Previous Article in Journal
Co-Fermentation and Genomic Insights into Lactic Acid Bacteria for Enhanced Propionic Acid Production Using a Non-GMO Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Impacts of Various Reheating Methods on Crispy Chicken: Physicochemical Properties, Oxidation and Flavor Profiles

1
The College of Life and Geographic Sciences, Kashi University, Kashi 844000, China
2
School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2025, 14(9), 1574; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091574 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 7 March 2025 / Revised: 19 April 2025 / Accepted: 27 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Meat)

Abstract

In this study, the impacts of water-bath reheating (WR), steam reheating (SR), air-frying reheating (AR), roasting reheating (RR), and microwave reheating (MR) on the physicochemical properties, oxidation, and flavor profiles of crispy chicken (CC) were investigated. The results revealed that the pH of CC was significantly reduced after reheating (p < 0.05). The AR samples had a slight change in L* and the highest springiness. The RR samples had the highest degree of lipid and protein oxidation. In addition, WR, AR, RR, and MR treatments effectively increased the contents of umami-related amino acids. Glu and Cys were typically the taste-active amino acids in CC. AR contributed to increasing the response values of umami and richness. As shown by the electronic nose and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis, 41 volatile compounds were obtained in CC. AR could efficiently increase the contents of nitrogen oxides and methyl compounds. Meanwhile, the content of trans-.alpha.-bergamotene, nonanal, and copaene were significantly increased after the AR process (p < 0.05). According to the results of analysis of variance (ANOVA), odor activity value (OAV), and variable importance in projection (VIP), anethole was considered the key differential flavor-active compound. Overall, AR was superior to other reheating methods in CC, with better texture and various flavor characteristics. This study provides a reference for choosing reheating technology for pre-cooked chicken products.
Keywords: crispy chicken; reheating methods; physicochemical properties; oxidation; flavor characteristics crispy chicken; reheating methods; physicochemical properties; oxidation; flavor characteristics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Su, T.; Yu, Y. Impacts of Various Reheating Methods on Crispy Chicken: Physicochemical Properties, Oxidation and Flavor Profiles. Foods 2025, 14, 1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091574

AMA Style

Ren X, Wang C, Wang X, Su T, Yu Y. Impacts of Various Reheating Methods on Crispy Chicken: Physicochemical Properties, Oxidation and Flavor Profiles. Foods. 2025; 14(9):1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Xiaona, Chun Wang, Xueqing Wang, Tingting Su, and Yigang Yu. 2025. "Impacts of Various Reheating Methods on Crispy Chicken: Physicochemical Properties, Oxidation and Flavor Profiles" Foods 14, no. 9: 1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091574

APA Style

Ren, X., Wang, C., Wang, X., Su, T., & Yu, Y. (2025). Impacts of Various Reheating Methods on Crispy Chicken: Physicochemical Properties, Oxidation and Flavor Profiles. Foods, 14(9), 1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14091574

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop