Combined Genome-Wide and Phenotypic Profiling of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum XHQ-007: Genome-Guided Insights into Tyramine Reduction, Safety Characteristics, and Probiotic Potential
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials and Strains
2.2. Screening of LAB with Tyramine Degradation Potential
2.3. Screening for Acid- and Bile Salt-Resistant Strains
2.4. Strain Identification and Characterization
2.4.1. Morphological Observation
2.4.2. Physiological and Biochemical Assays
2.4.3. Identification of Strain 16S rDNA
2.4.4. Determination of Growth and Acid Production Curves
2.5. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Functional Analysis
2.6. Comparative Genomic Analysis
2.7. Gene Annotation Related to Tyramine Degradation
2.8. Safety Analysis of Strains and Annotation of Related Genes
2.8.1. Antibiotic Resistance Testing
2.8.2. Indole Test
2.8.3. Nitroreductase Assay
2.8.4. Hemolysis Test
2.9. Probiotic Analysis of Strains and Annotation of Related Genes
2.9.1. Tolerance to Artificial Gastric and Intestinal Fluids
2.9.2. Antioxidant Assays
2.9.3. Coagulation Capacity Assay
2.9.4. Cell Surface Hydrophobicity Assay
2.9.5. Self-Coagulation Rate Assay
2.9.6. Antimicrobial Assay
2.10. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Analysis and Screening of Strains Most Likely to Reduce Tyramine
3.2. Identification and Fermentation Characterization of Strain LPXHQ-007
3.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Analysis of LPXHQ-007
3.4. Comparative Genomic Analysis of LPXHQ-007 and Five Other Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Strains
3.5. Putative Genetic Basis for Tyramine Degradation in LPXHQ-007
3.6. Strain Safety Analysis
3.6.1. Antibiotic Tolerance Analysis
3.6.2. Analysis of Virulence Factors and Harmful Metabolites
3.7. Analysis of Probiotic Properties of Strains
3.7.1. Analysis of Tolerance to Artificial Gastrointestinal Fluids
3.7.2. Antioxidant Activity Analysis
3.7.3. Annotation of Stress Tolerance-Related Genes
3.7.4. Adhesion Analysis
3.7.5. Analysis of Antibacterial Effects
4. Limitations and Future Prospects
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sadighara, P.; Bekheir, S.A.; Shafaroodi, H.; Basaran, B.; Sadighara, M. Tyramine, a biogenic agent in cheese: Amount and factors affecting its formation, a systematic review. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 2024, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, S.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Jia, Z.; Lu, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Q. Environmental driving forces affect the biogenic amine degradation performance of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum. Food Biosci. 2025, 74, 107809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Li, M.; Gao, Z.; Ma, H.; Chong, Y.; Hong, J.; Wu, J.; Wu, D.; Xi, D.; Deng, W. Advances in Whole Genome Sequencing: Methods, Tools, and Applications in Population Genomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, B.; Yin, R.; Li, X.; Cui, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, J.; Chen, W. Comparative genomic analysis of Lactiplantibacillus plantarumisolated from different niches. Genes 2021, 12, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, M.; Calles-Enríquez, M.; del Rio, B.; Ladero, V.; Alvarez, M.A. Construction and characterization of a double mutant of Enterococcus faecalisthat does not produce biogenic amines. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 16881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, L.; Guo, W.; Zhai, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, T.; Yang, L.; Jin, Y.; Duan, Y. Screening and the ability of biogenic amine-degrading strains from traditional meat products in Inner Mongolia. LWT 2023, 176, 114533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standard No. GB 5009.208-2016; National Food Safety Standard—Determination of Biogenic Amines in Foods. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2016.
- Zhang, J.; Zhu, B.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Lu, F. Remodeling Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Cell Wall Rigidity to Reduce Cell Lysis and Increase the Yield of Heterologous Proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 10552–10562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tang, J.; Peng, X.; Liu, D.-M.; Xu, Y.-Q.; Liang, M.-H.; Xiong, J.; Wu, J.-J. Assessment of the safety and probiotic properties of Lactobacillus delbrueckii DMLD-H1 based on comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis. LWT 2023, 184, 115070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arellano, K.; Vazquez, J.; Park, H. Safety Evaluation and Whole-Genome Annotation of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains from Different Sources with Special Focus on Isolates from Green Tea. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 1057–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.-H.; Liang, W.-S.; Wang, R.; Liang, Q.-C.; Zeng, X.-A.; Huang, Y.-Y. Assessment of the safety and probiotic properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HYY-DB9 based on comprehensive genomic and phenotypic analysis. LWT 2024, 203, 116386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.-M.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Liang, M.-H. Analysis of the probiotic characteristics and adaptability of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DMDL 9010 to gastrointestinal environment by complete genome sequencing and corresponding phenotypes. LWT 2022, 158, 113129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capozzi, V.; Russo, P.; Ladero, V.; Fernández, M.; Fiocco, D.; Alvarez, M.A.; Grieco, F.; Spano, G. Biogenic amines degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum: Toward a potential application in wine. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fadda, S.; Vignolo, G.; Oliver, G. Tyramine degradation and tyramine/histamine production by lactic acid bacteria and Kocuria strains. Biotechnol. Lett. 2001, 23, 2015–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, K.-L.; Liu, L.; Pan, W.-J. Two lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from naturally fermented foods improves physicochemical quality, antioxidant capacity, shelf life stability and metabolic profiles of Dangshan pear (Pyrus spp.) juice. Food Res. Int. 2025, 218, 116893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, X.; Chen, J.; Du, G.; Fang, F. Food-grade expression of multicopper oxidase with improved capability in degrading biogenic amines. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2022, 2, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liebgott, P.-P.; Amouric, A.; Comte, A.; Tholozan, J.-L.; Lorquin, J. Hydroxytyrosol from tyrosol using hydroxyphenylacetic acid-induced bacterial cultures and evidence of the role of 4-HPA 3-hydroxylase. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Yoon, S.H. A single amino acid substitution in aromatic hydroxylase (HpaB) of Escherichia coli alters substrate specificity of the structural isomers of hydroxyphenylacetate. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, A.; Lin, C.-C.; Lett, C.; Karpinska, B.; Wright, M.H.; Foyer, C.H. Catalase: A critical node in the regulation of cell fate. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2023, 199, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picciocchi, A.; Debeurme, F.; Beaumel, S.; Dagher, M.C.; Grunwald, D.; Jesaitis, A.J.; Stasia, M.J. Role of putative second transmembrane region of Nox2 protein in the structural stability and electron transfer of the phagocytic NADPH oxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 28357–28369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutkiewicz, M.; Nogues, I.; Witek, W.; Angelaccio, S.; Contestabile, R.; Ruszkowski, M. Insights into the substrate specificity, structure, and dynamics of plant histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase (HISN6). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 196, 759–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedone, E.; Ren, B.; Ladenstein, R.; Rossi, M.; Bartolucci, S. Functional properties of the protein disulfide oxidoreductase from the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus: A member of a novel protein family related to protein disulfide-isomerase. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 3437–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamoorthy, L.; Chang, C.J. Exosomal NADPH oxidase: Delivering redox signaling for healing. Biochemistry 2018, 57, 3993–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Rychen, G.; Aquilina, G.; Azimonti, G.; Bampidis, V.; de Lourdes Bastos, M.; Wester, P. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danielsen, M.; Wind, A. Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Reenen, C.A.; Dicks, L.M.T. Horizontal gene transfer amongst probiotic lactic acid bacteria and other intestinal microbiota: What are the possibilities? A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2011, 193, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2740. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Xu, B.; Min, Y.; Liu, J.; Shang, Y.; Lan, X.; Xiang, W.; Tang, J. Evaluation of the safety and probiotic properties of GABA-producing Enterococcus faecium AB157 based on whole genome and phenotype analysis. LWT 2025, 215, 117242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleerebezem, M.; Boekhorst, J.; van Kranenburg, R.; Molenaar, D.; Kuipers, O.P.; Leer, R.; Siezen, R.J. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 1990–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Hou, Y.; Inouye, M. CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van de Guchte, M.; Serror, P.; Chervaux, C.; Smokvina, T.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Maguin, E. Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van. Leeuwenhoek 2002, 82, 187–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cronan, J.E.; Luk, T. Advances in the Structural Biology, Mechanism, and Physiology of Cyclopropane Fatty Acid Modifications of Bacterial Membranes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2022, 86, e00013-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panday, S.; Talreja, R.; Kavdia, M. The role of glutathione and glutathione peroxidase in regulating cellular level of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Microvasc. Res. 2020, 131, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguirre, J.D.; Culotta, V.C. Battles with Iron: Manganese in Oxidative Stress Protection. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 13541–13548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marraffini, L.A.; Dedent, A.C.; Schneewind, O. Sortases and the art of anchoring proteins to the envelopes of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2006, 70, 192–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, W.; Hu, X.; Wu, T.; Chen, J. Cell surface-associated protein elongation factor Tu interacts with fibronectin mediating the adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum HC-2 to Penaeus vannamei intestinal epithelium and inhibiting the apoptosis induced by LPS and pathogen in Caco-2 cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Rebuffat, S. The manifold roles of microbial ribosomal peptide–based natural products in physiology and ecology. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 34–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Håvarstein, L.S.; Diep, D.B.; Nes, I.F. A family of bacteriocin ABC transporters carry out proteolytic processing of their substrates concomitant with export. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 16, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahizan, N.A.; Yang, S.K.; Moo, C.L.; Song, A.A.-L.; Chong, C.M.; Chong, C.W.; Abushelaibi, A.; Lim, S.H.E.; Lai, K.S. Terpene derivatives as a potential agent against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pathogens. Molecules 2019, 24, 2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsuyama, Y.; Ohnishi, Y. Type III Polyketide Synthases in Microorganisms. In Methods in Enzymology; Hopwood, D.A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; Volume 515, pp. 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sturme, M.H.J.; Francke, C.; Siezen, R.J.; de Vos, W.M.; Kleerebezem, M. Making sense of quorum sensing in lactobacilli: A special focus on Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Microbiology 2007, 153, 3939–3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleerebezem, M. Quorum sensing control of lantibiotic production; nisin and subtilin autoregulate their own biosynthesis. Peptides 2004, 25, 1405–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moll, G.N.; Konings, W.N.; Driessen, A.J. Bacteriocins: Mechanism of membrane insertion and pore formation. Antonie Van. Leeuwenhoek 1999, 76, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumariya, R.; Garsa, A.K.; Rajput, Y.S.; Sood, S.K.; Akhtar, N.; Patel, S. Bacteriocins: Classification, synthesis, mechanism of action and resistance development in food spoilage causing bacteria. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 128, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Strain | ANI (%) | Alignment Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Lactiplantibacillus pentosus A22 | 79.90 | 75.8 |
| Lactiplantibacillus plantarum AR171 | 99.22 | 92.5 |
| Lactiplantibacillus paraplantarum RX-8 | 86.44 | 85.2 |
| Project | Result | Project | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Catalase | - | Mannitol | + |
| VP | - | Aesculus chinensis | - |
| MR | + | Sorbitol | + |
| H2S | - | Sucrose | + |
| Gelatin | - | Rhamnose | + |
| Starch Hydrolysis | - | Maltose | + |
| Antibiotic | MIC (mg/L) | Cut-Off Values (mg/L) | Resistance Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin | 1 | 2 | S |
| Amoxicillin | 2 | n.r. | - |
| Chloramphenicol | 8 | 8 | S |
| Erythromycin | 1 | 1 | S |
| Tetracycline | 16 | 32 | S |
| Streptomycin | 128 | 64 | R |
| Kanamycin | 128 | 64 | R |
| Vancomycin | 128 | n.r. | - |
| Norfloxacin | 32 | n.r. | - |
| Gentamicin | 32 | 16 | R |
| Biogenic Amine Type | Gene Name | Gene Function | Gene ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyramine | tyrDC | Tyrosine decarboxylase | ND |
| tyrS | Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase | ND | |
| tyrP | Putative tyrosine/tyramine permease | ND | |
| nhaC | Na+/H+ antiporter | GL000169 | |
| Histamine | hdcA | Histidine decarboxylase | ND |
| hdcB | Active decarboxylase | ND | |
| hdcP | Histidine/histamine antiporter | ND | |
| hisS | Histidyl-tRNA synthetase | GL001716 | |
| Putrescine | speA | Arginine decarboxylase | ND |
| speC | Ornithine decarboxylase | ND | |
| speF | Ornithine decarboxylase | ND | |
| potE | Transmembrane substrate/product exchanger protein | ND | |
| Agmatine | aguA | Agmatine deiminase | ND |
| aguB | Putrescine transcarbamylase | ND | |
| aguC | Specific carbamate kinase | ND | |
| aguD | Agmatine/putrescine antiporter | ND | |
| Cadaverine | cadA, ldcC | Lysine decarboxylase | ND |
| cadB | Cadaverine/lysine antiporter | ND | |
| cadC | Transcriptional activator of cad operon | ND |
| Gene ID | Gene Name | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Universal stress family protein | ||
| GL001922 | GSP13 | general stress protein 13 |
| Proteases and chaperones | ||
| GL003029 | clpL | ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpL |
| GL000806 | clpC | ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpC |
| GL000605 | clpP, CLPP | ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunit |
| GL001055 | clpE | ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpE |
| GL001156 | clpP, CLPP | ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunit |
| GL001600 | hslU | ATP-dependent HslUV protease ATP-binding subunit HslU |
| GL001601 | hslV, clpQ | ATP-dependent HslUV protease, peptidase subunit HslV |
| GL001647 | clpB | ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpB |
| GL001822 | clpX, CLPX | ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpX |
| GL001836 | —— | Lon-like protease |
| Heat-shock stress | ||
| GL001742 | hrcA | heat-inducible transcriptional repressor |
| GL001739 | dnaJ | molecular chaperone DnaJ |
| GL001740 | dnaK, HSPA9 | molecular chaperone DnaK |
| GL001741 | GRPE | molecular chaperone GrpE |
| GL000450 | hslR | ribosome-associated heat shock protein Hsp15 |
| GL000456 | hslO | molecular chaperone Hsp33 |
| GL000554 | groES, HSPE1 | chaperonin GroES |
| GL000555 | groEL, HSPD1 | chaperonin GroEL |
| GL002299 | HSP20 | HSP20 family protein |
| GL002860 | HSP20 | HSP20 family protein |
| GL000116 | HSP20 | HSP20 family protein |
| Cold-shock stress | ||
| GL000030 | cspA | cold shock protein |
| GL000790 | cspA | cold shock protein |
| GL000980 | cspA | cold shock protein |
| Bile salt stress resistance | ||
| GL001468 | cfa | cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase |
| GL002718 | cfa | cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase |
| Acid stress | ||
| GL002848 | nhaC | Na+:H+ antiporter, NhaC family |
| GL000169 | nhaC | Na+:H+ antiporter, NhaC family |
| GL000350 | napA, nhaS3, nhaS5, gerN | Na+:H+ antiporter |
| GL002435 | napA, nhaS3, nhaS5, gerN | Na+:H+ antiporter |
| GL002042 | ATPF1E, atpC | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit epsilon |
| GL002043 | ATPF1B, atpD | F-type H+/Na+-transporting ATPase subunit beta |
| GL002044 | ATPF1G, atpG | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit gamma |
| GL002045 | ATPF1A, atpA | F-type H+/Na+-transporting ATPase subunit alpha |
| GL002046 | ATPF1D, atpH | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit delta |
| GL002047 | ATPF0B, atpF | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit b |
| GL002048 | ATPF0C, atpE | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit c |
| GL002049 | ATPF0A, atpB | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit a |
| GL000613 | clcA, clcB, CLC-E, CLC-F | chloride channel protein, CIC family |
| Osmotic stress | ||
| GL000332 | opuC | osmoprotectant transport system substrate-binding protein |
| GL000332 | opuBD | osmoprotectant transport system permease protein |
| GL000333 | opuA | osmoprotectant transport system ATP-binding protein |
| GL001386 | opuA | osmoprotectant transport system ATP-binding protein |
| GL001387 | opuBD | osmoprotectant transport system permease protein |
| GL001388 | opuC | osmoprotectant transport system substrate-binding protein |
| GL001389 | opuBD | osmoprotectant transport system permease protein |
| GL001491 | TC.APA | basic amino acid/polyamine antiporter, APA family |
| GL002802 | TC.APA | basic amino acid/polyamine antiporter, APA family |
| GL002840 | TC.BCT | betaine/carnitine transporter, BCCT family |
| Oxidative stress | ||
| GL001683 | nox2 | NADH oxidase (H2O-forming) |
| GL002201 | npr | NADH peroxidase |
| GL002926 | nox2 | NADH oxidase (H2O-forming) |
| GL000583 | nox2 | NADH oxidase (H2O-forming) |
| GL000589 | nox2 | NADH oxidase (H2O-forming) |
| GL003023 | katE, CAT, catB, srpA | catalase |
| GL000194 | gpx, btuE, bsaA | glutathione peroxidase |
| GL000334 | GSR, gor | glutathione reductase (NADPH) |
| GL001040 | GSR, gor | glutathione reductase (NADPH) |
| GL001585 | GSR, gor | glutathione reductase (NADPH) |
| GL002793 | GSR, gor | glutathione reductase (NADPH) |
| GL000206 | TXN, trxA | thioredoxin |
| GL000584 | trxB, TRR | thioredoxin reductase (NADPH) |
| GL001958 | TXN, trxA | thioredoxin |
| GL002002 | tpx | thioredoxin-dependent peroxiredoxin |
| GL002270 | TXN, trxA | thioredoxin |
| GL002917 | TXN, trxA | thioredoxin |
| GL000240 | mntH | manganese transport protein |
| GL001075 | mntH | manganese transport protein |
| GL002567 | mntH | manganese transport protein |
| GL000923 | mntA | manganese transport system ATP-binding protein |
| GL000924 | mntB | manganese transport system permease protein |
| GL000925 | mntC | manganese transport system substrate-binding protein |
| Nitrite stress | ||
| GL001908 | pgl | 6-phosphogluconolactonase |
| Pathogenic Bacteria | Cell-Free Supernatant (mm) | Bacterial Suspension (mm) | Cell-Free Supernatant (mm) | Bacterial Suspension (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPXHQ-007 | LP9010 | |||
| E. coli ATCC 35150 | 10.80 ± 0.43 a | 5.71 ± 0.20 a | 10.25 ± 0.34 a | 5.31 ± 0.32 a |
| S. aureus ATCC 25923 | 5.72 ± 0.66 a | 2.31 ± 0.45 a | 5.52 ± 0.15 a | 0 b |
| L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115 | 4.51 ± 0.14 a | 2.08 ± 0.31 a | 4.62 ± 0.18 a | 0 b |
| S. enterica ATCC 9120 | 5.57 ± 0.80 a | 2.76 ± 0.64 a | 5.43 ± 0.32 a | 0 b |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, L.-H.; Xu, H.; Chen, S.; Wu, W.; Han, Z.; Zeng, X.-A.; Huang, Y. Combined Genome-Wide and Phenotypic Profiling of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum XHQ-007: Genome-Guided Insights into Tyramine Reduction, Safety Characteristics, and Probiotic Potential. Foods 2026, 15, 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15111977
Wang L-H, Xu H, Chen S, Wu W, Han Z, Zeng X-A, Huang Y. Combined Genome-Wide and Phenotypic Profiling of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum XHQ-007: Genome-Guided Insights into Tyramine Reduction, Safety Characteristics, and Probiotic Potential. Foods. 2026; 15(11):1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15111977
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Lang-Hong, Haiqian Xu, Siyu Chen, Weitong Wu, Zhong Han, Xin-An Zeng, and Yanyan Huang. 2026. "Combined Genome-Wide and Phenotypic Profiling of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum XHQ-007: Genome-Guided Insights into Tyramine Reduction, Safety Characteristics, and Probiotic Potential" Foods 15, no. 11: 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15111977
APA StyleWang, L.-H., Xu, H., Chen, S., Wu, W., Han, Z., Zeng, X.-A., & Huang, Y. (2026). Combined Genome-Wide and Phenotypic Profiling of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum XHQ-007: Genome-Guided Insights into Tyramine Reduction, Safety Characteristics, and Probiotic Potential. Foods, 15(11), 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15111977

