Waste Sunflower Oil as a Feedstock for Efficient Single-Cell Oil and Biomass Production by Yarrowia lipolytica
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microorganism and Culture Conditions
2.2. WCO Collection and Characterization
2.3. Lipid Production Medium and Fermentation Conditions
2.4. Determination of Biomass Concentration
2.5. Lipid Extraction and Quantification
2.6. Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs)
2.7. Gas Chromatography Analysis of FAMEs
2.8. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Optimization of Biomass Production and Lipid Content
3.2. Influence of Process Parameters on the Fatty Acid Composition
3.3. Optimization of Palmitic Acid Amount
4. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hashem, A.H.; Khattab, A.M.; Abdelraof, M. A facile one-pot bioconversion of frying oil waste to single cell oils and related products using fungi via response surface methodology. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 16711–16721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- USDA. Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. United States Department of Agriculture–Foreign Agricultural Service. 2024. Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf (accessed on 14 November 2024).
- Abrante-Pascual, S.; Nieva-Echevarría, B.; Goicoechea-Oses, E. Vegetable oils and their use for frying: A review of their compositional differences and degradation. Foods 2024, 13, 4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beghetto, V. Waste cooking oils into high-value products: Where is the industry going? Polymers 2025, 17, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, P.; Chen, Q.; Xu, W.; Jin, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xu, J. Strategic economic and energy analysis of integrated biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Energy Convers. Manag. 2025, 325, 119354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foo, W.H.; Koay, S.S.N.; Chia, S.R.; Chia, W.Y.; Tang, D.Y.Y.; Nomanbhay, S.; Chew, K.W. Recent advances in the conversion of waste cooking oil into value-added products: A review. Fuel 2022, 324, 124539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onn, M.; Jalil, M.J.; Yusoff, N.I.S.M.; Edward, E.B.; Wahit, M.U. A comprehensive review on chemical route to convert waste cooking oils to renewable polymeric materials. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 211, 118194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Usman, M.; Salama, E.S.; Redina, M.; Thakur, N.; Li, X. Evaluation of various waste cooking oils for biodiesel production: A comprehensive analysis of feedstock. Waste Manag. 2021, 136, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Ping, L.; Gao, B.; Sun, T.; Zhang, H. The future of waste cooking oil and its carbon and economic benefits—An automotive energy perspective. Biomass Bioenergy 2024, 184, 107204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.; Long, F.; Zhao, J.; Liu, P.; Jiang, J.; Xu, J. The production of high-quality biofuel from waste oil. React. Chem. Eng. 2022, 7, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uğur, Ş.; Zieniuk, B.; Fabiszewska, A. Nutritional and medicinal properties of microbial oil. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalmas Neto, C.J.; Sydney, E.B.; Candeo, E.S.; de Souza, E.B.S.; Camargo, D.; Sydney, A.C.N.; de Carvalho, J.C.; Letti, L.A.J.; Pandey, A.; Soccol, C.R. New method for the extraction of single-cell oils from wet oleaginous microbial biomass: Efficiency, oil characterisation and energy assessment. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2020, 11, 3443–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazar, Z.; Liu, N.; Stephanopoulos, G. Holistic approaches in lipid production by Yarrowia lipolytica. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Magdouli, S.; Brar, S.K.; Blais, J.F. Morphology and rheological behaviour of Yarrowia lipolytica: Impact of dissolved oxygen level on cell growth and lipid composition. Process Biochem. 2018, 65, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wierzchowska, K.; Zieniuk, B.; Nowak, D.; Fabiszewska, A. Phosphorus and nitrogen limitation as a part of the strategy to stimulate microbial lipid biosynthesis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diwan, B.; Parkhey, P.; Gupta, P. From agro-industrial wastes to single cell oils: A step towards prospective biorefinery. Folia Microbiol. 2018, 63, 547–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gohain, M.; Bardhan, P.; Laskar, K.; Sarmah, S.; Mandal, M.; Bora, U.; Kalita, M.C.; Goud, V.V.; Deka, D. Rhodotorula mucilaginosa: A source of heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production from yeast single cell oil and waste cooking oil. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caporusso, A.; Capece, A.; De Bari, I. Oleaginous yeasts as cell factories for the sustainable production of microbial lipids by the valorization of agri-food wastes. Fermentation 2021, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrero, O.M.; Alvarez, H.M. Fruit residues as substrates for single-cell oil production by Rhodococcus species: Physiology and genomics of carbohydrate catabolism. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, M.; Miranda, S.M.; Belo, I. Microbial valorization of waste cooking oils for valuable compounds production—A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 50, 2583–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayın, B.; Bozkurt, A.G.; Kaban, G. Assessing Waste sunflower oil as a substrate for citric acid production: The inhibitory effect of Triton X-100. Fermentation 2024, 10, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatzifragkou, A.; Petrou, I.; Gardeli, C.; Komaitis, M.; Papanikolaou, S. Effect of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil on growth and lipid profile of Yarrowia lipolytica cultivated on glycerol-based media. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 1955–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enshaeieh, M.; Nahvi, I.; Madani, M. Improving microbial oil production with standard and native oleaginous yeasts by using Taguchi design. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saygün, A.; Sahin-Yesilçubuk, N.; Aran, N. Effects of different oil sources and residues on biomass and metabolite production by Yarrowia lipolytica YB 423-12. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2014, 91, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metcalfe, L.D.; Schmitz, A.A. The rapid preparation of fatty acid esters for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal. Chem. 1961, 33, 363–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Sun, H.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Long, H.; Geng, X.; Zhang, Y. Progress in the study of plant nitrogen and potassium nutrition and their interaction mechanisms. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beopoulos, A.; Cescut, J.; Haddouche, R.; Uribelarrea, J.L.; Molina-Jouve, C.; Nicaud, J.M. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog. Lipid Res. 2009, 48, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calvey, C.H.; Su, Y.K.; Willis, L.B.; McGee, M.; Jeffries, T.W. Nitrogen limitation, oxygen limitation, and lipid accumulation in Lipomyces starkeyi. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 200, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Waste cooking oil used as carbon source for microbial lipid production: Promoter or inhibitor. Environ. Res. 2022, 203, 111881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maddikeri, G.L.; Gogate, P.R.; Pandit, A.B. Improved synthesis of sophorolipids from waste cooking oil using fed batch approach in the presence of ultrasound. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 263, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemec, T.; Jernejc, K. Influence of Tween 80 on lipid metabolism of an Aspergillus niger strain. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 101, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grubišić, M.; Mihajlovski, K.; Gruičić, A.M.; Beluhan, S.; Šantek, B.; Ivančić Šantek, M. Strategies for improvement of lipid production by yeast Trichosporon oleaginosus from lignocellulosic biomass. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, H.B.; Gogate, P.; Annapure, U. Process intensification of acidolysis reaction catalysed by enzymes for synthesis of designer lipids using sonication. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 131374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadhav, H.B.; Gogate, P.R.; Waghmare, J.T.; Annapure, U.S. Intensified synthesis of palm olein designer lipids using sonication. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 73, 105478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Wan, C. Non-sterile fermentations for the economical biochemical conversion of renewable feedstocks. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017, 39, 1765–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Komesli, S.; Akbulut, S.; Arslan, N.P.; Adiguzel, A.; Taskin, M. Waste frying oil hydrolysis and lipase production by cold-adapted Pseudomonas yamanorum LP2 under non-sterile culture conditions. Environ. Technol. 2021, 42, 3245–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chitnis, A.V.; Dhoble, A.S. Non-sterile cultivation of Yarrowia lipolytica in fed-batch mode for the production of lipids and biomass. Biotechnol. Prog. 2024, 40, e3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santamauro, F.; Whiffin, F.M.; Scott, R.J.; Chuck, C.J. Low-cost lipid production by an oleaginous yeast cultured in non-sterile conditions using model waste resources. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakicka, M.; Lazar, Z.; Dulermo, T.; Fickers, P.; Nicaud, J.M. Lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica using industrial by-products under different culture conditions. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavšček, M.; Bhutada, G.; Madl, T.; Natter, K. Optimization of lipid production with a genome-scale model of Yarrowia lipolytica. BMC Syst. Biol. 2015, 9, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Lipids of oleaginous yeasts. Part I: Biochemistry of single cell oil production. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2011, 113, 1031–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratledge, C.; Wynn, J.P. The biochemistry and molecular biology of lipid accumulation in oleaginous microorganisms. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 51, 1–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Sources of microbial oils with emphasis to Mortierella (Umbelopsis) isabellina fungus. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 35, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lopes, M.; Miranda, S.M.; Alves, J.M.; Pereira, A.S.; Belo, I. Waste cooking oils as feedstock for lipase and lipid-rich biomass production. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019, 121, 1800188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taoka, Y.; Nagano, N.; Okita, Y.; Izumida, H.; Sugimoto, S.; Hayashi, M. Effect of Tween 80 on the growth, lipid accumulation and fatty acid composition of Thraustochytrium aureum ATCC 34304. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katre, G.; Joshi, C.; Khot, M.; Zinjarde, S.; RaviKumar, A. Evaluation of single cell oil (SCO) from a tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589 as a potential feedstock for biodiesel. AMB Express 2012, 2, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taskin, M.; Saghafian, A.; Aydogan, M.N.; Arslan, N.P. Microbial lipid production by cold-adapted oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica B9 in non-sterile whey medium. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2015, 9, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Jin, G.; Wang, Y.; Shen, H.; Zhao, Z.K. Lipid production on free fatty acids by oleaginous yeasts under non-growth conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 193, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taskin, M.; Ortucu, S.; Aydogan, M.N.; Arslan, N.P. Lipid production from sugar beet molasses under non-aseptic culture conditions using the oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula glutinis TR29. Renew. Energy 2016, 99, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radha, P.; Narayanan, S.; Chaudhuri, A.; Anjum, S.; Thomas, D.L.; Pandey, R.; Ramani, K. Synthesis of single-cell oil by Yarrowia lipolytica MTCC 9520 utilizing slaughterhouse lipid waste for biodiesel production. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Li, L.; Zhou, W.; Huang, H.; Ma, Q.; Gong, Z. Non-sterile fermentation for enhanced lipid production by Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosum using bifunctional benzamide as selective antibacterial agent and unique nitrogen source. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 418, 131926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carta, G.; Murru, E.; Banni, S.; Manca, C. Palmitic acid: Physiological role, metabolism and nutritional implications. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baeza-Jiménez, R.; López-Martínez, L.X.; García-Varela, R.; García, H.S. Lipids in fruits and vegetables: Chemistry and biological activities. In Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals: Chemistry and Human Health, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 423–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivadas, D.; Shokri, S.; Cattaruzza, A.; Chuck, C.J. Oleogels produced using single cell oils from the oleaginous yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima as potential fat replacers. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 172, 111921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammad, G.A.; Daod, S.T. Impact of Tween 80 on fatty acid composition in two bacterial species. Arch. Razi Inst. 2021, 76, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reitermayer, D.; Kafka, T.A.; Lenz, C.A.; Vogel, R.F. Interrelation between Tween and the membrane properties and high pressure tolerance of Lactobacillus plantarum. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusinova-Videva, S.; Petkova, Z.; Antova, G.; Stoyanov, P.; Mladenova, T.; Radoukova, T. Effect of polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80) on exopolysaccharide and biomass composition of psycchrophilic yeast. Pol. Polar Res. 2023, 44, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Factors | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen concentration (g/L) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| WCO concentration (g/L) | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 |
| Tween 80 (%, v/v) | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| Sonication | 0 | 1 | ||
| Sterility | 0 | 1 |
| Run | N (g/L) | WCO (g/L) | Tween 80 (%, v/v) | Sonication | Sterility | Biomass (g/L) | Lipid Content (% of Dry Cell Weight) | S/N Ratio for Biomass Production | S/N Ratio for Lipid Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 20 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.30 ± 0.03 | 68.56 ± 5.69 | 7.2346 | 36.7214 |
| 2 | 0 | 40 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 1.14 ± 0.37 | 58.50 ± 1.79 | 1.1381 | 35.3431 |
| 3 | 0 | 60 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 45.96 ± 16.76 | −2.4988 | 33.2476 |
| 4 | 0 | 80 | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 ± 0.05 | 72.86 ± 4.84 | 0.9844 | 37.2498 |
| 5 | 1 | 20 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 1.49 ± 0.11 | 33.02 ± 4.81 | 3.4637 | 30.3755 |
| 6 | 1 | 40 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 2.16 ± 0.05 | 49.98 ± 0.76 | 6.6891 | 33.9759 |
| 7 | 1 | 60 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 1.44 ± 0.11 | 23.54 ± 1.65 | 3.1672 | 27.4361 |
| 8 | 1 | 80 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.20 ± 0.10 | 37.94 ± 3.04 | 6.8485 | 31.5819 |
| 9 | 2 | 20 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 1.16 ± 0.06 | 31.06 ± 2.27 | 1.2892 | 29.8440 |
| 10 | 2 | 40 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 1.12 ± 0.13 | 38.68 ± 4.55 | 0.9844 | 31.7497 |
| 11 | 2 | 60 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 2.72 ± 0.04 | 19.37 ± 2.90 | 8.6914 | 25.7426 |
| 12 | 2 | 80 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 2.15 ± 0.13 | 32.05 ± 1.85 | 6.6488 | 30.1166 |
| 13 | 4 | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 2.13 ± 0.50 | 25.74 ± 3.03 | 6.5676 | 28.2122 |
| 14 | 4 | 40 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 1.28 ± 0.23 | 34.53 ± 0.85 | 2.1442 | 30.7639 |
| 15 | 4 | 60 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 1.96 ± 0.08 | 31.85 ± 1.60 | 5.8451 | 30.0622 |
| 16 | 4 | 80 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 4.18 ± 0.41 | 59.10 ± 1.73 | 12.4235 | 35.4317 |
| Source | DF | Seq SS | Contribution | Adj SS | Adj MS | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen concentration (g/L) | 3 | 52.401 | 24.65% | 52.401 | 17.4669 | 18.96 | 0.008 |
| WCO concentration (g/L) | 3 | 34.252 | 16.12% | 34.252 | 11.4172 | 12.39 | 0.017 |
| Tween 80 (%, v/v) | 3 | 108.781 | 51.18% | 108.781 | 36.2604 | 39.36 | 0.002 |
| Sonication | 1 | 2.434 | 1.15% | 2.434 | 2.4338 | 2.64 | 0.179 |
| Sterility | 1 | 10.989 | 5.17% | 10.989 | 10.9888 | 11.93 | 0.026 |
| Error | 4 | 3.685 | 1.73% | 3.685 | 0.9213 | ||
| Total | 15 | 212.542 | 100% |
| Source | DF | Seq SS | Contribution | Adj SS | Adj MS | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen concentration (g/L) | 3 | 88.224 | 52.55% | 88.224 | 29.4080 | 39.77 | 0.002 |
| WCO concentration (g/L) | 3 | 47.929 | 28.55% | 47.929 | 15.9764 | 21.61 | 0.006 |
| Tween 80 (%, v/v) | 3 | 8.229 | 4.90% | 8.229 | 2.7432 | 3.71 | 0.119 |
| Sonication | 1 | 4.501 | 2.68% | 4.501 | 4.5010 | 6.09 | 0.069 |
| Sterility | 1 | 16.037 | 9.55% | 16.037 | 16.0374 | 21.69 | 0.010 |
| Error | 4 | 2.958 | 1.76% | 2.958 | 0.7394 | ||
| Total | 15 | 167.879 | 100% |
| Run | N (g/L) | WCO (g/L) | Tween 80 (%, v/v) | Sonication | Sterility | C16:0 | C18:0 | C18:1n9c | C18:2n6c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 20 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 23.11 ± 2.23 | 12.40 ± 3.54 | 28.76 ± 5.10 | 35.72 ± 0.67 |
| 2 | 0 | 40 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 23.80 ± 0.01 | 20.03 ± 0.06 | 45.18 ± 1.65 | 11.00 ± 1.72 |
| 3 | 0 | 60 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 21.86 ± 1.57 | 15.65 ± 3.83 | 43.64 ± 2.45 | 18.86 ± 4.72 |
| 4 | 0 | 80 | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 22.54 ± 2.79 | 17.40 ± 5.16 | 44.30 ± 2.01 | 15.76 ± 4.38 |
| 5 | 1 | 20 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 12.09 ± 1.51 | 8.59 ± 0.01 | 48.35 ± 1.61 | 30.97 ± 3.12 |
| 6 | 1 | 40 | 0.0 | 1 | 1 | 13.94 ± 0.08 | 5.30 ± 0.01 | 42.71 ± 0.16 | 38.06 ± 0.06 |
| 7 | 1 | 60 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 10.84 ± 0.94 | 8.72 ± 2.26 | 56.86 ± 1.80 | 23.58 ± 1.39 |
| 8 | 1 | 80 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 12.62 ± 0.52 | 4.90 ± 0.19 | 47.28 ± 1.44 | 35.19 ± 2.15 |
| 9 | 2 | 20 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 14.18 ± 2.47 | 12.40 ± 3.68 | 51.14 ± 1.12 | 22.28 ± 7.27 |
| 10 | 2 | 40 | 2.0 | 0 | 1 | 13.14 ± 0.49 | 6.91 ± 0.49 | 46.48 ± 0.10 | 33.47 ± 0.88 |
| 11 | 2 | 60 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 14.37 ± 0.10 | 5.11 ± 0.89 | 41.88 ± 1.29 | 38.64 ± 2.09 |
| 12 | 2 | 80 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 12.66 ± 1.83 | 6.67 ± 1.34 | 46.40 ± 0.88 | 34.28 ± 0.40 |
| 13 | 4 | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 11.34 ± 0.30 | 5.68 ± 0.74 | 54.74 ± 1.08 | 28.24 ± 0.04 |
| 14 | 4 | 40 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 13.73 ± 3.27 | 7.62 ± 0.06 | 52.45 ± 1.15 | 26.20 ± 2.18 |
| 15 | 4 | 60 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 13.09 ± 0.08 | 5.56 ± 0.91 | 46.51 ± 0.91 | 34.84 ± 1.73 |
| 16 | 4 | 80 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 15.24 ± 0.84 | 1.44 ± 0.58 | 42.39 ± 1.97 | 40.93 ± 2.23 |
| Source | DF | Seq SS | Contribution | Adj SS | Adj MS | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen concentration (g/L) | 3 | 72.2554 | 91.16% | 72.2554 | 24.0851 | 132.64 | 0.000 |
| WCO concentration (g/L) | 3 | 1.2262 | 1.55% | 1.2262 | 0.4087 | 2.25 | 0.225 |
| Tween 80 (%, v/v) | 3 | 4.2572 | 5.37% | 4.2572 | 1.4191 | 7.81 | 0.038 |
| Sonication | 1 | 0.1452 | 0.18% | 0.1452 | 0.1452 | 0.80 | 0.422 |
| Sterility | 1 | 0.6489 | 0.82% | 0.6489 | 0.6489 | 3.57 | 0.132 |
| Error | 4 | 0.7263 | 0.92% | 0.7263 | 0.1816 | ||
| Total | 15 | 79.2592 | 100% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Sayın, B. Waste Sunflower Oil as a Feedstock for Efficient Single-Cell Oil and Biomass Production by Yarrowia lipolytica. Foods 2026, 15, 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15020290
Sayın B. Waste Sunflower Oil as a Feedstock for Efficient Single-Cell Oil and Biomass Production by Yarrowia lipolytica. Foods. 2026; 15(2):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15020290
Chicago/Turabian StyleSayın, Bilge. 2026. "Waste Sunflower Oil as a Feedstock for Efficient Single-Cell Oil and Biomass Production by Yarrowia lipolytica" Foods 15, no. 2: 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15020290
APA StyleSayın, B. (2026). Waste Sunflower Oil as a Feedstock for Efficient Single-Cell Oil and Biomass Production by Yarrowia lipolytica. Foods, 15(2), 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15020290

