Tissue-Specific Mercury Bioaccumulation and Probabilistic Human Health Risk in Freshwater Fish from the Arda River Reservoir Cascade (Bulgaria)
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Fish Sampling and Species Composition
2.3. Morphometrics Measurements
2.4. Sample Preparation and Mercury Analysis
2.5. Statistics Analysis
2.6. Human Health Risk Assessment
2.6.1. Estimated Daily Intake (EDI)
2.6.2. Target Hazard Quotient (THQ)
2.6.3. Hazard Index (HI)
2.6.4. Tolerable Weekly Intake (TWI) and Safe Weekly Intake (SWI)
2.6.5. Monte Carlo Simulation
2.7. Data Presentation
3. Results
3.1. General Levels and Variability of Mercury
3.2. Species-Specific Concentrations
3.3. Spatial Differences Between Dams
3.4. Organ-Specific Distribution
3.5. Spatially Modified Size Dependencies
3.6. Risk Assessment (THQ, SWI, Monte Carlo)
4. Discussion
4.1. Spatial Gradient and Cascade Reservoir Systems (H1)
4.2. Trophic Biomagnification and Species Contrasts (H2)
4.3. Organ-Specific Toxicokinetics and Internal Dynamics (H3)
4.4. Size-Dependent Bioaccumulation and Growth Dilution (H4)
4.5. Spatially Modified Size Effects
4.6. Implications for Human Health: An Integrated Approach (THQ + SWI + MC)
4.7. Supplement: Mixed Menus (HI)—Supplementary Only
4.8. Ecosystem Modulators and Management Implications
4.9. Strengths, Limitations, and Future Work
4.9.1. Strengths
4.9.2. Limitations
4.9.3. Future Work
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
| BW | Body Weight (kg) |
| CDF | Cumulative Distribution Function |
| CI | Confidence Interval |
| DOC | Dissolved Organic Carbon |
| EFSA | European Food Safety Authority |
| Hg | Mercury |
| HI | Hazard Index (HI = ΣTHQi) |
| LOD | Limit of Detection |
| MC | Monte Carlo (probabilistic simulation) |
| MeHg | Methylmercury |
| n | Sample size |
| P50 | Median (50th percentile) |
| P95 | 95th percentile |
| Probability Density Function | |
| PCA | Principal Component Analysis |
| RfD | Reference Dose (0.1 μg·kg−1·day−1 for MeHg) |
| SD | Standard Deviation |
| SWI | Safe Weekly Intake (g·week−1) |
| THg | Total Mercury |
| THQ | Target Hazard Quotient |
| TL | Total Length (cm) |
| TWI | Tolerable Weekly Intake (EFSA = 1.3 μg·kg−1·week−1) |
| TW | Total Weight (g) |
| WW | Wet Weight |
| ΣTHQi | Sum of individual tissue-specific THQ values |
References
- Driscoll, C.T.; Mason, R.P.; Chan, H.M.; Jacob, D.J.; Pirrone, N. Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, Pathways, and Effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4967–4983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNEP. Global Mercury Assessment 2018; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Selin, N.E. Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: A Review. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amos, H.M.; Jacob, D.J.; Streets, D.G.; Sunderland, E.M. Legacy impacts of all time anthropogenic emissions on the global mercury cycle. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2013, 27, 410–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parks, J.M.; Johs, A.; Podar, M.; Bridou, R.; Hurt, R.A., Jr.; Smith, S.D.; Tomanicek, S.J.; Qian, Y.; Brown, S.D.; Brandt, C.C.; et al. The Genetic Basis for Bacterial Mercury Methylation. Science 2013, 339, 1332–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilmour, C.C.; Bullock, A.L.; McBurney, A.; Podar, M.; Elias, D.A. Robust Mercury Methylation across Diverse Methanogenic Archaea. mBio 2018, 9, e02403-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mergler, D.; Anderson, H.A.; Chan, L.H.M.; Mahaffey, K.R.; Murray, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Stern, A.H. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: A worldwide concern. Ambio 2007, 36, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clarkson, T.W.; Magos, L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2006, 36, 609–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bravo, A.G.; Cosio, C.; Amouroux, D.; Zopfi, J.; Chevalley, P.-A.; Spangenberg, J.E.; Ungureanu, V.G.; Dominik, J. Extremely elevated methyl mercury levels in water, sediment and organisms in a Romanian reservoir affected by release of mercury from a chlor-alkali plant. Water Res. 2014, 49, 391–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonsson, S.; Skyllberg, U.; Nilsson, M.B.; Lundberg, E.; Andersson, A.; Björn, E. Differentiated Availability of Geochemical Mercury Pools Controls Methylmercury Levels in Estuarine Sediment and Biota. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Meng, B.; Feng, X. Mercury Methylation in Rice Paddy and Accumulation in Rice Plant: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 195, 110462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schartup, A.T.; Balcom, P.H.; Soerensen, A.L.; Gosnell, K.J.; Calder, R.S.D.; Mason, R.P.; Sunderland, E.M. Freshwater Discharges Drive High Levels of Methylmercury in Arctic Marine Biota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11789–11794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soerensen, A.L.; Schartup, A.T.; Skrobonja, A.; Bouchet, S.; Amouroux, D.; Liem Nguyen, V.; Björn, E. Deciphering the Role of Water Column Redoxclines on Methylmercury Cycling Using Speciation Modeling and Observations From the Baltic Sea. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2018, 32, 1498–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNEP. Global Mercury Assessment 2023; United Nations Environment Programme: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 of 25 April 2023 on maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2023, 119, 103–157. [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. Scientific Opinion on the risk for public health related to the presence of mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2985. [CrossRef]
- FAO/WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Evaluation of Mercury; FAO/WHO: Rome, Italy/Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Burger, J.; Gaines, K.F.; Gochfeld, M. Ethnic differences in risk from mercury among Savannah River fishermen. Risk Anal. 2001, 21, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavoie, R.A.; Jardine, T.D.; Chumchal, M.M.; Kidd, K.A.; Campbell, L.M. Biomagnification of mercury in Aquatic Food Webs: A Worldwide Meta-Analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 13385–13394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiener, J.G.; Krabbenhoft, D.P.; Heinz, G.H.; Scheuhammer, A.M. Ecotoxicology of mercury. In Handbook of Ecotoxicology, 2nd ed.; Hoffman, D.J., Rattner, B.A., Burton, G.A., Cairns, J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kidd, K.A.; Muir, D.C.G.; Evans, M.S.; Wang, X.; Whittle, M.; Swanson, H.K.; Johnston, T.; Guildford, S. Biomagnification of Mercury through Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush) Food Webs of Lakes with Different Physical, Chemical and Biological Characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 438, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Braune, B.M.; Chételat, J.; Amyot, M.; Brown, T.; Clayden, M.; Evans, M.; Fisk, A.T.; Gaden, A.; Girard, C.; Hare, A.; et al. Mercury in the Marine Environment of the Canadian Arctic: Review of Recent Findings. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 509–510, 67–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simoneau, M.; Lucotte, M.; Garceau, S.; Laliberté, D. Fish growth rates modulate mercury concentrations in walleye (Sander vitreus) from eastern Canadian lakes. Environ. Res. 2005, 98, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chumchal, M.M.; Drenner, R.W.; Fry, B.; Hambright, K.D.; Newland, L.W. Habitat Specific Differences in Mercury Concentration in a Top Predator from a Shallow Lake. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 2008, 137, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Power, M.; Klein, G.M.; Guiguer, K.R.R.A.; Kwan, M.H. Mercury Accumulation in the Fish Community of a Sub-Arctic Lake in Relation to Trophic Position and Carbon Sources. J. Appl. Ecol. 2002, 39, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloom, N.S. On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1992, 49, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Risher, J.F.; DeWoskin, R.S. Toxicological Profile for Mercury; ATSDR: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007.
- Bosch, A.C.; O’Neill, B.; Sigge, G.O.; Kerwath, S.E.; Hoffman, L.C. Heavy metals in marine fish meat and consumer health: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, F.; Wang, W.X. Why mercury concentration increases with fish size? Environ. Pollut. 2012, 163, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uzochukwu, I.E.; Nagy, L.; Somogyi, D.; Pásztor, A.; Ossai, N.I.; Antal, L.; Yancheva, V.; Csarnovics, I.; Nyeste, K. Burbot (Lota lota) as a bioindicator of microplastic pollution in the Tisza River: Multi-tissue contamination, polymer characterisation, and implications for ecological and human-health risks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2026, 503, 141048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Angelova, V.R.; Nikolova, L.N.; Balabanov, S.G.; Georgiev, G.K. Nutritional composition and heavy metal contamination in fish from Kardzhali Dam, Bulgaria. Agric. Food 2023, 11, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karapetkova, M.; Zhivkov, M. Freshwater Fishes of Bulgaria; Bulvest 2000: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kottelat, M.; Freyhof, J. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes; Publications Kottelat: Cornol, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. EPA. Method 7473: Mercury in Solids and Solutions by Thermal Decomposition; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
- Eurofish. The Fisheries and Aquaculture Sector in Bulgaria. 2020. Available online: https://eurofish.dk/the-fisheries-and-aquaculture-sector-in-bulgaria/ (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Friedl, G.; Wüest, A. Disrupting biogeochemical cycles in lakes. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 64, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vörösmarty, C.J.; Meybeck, M.; Fekete, B.; Sharma, K.; Green, P.; Syvitski, J.P.M. Anthropogenic sediment retention. Glob. Planet. Change 2003, 39, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horvat, M.; Nolde, N.; Fajon, V.; Jereb, V.; Logar, M.; Lojen, S.; Jacimovic, R.; Falnoga, I.; Liya, Q.; Faganeli, J.; et al. Total Mercury, Methylmercury and Selenium in Mercury Polluted Areas in the Province of Guizhou, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 304, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimondi, V.; Gray, J.E.; Costagliola, P.; Vaselli, O.; Lattanzi, P. Concentration, distribution, and translocation of mercury and methylmercury in mine-waste, sediment, soil, water, and fish collected near the Abbadia San Salvatore mercury mine, Monte Amiata district, Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 414, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biester, H.; Müller, G.; Schöler, H.F. Binding and Mobility of Mercury in Soils Contaminated by Emissions from Chlor-Alkali Plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 284, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cossa, D.; Harmelin-Vivien, M.; Mellon-Duval, C.; Loizeau, V.; Averty, B.; Crochet, S.; Chou, L.; Cadiou, J.-F. Influences of Bioavailability, Trophic Position, and Growth on Methylmercury in Hakes (Merluccius merluccius) from Northwestern Mediterranean and Northeastern Atlantic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4885–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schartup, A.T.; Thackray, C.P.; Qureshi, A.; Dassuncao, C.; Gillespie, K.; Hanke, A.; Sunderland, E.M. Climate change and overfishing increase neurotoxicant in marine predators. Nature 2019, 572, 648–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagles-Smith, C.A.; Ackerman, J.T.; Willacker, J.J.; Tate, M.T.; Lutz, M.A.; Fleck, J.A.; Stewart, A.R.; Wiener, J.G.; Evers, D.C.; Lepak, J.M.; et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mercury concentrations in freshwater fish across the Western United States and Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 568, 1171–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabana, G.; Tremblay, A.; Kalff, J.; Rasmussen, J.B. Pelagic food chain structure in Ontario lakes: A Determinant of Mercury Levels in Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 51, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Post, D.M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position. Ecology 2002, 83, 703–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fry, B.; Chumchal, M.M. Mercury Bioaccumulation in Estuarine Food Webs. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22, 606–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Storelli, M.M.; Giacominelli-Stuffler, R.; Marcotrigiano, G.O. Total and methylmercury residues in cartilaginous fish from Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 44, 1354–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hammerschmidt, C.R.; Fitzgerald, W.F. Methylmercury in Freshwater Fish Linked to Atmospheric Mercury Deposition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7764–7770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berlin, M.; Zalups, R.K.; Fowler, B.A. Mercury. In Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 3rd ed.; Nordberg, G.F., Fowler, B.A., Nordberg, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karimi, R.; Chen, C.Y.; Pickhardt, P.C.; Fisher, N.S.; Folt, C.L. Stoichiometric Controls of Mercury Dilution by Growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7477–7482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ravichandran, M. Interactions between mercury and organic matter. Chemosphere 2004, 55, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WHO. Guidance on Human Health Risk Assessment; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. EPA. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): Methylmercury (MeHg); U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2001.
- Flinders, C.; Barnhart, B.; Morrison, E.B.; Anderson, P.D.; Landis, W.G. Probabilistic Approaches for Risk Assessment and Regulatory Criteria Development. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2025, 21, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Watanabe, T.; Matsuda, R.; Uneyama, C. Probabilistic estimation of dietary intake of methylmercury from fish in Japan using Monte Carlo simulation. Food Saf. 2021, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Tong, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, X. Risk Assessment of Total Mercury and Methylmercury in Aquatic Products from Offshore Farms in China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 354, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Species | Common Name | Trophic Guild | Reservoir Distribution (K, SK, I) | n | TL Median (cm) | TW Median (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyprinus carpio | Common carp | Omnivore | K = 0, SK = 3, I = 0 | 3 | 48.1 | 2416 |
| Squalius orpheus | Orpheus dace | Omnivore | K = 0, SK = 0, I = 3 | 3 | 34.6 | 609 |
| Vimba melanops | Macedonian vimba | Omnivore | K = 5, SK = 0, I = 0 | 5 | 23.6 | 181 |
| Silurus glanis | European catfish | Predator | K = 0, SK = 3, I = 0 | 3 | 62.0 | 1862 |
| Perca fluviatilis | European perch | Predator | K = 5, SK = 0, I = 4 | 9 | 24.2 | 235 |
| Carassius gibelio | Prussian carp | Omnivore | K = 5, SK = 4, I = 8 | 17 | 28.4 | 451 |
| Rutilus rutilus | Roach | Omnivore | K = 5, SK = 0, I = 4 | 9 | 22.7 | 196 |
| Organ | Mean ± SD (mg·kg−1) | Median | Min | Max | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bones | 0.023 ± 0.018 | 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.069 | 49 |
| Gills | 0.011 ± 0.011 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.042 | 49 |
| Gonads | 0.006 ± 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.017 | 49 |
| Hearts | 0.024 ± 0.031 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.124 | 49 |
| Kidneys | 0.020 ± 0.021 | 0.011 | 0.003 | 0.107 | 49 |
| Liver | 0.032 ± 0.051 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.198 | 49 |
| Muscle | 0.044 ± 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.008 | 0.116 | 49 |
| Skin | 0.016 ± 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.067 | 49 |
| Spleen | 0.022 ± 0.027 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.120 | 49 |
| Organ | Pearson r (TL vs. THg) | Pearson r (TW vs. THg) | n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bones | −0.302 | −0.326 | 49 |
| Gills | −0.284 | −0.306 | 49 |
| Gonads | 0.245 | 0.087 | 49 |
| Hearts | −0.220 | −0.236 | 49 |
| Kidneys | −0.159 | −0.164 | 49 |
| Liver | −0.155 | −0.157 | 49 |
| Muscle | −0.172 | −0.230 | 49 |
| Skin | −0.334 | −0.364 | 49 |
| Spleen | −0.203 | −0.230 | 49 |
| (A) | |||||||||
| Species | THQ_det (Adults) | THQ_det (Pregnant) | THQ_det (Children) | SWI_med (Adults) | SWI_med (Pregnant) | SWI_med (Children) | SWI_P95 (Adults) | SWI_P95 (Pregnant) | SWI_P95 (Children) |
| 1 | 0.306 | 0.357 | 1.428 | 850 | 728 | 182 | 788 | 676 | 169 |
| 2 | 0.125 | 0.146 | 0.583 | 2081 | 1784 | 446 | 1797 | 1540 | 385 |
| 3 | 0.119 | 0.139 | 0.557 | 2180 | 1869 | 467 | 1571 | 1346 | 337 |
| 4 | 0.082 | 0.096 | 0.383 | 3165 | 2713 | 678 | 2243 | 1922 | 481 |
| 5 | 0.051 | 0.059 | 0.236 | 5132 | 4399 | 1100 | 1380 | 1183 | 296 |
| 6 | 0.066 | 0.077 | 0.308 | 3940 | 3377 | 844 | 2162 | 1853 | 463 |
| 7 | 0.063 | 0.073 | 0.294 | 4130 | 3540 | 885 | 3014 | 2583 | 646 |
| 8 | 0.025 | 0.029 | 0.116 | 10,430 | 8940 | 2235 | 7637 | 6546 | 1636 |
| (B) | |||||||||
| Species | MC P50 (Adults) | MC P50 (Pregnant) | MC P50 (Children) | MC P95 (Adults) | MC P95 (Pregnant) | MC P95 (Children) | MC P(>1) % (Adults) | MC P(>1) % (Pregnant) | MC P(>1) % (Children) |
| 1 | 0.033 | 0.038 | 0.153 | 0.063 | 0.073 | 0.294 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 2 | 0.079 | 0.092 | 0.367 | 0.159 | 0.186 | 0.743 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| 3 | 0.140 | 0.164 | 0.656 | 0.289 | 0.335 | 1.346 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.7% |
| 4 | 0.145 | 0.171 | 0.682 | 0.276 | 0.322 | 1.277 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 17.6% |
| 5 | 0.369 | 0.432 | 1.740 | 0.642 | 0.756 | 3.021 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 90.1% |
| 6 | 0.080 | 0.093 | 0.374 | 0.274 | 0.319 | 1.303 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.5% |
| 7 | 0.086 | 0.100 | 0.402 | 0.199 | 0.232 | 0.935 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.6% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Angelova, V.R.; Nikolova, L.N.; Bonev, S.G.; Georgiev, G.K. Tissue-Specific Mercury Bioaccumulation and Probabilistic Human Health Risk in Freshwater Fish from the Arda River Reservoir Cascade (Bulgaria). Toxics 2026, 14, 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14040291
Angelova VR, Nikolova LN, Bonev SG, Georgiev GK. Tissue-Specific Mercury Bioaccumulation and Probabilistic Human Health Risk in Freshwater Fish from the Arda River Reservoir Cascade (Bulgaria). Toxics. 2026; 14(4):291. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14040291
Chicago/Turabian StyleAngelova, Violina R., Ljudmila N. Nikolova, Stanimir G. Bonev, and Georgi K. Georgiev. 2026. "Tissue-Specific Mercury Bioaccumulation and Probabilistic Human Health Risk in Freshwater Fish from the Arda River Reservoir Cascade (Bulgaria)" Toxics 14, no. 4: 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14040291
APA StyleAngelova, V. R., Nikolova, L. N., Bonev, S. G., & Georgiev, G. K. (2026). Tissue-Specific Mercury Bioaccumulation and Probabilistic Human Health Risk in Freshwater Fish from the Arda River Reservoir Cascade (Bulgaria). Toxics, 14(4), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14040291

