Next Article in Journal
Can the Novel Photon-Counting CT Scan Accurately Predict Aortic Wall Thickness? Preliminary Results
Previous Article in Journal
Heparin and Gelatin Co-Functionalized Polyurethane Artificial Blood Vessel for Improving Anticoagulation and Biocompatibility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm: The Importance of the Rheological Model in Blood Flow Simulations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigating Delayed Rupture of Flow Diverter-Treated Giant Aneurysm Using Simulated Fluid–Structure Interactions

1
Mines Paris, Université PSL, Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux (CEMEF), UMR7635 CNRS, 06904 Sophia Antipolis, France
2
Interventional Neuroradiology Department, Nice University Hospital, 06100 Nice, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Bioengineering 2025, 12(3), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030305
Submission received: 25 February 2025 / Revised: 9 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 18 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interventional Radiology and Vascular Medicine)

Abstract

Giant intracranial aneurysms are frequently treated shortly after discovery due to their increased risk of rupture and commonly symptomatic nature. Among available treatments, flow diverters are often the sole viable option, though they carry a rare but serious risk of delayed post-operative rupture. The underlying mechanisms of these ruptures remain unknown, due to the biomechanical complexity of giant aneurysms and challenges in replicating in vivo hemodynamic conditions within numerical simulation frameworks. This study presents a novel fluid–structure interaction simulation of a giant intracranial aneurysm treated with a flow diverter, based on high-resolution rotational angiography imaging. The resulting hemodynamics are compared to three established delayed-rupture hypotheses involving pressure rises, chaotic flow and autolysis. When considering wall compliance, the analysis reveals a consistent phase shift, dampening in pressure cycles, and an increased aneurysmal flow. These findings highlight the need for revisiting existing hypotheses and provide a foundation for advancing both computational modelling and clinical management strategies for giant intracranial aneurysms.
Keywords: intracranial aneurysms; fluid–structure interaction; delayed rupture; flow diverter intracranial aneurysms; fluid–structure interaction; delayed rupture; flow diverter

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeken-Rico, P.; Chau, Y.; Goetz, A.; Sedat, J.; Hachem, E. Investigating Delayed Rupture of Flow Diverter-Treated Giant Aneurysm Using Simulated Fluid–Structure Interactions. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030305

AMA Style

Jeken-Rico P, Chau Y, Goetz A, Sedat J, Hachem E. Investigating Delayed Rupture of Flow Diverter-Treated Giant Aneurysm Using Simulated Fluid–Structure Interactions. Bioengineering. 2025; 12(3):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030305

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeken-Rico, Pablo, Yves Chau, Aurèle Goetz, Jacques Sedat, and Elie Hachem. 2025. "Investigating Delayed Rupture of Flow Diverter-Treated Giant Aneurysm Using Simulated Fluid–Structure Interactions" Bioengineering 12, no. 3: 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030305

APA Style

Jeken-Rico, P., Chau, Y., Goetz, A., Sedat, J., & Hachem, E. (2025). Investigating Delayed Rupture of Flow Diverter-Treated Giant Aneurysm Using Simulated Fluid–Structure Interactions. Bioengineering, 12(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12030305

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop