Next Article in Journal
Influence of Traditional Vanilla Curing on Its Physicochemical Properties and Aromatic Profile
Previous Article in Journal
A Balancing Act—20 Years of Nutrition and Health Claims Regulation in Europe: A Historical Perspective and Reflection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Structure, Assembly Processes of Microbial Communities and Their Effects on the Quality of Goat MEAT During Chilled Storage (4 °C)

1
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
2
School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
3
Yibin Etiange Food Co., Ltd., Yibin 644100, China
4
Chongqing Academy of Metrology and Quality Inspection, Chongqing 400020, China
5
Sichuan Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610599, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(9), 1653; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091653
Submission received: 6 April 2025 / Revised: 23 April 2025 / Accepted: 29 April 2025 / Published: 7 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Microbial community succession is closely related to the corruption of meat, but there are few studies on microbial community assembly and their relationship with physicochemical indexes in meat during chilled storage (4 °C). This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of bacterial community assembly and the effect of microbial succession on quality changes during the preservation of goat meat. The results showed that the stochastic process was the primary driving mechanism during community construction. During the chilled storage, the predominant bacteria in the three groups at the genus level were Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas. With the extension of storage duration, the relative abundance of Pseudomonas in samples from local markets and slaughterhouses increased rapidly and gradually acted as dominant flora during the succession process. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that Pseudomonas exhibited a highly significant positive association with total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and a highly significant negative correlation with redness (p < 0.01), which is crucial in the degradation of meat quality. These results provide guidance for regulating the microbial communities of goat meat during preservation by optimizing the storage conditions to delay the deterioration of goat meat.

1. Introduction

In comparison to other conventional red meats, goat meat has more unsaturated fatty acids and less total fat, which appeals to consumers who are health-conscious [1]. However, livestock and poultry meat are inevitably contaminated by microorganisms during the slaughtering, transportation, and marketing stages, which eventually leads to problems such as browning in color and a short shelf life [2,3]. According to studies, the primary factors influencing the deterioration of chilled meat are the development and metabolism of bacteria [4]. Under refrigeration conditions, some microorganisms can adapt to special environments and become dominant microorganisms [5,6]. The most common bacteria found in chilled meat under aerobic refrigeration include Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Brochothrix, Shewanella, Aeromonas, etc. [7,8,9], with the change in the preservation conditions and the type of meat, the dominant microorganisms will change accordingly [10,11].
In the last decade, reports of bacterial community succession in refrigerated pork, beef and lamb have been widespread [9,12,13,14,15], but reports of the mechanism of microbial community assembly in meat during chilled storage are very rare. So, the intricate mechanisms underlying the establishment and evolution of microbial community structures in meat during chilled storage require further elucidation. Nowadays, two ecological processes, the deterministic processes and stochastic processes are considered to be the rules regulating the assembly of bacterial communities [16,17]. The deterministic processes highlight the preeminent influence of environmental selections on microbial community assembly, while stochastic processes suggest that microbial taxa coexist in overlapping environmental niches rather than eliminate each other, suggesting that competitive ability matched and random variations are unrelated to environmental adaptability [18].
In this research, the assembly processes and co-occurrence network of bacterial communities were analyzed during preservation of goat meat, and the Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the bacterial communities and TVB-N, color, total plate count, mass loss rate, pH, and myoglobin, and comprehensively evaluated the effect of bacterial communities on the quality changes in goat meat during preservation. This work offers a theoretical basis for the quality prediction of goat meat and the improvement of chilled goat meat storage and transportation technology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Pretreatment

The goat meat samples (Longissimus thoracis et lumborum) were from three different goats, the samples of three Boer goats were transferred to the laboratory within two hours of purchase and named BA (Boer goat was purchased from agricultural trade market, distance and time from the market to the laboratory were 2 km and 20 min, respectively), BS (Boer goat was purchased from slaughterhouse, and the distance and time from the slaughterhouse to the laboratory were 32 km and 70 min, respectively) and BM (Boer goat was purchased from the local market, and the distance and time from the market to the laboratory were 4 km and 30 min, respectively). Goat meat samples were transported using ice packs for temperature control. The goat meat was cut into pieces of about 10 g in size, and every three pieces of goat meat were placed in a sterile disposable Petri dish, before all samples were placed in a refrigerator (4 °C), and all experiments were performed in three technical replicates.

2.2. Determination of pH

A portable pH meter (Testo205 portable pH meter, Shenzhen Testo Instrument Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was used to directly insert the samples to detect the pH, and the points of three samples were randomly picked for each measurement [19]. The pH of the samples was measured during different storage times (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days).

2.3. Determination of Color Value

The Red–Green Axis (a*) of the samples was measured by a colorimeter (CS-220, Hangzhou Color Spectrum Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China), and the points of the three samples were randomly picked for each measurement. The a* of the samples was carried out at different storage times (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days).

2.4. Determination of Mass Loss Rate

The mass loss rate (ML) of the samples was measured in triplicate at different storage times (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days). The mass loss rate of the samples was determined using the following equation.
Mass loss (%) = (m0 − m1)/m0
where m0 is the weight of the samples at the beginning of preservation, g; and m1 is the weight of the samples after preservation at 4 °C, g.

2.5. Determination of Myoglobin

The myoglobin was determined by the method provided by Krzywicki and Karol with a slight modification [19], and the myoglobin analyses were performed in triplicate at different storage times (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days). Briefly, goat meat samples (5 g) were homogenized in 25 mL of phosphate buffer (0.04 M, pH 6.8), the homogenized samples were incubated at 4 °C for 1 h in darkness and subsequently centrifuged (4500× g, 20 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was filtered through filter paper, and the absorbances of filtrate at 525, 545, 565, and 572 nm were measured with a spectrophotometer (UV-5200 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, Shanghai Yuanxi Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), respectively. The calculation formulas of deoxymyoglobin (DMb), oxymyoglobin (OMb), and metmyoglobin (MMb) are as follows:
DMb = (0.369 × R1 + 1.140 × R2 − 0.941 × R3 + 0.015) × 100
OMb = (0.882 × R1 − 1.267 × R2 + 0.809 × R3 − 0.361) × 100
MMb = (−2.514 × R1 + 0.777 × R2 + 0.800 × R3 + 1.098) × 100
where R1, R2, R3 are absorbance ratios A572 nm/A525 nm, A565 nm/A525 nm, A545 nm/A525 nm.

2.6. Determination of Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen (TVB-N)

The TVB-N was determined according to the Chinese Standard [20], and the TVB-N analyses were performed in triplicate at different storage times (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days). In short, 100 mL of trichloroacetic acid solution at a concentration of 20 g/L and 10 g of minced goat meat were combined in a conical flask, incubated for 30 min, and then filtered. Subsequently, 5 mL of MgO (10 g/L) was added to the reaction chamber containing 10 mL of the filtrate, and the glass cap was promptly secured for distillation. The receiving liquid was titrated with HCl (0.0100 mol/L) until the endpoint was reached.

2.7. Determination of Total Plate Count (TPC)

The TPC of the sample was determined by the method in the Chinese Standard [21], and the TPC analyses were performed in triplicate at different storage times (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days). Approximately 10 g of each goat meat sample was placed in a sterile homogenization bag with 90 mL of sterile saline solution (NaCl, 0.85%), then the sample was homogenized for 2 min by a Stomacher paddle homogenizer to obtain the stock solution. The stock solution was serially diluted and counted using the surface plate method. The TPC of goat meat log10 (CFU/g) was determined.

2.8. DNA Extraction and Bacterial Community Analysis

Bacterial communities were detected by high-throughput sequencing using primers (341F: 5′-CCTACGGGRBGCASCAG-3′, 806R: 5′-GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT-3′) to amplify the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. All PCR reactions were carried out with 15 μL of Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA); 0.2 μM of each primer and 10 ng of target DNA. PCR amplification was conducted using the following procedure: first denaturation step at 98 °C (1 min), followed by 30 cycles at 98 °C (10 s), 50 °C (30 s), and 72 °C (30 s); a concluding extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR results were analyzed using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequently purified with the Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines, the sequencing libraries were constructed with the NEBNext® UltraTM IIDNA Library Prep Kit (Ipswich, England), and their quality was assessed using the Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The library was ultimately sequenced using an Illumina NovaSeq (San Diego, CA, USA) technology, producing 250 bp paired-end reads. High-quality sequences were acquired following paired-end read assembly and quality checking [21,22,23], then assembled and applied to operational taxonomic unit (OTU) and taxonomic analysis [24]. The alpha diversity indices were calculated by QIIME2 software to determine the complexity of species among groups [25]. The samples from each goat were collected at different storage times (1, 4, and 7 days) in triplicate.

2.9. Models of Microbial Community Assembly

To evaluate community assembly processes, the β-nearest taxon index (βNTI) and Raup-Crick Bray–Curtis index (RCbray) of the bacterial community during the chilled storage were calculated by the method described by Stegen et al. [26,27]. Generally, if βNTI > 2, it suggests that variable selection or heterogeneous selection predominated community succession, while βNTI < −2 indicates the dominance of homogenous selection. |βNTI| < 2 means the community assembly was regulated by a stochastic process rather than a deterministic process. If |βNTI| < 2 and RCbray > 0.95, the difference between communities was attributed to dispersal limitation, and RCbray < −0.95 indicates that community succession was influenced by homogenizing dispersal. If |RCbray| < 0.95, community heterogeneity was due to undominated processes.

2.10. Statistics Analysis

The data were expressed as means ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SPSS statistical software (Version 27.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with p < 0.05 considered significant differences, and Duncan’s test was used for comparison of means.
The correlation matrices were plotted by the corrplot package in R language (Version 4.0.2), and the correlation coefficients between bacterial communities and physicochemical properties were computed using the Spearman method, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Quality Changes in Goat Meat During Chilled Storage

The pH, TVB-N, TPC, and mass loss rate of goat meat were measured to evaluate the quality changes in meat during preservation (4 °C). The pH has a significant impact on changes in meat quality, and it can affect meat color by influencing metmyoglobin reductase activity and oxygen consumption [22]. It can be seen from Figure 1a that the initial pH of the three groups ranged from 6.01 to 6.34. From the 1st to 7th day of preservation, the pH of group BA showed an upward trend and increased rapidly after the 4th day. Combined with Figure 1b, it can be seen that this may be related to the accumulation of TVB-N. On the 2nd day of preservation, the pH of the three goat meat samples decreased, which was mainly caused by the production of lactic acid through the glycolysis [23].
TVB-N is a crucial indicator for assessing the freshness of chilled meat, and it is produced by the degradation of proteins [24,25]. As shown in Figure 1b, the initial TVB-N values of BA, BM, and BS were 4.37 mg/100 g, 2.44 mg/100 g, and 5.67 mg/100 g, respectively. On the 7th day of the storage, the TVB-N of group BS was 21.13 mg/100 g, and that of group BA and BM were 17.99 mg/100 g and 16.93 mg/100 g, respectively. In accordance with the Chinese Standard [26], fresh goat meat should have a TVB-N value less than 15 mg/100 g; if the TVB-N of the meat exceeds this value, it means the meat has been spoiled. Therefore, it can be concluded that the meat quality of the samples from BS has been spoiled on the 6th day of preservation, and the groups of BA and BM have reached the spoilage standard on the 7th day of preservation.
As shown in Figure 1c, from the 1st to 7th days of the storage, the total plate counts (TPC) increased with the increase in preservation time. In accordance with the Chinese Standard [27], the TPC of fresh goat meat must be below 6 log10 CFU/g; on the 4th day of preservation, the samples from BM and BS reached the spoilage standard, and the samples from group BA reached the spoilage standard on the 5th day of preservation. As shown in Figure 1d, the mass loss rate (ML) of BA, BM, and BS on the second day of preservation was 0.53%, 0.34%, and 0.29%, respectively. During the whole preservation period, the ML of the three sample groups exhibited a consistent increasing trajectory, with no significant differences seen among the ML values of the groups.

3.2. Red–Green Axis (a*) and Myoglobin Changes in Goat Meat During Chilled Storage

Color is a critical indicator for meat, and it significantly affects the customer’s purchase decision. The a* value represents the Red–Green axis, which ranges from −128 to +128. A positive value of a* skews the color towards red, while a negative value of a* skews the color towards green. When a value is positive, the larger the value, the redder the color is; when a value is negative, the smaller the value, the greener the color is. The initial a* of BA, BM, and BS was 54.20, 58.45, and 73.46 on the 1st day of preservation (Figure 2a), respectively. On the 2nd day of preservation at 4 °C, the a* of the three groups decreased significantly, indicating that the color of the goat meat changed rapidly after slaughter. However, the a* of the three groups increased to varying degrees after the 4~6 days of preservation, which was consistent with the changing trend of oxymyoglobin (OMb) in the three groups (Figure 2b–d). As shown in Figure 2, the OMb was mainly derived from the reduction in metmyoglobin (MMb), which was due to the increased activity of myoglobin reductase with the increase in pH [28]. Ultimately, the increase in OMb led to an increase in the a* value of the samples.

3.3. Microbial Richness and Diversity of Goat Meat During Chilled Storage

The α-diversity analysis can show the abundance and diversity of microflora. The coverage index of all samples was greater than 0.999, which indicated that the sequencing results can reflect the real situation [29]. Pielou_e index can reflect the evenness of species; the more uniform the species, the greater the Pielou_e [30]. The Chao1 index is typically employed to indicate the species abundance of a community; the more species with low relative abundance in the community, the greater the Chao1 index. The Shannon and Simpson indices reveal the species diversity of the community; the higher the species diversity, the greater the Shannon and Simpson indices [15,31].
As demonstrated in Table 1, the Shannon and Pielou_e index of three groups decreased significantly on the 4th day during the chilled storage (p < 0.05), indicating that species diversity and evenness decreased during this period, which may be due to the low temperature, resulting in some microorganisms stopping their activities, leading a significant decrease in Shannon and Pielou_e index. On the 7th day of storage, the Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, and Pielou_e indices of the BS group continued to decline, while those of the BM group rebounded, which may be due to differences in microbial communities, leading some microbial to adapt to the low-temperature environment, resulting in an increase in species richness and uniformity.

3.4. Analysis of Microbial Community Dynamics During Chilled Storage

Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were dominant phyla in three groups during the chilled storage, and similar results were reported elsewhere (Figure 3a) [13]. These two types of bacteria are the main flora in the gut of goat [32], and it can be guessed that the microbial contamination in goat meat may mainly come from the slaughtering process, which aligns with the conclusion of Wolfe that environmental microorganisms play a critical role in the formation of food microbiome [33]. From the 1st to the 4th day of preservation, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in BM and BS groups decreased slightly, whereas Firmicutes’ relative abundance rose during this time. On the 7th day of the storage, Proteobacteria’s relative abundance in BM and BS groups rebounded, while Firmicutes’ relative abundance decreased significantly, and the relative abundance of Bacteroidota increased significantly.
At the level of genus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Brochothrix were the dominant bacteria in the chilled storage (Figure 3b), which is similar to many reported studies [34,35,36]. From the 1st day to the 7th day of the storage, the relative abundance of Pseudomonas in BM and BS groups increased rapidly and gradually became the dominant bacteria. The Brochothrix’ relative abundance increased notably on the 4th day and decreased significantly on the 7th day of chilled storage, indicating that the succession of microbial community in goat meat was mainly influenced by the storage environment. Studies have shown that the extracellular enzymes secreted by Pseudomonas have strong protease activity on myostromin, which helps the bacteria penetrate the meat, obtain new sources of nutrients, soften the meat and increase the formation of meat mucus [37,38], and Brochothrix is closely related to meat softening and mucus formation [39]. To preserve the freshness of goat meat, it is very important to prevent the growth of Pseudomonas and Brochothrix.

3.5. Ecological Assembly Processes of Bacterial Communities

To analyze the assembly processes of microbial communities during the chilled storage of goat meat, firstly the change in βNTI index was calculated based on microbial community assembly theories [40,41]. As shown in Figure 4a, the stochastic process (|βNTI| < 2) dominated the bacterial community assembly, indicating the bacteria in goat meat initially comes from the process of slaughtering, packaging, and transportation, which formed stable microorganism community during long-term operation as described in other studies [42]. Compared with deterministic processes, stochastic processes can produce more diverse ecological functions and buffer the disturbance caused by environmental changes, which is conducive to maintaining the stability and sustainability of ecosystem functions [43,44,45].
With the preservation in a relatively stable chilled storage environment, microorganisms erupt and inhibit their growth due to different adaptability, and they gradually form a microbial community structure dominated by spoilage bacteria, so the stochastic process (|βNTI| < 2) was the main driving mechanism for this community construction during chilled storage of goat meat. The results of RCbray index (Figure 4b,c) showed that in the stochastic process, homogenizing dispersal (RCbray < −0.95) and dispersal limitation (RCbray > 0.95) were the main microbial community formation process, which may be due to that the goat meat was preserved in a relatively constant temperature environment (4 °C) with less influence from other environmental factors [46]. Therefore, the stochastic process in the assembly of the bacterial communities during the chilled storage of goat meat suggests that microbial control in the slaughtering and storage stages is critical.

3.6. Co-Occurrence Networks Revealed Bacterial Interactions at Genus Level

In this research, the modularity index was all larger than 0.48 (Table 2), which indicated that the co-occurrence network of these three co-occurrence networks had modular profiles. Pseudomonas dominated the network interactions of the three groups, with the highest number of inter-connections with other species (Figure 5). The proportions of positively correlated connections in the co-occurrence network of BA, BM, and BS groups were 58.86%, 59.49% and 63.01%, respectively (Table 2), which indicated that there was a tendency towards cooperative rather than competitive relationships among bacteria. This more complex network is considered to be the result of environmental selection, which is consistent with the previous calculation results [46,47]. So, in the process of chilled storage of goat meat, Pseudomonas microorganisms have strong competitiveness in the preservation process and gradually become the dominant spoilage strain. This has important reference significance for the bacteriostatic control of goat meat during preservation in the future.

3.7. Analysis of the Relationship Between Bacterial Community and Physicochemical Indexes During Chilled Storage

The relationship between the physiochemical indexes and the bacteria of the top 30 genera at the genus level were investigated with Spearman correlation analysis. As shown in Figure 6, Pseudomonas is significantly positively correlated with TVB-N, DMb, ML, and TPC, and it is extremely significantly negatively correlated with a* (p < 0.01); it can be seen that during the storage process, Pseudomonas was the dominant flora and performed a critical role in the spoilage of meat. In addition, Myroides, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Veillonella and TVB-N were also positively correlated. Above all, it can be seen that Pseudomonas contribute significantly to the browning of meat color, which is similar to the browning of the other red meat [35].

4. Conclusions

The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Stochastic processes (dispersal limitation and homogenizing dispersal) were the main driving mechanisms for community construction. (2) With the increase in chilled storage time, Pseudomonas gradually evolved into the predominant flora, Pseudomonas, Myroides, Neisseria, etc., which play a critical role in the deterioration of fresh meat. (3) Pseudomonas exhibits a significantly positive correlation with TVB-N and an exceedingly strong negative correlation with a* (p < 0.01). This study can provide a theoretical basis for predicting the shelf life of chilled goat meat and improving the preservation technology of goat meat.

Author Contributions

Supervision, conceptualization, investigation, writing—reviewing and editing, funding acquisition, L.X.; data curation, L.C.; investigation, visualization, M.L. (Molazi Lapu) investigation, conceptualization, T.B.; investigation, visualization, J.W.; methodology, X.G.; funding acquisition, conceptualization, D.L.; conceptualization, writing—reviewing and editing, M.L. (Mingxue Liu); investigation, supervision, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Sichuan Mutton Innovation Team Program (SCCXTD-2024-14), Science Technology Program Plan Project of Sichuan Province (2022YFN0058), the Joint Fund for Science and Technology Education of Sichuan Province (2024NSFSC2067) and Yibin Science Technology Program (2022NY021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Longquan Xiao and Xinhui Wang were employed by the company Yibin Etiange Food Co., Ltd. and Author Xiaoying Guo wad employed by the company Sichuan Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, J.H.; Kannan, G.; Eega, K.R.; Kouakou, B.; Getz, W.R. Nutritional and quality characteristics of meat from goats and lambs finished under identical dietary regime. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 74, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Toohey, E.S.; Hopkins, D.L. Eating quality of commercially processed hot boned sheep meat. Meat Sci. 2006, 72, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ercolini, D.; Ferrocino, I.; Nasi, A.; Ndagijimana, M.; Vernocchi, P.; La Storia, A.; Laghi, L.; Mauriello, G.; Guerzoni, M.E.; Villani, F. Monitoring of microbial metabolites and bacterial diversity in beef stored under different packaging conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 7372–7381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bekhit, A.E.-D.A.; Holman, B.W.B.; Giteru, S.G.; Hopkins, D.L. Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) and its role in meat spoilage: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 109, 280–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Parlapani, F.F.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Nychas, G.J.; Boziaris, I.S. Microbiological spoilage and volatiles production of gutted European sea bass stored under air and commercial modified atmosphere package at 2 °C. Food Microbiol. 2015, 50, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fegan, N.; Jenson, I. The role of meat in foodborne disease: Is there a coming revolution in risk assessment and management? Meat Sci. 2018, 144, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Geeraerts, W.; Pothakos, V.; Vuyst, L.D.; Leroy, F. Diversity of the dominant bacterial species on sliced cooked pork products at expiration date in the Belgian retail. Food Microbiol. 2017, 65, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yong, D.L.; Xiong, X.; Wang, H.H.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Zou, Y.F. Characterization of the bacterial community of braised chicken, a specialty poultry product in China. Poult. Sci. 2018, 98, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wen, X.; Zhang, D.; Li, X.; Ding, T.; Liang, C.; Zheng, X.; Yang, W.; Hou, C. Dynamic changes of bacteria and screening of potential spoilage markers of lamb in aerobic and vacuum packaging. Food Microbiol. 2022, 104, 103996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balamatsia, C.; Patsias, A.; Kontominas, M.; Savvaidis, I. Possible role of volatile amines as quality-indicating metabolites in modified atmosphere-packaged chicken fillets: Correlation with microbiological and sensory attributes. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 1622–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wickramasinghe, N.N.; Ravensdale, J.; Coorey, R.; Chandry, S.P.; Dykes, G.A. The predominance of psychrotrophic pseudomonads on aerobically stored chilled red meat. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 1622–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Casaburi, A.; Piombino, P.; Nychas, G.J.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Bacterial populations and the volatilome associated to meat spoilage. Food Microbiol. 2015, 45, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liang, C.; Zhang, D.; Wen, X.; Li, X.; Chen, L.; Zheng, X.; Fang, F.; Li, J.; Hou, C. Effects of chilling rate on the freshness and microbial community composition of lamb carcasses. LWT 2022, 153, 112559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mansur, A.R.; Song, E.J.; Cho, Y.S.; Nam, Y.D.; Choi, Y.S.; Kim, D.O.; Seo, D.H.; Nam, T.G. Comparative evaluation of spoilage-related bacterial diversity and metabolite profiles in chilled beef stored under air and vacuum packaging. Food Microbiol. 2019, 77, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, C.; Wang, J.; Li, R.; Ye, K. High-throughput sequencing analysis of the bacterial community for assessing the differences in extraction methods of bacteria separation from chilled pork. LWT 2020, 134, 110213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, Y.; Li, Y.; Xiang, X.; Sun, R.; Yang, T.; He, D.; Zhang, K.; Ni, Y.; Zhu, Y.G.; Adams, J.M.; et al. Spatial scale affects the relative role of stochasticity versus determinism in soil bacterial communities in wheat fields across the North China Plain. Microbiome 2018, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, C.; Zhang, B.; Ning, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, T.; Wu, L.; Li, T.; Liu, W.; Zhou, J.; Wen, X. Seasonal dynamics of the microbial community in two full-scale wastewater treatment plants: Diversity, composition, phylogenetic group based assembly and co-occurrence pattern. Water Res. 2021, 200, 117295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, B.; Yao, J.; Chen, Z.; Ma, B.; Li, H.; Wancheng, P.; Liu, J.; Wang, D.; Duran, R. Biogeography, assembly processes and species coexistence patterns of microbial communities in metalloids-laden soils around mining and smelting sites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 425, 127945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krzywicki, K. The determination of haem pigments in meat. Meat Sci. 1982, 7, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. GB 5009.228-2016; Determination of the Volatile Basic Nitrogen in Food of China Food Safety National Standard. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Food and Drug Administration: Beijing, China, 2016.
  21. GB 4789.2-2016; Determination of the Total Number of Colonies in Food Microbiological Inspection of China Food Safety National Standard. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Food and Drug Administration: Beijing, China, 2016.
  22. Ramanathan, R.; Mancini, R.A. Role of mitochondria in beef color: A review. Meat Muscle Biol. 2018, 2, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vieira, C.; Fernandez, A.M. Effect of ageing time on suckling lamb meat quality resulting from different carcass chilling regimes. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 682–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhao, S.; Li, N.; Li, Z.; He, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, M.; Wang, Z.; Kang, Z.; Ma, H. Shelf life of fresh chilled pork as affected by antimicrobial intervention with nisin, tea polyphenols, chitosan, and their combination. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1047–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, F.; Li, S.; Zhong, G.; Liu, Y. Properties of novel chitosan incorporated with hexahydro-beta-acids edible films and its effect on shelf life of pork. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. GB 2707-2016; Fresh (Frozen) Livestock and Poultry Products of China Food Safety National Standard. National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Food and Drug Administration: Beijing, China, 2016.
  27. GB/T 9961-2008; Fresh and Frozen Carcasses of Mutton of China Food Safety National Standard. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
  28. Zhu, L.G.; Brewer, M.S. Effects of urea denatureation and pH on the ability of porcine myoglobin to undergo reduction. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, Z.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, X.; Zhang, W.; Wen, P. Effects of storage methods on the microbial community and quality of Sichuan smoked bacon. LWT 2022, 158, 113115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mandal, R.K.; Denny, J.E.; Namazzi, R.; Opoka, R.O.; Datta, D.; John, C.C.; Schmidt, N.W. Dynamic modulation of spleen germinal center reactions by gut bacteria during Plasmodium infection. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 109094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, M.; Qiao, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y. Tissue Type: A crucial factor influencing the fungal diversity and communities in sichuan pork bacon. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 655500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, A.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lv, S.; Jin, T.; Li, K.; Han, Z.; Li, Y. Microbiome analysis reveals the alterations in gut microbiota in different intestinal segments of Yimeng black goats. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 155, 104900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wolfe, B.E.; Button, J.E.; Santarelli, M.; Dutton, R.J. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell. 2014, 158, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stoops, J.; Ruyters, S.; Busschaert, P.; Spaepen, R.; Verreth, C.; Claes, J.; Lievens, B.; Van Campenhout, L. Bacterial community dynamics during cold storage of minced meat packaged under modified atmosphere and supplemented with different preservatives. Food Microbiol. 2015, 48, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shao, L.; Chen, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, H. Advances in understanding the predominance, phenotypes, and mechanisms of bacteria related to meat spoilage. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Doulgeraki, A.I.; Ercolini, D.; Villani, F.; Nychas, G.J. Spoilage microbiota associated to the storage of raw meat in different conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Katiyo, W.; de Kock, H.L.; Coorey, R.; Buys, E.M. Sensory implications of chicken meat spoilage in relation to microbial and physicochemical characteristics during refrigerated storage. LWT 2020, 128, 109468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, G.; Qing, l.; Tang, W.; Ma, F.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.; Qiu, W. AprD is important for extracellular proteolytic activity, physicochemical properties and spoilage potential in meat-borne Pseudomonas fragi. Food Control 2021, 124, 107868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pellissery, A.J.; Vinayamohan, P.G.; Amalaradjou, M.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Spoilage bacteria and meat quality. Meat Quality Anal. 2020, 307–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stegen, J.C.; Lin, X.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Konopka, A.E. Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stegen, J.C.; Lin, X.; Fredrickson, J.K.; Chen, X.; Kennedy, D.W.; Murray, C.J.; Rockhold, M.L.; Konopka, A. Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 2013, 7, 2069–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, P.; Yang, H.; Dai, X.; Gui, G.; Xiao, Y. Microbial community structure and drug resistance gene on water, ground and surface of slaughtering equipment in poultry slaughterhouse. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis 2018, 30, 1249–1258. [Google Scholar]
  43. Knelman, J.E.; Nemergut, D.R. Changes in community assembly may shift the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Graham, E.B.; Stegen, J.C. Dispersal-Based Microbial Community Assembly Decreases Biogeochemical Function. Processes 2017, 5, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Soliveres, S.; van der Plas, F.; Manning, P.; Prati, D.; Gossner, M.M.; Renner, S.C.; Alt, F.; Arndt, H.; Baumgartner, V.; Binkenstein, J.; et al. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 2016, 536, 456–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, S.J.; Zeng, Y.H.; Zhu, J.M.; Cai, Z.H.; Zhou, J. The structure and assembly mechanisms of plastisphere microbial community in natural marine environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 421, 126780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, S.; Jiang, P.; Wang, P.; Pei, Y.; Huang, H.; Xiao, F.; Deng, G.J. Three-Component Cascade Synthesis of Carbazoles through [1s,6s] Sigmatropic Shift under Metal-Free Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 3121–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Changes in pH (a), TVB-N (b), TPC to log10 count (c), and mass loss (d) of goat meat during preservation at 4 °C. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. BA: the fresh samples of Boer goat purchased from the agricultural trade market, BM: the fresh samples of Boer goat purchased from the local market, the same below, BS: the fresh samples of Boer goat purchased from a slaughterhouse, the same below.
Figure 1. Changes in pH (a), TVB-N (b), TPC to log10 count (c), and mass loss (d) of goat meat during preservation at 4 °C. Different letters in each column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. BA: the fresh samples of Boer goat purchased from the agricultural trade market, BM: the fresh samples of Boer goat purchased from the local market, the same below, BS: the fresh samples of Boer goat purchased from a slaughterhouse, the same below.
Foods 14 01653 g001
Figure 2. Changes in a* (a) and myoglobin (bd) in different groups of goat meat during storage at 4 °C. DMb, OMb, and MMb are deoxy-myoglobin, oxy-myoglobin, and met-myoglobin, respectively.
Figure 2. Changes in a* (a) and myoglobin (bd) in different groups of goat meat during storage at 4 °C. DMb, OMb, and MMb are deoxy-myoglobin, oxy-myoglobin, and met-myoglobin, respectively.
Foods 14 01653 g002
Figure 3. Changes in bacterial communities at phyla level (a) and the genus level (b). BA1, BA4, BA7 represent the samples collected from group BA on the 1st, 4th, and 7th day of the preservation, groups BM and BS were named according to the same rules, the same as below.
Figure 3. Changes in bacterial communities at phyla level (a) and the genus level (b). BA1, BA4, BA7 represent the samples collected from group BA on the 1st, 4th, and 7th day of the preservation, groups BM and BS were named according to the same rules, the same as below.
Foods 14 01653 g003
Figure 4. Ecological processes that generate the community succession patterns during the preservation process of goat meat. (a) βNTI results of the bacterial community; βNTI > 2, heterogeneous selection; βNTI < −2, homogeneous selection; |βNTI| < 2, stochastic process. (b) RCbray results of the bacterial community; RCbray > 0.95, dispersal limitation; RCbray < −0.95, homogenizing dispersal; |RCbray| < 0.95, undominated processes, which is the same as below. (c) The relative contribution rate of ecological succession during community construction during goat meat preservation.
Figure 4. Ecological processes that generate the community succession patterns during the preservation process of goat meat. (a) βNTI results of the bacterial community; βNTI > 2, heterogeneous selection; βNTI < −2, homogeneous selection; |βNTI| < 2, stochastic process. (b) RCbray results of the bacterial community; RCbray > 0.95, dispersal limitation; RCbray < −0.95, homogenizing dispersal; |RCbray| < 0.95, undominated processes, which is the same as below. (c) The relative contribution rate of ecological succession during community construction during goat meat preservation.
Foods 14 01653 g004
Figure 5. Co-occurrence networks revealed bacterial interactions at genus level. The size of each node is proportional to the relative abundance of bacterial genera.
Figure 5. Co-occurrence networks revealed bacterial interactions at genus level. The size of each node is proportional to the relative abundance of bacterial genera.
Foods 14 01653 g005
Figure 6. Spearman correlation analysis between bacteria and physicochemical indexes of chilled goat meat. The significant correlation was marked with asterisk: * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 6. Spearman correlation analysis between bacteria and physicochemical indexes of chilled goat meat. The significant correlation was marked with asterisk: * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Foods 14 01653 g006
Table 1. General information of sequence and alpha diversity analysis of goat meat during chilled storage.
Table 1. General information of sequence and alpha diversity analysis of goat meat during chilled storage.
SamplesChao1CoverageOTUsPielou_eShannonSimpson
BA1501.31 ± 211.37 a1.0000 a499 ± 211 a0.5317 ± 0.00 b4.72 ± 0.35 ab0.883 ± 0.003 b
BA4348.96 ± 48.54 a1.0000 a345 ± 49 a0.4767 ± 0.01 c4.01 ± 0.20 c0.886 ± 0.010 b
BA7342.99 ± 87.97 a1.0000 a342 ± 88 a0.5980 ± 0.04 a5.02 ± 0.52 a0.932 ± 0.016 a
BM1543.72 ± 33.95 a0.9993 a537 ± 38 a0.7267 ± 0.01 a6.59 ± 0.15 a0.975 ± 0.003 a
BM4215.64 ± 25.70 c1.0000 a207 ± 24 c0.5797 ± 0.02 b4.46 ± 0.28 c0.881 ± 0.021 b
BM7371.08 ± 9.32 b1.0000 a365 ± 13 b0.5850 ± 0.03 b4.98 ± 0.23 b0.899 ± 0.025 b
BS1443.70 ± 9.71 a0.9993 a439 ± 9 a0.7200 ± 0.01 a6.32 ± 0.08 a0.972 ± 0.003 a
BS4274.42 ± 40.33 b0.9997 a266 ± 38 b0.6317 ± 0.02 b5.08 ± 0.26 b0.920 ± 0.022 b
BS7231.51 ± 32.68 b1.0000 a227 ± 31 b0.6010 ± 0.04 b4.70 ± 0.42 b0.908 ± 0.024 b
Notes: All data are shown as the mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation. Distinct letters in the same group mean significant difference at p < 0.05. BA1, BA4, BA7 represent the samples collected from group BA on the 1st, 4th, 7th day of the preservation, groups BM and BS were named according to the same rules, and the same below.
Table 2. Main topological features of microbial community’s co-occurrence networks during chilled storage of goat meat.
Table 2. Main topological features of microbial community’s co-occurrence networks during chilled storage of goat meat.
NameGroup Name
BABMBS
Number of nodes85165144
Number of edges1931283218
Positive (%)58.8659.4963.01
Negative (%)41.1440.5136.99
Average degree4.54115.5523.028
Average path length1.2601.5702.784
Network diameter2.8415.4456.616
Clustering coefficient0.8660.7430.567
Graph density0.0540.0950.021
Centralization betweenness0.00590.00660.0252
Centralization degree0.1480.1430.091
Connectance0.0540.0950.021
Modularity0.4860.5050.625
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, L.; Cui, L.; Lapu, M.; Bai, T.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Liu, D.; Liu, M.; Wang, X. The Structure, Assembly Processes of Microbial Communities and Their Effects on the Quality of Goat MEAT During Chilled Storage (4 °C). Foods 2025, 14, 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091653

AMA Style

Xiao L, Cui L, Lapu M, Bai T, Wang J, Guo X, Liu D, Liu M, Wang X. The Structure, Assembly Processes of Microbial Communities and Their Effects on the Quality of Goat MEAT During Chilled Storage (4 °C). Foods. 2025; 14(9):1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091653

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Longquan, Lin Cui, Molazi Lapu, Ting Bai, Juan Wang, Xiaoying Guo, Dayu Liu, Mingxue Liu, and Xinhui Wang. 2025. "The Structure, Assembly Processes of Microbial Communities and Their Effects on the Quality of Goat MEAT During Chilled Storage (4 °C)" Foods 14, no. 9: 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091653

APA Style

Xiao, L., Cui, L., Lapu, M., Bai, T., Wang, J., Guo, X., Liu, D., Liu, M., & Wang, X. (2025). The Structure, Assembly Processes of Microbial Communities and Their Effects on the Quality of Goat MEAT During Chilled Storage (4 °C). Foods, 14(9), 1653. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091653

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop