The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
Abstract
:1. Introduction
History of Wine Packaging
2. Packaging Types
2.1. Glass
2.2. Light Weight Glass
2.3. Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
2.4. Bag-in-Box
2.5. Aluminum Cans
2.6. Tetra Pak®
3. Sensory and Flavor
3.1. Sensory and Flavor of Wine from Glass
3.2. Bag-in-Box
3.3. Sensory and Flavor of Wine from Aluminum Cans
3.4. Sensory and Flavor of Wine from Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
4. Sustainability and Environmental Impact
5. Attitudes toward Purchasing Alternative Wine Packaging Designs
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chambers, P.; Pretorius, I.; Chambers, P.J.; Pretorius, I.S. Fermenting knowledge: The history of winemaking, science and yeast research. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sicard, D.; Legras, J.-L. Bread, beer and wine: Yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. C. R. Biol. 2011, 334, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarro, A.; Puig, R.; Fullana-I-Palmer, P. Product vs. corporate carbon footprint: Some methodological issues. A case study and review on the wine sector. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 581–582, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Devesa-Rey, R.; Vecino, X.; Varela-Alende, J.; Barral, M.T.; Cruz, J.; Moldes, A. Valorization of winery waste vs. the costs of not recycling. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 2327–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marras, S.; Masia, S.; Duce, P.; Spano, D.; Sirca, C. Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 214–215, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV). Available online: http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/6782/oiv-2019-statistical-report-on-worldvitiviniculture.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2020).
- Revi, M.; Badeka, A.; Kontakos, S.; Kontominas, M. Effect of packaging material on enological parameters and volatile compounds of dry white wine. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robertson, G.L. Food Packaging Principles and Practice, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Roux, P.; Gérand, Y. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of the NOVINPAK® PET/RPET Bottle and Traditional Glass Bottle Including Vine Growing and Vine Making; Irstea: Montpellier, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Twede, D. The packaging technology and science of ancient transport amphoras. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2002, 15, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lockhart, H.E. A paradigm for packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 1997, 10, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGovern, P.E.; Fleming, S.J.; Katz, S.H. The Origins and Ancient History of Wine; Gordon and Breach Publishers: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Mass, J.L.; Wypyski, M.T.; Stone, R.E. Evidence for the Metallurgical Origins of Glass at Two Ancient Egyptian Glass Factories. MRS Bull. 2001, 26, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Island of Glass. MRS Bull. 1997, 22, 54. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lindsey, B. Bottle Typing/Diagnostic Shapes: Food Bottles & Canning Jars. Available online: http://www.sha.org/bottle/food.htm (accessed on 29 June 2020).
- Estreicher, S.K. From Fermentation to Transportation: Materials in the History of Wine. MRS Bull. 2002, 27, 991–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sajilata, M.; Savitha, K.; Singhal, R.; Kanetkar, V. Scalping of Flavors in Packaged Foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2006, 6, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imram, N. The role of visual cues in consumer perception and acceptance of a food product. Nutr. Food Sci. 1999, 99, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deliza, R.; MacFie, H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. J. Sens. Stud. 1996, 11, 103–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefani, G.; Romano, D.; Cavicchi, A. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story? Food Qual. Prefer. 2006, 17, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lange, C.; Martin, C.; Chabanet, C.; Combris, P.; Issanchou, S. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Qual. Prefer. 2002, 13, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mueller, S.; Lockshin, L. How Important Is Wine Packaging for Consumers? On the Reliability of Measuring Attribute Importance with Direct Verbal Versus Indirect Visual Methods. Ph.D. Thesis, Academy of Wine Business Research, Sonoma, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Ghidossi, R.; Poupot, C.; Thibon, C.; Pons, A.; Darriet, P.; Riquier, L.; De Revel, G.; Peuchot, M.M. The influence of packaging on wine conservation. Food Control 2012, 23, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charters, S.; Pettigrew, S. The dimensions of wine quality. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athens, K. Bottler caters to regional wineries. Sustain. Ind. Jan. 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Colman, T.; Päster, P. Red, White, and ‘Green’: The Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Global Wine Trade. J. Wine Res. 2009, 20, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jennings, D.; Wood, C. Wine: Achieving Competitive Advantage Through Design. Int. J. Wine Mark. 1994, 6, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, H.A.; Williams, R.; Bauman, M. Growth of the Wine-in-Can Market. Available online: https://www.depts.ttu.edu/hs/texaswine/docs/Wine_in_Can_Industry_Report.pdf (accessed on 29 October 2020).
- Thompson, K. Wine Packaging Alternatives Not All Good Wine Comes in Glass Bottles. Available online: https://www.iopp.org/files/public/ThompsonKatherineVT.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2020).
- Robinson, J. Red, White, and Green. Available online: https://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/red-white-and-green (accessed on 30 November 2020).
- De Gianna, A. Production of High-Quality Red Wines from Native Vines through the Management of Viticultural, Technological, Aging, and Packaging Variables; Universita di Foggia: Foggia, Italy, 2016; p. 279. [Google Scholar]
- Steckenborn, E. Why the Future of Wine Packaging is Recycled PET. Available online: https://www.beveragedaily.com/Article/2020/03/06/Why-the-future-of-wine-packaging-is-recycled-PET# (accessed on 11 November 2020).
- WRAP. Case Study Lightweight Wine Bottles: Less Is More. Available online: http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/GlassRight%20Wine%20lightweighing%20-%20web%20version.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2020).
- Gannon, S. How Light Can You Get? Economy Dictates that Bottles Decrease in Weight and Price; Wine Communications Group: Sonoma, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Stevens, R. Lightweight Bottles: The Lighter the Better? Available online: https://signetbranding.com/news/lightweight-bottles-the-lighter-the-better/ (accessed on 17 November 2020).
- Shirakura, A.; Nakaya, M.; Koga, Y.; Kodama, H.; Hasebe, T.; Suzuki, T. Diamond-like carbon films for PET bottles and medical applications. Thin Solid Films 2006, 494, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Bree, I.; De Meulenaer, B.; Samapundo, S.; Vermeulen, A.; Ragaert, P.; Maes, K.; De Baets, B.; Devlieghere, F. Predicting the headspace oxygen level due to oxygen permeation across multilayer polymer packaging materials: A practical software simulation tool. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2010, 11, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.Y.F.; Hu, Y.S.; Schiraldi, D.A.; Hiltner, A.; Baer, E. Crystallinity and oxygen transport properties of PET bottle walls. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 94, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dombre, C.; Rigou, P.; Wirth, J.; Chalier, P. Aromatic evolution of wine packed in virgin and recycled PET bottles. Food Chem. 2015, 176, 376–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ros-Chumillas, M.; Belissario, Y.; Iguaz, A.; López, A. Quality and shelf life of orange juice aseptically packaged in PET bottles. J. Food Eng. 2007, 79, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rick, L. Sustainably Optimized Flat Wine Bottles Enter US; Packaging Digest: Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wine Glass or Plastic Bottles? Available online: https://medium.com/@GarconWines/wine-in-glass-or-plastic-bottles-376d3c1dfd11 (accessed on 12 November 2020).
- Baude, C.K. A Preliminary Analysis of PET Barrier Technologies and Mechanical Performance Related to a 3L PET Wine Bottle, in Department of Packaging Science; Rochester Institute of Technology: New York, NY, USA, 2008; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
- Amcor Unveils Modern PET Bottle Concepts and Collaboration with Garçon Wines at Unified Wine and Grape Symposium. Available online: https://wineindustryadvisor.com/2020/02/05/amcor-unveils-modern-pet-bottle-concepts (accessed on 12 November 2020).
- Firstenfeld, J. The Changing Landscape of Wine Bottles; Wine Communications Group: Sonoma, CA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, J. Carbon Footprints, Wine and the Consumer. Available online: https://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/carbon-footprints-wine-and-consumer (accessed on 9 November 2020).
- Wine Packaging: The Pros and Cons of PET Bottles. Available online: https://www.packaginginnovation.com/packaging-materials/wine-packaging-the-pros-cons-of-pet-bottles/ (accessed on 12 November 2020).
- Kalkowski, J. Brining Innovation to Bag-in-Box; Packaging Digest: Oak Brook, IL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Fradique, S.; Hogg, T.; Pereira, J.; Pocas, M.F.F. Performance of Wine Bag-in-Box during Storage: Loss of Oxygen Barrier. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2011, 23, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
- Weed, A. Canned Wine Comes of Age; Wine Spectator: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, G. Wine Boxes and Cans Come of Age. Available online: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2019/wine-boxes-and-cans-come-of-age/ (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- Patterson, T. How Good Is That Wine Bag, Really? Wine Communications Group: Sonoma, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pinney, T. A History of Wine in America, 2nd ed.; University of California Press: Oakland, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, M. Is the Future of Wine in the Can? Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michellewilliams/2019/08/28/is-the-future-of-wine-in-the-can/#3d8590b76cc3 (accessed on 26 October 2020).
- Geueke, B. FPF Dossier: Can Coatings; Food Packaging: Zurich, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Vargel, C.; Jacques, M.; Schmidt, M.P. Corrosion of Aluminium; Science-Direct: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Allison, R.; Sacks, G.; Maslov-Bandic, L.; Montgomery, A.; Goddard, J. The Chemistry of Canned Wines; Cornell Viticulture and Enology: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Bomgardner, M. New epoxy could boot BPA from cans. Chem. Eng. Glob. Enterp. 2019, 97, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pires, E.J.; Teixeira, J.A.; Brányik, T.; Vicente, A.A. Yeast: The soul of beer’s aroma—A review of flavour-active esters and higher alcohols produced by the brewing yeast. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 1937–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Weed, A. Canned Wine Sales Are Bursting at the Seams; Wine Spectator: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- McIntyre, D. Once a Niche Product, Canned Wine Enters the Mainstream; Washington Post: Washington, WA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- IVA. Tetra Pak. Available online: https://www.iva.se/en/ (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Tetra Pak in Figures. Available online: https://www.tetrapak.com/about-tetra-pak/the-company/facts-figures (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Tetra Pak Packaging Material—Packed with Innovation. Available online: https://youtu.be/fR-esiS1Pn0 (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Packaging/Materials. Available online: https://www.tetrapak.com/packaging/materials (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Tetra Pak Prisma. Available online: https://www.tetrapak.com/en-us/solutions/packaging/packages/tetra-prisma-aseptic (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Acuti, D.; Mazzoli, V.; Grazzini, L.; Rinaldi, R. New patterns in wine consumption: The wine by the glass trend. Br. Food J. 2019, 122, 2655–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ponstein, H.J.; Meyer-Aurich, A.; Prochnow, A. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for German wine production. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 212, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tetra Pak: Protects What’s Good. Available online: https://www.tetrapak.com/en-us (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- Gannon, S. Pushing the Packaging Envelope—Alternative Formats and Closures Growing Fast in Volume Sales; Wine Communications Group: Sonoma, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, R.S. Wine Science: Principles and Applications; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Amerine, M.A.; Ough, C.S. Wine and Must Analysis M. A. Amerine and C. S. Ough Agricultural Experiment Station; University of California, Davis, CA John Wiley & Sons, New York/London/Sydney Toronto, 1974, 121 pp. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1974, 12, 19A. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno-Arribas, M.V.; Polo, M.C. Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Moreira, N.; Lopes, P.; Ferreira, H.; Cabral, M.; De Pinho, P.G. Sensory attributes and volatile composition of a dry white wine under different packing configurations. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrini, L.; Pantani, O.; Politi, S.; Angeloni, G.; Masella, P.; Calamai, L.; Parenti, A. Does bottle color protect red wine from photo-oxidation? Packag. Technol. Sci. 2019, 32, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilmartin, P. Understanding and controlling non-enzymatic wine oxidation. Manag. Wine Qual. 2010, 432–458. [Google Scholar]
- Benítez, P.; Castro, R.; Natera, R.; Barroso, C.G. Changes in the polyphenolic and volatile content of “Fino” Sherry wine exposed to high temperature and ultraviolet and visible radiation. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 222, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheynier, V.; Basire, N.; Rigaud, J. Mechanism of trans-caffeoyltartaric acid and catechin oxidation in model solutions containing grape polyphenoloxidase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1989, 37, 1069–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, E.; Martínez, A.; Laencina, J. Prevention of oxidative browning during wine storage. Food Res. Int. 1995, 28, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, N.; Lopes, P.; Ferreira, H.; Cabral, M.; De Pinho, P.G. Influence of packaging and aging on the red wine volatile composition and sensory attributes. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2016, 8, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidal, J.-C.; Moutounet, M. Monitoring of oxygen in the gas and liquide phases of bottles of wine at bottling and during storage. OENO One 2006, 40, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentana, A.; Pati, S.; La Notte, E.; Del Nobile, M.A. Chemical changes in Apulia table wines as affected by plastic packages. LWT 2009, 42, 1360–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eilert, S. New packaging technologies for the 21st century. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ferreira, A.C.S.; Hogg, T.; De Pinho, P.G. Identification of Key Odorants Related to the Typical Aroma of Oxidation-Spoiled White Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1377–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escudero, A.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Isolation and identification of odorants generated in wine during its oxidation: A gas chromatography–olfactometric study. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2000, 211, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, S.E.; Webster, J.B. Chapter 2 Sensory Impacts of Food–Packaging Interactions. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research; Academic Press: London, UK, 2009; pp. 17–64. [Google Scholar]
- Daiwa. Metal Can for Canning Wine; Daiwa Can: Tokyo, Japan, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Stokes, G.; Barics, S.J.A. Wine Packaged in Aluminum Containers. European Patent 2,767,583, 20 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Brewer, M.F. Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability. Nat. Resour. J. 1964, 3, 550–552. [Google Scholar]
- Meneses, M.; Torres, C.; Castells, F. Sensitivity analysis in a life cycle assessment of an aged red wine production from Catalonia, Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 562, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speirs, J.; McGlade, C.; Slade, R. Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass. Energy Policy 2015, 87, 654–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vellini, M.; Savioli, M. Energy and environmental analysis of glass container production and recycling. Energy 2009, 34, 2137–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isa, H. The need for waste management in the glass industries: A review. Sci. Res. Essays 2008, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molloy, M. The Meaning behind Colored Wine Bottles. In CGT Blog, Chateau Grand Traverse. Available online: https://cgtwines.com/cgt-lifestyle/blog/ (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Chen, D.; Masui, H.; Akai, T.; Yazawa, T. Investigation on a recycling process of waste colored glass. In Environmental Issues and Waste Management Technologies in the Ceramic and Nuclear Industries VIII; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; p. 398. [Google Scholar]
- Ankur, O.; Akriti, S.; Manvesh, S.; Seema, O. Food packaging–materials and sustainability—A review. Agric. Rev. 2015, 36, 241–245. [Google Scholar]
- Dudlicek, J.E.D. Beyond the Bottle. Progress. Groc. 2018, 97, 16. [Google Scholar]
- Berry, C. Should You Skip Canned Wine and Just Buy the Bottle? Available online: https://www.tasteofhome.com/article/canned-wine/ (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Rugani, B.; Vázquez-Rowe, I.; Benedetto, G.; Benetto, E. A comprehensive review of carbon footprint analysis as an extended environmental indicator in the wine sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 54, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlesinger, M.E. Aluminum Recycling, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, IL, USA, 2013; p. 282. [Google Scholar]
- Onstad, E. Factbook: Aluminum Cans Get Boost from Anger over Plastic Pollution. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-environment-plastic-aluminium-factbox/factbox-aluminum-cans-get-boost-from-anger-over-plastic-pollution-idUSKBN1WW0KC (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Hosford, W.F.; Duncan, J.L. The Aluminum Beverage can. Sci. Am. 1994, 271, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitts, E.; Witrick, K. Brewery Packaging in a Post-COVID Economy within the United States. Beverages 2021, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Squire, S. Wine Packaging: The Future of Wine Packaging in an Enviro-Conscious World; Winetitles Media: Broadview, Australia, 2019; pp. 79–81. [Google Scholar]
- Kriel, G. Canned wines take off in the SA market. Finweek 2020, 2020, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, L.; Worrell, E. Chapter 13—Plastic Recycling. In Handbook of Recycling; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 179–190. [Google Scholar]
- Geyer, R.; Jambeck, J.; Law, K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kibria, G. Presentation: Plastic Pollution- Sources, Global Production, Global “Hotspots”, Impacts on Biodiversity & Seafood; Adsorption of Organic & Inorganic Chemicals, and Mitigation. Pollut. Clim. Chang. Impacts 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Plastics: Material-Specific Data. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/plastics-material-specific-data (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Conkle, J.L.; Del Valle, C.D.B.; Turner, J.W. Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments? Environ. Manag. 2018, 61, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Defruyt, S. Towards a New Plastic Economy. Field Actions Sci. Rep. 2019, 19, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
- Marichelvam, M.K.; Jawaid, M.; Asim, M. Corn and Rice Starch-Based Bio-Plastics as Alternative Packaging Materials. Fibers 2019, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Where Glass Cannot Go: Bota Box Launches Eco-Friendly Bag-In-Box Premium Wine Range. Available online: https://www.packaginginsights.com/news/where-glass-cannot-go-bota-box-launches-eco-friendly-bag-in-box-premium-wine-range.html (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Ferrara, C.; De Feo, G. Comparative life cycle assessment of alternative systems for wine packaging in Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garbowski, T.; Gajewski, T.; Grabski, J.K. Estimation of the Compressive Strength of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes with Various Perforations. Energies 2021, 14, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKinney, R.W.J. Technology of Paper Recycling; Blackie Academic & Professional: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Otto, S.; Strenger, M.; Maier-Nöth, A.; Schmid, M. Food Packaging and Sustainability—Consumer Perception vs. Correlated Scientific Facts: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 298, 126733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawadiak, J.; Wojciechowski, S.; Piotrowski, T.; Krypa, A. Tetra Pak Recycling—Current Trends and New Developments. Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ma, Y. Changing Tetra Pak: From Waste to Resource. Sci. Prog. 2018, 101, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wine Statistics: US Wine Consumption; Wine Institute: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; p. 94105.
- Statista. Total Number of Wineries in the United States from 2009–2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/259353/number-of-wineries-in-the-us/ (accessed on 25 April 2021).
- Brown, K. America’s Favorite Drink over Time. Available online: https://vinepair.com/articles/americas-favorite-drinks-infographic/ (accessed on 28 April 2021).
- Lockshin, L.; Corsi, A.M. Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Econ. Policy 2012, 1, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barber, N.; Almanza, B.A. Influence of Wine Packaging on Consumers’ Decision to Purchase. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2006, 9, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GFK. Americans Reach Environmental Turning Point: Companies Need to Catch Up. Custom Research North America. Available online: https://www.csrwire.com/press_releases/15416-americans-reach-environmental-turning-point-companies-need-to-catch-up-according-to-gfk-roper-green-gauge-r-study (accessed on 25 April 2021).
- Peattie, K. Environmental Marketing Management: Meeting the Green Challenge; Financial Times Management: London, UK, 1995; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
- Bazoche, P.; Deola, C.; Soler, G.L. An experimental study of wine consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental characteristics. AgEcon 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcury, T. Environmental Attitude and Environmental Knowledge. Hum. Organ. 1990, 49, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolnicar, S.; Leisch, F. Selective marketing for environmentally sustainable tourism. Tour. Manag. 2008, 29, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
- Barber, N. Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Environmentally Friendly Wines: A Segmentation Approach. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2012, 13, 26–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrara, C.; Zigarelli, V.; De Feo, G. Attitudes of a sample of consumers towards more sustainable wine packaging alternatives. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 271, 122581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Packaging Type | Advantages | Disadvantages | Size | Recyclability |
---|---|---|---|---|
Glass | Traditional Inert superior gas and vapor barrier protection | Heavy Fragile Difficult to transport | Varies Common 750 mL | infinitely |
PET | Light weight Strong Inexpensive to produce | Need to incorporate oxygen scavengers Higher potential for oxidation | Varies | infinitely |
Bag-in-box | Larger volume Can be consumed over a period of time | More suspectable to oxygen permeation or SO2 loss Potential for absorption of flavor compounds | Varies Common 3 to 5 L | limited |
Aluminum cans | Light weight Ease of transport Resistant to oxidation Can be consumed directly from packaging | Low internal strength must be pressurized with N2 More suspectable to flavor sculping and taint | Can vary 375 mL current regulated size | limited |
TetraPak® | Light weight Easy to manufacture Flexible Highly stackable to improve transport and storage | Needs to incorporate both oxygen and light permeation Typically, a single use material | Varies 200 and 500 mL available | limited |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Thompson-Witrick, K.A.; Pitts, E.R.; Nemenyi, J.L.; Budner, D. The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine. Beverages 2021, 7, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages7020036
Thompson-Witrick KA, Pitts ER, Nemenyi JL, Budner D. The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine. Beverages. 2021; 7(2):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages7020036
Chicago/Turabian StyleThompson-Witrick, Katherine A., Eric R. Pitts, John L. Nemenyi, and Drew Budner. 2021. "The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine" Beverages 7, no. 2: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages7020036