Next Article in Journal
The Antimutagenic and Antioxidant Activity of Fermented Milk Supplemented with Cudrania tricuspidata Powder
Next Article in Special Issue
Extrusion Process as an Alternative to Improve Pulses Products Consumption. A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Soft Drink Consumption in Young Mexican Adults Is Associated with Higher Total Body Fat Percentage in Men but Not in Women
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional and Phytochemical Composition of Mediterranean Wild Vegetables after Culinary Treatment

by
Patricia García-Herrera
1,
Patricia Morales
1,*,
Montaña Cámara
1,
Virginia Fernández-Ruiz
1,*,
Javier Tardío
2 and
María Cortes Sánchez-Mata
1
1
Departamento Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Pza. Ramón y Cajal, s/n, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Instituto Madrileño de Investigación y Desarrollo Rural, Agrario y Alimentario (IMIDRA), Finca “El Encín”, Apartado 127, E-28800 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(12), 1761; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121761
Submission received: 23 October 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 26 November 2020 / Published: 28 November 2020

Abstract

:
Studies are scarce on the nutritional and phytochemical composition of wild edible Mediterranean plants after culinary processing. This work provides the nutritional composition after culinary treatment (including dietary fiber and mineral composition) and bioactive compounds (folates, vitamin C and organic acids) of wild Rumex pulcher L., Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke. leaves, and wild Asparagus acutifolius L., Bryonia dioica Jacq., Humulus lupulus L., Tamus communis L. young shoots. Shoots better preserved their nutrients than leaves, due to their different tissue structure. Fresh and cooked wild greens present high dietary fiber values, and remained at remarkable levels after boiling. Na, K, Mg and Zn were lost in about 50% due to culinary processing, while Ca, Cu, Fe and Mn were more stable. Boiled leaves of S. vulgaris remained as a good Mn source. A portion of 100 g of most of the cooked analyzed species could cover a relevant percentage of the daily requirement of folates (R. pulcher and A. acutifolius providing more than 80%) and vitamin C (T. communis and A. acutifolius providing more than 35%).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Mediterranean basin is characterized by an enormous biodiversity and a rich heritage of edible wild plants, which since Ancient times have represented an important source of nutrients for rural communities, both for food and medicinal uses. However, in the last century, the industrialization of agriculture, together with migratory phenomena, as well as other factors, have contributed to an important loss of the knowledge acquired over generations and has drastically changed the ways of life of rural communities regarding the use of these edible wild resources [1].
Despite this decline, several European countries, including Spain, still maintain the tradition of collecting and eating some wild plant resources, and nowadays, the growing demand for healthy foods and natural antioxidants—combined with the development of sustainable cuisine—have renewed interest in and promoted the culinary use of wild edible plants.
The implementation of traditional culinary knowledge has the potential to contribute to the diversification of income in depressed regions through the sale of high-quality local products, as it has been promoted in some community rural development policies [2,3]. The revitalization of some of these culinary traditions for their applications in haute-cuisine can also support this increased interest in these wild plant species [4]. In this sense, some wild species can be considered as a good material for food innovation due to their great versatility, as well as their great potential as a source of unusual colors and flavors.
Mediterranean wild vegetables are important sources of nutrients [5,6] and bioactive compounds [7,8,9,10,11], which are totally preserved when they are consumed in the fresh form. However, as with cultivated green vegetables [12,13,14,15], some species must be consumed after culinary treatments with different cooking techniques, such as boiling, frying, mixing with other ingredients in stews or other elaborations [16,17], as in the case of Rumex pulcher L., Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke. leaves, and Asparagus acutifolius L., Brionya dioica Jacq., Humulus lupulus L., Tamus communis L. young shoots, which could have an important effect on their nutritional composition. These processes are frequently necessary to improve their edibility and/or to remove undesirable compounds, such as oxalic acid; while in other cases, the process is part of the traditional behavior of its consumption. In black bryony (T. communis) and white bryony (B. dioica), some toxic compounds (saponins and triterpene glycosides, respectively), or some ribosome inactivating proteins, can be found in different parts of the plant, such as fruits and subterranean tubers, and the cooking process traditionally applied to the edible parts of these species may reduce those toxic substances, by either solubilization into cooking liquid or heat degradation [18,19,20,21,22].
Luckaj et al. [23] point out that, in the Mediterranean area, different preparation techniques were traditionally applied to wild edible plants. In Italy wild greens are usually eaten fried (often with eggs) after the initial boiling, or made into a soup. In southern France they are often eaten raw with dressing, whereas in Croatia most wild greens are boiled for a long time (usually nearly half an hour) and then dressed with olive oil. While in Spain the traditional cooking techniques were boiling and frying processes, with or without other ingredients, as previously stated by Tardio et al. [16,17].
However, as a consequence of these culinary processes, wild vegetables may lose thermolabile components, such as vitamin C or folates (vitamin B9), as well as mineral elements due to their dissolution in the liquid cooking medium [24,25]. Moreover, variations in the cooking conditions, such as maximum temperature reached, cooking time, pH, surface/volume relation, water used, oxygen and light presence, matrix and/or food type, as well as compounds sensitivity to these factors can influence the final composition [26,27]. Some research works have been conducted on the analysis of nutritional and phytochemical composition, as well as antioxidant activity of traditionally consumed wild edible plants all over the world [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. For example, Trichopoulou et al. [28] reported data of the nutritional composition of Cretan pies elaborated with cultivated and wild vegetables (such as Rumex spp. and Foeniculum vulgare Mill) cooked with olive oil. Salvatore et al. [29] reported the boiling effect on antioxidants (carotenoids, phenolics, flavonoids, and ascorbic acid content), as well as the antioxidant capacity of selected wild edible greens traditionally consumed in southern Italy (Asparagus acutifolius L., Borrago officinalis L., Cichorium Intybus L., Diplotaxis erucoides L., Sinapis Incana L. and Sinapus Nigra L.). Amalraj and Pius [33] studied calcium content its absorption inhibitors in raw and cooked green leafy vegetables commonly consumed in India. Prasanna et al. [35], reported the cooking effect (boiling, steaming, and frying) on polyphenols, flavonoids, carotenoids and antioxidant activity of leaves of six edible plants locally collected in Sri Lanka. Sergio et al. [38] studied bioactive phenolics and antioxidant capacity of some wild edible Mediterranean greens affected by boiling, steaming and microwave-cooking treatments.
However, there are very few studies about the final composition of these wild plant foods after culinary processing. This is the first report about folate (vitamin B9) content in the cooked analyzed wild species.
Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the cooking process effect in terms of nutritional and bioactive compounds of the selected Mediterranean wild edible greens (Rumex pulcher L., Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke., Asparagus acutifolius L., Bryonia dioica Jacq., Humulus lupulus L. and Tamus communis L.), in order to improve knowledge on these selected species, which are traditionally eaten after these types of culinary treatment in the Mediterranean areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Considering the high number of reports of wild vegetables being traditionally consumed after cooked vegetables in the Iberian Peninsula, [15,16,39], six wild edible greens were selected (Table 1). The samples included the basal leaves of Rumex pulcher L., the tender stems with leaves of Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke., and the young shoots of Asparagus acutifolius L., Bryonia dioica Jacq., Humulus lupulus L. and Tamus communis L.
As shown in Table 1, the samples were collected in different locations of Central Spain (Table 1). In order to obtain a representative sample, an amount of 500 g of the edible part of each species were selected from more than 25 plants randomly chosen in optimal conditions for consumption. The samples were collected in spring, when the edible parts were tender, which is the optimal moment for consumption. After gathering and preparation (cleaning, discarding altered parts), fresh plants were packed in plastic bags and transported to the laboratory in a cold system within the day. Then they were analyzed for moisture and vitamin C, as well as organic acids, while one portion was immediately freeze-dried and preserved in hermetic containers at −20 °C, in a dark and dry atmosphere, until used for the analysis of total available carbohydrates (TAC), dietary fiber, proteins, lipids, ashes, mineral elements (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) and vitamin B9 (folates).
Another portion of the raw material was boiled using traditional conditions: the greens were cut and added to boiling water (200 g of fresh plant per litre of water) for 10 min at 100 °C. Once cooked, the plant material was filtered from the cooking liquid, weighted, and subjected to the same analysis as the raw vegetables.

2.2. Analytical Methods

2.2.1. Moisture

Moisture content was determined by desiccation following the AOAC 984.25 method [40] to constant weight at 105 °C (oven Memert, Genesys, Daly City, CA, USA).

2.2.2. Crude Protein

Total protein was determined as nitrogen content by the Kjeldahl method, after digestion with H2SO4 distillation over 0.1 N H2SO4 and titration against 0.1 N NaOH. Total nitrogen content was converted to protein content by using the conversion factor 6.25 [40].

2.2.3. Total Fat

A Tecator Soxtec System HT 1043 Extraction Unit (Fisher-Scientific, Madrid, Spain) was used to extract a freeze-dried sample with petroleum ether; then the extract was dried at 105 °C and cooled and weighed following the AOAC 983.23 method [40].

2.2.4. Total Available Carbohydrates (TAC)

This analysis was carried out by a colorimetric method using an anthrone reagent, as described by Osborne and Voogt [41]. The methodology was optimized by [5], and involved hydrolysis of freeze-dried sample with HClO4 for 18 h in the dark, filtration and adjustment to 250 mL; then anthrone solution in 70% (v/v) H2SO4 was added to extract. Samples were kept in a boiling water bath for 12 min and absorbance was measured at 630 nm on a UV/Vis Spectrometer EZ210 (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with Lambda software PESSW ver. 1.2. The absorbance of the sample solution was compared to a 10–100 mg/mL concentration range standard glucose calibration curve.

2.2.5. Total Dietary Fiber Content

AOAC enzymatic–non-gravimetric methods (993.21) were used for total dietary fiber analysis [40]. Waste was dried at 100 °C, and ash and protein contents were determined in the residue.

2.2.6. Ash Content and Mineral Composition

For ash determination, the method 930.05 of AOAC was used [40], as adapted by García-Herrera et al. [5]. Incineration under high pressure was performed in a microwave oven (Muffle Furnace mls1200, Thermo Scientific, Madrid, Spain) for 24 h at 550 °C, and ashes were gravimetrically quantified. The residue was extracted with HCl (50% v/v) and HNO3 (50% v/v) to measure Fe, Cu, Mn and Zn were directly quantified. To avoid interferences between different elements, a dilution with La2O3/HCl was performed to analyse Ca and Mg; and with CsCl to analyse Na and K. All measurements were performed in atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) in Analyst 200 Perkin Elmer equipment (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), comparing absorbance responses with N 99.9% purity analytical standard solutions for AAS made with Fe(NO3)3, Cu(NO3)2, Mn(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)2, NaCl, KCl, CaCO3 and Mg band, supplied by Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and Panreac Química (Barcelona, Spain).

2.2.7. Folic acid and Folates (Vitamin B9)

Given the complexity of the different forms of natural folates with vitamin B9 activity occurring in the plants, a method was previously optimized by Morales et al. [11]. It involved the derivatization of the different chemical forms into 5-CH3-H4folate (mono and diglutamate) and HPLC-FL quantification. Briefly, the sample was extracted with a phosphate buffer of 100 mM Na2HPO4 × 2 H2O, pH 7 at 80 °C during 15 min, and centrifuged at 7000 rpm during 15 min. An aliquot of 5 mL of the supernatant obtained was incubated for 3 h at 37 °C, under stirring with rat serum and pancreatic chicken solution (5 mg/mL in phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 7), providing deconjugase (γ-glutamate pteroilpoli-hydrolase) to release folates from starch and proteins in the plant food matrix. Then, folates were reduced with NaBH4 into 5-CH3-H4folate and passed through SPE/SAX cartridges, previously activated. The total amount of folic acid (pteroylglutamic acid) and their polyglutamates in the samples were measured by HPLC-fluorescence, using a RP 18 endcapped Lichrospher 100 (Merck) 250 × 5 mm (5 μm), and a gradient of acetonitrile and 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 4.4) was used as reported by Morales et al. [11] at a flow-rate of 0.4 mL/min. Identification of chromatographic peaks was performed comparing retention times with those obtained from commercial pure standards of 5-CH3-H4folate monoglutamate and pteroyl diglutamic acid, subjected to the same derivatization as the samples. Quantification was based on the FL signal response, and the resultant peak areas in the chromatograms were plotted against concentrations obtained from standards. Total folates contents in non-cultivated greens are expressed in 5-CH3-H4folate (mono and diglutamate) in μg/100 g of fresh weight.

2.2.8. Vitamin C and Organic Acids

Vitamin C (Ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acid), as well as individual organic acids (oxalic, glutamic, malic, and citric), was determined based on protocols described by Sánchez-Mata et al. [42], using an HPLC-UV methodology after samples extraction with 4.5% m-phosphoric acid. The HPLC equipment used was a liquid chromatograph (Micron Analítica, Madrid, Spain) equipped with a Sphereclone ODS (2) 250 × 4.60, 5 μm Phenomenex column, isocratic pump (model PU-II), an AS-1555 automatic injector (Jasco, Japan), and a UV-visible detector (Thermo Separation Specta Series UV100), working at 245 nm for AA or 215 nm for organic acids. The mobile phase was 1.8 mM H2SO4 (pH = 2.6), with a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min for AA or 0.4 mL/min for organic acids. The compounds were identified by chromatographic comparisons with authentic standards (AA, oxalic, malic, and citric acids, all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and glutamic acid (Merck, Germany) using linear calibration curves of all compounds for quantification purposes. All data were analyzed using Biocrom 2000 3.0 software (Biocrom, Madrid, Spain). Vitamin C and organic acids content were expressed in mg/100 g of fresh weight (fw).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Triplicate analysis was done for all the samples. In tables, mean values ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates is given for all the measured parameters. Retention of nutrients through the processing of the samples was calculated as apparent retention, as defined by [43,44]. The data obtained in the present study were analyzed by means of Wilcoxon Student’s t test, using α = 0.05 as the level for statistical significance. Moreover, multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) was applied using Statgraphics Plus 5.1 software (Warrenton, VA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The proximate composition (moisture, TAC, dietary fiber, proteins, total fat and ashes), mineral contents, as well as vitamins B9 and C, and organic acids of the wild vegetables analyzed, raw and cooked, are presented in tables (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6).
As it can be observed in Table 2, all the parameters were highly affected (p < 0.05) by cooking process in the analyzed samples, except for B. dioica young shoots, which experiment lower variations in macronutrients.
As expected, moisture increased their content in cooked vegetables due to water absorption in all wild edible greens, being S. vulgaris tender leaves, the sample that absorbed a higher amount of water (6%) (Table 2). Figure 1 shows the dry weight data, allowing correction of the variations produced by the moisture and comparison of the macronutrients before and after cooking treatment. Proteins content decreased in all the cases, particularly, R. pulcher, H. lupulus and T. communis presented the highest losses with percentage percentages (89%, 87 and 83%, respectively), while A. acutifolius presented the best retention percentage (16% loss). Protein losses may be related to the denaturalization process due to heat treatment, which leads the smaller peptides and amino acids dissolution in the liquid medium.
Regarding available carbohydrates fraction, soluble sugars may also be dissolved into the cooking liquid while polymers may be thermally hydrolysed and then dissolved on it. R. pulcher and S. vulgaris tender leaves showed a relevant decrease in TAC (39 and 25% losses, respectively), while for other species, such as the young shoots of B. dioica, A. acutifolius and H. lupulus analyzed, this content was not significantly affected (p < 0.05) by cooking process. Even in some cases this fraction was slightly increased, attributable to some hydrolysis of the some fiber polymers, which may be converted in simple sugars, thus increasing the TAC fraction.
Moreover, after boiling processes, some losses in dietary fiber were also found in the studied species. However, when expressed as dry basis, dietary fiber content increased in all analyzed samples (Table 2), showing higher retention than any other nutrient. This observation is in agreement with the results of Amalraj and Pius [33] on Indian leafy wild vegetables. Based on EFSA recommendations (Dietary Reference Values published in 2017), it can be calculated that a portion of 100 g of these boiled wild plants, contributed by 11.6–17.6% to the daily requirements of dietary fiber, established as an Adequate Intake (AI) of 25 g/day for adults [45]).
It is clearly observed that all the species suffer an important loss in total ashes and therefore in their macro and microelements content due to the high-water solubility of minerals. However, young shoots presented higher ashes retention (34−44% losses) comparing with the tender-leaves species after the cooking process, as in the case of R. pulcher and S. vulgaris (with 47% and 65% of ashes losses, respectively) (Table 2).
However, macro and microelements showed different tendencies, due to the different forms in which they are present in the plant tissues. For example, K as free ions is widely distributed in food egetables, while others such as Fe can be found in this food matrix bonded to proteins or other high- molecular weight compounds [46].
The minerals that suffer the highest losses after the boiling process were Na, K, Mg and Zn. As it can be observed in Table 4, fresh S. vulgaris tender leaves stood out by its Mn content, with this content stable despite culinary treatment (0.6 mg Mn/100 g). When comparing with the nutritional recommendations of this mineral, it can be noted that 20% of the Mn adequate intake (AI) defined by [45] could be covered with the consumption of 100 g of this plant, even after boiling; accordingly, S. vulgaris can be highlighted as a good Mn source. Regarding Mg content, the losses were also higher in leaves than young shoots. Taking into account the Na content in analyzed wild greens, R. pulcher fresh leaves was the species with the highest Na content, however the cooking process highly promotes Na losses, which is especially relevant in this species (Table 3).
On the other hand, as expected, Ca, Cu and Fe were more stable, because these minerals can be linked to other molecules inhibiting their water solubilisation. This behavior is in agreement with other studies, reported by Amalraj and Pius [33], showing that calcium retention in wild vegetables is higher than other minerals; this can be related to some binding to other components in the food, such as oxalates, that inhibit extraction into the cooking liquid. Bryonia dioica and Silene vulgaris were the species that presented the higher Fe losses after boiling.
Thus, the binding to other compounds is an important aspect that should be taken into account from a nutritional point of view. Foods may also contain anti-nutritional factors, which render some nutrients unavailable for absorption, with oxalic acid as the most important one in the case of green vegetables [47]. For that reason, the relation between calcium and oxalic acid content in the analyzed wild vegetables is discussed below (Figure 2).
It is well established that cultivated green vegetables are a really good source of folates (vitamin B9), in this way, Morales et al. [11] also reported wild edible vegetables as a relevant source of this vitamin. However, folates content after culinary processing in these wild edible greens have not been previously reported. Folates content stability during heat treatment depends, among other factors, on the relation surface/volume of food, the presence of some cations such as Fe, or nitrates presence, while the presence of antioxidants (such as vitamin C, phenolic compounds, etc.) favors a higher retention of folates during the culinary process [48]. The analyzed fresh samples (Table 5) are highlighted due to the relevant amount of this vitamin, particularly in the case of R. pulcher (0.397 mg/100 g), S. vulgaris (0.519 mg/100 g) and A. acutifolius (0.589 mg/100 g), as well as in some cooked samples, such as R. pulcher (80.277 mg/100 g) and A. acutifolius (0.283 mg/100 g). In all cases, the consumption of 100 g of most of these species (fresh and/or cooked) could cover more than 100% of the daily amount of folates needed, established as a population reference intake (PRI) of 330 μg/day for adults ≥18 years. Moreover, the previously mentioned fresh species could cover around 86–98% of the PRI for pregnant women (600 μg/day), and boiled R. pulcher leaves and A. acutifolius shoots could cover 47.2 and 46.2% of the PRI for the same population group.
As it can be seen in Table 5, a significant reduction of folates content was observed after processing in all the analyzed species. The lower retention was observed in S. vulgaris (19.6%), reaching a final amount of 0.102 mg/100 g in the cooked vegetable. Although it can be thought that leafy vegetables lose nutrients more easily due to the liquid cooking medium, compared to stems and shoots, folates do not show this behavior, as previously reported by Lin and Lin [49]. In agreement with this, the present work shows that the leaves of R. pulcher display a better retention of folates (69.78%) than other samples, with 0.277 mg/100 g in the cooked sample. Additionally, it should be noted that the wild green, A. acutifolius shoot, has the highest folate content from those analyzed in the raw and cooked samples (0.587 and 0.280 mg/100 g, respectively).
As a result of this study, it can be stated that the analyzed wild vegetables are good sources of folates even after traditional cooking process (Table 5), since their final contents still represent more than 30% of dietary recommendations [45].
Regarding vitamin C, as expected, the studied wild greens significantly reduced their vitamin C contents after cooking. As it is well known, this vitamin presents a high thermal instability. As it can be observed in Table 5, R. pulcher, A. acutifolius, T. communis and H. lupulus, presented high vitamin C contents in the raw material (46.5, 56.7, 58.6 and 60.9 mg/100 g fw, respectively), with A. acutifolius and T. communis being the samples with the highest vitamin C retention percentages after processing (61.9% and 86.7%, respectively). Lower ascorbic acid and total vitamin C amounts were reported by Salvatore et al. [29] in selected wild greens boiled during 15 min.
Taking into account that the intake of vitamin C (PRI for adults ≥18 years, published by [45]) should be at least of 95 mg/day for women and 110 mg/day for men, even considering the most exigent value (110 mg/day), a portion of 100 g of all the fresh analyzed wild greens could provide at least the 20% of PRI for adults; and those with better retention of vitamin C (T. communis and A. acutifolius) still cover 37% and 43% of PRI for adults with a 100 g of cooked portion, a relevant contribution to daily intake. On the other hand, S. vulgaris and B. dioica drastically reduced their contents to only 13.4 and 6.4 mg/100 g, respectively.
It can also be stated from the present research that AA was generally more stable than DHAA, and that the high vitamin C contents may be related to a higher retention of folates, as previously stated by other authors [48]. For example, A. acutifolius was the species with the higher retention of folates and vitamin C together.
Many organic acids are involved in ascorbic acid metabolism in plants [50], and different authors have suggested their role in the reactions of the oxidation-reduction of tocopherols [51,52]. For that reason, the knowledge of their content in plant tissues, as well as their behavior through the cooking process, has been considered as interesting information that can help to explain the relationships between antioxidant compounds presence in the vegetables (namely ascorbic acid) and vitamin stability (as in the case of folates).
Table 6 shows the organic acid composition of the analyzed samples. Glutamic acid was only found in A. acutifolius and B. dioica young shoots, with losses of 69% and 100% respectively, after the culinary process. Malic acid was identified in the tender shoots of A. acutifolius, B. dioica and T. communis, with B. dioica having the highest content in either raw or cooked material and T. communis having the highest retention percentage. Citric acid was relatively stable in almost all the wild greens studied, with the exception of R. pulcher tender leaves with 33.6% retention, while T. communis had the most presence of this organic acid.
However, oxalic acid was the most relevant organic acid found in the analyzed samples, due to its role as an antinutrient. This compound, when ingested in high amounts, is excreted in urine, causing hyperoxaluria, which leads to the deposition of calcium oxalate in kidney tissue or crystallization as calcium oxalate kidney calculus (nephrolithiasis). The minimal lethal dose of this organic acid for adults has been established as 5 g per day, which is a very difficult level to reach in a normal and balanced diet. However, people with a sensitivity to form this kind of calculus should reduce the amount of oxalic acid in the diet to avoid this problem. Besides this, oxalate forms insoluble complexes with minerals such as Ca, and to a lesser extent Mg, in the gut; the insoluble complexes precipitate and are not absorbed, leading to a lower bioavailability of these minerals, and also less absorption of oxalates. Thus, a high intake of these minerals is desirable to impair the negative effects of oxalic acid, as both the urinary deposition of absorbed oxalic acid, and the reduction of minerals absorption [47,53,54,55].
The results in Table 6 show that the studied vegetables have oxalic acid contents from 80 to 730 mg/100 g, which are high amounts; however, with the exception of S. vulgaris, generally, those plants with higher oxalic acid amounts in the raw material (B. dioica and R. pulcher) lose this compound in a higher extent after culinary treatment (retentions of 36 and 39% respectively), while those with lower amounts (A. acutifolius, H. lupulus and T. communis) showed higher oxalic acid retentions (82%). From this, the removal of cooking liquids in oxalate-rich vegetables is desirable for people with the ability of easily form this oxalate kidney calculus, and also to avoid a decrease in dietary calcium bioavailability. Additionally, it can be stated that boiled Asparagus acutifolius, Bryonia dioica, Humulus lupulus and Tamus communis presented lower levels of oxalic acid, and thus they can be a better choice for this group of population.
As previously mentioned, the effects of oxalic acid in the human body are conditioned by the presence of cations in foods. For that reason, the ratios of oxalic acid to minerals have been proposed as indicators of the nutritional quality of foods: a high ratio would mean high oxalates absorption (with the risk of urinary calculus) and impaired mineral absorption; a low ratio would mean more minerals available to be absorbed and a higher capacity to reduce oxalates absorption and urinary deposition.
In this study, the molar ratios of oxalic acid/Ca and oxalic acid/Mg have been calculated for all the wild vegetables studied, either in raw and cooked material, to establish the effect of the cooking process on both the availability of minerals and negative effects of food oxalates. In accordance with Israr et al. [54], the molar ratio of oxalic acid to Ca or Mg above 2 would mean an excess of oxalic acid and impaired mineral absorption, while a value below 1 would minimize this negative effect. As it can be seen, from the studied samples, H. lupulus and T. communis are always below an oxalic acid/Ca ratio of 1; accordingly, they would be better options for people with a low calcium intake in their diet. Other species such as R. pulcher and A. acutifolius present high oxalic acid/Ca ratios, but this ratio notably decreases after boiling, which means that thermal treatment helps to increase the amount of available calcium in this species. On the contrary, B. dioica or S. vulgaris, in both raw and boiled forms, always present high values for the oxalic acid/Ca ratio (>2). Other authors also reported that the total oxalate level in plant foods was inversely correlated with the calcium bioavailability [33,56]. For this reason, a thorough cooking process has been recommended for oxalate-rich food to induce some dissolution of soluble oxalates into the cooking liquid.
Regarding oxalic acid/Mg ratio, similar behavior was found (Figure 2), with the exception that in some cases this ratio slightly increases through the cooking process, with can be attributed to the higher solubility of magnesium salts than oxalic acid into the cooking liquid; Israr et al. [54] also reported the higher solubility of magnesium oxalates than calcium oxalates in foods. Despite the slight increase, H. lupulus and T. communis shoots remain as species with more adequate oxalic acid/Mg ratios (not higher than 1,4), before and after boiling; A. acutifolius showed a ratio close to 2, which is still adequate; on the contrary, R. pulcher, B. dioica and Silene vulgaris presented a too high molar ratio oxalic acid/Mg.
For this reason, from the point of view of Ca and Mg availability and for people suffering of kidney calculus, the boiled shoots of wild H. lupulus and T. communis, and to a lesser extent A. acutifolius, are better choices; while B. dioica shoots and R. pulcher, and S. vulgaris leaves should be avoided.
Finally, multivariate analysis, a principal component analysis (PCA), which reduces the multidimensional structure of the data and provides a two-dimensional map explaining the variance observed, was carried out (Figure 3). This figure shows the difference between various wild vegetables analyzed, raw and cooked, using principal component analysis (PCA) based on the profiles of moisture, TAC, dietary fiber, proteins, total fat, ashes and mineral contents. It can be observed in Figure 3 that the obvious differences in the profiles of particular vegetables species, raw and cooked, vary substantially in terms of their moisture content. There are particular meaningful differences between some of the investigated vegetables, which are especially noteworthy for raw Rumex pulcher and Asparagus acutifolius. Examination of the PCA graphs shows a similarity between Bryonia dioica and Tamus communis, and also between Silene vulgaris and Rumex pulcher compounds in raw vegetables. When the data are compared for cooked vegetables, the similarities between Bryonia dioica and Tamus communis can still be observed (close distance between clusters), although the other vegetables species have smaller distance between clusters. Remarkably, after cooking, the differences between wild vegetables are less pronounced.
The first and second component explained 64.61% of the total variability in the composition of wild vegetables investigated. The first principal component (40.24% of the total variance) was highly correlated with dietary fiber, mineral content, K, Mg and in lesser degree with Na, while it was negatively correlated with moisture content. The second principal component (24.37% of the total variance) was highly correlated with protein, Zn, Cu and in minor degree with carbohydrates and lipids while it was negatively correlated with Fe and Ca content.
Raw Silene vulgaris, Rumex pulcher and Humulus lupulus were mostly characterized by the first component with high fiber, K, Mg content and low moisture content, while Bryonia dioica was negatively characterized by these compounds. Moreover, Tamus communis and Asparagus acutifolius could be considered rich in protein Zn, Cu and to a lesser extent in carbohydrates content characteristics related to component 2.
Raw wild vegetables analyzed were in the first, second and third quarter. However, those boiled were represented in the first and fourth quarter of the biplot. This data representation showed that the culinary technic affected in a great manner the mineral composition of the vegetables more than the proximate composition; this can be explained by the fact that ash and many minerals were negatively correlated with moisture content.

4. Conclusions

As expected, the boiling process supposes an increase of water content in all the vegetables studied, as well as protein and mineral content reduction. Dietary fiber stands as a major compound also in the cooked wild greens studied, providing 9–17% of daily recommendations (in a 100 g consumed portion). Na, K, Mg and Zn contents in the cooked vegetables are lost in approximately 50%. On the contrary, Ca, Cu, Fe and Mn remain more stable. The cooked tender leaves of Silene vulgaris are still a good Mn source (0.6 mg/100 g). Regarding vitamin retention, most of the analyzed species, even after boiling, could cover a relevant percentage of the PRI of folates and vitamin C; some species deserve a especial mention for remaining as very good sources of some vitamins, even after boiling, such as R. pulcher as a source of folates, T. communis as a source of vitamin C and A. acutifolius as a source of both vitamins.
Moreover, the boiling process can reduce the amount of the antinutrient oxalic acid in wild greens. It can be especially interesting in the case of the leaves of R. pulcher, reducing oxalic acid/Ca ratio through the loss oxalic acid, while Ca is kept in considerable amounts, thus improving calcium availability. This species, as well as the young shoots of A. acutifolius, H. lupulus and T. communis, after boiling, are good options from the point of view of oxalic acid/Ca ratio.
From all these results, the knowledge of the nutrient composition of some traditionally eaten wild greens is achieved, and its role as a source of nutrients even after culinary processing has been demonstrated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.S.-M. and M.C.; funding acquisition, J.T.; investigation, P.G.-H. and P.M.; methodology, M.C.S.-M., M.C., V.F.-R. and P.M.; resources, J.T.; supervision, M.C.S.-M. and M.C.; validation, M.C.S.-M., M.C. and V.F.-R.; writing—original draft, P.G.-H. and P.M.; writing—review and editing, M.C.S.-M., M.C., V.F.-R. and J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Project (CGL2006-09546/BOS), and to ALIMNOVA research group (UCM 252/2017). This work has been funded by Patricia García-Herrera is grateful to Complutense University for her PhD grant (Becas Complutense Predoctorales 2008).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank ALIMNOVA UCM Research Group (951505-GR58/08B) for the financial support received and to M. Pardo-de-Santayana, R. Morales, M. Molina and L. Aceituno for their collaboration in collecting the samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tardío, J.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Ethnobotanical Analysis of Wild Fruits and Vegetables Traditionally Consumed in Spain. In Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants. Ethnobotany and Food Composition Tables; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 57–80. ISBN 978-1-4939-3327-3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tardío, J.; Pardo de Santayana, M. Wild food plants traditionally used in Spain: Regional analysis. In Plants and People: Choices and Diversity through Time; Marinova, E., Peña-Chocarro Chevalier, L.A., Eds.; Oxbow Books: Barnsley, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pardo-De-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J.; Morales, R. The gathering and consumption of wild edible plants in the Campoo (Cantabria, Spain). Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 56, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Łuczaj, Ł.; Kujawska, M. Botanists and their childhood memories: An under-utilized expert source in ethnobotanical research. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 168, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. García-Herrera, P.; Sánchez Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Díez-Marqués, C.; Molina, M.; Tardío, J. Nutrient composition of six wild edible Mediterranean Asteraceae plants of dietary interest. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014, 34, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tardío, J.; Molina, M.; Aceituno-Mata, L.; Pardo de Santayana, M.; Morales, R.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Morales, P.; García, P.; Cámara, M.; Sánchez Mata, M.C. Montia fontana L. (Portulacaceae), an interesting wild vegetable traditionally consumed in the Iberian Peninsula. Genet. Resou. Crop. Evol. 2011, 58, 1105–1118. [Google Scholar]
  7. García-Herrera, P.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Tardío, J.; Olmedilla-Alonso, B. Carotenoid content of wild edible young shoots traditionally consumed in Spain (Asparagus acutifolius L., Humulus lupulus L., Bryonia dioica Jacq. and Tamus communis L.). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 1692–1698. [Google Scholar]
  8. García-Herrera, P.; Morales, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Sánchez Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Carvalho, A.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Pardo de Santayana, M.; Molina, M.; Tardío, J. Nutrients, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in wild populations of Allium ampeloprasum L., a valuable underutilizable vegetable. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 272–279. [Google Scholar]
  9. Morales, P.; Carvalho, A.M.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Molina, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Tocopherol composition and antioxidant activity of Spanish wild vegetables. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2012, 59, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.; Carvalho, A.M.; Sánchez-Mata, M.D.C.; Cámara, M.; Tardío, J. Fatty acids profiles of some Spanish wild vegetables. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2012, 18, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Morales, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Tardío, J. Optimization and application of FL-HPLC for folates analysis in 20 species of Mediterranean wild vegetables. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 8, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhan, L.J.; Pang, L.Y.; Ma, Y.D.; Zhang, C.C. Thermal processing affecting phytochemical contents and total antioxidant capacity in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.). J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lima, G.P.P.; Costa, S.M.; Monaco, K.D.; Uliana, M.R.; Fernandez, R.M.; Correa, C.R.; Vianello, F.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Minatel, I.O. Cooking processes increase bioactive compounds in organic and conventional green beans. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 68, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Danowska-Oziewicz, M.; Narwojsz, A.; Draszanowska, A.; Marat, N. The effects of cooking method on selected quality traits of broccoli and green asparagus. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sergio, L.; Cantore, V.; Spremulli, L.; Pinto, L.; Baruzzi, F.; Di Venere, D.; Boari, F. Effect of cooking and packaging conditions on quality of semi-dried green asparagus during cold storage. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tardío, J.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Morales, R. Ethnobotanical review of wild edible plants in Spain. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2006, 152, 27–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tardío, J. Spring is coming: The gathering and consumption of wild vegetables in Spain. In Ethnobotany in the New Europe: People, Health and Wild Plants Resources; Pardo-de-Santayana, M., Pieroni, A., Puri, R., Eds.; Berghahn Books: NewYork, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 211–238. [Google Scholar]
  18. Couplan, F. Les Belles Veneneuses. Encyclopedie des Plantes Comestibles de l’Europe, Vol 3; Equilibres Aujourd’houi: Flers, France, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hadad Chi, G.R.; Moradi, Z. The amounts and distribution of diosgenin and saponin and their carbohydrate moiety of Tamus communis L. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2005, 12, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin, J.T.; Liu, S.C.; Chen, S.L.; Chen, H.Y.; Yang, D.J. Effects of domestic processing on steroidal saponins in taiwanese yam cultivar (Dioscorea pseudojaponica Yamamoto). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9948–9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Güçlü-Üstündağ, Ö.; Mazza, G. Saponins: Properties, Applications and Processing. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 47, 231–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siegall, C.B.; Gawlak, S.L.; Chace, D.; Wolff, E.A.; Mixan, B.; Marquardt, H. Characterization of ribosome-inactivating proteins isolated from Bryonia dioica and their utility as carcinoma-reactive immunoconjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 1994, 5, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Łuczaj, Ł.; Končić, M.Z.; Miličević, T.; Dolina, K.; Pandža, M. Wild vegetable mixes sold in the markets of Dalmatia (southern Croatia). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Matallana-González, M.C.; Morales, P. The contribution of wild plants to dietary intakes of micronutrients (I): Vitamins. In Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants. Ethnobotany and Food Composition Tables; Sánchez Mata, M.C., Tardío, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 111–140. ISBN 978-1-4939-3327-3. [Google Scholar]
  25. García-Herrera, P.; Sánchez Mata, M.C. The contribution of wild plants to dietary intakes of micronutrients (I): Mineral Elements. In Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants. Ethnobotany and Food Composition Tables; Sánchez Mata, M.C., Tardío, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 111–140. ISBN 978-1-4939-3327-3. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lesková, E.; Kubíková, J.; Kovacíková, E.; Kosická, M.; Porubská, J.; Holcikova, K. Vitamin losses: Retention during heat treatment and continual changes expressed by mathematical models. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 252–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ros-Berruezo, G. Influence of food processing on vitamin content and availability. In “Hot Topics” en Vitaminas y Salud; Instituto Tomás Pascual Sanz: Madrid, Spain, 2011; pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  28. Trichopoulou, A.; Vasilopoulou, E.; Hollman, P.; Chamalides, C.; Foufa, E.; Kaloudis, T.; Kromhout, D.; Miskaki, P.; Petrochilou, I.; Poulima, E.; et al. Nutritional composition and flavonoid content of edible wild greens and green pies: A potential rich source of antioxidant nutrients in the Mediterranean diet. Food Chem. 2000, 70, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salvatore, S.; Pellegrini, N.; Brenna, O.; Del Rio, D.; Frasca, G.; Brighenti, F.; Tumino, R. Antioxidant characterization of some Sicilian edible wild greens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9465–9471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schönfeldt, H.C.; Pretorius, B. The nutrient content of five traditional South African dark green leafy vegetables—A preliminary study. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 1141–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boari, F.; Cefola, M.; Di Gioia, F.; Pace, B.; Serio, F.; Cantore, V. Effect of cooking methods on antioxidant activity and nitrate content of selected wild Mediterranean plants. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Van Jaarsvelda, P.; Fabera, M.; van Heerdenb, I.; Wenholdc, F.; van Rensburgd, W.J.; van Averbekee, W. Nutrient content of eight African leafy vegetables and their potential contribution to dietary reference intakes. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2014, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Amalraj, A.; Pius, A. Bioavailability of calcium and its absorption inhibitors in raw and cooked green leafy vegetables commonly consumed in India—An in vitro study. Food Chem. 2015, 170, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, K.S.; Ali, A.; Muhammad, I.I. The influence of microwave cooking on the nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of the underutilized perah seed. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2017, 16, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gunathilake, K.D.; Ranaweera, K.K.D.; Rupasinghe, H.P. Effect of different cooking methods on polyphenols, carotenoids and antioxidant activities of selected edible leaves. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Savo, V.; Salomone, F.; Mattoni, E.; Tofani, D.; Caneva, G. Traditional Salads and Soups with Wild Plants as a Source of Antioxidants: A Comparative Chemical Analysis of Five Species Growing in Central Italy. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Barros de Oliveira, H.A.; Anunciação, P.C.; Pereira da Silva, B.; Natal de Souza1, Â.M.; Silva Pinheiro, S.; Mattos Della Lucia, C.; de Morais Cardoso, L.; Vidigal Castro, L.C.; Pinheiro-Sant’ Ana1, H.M. Nutritional value of non-conventional vegetables prepared by family farmers in rural communities. Ciência Rural Santa Maria 2019, 49, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sergio, L.; Boari, F.; Pieralice, M.; Linsalata, V.; Cantore, V.; Di Venere, D. Bioactive Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Some Edible Wild Greens as Affected By Different Cooking Treatments. Foods 2020, 9, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tardío, J.; Pascual, H.; Morales, R. Alimentos Silvestres de Madrid: Guía de Plantas y Setas de Uso Alimentario Tradicional en la Comunidad de Madrid; Ediciones La Librería: Madrid, Spain, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  40. Horwitz, W.; Latimer, G.W. Official Methods of Analysis; Asociación de Químicos Analíticos Oficial Internacional AOAC, 18th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  41. Osborne, J.J.; Voogt, L. Análisis de Los Nutrientes de Los Alimentos; Acribia: Zaragoza, Spain, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cabrera-Loera, R.D.; Morales, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Cámara, M.; Díez-Marqués, C.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J. Wild vegetables of the Mediterranean area as valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Genet. Resou. Crop. Evol. 2012, 59, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Murphy, E.W.; Criner, P.E.; Gray, B.C. Comparison of methods for determining retentions of nutrients in cooked foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1975, 23, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bergström, L. Nutrients Losses and Gains in the Preparation of Food; Livsmedelsverket: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994.
  45. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients Summary Report. EFSA Support. Publ. 2017, 14, e15121E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lachance, P.A.; Fischer, M.C. Effects of food preparation procedures in nutrient retention with emphasis on food service practices. In Nutritional Evaluation of Food Processing; Karmas, E., Harris, R.S., Eds.; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 505–556. [Google Scholar]
  47. Derache, R. Toxicología y Seguridad de los Alimentos; Omega: Barcelona, Spain, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  48. Eitenmiller, R.R.; Laden, W.O. Vitamin A and b-carotene. Ascorbic acid. Thiamin. Vitamin B-6. Folate. In Vitamin Analysis for the Health and Food Science; Eitenmiller, R.R., Laden, W.O., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Ratón, FL, USA, 1999; pp. 15–19, 226–228, 275, 375, 411–465. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lin, B.F.; Lin, R.F. Effect of Chinese stir-fry cooking on folate contents of vegetables. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 1999, 37, 443–454. [Google Scholar]
  50. Barceló-Coll, J.; Nicola Rodrigo, G.; Sabater Garcia, B.; Sánchez Tamés, R. Fisiología Vegetal; Piramide: Madrid, Spain, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  51. López-Bucio, J.; Nieto-Jacobo, M.F.; Ramírez-Rodríguez, V.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Organic acid metabolism in plants: From adaptive physiology to transgenic varieties for cultivation in extreme soils. Plant Sci. 2000, 160, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nagaoka, S.; Kakiuchi, T.; Ohara, K.; Mukai, K. Kinetics of the reaction which natural vitamin regenerates E by Vitamin, C. Chem. Phys. Lipid. 2007, 146, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guil-Guerrero, J.L.; Torija-Isasa, M.E.; Giménez-Martínez, J.J.; Rodríguez-García, I.; Giménez-Giménez, A. Oxalic acid and calcium determination in wild edible plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 1821–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Israr, B.; Frazier, R.A.; Gordon, M.H. Effects of phytate and minerals on the bioavailability of oxalate from food. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1690–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mahan, L.K.; Escott-Stump, S.; Raymond, J.L. Krause Dietoterapia, 13th ed.; Elsevier: Madrid, Spain, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  56. Yadav, S.K.; Sehgal, S. Effect of domestic processing and cooking on selected antinutrient contents of some green leafy vegetables. Plant. Foods Hum. Nutr. 2003, 58, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proximate composition (a) before and (b) after boiling process in the wild edible greens selected (g/100 g dry basis).
Figure 1. Proximate composition (a) before and (b) after boiling process in the wild edible greens selected (g/100 g dry basis).
Foods 09 01761 g001aFoods 09 01761 g001b
Figure 2. Variations detected after boiling process on: (a) oxalic acid/Ca molar ratio; (b) oxalic acid/Mg molar ratio.
Figure 2. Variations detected after boiling process on: (a) oxalic acid/Ca molar ratio; (b) oxalic acid/Mg molar ratio.
Foods 09 01761 g002
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) graphs of nutrients from the raw (1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11) and boiled vegetables (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12) investigated. Numbers on the plot represent analyzed vegetables. Sample numbering for raw and boiled respectively: 1, 2: Silene vulgaris; 3, 4: Rumex pulcher; 5, 6: Bryonia dioica; 7, 8: Humulus lupulus; 9, 10: Tamus communis; 11, 12: Asparagus acutifolius L.: lipids; P: proteins; C: carbohydrates; F: fiber; A: ashes; M: moisture.
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) graphs of nutrients from the raw (1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11) and boiled vegetables (2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12) investigated. Numbers on the plot represent analyzed vegetables. Sample numbering for raw and boiled respectively: 1, 2: Silene vulgaris; 3, 4: Rumex pulcher; 5, 6: Bryonia dioica; 7, 8: Humulus lupulus; 9, 10: Tamus communis; 11, 12: Asparagus acutifolius L.: lipids; P: proteins; C: carbohydrates; F: fiber; A: ashes; M: moisture.
Foods 09 01761 g003
Table 1. Description and location of the sampled wild vegetable species.
Table 1. Description and location of the sampled wild vegetable species.
FamilySpeciesEdible PartSite
PolygonaceaeRumex pulcher L.Basal leavesAlcalá de Henares Foods 09 01761 i001
CaryophyllaceaeSilene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke.Tender stems with leavesCadalso de los Vidrios Foods 09 01761 i002
AsparagaceaeAsparagus acutifolius L.Young shoots with or without leavesAlcalá de Henares Foods 09 01761 i003
CannabaceaeHumulus lupulus L.Young shoots with or without leavesAlcalá de Henares Foods 09 01761 i004
CucurbitaceaeBryonia dioica Jacq.Young shoots with or without leavesAlcalá de Henares Foods 09 01761 i005
DioscoreaceaeTamus communis L.Young shoots with or without leavesTres Cantos Foods 09 01761 i006
Photographs (J. Tardio).
Table 2. The proximate composition of raw and boiled wild vegetables (g/100 g fresh weight).
Table 2. The proximate composition of raw and boiled wild vegetables (g/100 g fresh weight).
Species MoistureProteinsLipidsTACDietary FiberAshes
Rumex pulcher L.Fresh88.1 ± 0.1 *2.70 ± 0.01 *0.10 ± 0.02 *3.31 ± 0.10 *4.23 ± 0.03 *1.54 ± 0.02 *
Boiled90.8 ± 0.90.31 ± 0.020.03 ± 0.002.02 ± 0.124.41 ± 0.070.81 ± 0.01
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke.Raw86.1 ± 0.1 *3.16 ± 0.09 *0.33 ± 0.02 *1.50 ± 0.07 *5.64 ± 0.06 *2.18 ± 0.03 *
Boiled92.1 ± 0.41.98 ± 0.020.22 ± 0.021.13 ± 0.033.28 ± 0.030.77 ± 0.02
Asparagus acutifolius L.Raw86.9 ± 0.1 *3.00 ± 0.13 *0.44 ± 0.02 *4.46 ± 0.193.73 ± 0.06 *1.00 ± 0.04 *
Boiled89.6 ± 0.12.52 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.004.99 ± 0.453.56 ± 0.020.57 ± 0.03
Bryonia dioica L.Raw90.7 ± 0.1 *3.05 ± 0.210.11 ± 0.011.06 ± 0.073.69 ± 0.05 *1.03 ± 0.03 *
Boiled93.4 ± 0.22.01 ± 0.440.15 ± 0.021.21 ± 0.182.88 ± 0.030.62 ± 0.02
Humulus lupulus L.Raw86.2 ± 0.1 *4.23 ± 0.49 *0.10 ± 0.01 *2.02 ± 0.214.50 ± 0.15 *1.26 ± 0.01 *
Boiled90.7 ± 0.20.56 ± 0.010.15 ± 0.011.89 ± 0.173.81 ± 0.030.72 ± 0.01
Tamus communis L.Raw88.7 ± 0.4 *3.14 ± 0.06 *0.20 ± 0.01 *2.02 ± 0.21 *4.06 ± 0.10 *1.03 ± 0.01 *
Boiled90.6 ± 0.10.55 ± 0.050.08 ± 0.003.07 ± 0.193.33 ± 0.040.68 ± 0.03
TAC: Total available carbohydrates. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n − 1). n = 3. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), between raw and boiled samples.
Table 3. Mineral macro-elements in raw and boiled wild vegetables (mg/100 g fresh weight).
Table 3. Mineral macro-elements in raw and boiled wild vegetables (mg/100 g fresh weight).
Species K
(mg/100 g)
Na
(mg/100 g)
Ca
(mg/100 g)
Mg
(mg/100 g)
Rumex pulcher L.Raw520.8 ± 41.4 *123.5 ± 9.4 *68.2 ± 2.8 *45.7 ± 1.0 *
Boiled206.1 ± 20.329.1 ± 0.2107.1 ± 9.726.9 ± 1.8
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke.Raw670.7 ± 69.0 *21.8 ± 1.6 *74.0 ± 3.356.0 ± 0.6 *
Boiled226.4 ± 3.711.8 ± 2.567.9 ± 5.421.1 ± 0.2
Asparagus acutifolius L.Raw338.1 ± 21.5 *37.5 ± 3.0 *17.6 ± 1.5 *15.6 ± 0.9 *
Boiled177.1 ± 18.021.0 ± 1.931.5 ± 0.310.9 ± 1.8
Bryonia dioica L.Raw351.1 ± 12.9 *21.9 ± 2.331.7 ± 1.2 *14.6 ± 0.8 *
Boiled171.0 ± 10.218.1 ± 0.216.0 ± 1.59.0 ± 1.7
Humulus lupulus L.Raw421.3 ± 14.2 *57.7 ± 8.1 *58.3 ± 0.8 *28.9 ± 1.0 *
Boiled171.8 ± 15.77.1 ± 0.740.4 ± 5.617.0 ± 0.6
Tamus communis L.Raw307.4 ± 9.4 *16.3 ± 3.442.1 ± 2.719.0 ± 1.4
Boiled202.4 ± 22.914.9 ± 1.747.3 ± 3.315.2 ± 1.2
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n − 1). n = 3. Different letters mean statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), between raw and boiled samples.
Table 4. Mineral microelements in raw and boiled wild vegetables (mg/100 g fresh weight).
Table 4. Mineral microelements in raw and boiled wild vegetables (mg/100 g fresh weight).
Species Cu
(mg/100 g)
Fe
(mg/100 g)
Mn
(mg/100 g)
Zn
(mg/100 g)
Rumex pulcher L.Raw0.10 ± 0.011.26 ± 0.030.22 ± 0.010.39 ± 0.02 *
Boiled0.08 ± 0.011.10 ± 0.180.20 ± 0.020.18 ± 0.03
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke.Raw0.01 ± 0.0020.21 ± 0.00 *0.55 ± 0.01 *0.51 ± 0.01 *
Boiled0.06 ± 0.020.47 ± 0.020.60 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.01
Asparagus acutifolius L.Raw0.13 ± 0.01 *0.36 ± 0.030.07 ± 0.003 *0.85 ± 0.01 *
Boiled0.38 ± 0.080.22 ± 0.090.12 ± 0.010.42 ± 0.00
Bryonia dioica L.Raw0.26 ± 0.02 *0.41 ± 0.02 *0.13 ± 0.005 *0.61 ± 0.03 *
Boiled0.10 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.0050.08 ± 0.0010.30 ± 0.03
Humulus lupulus L.Raw0.14 ± 0.02 *0.58 ± 0.030.10 ± 0.002 *0.82 ± 0.01 *
Boiled0.08 ± 0.0010.57 ± 0.070.18 ± 0.020.40 ± 0.02
Tamus communis L.Raw0.14 ± 0.01 *0.48 ± 0.020.11 ± 0.030.64 ± 0.01 *
Boiled0.09 ± 0.020.43 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.010.44 ± 0.04
Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n − 1). n = 3. Different letters mean statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), between raw and boiled samples.
Table 5. Vitamins B9 (folates) and C in raw and boiled wild vegetables (mg/100 g fresh weight).
Table 5. Vitamins B9 (folates) and C in raw and boiled wild vegetables (mg/100 g fresh weight).
Species Total Folates
(mg/100 g)
% PRIAA
(mg/100 g)
DHAA
(mg/100 g)
Total Vitamin C
(mg/100 g)
% PRI
Rumex pulcher L.Raw0.397 ± 0.023 *120.330.8 ± 0.7 *16.1 ± 0.2 *46.5 ± 0.1 *42.3
Boiled0.277 ± 0.026 83.920.4 ± 0.71.2 ± 0.321.6 ± 0.9 19.6
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke.Raw0.519 ± 0.140 * 157.314.3 ± 1.011.1 ± 0.9 *25.1 ± 0.5 *22.8
Boiled0.102 ± 0.012 30.913.9 ± 1.0 nd13.4 ± 0.812.2
Asparagus acutifolius L.Raw0.589 ± 0.017 *178.529.3 ± 0.1 *26.0 ± 0.656.7 ± 0.6 *51.5
Boiled0.283 ± 0.007 85.724.2 ± 0.523.6 ± 1.447.9 ± 1.8 43.5
Bryonia dioica L.Raw0.177 ± 0.008 *53.612.0 ± 0.3 *13.7 ± 1.7 *25.7 ± 2.0 *23.4
Boiled0.122 ± 0.01536.96.4 ± 0.30.2 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.2 5.8
Humulus lupulus L.Raw0.304 ± 0.045 *92.137.2 ± 0.2 *23.2 ± 0.8 *60.9 ± 0.1 *55.4
Boiled0.177 ± 0.038 53.611.3 ± 0.55.6 ± 0.217.4 ± 0.815.8
Tamus communis L.Raw0.159 ± 0.004 *48.256.9 ± 0.2 *1.6 ± 0.1 *58.6 ± 0.4 *53.3
Boiled0.109 ± 0.022 33.036.2 ± 0.8 nd40.9 ± 1.637.2
AA = ascorbic acid; DHAA = dehydroascorbic acid. nd = non detected; PRI = population reference intake. Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n − 1). n = 3. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), between raw and boiled samples.
Table 6. Organic acids in raw and boiled wild vegetables (g/100 g fresh weight).
Table 6. Organic acids in raw and boiled wild vegetables (g/100 g fresh weight).
Species Oxalic AcidGlutamic AcidMalic AcidCitric Acid
Rumex pulcher L.Raw0.73 ± 0.02 *ndnd0.102 ± 0.003 *
Boiled0.29 ± 0.02ndnd0.034 ± 0.003
Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke.Raw0.63 ± 0.07 *ndnd0.12 ± 0.01 *
Boiled0.45 ± 0.03ndnd0.06 ± 0.02
Asparagus acutifolius L.Raw0.10 ± 0.010.042 ± 0.005 *0.22 ± 0.04 *0.33 ± 0.05
Boiled0.08 ± 0.000.029 ± 0.0020.09 ± 0.010.20 ± 0.07
Bryonia dioica L.Raw0.36 ± 0.02 *0.119 ± 0.004 *1.71 ± 0.04 *0.06 ± 0.01 *
Boiled0.13 ± 0.01nd0.98 ± 0.070.041 ± 0.005
Humulus lupulus L.Raw0.09 ± 0.02nd0.77 ± 0.17 *0.17 ± 0.01
Boiled0.083 ± 0.007nd0.47 ± 0.020.12 ± 0.03
Tamus communis L.Raw0.08 ± 0.01ndnd0.34 ± 0.02 *
Boiled0.08 ± 0.01ndnd0.24 ± 0.01
nd = non detected; Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n − 1). n = 3. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), between raw and boiled samples.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Herrera, P.; Morales, P.; Cámara, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Tardío, J.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C. Nutritional and Phytochemical Composition of Mediterranean Wild Vegetables after Culinary Treatment. Foods 2020, 9, 1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121761

AMA Style

García-Herrera P, Morales P, Cámara M, Fernández-Ruiz V, Tardío J, Sánchez-Mata MC. Nutritional and Phytochemical Composition of Mediterranean Wild Vegetables after Culinary Treatment. Foods. 2020; 9(12):1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121761

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Herrera, Patricia, Patricia Morales, Montaña Cámara, Virginia Fernández-Ruiz, Javier Tardío, and María Cortes Sánchez-Mata. 2020. "Nutritional and Phytochemical Composition of Mediterranean Wild Vegetables after Culinary Treatment" Foods 9, no. 12: 1761. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop