Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of Nanoplastics and GenX on Human Serum Albumin: The Role of Protein Corona Formation and Co-Adsorption
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into Transport Function of the Murine Organic Anion-Transporting Polypeptide OATP1B2 by Comparison with Its Rat and Human Orthologues
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neurotoxicity: Underlying Molecular Mechanisms and Future Perspectives

1
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Breeding and Healthy Husbandry, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Tianjin Agricultural University, Jinjing Road No. 22, Xiqing District, Tianjin 300384, China
3
Technology Innovation Center for Food Safety Surveillance and Detection (Hainan), Sanya Institute of China Agricultural University, Sanya 572025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxics 2026, 14(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010011
Submission received: 23 November 2025 / Revised: 16 December 2025 / Accepted: 18 December 2025 / Published: 20 December 2025

Abstract

The expanding application of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) in consumer products, medicine, and the food industry has raised significant concerns regarding their potential neurotoxicity. This review synthesizes current understanding of the pathways by which ZnO NPs gain access to the central nervous system (CNS), their resulting neurotoxic effects, and the underlying molecular mechanisms. These nanoparticles primarily breach the CNS via translocation across the blood–brain barrier, axonal transport along sensory nerves, and disruption of the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Upon entry, ZnO NPs induce behavioral deficits, including impaired learning, memory, and motor function, alongside pathological brain damage. The neurotoxicity is driven by a multi-faceted mechanism involving mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, energy depletion, and neuroinflammation, often triggered by the release of Zn2+ ions. Furthermore, ZnO NPs can activate diverse cell death pathways, including apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis. Critically, their neurotoxic potential is intrinsically linked to their physicochemical properties, such as size and shape. Emerging evidence also suggests that ZnO NP exposure may promote the aggregation of pathological proteins like Tau, thereby potentially increasing the risk for neurodegenerative diseases. Finally, we discuss potential mitigation strategies, such as surface modification and intervention with natural compounds. This review underscores the need for a refined risk assessment of ZnO NPs to ensure their safe deployment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, nanotechnology has transformed from applications primarily in industrial machinery to diverse domains such as medical technology, food production, and particularly, animal husbandry [1,2,3]. Propelled by substantial investment in nanomaterials—particularly metal and metal oxide nanoparticles—nanotechnology has flourished, yielding profound socioeconomic benefits [4,5,6]. Among these, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) have garnered significant attention for their potential in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and food products [7,8,9,10]. ZnO NPs are widely used in sunscreens due to their efficiency in scattering and absorbing ultraviolet (UV) radiation [11,12]. Certain green-synthesized ZnO NPs have been applied in cancer therapeutics [13,14,15]. As zinc is an essential trace element [16], ZnO NPs are also commonly utilized as zinc supplements in animal feed additives [17]. Furthermore, driven by their exceptional antibacterial efficacy, ZnO NPs are being actively incorporated into medical materials and food products [18,19]. However, the potential health risks arising from human and animal exposure to nanoparticles through various routes are a growing concern [20,21,22]. Beyond their pervasive dissemination, the reduction in bulk compounds to nanoscale materials fundamentally alters their physicochemical properties and biological interactions. For instance, the small size and high specific surface area of ZnO NPs confer greater reactivity compared to bulk ZnO [23]. Consequently, a critical question is whether ZnO NPs, by virtue of their distinctive nanoscale properties, pose a greater threat to ecosystems and public health than their bulk counterparts, warranting systematic investigation. Recent advances in research have expanded our understanding of nanomaterial toxicity to encompass the central nervous system (CNS)—the primary network integrating sensory input and coordinating motor responses throughout the body [24]. ZnO NPs can interact with the nervous system, elicit neurotoxicity, and thereby mediate brain tissue damage [25,26,27]. Although existing safety assessments have demonstrated the threat ZnO NPs pose to the brain, their mechanisms of neurotoxicity remain incompletely characterized. Therefore, this review analyzes the neuroinvasive properties and neurotoxic mechanisms of ZnO NPs, along with current protective strategies to mitigate their toxicity, aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risks these particles pose to the CNS. This synthesis aims to inform future risk assessments, regulatory decisions, and the development of strategies to mitigate ZnO NP-induced neurotoxicity.

2. Principal Pathways for ZnO NP-Mediated Zn Accumulation in the CNS

Biodistribution studies confirm that ZnO NPs penetrate the CNS [28], exhibiting dose-dependent accumulation within specific brain regions in experimental models. In one study, male C57BL/6J mice received a single intratracheal instillation of ZnO NPs at low (3 μg), medium (6 μg), or high (12 μg) doses. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) analysis of cerebral cortex tissue revealed a dose-dependent elevation in zinc levels. By day 3 post-exposure, cortical Zn concentrations increased progressively with dosage, from below 600 μg L−1 to approximately 700 μg L−1 [25]. Moreover, emerging evidence indicates that the nervous system exhibits heightened sensitivity to Zn2+. Following dissolution, ZnO NPs may induce neurotoxicity through liberated Zn2+ or other bioactive species within the brain [29]. The Zn2+ ions released from ZnO NPs can disseminate systemically to various organs, including the brain, while the remaining nanoparticles provide a continuous source of Zn2+, leading to progressive bioaccumulation in neural tissue. Current evidence indicates three principal pathways for ZnO NP translocation to the CNS: (1) blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration [30], (2) sensory neuronal translocation [28,31], and (3) microbiota–gut–brain axis signaling [32].

2.1. Blood–Brain Barrier Pathway

Metal oxide nanomaterials can increase metal levels in the brain parenchyma via four principal mechanisms at the BBB: passive diffusion, inhibition of efflux transporters, receptor-mediated endocytosis, and adsorptive transcytosis [33]. ZnO NPs can cross the BBB and enter the CNS [34]. Repeated intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of ZnO NPs over 5 days induced significant zinc accumulation in the brains of Swiss mice [35]. This finding is consistent with our earlier observation in SD rats, where a 7-day treatment with ZnO NPs also resulted in marked cerebral zinc enrichment [36]. Furthermore, NP-triggered neuroinflammation can disrupt BBB integrity and increase paracellular permeability, thereby promoting zinc accumulation in the brain parenchyma [37]. Importantly, ZnO NPs that initially cross the BBB via transcytosis can subsequently trigger microglial activation and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [38]. This inflammatory response degrades tight junction proteins (e.g., claudin-5), which increases paracellular permeability and creates a vicious cycle that facilitates further zinc influx into the brain parenchyma [39]. Apolipoproteins B and E (ApoB, ApoE) in the circulation can adsorb onto ZnO NPs, facilitating their uptake into brain endothelial cells via receptor-mediated endocytosis. This process mediates the transcytosis of nanoparticles across the BBB [25]. Following intragastric administration in mice, ZnO NPs can translocate systemically from the gastrointestinal tract into the circulation. Subsequent compromise of the BBB facilitates their accumulation in the brain, ultimately elevating levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) [40]. A schematic representation of these key BBB-translocation pathways is provided in Figure 1.

2.2. Sensory Neural Translocation Pathway

Early epidemiological studies linked occupational inhalation of micrometer-scale ZnO particles during welding to human cognitive impairment, a phenomenon initially attributed to olfactory nerve translocation [41]. This mechanism has now received experimental validation, as contemporary studies confirm that ZnO nanoparticles exploit the nasal–olfactory pathway to reach neural tissue. Both inhaled airborne ZnO nanoparticles and ingested ZnO NP-contaminated materials can stimulate sensory nerves—including the olfactory, trigeminal, and gustatory pathways—enabling axonal transport to the brain. Experimental evidence indicates that inhaled ZnO NPs bypass systemic circulation via two principal routes: (1) trans-epithelial transport across the olfactory mucosa with subsequent uptake by the trigeminal nerve, and (2) direct retrograde axonal transport along olfactory neurons into the brain parenchyma [31,42]. These principal neuro-invasive routes are schematically summarized in Figure 2. In a controlled study, 4-week-old male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats received a single intranasal instillation of ZnO NPs (13 mg Zn/kg), with ZnSO4 (at an equimolar Zn concentration) serving as the ionic control. After 7 days, the ZnO NPs had dissolved and transformed, and the resulting Zn2+ ions were transported via the olfactory bulb-to-brain pathway, elevating zinc levels in cerebral tissues. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy revealed comparable Zn speciation and analogous molecular perturbations in the hippocampus of ZnO NP-exposed and ZnSO4-control rats. This convergence indicates that the observed neurobiological effects stem predominantly from Zn2+ ions released during nanoparticle dissolution, rather than from the particulate form itself [29]. Following alternate-day sublingual administration of ZnO NPs (50–100 nm) for 30 consecutive days in Wistar rats, ICP-MS analysis revealed a significant increase in zinc content in the tongue, gustatory nerves, and brain tissues, with no significant changes observed in the blood or other organs. TEM further showed that ZnO NPs accumulated in close proximity to synaptic regions [28]. In taste exposure experiments, 30 days of sublingual ZnO NP administration (50 mg kg−1 d−1) resulted in nanoparticle absorption through taste buds and subsequent transport to the brain via gustatory nerves—specifically, the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the hippocampus revealed vacuolar degeneration of myelinated nerve fibers in both ZnO NP- and ZnSO4-exposed groups [43]. Importantly, rats receiving sublingual ZnO NP administration exhibited significantly higher cerebral zinc levels than their intragastrically dosed counterparts, despite equivalent cumulative exposure. This highlights the superior efficiency of gustatory-nerve-mediated transport over gastrointestinal absorption for delivering zinc to the CNS.

2.3. Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis Pathway

The gastrointestinal tract is the primary site of interaction for ingested ZnO NPs. Critically, emerging evidence identifies the gut as a key regulator in neurological disorders, wherein nanoparticle-induced dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction can propagate neuroinflammation via the microbiota–gut–brain axis [44,45]. The gut microbiota exhibits high susceptibility to diet-derived xenobiotics—including food additives, pharmaceuticals, and toxicants—which modulate neural function through the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Critically, intestinal dysbiosis triggers hyperexcitation of enteric neurons. These aberrant signals then propagate to the CNS via bidirectional neural pathways, establishing a state of maladaptive communication that can drive neuroinflammatory cascades [46]. First, neural connectivity pathways propagate enteric pathology to the central nervous system. Second, the enteric nervous system (ENS) shares key neurotransmitters with the CNS, such as 5-HT. Consequently, gastrointestinal impairment can disrupt higher-order neural functions, including learning, memory, and motor coordination [47]. Oral exposure to ZnO NPs upregulates the expression of enteric neuron-specific markers, including Hu proteins and β-tubulin III (TuJ1), indicating neuronal activation in the gut. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) further indicates that ZnO NPs alter the gut microbial community structure, notably reducing the abundance of Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium, thereby inducing dysregulation of the microbiota–gut–brain axis. These perturbations drive metabolic reprogramming in the hippocampus and elicit neurobehavioral deficits in young mice [32]. In 4-week-old mice, daily intragastric administration of ZnO NPs (26 mg kg−1) for 30 days induced pathological alterations in the gastrointestinal tract. This treatment triggered aberrant enteric neuronal excitation, enhanced intestinal 5-HT biosynthesis and transport, and increased cerebral 5-HT levels via augmented gut–brain communication [40]. Yang et al. revealed that oral exposure to ZnO NPs may lead to neurobehavioral impairments by interfering with the synthesis and secretion of gut-derived melatonin [48]. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that ZnO NP-induced gut dysbiosis compromises neurological function via disruption of the microbiota–gut–brain axis, as specifically evidenced in Figure 3.

3. Influence of ZnO NPs’ Nano-Specific Properties on Their Neurotoxicity

3.1. Unique Properties of Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles exhibit distinct physicochemical properties compared to their bulk counterparts, including size, morphology, specific surface area, and surface chemistry [49]. Their high specific surface area confers greater reactivity upon ZnO NPs compared to microscale ZnO particles [45,50]. This enhanced reactivity facilitates interactions with biological systems: ZnO NPs can form a protein corona or bind directly to biomolecules via electrostatic, hydrophobic, or hydrogen-bond interactions [45]. Consequently, equimolar exposures to metal oxide nanoparticles, their bulk counterparts, and soluble salts result in distinct toxicological outcomes. Metal oxide nanoparticles, exemplified by ZnO NPs, exhibit greater bioavailability and bioactivity than bulk oxides. Crucially, their toxicity profile proves more pronounced than that of ionic solutions at equivalent molar concentrations [51,52,53]. While non-toxic doses of bulk ZnO are inert, ZnO NPs induce apoptosis in murine microglial cells via activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (Akt) signaling pathways [52]. How et al. found that ZnO NPs can be transferred through the food chain (E. coliC. elegans) and that the nanoparticles themselves, rather than the released zinc ions, damage the type D GABAergic motor neurons in C. elegans, resulting in locomotor behavioral deficits [54]. Embryonic exposure of zebrafish (Danio rerio) to ZnO NPs (1–100 mg L−1) induces more severe abnormalities than exposure to dissolved Zn2+ at equivalent concentrations. ZnO NPs cause more severe disruptions in secondary motor neuron axon outgrowth and dorsal root ganglion development, with neurovascular defects persisting transgenerationally in zebrafish [51]. Upon exposure to ZnO NPs, astrocytes exhibit significantly greater generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and increased caspase activity compared to bulk ZnO. Comparative analyses of ZnO NPs, ZnCl2, and bulk ZnO reveal that both ZnO NPs and bulk ZnO induce marked mitochondrial damage, whereas ZnCl2 had minimal effect on the mitochondrial membrane potential. In colony formation assays, high concentrations (40 and 80 mg L−1) of ZnCl2 and ZnO NPs significantly reduced astrocyte colony formation, whereas bulk ZnO had little effect. These findings indicate that the potent cytotoxicity of ZnO NPs is not solely attributable to dissolution and ionic release, highlighting a nanoparticle-specific mechanism of neurotoxicity [53].

3.2. Relationship Between ZnO NP Properties and Their Neurotoxicity

The toxicological effects of ZnO NPs are closely associated with their physicochemical properties, including size, shape, surface area, and dispersibility [55,56]. Consequently, the toxicity of ZnO NPs must be interpreted in the context of their thorough physicochemical characterization, both in experimental and regulatory settings. For example, ZnO NPs with diameters of 50 and 100 nm exhibit greater toxicity to dopaminergic neurons than their 1000 nm counterparts. This enhanced neurotoxicity may stem from the greater propensity of smaller particles to cross the BBB, their higher cellular uptake, and their larger specific surface area with a higher density of reactive atoms [57]. Zebrafish and SH-SY5Y cells respond differently to various ZnO nanostructures, including nanoparticles (NPs), short nanorods (NRs), and long NRs. At lower concentrations, smaller ZnO NPs and short ZnO NRs demonstrate slightly higher toxicity compared to larger, long ZnO NRs. Conversely, at relatively higher concentrations, long ZnO NRs pose an increased risk. For instance, long NRs can induce Parkinson’s disease (PD)-like symptoms—including motor deficits, dopaminergic neuron loss, and α-synuclein accumulation—to an extent comparable to NPs, primarily via ROS generation. This shift in toxicity profile at higher concentrations may be attributed to the aggregation tendency of smaller ZnO NPs, thereby diluting their size-dependent effects [58]. The relationship between the properties of ZnO NPs and their toxicity varies across biological models [59]. For example, ZnO NRs are more cytotoxic to human lung epithelial cells and cause more pronounced damage in HepG2 cells than ZnO NPs [60,61]. In contrast, ZnO NPs are more toxic to Ana-1 cells than NRs [62]. In three eutrophic freshwater species, ZnO NPs had a lower median lethal concentration (LC50) than NRs [59]. Similarly, in marine bivalves, ZnO NPs induced stronger pro-apoptotic and pro-inflammatory effects than NRs [63]. Beyond direct neurotoxicity, ZnO NPs can also be transferred across the placenta, leading to embryonic developmental abnormalities. Studies have shown that exposed mice exhibit neural tube closure defects, which are closely associated with the activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress–calcium dysregulation–apoptosis pathway [64]. These findings collectively indicate that the comparative risk assessment of ZnO NPs with differing physicochemical properties is model-dependent. Therefore, defining a true safe exposure limit for ZnO NPs requires the integration of detailed physicochemical characterization into the risk assessment framework.

4. Neurotoxic Effects of ZnO Nanoparticles

4.1. Neurobehavioral Disorders

Neurobehavioral impairments encompass deficits in sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. Rodent behavioral studies demonstrate that ZnO NP exposure induces adverse neurobehavioral outcomes [47]. Amara et al. provided evidence that systemically circulating ZnO NPs can cross the BBB and accumulate in discrete neuroanatomical regions, including the cerebral cortex and cerebellum [65]. Their study using an intravenous (i.v.) rat model provided direct evidence: a concurrent increase in plasma zinc levels and cerebellar Zn2+ accumulation, confirming the biodistribution of nanoparticles into the CNS [65]. In 4-week-old Wistar rats, 8 weeks of i.p. ZnO NP exposure impaired spatial cognition, which was mediated by deficits in synaptic plasticity [66]. Similarly, five consecutive days of i.p. ZnO NP administration (300 mg/kg) induced cerebral Zn2+ accumulation and anxiety-like behaviors in Swiss mice [35]. Following oral exposure to ZnO NPs (26 mg/kg/day for 30 days), mice exhibited significant behavioral abnormalities, including reduced total distance traveled in the open field test, decreased time spent in the open arms in the elevated plus maze, and impaired balance and coordination in the rotarod test [48]. ZnO NP exposure alters the expression of key neurobehavioral markers such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and discs large homolog 4 (DLG4). Supporting this, juvenile mice (postnatal day 21) administered ZnO NPs (26 mg kg−1) via intragastric gavage for 30 days exhibited deficits in spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze, as well as suppressed locomotor activity in the open field test [47]. These neurobehavioral impairments may be associated with the upregulation of hippocampus-specific neurobehavioral genes BDNF and DLG4 [47]. Oral exposure to ZnO NPs (50 and 100 mg/kg) induced anxiety-like behaviors in rats, as indicated by reduced time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze, and also impaired spatial learning and memory, demonstrated by significantly prolonged escape latency in the Morris water maze test [67]. Following 30-day oral exposure to 34 mg/kg ZnO NPs, mice exhibited reduced total distance traveled and increased anxiety index in the open field test; prolonged immobility time and decreased escape attempts in the tail suspension test; and extended escape latency along with impaired spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze test [68]. After only 3 days of exposure to an environmentally relevant dose of ZnO NPs (14.6 mg kg−1), mice exhibited cognitive impairment in the novel object recognition test. This cognitive deficit was correlated with increased nitric oxide (NO) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), alongside decreased acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity [69].

4.2. Brain Tissue Injury

Studies indicate that ZnO NP exposure can induce brain tissue damage before observable neurobehavioral deficits manifest [70,71]. Specifically, ZnO NPs have been shown to reduce the brain-to-body weight ratio and induce pathological alterations in the brain tissue of rats. In rats treated with intragastric ZnO NPs, the hippocampus exhibited disorganized architecture and reduced neuronal density. Furthermore, a reduction in Nissl body staining was observed in both the cortex and hippocampus, accompanied by neuronal nuclear shrinkage, collectively indicating significant neuronal injury. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a marked increase in GFAP immunoreactivity in the cortex and hippocampus. This elevated GFAP expression signifies the transition of glial cells from a quiescent to an activated state [70]. In male albino rats, intragastric (i.g.) administration of ZnO NPs (5.6 mg/kg) induced BBB disruption and cerebellar neurodegeneration, the latter characterized by disorganized neuronal arrangement. Purkinje and granule cells exhibited pathological changes, including Nissl body loss and gliosis. This cerebellar damage was associated with dysregulation of apoptotic and inflammatory proteins: caspase-3 levels were significantly upregulated in Purkinje and granule cells; P53 and COX-2 expression were markedly elevated in cerebellar tissue; and secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α was significantly increased [71]. In Wistar rats orally exposed to ZnO NPs (100 mg/kg) for 75 days, significant neuropathological alterations were observed in the cerebral cortex, including disorganized cortical layers, widespread neuronal loss, multiple fissures and small cysts in the neuropil, shrinkage of pyramidal neurons with perineuronal edema, neuronal degeneration with pyknotic nuclei, as well as vascular dilation and tissue vacuolization. These structural damages were accompanied by elevated levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and p53 in brain tissues [72]. Maternal exposure to ZnO NPs induced neurodegenerative-like alterations in offspring brains, including pyknotic nuclei, eosinophilic cytoplasm, and neuropil vacuolization in hippocampal CA1 neurons, with severity dependent on exposure duration [73].
Based on the aforementioned findings regarding ZnO NPs-induced neurobehavioral disorders and brain tissue injury, we integrated and constructed a mechanistic diagram (Figure 4) to systematically elucidate the underlying molecular and cellular events through which ZnO NPs exposure leads to neurobehavioral impairments and brain tissue damage.

5. Mechanisms of ZnO NP-Induced Neurotoxicity

5.1. Induction of Neuronal Signaling Dysfunction

ZnO NPs impair neuronal signaling through neurotransmitter dysregulation and disruption of action potential dynamics. Multi-omics analyses revealed that intranasal instillation of ZnO NPs increases acetylcholine (ACh) synthesis, upregulates ACh transporters, and inhibits acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity in the rat hippocampus, thereby enhancing synaptic ACh levels. The inhibition of AChE may result from Zn2+ interactions with the enzyme’s structure or from the transcriptional downregulation of AChE expression [29]. In a study conducted in vitro, ZnO NPs dose-dependently inhibited AChE activity in PC-12 cells [74]. Maternal exposure to ZnO NPs significantly reduced AChE activity in offspring, disrupted acetylcholine metabolism, potentially impaired cholinergic neurotransmission, and consequently may lead to deficits in learning, memory, and other cognitive functions [73]. In the medulla, glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter underlying respiratory drive. ZnO NPs disrupt glutamatergic neurotransmission by altering glutamate metabolism and inhibiting postsynaptic receptor function. Furthermore, ZnO NPs augment 5-HT release in the mouse cerebral cortex, contributing to memory impairment and locomotor deficits [47]. By disrupting neurotransmission, ZnO NPs impair the normal respiratory drive. In acute experiments using in vitro brainstem-spinal cord preparations from neonatal rats, ZnO NPs compromised the function of respiratory rhythm-generating neurons. This was evidenced by reduced action potential amplitude and peak firing rates, which suppressed synchronized network activity and terminated respiratory rhythmogenesis. This effect may be mediated by Zn2+-dependent modulation of neuronal excitability [75].

5.2. Induction of Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress and Energy Exhaustion

Mitochondria, the primary energy producers in eukaryotic cells, are essential for mammalian brain function [76,77]. ZnO NPs can induce mitochondrial damage directly or by disrupting the electron transport chain, leading to oxidative stress. This cascade ultimately depletes intracellular ATP levels, thereby altering cerebral energy metabolism [78,79,80]. In rats, intranasal instillation of ZnO NPs upregulated glycolysis but downregulated the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation. This metabolic rewiring reduced cerebral ATP levels, creating an energy deficit that culminated in bioenergetic failure [81]. In microglial cells, a 10 h exposure to ZnO NPs (6.6 mg L−1) significantly increased intracellular ROS, depolarized the mitochondrial membrane potential, and reduced ATP levels by 50% compared to controls [82]. In astrocytes, treatment with ZnO NPs (5, 20, and 40 mg L−1) for 6 h increased ROS levels by 29%, 38%, and 49%, respectively. Alternatively, impaired mitochondrial function may trigger mitophagy, a selective form of autophagy, as a cytoprotective response to mitigate damage. Complementary in vitro studies showed that ZnO NPs are internalized by rat C6 glial cells and induce oxidative stress in a time-dependent manner, evident at 3 and 6 h post-exposure [83]. In SH-SY5Y cells, exposure to ZnO NPs induced mitochondrial swelling and cristae disappearance, significantly reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, and disrupted both mitochondrial structure and function. This led to excessive production of ROS, decreased superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels, collectively triggering increased intracellular oxidative stress [64]. Exposure to ZnO NPs disrupts GSH metabolism in nematodes, leading to a reduction in GSH content and affecting the activities of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and glutathione S-transferase (GSH-ST) [84]. In zebrafish larvae and C. elegans, ZnO NP exposure triggered the accumulation of ROS and superoxide anion (O2). This oxidative burden led to elevated MDA levels, indicating lipid peroxidation, while concurrently depleting GSH and suppressing the activities of key antioxidant enzymes (SOD, catalase (CAT), and GSH-Px) [85]. Interestingly, residual PINK1 recruited parkin from the cytosol to mitochondria, triggering a compensatory mitophagic response that alleviated ZnO NP-induced cytotoxicity [86]. ZnO NPs may contribute to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative pathologies by promoting neuroinflammation, microglial activation, ROS accumulation, and neuronal loss [87].

5.3. Induction of Neuroinflammation

In contrast to direct neuronal damage, neuroinflammation plays a predominant role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, PD, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [88]. This activation inhibits the production and migration of cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs), thereby impairing cranial neural crest development and leading to craniofacial defects in chicken embryos [89]. Following i.g. administration of ZnO NPs (600 mg kg−1), rats exhibited elevated serum levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), CAT, and GSH. Concurrently, the cerebral cortex showed significant upregulation of the pro-inflammatory mediators TNF-α, IL-1β, and nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) [90]. Sublingual ZnO NP exposure elevated cortical levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-13 in a dose-dependent manner, leading to localized neuroinflammation in mice [28]. qRT-PCR analysis showed that ZnO NPs stimulation potently increased the secretion of TNF-α and IL-1β from BV-2 microglial cells, with levels peaking at 3 and 6 h post-exposure. This inflammatory response was orchestrated by the coordinated activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and the phosphorylation of ERK and p38 MAPKs [70]. In PC-12 cells, ZnO NPs (≥10 μg/mL) elevated the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α in time- and concentration-dependent manners [74]. In SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells, ZnO NPs activate the NF-κB signaling pathway and suppress the expression of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). Conversely, UCH-L1 overexpression deubiquitinates the endogenous NF-κB inhibitor IκB-α, thereby blocking NF-κB nuclear translocation and mitigating neuronal damage [57]. Oral administration of ZnO NPs (400 mg/kg) significantly elevated serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) in rats and concurrently induced cerebellar astrocyte proliferation (indicated by increased GFAP expression), thereby establishing a vicious cycle between inflammation and oxidative stress [91].

5.4. Induction of Neuronal Apoptosis

Seven-day consecutive exposure to ZnO NPs (40 and 100 mg kg−1) induced a dose-dependent upregulation of the apoptotic executioner caspase-3 in rat brain tissue, accompanied by significant DNA fragmentation—a hallmark of programmed cell death [92]. Treatment of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells with 15 μmol L−1 ZnO NPs for 12 and 24 h significantly promoted apoptosis via activation of the Akt/caspase-3/caspase-7 pathway. Acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining and quantitative apoptosis assays confirmed ZnO NP-induced programmed cell death in rat astrocytes. Caspase-3/7 activity increased in a concentration-dependent manner, with 80 mg L−1 ZnO NPs triggering a pronounced increase of 71.9 ± 3.8% compared to controls [93]. ZnO NPs (3–12 μg/mL, 24 h) induced mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells, characterized by Caspase-3/9 activation, Bax/Bcl-2 dysregulation, and dose-dependent apoptotic rate elevation [94]. In the rat cerebellum, Bax expression was elevated, and Calbindin D28k level was reduced following ZnO NP exposure (400 mg/kg), resulting in calcium dyshomeostasis and enhanced apoptosis of Purkinje cells [91].

5.5. Induction of Neuronal Ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death characterized by inactivation of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), iron dyshomeostasis, and lethal lipid peroxidation [95,96,97]. Nanoparticles have been reported to suppress tumor growth by inducing ferroptosis in mouse xenograft models, establishing a link between nanomaterial exposure and this cell death pathway [98,99]. Emerging evidence demonstrates that ZnO NPs can induce ferroptosis. Following intratracheal instillation of ZnO NPs, mouse cortical neurons exhibited features of ferroptosis, including significantly decreased expression of the key regulators GPX4 and solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11). Conversely, expression of the ferroptosis-promoting protein voltage-dependent anion channel 3 (VDAC3) was markedly increased. In neuron-like PC-12 cells, ZnO NP treatment induced concentration-dependent decreases in GPX4 and SLC7A11 protein levels, confirming ferroptosis in vitro. Mechanistically, the JNK pathway mediated ZnO NP-induced lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis, as the JNK inhibitor SP600125 reversed these effects. The specific ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 attenuated ZnO NP-induced neuronal death in vivo and in vitro, confirming ferroptosis as a key mechanism of ZnO NP neurotoxicity [25]. In bEnd.3 cells, treatment with 20 μg/mL ZnO NPs for 9 h induced lysosomal NP accumulation, increased intracellular iron and lipid peroxidation, and downregulated GPX4, culminating in oxidative stress and ferroptosis [38]. This intracellular iron overload dysregulated autophagic flux and increased membrane permeability, indicating compromised blood–brain barrier integrity and exacerbated cytotoxicity [38].

5.6. Induction of Neuronal Pyroptosis

Pyroptosis is a pro-inflammatory form of regulated cell death characterized by plasma membrane rupture and release of intracellular contents following activation of intense inflammatory cascades by intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli [100]. Emerging evidence suggests a potential link between ZnO NPs and pyroptotic cell death. Exposure of BV-2 microglial cells to 80 mg L−1 ZnO NPs significantly reduced cell viability and induced intracellular ROS accumulation and mitochondrial damage. Flow cytometric analysis using Annexin V-FITC/PI staining detected no significant population of early apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI). Western blot analysis confirmed the absence of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage and caspase-3 activation. In contrast, the late apoptotic/necrotic cell population (Annexin V+/PI+) accounted for 68.2 ± 6.7% of the total. This biomarker profile, together with observed plasma membrane damage, suggests that ZnO NPs induce non-apoptotic, membrane-disruptive cell death, potentially through pyroptosis or secondary necrosis [101].

6. Potential Risk of ZnO NP-Induced Neurodegenerative Disorders

Neurodegenerative diseases represent a growing public health challenge with substantial societal burdens. Epidemiological studies demonstrate a positive correlation between nanoparticles and neurodegenerative diseases [102,103,104]. For instance, titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) are an established risk factor for PD, capable of inducing motor deficits, neuronal loss, dopamine depletion, and Lewy body aggregation [105,106]. Emerging evidence indicates that ZnO NPs pose a neurodegenerative risk by inducing pathological aggregation of the Tau protein. Exposure to ZnO NPs triggers Tau aggregation and generates proteolytic fragments in SH-SY5Y cells, recapitulating key molecular features of neurodegenerative pathology [58]. The study by Chuang et al. demonstrated that the neurobiological effects of ZnO NPs are concentration- and property-dependent [107]. At low concentrations, ZnO NPs exhibit neuroprotective effects by inhibiting protein oxidation, activating autophagic flux, and suppressing Tau protein aggregation. In contrast, high concentrations inactivate autophagic flux and promote Tau aggregation in the brain. In their model, 7-week-old male SD rats exposed to ZnO NPs (10 mg kg−1) exhibited microglial activation in the hippocampus and elevated Tau expression in the cerebellum and hippocampus. Under physiological conditions, accumulated Tau protein in the healthy brain is efficiently cleared by degradation mechanisms such as autophagy. However, high-concentration ZnO NP exposure did not significantly alter key hippocampal autophagy markers, such as LC3-II and p62. This absence of autophagic response—contrary to previously reported ZnO NP-mediated autophagy induction [107]—demonstrates a failure to upregulate cerebral autophagy under neurotoxic conditions. Consequently, this compromised degradation capacity promotes further pathological Tau accumulation.

7. Approaches for Reducing ZnO NP-Induced Toxicity

Current strategies to mitigate ZnO NP toxicity remain limited, primarily falling into two categories: surface modification to reduce their intrinsic reactivity and the use of protective natural compounds. Coating ZnO NPs with bovine serum albumin (BSA) via covalent or non-covalent interactions reduced their cytotoxicity and suppressed ROS generation [108]. Unlike bare ZnO NPs, incorporation into sodium alginate–gum acacia hydrogels prevented red blood cell aggregation. In Vero cells, this hydrogel formulation significantly reduced MDA production, indicating attenuated oxidative stress and consequently lower cytotoxicity [109]. Oral administration of betaine alleviated ZnO NP-induced depressive-like behaviors in mice. Betaine treatment also reduced serum MDA levels and enhanced the activities of SOD and glutathione peroxidase (GPx). Furthermore, betaine treatment ameliorated histological alterations in the hippocampus [110]. In SD rats, intraperitoneal injection of Apis mellifera venom significantly alleviated ZnO NP-induced depression, anxiety, memory impairment, and spatial learning deficits. The treatment also reduced serotonin and dopamine levels, as well as zinc content, in brain tissue. Additionally, it attenuated the ZnO NP-induced increase in neurofilament and GAP-43 immunoreactivity [111]. In Drosophila, dietary quercetin and astragaloside supplementation during the reproductive phase ameliorated ZnO NP-induced developmental toxicity. This protection was mediated by the attenuation of oxidative stress—via upregulation of GSH and SOD and downregulation of MDA—and the subsequent suppression of ferroptosis [112]. Oral administration of saffron extract (200 mg/kg, 21 days) attenuated ZnO NP-induced neurotoxicity by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities and GSH levels while reducing lipid peroxidation, suppressing neuroinflammation via decreased hippocampal IL-6 and IL-1α, and preserving neurobehavioral and cholinergic function [67]. Thymoquinone and quercetin significantly reduced ZnO NP-induced chromosomal aberrations, micronucleus formation, and DNA damage. Additionally, they enhanced the activities of SOD and catalase (CAT), decreased LPO levels, and increased GSH content in the liver. The optimal protective doses of thymoquinone and quercetin against ZnO NP-induced toxicity were determined to be 18 mg/kg body weight and 500 mg/kg body weight, respectively [112]. Quercetin (50 mg/kg/d) effectively mitigates ZnO NP-induced cerebellar toxicity. The mechanism involves inhibiting oxidative stress (reducing MDA and TOS, increasing SOD, GSH, and TAC), alleviating inflammatory response (downregulating IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and GFAP), maintaining calcium homeostasis, and reducing apoptosis (downregulating Bax and upregulating Calbindin D28k), thereby preserving the structural and functional integrity of Purkinje cells [91]. Folate pretreatment (10 mg/kg, i.p., one week) alleviates ZnO NP-induced neurotoxicity by increasing serum GFAP and MBP levels, decreasing MAOA, and improving astrocyte function and myelin integrity [113]. In our previous study, we demonstrated that paeoniflorin restored ZnO NP-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis by increasing the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria and reducing harmful bacteria. Furthermore, paeoniflorin ameliorated ZnO NP-induced hepatic metabolic disorders, including improvements in organic acid and lipid metabolism. It also alleviated abnormalities in body weight, liver index, hepatic histopathology, and biochemical markers, while suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress products. Mechanistically, paeoniflorin regulated the SIRT1–mTOR–TFEB axis, thereby inhibiting ZnO NP-induced hepatocyte pyroptosis [114].

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

ZnO NPs induce neurotoxicity primarily by elevating Zn2+ levels in the brain, which they access via multiple routes, including translocation across the BBB, sensory neural translocation, and the microbiota–gut–brain axis. The neurotoxicity of ZnO NPs exhibits nanoparticle-specific characteristics that are intrinsically linked to their physicochemical properties, such as size, shape, and surface chemistry. Experimentally, ZnO NPs cause significant brain tissue damage and lead to neurobehavioral impairments in animal models. The mechanisms underlying ZnO NP neurotoxicity are multifaceted, involving disrupted neuronal signaling, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and the activation of diverse cell death pathways, including apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis. These processes collectively contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. These effects are mediated by complex signaling networks, including NF-κB, MAPK, BDNF, PINK1, and caspase-3. However, key aspects of their neurotoxicology remain poorly understood, including the precise transformation processes and chemical speciation of ZnO NPs within the nervous system. Research on ZnO NP-induced neuronal death, particularly non-apoptotic forms like pyroptosis and ferroptosis, remains in its infancy. Furthermore, most studies have focused on neurons, with the roles of glial cells receiving considerably less attention. Therefore, future studies are warranted to elucidate the detailed molecular mechanisms and to explore potential links to a broader range of neurological conditions, including cerebral ischemia, traumatic brain injury, Huntington’s disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Current strategies to mitigate ZnO NP toxicity—primarily surface modification and the use of natural protective compounds—remain limited. Given the current irreplaceability of ZnO NPs in many applications, expanding the search for effective natural protective agents is imperative. Concurrently, future efforts must prioritize the development of safer-by-design production protocols, rigorous dosage control, and stringent regulatory frameworks to minimize the risks associated with ZnO NP exposure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C., X.P., D.L., S.T.; methodology, C.C., X.P., Y.Y., C.G.; formal analysis, S.L., R.Z., J.W.; investigation, C.C., X.P., Y.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C., X.P.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y., D.L.; funding acquisition, D.L., S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32302926, 32503297, and 32473083) and the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (24JCQNJC01290), Tianjin Science and Technology Planning Project (25ZYCGSN00730).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AChAcetylcholine
AChEAcetylcholinesterase
AktProtein kinase B
ApoBApolipoprotein B
ApoEApolipoprotein E
BBBBlood–brain barrier
BDNFBrain-derived neurotrophic factor
CATCatalase
CNSCentral nervous system
CRPC-reactive protein
DLG4Disc large homolog 4
ENSEnteric nervous system
GFAPGlial fibrillary acidic protein
GPX4Glutathione peroxidase 4
GSHGlutathione
GSH-PxGlutathione peroxidase
GSH-STGlutathione S-transferase
ICP-MSInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
i.g.Intragastric
IL-1βInterleukin-1 Beta
IL-6Interleukin-6
i.p.Intraperitoneal
i.v.Intravenous
MAOAMonoamine oxidase A
MBPMyelin basic protein
MDAMalondialdehyde
NOS2Nitric oxide synthase 2
PARPPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
PCoAPrincipal coordinate analysis
SODSuperoxide dismutase
TACTotal antioxidant capacity
TBARSThiobarbituric acid reactive substances
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor-alpha
UCH-L1Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1
UVUltraviolet
VDAC3Voltage-dependent anion channel 3
XANESX-ray absorption near-edge structure
ZnO NPsZinc oxide nanoparticles
α-synucleinAlpha-synuclein
5-HT5-Hydroxytryptamine

References

  1. Anchordoquy, T.; Artzi, N.; Balyasnikova, I.V.; Barenholz, Y.; La-Beck, N.M.; Brenner, J.S.; Chan, W.C.W.; Decuzzi, P.; Exner, A.A.; Gabizon, A.; et al. Mechanisms and Barriers in Nanomedicine: Progress in the Field and Future Directions. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 13983–13999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dehnad, D.; Ghorani, B.; Emadzadeh, B.; Emadzadeh, M.; Assadpour, E.; Rajabzadeh, G.; Jafari, S.M. Recent advances in iron encapsulation and its application in food fortification. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 64, 12685–12701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, K.; Lu, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Lu, Q.; Cao, X.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z. Nanomaterials in Animal Husbandry: Research and Prospects. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 915911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alavi, M.; Kamarasu, P.; McClements, D.J.; Moore, M.D. Metal and metal oxide-based antiviral nanoparticles: Properties, mechanisms of action, and applications. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 306, 102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Senthil Rathi, B.; Ewe, L.S.; Sanjay, S.; Sujatha, S.; Yew, W.K.; Baskaran, R.; Tiong, S.K. Recent trends and advancement in metal oxide nanoparticles for the degradation of dyes: Synthesis, mechanism, types and its application. Nanotoxicology 2024, 18, 272–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barciela, P.; Carpena, M.; Li, N.-Y.; Liu, C.; Jafari, S.M.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Prieto, M.A. Macroalgae as biofactories of metal nanoparticles; biosynthesis and food applications. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 311, 102829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Saadony, M.T.; Fang, G.; Yan, S.; Alkafaas, S.S.; El Nasharty, M.A.; Khedr, S.A.; Hussien, A.M.; Ghosh, S.; Dladla, M.; Elkafas, S.S.; et al. Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization, and Biomedical Applications—A Review. Int. J. Nanomed. 2024, 19, 12889–12937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Adra, H.J.; Ryu, H.-B.; Jo, A.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Choi, S.-J.; Kim, Y.-R. Ligand-based magnetic extraction and safety assessment of zinc oxide nanoparticles in food products. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 465, 133235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sultan, M.; Ibrahim, H.; El-Masry, H.M.; Hassan, Y.R. Antimicrobial gelatin-based films with cinnamaldehyde and ZnO nanoparticles for sustainable food packaging. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, Z.; Tan, H.; Ye, Y.; Xu, W.; Gao, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, J.; Tian, H.; Peng, F.; et al. NIR-Actuated Ferroptosis Nanomotor for Enhanced Tumor Penetration and Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2412227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lewicka, Z.A.; Yu, W.W.; Oliva, B.L.; Contreras, E.Q.; Colvin, V.L. Photochemical behavior of nanoscale TiO2 and ZnO sunscreen ingredients. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013, 263, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Porrawatkul, P.; Nuengmatcha, P.; Kuyyogsuy, A.; Pimsen, R.; Rattanaburi, P. Effect of Na and Al doping on ZnO nanoparticles for potential application in sunscreens. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2023, 240, 112668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahamed, M.; Javed Akhtar, M.; Majeed Khan, M.A.; Alhadlaq, H.A. Facile green synthesis of ZnO-RGO nanocomposites with enhanced anticancer efficacy. Methods 2021, 199, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Anjum, S.; Hashim, M.; Malik, S.A.; Khan, M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Abbasi, B.H.; Hano, C. Recent Advances in Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) for Cancer Diagnosis, Target Drug Delivery, and Treatment. Cancers 2021, 13, 4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dutta, G.; Sugumaran, A.; Narayanasamy, D. pH-responsive nanocapsules loaded with 5-fluorouracil-coated green-synthesized CuO-ZnO NPs for enhanced anticancer activity against HeLa cells. Med. Oncol. 2025, 42, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Berger, M.M.; Shenkin, A.; Schweinlin, A.; Amrein, K.; Augsburger, M.; Biesalski, H.-K.; Bischoff, S.C.; Casaer, M.P.; Gundogan, K.; Lepp, H.-L.; et al. ESPEN micronutrient guideline. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 41, 1357–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, J.; Xiong, D.; Long, M. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles as Next-Generation Feed Additives: Bridging Antimicrobial Efficacy, Growth Promotion, and Sustainable Strategies in Animal Nutrition. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gökmen, G.G.; Mirsafi, F.S.; Leißner, T.; Akan, T.; Mishra, Y.K.; Kışla, D. Zinc oxide nanomaterials: Safeguarding food quality and sustainability. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2024, 23, e70051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Monika, P.; Krishna, R.H.; Hussain, Z.; Nandhini, K.; Pandurangi, S.J.; Malek, T.; Kumar, S.G. Antimicrobial hybrid coatings: A review on applications of nano ZnO based materials for biomedical applications. Biomater. Adv. 2025, 172, 214246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Winiarska, E.; Jutel, M.; Zemelka-Wiacek, M. The potential impact of nano- and microplastics on human health: Understanding human health risks. Environ. Res. 2024, 251, 118535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, S.; Ahmad, N.; Dar, M.A.; Manan, S.; Rani, A.; Alghanem, S.M.S.; Khan, K.A.; Sethupathy, S.; Elboughdiri, N.; Mostafa, Y.S.; et al. Nano-Agrochemicals as Substitutes for Pesticides: Prospects and Risks. Plants 2023, 13, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, P.; Liu, J. Micro(nano)plastics in the Human Body: Sources, Occurrences, Fates, and Health Risks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 3065–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pei, X.; Jiang, H.; Xu, G.; Li, C.; Li, D.; Tang, S. Lethality of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Surpasses Conventional Zinc Oxide via Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Damage and Calcium Overload: A Comparative Hepatotoxicity Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bencsik, A.; Lestaevel, P.; Canu, I.G. Nano- and neurotoxicology: An emerging discipline. Prog. Neurobiol. 2018, 160, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qin, X.; Tang, Q.H.; Jiang, X.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, Y.D.; Zou, Z.; Chen, C.Z. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Ferroptotic Neuronal Cell Death in vitro and in vivo. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020, 15, 5299–5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Wu, J.; Kang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Shao, L. MDM2 upregulation induces mitophagy deficiency via Mic60 ubiquitination in fetal microglial inflammation and consequently neuronal DNA damage caused by exposure to ZnO-NPs during pregnancy. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 457, 131750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shohag, S.; Horie, Y. Neurotoxicity and Cardiovascular Toxicity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles to Oryzias melastigma. J. Appl. Toxicol. JAT 2024, 45, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, A.; Wang, R.; Kang, Y.; Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shao, L. Tongue-Brain-Transported ZnO Nanoparticles Induce Abnormal Taste Perception. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, e2203316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Z.L.; Zhang, P.; Luo, Y.L.; Xie, H.D.Q.H.; Chakraborty, S.; Monikh, F.A.; Bu, L.J.; Liu, Y.Y.; Ma, Y.C.; Zhang, Z.Y.; et al. Intranasal exposure to ZnO nanoparticles induces alterations in cholinergic neurotransmission in rat brain. Nano Today 2020, 35, 100977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, C.H.; Shen, C.C.; Cheng, Y.W.; Huang, S.H.; Wu, C.C.; Kao, C.C.; Liao, J.W.; Kang, J.J. Organ biodistribution, clearance, and genotoxicity of orally administered zinc oxide nanoparticles in mice. Nanotoxicology 2012, 6, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kao, Y.Y.; Cheng, T.J.; Yang, D.M.; Wang, C.T.; Chiung, Y.M.; Liu, P.S. Demonstration of an Olfactory Bulb-Brain Translocation Pathway for ZnO Nanoparticles in Rodent Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2012, 48, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, J.J.; Zhang, S.S.; Chen, C.; Jiang, X.J.; Qiu, J.F.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wang, T.X.; Qin, X.; Zou, Z.; et al. Crosstalk of gut microbiota and serum/hippocampus metabolites in neurobehavioral impairments induced by zinc oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 21429–21439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, T.; Tang, M. The inflammatory response to silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles in the central nervous system. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cho, W.S.; Kang, B.C.; Lee, J.K.; Jeong, J.; Che, J.H.; Seok, S.H. Comparative absorption, distribution, and excretion of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles after repeated oral administration. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2013, 10, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. de Souza, J.M.; Mendes, B.D.O.; Guimarães, A.T.B.; Rodrigues, A.S.d.L.; Chagas, T.Q.; Rocha, T.L.; Malafaia, G. Zinc oxide nanoparticles in predicted environmentally relevant concentrations leading to behavioral impairments in male swiss mice. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 613–614, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pei, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, C.; Li, D.; Tang, S. Oxidative stress-related canonical pyroptosis pathway, as a target of liver toxicity triggered by zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 130039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shim, K.H.; Jeong, K.H.; Bae, S.O.; Kang, M.O.; Maeng, E.H.; Choi, C.S.; Kim, Y.R.; Hulme, J.; Lee, E.K.; Kim, M.K.; et al. Assessment of ZnO and SiO nanoparticle permeability through and toxicity to the blood-brain barrier using Evans blue and TEM. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, E.-H.; Baek, S.M.; Kim, D.; Choi, S.; Kim, W.; Bian, Y.; Tahmasebi, S.; Bae, O.-N. Iron overload and oxidative stress participated in zinc oxide nanoparticles-induced blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safe 2025, 301, 118528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, B.; Yin, Q.; Fei, Y.; Zhu, J.; Qiu, Y.; Fang, W.; Li, Y. Research progress of mechanisms for tight junction damage on blood-brain barrier inflammation. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 128, 1579–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, S.S.; Cheng, S.Q.; Jiang, X.J.; Zhang, J.; Bai, L.L.; Qin, X.; Zou, Z.; Chen, C.Z. Gut-brain communication in hyperfunction of 5-hydroxytryptamine induced by oral zinc oxide nanoparticles exposure in young mice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 135, 110906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Andrzejak, R.; Antonowicz, J.; Andreasik, Z. An atypical case of acute zinc poisoning. Med. Pr. 1992, 43, 329–333. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kreyling, W.G. Discovery of unique and ENM- specific pathophysiologic pathways: Comparison of the translocation of inhaled iridium nanoparticles from nasal epithelium versus alveolar epithelium towards the brain of rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2016, 299, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, A.J.; Liang, H.M.; Liu, J.; Ou, L.L.; Wei, L.M.; Wu, J.R.; Lai, X.; Han, X.; Shao, L.Q. Central neurotoxicity induced by the instillation of ZnO and TiO nanoparticles through the taste nerve pathway. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 2453–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zheng, P.; Zeng, B.; Liu, M.; Chen, J.; Pan, J.; Han, Y.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, K.; Zhou, C.; Wang, H.; et al. The gut microbiome from patients with schizophrenia modulates the glutamate-glutamine-GABA cycle and schizophrenia-relevant behaviors in mice. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaau8317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kundu, P.; Lee, H.U.; Garcia-Perez, I.; Tay, E.X.Y.; Kim, H.; Faylon, L.E.; Martin, K.A.; Purbojati, R.; Drautz-Moses, D.I.; Ghosh, S.; et al. Neurogenesis and prolongevity signaling in young germ-free mice transplanted with the gut microbiota of old mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau4760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cryan, J.F.; O’Riordan, K.J.; Cowan, C.S.M.; Sandhu, K.V.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Boehme, M.; Codagnone, M.G.; Cussotto, S.; Fulling, C.; Golubeva, A.V.; et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1877–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pan, Q.; Liu, Q.; Wan, R.; Kalavagunta, P.K.; Liu, L.; Lv, W.; Qiao, T.; Shang, J.; Wu, H. Selective inhibition of intestinal 5-HT improves neurobehavioral abnormalities caused by high-fat diet mice. Metab. Brain Dis. 2019, 34, 747–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, C.; Lu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zou, Z.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Tian, X.; Cheng, S.; Jiang, X. Alterations of Gut-Derived Melatonin in Neurobehavioral Impairments Caused by Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2023, 18, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Amde, M.; Liu, J.F.; Tan, Z.Q.; Bekana, D. Transformation and bioavailability of metal oxide nanoparticles in aquatic and terrestrial environments. A review. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 230, 250–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Goodman, C.M.; McCusker, C.D.; Yilmaz, T.; Rotello, V.M. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. Bioconjug Chem. 2004, 15, 897–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kteeba, S.M.; E-Ghobashy, A.E.; El-Adawi, H.I.; El-Rayis, O.A.; Sreevidya, V.S.; Guo, L.D.; Svoboda, K.R. Exposure to ZnO nanoparticles alters neuronal and vascular development in zebrafish: Acute and transgenerational effects mitigated with dissolved organic matter. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 242, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, J.; Kang, Y.Y.; Zheng, W.; Song, B.; Wei, L.M.; Chen, L.J.; Shao, L.Q. Ion-Shedding Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Microglial BV2 Cell Proliferation via the ERK and Akt Signaling Pathways. Toxicol. Sci. 2017, 156, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sudhakaran, S.; Athira, S.S.; Mohanan, P.V. Zinc oxide nanoparticle induced neurotoxic potential upon interaction with primary astrocytes. Neurotoxicology 2019, 73, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. How, C.M.; Huang, C.-W. Dietary Transfer of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induces Locomotive Defects Associated with GABAergic Motor Neuron Damage in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shin, S.W.; Song, I.H.; Um, S.H. Role of Physicochemical Properties in Nanoparticle Toxicity. Nanomaterials 2015, 5, 1351–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abonyi, H.N.; Peter, I.E.; Onwuka, A.M.; Achile, P.A.; Obi, C.B.; Akunne, M.O.; Ejikeme, P.M.; Amos, S.; Akunne, T.C.; Attama, A.A.; et al. Nanotoxicology: Developments and new insights. Nanomedicine 2024, 20, 225–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tian, L.; Wang, K.; Liu, H.L.; Li, K.; Lin, B.C.; Fang, Z.; Han, J.; Li, N.; Yang, H.; Bian, L.P.; et al. UCH-L1 mitigates neurotoxicity induced by ZnO particles via stabilizing the inhibitor of NF-kappa B signaling, IκB-α. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jin, M.; Li, N.; Sheng, W.L.; Ji, X.N.; Liang, X.; Kong, B.; Yin, P.G.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.S.; Liu, K.C. Toxicity of different zinc oxide nanomaterials and dose-dependent onset and development of Parkinson’s disease-like symptoms induced by zinc oxide nanorods. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Dobretsov, S.; Sathe, P.; Bora, T.; Barry, M.; Myint, M.T.Z.; Al Abri, M. Toxicity of Different Zinc Oxide Nanomaterials at 3 Trophic Levels: Implications for Development of Low-Toxicity Antifouling Agents. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2020, 39, 1343–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hsiao, I.L.; Huang, Y.-J. Effects of various physicochemical characteristics on the toxicities of ZnO and TiO nanoparticles toward human lung epithelial cells. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 1219–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Matula, K.; Richter, L.; Adamkiewicz, W.; Åkerström, B.; Paczesny, J.; Holyst, R. Influence of nanomechanical stress induced by ZnO nanoparticles of different shapes on the viability of cells. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 4162–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Song, X.P.; Li, L.; Chen, X.; Xu, Q.; Song, B.; Pan, Z.Y.; Liu, Y.N.; Juan, F.Y.; Xu, F.; Cao, B.Q. Enhanced triethylamine sensing performance of α-FeO nanoparticle/ZnO nanorod heterostructures. Sens. Actuat B-Chem 2019, 298, 126917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Falfushynska, H.I.; Wu, F.L.; Ye, F.; Kasianchuk, N.; Dutta, J.; Dobretsov, S.; Sokolova, I.M. The effects of ZnO nanostructures of different morphology on bioenergetics and stress response biomarkers of the blue mussels. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 694, 133717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yan, Y.; Huang, W.; Lu, X.; Chen, X.; Shan, Y.; Luo, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Li, C. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induces cell death and consequently leading to incomplete neural tube closure through oxidative stress during embryogenesis. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2024, 40, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Amara, S.; Ben-Slama, I.; Mrad, I.; Rihane, N.; Jeljeli, M.; El-Mir, L.; Ben-Rhouma, K.; Rachidi, W.; Sève, M.; Abdelmelek, H.; et al. Acute exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles does not affect the cognitive capacity and neurotransmitters levels in adult rats. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Han, D.D.; Tian, Y.T.; Zhang, T.; Ren, G.G.; Yang, Z. Nano-zinc oxide damages spatial cognition capability via over-enhanced long-term potentiation in hippocampus of Wistar rats. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hamdi, E.; Muñiz-Gonzalez, A.-B.; Hidouri, S.; Bermejo, A.M.; Sakly, M.; Venero, C.; Amara, S. Prevention of neurotoxicity and cognitive impairment induced by zinc nanoparticles by oral administration of saffron extract. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2023, 107, 1473–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Deng, H.; Yi, S.; Li, T.; Kang, X.; Li, J.; Li, C.; Wang, T.; Xiang, B.; et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles damage the prefrontal lobe in mouse: Behavioral impacts and key mechanisms. Toxicol. Lett. 2024, 397, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Estrela, F.N.; Guimaraes, A.T.B.; Araújo, A.P.D.; Silva, F.G.; da Luz, T.M.; Silva, A.M.; Pereira, P.S.; Malafaia, G. Toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics and zinc oxide to mice. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liang, H.; Chen, A.; Lai, X.; Liu, J.; Wu, J.; Kang, Y.; Wang, X.; Shao, L. Neuroinflammation is induced by tongue-instilled ZnO nanoparticles via the Ca2+-dependent NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2018, 15, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Amer, M.G.; Karam, R.A. Morphological and Biochemical Features of Cerebellar Cortex After Exposure to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Possible Protective Role of Curcumin. Anat. Rec. 2018, 301, 1454–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yousef, M.I.; Roychoudhury, S.; Jafaar, K.S.; Slama, P.; Kesari, K.K.; Kamel, M.A.-N. Aluminum oxide and zinc oxide induced nanotoxicity in rat brain, heart, and lung. Physiol. Res. 2022, 71, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Al-Zahrani, N.S.; Zafrah, H.; Hassan, A.H.; El Nashar, E.M.; El Henafy, H.M.A. Zinc oxide nanoparticles exposure disrupts brain redox-inflammatory-epigenetic axis and impairs PI3K/Akt survival pathway in male offspring. Metab. Brain Dis. 2025, 40, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Suthar, J.K.; Vaidya, A.; Ravindran, S. Size, Surface Properties, and Ion Release of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Effects on Cytotoxicity, Dopaminergic Gene Expression, and Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition in Neuronal PC-12 Cells. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 202, 2254–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nicolosi, A.; Cardoit, L.; Pasquereau, P.; Jaillet, C.; Thoby-Brisson, M.; Juvin, L.; Morin, D. Acute exposure to zinc oxide nanoparticles critically disrupts operation of the respiratory neural network in neonatal rat. Neurotoxicology 2018, 67, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Borcherding, N.; Brestoff, J.R. The power and potential of mitochondria transfer. Nature 2023, 623, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Song, N.; Mei, S.; Wang, X.; Hu, G.; Lu, M. Focusing on mitochondria in the brain: From biology to therapeutics. Transl. Neurodegener. 2024, 13, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Guo, Z.L.; Zhang, P.; Xie, H.Q.; Zhao, B.; Lynch, I. First Evidence for Compromised Brain Energy Metabolism upon Intranasal Exposure to ZnO Nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Tech. Let. 2020, 7, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chevallet, M.; Gallet, B.; Fuchs, A.; Jouneau, P.H.; Um, K.; Mintz, E.; Michaud-Soret, I. Metal homeostasis disruption and mitochondrial dysfunction in hepatocytes exposed to sub-toxic doses of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18495–18506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Nalika, N.; Parvez, S. Mitochondrial dysfunction in titanium dioxide nanoparticle-induced neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Mech. Method. 2015, 25, 355–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sruthi, S.; Mohanan, P.V. Investigation on cellular interactions of astrocytes with zinc oxide nanoparticles using rat C6 cell lines. Colloid. Surf. B 2015, 133, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sharma, A.K.; Singh, V.; Gera, R.; Purohit, M.P.; Ghosh, D. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Induces Microglial Death by NADPH-Oxidase-Independent Reactive Oxygen Species as well as Energy Depletion. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 6273–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, Y.; Yu, C.G.; Huang, G.Y.; Wang, C.L.; Wen, L.P. Nano rare-earth oxides induced size-dependent vacuolization: An independent pathway from autophagy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Han, X.; Teng, J.; Chen, X.; Yan, F. ZnO-NPs Neurotoxicity to Caenorhabditis elegans: Disorders of Fatty Acid Synthesis and Glutathione Metabolism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 18450–18467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Teng, J.; Yu, T.; Yan, F. GABA attenuates neurotoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles due to oxidative stress via DAF-16/FoxO and SKN-1/Nrf2 pathways. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 934, 173214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wei, L.; Wang, J.; Chen, A.; Liu, J.; Feng, X.; Shao, L. Involvement of PINK1/parkin-mediated mitophagy in ZnO nanoparticle-induced toxicity in BV-2 cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1891–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, Y.; Xiong, L.L.; Tang, M. Toxicity of inhaled particulate matter on the central nervous system: Neuroinflammation, neuropsychological effects and neurodegenerative disease. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2017, 37, 644–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Uttara, B.; Singh, A.V.; Zamboni, P.; Mahajan, R.T. Oxidative Stress and Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Review of Upstream and Downstream Antioxidant Therapeutic Options. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2009, 7, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yan, Y.; Wang, G.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Chuai, M.L.; Brand-Saberi, B.; Chen, G.B.; Jiang, X.H.; Yang, X.S. Zinc oxide nanoparticles exposure-induced oxidative stress restricts cranial neural crest development during chicken embryogenesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ansar, S.; Abudawood, M.; Hamed, S.S.; Aleem, M.M. Exposure to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induces Neurotoxicity and Proinflammatory Response: Amelioration by Hesperidin. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2017, 175, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Abdelrahman, S.A.; El-Shal, A.S.; Abdelrahman, A.A.; Saleh, E.Z.H.; Mahmoud, A.A. Neuroprotective effects of quercetin on the cerebellum of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnoNps)-exposed rats. Tissue Barriers 2022, 11, 2115273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Attia, H.; Nounou, H.; Shalaby, M. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Induced Oxidative DNA Damage, Inflammation and Apoptosis in Rat’s Brain after Oral Exposure. Toxics 2018, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kim, J.H.; Jeong, M.S.; Kim, D.Y.; Her, S.; Wie, M.B. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce lipoxygenase-mediated apoptosis and necrosis in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Neurochem. Int. 2015, 90, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, L.; Duan, Z.; Liang, M.; Wang, C.; Liang, T.; Sun, L.; Yan, C.; Li, Q.; Liang, T. A pivotal role of selective autophagy in mitochondrial quality control: Implications for zinc oxide nanoparticles induced neurotoxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2022, 363, 110003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Li, J.; Cao, F.; Yin, H.-L.; Huang, Z.-J.; Lin, Z.-T.; Mao, N.; Sun, B.; Wang, G. Ferroptosis: Past, present and future. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Stockwell, B.R. Ferroptosis: Death by lipid peroxidation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 120, S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tang, Q.H.; Bai, L.L.; Zou, Z.; Meng, P.; Xia, Y.Y.; Cheng, S.Q.; Mu, S.Y.; Zhou, J.R.; Wang, X.F.; Qin, X.; et al. Ferroptosis is newly characterized form of neuronal cell death in response to arsenite exposure. Neurotoxicology 2018, 67, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kim, S.E.; Zhang, L.; Ma, K.; Riegman, M.; Chen, F.; Ingold, I.; Conrad, M.; Turker, M.Z.; Gao, M.H.; Jiang, X.J.; et al. Ultrasmall nanoparticles induce ferroptosis in nutrient-deprived cancer cells and suppress tumour growth. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Shen, Z.Y.; Liu, T.; Li, Y.; Lau, J.; Yang, Z.; Fan, W.P.; Zhou, Z.J.; Shi, C.R.; Ke, C.M.; Bregadze, V.I.; et al. Fenton-Reaction-Acceleratable Magnetic Nanoparticles for Ferroptosis Therapy of Orthotopic Brain Tumors. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 11355–11365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, X.; Jiang, L.P.; Shi, L.M.; Yao, K.; Sun, X.C.; Yang, G.; Jiang, L.J.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N.N.; Zhang, H.Y.; et al. Zearalenone induces NLRP3-dependent pyroptosis via activation of NF-κB modulated by autophagy in INS-1 cells. Toxicology 2019, 428, 152304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sruthi, S.; Nury, T.; Millot, N.; Lizard, G. Evidence of a non-apoptotic mode of cell death in microglial BV-2 cells exposed to different concentrations of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 12500–12520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Peters, R.; Ee, N.; Peters, J.; Booth, A.; Mudway, I.; Anstey, K.J. Air Pollution and Dementia: A Systematic Review. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019, 70, S145–S163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Patten, K.T.; Valenzuela, A.E.; Wallis, C.; Berg, E.L.; Silverman, J.L.; Bein, K.J.; Wexler, A.S.; Lein, P.J. The Effects of Chronic Exposure to Ambient Traffic-Related Air Pollution on Alzheimer’s Disease Phenotypes in Wildtype and Genetically Predisposed Male and Female Rats. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 57005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shang, J.; Yan, J.; Lou, H.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y.; Fan, X.; Lu, X. Oral Exposure to Food-Grade Nanoparticles Poses a Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease-Like Symptoms by Triggering Autophagy Defects in Neurons. Adv. Sci. 2025, e08096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hu, Q.L.; Guo, F.L.; Zhao, F.H.; Fu, Z.W. Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles exposure on parkinsonism in zebrafish larvae and PC12. Chemosphere 2017, 173, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ren, C.; Hu, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, Q. Ultra-trace graphene oxide in a water environment triggers Parkinson’s disease-like symptoms and metabolic disturbance in zebrafish larvae. Biomaterials 2016, 93, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Chuang, H.C.; Yang, Y.T.; Chen, H.C.; Hwang, Y.H.; Wu, K.Y.; Chen, T.F.; Chen, C.L.; Jhan, M.K.; Cheng, T.J. Acute Effects of Pulmonary Exposure to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on the Brain in vivo. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2020, 20, 1651–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Žūkienė, R.; Snitka, V. Zinc oxide nanoparticle and bovine serum albumin interaction and nanoparticles influence on cytotoxicity in vitro. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Raguvaran, R.; Manuja, A.; Manuja, B.K.; Riyesh, T.; Singh, S.; Kesavan, M.; Dimri, U. Sodium alginate and gum acacia hydrogels of zinc oxide nanoparticles reduce hemolytic and oxidative stress inflicted by zinc oxide nanoparticles on mammalian cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 101, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Jeyhoonabadi, M.; Alimoahmmadi, S.; Hassanpour, S.; Hashemnia, M. Betaine Ameliorates Depressive-Like Behaviors in Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Exposed Mice. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 4771–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Eleiwa, N.Z.H.; Ali, M.A.-A.; Said, E.N.; Metwally, M.M.M.; Abd-ElHakim, Y.M. Bee venom (Apis mellifera L.) rescues zinc oxide nanoparticles induced neurobehavioral and neurotoxic impact via controlling neurofilament and GAP-43 in rat brain. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 88685–88703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ji, L.; Huang, Q.; Qi, Y.; Wang, Z.; Kong, X.; Zhu, X.; Yang, B.; Li, J.; He, X.; Deng, X.; et al. Quercetin and Astragaloside IV Mitigate the Developmental Abnormalities Induced by Gestational Exposure to Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 47802–47810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Nusair, S.D.; Almbaidin, R.G.; Al-Sawalha, N.A. Investigating the Impact of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Folic Acid on Neuronal Markers in a Rat Model of Nanotoxicity. J. Toxicol. 2025, 2025, 1695369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Pei, X.; Tang, S.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, W.; Xu, G.; Zuo, Z.; Ren, Z.; Chen, C.; Shen, Y.; Li, C.; et al. Paeoniflorin recued hepatotoxicity under zinc oxide nanoparticles exposure via regulation on gut-liver axis and reversal of pyroptosis. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Blood–brain barrier pathway. ZnO NPs compromise the BBB and gain access to the CNS. The subsequent increase in levels of both ZnO NPs and zinc in the brain triggers a rise in 5-HT concentration.
Figure 1. Blood–brain barrier pathway. ZnO NPs compromise the BBB and gain access to the CNS. The subsequent increase in levels of both ZnO NPs and zinc in the brain triggers a rise in 5-HT concentration.
Toxics 14 00011 g001
Figure 2. Sensory neural translocation pathway. Intranasal and oral exposure to ZnO NPs enables translocation along neural pathways—including the olfactory, trigeminal, and gustatory nerves—which facilitates zinc accumulation in the brain.
Figure 2. Sensory neural translocation pathway. Intranasal and oral exposure to ZnO NPs enables translocation along neural pathways—including the olfactory, trigeminal, and gustatory nerves—which facilitates zinc accumulation in the brain.
Toxics 14 00011 g002
Figure 3. Microbiota–gut–brain axis pathway. ZnO NP exposure induces gut microbiota dysbiosis and activates βIII-tubulin, stimulating enteric neuronal excitation. These excitatory signals (e.g., serotonin, 5-HT) are subsequently propagated to the central nervous system, leading to elevated serotonin levels in the brain.
Figure 3. Microbiota–gut–brain axis pathway. ZnO NP exposure induces gut microbiota dysbiosis and activates βIII-tubulin, stimulating enteric neuronal excitation. These excitatory signals (e.g., serotonin, 5-HT) are subsequently propagated to the central nervous system, leading to elevated serotonin levels in the brain.
Toxics 14 00011 g003
Figure 4. Neurotoxic effects of ZnO nanoparticles. Exposure to ZnO NPs triggered anxiety-like behaviors, spatial learning and memory deficits, and motor impairments in mice. These neurological dysfunctions were associated with marked brain tissue damage, characterized by elevated levels of BDNF, DLG4, NO, and TBA, inhibited AChE activity, a decreased brain somatic index, and a reduction in neuronal cell count.
Figure 4. Neurotoxic effects of ZnO nanoparticles. Exposure to ZnO NPs triggered anxiety-like behaviors, spatial learning and memory deficits, and motor impairments in mice. These neurological dysfunctions were associated with marked brain tissue damage, characterized by elevated levels of BDNF, DLG4, NO, and TBA, inhibited AChE activity, a decreased brain somatic index, and a reduction in neuronal cell count.
Toxics 14 00011 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, C.; Pei, X.; Yu, Y.; Gao, C.; Wang, J.; Zhu, R.; Liu, S.; Tang, S.; Li, D. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neurotoxicity: Underlying Molecular Mechanisms and Future Perspectives. Toxics 2026, 14, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010011

AMA Style

Chen C, Pei X, Yu Y, Gao C, Wang J, Zhu R, Liu S, Tang S, Li D. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neurotoxicity: Underlying Molecular Mechanisms and Future Perspectives. Toxics. 2026; 14(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Chun, Xingyao Pei, Yonger Yu, Chang Gao, Jinran Wang, Rongyao Zhu, Shuxuan Liu, Shusheng Tang, and Daowen Li. 2026. "Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neurotoxicity: Underlying Molecular Mechanisms and Future Perspectives" Toxics 14, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010011

APA Style

Chen, C., Pei, X., Yu, Y., Gao, C., Wang, J., Zhu, R., Liu, S., Tang, S., & Li, D. (2026). Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neurotoxicity: Underlying Molecular Mechanisms and Future Perspectives. Toxics, 14(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop