Next Article in Journal
Hemorrhage and Sudden Death in a Cat with Pancreatic Hemangiosarcoma
Previous Article in Journal
Malformation of the Cortical Development Associated with Severe Clusters of Epileptic Seizures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whole Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Cats and Dogs in South Korea in 2021

1
Foreign Animal Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gimcheon 39660, Republic of Korea
2
Animal Health Center, Research Institute of Public Health and Environment, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gwacheon 13818, Republic of Korea
3
Animal Welfare Division, Parks and Recreation Bureau, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul 04524, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vet. Sci. 2023, 10(1), 6; https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010006
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Forty SARS-CoV-2-positive swab samples from 40 animals owned by confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected owners in Korea in 2021 were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify the genomic lineage of the viruses. Among the 40 animal samples, eight Pango lineages (B.1.1.7) (Alpha variant), B.1.429 (Epsilon variant), B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, B.1.620, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant) were identified. This study provides the first reported cases of six lineages (B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.620, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) in cats and dogs. Our results emphasize the importance of monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in pets because they are dynamic hosts of variant Pango lineages of SARS-CoV-2.

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 infections have caused unprecedented damage worldwide by affecting humans and various animals. The first reported animal infection was observed in a pet dog in Hong Kong in March 2020. 36 countries reported 692 SARS-CoV-2 infections in 25 different animal species by 31 August 2022. Most outbreaks were caused by contact with SARS-CoV-2 infected humans. In South Korea, the first SARS-CoV-2 infection in an animal was reported in a cat in February 2021. As of 31 December 2021, 74 dogs and 42 cats have been confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 in South Korea. Here, we identified various SARS-CoV-2 genomic lineages in SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cats and dogs. Among the 40 animal samples sequenced for lineage identification, a total of eight Pango lineages (B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), B.1.429 (Epsilon variant), B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, B.1.620, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified. The dominant lineages were AY.69 (Delta variant; 37.5%), B.1.497 (35.0%), and B.1.619.1 (12.5%). This study provides the first reported cases of six lineages (B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.620, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant)), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant) in cats and dogs. Our results emphasize the importance of monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in pets because they are dynamic hosts of variant Pango lineages of SARS-CoV-2.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused unprecedented global damage by affecting not only humans, but also various animals. COVID-19 was first reported in humans in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, and was caused by SARS-CoV-2 [1]. As of October 2022, about 630 million people have been infected with SARS-CoV-2, and about 6.5 million of them have been confirmed dead [2]. SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-stranded RNA virus belonging to the family Coronaviridae of the order Nidovirales [3]. Coronaviruses are known to have a virus mutation rate about 10 times lower than that of influenza viruses because they have an exonuclease enzyme that lowers the replication error rate [4]; however, similar to many other RNA viruses, the SARS-CoV-2 genome has been constantly mutating to adapt to the host immune system since its emergence [5,6]. The evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 gene has resulted in tens of thousands of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, which has caused continuous public health difficulties such as vaccines, treatments, and application of diagnostic technologies [7]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has classified SARS-CoV-2 with mutations of high impact as variants of concern (VOC), and to date, five major VOC have been detected: the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (N.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variants [2].
SARS-CoV-2 spillover from humans to domestic cats, dogs, and other animals has been reported globally [8]. The first reported animal infection was observed in Hong Kong in March 2020 when a pet dog was infected with SARS-CoV-2 [9]. In total, 36 countries had reported 692 SARS-CoV-2 infections in 25 different animal species (cat, dog, mink, otter, pet ferret, lion, tiger, puma, snow leopard, gorilla, white-tailed deer, fishing cat, binturong, South American coati, spotted hyena, Eurasian lynx, Canada lynx, hippopotamus, hamster, mule deer, giant anteater, west Indian manatee, blacktailed marmoset, common squirrel monkey, and mandrill) as of 31 August 2022 [8]. The actual number of animal infections was expected to be higher than 692 as the number of SARS-CoV-2 sequences uploaded in Global Initiative for Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) was >2400 as of 8 December 2022 [10]. Most of these infections are believed to be spillovers from humans, except for a few cases such as mink-to-human infections in European countries [11,12,13] and hamster-to-human infections in Hong Kong [14,15,16].
In South Korea, the first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals was reported on 29 January 2021, in a domestic cat in Gyeongnam province, residing in a religious facility, where multiple individuals (120 residents and visitors) were confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 infection [17]. The virus lineage was B.1.497 (Pango v.2.3.2), and the virus genomes found in the owner and the cat were identical. Based on an epidemiological investigation of the facility, it was believed that the owner transmitted the virus to cat. This event raised public concern, and guidelines for the management of COVID-19 in pet cats and dogs were established by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) in South Korea in February 2021. The guidelines specified that pets owned by COVID-19 confirmed patients should be tested in provincial government veterinary laboratories if the animals had been in contact with the confirmed patients and showed suspected clinical symptoms of COVID-19. Between February and December 2021, 116 animals (42 cats and 74 dogs) were confirmed to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 (MAFRA internal document, 2022). In this study, 40 SARS-CoV-2-positive swab samples from 40 animals were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify the genomic lineage of the viruses. Among the 40 animal samples, a total of eight Pango lineages (B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), B.1.429 (Epsilon variant), B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, B.1.620, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified. This study provides the first reported cases of six lineages (B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.620, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) in cats and dogs. Our results emphasize the importance of monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in pets because they are dynamic hosts of variant Pango lineages of SARS-CoV-2.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Detection of SARS-CoV-2

In total, 110 SARS-CoV-2 positive domestic animal (41 cats and 69 dogs) sample sets (oropharyngeal and rectal swabs, as well as nasopharyngeal swabs) were collected in seven South Korean municipalities (Seoul, Daegu, Gwangju, Sejong, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeongnam-do, and Jeonbuk-do) between February and December 2021 and sent to the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency (APQA) for whole genome sequencing (Supplementary Table S1). All owners of the sampled animals were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by the Ministry of Health, and the animal samples were collected and tested the day of, or one to two days after confirmation. To identify the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, commercially available real-time RT-PCR assays (Kogene Biotech, Seoul, South Korea) targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDRP) gene and envelope (E) protein gene were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, viral RNA was extracted using the Maxwell® RSC Total Nucleic Acid kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time RT-PCR was performed using a Bio-Rad thermocycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Animal samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) value of 20–30 were then subjected to NGS of the whole genome of the virus.

2.2. Next-Generation Sequencing and Assembly

RNA was converted to cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara Bio Europe SAS, Saint-Germain-en Laye, France) with a combination of oligo-dT and random hexamer methods, following the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was used for viral DNA enrichment using the Qiagen SARS-CoV-2 Primer Panel (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The amplified PCR products were used for sequencing-ready library preparation using an Illumina DNA LibraryPrep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The prepared libraries were loaded onto the Illumina Mini-Seq platform and a 150 bp paired-end sequencing kit (300 cycles).
Raw reads were trimmed using the Bbduk software (v38.96) [18]. Trimmed reads were then aligned to the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 reference sequence (NC_045512.2) using the BWA software (v1.9.0) [19]. Only uniquely mapped reads extracted using SAMtools (v1.15.1) were considered for downstream analyses [20]. The reads mapped to the genes were counted using gff2bed (v24.3.9) [21]. The aligned reads were sorted, variant calling was performed using GATK variant caller v4.6.2.1 [22], and a consensus sequence was generated from each sample using BCFTools v0.1.16. with default parameters [23].

2.3. Genotyping and Phylogenetic Analysis

Lineage classification was performed using the Pangolin tool (v.4.1.3) based on the Pango Dynamic Nomenclature System [24,25]. Phylogenetic analysis of the whole-genome sequencing data of the samples was performed by multiple sequence alignment of the sequences with the complete genomes available in the GISAID database. A total of 26,373 complete genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 strains reported in South Korea were retrieved from the GISAID database on 16 October 2022. Among the 26,373 complete genome sequences, 800 were selected by blasting each animal sample sequence and choosing the 20 sequences showing the highest homology with each sample sequence. After removing redundant sequences, 421 were selected (Supplementary Table S3). The 461 (421 and 40) sequences were aligned using MAFFT v7.508 and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using IQ-TREE v.2.2.0 to apply the GTR + F model of nucleotide substitution with default heuristic search options and bootstrapping with 1000 replicates [26,27].

3. Results

3.1. SARS-CoV-2 Whole Genome Sequencing in Cats and Dogs

All samples collected from SARS-CoV-2 confirmed pets of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed owners were tested for SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance. Forty samples (25 cats and 15 dogs) showed Ct values of approximately 20 to 30 in real-time RT-PCR, and they were subjected to whole genome sequencing using Illumina. The run produced an average of 3,825,036 reads and the average coverage was 2126.8 with a read depth of 20x covering 97.0% of the full-length genome of the reference genome (Supplementary Table S2). Forty full-genome sequences were generated, with an average genome size of 29,891 bp.

3.2. Molecular and Phylogenetic Characterization of Viral Genomes

The resulting SARS-CoV-2 genomes were compared with the reference NC_045512.2 (Wuhan-Hu-1) for genotyping. One Alpha, one Epsilon, 17 Delta, and 21 other variants were identified. All identified lineages based on the Pango Dynamic Nomenclature System are presented in Table 1. Five Pango lineages (B.1.497, B.1.619.1, B.1.620, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified in dogs, and seven Pango lineages (B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), B.1.429 (Epsilon variant), B.470, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified in cats. Four Pango lineages (B.1.497, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified in both species. The most dominant Pango lineages were AY.69 (Delta variant) (37.5%), B.1.497 (35.0%), and B.1.619.1 (12.5%).
Phylogenetic analysis was performed by comparing the 40 complete genomes of SARS-CoV-2 from cats and dogs in this study and SARS-CoV-2 human genomes from South Korea available in the GISAID database. The 421 viral genome sequences were used to infer a maximum likelihood tree using a dataset comprising all SARS-CoV-2 genomes identified in South Korea. All eight lineages identified in South Korean cats or dogs were grouped in the lineage branches of South Korean human SARS-CoV-2 isolates (Figure 1).
The 40 full genomes generated in this study were submitted to GISAID (Accession ID. EPI_ISL_15727682~ EPI_ISL_15727702, EPI_ISL_15775580~ EPI_ISL_15775595, EPI_ISL_15788906, EPI_ISL_15793141, and EPI_ISL_15793142, Table 2).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first report of SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequencing of cats and dogs in South Korea. A total of 391 pet samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2, 116 of which were positive (29.7 %), and 110 positive samples were finally submitted to APQA for genome sequencing.
In this study, 40 animal samples from 110 SARS-CoV-2 positive pet cats and dogs of by SARS-CoV-2 confirmed owners were sequenced using Illumina NGS. Most animal samples (102, 92.7 %) were from Seoul, where 18.3% of the total population of South Korea reside and the second biggest pets population (18.4%) out of 2,782,811 pet cats and dogs is registered [28].
In total, eight Pango lineages (B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), B.1.429 (Epsilon variant), B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.620, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified in this study. Dominant lineages were AY.69 (Delta variant; 37.5%), B.1.497 (35.0%), and B.1.619.1 (12.5%). In cats, B.1.497 was the most detected lineage (40.0%), followed by AY.69 (Delta variant; 36.0%). In dogs, AY.69 (Delta variant) was the most detected lineage (40.0%), followed by B.1.497 (26.7%).
Since the first human SARS-CoV-2 case in January 2020, 630,783 confirmed human cases, with 5563 deaths, have been reported in South Korea, as of December 2021 [29]. All eight SARS-CoV-2 lineages detected in cats and dogs in this study were also found in humans in South Korea. The Pango lineage B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant) was first detected in the obtained human samples in December 2020, and was last detected in September 2021 in South Korea [10]. The total number of human B.1.1.7 sequences uploaded in GISAID is 862. This lineage has been detected in at least 41 countries, most commonly in the United Kingdom (24.0%), the USA (20.0%), Germany (9%), Sweden (6.0%), and Denmark (6.0%) [30]. B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant) was reported in a cat and dog in the USA in February 2021 [31]. It has also been detected in cats and dogs in Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, France, Italy, Latvia, and Thailand in 2021 [10]. In this study, B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant) was detected in a cat in Seoul in June 2021, approximately six months after the first human B.1.1.7 case in South Korea.
The B.1.429 lineage (Epsilon variant) was first detected in South Korea in December 2020, and was last detected in samples collected in June 2021 [10]. A total of 107 human B.1.429 sequences have been deposited in GISAID. This lineage has been detected in at least 45 countries, most commonly in the USA (97.0%), Canada (2.0%), and Mexico (1.10%) [30]. B.1.429 (Epsilon variant) was reported in cats in the USA in February 2021 [10]. In this study, B.1.429 (Epsilon variant) was detected in a cat in Seoul in March 2021, approximately three months after the first human B.1.429 (Epsilon variant) case.
The B.1.470 lineage was first detected in South Korea in December 2020 and was last detected in the samples collected in May 2021 [10]. A total of 25 sequences from Korea are uploaded in GISAID. This lineage has been detected in at least 29 countries, most commonly in Indonesia (62.0%), Malaysia (5.0%), South Korea (3.0%), Singapore (3.0%), and Japan (2.0%) [30]. There have been no official reports of confirmed cases of this lineage in cats and dogs. In this study, B.1.470 was detected in a cat in Seoul in April 2021, approximately four months after the first human B.1.470 case.
The B.1.497 lineage was first detected in South Korea in March 2020 and was a dominant subgroup until April 2021 [32]. This lineage was dynamically associated with visitors to clubs and bars in Itaewon, Seoul, from April 29 to 6 May 2020, and caused one of the major local and long-term epidemics in South Korea [33]. A total of 3180 sequences in Korea have been uploaded in GISAID. The B.1.497 lineage has been detected in at least 11 countries, most commonly in South Korea (98.6%), the USA (0.65%), and Japan (0.06%) [30]. There have been no official reports of confirmed cases of this lineage in cats and dogs. In this study, B.1.497 was detected in a cat in Seoul in February 2021, approximately seven months after the first human B.1.497 case. In total, this study detected this lineage in 14 animals (10 cats and four dogs).
The earliest sequences of B.1.619.1 and B.1.620 were reported in South Korea in February and March 2021, respectively [10]. KCDA carried out whole genome sequencing when the number of infections by B.1.619 and B.1.620 increased sharply (April–July 2021), and the prevalence rates increased rapidly to 67% in June 2021 and decreased when the Delta variant emerged in July [32]. B.1.619 and B.1.620 were identified in imported cases in South Korea in 2021, and B.1.619.1 has been reclassified as it has an additional mutation in ORF1a (K3929R) [31,32]. A total of 1595 and 412 B.1.619.1 and B.1.620 sequences in Korea, respectively, have been uploaded in GISAID. Both B.1.619.1 and B.1.620 were last detected in samples collected in September 2021. B.1.619.1 was confirmed in at least 13 countries, most commonly in South Korea (100.0%) and Belgium (1.0%) [30]. B.1.620 was confirmed in at least 37 countries, most commonly in South Korea (32.0%), Lithuania (15.0%), France (11.0%), Republic of the Congo (6.0%), and Italy (5.0%) [30]. There have been no official reports of confirmed cases of B.1.619.1 and B.1.620 in cats and dogs. In this study, B.1.619.1 was detected in a dog in Seoul in June 2021, four months after the first human B.1.619.1 case, as well as in two additional dogs and two cats. B.1.620 was detected in a dog in Jeonbuk-do in May 2021, three months after the first human B.1.620 case.
The AY.69 lineage (Delta variant, alias of B.1.617.2.69) was first reported in human samples collected in South Korea in May 2021 [10], and became the dominant lineage (56.7%) together with AY.122.5 (19.7%) from April 2020 to January 2022 [34]. A total of 11,348 AY.69 sequences have been uploaded in GISAD: AY.69 was last detected in January 2022 [10]. This lineage has been detected in at least 16 countries, most commonly in South Korea (100.0%) [30]. There have been no official reports of confirmed cases of this lineage in cats and dogs. In this study, AY.69 (Delta variant) was detected in a cat in Seoul in July 2021, two months after the first human AY.69 (Delta variant) case. Since then, it has been detected in eight cats and six dogs.
The AY.122.5 lineage (Delta variant, alias of B.1.617.2.122.5) was first detected in South Korea in August 2021 [10]. It became dominant among Delta variants in South Korea in December 2021 and was the second most detected lineage (19.5%) in January 2022, while Omicron BA.1.1. was the most detected (53.2%) [34]. AY.122.5 was last detected in February 2022, and a total of 4141 sequences from Korea have been uploaded [10]. This lineage has been detected in at least eight countries, most commonly in South Korea (99.0%) and the USA (15.0%) [30]. There have been no official reports of confirmed cases of this lineage in cats and dogs. In this study, AY.122.5 (Delta variant) was detected in a cat in Seoul in October and in a dog in Gyeongnam-do in December 2021, two to four months after the first human AY.122.5 (Delta variant) case.
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) performed genomic surveillance on 17.6% human samples submitted for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis from April 2021 to January 2022, which is a similar samples collection period to that of the current study [34]. The most dominant variant in humans was the Alpha variant (13.7–24.4%) from April to June, and the Delta variant (59.6–96.1%) from July to December in 2021. In detail, AY.69 and AY.122.5 were the dominant Delta variant sub-lineages in humans during the fourth wave of COVID-19 (July–December 2021), when the Delta variant was the major variant in South Korea. In our study, AY.69 and AY.122.5 were also the most dominant lineages (73.9%, 17 out of 20) in cats and dogs during the same period. In another study carried out by KDCA, B.1.497 was the most dominant Pango lineage from April 2020 to April 2021 [32]. In this study, 12 (85.7%) out of 14 samples collected during February-April 2021 are B.1.497 Pango lineage.
The eight Pango lineages identified in cats and dogs were all grouped into the same South Korean human SARS-CoV-2 lineage branches. The delays between the first human and animal cases were between 2 and 9 months, and all animal cases were confirmed after the same Pango lineages were identified in humans. Therefore, the SARS-CoV-2 viruses that circulated in South Korea are believed to have shared hosts, and the results provide additional evidence for the theory that most animal infections of SARS-CoV-2, especially in cats and dogs, are the spillover from humans. We have confirmed that most of the defining mutations of each lineage exist in each genome. Further study is needed to identify any specific mutations that show species-specific characteristics.
Among the eight lineages detected in cats or dogs in this study, four lineages (B.1.497, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) are considered South Korean lineages [30], because they have been reported for the first time in South Korea, and most of the genome sequences deposited in GISAID are from South Korea (98.6% of B.1.497, 100% of B.1.619.1, 99.0% of AY.69 (Delta variant), and 100% of AY.122.5 (Delta variant). These four lineages were also the four most dominant lineages in the animals in this study (AY.69, 37.5%, B.1.497, 35%, B.1.619.1, 12.5%, and AY.122.5, 5%).
According to GISAID, as of 16 October 2022, 71 and 46 SARS-CoV-2 Pango lineages have been detected in cats and dogs, respectively. However, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant), which are South Korean lineages, and B.1.470 and B.1.620 have, to date, not been reported in cats and dogs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a molecular epidemiological study of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cats and dogs living under natural conditions in South Korea, and of the infection of SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, B.1.620, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant) in cats and dogs globally. The data obtained in this study emphasize the need for further epidemiological studies and consistent surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in animals. Our study highlights the importance of genomic surveillance to monitor the emergence of new viral lineages in different species.

5. Conclusions

We identified various SARS-CoV-2 genomic lineages in cats and dogs. Among 40 animal samples sequenced for lineage identification of SARS-CoV-2, eight Pango lineages (B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), B.1.429 (Epsilon variant), B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.619.1, B.1.620, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were identified, and dominant lineages were AY.69 (Delta variant), B.1.497, and B.1.619.1 in both cats and dogs. All eight lineages were confirmed to have simultaneously occurred in humans in South Korea. Importantly, six lineages (B.1.470, B.1.497, B.1.620, B.1.619.1, AY.69 (Delta variant), and AY.122.5 (Delta variant)) were first reported in cats and dogs in this study. Our results validate that monitoring SARS-CoV-2 in pets is important and that cats and dogs are dynamic hosts of SARS-CoV-2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vetsci10010006/s1, Table S1: SARS-CoV-2 positive animals which samples were provided to APQA from Provincial/City government veterinary authorities for variants monitoring; Table S2: Results of Illumina sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in dogs and cats; Table S3: 420 Korean human SARS-CoV-2 sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-K.S. and J.N.; methodology, Y.-K.S., O.-K.K., J.H., Y.K., I.J.S. and H.-K.S.; formal analysis, O.-K.K. and J.H.; investigation, Y.-K.S., O.-K.K. and J.H.; data curation, Y.-K.S. and O.-K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-K.S. and O.-K.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.-K.S., O.-K.K. and H.-E.K.; project administration, Y.-K.S. and H.-E.K.; funding acquisition, Y.-K.S., J.N. and H.-E.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs in the Republic of Korea (Grant no. B-1543085-2021-22).

Institutional Review Board Statement

For the control of COVID-19, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), the Republic of Korea has issued an administrative order (as of 1 February 2021) to conduct COVID-19 tests on companion animals owned by positive confirmed patients and living in the same space. Therefore, the samples from cats and dogs were collected regardless of the owner’s consent under agreement between the Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs of the South Korea Government and the owners.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are downloaded from GISAID (https://gisaid.org).

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues in the veterinary laboratories of provincial governments for assistance in collecting, screening, and transporting clinical samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.W.; Tian, J.H.; Pei, Y.Y.; et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. WHO World Health Organization 2022. WHO, COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 31 October 2022).
  3. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tao, K.; Tzou, P.L.; Nouhin, J.; Gupta, R.K.; de Oliveira, T.; Kosakovsky Pond, S.L.; Fera, D.; Shafer, R.W. The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 22, 757–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gupta, A.M.; Chakrabarti, J.; Mandal, S. Non-synonymous mutations of SARS-CoV-2 leads epitope loss and segregates its variants. Microbes Infect. 2020, 22, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, C.; Xie, C.; Bu, G.L.; Zhong, L.Y.; Zeng, M.S. Molecular characteristics, immune evasion, and impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2022, 7, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Maher, M.C.; Bartha, I.; Weaver, S.; di Iulio, J.; Ferri, E.; Soriaga, L.; Lempp, F.A.; Hie, B.L.; Bryson, B.; Berger, B.; et al. Predicting the mutational drivers of future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabk3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. WOAH COVID-19 Dashboard. World Organisation for Animal Health. Available online: https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-offer/emergency-preparedness/covid-19/ (accessed on 31 October 2022).
  9. Sit, T.H.C.; Brackman, C.J.; Ip, S.M.; Tam, K.W.S.; Law, P.Y.T.; To, E.M.W.; Yu, V.Y.T.; Sims, L.D.; Tsang, D.N.C.; Chu, D.K.W.; et al. Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2020, 586, 776–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Global Initiative for Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID). EiCoV Dashboard. Available online: https://www.epicov.org/ (accessed on 31 October 2022).
  11. Oude Munnink, B.B.; Sikkema, R.S.; Nieuwenhuijse, D.F.; Molenaar, R.J.; Munger, E.; Molenkamp, R.; van der Spek, A.; Tolsma, P.; Rietveld, A.; Brouwer, M.; et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science 2021, 371, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hammer, A.S.; Quaade, M.L.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Fonager, J.; Rasmussen, M.; Mundbjerg, K.; Lohse, L.; Strandbygaard, B.; Jorgensen, C.S.; Alfaro-Nunez, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission between Mink (Neovison vison) and Humans, Denmark. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 547–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Larsen, H.D.; Fonager, J.; Lomholt, F.K.; Dalby, T.; Benedetti, G.; Kristensen, B.; Urth, T.R.; Rasmussen, M.; Lassauniere, R.; Rasmussen, T.B.; et al. Preliminary report of an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in mink and mink farmers associated with community spread, Denmark, June to November 2020. Euro Surveill. 2021, 26, 2100009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yen, H.L.; Sit, T.H.C.; Brackman, C.J.; Chuk, S.S.Y.; Gu, H.; Tam, K.W.S.; Law, P.Y.T.; Leung, G.M.; Peiris, M.; Poon, L.L.M.; et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant (AY.127) from pet hamsters to humans, leading to onward human-to-human transmission: A case study. Lancet 2022, 399, 1070–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Haagmans, B.L.; Koopmans, M.P.G. Spreading of SARS-CoV-2 from hamsters to humans. Lancet 2022, 399, 1027–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kok, K.H.; Wong, S.C.; Chan, W.M.; Wen, L.; Chu, A.W.; Ip, J.D.; Lee, L.K.; Wong, I.T.; Lo, H.W.; Cheng, V.C.; et al. Co-circulation of two SARS-CoV-2 variant strains within imported pet hamsters in Hong Kong. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2022, 11, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, T.; Ryu, B.; Lee, S.; Song, Y.; Jeong, Y.; Kim, I.; Kim, J.; Kim, E.; Lee, W.; Lee, H.; et al. Management following the first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 in a domestic cat associated with a massive outbreak in South Korea. One Health 2021, 13, 100328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bushnell, B. BBTools Software Package. 2014. Available online: https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/ (accessed on 1 September 2022).
  19. Li, H.; Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; Genome Project Data Processing, S. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Neph, S.; Kuehn, M.S.; Reynolds, A.P.; Haugen, E.; Thurman, R.E.; Johnson, A.K.; Rynes, E.; Maurano, M.T.; Vierstra, J.; Thomas, S.; et al. BEDOPS: High-performance genomic feature operations. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1919–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2987–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rambaut, A.; Holmes, E.C.; O’Toole, A.; Hill, V.; McCrone, J.T.; Ruis, C.; du Plessis, L.; Pybus, O.G. A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to assist genomic epidemiology. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 1403–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. O’Toole, A.; Scher, E.; Underwood, A.; Jackson, B.; Hill, V.; McCrone, J.T.; Colquhoun, R.; Ruis, C.; Abu-Dahab, K.; Taylor, B.; et al. Assignment of epidemiological lineages in an emerging pandemic using the pangolin tool. Virus Evol. 2021, 7, veab064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Katoh, K.; Misawa, K.; Kuma, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Nguyen, L.T.; Schmidt, H.A.; von Haeseler, A.; Minh, B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Animal Protection Management System, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Policy Promotion Dashboard. Available online: https:animal.go.kr/ (accessed on 18 December 2022).
  29. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA), Republic of Korea. COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://ncov.kdca.go.kr/ (accessed on 12 December 2022).
  30. Pango Lineages: Latest Epidemiological Lineages of SARS-CoV-2. Lineage List Dashboard. Available online: https://www.cov-lineages.org/ (accessed on 31 October 2022).
  31. Hamer, S.A.; Ghai, R.R.; Zecca, I.B.; Auckland, L.D.; Roundy, C.M.; Davila, E.; Busselman, R.E.; Tang, W.; Pauvolid-Correa, A.; Killian, M.L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant of concern detected in a pet dog and cat after exposure to a person with COVID-19, USA. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 1656–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Park, A.K.; Kim, I.H.; Man Kim, H.; Lee, H.; Lee, N.J.; Kim, J.A.; Woo, S.; Lee, C.Y.; Lee, J.; Oh, S.J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.619 and B.1.620 Lineages, South Korea, 2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kwon, J.H.; Kim, J.M.; Lee, D.H.; Park, A.K.; Kim, I.H.; Kim, D.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Lim, N.; Cho, K.Y.; Kim, H.M.; et al. Genomic epidemiology reveals the reduction of the introduction and spread of SARS-CoV-2 after implementing control strategies in Republic of Korea, 2020. Virus Evol. 2021, 7, veab077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, I.H.; Park, A.K.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, H.M.; Kim, K.J.; Kim, J.A.; Noh, J.S.; Lee, C.Y.; Rhee, J.E.; Kim, E.J. Status and characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 variant outbreak in the Republic of Korea in January 2021. Public Health Wkly Rep. (Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency) 2022, 15, 497–509. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis of SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequences. This tree includes 40 SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequences obtained in this study (25 dogs and 15 cats) and 421 SARS-CoV-2 complete genome sequences in GISAID from humans in South Korea. The analysis used ML with the GTR and F model.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis of SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequences. This tree includes 40 SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequences obtained in this study (25 dogs and 15 cats) and 421 SARS-CoV-2 complete genome sequences in GISAID from humans in South Korea. The analysis used ML with the GTR and F model.
Vetsci 10 00006 g001
Table 1. Number of sequences of variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 in 40 animal samples.
Table 1. Number of sequences of variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 in 40 animal samples.
Pango Lineage Cat(%) *Dog(%) *Total(%) *
B.1.497 1040.0426.71435.0
B.1.429(Epsilon variant)14.0-0.012.5
B.1.470 14.0-0.012.5
B.1.620 -0.016.712.5
B.1.1.7(Alpha variant)14.0-0.012.5
B.1.619.1 28.0320.0512.5
AY.69(Delta variant)936.0640.01537.5
AY.122.5(Delta variant)14.016.725.0
Total 25 15 40
* The frequency of the lineage among positive samples in cats or dogs.
Table 2. Pangolin lineages of SARS-CoV-2 in 40 animal samples.
Table 2. Pangolin lineages of SARS-CoV-2 in 40 animal samples.
No.SpeciesStrainSampling DatePango LineageNextstrain Clade †GISAID Clade ‡WHO LabelGISAID Accession ID.
1cat01-Seoul-012021-02-13B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15775580
2cat02-Sejong-012021-02-16B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15775581
3dogSeoul-0022021-02-16B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15775592
4dog03-Gyeonggi-012021-02-19B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15788906
5cat04-Gwangju-012021-03-05B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15793141
6catSeoul-0042021-03-08B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15775582
7catSeoul-0052021-03-09B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727682
8catSeoul-0062021-03-09B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727683
9catSeoul-0072021-03-09B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727684
10catSeoul-0142021-03-26B.1.42921C (Epsilon)GHEpsilon VariantEPI_ISL_15727685
11dog05-Daegu-012021-03-30B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727696
12dogSeoul-0162021-04-06B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15775593
13catSeoul-0182021-04-11B.1.47020AGHEPI_ISL_15727686
14catSeoul-192021-04-13B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727687
15catSeoul-282021-05-04B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727688
16catSeoul-292021-05-04B.1.49720CGHEPI_ISL_15727689
17dog06-Jeonbuk-012021-05-28B.1.62020AGEPI_ISL_15775590
18catSeoul-0362021-06-04B.1.1.720I (Alpha, V1)GRYAlpha variantEPI_ISL_15727690
19dogSeoul-0382021-06-06B.1.619.120AGHEPI_ISL_15775594
20catSeoul-0462021-06-30B.1.619.120AGHEPI_ISL_15775583
21catSeoul-0492021-07-02AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727691
22catSeoul-0502021-07-11AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775584
23dogSeoul-0532021-07-13B.1.619.120AGHEPI_ISL_15727698
24dogSeoul-0542021-07-14AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727699
25dogSeoul-0592021-07-20AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727700
26catSeoul-0612021-07-22AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727692
27dogSeoul-0652021-07-27AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15793142
28catSeoul-0692021-08-01B.1.619.120AGHEPI_ISL_15727693
29dogSeoul-0712021-08-03B.1.619.120AGHEPI_ISL_15727701
30catSeoul-0762021-08-08AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775585
31catSeoul-0772021-08-08AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727694
32dog07-Gyeonggi-North-012021-08-10AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775591
33dogSeoul-0792021-08-10AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775595
34dogSeoul-0812021-08-20AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727702
35catSeoul-0822021-08-24AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727695
36catSeoul-0932021-09-19AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775586
37catSeoul-0972021-10-08AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775587
38catSeoul-0982021-10-08AY.6921I (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775588
39catSeoul-0992021-10-24AY.122.521J (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15775589
40dog08-Gyeongnam-012021-12-10AY.122.521J (Delta)GKDelta variantEPI_ISL_15727697
† Nextstrain clade was determined by Nextclade (v2.8.1) (https://clade.nextstrain.org). ‡ GISAID Clade was determined based on the “Clade and lineage nomenclature, 2 March 2021” [10]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, Y.-K.; Kwon, O.-K.; Heo, J.; Nah, J.; Kang, H.-E.; Kang, Y.; Song, I.J.; Sung, H.-K. Whole Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Cats and Dogs in South Korea in 2021. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010006

AMA Style

Shin Y-K, Kwon O-K, Heo J, Nah J, Kang H-E, Kang Y, Song IJ, Sung H-K. Whole Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Cats and Dogs in South Korea in 2021. Veterinary Sciences. 2023; 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Yeun-Kyung, Oh-Kyu Kwon, Jinhwa Heo, Jinju Nah, Hae-Eun Kang, Yunhee Kang, In Jun Song, and Ho-Kyung Sung. 2023. "Whole Genome Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Cats and Dogs in South Korea in 2021" Veterinary Sciences 10, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop