Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Membrane-Based Operations in the Fruit Juice Processing Industry: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Macroelements, Transition Elements, and Anionic Contents of Commercial Roasted Ground Coffee Available in Jordanian Markets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Trends in Kombucha: Marketing Perspectives and the Need for Improved Sensory Research
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biogenic Amines in Alcohol-Free Beverages

Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Beverages 2020, 6(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6010017
Submission received: 20 December 2019 / Revised: 21 February 2020 / Accepted: 27 February 2020 / Published: 9 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wide World of Beverage Research: Reviews of Current Topics)

Abstract

:
Biogenic amines are ubiquitous bioactive compounds that are synthesized by living organisms and perform essential functions for their metabolism. In the human diet, their excessive intake can cause food poisoning. In food, especially in alcohol-free beverages, biogenic amines can be synthesized by enzymes, naturally present in raw materials, or by microorganisms, which may be naturally present in the matrix or be added during beverage transformation processes. For this reason, in alcohol-free beverages, biogenic amine amount can be considered, above a certain level, as undesired microorganism activity. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the biogenic amine profile of non-alcoholic beverages in order to monitor food quality and safety. Moreover, biogenic amines can be taken into account by industries in order to monitor production processes and products. This review article provides an overview on the biogenic amine profile of alcohol-free beverages (plant milk, nervine drinks, soft drinks, and fruit juices). Furthermore, the clinical and toxicological effects, the biogenic amines legislation, and biogenic amine synthesis have been evaluated in non-alcoholic beverages.

1. Introduction

Biogenic amines (BAs) are ubiquitous bioactive compounds, which can be produced through decarboxylation of amino acids or through amination or transamination of aldehydes and ketones [1]. Microorganisms’, plants’, and animals’ metabolism can synthetize BAs and degrade these compounds as a result of their normal metabolic activities [2]. BAs, characterized by low molecular weight, can be ranked in different classes on the basis of their chemical structure (aliphatic, aromatic, and heterocyclic amines). In addition to this grading, BAs can be classified by amino group number: monoamines (e.g., tyramine, serotonin, and phenylethylamine), diamines (e.g., putrescine, tryptamine, and cadaverine), and polyamines (e.g., spermine and spermidine) [3]. These compounds are divided into natural/endogenous and exogenous. Moreover, natural polyamines can be synthesized from normal plants’ and animals’ cellular metabolism, whereas exogenous polyamines originate from decarboxylation mediated by microorganisms [4].
Some biogenic amines such as spermine, spermidine, putrescine, and cadaverine are essential for cellular metabolism. These compounds are important for protein synthesis, nucleic acid regulation, and membrane stabilization [5]. Histamine, along with other biogenic amines such as tyramine, cadaverine, and putrescine, are implicated into inflammatory response, caused by ingestion of contaminated food and beverages [6]. This reaction is called “histamine poisoning”, because the cause of disease is mainly related to histamine ingestion [7]. BA synthesis occurs with great incidence in high-protein food. The amines profile, in beverages, depend on matrix considered and on microorganisms or enzymes contained [8]. Moreover, BAs are generated by endogenous amino acid decarboxylase activity in raw food materials or by decarboxylase-positive microorganism growth. In beverages, BAs can be synthetized by endogenous enzymes or microorganisms present in raw material or added during transformation processes [9]. Beverages are defined as “any liquid with a thirst quenching or refreshment function” and they involve different class of commodities [10]. They can be divided into the classes of alcoholic and alcohol-free drinks. Alcohol-free beverages include different types of drinks, for example, fruit juice, dairy beverages, and energy drinks. These drinks may come from animals (e.g., cow’s milk, goat’s milk) or fruits/vegetables (e.g., fruit juices, soymilk, oranges) [11,12]. In alcohol-free beverages, which are non-fermented drinks, biogenic amine content can be considered, above a certain level, as a microorganism activity unwanted signal. Indeed, in unfermented beverages, BA amount can be considered as a food quality and safety index [13]. Although there are reviews providing insight on BA chemistry and analysis [14,15], there is no study devoted to BA occurrence in non-alcoholic beverages.
The aim of this paper was to summarize the state of the art research concerning biogenic amines in alcohol-free beverages, focusing the attention on BAs’ clinical and toxicological aspects, their regulation, and their content in alcohol-free drinks.

2. Clinical and Toxicological Aspects

BA ingestion, through food and beverages, can have harmful effects on consumers’ health. Both BAs in food and those biosynthesized by cell metabolism have physiological functions [16]. BAs can be dangerous for human health in cases where they are ingested in considerable quantities or when their natural catabolism is inhibited [17]. One of the major problems that can be linked to BA contamination in food is scombroid syndrome (Scombrotoxin Fish Poisoning, SFP), also called “Histamine Poisoning” [7,17,18]. This poisoning is often associated with the ingestion of fish contaminated from histamine [19,20]. However, the other BAs are considered as enhancers of histamine effects. However, toxicity is such that it is not linked to any single BA’s action but to the synergistic effect of several BAs [21]. In lower concentration, histamine is physiologically present inside the human body and its normal function consists of allergic response initiation. Histamine is generally bound to heparin, and it is released into the bloodstream by cells after immune system stimulation [7]. Some polyamines, such as putrescine, spermine, spermidine, and cadaverine, are essential elements of cells, as they are fundamental in nucleic acid regulation and protein synthesis. These BAs also have the specific function of stabilizing cell membranes [22,23]. Polyamines can also act as secondary messengers in cellular metabolism, an essential process for cell growth and regeneration [24,25,26]. Even if some amines are physiologically present in the human body, their ingestion at a high concentration can be toxic and produce poisoning symptoms, involving a wide range of organs [27]. Below physiological conditions, BAs can be metabolized by three different enzymes, present in gastrointestinal tract, which have the ability to oxidize BA amino groups: diamino oxidase (DAO), monoamine oxidase (MAO), and histamine-N-methyltransferase (HMT). These enzyme systems are able to degrade concentration of amines that are normally taken in with food and beverages [17,28,29]. It is almost impossible to calculate the acceptable daily dose for the human organism, as individual BA toxicity is enhanced by a combination of several BAs [30]. The symptoms, caused by an excessive BAs intake, can occur not only in people with greater sensitivity to histamine and other BAs, but also in all subjects with a normal catabolic activity of BAs. The symptoms caused by BA ingestion are similar to food poisoning. Among the major effects, caused by BAs, are nausea, vomiting, respiratory distress, hot flushes, headache, dizziness, skin redness, itching, oral inflammation, hypotension, vasodilation, or vasoconstriction (Table 1) [20,31,32]. The duration of symptoms can diverge from 8 to 12 h, with more or less serious consequences for consumers [19]. In many cases, these symptoms disappear quickly if the intoxication is associated with the consumption of contaminated foods, and for this reason it is difficult to differentiate them from other diseases [33]. The EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) reported that dose–response at which symptoms occur, related to histamine ingestion, is 25–50 mg, and that poisoning occurs after consuming 75–300 mg of histamine [34].

3. Biogenic Amine Regulation

Food concentration limits have been defined as limiting food poisoning linked to BA intake. On the basis of recommendations reported in the Codex Alimentarius, the European Commission has given specific attention to food products with higher risk of biogenic amine contamination. These regulations are aimed at limiting BA amount in food, so as to protect consumers’ health. At the European and extra-European level, maximum acceptable concentration limits have been defined only for histamine in fish and fish products, whereas in other foods there are only proposed and/or recommended limits. A limit for the other BAs or other food products do not occur in any national legislation [49]. Table 2 shows the European and extra-European regulations relating to histamine legal limits in fish. As for drinks, there is no uniform legislation. However, only some European countries, in an arbitrary way, have established the legal limits for histamine (2 mg/L for Germany, 6 mg/L in Belgium, 8 mg/L in France, 4 mg/L in the Netherlands, and 10 mg/L for Switzerland and Austria) only in two beverages: wine and beer [50].
However, BAs are ubiquitous compounds, and the joint presence of several BAs in beverages can have harmful effects on health; therefore, it is of considerable importance to study and evaluate the BA profile of alcohol-free beverages.

4. Beverage Classification

Beverages are consumed mainly for their nutritional value (e.g., milk, fruit juices), thirst-quenching qualities (e.g., non-alcoholic drinks), exciting nature (e.g., coffee, tea), and recreational value (e.g., alcoholic beverages). Drinks are a heterogeneous class of commodities. There is no uniform regulation that defines how beverages should be classified. However, beverage classification can be based on many aspects, including formulation, carbonization, alcohol content, and physiological effects, among others [55].
Figure 1 shows a scheme displaying general beverage classification. Primarily, beverages can be divided into natural and synthetic beverages. Natural drinks are all drinks that are obtained through natural ingredient use or through a natural transformation process (such as milk, fruit juice, and wine), whereas synthetic drinks are obtained through artificial compound mixing (such as aroma, coloring, and sugar syrup) [56]. Another type of beverage classification is based on the presence or absence of carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide can be added to sugary beverages (such as cola drinks and carbonated water), or it can be produced naturally during fermentation processes, such as in wine and beer [57,58].
Another beverage classification is based on alcohol content. This classification is the most common form used to divide drinks. Alcoholic beverages are characterized by the presence of ethanol produced by fermentation processes. Generally, alcoholic beverages are furthermore divided into three classes: beer, wine, and spirits. Beer is the product obtained from fermentation of the soluble portion of barley (malt) or other cereal products such as rice and corn [59]. Wine is obtained from grape fermentation by yeasts (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and lactic bacteria [60]. Lastly, spirits contain high amount of alcohol (>15%) [61]. Spirit drinks can be produced from different raw materials (e.g., herbs, fruits, cereals) and they are subjected to distillation of fermented products or to raw material maceration in ethyl alcohol [61,62]. On the other hand, non-alcoholic beverages (such as fruit juices, milk, and soft drinks) do not content ethanol. Another drink classification method is based on temperature in which they are served. For this reason, they are divided into cold and hot. Furthermore, beverages can be classified based on physiological effects (e.g., excitants) that can be expected from stimulant drinks (e.g., coffee and tea infusion), which are predicted by bioactive molecules (e.g., caffeine, theobromine, phenolic compounds, ethanol) that act on the nervous and circulatory systems. On the contrary, non-stimulating beverages have no physiological effects (e.g., fruit juices, soft drinks) [63,64].
Therefore, within this classification, alcohol-free beverages, depending on drink types considered, can be both natural or synthetic, carbonated or not, they can have physiological effects or not, and they can be served either hot or cold [56].

5. Biogenic Amines in Alcohol-Free and Non-Alcoholic Beverages

In beverages, BAs can be considered as an indicator of food quality, food safety, and product freshness, as BAs are related to their transformation processes (such as fermentation, maturing, and maturation) and also beverage conservation processes [13]. However, BA concentration and type in beverages can also be related to food matrix from which they originate [65]. The studies carried out on BA are about 16,300 (Scopus data). From 1995 to 2015, scientific article production on BAs remained almost similar, around 250 per year, whereas from 2016 onwards there has been a significant improvement of publication (Figure 2a). In the literature, there are few biogenic amine publications in alcohol-free beverages. Indeed, only 1% total articles treat BAs in beverages, approximately 181 publications in 25 years (Figure 2b).

5.1. Biogenic Amine Synthesis in Alcohol-Free and Non-Alcoholic Beverages

Although, BAs are ubiquitous compounds and they are found mainly in protein foods, they can also be present in many types of beverages [66]. In alcohol-free beverages, BA amount above certain levels is associated with undesirable microorganism activity. However, BA level in alcohol-free drinks is not necessarily linked with microorganism activity and/or food spoilage [13]. BAs are formed in beverages primarily by amino acid decarboxylation related to microbial metabolism or cellular enzymes. BAs are also formed by decarboxylating and proteolytic enzymes that are produced by microorganisms naturally present in native microbial flora of drinks, or microorganisms added as starter culture, or added through contamination [67].
In alcohol-free drinks, microorganisms can be added by contamination due to inadequate hygienic condition. For these reasons, BA content in drinks could be used as an indicator of food quality and safety [1,13,68]. However, some BAs, especially endogenous polyamines, are naturally present in beverages, and they are synthetized during normal metabolic cell process [67].
BAs content depends on several aspects. First of all, BA concentration depends on type of alcohol-free beverage considered (i.e., animal or fruits/vegetables origin). Moreover, BA concentration and type mainly depend on microorganism presence with decarboxylase activity on decarboxylase enzyme types and on free amino acid amounts [69,70].
In alcohol-free beverages, derived from fruits/vegetables matrix, some BAs are representative of different plant species and can be used as a chemotaxonomic index [70]. Spermidine and spermine polyamines are ubiquitarians in plants, along with polyamine precursor putrescine, and consequently they are mainly found in fruits/vegetables drinks. In plants, these polyamines play the role of organic nitrogen sources, and they are involved in embryogenesis, root growth, control of intracellular pH, flower and fruit development, secondary metabolite synthesis, and abiotic stress response (e.g., potassium deficiency, osmotic shock, pathogen infection) [71,72].
In drinks based on animal matrix, such as milk and chocolate milk, the polyamines (spermidine and spermine), which have important role in cell growth, and the others BAs are detected with great variability, depending upon animal species and thermal treatments [73].
In both types of alcohol-free beverages, either animal or fruits/vegetables origin, there are some factors that can influence BA synthesis that are associated with microorganism presence or enzymes with decarboxylase capacity [74]. BA synthesis is influenced by different factors, which depend upon raw material (such as pH, chemical composition, and free amino acid), microorganisms and enzymes with decarboxylase activity, and processing and storage condition (such as temperature, sugar, and additives). The issue that most affects biogenic amine development is microorganism activity, associated or not, with raw material, transformative drink process, and storage [75].
Although, all the conditions entertain BA synthesis directly or indirectly, namely, by acting on microorganisms or enzyme decarboxylase activity of beverage matrix. Firstly, biogenic amine amounts are influenced by free amino acid amount in drinks. The availability of free amino acids depends on proteolytic activity or beverage matrix concerned [76]. Instead, pH can regulate, directly or indirectly, decarboxylase enzymes by increasing or decreasing their activity. Enzyme activities increase when beverage pH is low. Furthermore, the upsurge in BA amount may be linked to the defense mechanism of microorganisms, which use biogenic amines to respond to acidity improvement [77]. Storage temperature is another critical factor, which act on microorganism and enzyme activities, affecting the biogenic amine synthesis [4].
Another important factor in BA synthesis are additives (e.g., sugar, soy lecithin, and sodium sulphide) contained in beverage matrixes. Additive addiction can reduce microorganisms and enzyme activities; thus, BA synthesis is reduced indirectly [78].
In drinks, the additive of particular importance is sugar. Moreover, the absence of sugar influences the predisposition of the formation of biogenic amines during storage [79]. All these factors act in a combined manner, affecting the concentration of biogenic amines in food [80].
In Figure 3, a scheme is reported on biogenic amines synthesis and their precursor amino acids. BA synthesis occurs by removing the carboxyl group of amino acids by decarboxylase enzymes. The reaction mechanism also includes the presence of cofactors, such as vitamin B6, which acts as a link between enzyme active site and amino acids, leading to intermediate base formation, which are subsequently transformed into biogenic amines. Each BA is generated from an amino acid and a specific decarboxylase enzyme, with some exceptions (e.g., agmatine, spermine, and spermidine, which can all be synthesized, starting from arginine) [3,67,81].

5.2. Biogenic Amine Amount in “Plant Milk”

Fruits/vegetables milks, which are also called “plant milk” or “non-dairy milk”, are beverages based on fruits/vegetables raw materials (e.g., barley, rice, wheat). The commodity definition of “milk” is specified by regulation (EC) no. 1308/2013, which defines it as “the normal mammary secretion obtained from one or more milking without either addition thereto or extraction therefrom” [82]. Although plant milks do not fall into this product category, indeed consumers have given it the name “milk” for its color likeness with animal milk [83]. Plant milks are produced through raw material milling and extraction, solid fraction separation, fruits/vegetables milk formulation and homogenization, ultra-high temperature (UHT) treatment, and packaging [84]. Fruits/vegetables milks can be classified according to the raw material used, such as cereal-based (e.g., oat milk, corn milk, rice milk), legume-based (e.g., soy milk, lupine milk), nut-based (e.g., coconut milk, walnut milk), seed-based (e.g., sesame milk, flax milk, hemp milk), and pseudo-cereal milk (e.g., quinoa milk, teff milk, amaranth milk) [85]. Table 3 reports literature data on BA contents in plant milks. In plant-based products, BAs may occur as a product of cellular metabolism and accumulated through enzymatic activity [83]. BA concentration and type detected in plant milks diverge according to milk classes taken into consideration. The analytical methods used for BA determination in plant milks are ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)/fluorescence detection (FD) [4] and HPLC/FD [86]. The significant difference between the two methods concerns the analysis time; indeed, analysis time performed by UHPLC/FD is less than HPLC/FD [4,86]. The most detected BAs in plant milks are spermine, spermidine, histamine, cadaverine, and tyramine, whereas tryptamine has not been detected in any of the analyzed samples. The polyamines spermine and spermidine were found in higher quantities in soymilk, at concentrations of 8.37 mg/L and 2.04 mg/L, respectively [4]. Polyamines are present in all plant milks, although at different concentrations, and these can be linked to endogenous synthesis of polyamines or even to enzymatic activity of the matrix [86], although the highest concentration of histamine (8.37 mg/L), which is the only regulated amine, was observed in millet milk samples [87]. As for cadaverine, the highest concentration (5.36 mg/L) was found in barley milk, whereas tyramine concentration (not detected (nd)-0.66 mg/L), putrescine, and phenylethylamine appeared to be low in all samples analyzed in the literature [4,86,87].

5.3. Biogenic Amine Amount in Fruit Juice

Fruit juices are defined by the directive (EC) no. 2001/112, which can consist of 100% pure juice made from pulp of fresh fruit or from concentrate. Fruit juice does not contain flavorings, dyes, stabilizers, or any other added ingredients [88]. Different types of fruit juices can be distinguished: fruit concentrated juice and fruit nectars. In the former beverages, juice is obtained by reconstituting concentrated fruit juice with potable water. On the other hand, fruit nectars are obtained with the addition of water, with or without the addition of sugars, to the fruit juices, fruit purée, and/or concentrated fruit purée. The fruit content varies in a range from 25% to 99%, and minimum juice content varies according to the fruit in question [89]. The raw materials from which fruit juices originate are natural sources of BAs, especially polyamines [85]. In fact, polyamines are ubiquitous compounds in the plant kingdom, together with their putrescine precursor [79]. HPLC is the analytical method used for identification of BAs in fruit juice samples, supported by a UV or FD detector. The analysis time varies between 20 and 71 min, depending on the chromatographic method that is set, whereas the limit of detection (LOD) varies between 0.001 and 0.023 mg/L and the limit of quantification (LOQ) varies between 0.001 and 0.017 mg/L [79,90,91,92,93].
In all fruit juices analyzed in literature, the presence of putrescine (0.01–60.97 mg/L) was found; the highest amount was found in orange concentrated juice (60.97 mg/L) [90] and in orange juice (43.70 mg/L) (Table 4) [79]. Consequently, spermine (0.24–3.58 mg/L) and spermidine (nd-5.41 mg/L) were detected in all the samples analyzed in the literature [79,89,90,91,92,93]. Furthermore, the highest cadaverine concentration was detected in apricot juice (17.93 mg/L) and indeed in orange concentrated juice ethylamine (38.6 mg/L) [89]. The other BAs (phenylethylamine, tyramine, tryptamine, methylamine) have been identified only in some types of fruit juices: pear nectar, orange juice, apple juice, mango juice, pineapple, litchi juice, and grapefruit juice [89,90,91,92,93]. Histamine was only found in orange juice at a lower concentration (nd-0.26 mg/L) [91].

5.4. Biogenic Amine Content in Stimulating Beverages

Nervine drinks are all drinks that contain bioactive compounds that can lead to physiological effects on the central nervous system. Nervine drinks originate from nervine foods such as coffee, tea, and cocoa [94]. The brew process involves raw material extraction, by boiling water or steam, of water-soluble compounds contained in stimulating beverages. The main factors, which involve BA presence in nervine beverages, can be traced back to industrial treatments (fermentation, toasting, etc.) that the raw materials undergo before beverage preparation. In the literature there are few works that have investigated BAs in nervine drinks; instead, greater attention has been given to BA evaluation and determination in raw materials due to the fact that BAs can be taken as quality indicators of industrial processes [86]. Liquid chromatography is the method that has been applied for the identification and quantification of BA in stimulating beverages. The analysis time varied according to the method chosen between 20 and 80 min. In addition, the LOD and LOQ were 0.31–0.50 mg/L and 0.56–1.50 mg/L, respectively [95,96,97,98,99,100]. Table 5 shows BA concentrations in nervine beverages. Tea infusion is a drink made from the leaves of Camellia sinensis plant. Depending on the manufacturing process, different types of tea can be distinguished: black tea, green tea, white tea, oolong tea, yellow tea, and pu-er tea [96]. The literature studies investigated the BA profile of black and green tea infusions, reconstituted instant tea, and tea-based drinks [56]. Endogenous BAs were recovered in tea infusion, most notably, putrescine (nd-14.2 mg/L), spermidine (nd-10.4 mg/L), and spermine (nd-10.3 mg/L) [96,97]. Spizzirri et al. (2016) [97] found a higher content of BAs in samples analyzed compared to the study carried out by Bruckner et al. (2012) [95]. Furthermore, literature studies showed that black tea infusion, compared to green tea infusion, instant tea, and tea-based drinks, also contained histamine (nd-20.0 mg/L) and cadaverine (nd-14 mg/L), which are mostly involved in BA food poisoning [96,97]. Coffee drink is obtained from seeds of Coffea plants. Coffee brewing is performed by three different methods: decoctions, infusion, and pressure methods. There are only three studies in the literature that have evaluated the BA profile of coffee-based drinks [56]. In three types of coffee studied (Espresso coffee, Turkish coffee, and reconstituted instant coffee), the following BAs were found: phenylalanine, putrescine, cadaverine, histamine, tyramine, spermidine, spermine, and serotonin [98,99,100]. Instant coffee was found to have a higher content of serotonin (8.0–18.0 mg/L), compared to Espresso [98] and Turkish coffee [99]. Histamine, present in all the samples analyzed, was detected at low concentrations (nd-1.62 mg/L), which is lower than the European recommended concentration [98,99,100]. The BA profile shows how the coffee brew process influences the BAs amount set out in beverages [98]. The study by Restuccia et al. (2015) [97] showed that use of high temperatures and coffee beverage extraction pressures reduce BA amount in finished drinks, compared to Turkish coffee, obtained by coffee seed decoction [99,101], or reconstituted instant coffee [100].

5.5. Biogenic Amine Amount in Soft Drinks

Among alcohol-free beverages there are soft drinks. These are a heterogeneous beverage class that includes carbonated beverages, milk-based drinks, non-alcoholic beers, and energy drinks [56]. In the literature there are few studies carried out to evaluate BA profile and amount in these drinks. The beverages analyzed in the literature are orange carbonated-based drink [79], non-alcoholic beer [102,103], dairy beverages [104], and milk chocolate [105]. The BA determination methods used in soft drinks is high performance liquid chromatography, supported by UV [79,102,104,105]; FD [102,103] detector. The analysis time for the reported literature methods varied between 35 and 71 min. In addition, the LOD and LOQ were 0.003–1.40 mg/L and 0.009–4.60 mg/L, respectively [79,102,103,104,105]. Vieira et al. (2007) evaluated BA amount in 35 samples of orange carbonated-based drinks. In these samples, putrescine (0.69–5.14 mg/L), histamine (0.01–0.03 mg/L), spermidine (0.01–0.32 mg/L), and spermine (0.01–0.04 mg/L) were found [79]. The BA concentration in orange carbonated-based drinks follows the amino profile of orange juices from which they are produced [106]. Non-alcoholic beer is another soft drink in which BAs have been studied. Non-alcoholic beer is a drink that contains less than 0.5% alcohol by volume [107]. The amines most present were putrescine (0.31–1.43 mg/L), cadaverine (0.11–0.56 mg/ L), tryptamine (0.28–2.56 mg/L), spermine (0.13–0.72 mg/L), and spermidine (0.16–0.81 mg/L). Phenylethylamine, histamine, and tyramine were only found in some of the analyzed non-alcoholic beer samples (Table 6) [102,103]. Another type of soft drink considered is dairy beverages. These drinks are made from milk, both fruits/vegetables and animal, to which flavors and other ingredients are added [108]. In the literature, the BA profile of only one sample of dairy beverages [104] and eight samples of chocolate milk [105] was studied. The analyses showed that the BAs detected in the dairy beverages sample were putrescine (3.2 mg/L), histamine (1.9 mg/L), and agmatine (3.1 mg/L) [104]. In chocolate milk samples, the BAs detected were putrescine (nd-0.4 mg/L), tyramine (nd-0.03 mg/L), tryptamine (nd-0.1 mg/L), spermine (nd-2.0 mg/L), and spermidine (nd-2.0 mg/L) [105]. To date, there are limited data in the literature to fully and thoroughly assess the BA profile of soft drinks.

6. Conclusions

To our best knowledge, this is the first review that deals with BAs in alcohol-free beverages. In recent years, alcohol-free beverage consumption has been growing strongly [109,110]. In soft drinks, it is essential to monitor BA amount as an important aspect related to BA control in the monitoring of the quality of drinks. Another aspect to pay attention to is histamine, cadaverine, and tyramine content in alcohol-free beverages, in order to promote consumer health defense, as BAs may be involved in food poisoning [30]. For these reasons, BAs can be taken into consideration as product and process indicators, which allow beverage quality and safety to be controlled along the entire production chain. To date, in the literature there are few studies regarding BAs in alcohol-free beverages. BA concentration and type content in alcohol-free beverages differ significantly on the basis of drink type taken into consideration, on transformation and production process, and on raw material from which they are originated. The most common BAs that have been detected at different amounts in all alcohol-free beverages, are the polyamines spermine and spermidine, and their precursor putrescine. This is related to the fact that these amines are specific for cellular metabolism, both animal and fruits/vegetables. Moreover, in all alcohol-free beverages, histamine (nd-20.0 mg/L)—the only BA that is currently regulated—has lower concentrations than the limit established by European law (100 mg/L) [51]. Following previous considerations, it should be useful to actively promote BA study profile in alcohol-free drinks, not only in order to protect human health but also to allow beverage industries to monitor food quality and food safety along the entire production chain.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HimHistamine
TyrTyramine
PutPutrescine
CadCadaverine
MetMethylamine
AgmAgmatine
PhePhenylethylamine
SpmSpermine
SpdSpermidine
TryTryptamine
EtyEthylamine
SerSerotonin
nd not detected
ni not investigated
BasBiogenic amines
LODLimit of detection
LOQLimit of quantification

References

  1. Silla Santos, M.H. Biogenic amines: Their importance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 29, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Monagas, M.; Bartolomé, B. Anthocyanins and anthocyanin-derived compounds. In Wine Chemistry and Biochemistry, 1st ed.; Victoria Moreno-Arribas, M., Carmen Polo, M., Eds.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 439–462. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dvoryanchikv, G.; Tomchik, S.M.; Chaudhari, N. Biogenic amine synthesis and uptake in rodent taste buds. J. Comp. Neurol. 2007, 505, 302–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Toro-Funes, N.; Bosch-Fusté, J.; Veciana-Nogués, M.T.; Vidal-Carou, M.C. Effect of ultra-high-pressure homogenization treatment on the bioactive compounds of soya milk. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ali, M.A.; Poortvliet, E.; Strömberg, R.; Yngve, A. Polyamines in foods: Development of a food database. Food Nutr. Res. 2011, 55, 5572–5586. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shalaby, A.R. Significance of biogenic amines to food safety and human health. Food Res. Int. 1996, 29, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Taylor, S.L.; Eitenmiller, R.R. Histamine food poisoning: Toxicology and clinical aspects. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1986, 17, 91–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Russo, P.; Capozzi, V.; Spano, G.; Corbo, M.R.; Sinigaglia, M.; Bevilacqua, A. Metabolites of microbial origin with an impact on health: Ochratoxin A and biogenic amines. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Costantini, A.; Vaudano, E.; Pulcini, L.; Carafa, T.; Garcia-Moruno, E. An Overview on Biogenic Amines in Wine. Beverages 2019, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. UNCTAD. Standard International Trade Classification Revision 3. Int. Trade Commod. Stat. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Centre, M.; Education, V. Study of Food Products and Beverages Industry. Methodol. Cent. Vocat. Educ. Train. 2008, 12, 226–233. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandrasekara, A.; Shahidi, F. Herbal beverages: Bioactive compounds and their role in disease risk reduction—A review. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2018, 8, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Herrero, A.M. Impact of biogenic amines on food quality and safety. Foods 2019, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Neofotistos, A.D.G.; Tsagkaris, A.S.; Danezis, G.P.; Proestos, C. Emerging Trends in Biogenic Amines Analysis. In Biogenic Amines; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mohammed, G.I.; Bashammakh, A.S.; Alsibaai, A.A.; Alwael, H.; El-Shahawi, M.S. A critical overview on the chemistry, clean-up and recent advances in analysis of biogenic amines in foodstuffs. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 78, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bardócz, S. Polyamines in food and their consequences for food quality and human health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 6, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Comas-Basté, O.; Luz Latorre-Moratalla, M.; Sánchez-Pérez, S.; Teresa Veciana-Nogués, M.; del Carmen Vidal-Carou, M. Histamine and Other Biogenic Amines in Food. From Scombroid Poisoning to Histamine Intolerance. Biog. Amines 2019, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hungerford, J.M. Scombroid poisoning: A review. Toxicon 2010, 56, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Visciano, P.; Schirone, M.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Histamine poisoning and control measures in fish and fishery products. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Taylor, S.L.; Stratton Jayne, E.; Nordlee, J.A. Histamine Poisoning (Scombroid Fish Poisoning): An Allergy-Like Intoxication. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 1989, 27, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schirone, M.; Visciano, P.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Histamine food poisoning. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2017, 241, 217–235. [Google Scholar]
  22. Emborg, J.; Laursen, B.G.; Dalgaard, P. Significant histamine formation in tuna (Thunnus albacares) at 2 °C- Effect of vacuum- and modified atmosphere-packaging on psychrotolerant bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 101, 263–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Taylor, S.L.; Lieber, E.R. In vitro inhibition of rat intestinal histamine-metabolizing enzymes. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1979, 17, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brown, R.E.; Haas, H.L. On the mechanism of histaminergic inhibition of glutamate release in the rat dentate gyrus. J. Physiol. 1999, 515, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kusano, T.; Berberich, T.; Tateda, C.; Takahashi, Y. Polyamines: Essential factors for growth and survival. Planta 2008, 228, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lenis, Y.Y.; Elmetwally, M.A.; Maldonado-Estrada, J.G.; Bazer, F.W. Physiological importance of polyamines. Zygote 2017, 25, 244–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Moinard, C.; Cynober, L.; de Bandt, J.P. Polyamines: Metabolism and implications in human diseases. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 24, 84–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mietz, J.L.; Karmas, E. Polyamine and histamine content of rockfish, salmon, lobster, and shrimp as an indicator of decomposition. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. (USA) 1978, 61, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maintz, L.; Novak, N. Histamine and histamine intolerance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 85, 1185–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kovacova-Hanuskova, E.; Buday, T.; Gavliakova, S.; Plevkova, J. Histamine, histamine intoxication and intolerance. Allergol. Immunopathol. (Madr.) 2015, 43, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ruiz-Capillas, C.; Jimenez Colmenero, F. Biogenic amines in meat and meat products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Doeun, D.; Davaatseren, M.; Chung, M.S. Biogenic amines in foods. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1463–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fogel, W.A.; Lewinski, A.; Jochem, J. Histamine in food: Is there anything to worry about? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Biji, K.B.; Ravishankar, C.N.; Venkateswarlu, R.; Mohan, C.O.; Srinivasa, T.K. Biogenic amines in seafood: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2210–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Abdulhussein, A.A.; Wallace, H.M. Polyamines and membrane transporters. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tortorella, V.; Masciari, P.; Pezzi, M.; Mola, A.; Tiburzi, S.P.; Zinzi, M.C.; Scozzafava, A.; Verre, M. Histamine Poisoning from Ingestion of Fish or Scombroid Syndrome. Case Rep. Emerg. Med. 2014, 2014, 482531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stratta, P.; Badino, G. Scombroid poisoning. Can. Med Assoc. J. 2012, 184, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tofalo, R.; Perpetuini, G.; Schirone, M.; Suzzi, G. Biogenic Amines: Toxicology and Health Effect. Encycl. Food Health 2015, 71, 424–429. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shalaby, A.R. Changes in biogenic amines in mature and germinating legume seeds and their behavior during cooking. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2000, 44, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dickinson, G. Scombroid fish poisoning syndrome. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1982, 11, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Marcobal, A.; de las Rivas, B.; Landete, J.M.; Tabera, L.; Muñoz, R. Tyramine and Phenylethylamine Biosynthesis by Food Bacteria. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 448–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ladero, V.; Calles-Enriquez, M.; Fernandez, M.A.; Alvarez, M. Toxicological Effects of Dietary Biogenic Amines. Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 2010, 6, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fankhauser, C.; Charieras, T.; Caille, D.; Rovei, V. Interaction of MAO inhibitors and dietary tyramine: A new experimental model in the conscious rat. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1994, 32, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Medina, M.Á.; Urdiales, J.L.; Rodríguez-Caso, C.; Ramírez, F.J.; Sánchez-Jiménez, F. Biogenic amines and polyamines: Similar biochemistry for different physiological missions and biomedical applications. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 38, 23–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Broadley, K.J. The vascular effects of trace amines and amphetamines. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 125, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kalač, P. Health effects and occurrence of dietary polyamines: A review for the period 2005-mid 2013. Food Chem. 2014, 161, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eliassen, K.A.; Reistad, R.; Risoen, U.; Ronning, H.F. ScienceDirect -Food Chemistry: Dietary polyamines. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2002, 13, 273–280. [Google Scholar]
  48. Pegg, A.E. The function of spermine. IUBMB Life 2014, 66, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. FAO/WHO. Public Health Risks of Histamine and Other Biogenic Amines from Fish and Fishery Products; WHO (Word Health Organization): Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  50. EFSA. Scientific Opinion on risk-based control of biogenic amine formation in fermented foods. EFSA Eur. Food Saf. Auth. J. 2011, 9, 2393. [Google Scholar]
  51. Roger, S.; Tofalo, B. Biogenic Amines in Food: Analysis, Occurrence and Toxicity. Royal Society of Chemistry. Food Chem. Funct. Anal. 2019, 20, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  52. EU. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on Microbiological Criteria for Foodstuffs; European Union (EU): Brussels, Belgium, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  53. USFDA. Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance; Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition: College Park, MD, USA, 2019.
  54. FSANZ. Imported Food Risk Statement: Fish and Fish Products from the Families Specified and Histamine; Food Safety Australia New Zealand: Canberra, Australia, 2016.
  55. Mohedano, M.L.; López, P.; Spano, G.; Russo, P. Controlling the formation of biogenic amines in fermented foods. In: Advances in Fermented Foods and Beverages: Improving Quality. Technol. Health Benefits 2015, 64, S95–S100. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bhattacharjee, C.; Saxena, V.K.; Dutta, S. Fruit juice processing using membrane technology: A review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2017, 43, 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mudgil, D.; Barak, S. Beverages: Processing and Technology; Scientific Publishers: Jodhpur, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kalac, P.; Krizek, M. A Review of Biogenic Amines and Polyamines in Beer. J. Inst. Brew. 2003, 109, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Brányik, T.; Vicente, A.A.; Dostálek, P.; Teixeira, J.A. A review of flavour formation in continuous beer fermentations. J. Inst. Brew. 2008, 114, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Montanari, L.; Floridi, S.; Marconi, O.; Tironzelli, M.; Fantozzi, P. Effect of mashing procedures on brewing. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 221, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lodolo, E.J.; Kock, J.L.F.; Axcell, B.C.; Brooks, M. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae—The main character in beer brewing. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 1018–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. EU. European Parliament and Council (EU) 2019/787 Regarding the Definition, Designation, Presentation and Labeling of Beverages Witty, Using the Names of Spirit Drinks in Presentation and Labeling of Other Foodstuffs, as well as the Protection of Geographica; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  63. Brereton, P.; Hasnip, S.; Bertrand, A.; Wittkowski, R.; Guillou, C. Analytical methods for the determination of spirit drinks. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2003, 22, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cabrera, C.; Artacho, R.; Giménez, R. Beneficial Effects of Green Tea—A Review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2006, 25, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Flick, G.J.; Ankenman Granata, L. Biogenic amines in foods. Toxins Food 2004, 8, 121–153. [Google Scholar]
  66. FAO/WHO Commission. Discussion Paper Histamine, Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Joint FAO/WHO food Standards Programme; WHO (Word Health Organization): Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 7. [Google Scholar]
  67. Dadáková, E.; Pelikánová, T.; Kalač, P. Content of biogenic amines and polyamines in some species of European wild-growing edible mushrooms. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2009, 230, 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  68. Linares, D.M.; Martín, M.C.; Ladero, V.; Álvarez, M.A.; Fernández, M. Biogenic amines in dairy products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vinci, G.; Antonelli, M.L. Biogenic amines: Quality index of freshness in red and white meat. Food Control 2002, 13, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Torracca, B.; Pedonese, F.; López, M.B.; Turchi, B.; Fratini, F.; Nuvoloni, R. Effect of milk pasteurisation and of ripening in a cave on biogenic amine content and sensory properties of a pecorino cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2016, 61, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Casal, S.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Ferreira, M.A. Determination of biogenic amines in coffee by an optimized liquid chromatographic method. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2002, 25, 2535–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wheaton, T.A.; Stewart, I. Quantitative analysis of phenolic amines using ion-exchange chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 1965, 12, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bouchereau, A.; Guenot, P.; Larher, F. Analysis of amines in plant materials. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 2000, 747, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sagratini, G.; Fernández-Franzón, M.; De Berardinis, F.; Font, G.; Vittori, S.; Mañes, J. Simultaneous determination of eight underivatised biogenic amines in fish by solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tassoni, A.; Tango, N.; Ferri, M. Comparison of biogenic amine and polyphenol profiles of grape berries and wines obtained following conventional, organic and biodynamic agricultural and oenological practices. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Linares, D.M.; Del Río, B.; Ladero, V.; Martínez, N.; Fernández, M.; Martín, M.C.; Alvarez, M.A. Factors influencing biogenic amines accumulation in dairy products. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 28, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Calzada, J.; Del Olmo, A.; Picon, A.; Gaya, P.; Nuñez, M. Proteolysis and biogenic amine buildup in high-pressure treated ovine milk blue-veined cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 4816–4829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sabaté, J.; Pujolà, M.; Labanda, J.; Llorens, J. Influence of pH and operation variables on biogenic amines nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 58, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, J.Y.; Kima, Y.G.; Her, J.Y.; Kim, M.K.; Lee, K.G. Reduction of biogenic amine contents in fermented soybean paste using food additives. LWT 2018, 98, 470–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vieira, S.M.; Theodoro, K.H.; Glória, M.B.A. Profile and levels of bioactive amines in orange juice and orangesoft drink. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 895–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krause, I.; Bockhardt, A.; Klostermeyer, H. Characterization of cheese ripening by free amino acids and biogenic amines and influence of bactofugation and heat-treatment of milk. Lait 1997, 77, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. EU. Council Directive (EC) N° 2001/112 Fruit Juices and Other Similar Products Intended for Human Consumption; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  83. McClements, D.J.; Newman, E.; McClements, I.F. Plant-based Milks: A Review of the Science Underpinning Their Design, Fabrication, and Performance. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 2046–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. O’Connell, J.E.; Fox, P.F. Significance and applications of phenolic compounds in the production and quality of milk and dairy products: A review. Int. Dairy J. 2001, 11, 103–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Righetti, L.; Tassoni, A.; Bagni, N. Polyamines content in plant derived food: A comparison between soybean and Jerusalem artichoke. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Papageorgiou, M.; Lambropoulou, D.; Morrison, C.; Kłodzińska, E.; Namieśnik, J.; Płotka-Wasylka, J. Literature update of analytical methods for biogenic amines determination in food and beverages. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 98, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Gobbi, L.; Ciano, S.; Rapa, M.; Ruggieri, R. Biogenic Amines Determination in “Plant Milks”. Beverages 2019, 5, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Echavarría, A.P.; Torras, C.; Pagán, J.; Ibarz, A. Fruit Juice Processing and Membrane Technology Application. Food Eng. Rev. 2011, 3, 136–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Preti, R.; Bernacchia, R.; Vinci, G. Chemometric evaluation of biogenic amines in commercial fruit juices. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 2031–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Preti, R.; Antonelli, M.L.; Bernacchia, R.; Vinci, G. Fast determination of biogenic amines in beverages by a core-shell particle column. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Basheer, C.; Wong, W.; Makahleh, A.; Tameem, A.A.; Salhin, A.; Saad, B.; Lee, H.K. Hydrazone-based ligands for micro-solid phase extraction-high performance liquid chromatographic determination of biogenic amines in orange juice. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4332–4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jain, A.; Gupta, M.; Verma, K.K. Salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction for the determination of biogenic amines in fruit juices and alcoholic beverages after derivatization with 1-naphthylisothiocyanate and high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. A 2015, 1422, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Saaid, M.; Saad, B.; Ali, A.S.M. In situ derivatization hollow fibre liquid-phase microextraction for the determination of biogenic amines in food samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 5165–5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Arlorio, M.; Coïsson, J.D.; Martelli, A. Validation of an isocratic HPLC method based on the use of ABZ+ Plus phase for the simultaneous determination of methylxantines, chlorogenic acid, some hydroxy-benzoic and hydroxy-cinnamic acids. Application to cocoa, coffee, tea and cola-drinks. Chromatographia 2000, 52, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Khan, N.; Mukhtar, H. Tea polyphenols for health promotion. Life Sci. 2007, 81, 519–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Brückner, H.; Flassig, S.; Kirschbaum, J. Determination of biogenic amines in infusions of tea (Camellia sinensis) by HPLC after derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride (Fmoc-Cl). Amino Acids 2012, 42, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Spizzirri, U.G.; Picci, N.; Restuccia, D. Extraction efficiency of different solvents and LC-UV determination of biogenic amines in tea leaves and infusions. J. Anal. Methods Chem. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Restuccia, D.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Parisi, O.I.; Cirillo, G.; Picci, N. Brewing effect on levels of biogenic amines in different coffee samples as determined by LC-UV. Food Chem. 2014, 11, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Özdestan, Ö. Evaluation of bioactive amine and mineral levels in Turkish coffee. Food Res. Int. 2014, 61, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Da Silveira, T.M.L.; Tavares, É.; Glória, M.B.A. Profile and levels of bioactive amines in instant coffee. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Clarke, R.J.; Vitzthum, O.G. Coffee: Recent Developments; Blackwell Science: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  102. Aflaki, F.; Ghoulipour, V.; Saemian, N.; Salahinejad, M. A simple method for benzoyl chloride derivatization of biogenic amines for high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Aflaki, F.; Ghoulipour, V.; Saemian, N.; Sheibani, S. Biogenic Amine Contents in Non-alcoholic Beers: Screening and Optimization of Derivatization. Food Anal. Methods 2014, 7, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sun, J.; Guo, H.X.; Semin, D.; Cheetham, J. Direct separation and detection of biogenic amines by ion-pair liquid chromatography with chemiluminescent nitrogen detector. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 4689–4697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lavizzari, T.; Teresa Veciana-Nogués, M.; Bover-Cid, S.; Mariné-Font, A.; Carmen Vidal-Carou, M. Improved method for the determination of biogenic amines and polyamines in vegetable products by ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1129, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Roll, R. Orange juice and weather. Am. Econ. Rev. 1984, 74, 861–880. [Google Scholar]
  107. Catarino, M.; Mendes, A. Non-alcoholic beer -A new industrial process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 79, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Spano, G.; Russo, P.; Lonvaud-Funel, A.; Lucas, P.M.; Alexandre, H.; Grandvalet, C.; Coton, E.; Coton, M.; Coton, M.; Bach, B.; et al. Biogenic amines in fermented foods. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 3, S95–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Vartanian, L.R.; Schwartz, M.B.; Brownell, K.D. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Public Health 2007, 97, 667–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Attila, S.; Çakir, B. Energy-drink consumption in college students and associated factors. Nutrition 2011, 27, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Beverage classification.
Figure 1. Beverage classification.
Beverages 06 00017 g001
Figure 2. Temporal evaluation of scientific publications on biogenic amines (BAs). Keywords: “Biogenic Amines” (a), “Biogenic Amines” + “Beverages” (b). (* 2019 unfinished data).
Figure 2. Temporal evaluation of scientific publications on biogenic amines (BAs). Keywords: “Biogenic Amines” (a), “Biogenic Amines” + “Beverages” (b). (* 2019 unfinished data).
Beverages 06 00017 g002
Figure 3. BA biosynthesis.
Figure 3. BA biosynthesis.
Beverages 06 00017 g003
Table 1. Physiological effect of biogenic amines.
Table 1. Physiological effect of biogenic amines.
Biogenic AminePhysiological EffectReference
HistamineRelease of adrenaline and noradrenaline
Allergic processes
Stimulation of the smooth muscles of the uterus, intestine, and respiratory tract
Stimulation of sensory and motor neurons
Control of gastric secretion
[35,36,37,38,39]
TyraminePeripheral vascularization
Increase in cardiac output
Increased lacrimation and salivation
Increased breathing
Increased blood sugar levels
Noradrenaline release of the sympathetic nervous system
Migraine
[16,37,40,41]
Putrescine and cadaverineHypotension
Bradycardia
Lockjaw
Extremity paralysis
Enhancement of the toxicity of other amines
[37,42,43]
β-PhenethylamineNoradrenaline release of the sympathetic nervous
Increase in blood pressure
Migraine
[37]
TryptamineIncrease in blood pressure[38]
Spermine and spermidineHypotension
Bradycardia
Enhancement of the toxicity of other amines
[38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]
Table 2. Concentration limit of histamine in different countries.
Table 2. Concentration limit of histamine in different countries.
RegulationRroductsLimit (mg/kg)Reference
Reg. (EC) no. 1019/2013 (modify Reg. (EC) no. 2073/2005)Fish species (Scombridae, Clupeidae, Engraulidae, Coryphenidae,
Pomatomidae, and Scombreresosidae)
100–200[51]
Fish products that have undergone enzyme maturation treatment200–400
USFDAFish products500[52]
FSANZSample composed of different species of fish100[53]
Codex AlimentariusFish and fish product (Clupeidae, Scrombridae, Scromberesocidae,
Pomatomidae, and Coryphaenidae families)
100[54]
Table 3. Biogenic amine amount for plant milk.
Table 3. Biogenic amine amount for plant milk.
BeveragesNo. *Biogenic Amine Amount (mg/L)Reference
PhePutCadHisTyrTrySpdSpm
Soymilk-based product1ni *ninininini8.181.98[4]
Soymilk UHT6nininininini7.77 ÷ 8.371.91 ÷ 2.04
Spelt milk3nd *nd0.49 ÷ 1.175.26 ÷ 6.64ndnindnd[87]
Oat milk3ndnd0.64 ÷ 0.716.59 ÷ 8.06ndni0.46 ÷ 0.690.10 ÷ 0.17
Millet milk5ndndnd ÷ 0.236.14 ÷ 8.37nd ÷ 0.25nindnd
Barley milk4ndnd1.47 ÷ 5.36nd ÷ 3.150.28 ÷ 0.62nind ÷ 0.31nd ÷ 0.14
Quinoa milk4ndnd0.52 ÷ 0.686.77 ÷ 7.690.10 ÷ 0.22nindnd ÷ 0.14
Rice milk4ndndnd ÷ 0.253.10 ÷ 7.44ndni-nd ÷ 0.17
* nd = not detected; ni = not investigated; No. = sample numbers.
Table 4. Biogenic amine amount in fruit juice.
Table 4. Biogenic amine amount in fruit juice.
BeveragesNo. *Biogenic Amine Amount (mg/L) Reference
PhePutCadHisTyrTrySpdSpmSerEtyMet
Pear nectar3nd *1.23 ÷ 3.105.88 ÷ 17.2ndndni *1.70 ÷ 2.171.47 ÷ 2.19ndndnd[90]
Apricot nectar3nd1.10 ÷ 3.256.81 ÷ 11.25ndndni1.32 ÷ 2.952.21 ÷ 2.74ndnd ÷ 2.45nd
Peach nectar3nd1.88 ÷ 7.226.51 ÷ 13.03ndndni1.34 ÷ 1.961.58 ÷ 3.58ndndnd
Orange juice10.630.650.990.500.670.890.76nininini[91]
Orange juice21nd22.6 ÷ 43.7nd0.03 ÷ 0.260.02 ÷ 0.67nd1.80 ÷ 4.200.08 ÷ 0.34nd ÷ 0.48nini[79]
Orange juice10.010.01ninind0.050.01ninini0.06[92]
Apple juice10.090.01nini0.120.060.01ninini0.78
Grape juice10.100.06ninind0.35ndnininind
Mango juice10.170.06nini0.140.310.01nininind
Pineapple juice10.030.12nini0.010.01ndninini0.84
Litchi juice10.010.01nini0.02nd0.03ninini0.07
Apricot juice7nd1.39 ÷ 7.103.96 ÷ 17.93ndndni1.97 ÷ 2.521.22 ÷ 2.51ndndnd[89]
Peach 50% juice6nd1.41 ÷ 3.191.95 ÷ 10.06ndndni1.34 ÷ 2.011.22 ÷ 2.72ndndnd
Peach 70% juice6nd2.25 ÷ 3.594.11 ÷ 6.05ndndni2.02 ÷ 4.441.37 ÷ 1.89ndndnd
Pear 50% juice6nd1.11 ÷ 2.681.91 ÷ 8.31ndndni1.16 ÷ 1.771.17 ÷ 3.53ndndnd
Pear 70% juice6nd1.42 ÷ 4.443.75 ÷ 6.15ndndni1.90 ÷ 2.651.22 ÷ 1.41nd1.12 ÷ 1.23nd
Apple concentrate juice10nd0.59 ÷ 1.680.55 ÷ 4.27ndndni0.24 ÷ 0.670.24 ÷ 0.99ndnd ÷ 0.41nd
Pineapple concentrate juice10nd1.53 ÷ 1.98nd ÷ 3.14ndndni2.55 ÷ 5.411.53 ÷ 3.17nd ÷ 4.610.22 ÷ 1.65nd ÷ 1.88
Grapefruit concentrate juice11nd7.17 ÷ 20.80.38 ÷ 2.28ndndni1.03 ÷ 2.110.32 ÷ 0.50nd ÷ 1.746.21 ÷ 12.98nd ÷ 1.17
Orange concentrate juice12nd34.70 ÷ 60.97ndndndni2.04 ÷ 3.660.37 ÷ 1.37nd ÷ 1.3224.06 ÷ 38.64nd ÷ 2.72
Orange juice5nd0.55 ÷ 2.21nind ÷ 0.04nd ÷ 0.06nd0.08 ÷ 0.14nininini[91]
* nd = not detected; ni = not investigated; No. = sample numbers.
Table 5. Biogenic amine amount in nervine beverages (mg/L).
Table 5. Biogenic amine amount in nervine beverages (mg/L).
BeveragesNo. *Biogenic Amine AmountReference
PhePutCadHisTyrTryAgmSpdSpmSer
Black tea14nd * ÷ 0.03nd ÷ 0.02ndndnd ÷ 0.19ni *nind ÷ 0.05nd ÷ 0.34ni[96]
Green tea6nd0.02 ÷ 0.08ndndnd ÷ 0.04nini0.03 ÷ 0.090.06 ÷ 0.32ni
Instant tea10.02ndndnd0.03nini0.05nini
Black tea infusion14nd ÷ 2.008.4 ÷ 10.2nd ÷ 14.0nd ÷ 20.0ndnini6.5 ÷ 10.8nd ÷ 0.3nd ÷ 14.1[97]
Green tea7nd10.3 ÷ 14.6ndndndnini6.3 ÷ 10.4ndnd ÷ 11.5
Tea drinks3ndnd ÷ 6.9ndndndnini4.3 ÷ 6.7ndnd
Espresso coffee200.20 ÷ 1.210.60 ÷ 2.270.19 ÷ 1.840.22 ÷ 1.620.25 ÷ 1.89nini0.45 ÷ 1.20nd ÷ 1.95nd ÷ 0.90[98]
Turkish coffee10nd ÷ 4.990.5 ÷ 1.51.4 ÷ 9.0ndnd ÷ 19.7ninindnd3.70 ÷ 13.55[99]
Instant coffee160.4 ÷ 7.40.4 ÷ 5.30.4 ÷ 8.10.4 ÷ 1.40.4 ÷ 5.5nd0.4 ÷ 5.30.4 ÷ 7.70.5 ÷ 4.18.00 ÷ 18.0[100]
* nd = not detected; ni = not investigated; No. = sample numbers.
Table 6. Biogenic amine amount in soft drinks.
Table 6. Biogenic amine amount in soft drinks.
BeveragesNo. *Biogenic Amines amount (mg/L)Reference
PhePutCadHisTyrTryAgmSpdSpmSer
Orange carbonated-based35nd *0.69 ÷ 5.14nd0.01 ÷ 0.03ndndnd0.01 ÷ 0.320.01 ÷ 0.04nd[79]
Non-alcoholic beer10nd ÷ 0.540.31 ÷ 1.430.11 ÷ 0.42nd ÷ 0.62nd ÷ 0.480.29 ÷ 2.56nd0.16 ÷ 0.810.13 ÷ 0.68ni *[102]
Non-alcoholic beer5nd ÷ 0.480.56 ÷ 1.300.28 ÷ 0.56nd ÷ 0.37nd ÷ 0.270.28 ÷ 1.30nd0.35 ÷ 0.730.24 ÷ 0.72ni[103]
Dairy beverages1nd3.2nd1.90ndnd3.10ndndni[104]
Milk chocolate8nind ÷ 0.40nindnd ÷ 0.03nd ÷ 0.10nind ÷ 1.00nd ÷ 2.00ni[105]
* nd = not detected; ni = not investigated; No. = sample number.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vinci, G.; Maddaloni, L. Biogenic Amines in Alcohol-Free Beverages. Beverages 2020, 6, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6010017

AMA Style

Vinci G, Maddaloni L. Biogenic Amines in Alcohol-Free Beverages. Beverages. 2020; 6(1):17. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6010017

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vinci, Giuliana, and Lucia Maddaloni. 2020. "Biogenic Amines in Alcohol-Free Beverages" Beverages 6, no. 1: 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6010017

APA Style

Vinci, G., & Maddaloni, L. (2020). Biogenic Amines in Alcohol-Free Beverages. Beverages, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6010017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop