Comparative Effects of Freeze-Drying and Sun-Drying on Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Microbial Characteristics, and Aroma Profile of Purple Sweet Potato-Enriched Tarhana
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Preparation of Purple Sweet Potato Puree
2.2.2. Preparation of Purple Sweet Potato Powder by Freeze-Drying (Lyophilization)
2.2.3. Production of Tarhana Enriched with Purple Sweet Potato
2.2.4. Analyses Performed on the Produced Tarhana Samples
Physicochemical Analyses
Analysis of Microstructural Produced Tarhana Samples by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Analysis of Phenolic Compounds
Analysis of Antioxidant Activity
Analysis of Aroma Compounds
- Extraction of Aroma Compounds
- GC-FID and GC-MS Conditions
- Quantification of Aroma Compounds
Microbiological Analysis
2.2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Physicochemical Properties
3.1.1. Moisture Content and Water Activity
3.1.2. Color Characteristics of Tarhana Samples
3.2. SEM Analysis of Tarhana Samples
3.3. Results of Microbiological Analysis
3.4. Phenolic Compounds
3.5. Antioxidant Activity
3.6. Aroma Profile of Tarhana
3.7. Results of PCA
3.8. Practical Implications and Industrial Feasibility
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cai, Z.; Qu, Z.; Lan, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ma, X.; Wan, Q.; Jing, P.; Li, P. Conventional, ultrasound-assisted, and accelerated-solvent extractions of anthocyanins from purple sweet potatoes. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dincer, C.; Karaoglan, M.; Erden, F.; Tetik, N.; Topuz, A.; Ozdemir, F. Effects of baking and boiling on the nutritional and antioxidant properties of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] cultivars. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2011, 66, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, L.; Liu, H.; Wu, W. Processability and physical-functional properties of purple sweet potato powder as influenced by explosion puffing drying. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2021, 15, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhai, W.; Yang, Z. Studies on antioxidant capacity of anthocyanin extract from purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 7046–7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truong, V.D.; Avula, R.Y.; Pecota, K.; Yencho, C.G. Sweetpotato production, processing and nutritional quality. In Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing, 2nd ed.; Siddiq, M., Uebersax, M.A., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Ames, IA, USA, 2018; pp. 811–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, A.; Xiao, R.; He, S.; An, X.; He, Y.; Wang, C.; Yin, S.; Wang, B.; Shi, X.; He, J. Research advances of purple sweet potato anthocyanins: Extraction, identification, stability, bioactivity, application, and biotransformation. Molecules 2019, 24, 3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santiago, D.M.; Matsushita, K.; Noda, T.; Tsuboi, K.; Yamada, D.; Murayama, D.; Koaze, H.; Yamauchi, H. Effect of purple sweet potato powder substitution and enzymatic treatments on bread making quality. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2015, 21, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, Y.R.; Kim, I.; Lee, J. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.): Varietal comparisons and physical distribution. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sabuncu, M.; Dulger Altıner, D.; Sahan, Y. In vitro biological activity and nutritional evaluation of purple potato (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Vitelotte). BMC Chem. 2025, 19, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adeleke, D.; Egal, A.; Modise, S.; Adeleke, R. Nutritional and functional characterization of a maize–soybean–orange-fleshed sweet potato complementary food blend via lactic acid fermentation. Food Humanit. 2026, 6, 101053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andriani, R.B.; Wikandari, P.R. The effect of fermentation time on the product quality of purple sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) probiotic ice cream with starter culture of Lactobacillus plantarum B1765. World J. Adv. Res. Rev. 2022, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faramitha, F.; Mahendradatta, M.; Asfar, M.; Iqbal, M.; Adam, A. Study utilisation of purple sweet potato in food products: Research trends bibliometric. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2024, 23, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erbaş, M.; Certel, M.; Uslu, M.K. Microbiological and chemical properties of tarhana during fermentation and storage as wet—Sensorial properties of tarhana soup. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Settanni, L.; Moschetti, G. Non-starter lactic acid bacteria used to improve cheese quality and provide health benefits. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanguler, H.; Erten, H. Chemical and microbiological characteristics of shalgam (şalgam): A traditional Turkish lactic acid fermented beverage. J. Food Qual. 2012, 35, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fellows, P.J. Food Processing Technology: Principles and Practice, 3rd ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ratti, C. Hot air and freeze-drying of high-value foods: A review. J. Food Eng. 2001, 49, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciurzynska, A.; Lenart, A. Freeze-drying—Application in food processing and biotechnology—A review. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2011, 61, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunha, P.C.D.; Silva, M.T.D.C.; Barbosa, M.I.M.J.; Ferreira, E.H.D.R. Application of lyophilized purple-fleshed sweet potato powder as a multifunctional ingredient in Greek yogurt. Ciênc. Rural 2023, 54, e20220688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moscetti, R.; Raponi, F.; Monarca, D.; Bedini, G.; Ferri, S.; Massantini, R. Effects of hot-water and steam blanching of sliced potato on polyphenol oxidase activity. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şengün, I.Y.; Nielsen, D.S.; Karapınar, M.; Jakobsen, M. Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from tarhana, a traditional Turkish fermented food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 135, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Method 960.52; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Ranadheera, C.S.; Evans, C.A.; Adams, M.C.; Baines, S.K. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and Propionibacterium jensenii 702 by spray drying in goat’s milk. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 123, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abad-García, B.; Berrueta, L.A.; Garmón-Lobato, S.; Gallo, B.; Vicente, F. A general analytical strategy for the characterization of phenolic compounds in fruit juices by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 5398–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kesen, S.; Kelebek, H.; Selli, S. Characterization of the volatile, phenolic and antioxidant properties of monovarietal olive oil obtained from cv. Halhali. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2013, 90, 1685–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, L.; Lu, J. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of different grape cultivars grown in China. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaftan, A.; Elmacı, Y. Aroma characterization of virgin olive oil from two Turkish olive varieties by SPME/GC/MS. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 14, 1160–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kesen, S.; Kiliç, E.E. Fatty acid and aroma profiles of microencapsulated olive oils from Southeastern Anatolia: Effects of cultivar variations, storage time, and wall material formulation. Foods 2025, 14, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International IDF Standard 112B; Milk and Milk Products: Preparation of Sample and Dilutions for Microbiological Examination. International Dairy Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 1992.
- International IDF Standard 100A; Milk and Milk Products: Enumeration of Micro-Organisms—Colony Count at 30 °C. International Dairy Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 1987.
- ISO 21527-1:2008; Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs—Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Yeasts and Moulds—Part 1: Colony Count Technique in Products with Water Activity Greater than 0.95. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
- Kılıç, E.E.; Halil Kılıç, İ.; Koç, B. Yoghurt production potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from leguminous seeds and effects of encapsulated lactic acid bacteria on bacterial viability and physicochemical and sensory properties of yoghurt. J. Chem. 2022, 2022, 2683126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TS 2282; Tarhana Standard. Turkish Standards Institute: Ankara, Türkiye, 2004.
- Işık, M.S.; Bilgin, R.; Gökırmaklı, Ç.; Şatır, G.; Güzel-Seydim, Z.B. Determination of the effects of different drying methods on tarhana with improved functional properties. Turk. J. Agric.-Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 11, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bardakçi, M.S.; Karacabey, E. Drying of tarhana dough by Refractance Window™ technology under vacuum/atmospheric conditions: Characterization of physical and quality parameters. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 971–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gülden, E.; Erdoğan, S.L.; Akdoğan, A.; Altay, K.; Çalışkan Koç, G. Enrichment of tarhana with olive leaf powder: Evaluation of physical, functional, Powder, and sensory properties. ISPEC J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2025, 9, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kıymaz, B.M.; Birkan, M.; Bayraktar, Z.; Tozluoglu, M.N.; Kırtekın, B.; Korur, M.; Arıcı, M. Evaluation of the variations in the physicochemical and microbiological properties of tarhana enriched with a black carrot during the production process. Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 2025, 43, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- İbanoğlu, Ş.; Ainsworth, P.; Wilson, G.; Hayes, G.D. The effect of fermentation conditions on the nutrients and acceptability of tarhana. Food Chem. 1995, 53, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cingöz, A.; Erdoğan, Z. Physicochemical, functional, sensory, and rheological properties of traditional tarhanas from the Central Anatolian region. Black Sea J. Agric. 2025, 8, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamer, C.E.; Kumral, A.; Aşan, M.; Şahin, İ. Chemical compositions of traditional tarhana having different formulations. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2007, 31, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilgiçli, N.; Elgün, A.; Herken, E.N.; Türker, S.; Ertaş, N.; Ìbanoǧlu, Ş. Effect of wheat germ/bran addition on the chemical, nutritional and sensory quality of tarhana, a fermented wheat flour-yoghurt product. J. Food Eng. 2006, 77, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herken, E.N.; Aydin, N. Use of carob flour in the production of tarhana. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 65, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayta, M.; Alpaslan, M.; Baysar, A. Effect of drying methods on functional properties of tarhana: A wheat flour–yogurt mixture. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 740–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilgiçli, N. Effect of buckwheat flour on chemical and functional properties of tarhana. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krokida, M.K.; Maroulis, Z.B. Structural properties of dehydrated products during rehydration. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 36, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibanoglu, S.; Kaya, S.; Kaya, A. Evaluation of sorption properties of Turkish tarhana powder. Food/Nahrung 1999, 43, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giusti, M.M.; Wrolstad, R.E. Acylated anthocyanins from edible sources and their applications in food systems. Biochem. Eng. J. 2003, 14, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J.; Giusti, M.M. Anthocyanins: Natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 1, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kamiloglu, S.; Pasli, A.A.; Ozcelik, B.; Van Camp, J.; Capanoglu, E. Colour retention, anthocyanin stability and antioxidant capacity in black carrot (Daucus carota) jams and marmalades: Effect of processing, storage conditions and in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gumul, D.; Korus, A.; Ziobro, R. Extruded Preparations with Sour Cherry Pomace Influence Quality and Increase the Level of Bioactive Components in Gluten-Free Breads. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 2020, 8024398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Truong, V.D.; McFeeters, R.F.; Thompson, R.T.; Dean, L.L.; Shofran, B. Phenolic acid content and composition in leaves and roots of common commercial sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) cultivars in the United States. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, C343–C349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castañeda-Ovando, A.; Pacheco-Hernández, M.L.; Páez-Hernández, M.E.; Rodríguez, J.A.; Galán-Vidal, C.A. Chemical studies of anthocyanins: A review. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 859–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kırca, A.; Özkan, M.; Cemeroğlu, B. Stability of black carrot anthocyanins in various fruit juices and nectars. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enaru, B.; Dreţcanu, G.; Pop, T.D.; Stǎnilǎ, A.; Diaconeasa, Z. Anthocyanins: Factors affecting their stability and degradation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Göncü, A. The effect of using sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) puree in tarhana formulations on nutritional value and functional properties of tarhana. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 5412–5425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Göncü, A.; Çelik, İ. Investigation of some properties of gluten-free tarhanas produced by red, green and yellow lentil whole flour. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 40, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köse, Y.E.; Okumuş, E.; Köse, Ş.; Sağdıç, O.; Ceylan, M.M.; Altun, İ. Textural, pasting and thermal properties of traditional Maras tarhana produced with cracked wheat. J. Inst. Sci. Technol. 2025, 15, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Champagne, C.P.; Gardner, N.J.; Roy, D. Challenges in the addition of probiotic cultures to foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morgan, C.A.; Herman, N.; White, P.A.; Vesey, G. Preservation of micro-organisms by drying; a review. J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 66, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blandino, A.; Al-Aseeri, M.E.; Pandiella, S.S.; Cantero, D.; Webb, C. Cereal-based fermented foods and beverages. Food Res. Int. 2003, 36, 527–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çevik, A.; Ertaş, N. Effect of quinoa, buckwheat and lupine on nutritional properties and consumer preferences of tarhana. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crops Foods 2019, 11, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawidowicz, A.L.; Typek, R. Thermal stability of 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid in aqueous solutions at different heating conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12578–12584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Babaei Rad, S.; Mumivand, H.; Mollaei, S.; Khadivi, A. Effect of drying methods on phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of Capparis spinosa L. fruits. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Calín-Sánchez, Á.; Lipan, L.; Cano-Lamadrid, M.; Kharaghani, A.; Masztalerz, K.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Figiel, A. Comparison of traditional and novel drying techniques and its effect on quality of fruits, vegetables and aromatic herbs. Foods 2020, 9, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Değirmencioğlu, N.; Gürbüz, O.; Herken, E.N.; Yıldız, A.Y. The impact of drying techniques on phenolic compound, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of oat flour tarhana. Food Chem. 2016, 194, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hole, A.S.; Rud, I.; Grimmer, S.; Sigl, S.; Narvhus, J.; Sahlstrøm, S. Improved bioavailability of dietary phenolic acids in whole grain barley and oat groat following fermentation with probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Lactobacillus reuteri. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 6369–6375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaur, G.; Gänzle, M.G. Conversion of (poly)phenolic compounds in food fermentations by lactic acid bacteria: Novel insights into metabolic pathways and functional metabolites. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 6, 100448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, H. Chemical and biological changes of polyphenols caused by food thermal processing. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 948894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Z.; Han, Z.; Zhu, M.; Wan, X.; Zhang, L. Effects of thermal processing on transformation of polyphenols and flavor quality. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 51, 101014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daglia, M. Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Filannino, P.; Di Cagno, R.; Gobbetti, M. Metabolic and functional paths of lactic acid bacteria in plant foods: Get out of the labyrinth. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018, 49, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vega-Gálvez, A.; Miranda, M.; Díaz, L.P.; López, L.; Rodriguez, K.; Di Scala, K. Effective moisture diffusivity determination and mathematical modelling of the drying curves of the olive-waste cake. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 7265–7270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frankel, E.N. Lipid Oxidation, 2nd ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Shahidi, F.; Zhong, Y. Lipid oxidation and improving the oxidative stability. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4067–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kelebek, H. LC-DAD–ESI-MS/MS characterization of phenolic constituents in Turkish black tea: Effect of infusion time and temperature. Food Chem. 2016, 204, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hur, S.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, Y.C.; Choi, I.; Kim, G.B. Effect of fermentation on the antioxidant activity in plant-based foods. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beshkova, D.; Simofva, E.; Frengova, G.; Simov, Z. Production of flavour compounds by yogurt starter cultures. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 20, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reineccius, G. Flavor Chemistry and Technology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, A.J.; Linforth, R.S.T. Flavour release in the mouth. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1996, 7, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Physical Properties | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture content (%) | Control | – | 5.19 ± 0.01 aA | 3.16 ± 0.02 dB |
| Puree | 5 | 5.22 ± 0.06 aA | 3.45 ± 0.03 cB | |
| 10 | 5.31 ± 0.03 aA | 3.51 ± 0.03 cB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 5.26 ± 0.03 aA | 3.25 ± 0.04 dB | |
| 10 | 5.19 ± 0.02 aA | 3.18 ± 0.04 dB | ||
| Water activity | Control | – | 0.32 ± 0.01 bA | 0.12 ± 0.01 fB |
| Puree | 5 | 0.34 ± 0.01 bA | 0.12 ± 0.01 fB | |
| 10 | 0.40 ± 0.01 aA | 0.15 ± 0.02 eB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 0.39 ± 0.01 aA | 0.18 ± 0.01 dB | |
| 10 | 0.30 ± 0.01 cA | 0.22 ± 0.01 cB | ||
| Ash content (%) | Control | – | 3.12 ± 0.11 aA | 3.27 ± 0.12 aA |
| Puree | 5 | 4.29 ± 0.28 bA | 4.42 ± 0.24 bA | |
| 10 | 4.44 ± 0.23 bcA | 4.58 ± 0.36 bA | ||
| Powder | 5 | 4.54 ± 0.17 bcA | 4.69 ± 0.24 bA | |
| 10 | 4.79 ± 0.19 cA | 4.84 ± 0.10 bA | ||
| Protein content (%) | Control | – | 13.09 ± 0.30 bA | 13.72 ± 0.51 aA |
| Puree | 5 | 12.99 ± 0.22 abA | 13.48 ± 0.53 aA | |
| 10 | 12.44 ± 0.25 aA | 13.37 ± 0.36 aA | ||
| Powder | 5 | 13.21 ± 0.39 bA | 13.87 ± 0.36 aA | |
| 10 | 13.45 ± 0.36 bA | 13.92 ± 0.70 aA | ||
| pH | Control | – | 4.20 ± 0.01 dA | 4.12 ± 0.02 dB |
| Puree | 5 | 4.07 ± 0.01 cA | 3.97 ± 0.03 cB | |
| 10 | 3.93 ± 0.03 bA | 3.88 ± 0.02 bB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 3.95 ± 0.01 bA | 3.85 ± 0.01 bA | |
| 10 | 3.87 ± 0.01 aA | 3.78 ± 0.01 aB | ||
| Titratable acidity (%) | Control | – | 1.27 ± 0.05 aA | 1.48 ± 0.04 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 1.48 ± 0.04 bA | 1.69 ± 0.03 bB | |
| 10 | 1.69 ± 0.06 cA | 1.92 ± 0.03 cB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 1.60 ± 0.03 cA | 1.81 ± 0.03 cB | |
| 10 | 1.87 ± 0.03 dA | 2.16 ± 0.04 eB |
| Color Value | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | Control | – | 51.97 ± 0.20 eA | 88.66 ± 0.09 eB |
| Puree | 5 | 48.18 ± 0.13 dA | 81.70 ± 0.15 dB | |
| 10 | 41.91 ± 0.04 cA | 79.53 ± 0.19 cB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 37.49 ± 1.08 bA | 73.79 ± 0.03 bB | |
| 10 | 31.80 ± 2.02 aA | 69.24 ± 1.96 aB | ||
| a* | Control | – | 4.18 ± 0.04 aA | 0.40 ± 0.03 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 10.17 ± 0.07 bA | 5.24 ± 0.01 bB | |
| 10 | 11.26 ± 0.03 cA | 6.68 ± 0.06 cB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 14.37 ± 0.20 eA | 9.87 ± 0.03 dB | |
| 10 | 13.52 ± 0.28 dA | 11.63 ± 0.08 eB | ||
| b* | Control | – | 18.03 ± 0.02 dA | 13.32 ± 0.05 dB |
| Puree | 5 | 12.81 ± 0.26 bA | 11.71 ± 0.08 cB | |
| 10 | 12.53 ± 0.07 aA | 11.30 ± 0.14 bB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 11.14 ± 1.02 aA | 11.27 ± 0.17 bB | |
| 10 | 10.73 ± 1.03 aA | 10.54 ± 0.04 aB |
| Microbial Properties | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAB (log CFU/g) | Control | – | 3.45 ± 0.09 aA | 4.32 ± 0.13 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 3.71 ± 0.05 aA | 5.61 ± 0.25 bcB | |
| 10 | 3.98 ± 0.27 aA | 6.02 ± 0.16 cB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 3.42 ± 0.21 aA | 5.45 ± 0.13 bB | |
| 10 | 3.50 ± 0.28 aA | 5.82 ± 0.15 bcB | ||
| Yeast & Mold (log CFU/g) | Control | – | 2.01 ± 0.02 aA | 1.29 ± 0.16 bA |
| Puree | 5 | 2.37 ± 0.17 aA | 1.21 ± 0.11 abB | |
| 10 | 2.26 ± 0.18 aA | 1.32 ± 0.15 bB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 2.12 ± 0.20 aA | 1.02 ± 0.06 aB | |
| 10 | 2.02 ± 0.19 aA | 1.00 ± 0.07 aB | ||
| TMAB (log CFU/g) | Control | – | 4.11 ± 0.17 aA | 3.22 ± 0.24 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 4.24 ± 0.18 aA | 3.22 ± 0.24 aB | |
| 10 | 4.08 ± 0.15 aA | 3.41 ± 0.19 aB | ||
| Powder | 5 | 4.02 ± 1.32 aA | 3.12 ± 0.09 aB | |
| 10 | 3.89 ± 0.19 aA | 3.02 ± 0.16 aB |
| Compound | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD | Compound | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanillic acid | Control | – | 1634.31 ± 31.50 aA | 1712.92 ± 20.90 aB | Syringic acid | Control | – | 486.41 ± 23.03 aA | 506.27 ± 11.36 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 1665.51 ± 21.82 abA | 1738.26 ± 31.04 abB | Puree | 5 | 502.05 ± 10.60 bA | 522.21 ± 25.03 abA | ||
| 10 | 1697.22 ± 17.54 bcA | 1760.00 ± 22.27 bB | 10 | 518.04 ± 11.70 abA | 545.74 ± 17.17 bcA | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 1680.27 ± 20.83 bcA | 1764.37 ± 20.99 bB | Powder | 5 | 514.83 ± 25.71 abA | 542.53 ± 9.54 bcA | ||
| 10 | 1715.29 ± 21.72 cA | 1886.90 ± 18.06 cB | 10 | 545.05 ± 6.00 bA | 565.99 ± 10.38 cB | ||||
| Caffeic acid | Control | – | 1730.73 ± 23.20 aA | 2152.56 ± 18.33 aB | p-Coumaric acid | Control | – | 904.00 ± 18.84 aA | 997.97 ± 10.44 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 1745.86 ± 24.22 abA | 2193.70 ± 65.50 abB | Puree | 5 | 987.45 ± 12.08 bA | 1024.78 ± 22.85 aA | ||
| 10 | 1786.52 ± 19.83 bcA | 2278.24 ± 23.3 cB | 10 | 1096.32 ± 10.82 dA | 1166.90 ± 16.99 cB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 1777.82 ± 37.33 bcA | 2252.62 ± 19.58 bcB | Powder | 5 | 1021.59 ± 21.65 cA | 1112.25 ± 13.31 bB | ||
| 10 | 1807.85 ± 24.16 cA | 2376.21 ± 25.92 dB | 10 | 1135.56 ± 15.51 eA | 1214.17 ± 13.16 dB | ||||
| Ferulic acid | Control | – | 1643.01 ± 15.32 aA | 1965.05 ± 19.19 aB | Chlorogenic acid | Control | – | 2176.16 ± 35.05 aA | 3526.65 ± 30.22 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 1685.83 ± 20.2 abA | 1998.69 ± 22.62 aB | Puree | 5 | 2191.56 ± 20.84 aA | 3765.38 ± 29.98 bB | ||
| 10 | 1721.74 ± 35.78 bA | 2068.60 ± 24.20 bB | 10 | 2221.47 ± 32.53 aA | 3994.08 ± 45.72 dB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 1702.46 ± 26.78 bA | 2067.49 ± 29.82 bB | Powder | 5 | 2208.62 ± 36.01 aA | 3928.95 ± 34.47 cB | ||
| 10 | 1798.82 ± 23.17 cA | 2176.73 ± 11.57 cB | 10 | 2565.43 ± 51.26 bA | 4827.59 ± 25.74 eB | ||||
| Fumaric acid | Control | – | 1888.21 ± 10.99 aA | 2018.27 ± 26.77 aB | |||||
| Puree | 5 | 1907.65 ± 30.73 abA | 2065.02 ± 24.76 abB | ||||||
| 10 | 1948.15 ± 29.03 bcA | 2168.46 ± 25.63 cB | |||||||
| Powder | 5 | 1932.88 ± 19.05 abA | 2112.40 ± 35.92 bB | ||||||
| 10 | 1989.85 ± 22.41 cA | 2249.70 ± 21.90 dB | |||||||
| Antioxidant activity (µmolTE/g) | Control | – | 9.79 ± 0.23 aA | 10.14 ± 0.24 aB | |||||
| Puree | 5 | 9.85 ± 0.29 aA | 10.21 ± 0.35 aB | ||||||
| 10 | 10.01 ± 0.40 aA | 10.47 ± 0.23 aB | |||||||
| Powder | 5 | 9.92 ± 0.43 aA | 10.39 ± 0.22 aB | ||||||
| 10 | 10.20 ± 0.02 aA | 10.68 ± 0.26 aB |
| Compound | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD | Compound | Formulation | Conc. (%) | SD | FD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hexanal | Control | – | 1259.84 ± 39.88 cA | 996.38 ± 14.92 dB | Heptanal | Control | – | 18.21 ± 0.61 bA | 14.62 ± 0.31 cB |
| Puree | 5 | 1202.52 ± 11.00 bA | 925.11 ± 20.32 cB | Puree | 5 | 18.02 ± 0.54 abA | 14.25 ± 0.70 bcB | ||
| 10 | 1195.43 ± 14.04 bA | 882.56 ± 30.85 bB | 10 | 18.56 ± 0.68 bA | 14.84 ± 0.40 cB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 1147.22 ± 29.28 aA | 826.52 ± 20.79 aB | Powder | 5 | 17.86 ± 0.62 aA | 13.42 ± 0.45 abB | ||
| 10 | 1104.23 ± 17.37 aA | 802.63 ± 15.22 aB | 10 | 17.02 ± 0.43 aA | 13.07 ± 0.28 aB | ||||
| Pentanol | Control | – | 53.61 ± 3.10 bA | 45.57 ± 2.79 dB | Limonene | Control | – | 245.73 ± 5.16 aA | 356.21 ± 10.95 bB |
| Puree | 5 | 52.52 ± 1.51 bA | 42.42 ± 1.46 cdA | Puree | 5 | 326.23 ± 11.69 bA | 334.23 ± 21.88 abB | ||
| 10 | 50.78 ± 2.44 abA | 39.96 ± 1.95 cB | 10 | 381.28 ± 11.84 cA | 315.42 ± 13.72 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 50.63 ± 2.32 aA | 36.16 ± 0.64 bB | Powder | 5 | 410.04 ± 9.90 dA | 351.35 ± 11.88 bB | ||
| 10 | 47.55 ± 1.39 aA | 32.43 ± 1.10 aB | 10 | 438.54 ± 16.50 dA | 363.24 ± 16.71 bB | ||||
| Ethyl hexanoate | Control | – | 10.25 ± 0.03 bA | 36.43 ± 0.71 aB | 3-Methyl butanol | Control | – | 27.54 ± 0.69 aA | 47.83 ± 1.94 bB |
| Puree | 5 | 9.12 ± 0.45 aA | 36.02 ± 1.47 aB | Puree | 5 | 26.62 ± 1.30 aA | 44.38 ± 2.29 abB | ||
| 10 | 8.96 ± 0.43 aA | 35.86 ± 2.71 aB | 10 | 26.06 ± 1.09 aA | 40.43 ± 2.12 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 10.02 ± 0.48 bA | 36.25 ± 2.04 aB | Powder | 5 | 27.48 ± 1.41 aA | 47.17 ± 1.04 bB | ||
| 10 | 9.86 ± 0.30 bA | 36.53 ± 1.85 aB | 10 | 27.36 ± 1.82 aA | 47.06 ± 3.46 bB | ||||
| Octanal | Control | – | 210.76 ± 9.37 dA | 116.42 ± 6.24 cB | Nonanal | Control | – | 564.89 ± 19.88 cA | 417.93 ± 18.84 bB |
| Puree | 5 | 188.10 ± 8.98 cA | 103.88 ± 3.90 abB | Puree | 5 | 538.62 ± 15.79 bcA | 396.88 ± 13.94 abB | ||
| 10 | 172.55 ± 9.27 bA | 98.32 ± 6.83 aB | 10 | 512.88 ± 10.09 abA | 373.44 ± 17.46 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 164.89 ± 8.10 aA | 112.23 ± 8.45 bcB | Powder | 5 | 505.57 ± 17.29 aA | 410.06 ± 12.15 bB | ||
| 10 | 155.47 ± 7.09 aA | 107.44 ± 6.42 bcB | 10 | 486.12 ± 13.48 aA | 406.26 ± 13.58 bB | ||||
| (E)-3-Octen-2-one | Control | – | 53.78 ± 5.06 cA | – | 2-Propyl-1-heptanol | Control | – | 375.26 ± 5.25 cA | 523.01 ± 11.93 bB |
| Puree | 5 | 50.14 ± 3.03 bcA | – | Puree | 5 | 355.72 ± 13.13 bA | 501.77 ± 11.41 abB | ||
| 10 | 44.63 ± 1.99 bA | – | 10 | 332.82 ± 11.20 aA | 486.99 ± 16.80 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 38.45 ± 1.02 aA | – | Powder | 5 | 366.01 ± 11.60 bcA | 518.93 ± 13.11 bB | ||
| 10 | 34.59 ± 3.39 aA | – | 10 | 360.47 ± 2.49 bcA | 513.40 ± 11.28 bB | ||||
| Acetic acid | Control | – | 198.71 ± 3.83 cA | 246.89 ± 9.60 cB | Benzaldehyde | Control | – | 193.61 ± 6.46 cA | 223.16 ± 12.27 bB |
| Puree | 5 | 175.16 ± 9.40 bA | 226.84 ± 7.41 bB | Puree | 5 | 168.09 ± 8.39 bA | 207.09 ± 9.95 abB | ||
| 10 | 161.25 ± 10.66 aA | 215.32 ± 12.30 abB | 10 | 153.43 ± 6.22 aA | 200.72 ± 10.49 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 185.84 ± 9.91 bA | 208.61 ± 10.73 abB | Powder | 5 | 188.95 ± 9.27 bA | 213.15 ± 14.62 abB | ||
| 10 | 179.38 ± 3.81 bA | 197.04 ± 9.67 aB | 10 | 171.01 ± 6.44 bA | 206.86 ± 7.87 abB | ||||
| Isononenal | Control | – | 129.39 ± 8.06 cA | 101.07 ± 5.38 dB | 2,3-Butanediol | Control | – | 569.83 ± 15.89 aA | 575.05 ± 9.35 aA |
| Puree | 5 | 123.76 ± 4.96 bcA | 91.05 ± 2.57 cB | Puree | 5 | 550.27 ± 12.53 aA | 556.08 ± 15.47 aA | ||
| 10 | 114.18 ± 5.40 abA | 82.67 ± 3.40 bB | 10 | 541.18 ± 15.03 aA | 543.35 ± 25.24 aA | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 117.66 ± 6.19 aA | 94.32 ± 4.38 cdB | Powder | 5 | 562.02 ± 13.07 aA | 564.09 ± 16.14 aA | ||
| 10 | 108.77 ± 4.93 aA | 71.45 ± 3.01 aB | 10 | 553.52 ± 15.60 aA | 558.51 ± 18.25 aA | ||||
| 3-Methyl-2-butanol | Control | – | 311.28 ± 12.73 cA | 365.42 ± 9.09 bB | Ethyl decanoate | Control | – | 108.85 ± 5.2 bA | 258.14 ± 10.10 bB |
| Puree | 5 | 282.79 ± 9.42 abA | 348.32 ± 13.08 abB | Puree | 5 | 92.08 ± 3.35 aA | 232.36 ± 15.01 abB | ||
| 10 | 264.70 ± 9.10 aA | 334.37 ± 11.66 aB | 10 | 85.14 ± 5.36 aA | 220.76 ± 16.75 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 304.45 ± 11.85 bA | 357.05 ± 17.34 abB | Powder | 5 | 102.47 ± 6.95 aA | 243.82 ± 13.03 abB | ||
| 10 | 285.26 ± 10.41 bA | 342.63 ± 19.95 abB | 10 | 94.08 ± 4.28 aA | 235.14 ± 15.86 abB | ||||
| 3,6-Dimethylpiperazine-2,5-dione | Control | – | 42.16 ± 2.12 bA | 20.19 ± 0.92 bB | 3-Methyl butanoic acid | Control | – | 256.26 ± 6.17 dA | 617.14 ± 10.29 aB |
| Puree | 5 | 38.13 ± 1.06 aA | 19.13 ± 0.57 abB | Puree | 5 | 221.12 ± 10.41 cA | 618.99 ± 19.08 aB | ||
| 10 | 36.95 ± 1.87 aA | 18.44 ± 0.50 aB | 10 | 205.23 ± 9.92 bA | 608.75 ± 11.09 aB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 41.10 ± 3.14 aA | 20.01 ± 1.03 bB | Powder | 5 | 196.23 ± 6.19 aA | 611.20 ± 20.36 aB | ||
| 10 | 38.23 ± 1.77 aA | 19.82 ± 0.28 bB | 10 | 186.56 ± 7.32 aA | 594.14 ± 19.64 aB | ||||
| Hexanoic acid | Control | – | 305.25 ± 10.80 cA | 418.46 ± 15.89 cB | 2-Phenylethyl isobutyrate | Control | – | 206.58 ± 10.74 bA | 435.33 ± 15.23 cB |
| Puree | 5 | 264.13 ± 16.91 bA | 365.67 ± 14.02 aB | Puree | 5 | 203.16 ± 13.22 bA | 439.09 ± 20.80 cB | ||
| 10 | 232.89 ± 9.57 aA | 341.68 ± 16.95 aB | 10 | 186.58 ± 7.10 aA | 412.07 ± 20.65 bcB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 281.48 ± 7.12 bA | 394.48 ± 15.70 bcB | Powder | 5 | 201.41 ± 8.36 aA | 401.80 ± 12.48 abB | ||
| 10 | 273.54 ± 10.82 bA | 368.38 ± 10.84 abB | 10 | 170.24 ± 4.98 aA | 378.95 ± 9.62 aB | ||||
| Phenylethyl alcohol | Control | – | 259.10 ± 13.40 abA | 327.21 ± 13.78 aB | Octanoic acid | Control | – | 277.40 ± 13.09 cA | 450.72 ± 17.36 cB |
| Puree | 5 | 271.92 ± 9.30 bA | 343.00 ± 19.55 abB | Puree | 5 | 241.65 ± 9.67 aA | 425.94 ± 11.98 cB | ||
| 10 | 298.52 ± 8.34 cA | 359.19 ± 14.97 bB | 10 | 224.40 ± 8.09 aA | 389.72 ± 17.83 bB | ||||
| Powder | 5 | 262.22 ± 12.35 aA | 338.91 ± 14.42 abB | Powder | 5 | 268.95 ± 8.86 bA | 374.61 ± 13.55 abB | ||
| 10 | 248.35 ± 9.48 aA | 316.11 ± 12.71 aB | 10 | 251.47 ± 10.50 bA | 356.27 ± 11.20 aB | ||||
| Nonanoic acid | Control | – | 277.40 ± 13.15 cA | 179.25 ± 9.69 bB | |||||
| Puree | 5 | 262.78 ± 7.63 bcA | 173.46 ± 10.32 bB | ||||||
| 10 | 245.86 ± 10.38 bA | 167.12 ± 8.96 bB | |||||||
| Powder | 5 | 202.85 ± 5.13 aA | 150.89 ± 4.42 aB | ||||||
| 10 | 194.99 ± 6.46 aA | 144.46 ± 5.80 aB |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kiliç, E.E.; Kesen, S. Comparative Effects of Freeze-Drying and Sun-Drying on Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Microbial Characteristics, and Aroma Profile of Purple Sweet Potato-Enriched Tarhana. Foods 2026, 15, 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122217
Kiliç EE, Kesen S. Comparative Effects of Freeze-Drying and Sun-Drying on Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Microbial Characteristics, and Aroma Profile of Purple Sweet Potato-Enriched Tarhana. Foods. 2026; 15(12):2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122217
Chicago/Turabian StyleKiliç, Eda Elgin, and Songül Kesen. 2026. "Comparative Effects of Freeze-Drying and Sun-Drying on Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Microbial Characteristics, and Aroma Profile of Purple Sweet Potato-Enriched Tarhana" Foods 15, no. 12: 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122217
APA StyleKiliç, E. E., & Kesen, S. (2026). Comparative Effects of Freeze-Drying and Sun-Drying on Phenolic Composition, Antioxidant Capacity, Microbial Characteristics, and Aroma Profile of Purple Sweet Potato-Enriched Tarhana. Foods, 15(12), 2217. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15122217

