Turning Disposed into Disposable—Development of Single-Use Products from Underutilized Brewery Wastes
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Manufacturing of BSG/SY Materials
2.3. Thermooxidation of Vegetable Oils
2.4. Coating of Developed Materials with Vegetable Oils
2.5. Evaluation of Industrial Potential
2.6. Characterization
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Manufacturing and Appearance of BSG/SY Composite Materials
3.2. Physico-Mechanical Structure of BSG/SY Composite Materials
3.3. Surface Wettability of BSG/SY Composite Materials
3.4. Analysis of Oil Crosslinking
3.5. Surface Modification by Oils
3.6. Manufacturing of the Final Product—Disposable Plates
3.7. Limitations and Further Considerations for Potential Applications
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ATR | Attenuated total reflectance |
| BSG | Brewers’ spent grain |
| CA | Citric acid |
| DG | Degassing |
| DSC | Differential scanning calorimetry |
| EU | European Union |
| FTIR | Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy |
| NEBRs | Non-enzymatic browning reactions |
| SA | Succinic acid |
| SY | Spent yeast |
| TA | L-(+)-tartaric acid |
| TAG | Triacyloglycerol |
| TGA | Thermogravimetric analysis |
| WCA | Water contact angle |
References
- The Brewers of Europe. Beer Serves Europe—Let’s Treat It Right. Available online: https://brewersofeurope.eu/beer-serves-europe-lets-treat-it-right/ (accessed on 15 February 2026).
- Eurostat. EU Labour Market—Quarterly Statistics. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=EU_labour_market_-_quarterly_statistics (accessed on 15 February 2026).
- The Brewers of Europe. European Beer Trends. Statistic Report, 2024 Edition. Available online: https://brewersofeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/eu-beer-trends-2024-web.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2026).
- The Brewers of Europe. The Contribution Made by Beer to the European Economy. Available online: https://brewersofeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/economic-report-web.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2026).
- Mussatto, S.I.; Dragone, G.; Roberto, I.C. Brewers’ Spent Grain: Generation, Characteristics and Potential Applications. J. Cereal Sci. 2006, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A. More than Just a Beer—The Potential Applications of by-Products from Beer Manufacturing in Polymer Technology. Emergent Mater. 2022, 5, 765–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, L.; Wechsler, L.; Peltzer, M.A.; Ciannamea, E.M.; Ruseckaite, R.A.; Stefani, P.M. Sustainable Particleboards Based on Brewer’s Spent Grains. Polymers 2023, 16, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klímek, P.; Wimmer, R.; Kumar Mishra, P.; Kúdela, J. Utilizing Brewer’s-Spent-Grain in Wood-Based Particleboard Manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 812–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohit, H.; Arul Mozhi Selvan, V. A Comprehensive Review on Surface Modification, Structure Interface and Bonding Mechanism of Plant Cellulose Fiber Reinforced Polymer Based Composites. Compos. Interfaces 2018, 25, 629–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revert, A.; Reig, M.; Seguí, V.J.; Boronat, T.; Fombuena, V.; Balart, R. Upgrading Brewer’s Spent Grain as Functional Filler in Polypropylene Matrix. Polym. Compos. 2017, 38, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabrera-Álava, D.; Lazo, M.; Adrián, E.; Rigail-Cedeño, A.F. Processability Characteristics of Biocomposite from Recycled High-Density Polyethylene and Brewers’ Spent Grain. Macromol. Symp. 2024, 413, 2400017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zedler, Ł.; Colom, X.; Saeb, M.R.; Formela, K. Preparation and Characterization of Natural Rubber Composites Highly Filled with Brewers’ Spent Grain/Ground Tire Rubber Hybrid Reinforcement. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 145, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Mirkin, S.; Park, H.E. Biodegradable Composite Film of Brewers’ Spent Grain and Poly (Vinyl Alcohol). Processes 2023, 11, 2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Luca, S.; Mueller, K.; Tomei, L.; Gallichi Nottiani, D.; Milanese, D.; Sciancalepore, C. Brewer’s Spent Grains as Alternative Ligno-Cellulosic Filler for the Preparation of Bio-Based Polymer Composites. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2025, 2025, 5060184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visco, A.; Scolaro, C.; Oliveri, F.; Ruta, A.J. Mathematical Modelling of Tensile Mechanical Behavior of a Bio-Composite Based on Polybutylene-Succinate and Brewer Spent Grains. Polymers 2024, 16, 2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A. Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Brewers’ Spent Grain Composites—The Impact of Filler Treatment on the Mechanical Performance. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M.; Kosmela, P.; Mysiukiewicz, O.; Sulima, P.; Przyborowski, J.A.; Kowalkowska-Zedler, D. Mater-Bi/Brewers’ Spent Grain Biocomposites—Novel Approach to Plant-Based Waste Filler Treatment by Highly Efficient Thermomechanical and Chemical Methods. Materials 2022, 15, 7099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M.; Kosmela, P.; Mysiukiewicz, O.; Aniśko, J.; Sulima, P.; Andrzej Przyborowski, J.; Reza Saeb, M. The Impact of Thermomechanical and Chemical Treatment of Waste Brewers’ Spent Grain and Soil Biodegradation of Sustainable Mater-Bi-Based Biocomposites. Waste Manag. 2022, 154, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castanho, M.N.; de Souza do Prado, K.; de Paiva, J.M.F. Developing Thermoplastic Corn Starch Composites Filled with Brewer’s Spent Grain for Applications in Biodegradable Films. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbu, M.C.; Montecuccoli, Z.; Förg, J.; Barbeck, U.; Klímek, P.; Petutschnigg, A.; Tudor, E.M. Potential of Brewer’s Spent Grain as a Potential Replacement of Wood in PMDI, UF or MUF Bonded Particleboard. Polymers 2021, 13, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarupan, L.; Kruakam, C.; Bumbudsanpharoke, N. Valorization of Brewer’s Spent Grains to Produce Nutrient Biodegradable Plant Pot. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2024, 26, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baiano, A.; Fiore, A. Development and Characterization of Brewers’ Spent Grain-Based Materials. Circ. Econ. 2025, 4, 100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M.; Kosmela, P.; Aniśko, J.; Szulc, J.; Skórczewska, K.; Piasecki, A.; Kuang, T. More than Just a Beer—Brewers’ Spent Grain, Spent Hops, and Spent Yeast as Potential Functional Fillers for Polymer Composites. Waste Manag. 2024, 180, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M.; Kosmela, P.; Aniśko, J.; Piasecki, A.; Saeb, M.R. Two in One: Combining Brewers’ Spent Grain and Spent Yeast as Functional Fillers for Sustainable Polymer Composites to Maximize the Resource Efficiency of Brewing By-Products. Cellulose 2025, 32, 6049–6066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Hamed, U.; Seddighi, H.; Thomas, K. Economic Returns of Using Brewery`s Spent Grain in Animal Feed. Int. Sch. Sci. Res. Innov. 2011, 5, 142–145. [Google Scholar]
- Henkin, J.M.; Mainali, K.; Sharma, B.K.; Yadav, M.P.; Ngo, H.; Sarker, M.I. A Review of Chemical and Physical Analysis, Processing, and Repurposing of Brewers’ Spent Grain. Biomass 2025, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M. Sposób Wytwarzania Biodegradowalnych Kształtek z Wykorzystaniem Niemodyfikowanych Drożdży Jako Spoiwa. Polish Patent Application P.451623, 28 March 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Kadimaliev, D.; Telyatnik, V.; Revin, V.; Parshin, A.; Allahverdi, S.; Gunduz, G.; Kezina, E.; Asik, N. Optimization of the Conditions Required for Chemical and Biological Modification of the Yeast Waste from Beer Manufacturing to Produce Adhesive Compositions. Bioresources 2012, 7, 1984–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dudeja, I.; Mankoo, R.K.; Singh, A.; Kaur, J. Citric Acid: An Ecofriendly Cross-Linker for the Production of Functional Biopolymeric Materials. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2023, 36, 101307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Król, K.; Gantner, M. Morphological Traits and Chemical Composition of Hazelnut from Different Geographical Origins: A Review. Agriculture 2020, 10, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, I.; Sousa, A.; Morais, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Bento, A.; Estevinho, L.; Pereira, J.A. Chemical Composition, and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Three Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) Cultivars. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 1801–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duman, E.; Özcan, M.M. The Influence of Industrial Refining Stages on the Physico-Chemical Properties, Fatty Acid Composition and Sterol Contents in Hazelnut Oil. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2501–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Król, K.; Gantner, M.; Piotrowska, A. The Quality Characteristic and Fatty Acid Profile of Cold-Pressed Hazelnut Oils during Nine Months of Storage. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavarini, S.; Castagna, A.; Conte, G.; Foschi, L.; Sanmartin, C.; Incrocci, L.; Ranieri, A.; Serra, A.; Angelini, L.G. Evaluation of Chemical Composition of Two Linseed Varieties as Sources of Health-Beneficial Substances. Molecules 2019, 24, 3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Symoniuk, E.; Ratusz, K.; Krygier, K. Oxidative Stability and the Chemical Composition of Market Cold-Pressed Linseed Oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2017, 119, 1700055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, S.; Khalid, N.; Ahmed, I.; Shahzad, A.; Suleria, H.A.R. Physicochemical Characteristics, Functional Properties, and Nutritional Benefits of Peanut Oil: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1562–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, M.; Wen, X.; Zhao, J.; Liu, F.; Ni, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, J. Effect of Industrial Chemical Refining on the Physicochemical Properties and the Bioactive Minor Components of Peanut Oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2016, 93, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Li, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, C.; Xue, Y. Effect of Roasting on the Chemical Components of Peanut Oil. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 125, 109249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Almeida Vittori Gouveia, L.; Zago, L.; Seixas Bello Moreira, A. Physical-Chemical Characterization and Nutritional Quality of Sesame Oil (Sesamum indicum L.). J. Nutr. Health Food Sci. 2017, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Kheirati Rounizi, S.; Akrami Mohajeri, F.; Moshtaghi Broujeni, H.; Pourramezani, F.; Jambarsang, S.; Kiani, H.; Khalili Sadrabad, E. The Chemical Composition and Heavy Metal Content of Sesame Oil Produced by Different Methods: A Risk Assessment Study. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 2886–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, J.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L.; Wang, N.; Wang, X. Effect of Roasting Treatment on the Chemical Composition of Sesame Oil. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 101, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castelo-Branco, V.N.; Santana, I.; Di-Sarli, V.O.; Freitas, S.P.; Torres, A.G. Antioxidant Capacity Is a Surrogate Measure of the Quality and Stability of Vegetable Oils. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2016, 118, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamas, D.L.; Crapiste, G.H.; Constenla, D.T. Changes in Quality and Composition of Sunflower Oil during Enzymatic Degumming Process. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 58, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muttagi, G.C.; Joshi, N. Physico-Chemical Composition of Selected Sunflower Seed Cultivars. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2020, 8, 2095–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosa, P.M.; Antoniassi, R.; Freitas, S.C.; Bizzo, H.R.; Zanotto, D.L.; Oliveira, M.F.; Castiglion, V.B.R. Chemical Composition of Brazilian Sunflower Varieties. Helia 2009, 32, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, P.; Liu, R.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Effects of Processing Methods on the Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Oil. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 135, 109958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, P.; Jin, J.; Liu, R.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Chemical Compositions of Walnut (Juglans regia L.) Oils from Different Cultivated Regions in China. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2018, 95, 825–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharibzahedi, S.M.T.; Mousavi, S.M.; Hamedi, M.; Khodaiyan, F. Determination and Characterization of Kernel Biochemical Composition and Functional Compounds of Persian Walnut Oil. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 845:2006; Cellular Plastics and Rubbers—Determination of Apparent Density. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
- ASTM D790-17; Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
- ISO 868:2003; Plastics and Ebonite—Determination of Indentation Hardness by Means of a Durometer (Shore Hardness). International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
- Yao, G.-Y.; Chen, X.-P.; Long, Z.-Y.; Du, X.-B.; Liang, J.-Z.; Wei, X.-J.; Wang, L.-L. The Non-Enzymatic Browning of Pine Bark during Thermal Treatment: Color and Chemical Changes, Color Kinetics and Insights into Mechanisms. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 204, 117289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, A.; Mikes, F.; Bühler, S.; Matsakas, L. Valorization of Brewers’ Spent Grain for the Production of Lipids by Oleaginous Yeast. Molecules 2018, 23, 3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, E.; Teixeira, J.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Valorization of Brewers’ Spent Grain and Spent Yeast through Protein Hydrolysates with Antioxidant Properties. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 242, 1975–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, K.M.; Steffen, E.J.; Arendt, E.K. Brewers’ Spent Grain: A Review with an Emphasis on Food and Health. J. Inst. Brew. 2016, 122, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemli, G.; Aydın, I.; Zekoviç, E. Evaluation of Some of the Properties of Particleboard as Function of Manufacturing Parameters. Mater. Des. 2007, 28, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A.; Cieśliński, H.; Skórczewska, K.; Kosmela, P.; Aniśko-Michalak, J.; Piasecki, A.; Barczewski, M. The Impact of Brewers’ Spent Grain Type on the Structure and Performance of Poly(ε-Caprolactone)-Based Composites. Cellulose 2025, 32, 8283–8307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borrelli, R.C.; Visconti, A.; Mennella, C.; Anese, M.; Fogliano, V. Chemical Characterization and Antioxidant Properties of Coffee Melanoidins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6527–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, F.; Tian, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X.; Wang, D.; Fatehi, P. Cellulose Fiber Drainage Improvement via Citric Acid Crosslinking. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 281, 136338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, A.P.C.; Saraiva, J.N.; Cavaco, G.; Portela, R.P.; Leal, C.R.; Sobral, R.G.; Almeida, P.L. Crosslinked Bacterial Cellulose Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2022, 177, 111438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csiszár, E.; Herceg, I.; Fekete, E. Effect of Heating and Citric Acid on the Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystal Thin Films. Polymers 2023, 15, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbooti, M.M.; Al-Sammerrai, D.A. Thermal Decomposition of Citric Acid. Thermochim. Acta 1986, 98, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czégény, Z.; Bozi, J.; Sebestyén, Z.; Blazsó, M.; Jakab, E.; Barta-Rajnai, E.; Forster, M.; Nicol, J.; McAdam, K.G.; Liu, C. Thermal Behaviour of Selected Flavour Ingredients and Additives under Simulated Cigarette Combustion and Tobacco Heating Conditions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2016, 121, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caires, F.J.; Lima, L.S.; Carvalho, C.T.; Ionashiro, M. Thermal Behaviour of Succinic Acid, Sodium Succinate and Its Compounds with Some Bivalent Transition Metal Ions. Thermochim. Acta 2010, 500, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemli, G.; Öztürk, İ. Influences of Some Factors on the Formaldehyde Content of Particleboard. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 770–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dukarska, D.; Rogoziński, T.; Antov, P.; Kristak, L.; Kmieciak, J. Characterisation of Wood Particles Used in the Particleboard Production as a Function of Their Moisture Content. Materials 2021, 15, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, M.S.; Phong, N.T.; Noh, S.; Joe, E.-N.; Nam, W.J.; Lee, J.; Kang, K.H.; Kim, Y.M.; Um, Y.; Jeon, J.-R. Three-Dimensional Biomass Composites Using the Maillard Reaction Products of Molasses as a Binder. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 1559–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choupani Chaydarreh, K.; Lin, X.; Guan, L.; Hu, C. Interaction between Particle Size and Mixing Ratio on Porosity and Properties of Tea Oil Camellia (Camellia oleifera Abel.) Shells-Based Particleboard. J. Wood Sci. 2022, 68, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, H.; Zaaba, N.F. The Mechanical Properties, Water Resistance and Degradation Behaviour of Silica-Filled Sago Starch/PVA Plastic Films. J. Elastomers Plast. 2014, 46, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azeredo, H.M.C.; Morrugares-Carmona, R.; Wellner, N.; Cross, K.; Bajka, B.; Waldron, K.W. Development of Pectin Films with Pomegranate Juice and Citric Acid. Food Chem. 2016, 198, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, A.; Uppaluri, R.; Das, C. Feasibility of Poly-Vinyl Alcohol/Starch/Glycerol/Citric Acid Composite Films for Wound Dressing Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 998–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuller, M.; Or, D. Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Structured Porous Media: A Review of Liquid Configuration–Based Models. Vadose Zone J. 2002, 1, 14–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, C.; Altgen, M.; Rautkari, L. Thermal Modification of Wood—A Review: Chemical Changes and Hygroscopicity. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 6581–6614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazachi, A.; Astrath, N.G.C.; Savi, E.L.; Malacarne, L.C.; Baesso, M.L.; Torquato, A.S.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Lukasievicz, G.V.B.; Herculano, L.S. Spectroscopic and Chemometric Analysis and Oil Stability Index Characterization of Thermo-oxidized Edible Vegetable Oils. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2024, 126, 2300204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kmiecik, D.; Fedko, M.; Rudzińska, M.; Siger, A.; Gramza-Michałowska, A.; Kobus-Cisowska, J. Thermo-Oxidation of Phytosterol Molecules in Rapeseed Oil during Heating: The Impact of Unsaturation Level of the Oil. Foods 2020, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yuan, L.; Meng, X.; Xin, K.; Ju, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, C.; Hu, L. A Comparative Study on Classification of Edible Vegetable Oils by Infrared, near Infrared and Fluorescence Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometrics. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 288, 122120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohman, A.; Che Man, Y.B. Application of FTIR Spectroscopy for Monitoring the Stabilities of Selected Vegetable Oils During Thermal Oxidation. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013, 16, 1594–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozulku, G.; Yildirim, R.M.; Toker, O.S.; Karasu, S.; Durak, M.Z. Rapid Detection of Adulteration of Cold Pressed Sesame Oil Adultered with Hazelnut, Canola, and Sunflower Oils Using ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy Combined with Chemometric. Food Control 2017, 82, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sim, S.F.; Ting, W. An Automated Approach for Analysis of Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectra of Edible Oils. Talanta 2012, 88, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furlan, P.Y.; Wetzel, P.; Johnson, S.; Wedin, J.; Och, A. Investigating the Oxidation of Biodiesel from Used Vegetable Oil by FTIR Spectroscopy: Used Vegetable Oil Biodiesel Oxidation Study by FTIR. Spectrosc. Lett. 2010, 43, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, M.; Chen, J.; Jing, B.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Y.; Yu, X. Analysis of Reaction Kinetics of Edible Oil Oxidation at Ambient Temperature by FTIR Spectroscopy. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2020, 122, 1900302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daoud, S.; Bou-maroun, E.; Dujourdy, L.; Waschatko, G.; Billecke, N.; Cayot, P. Fast and Direct Analysis of Oxidation Levels of Oil-in-Water Emulsions Using ATR-FTIR. Food Chem. 2019, 293, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayati, I.N.; Man, Y.B.C.; Tan, C.P.; Aini, I.N. Monitoring Peroxide Value in Oxidized Emulsions by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2005, 107, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.P.; Che Man, Y.B. Recent Developments in Differential Scanning Calorimetry for Assessing Oxidative Deterioration of Vegetable Oils. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Wei, Y.; Guan, N.; Li, B.; Wang, Y. Changes in Chemical Composition of Flaxseed Oil during Thermal-Induced Oxidation and Resultant Effect on DSC Thermal Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 7135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajagukguk, Y.V.; Utcu, M.A.; Islam, M.; Muzolf-Panek, M.; Tomaszewska-Gras, J. Authenticity Assessment from Sesame Seeds to Oil and Sesame Products of Various Origin by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Molecules 2022, 27, 7496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fediuc, G.; Spinei, M.; Oroian, M. Cold-Pressed Walnut-Oil Adulteration with Edible Oils Detection Using Vis-NIR Spectroscopy. Foods 2025, 14, 3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calligaris, S.; Arrighetti, G.; Barba, L.; Nicoli, M.C. Phase Transition of Sunflower Oil as Affected by the Oxidation Level. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2008, 85, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiavaro, E.; Vittadini, E.; Rodriguez-Estrada, M.T.; Cerretani, L.; Bendini, A. Differential Scanning Calorimeter Application to the Detectionof Refined Hazelnut Oil in Extra Virgin Olive Oil. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazzari, M.; Chiantore, O. Drying and Oxidative Degradation of Linseed Oil. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 65, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, N.; Gao, Y.; Yu, X. The Formation, Determination and Health Implications of Polar Compounds in Edible Oils: Current Status, Challenges and Perspectives. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.P.; Che Man, Y.B. Differential Scanning Calorimetric Analysis of Edible Oils: Comparison of Thermal Properties and Chemical Composition. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2000, 77, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiavaro, E.; Rodriguez-Estrada, M.T.; Bendini, A.; Rinaldi, M.; Cerretani, L. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Thermal Properties and Oxidative Stability Indices of Microwave Heated Extra Virgin Olive Oils. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M.; Skórczewska, K.; Szulc, J.; Chmielnicki, B.; Korol, J.; Formela, K. Sustainable Upcycling of Brewers’ Spent Grain by Thermo-Mechanical Treatment in Twin-Screw Extruder. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tena, J.; Fueyo, N. A Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Predicting Food Browning through Melanoidin Kinetics during Baking. J. Food Eng. 2026, 407, 112826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starowicz, M.; Ostaszyk, A.; Zieliński, H. The Relationship between the Browning Index, Total Phenolics, Color, and Antioxidant Activity of Polish-Originated Honey Samples. Foods 2021, 10, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marć, M.; Rutkowska, M.; Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M. Biocomposites from Recycled Resources as Candidates for Laboratory Reference Material to Validate Analytical Tools Used in Organic Compounds Emissions Investigation. Build. Environ. 2022, 219, 109259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marć, M.; Namieśnik, J.; Zabiegała, B. The Miniaturised Emission Chamber System and Home-Made Passive Flux Sampler Studies of Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons Emissions from Selected Commercially-Available Floor Coverings. Build. Environ. 2017, 123, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, M.; Chen, C.; Song, J.; Ni, Y.; Xiang, B.; Zou, J.; Xu, D. Safety of plant fiber-based food contact materials: Overview of the discovery, identification, detection and risk assessment of unknown risk substances. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2024, 43, 101281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habschied, K.; Krstanović, V.; Mastanjević, K. The Importance of Cleaning and Sanitation in Homebrewing. Beverages 2024, 10, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciont, C.; Epuran, A.; Kerezsi, A.D.; Coldea, T.E.; Mudura, E.; Pasqualone, A.; Zhao, H.; Suharoschi, R.; Vriesekoop, F.; Pop, O.L. Beer Safety: New Challenges and Future Trends within Craft and Large-Scale Production. Foods 2022, 11, 2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chetrariu, A.; Dabija, A. Spent Grain: A Functional Ingredient for Food Applications. Foods 2023, 12, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hejna, A.; Szulc, J.; Błaszak, B. Brewers’ spent grain—Simply waste or potential ingredient of functional food? Żywność Nauka Technol. Jakość 2023, 30, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyhan, L.; Sahin, A.W.; Schmitz, H.H.; Siegel, J.B.; Arendt, E.K. Brewers’ Spent Grain: An Unprecedented Opportunity to Develop Sustainable Plant-Based Nutrition Ingredients Addressing Global Malnutrition Challenges. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 10543–10564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aradwad, P.; Raut, S.; Abdelfattah, A.; Rauh, C.; Sturm, B. Brewer’s spent grain: Unveiling innovative applications in the food and packaging industry. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devnani, B.; Moran, G.C.; Grossmann, L. Extraction, Composition, Functionality, and Utilization of Brewer’s Spent Grain Protein in Food Formulations. Foods 2023, 12, 1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, A.; Arendt, E.K.; Zannini, E.; Sahin, A.W. Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product. Fermentation 2020, 6, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, A.S.; Odila Pereira, J.; Ferreira, C.; Faustino, M.; Durão, J.; Pereira, A.M.; Oliveira, C.M.; Pintado, M.E.; Carvalho, A.P. Spent Yeast Valorization for Food Applications: Effect of Different Extraction Methodologies. Foods 2022, 11, 4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vieira, E.; Cunha, S.C.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. Characterization of a Potential Bioactive Food Ingredient from Inner Cellular Content of Brewer’s Spent Yeast. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 3235–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brassesco, M.E.; Paupério, A.; Pereira, C.D.; Ferreira, J.P.; Pintado, M. Peptide-Rich Yeast Fractions from Brewer’s Spent Yeast: A Scalable Fractionation Approach and Their Functional Application in Bakery Products. Foods 2025, 14, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

















| Oil | Saturated Fatty Acids | Monounsaturated Fatty Acids | Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids | Acid Value, mg KOH/g | Peroxide Value, meq O2/kg Oil | Refs. | Viscosity, mPa·s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazelnut | 7.0–15.6 | 77.8–87.1 | 1.9–15.1 | 0.14–3.26 | 0.28–12.50 | [30,31,32,33] | 49.0 ± 0.3 |
| Linseed | 5.7–11.1 | 11.2–23.7 | 65.3–81.8 | 0.53–3.15 | 1.23–4.50 | [34,35] | 30.8 ± 0.3 |
| Peanut | 20.9–22.0 | 41.7–44.8 | 34.3–36.2 | 0.09–2.19 | 0.33–7.72 | [36,37,38] | 51.6 ± 0.4 |
| Sesame | 14.7–18.2 | 35.5–41.6 | 40.8–49.1 | 0.75–3.68 | 0.92–8.99 | [39,40,41] | 42.3 ± 0.3 |
| Sunflower | 9.6–10.1 | 20.7–26.5 | 62.8–69.6 | 0.24–4.10 | 1.03–5.38 | [42,43,44,45] | 39.5 ± 0.3 |
| Walnut | 4.1–13.6 | 12.8–25.4 | 61.8–77.7 | 0.05–0.58 | 1.12–3.10 | [46,47,48] | 34.6 ± 0.3 |
| Sample | Content, wt% | Initial Moisture Content, wt% | Water to Dry Solids Ratio | Targeted Density, kg/m3 | Temperature, °C | Pressure, bar | Time, s | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSG | SY | CA | SA | TA | |||||||
| 1 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 620 | 200 | 20 | 10 |
| 2 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 620 | 200 | 20 | 20 |
| 3 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 620 | 200 | 20 | 30 |
| 4 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 620 | 200 | 20 | 60 |
| 5 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 620 | 200 | 20 | 120 |
| 6 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 620 | 200 | 20 | 180 |
| 7 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 723 | 200 | 20 | 120 |
| 8 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 826 | 200 | 20 | 120 |
| 9 | 75 | 25 | - | - | - | 28.38 | 1:2.52 | 930 | 200 | 20 | 120 |
| 10 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 930 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| 11 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 930 | 200 | 20 | 30 |
| 12 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 930 | 220 | 20 | 30 |
| 13 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 930 | 200 | 25 | 30 |
| 14 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 930 | 200 | 30 | 30 |
| 15 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1240 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| 16 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1240 | 200 | 20 | 30 |
| 17 | 85 | 15 | - | - | - | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1240 | 220 | 20 | 30 |
| 18 | 92.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 15.51 | 1:5.45 | 1240 | 200 | 20 | 30 |
| 19 | 92.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 15.51 | 1:5.45 | 1240 | 200 | 25 | 30 |
| 20 | 92.5 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 15.51 | 1:5.45 | 1240 | 200 | 30 | 30 |
| 21 | 82.87 | 14.63 | 2.5 | - | - | 20.51 | 1:3.88 | 1240 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| 22 | 80.75 | 14.25 | 5.0 | - | - | 19.98 | 1:4.00 | 1240 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| 23 | 76.50 | 13.50 | 10.0 | - | - | 18.94 | 1:4.28 | 1240 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| 24 | 80.75 | 14.25 | - | 5.0 | - | 19.98 | 1:4.01 | 1240 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| 25 | 80.75 | 14.25 | - | - | 5.0 | 19.98 | 1:4.01 | 1240 | 180 | 20 | 30 |
| Sample | Content, wt% | Initial Moisture Content, wt% | Water to Dry Solids Ratio | Targeted Density, kg/m3 | Temperature, °C | Pressure, bar | Procedure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSG | SY | |||||||
| 1 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 860 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 15 s (total 50 s) |
| 2 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 945 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → (DG) → 30 s → DG → 15 s (50 s) |
| 3 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1030 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → (DG) → 30 s → DG → 15 s (50 s) |
| 4 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1030 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (65 s) |
| 5 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1084 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (65 s) |
| 6 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1140 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (65 s) |
| 7 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1204 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (65 s) |
| 8 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1290 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (65 s) |
| 9 | 85 | 15 | 21.03 | 1:3.76 | 1290 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 60 s (95 s) |
| 10 | 90 | 10 | 17.35 | 1:4.76 | 1290 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 60 s (95 s) |
| 11 | 90 | 10 | 17.35 | 1:4.76 | 1375 | 180 | 130 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (97 s) |
| 12 | 90 | 10 | 17.35 | 1:4.76 | 1375 | 180 | 210 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (97 s) |
| 13 | 90 | 10 | 17.35 | 1:4.76 | 1375 | 200 | 210 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (97 s) |
| 14 | 90 | 10 | 17.35 | 1:4.76 | 1460 | 200 | 210 | 1 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s → DG → 30 s (97 s) |
| Oil | Aging Time, Days | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
| Hazelnut | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Linseed | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Peanut | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Sesame | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Sunflower | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Walnut | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Oil | Aging Time, Days | Color Parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | Chroma | Hue, ° | BI | ||
| Hazelnut | 0 | 82.29 ± 0.62 | −0.23 ± 0.11 | 0.59 ± 0.29 | 0.64 ± 0.30 | 65.88 ± 11.24 | −0.13 ± 0.08 |
| Linseed | 74.98 ± 1.75 | −0.02 ± 0.31 | 5.07 ± 1.36 | 5.08 ± 1.37 | 87.39 ± 1.09 | 0.65 ± 0.28 | |
| Peanut | 82.84 ± 0.15 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | −1.94 ± 0.05 | 2.03 ± 0.05 | 73.29 ± 0.70 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | |
| Sesame | 75.58 ± 2.48 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | 0.66 ± 0.20 | 0.72 ± 0.19 | 65.65 ± 8.32 | 0.36 ± 0.09 | |
| Sunflower | 81.83 ± 0.90 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | −1.19 ± 0.27 | 1.25 ± 0.28 | 72.93 ± 3.43 | 0.18 ± 0.06 | |
| Walnut | 77.52 ± 2.30 | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.21 ± 0.49 | 0.55 ± 0.22 | 52.38 ± 12.51 | 0.31 ± 0.08 | |
| Treatment at 120 °C | |||||||
| Hazelnut | 3 | 82.09 ± 0.43 | 0.56 ± 0.01 | −1.75 ± 0.06 | 1.83 ± 0.05 | 72.13 ± 0.79 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
| 7 | 70.39 ± 0.90 | −1.27 ± 0.11 | 39.08 ± 2.96 | 39.10 ± 2.96 | 88.12 ± 0.26 | 4.25 ± 0.52 | |
| 14 | 64.10 ± 1.27 | 7.81 ± 1.41 | 59.45 ± 5.05 | 59.96 ± 5.18 | 82.56 ± 0.79 | 18.30 ± 2.25 | |
| Linseed | 3 | 63.29 ± 2.20 | 9.36 ± 0.73 | 59.63 ± 4.43 | 60.36 ± 4.46 | 81.08 ± 0.43 | 20.28 ± 1.05 |
| 7 | 62.03 ± 2.08 | 21.77 ± 3.48 | 58.43 ± 6.02 | 62.45 ± 5.90 | 69.47 ± 3.37 | 33.94 ± 3.43 | |
| 14 | 46.16 ± 4.62 | 27.65 ± 5.40 | 58.18 ± 3.73 | 64.64 ± 3.26 | 64.59 ± 5.05 | 53.52 ± 8.13 | |
| Peanut | 3 | 82.45 ± 2.29 | 0.41 ± 0.17 | 1.44 ± 0.46 | 1.51 ± 0.45 | 72.89 ± 7.48 | 0.53 ± 0.15 |
| 7 | 72.80 ± 3.91 | −1.36 ± 0.45 | 14.15 ± 3.42 | 14.23 ± 3.40 | 84.20 ± 2.49 | 0.58 ± 0.71 | |
| 14 | 70.31 ± 0.65 | 0.09 ± 0.79 | 50.16 ± 4.05 | 50.17 ± 4.05 | 89.20 ± 0.38 | 7.33 ± 1.29 | |
| Sesame | 3 | 82.33 ± 0.52 | 0.40 ± 0.19 | −0.50 ± 0.17 | 0.66 ± 0.20 | 54.21 ± 17.55 | 0.29 ± 0.16 |
| 7 | 66.43 ± 0.55 | 9.30 ± 0.51 | 70.30 ± 3.31 | 70.92 ± 3.35 | 82.47 ± 0.08 | 21.04 ± 1.27 | |
| 14 | 65.63 ± 1.55 | 14.37 ± 4.36 | 82.80 ± 3.73 | 84.11 ± 4.42 | 80.27 ± 2.48 | 28.93 ± 5.91 | |
| Sunflower | 3 | 72.75 ± 0.24 | −1.41 ± 0.15 | 39.28 ± 0.65 | 39.30 ± 0.66 | 87.95 ± 0.20 | 4.00 ± 0.10 |
| 7 | 65.81 ± 1.61 | 9.96 ± 1.32 | 73.19 ± 2.79 | 73.88 ± 2.72 | 82.23 ± 1.14 | 22.47 ± 1.91 | |
| 14 | 62.38 ± 0.77 | 21.56 ± 1.38 | 85.60 ± 1.63 | 88.28 ± 1.73 | 75.86 ± 0.80 | 38.68 ± 1.93 | |
| Walnut | 3 | 65.56 ± 2.04 | 1.46 ± 0.37 | 50.41 ± 3.62 | 50.43 ± 3.63 | 88.35 ± 0.33 | 9.43 ± 0.68 |
| 7 | 62.61 ± 0.64 | 12.67 ± 0.47 | 51.37 ± 1.41 | 52.91 ± 1.35 | 76.13 ± 0.68 | 22.73 ± 0.66 | |
| 14 | 53.19 ± 1.67 | 19.21 ± 4.02 | 56.11 ± 4.01 | 59.41 ± 4.42 | 71.17 ± 3.56 | 35.97 ± 5.80 | |
| Treatment at 100 °C | |||||||
| Linseed | 3 | 75.99 ± 3.96 | −0.89 ± 2.60 | 48.17 ± 4.71 | 48.24 ± 4.69 | 86.95 ± 0.98 | 5.46 ± 2.33 |
| 7 | 66.20 ± 5.27 | 5.34 ± 3.83 | 51.82 ± 6.78 | 52.18 ± 7.06 | 84.36 ± 3.54 | 14.00 ± 5.79 | |
| 14 | 63.54 ± 4.59 | 11.22 ± 2.86 | 56.13 ± 7.27 | 57.28 ± 7.50 | 78.74 ± 2.21 | 21.69 ± 4.03 | |
| Sunflower | 3 | 75.27 ± 1.49 | −0.46 ± 0.14 | 1.60 ± 1.04 | 1.68 ± 1.02 | 68.01 ± 14.52 | −0.22 ± 0.03 |
| 7 | 78.05 ± 1.19 | −2.73 ± 0.31 | 33.18 ± 3.64 | 33.30 ± 3.60 | 85.19 ± 1.09 | 1.68 ± 0.76 | |
| 14 | 75.00 ± 0.76 | −1.59 ± 0.34 | 49.87 ± 2.89 | 49.90 ± 2.87 | 88.15 ± 0.53 | 5.16 ± 0.78 | |
| Walnut | 3 | 86.96 ± 7.18 | −2.49 ± 0.62 | 19.64 ± 6.34 | 19.80 ± 6.36 | 82.51 ± 1.31 | 0.13 ± 0.45 |
| 7 | 71.26 ± 2.62 | −0.65 ± 0.85 | 51.12 ± 4.23 | 51.14 ± 4.22 | 89.01 ± 0.77 | 6.58 ± 1.34 | |
| 14 | 69.55 ± 2.60 | 4.26 ± 2.03 | 58.88 ± 3.49 | 59.06 ± 3.48 | 85.85 ± 2.01 | 13.14 ± 2.46 | |
| Treatment at 80 °C | |||||||
| Linseed | 3 | 78.05 ± 1.56 | −3.00 ± 1.51 | 41.25 ± 4.04 | 41.38 ± 4.06 | 85.84 ± 2.00 | 2.46 ± 1.46 |
| 7 | 67.76 ± 4.16 | 0.19 ± 1.62 | 42.66 ± 3.03 | 42.69 ± 3.04 | 88.19 ± 1.01 | 6.66 ± 2.33 | |
| 14 | 66.07 ± 3.25 | 2.63 ± 1.23 | 46.86 ± 5.56 | 46.94 ± 5.59 | 86.86 ± 1.35 | 10.10 ± 2.05 | |
| Sunflower | 3 | 75.10 ± 1.44 | −0.08 ± 0.11 | −1.53 ± 0.34 | 1.54 ± 0.34 | 85.01 ± 3.40 | −0.26 ± 0.10 |
| 7 | 79.94 ± 0.55 | −0.82 ± 0.09 | 7.41 ± 0.43 | 7.45 ± 0.44 | 83.74 ± 0.41 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | |
| 14 | 76.98 ± 0.78 | −3.52 ± 0.32 | 31.50 ± 1.70 | 31.70 ± 1.66 | 83.58 ± 0.91 | 0.72 ± 0.53 | |
| Walnut | 3 | 74.64 ± 0.94 | −0.29 ± 0.14 | 2.23 ± 0.69 | 2.25 ± 0.70 | 82.94 ± 2.14 | 0.01 ± 0.06 |
| 7 | 76.94 ± 3.60 | −3.55 ± 0.75 | 30.36 ± 3.30 | 30.57 ± 3.31 | 83.33 ± 1.33 | 0.56 ± 0.69 | |
| 14 | 73.87 ± 1.88 | −1.77 ± 0.44 | 38.23 ± 3.74 | 38.27 ± 3.74 | 87.35 ± 0.62 | 3.43 ± 0.56 | |
| Thermal treatment at 80 °C | ||||
| Oil | Aging time, days | |||
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
| Linseed | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Sunflower | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Walnut | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Thermal treatment at 100 °C | ||||
| Oil | Aging time, days | |||
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
| Linseed | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Sunflower | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Walnut | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Hejna, A.; Barczewski, M. Turning Disposed into Disposable—Development of Single-Use Products from Underutilized Brewery Wastes. Foods 2026, 15, 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15050860
Hejna A, Barczewski M. Turning Disposed into Disposable—Development of Single-Use Products from Underutilized Brewery Wastes. Foods. 2026; 15(5):860. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15050860
Chicago/Turabian StyleHejna, Aleksander, and Mateusz Barczewski. 2026. "Turning Disposed into Disposable—Development of Single-Use Products from Underutilized Brewery Wastes" Foods 15, no. 5: 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15050860
APA StyleHejna, A., & Barczewski, M. (2026). Turning Disposed into Disposable—Development of Single-Use Products from Underutilized Brewery Wastes. Foods, 15(5), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15050860

















































