Next Article in Journal
A Highly Conserved Region in BRCA2 Suppresses the RAD51-Interaction Activity of BRC Repeats
Next Article in Special Issue
Obesity during Pregnancy in the Horse: Effect on Term Placental Structure and Gene Expression, as Well as Colostrum and Milk Fatty Acid Concentration
Previous Article in Journal
Chrysoeriol Improves In Vitro Porcine Embryo Development by Reducing Oxidative Stress and Autophagy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Importance of Water Transport in Mammalian Female Reproductive Tract
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Veterinary Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/vetsci10020144
vetsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Developmental Ultrasound Characteristics in Guinea Pigs: Similarities with Human Pregnancy

by
Alejandro A. Candia
1,2,
Tamara Jiménez
1,
Álvaro Navarrete
3,
Felipe Beñaldo
1,
Pablo Silva
1,
Claudio García-Herrera
3,
Amanda N. Sferruzzi-Perri
4,
Bernardo J. Krause
2,
Alejandro González-Candia
1,2,* and
Emilio A. Herrera
1,5,*
1
Laboratorio de Función y Reactividad Vascular, Programa de Fisiopatología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas (ICBM), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7500922, Chile
2
Institute of Health Sciences, University of O’Higgins, Rancagua 2841959, Chile
3
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago 9170022, Chile
4
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EG, UK
5
International Center for Andean Studies (INCAS), University of Chile, Putre 1070000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(2), 144; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10020144
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 27 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Placentation in Mammals: Development, Function and Pathology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Despite the relevance of biometrical and blood flow assessments for studying fetoplacental physiology during pregnancy, there is no detailed description of any animal model, which is needed to extrapolate results to human pregnancy. Here, we examined biometry and intrauterine blood flow in pregnant guinea pigs from the second trimester until term. We show that fetal and placental biometry, as well as changes in the main vascular beds across pregnancy, compared qualitatively to data from humans. These findings emphasize that the guinea pig is a reliable model to study fetal development and placental function with translational significance for human pregnancy.

Abstract

Background: Biometrical and blood flow examinations are fundamental for assessing fetoplacental development during pregnancy. Guinea pigs have been proposed as a good model to study fetal development and related gestational complications; however, longitudinal growth and blood flow changes in utero have not been properly described. This study aimed to describe fetal and placental growth and blood flow of the main intrauterine vascular beds across normal guinea pig pregnancy and to discuss the relevance of this data for human pregnancy. Methods: Pregnant guinea pigs were studied from day 25 of pregnancy until term (day ~70) by ultrasound and Doppler assessment. The results were compared to human data from the literature. Results: Measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), cranial circumference (CC), abdominal circumference, and placental biometry, as well as pulsatility index determination of umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery (MCA), and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), were feasible to determine across pregnancy, and they could be adjusted to linear or nonlinear functions. In addition, several of these parameters showed a high correlation coefficient and could be used to assess gestational age in guinea pigs. We further compared these data to ultrasound variables from human pregnancy with high similarities. Conclusions: BPD and CC are the most reliable measurements to assess fetal growth in guinea pigs. Furthermore, this is the first report in which the MCA pulsatility index and CPR are described across guinea pig gestation. The guinea pig is a valuable model to assess fetal growth and blood flow distribution, variables that are comparable with human pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Biometrical and blood flow assessments are currently the best tools for examining in utero development, cardiovascular health, and the diagnosis and management of several high-risk pregnancy conditions, such as preeclampsia, congenital diseases, and placental insufficiency [1,2,3]. In terms of blood flow measurements, the most explored vascular beds are the uterine (UtA), umbilical (UA), and middle cerebral artery (MCA). Of note, abnormalities in UtA blood flow by Doppler ultrasound are associated with hypertensive disorders, and they are a good predictor of neonatal adverse outcomes [4], whereas changes in UA and MCA are useful in the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction (FGR) [3]. In addition, the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), defined as the relationship between the pulsatility indices (PIs) of the MCA and UA, has been proposed as a helpful tool to forecast adverse fetal outcomes, such as perinatal death in pregnancies with suspected FGR [5]. Furthermore, abnormal CPR during the second trimester is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery and neonatal intensive care unit admission [6]. There is also a potential benefit of identifying blood flow changes in utero in stratifying babies for postnatal monitoring and potential risks. For instance, findings suggest that abnormal CPR may predict delayed neurodevelopment in early childhood born with FGR [7]. Despite these data, more studies are necessary to determine its clinical utility and to identify experimental models to investigate the pathophysiological changes impacting prenatal and postnatal outcomes.
Several experimental animal species have been employed to study fetal development and placental function, with specific attention paid to examining placental histological, gene, and protein expression changes that are relevant to maternal and fetal health [8,9,10,11]. However, there is no well-established animal model which allows the association of in-vivo vascular flow changes with such histological and molecular changes during pregnancy, which is needed to provide an avenue for translating findings to humans.
Guinea pigs have been proposed as an excellent model to study placental function, fetal development, and intrauterine programming [8]. This is based on the guinea pig having a hemomonochorial placenta, similar to humans [12], as well as a deeper trophoblast invasion of the decidua compared to rodents [13]. They are also amendable to instrumentation, such as for the insertion of catheters and vascular occluders, as well as to improve the investigation of blood flow changes during pregnancy [14,15]. Most studies employing guinea pigs have focused on measuring placental structure, nutrient exchange, and offspring outcomes [8]. Few studies have used ultrasound to describe biparietal diameter (BPD) and the resistance index of the umbilical artery during guinea pig pregnancy (G22 to G69) [16]. Further studies have analyzed other biometric parameters, such as abdominal and placental diameter with ultrasound imaging in guinea pigs [17,18]. Lastly, studies using sonography have reported that UA and UtA PI are altered in guinea pig pregnancies with placental insufficiency [15], with changes similar to what is seen in humans. Despite these reports, no study has assessed fetal and placental biometry in association with changes in blood flow characteristics, particularly regarding MCA and CPR using Doppler ultrasound across pregnancy, in guinea pigs.
Therefore, the aims of this study were to describe the normal fetal and placental growth, as well as the Doppler assessment of several arteries across pregnancy in guinea pigs, and to discuss the similarities of these data with those obtained for human pregnancy.

2. Materials and Methods

All animal care, maintenance, and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (CICUA) of the Universidad de Chile (20354-MED-UCH) and performed under the agreement to Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Ultrasonographic examinations were performed in conscious, non-sedated animals, gently restrained by an expert operator.

2.1. Animals

Nineteen adult female Pirbright White guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) were used in this study. Animals were housed under standard conditions (35–40% humidity, 20–21 °C, and 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle) and fed standard chow that was controlled according to body weight (LabDiet 5025, Guinea Pigs, 25–30 g/day). At 3–4 months of age, virgin sows in estrus, determined by the observation of vaginal membrane opening, were paired with a male for 2 days. After this mating period, the females returned to individual housing cages with daily monitoring of body weight, food intake, and water consumption. At gestational day (G) 20–25, pregnancy was confirmed by ultrasonography, considering the first day paired with the male as G0 [15]. After confirming pregnancy, the guinea pigs were submitted twice a week to ultrasound and Doppler examination until G35 (n = 4 dams/10 fetuses), G60 (n = 4 dams/11 fetuses), or birth (G70 ± 3, n = 11 dams/23 fetuses) after being randomly assigned to each group. Animals euthanized at G35 and G60 were submitted to a maternal anesthetic overdose (sodium thiopentone 200 mg·kg−1 i.p., Opet, Laboratorio, Chile). After the cardiorespiratory arrest was confirmed, fetuses and placentas were dissected, and we measured biparietal diameter (BPD), fetal weight and volume, and placental weight, thickness, length width, and volume. Lastly, placental efficiency was calculated as fetal weight/placental weight.

2.2. Ultrasound Assessment

Biometrical and vascular assessments were performed using a portable ultrasonograph (Z6 VET, Mindray) with an L14-6P linear ultrasound transducer. BPD, cranial circumference (CC), abdominal circumference (AC), and placental thickness, transversal axis length, transversal area, and discoid perimeter and area were measured twice per week from G25 to the end of gestation. Placental volume was estimated as follows:
Placental volume (mm3) = (discoid placental area) × (placental thickness).
Blood flow velocity in the umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and both uterine arteries (UtA) were assessed by Doppler ultrasound, and the pulsatility index (PI) was estimated by the ultrasonography software. UtA was determined as the average of the left and right arteries during each examination. The cerebroplacental ratio was calculated as MCA PI to UA PI. The definition of each measurement is shown in Table 1. Ultrasound accuracy was established by calculating the percentage error between the ultrasound and euthanized measurements as follows:
[(Postmortem direct measurement − in vivo ultrasonic measurement)/postmortem direct measurement] × 100.

2.3. Ultrasound Data Processing

For the Doppler ultrasound analyses (PI UA, PI MCA, and CPR), the best fit of the curve was determined and plotted against percentage of pregnancy (PP) (2.5% of PP between points). Then, we calculated the initial slope as the first data points before reaching a 5% of variation in the best-fit slope between one data point and the next. This slope was designated as velocity 1 (V1). In a similar way, a final slope was calculated including the data points after the percentage variation in the best-fit slope returned lower than 5%. This was designated as velocity 3 (V3). In addition, when possible, an inflection point was determined, which was defined as the point where the slope was equal to 0. Lastly, for Doppler data, the percentage variation between the initial and final slopes was calculated.
Human data related to biometry from a multinational prospective observational study [19] and Doppler ultrasound data summarized in a recent systematic analysis [20] were reviewed. The PP was calculated considering 40 weeks and 70 days as 100% pregnancy in humans and guinea pigs, respectively. For the biometry data (BPD, CC, and CA), we estimated the percentage of growth (PG) of each variable, considering 100% as the value at 40 weeks and 70 days of gestation in humans and guinea pigs, respectively. We plotted the biometrical and Doppler data against PP for each variable.
Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated from BPD, AC, and the measured weight at four timepoints: G30 and G60 (euthanized), and G69 and G72 (post delivery). Using data obtained at those timepoints, we determined a multiple linear regression between the decimal logarithm of the fetal/neonatal weight and the explanatory variables, including the interaction between them, obtaining a Hadlock-type equation to determine the EFW [21,22].

2.4. Histology

The collected placentas at G35 and G60 were immersed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 h and then stored in PBS until analysis. Briefly, the samples (half of placenta) were paraffin-embedded with the longest axis oriented to the front, and 5 µm tissue slices were obtained and stained with hematoxylin/eosin using a standard protocol [23]. Digital images of each stained section were acquired on a Nanozoom Slide Scanner (Hamamatsu, Japan) and viewed with NPD2.view 2 software.

2.5. Statistics

Guinea pig biometrical and Doppler data were plotted against the gestational day. Curves were adjusted according to their best fit, which was determined by the sum-of-squares F-test. Biometrical variables at the end of gestation were expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons between ultrasound and euthanized measurements were made by a paired t-test (significant if p < 0.05) using Graph Pad Prism 9.0 (San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Fetal Biometry

The BPD, CC, and AC of fetuses were measured using ultrasound in guinea pigs from G25 until term. This analysis revealed that BPD, CC (perimeter), and AC (perimeter) increased along with gestational age and conformed to a second-order polynomial (quadratic) curve, all with high determination coefficients (Figure 1A,B,D). Fetal CC (area) and AC (area) also increased with gestational age; however, these parameters fitted to a first-order polynomial (straight line) curve (Figure 1C,E).

3.2. Placental Biometry

Placental thickness, placental length, and transversal area of the placenta were visualized from G25 until term. These parameters were found to increase with gestational age and fitted to a quadratic function (Figure 2A–C). The perimeter and area of discoid placental view were also fitted to a quadratic line with a low determination coefficient. Placental discoid area was difficult to quantify in ultrasound assessments performed after G50, as the placental diameter was larger than the maximum dimension of the screen (Figure 2D,E). Lastly, placental volume was calculated, and the best fit was obtained when placental weight was fitted to a straight line (Figure 2F).

3.3. Doppler Ultrasound

In guinea pigs from G25 until term, UA PI was examined and described as a quadratic negative nonlinear regression (Figure 3A), whereas MCA PI was detected from G35 until G65 and fitted to linear regression (Figure 3B). Both PI measures decreased across pregnancy. We found that CPR fitted to a quadratic nonlinear regression but with a high variability (r2 = 0.2030) (Figure 3C). Lastly, UtA PI showed a straight-line fit with a high variability across gestation (r2 = 0.1004) (Figure 3D).

3.4. Fetal and Placental Biometry

Biometrical data measured at euthanasia are shown in Table 2. By comparison (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test) to values obtained with ultrasound measurements at G35, no significant differences were identified, with an estimated ultrasound accuracy of 1.17%. Using histological analyses, three macrostructures of the placenta could be identified at G35: the decidua, subplacenta, and labyrinth + interlobium (Figure 4A). However, at G60 the subplacenta was absent (Figure 4B). Ultrasound screening was unable to differentiate placental structures at any gestational age studied.

3.5. Fetal Biometry at Birth

We assessed weight and BPD at birth in both females and males. Although no significant differences in weight and BPD between sexes were identified (Figure 5A,B), the ratio of BPD to body weight was greater in males compared to females (Figure 5C).

3.6. Estimated Fetal Weight

After performing a multiple linear regression considering the variables BPD, AC, and their interaction, as well as the fetal/neonatal weight, at the four different timepoints, we obtained the Hadlock-type equation for estimated fetal weight (Figure 6).

3.7. Comparison of Guinea Pig and Human Fetal Biometry

The growth rates of BPD, CC, and CA as a percentage of pregnancy for our guinea pig data and humans (published data from WHO 2017 reports [19]) are plotted in Figure 7A–C. Qualitatively, the three parameters displayed similar growth patterns as pregnancy progressed when comparing guinea pigs to humans (Figure 7A–C).

3.8. Guinea Pig and Human Doppler Ultrasound

Comparison of PI of UA, PI of MCA, and CPR as a percentage of pregnancy for our guinea pig data and human published studies (Medina-Castro et al. [24,25], Parra-Cordero et al. [26], Arduini et al. [27], Seffah et al. [28], Bahlmann et al. [29], Morales-Roselló et al. [30], Ebbing et al. [31], and Baschat et al. [32], previously summarized in Oros et al. 2019 [20]) are shown in Figure 7D–F. This analysis revealed that, in both guinea pig and human datasets, UA PI decreased across pregnancy, with a tendency to stabilize in the last third of pregnancy (Figure 7D). Meanwhile, MCA PI in humans exhibited a hyperbola-like nonlinear regression, reaching its maximum point (inflection point) at around 70% pregnancy. However, in guinea pigs, MCA PI showed a nonlinear regression, decreasing across pregnancy with a change in velocity at 77% pregnancy progression and a 76% variation throughout pregnancy (Figure 7E). In the case of CPR, this conformed to a similar hyperbola-like nonlinear regression in both human and guinea pig datasets, reaching a maximum point at 80% and 65% of pregnancy in humans and guinea pigs, respectively (Figure 7F).

4. Discussion

In this work, we described fetal and placental growth, as well as intrauterine hemodynamic changes that occur during physiological, healthy guinea pig pregnancies, and then compared these data to those available for humans. This is important for understanding the usefulness and translatability of fetoplacental physiological studies in guinea pigs. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of MCA PI and CPR across pregnancy in guinea pigs.
BPD and AC are the main parameters assessed to determine fetal growth in humans and other species [3,33,34]. In the current study, we showed that BPD, CC, and AC are reliable variables when assessing fetal growth in guinea pigs. Here, we decided to take a data-driven approach to model our results. This was based on the fact that our data fitted best to a straight or quadratic model rather than to classic growth equations such as the exponential growth equation (Y = Y0 × exp(k × X)) or the logistic growth model (Y = YM × Y0/((YM − Y0) × exp(−k × x) + Y0), when comparing by sum-of-square F-tests.
Previously, Turner and Trudinger (2000) [35], and Santos et al. (2014) [17] described the normal growth of BPD in guinea pigs from G22 until the end of pregnancy. Turner and Trudinger presented these data as a mean of 3–5 day intervals, whereas Santos et al. showed a mean for every 5 days of gestation. Interestingly, they reported mean values of around 1.9 cm and 3.4 cm, respectively, at G65. In our work, the mean value at G65 was 1.86 cm, which is very similar to that reported by Turner and Trudinger. Differences in values between studies likely relate to factors such as the breed/strain or maternal age of guinea pigs used. For instance, Turner and Trudinger reported a breed which was different to ours (English Short Hair vs. Pirbright White, respectively), as well as a higher range of maternal age (4–12 months vs. 3–5 month) [35]. Differences could also be related to the operator’s technique and variability in the litter size of the guinea pigs in each study [36]. In a similar way, we found similar values in fetal weight at G35 and G60 when we compared our postmortem results to Draper et al. [37] and Ibsen et al. [38]. For instance, at G35, the differences in fetal weight between our results and Draper et al. were −1.54 g, with an average of 3.06 g and 4.6 g, respectively. Again, these small differences could be related to the guinea pig strain used, which was not reported in those studies, as well as to the litter size employed, which varied from one to eight fetuses. Our study used dams with litter sizes of two and three fetuses. Although this might be considered a limitation, we provided consistent fitting of variables such as the BPD and pulsatility index of umbilical artery in virgin dams of 606.9 ± 94.5 g. Moreover, by studying dams with only two or three fetuses, we limited the effect of varied litter size as a confounder in our analyses.
In the current investigation, biometry at birth (BPD and CC) was similar between females and males; however, symmetry of neonates appeared to differ between the sexes, with males showing a greater ratio of BPD to body weight. This aspect could be relevant to explore when studying fetal development. Unfortunately, we were unable to diagnose fetal sex by ultrasound during pregnancy; therefore, we were unable to compare intrauterine changes between males and females.
Studies have previously proposed that placental shape and size are relevant for identifying FGR as well as the programming of offspring cardiovascular risk [39,40]. With this in mind, we attempted to describe placental growth across pregnancy by taking measures of placenta size using two different axes. The transversal view allowed us to capture a longitudinal and transverse axis, where we visualized the decidua and the exchange placental region. This observation and histological studies of placentas at G35 and G60 are consistent with Santos et al. [17], likely reflecting changes in lobule formation and vascular organization of the guinea pig placenta toward term. Moreover, histological inspection of the placenta confirmed the involution of the subplacenta across pregnancy as it was no longer apparent at G60 [41]. Further work is required to develop strategies to differentiate this structure, along with other placental compartments, by ultrasound, as well as to develop quantitative analysis of the postmortem placental structure. Further work is also needed to examine placental growth from a discoid view as, after G50, it was difficult to visualize it in only one screenshot. Indeed, imaging the placenta in a discoid view could further inform on the placental shape and vascular flow in guinea pigs [40]. Other imaging techniques may be useful to assessing placental size and morphological characteristics, such as microCT imaging and CT angiography [42,43].
We assessed UA and MCA PI during guinea pig gestation, as these are probably the two most used Doppler measurements to monitor fetal wellbeing and FGR during pregnancy [3]. Here, we showed that UA PI exhibited an inverse nonlinear regression, with a good fit during pregnancy in guinea pigs. On the other hand, MCA PI described an inverse linear regression but with a moderate determination coefficient and a higher variability. Taking these indices together, we were able to estimate the CPR; however, our data were again highly variable. Furthermore, visualization of MCA was feasible only after G35, which may provide an explanation for the linearity of the data fit and the high variability observed mostly at earlier gestational age.
In humans, an absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery or changes in UA PI centile (i.e., >95th centile) associated with structural changes (i.e., <10th centile in estimated fetal weight) are used for the diagnosis of early- and late-onset FGR, respectively [3]. Thus, in humans, an alteration of PI is determined by changes in PI centile. However, in guinea pigs, an alteration or significant change in PI is determined by statistical comparison between two experimental groups. Previously, our group reported that the umbilical artery PI is increased in guinea pigs with placental insufficiency [15]. In the current study, we provide new information regarding the behavior of both functional (Doppler) and structural (biometrical) variables in a physiological context. However, further work in our lab is currently underway to study the role of possible alterations in these parameters under different context (e.g., gestational hypoxia).
EFW is a valuable parameter in the clinical context [3]. In humans, it is calculated on the basis of at least two biometrical parameters, such as head circumference and abdominal circumference [22]. Considering the differences in head shape between humans and guinea pigs, we decided to replace head circumference with BPD, since the latter seems to be more consistently measured. From there, we determined a Hadlock-type equation for EFW. However, the utility of this equation for our study is limited. Firstly, our study involved data obtained from four timepoints. Secondly, the number of litters studied was limited. Lastly, we were unable to validate our findings against a different cohort of guinea pigs. Despite this, we think that this equation may be helpful for other researchers working with guinea pigs. Indeed, current efforts in the lab are aimed at validating this parameter so as to increase the knowledge of guinea pig prenatal growth.
Applying a more in-depth analysis, we tried to establish similarities in the behavior of biometrical and blood flow data measured by ultrasound across pregnancies in guinea pigs and humans. Among the studied biometrical variables, fetal BPD and CC seemed to have a similar growth pattern between guinea pigs and humans, whereby these parameters increased with gestation. On the other hand, UA PI tended to decrease along gestation in guinea pigs and humans. In addition, the linear reduction in MCA PI during guinea pig gestation differed from the nonlinear behavior of human data. One possible explanation for these differences could be related to the gestational age at which the variables were initially assessed, as we obtained data at 40% pregnancy in guinea pigs, whereas most human data are reported at 60% pregnancy. Lastly, values for CPR showed a similar behavior in humans and guinea pigs. In humans, while there is high variability among different studies, and while the reference charts for Doppler parameters have yet to be fully established [20,44], our results in guinea pigs are promising as we were able to report similar clinically relevant values, e.g., for UA PI and CPR.

5. Conclusions

Altogether, our findings increase the knowledge on fetal and placental growth, as well as hemodynamic assessment across pregnancy in guinea pigs. This is important as guinea pigs are established as a valuable animal model for studying pregnancy complications and the developmental programming of heath and disease [8]. Furthermore, the docile nature, ease of reproduction and handling, and body size of guinea pigs make them ideal for studies of development and reproduction. This study showed that fetal and placental biometry, as well as changes in the main vascular beds across pregnancy, can be comparable to data from humans. These findings emphasize that the guinea pig is a reliable model to study fetal development and placental function with translational significance for human pregnancy.

Author Contributions

A.G.-C., B.J.K. and E.A.H. conceptualized the study, designed the experiments, and provided funding. A.A.C., Á.N, T.J., P.S., F.B., P.S., C.G.-H., A.N.S.-P., B.J.K. and E.A.H. collected, analyzed, and interpreted the experimental data. A.A.C., Á.N. and E.A.H. drafted the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FONDECYT Regular 1201283 (E.A.H.), 1220421 (B.J.K.), and 1220956 (C.G.-H.), as well as FONDECYT de Iniciación 11200798 (A.G.-C.). A.A.C. acknowledges the support of ANID PFCHA/DOCTORADO NACIONAL/2019-21190352, and Á.N. acknowledges the support of ANID PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2019-21190623.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (CICUA) of the Universidad de Chile (20354-MED-UCH, date of approval 08/04/2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Marcelo Barrales and Jaime Rossel for their excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chilumula, K.; Saha, P.K.; Muthyala, T.; Saha, S.C.; Sundaram, V.; Suri, V. Prognostic Role of Uterine Artery Doppler in Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia with Severe Features. J. Ultrasound 2021, 24, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marek, J.; Tomek, V.; Skovranek, J.; Povysilova, V.; Samanek, M. Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Congenital Heart Disease in an Unselected National Population: A 21-Year Experience. Heart 2011, 97, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gordijn, S.J.; Beune, I.M.; Thilaganathan, B.; Papageorghiou, A.; Baschat, A.A.; Baker, P.N.; Silver, R.M.; Wynia, K.; Ganzevoort, W. Consensus Definition of Fetal Growth Restriction: A Delphi Procedure: Consensus Definition of FGR. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 48, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Loardi, C.; Fratelli, N.; Mazzoni, G.; Orabona, R.; Valcamonico, A.; Fichera, A.; Sartori, E.; Prefumo, F. Uterine Artery Doppler for the Prediction of Outcome in Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021, 26, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Conde-Agudelo, A.; Villar, J.; Kennedy, S.H.; Papageorghiou, A.T. Predictive Accuracy of Cerebroplacental Ratio for Adverse Perinatal and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: CPR Predicts Perinatal Death in Suspected FGR. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 52, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Winchester, M.-L.; McCarther, N.; Cancino, D.; Fitzgerald, S.; Parrish, M. Second Trimester Cerebroplacental Ratio versus Umbilicocerebral Ratio for the Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021, 35, 7929–7935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Monteith, C.; Flood, K.; Pinnamaneni, R.; Levine, T.A.; Alderdice, F.A.; Unterscheider, J.; McAuliffe, F.M.; Dicker, P.; Tully, E.C.; Malone, F.D.; et al. An Abnormal Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) Is Predictive of Early Childhood Delayed Neurodevelopment in the Setting of Fetal Growth Restriction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 221, e1–e273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Morrison, J.L.; Botting, K.J.; Darby, J.R.T.; David, A.L.; Dyson, R.M.; Gatford, K.L.; Gray, C.; Herrera, E.A.; Hirst, J.J.; Kim, B.; et al. Guinea Pig Models for Translation of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Hypothesis into the Clinic: Guinea Pig as a Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Model. J. Physiol. 2018, 596, 5535–5569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fowden, A.L.; Camm, E.J.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N. Effects of Maternal Obesity On Placental Phenotype. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2020, 19, 113–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gonzaléz-Candia, A.; Candia, A.A.; Ebensperger, G.; Reyes, R.V.; Llanos, A.J.; Herrera, E.A. The Newborn Sheep Translational Model for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of the Neonate at High Altitude. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2020, 11, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lopez-Tello, J.; Arias-Alvarez, M.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.; Sferuzzi-Perri, A.N. Models of Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Fetal Programming in Rabbits. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2019, 86, 1781–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mitchell, B.F.; Taggart, M.J. Are Animal Models Relevant to Key Aspects of Human Parturition? Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 297, R525–R545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaufmann, P.; Black, S.; Huppertz, B. Endovascular Trophoblast Invasion: Implications for the Pathogenesis of Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Preeclampsia. Biol. Reprod. 2003, 69, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lopez-Tello, J.; Jimenez-Martinez, M.A.; Herrera, E.A.; Krause, B.J.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N. Progressive Uterine Artery Occlusion in the Guinea Pig Leads to Defects in Placental Structure That Relate to Fetal Growth. Placenta 2018, 72–73, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Herrera, E.A.; Alegría, R.; Farias, M.; Díaz-López, F.; Hernández, C.; Uauy, R.; Regnault, T.R.H.; Casanello, P.; Krause, B.J. Assessment of in vivo Fetal Growth and Placental Vascular Function in a Novel Intrauterine Growth Restriction Model of Progressive Uterine Artery Occlusion in Guinea Pigs: Intrauterine Growth Restriction Model in Guinea Pigs. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 1553–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Turner, A.J.; Trudinger, B.J. A Modification of the Uterine Artery Restriction Technique in the Guinea Pig Fetus Produces Asymmetrical Ultrasound Growth. Placenta 2009, 30, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Santos, J.; Fonseca, E.; van Melis, J.; Miglino, M.A. Morphometric Analysis of Fetal Development of Cavia Porcellus (Linnaeus, 1758) by Ultrasonography—Pilot Study. Theriogenology 2014, 81, 896–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Swanson, A.M.; Mehta, V.; Ofir, K.; Rowe, M.; Rossi, C.; Ginsberg, Y.; Griffin, H.; Barker, H.; White, T.; Boyd, M.; et al. The Use of Ultrasound to Assess Fetal Growth in a Guinea Pig Model of Fetal Growth Restriction. Lab. Anim. 2017, 51, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kiserud, T.; Piaggio, G.; Carroli, G.; Widmer, M.; Carvalho, J.; Neerup Jensen, L.; Giordano, D.; Cecatti, J.G.; Abdel Aleem, H.; Talegawkar, S.A.; et al. The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oros, D.; Ruiz-Martinez, S.; Staines-Urias, E.; Conde-Agudelo, A.; Villar, J.; Fabre, E.; Papageorghiou, A.T. Reference Ranges for Doppler Indices of Umbilical and Fetal Middle Cerebral Arteries and Cerebroplacental Ratio: Systematic Review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 53, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Burd, I.; Srinivas, S.; Paré, E.; Dharan, V.; Wang, E. Is Sonographic Assessment of Fetal Weight Influenced by Formula Selection? J. Ultrasound Med. 2009, 28, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stirnemann, J.; Salomon, L.J.; Papageorghiou, A.T. INTERGROWTH-21st Standards for Hadlock’s Estimation of Fetal Weight. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 946–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cardiff, R.D.; Miller, C.H.; Munn, R.J. Manual Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Mouse Tissue Sections. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2014, 2014, pdb-prot073411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Medina Castro, N.; Figueroa Diesel, H.; Guzmán Huerta, M.; Hernández Andrade, E. Normal reference values of the pulsatility index from the uterine and umbilical arteries during pregnancy. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex. 2006, 74, 509–515. [Google Scholar]
  25. Medina Castro, N.; Figueroa Diesel, H.; Hernández Andrade, E. Normal reference values of the pulsatility index and peak systolic velocity in the fetal middle cerebral artery during normal pregnancy. Ginecol. Obstet. Mex. 2006, 74, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Parra-Cordero, M.; Lees, C.; Missfelder-Lobos, H.; Seed, P.; Harris, C. Fetal Arterial and Venous Doppler Pulsatility Index and Time Averaged Velocity Ranges: Reference Ranges for Fetal Arterial and Venous Doppler. Prenat. Diagn. 2007, 27, 1251–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arduini, D.; Rizzo, G. Normal Values of Pulsatility Index Front Fetal Vessels: A Cross-Sectional Study on 1556 Healthy Fetuses. J. Perinat. Med. 1990, 18, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seffah, J.D.; Swarray-Deen, A. Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler Indices and Clinical Application at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 134, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bahlmann, F.; Fittschen, M.; Reinhard, I.; Wellek, S.; Puhl, A. Blood Flow Velocity Waveforms of the Umbilical Artery in a Normal Population: Reference Values from 18 Weeks to 42 Weeks of Gestation. Ultraschall Med. Eur. J. Ultrasound 2012, 33, E80–E87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Morales-Roselló, J.; Khalil, A.; Morlando, M.; Hervás-Marín, D.; Perales-Marín, A. Doppler Reference Values of the Fetal Vertebral and Middle Cerebral Arteries, at 19–41 Weeks Gestation. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015, 28, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ebbing, C.; Rasmussen, S.; Kiserud, T. Middle Cerebral Artery Blood Flow Velocities and Pulsatility Index and the Cerebroplacental Pulsatility Ratio: Longitudinal Reference Ranges and Terms for Serial Measurements. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 30, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Baschat, A.A.; Gembruch, U. The Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio Revisited: Cerebroplacental Doppler Ratio. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 21, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chavatte-Palmer, P.; Laigre, P.; Simonoff, E.; Chesné, P.; Challah-Jacques, M.; Renard, J.-P. In Utero Characterisation of Fetal Growth by Ultrasound Scanning in the Rabbit. Theriogenology 2008, 69, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pallares, P.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. Use of Ultrasound Imaging for Early Diagnosis of Pregnancy and Determination of Litter Size in the Mouse. Lab. Anim. 2009, 43, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Turner, A.J.; Trudinger, B.J. Ultrasound Measurement of Biparietal Diameter and Umbilical Artery Blood Flow in the Normal Fetal Guinea Pig. Comp. Med. 2000, 50, 6. [Google Scholar]
  36. Czarnecki, R.; Adamski, M. Factors Influencing Litter Size and Birthweight in the Newborn Long-Haired Guinea Pigs ( Cavia Aperea f. Porcellus). J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2016, 44, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Draper, R.L. The Prenatal Growth of the Guinea-Pig. Anat. Rec. 1920, 18, 369–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ibsen, H.L. Prenatal Growth in Guinea-Pigs with Special Reference to Environmental Factors Affecting Weight at Birth. J. Exp. Zool. 1928, 51, 51–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahn, K.H.; Lee, J.H.; Cho, G.J.; Hong, S.-C.; Oh, M.-J.; Kim, H.-J. Placental Thickness-to-Estimated Foetal Weight Ratios and Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants at Delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 37, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Burton, G.J.; Fowden, A.L.; Thornburg, K.L. Placental Origins of Chronic Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2016, 96, 1509–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Davies, J.; Dempsey, E.W.; Amoroso, E.C. The Subplacenta of the Guinea-Pig: Development, Histology and Histochemistry. J. Anat. 1961, 95, 457–473. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. De Clercq, K.; Persoons, E.; Napso, T.; Luyten, C.; Parac-Vogt, T.N.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N.; Kerckhofs, G.; Vriens, J. High-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MicroCT Reveals the True Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Murine Placenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 13927–13936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mikkelsen, E.; Lauridsen, H.; Nielsen, P.M.; Qi, H.; Nørlinger, T.; Andersen, M.D.; Uldbjerg, N.; Laustsen, C.; Sandager, P.; Pedersen, M. The Chinchilla as a Novel Animal Model of Pregnancy. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017, 4, 161098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wolf, H.; Stampalija, T.; Lees, C.C.; TRUFFLE Study Group; Arabin, B.; Berger, A.; Bergman, E.; Bhide, A.; Bilardo, C.M.; Breeze, A.C.; et al. Fetal Cerebral Blood-flow Redistribution: Analysis of Doppler Reference Charts and Association of Different Thresholds with Adverse Perinatal Outcome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 58, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Vetsci 10 00144 g001 550
Figure 1. Fetal biometry across pregnancy. Guinea pig fetal (A) biparietal diameter (BPD), (B) cranial circumference (CC), (C) cranial area (CA), (D) abdominal circumference (AC), and (E) abdominal area (AA), and their best fit from gestational day 25 to the end of pregnancy. Each dot represents an individual measurement (n = 47 from 19 litters). Black line = data best fit. Magenta dashed lines = 95% CI.
Figure 1. Fetal biometry across pregnancy. Guinea pig fetal (A) biparietal diameter (BPD), (B) cranial circumference (CC), (C) cranial area (CA), (D) abdominal circumference (AC), and (E) abdominal area (AA), and their best fit from gestational day 25 to the end of pregnancy. Each dot represents an individual measurement (n = 47 from 19 litters). Black line = data best fit. Magenta dashed lines = 95% CI.
Vetsci 10 00144 g001
Vetsci 10 00144 g002 550
Figure 2. Placental biometry across pregnancy. Guinea pig placental (A) thickness, (B) length, (C) transversal area axis, (D) discoid perimeter, (E) discoid area, and (F) estimated placental volume, and their best fit from gestational day 25 to the end of pregnancy. Each dot represents an individual measurement (n = 47 from 19 litters). Black line = data best fit. Magenta dashed lines = 95% CI.
Figure 2. Placental biometry across pregnancy. Guinea pig placental (A) thickness, (B) length, (C) transversal area axis, (D) discoid perimeter, (E) discoid area, and (F) estimated placental volume, and their best fit from gestational day 25 to the end of pregnancy. Each dot represents an individual measurement (n = 47 from 19 litters). Black line = data best fit. Magenta dashed lines = 95% CI.
Vetsci 10 00144 g002
Vetsci 10 00144 g003 550
Figure 3. Doppler ultrasound across pregnancy. Guinea pig pulsatility index of (A) umbilical artery (UA), (B) middle cerebral artery (MCA), (C) cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and (D) uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index, and their best fit from gestational day 25 to the end of pregnancy. Each dot represents an individual measurement (n = 47 from 19 litters). Black line = data best fit. Magenta dashed lines = 95%CI.
Figure 3. Doppler ultrasound across pregnancy. Guinea pig pulsatility index of (A) umbilical artery (UA), (B) middle cerebral artery (MCA), (C) cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and (D) uterine artery (UtA) pulsatility index, and their best fit from gestational day 25 to the end of pregnancy. Each dot represents an individual measurement (n = 47 from 19 litters). Black line = data best fit. Magenta dashed lines = 95%CI.
Vetsci 10 00144 g003
Vetsci 10 00144 g004 550
Figure 4. Placental structure at G35 and G60. Placental structure at (A) gestational day 35 and (B) gestational day 60. Green line = decidua. Dark-blue line = subplacenta. Orange line = interlobium and labyrinth zone. Scale = 5 mm.
Figure 4. Placental structure at G35 and G60. Placental structure at (A) gestational day 35 and (B) gestational day 60. Green line = decidua. Dark-blue line = subplacenta. Orange line = interlobium and labyrinth zone. Scale = 5 mm.
Vetsci 10 00144 g004
Vetsci 10 00144 g005 550
Figure 5. Neonatal biometry at birth. Neonatal (A) weight, (B) biparietal diameter (BPD), and (C) BPD to neonatal weight ratio of female (white circles, n = 10) and male (black circles, n = 13) guinea pigs. Data were analyzed by Mann–Whitney t-test. Significant differences when p < 0.05 (*).
Figure 5. Neonatal biometry at birth. Neonatal (A) weight, (B) biparietal diameter (BPD), and (C) BPD to neonatal weight ratio of female (white circles, n = 10) and male (black circles, n = 13) guinea pigs. Data were analyzed by Mann–Whitney t-test. Significant differences when p < 0.05 (*).
Vetsci 10 00144 g005
Vetsci 10 00144 g006 550
Figure 6. Guinea pig estimated fetal weight. Estimated fetal weight multiple linear regression from gestational day 25 to 72. White circles indicate timepoints where the variables were obtained (G35, n = 10; G60, n = 11; G69, n = 9; G72, n = 6). Black dots indicate the estimated fetal weight for gestational day.
Figure 6. Guinea pig estimated fetal weight. Estimated fetal weight multiple linear regression from gestational day 25 to 72. White circles indicate timepoints where the variables were obtained (G35, n = 10; G60, n = 11; G69, n = 9; G72, n = 6). Black dots indicate the estimated fetal weight for gestational day.
Vetsci 10 00144 g006
Vetsci 10 00144 g007 550
Figure 7. Guinea pig and human fetal ultrasound variables across pregnancy. Guinea pig and human (A) biparietal diameter (BPD), (B) cranial circumference (CC), and (C) abdominal circumference (AC) acceleration across pregnancy and pulsatility index (PI) of (D) umbilical artery (UA), (E) middle cerebral artery (MCA), and (F) cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) from 40% of pregnancy until term. WHO 2017 [19], Medina-Castro et al. [24,25], Parra-Cordero et al. [26], Arduini et al. [27], Seffah et al. [28], Bahlmann et al. [29], Morales-Roselló et al. [30], Ebbing et al. [31], and Baschat et al. [32] are studies based on human data.
Figure 7. Guinea pig and human fetal ultrasound variables across pregnancy. Guinea pig and human (A) biparietal diameter (BPD), (B) cranial circumference (CC), and (C) abdominal circumference (AC) acceleration across pregnancy and pulsatility index (PI) of (D) umbilical artery (UA), (E) middle cerebral artery (MCA), and (F) cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) from 40% of pregnancy until term. WHO 2017 [19], Medina-Castro et al. [24,25], Parra-Cordero et al. [26], Arduini et al. [27], Seffah et al. [28], Bahlmann et al. [29], Morales-Roselló et al. [30], Ebbing et al. [31], and Baschat et al. [32] are studies based on human data.
Vetsci 10 00144 g007
Table
Table 1. Description of the ultrasound measurements made.
Table 1. Description of the ultrasound measurements made.
VariableDefinitionUnitsRepresentative Image
Biparietal diameter (BPD)From a transversal visualization of the cranium: Distance from the external side of the parietal bone to the internal side of the opposite parietal bonemmVetsci 10 00144 i001
Cranial circumference (CC)Elipse around DBP as transversal diameter and a longitudinal diameter touching the occipital bonemm (perimeter), mm2 (area)Vetsci 10 00144 i002
Abdominal circumference (AC)Circumference around the edges of a transversal abdominal visualization at stomach/liver levelmm (perimeter), mm2 (area)Vetsci 10 00144 i003
Transversal area of placenta (PA)Region observed in a transversal visualization of placenta excluding deciduamm (perimeter), mm2 (area)Vetsci 10 00144 i004
Placental length (PL)Longitudinal segment in a transversal visualization of placentammVetsci 10 00144 i005
Placental thickness (PT)Transversal segment in a transversal visualization of placentammVetsci 10 00144 i006
Discoid area of placentaRegion observed in a posterior visualization of placentamm (perimeter), mm2 (area)Vetsci 10 00144 i007
Umbilical artery (UA)From a longitudinal view of the placenta: Blood flow detected by Doppler ultrasound between the fetus abdomen and the placentaPulsatility index ((systolic velocity-diastolic velocity)/mean velocity)Vetsci 10 00144 i008
Middle cerebral artery (MCA)From a transversal visualization of the cranium: Blood flow detected by Doppler ultrasound above the circle of Willis in a transverse directionPulsatility index ((systolic velocity-diastolic velocity)/mean velocity)Vetsci 10 00144 i009
Uterine Artery (UtA)From a sagittal view of the maternal urinary bladder: Blood flow detected by Doppler ultrasound surrounding the bladder in an ~45° anglePulsatility index ((systolic velocity-diastolic velocity)/mean velocity)Vetsci 10 00144 i010
Cerebro-placental ratio (CPR)Ratio between MCA and UA pulsatility indexesAU
Table
Table 2. Fetal and placental biometry at euthanasia.
Table 2. Fetal and placental biometry at euthanasia.
G35G60
Fetal Weight (g)3.06 ± 0.2883.30 ± 3.47
BPD (mm) 19.21 ± 0.3510.09 ± 0.35
Volume (mm3)3.23 ± 0.1679.00 ± 2.99
Placental weight (g)2.51 ± 0.215.60 ± 0.23
Placental Thickness (mm)6.12 ± 0.428.90 ± 0.71
Placental Length (mm)19.43 ± 0.4229.35 ± 0.74
Placental Width (mm)14.43 ± 0.4525.70 ± 0.57
Placental Volume (mm3)2.74 ± 0.126.75 ± 0.39
Placental Efficiency (AU)1.24 ± 0.0815.06 ± 0.75
1 BPD, biparietal diameter.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Candia, A.A.; Jiménez, T.; Navarrete, Á.; Beñaldo, F.; Silva, P.; García-Herrera, C.; Sferruzzi-Perri, A.N.; Krause, B.J.; González-Candia, A.; Herrera, E.A. Developmental Ultrasound Characteristics in Guinea Pigs: Similarities with Human Pregnancy. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10020144

AMA Style

Candia AA, Jiménez T, Navarrete Á, Beñaldo F, Silva P, García-Herrera C, Sferruzzi-Perri AN, Krause BJ, González-Candia A, Herrera EA. Developmental Ultrasound Characteristics in Guinea Pigs: Similarities with Human Pregnancy. Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(2):144. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10020144

Chicago/Turabian Style

Candia, Alejandro A., Tamara Jiménez, Álvaro Navarrete, Felipe Beñaldo, Pablo Silva, Claudio García-Herrera, Amanda N. Sferruzzi-Perri, Bernardo J. Krause, Alejandro González-Candia, and Emilio A. Herrera. 2023. "Developmental Ultrasound Characteristics in Guinea Pigs: Similarities with Human Pregnancy" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 2: 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10020144

APA Style

Candia, A. A., Jiménez, T., Navarrete, Á., Beñaldo, F., Silva, P., García-Herrera, C., Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N., Krause, B. J., González-Candia, A., & Herrera, E. A. (2023). Developmental Ultrasound Characteristics in Guinea Pigs: Similarities with Human Pregnancy. Veterinary Sciences, 10(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10020144

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop