1. Introduction
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies, demonstrating remarkable clinical efficacy against leukemias, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma [
1,
2]. Since the first FDA approval in 2017, numerous CAR-T products have either received regulatory approval or are in late-stage clinical trials—a testament to the maturity of this therapeutic technology [
3]. Yet approval of commercial CAR-T therapies such as Kymriah and Yescarta has not guaranteed widespread access, because their high cost remains a formidable barrier to broad adoption, particularly in developing economies. A substantial portion of the total price of CAR-T therapy is attributable to the high cost of clinical-grade lentiviral (LV) and gamma-retroviral (gRV) vectors—the only two classes of delivery vehicles used for CAR transgene transfer into T cells in all approved CAR-T products [
4]. Thus, developing cost-effective and scalable vector production methods is critically important for expanding access to this life-saving technology and reducing its cost.
LVs engineered from the HIV-1 genome remain the “gold standard” for genetic modification of T cells. Their key advantages include the ability to efficiently transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells, as well as stable, long-term transgene expression through host genome integration [
5,
6]. These properties make LVs indispensable for generating CAR-T products that require sustained CAR expression throughout cell generations. Moreover, recent studies demonstrate the expansion of CAR-T therapy beyond oncology—into autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis)—creating additional demand for clinical-grade LVs [
3].
In academic laboratories, LV production is most commonly achieved via plasmid transfection of adherent HEK293 cells and their derivatives cultured in static vessels [
7,
8]. However, this approach suffers from fundamental drawbacks that render it highly inefficient for industrial scaling. First, adherent monolayers are difficult to scale beyond 10
9 cells, necessitating multi-tiered plastic culture vessels (e.g., Cell Factory systems). This increases labor costs, consumable consumption, and production time. Second, the dependence of adherent cells on fetal bovine serum (FBS) creates risks of adventitious virus contamination, causes batch-to-batch variability, and substantially increases costs [
9,
10]. Third, industrial-scale transfection of adherent cultures requires large quantities of high-quality plasmid DNA, imposing an additional burden on downstream purification steps and increasing overall cost.
To address these challenges, researchers are actively pursuing alternative LV production strategies suitable for large-scale cGMP manufacturing [
11,
12]. A natural and highly promising solution is the transition to suspension cultures, which are significantly easier to scale, enable the use of serum-free media (SFM), and integrate better with modern bioreactor systems. Many strategies employ HEK293 cells (or their derivatives) adapted to suspension growth [
10,
13,
14]. Although suspension adaptation and transfection protocols for HEK cells exist, many of these protocols were designed for recombinant protein production, not for generating packaged LVs [
7,
8,
15,
16]. Moreover, adapting HEK293 cells to serum-free suspension conditions has been shown to reduce transfection efficiency [
17,
18,
19].
Commercial suspension LV production systems (e.g., LV-MAX from Thermo Fisher) exist, but they require proprietary reagents, specialized media, and costly licensing agreements, placing them out of reach for most academic institutions and resource-limited laboratories [
20]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop an open, accessible, and scalable LV production platform based on suspension-adapted HEK293 cells—one that combines high efficiency with low cost and can be readily reproduced in academic settings.
The aim of this study was to adapt HEK293FT cells to suspension growth in serum-free medium (FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium) and to employ the adapted cells for LV production carrying a CAR transgene for CAR-T therapy. Using a direct adaptation method, we generated a novel cell line, HEK293FT-DS, that grows stably in suspension with high viability. We thoroughly characterized the growth parameters and stability of the resulting cell lines, optimized key transfection parameters (PEI:DNA ratio, cell density at transfection), and successfully scaled the process to obtain LV quantities sufficient for transducing primary T cells on the CliniMACS Prodigy instrument. The functional potency of the resulting vectors was confirmed by their ability to efficiently transduce donor T cells, achieving CAR expression levels > 57%. Our HEK293FT-DS-based platform represents a cost-effective and accessible alternative to commercial systems, positioning it as a valuable tool for academic CAR-T cell production.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Lines and Reagents
Adherent HEK293FT cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat. R70007, Waltham, MA, USA) were cultured in complete medium, which is Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with high glucose (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA, Cat. 11965092), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco Cat. 10091148, Grand Island, NY, USA), 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Pen/Strep), 1% non-essential amino acids (NEAA), and 2 mM L-glutamine (all from Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Suspension-adapted cell lines derived from HEK293FT by the methods of sequential and direct adaptation were cultured in serum-free FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium (SFM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA, Cat. 12338026). Cells were grown in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with vented caps (Corning, Corning, NY, USA, Cat. 431144) using a working culture volume of 50 mL. The flasks were placed on an orbital shaker (IKA, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany, model KS260CS1) installed in a CO2 incubator (Wiggens, Wuppertal, Germany, model WCI-1200). Cultures were agitated constantly at 150 rpm. Cells were split when the density reached 2 × 106 cells/mL; the next passage was performed at an initial seeding density of 3 × 105 cells/mL. Cell viability was regularly determined by trypan blue (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) exclusion.
2.2. Plasmids
The following plasmids were used: the LV-RNA-encoding transfer vectors LV/CAR and LV/CAR-GFP were described in a previous article [
21]. Both vectors encode a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) against the human cell surface marker CD19 as the transgene. LV/CAR-GFP additionally encodes GFP fused to CAR via an uncleavable linker [
21]. For LV packaging, the packaging helper psPAX2 (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA, Cat. 12260) and the envelope plasmid pMD2.G (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA, Cat. 12259) were used. Plasmids were isolated by alkaline lysis and purified by ultracentrifugation in cesium chloride gradients as described in [
22].
2.3. Sequential Adaptation of HEK293FT Cells to Suspension Culture
Adherent HEK293FT cells were grown in five 150 mm dishes in complete DMEM until approximately 90% confluence. The cells were detached using TrypLE Select (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA, Cat. 12563-029), pooled, counted, and transferred into a 500 mL Erlenmeyer shaker flask (Corning, Corning, NY, USA, Cat. 431145) containing 100 mL of complete DMEM. The seeding density was 1 × 106 cells/mL. The flask was placed on an orbital shaker installed in a CO2 incubator and incubated at 150 rpm and 37 °C in 5% CO2.
Every 3–6 days, or when the cell density exceeded 2 × 106 cells/mL, the culture was passaged. During seven passages, the proportion of serum-containing medium was gradually reduced while the proportion of serum-free FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium (SFM) was increased: P1—0% SFM; P2—5% SFM; P3—10% SFM; P4—25% SFM; P5—50% SFM; P6—75% SFM; P7—100% SFM. Viable cell density and viability were monitored before and at the end of each passage by trypan blue exclusion. After P7, cells were cryopreserved in SFM supplemented with 10% human serum albumin (HSA; Biopharma Plasma LLC, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine) and 10% DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
2.4. Direct Adaptation of HEK293FT Cells to Suspension Culture
HEK293FT cells were grown in five 150 mm dishes in complete DMEM to approximately 90% confluence, detached using TrypLE Select, pooled and transferred into a 500 mL Erlenmeyer shaker flask containing 100 mL of FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium (SFM). The flask was placed on an orbital shaker at 150 rpm and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2.
Passaging was performed every four days for passages P1–P6, and the final passage (before cryopreservation) lasted 5 days. Before each passage, the viable cell density was determined. To initiate a new passage, 50 mL of the culture was transferred to a new flask and supplemented with 50 mL of fresh SFM. After P7, cells were cryopreserved in SFM supplemented with 10% HSA and 10% DMSO.
2.5. Comparative Growth Kinetics of Adapted Cell Lines
Cell lines obtained using the sequential adaptation method (designated HEK293FT-SS) and the direct adaptation method (designated HEK293FT-DS) were subjected to batch growth analysis. Cryopreserved vials were thawed and cultured in SFM for two 3-day passages to allow recovery.
For growth kinetics, cells were seeded into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks (Corning Cat. 431144) containing 50 mL of SFM at an initial density of 3 × 105 cells/mL. Flasks were incubated at 150 rpm, 37 °C, and 5% CO2. Every 24 h for 10 days, aliquots were taken to measure viable cell density and viability using trypan blue exclusion. Three biological replicates were performed.
2.6. Stability of Growth Characteristics over 35 Passages
This experiment was performed with HEK293FT-DS cells. Cells were seeded into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of SFM at 3 × 105 cells/mL and incubated for 3 days. At the end of each passage, the viable cell density was measured, and the cells were reseeded for the next passage at 3 × 105 cells/mL.
The specific growth rate μ (day
−1) was calculated as:
The population doubling time Td (days) was calculated as:
2.7. Preparation of PEI Transfection Reagent
All transfections were carried out using linear 40 kDa polyethylenimine (PEI MAX; Polysciences Cat. 24765-1; Warrington, PA, USA). The PEI stock solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared in 25 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sterilized by filtration (0.22 μm), and stored at +4 °C.
2.8. Transfection of Adherent HEK293FT Cells
Adherent HEK293FT cells were seeded in 150 mm dishes (P150) at a density of 1 × 105 cells/cm2.
For each P150 dish, a total of 10 μg of plasmid DNA (pLV/CAR-GFP, psPAX2, and pMD2.G at a molar ratio of 2:1.5:1) was diluted in 2.5 mL of serum-free DMEM. Separately, 30 μL of the 1 mg/mL PEI MAX stock solution was diluted in 2.5 mL of serum-free DMEM. The diluted PEI solution was then added to the diluted DNA solution and mixed briefly by vortexing. The resulting mixture was incubated for 15 min at room temperature (RT) to allow polyplex formation.
Before addition of the transfection mixture, the culture medium was removed. Immediately, 5 mL of the polyplex mixture was added to the cell monolayer and distributed evenly over the cells. The cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Subsequently, 20 mL of complete DMEM was added to each dish without removing the transfection mixture. Cells were further incubated for 48 h. The culture supernatant was then collected, clarified by centrifugation at 300× g for 10 min, filtered through a 0.45 μm PES membrane (Pall Corporation Cat. 515-0157, Port Washington, NY, USA), aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C until use. All transfections were performed in three biological replicates (independent transfections with separate cell passages).
2.9. Initial Transfection Protocol for Suspension-Adapted Cells
Suspension-adapted cells were transfected using PEI MAX. Cells were routinely maintained in SFM and passaged every 2–3 days to maintain viability above 90%.
On the day of transfection, cells were seeded into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks at a density of 1 × 106 viable cells/mL in a final volume of 50 mL of fresh SFM. A plasmid mixture containing the transfer vector pLV/CAR-GFP, the packaging helper psPAX2, and the envelope plasmid pMD2.G at a molar ratio of 2:1.5:1 was prepared. The total amount of plasmid DNA was 1 μg per 106 cells. This DNA mixture was diluted in 5 mL of SFM. Separately, PEI MAX (3 μg per 106 cells) was diluted in 5 mL of SFM. The DNA and PEI solutions were combined, vortexed and incubated for 15 min at RT. The polyplex mixture was then added to the cells. After 48 h of incubation at 37 °C with agitation at 150 rpm, the culture supernatant was harvested, clarified by centrifugation at 300× g for 10 min, filtered through a 0.45 μm PES membrane, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C. Transfections were performed in three biological replicates.
2.10. Optimization of Transfection Conditions
Optimization of the PEI:DNA mass ratio. For adherent cells, the protocol described in
Section 2.8 was used. For suspension cells, the initial protocol described in
Section 2.9 served as the starting point. Different PEI:DNA mass ratios (1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1, 2.5:1, 3:1, and 4:1) were tested. The total amount of plasmid DNA (pLV/CAR-GFP, psPAX2, and pMD2.G at a 2:1.5:1 molar ratio) was kept constant at 1 μg per 10
6 cells, while the amount of PEI MAX was adjusted accordingly. All other parameters remained unchanged.
Optimization of cell density during transfection. Suspension-adapted cells were maintained in Erlenmeyer flasks in SFM with viability consistently above 90%. On the day of transfection, the required number of cells was pelleted by centrifugation (300×
g, 5 min) and resuspended in either fresh SFM or complete DMEM to a volume of 40 mL, yielding cell densities ranging from 0.625 × 10
6 to 30 × 10
6 cells/mL. The amounts of PEI and total plasmid DNA were scaled proportionally to the cell density, maintaining a constant DNA amount of 1 μg per 10
6 cells and a constant PEI:DNA mass ratio of 2.5:1. Polyplexes were formed by mixing 5 mL of the DNA solution in SFM with 5 mL of the PEI solution in SFM, followed by incubation for 15 min at RT. The resulting 10 mL of polyplex mixture was added to the 40 mL of cell suspension, giving final working cell densities of 0.5 × 10
6 to 24 × 10
6 cells/mL. Four hours after addition of the polyplex mixture, the culture was diluted with SFM to a final density of 1 × 10
6 cells/mL. The LV-containing supernatant was harvested at 48 h post-transfection and processed as described in
Section 2.8. Each condition was tested in three biological replicates.
2.11. Scale-Up of Lentiviral Vector Production
For large-scale production of the LV/CAR vector, HEK293FT-DS cells were maintained in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks (Corning Cat. 431146) with a working culture volume of 250 mL. On the day of transfection, 250 × 106 cells per sample were pelleted by centrifugation (300× g, 5 min) and resuspended in 14 mL of SFM, corresponding to a cell density of 17.9 × 106 cells/mL. The cell suspension was transferred to a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask (Corning Cat. 431143) and placed on an orbital shaker. The DNA (250 μg) and PEI MAX (625 μg) were each diluted in 800 μL of SFM. The two solutions were combined and incubated for 15 min at RT, and the resulting polyplex mixture was added to the cells, yielding a final cell density of 16 × 106 cells/mL. Four hours after addition of the polyplex mixture, the culture was transferred to a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask, and fresh SFM was added to bring the final volume to 250 mL.
Cultures were harvested 48 h post-transfection. Four identical samples were processed simultaneously to collect a total of 1 L of LV-containing supernatant.
2.12. Concentration of Lentiviral Vectors
Clarified supernatant containing lentiviral particles was concentrated using a two-step procedure: first by tangential flow filtration (TFF), followed by ultracentrifugation at 20,000× g.
For TFF, the supernatant was processed on a Tanfil 100 tangential flow filtration system (Rocker Scientific Co., New Taipei City, Taiwan) equipped with a Minimate TFF capsule containing an Omega membrane (Pall Life Sciences Cat. OA300C12, 300 kDa molecular weight cut-off). A 500 mL aliquot of clarified supernatant was concentrated to a final volume of 7 mL (the system dead volume). The reservoir was then rinsed with 50 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 1% human serum albumin (HSA), and the concentration procedure was repeated. The resulting 7 mL concentrate was collected and pooled with the previous concentrate. The remaining supernatant was processed similarly. In total, 1 L of supernatant was concentrated to 28 mL (concentration factor 35.7×).
The TFF concentrate was transferred in 1 mL aliquots into thick-walled 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA, Cat. 357448) and subjected to ultracentrifugation at 20,000× g for 2 h at 4 °C using a Beckman MLA-130 rotor (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and Optima MAX-XP Ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed. The resulting pellets were resuspended overnight in 0.5 mL of RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% HSA and 0.0001% Pluronic F68 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, Cat. P5556). The next day, the resuspended LV particles were pooled, aliquoted and stored at −80 °C.
2.13. Determination of Lentiviral Functional Titer
Lentiviral functional titers (TU/mL) were determined by transducing HEK293FT cells with serial dilutions, followed by flow cytometric analysis. HEK293FT cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 4 × 105 cells per well and allowed to attach. Serial dilutions of LV preparations were prepared in complete DMEM containing 8 µg/mL polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, Cat. H9268) and added to the cells. After 12 h, the polybrene-containing medium was replaced with standard complete DMEM. Preliminary experiments used dilutions from 1:10 to 1:10,000 to estimate the titer range. Subsequently, titrations were performed with dilutions of 1:10 to 1:1000 to achieve 1–20% transduced cells in the final well. At 72 h post-transduction, cells were harvested.
For the LV/CAR-GFP vector, transduction efficiency was assessed by quantifying GFP-positive cells. Cells were detached with trypsin-EDTA (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), washed with PBS, and resuspended in MACSQuant Running Buffer (RB; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-092-747). For the LV/CAR vector (without GFP), non-permeabilized cells were stained sequentially with biotinylated CD19 CAR Detection Reagent (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-129-550) and anti-biotin-PE antibody (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-113-291). Samples were acquired on a MACSQuant 10 flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). At least 50,000 events were recorded per sample. Data were analyzed using MACSQuantify Software v.2.13 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Gates for positive cells were set using naïve HEK293FT cells as a negative control, with <0.1% events in the positive gate. MACSQuant Calibration Beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-093-607) were used to monitor gate stability across experiments. The functional titer (TU/mL) was calculated as:
2.14. p24 ELISA and Calculation of Specific Activity
The concentration of HIV-1 p24 capsid protein in LV batches was measured using a Lenti-X p24 Rapid Titer Kit (Takara Bio USA, Mountain View, CA, USA, Cat. 631476) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, serial 10-fold dilutions of the samples were prepared in the diluent buffer provided with the kit. Aliquots (100 µL) of diluted samples were added to anti-p24-coated wells of the ELISA plate, followed by 20 µL of lysis buffer, and incubated for 30 min. Then, 100 µL of HRP-conjugated anti-p24 antibody was added and incubated for an additional 30 min. After six washes with wash buffer, 100 µL of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate was added, and incubated for 30 min in the dark, and the reaction was stopped with 100 µL of stop solution. Optical density was measured at 450 nm. p24 concentration (ng/mL) was calculated using a standard curve (0–1600 pg/mL). Specific activity was defined as the ratio of functional titer to p24 concentration in the same sample:
2.15. Functional Characterization of the LV/CAR Vector
Primary human T-cells for CAR-T cell generation were isolated from concentrated peripheral blood leukocytes (an apheresis product) provided by the Scientific and Production Center of Transfusiology (SPCT, Astana, Kazakhstan), a licensed medical institution. Donors provided written informed consent at the time of collection. Only surplus, anonymized, frozen apheresis products not required for clinical use were transferred to the authors’ laboratory for this work. No blood products were collected specifically for this study. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the National Center for Biotechnology (NCB).
Isolation of CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells was performed on a CliniMACS Prodigy cell processor (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) using a TS520 Tubing Set (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as described in detail in [
23]. Briefly, a cryopreserved leukapheresis product was thawed, treated with Benzonase (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, 50 U/mL; Cat. 70664-3), and washed. CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells were isolated immunomagnetically using the automated T-Cell Transduction 2.0 (TCT 2.0) program built into the CliniMACS Prodigy instrument. The isolated T cells were transferred to a reapplication bag (RAB) connected to the TS520 tubing set. The T cell suspension in TexMACS Medium (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-097-196) was supplemented with 10% HSA and 10% DMSO, aliquoted, and cryopreserved in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen.
For CAR-T cell production, previously isolated CD4
+ and CD8
+ T cells were recovered from cryostorage. A total of 1 × 10
6 T cells were transferred into TexMACS Medium supplemented with 1000–1500 U/mL recombinant human IL-7 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 170-076-111) and 300–450 U/mL recombinant human IL-15 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 170-076-186). The cells were activated with TransAct reagent (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-128-758). On the next day, cells were transduced with the LV/CAR vector prepared as described in
Section 2.11 and
Section 2.12. A total of 2 × 10
6 transducing units (TU) of the vector were used to achieve a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 TU/cell. The culture was expanded in T-flasks until day 12, and the final CAR-T cell product was cryopreserved in TexMACS Medium containing 10% HSA and 10% DMSO.
2.16. Flow Cytometric Analysis of CAR Expression
The final CAR-T cell product was analyzed by flow cytometry as described in [
23]. Cells were stained with the following antibodies (all from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany): CD3-FITC (130-113-138), CD4-VioGreen (130-113-221), CD8-APC-Vio770 (130-113-155), CD14-APC (130-113-143), CD45-VioBlue (130-113-122), biotinylated CD19 CAR Detection Reagent (130-129-550), and anti-biotin-PE (130-113-291). CAR staining was performed in two steps: first with biotinylated CD19 CAR Detection Reagent (2 µL per 100 µL cell suspension, 10 min at RT), followed by washing and incubation with anti-biotin-PE together with the remaining antibodies (10 min at RT). After a final wash, cells were resuspended in MACSQuant Running Buffer (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, Cat. 130-092-747). Samples were acquired on a MACSQuant 10 flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and data were analyzed using MACSQuantify Software v.2.13 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).
2.17. Statistical Analysis
Data from three biological replicates are presented as mean ± SD. Comparisons between two groups were made using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test. For multiple groups, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test was used. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the transfection optimization data (factors: cell density and culture medium). For growth kinetics over time, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (RM ANOVA) was performed with factors “cell line” and “time”, applying the Geisser–Greenhouse correction. One-way RM ANOVA with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction was applied to stability parameters over 15 passages. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.3.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Significance levels are designated as: ns (not significant, p > 0.05), * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01), *** (p ≤ 0.001).
4. Discussion
The growing demand for clinical-grade vectors as gene delivery vehicles in the rapidly expanding field of cell and gene therapy (CGT) has mandated scalable, cost-effective vector production methods [
4,
8,
9]. Although transient transfection of adherent HEK293 cells remains the most common approach in academic laboratories, its reliance on serum-containing media and multi-layer plastic vessels makes scale-up labour-intensive and expensive [
7,
10]. In this study, we developed an open-system alternative based on a newly generated suspension-adapted HEK293FT cell line, designated HEK293FT-DS, and an optimised high-density transfection protocol.
We adapted HEK293FT cells to serum-free FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium using two methods. Direct adaptation was faster than sequential adaptation and resulted in superior viability (>93% vs. 89.5%) and a higher specific growth rate (μ = 0.54 day
−1, doubling time 31 h). These growth properties remained stable over 35 passages, indicating phenotypic stability essential for scaling LV production. The HEK293FT-DS cell line therefore compares favourably with other suspension-adapted HEK293 lines [
10,
24,
25].
After adaptation to serum-free suspension culture, LV titers obtained with the PEI-based transfection protocol devised for adherent cells were approximately 50-fold lower, a reduction consistent with previous reports for cells grown in complex serum-free media [
13,
24]. Inspired by Backliwal et al. [
26], who showed that increasing cell density during transfection could overcome medium-associated inhibition, we systematically raised the cell density during transfection. Increasing from 1 × 10
6 to 16 × 10
6 cells/mL boosted functional LV titers by more than two orders of magnitude, reaching approximately 9 × 10
6 TU/mL in SFM. Further increases in cell density did not improve titers, possibly because LV assembly imposes higher metabolic demands than production of a soluble recombinant protein [
26]. We therefore selected 16 × 10
6 cells/mL as optimal.
The optimal PEI:DNA mass ratio for suspension cells was 2.5:1, lower than the 3:1 ratio found for adherent cells. This observation is supported by other studies that identified an optimal PEI:DNA ratio of 2:1 for transfecting suspension-adapted HEK-293 cells [
13].
Using the optimised parameters, we performed four parallel transfections and produced 1 L of LV-containing supernatant. Two-step concentration by tangential flow filtration and ultracentrifugation gave a final functional yield of 64–71%, which compares favourably with the 55% recovery reported by Bauler et al. [
10] and is generally higher than typical recoveries from adherent cell supernatants [
7]. The final concentrated titers (3.15–3.40 × 10
8 TU/mL) were sufficient for clinical-scale CAR-T cell production (e.g., sufficient to transduce above 10
8 T-cells, a typical starting amount in the Miltenyi Biotec clinical CAR-T manufacturing process).
The specific activity of the unconcentrated suspension supernatant (14.1 ± 3.4 TU/pg) fell within the range of 10–50 TU/pg reported for crude HEK293-based LV supernatants [
27,
28]. Following tangential flow filtration and ultracentrifugation, the specific activities of the final concentrated batches increased to 856 and 997 TU/pg, respectively. This substantial increase over the crude supernatant value reflects the efficient removal of free p24 and non-infectious particles during the two-step concentration process.
Functional validation of the LV/CAR vector was performed by transducing primary human T cells (CD4
+ and CD8
+) at a moderate multiplicity of infection (MOI). Our two LV/CAR batches yielded 56.96% and 57.21% CAR-positive cells within the viable CD3
+ T-cell population. These transduction efficiencies are similar to those reported by Tirapelle et al. [
24], who used vectors produced in a comparable suspension-adapted HEK293T system.
Other groups have also developed approaches to overcome the limitations of adherent cultures for scaled LV production. Commercial systems such as LV-MAX can achieve titers up to 10
8 TU/mL, but rely on proprietary transfection enhancers specifically designed for high-titer LV production [
20]. Such proprietary systems require costly licensing agreements, placing them out of reach for many academic laboratories. The key distinction of our HEK293FT-DS cell line is that it was derived from HEK293FT cells, which express the SV40 large T antigen—a feature absent in HEK293F and Expi293 cells. This property may enhance plasmid replication and potentially increase LV yields. Our platform uses widely available, low-cost reagents (PEI (polyethylenimine, PEI MAX; Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA) and FreeStyle 293 Expression Medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA)) and an in-house adapted cell line, making it an accessible and cost-effective alternative for academic and resource-limited settings. While our peak titers in clarified supernatant (~9 × 10
6 TU/mL) are lower than those of LV-MAX, the overall yield of 4–5 × 10
9 TU per batch is sufficient for clinical-scale CAR-T cell manufacturing.
Another strategy is the use of stable producer cell lines (PCLs), which eliminate the need for plasmid transfection altogether. While PCLs may be desirable in true industrial settings, their generation is time-consuming and labour-intensive because it requires multiple rounds of clonal selection and validation [
8,
11,
12,
25]. For academic laboratories that frequently work with different CAR constructs, a flexible transient transfection system based on an efficient, suspension-adapted cell line—such as the one described here—offers the best balance of speed, cost, and performance.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, while we demonstrated stable growth over 35 passages, extended monitoring beyond 50 passages would be required for full master cell bank qualification. Second, the adaptation experiments were performed once; although subsequent stability data from three biological replicates confirm the robustness of the resulting cell line, independent adaptation events would further strengthen this conclusion. Third, scale-up was performed in shake flasks rather than in controlled stirred-tank bioreactors; evaluation under dynamic bioreactor conditions (pH, DO control) will be necessary for industrial implementation. Fourth, while we demonstrated efficient CAR expression in primary T cells, functional assays (cytotoxicity, cytokine release) were not performed, as the primary objective of this study was to establish the LV production platform. Finally, comprehensive QC metrics (HCP, hcDNA, RCL) were beyond the scope of this academic study but will be essential for clinical-grade manufacturing.
The described LV production platform, based on suspension adaptation and high-density transfection, provides a low-cost, open system well suited for academic use.