Next Article in Journal
Influence of Herbal Additives on the Physicochemical, Microbiological, Polyphenolic, and Sensory Profile of Green Tea-Based Kombucha
Previous Article in Journal
Optimized Alkaline Extraction and Functional Characterization of Carrageenan from Eucheuma perplexum Using Response Surface Methodology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Fairness in Beef Pricing: The Moderating Role of Freshness Under Conditions of Information Overload
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genotypic and Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Sucuk: A Preliminary Screening of Potential Starter Cultures

1
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Türkiye
2
Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, School of Tourism and Hotel Management, Ardahan University, Ardahan 75002, Türkiye
3
Aydıntepe Vocational School, Department of Food Processing, Bayburt University, Bayburt 69500, Türkiye
4
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Türkiye
5
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bayburt University, Bayburt 69000, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(20), 3495; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203495
Submission received: 11 September 2025 / Revised: 7 October 2025 / Accepted: 13 October 2025 / Published: 14 October 2025

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolated from traditionally produced sucuk for their potential use in starter culture development and food safety applications in fermented meat products. A total of 145 isolates (95 LAB and 50 CoNS) were analyzed through genetic identification, phylogenetic analysis, and assessments of technological properties. Antagonistic activity against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus was also evaluated, along with antibiotic sensitivity. Among LAB, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum was the most prevalent species (60 isolates), while Staphylococcus xylosus was the predominant CoNS species (24 isolates). The isolates exhibited diverse technological properties and varying levels of antagonistic activity against the tested pathogens. Antibiotic sensitivity tests indicated that 15 selected isolates were negative for antibiotic resistance genes. Overall, this comprehensive characterization provides valuable insights for the development of starter cultures and for enhancing food safety in fermented meat products.

1. Introduction

Fermented meat products are foods that acquire their desired properties through the activity of microorganisms and/or enzymes. Fermented sausages represent a significant proportion of these products and are widely consumed across many countries. In Türkiye, two types of fermented sausages are produced: sucuk and heat-treated sucuk. Sucuk refers to dry-fermented sausage produced without a subsequent heat treatment step, while heat-treated sucuk denotes a semi-dry fermented sausage produced by short fermentation followed by heat treatment (60–68 °C) and drying. In both products, starter cultures are crucial for acid formation during the fermentation phase and, therefore, especially for ensuring product safety. However, while starter culture activity continues throughout the ripening process in sucuk, the activity is limited in heat-treated sucuk due to the heat treatment [1]. The use of starter cultures has been increasing for both product types. However, industrially produced sucuk often falls short of consumer expectations, particularly in terms of taste and aroma. Therefore, the selection of appropriate starter culture preparations is crucial [2]. Since the dominant microbiota of traditional fermented sausages is associated with desirable characteristics, using selected strains as starter cultures can contribute to preserving the typical character of the product, as well as providing benefits for both producers and consumers [3,4]. The most suitable approach is to isolate strains with desirable technological characteristics from fermented sausages and then apply them as starter cultures [5].
Two groups of microorganisms are considered technologically important in the fermentation and ripening of fermented meat products. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) contribute not only to flavor development, but also to the inhibition of spoilage organisms and foodborne pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus [2,6]. Gram-positive, catalase-positive cocci (mainly coagulase-negative staphylococci) represent the other important group, contributing to aroma formation through their proteolytic and lipolytic activities, preventing or delaying autoxidation by decomposing peroxides through catalase activity, and playing a role in color formation via nitrate reductase activity [2,7,8].
Commercial starter culture preparations for meat products were first introduced in the USA in 1957 and in Europe in 1961. These preparations are available as single- or multi-strain cultures and are usually derived from traditional products. In Türkiye, a limited number of studies have focused on the isolation and identification of LAB and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from sucuk [9,10,11,12]. Moreover, only three studies have tested strains isolated from sucuk as starter cultures [13,14,15]. Thus, there is a clear need for more comprehensive research on the development of starter cultures in meat products. Starter cultures are used in the meat industry to ensure product safety by inhibiting pathogenic bacteria, to prolong shelf life by preventing undesirable changes caused by spoilage microorganisms or abiotic reactions, to provide novel sensory properties, and to confer beneficial health effects [2].
Among LAB, strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Latilactobacillus curvatus, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus, Latilactobacillus sakei, Pediococcus pentosaceus, and P. acidilactici are widely used as starter cultures in the meat industry. Among Gram-positive, catalase-positive cocci, Staphylococcus carnosus, Staphylococcus xylosus, and Kocuria varians are common [2,12,13]. In the present study, LAB and CoNS isolates obtained from traditionally produced sucuk were genotypically identified, and their technological properties as well as antibiotic sensitivities were evaluated. The potential for utilizing these strains as starter cultures was then evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

In this study, molecular characterization was performed on 95 isolates of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and 50 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) previously isolated and identified by Kaban [16] and stored at −80 °C. Molecular identification was carried out based on the homology of the 16S rRNA region. To determine the technological properties of LAB isolates tests were conducted for growth at different temperatures, NaCl and pH tolerance, lipolytic and proteolytic activities, acetoin formation, D-/L-lactic acid production, and amino acid decarboxylase activity. In addition, agar spot and well diffusion assays were performed to evaluate antagonistic activity. For CoNS isolates, growth at different temperatures, NaCl concentrations, and pH values, as well as proteolytic and lipolytic activities, acetoin production, biofilm formation, and nitrate reductase activity were assessed. Finally, the antibiotic sensitivities of all isolates were determined.

2.2. DNA Isolation and 16s rRNA Amplification

Genomic DNA was isolated according to the method described by Barış [17]. For the identification of bacterial isolates, the 16S rRNA gene region was selected and amplified in vitro using universal primers 27F (forward 5′-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3′; 0.7 µL, 50 µM) and 1492R (reverse 5′-GGT TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′; 0.7 µL, 50 µM) in a 70 µL polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The PCR mixture contained 7 µL of 10× PCR buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, 500 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin, pH 8.3), 1.4 µL of dNTP mix (10 mM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP, dTTP), 2.8 µL of DMSO, 4.2 µL of MgCl2, 0.7 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/µL), 1.5 µL of template DNA, and sterile distilled water to adjust the final volume.
The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 53 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min [14]. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel containing 0.6 µL ethidium bromide, run at 90 V for 75 min, and visualized using a gel documentation system (DNR BioImaging Systems Software version 2.7). Sequencing of the PCR products was performed by MacroGen Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The resulting sequences were deposited in the NCBI database, and accession numbers were obtained for the identified isolates. Multiple sequence alignment of the 16S rRNA gene sequences was conducted using MEGA X 10.1.7, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates [18]. MEGA X software was also used for further phylogenetic analyses [19]. It should be noted that 16S rRNA sequence analysis, while providing reliable identification at the genus and species levels, has inherent limitations in distinguishing strain-level differences due to the highly conserved nature of this genetic region. The molecular identification performed in this study should therefore be considered as species-level identification rather than strain-level characterization.

2.3. Determination of Technological Properties

2.3.1. Growth at Different Temperatures

The growth ability of LAB and CoNS isolates was evaluated at 4 °C (7–10 days), 15 °C (3 days), 25 °C (2 days), and 45 °C (3 days). Isolates were incubated in de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) broth (for LAB) and Brain Heart Infusion (BHI, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) broth (for CoNS). Optical density at 600 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer to assess growth [20].

2.3.2. Growth at Different NaCl Concentrations

To determine salt tolerance, LAB and CoNS isolates were incubated in MRS and BHI broth supplemented with 6.5% and 10% NaCl (w/v) at 30 °C for 5 days. Growth was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm [20].

2.3.3. Growth at Different pH Values

Overnight cultures (0.05 mL) of LAB isolates were inoculated into MRS broth, and CoNS isolates into BHI broth, both adjusted to different pH values using HCl. After incubation at 32 °C for 18–24 h, the presence of turbidity was recorded as positive [21].

2.3.4. Lipolytic Activity

Supernatants of LAB and CoNS isolates were inoculated into wells of tributyrin agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 30 °C for 6 days. Lipolytic activity was determined by the appearance of clear zones around the wells [22].

2.3.5. Proteolytic Activity

Proteolytic activity was determined using gelatinase and calcium caseinate agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). LAB and CoNS trains were inoculated onto the media, and the presence of clear zones around colonies was considered positive [23].

2.3.6. Acetoin Formation

Acetoin production from glucose was tested using Methyl Red/Voges-Proskauer (MR/VP) medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Tubes containing 5 mL of medium were sterilized at 121 °C for 15 min and inoculated with overnight cultures. After incubation at 32 °C for 48 h, 1 mL of culture was mixed with 0.2 mL of 40% KOH and 0.6 mL of α-naphthol solution. The appearance of a pink to bright red ring within 15 min indicated a positive result [24].

2.3.7. Determination of Antibiotic Sensitivities

Antibiotic sensitivity of LAB and CoNS isolates was determined using the disk diffusion method. The following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin (10 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), streptomycin (10 µg), cephalothin (30 µg), and penicillin G (10 U). Disks were placed on Mueller–Hinton agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) plates, and zones of inhibition were measured after incubation [23].

2.3.8. D-L Lactic Acid Production

D-/L-lactic acid production by LAB isolates was determined using enzyme test kits (Boehringer Mannheim R–Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [25].

2.3.9. Amino Acid Decarboxylase Activity

Møller decarboxylase medium (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to assess biogenic amine formation in LAB isolates. Four media were prepared: one control (no amino acid added) and three supplemented with arginine, lysine, or ornithine (5 g/L each). Each tube was filled with 3 mL of medium and overlaid with 5 mm of sterile paraffin oil. After sterilization at 115 °C for 10 min, isolates were inoculated and incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. A color change from yellow to purple indicated positive decarboxylase activity [24].

2.3.10. Antagonistic Activity

Antagonistic activity of LAB isolates against Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 7644) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923 and ATCC 29213) was assessed by agar spot and well diffusion assays [26].
Agar spot test: LAB isolates were spotted on MRS plates and incubated anaerobically overnight. Plates were overlaid with semi-solid tryptic soy agar (TSA, 0.8% agar) containing 100 µL of pathogen culture, then incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 48 h. Zone diameters were measured.
Well diffusion test: Cell-free supernatants from overnight cultures were obtained by centrifugation (25 °C, 5700 g, 10 min), neutralization to pH 6.5–7.0 and filtration (cellulose acetate filter). Wells (5 mm) were made in TSA plates containing 100 µL of pathogen culture. Each well was filled with 50 µL of supernatant and plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 48 h. The antimicrobial activity was assessed by measuring inhibition zones.

2.3.11. Nitrate Reductase Activity

CoNS isolates were inoculated into nitrate broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. Nitrate reagent (0.2–0.5 mL) was then added. The appearance of a red color indicated a positive result. If no color appeared, zinc dust was added for confirmation: red color after zinc addition was considered negative [24].

2.3.12. Biofilm Formation

Biofilm formation by CoNS isolates was determined on Congo red agar (CRA, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the method of Landeta et al. [23]. CRA plates were prepared with 0.8 g Congo red, 0.8 g sucrose, 37 g MRS broth, and 10 g agar in 1 L of medium. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and then at room temperature overnight. Biofilm-producing isolates formed black colonies, while non-producers formed red colonies.

2.4. Identification of Antibiotic Resistance Genes

Fifteen strains of LAB and CoNS were selected from the molecularly identified and technologically characterized isolates (Latilactobacillus sakei S15, L. sakei S23, L. plantarum S24, L. plantarum S33, L. plantarum S40, L. plantarum S91, L. plantarum S93, L. plantarum S107, Pediococcus pentosaceus S128b, P. acidilactici S145a, Staphylococcus xylosus G27, S. saprophyticus G13, S. xylosus S98, S. xylosus S81, and S. carnosus G109), and analyzed for antibiotic resistance genes against penicillin G, ampicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, tetracycline, streptomycin, cephalotin, and vancomycin. To confirm phenotypic resistance, the corresponding resistance genes were screened genotypically. PCR assays were performed using specific primers for the antibiotic resistance genes listed in Table 1, and the amplification conditions were directly adopted from the referenced studies from which the primers were obtained. The resulting PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel prepared with 0.5× TBE buffer and containing ethidium bromide.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Molecular Identification

In this study, 95 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolates and 50 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) isolates were identified by 16S rRNA analysis. LAB accession numbers included KR025381–KR025399, KX831552–KX831555, KR011002–KR011009, KR011012–KR011016, KR011018–KR011022, KR010996–KR010999, KT327837–KT327866, KR025400–KR025405, and KT275940–KT275959. For catalase-positive cocci, the accession numbers were KT3728370119–KT3728370125.
Genetic identification revealed that 60 isolates were identified as Lactiplantibacillus (formerly Lactobacillus) plantarum, followed by 18 isolates of L. paraplantarum, 13 isolates of Latilactobacillus (formerly Lactobacillus) sakei, three isolates of Pediococcus acidilactici, and one isolate of P. pentosaceus. Thus, the dominant species in sucuk samples was L. plantarum, consistent with the findings of Kaban [16]. However, L. sakei and L. paraplantarum were also identified through genotypic analysis. Similarly, 37.2% [20] and even 45.6% [21] of isolates from Greek-type traditional fermented sausages were reported as L. plantarum. In Spanish-type sausages, L. plantarum was detected in 50% of fuet samples and in 100% of chorizo samples [34]. Drosinos et al. [20] further identified 7.3% of LAB isolates as L. curvatus and 3.5% as L. sakei. Although not dominant, L. sakei was also isolated in sucuk studies by Gürakan et al. [9] and Çon and Gökalp [11], whereas Özdemir [10] reported L. sakei as the dominant species. Adigüzel and Atasever [35] identified L. plantarum as dominant in sucuk by both phenotypic and genotypic methods, while also isolating P. pentosaceus, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, L. curvatus subsp. curvatus, L. brevis, L. fermentum, Weissella viridescens, L. delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii, W. confusa, L. collinoides, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides var. dextranicum. These variations are attributed to the absence of standardized sausage production methods and differences in ripening temperature as well as the type and dosage of curing agents. Kaya and Kaban [2] noted that L. curvatus and L. sakei were dominant in traditional fermented sausages fermented at 20–22 °C without starter culture, whereas L. plantarum prevailed at higher ripening temperatures (>25 °C). In other European countries, L. sakei, L. curvatus, and L. plantarum have been reported as dominant species in traditional fermented sausages [36].
In addition to lactobacilli species, three isolates were identified as P. acidilactici and one as P. pentosaceus. These species were also isolated by Çon and Gökalp [11], while Yaman et al. [37] reported only P. pentosaceus. Different proportions of Pediococcus species have been reported in other types of fermented sausages [38,39].
Among CoNS isolates, Staphylococcus xylosus was identified as the dominant species (24 isolates), followed by S. saprophyticus (10 isolates). Other identified species included S. equorum (6 isolates), S. simulans (3 isolates), S. succinus (2 isolates), S. carnosus (2 isolates), S. hominis (1 isolate), S. caprae (1 isolate), and S. vitulinus (1 isolate). These findings were consistent with the phenotypic description by Kaban [16]. A notable finding was the dominance of S. xylosus. Among catalase-positive cocci, Staphylococcus species are generally more prevalent than micrococci in dry fermented sausages [40]. S. xylosus has been reported as the dominant species in many Italian [41,42,43,44] and Spanish-type fermented sausages [45,46,47]. In contrast, S. saprophyticus has been identified as dominant in some other fermented sausages [20,21,48,49,50].
S. carnosus, a species commonly used as a starter culture, was also detected, though its isolation rate was low [16]. In fact, S. carnosus has not been recovered in several studies [42,44,46,47,48,50]. Nevertheless, Montel et al. [51], Papamanoli et al. [49], Aymerich et al. [34], and Martin et al. [47] succeeded in isolating S. carnosus from fermented sausage samples.
Another technologically important species is S. equorum. Due to its salt tolerance, ability to grow at low temperatures, and proteolytic and lipolytic activities, S. equorum has been suggested as a potential starter culture for fermented meat products [52]. In this study, six isolates were identified as S. equorum, and this species has also been reported in other fermented sausages [21,42,44,50,53]. By contrast, S. carnosus was isolated only rarely; for example, Nunes et al. [54] detected S. carnosus in commercial salami but not in artisanal products.
According to the phylogenetic tree shown in Figure 1, most L. plantarum strains and all L. paraplantarum strains clustered closely together, whereas L. plantarum S2 formed a separate subgroup. Thirteen L. sakei strains grouped closely into a distinct cluster, while the three Pediococcus strains also formed a subgroup. Interestingly, the P. acidilactici S145a was included in a subgroup with L. plantarum and L. paraplantarum (Figure 1). A close phylogenetic relationship between Pediococcus and Lactobacillus species has also been reported previously [55]. Evaluation of the growth characteristics of the P. acidilactici S145a revealed that, unlike the other P. acidilactici strains, it exhibited good growth at pH 4.5 (Figure 1).
The phylogenetic tree constructed from the 16S rRNA regions of Staphylococcus strains is presented in Figure 2. They formed seven subgroups. One of these subgroups consisted exclusively of S. xylosus strains, which clustered closely with S. saprophyticus. In other subgroups, S. equorum and S. succinus grouped together, while S. vitulinus, S. hominis, S. caprae, S. simulans, and S. carnosus were found to be phylogenetically close (Figure 2). A similar affinity between these strains was also reported by Nunes et al. [54].

3.2. Technological Properties

Growth characteristics of the isolates are shown in Table 2. The ability of LAB isolates to grow under different temperature conditions is a key factor in determining their suitability as starter cultures, since it directly influences fermentation performance and the rate of acid formation. Strain characteristics also affect the textural and sensory properties of fermented products. Environmental factors such as fermentation temperature, pH, and salt concentration in sucuk and similar dry fermented sausages are critical for the survival and activity of starter cultures. Importantly, isolates to be used as starters should not exhibit amino acid decarboxylase activity, as this leads to the formation of biogenic amines. For CoNS, catalase and nitrate reductase activities are particularly important for color formation, oxidative stability, and overall product quality. In addition, proteolytic and lipolytic activities in this group of microorganisms contribute significantly to flavor development [57].
All 60 L. plantarum isolates exhibited strong growth at 25 °C, and all but one isolate (L. plantarum S53b) grew well at 15 °C. Drosinos et al. [20] reported that 86% of L. plantarum isolates grew at 4 °C, 100% at 15 °C, and 32.7% at 47 °C. In contrast, CoNS isolates generally did not grow at 4 °C, and no isolates grew well at 45 °C. As shown in Table 2, the majority of LAB grew very well at 6.5% NaCl, whereas growth decreased at 10% NaCl, with only three isolates showing good tolerance. Similarly, a considerable number of CoNS isolates grew at 6.5% NaCl. pH also proved to be an important factor, as most isolates grew well between pH 5.0 and 6.5. The acidification that occurs during fermentation, and the resulting drop in pH, not only influences color, flavor, and texture development but also inhibits spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms [2]. However, a pH drop below 5 can negatively impact flavor formation due to the suppression of catalase-positive cocci [16].
Biochemical and metabolic activities of LAB and CoNS isolates were given in Table 3. Most of the tested isolates did not show proteolytic or lipolytic activity. However, seven L. plantarum isolates and one L. sakei strain exhibited strong proteolytic activity. Among CoNS, 42% of S. xylosus isolates showed proteolytic activity. With respect to lactic acid configuration, all but three L. plantarum isolates produced D-L lactic acid, as did 11 L. sakei isolates and all Pediococcus isolates. Amino acid decarboxylase activity was rare: only one strain (L. plantarum S97, with arginine decarboxylase activity) tested positive.
One of the most important functions of CoNS in meat products is their nitrate reductase activity. This activity is particularly significant in products containing nitrate, as microorganisms capable of converting nitrate to nitrite are required for the expected effects of nitrate to occur [58]. In the present study, nitrate reductase activity was observed in all isolates except six CoNS isolates (S. xylosus [n = 5] and S. carnosus [n = 1]). LAB isolates may also display nitrate reductase activity. Kamiloğlu et al. [59] reported weak nitrate reductase activity in L. plantarum isolates from sucuk. In the present study, seven L. plantarum isolates, one L. sakei strain, and one L. paraplantarum strain showed nitrate reductase activity. Additionally, 48 CoNS isolates (except two, S. xylosus and S. equorum) produced acetoin. Likewise, 86% of LAB isolates were acetoin-positive. Excessive acetoin or acetic acid formation in fermented sausages is considered undesirable [2].
Biofilm formation was also evaluated in CoNS isolates, with only one isolate (S. equorum) testing positive. In this study, the Congo Red Agar (CRA) method was employed as a screening tool to assess biofilm formation. While CRA is a simple and cost-effective method, it has recognized limitations in sensitivity and accuracy. Nevertheless, it provided valuable preliminary data that can guide future, more quantitative investigations. Biofilm formation is an important virulence factor and may contribute to the pathogenic potential of microorganisms in humans [60].
Finally, the antimicrobial activities of LAB highlight their potential as natural barriers for product safety. LAB can exert antimicrobial effects through the production of organic acids (lactic, acetic, formic, propionic), proteinaceous bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide, and other inhibitory substances [61]. These properties enhance both the safety and technological performance of starter cultures in fermented meat products.
Agar spot and well diffusion assays were performed to evaluate the antagonistic activity of the isolates identified in this study. In the agar spot test, all isolates exhibited good to very good antagonistic activity against Listeria monocytogenes, whereas fewer isolates were active against Staphylococcus aureus. In contrast, in the well diffusion assay, only one L. plantarum strain demonstrated antagonistic activity against L. monocytogenes (Table 4). The discrepancy between agar spot and well diffusion results may be explained by the nature of inhibitory compounds. In agar spot assays, bacterial colonies produce high local concentrations of acids, hydrogen peroxide, or bacteriocins directly on the agar surface, resulting in visible inhibition. In contrast, cell-free supernatants tested in well diffusion may contain lower concentrations of inhibitory molecules, some of which may not diffuse efficiently in agar. Moreover, inhibition observed without pH neutralization or catalase treatment may reflect organic acids or hydrogen peroxide rather than bacteriocins [6].
Antibiotic sensitivity and the absence of antibiotic resistance genes are also critical criteria for selecting isolates to be used as starter cultures. According to the World Health Organization, LAB intended for food applications should not harbor resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics [62]. Antibiotic susceptibility of the identified isolates was assessed against 10 antibiotics (Table 5). As shown, most LAB isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline, but resistant to vancomycin, streptomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin. In contrast, the majority of CoNS isolates were sensitive to all antibiotics tested. Wang et al. [63] examined the antibiotic susceptibility and resistance genes of LAB and staphylococci isolates obtained from Chinese cured beef samples. They reported ampicillin sensitivity in all isolates, as well as sensitivity to penicillin, gentamicin, neomycin, norfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin at low concentrations. However, high levels of streptomycin resistance were observed, and widespread resistance was reported for vancomycin, erythromycin, roxithromycin, lincomycin, and kanamycin. The effects of tetracycline, oxytetracycline, and chloramphenicol varied among isolates.
In the present study, the genomic DNA of selected isolates intended for use in sausage production was screened for resistance genes against penicillin G, ampicillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, tetracycline, streptomycin, cephalothin, and vancomycin. No antibiotic resistance genes corresponding to the tested antibiotics were detected in any of the isolates.

4. Conclusions

This study provided a detailed characterization of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) obtained from traditionally fermented sucuk. Among LAB, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum was the most frequent species, while Staphylococcus xylosus dominated within the CoNS group. The isolates evaluated for their potential as starter cultures demonstrated good growth in both heat-treated sucuk and traditionally sucuk. In addition, they exhibited key technological properties—including nitrate reductase activity, antagonistic activity, D-/L-lactic acid production, and proteolytic and lipolytic activities—indicating their suitability for use as starter cultures. The rate and extent of acid formation are critical not only for product characteristics but also for ensuring microbiological stability and safety in sucuk production. In this traditional fermented meat product, a continuous and technologically relevant decrease in pH during fermentation can only be achieved through the use of starter cultures. Moreover, the application of starter cultures allows for the production of standardized and high-quality products. In conclusion, the use of genotypically characterized LAB isolated from traditionally produced sucuk, together with CoNS isolates selected for desirable technological traits, may provide significant contributions to both the quality and safety of sucuk and heat-treated sucuk.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, A.K.; B.S., K.Ç.T., M.K. (Mehmet Karadayı) and G.K.; methodology, B.S., M.K. (Mehmet Karadayı), G.K. and M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya); investigation, M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya) and G.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K., B.S. and K.Ç.T.; writing—review and editing, M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya) G.K. and M.G.; Conceptualization, M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya) and M.G.; supervision, M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya); project administration, M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya); funding acquisition, M.K. (Mükerrem Kaya). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy (Project No.: TAGEM/13/AR-GE/7).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kaban, G.; Oral, Z.F.Y.; Kaya, M. Sucuk. In Production of Traditional Mediterranean Meat Products; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 133–141. ISBN 978-1-0716-2103-5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaya, M.; Kaban, G. Fermente et ürünleri. In Gıda Biyoteknolojisi; Aran, N., Ed.; Nobel Yayın Dağıtım: Ankara, Türkiye, 2019; pp. 157–195. ISBN 978-605-133-134-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fadda, S.; Castellano, P.; Terán, L.; Raya, R.; Vignolo, G. Lactic Acid Bacteria in Meat Fermentations: Role of Autochthonous Starter Cultures on Quality, Safety, and Health. In Lactic Acid Bacteria; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 228–246. ISBN 9781003352075. [Google Scholar]
  4. Milani, G.; Tabanelli, G.; Barbieri, F.; Montanari, C.; Gardini, F.; Daza, M.V.B.; Castellone, V.; Bozzetti, M.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Bassi, D. Technological traits and mitigation activity of autochthonous lactic acid bacteria from mediterranean fermented meat-products. LWT 2024, 196, 115861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shao, X.; Wang, H.; Song, X.; Xu, N.; Sun, J.; Xu, X. Effects of different mixed starter cultures on microbial communities, taste and aroma compounds of traditional Chinese fermented sausages. Food Chem. X 2024, 21, 101225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. García-López, J.D.; Barbieri, F.; Banos, A.; Madero, J.M.G.; Gardini, F.; Montanari, C.; Tabanelli, G. Use of two autochthonous bacteriocinogenic strains as starter cultures in the production of Salchichónes, a type of Spanish fermented sausages. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 7, 100615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dong, Z.; Wang, L.; Ge, Y.; An, Y.; Sun, X.; Xue, K.; Chen, L. Screening, identification, and application of superior starter cultures for fermented sausage production from traditional meat products. Fermentation 2025, 11, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zheng, S.S.; Wang, C.Y.; Hu, Y.Y.; Yang, L.; Xu, B.C. Enhancement of fermented sausage quality driven by mixed starter cultures: Elucidating the perspective of flavor profile and microbial communities. Food Res. Int. 2024, 178, 113951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gürakan, G.C.; Bozoğlu, T.F.; Weiss, N. Identification of Lactobacillus strains from Turkish-style dry fermented sausages. LWT–Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Özdemir, H. Türk fermente sucuğunun florasındaki dominant laktobasil türlerinin sucuğun organoleptik nitelikleri ile ilişkisi. Ank. Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg. 1999, 46, 189–198. [Google Scholar]
  11. Çon, A.H.; Gökalp, H.Y. Production of bacteriocin-like metabolites by lactic acid cultures isolated from sucuk samples. Meat Sci. 2000, 55, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kaban, G.; Kaya, M. Identification of lactic acid bacteria and Gram-Positive catalase-positive cocci isolated from naturally fermented sausage (sucuk). J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, M385–M388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kaban, G.; Kaya, M. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Staphylococcus xylosus on the quality characteristics of dry fermented sausage “sucuk”. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, S58–S63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kaban, G.; Kaya, M. Effects of Staphylococcus carnosus on quality characteristics of sucuk (Turkish dry-fermented sausage) during ripening. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2009, 18, 150–156. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaban, G.; Sallan, S.; Çınar Topçu, K.; Sayın Börekçi, B.; Kaya, M. Assessment of technological attributes of autochthonous starter cultures in Turkish dry fermented sausage (sucuk). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 4392–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaban, G. Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Catalase-Positive Cocci in Traditionally-Produced Sucuk, Their Possible Uses in Production, and Their Effects on Volatile Compounds. Ph.D. Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  17. Barış, Ö. Isolation, Characterization and Identification of the Bacteria that are Effective in Dripstone Formation in the Caves in Erzurum. Ph.D. Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  18. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Drosinos, E.; Mataragas, M.; Xiraphi, N.; Moschonas, G.; Gaitis, F.; Metaxopoulos, J. Characterization of the microbial flora from a traditional Greek fermented sausage. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Drosinos, E.H.; Paramithiotis, S.; Kolovos, G.; Tsikouras, I.; Metaxopoulos, I. Phenotypic and technological diversity of lactic acid bacteria and staphylococci isolated from traditionally fermented sausages in southern Greece. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kenneally, P.; Leuschner, R.; Arendt, E. Evaluation of the lipolytic activity of starter cultures for meat fermentation purposes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 84, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Landeta, G.; Curiel, J.A.; Carrascosa, A.V.; Muñoz, R.; De Las Rivas, B. Technological and safety properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Spanish dry-cured sausages. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harrigan, W.F. Laboratory Methods in Food Microbiology; Gulf Professional Publishing: Houston, TX, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sawitzki, M.C.; Fiorentini, Â.M.; Bertol, T.M.; Sant’Anna, E.S. Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from naturally fermented sausages and their technological properties for application as starter cultures. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 29, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schillinger, U.; Lücke, F.K. Einsatz von milchsäurebakterien als schutzkulturen bei fleischerzeugnissen. In Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesanst. für Fleischforsch; BAFF: Kulmbach, Germany, 1989; Volume 28, pp. 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  27. Martineau, F.; Picard, F.J.; Lansac, N.; Ménard, C.; Roy, P.H.; Ouellette, M.; Bergeron, M.G. Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maynou, G.; Migura-Garcia, L.; Chester-Jones, H.; Ziegler, D.; Bach, A.; Terré, M. Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli strains before and after weaning. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 7967–7979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bozdogan, B.; Berrezouga, L.; Kuo, M.S.; Yurek, D.A.; Farley, K.A.; Stockman, B.J.; Leclercq, R. A new resistance gene, linB, conferring resistance to lincosamides by nucleotidylation in Enterococcus faecium HM1025. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 925–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ouoba, L.I.I.; Lei, V.; Jensen, L.B. Resistance of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria of African and European origin to antimicrobials: Determination and transferability of the resistance genes to other bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 121, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sáenz, Y.; Vinué, L.; Ruiz, E.; Somalo, S.; Martínez, S.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Torres, C. Class 1 integrons lacking qacEΔ1 and sul1 genes in Escherichia coli isolates of food, animal and human origins. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 144, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jafari, E.; Mostaan, S.; Bouzari, S. Characterization of antimicrobial susceptibility, extended-spectrum β-Lactamase genes and phylogenetic groups of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from patients with diarrhea. Osong Public Health Res. Perspect. 2020, 11, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dezfulian, A.; Aslani, M.M.; Oskoui, M.; Farrokh, P.; Azimirad, M.; Dabiri, H.; Zali, M.R. Identification and characterization of a high vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harboring vana gene cluster isolated from diabetic foot ulcer. Iran. J. Basic. Med. Sci. 2012, 15, 803–806. [Google Scholar]
  34. Aymerich, T.; Martin, B.; Garriga, M.; Hugas, M. Microbial quality and direct PCR identification of lactic acid bacteria and nonpathogenic staphylococci from artisanal low-acid sausages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4583–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adigüzel, G.; Atasever, M. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Turkish dry fermented sausage. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 14, 4130–4138. [Google Scholar]
  36. Milićević, B.; Danilović, B.; Zdolec, N.; Kozachinski, L.; Dobranic, V.; Savić, D. Microbiota of the fermented sausages: Influence on product quality and safety. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 20, 1061–1078. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yaman, A.; Gökalp, H.; Çon, A.H. Some characteristics of lactic acid bacteria present in commercial sucuk samples. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Borović, B.; Velebit, B.; Vesković, S.; Lakićević, B.; Baltić, T. The characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated during the traditional production of Užička sausage. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 85, p. 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bungenstock, L.; Abdulmawjood, A.; Reich, F. Evaluation of antibacterial properties of lactic acid bacteria from traditionally and industrially produced fermented sausages from Germany. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kesmen, Z.; Yarimcam, B.; Aslan, H.; Özbekar, E.; Yetim, H. Application of different molecular techniques for characterization of catalase-positive cocci isolated from sucuk. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, M222–M229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Comi, G.; Citterio, B.; Manzano, M.; Cantoni, C.; Bertoldi, M. Evaluation and characterization of Micrococcaceae strains in Italian dry fermented sausages. Fleischwirtschaft 1992, 72, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar]
  42. Coppola, R.; Lorizzo, M.; Saotta, R.; Sorrentino, E.; Grazia, L. Characterization of Micrococci and Staphylococci isolated from soppressata molisana, a Southern Italy fermented sausage. Food Microbiol. 1997, 14, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cocolin, L.; Manzano, M.; Aggio, D.; Cantoni, C.; Comi, G. A Novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for the identification of Micrococcaceae strains involved in meat fermentations: Its application to naturally fermented Italian sausages. Meat Sci. 2001, 57, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Blaiotta, G.; Pennacchia, C.; Villani, F.; Ricciardi, A.; Tofalo, R.; Parente, E. Diversity and dynamics of communities of coagulase-negative staphylococci in traditional fermented sausages. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Miralles, M.C.; Flores, J.; Perez-Martinez, G. Biochemical tests for the selection of Staphylococcus strains as potential meat starter cultures. Food Microbiol. 1996, 13, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. García-Varona, M.; Santos, E.M.; Jaime, I.; Rovira, J. Characterisation of Micrococcaceae isolated from different varieties of Chorizo. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 54, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martín, B.; Garriga, M.; Hugas, M.; Bover-Cid, S.; Veciana-Nogués, M.; Aymerich, T. Molecular, technological and safety characterization of Gram-positive catalase-positive cocci from slightly fermented sausages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 107, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Samelis, J.; Metaxopoulos, J.; Vlassi, M.; Pappa, A. Stability and safety of traditional Greek salami—A microbiological ecology study. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 44, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Papamanoli, E.; Kotzekidou, P.; Tzanetakis, N.; Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. Characterization of Micrococcaceae isolated from dry fermented sausage. Food Microbiol. 2002, 19, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mauriello, G.; Casaburi, A.; Blaiotta, G.; Villani, F. Isolation and technological properties of coagulase-negative staphylococci from fermented sausages of Southern Italy. Meat Sci. 2004, 67, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Montel, M.C.; Talon, R.; Cantonnet, M.; Fournaud, J. Identification of Staphylococcus from French dry sausage. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 15, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hammes, W.P.; Hertel, C. New developments in meat starter cultures. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Iacumin, L.; Manzano, M.; Comi, G. Catalase-positive cocci in fermented sausage: Variability due to different pork breeds, breeding systems and sausage production technology. Food Microbiol. 2012, 29, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nunes, R.S.C.; Del Aguila, E.M.; Paschoalin, V.M.F. Safety evaluation of the coagulase-negative staphylococci microbiota of salami: Superantigenic toxin production and antimicrobial resistance. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 483548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  56. Felsenstein, J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Santos Cruxen, C.E.; Funck, G.D.; Haubert, L.; da Silva Dannenberg, G.; de Lima Marques, J.; Chaves, F.C.; Fiorentini, Â.M. Selection of native bacterial starter culture in the production of fermented meat sausages: Application potential, safety aspects, and emerging technologies. Food Res. Int. 2019, 122, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kamiloğlu, A.; Kaban, G.; Kaya, M. Contribution of catalase-positive cocci on flavour formation in fermented sausages. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2016, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kamiloğlu, A.; Kaban, G.; Kaya, M. Technological properties of autochthonous Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from sucuk (Turkish dry-fermented sausage). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Coenye, T.; Peeters, E.; Nelis, H.J. Biofilm formation by Propionibacterium acnes is associated with increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and increased production of putative virulence factors. Res. Microbiol. 2007, 158, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dalié, D.; Deschamps, A.; Richard-Forget, F. Lactic acid bacteria—Potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: A review. Food Control. 2010, 21, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Álvarez-Cisneros, Y.M.; Ponce-Alquicira, E. Antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria. In Antimicrobial Resistance—A Global Threat; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, J.; Li, M.; Liu, M.; Yang, K.; Zhang, J.; Fan, M.; Wei, X. Antibiotic resistance of coagulase-negative staphylococci and lactic acid bacteria isolated from naturally fermented Chinese cured beef. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 2054–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree constructed from the 16S rRNA regions of LAB (The phylogenetic tree of all LAB isolates (n = 95) was constructed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The Neighbor-Joining method was used to generate the tree [18], and the optimal tree had a total branch length of 0.21319605. Evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distance method [55]. The final dataset included 1464 positions, and evolutionary analyses were performed using MEGA X [19]).
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree constructed from the 16S rRNA regions of LAB (The phylogenetic tree of all LAB isolates (n = 95) was constructed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. The Neighbor-Joining method was used to generate the tree [18], and the optimal tree had a total branch length of 0.21319605. Evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distance method [55]. The final dataset included 1464 positions, and evolutionary analyses were performed using MEGA X [19]).
Foods 14 03495 g001
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree constructed from the 16S rRNA regions of Staphylococcus strains (The Neighbor-Joining method [18] was used to infer the evolutionary history. The optimal tree is presented, with a total branch length of 0.14661326. Related taxa clustered together according to the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) [56]. Evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distance method [53]. A total of 50 CoNS nucleotide sequences were analyzed, and the final dataset contained 1485 positions. Evolutionary analyses were performed using MEGA X [16]).
Figure 2. The phylogenetic tree constructed from the 16S rRNA regions of Staphylococcus strains (The Neighbor-Joining method [18] was used to infer the evolutionary history. The optimal tree is presented, with a total branch length of 0.14661326. Related taxa clustered together according to the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) [56]. Evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distance method [53]. A total of 50 CoNS nucleotide sequences were analyzed, and the final dataset contained 1485 positions. Evolutionary analyses were performed using MEGA X [16]).
Foods 14 03495 g002
Table 1. Primer sets used to identify antibiotic resistance genes.
Table 1. Primer sets used to identify antibiotic resistance genes.
Antibiotic PrimersReferences
Penicillin GblaZ5′-ACTTCAACACCTGCTG
TTTC-3′/5′-TGACCACTTTTATCAGCAACC-3′
Martineau et al. [27]
AmpicillinblaTEM5′-GCGGAACCCCTATTTG-3′/5′-ACC AAT GCT TAA TCA GTG AG-3′Maynou et al. [28]
ClindamycinlinB5′-CCTACCTATTGTTTGTGGAA-3′/5′-ATAACGTTACTCTCCTATTC-3′Bozdogan et al. [29]
Erythromycinerm (A)5′-AAGCGGTAAAACCCCTCTGAG-3′/5′-TCA AAG CCT GTC GGA ATT GG-3′Ouoba et al. [30]
Gentamicinaac(3″)IV5′-AGTTGACCCAGGGCTGTCGC-3′/5′-GTG TGC TGC TGG TCC ACA GC-3′Ouoba et al. [30]
Kanamycinaph(3″)-I5′-AACGTCTTGCTCGAGGCCGCG-3′/5′-GGCAAGATCCTGGTATCGGTCTGCG-3′Ouoba et al. [30]
TetracyclinetetA5′-GTAATTCTGAGCACTGTCGC-3′/5′-CTGCCTGGACAACATTGCTT-3′Sáenz et al. [31]
StreptomycinstrA5′-CCAATCGCAGATAGAAGG C-3′/5′-CTT GGT GAT AAC GGC AAT TC-3′Ouoba et al. [30]
CephalotinblaCTX-M95′-GTGACAAAGAGAGTGCAACGG-3′/5′-ATGATTCTCGCCGCTGAAGCC-3′Jafari et al. [32]
VancomycinvanR5′-AGCGATAAAATACTTATTGTGGA-3′/5′-CGGATTATCAATGGTGTCGTT-3′Dezfulian et al. [33]
Table 2. Growth characteristics of isolates at different temperature, pH and NaCl concentrations.
Table 2. Growth characteristics of isolates at different temperature, pH and NaCl concentrations.
Isolates
L1L2L3P1P2S1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9
Number of Isolates
6018133124106322111
4 °CN-----2194312-11
P60181331312-1-1--
15 °CN-----1--------
P-----3133-1---
G12131-2093-11111
VG5916-21----1----
25 °CP-----2-2------
G--41-22104322111
VG6018921---------
45 °CN1----1374-11-11
P7-11--11323111--
G5218231---------
6.5% NaClN2-------------
P--8--41-------
G--42-2096322111
VG5818111---------
10% NaClN10113--1--------
P4717-3141-1-1--1
G3----199622111-
pH 4.5N--7--612------
P3-22-143332211-
G5718411461-----1
pH 5.0N-----3-2------
P2-8--732-1111-
G57185311472311--1
VG1-------------
pH 5.5P1----5-3--1---
G--102-19103321111
VG5918311---------
pH 6.0P-----4-2------
G--82-20104322111
VG6018511---------
pH 6.5P-----2-2------
G--82-22104322111
VG6018511---------
L1: L. plantarum; L2: L. paraplantarum; L3: L. sakei; P1: P. acidilactici; P2: P. pentosaceus; S1: S. xylosus; S2: S. saprophyticus; S3: S. equorum; S4: S. simulans; S5: S. succinus; S6: S. carnosus; S7: S. hominis; S8: S. caprea; S9: S. vitulinus, N: negative, P: poor, G: good, VG: very good.
Table 3. Biochemical and Metabolic Activities of LAB and CoNS Isolates.
Table 3. Biochemical and Metabolic Activities of LAB and CoNS Isolates.
IsolatesTotal Number DL Lactic Acid Acetoin FormationProteolytic Activity Lipolytic Activity Nitrate Reductase Activity Decarboxylase Activity Biofilm Formation
L16057477061NT
L21818180020NT
L31311121010NT
P13330000NT
P21110000NT
S124NT2210019NT0
S210NT100010NT0
S36NT4006NT1
S43NT3003NT0
S52NT2002NT0
S62NT2001NT0
S71NT1001NT0
S81NT1001NT0
S91NT1001NT0
L1: L. plantarum; L2: L. paraplantarum; L3: L. sakei; P1: P. acidilactici; P2: P. pentosceus; S1: S. xylosus; S2: S. saprophyticus; S3: S. equorum; S4: S. simulans; S5: S. succinus; S6: S. carnosus; S7: S. hominis; S8: S. caprea; S9: S. vitulinus, NT: Not tested.
Table 4. Antogonistic activity results of isolates.
Table 4. Antogonistic activity results of isolates.
IsolatesNumber L. monocytogenes
ATCC 7644
S. aureus ATCC 25923S. aureus ATCC 29213
Agar spot
NPGVGNPGVGNPGVG
L. plantarum60--53715342-15144-
L. paraplantarum18--18--117--117-
L. sakei13---1356-213---
P. acidilactici3--3---3---3-
P. pentosaceus1--1---1---1-
Well diffusion
NPGVGNPGVGNPGVG
L. plantarum6059-1-60---60---
L. paraplantarum1818---18---18---
L. sakei13121--13---13---
P. acidilactici33---3---3---
P. pentosaceus11---1---1---
N: negative, P: poor, G: good, VG: very good.
Table 5. Susceptibility of LAB and CoNS isolates to different antibiotics.
Table 5. Susceptibility of LAB and CoNS isolates to different antibiotics.
Isolates Antibiotic Susceptibility
Number of
Isolates
AClEGKTVSCP
L. plantarum60556058--54115254
L. paraplantarum18111818--13--88
L. sakei13131313-113--1313
P. acidilactici3233--1---2
P. pentosaceus1111--1----
S. xylosus2424242422222424192424
S. saprophyticus101010101010101091010
S. equorum66666666666
S. simulans33333333333
S. succinus22222222222
S. carnosus22122222122
S. hominis11111111111
S. caprea11111111111
S. vitulinus11111111111
A: Ampicillin (10 µg), Cl: clindamycin (2 µg), E: erytromycin(15 µg), G: gentamicin (10 µg), K: kanamycin (30 µg), T: tetracycline (30 µg), V: vancomycin (30 µg), S: streptomycin (10 µg), C: cephalotin (30 µg), P: Penicillin G (10 U).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaya, M.; Sayın, B.; Topçu, K.Ç.; Karadayı, M.; Kamiloğlu, A.; Güllüce, M.; Kaban, G. Genotypic and Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Sucuk: A Preliminary Screening of Potential Starter Cultures. Foods 2025, 14, 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203495

AMA Style

Kaya M, Sayın B, Topçu KÇ, Karadayı M, Kamiloğlu A, Güllüce M, Kaban G. Genotypic and Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Sucuk: A Preliminary Screening of Potential Starter Cultures. Foods. 2025; 14(20):3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203495

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaya, Mükerrem, Bilge Sayın, Kübra Çinar Topçu, Mehmet Karadayı, Aybike Kamiloğlu, Medine Güllüce, and Güzin Kaban. 2025. "Genotypic and Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Sucuk: A Preliminary Screening of Potential Starter Cultures" Foods 14, no. 20: 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203495

APA Style

Kaya, M., Sayın, B., Topçu, K. Ç., Karadayı, M., Kamiloğlu, A., Güllüce, M., & Kaban, G. (2025). Genotypic and Technological Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Isolated from Sucuk: A Preliminary Screening of Potential Starter Cultures. Foods, 14(20), 3495. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14203495

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop