Review Reports
- Corinna L. Seidel*,
- Julian Lipp and
- Benedikt Dotzer
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Vishakha Grover Reviewer 3: Norberto Roveri
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe article should have better-quality figures.
Author Response
We increased the quality of all figures. All figures have a resolution of
600 dpi.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsIt is a nice study conducted and presented well.
Author Response
Thank you very much for this positive review.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe work concerns a topic of interest in orthodontics and is therefore
of great importance for practitioners in this field.
The scientific investigation has been appropriately carried out with care and in detail. The results obtained are clear and systematically
reported. The conclusions are appropriate and of high interest to those
works in this field. I would not suggest any changes and would recommend the publication of the article in its current state.
Author Response
Thank you very much for this positive review.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf