Next Article in Journal
Egg Yolk Granule Nanoparticles Promote Longitudinal Bone Growth in HFD-Obese Mice
Previous Article in Journal
InsectFish—The Use of Insect Meal in the Fish Sector in Creating Farm-to-Fork Value: Chemical and Quality Characteristics of Sparus aurata Fillets Fed Hermetia illucens Larvae-Based Feed
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aptamer Sequence Optimization and Its Application in Food Safety Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Noble Metal-Based Nanocomposites for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Detection of Food Contaminants

1
Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Health of Tianjin, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(17), 3108; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173108
Submission received: 18 August 2025 / Revised: 4 September 2025 / Accepted: 4 September 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025

Abstract

Public health concerns related to food contaminants, including biotoxins, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, illegal additives, foodborne pathogens, and heavy metals, have garnered significant public attention in recent years. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop rapid and accurate technologies to detect these harmful substances. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), due to its characteristics of high sensitivity and specificity enabling the detection of food contaminants within complex matrices, has attracted widespread interest. This review focuses on the application of noble metal-based nanocomposites as SERS-active substrates for food contaminant detection. It particularly highlights the structure–performance relationships of metallic nanomaterials, including gold and silver nanoparticles (e.g., nanospheres, nanostars, nanorods), bimetallic structures (e.g., Au@Ag core–shell), as well as metal–nonmetal composite nanomaterials such as semiconductor-based, carbon-based, and porous framework-based materials. All of which play a crucial role in achieving effective Raman signal enhancement. Furthermore, the significant applications in detecting various contaminants and distinct advantages in terms of the sensitivity and selectivity of noble metal-based nanomaterials are also discussed. Finally, this review addresses current challenges associated with SERS technology based on noble metal-based nanomaterials and proposes corresponding strategies alongside future perspectives.

1. Introduction

In recent years, food safety issues have garnered global attention due to their increasing complexity and serious public health impacts. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that nearly 600 million people worldwide fall ill annually from consuming food contaminated with chemical and biological pollutants, resulting in about 420,000 deaths [1]. This dramatic rise in foodborne diseases poses significant threats to both public health and economic stability. Food contaminants are broadly categorized as chemical and biological. Chemical contaminants, including biotoxins, antibiotics, pesticides/veterinary drugs, heavy metals and nitrites, can accumulate in tissues over time, leading to chronic toxicity. Their adverse effects include organ damage, neurotoxicity, and carry risks of teratogenicity, carcinogenicity, and mutagenicity. Biological contaminants primarily consist of pathogenic bacteria and viruses, such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and norovirus, which are associated with acute infections, toxin-mediated diseases, and occasional outbreaks [2,3]. Given the unpredictable and diverse nature of these contaminants, it is imperative to develop efficient and accurate sensing techniques for detecting food contaminants.
Currently, conventional methods applied for food contaminant analysis mainly include liquid chromatography (LC) [4], mass spectrometry (MS) [5], high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) [6], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [7], and biochemical assays. These methods are considered the gold standard for laboratory quantification due to their high accuracy. However, they often require cumbersome and time-costly pretreatment process, and rely on expensive instrumentation and specialized technical personnel. Consequently, developing novel food contaminant detection technologies characterized by high accuracy, sensitivity, and rapidity is significantly crucial. In contrast, SERS offers unique advantages for rapid screening, including fingerprint identification capability for highly sensitive and specific detection, as well as potential for rapid, on-site, and non-destructive analysis. Raman spectroscopy utilizes inelastic light scattering to identify molecular structures and characterize compositions through spectral fingerprints. However, its inherent weak signal restricts applications to solid or high-concentration solutions and impedes reliable quantification [8,9]. In 1974, Fleischmann et al. observed a dramatically enhanced Raman signal from pyridine adsorbed on a roughened silver (Ag) electrode [10]. This signal amplification phenomenon was subsequently termed surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [11]. The intrinsic plasmonic properties of gold (Au) or Ag nanostructures render them common and efficient SERS substrates. Nevertheless, the dynamic environment of fluid samples restricts consistent contact between target molecules and plasmonic nanostructures, leading to poor reproducibility in SERS measurements [12,13]. Therefore, incorporating non-noble metal nanomaterials, which offer selective capture and rapid enrichment capabilities, can significantly improve SERS performance compared to monometallic noble metal substrates.
Numerous reviews on SERS technology for food contaminant analysis have recently emerged. These primarily discuss aptamer-based [14], antibody-based [15,16], and metal–organic framework (MOF)-based [17] SERS sensing strategies. Aptamers provide benefits such as high affinity and design flexibility, yet their conformational stability is strongly influenced by environmental conditions like pH and ionic strength [18]. Antibodies exhibit strong specificity, yet their high production cost and susceptibility to denaturation limit their practicality for on-site rapid detection. Offer exceptional capabilities for target enrichment owing to their ultrahigh surface area and tunable pore sizes. However, their typically small apertures may hinder the diffusion and capture of larger molecules, including certain protein toxins or pathogens, thereby reducing detection sensitivity. Integrating noble metals with functional non-metallic components enables precise nano-environment engineering to control analyte–substrate interactions. By incorporating recognition elements, such as aptamers, antibodies, and molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), targets can be selectively captured. Additionally, porous frameworks or magnetic cores facilitate pre-concentration, significantly increasing local analyte concentrations at SERS-active sites. This directed interaction markedly reduces variability and enhances detection reliability [19,20].
This review aims to fill that gap by comprehensively outlining noble metal nanocomposites as SERS substrates and their applications for detecting food contaminants (Figure 1). We critically examine categories of these nanocomposites and their role in improving the sensitivity and specificity of SERS technology. Challenges and future prospects of SERS detection strategies are further discussed. This paper offers effective solutions to multiple challenges in the practical application of SERS technology, including low signal reproducibility, strong matrix interference, and poor analytical robustness.

2. SERS-Active Substrate Materials

Traditional Raman spectroscopy is limited by a small scattering cross-section, producing extremely weak signals typically on the order of 10−10 of the incident light intensity. Moreover, SERS signals exhibit significant vulnerability to fluorescence-derived interference and laser-induced noise. To address these issues, SERS technology, based on electromagnetic enhancement (EM) and chemical enhancement (CM) mechanisms, has emerged [21]. EM arises primarily from plasmon-mediated field amplification at metallic nanostructures, where light-induced surface plasmon resonance (SPR) intensifies localized electromagnetic fields [22]. CM contributions originate from adsorbate-substrate interactions, including resonance Raman effects, charge-transfer, and interfacial chemical bonding, which synergistically augment molecular Raman signatures [23]. To improve SERS performance, researchers are dedicated to designing SERS-active substrates possessing superior stability, uniformity, reactivity, and high sensitivity. Benefiting from the synergistic development of nanoscience, optical technology, and electron transfer mechanism research, substrates with diverse shapes, compositions, and sizes can be synthesized. These substrates exhibit varying SERS enhancement factors (Efs) and demonstrate significant potential in trace contaminant analysis [24]. Based on material composition and structure, SERS substrates are primarily categorized into monometal, bimetallic, and metal-nonmetal composite substrates. These substrates can significantly enhance Raman signals via both EM and CM mechanisms, thereby advancing SERS analysis.

2.1. Monometallic Substrates

Monometallic nanomaterials exhibit unique physicochemical properties, attracting considerable research interest. Among various noble metal nanomaterials, Au and Ag nanomaterials are the most commonly employed SERS substrates, dominate as plasmonic SERS substrates due to their intense visible, near-infrared resonance and high enhancement factors [25]. Substrate performance is critically influenced by morphological parameters, crystallinity, and dimensions. Engineered nanostructures, including nanoparticles (NPs), nanospheres (NSs), nanoflowers (NFs), and nanorods (NRs), serve as highly active platforms for enhancing detection sensitivity toward food contaminants [26]. Au NPs are readily synthesized and exhibit good stability. More irregularly shaped nanomaterials generally exhibit stronger SPR, leading to more significant SERS signal enhancement [27]. Zhao et al. [28] synthesized colloidal Au NFs with controlled petal numbers via a template method (Figure 2a). The NF structures, featuring numerous corners, tips, and gaps, facilitate strong plasmonic coupling, generating abundant “hotspots” and markedly enhanced SERS intensity under 532 nm and 785 nm excitation wavelengths, achieving an EF 5.3 × 108. The size of metallic nanoparticles is a paramount factor governing their SERS performance. It directly influences their localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) properties, which in turn dictates the electromagnetic enhancement efficiency [29]. As the size of gold or silver nanoparticles increases, their LSPR absorption peak red-shifts, enhancing SERS intensity. Sherpa et al. effectively tuned the size of Ag nanoparticles to a key range of 13–24 nm, resulting in controllable adjustments in LSPR wavelength (420–490 nm) and direct band gap (2.05–2.48 eV) [30]. These optimized optical properties correlate directly with the electromagnetic field enhancement strength, fundamentally enabling the EF to rise from 106 to over 107. Moreover, nanoparticle size is critical for hotspot formation. For the same gap distance, the SERS signal generated between larger nanoparticles (e.g., 60–80 nm) is significantly stronger than that between smaller nanoparticles (e.g., 20 nm). Luo et al. [31] fabricated a tunable Au/Au triangular nanogap array with gap sizes of 3–10 nm via atomic layer lithography. This array provides abundant “hotspots” (EF: 108), exhibiting an SERS intensity significantly higher than that of a thin Au film of equivalent thickness. Furthermore, modifying substrate materials can also effectively enhance SERS “hotspots”.
Ag nanostructures are widely employed as SERS-active substrates due to their robust conductivity, oxidation resistance, biocompatibility, and cost advantage over Au, thereby significantly amplifying Raman signals. Hassan et al. [33] synthesized flower-like Ag NPs with highly roughened surfaces via a nucleation method, coupled with solid-phase extraction (SPE) for detecting methomyl, acetamiprid, and 2,4-D in green tea. The irregular surface morphology of the flower-like Ag NPs contains numerous crevices, which greatly enhance SERS intensity through localized plasmonic resonance. The incorporation of SPE allows rapid and efficient sample purification, accelerating the SERS detection process. The EF for AgNPs synthesized at 25 °C reached 1.39 × 106. The detection limits (LODs) for methomyl, acetamiprid, and 2,4-D were as low as 1.88 × 10−4 µg/mL. Yao et al. [32] developed a surface-modified Ag nanoaggregates for SERS detection of hydrophobic contaminants in food (Figure 2b). The hydrophobicity of Ag nanoaggregates can be precisely tuned by controlling the alkyl chain length of cationic surfactants. This method offers well-defined parameters and excellent reproducibility, demonstrating promising application prospects.

