Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Compounds from Sesame Cake and Antioxidant Activity: A New Insight for Agri-Food Residues’ Significance for Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Lactic Acid Fermentation as a Pre-Treatment Process for Faba Bean Flour and Its Effect on Textural, Structural and Nutritional Properties of Protein-Enriched Gluten-Free Faba Bean Breads
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/foods8100429
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiple Emulsions with Extracts of Cactus Pear Added in A Yogurt: Antioxidant Activity, In Vitro Simulated Digestion and Shelf Life

by
Antonio de Jesús Cenobio-Galindo
1,
Gilberto Díaz-Monroy
1,
Gabriela Medina-Pérez
1,2,
M. Jesús Franco-Fernández
1,
Fanny Emma Ludeña-Urquizo
3,
Rodolfo Vieyra-Alberto
1 and
Rafael Germán Campos-Montiel
1,*
1
Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Av. Rancho Universitario s/n Km.1, Tulancingo C.P. 43760, Hgo., Mexico
2
Programa de Doctorado en Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico para la Sociedad, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México C.P. 07369, Cd. México, Mexico
3
Facultad de Industria Alimentarias, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Av. la Molina s/n, La Molina, Lima Apdo 12-056, Peru
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2019, 8(10), 429; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100429
Submission received: 17 August 2019 / Revised: 11 September 2019 / Accepted: 16 September 2019 / Published: 22 September 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Consumers demand so-called natural in which additive and antioxidant preservatives are from natural origin. Research focuses in using extracts from plants and fruits that are rich in bioactive compounds such as phenolics and betalains, but these are also prone to interact with proteins and are exposed to suffer degradation during storage. In this work, we developed a fortified yogurt with the addition of betalains and polyphenols from cactus pear extract encapsulated in a multiple emulsion (ME) (W1/O/W2). Different formulations of ME were made with two polymers, gum arabic (GA) and maltodextrin (MD) and with the best formulation of ME four types of yogurt were prepared using different % (w/w) of ME (0%, 10%, 20% and 30%). Bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, color and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were analyzed in the different yogurts over 36 days of shelf life. Furthermore, in vitro simulated digestion was evaluated. The yogurts had significant (p < 0.05) differences and the ME protected the bioactive compounds, activity of antioxidants and color. The ME did not affect the viability of LAB during 36 days of storage. The in vitro digestion showed the best bioaccessibilities of antioxidant compounds with the yogurts with ME.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays people are more interested in consuming functional foods to preserve and/or improve their health. Yogurt is a food produced by the acid coagulation of milk and is very popular [1]. One of the most important advantages of yogurts is it has acid lactic bacteria which improve digestion and therefore health. The Codex Alimentarius [2] established that a minimum of 106 viable lactic acid bacteria/mL are needed to observe beneficial effects in health when consumed in functional foods.
Several reports indicate that yogurts can be added with some compounds to improve their characteristics [3]. There is currently a growing interest in this type of food containing bioactive compounds of plant origin, which provide benefits as antioxidant activity [4]. Jung et al. [5] incorporated red ginseng extract into a yogurt finding that the antioxidant capacity of the added yogurts was improved. Su et al. [6] elaborated a Hickory milk-based yogurt, finding an important antioxidant activity, effect attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds and small peptides. In addition to some reports with the addition of colorants of natural origin [7,8] to replace artificial colorants that could damage health because its use has been associated with allergies, asthma, hyperactive behavior in children, and it has been associated with an increased risk of cancer [9,10].
The bioactive compounds used in foods mainly originate from vegetables [11]. Polyphenols are bioactive compounds that have antioxidant activity [12]. One important source of phenolic compounds (as rutin, ferulic acid, among others) is a cactus pear of the genus Opuntia, known as xoconostle, and these compounds have proven to have interesting properties, such as important antioxidant activity [13,14].T there are reports indicating that this fruit is an important source of natural pigments, such as betalains [15]. Unfortunately, these compounds are sensitive to environmental factors, which is why needed to be incorporated into a stable matrix so that they can retain their activity for longer periods [16].
Encapsulation is used to protect compounds and release in a controlled manner [17]. There are different encapsulation methods, one of which is the use of multiple emulsions. There are two types of multiple emulsions: water in oil in water (W1/O/W2) and oil in water in oil (O1/W/O2). Multiple emulsions (W1/O/W2) are capable of protecting to the bioactive compounds in conditions simulated of in vitro digestion [18]. Kreatsouli et al. [19] found than maltodextrin how material of encapsulation for olive mill wastewater phenolic extracts had enhanced the activity antioxidant in human endothelial cell. Pimentel-González [20] evidenced that the encapsulation of polyphenols in multiple emulsions not only protects bioactive compounds, foods can maintain physicochemical characteristics similar to those that have not been added for a longer period. The objective of this study was to develop yogurt with natural pigments and antioxidant compounds from cactus fruit protected through of multiple emulsions to preserve this biological properties in in vitro digestion and increment the shelf life through controlled released of the bioactive compounds.

2. Materials and Method

Extracts from cactus pear (Opuntia oligacantha C.F. Först) were obtained from the Autonomous University of Hidalgo State. The extracts have phenolics compounds as rutin, ferulic acid, quercetin, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, apigenin, caffeic acid and kaempferol [14]. A lactic culture, Y1.50B, which is a mixture of Streptococcus thermophiles and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, was purchased with a national supplier (Raff S.A, de C.V., and Mexico). Used chemicals and reagents are the following: 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS), potassium persulphate, Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, ascorbic acid, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), pepsin, and quercetin from Sigma-Aldrich (México, Mexico); methanol, acetone, sodium bicarbonate, anhydrous sodium carbonate, hydrochloric acid, ethanol from J.T. Baker S.A; gallic acid and aluminum trichloride from Fermont (Monterrey, N.L., Mexico); Grindsted PGPR 90 (ester of fatty acids of polyglycerol and polyricinoleate) Panodan SDK (esters monoglycerides and diglycerides of tartaric acid diacetyl) from Danisco, México S.A. de C.V.; arabic gum from Frutarom, France; maltodextrin from Grain Processing Corporation Oregon, IA, USA; bile salts OXOID LTD, UK; canola oil From Capullo® (Unilever de México, Tultitlan, Edo. México, Mexico); and pancreatine from Hycel de México S.A. de C.V. México. The medium used was MRS agar (Bioxon- Becton Dickinson México, Edo. México, Mexico).

2.1. Multiple Emulsion Formulation

The emulsion was made according to Pimentel-Gonzalez et al. [20] with some modifications. The primary emulsion (W/O) contained 30 mL of cactus pear extract as the internal aqueous phase inside an oil phase of 56 mL canola oil with a mixture of one part hydrophilic emulsifier (Panodan SDK) and four parts hydrophobic emulsifier (Grindsted PGPR 90). The emulsification was carried out with a high shear Ultra-Turrax IKA T25 (digital, Luxembourg, Germany) at 10,000 rpm for 5 min in an ice bath. The double emulsion consisted of 30 mL of primary emulsion with 20 g of polymer and 54 mL of distilled water homogenized at 5 rpm for 5 min in an ice bath. Three formulations were made with different proportions of two polymers; gum arabic (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): GA40%-MD60%; GA50%-MD50%; GA60%-MD40%. In the emulsions were determined droplet diameter, total phenols, flavonoids, betalains and antioxidant activity (ABTS and DPPH). To analyze droplets diameter of the emulsion analysis of the emulsion was taken a sample of one mL and put in slide. It was used optic microscope Olympus BX 45 (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd, Tokio, Japan). It was analyzed 30 droplets using software Image-Pro Plus (version 4.5, Media Cybernetics, Inc., Silver Springs, MD, USA).

2.2. Process of Yogurt with the Multiple Emulsions

Whole cow’s milk was used, heated to 45 °C and two percent of milk powder and three percent of sugar were added, mixed until dissolution complete, cool at 42 °C, and it was addition two per cent of lactic culture. The mixture was incubated at 42 °C until has acidity of 70 °D, cool and storage for 12 h at 4 °C, after the refrigeration the suspended fat was withdrawal of superficial and the yogurt was churned to homogenization. Last, the yogurt was mixed with different concentration of the double emulsion. The treatments were following: Yogurt control without ME (Y); Yogurt 10% of ME (Y10); Yogurt 20% of ME (Y20); Yogurt 30% of ME (Y30).

2.3. Color

Colorimeter “Hunter Lab” (Minolta, CM508d, Osaka, Japan) was used. The equipment measured darkness and lightness “L”, negative green or positive red value of “a” and negative blue or positive yellow value of “b”. It was taking a sample and it was put in the equipment to obtain the values of coordinates L, a y b [21], three repetitions per treatment were determined.

2.4. Total Phenols

To analysis of total phenols was used technique of Folin Ciocalteu described by Ainsworth & Gillespie et al. [22] with some modifications. One mL of sample and mixed with 5 mL of the reactive of Folin Ciocalteu diluted (1:10) after seven minutes was addition 4 mL of sodium carbonate to 7.5%. The samples let stand in the darkness for 120 min. Finally, they were read at 760 nm in spectrophotometer (Jenway 6715, Staffordshire, UK). The results were expressed in mg of gallic acid equivalents for 100 mL (mg GAE/100 mL).

2.5. Flavonoids

Total flavonoid content was determined according to Pothitirat et al. [23] with some modifications. A solution of aluminum trichloride (AlCl3) (449598 Sigma-Aldrich®, Saint Louis, MO, USA) in 2% methanol (PQ06121 Fermont®, Monterrey, N.L., Mexico) was used. Two mL of the extract was mixed with 2 mL of the methanol solution and placed in the dark to rest for 10 min, after the samples was read at a wavelength of 415 nm. The blank was methanol. The results were expressed in mg of quercetin (1592409 Sigma-Aldrich®, Saint Louis, MO, USA) equivalents for 100 mL of yogurt (mg QE/100 mL).

2.6. Betalains

The method of Castellanos-Santiago & Yahia [24] was adapted with some modifications for the determination of betalains. One mL of the sample was mixed with 20 mL of methanol. The mixture stirred and it was read at 483 nm for betaxanthins and 535 nm for betacyanins. The blank was 80 % of methanol. Total content of betalains were expressed in mg/100 mL.

2.7. Antioxidant Activity ABTS

The antioxidant activity using the radical 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (A1888 Sigma-Aldrich®, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was measured by reacting 10 mL of a 7 mM ABTS solution with 10 mL of 2.45 mM (K2S2O8) potassium persulfate (216224 Sigma-Aldrich®, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The mixture was agitated for 16 h in the dark. The cation radical was adjusted with 20% solution of ethanol (100983 Merck®, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) to an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.1 at a 734 nm wavelength; then 200 μL of the extract was added to 2 mL of adjusted ABTS. The reaction occurred for 6 min, after which the absorbance was read [25]. The results were expressed as mg of ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE/100 mL).

2.8. Antioxidant Activity DPPH

It was used the methodology described by Reyes-Munguía et al. [26]; the radical 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) was prepared with a solution 80% of methanol until to obtain a concentration of 6.1 × 10−5 M and it was stirred during 2 h in the darkness. It was added 0.5 mL of the sample and 2.5 mL of DPPH and the mixture of both were left reaction for 1 h in darkness and it was read to 515 nm until stabilized. The blank was 80% methanol and the mixture was read at 515 nm. The results were expressed as mg of ascorbic acid equivalents for 100 mL (AAE/100 mL).

2.9. In Vitro Simulated Digestion

Simulated Intestinal conditions of the yogurt where determined following the method described by Rufián-Henares and Morales [27] with some modifications. There were established two phases: (A) Gastric phase; the extract was diluted (1:5) with distilled water and adjusted to pH 2 by addition of HCl 6 N and 20 mL of gastric liquid (16% of pepsin and 10 % of NaCl in HCL 0.1 M) the mixed was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in a shaking water bath. When the trial finished two aliquots were taken for the next step and the further analyses; (B) Second phase; the pH of samples from the first trial was adjusted to 7 with sodium bicarbonate (0.5 M) then 1.25 mL of freshly prepared pancreatinin–bile mixture (0.4 g of pancreatinin and 2.5 g of bile salts in 100 mL of 0.1 M NaHCO3 (pancreatic fluid). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in a shaking water bath. When the trial finished an aliquot was taken for the further analysis. At the end of the gastrointestinal digestion, the samples was heated in a boiling bath for 4 min in order to inactivate the enzymes and immediately centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C in a centrifuge Z 36 HK (HERMLE Labortechnik GmbH, Wehingen, Germany) for the analysis of total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activity by DPPH and ABTS.

2.10. Microbiology Analysis

The viability of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was determined through plate culture. The medium used was MRS agar. The incubation was during 24 h at 37 °C and the cells were counts as colony forming unit per mL (CFU/mL), a sterile saline solution was used as a negative control.

2.11. Statistics Analysis

The experimental design was completely randomized. It was used variance analysis with a significance of (p < 0.05). When they existed differences significance (p < 0.05), it was used medium comparisons technique of Tukey. All the experiments were for triplicate. All data were analyzed using the NCSS 2007 software (Wireframe Graphics, Kaysville, UT, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Multiple Emulsions

The formulations showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in droplets diameter (Figure 1). The formulation GA60%-MD40% had the smaller diameter with droplets of 3.5 µm, this can be due to proportion of arabic gum, which has proteins with emulsifiers properties and stability colloidal against the flocculation [28]. These results were similar to report Di Battista et al. [29] with droplets size 14.7 µm that contain phytosterols used a formulation of gum arabic (75%) and maltodextrin (25%).
The concentration of total phenols, flavonoids and betalains showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between the formulated emulsions (Figure 2) during 36 days of storage. The best formulation was GA60%-MD40% keeping 27.3 mg GAE/100 mL of total phenols, 3.3 mg QE/ 100 mL of flavonoids and 1.9 mg/ 100 mL of betalains. These results are higher than reported by Rodríguez-Barahona et al. [30] in phenols in a double emulsion with juice of Morinda citrifolia. Comunian et al. [31] showed results similar, a decrement in flavonoids with emulsion of oil during storage and Otálora et al. [32] observed the same behavior in betalains encapsulated of Opuntia ficus indica.
The antioxidant activity showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between different formulations (Figure 3). The emulsion with higher protection of antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) was GA60%-MD40%, this due to a major concentration of gum arabic in external phase, that help to slow the destabilization of the emulsion [33] in consequence avoid the degradation of the antioxidant compounds. Munguía et al. [34] found the protection of antioxidant compounds from Opuntia ficus indica is better with arabig seyal gum.

3.2. Characterization of Yogurts with the Multiple Emulsion

3.2.1. Color

The value “L” was increment in proportion of the concentration of the emulsion, due at the maltodextrin, it is a white powder that confer higher value of luminosity [35]. It is observed that the values of L decrease with respect to time.
There are significant differences for the parameter “a” (p < 0.05), where it is observed that the treatment that presented higher values was Y30, which means that it tends to red, remembering that thanks to the addition of the multiple emulsions betalains were incorporated that tend to this color.
The parameter “b” was increment in all yogurts during shelf life (Table 1). Comunian et al. [31] reported an increment in the parameter “b” during storage of 30 days with yogurts added with encapsulated of echium oil, phytosterol and sinapic acid.

3.2.2. Total Phenols, Flavonoids and Betalains

All the tested samples from yogurts their quantified amounts of total phenols, flavonoids and betalains tended to decrease over the shelf life (Table 2). The yogurt Y20 had the greatest preservation of bioactive compounds (22.3%, 73.7% and 81.1% of total phenols, flavonoids and betalains, respectively). Muniandy et al. [36] observed similar results: phenols were reduced in refrigerated storage of yogurt with added black tea. The same behavior was found with flavonoids in a yogurt fortified with the grape Vitis vinífera by Chouchouli et al. [37]. In the same way, microencapsulate with betalains from purple cactus pear was reduced during storage [38].

3.2.3. Antioxidant Activity by ABTS and DPPH

The antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) were similar to bioactive compounds, with significant differences in shelf life and among the yogurts (Table 3). The yogurt Y30 retained more than 70% of its antioxidant activity measured as ABTS (14.9 mg AAE/ 100 mL) over its shelf life. Pimentel et al. [20] reported a decrease in antioxidant activity (ABTS) in cheese fortified with encapsulated phenolic compounds extracted from grape during their maturation. Amirdivani and Baba, [39] found same our results, a trend decreased of the antioxidant activity (DPPH) during storage of 28 days of an herbal yogurt.

3.2.4. LAB Quantification

The LAB had a decrease during storage, how reported Mahrous and Abd-El-Salam [40] in a yogurt fortified with omega-3 and vitamin E. However, all the yogurts had a concentration of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) according to normative [2] with minimum concentration of 1 × 106 CFU/mL in shelf life (Table 3).

3.2.5. In Vitro Simulated Digestion

The yogurt Y30 had the best protection of total phenols (94.6%). In the total phenols showed a lost so much in gastric digestion how intestinal digestion (Table 4). Schulz et al. [41] reported a lost about of 90% in total phenols from jucara, Euterpe edulis (Martius) pulp after an in vitro digestion.
The flavonoids presents a different comport in process in vitro digestion. The content of flavonoids was not significant different (p > 0.05) in gastric digestion. However, in intestinal digestion stage, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments being again the Y30 the major protection of flavonoids 96.7% (Table 4). The results of protection are higher than reported by Gullon et al. [42] with a loss of 50% with free flavonoids from Punica granatum in intestinal digestion due the use of double emulsions.
The Y30 had the better protection of antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) with value of 77.6% and 95.2% respectively (Table 4). Frontela-Saseta et al. [43] reported 65% in antioxidant activity (ABTS) with fruit juices enriched with Pycnogenol at an in vitro digestion. Zudaire et al. [44] found a protection of 31% of antioxidant activity (DPPH) with garlic (Allium cepa L.) at an in vitro digestion. The double emulsions improved the protection of bioactive compounds and their antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) in the yogurts.
Food processing can have positive or negative effects on the bioaccessibility of certain compounds. The activity of bioactive compounds is given by multiple factors, such as the release of its matrix, changes in digestion, absorption, metabolism, among others; i.e., these compounds must be bioavailable before acting [16,45]. There are reports regarding the advantages of using double emulsions for encapsulation of bioactive compounds, Jia et al. [46] mention that double emulsions have good stability thanks to their external phase when they are subjected to gastric conditions, either using proteins or polysaccharides, although the latter tend to aggregate in gastric fluids. Ydjedd et al. [47] evaluated the effect of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion of encapsulated phenolic compounds and found that after being subjected to the gastric phase these compounds still continue, which means that their encapsulation protects them against changes in pH and enzymatic activity, contributing to an increase in bioavailability.
Martins et al. [48] incorporated free and encapsulated phenolic compounds of Rubus ulmifolius Schott to yogurt and evaluated their activity, finding that these compounds give the matrix antioxidant capacity, finding a better result when the encapsulated extract was used, suggesting that adding encapsulated compounds is an interesting alternative for these products. On the other hand, Caldas-Cueva et al. [49] incorporated pigments from Opuntia soehrensii in a yogurt and evaluated their effect, finding that adding the extracts contributed an important source of bioactive compounds, such as betalains, being also used as an effective natural colorant, which suggests a potential use of these pigments to give their color and antioxidant activity to various functional foods, specifically in the dairy industry.

4. Conclusions

The formulation AG60%-MD40% had the best stability and major protection of bioactive compounds (total phenols, flavonoids and betalains) and antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH). The results show that incorporating bioactive compounds from cactus pear into a multiple emulsions are adequate to prevent the loss of the antioxidant activity and increment the shelf life of yogurt. The multiple emulsions fortified the yogurt with antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) and it give a natural color red, besides it keeps the viability of bacteria acid lactic major of 1 × 106 CFU/mL and a longer shelf life. The total phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) in the yogurts were protected in the gastric and intestinal digestion by the multiple emulsions. This yogurt with multiple emulsions could improve the health of the consumer due increment of bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds and keep the antioxidant properties after in vitro simulated digestion.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation A.d.J.C.-G.; Investigation G.D.-M.; Writing—review and editing G.M.-P.; Formal analysis M.J.F.-F.; Validation F.E.L.-U.; Methodology R.V.-A.; Data curation R.G.C.-M.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sert, D.; Mercan, E.; Dertli, E. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria from yogurt-like product fermented with pine cone and determination of their role on physicochemical, textural and microbiological properties of product. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 78, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Codex Alimentarius. International Food Standards; Standard for Fermented Milks, CXS 243-2003. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/ (accessed on 24 November 2018).
  3. Ye, M.; Ren, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y. Quality characteristics and antioxidant activity of hickory-black soybean yogurt. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moldovana, B.; Iasko, B.; David, L. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of some commercial fruit-flavored yogurts. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Chem. 2016, 61, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jung, J.; Paik, H.D.; Yoon, H.J.; Jang, H.J.; Jeewanthi, R.K.C.; Jee, H.S.; Lee, S.K. Physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant capacity in yogurt fortified with red ginseng extract. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. 2016, 36, 412–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Su, N.; Ren, L.; Ye, H.; Sui, Y.; Li, J.; Ye, M. Antioxidant activity and flavor compounds of hickory yogurt. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 1894–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nontasan, S.; Moongngarm, A.; Deeseenthum, S. Application of functional colorant prepared from black rice bran in yogurt. APCBEE Procedia 2012, 2, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Díaz-García, M.C.; Castellar, M.R.; Obón, J.M.; Obón, C.; Alcaraz, F.; Rivera, D. Production of an anthocyanin-rich food colorant from Thymus moroderi and its application in foods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 95, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Benvidi, A.; Abbasi, S.; Gharaghani, S.; Tezerjani, M.D.; Masoum, S. Spectrophotometric determination of synthetic colorants using PSO–GA-ANN. Food Chem. 2017, 220, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Raddatz-Mota, D.; Pérez-Flores, L.J.; Carrari, F.; Mendoza-Espinoza, J.A.; de León-Sánchez, F.D.; Pinzón-López, L.L.; Rivera-Cabrera, F. Achiote (Bixa orellana L.): A natural source of pigment and vitamin E. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 1729–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. González-Aguilar, G.; Robles-Sánchez, R.M.; Martínez-Téllez, M.A.; Olivas, G.I.; Álvarez-Parrilla, E.; De La Rosa, L.A. Bioactive compounds in fruits: Health benefits and effect of storage conditions. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 2008, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. D’Archivio, M.; Filesi, C.; Di Benedetto, R.; Gargiulo, R.; Giovannini, C.; Masella, R. Polyphenols, dietary sources and bioavailability. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2007, 43, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Espinosa-Muñoz, V.; Roldán-Cruz, C.A.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; Quintero-Lira, A.; Almaraz-Buendía, I.; Campos-Montiel, R.G. Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Phenols, Flavonoids, and Biocompounds with Inhibitory Effect against Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus from Cactus Pear. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cenobio-Galindo, A.J.; Pimentel-González, D.J.; Del Razo-Rodríguez, O.E.; Medina-Pérez, G.; Carrillo-Inungaray, M.L.; Reyes-Munguía, A.; Campos-Montiel, R.G. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of a starch film with bioextracts microencapsulated from cactus fruits (Opuntia oligacantha). Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hernández-Fuentes, A.D.; Trapala-Islas, A.; Gallegos-Vásquez, C.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Pinedo-Espinoza, J.M.; Guzmán-Maldonado, S.H. Physicochemical variability and nutritional and functional characteristics of xoconostles (Opuntia spp.) accessions from Mexico. Fruits 2015, 70, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cilla, A.; Bosch, L.; Barberá, R.; Alegría, A. Effect of processing on the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds–A review focusing on carotenoids, minerals, ascorbic acid, tocopherols and polyphenols. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2018, 68, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dias, M.I.; Ferreira, I.C.; Barreiro, M.F. Microencapsulation of bioactives for food applications. Food Funct. 2015, 6, 1035–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rodríguez-Huezo, M.E.; Estrada-Fernández, A.G.; García-Almendárez, B.E.; Ludeña-Urquizo, F.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Pimentel-González, D.J. Viability of Lactobacillus plantarum entrapped in double emulsion during Oaxaca cheese manufacture, melting and simulated intestinal conditions. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 768–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kreatsouli, K.; Fousteri, Z.; Zampakas, K.; Kerasioti, E.; Veskoukis, A.S.; Mantas, C.; Stagos, D. A Polyphenolic Extract from Olive Mill Wastewaters Encapsulated in Whey Protein and Maltodextrin Exerts Antioxidant Activity in Endothelial Cells. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pimentel-González, D.J.; Aguilar-García, M.E.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G.; Salcedo-Hernández, R.; Guevara-Arauza, J.C.; Campos-Montiel, R.G. The Process and Maturation Stability of Chihuahua Cheese with Antioxidants in Multiple Emulsions. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 1027–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiménez-Alvarado, R.; Aguirre-Álvarez, G.; Campos-Montiel, R.G.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Pinedo-Espinoza, J.M.; González-Aguayo, E.; Hernández-Fuentes, A.D. Effect of high-pulsed electric fields on the extraction yield and quality of juices obtained from the endocarp of nine prikly pear (Opuntia spp.) varieties. Jokull 2015, 65, 414–435. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ainsworth, E.A.; Gillespie, K.M. Estimation of total phenolic content and other oxidation substrates in plant tissues using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 875–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pothitirat, W.; Chomnawang, M.T.; Supabphol, R.; Gritsanapan, W. Comparison of bioactive compounds content, free radical scavenging and anti-acne inducing bacteria activities of extracts from the mangosteen fruit rind at two stages of maturity. Fitoterapia 2009, 80, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Castellanos-Santiago, E.; Yahia, E.M. Identification and quantification of betalains from the fruits of 10 Mexican prickly pear cultivars by high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5758–5764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nenadis, N.; Wang, L.F.; Tsimidou, M.; Zhang, H.Y. Estimation of scavenging activity of phenolic compounds using the ABTS•+ assay. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4669–4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Reyes-Munguía, A.; Azúara-Nieto, E.; Beristain, C.I.; Cruz-Sosa, F.; Vernon-Carter, E.J. Purple maguey (Rhoeo discolor) antioxidant properties. CyTA-J. Food 2009, 7, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rufián-Henares, J.A.; Morales, F.J. Effect of in vitro enzymatic digestion on antioxidant activity of coffee melanoidins and fractions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10016–10021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dickinson, E. Double emulsions stabilized by food biopolymers. Food Biophys. 2011, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Battista, C.A.; Constenla, D.; Ramírez-Rigo, M.V.; Piña, J. The use of arabic gum, maltodextrin and surfactants in the microencapsulation of phytosterols by spray drying. Powder Technol. 2015, 286, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodríguez-Barahona, C.M.; Corrales-García, J.E.; Hernández-Montes, A.; Ybarra-Moncada, M.C.; García-Mateos, M.R. Contenido fitoquímico de jugo de noni (Morinda citrifolia) microencapsulado en emulsiones W/O/W. Rev. CENIC Cienc. Quím. 2015, 46, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  31. Comunian, T.A.; Ravanfar, R.; de Castro, I.A.; Dando, R.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S.; Abbaspourrad, A. Improving oxidative stability of echium oil emulsions fabricated by Microfluidics: Effect of ionic gelation and phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 2017, 233, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Otálora, M.C.; Carriazo, J.G.; Iturriaga, L.; Nazareno, M.A.; Osorio, C. Microencapsulation of betalains obtained from cactus fruit (Opuntia ficus-indica) by spray drying using cactus cladode mucilage and maltodextrin as encapsulating agents. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kanakdande, D.; Bhosale, R.; Singhal, R.S. Stability of cumin oleoresin microencapsulated in different combination of gum arabic, maltodextrin and modified starch. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 67, 536–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Munguía, A.R.; Castillo, J.I.M.; Elorza, A.V. Determinación De Actividad Antioxidante y Microencapsulación De Compuestos Activos De Opuntia Ficus-Indica. Tlatemoani 2014, 16, 1989–9300. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mendoza-Corvis, F.A.; Arteaga, M.; Pérez, O. Comportamiento de la vitamina C en un producto a base de lactosuero y pulpa de mango variedad Magdalena River (Mangífera indica.) durante el secado por aspersión. Rev. Chil. Nutr. 2016, 43, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Muniandy, P.; Shori, A.B.; Baba, A.S. Influence of green, white and black tea addition on the antioxidant activity of probiotic yogurt during refrigerated storage. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2016, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chouchouli, V.; Kalogeropoulos, N.; Konteles, S.J.; Karvela, E.; Makris, D.P.; Karathanos, V.T. Fortification of yoghurts with grape (Vitis vinifera) seed extracts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 53, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saenz, C.; Gomez, H.; Fabry, A.M.; Cancino, B.; Vergara, C.; Paz, R. Soft-drinks prepared with pulp, ultrafiltrated and nanofiltrated purple cactus pear microparticles: Betalains stability. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1067, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amirdivani, S.; Baba, A.S. Changes in yogurt fermentation characteristics, and antioxidant potential and in vitro inhibition of angiotensin-1 converting enzyme upon the inclusion of peppermint, dill and basil. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 1458–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mahrous, H.; Abd-El-Salam, R. Production of a functional frozen yoghurt fortified with omega-3 and vitamin E. Am. J. Food Nutr. 2014, 2, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schulz, M.; Biluca, F.C.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Borges, G.D.S.C.; Vitali, L.; Micke, G.A.; Costa, A.C.O. Bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential of juçara fruits (Euterpe edulis Martius) subjected to in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. 2017, 228, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gullon, B.; Pintado, M.E.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion of pomegranate peel (Punica granatum) flour obtained from co-products: Changes in the antioxidant potential and bioactive compounds stability. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 19, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Frontela-Saseta, C.; López-Nicolás, R.; González-Bermúdez, C.A.; Peso-Echarri, P.; Ros-Berruezo, G.; Martínez-Graciá, C.; Virgili, F. Evaluation of antioxidant activity and antiproliferative effect of fruit juices enriched with Pycnogenol® in colon carcinoma cells. The effect of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Phytother. Res. 2011, 25, 1870–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zudaire, L.; Viñas, I.; Abadias, M.; Simó, J.; Echeverria, G.; Plaza, L.; Aguiló-Aguayo, I. Quality and bioaccessibility of total phenols and antioxidant activity of calçots (Allium cepa L.) stored under controlled atmosphere conditions. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 129, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bohn, T.; McDougall, G.J.; Alegría, A.; Alminger, M.; Arrigoni, E.; Aura, A.M.; Brito, C.; Cilla, A.; El, S.N.; Karakaya, S.; et al. Mind the gap—Deficits in our knowledge of aspects impacting the bioavailability of phytochemicals and their metabolites—A position paper focusing on carotenoids and polyphenols. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1307–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jia, Z.; Dumont, M.J.; Orsat, V. Encapsulation of phenolic compounds present in plants using protein matrices. Food Biosci. 2016, 15, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ydjedd, S.; Bouriche, S.; López-Nicolás, R.; Saánchez-Moya, T.; Frontela-Saseta, C.; Ros-Berruezo, G.; Rezgui, F.; Louaileche, H.; Kati, D.E. Effect of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion on encapsulated and nonencapsulated phenolic compounds of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) pulp extracts and their antioxidant capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Martins, A.; Barros, L.; Carvalho, A.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Fernandes, I.P.; Barreiro, F.; Ferreira, I.C. Phenolic extracts of Rubus ulmifolius Schott flowers: Characterization, microencapsulation and incorporation into yogurts as nutraceutical sources. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Caldas-Cueva, J.P.; Morales, P.; Ludeña, F.; Betalleluz-Pallardel, I.; Chirinos, R.; Noratto, G.; Campos, D. Stability of betacyanin pigments and antioxidants in ayrampo (Opuntia soehrensii Britton and Rose) seed extracts and as a yogurt natural colorant. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016, 40, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Foods 08 00429 g001 550
Figure 1. Changes during storage in the diameter of droplets of three multiple emulsions formulated with two polymers, arabic gum (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): GA40%-MD60% ( Foods 08 00429 i001), AG50%-MD50% ( Foods 08 00429 i002) and AG60%-MD40% ( Foods 08 00429 i003) during storage for 36 days.
Figure 1. Changes during storage in the diameter of droplets of three multiple emulsions formulated with two polymers, arabic gum (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): GA40%-MD60% ( Foods 08 00429 i001), AG50%-MD50% ( Foods 08 00429 i002) and AG60%-MD40% ( Foods 08 00429 i003) during storage for 36 days.
Foods 08 00429 g001
Foods 08 00429 g002 550
Figure 2. Content of total phenol (A), total flavonoids (B) and betalains; (C) of three multiple emulsions formulated with two polymers, arabic gum (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): AG40%-MD60% ( Foods 08 00429 i001), AG50%-MD50% ( Foods 08 00429 i002) and AG60%-MD40% ( Foods 08 00429 i003) during 36 days of storage.
Figure 2. Content of total phenol (A), total flavonoids (B) and betalains; (C) of three multiple emulsions formulated with two polymers, arabic gum (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): AG40%-MD60% ( Foods 08 00429 i001), AG50%-MD50% ( Foods 08 00429 i002) and AG60%-MD40% ( Foods 08 00429 i003) during 36 days of storage.
Foods 08 00429 g002
Foods 08 00429 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Antioxidant activity ABTS and (B) Antioxidant activity DPPH of three multiple emulsions formulated with two polymers, arabic gum (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): AG40%-MD60% ( Foods 08 00429 i001), AG50%-MD50% ( Foods 08 00429 i002) and AG60%-MD40% ( Foods 08 00429 i003) during 36 days.
Figure 3. (A) Antioxidant activity ABTS and (B) Antioxidant activity DPPH of three multiple emulsions formulated with two polymers, arabic gum (GA) and maltodextrin (MD): AG40%-MD60% ( Foods 08 00429 i001), AG50%-MD50% ( Foods 08 00429 i002) and AG60%-MD40% ( Foods 08 00429 i003) during 36 days.
Foods 08 00429 g003
Table
Table 1. Color parameters of L, a y b in different yogurts with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions during 36 days of storage.
Table 1. Color parameters of L, a y b in different yogurts with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions during 36 days of storage.
Days/YogurtsY0Y10Y20Y30
L
066.4 ± 0.2 cA66.5 ± 0.3 cA67.6 ± 0.3 cB68.8 ± 0.5 cC
1264.4 ± 0.4 cC62.7 ± 0.8 bB60.3 ± 0.2 bA60.8 ± 0.2 bA
2462.1 ± 0.2 bB61.9 ± 0.4 bB60.5 ± 0.4 bA60.0 ± 0.1 bA
3660.2 ± 0.1 aC59.9 ± 0.1 aC58.9 ± 0.1 aB58.5 ± 0.2 aA
a
0−1.2 ± 0.1 aA1.2 ± 0.05 bB1.6 ± 0.05 cC2.1 ± 0.01 cD
12−1.2 ± 0.05 aA1.2 ± 0.04 bB1.5 ± 0.02 bcC2.0 ± 0.12 bcD
24−0.2 ± 0.01 bA1.2 ± 0.03 bB1.4 ± 0.04 bC1.9 ± 0.09 bD
36−0.1 ± 0.03 bA1.1 ± 0.01 aB1.2 ± 0.03a C1.7 ± 0.03 aD
b
06.3 ± 0.05 aA7.3 ± 0.04 aB7.4 ± 0.02 aCD7.4 ± 0.02 aD
126.5 ± 0.5 aA8.1 ± 0.1 bC8.2 ± 0.2 bC7.7 ± 0.5 abBC
247.50.3 bA9.1 ± 0.1 cC8.8 ± 0.2 cC8.25 ± 0.1 bB
367.6 ± 0.1 bA9.31 ± 0.2 dD8.91 ± 0.1 cC8.35 ± 0.1 bB
Yogurt control without emulsion (Y), yogurt with 10% of emulsion (Y10), yogurt with 20% of emulsion (Y20) and yogurt with 30% of emulsion (Y30). Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the column (among time) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages. Different uppercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the row (among yogurts) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages.
Table
Table 2. Total phenols, flavonoids and total betalains in different yogurts added with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions during 36 days of storage.
Table 2. Total phenols, flavonoids and total betalains in different yogurts added with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions during 36 days of storage.
Days/YogurtsY0Y10Y20Y30
Total phenols (mg GAE/100 mL)
0ND17.9 ± 0.1 dA38.5 ± 0.4 dB50.7 ± 0.1 cC
12ND12.7 ± 0.2 cA20.1 ± 0.1 cB23.1 ± 0.1 bC
24ND7.7 ± 0.1 bA10.3 ± 0.5 bB14.5 ± 0.1 aC
36ND6.4 ± 0.2 aA8.6 ± 0.3 aB9.9 ± 0.2 aC
Flavonoids (mg QE/100 mL)
0ND19.9 ± 0.1 dA25.1 ± 0.5 cB23.8 ± 0.1 cC
12ND18.2 ± 0.2 cA21.1 ± 0.5 bB28.3 ± 0.3 bC
24ND16.8 ± 0.5 bA19.1 ± 0.3 aB26.1 ± 0.7 aC
36ND15.9 ± 0.2 aA18.5 ± 0.5 aB25.1 ± 0.5 aC
Total betalains (mg/100 mL)
0ND0.52 ± 0.01 cA1.1 ± 0.04 cB1.4 ± 0.06 bC
12ND0.5 ± 0.05 bcA1.0 ± 0.03 bB1.3 ± 0.04 bC
24ND0.5 ± 0.1 bcA0.9 ± 0.01 aB1.1 ± 0.1 aC
36ND0.46 ± 0.01 aA0.9 ± 0.02 aB1.0 ± 0.02 aC
Yogurt control without emulsion (Y), yogurt with 10% of emulsion (Y10), yogurt with 20% of emulsion (Y20) and yogurt with 30% of emulsion (Y30). Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the column (among time) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages. Different uppercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the row (among yogurts) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages. ND = no detected.
Table
Table 3. Antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) and lactic acid bacteria in different yogurts added with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions during 36 days of storage.
Table 3. Antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) and lactic acid bacteria in different yogurts added with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions during 36 days of storage.
Days/YogurtsY0Y10Y20Y30
ABTS (mg AAE/100 mL)
015.8 ± 1.6 bA15.8 ± 1.6 bA16.3 ± 1.4 cA21.0 ± 1.3 cB
121.8 ± 0.1 aA14.0 ± 0.5 bB14.7 ± 1.4 cB17.9 ± 0.3 bC
241.6 ± 0.1 aA10.1 ± 0.8 bA11.8 ± 0.6 bB16.8 ± 0.3 aC
361.6 ± 0.01 aA10.1 ± 1.4 aB9.1 ± 0.3 aB14.9 ± 0.3 aC
DPPH (mg AAE/100 mL)
02.1 ± 0.02 aA51.2 ± 0.2 dA52.7 ± 0.8 dB52.9 ± 0.3 cC
122.1 ± 0.04 aA18.2 ± 0.9 bB29.8 ± 0.2 cD26.1 ± 0.7 bC
242.0 ± 0.03 aA12.5 ± 01 aB17.7 ± 0.3 bC11.0 ± 1.9 aB
361.8 ± 0.1 bA11.1 ± 0.2 aC9.9 ± 0.3 aB9.3 ± 0.3 aB
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (CFU × 10 6 mL)
031.7 ± 0.6 cA31.3 ± 0.5 cA31.6 ± 0.7 cA31.3 ± 0.5 cA
1228.3 ± 1.5 bcC25.1 ± 0.1 bB24.6 ± 0.5 bB21.3 ± 0.6 bA
2425.3 ± 0.5 bc16.3 ± 1.1 aB13.4 ± 0.6 aA12.3 ± 0.5 aA
3618.3 ± 2.4 aC14.7 ± 1.5 aB12.6 ± 1.7 aA11.9 ± 0.7 aA
Yogurt control without emulsion (Y), yogurt with 10% of emulsion (Y10), yogurt with 20% of emulsion (Y20) and yogurt with 30% of emulsion (Y30). Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference (p <0.05) within the column (among time) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages. Different uppercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the row (among yogurts) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages. ND = no detected.
Table
Table 4. Total Phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) in different yogurts added with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions in vitro digestion.
Table 4. Total Phenols, flavonoids and antioxidant activities (ABTS and DPPH) in different yogurts added with different % (w/w) of multiple emulsions in vitro digestion.
YogurtsTotal Phenols (mg GAE/ 100 mL)Flavonoids (mg QE/100 mL)
Without treatmentGastric digestionIntestinal digestionWithout treatmentGastric digestionIntestinal digestion
Y0NDNDNDNDNDND
Y1019.9 ± 0.3 cA17.5 ± 0.1 bA16.4 ± 0.2 aA17.9 ± 0.3 bA18.2 ± 0.4 bA17.4 ± 0.2 aA
Y2039.6 ± 0.2 cB38.2 ± 0.1 bB37.1 ± 0.3 aB28.5 ± 0.5 bB28.9 ± 0.3 bB27.1 ± 0.4 aB
Y3051.9 ± 0.3 cC50.1 ± 0.2 bC49.2 ± 0.2 aC30.5 ± 0.2 bC31.1 ± 0.2 bC29.5 ± 0.3 aC
ABTS (mg AAE/100 mL)DPPH (mg AAE/100 mL)
Without treatmentGastric digestionIntestinal digestionWithout treatmentGastric digestionIntestinal digestion
Y01.8 ± 0.01 ANDND2.0 ± 0.02 ANDND
Y1015.76 ± 0.03 cA13.3 ± 0.03 bA10.7 ± 0.15 aA51.56 ± 0.01 cB49.5 ± 0.14 bA47.25 ± 0.06 aA
Y2016.3 ± 0.09 cB14.3 ± 0.14 bB12.1 ± 0.02 aB52.06 ± 0.02 cC50.11 ± 0.11 bB48.33 ± 0.11 aB
Y3021.0 ± 0.11 cC19.2 ± 0.07 bC16.3 ± 0.05 aC52.84 ± 0.05 cD51.68 ± 0.16 bC49.18 ± 0.08 aC
Yogurt control without emulsion (Y), yogurt with 10% of emulsion (Y10), yogurt with 20% of emulsion (Y20) and yogurt with 30% of emulsion (Y30). Different lowercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the row (among time) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages. Different uppercase letters represent a significant difference (p < 0.05) within the column (among yogurts) as determined by Tukey´s comparison of averages.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cenobio-Galindo, A.d.J.; Díaz-Monroy, G.; Medina-Pérez, G.; Franco-Fernández, M.J.; Ludeña-Urquizo, F.E.; Vieyra-Alberto, R.; Campos-Montiel, R.G. Multiple Emulsions with Extracts of Cactus Pear Added in A Yogurt: Antioxidant Activity, In Vitro Simulated Digestion and Shelf Life. Foods 2019, 8, 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100429

AMA Style

Cenobio-Galindo AdJ, Díaz-Monroy G, Medina-Pérez G, Franco-Fernández MJ, Ludeña-Urquizo FE, Vieyra-Alberto R, Campos-Montiel RG. Multiple Emulsions with Extracts of Cactus Pear Added in A Yogurt: Antioxidant Activity, In Vitro Simulated Digestion and Shelf Life. Foods. 2019; 8(10):429. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100429

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cenobio-Galindo, Antonio de Jesús, Gilberto Díaz-Monroy, Gabriela Medina-Pérez, M. Jesús Franco-Fernández, Fanny Emma Ludeña-Urquizo, Rodolfo Vieyra-Alberto, and Rafael Germán Campos-Montiel. 2019. "Multiple Emulsions with Extracts of Cactus Pear Added in A Yogurt: Antioxidant Activity, In Vitro Simulated Digestion and Shelf Life" Foods 8, no. 10: 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100429

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop