Production Performance and Properties of Eggs from Hens Fed Diets Differing in Corn Grain Hardness, Vitamin A Supplementation Level, and Mineral Form
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Grain Production
2.2. Hens, Experimental Design, and Treatment Diets
2.3. Analysis of Egg Quality and Color
2.4. Analysis of Tocols and Retinol Content in Egg Yolk
2.5. Analysis of Fatty Acid Profile in Egg Yolk
2.6. Analysis of Egg Oxidative Stability
2.6.1. Analysis of Oxidative Stability During Storage
2.6.2. Analysis of Fe-Induced Lipid Oxidation
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Production Performance
3.2. Egg Quality Parameters
3.3. Content of Tocols and Retinol in Egg Yolks
3.4. Yolk Fatty Acid Profile
3.5. Yolk Oxidative Stability
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lima, H.J.D.; Souza, L.A.Z. Vitamin A in the diet of laying hens: Enrichment of table eggs to prevent nutritional deficiencies in humans. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Anton, M.; Nau, F.; Nys, Y. Bioactive egg components and their potential uses. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2006, 62, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Réhault-Godbert, S.; Guyot, N.; Nys, Y. The Golden Egg: Nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seuss-Baum, I. Nutritional evaluation of egg compounds. In Bioactive Egg Compounds; Huopalahti, R., López-Fandiño, R., Anton, M., Schade, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 117–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Calder, P.C.; Cawood, A.L.; James, C.; Page, F.; Putnam, S.; Minihane, A.M. An overview of national and international long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake recommendations for healthy populations. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2026, 39, e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mitra, S.; Paul, S.; Roy, S.; Sutradhar, H.; Bin Emran, T.; Nainu, F.; Khandaker, M.U.; Almalki, M.; Wilairatana, P.; Mubarak, M.S. Exploring the immune-boosting functions of vitamins and minerals as nutritional food bioactive compounds: A comprehensive review. Molecules 2022, 27, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Djuricic, I.; Calder, P.C. Beneficial outcomes of omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on human health: An update for 2021. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hayat, Z.; Cherian, G.; Pasha, T.N.; Khattak, F.M.; Jabbar, M.A. Oxidative stability and lipid components of eggs from flax-fed hens: Effect of dietary antioxidants and storage. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- El-Ratel, I.T.; Amara, M.M.; Beshara, M.M.; El Basuini, M.F.; Fouda, S.F.; El-Kholy, K.H.; Ebeid, T.A.; Kamal, M.; Othman, S.I.; Rudayni, H.A.; et al. Effects of supplemental vitamin a on reproduction and antioxidative status of aged laying hens, and growth, blood indices and immunity of their offspring. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Panda, A.K.; Cherian, G. Role of vitamin e in counteracting oxidative stress in poultry. J. Poult. Sci. 2014, 51, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Alagawany, M.; Elnesr, S.S.; Farag, M.R.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Taha, A.E.; Tiwari, R.; Yatoo, M.I.; Bhatt, P.; Khurana, S.K.; et al. Omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in poultry nutrition: Effect on production performance and health. Animals 2019, 9, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gan, L.; Zhao, Y.; Mahmood, T.; Guo, Y. Effects of dietary vitamins supplementation level on the production performance and intestinal microbiota of aged laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 3594–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Koppenol, A.; Delezie, E.; Aerts, J.; Willems, E.; Wang, Y.; Franssens, L.; Everaert, N.; Buyse, J. Effect of the ratio of dietary n-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on broiler breeder performance, egg quality, and yolk fatty acid composition at different breeder ages. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Moreno, J.A.; Díaz-Gómez, J.; Nogareda, C.; Angulo, E.; Sandmann, G.; Portero-Otin, M.; Christou, P. The Distribution of carotenoids in hens fed on biofortified maize is influenced by feed composition, absorption, resource allocation and storage. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, K.K.; Han, M.M.; Dong, Y.Y.; Miao, Z.Q.; Zhang, J.Z.; Song, X.Y.; Li, J.H. Low levels of organic compound trace elements improve the eggshell quality, antioxidant capacity, immune function, and mineral deposition of aged laying hens. Animals 2021, 15, 100401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kljak, K.; Duvnjak, M.; Grbeša, D. Effect of starch properties and zein content of commercial maize hybrids on kinetics of starch digestibility in an in vitro poultry model. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 3311–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Herwig, E.; Abbott, D.; Schwean-Lardner, K.V.; Classen, H.L. Assessing the effect of rate and extent of starch digestion on laying hen performance. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 2940–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kljak, K.; Duvnjak, M.; Grbeša, D. Contribution of zein content and starch characteristics to vitreousness of commercial maize hybrids. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 80, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zurak, D.; Svečnjak, Z.; Gunjević, V.; Kiš, G.; Janječić, Z.; Pirgozliev, V.; Grbeša, D.; Kljak, K. Carotenoid content and deposition efficiency in yolks of laying hens fed with dent corn hybrids differing in grain hardness and processing. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gunjević, V.; Zurak, D.; Grbeša, D.; Kiš, G.; Međimurec, T.; Pirgozliev, V.; Kljak, K. Bioaccessibility of tocols in commercial maize hybrids determined by an in vitro digestion model for poultry. Molecules 2023, 28, 5015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Goffman, F.D.; Böhme, T. Relationship between fatty acid profile and vitamin E content in maize hybrids (Zea mays L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4990–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gayral, M.; Bakan, B.; Dalgalarrondo, M.; Elmorjani, K.; Delluc, C.; Brunet, S.; Marion, D. Lipid partitioning in maize (Zea mays L.) Endosperm highlights relationships among starch lipids, amylose, and vitreousness. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3551–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Elnesr, S.S.; Mahmoud, B.Y.; da Silva Pires, P.G.; Moraes, P.; Elwan, H.A.; El-Shall, N.A.; Alagawany, M. Trace minerals in laying hen diets and their effects on egg quality. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2024, 202, 5664–5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghasemi, H.A.; Hajkhodadadi, I.; Hafizi, M.; Fakharzadeh, S.; Abbasi, M.; Kalanaky, S.; Nazaran, M.H. Effect of advanced chelate compounds-based mineral supplement in laying hen diet on the performance, egg quality, yolk mineral content, fatty acid composition, and oxidative status. Foods 2022, 366, 130636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Surai, P.F.; Sparks, N.H.C. Designer Eggs: From Improvement of Egg Composition to Functional Food. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zurak, D.; Gunjević, V.; Grbeša, D.; Svečnjak, Z.; Kralik, Z.; Košević, M.; Džidić, A.; Pirgozliev, V.; Kljak, K. Kernel properties related to carotenoid release during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion in commercial dent maize hybrids. Food Chem. 2024, 435, 137535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zurak, D.; Svečnjak, Z.; Kiš, G.; Grbeša, D.; Pirgozliev, V.; Kljak, K. Comparability of in vitro bioaccessibility of carotenoids with their yolk content in laying hens for dent maize hybrids differing in kernel traits. Food Res. Int. 2025, 213, 116586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lohmann Breeders GmbH. Lohmann Brown-Classic Layers. Management Guide. Cage Housing. Available online: https://lohmann-breeders.com/strains/lohmann-brown-classic-cage-housing/ (accessed on 3 July 2023).
- Kowalska, E.; Kucharska-Gaca, J.; Kuźniacka, J.; Lewko, L.; Gornowicz, E.; Biesek, J.; Adamski, M. Egg quality depending on the diet with different sources of protein and age of the hens. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Surai, P.F.; Speake, B.K.; Wood, N.A.; Blount, J.D.; Bortolotti, G.R.; Sparks, N.H. Carotenoid discrimination by the avian embryo: A lesson from wild birds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2001, 128, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kurilich, A.C.; Juvik, J.A. Quantification of carotenoid and tocopherol antioxidants in Zea mays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1948–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Smedes, F. Determination of total lipid using non-chlorinated solvents. Analyst 1999, 124, 1711–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- ISO 12966-2:2017; Animal and Vegetable Fats and Oils—Gas Chromatography of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters—Part 2: Preparation of Methyl Esters of Fatty Acids. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- ISO 12966-1:2014; Animal and Vegetable Oils and Fats—Analysis by Gas Chromatography of Methyl Esters of Fatty Acids. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
- Botsoglou, N.A.; Fletouris, D.J.; Papageorgiou, G.E.; Vassilopoulos, V.N.; Mantis, A.J.; Trakatellis, A.G. Rapid, sensitive, and specific thiobarbituric acid method for measuring lipid peroxidation in animal tissue, food, and feedstuff samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 1931–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Botsoglou, E.; Govaris, A.; Fletouris, D.; Iliadis, S. Olive leaves (Olea europea L.) and α-tocopheryl acetate as feed antioxidants for improving the oxidative stability of α-linolenic acid-enriched eggs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2013, 97, 740–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gunjević, V.; Grbeša, D.; Zurak, D.; Kiš, G.; Janječić, Z.; Svečnjak, Z.; Bedeković, D.; Duvnjak, M.; Pirgozliev, V.; Kljak, K. Effect of maize hybrid in complete feed on the production performance and economic considerations in laying hens. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Melo-Durán, D.; Pérez Hernandez, J.F.; González-Ortiz, G.; Villagómez-Estrada, S.; Bedford, M.R.; Graham, H.; Sola-Oriol, D. Growth performance and total tract digestibility in broiler chickens fed different corn hybrids. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Caballero-Rothar, N.N.; Borrás, L.; Gerde, J.A. Physical and chemical kernel traits affect starch digestibility and glycemic index of cooked maize flours. Food Chem. 2022, 369, 130953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Byrne, L.; Ross, S.; Taylor-Pickard, J.; Murphy, R. The effect of organic trace mineral supplementation in the form of proteinates on performance and sustainability parameters in laying hens: A Meta-analysis. Animals 2023, 13, 3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, F.; Jiang, Z.; Jiang, S.; Li, L.; Lin, X.; Gou, Z.; Fan, Q. Dietary vitamin A supplementation improved reproductive performance by regulating ovarian expression of hormone receptors, caspase-3 and Fas in broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Shastak, Y.; Pelletier, W. Delving into vitamin A supplementation in poultry nutrition: Current knowledge, functional effects, and practical implications. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2023, 80, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Amerah, A.M.; Ravindran, V.; Lentle, R.G.; Thomas, D.G. Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2007, 63, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kasim, A.B.; Edwards, H.M. Effect of sources of maize and maize particle sizes on the utilization of phytate phosphorus in broiler chicks. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000, 86, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Berzin, N.I.; Bauman, V.K. Vitamin-A-dependent zinc-binding protein and intestinal absorption of zn in chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 1987, 57, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ogbuewu, I.P.; Mbajiorgu, C.A. Meta-Analysis of Zinc Supplementation on Laying Performance, Egg Quality Characteristics, and Blood Zinc Concentrations in Laying Hens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 5188–5204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Piazza, M.C.N.; Lima, I.L.; Nunes, R.V.; Dias, K.M.M.; Bernardes, R.D.; Castro, L.P.; Honório, B.A.; Vieira, G.L.; Calderano, A.A. Use of corn bran with solubles in laying hen’s diets. Animals 2025, 15, 2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, X.C.; Zhang, H.J.; Wang, H.; Yue, H.Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, S.G.; Qi, G.H. Effect of different protein ingredients on performance, egg quality, organ health, and jejunum morphology of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 1316–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ali, M.; Scott, M.P.; Bakht, J. Molecular mechanism of methionine differentiation in high and low methionine maize lines. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 3747–3752. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, S.; Niu, J.; Xv, J.; Fang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, D.; Wang, L.; Ding, B. Interactive effects of vitamins A and K3 on laying performance, egg quality, tibia attributes and antioxidative status of aged roman pink laying hens. Animal 2021, 15, 100242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.; Ma, X.-M.; Yang, C.-W.; Jiang, S.-Z.; Huang, L.-B.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Jiao, N.; Yang, W.-R. Low level of dietary organic trace elements improve the eggshell strength, trace element utilization, and intestinal function in late-phase laying hens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 903615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zurak, D.; Svečnjak, Z.; Kiš, G.; Pirgozliev, V.; Grbeša, D.; Kljak, K. Effect of supplementing corn diet for laying hens with vitamin A and trace minerals on carotenoid content and deposition efficiency in egg yolk. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 104843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bao, Y.M.; Choct, M. Trace Mineral Nutrition for Broiler Chickens and Prospects of Application of Organically Complexed Trace Minerals: A Review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2009, 49, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mendonça, C.X., Jr.; Almeida, C.R.M.; Mori, A.V.; Watanabe, C. Effect of dietary vitamin A on egg yolk retinol and tocopherol levels. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2002, 11, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mori, A.V.; Mendonça, C.X., Jr.; Alessandra, G.P.; Alencar, R.R.; Watanabe, C.; Almeida, C.R.M. Supplementing hen diets with vitamins A and E affects egg yolk retinol and α-tocopherol. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2003, 12, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nimalaratne, C.; Wu, J. Hen Egg as an Antioxidant Food Commodity: A Review. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8274–8293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Oliveira, D.D.; Baião, N.C.; Cançado, S.V.; Grimaldi, R.; Souza, M.R.; Lara, L.J.C.; Lana, A.M.Q. Effects of lipid sources in the diet of laying hens on the fatty acid profiles of egg yolks. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 2484–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Zolfaghari, R.; Cifelli, C.J.; Banta, M.D.; Ross, A.C. Fatty acid Delta(5)-Desaturase mRNA is regulated by dietary vitamin A and exogenous retinoic acid in liver of adult rats. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 391, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, Q.; Jin, G.; Wang, N.; Guo, X.; Jin, Y.; Ma, M. Lipolysis and oxidation of lipids during egg storage at different temperatures. Czech J. Food Sci. 2017, 35, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Florou-Paneri, P.; Dotas, D.; Mitsopoulos, I.; Dotas, V.; Botsoglou, E.; Nikolakakis, I.; Botsoglou, N. Effect of Feeding Rosemary and α-Tocopheryl Acetate on Hen Performance and Egg Quality. J. Poult. Sci. 2006, 43, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kljak, K.; Carović-Stanko, K.; Kos, I.; Janječić, Z.; Kiš, G.; Duvnjak, M.; Safner, T.; Bedeković, D. Plant carotenoids as pigment sources in laying hen diets: Effect on yolk color, carotenoid content, oxidative stability and sensory properties of eggs. Foods 2021, 10, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dotas, V.; Gourdouvelis, D.; Symeon, G.; Hatzizisis, L.; Mitsopoulos, I.; Galamatis, D.; Ioannidou, M.; Sossidou, E. Fatty acid profile and oxidative stability of layers’ egg yolk as affected by dietary supplementation with fresh purslane and addition of aromatic plant essential oils to drinking water. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Khan, R.U.; Khan, A.; Naz, S.; Ullah, Q.; Puvača, N.; Laudadio, V.; Mazzei, D.; Seidavi, A.; Ayasan, T.; Tufarelli, V. Pros and cons of dietary vitamin A and its precursors in poultry health and production: A comprehensive review. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Galobart, J.; Barroeta, A.C.; Baucells, M.D.; Cortinas, L.; Guardiola, F. α-Tocopherol Transfer Efficiency and Lipid Oxidation in Fresh and Spray-Dried Eggs Enriched with ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids. Poult. Sci. 2001, 80, 1496–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kralik, Z.; Kralik, G.; Košević, M.; Galović, O.; Samardžić, M. Natural Multi-Enriched Eggs with n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, Selenium, Vitamin E, and Lutein. Animals 2023, 13, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chiremba, C.; Taylor, J.R.N.; Rooney, L.W.; Beta, T. Microwave-assisted extraction of bound phenolic acids in bran and flour fractions from sorghum and maize cultivars varying in hardness. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yu, Y.; Liang, G. Interaction mechanism of phenolic acids and zein: A spectrofluorometric and molecular dynamics investigation. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 348, 118032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]

| Hybrid | Mineral Form | Vitamin A Level | C16:0 | C16:1 | C18:0 | C18:1 cis | C18:2 cis | C18:3n3 | C20:0 | C20:1 | C22:0 | C22:2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJ/kg | % of Total Fat | |||||||||||
| Soft | Inorganic | 5000 | 9.19 | 0.131 | 3.02 | 28.75 | 56.90 | 0.696 | 0.326 | 0.202 | 0.497 | 0.294 |
| 10,000 | 9.15 | 0.126 | 3.00 | 28.38 | 57.34 | 0.774 | 0.338 | 0.201 | 0.505 | 0.181 | ||
| 20,000 | 8.93 | 0.126 | 3.09 | 28.63 | 57.31 | 0.724 | 0.336 | 0.201 | 0.544 | 0.112 | ||
| Organic | 5000 | 9.13 | 0.126 | 3.13 | 28.75 | 56.91 | 0.701 | 0.338 | 0.198 | 0.546 | 0.165 | |
| 10,000 | 9.34 | 0.126 | 3.11 | 28.73 | 56.71 | 0.747 | 0.347 | 0.214 | 0.541 | 0.129 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.37 | 0.132 | 3.01 | 28.42 | 57.24 | 0.721 | 0.315 | 0.191 | 0.451 | 0.153 | ||
| Hard | Inorganic | 5000 | 9.24 | 0.149 | 2.97 | 28.51 | 57.16 | 0.778 | 0.343 | 0.209 | 0.490 | 0.150 |
| 10,000 | 8.93 | 0.149 | 3.09 | 28.86 | 57.01 | 0.740 | 0.344 | 0.206 | 0.554 | 0.111 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.20 | 0.147 | 2.96 | 28.48 | 57.25 | 0.764 | 0.338 | 0.204 | 0.463 | 0.191 | ||
| Organic | 5000 | 9.21 | 0.147 | 3.00 | 28.54 | 57.07 | 0.790 | 0.345 | 0.211 | 0.501 | 0.176 | |
| 10,000 | 9.07 | 0.151 | 3.05 | 28.52 | 57.20 | 0.783 | 0.351 | 0.211 | 0.535 | 0.127 | ||
| 20,000 | 9.10 | 0.148 | 3.03 | 28.63 | 57.13 | 0.776 | 0.353 | 0.211 | 0.519 | 0.112 | ||
| Hybrid | Mineral Form | Vitamin A Level | α- Tocopherol | γ- Tocopherol | δ- Tocopherol | α- Tocotrienol | γ- Tocotrienol | Total Tocols |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJ/kg | µg/g DM | |||||||
| Soft | Inorganic | 5000 | 22.53 | 17.66 | 1.03 | 0.51 | 1.82 | 55.58 |
| 10,000 | 22.89 | 16.59 | 1.15 | 0.52 | 1.61 | 53.75 | ||
| 20,000 | 22.22 | 15.85 | 1.17 | 0.50 | 1.68 | 52.95 | ||
| Organic | 5000 | 22.31 | 19.47 | 1.33 | 0.57 | 1.75 | 55.87 | |
| 10,000 | 23.00 | 18.26 | 1.19 | 0.55 | 1.94 | 57.31 | ||
| 20,000 | 23.50 | 17.00 | 1.09 | 0.61 | 1.72 | 56.70 | ||
| Hard | Inorganic | 5000 | 21.44 | 23.66 | 1.35 | 0.60 | 2.52 | 60.78 |
| 10,000 | 22.18 | 24.85 | 1.23 | 0.70 | 2.48 | 62.82 | ||
| 20,000 | 22.60 | 25.86 | 1.10 | 0.62 | 2.39 | 64.61 | ||
| Organic | 5000 | 22.78 | 24.33 | 1.08 | 0.69 | 2.61 | 63.05 | |
| 10,000 | 22.84 | 23.83 | 1.48 | 0.63 | 2.52 | 62.44 | ||
| 20,000 | 21.88 | 24.39 | 0.98 | 0.67 | 2.42 | 62.56 | ||
| Source of Variation | Diet Intake | Egg Production | Egg Weight | Egg Mass | FCR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (H) | 0.534 | 0.244 | 0.670 | 0.045 | 0.027 |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.069 | 0.450 | 0.095 | 0.544 | 0.198 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.834 | 0.122 | <0.001 | 0.011 | 0.212 |
| H × MF | 0.714 | 0.657 | 0.005 | 0.017 | 0.190 |
| H × VitA | 0.237 | 0.759 | 0.019 | 0.040 | 0.017 |
| MF × VitA | 0.111 | 0.554 | <0.001 | 0.467 | 0.003 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.303 | 0.135 | 0.473 | 0.027 | 0.279 |
| g | % | g | g | ||
| Hybrid 3 | |||||
| Soft | 113.04 | 96.5 | 60.44 | 57.99 b | 1.95 a |
| Hard | 112.56 | 97.4 | 60.56 | 58.95 a | 1.91 b |
| Mineral form 3 | |||||
| Inorganic | 113.51 | 96.7 | 60.75 | 58.62 | 1.92 |
| Organic | 112.08 | 97.2 | 60.25 | 58.32 | 1.94 |
| Vitamin A 3 | |||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 112.82 | 96.5 | 59.75 b | 57.51 b | 1.95 |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 112.50 | 96.4 | 61.18 a | 58.56 ab | 1.92 |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 113.08 | 98.0 | 60.57 a | 59.35 a | 1.93 |
| Source of Variation | Height | Width | Shape Index | Egg Surface Area | Weight | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shell | Yolk | Albumen | |||||
| Hybrid (H) | 0.079 | 0.859 | 0.083 | 0.299 | 0.019 | 0.879 | 0.961 |
| Mineral form (MF) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.618 | 0.277 | <0.001 | 0.823 | <0.001 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.038 | <0.001 | 0.251 | 0.886 | 0.067 | 0.075 | 0.021 |
| H × MF | 0.514 | 0.649 | 0.816 | 0.774 | 0.329 | 0.087 | 0.809 |
| H × VitA | 0.042 | 0.891 | 0.010 | 0.292 | <0.001 | 0.515 | 0.944 |
| MF × VitA | 0.085 | 0.029 | 0.495 | 0.033 | 0.687 | 0.487 | 0.022 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.053 | 0.674 | 0.190 | 0.145 | 0.033 | 0.461 | 0.433 |
| mm | mm | % | cm2 | g | g | g | |
| Hybrid 2 | |||||||
| Soft | 55.21 | 44.16 | 80.00 | 149.49 | 8.01 a | 14.33 | 38.17 |
| Hard | 55.03 | 44.14 | 88.24 | 141.55 | 7.91 b | 14.34 | 38.18 |
| Mineral form 2 | |||||||
| Inorganic | 55.32 a | 44.29 a | 80.08 | 140.46 | 8.06 a | 14.33 | 38.73 a |
| Organic | 54.92 b | 44.01 b | 80.15 | 141.57 | 7.87 b | 14.35 | 37.62 b |
| Vitamin A 2 | |||||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 54.96 b | 43.95 b | 79.98 | 141.34 | 7.90 | 14.19 | 37.64 b |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 55.11 ab | 44.22 a | 80.26 | 140.99 | 7.95 | 14.27 | 38.40 a |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 55.29 a | 44.29 a | 80.12 | 140.73 | 8.03 | 14.54 | 38.49 a |
| Source of Variation | Albumen Height | YCF 2 Color | Haugh Units | Shell Strength | Shell Thickness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (H) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.894 | 0.280 |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.009 | 0.029 | 0.063 | 0.128 | 0.338 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.337 | <0.001 | 0.294 | 0.014 | 0.290 |
| H × MF | 0.372 | 0.329 | 0.451 | 0.928 | 0.325 |
| H × VitA | 0.368 | 0.006 | 0.645 | 0.809 | 0.410 |
| MF × VitA | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.038 | <0.001 | 0.383 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.743 | 0.061 | 0.897 | 0.426 | 0.329 |
| mm | kg cm−2 | mm | |||
| Hybrid 3 | |||||
| Soft | 7.21 a | 6.54 b | 83.02 a | 5.25 | 0.361 |
| Hard | 6.82 b | 6.80 a | 80.71 b | 5.26 | 0.409 |
| Mineral form 3 | |||||
| Inorganic | 7.15 a | 6.63 b | 82.56 | 5.30 | 0.363 |
| Organic | 6.87 b | 6.71 a | 81.17 | 5.22 | 0.406 |
| Vitamin A 3 | |||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 6.98 | 6.69 a | 81.78 | 5.17 b | 0.362 |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 7.12 | 6.56 b | 82.62 | 5.26 ab | 0.357 |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 6.93 | 6.76 a | 81.20 | 5.35 a | 0.434 |
| Source of Variation | Yolk | Shell | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | L* | a* | b* | |
| Hybrid (H) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.139 | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.268 | 0.354 | 0.012 | 0.355 | 0.885 | 0.016 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.058 | 0.004 | 0.127 | 0.479 | 0.526 | 0.478 |
| H × MF | 0.003 | 0.205 | 0.398 | 0.271 | 0.559 | 0.031 |
| H × VitA | 0.701 | 0.002 | 0.298 | 0.276 | 0.172 | 0.484 |
| MF × VitA | 0.280 | 0.893 | 0.331 | 0.028 | 0.002 | 0.232 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.191 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.319 | 0.944 | 0.103 |
| Hybrid 3 | ||||||
| Soft | 72.47 a | 8.97 b | 75.54 a | 56.57 | 19.52 b | 30.04 b |
| Hard | 71.43 b | 10.21 a | 72.95 b | 55.67 | 20.39 a | 30.86 a |
| Mineral form 3 | ||||||
| Inorganic | 72.03 | 9.64 | 73.95 b | 56.41 | 19.97 | 30.74 a |
| Organic | 71.87 | 9.54 | 74.53 a | 55.84 | 19.93 | 30.15 b |
| Vitamin A 3 | ||||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 71.72 | 9.82 a | 73.91 | 55.65 | 20.06 | 30.59 |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 72.16 | 9.35 b | 74.38 | 56.18 | 20.10 | 30.52 |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 71.97 | 9.59 ab | 74.44 | 56.56 | 19.70 | 30.25 |
| Source of Variation | α-Tocopherol | γ-Tocopherol | Total Tocols | Retinol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid (H) | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.244 | 0.070 |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.704 | 0.010 | 0.540 | 0.994 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| H × MF | 0.059 | 0.286 | 0.057 | 0.839 |
| H × VitA | 0.040 | 0.280 | 0.045 | 0.885 |
| MF × VitA | 0.003 | 0.120 | 0.002 | 0.965 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.539 | 0.232 | 0.526 | 0.646 |
| Hybrid 2 | ||||
| Soft | 13.13 b | 4.89 a | 18.03 | 15.26 |
| Hard | 13.84 a | 4.53 b | 18.37 | 14.96 |
| Mineral form 2 | ||||
| Inorganic | 13.43 | 4.85 a | 18.29 | 15.11 |
| Organic | 13.53 | 4.57 b | 18.l1 | 15.11 |
| Vitamin A 2 | ||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 14.17 a | 4.99 a | 19.15 a | 14.35 c |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 13.70 a | 4.65 b | 18.35 b | 14.75 b |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 12.58 b | 4.49 b | 17.08 c | 16.23 a |
| (a) Analysis of variance for egg yolk fatty acid profile with means for the main effect of the investigated factors 1 | |||||||||||
| Source of Variation | C14:0 | C16:0 | C16:1 | C17:0 | C18:0 | C18:1 trans | C18:1 cis | C18:2 cis | C18:3n6 | C18:3n3 | |
| Hybrid (H) | 0.028 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.080 | 0.474 | 0.023 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.174 | 0.404 | 0.268 | 0.778 | 0194 | 0.004 | 0.785 | 0.207 | 1.000 | 0.410 | |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.335 | 0.370 | 0.094 | 0.079 | 0.751 | 0.123 | 0.028 | 0.210 | 0.086 | 0.246 | |
| H × MF | 0.099 | 0.034 | 0.002 | 0.099 | 0.976 | 0.237 | 0.468 | 0.155 | 0.274 | 0.410 | |
| H × VitA | 0.947 | 0.329 | 0.057 | 0.178 | 0.891 | 0.309 | 0.928 | 0.864 | 0.872 | 0.513 | |
| MF × VitA | 0.711 | 0.159 | 0.007 | 0.246 | 0.364 | 0.135 | 0.309 | 0.250 | 0.839 | 0.395 | |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.374 | 0.100 | 0.635 | 0.093 | 0.236 | 0.101 | 0.970 | 0.323 | 0.065 | 0.048 | |
| % of total fat content | |||||||||||
| Hybrid 3 | |||||||||||
| Soft | 0.30 b | 25.17 b | 2.13 b | 0.158 a | 8.89 | 0.112 | 35.35 b | 21.16 a | 0.162 a | 0.203 a | |
| Hard | 0.32 a | 25.85 a | 2.26 a | 0.146 b | 9.15 | 0.110 | 39.13 a | 19.44 b | 0.147 b | 0.179 b | |
| Mineral form 3 | |||||||||||
| Inorganic | 0.32 | 25.45 | 2.17 | 0.153 | 8.93 | 0.107 b | 38.70 | 20.53 | 0.154 | 0.193 | |
| Organic | 0.31 | 25.57 | 2.21 | 0.152 | 9.13 | 0.114 a | 38.78 | 20.06 | 0.154 | 0.188 | |
| Vitamin A 3 | |||||||||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 0.30 | 25.35 | 2.13 | 0.157 | 8.95 | 0.108 | 38.96 a | 20.49 | 0.153 | 0.192 | |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 0.31 | 25.61 | 2.20 | 0.154 | 9.08 | 0.110 | 38.10 b | 20.58 | 0.161 | 0.197 | |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 0.32 | 25.56 | 2.24 | 0.146 | 9.04 | 0.114 | 39.16 a | 19.83 | 0.150 | 0.184 | |
| (b) Analysis of variance for egg yolk fatty acid profile with means for the main effect of the investigated factors 1,2 | |||||||||||
| Source of variation | C20:1 | C20:2 | C20:3n6 | C20:4n6 | C24:1 | SFA | MUFA | PUFA | n6 | n3 | n6/n3 |
| Hybrid (H) | 0.123 | 0.088 | 0.199 | 0.584 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.011 | <0.001 | 0.398 | <0.001 | 0.025 |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.903 | 0.586 | 0.199 | 0.644 | 0.629 | 0.157 | 0.655 | 0.263 | 0.584 | 0.410 | 0.536 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.752 | 0.227 | 0.592 | 0.024 | 0.010 | 0.267 | 0.034 | 0.143 | 0.024 | 0.246 | 0.475 |
| H × MF | 0.188 | 0.055 | 0.275 | 0.539 | 0.109 | 0.249 | 0.275 | 0.139 | 0.552 | 0.410 | 0.844 |
| H × VitA | 0.026 | 0.019 | 0.026 | 0.539 | 0.613 | 0.717 | 0.902 | 0.834 | 0.558 | 0.513 | 0.494 |
| MF × VitA | 0.411 | 0.491 | 0.332 | 0.220 | 0.361 | 0.342 | 0.170 | 0.306 | 0.212 | 0.395 | 0.699 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.155 | 0.146 | 0.468 | 0.688 | 0.991 | 0.049 | 0.991 | 0.401 | 0.747 | 0.048 | 0.135 |
| % of total fat content | |||||||||||
| Hybrid 3 | |||||||||||
| Soft | 0.218 | 0.243 | 0.211 | 2.34 | 0.354 a | 34.53 b | 41.16 b | 24.31 a | 2.71 | 0.203 a | 13.51 b |
| Hard | 0.226 | 0.234 | 0.203 | 2.30 | 0.319 b | 35.46 a | 42.04 a | 22.50 b | 2.65 | 0.179 b | 14.99 a |
| Mineral form 3 | |||||||||||
| Inorganic | 0.222 | 0.240 | 0.203 | 2.31 | 0.334 | 34.84 | 41.53 | 23.63 | 2.66 | 0.193 | 14.05 |
| Organic | 0.222 | 0.237 | 0.211 | 2.34 | 0.339 | 35.14 | 41.67 | 23.18 | 2.70 | 0.188 | 14.44 |
| Vitamin A 3 | |||||||||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 0.224 | 0.238 | 0.204 | 2.24 b | 0.322 b | 34.76 | 41.74 ab | 23.50 | 2.59 b | 0.192 | 13.71 |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 0.220 | 0.244 | 0.211 | 2.45 a | 0.363 a | 35.16 | 41.00 b | 23.84 | 2.82 a | 0.197 | 14.56 |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 0.222 | 0.234 | 0.206 | 2.28 b | 0.325 b | 35.07 | 42.06 a | 22.87 | 2.63 b | 0.184 | 14.47 |
| Source of Variation | During Storage | Fe-Induced Lipid Oxidation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | 4 °C | 22 °C | 30 °C | 0 min | 100 min | 200 min | Slope | |
| Hybrid (H) | 0.412 | 0.697 | 0.215 | 0.003 | 0.043 | 0.021 | 0.042 | 0.028 |
| Mineral form (MF) | 0.322 | 0.004 | 0.491 | 0.276 | 0.822 | 0.418 | 0.088 | 0.853 |
| Vitamin A (VitA) | 0.404 | 0.022 | 0.074 | 0.003 | 0.921 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| H × MF | 0.235 | 0.34 | 0.506 | 0.763 | 0.395 | 0.011 | 0.023 | 0.021 |
| H × VitA | 0.368 | 0.191 | 0.128 | 0.601 | 0.223 | 0.125 | 0.140 | 0.134 |
| MF × VitA | 0.413 | 0.063 | 0.739 | <0.001 | 0.470 | 0.359 | 0.994 | 0.999 |
| H × VitA × MF | 0.436 | 0.486 | 0.049 | 0.780 | 0.833 | 0.898 | 0.219 | 0.210 |
| ng MDA/g egg yolk 2 | ||||||||
| Hybrid 3 | ||||||||
| Soft | 35.62 | 31.95 | 28.45 | 32.14 b | 31.51 a | 64.48 b | 111.64 b | 0.400 b |
| Hard | 29.93 | 31.26 | 30.90 | 36.79 a | 29.35 b | 76.37 a | 134.76 a | 0.527 a |
| Mineral form 3 | ||||||||
| Inorganic | 36.21 | 28.98 b | 30.36 | 33.64 | 30.31 | 72.50 | 124.07 | 0.469 |
| Organic | 29.33 | 34.24 a | 29.00 | 35.29 | 30.55 | 68.35 | 122.33 | 0.458 |
| Vitamin A 3 | ||||||||
| 5000 IU/kg | 39.29 | 29.93 b | 32.89 | 38.25 a | 30.49 | 59.46 b | 98.75 b | 0.341 b |
| 10,000 IU/kg | 28.54 | 35.14 a | 28.18 | 32.32 b | 30.15 | 67.83 b | 114.45 b | 0.421 b |
| 20,000 IU/kg | 30.50 | 29.75 b | 27.96 | 32.82 b | 30.66 | 83.99 a | 156.40 a | 0.629 a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kljak, K.; Zurak, D.; Kiš, G.; Janječić, Z.; Bedeković, D.; Medić, H.; Pirgozliev, V.; Marušić Radovčić, N. Production Performance and Properties of Eggs from Hens Fed Diets Differing in Corn Grain Hardness, Vitamin A Supplementation Level, and Mineral Form. Foods 2026, 15, 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040692
Kljak K, Zurak D, Kiš G, Janječić Z, Bedeković D, Medić H, Pirgozliev V, Marušić Radovčić N. Production Performance and Properties of Eggs from Hens Fed Diets Differing in Corn Grain Hardness, Vitamin A Supplementation Level, and Mineral Form. Foods. 2026; 15(4):692. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040692
Chicago/Turabian StyleKljak, Kristina, Dora Zurak, Goran Kiš, Zlatko Janječić, Dalibor Bedeković, Helga Medić, Vasil Pirgozliev, and Nives Marušić Radovčić. 2026. "Production Performance and Properties of Eggs from Hens Fed Diets Differing in Corn Grain Hardness, Vitamin A Supplementation Level, and Mineral Form" Foods 15, no. 4: 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040692
APA StyleKljak, K., Zurak, D., Kiš, G., Janječić, Z., Bedeković, D., Medić, H., Pirgozliev, V., & Marušić Radovčić, N. (2026). Production Performance and Properties of Eggs from Hens Fed Diets Differing in Corn Grain Hardness, Vitamin A Supplementation Level, and Mineral Form. Foods, 15(4), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15040692

