning, L.C.; Van Den Ingh, T.S.; Arends, B.; IJzer, J.; Van Sluijs, F.J.; Rothuizen, J. Regenerative and Fibrotic Pathways in Canine Hepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Portal Vein Hypoplasia, New Models for Clinical Hepatocyte Growth Factor Treatment. Comp. Hepatol. 2005, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Porato, M.; Noël, S.; Pincemail, J.; Albert, A.; Cheramy-Bien, J.-P.; Le Goff, C.; Hamaide, A. Selected Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Healthy Beagle Dogs: A Preliminary Study. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1063216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pincemail, J.; Dubrowski, T.; Durand, T.; Chiap, P.; Charlier, C.; Donneau, A.-F.; Bertrand-Michel, J.; Dupuy, A.; Vigor, C.; Van Heugen, J.-C.; et al. Validated Routine-Ready UHPLC/MS-MS Method for the Reference Range Determination in Human Plasma of 15-F2t-Isoprostane, Biomarker of the Oxidative Stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 108, S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omaye, S.T.; Turnbull, J.D.; Sauberlich, H.E. Selected Methods for the Determination of Ascorbic Acid in Animal Cells, Tissues, and Fluids. Methods Enzymol. 1979, 62, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stürup, S.; Hayes, R.B.; Peters, U. Development and Application of a Simple Routine Method for the Determination of Selenium in Serum by Octopole Reaction System ICPMS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 381, 686–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buzelin, J.; Glémin, P. La Résistance Urétrale Applications Cliniques 2ème Partie. Cont. Statique Pelvienne 2001, 13, 4–9. [Google Scholar]
- Abrams, P.; Cardozo, L.; Fall, M.; Griffiths, D.; Rosier, P.; Ulmsten, U.; Van Kerrebroeck, P.; Victor, A.; Wein, A. The Standardisation of Terminology in Lower Urinary Tract Function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 2003, 61, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, H.Y.; Shin, J.H.; Yun, H.; Ryu, C.-M.; Lee, S.; Heo, J.; Lim, J.; Park, J.; Hong, K.-S.; Chung, H.-M.; et al. A Preclinical Study of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treating Detrusor Underactivity by Chronic Bladder Ischemia. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2021, 17, 2139–2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.-C.; Shaw, S.-W.S.; Ko, Y.-S.; Huang, Y.-H.; Lee, T.-H. Effect of Amniotic Fluid Stem Cell Transplantation on the Recovery of Bladder Dysfunction in Spinal Cord-Injured Rats. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonecchi, R. Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors: An Overview. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Porato, M.; Antoine, N.; Waroux, O.; Piret, J.; Noël, S.; Hamaide, A. Tracking of Autologous Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells after Intravenous Administration: A Pilot Study in a Dog with Induced Acute Bladder Injury. Front. Vet. Sci. 2025, 12, 1644746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reynard, J.M.; Peters, T.J.; Lamond, E.; Abrams, P. The Significance of Abdominal Straining in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Br. J. Urol. 1995, 75, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, A.J.; Grimes, M.; Lyon, W.; Kemper, A.; Wang, S.; Bushman, W. Cluster Analysis of Men Undergoing Surgery for BPH/LUTS Reveals Prominent Roles of Both Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Diminished Bladder Contractility. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0251721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.-F.; Lee, C.-L.; Kuo, H.-C. Change of Detrusor Contractility in Patients with and without Bladder Outlet Obstruction at Ten or More Years of Follow-Up. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, C.S.; Abrams, P. The Abrams-Griffiths Nomogram. World J. Urol. 1995, 13, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, D.; Höfner, K.; Van Mastrigt, R.; Rollema, H.J.; Spångberg, A.; Gleason, D. Standardization of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function: Pressure-Flow Studies of Voiding, Urethral Resistance, and Urethral Obstruction. Neurourol. Urodyn. 1997, 16, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.-C.; Jiang, Y.-H.; Kuo, H.-C. Prediction of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Male Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Based on Symptom Scores and Noninvasive Office-Based Diagnostic Tools. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, X.; Li, B. Recent Advances in the Diagnosis of Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men. Bladder 2024, 11, e21200017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kessler, T.M.; Gerber, R.; Burkhard, F.C.; Studer, U.E.; Danuser, H. Ultrasound Assessment of Detrusor Thickness in Men—Can It Predict Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Replace Pressure Flow Study? J. Urol. 2006, 175, 2170–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anan, G.; Iwamura, H.; Mikami, J.; Ito, J.; Kaiho, Y.; Sato, M. Appropriate Bladder Volume to Measure Bladder Wall Thickness Correlating with Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Int. J. Urol. 2023, 30, 495–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oelke, M. International Consultation on Incontinence-research Society (ICI-RS) Report on Non-invasive Urodynamics: The Need of Standardization of Ultrasound Bladder and Detrusor Wall Thickness Measurements to Quantify Bladder Wall Hypertrophy. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2010, 29, 634–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Ai, J.; Liao, B.; Xiao, K.; Lin, L.; Chen, H.; Zhou, L. The Roles of MCP-1/CCR2 Mediated Macrophage Recruitment and Polarization in Bladder Outlet Obstruction (BOO) Induced Bladder Remodeling. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 99, 107947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, M.; Wang, R.; Zhu, P.; Wang, Q.; Sun, B.; Lu, K.; Zhang, J.; Xie, W.; Guo, H.; Li, S.; et al. Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells Improve Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Rats: Preliminary Data and microRNA-mRNA Expression Profile. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2022, 18, 2403–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianchini, D.; De Martini, I.; Cadoni, A.; Zicca, A.; Tabaton, M.; Schenone, A.; Anfosso, S.; Wattar, A.S.A.; Zaccheo, D.; Mancardi, G.L. GFAP Expression of Human Schwann Cells in Tissue Culture. Brain Res. 1992, 570, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Lu, Y.; Sun, F.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Zou, Q. The Nerve-Induced Adipose Stem Cells Promote Nerve Repair in Stress Urinary Incontinence by Regulating Schwann Cell Repair Phenotype Conversion Through Activation of the Notch Pathway. Mol. Neurobiol. 2025, 62, 7330–7344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoshida, M.; Yamaguchi, O. Detrusor Underactivity: The Current Concept of the Pathophysiology. LUTS Low. Urin. Tract. Symptoms 2014, 6, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.J.; Kim, J.; Na, Y.G.; Kim, K.H. Irreversible Bladder Remodeling Induced by Fibrosis. Int. Neurourol. J. 2021, 25, S3–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, S.-H.; Wei, Y.-H.; Chang, L.S.; Lin, A.T.L.; Chen, K.-K.; Yang, A.-H. Morphological and Morphometric Analysis of Human Detrusor Mitochondria with Urodynamic Correlation after Partial Bladder Outlet Obstruction. J. Urol. 2000, 163, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, C.; Shaw, S.S.; Lin, Y.; Lee, T. Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells Ameliorate Bladder Dysfunction Induced by Chronic Bladder Ischemia in Rat. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2017, 9999, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horn, T.; Kortmann, B.B.M.; Holm, N.R.; Smedts, F.; Nordling, J.; Kiemeney, L.A.L.M.; De La Rosette, J.J.M.C.H. Routine Bladder Biopsies in Men with Bladder Outlet Obstruction? Urology 2004, 63, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metcalfe, P.D.; Wang, J.; Jiao, H.; Huang, Y.; Hori, K.; Moore, R.B.; Tredget, E.E. Bladder Outlet Obstruction: Progression from Inflammation to Fibrosis. BJU Int. 2010, 106, 1686–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosch, R.; Abrams, P.; Averbeck, M.A.; Finazzi Agró, E.; Gammie, A.; Marcelissen, T.; Solomon, E. Do Functional Changes Occur in the Bladder Due to Bladder Outlet Obstruction?-ICI-RS 2018. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2019, 38, S56–S65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mills, I.W.; Noble, J.G.; Brading, A.F. Radiotelemetered Cystometry in Pigs: Validation and Comparison of Natural Filling versus Diuresis Cystometry. J. Urol. 2000, 164, 1745–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noël, S.; Massart, L.; Hamaide, A. Urodynamic Investigation by Telemetry in Beagle Dogs: Validation and Effects of Oral Administration of Current Urological Drugs: A Pilot Study. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McCafferty, G.P.; Coatney, R.W.; Laping, N.J.; Thorneloe, K.S. Urodynamic Measurements by Radiotelemetry in Conscious, Freely Moving Beagle Dogs. J. Urol. 2009, 181, 1444–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]















| DOG 1 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procedure/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | ||||||
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | |||||||
| Urodynamic telemetric recording | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | ||||||
| Percentage of AUS cuff repletion | (no AUS) | 0–60% | 60–70% | 75% | 75% | (no AUS) | (no AUS) | ||||||
| Urethral sub-obstruction | before obstruction | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | maximal | 0–3 months after AUS removal | 3–7 months after AUS removal | ||||||
| Urethral pressure profilometry | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | ||||||
| Bladder ultrasonography | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | ||||||
| Urine residual volume collection | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the end of the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | ||||||
| Bladder wall full thickness biopsy | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | ||||||
| Oxidative stress status (blood) | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | at the endof the period | ||||||
| Urinalysis | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | ||||||
| Creatinine and blood urea nitrogen analysis | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | ||||||
| Kidney ultrasonography | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | ||||||
| DOG 2 | |||||||||||||
| Procedure/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | T10 | |||
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | 05/2022–09/2022 | 09/2022–10/2022 | 10/2022–03/2023 | ||||
| Urodynamic telemetric recording | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | ![]() | every week (days 1, 3, 5) | |||
| Percentage of AUS cuff repletion | (no AUS) | 0–60% | 60–70% | 75% | 85–115% | 115% | 115% | 115% | (no AUS) | (no AUS) | |||
| Urethral sub-obstruction | before obstruction | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | chronic progressive | maximal | 2 weeks after AUS removal/ADMSCs injection | 0.5–5 months after AUS removal | |||
| Urethral pressure profilometry | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | ![]() | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | at the end of the period | |||
| Bladder ultrasonography | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | at the end of the period | |||
| Urine residual volume collection | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | at the end of the period | |||
| Bladder wall full thickness biopsy | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | ![]() | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | |||
| Oxidative stress status (blood) | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | at the end of the period | at the end of the period | ![]() | at the end of the period | |||
| Urinalysis | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | |||
| Creatinine and blood urea nitrogen analysis | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | every 2 other week | |||
| Kidney ultrasonography | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | weekly | |||
| Gene | Primers | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| gfap | F | AGATCCACGATGAGGAGGTG | Lim et al., 2017 [33] |
| R | TCTTAGGGCTGCTGTGAGGT | ||
| hgf | F | AAAGGAGATGAGAAACGCAAACAG | Spee et al., 2005 [35] |
| R | GGCCTAGCAAGCTTCAGTAATACC | ||
| ccl2 | F | AAAGAGTCACCAGCAGCAAG | Riddell et al., 2022 [32] |
| R | ATGGCTTTGCAGTTTGGGTT | ||
| ccr2 | F | TGTAAGTCATTCACGGGGCT | Riddell et al., 2022 [32] |
| R | CTGAGGACTGCAGGAGGAAA | ||
| vegf-a | F | GCTGCTGTAATGATGAGGGC | Lee et al., 2024 [34] |
| R | CCCTTCCCCTTTCCTCGAAT | ||
| vegf-b | F | TCTGACTGTGGAGCTCATGG | Lee et al., 2024 [34] |
| R | TTCTTCCAGGGACATCTCGC | ||
| vegf-c | F | GCCCAACATCAGTGCAAGAA | Lee et al., 2024 [34] |
| R | TTGTTGCTGCTCCAAACTCC | ||
| vegf-d | F | GAACAGCAGATTAGGGCAGC | Lee et al., 2024 [34] |
| R | TGCCACTCCTCGTCTATGAC | ||
| β-actin | F | GAGACCTGACCGACTACCT | Qiu et al., 2008 [30,31] |
| R | GCTGCCTCCAGACAACAC | ||
| Protein | Primary Antibody | Secondary Antibody |
|---|---|---|
| CCR2 | polyclonal rabbit anti CCR2 1/100 (Santa Cruz *) | HRP-Goat anti Rabbit IgG impress Vector ready to use |
| CCL2 | polyclonal Mouse anti canine CCL2/JE/MCP 1 1/100 (R&D **) | HRP-Goat anti mouse IgG impress Vector ready to use |
| VEGF | monoclonal Mouse anti VEGF 1/50 (Santa Cruz) | HRP-Goat anti mouse IgG impress Vector ready to use |
| GFAP | polyclonal Rabbit anti GFAP 1/500 (Dako) | HRP-Goat anti Rabbit IgG impress Vector ready to use |
| DOG 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 |
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | |
| Pabdomax (mmHg) | 12.73 | 8.59 | 8.36 | 8.68 | 8.49 | 6.97 | 3.41 |
| Pabdomean (mmHg) | 8.26 | 6.30 | 6.11 | 5.69 | 5.12 | 4.56 | −0.09 |
| Compliance (mL/cmH2O) | 3.10 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 0.90 | 0.60 | 6.70 | 2.20 |
| DOG 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | T10 |
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | 05/2022–09/2022 | 09/2022–10/2022 | 10/2022–03/2023 | |
| Pabdomax (mmHg) | 1.76 | 0.41 | −2.17 | 3.34 | −10.13 | −15.69 | −15.74 | 5.74 | / | −7.16 |
| Pabdomean (mmHg) | −2.81 | −3.77 | −6.69 | −5.08 | −14.04 | −19.3 | −18.8 | 3.31 | / | −12.79 |
| Compliance (mL/cmH2O) | 3.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 4.00 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 0.6 | / | 2.8 |
| DOG 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 |
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | |
| MUP (cmH2O) | 207 | 226 | 166 | 181 | 313 | 339 | 206 |
| MUCP (cmH2O) | 207 | 217 | 152 | 172 | 299 | 336 | 205 |
| IP (cm*cmH2O) | 735 | 1276 | 1218 | 1026 | 1654 | 1399 | 1282 |
| LbMUP (mm) | 138 | 201 | 45 | 36 | 208 | 113 | 83 |
| DOG 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | T10 |
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | 05/2022–09/2022 | 09/2022–10/2022 | 10/2022–03/2023 | |
| MUP (cmH2O) | 107 | 130 | 120 | 137 | / | / | 79 | 158 | / | 64 |
| MUCP (cmH2O) | 99 | 125 | 106 | 129 | / | / | 74 | 144 | / | 62 |
| IP (cm*cmH2O) | 684 | 927 | 931 | 1094 | / | / | 608 | 1267 | / | 690 |
| LbMUP (mm) | 248 | 216 | 18,3 | 82 | / | / | 89 | 67 | / | 192 |
| DOG 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 |
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | |
| Mean renal pelvis measure (Right: Left, mm) | 1.0:0.8 | 1.1:1.0 | 1.1:1.0 | 1.2:1.0 | 1.1:1.0 | 1.1:1.3 | 1.3:1.4 |
| Mean bladder wall thickness (mm) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| DOG 2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable/Study Phase | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | T10 |
| 01/2020–02/2020 | 02/2020–04/2020 | 05/2020–11/2020 | 01/2021–03/2021 | 05/2021–09/2021 | 10/2021–01/2022 | 01/2022–04/2022 | 05/2022–09/2022 | 09/2022–10/2022 | 10/2022–03/2023 | |
| Mean renal pelvis measure (Right: Left, mm) | 0.9:0.9 | 1.1:0.9 | 1.1:0.9 | 1.2:1.0 | 1.1:0.9 | 1.0:0.9 | 1.0:0.8 | 1.0:0.8 | 0.9:1.0 | 1.0:0.8 |
| Mean bladder wall thickness (mm) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | / | 1.6 |
| Study Period | Urodynamics | Histology | Molecular Study | Oxidative Stress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dog 1 | Dog 2 | Dog 1 | Dog 2 | Dog 1 | Dog 2 | Dog 1 | Dog 2 | |
| Maximal sub- obstruction | Maximal Pdetth Maximal urethral resistance Minimum urinary flow Maximal IP Minimal bladder compliance | Disorganization of muscular layer | ↓ gfap expression ↑ vegf-b expression | Elevated reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione ratio | / | |||
| Hyperemia | ↑ ccl2 and ccr2 expression ↑ CCL2 protein expression (urothelium + detrusor) | ↑ hgf, vegf-a, vegf-c and vegf-d expression ↓ CCL2 protein expression (urothelium + detrusor) | ||||||
| End of the study | ↓ urethral resistance ↑ urinary flow (not to baseline values) ↑ bladder compliance (not to baseline values) | ↑ connective tissue in sub-serosal layer | ↑ connective tissue in sub-serosal layer and in sub-urothelial layer | ↑ hgf expression ↑ ccl2 expression ↓ vegf-d expression | Elevated oxidized glutathione | Elevated reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione ratio | ||
| Pdetth back to baseline IP still elevated | Pdetth not back to baseline IP back to baseline | ↑ ccr2 expression ↓ gfap and vegf-a expression ↑ CCL2 protein expression (detrusor) | ↑ gfap expression ↓ vegf-c expression ↓ CCL2 protein expression (urothelium + detrusor) | |||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Porato, M.; Noël, S.; Antoine, N.; Bolen, G.; Pincemail, J.; Garigliany, M.-M.; de Leval, J.; Piret, J.; Decortis, F.; Hamaide, A. Longitudinal Pilot Study of Progressive Urethral Sub-Obstruction in a Canine Model: Bladder Functional and Structural Changes and Exploratory Evaluation of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Vet. Sci. 2026, 13, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13050460
Porato M, Noël S, Antoine N, Bolen G, Pincemail J, Garigliany M-M, de Leval J, Piret J, Decortis F, Hamaide A. Longitudinal Pilot Study of Progressive Urethral Sub-Obstruction in a Canine Model: Bladder Functional and Structural Changes and Exploratory Evaluation of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Veterinary Sciences. 2026; 13(5):460. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13050460
Chicago/Turabian StylePorato, Mathilde, Stéphanie Noël, Nadine Antoine, Géraldine Bolen, Joël Pincemail, Mutien-Marie Garigliany, Jean de Leval, Joëlle Piret, Frédéric Decortis, and Annick Hamaide. 2026. "Longitudinal Pilot Study of Progressive Urethral Sub-Obstruction in a Canine Model: Bladder Functional and Structural Changes and Exploratory Evaluation of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells" Veterinary Sciences 13, no. 5: 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13050460
APA StylePorato, M., Noël, S., Antoine, N., Bolen, G., Pincemail, J., Garigliany, M.-M., de Leval, J., Piret, J., Decortis, F., & Hamaide, A. (2026). Longitudinal Pilot Study of Progressive Urethral Sub-Obstruction in a Canine Model: Bladder Functional and Structural Changes and Exploratory Evaluation of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Veterinary Sciences, 13(5), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci13050460