2.2. Bimetallic Substrates

The combination of two plasmonic metals at ultrashort distances induces strong interfacial plasmonic coupling, thereby concentrating electromagnetic fields beyond monometallic limitations. These synergistic hotspots substantially amplify SERS signals and photocatalytic activity compared to single metal nanocrystals [34,35]. Au and Ag nanomaterials are the most common SERS substrates. Ag NPs exhibit sharper plasmonic peaks and provide higher Raman signals than Au NPs but are highly unstable. Combining Au and Ag into Au@Ag bimetallic nanostructures integrates the optical enhancement of Ag with the surface stability of Au, yielding excellent SERS performance. Yang et al. developed a reproducible method for synthesizing Au@Ag core–shell structures by systematically optimizing the volume of AgNO3. When 150 μL of AgNO3 solution was added, an optimal Ag shell with a thickness of approximately 6 nm was formed on the Au NR surface. Under these conditions, the resulting SERS substrate achieved the highest enhancement factor (2.91 × 107) and exhibited excellent reproducibility across different batches (Figure 3a) [36]. Similarly, Chen et al. reported a reproducible approach for preparing core–shell Au@Ag NRs by controlling the amount of AgNO3 added [37]. The optimal plasmonic properties were achieved with the addition of 10 μL of AgNO3. The irregular surface of NRs provides higher Raman intensity than Au or Ag NSs (Figure 3b). Building on this, Xu et al. engineered magnetic Au@Ag NPs functionalized with 4-mercaptophenylboronic acid (4-MPBA), yielding Mau@Ag@MPBA substrate with enhanced SERS amplification (EF: 2.65 × 107) [38]. NF structures, being more irregular than NRs, provide high-density “hotspots”, significantly boosting SERS substrate activity.
Moreover, SERS signal intensity depends critically on the homogeneity of “hotspots” and the distribution of molecular adsorption sites on the substrate [39]. To enhance detection specificity, Guo et al. designed a flexible SERS substrate incorporating Au@Ag core–shell nanocube arrays and MIP technology [40]. This platform demonstrates high sensitivity, outstanding selectivity, and mechanical flexibility, making it ideal for in situ detection on irregular surfaces. The Au@Ag nanocubes leverage the stability of the Au core and the strong plasmonic enhancement of the Ag shell, forming an ordered array with dense hotspots. This configuration ensures high signal sensitivity, uniformity, and stability. Coating the flexible substrate with MIP enables selective recognition and enrichment of target molecules from complex matrices, greatly improving selectivity and interference resistance. Consequently, the substrate performs reliably in real sample analyses with complex compositions. In summary, the SERS efficiency of noble metal nanostructures is highly influenced by their size, morphology, and architecture. The Ag shell contributes strong electromagnetic enhancement, while the Au core enhances chemical durability, preventing Ag oxidation and ensuring long-term stability and reproducible performance. For practical implementation, however, robustness in synthesis is as essential as high performance. Precise optimization of reaction parameters, such as precursor concentration and addition rate, enables the fabrication of SERS substrates with uniform morphology, consistent performance, and high reproducibility.

2.3. Metal-Nonmetal Composite Substrates

The recent development of novel non-metallic nanomaterials, including semiconductor materials, porous framework materials, and carbon-based nanomaterials in recent years, has opened new avenues for the engineering of SERS-active substrates [41,42,43]. Literature studies indicate that hybrid substrates combining metallic and non-metallic materials exhibit unique electronic and optical properties. Semiconductor materials, owing to their chemical stability, cost-effectiveness, and biocompatibility, making them promising candidates for SERS applications [44]. Constructing hybrid composites by integrating noble metal nanomaterials with semiconductors combines advantages such as high-density SERS hotspots and efficient mass transfer. Fueaimi et al. [45] fabricated silver nanofibers (Ag NFs) on Ag2S thin films using electron beam irradiation. The Ag2S semiconductor was selected for its unique properties and high stability. This design overcomes the susceptibility of silver to oxidation. Under optimal conditions, the Ag NF substrate demonstrated excellent SERS performance, achieving an EF as high as 1.57 × 106 for methylene blue (MB) and a low LOD down to 1.18 × 10−11 M. Kumar et al. decorated Au NPs onto Cu2O microspheres using polyol and photoreduction methods to create a novel SERS substrate (Figure 4a) [46]. Examination of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and elemental mapping images revealed rough copper oxide microspheres with an average particle size of 1.69 μm, uniformly decorated with Au NPs on the surface. The electromagnetic and chemical synergistic effects between the Au NPs, Cu2O microspheres, and target dye molecules significantly enhanced the SERS activity. After parameter optimization, EFs reached 2.55 × 1012 for rhodamine B (RhB) (LOD: 2.36 × 10−13 M) and 1.2 × 1011 for MB (LOD: 3.40 × 10−12 M). Wu et al. successfully synthesized ternary Au@CuO-Ag nanocubes with a core–shell-satellite structure via galvanic replacement [47]. This structure not only exhibited remarkable SERS enhancement but also demonstrated superior self-cleaning capability, maintaining high activity even after 6 cycles of use. Applied to malachite green detection, the LOD was as low as 10−9 M. Tiwari et al. developed an SERS substrate based on ZnO/ZnFe2O4 organic nanostructures modified with Au NPs [48]. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to characterize the surface chemical structure and bonding mechanisms of the synthesized ZnO/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposite. The results confirm that the electromagnetic interactions between Au0 and the material led to the enhancement of the SERS signal. The combination of ZnFe2O4, with its smaller band gap, and ZnO significantly enhanced the Raman signal (EF: 1.6 × 108). This substrate achieved an LOD of 0.39 μM for melamine detection.
Although solid substrates like semiconductors provide compactness and uniformity for metallic materials, their practical application is often constrained by limitations including insufficient dispersibility, poor adsorption capacity, and suboptimal stability. Consequently, researchers have recently focused on developing novel porous flexible substrates to significantly enhance signal amplification and hotspot effects. Ding et al. [51] successfully fabricated an SERS-active substrate using a composite of MOFs and AgNPs (MOFs-AgNPs). This substrate enabled ultrasensitive detection of sildenafil (SIL) and pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) adulterants in dietary supplements. The enhanced performance stems from the strong inherent adsorption capability of MOFs, which effectively enriches target molecules, and the confinement of these molecules within the intense electromagnetic field enhancement zones of the in situ generated AgNPs. This combination significantly boosted SERS activity, resulting in MOFs-AgNPs substrates outperforming pure AgNP substrates. In another study, Yang et al. [49] engineered beaded AgNWs@ZIF-8 core–shell nanochains through controlled ZIF-8 growth on silver nanowires (Ag NWs), enabling in situ multiplex detection of methyl parathion and carbaryl residues on agricultural produce surfaces (Figure 4b). The XPS analysis revealed two distinct peaks for Ag 3d at Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2, respectively. The spin–orbit splitting energy of 6.00 eV confirms the presence of metallic Ag (Ag0) in the AgNWs@ZIF-8 composite. This finding further indicates that the LSPR effect of metallic Ag generates a strong electromagnetic field, which amplifies the Raman signal of adsorbed molecules by a factor of 106 to 1010. Benefiting from the microporous structure of the ZIF-8 shell and the SPR properties of the internal Ag NWs, the Ag NWs@ZIF-8 core–shell nanochain exhibited excellent adsorption capacity and significant SERS activity (EF: 4.2 × 107). This synthesis method demonstrates excellent controllability and reproducibility, providing a new design concept for constructing novel metal NP@MOF composites. In summary, the porous structure of the MOF not only enriches the targets but also provides well-defined channels that serve as uniform anchoring sites for noble metal NPs. This effectively prevents NP aggregation and significantly enhances the substrate’s uniformity and signal reproducibility.
Carbon-based porous architectures, including porous carbon, graphene, and their derivatives, are fabricated through physical activation or chemical synthesis, offering enhanced surface activity. Relative to conventional non-porous materials, these architectures exhibit exceptional adsorption properties, enabling efficient enrichment of Raman “hotspots” and significantly enhancing detection sensitivity [52,53]. Graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) offer advantages such as stability, sensitivity, reproducibility, biocompatibility, ease of preparation, and modification. Furthermore, graphene demonstrates remarkable charge transfer between graphene and molecules [54,55]. However, given the limited contribution of chemical enhancement to SERS, graphene-metal hybrid architectures synergistically combine graphene-derived chemical enhancement with noble metal plasmonic amplification, generating significantly greater SERS intensity. Shanta et al. [56] developed a GO/Ag composite for detecting the hydrophobic pollutant PCB-77. This rGO-NP substrate outperformed planar silver nanoarrays and silver nanoprisms in SERS enhancement, achieving an LOD of 100 nM for coplanar PCB-77. Li et al. [57] developed a hydrophilic SERS imprinted sensor (AGP-MIM) by depositing MIPs onto an Ag/GO composite for antibiotic detection. SEM images showed that the synthesized composite exhibits a particle size of approximately 800 nm. The incorporation of GO further increases the surface roughness of the Ag/GO composite, which promotes the formation of a greater number of SERS “hotspots” [58]. The MIPs selectively adsorb target molecules on the surface while effectively protecting the internal SERS substrate. This platform achieved an LOD of 0.0078 nmol/L for antibiotics. He et al. [59] successfully fabricated magnetic Fe3O4/GO/Ag microspheres by coating Fe3O4 with GO followed by in situ Ag deposition, which was evidenced by SEM spectra. XPS spectrum confirm the presence of both Ag0 and the GO component. These exhibited higher SERS intensity than Fe3O4/Ag microspheres (LOD: 10−9 M) and possessed catalytic activity, completely degrading methylene blue and ciprofloxacin within 12 min. To achieve on-site detection of beverage colorants, Kong et al. [50] employed a GO/Au@Ag nanobox (NB)-functionalized filtration membrane in conjunction with a portable Raman spectrometer (Figure 4c). SEM observations indicate that the wrinkled two-dimensional membrane structure of GO offers abundant anchoring sites for the deposition of metal nanomaterials, leading to the formation of dense SERS hotspots. Compared with bare Au@Ag NBs, the GO/Au@Ag NRs membrane exhibited a 2.74-fold enhancement in SERS intensity. The irregular shape of Au@Ag NBs enhances SERS intensity, while GO exhibits strong enrichment capability for target analytes, achieving an LOD of 1.12 × 10−9 mol/L for R6G. In addition to improving sensitivity through the chemical enhancement mechanism, the incorporation of carbon-based materials such as GO leverages their high specific surface area and π-π interactions to selectively enrich hydrophobic target molecules. This effectively mitigates interference from hydrophilic compounds in complex food matrices, thereby improving the selectivity and robustness of the analysis.
Carbon dots (CDs), consisting of a sp2-hybridized carbon core and diverse surface functional groups, represent an emerging class of carbon-based nanomaterials [60,61]. Integration of CDs with metallic NPs leverages these structural attributes to achieve significant enhancement in SERS performance. Luo et al. [62] synthesized Au@CDs composites with an average diameter of 24 nm and a ~2 nm CD shell through the reduction of HauCl4 with CDs at 100 °C. The ultrathin CD layer promotes the adsorption of aromatic molecules, resulting in an EF of 8.8 × 103, approximately 4 times higher than that of AuNPs. Applied to rhodamine 6G detection, the LOD was approximately 3.8 × 10−7 nmol/L. Bhunia et al. [63] fabricated a SERS sensor by depositing Ag NPs onto an active flexible polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) film embedded with CDs. The incorporation of CDs markedly enhanced the SERS performance of the Ag NPs through efficient energy transfer between CDs and AgNPs. This platform achieved nanomolar-level detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chen et al. [64] prepared CDs-capped Ag NPs (AgNPs/CDs) with nanostructures including nanochains, nanoplates (2D), and nanobodies by controlling CD dosage. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses revealed distinct lattice fringes of the Ag NPs, while XPS and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra further confirmed the successful synthesis of both CDs and Ag NPs. The composites showed good dispersibility in water, and numerous tiny gaps (“hotspots”) formed between adjacent particles, greatly enhancing SERS activity. Among them, the 2D-AgNPs/CDs structure exhibited the highest SERS intensity, achieving an LOD of 3.9 ppt for thiram residues in apples. Additionally, modifying metal NPs with flexible substrates like cellulose or PDMS has also yielded satisfactory SERS intensity. Although CDs possess relatively weak plasmonic activity, their abundant surface polar functional groups facilitate the enrichment of target molecules through hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, and π-π stacking, creating favorable conditions for charge transfer. Moreover, certain doped carbon dots can reduce the energy barrier associated with charge transfer, promoting more efficient electron exchange between the Ag substrate and target molecules, and leading to a significant enhancement of the Raman signal [65,66].

3. Applications of Noble Metal-Based Nanocomposites for SERS Detection of Food Contaminants

In food safety applications, noble metal-based nanomaterials have enabled novel SERS-based sensor platforms, facilitating rapid, sensitive, and non-destructive screening of diverse contaminants and additives (Table 1). These analytical tools detect trace pesticides, veterinary drugs, heavy metal ions, biotoxins, and food additives, which is critical capabilities for ensuring food safety. They enable the identification and quantitative analysis of harmful substances prior to their entry into the consumption stage [67,68].

3.1. Biotoxins

Biotoxins are a class of naturally occurring toxic substances derived from living organisms, such as animals, plants, or microorganisms, capable of exerting specific toxic effects in other biological species. These toxins readily contaminate human food chain, causing acute or chronic poisoning. Moreover, their potential long-term health risks, including mutagenicity and teratogenicity, pose serious threats to human health [85,86]. SERS technology, leveraging its ultra-high sensitivity, excellent specificity, and capability for multi-target synchronous detection, offers significant advantages in the field of biotoxin analysis. Advances in nanotechnology have further facilitated functional nanomaterial design. These nanomaterials can amplify SERS signals, enhance detection sensitivity, and expand applicability to complex real samples [87,88]. Owing to these attributes, SERS has emerged as a promising tool for detecting biotoxins such as mycotoxins, microcystins, and tetrodotoxin. Current research is increasingly focused on developing novel nanomaterials and methods to achieve higher sensitivity and more rapid detection performance.
Currently, SERS-based toxin detection platforms have been widely established, with aptamer-mediated specific recognition emerging as the predominant strategy due to its superior selectivity. Ma et al. designed a dumbbell-shaped Au@Ag nanodumbbell (Au@Ag ND) aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of ochratoxin A (OTA) (Figure 5a) [71]. TEM showed that glycine induced preferential growth of Ag on the ends of Au NRs, forming dumbbell-shaped Au@AgNDs with the thickness of the outer Ag shell at 5 nm. Further characterization by Ultraviolet-Visible Near-Infrared spectroscopy revealed an absorption peak around 400 nm, indicating the successful deposition of the silver shell onto the gold nanorod surface, which is consistent with the TEM observations. Subsequently, SH-Apt and SH-cDNA were covalently modified onto opposite ends of the Au@AgNDs. Base pairing formed nanogap structures generating high-density hotspots. Upon OTA binding, the aptamer dissociated from the complementary strand, causing the disintegration of the dumbbell structure and consequent SERS signal reduction. The LOD of 0.007 ng/mL is lower than those reported for conventional HPLCs (typically 0.03 μg/mL) [72]. Although SERS technology demonstrates exceptional performance for detecting standard solutions in laboratory settings, its application in real complex food matrices, such as meat, fruits, and beverages, remains challenging. Complex food components can cause strong background fluorescence, spectral interference, and nonspecific adsorption, which mask the SERS signals of target molecules and compromise detection accuracy and reproducibility [89]. In comparison, magnetic composite materials allow for rapid magnetic separation and concentration, substantially streamlining sample preprocessing. This integrated approach markedly improves the anti-interference performance, sensitivity, and operational efficiency of SERS technology in real industrial applications. He et al. [90] designed an efficient magnetic separation SERS platform utilizing SH-cDNA-modified Fe3O4@Au NFs as capture probes and SH-Apt/Cy3-Apt-modified Au@Ag NSs as reporter probes. Surface characterization techniques such as SEM, zeta potential, and XRD confirmed the successful fabrication of both the SERS substrate and the probes. Strong SERS signals were generated via base pairing between the aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) aptamer and its complementary strand. In the presence of AFB1, the aptamer preferentially binds the toxin, leading to weakened signals after magnetic separation. The method achieved an LOD of 0.40 pg/mL and a recovery rate of 96.6% to 115%.
To overcome the limitations of single-aptamer sensors, such as susceptibility to background interference and poor reliability, Wang et al. developed a photothermal (PT) and SERS dual-mode immunochromatographic sensor for sensitive AFB1 detection [91]. This study constructed bayberry-like core-satellite nanostructures loaded with DTNB and conjugated them with antibodies to form a dual-functional photothermal-SERS probe (PT@SERS NPs), enabling both qualitative and quantitative detection of AFB1. The resulting probe demonstrated a photothermal conversion efficiency of 42.11% and high SERS intensity (EF: 1.59 × 107). The LOD of this assay was 0.0073 ng/mL, which was lower than those reported for conventional HPLC (0.07 ng/mL) and colorimetric (0.008 ng/mL) assay [92], but was higher than apt-based strategy (0.40 pg/mL) [90].The constructed SERS sensor demonstrated exceptional dual performance, offering a promising technological approach for rapid mycotoxin detection.

3.2. Pesticides and Veterinary Residues

Pesticides are widely applied in agriculture for pest control, weed management, and crop growth regulation, while veterinary drugs are employed for preventing and treating animal diseases and promoting growth. However, residues of these agrochemicals may persist in food and accumulate in human body, posing potential health risks. Therefore, developing rapid, simple, and highly sensitive detection technologies for pesticide and veterinary drug residues is imperative [93,94]. In the field of pesticide detection, SERS technologies offers significant advantages over traditional chromatographic methods. The latter often requires complex sample preparation, being time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. In contrast, SERS enables rapid, non-destructive, and in situ analysis, making it well-suited for on-site screening. Numerous innovative SERS strategies have been developed for trace detection of pesticide and veterinary drug residues. Yang et al. [36] constructed a magnetic separation-assisted SERS immunosensing platform using core–shell AuNRs@Ag. Leveraging the property that AuNRs facilitate “hotspot” formation more readily than spherical NPs for Raman signal enhancement, 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) as internal standard signal molecule were stably sandwiched between the Au core and Ag shell. The optimal AgNO3 addition was determined by monitoring the variation in silver shell thickness observed in TEM images. When 150 μL of AgNO3 solution was added, an optimal Ag shell thickness of approximately 6 nm was achieved on the surface of the AuNRs, resulting in a maximum Raman EF of 2.91 × 107. This method employed amantadine (AMD)-BSA modified AuNRs@Ag as signal probes combined with monoclonal antibody-conjugated magnetic beads (MBs) as capture probes. Sensitive detection of the veterinary drug AMD was realized via immunocompetitive reaction (LOD: 0.0038 μg/L). Magnetic separation significantly improved detection efficiency, enabling completion of the entire process within 30 min.
However, antigen–antibody binding can lead to false-positive results. Aptamers, owing to their high specificity and precise recognition capabilities, have emerged as more reliable molecular recognition tools. He et al. developed a multifunctional nanoprobe (CDNAg@MIPApt) for ultrasensitive glyphosate detection [73]. A glyphosate-imprinted MIP provides cavities with complementary size and functional groups, ensuring specific target capture. In this work, the successful recognition by the MIP is the key trigger for the detection signal change. Glyphosate binding inhibits the probe’s catalytic activity, reducing AgNP generation and decreasing all three optical signals. This “signal-off” response shows a linear negative correlation with concentration, achieving sensitive detection of glyphosate with an LOD of 0.034 nmol/L, which is lower than those reported for conventional HPLC (1.76 μmol/L) [95] and fluorescent (0.048 μmol/L) [81] techniques.
Porous framework materials, characterized by ultrahigh porosity, enormous specific surface area, and tunable pore size, can be grown in situ on the surface of metal NPs to form core–shell structures, significantly enhancing the sensing performance and stability of SERS substrates. Pu et al. constructed a 3D carbon cloth/ZnO-Ag@ZIF-8 SERS substrate [96]. The ZIF-8 coating offers high surface area and abundant adsorption sites, enhancing analyte enrichment. Within the 3D structure, ZIF-8 synergizes with ZnO and AgNPs to improve electromagnetic field distribution, increasing SERS sensitivity by two orders of magnitude compared to uncoated substrates. Sun et al. successfully synthesized a novel core–shell material (Ag MW@HOF) under mild conditions for SERS detection of the pesticide 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene (BPE) residue (Figure 5b) [76]. The material composed of a silver microwire (Ag MW) core and a hydrogen-bonded organic framework (HOF) shell. This study revealed that the SERS sensing performance was significantly enhanced through the synergistic effects of surface hydrogen bonding, adsorption energy differences, and notably, the pore confinement effect within the HOF shell. By precisely controlling the HOF shell pore size, the AgMW@HOF substrate exhibited highly active and quantifiable SERS responses to probe molecules within a concentration range of 200–1000 ng/mL. Additionally, a HOF-based core–shell SERS chip was fabricated for on-site monitoring of pesticides in aqueous environments. Owing to the mild synthesis conditions, excellent stability and tunable structure, porous framework materials represent promising and controllable platforms for constructing functional SERS substrates. Importantly, the clarification of the SERS signal enhancement mechanisms provides valuable insights for the further development of HOF-based SERS sensing technologies.

3.3. Illegal Food Additives

Illegal food additives refer to non-edible chemical substances (e.g., melamine, clenbuterol, industrial dyes) incorporated during food processing. These substances are prohibited due to their significant toxicity or unknown hazards [97]. By utilizing plasmonic enhancement in Au/Ag/Cu nanomaterials, SERS intensifies molecular Raman signatures, enabling ultra-sensitive detection of illegal additives. Melamine, an industrial chemical, is often fraudulently incorporated into dairy and feed products to artificially elevate apparent protein content owing to its high nitrogen content (66%) [98]. While exhibiting low acute toxicity, excessive intake leads to the formation of insoluble melamine-cyanuric acid crystals in the kidneys, inducing renal failure. Xing et al. [77] developed an aptamer-modified substrate with in situ synthesized Ag NPs for simultaneous detection of melamine and cyromazine in raw milk. The aptamer functioned as a recognition element, enabling specific binding and precise capture of target molecules. The achieved LODs were 43.5 ppb for melamine and 23.6 ppb for cyromazine, both well below the relevant national standard limits. The entire detection process can be completed within 10 min, facilitating real-time and on-site analysis. Dong et al. [99] constructed a highly sensitive melamine detection platform using aptamer-conjugated SERS nanosensors combined with oligonucleotide microarray technology, designed for trace analysis in milk. The sensor utilized Au NPs functionalized with Raman reporters and poly-thymine aptamers, enabling specific melamine recognition via the formation of a “T-M-T” hydrogen-bonding structure. The LOD of this assay was 1.0 ppt, which was even lower than those reported for conventional HPLC (0.73 ppm) [100] and Ag NPs-Apt (43.5 ppb) assay [77].
Clenbuterol was originally developed for asthma treatment but has been illegally used as a feed additive to promote leanness in livestock. Due to its slow metabolism and persistence in animal tissues, clenbuterol has caused severe food poisoning incidents. As a result, the use of clenbuterol in livestock production has been banned in China and the European Union (EU) [101,102]. Recently, various SERS sensing strategies have been established for detecting trace clenbuterol. Zhu et al. [103] developed a competitive immunoassay by conjugating antibodies to 4,4′-dipyridyl (4,4′-DP)-labeled Au NPs and immobilizing clenbuterol-BSA on a glass substrate. Clenbuterol in samples competed with the immobilized clenbuterol-BSA for binding to the antibody-conjugated NPs. The proposed SERS method enabled accurate detection of clenbuterol in swine urine with a LOD of 0.1 pg/mL. To address possible false positives associated with antigen–antibody binding and to improve sensitivity, Duan et al. [78] modified aptamers onto Fe3O4@Au@Ag magnetic NPs as capture probes, and introduced 4-MBA-labeled Au NPs bound to complementary DNA as signal probes (Figure 5c). The specific hybridization between aptamer and complementary DNA generated a strong SERS signal. Upon introduction of clenbuterol, the target analyte bound to the aptamer, competitively displacing the signal probe and resulting in signal reduction. The method achieved an LOD of 0.003 ng/mL for clenbuterol detection in pork samples. Cheng et al. [104] innovatively employed a rGO/AuNPs composite as the SERS probe. TEM observations confirmed that surface chemical modification of GO significantly improved the electrostatic adsorption and nucleation of AuNPs. The rGO not only enhanced the SERS effect but also enriched target molecules via π-π interactions and improved substrate stability. Utilizing liquid–liquid extraction for urine sample pretreatment, this method exhibited an LOD of 0.5 ng/mL and a total analysis time of 8 min, rendering it amenable to point-of-care testing.
Malachite green (MG) is a triphenylmethane dye once widely used in aquaculture to inhibit microbes, fungi, and parasites. However, its use is now prohibited due to its carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic risks to humans. For detecting trace MG residues in aquatic products, Liu et al. [79] utilized sea urchin-like SG@SiO2 NPs as a SERS substrate. The numerous tips on this nanostructure generated significant SERS signals via localized surface plasmon resonance (EF: 3.2 × 106). However, pure SG NPs exhibited poor stability, depositing a silica layer effectively enhanced substrate stability. Successfully applied to MG detection in tilapia, the LOD reached 1.5 × 10−9 mol/L, which was lower than those reported for immunoassay (1.29 × 10−7 mol/L) [105] and conventional HPLC-MS/MS (5.48 × 10−9 mol/L) technology [106]. To further improve selectivity and enrichment efficiency, Ekmen et al. [107] employed MIP technology, which offers abundant specific recognition sites and strong binding affinity. Magnetic NPs coated with an MIP layer were prepared for specific capture and enrichment of MG. Subsequently, the magnetic complex was then deposited onto a silicon wafer coated with Ag nanodendrites for SERS detection. This enabled highly sensitive analysis of MG in carp, achieving an LOD of 1.62 × 10−6 M.

3.4. Foodborne Pathogens

Foodborne pathogens are bacteria capable of causing food poisoning or using food as a transmission route. They can enter the human body through contaminated water or food, subsequently causing foodborne illnesses. These pathogens have become one of the most critical global public health issues. Common foodborne pathogens include Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes) [108,109]. Furthermore, Chuesiang et al. leveraged the coffee-ring effect for SERS signal enhancement, depositing bacteria, aptamer, AgNPs onto gold-coated slides to form coffee rings prior to SERS detection [69]. This enabled detection of Salmonella Enteritidis in ground beef at levels as low as 4 × 104 CFU/g within 4 h. Building on this, Zhao et al. developed a multifunctional Fe3O4@Au-Apt sensor integrating capture, detection, and photothermal therapy [110]. The high surface roughness of Fe3O4@Au improved SERS signals, while Fe3O4 magnetic separation accelerated the reaction process. The aptamer-conjugated Fe3O4@Au-Apt specifically captured target bacteria, achieving an LOD of 25 CFU/mL for S. aureus, which is lower than that of polymerase chain reaction (5 × 103 CFU/g) [111]. Additionally, this substrate exhibited strong photothermal conversion efficiency; temperature increased by 30.8 °C within 5 min under laser irradiation, killing up to 97% of the target bacteria.
To further improve multiplex detection capability, Cheng et al. constructed a magnetic-assisted platform utilizing wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-modified magnetic NPs for efficient bacterial capture [74]. With streptavidin (SA) mediation, this platform significantly increased the number of aptamer-conjugated AuNPs, enabling simultaneous and highly sensitive detection of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes as limits as low as 3 and 5 cells/mL, respectively. Addressing the issue of weak binding between bacteria and metal NPs, Wang et al. [75] designed a boronic acid-functionalized, polydopamine-coated Au@Ag nanoprobe for detecting S. aureus and E. coli. The boronic acid groups effectively captured bacteria, whereas the application of a biocompatible polydopamine (PDA) coating stabilized SERS signals and protected the MNPs from oxidation. Combined with IgG@Fe3O4 magnetic separation, this probe amplified the SERS signal by 108-fold upon bacterial binding, successfully classifying multiple pathogens with a LOD of 10 CFU/mL. And the entire detection process was completed within 30 min. Zhou et al. [80] proposed an integrated bacterial SERS detection platform combining magnetic capture, free antibodies, and PA-SERS tags. In this method, target bacteria were first captured by Fe3O4@Au-Apt magnetic beads, then labeled with free antibodies that provided Fc sites, and finally bound to PA-SERS tags. This strategy circumvented antibody inactivation associated with direct tag conjugation and reduced steric hindrance, significantly improving the specificity and sensitivity for detecting E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and S. Typhimurium (LODs: 10, 10, and 25 CFU/mL, respectively), representing a hundred-fold improvement over traditional lateral flow immunoassay (LFA). However, most current studies focus solely on constructing single-function biological platforms for accurate analysis of foodborne pathogens. Dai et al. developed an integrated SERS platform based on a “capture probe/bacteria/signal probe” sandwich structure (Figure 5d) [81] SEM images revealed that the roughness of the SERS substrate significantly increased due to the deposition of Ag nanocrystals, which indirectly confirms the successful preparation of ZnO/Ag nanocomposites. Utilizing aptamer-modified ZnO/Ag and Au@Ag-4-MPBA-aptamer as probes, this sensor successfully achieved simultaneous, highly sensitive detection of the foodborne pathogens S. Typhimurium and S. aureus (LOD: 10 CFU/mL) and efficient photothermal sterilization (photothermal efficiency of 54.32%). This sensor integrates dual electromagnetic and chemical enhancement mechanisms, significantly boosting SERS signal intensity (EF: 4.67 × 105). Its inherent biocompatibility renders it a novel tool for food safety detection and mitigation applications.

3.5. Heavy Metal Ions

Heavy metal ions, such as Hg2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Cr3+, and Cu2+, pose serious threats to human health and ecological environments due to their high toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulative nature [112,113]. SERS-based assays are now widely used for trace-level monitoring of these contaminants, capitalizing on exceptional sensitivity, rapid response kinetics, and molecular fingerprinting capabilities. The integration of noble metal-based nanomaterials as SERS substrates, which possess unique optical properties and high specific surface area, further improves analytical performance to nanogram-level detection limits. These advances open new avenues and establish a highly sensitive framework for contaminant monitoring and bioanalysis.
For instance, Kamal et al. developed a silver phosphate (Ag3PO4) microcube SERS substrate using a double precipitation method for the ultrasensitive detection of Hg2+ and Pb2+ [82]. By synergistically immobilizing target ions with the organic linker 4,4′-bipyridine (BPy), this substrate achieved exceptional sensitivity (EF: 1010) and an ultra-low detection limit (10−15 M). Beyond exhibiting excellent stability and selectivity, the Ag3PO4 substrate also demonstrated outstanding catalytic degradation capability, allowing for at least 4 cycles of reuse under light illumination. These properties render it an efficient and reliable platform for recyclable SERS detection of heavy metal ions (Figure 5e). To increase the density of plasmonic nanostructures and interaction sites, three-dimensional (3D) cross-linked structures have been developed, which offer higher electromagnetic field enhancement than traditional two-dimensional (2D) substrates. Following this approach, Parveen et al. developed a novel 3D SERS substrate, ZnO@single-walled carbon nanotubes (ZnO@SWCNTs), for environmental heavy metal ion detection [83]. Surface morphology techniques such as FE-SEM, and XRD demonstrated that the necklace-like and pearl-like structures of ZnO NPs were successfully formed on the surface of SWCNTs. The 3D architecture greatly increases the coverage of plasmonic nanostructures and the density of hot spots, leading to a strong SERS effect. Furthermore, SWCNTs offer a much larger surface area than 2D planar structures, allowing for the adsorption of more heavy metal ions and further improving detection sensitivity. This substrate showed high sensitivity and selectivity for Pb2+ with an ultra-low LOD of 0.225 nM, excellent stability, and good reproducibility, making it a powerful tool for trace Pb2+ detection in aqueous solutions. Furthermore, He et al. [84] developed a novel plasmonic MOF-based SERS sensor (Ag@UiO-68-SMe) using an electrochemical method, which enabled the large-scale fabrication of nanotextured Ag needles. SEM observations confirmed the uniform growth of the nanotextured Ag needles on the MOF surface. The thiomethyl groups in the functionalized MOF specifically recognize Hg2+, capturing and concentrating it from complex samples. This greatly enhances the local Hg2+ concentration at the sensing interface, achieving highly sensitive on-site detection with a LOD of 0.17 ppb, representing a three-fold improvement over conventional HPLC-inductively coupled plasma-MS (HPLC-ICP-MS) [114].
However, Raman signal amplification strategies that rely on complex nanostructures can introduce substantial measurement variability. This affects the reproducibility of SERS measurements and hinders the establishment of standardized detection protocols. Moreover, such strategies often exhibit good performance only for specific target molecules, further limiting the technique’s general applicability. While machine learning (ML) algorithms offer potential solutions to these challenges, the absence of standardized model development pipelines and benchmark datasets remains a significant obstacle. To address this, Park et al. constructed a benchmark SERS spectral dataset using lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) and conducted a comparative study to identify the optimal combination of preprocessing steps and ML models [115]. By evaluating the classification performance of multiple ML models, their optimized model successfully identified Pb2+ in independent testing and achieved a balanced accuracy of 84.6% in cross-batch validation.

4. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Noble metal-based nanomaterials demonstrate considerable potential for highly sensitive detection of food contaminants by leveraging their unique SPR effect to significantly enhance Raman scattering signals. However, their practical application is accompanied by both promising prospects and significant challenges.
(1)
Material stability and detection reproducibility: The stability of noble metal NPs, which directly influences the reproducibility and reliability of SERS detection strategies, is affected by the preparation techniques and storage conditions. Due to their high surface energy and susceptibility to oxidation, these NPs are prone to aggregation in complex matrices or during storage, leading to weakened SPR effects and diminished SERS signals. Consequently, developing reproducible and robust chemical production schemes is essential to address this challenge. Noble metal composites offer a key advantage over single materials. They provide a multifunctional platform that improves SERS reproducibility, interference resistance, and robustness. Moreover, immobilizing NPs onto porous supports via covalent bonding or coordination interactions can effectively prevent aggregation. Precise control over nanoparticle size monodispersity is crucial for the fabrication of reproducible and reliable SERS substrates. Therefore, when designing SERS substrates for food contaminants, the size of the metallic nanoparticles must be carefully tailored to achieve optimal analytical performance.
(2)
Specificity in complex systems: The co-existence of multiple contaminants in food, including structurally similar compounds, makes accurate discrimination difficult when relying solely on non-specific adsorption onto noble metal nanomaterials. To address this limitation, the integration of recognition elements (e.g., antibodies, aptamers, MIPs) or microfluidic devices can significantly improve the sensitivity and selectivity of quantitative detection for target molecules. Additionally, improving signal resolution by combining SERS with advanced techniques, such as confocal micro-Raman or surface-enhanced resonance Raman spectroscopy followed by data analysis using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) or deep learning algorithms to extract characteristic features from overlapping peaks, represents a promising strategy.
(3)
Mitigation of matrix interference: The complexity of food matrices can cause severe interference in SERS detection, potentially masking target signals and impeding accurate identification and quantification. External sample pretreatment, such as dilution, centrifugation, organic solvent extraction, or SPE, can also be utilized to purify and concentrate target analytes. On the other hand, a viable solution involves the development of targeted purification materials with high adsorption capacity. These materials can selectively capture target analytes through surface-specific interactions, such as molecular imprinting or coordination binding within porous framework structures, thereby minimizing the matrix contact area and interference.
(4)
Scalable and cost-effective fabrication: There is an urgent need to develop scalable and cost-effective nanomaterial manufacturing techniques. The key lies in the selection of straightforward and environmentally benign synthesis approaches and the exploration of integration strategies compatible with existing commercial technologies, both of which offer substantial potential for reducing production costs. Flexible SERS substrates, due to their portability and versatility, are particularly well-suited for large-scale practical applications.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, conceptualization, methodology, and validation, H.L.; data curation, writing—editing, R.G.; formal analysis, and writing—editing, X.H.; data curation, M.G.; resources, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, and project administration, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Program of China, grant number 32272416 and 32572695; Natural Science Foundation of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, grant number 2025SHZR3485; and the Project Program of Key Laboratory of Tianjin Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Health of China, grant number TJS202405.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Research Centre of Modern Analytical Technology (TUST) for their instrument support and help with the data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kirk, M.D.; Pires, S.M.; Black, R.E.; Caipo, M.; Crump, J.A.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Döpfer, D.; Fazil, A.; Fischer-Walker, C.L.; Hald, T.; et al. World Health Organization Estimates of the Global and Regional Disease Burden of 22 Foodborne Bacterial, Protozoal, and Viral Diseases, 2010: A Data Synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, H.; Meng, M.; Cao, J.; Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Pan, M.; Wang, S. Review: Nanozyme-based point-of-care testing for portable and on-site monitoring of food contaminants. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 161, 105062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, H.; Yang, J.; Hu, X.; Han, R.; Wang, S.; Pan, M. Portable smartphone-assisted fluorescence-colorimetric multidimensional immunosensing microarray based on NH2-UiO-66@PtNPs multifunctional composite for efficient and visual detection of amantadine. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 473, 145401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, C.; Zhao, W.; Ren, N.; Guo, W.; Wang, S. Rapid LC-MS/MS method for the detection of seven animal species in meat products. Food Chem. 2022, 371, 131075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Anwarul Hasan, G.M.M.; Das, A.K.; Satter, M.A. Multi residue analysis of organochlorine pesticides in fish, milk, egg and their feed by GC-MS/MS and their impact assessment on consumers health in Bangladesh. NFS J. 2022, 27, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morsi, R.; Ghoudi, K.; Elabyad, B.; Kadoura, Z.; Zeidane, H.; Al-Meetani, B.; Meetani, M.A. HPLC-MS/MS monitoring and health risk assessment of carbosulfan and its metabolites in date palm fruit (Phoenix dactylifera). Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Singh, J.; Birbian, N.; Sinha, S.; Goswami, A. A critical review on PCR, its types and applications. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. 2014, 1, 65–80. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kudelski, A. Analytical applications of Raman spectroscopy. Talanta 2008, 76, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Das, R.S.; Agrawal, Y.K. Raman spectroscopy: Recent advancements, techniques and applications. Vib. Spectrosc. 2011, 57, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fleischmann, M.; Hendra, P.J.; McQuillan, A.J. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1974, 26, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeanmaire, D.L.; Van Duyne, R.P. Surface Raman spectroelectrochemistry: Part I. Heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic amines adsorbed on the anodized silver electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1977, 84, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, S.; Dang, H.; Moon, J.-I.; Kim, K.; Joung, Y.; Park, S.; Yu, Q.; Chen, J.; Lu, M.; Chen, L.; et al. SERS-based microdevices for use as in vitro diagnostic biosensors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 5394–5427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tang, X.; Hao, Q.; Hou, X.; Lan, L.; Li, M.; Yao, L.; Zhao, X.; Ni, Z.; Fan, X.; Qiu, T. Exploring and engineering 2D transition metal dichalcogenides toward ultimate SERS performance. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2312348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Awiaz, G.; Lin, J.; Wu, A. Recent advances of Au@Ag core-shell SERS-based biosensors. Exploration 2023, 3, 2022007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Terzapulo, X.; Kassenova, A.; Bukasov, R. Immunoassays: Analytical and clinical performance, challenges, and perspectives of SERS detection in comparison with fluorescent spectroscopic detection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wu, T.; Mao, Y.; Wang, T.; Ma, L.; Cao, J.; Xie, B.; Wei, J.; Li, P. Evolving trends in nanozyme-based SERS systems for food contaminant monitoring: A review. Food Chem. 2025, 486, 144621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gu, Y.; Pu, X.; Chen, J.; Yi, L.; Bi, J.; Duan, F.; Ge, K. Recent advances of MOF-based SERS substrates in quantitative analysis of food contaminants: A review. Analyst 2024, 149, 4997–5013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, Y.; Hu, J.; Jin, J.; Zhou, H.; Jin, S.; Yang, D. Advances in machine learning-assisted SERS sensing towards food safety and biomedical analysis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 180, 117974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, Q.; Dong, Q.; Pu, H. Multiplex surface-enhanced Raman scattering: An emerging tool for multicomponent detection of food contaminants. Biosensors 2023, 13, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Xue, Z.; Peng, B.; Kou, X.; Gao, Z. Research progress of dual-mode sensing technology strategy based on SERS and its application in the detection of harmful substances in foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 148, 104487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, Z.K.; Peng, J.P.; Xu, L.G.; Liu, P.J. Development and application of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cai, Q.; Gan, W.; Falin, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Zhuang, J.; Hao, W.; Huang, S.; Tao, T.; Chen, Y. Two-dimensional van der waals heterostructures for synergistically improved surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 21985–21991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yu, X.; Cai, H.; Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Pan, N.; Luo, Y.; Wang, X.; Hou, J. Tuning chemical enhancement of SERS by controlling the chemical reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pilot, R.; Signorini, R.; Durante, C.; Orian, L.; Bhamidipati, M.; Fabris, L. A review on surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Biosensors 2019, 9, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Chang, Y.; Guo, J.; Wang, C. Sensitive and handy detection of pesticide residue on fruit surface based on single microsphere surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy technique. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiao, A.; Dong, X.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Tian, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, M. Construction of pure worm-like AuAg nanochains for ultrasensitive SERS detection of pesticide residues on apple surfaces. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2019, 209, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pan, H.; Ahmad, W.; Jiao, T.; Zhu, A.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q. Label-free Au NRs-based SERS coupled with chemometrics for rapid quantitative detection of thiabendazole residues in citrus. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, Y.X.; Kang, H.S.; Zhao, W.Q.; Chen, Y.L.; Ma, L.; Ding, S.J.; Chen, X.B.; Wang, Q.Q. Dual plasmon resonances and tunable electric field in structure-adjustable Au nanoflowers for improved SERS and photocatalysis. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, H.; Luo, Y.; Hou, C.; Huo, D.; Zhou, Y.; Zou, S.; Zhao, J.; Lei, Y. Flexible bipyramid-AuNPs based SERS tape sensing strategy for detecting methyl parathion on vegetable and fruit surface. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 285, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sherpa, L.; Nimmala, A.; Rao, S.V.S.N.; Khan, S.A.; Pathak, A.P.; Tripathi, A.; Tiwari, A. Refining shape and size of silver nanoparticles using ion irradiation for enhanced and homogeneous SERS activity. Discov. Nano 2024, 19, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Luo, S.; Mancini, A.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; Maier, S.A.; De Mello, J. High-throughput fabrication of triangular nanogap arrays for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 7438–7447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yao, L.; Ouyang, L.; Lv, J.; Dai, P.; Zhu, L. Rapid and sensitive SERS detection of food contaminants by using nano-Ag aggregates with controllable hydrophobicity. Microchem. J. 2021, 166, 106221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hassan, M.M.; Zareef, M.; Jiao, T.; Liu, S.; Xu, Y.; Viswadevarayalu, A.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. Signal optimized rough silver nanoparticle for rapid SERS sensing of pesticide residues in tea. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ma, H.; Hu, L.; Ding, F.; Liu, J.; Su, J.; Tu, K.; Peng, J.; Lan, W.; Pan, L. Introducing high-performance star-shaped bimetallic nanotags into SERS aptasensor: An ultrasensitive and interference-free method for chlorpyrifos detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 263, 116577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, D.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Guo, Q.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J. Facile fabrication of Au-Ag alloy nanoparticles/Ag nanowires SERS substrates with bimetallic synergistic effect for ultra-sensitive detection of crystal violet and alkali blue 6B. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2025, 324, 124981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yang, J.; Pan, M.; Liu, K.; Xie, X.; Wang, S.; Hong, L.; Wang, S. Core-shell AuNRs@Ag-enhanced and magnetic separation-assisted SERS immunosensing platform for amantadine detection in animal-derived foods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 349, 130783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Z.; Sun, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Huang, X.; Zou, X.; Li, Z.; Wei, R. Facile synthesis of Au@Ag core–shell nanorod with bimetallic synergistic effect for SERS detection of thiabendazole in fruit juice. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, Y.; Hassan, M.M.; Zhu, A.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. Dual-mode of magnetic assisted Au@Ag SERS tags and cationic conjugated UCNPs for qualitative and quantitative analysis of multiple foodborne pathogens. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 344, 130305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hassan, M.M.; He, P.; Xu, Y.; Zareef, M.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. Rapid detection and prediction of chloramphenicol in food employing label-free HAu/Ag NFs-SERS sensor coupled multivariate calibration. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Guo, H.; Li, H.J.; Xu, M.Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, D.; Wang, D.D.; Sun, W. Flexible Au@Ag/PDMS SERS imprinted membrane combined with molecular imprinting technology for selective detection of MC-LR. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2025, 327, 125393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, Y.; Dang, A.; Liu, X.; Han, Y.; Chen, J.; Zada, A.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Luo, F.; Li, T.; et al. Synergistic resonances and charge transfer in double-shelled ZnO hollow microspheres for high-performance semiconductorb based SERS substrates. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 10104–10113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chang, W.-R.; Hsiao, C.; Chen, Y.-F.; Kuo, C.-F.J.; Chiu, C.-W. Au nanorods on carbon-based nanomaterials as nanohybrid substrates for high-efficiency dynamic surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 41815–41826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhou, J.; Wu, C.; He, X.; Zhang, L.; Gong, X.; Ren, W.; Lv, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, A.; Huang, Y. Single AgNF@ZIF-8 nanoparticle for deep learning assisted SERS detection of gaseous molecule. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 48, 104232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, L.; Zhang, H.; Tian, Y.; Jiao, A.; Chen, F.; Chen, M. Photochemical synthesis of ZnO@Au nanorods as an advanced reusable SERS substrate for ultrasensitive detection of light-resistant organic pollutant in wastewater. Talanta 2019, 194, 680–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fueaimi, P.; Leeladee, P.; Sapcharoenkun, C.; Treetong, A.; Wutikhun, T.; Kasamechonchung, P.; Chanpeng, K.; Klamchuen, A.; Tuntulani, T. A facile and controllable method to fabricate Ag nanofilaments from β-silver sulfide for highly sensitive SERS substrates. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2021, 26, 100748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kumar, E.A.; Wang, T.-J.; Chang, Y.-H. Ultrasensitive SERS substrates based on Au nanoparticles photo-decorated on Cu2O microspheres for the detection of rhodamine B and methylene blue. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 585, 152696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, T.; Zheng, H.; Kou, Y.; Su, X.; Kadasala, N.R.; Gao, M.; Chen, L.; Han, D.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J. Self-sustainable and recyclable ternary Au@Cu2O–Ag nanocomposites: Application in ultrasensitive SERS detection and highly efficient photocatalysis of organic dyes under visible light. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2021, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tiwari, M.; Singh, A.; Dureja, S.; Basu, S.; Pattanayek, S. Au nanoparticles decorated ZnO/ZnFe2O4 composite SERS-active substrate for melamine detection. Talanta 2022, 236, 122819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, J.; Pan, M.; Yang, X.; Liu, K.; Song, Y.; Wang, S. Effective adsorption and in-situ SERS detection of multi-target pesticides on fruits and vegetables using bead-string like Ag NWs@ZIF-8 core-shell nanochains. Food Chem. 2022, 395, 133623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kong, L.; Chen, J.; Huang, M. GO/Au@Ag nanobones decorated membrane for simultaneous enrichment and on-site SERS detection of colorants in beverages. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 344, 130163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ding, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Hao, B.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, B.; Tian, Y. Metal–organic framework modified by silver nanoparticles for SERS-based determination of sildenafil and pioglitazone hydrochloride. Microchim. Acta 2021, 188, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huyen, N.T.; Ngan, L.T.Q.; Xuan, L.T.Q.; Suong, T.A.S.; Thanh, C.T.; Tu, N.V.; Binh, P.T.; Tan, T.V.; Tuyen, N.V.; Cao, D.T.; et al. Reduced graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes nanocomposites-decorated porous silver nanodendrites for highly efficient SERS sensing. Opt. Mater. 2025, 162, 116935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, L.; Yin, M.; Li, J.; Wei, G.; Bai, H.; Xi, G.; Mao, L. Directly convert carbonaceous microspheres to three-dimensional porous carbon microspheres with a robust self-supporting structure as a metal-free SERS substrate for online high-throughput analysis. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 13659–13666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, S.; Li, Z.; Hao, Q.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.; Xu, J.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z. Ultrastable graphene isolated AuAg nanoalloy for SERS biosensing and photothermal therapy of bacterial infection. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 108636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, B.; Geng, Y.; Wang, Z. A new strategy for constructing 3D hybrid graphene/Au/rectangular pyramids PMMA on a flexible SERS substrate for trace molecule detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 410, 135711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shanta, P.V.; Cheng, Q.J.A.S. Graphene oxide nanoprisms for sensitive detection of environmentally important aromatic compounds with SERS. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhou, T.; Liu, C.; Che, G. Synthesization of flexible SERS imprinted sensor based on Ag/GO composites and selective detection of antibiotic in aqueous sample. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 3405–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Long, Y.; Wang, W.; Xiong, W.; Li, H. Hybrid structure design, preparation of Ag-GO SERS optical fiber probe and its chemical, electromagnetic enhancement mechanism. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 901, 163660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. He, J.; Song, G.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Li, J. Multifunctional magnetic Fe3O4/GO/Ag composite microspheres for SERS detection and catalytic degradation of methylene blue and ciprofloxacin. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 893, 162226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gokulakrishnan, J.; Koppole, K.; Rugmini, R.; Sekhar, K.C. Green synthesis of carbon dots-functionalized silver nanoparticles for SERS-based detection of thiram fungicide. Appl. Phys. A Mater. 2023, 129, 778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, X.; Li, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, F.; Yang, D.; Xia, Q.; Yang, Y. SERS detection of Hg2+ and aflatoxin B1 through on-off strategy of oxidase-like Au@HgNPs/carbon dots. Food Chem. 2023, 424, 136443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Luo, P.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Synthesis of gold@carbon dots composite nanoparticles for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 7360–7366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bhunia, S.K.; Zeiri, L.; Manna, J.; Nandi, S.; Jelinek, R. Carbon-dot/silver-nanoparticle flexible SERS-active films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 25637–25643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, M.; Du, B.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, X.; Lin, Z.; Dong, Y.; Fu, F.; Yu, T. Tuning the aggregation of silver nanoparticles with carbon dots for the surface-enhanced Raman scattering application. Carbon 2021, 185, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, C.; You, T.; Yang, N.; Gao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Yin, P. Hydrophobic paper-based SERS platform for direct-droplet quantitative determination of melamine. Food Chem. 2019, 287, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pham, T.B.; Hoang, T.H.C.; Vu, D.C.; Bui, H.; Pham, V. Improved versatile SERS spheroid end-facet optical fiber substrate based on silver nano-dendrites directly planted with gold nanoparticles using dual-laser assisted for pesticides detection. Opt. Mater. 2022, 126, 112196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Asgari, S.; Sun, L.; Lin, J.; Weng, Z.; Wu, G.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, M. Nanofibrillar cellulose/Au@Ag nanoparticle nanocomposite as a SERS substrate for detection of paraquat and thiram in lettuce. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, F.; Shang, W.; Xuan, M.; Ma, G.; Ben, Z. Layered filter paper-silver nanoparticle-ZIF-8 composite for efficient multi-mode enrichment and sensitive SERS detection of thiram. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chuesiang, P.; Ryu, V.; Siripatrawan, U.; He, L.; McLandsborough, L. Aptamer-based surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for the rapid detection of Salmonella Enteritidis contaminated in ground beef. LWT 2021, 150, 111937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Song, Y.; Ma, Z.; Fang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, Z.; Yang, H.; Wang, F. Au sputtered paper chromatography tandem Raman platform for sensitive detection of heavy metal ions. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 1455–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ma, X.; Shao, B.; Wang, Z. Gold@silver nanodumbbell based inter-nanogap aptasensor for the surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy determination of ochratoxin A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1188, 339189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yang, X.; Zhao, J.; Ma, T.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.L.; Ji, S.L.; Sun, M.Y.; Liu, Y.S.; Hu, Z.H.; Liu, Q.W.; et al. Magnetic covalent organic framework for effective solid-phase extraction and HPLC determination of ochratoxin A in food. LWT 2023, 179, 114639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. He, X.; He, Y.Y.; Li, C.N.; Jiang, Z.L. A new di-recognition and di-functional nanosurface aptamer molecularly imprinted polymer probe for trace glyphosate with SERS/RRS/Abs trimode technique. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 261, 116487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cheng, S.; Tu, Z.; Zheng, S.; Cheng, X.; Han, H.; Wang, C.; Xiao, R.; Gu, B. An efficient SERS platform for the ultrasensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes via wheat germ agglutinin-modified magnetic SERS substrate and streptavidin/aptamer co-functionalized SERS tags. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1187, 339155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, R.; Tang, K.; Ding, C.; Yu, S. SERS-based immunocapture and detection of pathogenic bacteria using a boronic acid-functionalized polydopamine-coated Au@Ag nanoprobe. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Cheng, J. Hydrogen-bonded organic framework-based core shell structures via a pore confinement control strategy for high performance SERS sensing. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 499, 156559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xing, H.; Zheng, B.; Li, X.; Dang, X.; Zhang, H.; Tian, F.; Hu, X. Sensitive SERS detection of melamine and cyromazine in raw milk using aptamer-based in situ silver nanoparticles synthesis. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Duan, N.; Qi, S.; Guo, Y.; Xu, W.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z. Fe3O4@Au@Ag nanoparticles as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates for sensitive detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride in pork with the use of aptamer binding. LWT 2020, 134, 110017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, Y.; Lei, L.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yan, J.; Zhu, W.; Tan, X.; Wang, Q. Fabrication of sea urchin-like Au@SiO2 nanoparticles SERS substrate for the determination of malachite green in tilapia. Vib. Spectrosc. 2022, 118, 103319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhou, Z.; Xiao, R.; Cheng, S.; Wang, S.; Shi, L.; Wang, C.; Qi, K.; Wang, S. A universal SERS-label immunoassay for pathogen bacteria detection based on Fe3O4@Au-aptamer separation and antibody-protein A orientation recognition. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1160, 338421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Dai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Guo, R.; Qian, S.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H. A multifunctional biosensor for selective identification, sensitive detection and efficient photothermal sterilization of Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus. Anal. Chim. Acta 2025, 1338, 343589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kamal, S.; Yang, T.C.-K. Silver enriched silver phosphate microcubes as an efficient recyclable SERS substrate for the detection of heavy metal ions. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2022, 605, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Parveen, S.; Saifi, S.; Akram, S.; Husain, M.; Zulfequar, M. ZnO nanoparticles functionalized SWCNTs as highly sensitive SERS substrate for heavy metal ions detection. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 149, 106852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. He, Z.J.; Hu, J.Y.; Zhong, J.; Long, Y.C.; Shen, J.D.; Chen, S.; Ou, W.H.; Liu, Q.Y.; Lu, J.; Lou, Z.Z.; et al. Plasmonic MOF for highly selective SERS sensing of trace Mercury (II) in complex matrices. Small 2025, 21, 2409988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Parak, M.; Asgari, A.; Nourian, Y.H.; Ghanei, M. A review of poisoning with various types of biotoxins and its common clinical symptoms. Toxicon 2024, 240, 107629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tang, X.; Zuo, J.; Yang, C.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Ping, J.; Li, P. Current trends in biosensors for biotoxins (mycotoxins, marine toxins, and bacterial food toxins): Principles, application, and perspective. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jiang, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, B.; Wu, L. Advances in multifunctional nanoagents and SERS-based multimodal sensing for biotoxin in foods. Foods 2025, 14, 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tang, X.; Jiang, H.; Wen, R.; Xue, D.; Zeng, W.; Han, Y.; Wu, L. Advancements and challenges on SERS-based multimodal biosensors for biotoxin detection. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 152, 104672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, Q.; Yang, M.; Yang, X.; Li, H.; Guo, Z.; Rahma, M.H. A large Raman scattering cross-section molecular embedded SERS aptasensor for ultrasensitive Aflatoxin B1 detection using CS- Fe3O4 for signal enrichment. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2018, 189, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. He, H.; Sun, D.-W.; Pu, H.; Huang, L. Bridging Fe3O4@Au nanoflowers and Au@Ag nanospheres with aptamer for ultrasensitive SERS detection of aflatoxin B1. Food Chem. 2020, 324, 126832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, Q.; Ren, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, J. A dual-mode immunochromatographic sensor with photothermal and surface-enhanced Raman scattering for sensitive detection of aflatoxin B1. Microchem. J. 2024, 206, 111604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Shi, Y.; Hu, X.T.; Wang, X.; Liang, N.N.; Shen, T.T.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y. A dual-modal biosensor coupling cooperative catalysis strategy for sensitive detection of AFB1 in agri-products. Food Chem. 2023, 426, 136553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Adhikari, S.; Joshi, R.; Joshi, R.; Kim, M.; Jang, Y.; Tufa, L.T.; Gicha, B.B.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.; Cho, B.-K. Rapid and ultrasensitive detection of thiram and carbaryl pesticide residues in fruit juices using SERS coupled with the chemometrics technique. Food Chem. 2024, 457, 140486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yi, S.; Yang, M.; Yu, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, D.; Han, F.; Grishko, A.; Li, Y.; Qin, Q.; Zhou, B. Highly sensitive flexible SERS substrates with a sandwich structure for rapid detection of trace pesticide residues. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 654, 159455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gains, K.K.K.; Roland, N.G.K.; Urbain, K.Y.; Ardjouma, D. Determination of the glyphosate content in liquid and dry formulations by HPLC-UV: Pre-column derivation with 9-Fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC). Chromatographia 2022, 85, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pu, J.; Tian, W.Y.; Shang, W.J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, G.R.; Xu, F.G. Three-dimensional noble metal-metal organic framework composite as SERS substrate for efficient capture and detection of pesticides. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 419, 136457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Duan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lei, M.; Hou, C.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Fang, K.; Wang, T. Hybrid silica material as a mixed-mode sorbent for solid-phase extraction of hydrophobic and hydrophilic illegal additives from food samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1672, 463049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ai, K.; Liu, Y.; Lu, L. Hydrogen-bonding recognition-induced color change of gold nanoparticles for visual detection of melamine in raw milk and infant formula. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9496–9497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dong, N.; Hu, Y.; Yang, K.; Liu, J. Development of aptamer-modified SERS nanosensor and oligonucleotide chip to quantitatively detect melamine in milk with high sensitivity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 228, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Abedini, R.; Khaniki, G.J.; Aghaee, E.M.; Sadighara, P.; Nazmara, S.; Akbari-Adergani, B.; Naderi, M. Determination of melamine contamination in chocolates containing powdered milk by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2021, 19, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hu, J.; Zhan, C.; Xu, Z.; Shi, H.; Wang, H.; He, Y.; Ouyang, A. Research on highly sensitive detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride based on THz metamaterial enhancement. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 4627–4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, J.; Liu, Z.B.; Huang, Q.; Lin, C.Q.; Lin, X. Highly sensitive fluorescent probe for clenbuterol hydrochloride detection based on its catalytic oxidation of eosine Y by NaIO4. J. Fluoresc. 2014, 24, 1495–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhu, G.; Hu, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhong, L. Highly sensitive detection of clenbuterol using competitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering immunoassay. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 697, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cheng, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, P.; Xie, J.; Han, C.; Su, X.-O. Rapid and sensitive determination of clenbuterol residues in animal urine by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 279, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lu, Y.K.; Xu, D.; Liu, W.Y.; Xie, J.; Lu, Y. A rapid tricolour immunochromatographic assay for simultaneous detection of tricaine and malachite green. Biosensors 2022, 12, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Nebot, C.; Iglesias, A.; Barreiro, R.; Manuel Miranda, J.; Vazquez, B.; Manuel Franco, C.; Cepeda, A. A simple and rapid method for the identification and quantification of malachite green and its metabolite in hake by HPLC-MS/MS. Food Control 2013, 31, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ekmen, E.; Bilici, M.; Turan, E.; Tamer, U.; Zengin, A. Surface molecularly-imprinted magnetic nanoparticles coupled with SERS sensing platform for selective detection of malachite green. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 325, 128787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, S.; Zheng, H.; Yang, S.; Qi, Y.; Li, W.; Kang, S.; Hu, H.; Hua, Q.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Z. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of α-copaene against foodborne pathogenic bacteria and its application in beef soup. LWT 2024, 195, 115848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Deng, R.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Deng, S.; Xia, X. Precise, sensitive detection of viable foodborne pathogenic bacteria with a 6-order dynamic range via digital rolling circle amplification. ACS Sens. 2024, 9, 4127–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhao, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, T.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, Y. Aptamer-conjugated magnetic Fe3O4@Au core-shell multifunctional nanoprobe: A three-in-one aptasensor for selective capture, sensitive SERS detection and efficient near-infrared light triggered photothermal therapy of Staphylococcus aureus. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 350, 130879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Irkin, R.; Bozkurt, B.; Tumen, G. Determination of the prevalence of Salmonella spp. and S. aureus in meat products by real-time PCR and testing their antibiotic susceptibility. Med. Weter. 2021, 77, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Si, L.; Wu, Q.; Jin, Y.; Wang, Z. Research progress in the detection of trace heavy metal ions in food samples. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1423666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, H.; Ren, K.; He, C.; Hu, X.; Sun, J.; Wang, S.; Pan, M. Fluorescent NH2-MIL-88(Fe)-stabilized PtNPs nanozyme for dual-channel "OFF-ON" simultaneous and visual detection of glyphosate and Pb2+ in agri-environments and foodstuffs. Food Chem. 2025, 489, 144906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jiao, H.P.; Bi, R.X.; Li, F.L.; Chao, J.B.; Zhang, G.M.; Zhai, L.H.; Hu, L.G.; Wang, Z.H.; Dai, C.F.; Li, B. Rapid, easy and catalyst-free preparation of magnetic thiourea-based covalent organic frameworks at room temperature for enrichment and speciation of mercury with HPLC-ICP-MS. J. Chromatogr. A 2024, 1717, 464683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Park, S.; Lee, J.; Khan, S.; Wahab, A.; Kim, M. Machine learning-based heavy metal ion detection using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Sensors 2022, 22, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classifications of noble metal-based SERS nanomaterials and their applications in food contaminants detection.
Figure 1. Classifications of noble metal-based SERS nanomaterials and their applications in food contaminants detection.
Foods 14 03108 g001
Figure 2. (a) Morphological characterization of Au nanoflowers [28]. Copyright Nanomaterials, 2021. (b) Cationic surfactants induce the aggregation of silver nanoparticles [32]. Copyright Microchemical Journal, 2021.
Figure 2. (a) Morphological characterization of Au nanoflowers [28]. Copyright Nanomaterials, 2021. (b) Cationic surfactants induce the aggregation of silver nanoparticles [32]. Copyright Microchemical Journal, 2021.
Foods 14 03108 g002
Figure 3. (a) Morphological characterization of AuNRs@Ag [36]. Copyright Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2021. (b) Morphological characterization of Au@Ag NRs with the different addition volume of AgNO3 (A: UV–vis spectra and B: SERS spectra of Au@Ag NRs with the different addition volume of AgNO3 C and D1–D4: TEM spectra of Au@Ag NRs) [37]. Copyright Food Chemistry, 2022.
Figure 3. (a) Morphological characterization of AuNRs@Ag [36]. Copyright Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2021. (b) Morphological characterization of Au@Ag NRs with the different addition volume of AgNO3 (A: UV–vis spectra and B: SERS spectra of Au@Ag NRs with the different addition volume of AgNO3 C and D1–D4: TEM spectra of Au@Ag NRs) [37]. Copyright Food Chemistry, 2022.
Foods 14 03108 g003
Figure 4. (a) Construction process of Au/Cu2O based SERS substrates for detection of RhB and MB [46]. Copyright Applied Surface Science, 2022. (b) Morphological characterization of AgNWs and AgNWs@ZIF-8 [49]. Copyright Food Chemistry, 2022. (c) GO/Au@Ag NBs-based SERS substrates for enrichment and detection of colorants in beverages [50]. Copyright Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2021.
Figure 4. (a) Construction process of Au/Cu2O based SERS substrates for detection of RhB and MB [46]. Copyright Applied Surface Science, 2022. (b) Morphological characterization of AgNWs and AgNWs@ZIF-8 [49]. Copyright Food Chemistry, 2022. (c) GO/Au@Ag NBs-based SERS substrates for enrichment and detection of colorants in beverages [50]. Copyright Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2021.
Foods 14 03108 g004
Figure 5. (a) Au@Ag nanodumbbell based inter-nanogap SERS aptasensor for the detection of OTA [71]. Copyright Analytica Chimica Acta, 2021. (b) Based on AgMW@HOF SERS substrates for detecting BPE [76]. Copyright Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024. (c) SERS-based aptasensor for the detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride [78]. Copyright LWT, 2020. (d) ZnO/Ag-Au@Ag SERS probes to detect S. typ and S. aureus [81]. Copyright Analytica Chimica Acta, 2025. (e) Ag3PO4/SWCNT as efficient SERS substrate for detecting Hg2+ and Pb2+ [82]. Copyright Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022.
Figure 5. (a) Au@Ag nanodumbbell based inter-nanogap SERS aptasensor for the detection of OTA [71]. Copyright Analytica Chimica Acta, 2021. (b) Based on AgMW@HOF SERS substrates for detecting BPE [76]. Copyright Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024. (c) SERS-based aptasensor for the detection of clenbuterol hydrochloride [78]. Copyright LWT, 2020. (d) ZnO/Ag-Au@Ag SERS probes to detect S. typ and S. aureus [81]. Copyright Analytica Chimica Acta, 2025. (e) Ag3PO4/SWCNT as efficient SERS substrate for detecting Hg2+ and Pb2+ [82]. Copyright Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022.
Foods 14 03108 g005
Table 1. A summary of various noble metal-based nanocomposites as substrates for SERS detection of food contaminants.
Table 1. A summary of various noble metal-based nanocomposites as substrates for SERS detection of food contaminants.
SERS SubstratesContaminantsEFsDetection PerformancesRef.
MonometalAu NRsThiabendazole-Linear range: 1–18 μM
LOD: 0.33 μg /mL
Recovery: 83.5–98.5% (Citrus)
[27]
Au NFsMethyl Parathion1.54 × 108LOD: 31.56 ng/cm2[29]
Ag NPsS. Enteritidis-Linear range: 3–6 log CFU/mL
LOD: 4 log CFU/mL
[69]
Au NPs@4-MBACd2+/Cu2+/Ni2+2.1 × 10LOD: <1 μM[70]
BimetalAuNRs@AgAmantadine2.91 × 107Linear range: 0.01–50.0 μg/L
LOD: 0.0038 μg/L
Recovery: 82.0–106.0% (Chicken/Egg/Milk)
[36]
Au@AgNDOTA1.7 × 105Linear range: 0.01–50 ng/mL
LOD: 0.007 ng/mL
Recovery: 92.4–101.6% (Peanut oil)
[71]
Au@Ag NPsKanamycin-Linear range: 10–100 ng/mL
LOD: 0.90 pg/mL
Recovery: 90.4–112% (Liquid whole milk)
[72]
HAu@AgNFs@MBA2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid3.28 × 108Linear range: 0.001−100 μg/mL
LOD: 0.11 ng/mL
Recovery: 89.73–100.27 % (Tea/Milk)
[73]
Au@Ag@PDAS. aureus/E. coli/S. dysenteriae/
P. aeruginosa/K. pneumonia
2.92 × 108Linear range: 103–10 CFU/mL
LOD: 10 CFU/mL
[74]
Au/Ag nanodimersS. Typhi/S. aureus-Linear range: 102–107 CFU/mL
LOD: 50 CFU/mL (S. typhimurium);
96 CFU/mL (S. aureus)
Recovery: 92.86–107.32% (Milk)
[75]
Metal-nonmetalAgNWs@ZIF-8Methyl parathion/
Carbaryl
4.2 × 107LOD: 7.6 × 10−9 mol/L (Methyl parathion);
5.7 × 10−9 mol/L (Carbaryl)
Recovery: 77.4–117.5% (Apple/Cabbage/Strawberry)
[49]
Au@HgNPs/CDsHg2+/AFB1-Linear range: 0.625–90 µg/L
LOD: 0.147 µg/L (Hg2+);
0.08 µg/L (AFB1)
Recovery: 89.15–109.63% (Peanut oil)
[61]
AgMW@HOF1,2-bis(4-pyridyl) ethylene-Linear range: 200–1000 ng/mL[76]
CYR-AgNPsMelamine/Cyromazine-Linear range: 0.1–0.5 ppm
LOD: 43.5 ppb (Melamine);
23.6 ppb (Cyromazine)
Recovery: 95–105% (Raw milk)
[77]
Fe3O4@Au@AgClenbuterol hydrochloride-Linear range: 0–1.5 ng/mL
LOD: 0.003 ng/mL
Recovery: 90.7–108.0% (Pork)
[78]
Au@SiO2Malachite green3.2 × 106Linear range: 10−5–10−9 M
LOD: 1.5 × 10−9 M
Recovery: 91.69–102.49% (Tilapia filets)
[79]
Fe3O4@AuE. coli/L. mono/S. typhi-Linear range: 107–10 cells/mL
LOD: 10 cells/mL (E. coli); 10 cells/mL (L. mono);
25 cells/mL (S. typhi)
Recovery: 84.0–110.2% (Milk/Lettuce/Urine)
[80]
ZnO/Ag–Au@AgS. Typhi/S. aureus4.67 × 105Linear range: 10–108 CFU/mL
LOD: 10 CFU/mL
[81]
Ag3PO4/SWCNTHg2+/Pb2+1010Linear range: 10−5 M–10−15 M
LOD: 10−15 M
Recovery: 97.66–98.85% (Water/River)
[82]
ZnO@SWCNTsPb2+-Linear range: 0.01–100 μM
LOD: 0.225 nM
[83]
Ag@UiO-68-SMeHg2+-LOD: 0.17 ppb[84]
Note: “-” in the table indicates that the relevant content is not explicitly mentioned in the document.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Gao, R.; Hu, X.; Gao, M.; Pan, M. Noble Metal-Based Nanocomposites for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Detection of Food Contaminants. Foods 2025, 14, 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173108

AMA Style

Li H, Gao R, Hu X, Gao M, Pan M. Noble Metal-Based Nanocomposites for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Detection of Food Contaminants. Foods. 2025; 14(17):3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Huilin, Rui Gao, Xiaochun Hu, Mengmeng Gao, and Mingfei Pan. 2025. "Noble Metal-Based Nanocomposites for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Detection of Food Contaminants" Foods 14, no. 17: 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173108

APA Style

Li, H., Gao, R., Hu, X., Gao, M., & Pan, M. (2025). Noble Metal-Based Nanocomposites for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Detection of Food Contaminants. Foods, 14(17), 3108. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14173108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop