Next Article in Journal
Advancing Kiwifruit Maturity Assessment: A Comparative Study of Non-Destructive Spectral Techniques and Predictive Models
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Properties of Thermally Processed Oyster Shell Powder for Use as Calcium Supplement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Nanozyme Catalysis for Food Safety Detection: A Comprehensive Review on Progress and Challenges

by
Renqing Yang
1,2,
Zeyan Liu
1,
Haili Chen
1,
Xinai Zhang
1,*,
Qing Sun
1,*,
Hany S. El-Mesery
3,
Wenjie Lu
3,
Xiaoli Dai
3 and
Rongjin Xu
3
1
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(15), 2580; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152580
Submission received: 23 June 2025 / Revised: 9 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 23 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Quality and Safety)

Abstract

The prosperity of enzyme-mimicking catalysis has promoted the development of nanozymes with diversified activities, mainly including catalase-like, oxidase-like, peroxidase-like, and superoxide dismutase-like characteristics. Thus far, the reported nanozymes can be roughly divided into five categories, comprising noble metals, metal oxides, carbon-based nanostructures, metal–organic frameworks, and covalent organic frameworks. This review systematically summarizes the research progress of nanozymes for improving catalytic activity toward sensing applications in food safety monitoring. Specifically, we highlight the unique advantages of nanozymes in enhancing the performance of colorimetric, fluorescence, and electrochemical sensors, which are crucial for detecting various food contaminants. Moreover, this review addresses the challenges faced in food safety detection, such as the need for high sensitivity, selectivity, and stability under complex food matrices. Nanozymes offer promising solutions by providing robust catalytic activity, adjustable enzyme-like properties, and excellent stability, even in harsh environments. However, practical implementation challenges remain, including the need for a deeper understanding of nanozyme catalytic mechanisms, improving substrate selectivity, and ensuring long-term stability and large-scale production. By focusing on these aspects, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of nanozyme-based sensors for food safety detection and to inspire future research directions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Natural enzymes, typically proteins, exhibit high specificity and catalytic efficiency and thus play important roles in various fields [1,2,3]. However, their stability and activity can be limited by factors such as temperature [4,5,6], pH [7,8,9,10], and the presence of inhibitors [11,12,13], consequently hindering their widespread application in sensing analysis [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Therefore, the development of new artificial enzymes to replace natural enzymes is of great significance in expanding their sensing analysis [14,17,18]. With the rapid development of nanotechnology [19,20,21,22,23], multiple nanomaterials with enzyme-mimicking catalytic activity, named as “nanozyme” [14,18,24], have been successfully developed for use as an artificial enzyme [18,25,26,27].
Back in 2004, Manea proposed the professional term “nanozyme”, who applied organic ligands to modify gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), and then complexed with Zn2+ to prepare nanostructures with ribonuclease-like activity for cleaving phosphate esters [28]. Since the discovery of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with similar functions as horseradish peroxidase in 2007 [29], the development of nanostructures with natural enzyme-like properties has emerged as a pivotal field [30,31]. In 2013, Wei’s group summarized the nanomaterials with catalytic activity and also gave a specific definition of nanozymes. The development timeline of nanozymes is shown in Figure 1. Thus far, it is found that nanozymes exhibit diversified enzyme-like characteristics, mainly including catalase, oxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, etc. [32,33,34,35]. According to the structural compositions, the reported nanozymes can be roughly divided into noble metals (e.g., Au, Ag, Pt, Pd), metal oxides (e.g., Fe3O4, CeO2, ZnO, CuO), carbon-based nanostructures (e.g., carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, and carbon dots), metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and covalent–organic frameworks (COFs) [36,37,38,39].
When compared with natural enzymes [41,42,43,44], nanozymes with biomimic catalytic activities have outstanding advantages as shown in Table 1. First, nanozymes as nanostructures are endowed with the unique physical and chemical properties [45,46,47], such as the adjustable morphology, structure, and composition; Second, nanozymes are endowed with high structural stability, strong biocompatibility, and exhibit high biocatalytic a1ctivity under harsh surroundings [31,48,49]; Third, the unique merits of nanostructures with magnetic and photothermal effects, extend them with a wider range of application fields [49,50,51]; Four, the synthetic modes are simple and cost-effective and provide the possibility for large-scale production [22,52,53]. Owing to their excellent performance, nanozymes have been widely applied in several fields [54,55], becoming a hot research topic in the fields of chemistry and materials.
This review systematically summarizes the research progress of nanozymes toward sensing applications. Specifically, the classification and regulation strategies of nanozymes for enhancing their catalytic activity were introduced in detail, followed by a focus on their applications in sensing toward food safety, medical testing, and environmental monitoring fields. Lastly, this review discusses and looks forward to the challenges and future prospects in this field, aiming to provide reference and inspiration for the research and application of nanozymes, and further promote their application.

2. Background and Significance of Food Safety Detection

Food safety detection refers to the monitoring and analysis of various harmful substances in food to ensure it meets quality and safety standards. Key targets for detection include pesticide residues, heavy metals, mycotoxins, foodborne pathogens, and other harmful compounds. These contaminants can pose serious health risks to consumers, ranging from acute poisoning to long-term adverse effects such as cancer, neurological disorders, and reproductive problems.
Natural enzymes have been widely used in food safety detection due to their high catalytic efficiency and specificity. They can recognize and react with target analytes, enabling the detection of specific harmful substances. However, natural enzymes have limitations such as instability under harsh conditions (high temperature, extreme pH, etc.), short lifespan, and high production costs, which restrict their practical application.
Nanozymes, with their enzyme-mimicking catalytic properties, have emerged as promising alternatives to natural enzymes. They can provide comparable or even superior catalytic efficiency in food safety detection while offering enhanced stability, durability, and cost-effectiveness. In this review, we will compare the application principles and advantages of natural enzymes and nanozymes in the field of food safety detection, highlighting the potential of nanozymes to overcome the limitations of natural enzymes and offering new opportunities for advancing food safety monitoring technologies.

3. Fundamental Principles of Nanozymes

Nanozyme technology is rooted in the fundamental principles of enzymatic mechanisms, which involve the catalytic conversion of substrates into products through specific biochemical reactions [25,62,63]. The interaction between nanozymes and substrates can be explained through various theoretical models. For instance, the Michaelis–Menten model, which describes the rate of enzymatic reactions, can also be applied to nanozymes. The catalytic efficiency of nanozymes is influenced by their surface area, morphology, and the nature of the used nanomaterials [64,65,66]. These factors can enhance enzyme activity by providing a greater active site exposure and facilitating substrate binding [66,67,68]. For example, Zhang et al. demonstrated that functionalized MOFs exhibited remarkable peroxidase-like activity (Figure 2), which is attributed to their high surface area and stability across a wide range of temperatures and pH levels. Moreover, molecular docking simulation, a computational technique that predicts non-covalent host–guest interactions, is applied to elucidate the recognition mechanism of MOFs toward substrates at the molecular level [69,70].
Nanozymes play a pivotal role in improving enzyme activity and stability [51,71]. Their unique physical and chemical properties, such as high surface-to-volume ratios and tunable surface functionalities, allow for enhanced enzyme–substrate interactions. Liu et al. introduced an electric field-induced preconcentration that significantly improved the electrochemical detection of metal ions by enhancing the recognition of specific complexes. This method effectively reduced interference from non-specific ions, thus verifying the potential of nanozymes in enhancing sensing performance [72,73,74].
Moreover, the use of nanomaterials in nanozymes facilitates the development of advanced sensing technologies. The integration of nanozymes into electrochemical sensors has led to improved detection limit and faster response time [75,76]. For example, the incorporation of oxalate decarboxylase (OXDC) in sensing platforms has shown promise due to its metal-dependent catalytic activity and potential applications in clinical diagnostics and food processing [77]. The modulation of redox properties further illustrates the function of nanomaterials in enhancing enzymatic function [78].

4. Classification and Properties of Nanozymes

The synthesis methods of nanozymes are diverse, with each approach exhibiting distinct principles and applicability. Physical synthesis methods primarily include mechanical grinding and physical deposition, which employ physical means to break down raw materials or deposit them into nanoscale particles. These methods are suitable for processing heat-sensitive or poorly soluble materials, but they may encounter issues such as particle agglomeration and insufficient precision in size control. Chemical synthesis methods utilize chemical reactions in solution to generate nanoparticles, encompassing techniques like precipitation, sol-gel, and hydrothermal/solvothermal processes. These approaches enable precise regulation of nanozyme composition, size, and morphology, though they may require toxic reagents and stringent reaction conditions. Biological synthesis methods leverage biological entities or their extracts as reaction media, such as utilizing microbial metabolic processes or biomolecules in plant extracts to reduce and stabilize metal ions, forming nanoparticles. This method operates under mild, environmentally friendly conditions but suffers from low synthesis efficiency and suboptimal product purity. Additionally, template-assisted synthesis employs pre-constructed templates (e.g., DNA, MOFs) to guide nanostructure formation, enabling precise construction of complex nanostructures, albeit with increased process complexity due to template preparation and removal. Green synthesis strictly adheres to green chemistry principles, utilizing renewable resources and non-toxic solvents to synthesize nanozymes through simple, efficient, and low-cost methods, thereby reducing environmental footprints. The selection of synthesis methods must comprehensively consider factors such as target nanozyme type, desired performance, production scale, and cost-effectiveness to achieve efficient application in fields like food safety detection. Next, we will focus on the synthesis and characteristics of five categories of nanozymes: noble metals, metal oxides, carbon-based nanostructures, metal–organic frameworks, and covalent organic frameworks.

4.1. Noble Metals

Noble metal-based nanozymes have garnered significant attention due to their unique catalytic properties and widespread applications in sensing technologies [79,80,81]. These nanozymes can be classified primarily into two categories: metallic nanoparticles and alloy nanoparticles, both exhibiting distinct synthesis methods, properties, and applications [82,83,84].

4.1.1. Synthesis Methods

The synthesis of noble metal nanoframes generally involves the use of sacrificial templates to assist or guide the formation of framework structures [85,86,87]. These templates are usually pre-fabricated using different protocols. There are five main methods of synthesis.
(1) The first method is template-assisted assembly of nanoscale building blocks. This method involves using pre-fabricated templates to guide the spatial arrangement of nanoscale components [88]. For example, Liu et al. (2017) demonstrated the synthesis of gold nanoframes by assembling gold nanoparticles onto DNA Origami (Figure 3A), followed by the removal of the templates. This approach enables precise control over the nanoframe architecture through the design of the sacrificial template [89]. (2) The second method is facet-selective etching of solid nanocrystals. Guo et al. (2022) utilized facet-selective etching to transform solid platinum nanocubes into nanoframes. By selectively dissolving the facets using an oxidative etchant, they achieved porous platinum nanoframes with enhanced catalytic activity for oxygen reduction reactions (Figure 3B). This method leverages crystallographic anisotropy to create well-defined framework structures [90]. (3) Another method is a synthesis approach based on a seed-mediated growth strategy. Zhou et al. (2021) used Pd decahedra with fivefold twinning as seeds and achieved asymmetric growth of Au on the Pd seeds by controlling the slow reduction kinetics of the Au precursor (AuBr4 instead of AuCl4) and the weak reducing agent (ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, Asc-2P) (Figure 3C). This ultimately led to the synthesis of Pd-Au asymmetric nanopyramids [91]. (4) Then, another method is the dealloying of hollow alloy nanocrystals. Huang et al. (2023) developed platinum–nickel (Pt-Ni) nanoframes through the dealloying of hollow PtNi alloy precursors. By leaching away the less noble nickel component, they obtained porous Pt-rich nanoframes with high surface area, ideal for electrocatalytic applications. Dealloying offers a scalable route to tune composition and porosity simultaneously [92]. (5) The last method is the oriented deposition of nanoframes. Liu et al. (2021) reported the synthesis of rhodium nanoframes via electrochemical deposition guided by surfactants (Figure 3D). By controlling the growth direction of rhodium atoms on cubic templates, they achieved three-dimensional nanoframes with tailored geometries. This method highlights the role of kinetic control in framework formation [93].

4.1.2. Properties

Noble metal nanozymes are known for their versatile catalytic and optical properties, making them highly valuable for various applications [94,95,96,97]. In photocatalytic systems, noble metals such as Pt, Au, and Ru significantly enhance charge separation and electron transfer dynamics when integrated with semiconductors like cadmium sulfide (CdS).
For instance, Pt-decorated CdS hollow spheres exhibit superior photocatalytic hydrogen evolution due to a higher Schottky barrier, which minimizes electron backflow and maximizes interfacial electron transfer efficiency. Au NPs also play a crucial role in enhancing the photocatalytic performance of CdS by facilitating electron transfer and reducing recombination rates [98]. In addition to their role in photocatalysis, noble metal NPs such as Au have been found to exhibit glucose oxidase (GOD)-like activity, catalyzing glucose oxidation through a two-step dehydrogenation mechanism followed by oxygen reduction to H2O2, similar to natural enzymes [99]. This GOD-like activity of Au NPs has been leveraged for the development of biosensors and bioanalytical tools. However, other noble metals like Pt and palladium (Pd) tend to favor the 4-electron oxygen reduction pathway to H2O, limiting H2O2 generation due to their catalase-like activity [100]. This difference in catalytic behavior highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate noble metal for specific applications. Moreover, the integration of noble metal NPs with flexible substrates has led to the development of portable and sensitive SERS chips. For instance, a flexible and stable SERS chip was fabricated by embedding Au@Ag NPs between an adhesive acrylic polymer tape and a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film, enabling nondestructive detection of thiram on fruit peels [101]. This approach combines the advantages of flexible substrates and noble metal NPs, providing a promising tool for on-site food safety analysis [102].

4.2. Metal Oxides

Metal oxides have been developed as nanozymes due to their non-toxicity, simple preparation, good mobility, and relatively low cost [103,104,105]. These include magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, copper oxide (CuO), cuprous oxide (Cu2O), cerium dioxide (CeO2), vanadium pentoxide (V2O5), manganese dioxide (MnO2), cobalt tetraoxide (Co3O4), and nickel oxide (NiO) [106,107]. It has been reported that these metal oxide nanozymes also exhibit simulated enzyme activities such as peroxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, and oxidase.

4.2.1. Synthesis Methods

The synthesis of metal oxide nanozymes is mainly carried out through physical, chemical, and composite synthesis methods [108,109,110]. For example, Alkallas et al. (2023) used pulsed laser ablation to synthesize Fe3O4 NPs particles (Figure 4A), which exhibited good dispersibility and stability [111,112]. Meanwhile, Lei et al. (2024) employed hydrothermal/solvothermal methods to synthesize Pt/TiO2 nanoparticles (Figure 4B), precisely controlling the size, morphology, and purity of the nanozymes. The resulting products were relatively uniform and of high purity [113]. Furthermore, Chen et al. (2023) used MOFs as precursors, converting MOFs into metal oxide nanozymes through pyrolysis, thereby preparing high specific surface area OM-CeO2@C (Figure 4C) and enhancing their catalytic performance [114].

4.2.2. Properties

Metal oxide nanozymes have shown broad application prospects in the fields of biomedicine and environmental detection due to their unique catalytic activity, high stability, and biocompatibility [115]. For example, iron oxide nanozymes (IONzymes) can decompose hydrogen peroxide to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) under acidic conditions by simulating peroxidase activity, thereby effectively inhibiting the growth of intracellular Salmonella and promoting the autophagy pathway [116]. In addition, nanozymes such as MnO2 and CeO2 exhibit oxidase-like activity and can efficiently catalyze the oxidation reaction of colorimetric substrates (such as TMB), providing a sensitive colorimetric sensing platform for the rapid detection of organophosphorus pesticides (such as dichlorvos) [117]. The catalytic kinetic parameters of these nanozymes (such as the low Michaelis constant Km) indicate their high affinity for substrates, further supporting their application in complex biological environments [118]. Moreover, the multivalent characteristics of metal oxide nanozymes (such as Fe2+/Fe3+, Mn2+/Mn3+) and surface modification strategies (such as functionalized ligands or composite materials) can significantly enhance their catalytic efficiency and selectivity, laying the foundation for the development of multifunctional nano-diagnostic and therapeutic systems [119].

4.3. Carbon-Based Nanostructures

Carbon-based nanomaterials have also been found to possess enzyme-like activities, such as carbon dots, graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, and fullerenes [64,120,121,122]. Their enzyme-like activities are attributed to the surface groups and unique electronic structures of carbon-based materials [123,124,125]. Therefore, the activity of carbon-based nanozymes can be greatly improved through rational design. These tunable carbon-based nanozymes have attracted widespread attention from researchers due to their excellent physical and chemical properties [126,127,128].

4.3.1. Synthesis Methods

Carbon dots can be synthesized by different synthesis routes like microwave-assisted, hydrothermal synthesis, arc discharge, laser ablation, etc. [121,129,130,131,132]. Zhang et al. (2024) employ citric acid and m-phenylenediamine to synthesize N, P-codoped carbon dots (N, P-CDs) by a microwave-assisted method. Anhydrous ethanol and phosphoric acid are essential to the properties of N, P-CDs [133,134]. Carbon nanotubes can be prepared by plasma-based methods such as arc discharge and laser ablation, thermal preparation methods like chemical vapor deposition, and hydrothermal methods [135,136,137]. Shao et al. (2023) developed a field-effect transistor (FET) biosensor based on semiconductor-enriched single-walled carbon nanotubes (sc-SWCNTs) functionalized with norfentanyl antibodies for the sensitive detection of norfentanyl using the method of electrodeposition [138]. Fullerenes are commonly prepared by the arc discharge method. The operation is carried out in a high-temperature furnace. Carbon clusters are annealed with the help of a buffer gas passing through the quartz tube [139,140,141]. The temperature of the tube is maintained between 25 and 1000 °C. The reaction results in the consumption of the carbon electrode at the negative terminal.
Fullerenes are obtained by the annealing process of carbon after it has condensed. They are then collected in the water-cooler trap. C60 can be separated from the mixture using chromatography. Graphene oxide is commonly synthesized using the modified Hummers’ method [142]. Graphite in its flaky or powdery form is added to a protonated solvent (solution of sulfuric acid and sodium nitrate) [143]. The mixture is then reacted with H2O2 to eliminate metal ion impurities. Consequently, the color of the solution changes from dark brown to yellow. Graphene is obtained after centrifuging, washing, and freeze-drying the solution [144,145].

4.3.2. Properties

The core properties of carbon-based nanostructures are determined by their atomic arrangement and dimensional characteristics [146,147]. Recent research has further revealed their unique behaviors in electrical, mechanical, optical, and chemical aspects. In terms of electrical properties, graphene has a high room-temperature carrier mobility [148]. For single-walled carbon nanotubes, the semiconductor purity has been improved through catalyst engineering, and their bandgap is linearly related to the inverse of the diameter [149]. In terms of mechanical properties, the compressive modulus of three-dimensional graphene foam is very high, and it can fully recover after being strained [150]. In the optical field, the fluorescence quantum yield of the content of carbon quantum dots is very high due to surface passivation, making them suitable for the nanozyme field [151]. In terms of chemical properties, the carboxyl density of graphene oxide can enhance its dispersibility in composite materials [152]. The precise control of these properties provides a basis for the design of multifunctional devices.

4.4. Metal-Organic Frameworks

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline hybrid materials composed of inorganic metal nodes combined with suitable organic linkers [64,153,154], characterized by their highly ordered structural arrangement [17,155,156]. They exhibit high specific surface area, excellent stability, and flexible nanoscale porosity. Due to the presence of abundant active sites and transition metals, many MOF materials have been reported to possess enzyme-mimicking catalytic activity [157]. Owing to their superior enzyme-mimicking catalytic activity and high substrate affinity, MOF-based nanozymes have been widely applied in the field of sensing [158,159,160].

4.4.1. Synthesis Methods

Most MOFs are synthesized via hydrothermal or solvothermal methods (Figure 5). Solvothermal methods are favorable for the slow crystallization of MOFs, yielding single crystals or highly crystalline powders that are suitable for structural analysis [161,162]. Zhang et al. (2024) developed a novel ratiometric fluorescence sensor based on a bimetallic metal–organic framework (Eu/Zr-MOF) via hydrothermal synthesis for the detection of tetracycline [163]. Meanwhile, Tang et al. (2024) prepared rose-like NiCo-LDH derived from bimetallic NiCo-MOF and constructed a sensing platform with a large electrocatalytic surface area, high conductivity, and good stability using N2H4 [164]. Recently, many studies have employed MOF-on-MOF heterostructures composed of two completely different MOFs. These MOF-on-MOF structures exhibit synergistically enhanced properties compared to individual MOF subunits. Liu et al. (2020) epitaxially grew the guest MOF (ZIF-8) on the specific facets of the host MOF (MIL-125). Moreover, the growth position of ZIF-8 on MIL-125 can be selected by using MIL-125 hosts with facets exposed on the corners or side surfaces. Based on this, two different structural MIL-125@ZIF-8 heterojunctions were synthesized, enhancing their photocatalytic performance [165].

4.4.2. Properties

The properties of MOFs are determined by their highly ordered pore structures, as well as the synergy between metal nodes and organic linkers [70,166]. In terms of structural characteristics, the specific surface area of MOFs can exceed 7000 m2 g−1 (e.g., NU-1501-Al, with a BET surface area reaching 7310 m2 g−1), and pore sizes can be precisely controlled within the range of 0.5–10 nm, making them suitable for gas adsorption and separation [167]. Regarding chemical properties, the stability of MOFs has been significantly enhanced [73]. For example, zirconium-based MOFs (such as UiO-66) can maintain structural integrity in aqueous solutions with a pH range of 1–12 through ligand modification, and they have good thermal stability [168]. In terms of functionalization, post-synthetic modification can enhance its catalytic activity. For instance, the high porosity of MIL-101 achieves good adsorption performance [169]. ZJU-300 exhibits superior performance in C2H2 adsorption, with an adsorption capacity reaching 3.23 mmol g−1 [170]. Moreover, the mechanical properties of MOFs have been optimized by introducing flexible linkers. For example, MIL-53 (Al) has a good reversible contraction rate [171].

4.5. Covalent Organic Frameworks

Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs) are a class of crystalline porous polymers formed by the covalent connection of organic molecules [172,173,174]. They are characterized by their regular pore structures, highly ordered lattices, and strong designability. Typically composed of lightweight elements such as carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and boron, COFs exhibit good thermal and chemical stability and can have two-dimensional or three-dimensional structural forms. The synthesis of COFs is mainly achieved through condensation reactions, solvothermal synthesis, or template synthesis. Leveraging their porosity and functionality, COFs have shown broad application prospects in multiple fields such as gas storage and separation, catalysis, energy storage, sensing, drug delivery, and environmental remediation [175,176].

4.5.1. Synthesis Methods

COFs have been continuously innovated in recent years, covering efficient preparation, structural controllability, and functional integration. Solvothermal methods enhance crystallinity by optimizing solvent systems and reaction kinetics. For example, Zhang et al. (2025) synthesized highly crystalline In2S3/TpBpy using a mixed solvent (Figure 6A), achieving a specific surface area of 640 m2 g−1 [177]. Mechanochemical synthesis has gained attention due to its solvent-free and low-energy consumption advantages. Niu et al. (2022) rapidly prepared COFs via ball milling at room temperature (Figure 6B) [178]. Interfacial polymerization techniques have also made further breakthroughs. Wang et al. (2023) reported a method for synthesizing ultrathin COF membranes via liquid–liquid interfacial self-assembly (Figure 6C). The membrane exhibited a high water flux of 91.77 kg·m−2·h−1 and provided some theoretical and technical guidance for interfacial polymerization [179]. The combination of dynamic covalent chemistry and photoresponsive technology has driven the development of smart COFs. Sum et al. (2022) achieved functional integration in the synthesis of a photoresponsive o-COF by combining porphyrin photosensitizers with diarylethene switches (Figure 6D). They also introduced an effective strategy for functionalizing COFs by integrating multiple functional building blocks, thereby further enriching the functional diversity of such materials [180].

4.5.2. Properties

The properties of COFs are dominated by their crystalline porous structures connected by fully covalent bonds [172,173,181], which are characterized by high specific surface area, programmable pore sizes, and customizable functionalities. In terms of structural characteristics, COFs have large specific surface areas, and their pore sizes can be precisely controlled through monomer design, making them suitable for gas separation and catalysis. Their chemical stability is significantly enhanced. For example, COF-42, which is connected by boronic ester bonds, maintains structural integrity in a wide range of aqueous solutions with different pH values and exhibits good thermal stability [182].
In terms of functionalization, the introduction of photosensitive groups (such as porphyrins) through in situ synthesis can achieve efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production, with a hydrogen production rate of 126 mmol g−1 h−1 for TP-COF [183]. The charge transport properties have been optimized through π-π stacking, with the carrier mobility of TTF-COF increased to 1.2 cm2 V−1 s−1, making it suitable for organic field-effect transistors [184]. Regarding dynamic response characteristics, COF-320 with imine bonds exhibits a reversible volume expansion rate of 15% under humidity stimulation, providing a new material platform for flexible sensors [185]. The systematic regulation of these properties has propelled the applications of COFs in the fields of energy, sensing, and biomedicine.

5. Sensing Applications of Nanozymes

Owing to their low cost, high stability, and controllable catalytic activity, nanozymes have become an ideal substitute for natural enzymes and have shown broad application prospects in various sensing fields [45,186,187]. In colorimetric sensing, nanozymes can catalyze reactions to cause color changes in substrates, thus enabling visual detection [82,188]. In fluorescence sensing, nanozymes can combine with fluorescent substrates and produce changes in fluorescence signals through catalytic reactions, which can be used to detect various targets [65,186,189,190]. In electrochemical sensing, nanozymes can catalyze redox reactions to enhance signal output and achieve sensitive detection of target molecules [55,191]. In Raman sensing, nanozymes can serve as signal-enhancing substrates to increase Raman scattering intensity [192,193,194,195]. In chemiluminescence sensing, nanozymes can catalyze chemiluminescent reactions [196,197]. These applications demonstrate that nanozymes have significant value in the fields of biomedical detection and environmental monitoring.

5.1. Colorimetric Sensing

Colorimetric sensors can detect analytes through color changes, which can be read out by the naked eye or low-cost portable devices [71,160,198,199,200]. Due to their simple signal reading and rapid detection, colorimetric sensors have been widely used [201,202,203,204,205]. The instability of biological enzymes and their low catalytic activity under harsh conditions greatly hinder the detection performance of colorimetric sensors [206,207,208]. Compared with biological enzymes [77,209,210,211,212], nanozymes have good catalytic activity and high stability [213,214,215]. As a substitute for biological enzymes, nanozymes can be used to construct colorimetric sensors to improve the selectivity, sensitivity, and stability of detection [216,217,218]. The related applications are described as follows.
Wu et al. (2023) constructed a colorimetric sensor array based on Au2Pt bimetallic nanozymes for the detection of antioxidants in food, which was successfully applied to the identification and quantitative analysis of five antioxidants, each of which exhibited a unique colorimetric response (Figure 7A) [219]. Li et al. (2022) constructed a simple and effective multi-channel colorimetric sensor array using Pt NPs as the sole nanozyme sensing receptor for the identification and detection of pesticides. Based on the differential inhibition or enhancement in the catalytic activity of Pt NPs nanozymes by pesticides, five pesticides were successfully identified (Figure 7B) [220]. Li et al. (2022) synthesized Fe-N/S-C single-atom nanozymes with oxidase-like activity using peanut shells as a template and developed a colorimetric sensor for the simultaneous detection of glutathione and Hg2+, which showed a wide linear range of 0.8–100 μM and 1 nM–100 μM (Figure 7C) [221]. Razavi et al. (2022) synthesized Bi2Fe4O9 nanoparticles by the hydrothermal method, which have high water solubility and good stability. A colorimetric sensing platform based on these nanoparticles was developed for accurate, highly sensitive, and selective detection of dopamine at the nanomolar level [222]. Gai et al. (2023) synthesized CeO2@NC nanozymes under mild conditions, which exhibited catalytic activity comparable to that of organophosphorus hydrolase and high stability under extreme conditions. A visual colorimetric detection method for organophosphorus pesticides was developed using these nanozymes, opening up an interesting pathway for pesticide detection (Figure 7D) [223].

5.2. Fluorescence Sensing

Fluorescent sensors are mainly constructed based on fluorescence enhancement (“turn-on”) or quenching (“turn-off”) mediated by the target analyte [88,142,224,225]. The emergence of nanozymes has provided a great opportunity for the development of fluorescent sensors [120,226,227,228]. In recent years, fluorescent sensors based on nanozymes have attracted extensive research interest due to their excellent performance in fluorescence signal generation and amplification [75,229,230], and they have been widely applied in many fields [231,232,233].
For example, Wang et al. (2022) synthesized a novel fluorescent nanoprobe with yellow emission based on super-bright lysozyme functionalization for the determination of xanthine, with a detection limit as low as 0.23 μmol L−1, enabling quantitative analysis of xanthine in the range of 0.5 to 400 μmol L−1 (Figure 8A) [234]. Li et al. (2022) developed a novel dual-mode fluorescent/colorimetric sensing strategy for the detection of Hg2+ by integrating porous cerium oxide nanorods, which exhibited a linear range of 0.08–12.5 nM and a detection limit of 0.079 nM in fluorescence assays, with the developed sensor showing high sensitivity, accuracy, and reliability [235,236]. Zhao et al. (2022) designed a ratiometric fluorescence strategy, synthesizing NH2-Cu-MOF with peroxidase-like activity for the detection of catechol, expanding the new application of fluorescent MOF-based nanozymes in environmental analysis (Figure 8B) [237]. Liao et al. (2024) developed a multifunctional magnetic luminescent nanozyme Fe3O4@CeO2/Tb-MOF, which showed excellent performance in sensitive detection and efficient degradation. The Fe3O4@CeO2/Tb-MOF-based fluorescent sensing had a wide linear range of 50 nM–500 μM and a low detection limit of 18.9 nM, and its magnetism allowed for recyclability, avoiding secondary pollution (Figure 8C) [238].

5.3. Electrochemical Sensing

The establishment of electrochemical sensors is mainly based on the changes in the output electrical signals generated from the chemical reactions between the target analytes and the immobilized electrode recognition elements [74,239,240,241]. The generation of electrical signals is usually related to the concentration of the target analytes [79,242,243], thus enabling qualitative detection and quantitative analysis of target molecules [157,244,245,246]. Electrochemical sensors have the advantages of simple operation, low cost, good stability, and high sensitivity, and have been widely used in multiple fields [21,247,248,249,250].
Wu et al. (2021) employed nanozymes with peroxidase-like and oxidase-like properties (two-dimensional (2D) MnO2 nanosheets, manganese dioxide nanosheets (MnNS)) as advanced catalysts to develop a novel homogeneous electrochemical sensor for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides (OPs), using dissolved oxygen as a co-reactant to avoid interference from H2O2 and color (Figure 9A) [251]. Wei et al. (2021) developed a cobalt metal–organic framework modified carbon cloth/paper (Co-MOF/CC/Paper) hybrid button sensor as a portable, robust, and user-friendly electrochemical analytical chip for the non-enzymatic quantitative detection of glucose. A highly integrated electrochemical analytical chip with a flexible Co-MOF/CC sensing interface was successfully fabricated [252]. Wang et al. (2024) utilized the toxicity and excellent electrochemical properties of single-atom iron nanozymes (SA-Fe-NZ) to successfully construct a smartphone-assisted dual-mode biosensor, where the approach of aptamers labeled with electrochemical signaling molecules to the electrode surface caused changes in the electrochemical signal, demonstrating good detection performance (Figure 9B) [253]. He et al. (2022) developed a highly selective and sensitive p-nitrophenol (p-NP) sensor based on a composite of Ni-NCs and polyethyleneimine (PEI) (Figure 9C) [254].
Compared with bare GCE, Ni-NCs/GCE, and PEI/GCE, the Ni-NCs-PEI/GCE sensor exhibited better performance in the electrocatalytic detection of p-NP due to the synergistic effect between Ni-NCs and PEI [254]. A novel hydrazine electrochemical sensor with excellent sensing capabilities was prepared by electrodeposition of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on the surface of MIL-53 (Fe, Ni) MOF-derived nanostructures on a nickel foam (NF) substrate via a solvothermal method, which could perform highly sensitive hydrazine detection in tap water with good selectivity as well as reliable stability and reproducibility (Figure 9D) [255].

5.4. Raman Sensing

SERS has received widespread attention as an emerging and powerful analytical technique [256,257,258]. Due to its outstanding advantages, such as ultrahigh sensitivity, in situ non-invasive detection, and unique fingerprint information [259,260,261,262], it has rapidly developed in the construction of sensors [263,264,265,266]. In recent years, by utilizing nanozymes to enhance SERS performance [80,267,268], a variety of SERS-based analytical platforms have been successfully established for the sensitive detection of multiple target molecules [269,270,271].
Xi et al. (2023) developed iron single atoms (Fe-SA/Ti3C2Tx) with intrinsic peroxidase-like activity loaded on Ti3C2Tx (Figure 10A) and further constructed a sensitive Raman sensor array for the detection of five antioxidants, achieving satisfactory signal amplification performance. By utilizing the blocking effect of radical reactions and its highly recognizable catalytic characteristics, it can simultaneously identify antioxidants, including ascorbic acid, uric acid, glutathione, melatonin, and tea polyphenols [272]. Chen et al. (2025) synthesized a dual-mode paper sensor based on AuNPs and 4-mercaptopyridine for rapid and ultrasensitive detection of Hg2+ in tea. The sensor combined SERS technology with a silver shell grown in situ on the surface of AuNPs to significantly enhance signal intensity (Figure 10B). The detection limit of SERS was 0.48 pM, which is 500 times lower than that of traditional methods [273]. Xu et al. (2022) designed a novel SERS detection method for Cr (VI) detection through the catalytic oxidation of TMB by bifunctional (−)AuNPs (Figure 10C). The detection exhibited excellent selectivity with a detection limit as low as 0.4 nM [274]. Shaikh et al. (2023) synthesized silver nanostructures (Ag@Ch) loaded on a corrugated chitosan matrix for highly sensitive SERS detection of methylene blue, crystal violet, and p-nitrophenol [275]. Zhu et al. (2023) prepared Ag/ZnO nanorods on a PDMS film by mimicking the nanorod array on the surface of a dragonfly wing (Figure 10D). By combining semiconductor photoinduction and bionic nanostructures, the visualization and quantitative analysis of plastic microparticles were achieved, with the generated PIERS enhancement ratio being 11.3 times higher than that of normal SERS [276].

5.5. Chemiluminescence Sensing

Chemiluminescent sensors, as a promising analytical tool, are constructed based on light emission generated from chemical reactions [277,278,279]. They have the advantages of convenient operation, rapid response, simple equipment, low limit of detection (LOD), and wide linear range, and have been widely used for the detection of various targets [277,280,281]. The emergence of nanozymes also provides a promising strategy for the design and development of chemiluminescent biosensors.
Chang et al. (2023) synthesized a zirconium hydroxide nanozyme (ZrOX-OH) with phosphatase-like activity, achieving direct and specific chemiluminescent detection of glyphosate. The nanozyme was prepared by simple alkaline solution treatment of UIO-66 and could catalyze the dephosphorylation of the substrate AMPPD to produce a strong chemiluminescent signal (Figure 11A) [282]. Wang et al. (2023) synthesized a chemiluminescent test paper based on an iron porphyrin single-atom nanozyme (MOF-FeP) for rapid and highly sensitive detection of Epstein–Barr virus antibodies related to nasopharyngeal cancer. The nanozyme, by mimicking the active sites of natural peroxidase, exhibited excellent peroxidase-like activity and could catalyze the chemiluminescence of the luminol substrate (Figure 11B) [283]. Dong et al. (2024) synthesized bimetallic CoMoO4 nanorods, which were successfully prepared with high peroxidase activity through hydrothermal and subsequent calcination processes. These nanorods were first used as chemiluminescent catalysts, enhancing the CL intensity of the luminol/hydrogen peroxide system by nearly 750 times. A sensitive and rapid detection platform for dopamine was established based on the quenching effect of dopamine on chemiluminescent signals [284].
And Martínez-Pérez-Cejuela et al. (2024) developed a chemiluminescent sensing paper based on a Prussian blue/metal–organic framework MIL-101 nanozyme for rapid detection of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Figure 11D). Prussian blue nanoparticles (PB-NPs) were first grown in situ on the MIL-101 (Fe) structure to form a PB-NPs@MIL-101 (Fe) composite. This composite was used to prepare a one-step H2O2 detection sensing paper, capable of detecting H2O2 down to 8.2 μM with good reproducibility and storage stability [285]. Jia et al. (2023) developed a novel nanochannel-confined biomimetic nanozyme/bioenzyme cascade reaction system (CSMS@PMoV2@GOx) for generating persistent and intense chemiluminescence. The system co-immobilized polyoxometalates (PMoV2) and glucose oxidase (GOx) in the nanochannels of core-shell mesoporous silica microspheres (CSMS), enabling the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) from glucose and luminol reactions, which in turn triggered chemiluminescent emission (Figure 11C) [286].
Figure 11. (A) Detection of glyphosate using ZrOX-OH nanozyme-catalyzed dephosphorylation of AMPPD [282]; (B) Detection of EB virus antibodies using MOF-FeP [283]; (C) Enhanced detection of dopamine by CoMoO4 nanorods in the chemiluminescence system of luminol/H2O2 [286]; (D) Detection of H2O2 using Prussian blue/MIL-101 nanozyme-based paper sensor [285].
Figure 11. (A) Detection of glyphosate using ZrOX-OH nanozyme-catalyzed dephosphorylation of AMPPD [282]; (B) Detection of EB virus antibodies using MOF-FeP [283]; (C) Enhanced detection of dopamine by CoMoO4 nanorods in the chemiluminescence system of luminol/H2O2 [286]; (D) Detection of H2O2 using Prussian blue/MIL-101 nanozyme-based paper sensor [285].
Foods 14 02580 g011

6. Practical Implementation Challenges

The practical application of nanozymes in sensing and analysis is constrained by various methodological limitations. First, the catalytic mechanisms of nanozymes have not been fully elucidated, especially the dynamic behavior of their active sites and the mechanisms of substrate binding, which lack a unified theoretical explanation. For example, the peroxidase-like activity of noble metal nanozymes (such as Au and Pt) is usually attributed to the electron transfer capability of surface metal atoms [287], but the differences in their catalytic pathways compared to natural enzymes (such as horseradish peroxidase) remain unclear [267,288]. The redox activity of metal oxide nanozymes (such as Fe3O4 and CeO2) is related to their multivalent characteristics, but how to optimize catalytic efficiency through precise regulation of oxygen vacancies or surface functional groups remains a technical challenge [112,289]. In addition, the enzyme-like activity mechanisms of carbon-based nanozymes (such as graphene quantum dots) are highly dependent on their surface defects and heteroatom doping, but existing characterization methods (such as in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) are unable to track the microstructural changes during the catalytic process in real time, limiting the development of rational design strategies [130,290].
Second, the selectivity and specificity of nanozymes remain technical bottlenecks. Compared with natural enzymes, nanozymes exhibit weaker substrate recognition capabilities and are susceptible to interference from coexisting substances in complex matrices. Notably, food extracts containing fats, proteins, and reducing agents (e.g., ascorbic acid) profoundly suppress nanozyme activity through three key mechanisms: (1) hydrophobic fats form bio-coronas that block active sites; (2) proteins adsorb onto surfaces via electrostatic interactions, reducing catalytic accessibility; (3) reducing agents competitively consume reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing false-negative signals. Although surface modification (e.g., ligand functionalization) may partially improve selectivity, this process risks masking active sites or introducing non-specific adsorption [88,145].
Finally, the long-term stability and large-scale production of nanozymes are still unresolved problems. Although some nanozymes (such as MOFs and COFs) are stable in mild environments under laboratory conditions, in practical applications, extreme pH, high temperature, or high ionic strength may lead to structural collapse or deactivation of active sites. For example, Zr-MOFs are prone to ligand hydrolysis under strongly acidic conditions, limiting their application in gastric juice detection. In addition, the high cost and complex synthesis process of noble metal-based nanozymes hinder their large-scale commercialization, while the low activity of carbon-based or metal oxide nanozymes needs to be improved through complex post-treatment (such as doping and compositing), further increasing production difficulties [291,292].

7. Outlook

The future development of nanozymes in the field of sensing and analysis will revolve around material innovation, mechanistic exploration, and application expansion. First, designing new nanozyme materials through interdisciplinary approaches (such as computational chemistry and machine learning) is expected to break through the current limitations of catalytic activity and selectivity. For example, using high-throughput screening techniques combined with molecular dynamics simulations can accurately predict nanostructures with specific enzyme activities, thereby accelerating the development of high-performance nanozymes. Second, in-depth elucidation of the catalytic mechanisms of nanozymes is a key research direction. Revealing the dynamic structural changes during the catalytic process through in situ characterization techniques (such as in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and cryo-electron microscopy) will provide theoretical support for optimizing nanozyme performance.
In terms of applications, the integration of multifunctional sensing systems is a future trend. For example, combining nanozymes with microfluidic technology to develop “lab-on-a-chip” platforms can enable parallel detection and real-time monitoring of multiple targets. In addition, the integration of nanozymes with smart materials (such as photo-responsive and magnetically responsive materials) can build environmentally adaptive sensing systems, enhancing detection reliability in complex scenarios. In the fields of environment and health, nanozyme sensing technology is expected to further expand into in situ remediation of pollutants and early disease diagnosis. For example, developing self-cleaning nanozyme sensors can simultaneously detect and degrade organic pollutants in water, while wearable sensors based on nanozymes may provide continuous monitoring solutions for chronic disease management.
Finally, promoting the green synthesis and sustainable application of nanozymes is crucial. Preparing low-cost nanozymes through biotemplating or using waste-derived carbon materials can reduce environmental burdens and improve resource utilization. At the same time, establishing international unified performance evaluation standards and toxicity assessment systems will accelerate the transition of nanozymes from the laboratory to industrialization. With continuous technological breakthroughs, nanozymes are expected to become a core component of the next generation of intelligent sensing systems, providing more efficient and precise solutions for food safety, medical diagnosis, and environmental protection. Moreover, large-scale deployment of nanozymes raises concerns regarding potential environmental release and ecotoxicity. As nanozymes are increasingly applied in food safety detection and other fields, their production, use, and disposal may lead to the release of nanoparticles into the environment. Therefore, stringent regulatory frameworks and ecological risk assessment systems should be established to ensure that large-scale deployment of nanozymes does not pose unacceptable risks to ecosystems and human health.

Author Contributions

R.Y. is the leading author and prepared this review paper. Z.L., H.C., H.S.E.-M., X.D. and R.X. provided critical feedback. X.Z., Q.S. and W.L. provided critical feedback and revised this review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to my mentors and fellow students for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.-T.; Li, Z.; Fox, G.P.; Gidley, M.J.; Dhital, S. Protein-starch matrix plays a key role in enzymic digestion of high-amylose wheat noodle. Food Chem. 2021, 336, 127719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Z.; Dai, Y.Q.; Azi, F.; Wang, Z.J.; Xu, W.M.; Wang, D.Y.; Dong, M.S.; Xia, X.D. Constructing Protein-Scaffolded Multienzyme Assembly Enhances the Coupling Efficiency of the P450 System for Efficient Daidzein Biosynthesis from (2S)-Naringenin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 5849–5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wong, F.C.; Xiao, J.B.; Wang, S.Y.; Ee, K.Y.; Chai, T.T. Advances on the antioxidant peptides from edible plant sources. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ren, X.F.; Liang, Q.F.; Ma, H.L. Effects of sweeping frequency ultrasound pretreatment on the hydrolysis of zein: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity and thermodynamics analysis. J. Food Sci. Technol. Mysore 2018, 55, 4020–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarpong, F.; Yu, X.J.; Zhou, C.S.; Yang, H.P.; Uzoejinwa, B.B.; Bai, J.W.; Wu, B.G.; Ma, H.L. Influence of anti-browning agent pretreatment on drying kinetics, enzymes inactivation and other qualities of dried banana (Musa ssp.) under relative humidity-convective air dryer. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2018, 12, 1229–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, L.; Li, W.X.; Liu, Y.Y.; Zhi, W.J.; Han, J.; Wang, Y.; Ni, L. Green separation of bromelain in food sample with high retention of enzyme activity using recyclable aqueous two-phase system containing a new synthesized thermo-responsive copolymer and salt. Food Chem. 2019, 282, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sarpong, F.; Oteng-Darko, P.; Golly, M.K.; Amenorfe, L.P.; Rashid, M.T.; Zhou, C.S. Comparative study of enzymes inactivation and browning pigmentation of apple (Malus domestica) slices by selected gums during low temperature storage. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, 12681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ji, D.Y.; Ma, H.L.; Chen, X.M. Ultrasonication increases γ-aminobutyric acid accumulation in coffee leaves and affects total phenolic content and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.C.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Xu, J.J. Selective enzyme inactivation in a simulated system and in cabbage juice using electrospray technology. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2022, 75, 102875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, Y.; Ji, D.Y.; Ma, H.L.; Chen, X.M. Ultrasound accelerated γ-aminobutyric acid accumulation in coffee leaves through influencing the microstructure, enzyme activity, and metabolites. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdualrahman, M.A.Y.; Zhou, C.S.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Yagoub, A.A.; Ma, H.L.; Mao, L.; Wang, K. Effects of ultrasound pretreatment on enzymolysis of sodium caseinate protein: Kinetic study, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory activity, and the structural characteristics of the hydrolysates. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, 13276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, J.K.; Wang, Y.Y.; Qiu, W.Y.; Ma, H.L.; Wang, Z.B.; Wu, J.Y. Three-phase partitioning as an elegant and versatile platform applied to nonchromatographic bioseparation processes. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2416–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qu, W.J.; Sehemu, R.M.; Zhang, T.; Song, B.J.; Yang, L.; Ren, X.F.; Ma, H.L. Immobilized enzymolysis of corn gluten meal under triple-frequency ultrasound. Int. J. Food Eng. 2018, 14, 20170347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, X.; Ahmad, W.; Rong, Y.; Wu, J.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q. A dual-mode fluorescence and colorimetric sensing platform for efficient detection of ofloxacin in aquatic products using iron alkoxide nanozyme. Food Chem. 2024, 442, 138417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, N.; Zhou, X.; Yu, D.F.; Jiao, S.Y.; Han, X.; Zhang, S.L.; Yin, H.; Mao, H.P. Pesticide residues identification by impedance time-sequence spectrum of enzyme inhibition on multilayer paper-based microfluidic chip. J. Food Process Eng. 2020, 43, e13544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, D.S.; Ling, X.T.; Zhou, X.G.; Li, X.; Wang, J.Y.; Qu, S.; Yang, Y.W.; Zhang, B.L. Evaluation of the Quality of a High-Resistant Starch and Low-Glutelin Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Generated through CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Mutagenesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 9733–9742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Huang, X.; Hu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Wei, X.; Zhai, X.; et al. H-Bond Modulation Mechanism for Moisture-driven Bacteriostat Evolved from Phytochemical Formulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 34, 2312053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liao, D.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yi, Y.H.; Weng, W.C.; Zhu, G.B. Colorimetric detection of organophosphorus pesticides based on Nb2CTx MXene self-reducing PdPt nanozyme integrated with hydrogel and smartphone. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 9223–9232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arshad, A.; Ding, L.J.; Akram, R.; Zhu, W.R.; Long, L.L.; Wang, K. Construction of a novel Au@Os mediated TMB-H2O2 platform with dual-signal output for rapid and accurate detection of ziram in food. Food Chem. 2025, 462, 140988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Zhou, Y.F.; Ming, L.; Chen, L.H.; Xue, M.Q.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.Y. Dual-mode strategy for the determination of vanillin in milk-based products based on molecular-imprinted nanozymes. Food Chem. 2025, 469, 142615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.A.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.L.; Huang, X.W.; El-Mesery, H.S.; Shi, Y.Q.; Zou, Y.C.; Li, Z.H.; Li, Y.H.; Shi, J.Y.; et al. Simple-easy electrochemical sensing mode assisted with integrative carbon-based gel electrolyte for in-situ monitoring of plant hormone indole acetic acid. Food Chem. 2025, 467, 142342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.N.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Huang, X.W.; Shi, Y.Q.; Zou, Y.C.; Hu, X.T.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Energy difference-driven ROS reduction for electrochemical tracking crop growth sensitized with electron-migration nanostructures. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1304, 342515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, G.; Zhu, M.; Liu, Z.J.; Zhang, B.; Shi, M.J.; Wang, S. Development and evaluation of the magnetic particle-based chemiluminescence immunoassay for rapid and quantitative detection of Aflatoxin B1 in foodstuff. Food Agric. Immunol. 2018, 29, 564–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, H.L.; Huang, X.W.; Shi, Y.Q.; Li, Y.H.; Tan, W.L.; Zhang, X.A.; Zou, Y.C.; Wang, T.X.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Electrochemical Sensing toward Noninvasive Evaluation of High-Starch Food Digestion via Point-of-Use Monitoring Glucose Level in Saliva. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 11422–11434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, X.; Zhu, M.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, Z.; Shi, J.; Zou, X.; Han, E. Simple electrochemical sensing for mercury ions in dairy product using optimal Cu2+-based metal-organic frameworks as signal reporting. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 123222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, S.H.; Shao, D.; Wang, J.M.; Zheng, X.F.; Yang, Z.Q.; Wang, A.J.; Chen, Z.Y.; Gao, Y.J. Pre-ligand-induced porous MOF as a peroxidase mimic for electrochemical analysis of deoxynivalenol (DON). Food Chem. 2025, 480, 143860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, C.; Cui, H.Y.; Han, Y.F.; Yu, F.F.; Shi, X.M. Development of a biomimetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on molecularly imprinted polymers on paper for the detection of carbaryl. Food Chem. 2018, 240, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Manea, F.; Houillon, F.B.; Pasquato, L.; Scrimin, P. Nanozymes: Gold-Nanoparticle-Based Transphosphorylation Catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6165–6169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, L.; Zhuang, J.; Nie, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, N.; Wang, T.; Feng, J.; Yang, D.; Perrett, S.; et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, Z.Y.; Yang, R.Q.; Chen, H.L.; Zhang, X.A. Recent Advances in Food Safety: Nanostructure-Sensitized Surface-Enhanced Raman Sensing. Foods 2025, 14, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, H.L.; Wang, J.L.; Zhang, W.W.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, X.N.; Huang, X.W.; Shi, Y.Q.; Zou, Y.C.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; et al. Highly catalytic Ce-based MOF for powering electrochemical aptasensing toward evaluating dissolution rate of microelement copper from tea-leaves. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 140, 107266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, D.; Wu, L.; Yao, H.; Zhao, L. Catalase-Like Nanozymes: Classification, Catalytic Mechanisms, and Their Applications. Small 2022, 18, 2203400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Feng, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y. Recent advances in the development and analytical applications of oxidase-like nanozymes. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 166, 117220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gao, W.; He, J.; Chen, L.; Meng, X.; Ma, Y.; Cheng, L.; Tu, K.; Gao, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, M.; et al. Deciphering the catalytic mechanism of superoxide dismutase activity of carbon dot nanozyme. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhou, S. Progress and Perspective on Carbon-Based Nanozymes for Peroxidase-like Applications. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 11751–11760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sepehrmansourie, H.; Alamgholiloo, H.; Noroozi Pesyan, N.; Zolfigol, M.A. A MOF-on-MOF strategy to construct double Z-scheme heterojunction for high-performance photocatalytic degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 321, 122082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ajmal, Z.; Kizito, S.; Alalwan, B.; Kumar, A.; El-Jery, A.; Ashraf, G.A.; Hussain, I.; Al-Hadeethi, Y.; Ali, H.; Alshammari, A.; et al. Recent advances in COF-based framework: Synthesis, Potential application, Current challenges and Future direction. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 39, 102140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Q.; Zhang, A.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, D. A Review on Metal- and Metal Oxide-Based Nanozymes: Properties, Mechanisms, and Applications. Nano Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, D.; Xu, G.; Zhang, X.; Gong, H.; Jiang, L.; Sun, G.; Li, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; et al. Dual-functional ultrathin wearable 3D particle-in-cavity SF-AAO-Au SERS sensors for effective sweat glucose and lab-on-glove pesticide detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 359, 131512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Lou, Z.; Li, S.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, L.; Wei, H. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): Next-generation artificial enzymes (II). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1004–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Han, J.; Feng, H.; Wu, J.C.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, L.; Luo, P.; Wang, Y. Construction of Multienzyme Co-immobilized Hybrid Nanoflowers for an Efficient Conversion of Cellulose into Glucose in a Cascade Reaction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 7910–7921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, B.; Wang, L.K.; Miao, W.J.; Wu, Q.F.; Liu, Y.X.; Sun, Y.L.; Gao, C. Thermal versus Microwave Inactivation Kinetics of Lipase and Lipoxygenase from Wheat Germ. J. Food Process Eng. 2016, 39, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Apaliya, M.T.; Zhang, H.Y.; Yang, Q.Y.; Zheng, X.F.; Zhao, L.N.; Kwaw, E.; Mahunu, G.K. Hanseniaspora uvarum enhanced with trehalose induced defense-related enzyme activities and relative genes expression levels against Aspergillus tubingensis in table. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 132, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Golly, M.K.; Ma, H.L.; Duan, Y.Q.; Wu, P.; Dabbour, M.; Sarpong, F.; Farooq, M. Enzymolysis of walnut (Juglans regia L.) meal protein: Ultrasonication-assisted alkaline pretreatment impact on kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zandieh, M.; Liu, J. Nanozymes: Definition, Activity, and Mechanisms. Adv. Mater. 2023, 36, e2211041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liang, N.; Shi, B.; Hu, X.; Li, W.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zou, X.; Shi, J. A ternary heterostructure aptasensor based on metal-organic framework and polydopamine nanoparticles for fluorescent detection of sulfamethazine. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, S.P.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Guo, Z.M.; Zhang, D.; Zou, X.B. Enzyme-assisted patulin detoxification: Recent applications and perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 146, 104383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mehedi Hassan, M.; He, P.; Xu, Y.; Zareef, M.; Li, H.; Chen, Q. Rapid detection and prediction of chloramphenicol in food employing label-free HAu/Ag NFs-SERS sensor coupled multivariate calibration. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lu, W.J.; Dai, X.L.; Yang, R.Q.; Liu, Z.Y.; Chen, H.L.; Zhang, Y.F.; Zhang, X.N. Fenton-like catalytic MOFs driving electrochemical aptasensing toward tracking lead pollution in pomegranate fruit. Food ControL 2025, 169, 111006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ouyang, Q.; Wang, L.; Ahmad, W.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q. Upconversion Nanoprobes Based on a Horseradish Peroxidase-Regulated Dual-Mode Strategy for the Ultrasensitive Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in Meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 9947–9956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marimuthu, M.; Arumugam, S.S.; Sabarinathan, D.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Metal organic framework based fluorescence sensor for detection of antibiotics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 1002–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ouyang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Y.; Din, Z.-u.; Chen, Q. Mesoporous silica-modified upconversion biosensor coupled with real-time ion release properties for ultrasensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus in meat. Food Control 2023, 145, 109444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Z.P.; Zhang, Y.; Jayan, H.; Gao, S.P.; Zhou, R.Y.; Yosri, N.; Zou, X.B.; Guo, Z.M. Recent and emerging trends of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-based sensors for detecting food contaminants: A critical and comprehensive review. Food Chem. 2024, 448, 139501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, F.; Wang, L.; Li, M.; Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Ping, J. Nanozyme-based biosensor for organophosphorus pesticide monitoring: Functional design, biosensing strategy, and detection application. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 165, 117152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, Z.; Guo, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Ding, L.; Liu, H.; Yu, X. Nanozyme-Enhanced Electrochemical Biosensors: Mechanisms and Applications. Small 2023, 20, e2307815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.Y.; Ma, H.L.; Wang, B.; Qu, W.J.; Wali, A.; Zhou, C.S. Relationships between the structure of wheat gluten and ACE inhibitory activity of hydrolysate: Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 3313–3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. He, R.H.; Xing, H.; Wang, Z.P.; Ding, W.H.; Zhu, P.P.; Liu, B.; Ma, H.L. Establishment of an Enzymatic Membrane Reactor for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides Preparation from Wheat Germ Protein Isolates. J. Food Process Eng. 2016, 39, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Z.W.; Li, Y.L.; Wang, L.K.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, K.K.; Sun, J.; Xu, B. Evaluation of the possible non-thermal effect of microwave radiation on the inactivation of wheat germ lipase. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, e12506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Osae, R.; Zhou, C.S.; Xu, B.G.; Tchabo, W.; Tahir, H.E.; Mustapha, A.T.; Ma, H.L. Effects of ultrasound, osmotic dehydration, and osmosonication pretreatments on bioactive compounds, chemical characterization, enzyme inactivation, color, and antioxidant activity of dried ginger slices. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, S.S.; Li, H.H.; Hassan, M.M.; Ali, S.; Chen, Q.S. SERS based artificial peroxidase enzyme regulated multiple signal amplified system for quantitative detection of foodborne pathogens. Food Control 2021, 123, 107733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sadalage, P.S.; Dar, M.A.; Bhor, R.D.; Bhalerao, B.M.; Kamble, P.N.; Paiva-Santos, A.C.; Nimbalkar, M.S.; Sonawane, K.D.; Pai, K.L.A.; Patil, P.S.; et al. Optimization of biogenic synthesis of biocompatible platinum nanoparticles with catalytic, enzyme mimetic and antioxidant activities. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 102024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gan, Z.Y.; Hu, X.T.; Xu, X.C.; Zhang, W.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y.; Zheng, K.Y.; Arslan, M. A portable test strip based on fluorescent europium-based metal-organic framework for rapid and visual detection of tetracycline in food samples. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 129501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, C.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Q.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zou, X.; Sun, Z. Molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor for ethyl carbamate detection in Baijiu based on “on-off” nanozyme-catalyzing process. Food Chem. 2024, 453, 139626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dai, Y.; Peng, W.; Ji, Y.; Wei, J.; Che, J.; Huang, Y.; Huang, W.; Yang, W.; Xu, W. A self-powered photoelectrochemical aptasensor using 3D-carbon nitride and carbon-based metal-organic frameworks for high-sensitivity detection of tetracycline in milk and water. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 8022–8035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yang, W.; Liu, C.; Zhang, B.; Wu, C.; Cao, Y.; Huang, W.; Xu, W. Construction of a Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dot Fluorescent Molecularly Imprinted Sensor for Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Sulfadiazine in Pork Samples. Food Anal. Methods 2024, 17, 1689–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, X.N.; Huang, X.Y.; Xu, Y.W.; Wang, X.; Guo, Z.M.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Single-step electrochemical sensing of ppt-level lead in leaf vegetables based on peroxidase-mimicking metal-organic framework. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 168, 112544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, H.; Geng, W.; Zheng, Z.; Haruna, S.A.; Chen, Q. Flexible SERS sensor using AuNTs-assembled PDMS film coupled chemometric algorithms for rapid detection of chloramphenicol in food. Food Chem. 2023, 418, 135998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, S.S.; Zhang, M.M.; Chen, Q.S.; Ouyang, Q. Multifunctional Metal-Organic Frameworks Driven Three-Dimensional Folded Paper-Based Microfluidic Analysis Device for Chlorpyrifos Detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 14375–14385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, J.; Huang, R.; Qi, W.; Su, R.; Binks, B.P.; He, Z. Construction of a bioinspired laccase-mimicking nanozyme for the degradation and detection of phenolic pollutants. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 254, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Huang, X.; Huang, Q.; Wen, Y.; Li, B.; Holmes, M.; Shi, J.; Zou, X. Uniform stain pattern of robust MOF-mediated probe for flexible paper-based colorimetric sensing toward environmental pesticide exposure. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, H.; Wang, F.; Lin, J.; Yang, W.; Kang, W.; Jiang, H.; Adade, S.Y.-S.S.; Cai, J.; Xue, Z.; Chen, Q. Detection of wheat toxigenic Aspergillus flavus based on nano-composite colorimetric sensing technology. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, T.; Meng, S.; Liu, D.; Dong, D.; You, T. Electric Field-Induced Specific Preconcentration to Enhance DNA-Based Electrochemical Sensing of Hg2+ via the Synergy of Enrichment and Self-Cleaning. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 7412–7419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, X.; Huang, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Daglia, M.; Xiao, J.; Shi, J.; Zou, X. Bioinspired nanozyme enabling glucometer readout for portable monitoring of pesticide under resource-scarce environments. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, X.; Hu, X.T.; Zhai, X.D.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y. A simple and sensitive electrochemical sensing based on amine-functionalized metal-organic framework and polypyrrole composite for detection of lead ions in meat samples. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 5813–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, W.; Cao, L.; Lu, H.; Huang, Y.; Yang, W.; Cai, Y.; Li, S.; Li, S.; Zhao, J.; Xu, W. Custom-printed microfluidic chips using simultaneous ratiometric fluorescence with “Green” carbon dots for detection of multiple antibiotic residues in pork and water samples. J. Food Sci. 2024, 89, 5980–5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wu, X.; Yin, L.; Gao, S.; Zhou, R.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, S.; Jayan, H.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Zou, X.; Guo, Z. Core-satellite nanoassembly system with aptamer-conjugated Au@Ag nanoparticles for SERS detection of patulin in apples. Food Control 2024, 159, 110293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zan, X.; Yan, Y.; Chen, G.; Sun, L.; Wang, L.; Wen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; et al. Recent Advances of Oxalate Decarboxylase: Biochemical Characteristics, Catalysis Mechanisms, and Gene Expression and Regulation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 10163–10178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yin, L.; You, T.; Arslan, M.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Guo, Z.; Zou, X.; Cai, J. Dual-layers Raman reporter-tagged Au@Ag combined with core-satellite assemblies for SERS detection of Zearalenone. Food Chem. 2023, 429, 136834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Han, E.; Li, L.; Gao, T.; Pan, Y.; Cai, J. Nitrite determination in food using electrochemical sensor based on self-assembled MWCNTs/AuNPs/poly-melamine nanocomposite. Food Chem. 2024, 437, 137773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hassan, M.M.; Wei, S.; Xu, Y.; Zareef, M.; Li, H.; Sayada, J.; Chen, Q. Ascorbate functionalized Au@AgNPs SERS sensor combined random frog-partial least squares for the prediction of chloramphenicol in milk. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 129, 106106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shen, L.Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, C.X.; Yin, H.B.; Wang, A.L.; Wang, C.T. Functional characterization of bimetallic CuPdx nanoparticles in hydrothermal conversion of glycerol to lactic acid. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, L.; Xu, X.; Song, Y.; Huang, J.; Xu, H. Research progress of nanozymes in colorimetric biosensing: Classification, activity and application. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, X.; Liang, X.; Yu, J.; Xu, K.; Shen, J.-W.; Duan, W.; Zeng, J. Recent development of noble metal-based bimetallic nanoparticles for colorimetric sensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2023, 169, 117386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, C.Y.; Wu, B.D.; Jiang, K.; Wei, M.; Wang, S. Effects of different concentrations and types of Cu and Pb on soil N-fixing bacterial communities in the wheat rhizosphere. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 144, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chen, P.; Yin, L.M.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Zou, X.B.; Guo, Z.M. Green reduction of silver nanoparticles for cadmium detection in food using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy coupled multivariate calibration. Food Chem. 2022, 394, 133481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wu, Q.Q.; Zhong, Y.T.; Chen, R.M.; Ling, G.Y.; Wang, X.H.; Shen, Y.R.; Hao, C. Cu-Ag-C@Ni3S4 with core shell structure and rose derived carbon electrode materials: An environmentally friendly supercapacitor with high energy and power density. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 222, 119676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yang, R.; Mu, W.Y.; Chen, Q.Y. Urazole-Au Nanocluster as a Novel Fluorescence Probe for Curcumin Determination and Mitochondria Imaging. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, Z.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Ren, X.X.; Li, W.B.; Sun, J.F.; Wang, X.W.; Huang, Y.Q.; Guo, Y.G.; Zeng, H.W. Novel fluorescence immunoassay for the detection of zearalenone using HRP-mediated fluorescence quenching of gold-silver bimetallic nanoclusters. Food Chem. 2021, 355, 129633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Liu, W.; Li, L.; Yang, S.; Gao, J.; Wang, R. Self-Assembly of Heterogeneously Shaped Nanoparticles into Plasmonic Metamolecules on DNA Origami. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 14177–14181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Guo, K.; Teng, Y.; Guo, R.; Meng, Y.; Fan, D.; Hao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, D. Engineering ultrathin PdAu nanoring via a facile process for electrocatalytic ethanol oxidation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 628, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, L.; Qiu, X.; Lyu, Z.; Zhao, M.; Xia, Y. Pd–Au Asymmetric Nanopyramids: Lateral vs Vertical Growth of Au on Pd Decahedral Seeds. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 5391–5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Huang, C.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Wei, Z. Pt Alloy Nanocrystal Catalysts: Diminishing Sizes and Improving Stability. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 12827–12840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, M.; Lyu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; Xie, M.; Xia, Y. Twin-Directed Deposition of Pt on Pd Icosahedral Nanocrystals for Catalysts with Enhanced Activity and Durability toward Oxygen Reduction. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 2248–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhou, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Liu, J.; Xu, J.-J.; Chen, H.-Y. Dual-Mode SERS and Electrochemical Detection of miRNA Based on Popcorn-like Gold Nanofilms and Toehold-Mediated Strand Displacement Amplification Reaction. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 6120–6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.N.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Liu, Y. Full nitration-denitration versus partial nitration-denitration-anammox for treating high-strength ammonium-rich organic wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 261, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zeng, K.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.X.; Meng, H.; Wu, Q.Y.; Yang, J.; Liang, H.F. Gold nanoparticle-carbon nanotube nanohybrids with peroxidase-like activity for the highly-sensitive immunoassay of kanamycin in milk. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 6028–6037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, H.B.; Xie, R.Y.; Hao, Y.Q.; Pang, J.Y.; Gao, H.; Qu, F.Y.; Tian, M.M.; Guo, C.H.; Mao, B.D.; Chai, F. Portable smartphone-integrated AuAg nanoclusters electrospun membranes for multivariate fluorescent sensing of Hg2+, Cu2+ and L-histidine in water and food samples. Food Chem. 2023, 418, 135961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Meng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, C.; Trapalis, C.; Zhang, L.; Yu, J. Dynamics of Electron Transfer in CdS Photocatalysts Decorated with Various Noble Metals. Small 2023, 20, e2308952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, T.; Lin, H.; Cao, Y.; Yao, Q.; Xie, J. Interactions of Metal Nanoclusters with Light: Fundamentals and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2021, 34, 2103918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, J.; Ma, Q.; Li, M.; Chao, D.; Huang, L.; Wu, W.; Fang, Y.; Dong, S. Glucose-oxidase like catalytic mechanism of noble metal nanozymes. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, K.; Sun, D.-W.; Pu, H.; Wei, Q. Polymer multilayers enabled stable and flexible Au@Ag nanoparticle array for nondestructive SERS detection of pesticide residues. Talanta 2021, 223, 121782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Han, C.F.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, Z.J.; Du, D.L.; Li, M. Cascade amplifying aptasensor for positively correlated detecting OTA: Based on DNase I-assisted cyclic enzyme digestion and AgNPs@gel-enhanced fluorescence. Food Control 2023, 153, 109970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Zhang, C.; Shi, X.; Yu, F.; Quan, Y. Preparation of dummy molecularly imprinted polymers based on dextran-modified magnetic nanoparticles Fe3O4 for the selective detection of acrylamide in potato chips. Food Chem. 2020, 317, 126431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, C.; Tian, X.; Chang, X.; Ren, Y.; Yu, S. Applications of surface functionalized Fe3O4 NPs-based detection methods in food safety. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Su, X.Y.; Zheng, K.Y.; Tian, X.Y.; Zhou, X.; Zou, X.B.; Xu, X.C.; Sun, Z.B.; Zhang, W. An advanced ratiometric molecularly imprinted sensor based on metal ion reoxidation for indirect and ultrasensitive glyphosate detection in fruit. Food Chem. 2023, 429, 136927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chouke, P.B.; Shrirame, T.; Potbhare, A.K.; Mondal, A.; Chaudhary, A.R.; Mondal, S.; Thakare, S.R.; Nepovimova, E.; Valis, M.; Kuca, K.; et al. Bioinspired metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: A road map to potential applications. Mater. Today Adv. 2022, 16, 100314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Qian, K.; Huang, W. Metal–Support Interactions in Metal/Oxide Catalysts and Oxide–Metal Interactions in Oxide/Metal Inverse Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 1268–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ali, S.S.; Moawad, M.S.; Hussein, M.A.; Azab, M.; Abdelkarim, E.A.; Badr, A.; Sun, J.Z.; Khalil, M. Efficacy of metal oxide nanoparticles as novel antimicrobial agents against multi-drug and multi-virulent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retail raw chicken meat and giblets. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2021, 344, 109116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, Z.H.; Zhang, X.; Huang, X.W.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y.; Xu, Y.W.; Hu, X.T.; Sun, Y.; Zhai, X.D. Hypha-templated synthesis of carbon/ZnO microfiber for dopamine sensing in pork. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127646. [Google Scholar]
  110. Wang, Q.; Mei, S.H.; Manivel, P.; Ma, H.L.; Chen, X.M. Zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using coffee leaf extract assisted with ultrasound as nanocarriers for mangiferin. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 868–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Alkallas, F.H.; Alghamdi, S.M.; Rashed, E.A.; Trabelsi, A.B.G.; Nafee, S.S.; Elsharkawy, W.B.; Alsubhe, E.; Alshreef, S.H.; Mostafa, A.M. Nanocomposite Fe3O4-MWCNTs based on femtosecond pulsed laser ablation for catalytic degradation. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 140, 110445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Peng, L.J.; Zhu, A.F.; Ahmad, W.; Adade, S.; Chen, Q.M.; Wei, W.Y.; Chen, X.M.; Wei, J.; Jiao, T.H.; Chen, Q.S. A three-channel biosensor based on stimuli-responsive catalytic activity of the Fe3O4@Cu for on-site detection of tetrodotoxin in fish. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lei, L.; Cao, Q.; Ma, J.; Hou, F. One-Step Hydrothermal/Solvothermal Preparation of Pt/TiO2: An Efficient Catalyst for Biobutanol Oxidation at Room Temperature. Molecules 2024, 29, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chen, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Shen, K. Metal-Organic Frameworks as a New Platform to Construct Ordered Mesoporous Ce-Based Oxides for Efficient CO2 Fixation under Ambient Conditions. Small 2023, 19, e2303235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Luo, L.J.; Liu, X.H.; Ma, S.; Li, L.B.; You, T.Y. Quantification of zearalenone in mildewing cereal crops using an innovative photoelectrochemical aptamer sensing strategy based on ZnO-NGQDs composites. Food Chem. 2020, 322, 126778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Shi, S.; Wu, S.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, Y.; He, X.; Gong, J.; Farnell, Y.; Tang, Y.; Huang, Y.; et al. Iron oxide nanozyme suppresses intracellular Salmonella Enteritidis growth and alleviates infection in vivo. Theranostics 2018, 8, 6149–6162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, S.G.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Q.; Gao, W.; Shi, X.; Liu, Z. A portable colorimetric sensing platform for rapid and sensitive quantification of dichlorvos pesticide based on Fe-Mn bimetallic oxide nanozyme-participated highly efficient chromogenic catalysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1292, 342243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhao, D.; Bai, P.; Zhou, A.; Meng, H.-M.; Li, Z. Functionalized nanoscale metal oxides for biosensing, bioimaging and cancer therapy. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2024, 174, 117684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gong, F.; Yang, N.; Wang, Y.; Zhuo, M.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, L. Oxygen-Deficient Bimetallic Oxide FeWOX Nanosheets as Peroxidase-Like Nanozyme for Sensing Cancer via Photoacoustic Imaging. Small 2020, 16, 2003496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Li, W.; Hu, X.; Li, Q.; Shi, Y.; Zhai, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Shi, J.; et al. Copper nanoclusters @ nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots-based ratiometric fluorescence probe for lead (II) ions detection in porphyra. Food Chem. 2020, 320, 126623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, C.; Yu, X.; Shi, X.; Han, Y.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y. Development of Carbon Quantum Dot–Labeled Antibody Fluorescence Immunoassays for the Detection of Morphine in Hot Pot Soup Base. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Yuan, J.J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, J.Z.; Gan, L.P.; He, M.Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, P.P.; Qiu, F.X. Preparation and application of Mg-Al composite oxide/coconut shell carbon fiber for effective removal of phosphorus from domestic sewage. Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 126, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ji, Q.H.; Yu, X.J.; Chen, L.; Yarley, O.P.N.; Zhou, C.S. Facile preparation of sugarcane bagasse-derived carbon supported MoS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution reaction. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 172, 114064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liang, J.K.; Li, H.X.; Chen, L.; Ren, M.N.; Fakayode, O.A.; Han, J.Y.; Zhou, C.S. Efficient hydrogen evolution reaction performance using lignin-assisted chestnut shell carbon-loaded molybdenum disulfide. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 193, 116214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Marimuthu, M.; Xu, K.C.; Song, W.; Chen, Q.S.; Wen, H.L. Safeguarding food safety: Nanomaterials-based fluorescent sensors for pesticide tracing. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Guan, X.; Li, Z.; Geng, X.; Lei, Z.; Karakoti, A.; Wu, T.; Kumar, P.; Yi, J.; Vinu, A. Emerging Trends of Carbon-Based Quantum Dots: Nanoarchitectonics and Applications. Small 2023, 19, e2207181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Levchenko, I.; Baranov, O.; Riccardi, C.; Roman, H.E.; Cvelbar, U.; Ivanova, E.P.; Mohandas, M.; Ščajev, P.; Malinauskas, T.; Xu, S.; et al. Nanoengineered Carbon-Based Interfaces for Advanced Energy and Photonics Applications: A Recent Progress and Innovations. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 10, 2201739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shoaib, M.; Li, H.H.; Khan, I.M.; Zareef, M.; Hassan, M.M.; Niazi, S.; Chen, Q.S. Emerging MXenes-based aptasensors: A paradigm shift in food safety detection. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 151, 104635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hu, X.T.; Shi, J.Y.; Shi, Y.Q.; Zou, X.B.; Tahir, H.E.; Holmes, M.; Zhang, W.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Xu, Y.W. A dual-mode sensor for colorimetric and fluorescent detection of nitrite in hams based on carbon dots-neutral red system. Meat Sci. 2019, 147, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Hu, X.T.; Li, Y.X.; Xu, Y.W.; Gan, Z.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Li, Y.H. Green one-step synthesis of carbon quantum dots from orange peel for fluorescent detection of Escherichia coli in milk. Food Chem. 2021, 339, 127775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Zhang, J.N.; Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.W.; Zhai, X.D.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Sobhy, R.; Khalifa, I.; Zou, X.B. Lemon-derived carbon quantum dots incorporated guar gum/sodium alginate films with enhanced the preservability for blanched asparagus active packaging. Food Res. Int. 2025, 202, 115736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhang, T.; Zhao, B.C.; Chen, Q.Y.; Peng, X.M.; Yang, D.Y.; Qiu, F.X. Layered double hydroxide functionalized biomass carbon fiber for highly efficient and recyclable fluoride adsorption. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2019, 62, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, D.-H.; Yang, L.; Li, N.; Su, K.; Liu, L.; Li, C.-Y. Detection of ciprofloxacin and pH by carbon dots and rapid, visual sensing analysis. Food Chem. 2024, 459, 140313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yuan, Z.C.; Huang, X.W.; Zhang, X.N.; Gao, S.J.; Chen, H.L.; Li, Z.H.; El-Mesery, H.S.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B. Unveiling rheological behavior of hydrogels toward Magic 3D printing patterns. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 168, 111505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zeng, K.; Wei, W.; Jiang, L.; Zhu, F.; Du, D.L. Use of Carbon Nanotubes as a Solid Support To Establish Quantitative (Centrifugation) and Qualitative (Filtration) Immunoassays To Detect Gentamicin Contamination in Commercial Milk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7874–7881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ma, S.; Wang, M.; You, T.Y.; Wang, K. Using Magnetic Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes as Modified QuEChERS Adsorbent for Simultaneous Determination of Multiple Mycotoxins in Grains by UPLC-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8035–8044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhang, W.; Liu, C.; Zou, X.B.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Y.W. A β-CD/MWCNT-modified-microelectrode array for rapid determination of imidacloprid in vegetables. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 2326–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Shao, W.; Zeng, Z.; Star, A. An Ultrasensitive Norfentanyl Sensor Based on a Carbon Nanotube-Based Field-Effect Transistor for the Detection of Fentanyl Exposure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 37784–37793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Huang, X.W.; Sun, W.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhai, X.D.; Hu, X.T.; Zou, X.B. Hydrogen sulfide gas sensing toward on-site monitoring of chilled meat spoilage based on ratio-type fluorescent probe. Food Chem. 2022, 396, 133654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bi, J.R.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.T.; Song, Y.K.; Cong, S.; Yu, C.X.; Zhu, B.W.; Tan, M.Q. Presence and Formation Mechanism of Foodborne Carbonaceous Nanostructures from Roasted Pike Eel (Muraenesox cinereus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2862–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhang, T.; Yuan, D.S.; Guo, Q.; Qiu, F.X.; Yang, D.Y.; Ou, Z.P. Preparation of a renewable biomass carbon aerogel reinforced with sisal for oil spillage clean-up: Inspired by green leaves to green Tofu. Food Bioprod. Process. 2019, 114, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sharma, A.S.; Ali, S.; Sabarinathan, D.; Murugavelu, M.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Recent progress on graphene quantum dots-based fluorescence sensors for food safety and quality assessment applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 5765–5801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Lin, L.; Chen, W.Q.; Li, C.Z.; Cui, H.Y. Enhancing stability of Eucalyptus citriodora essential oil by solid nanoliposomes encapsulation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Smith, A.T.; LaChance, A.M.; Zeng, S.; Liu, B.; Sun, L. Synthesis, properties, and applications of graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide and their nanocomposites. Nano Mater. Sci. 2019, 1, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Li, Y.H.; Li, Y.X.; Zhang, D.; Tan, W.L.; Shi, J.Y.; Li, Z.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Yu, Y.Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; et al. A fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe based on functionalized graphene oxide and upconversion nanoparticles for sensitive and rapid detection of zearalenone. LWT 2021, 147, 111541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Du, X.J.; Du, W.H.; Sun, J.; Jiang, D. Self-powered photoelectrochemical sensor for chlorpyrifos detection in fruit and vegetables based on metal-ligand charge transfer effect by Ti3C2 based Schottky junction. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bin, Z.; Feng, L.; Yan, Y. Biomimetic metalloporphyrin oxidase modified carbon nanotubes for highly sensitive and stable quantification of anti-oxidants tert-butylhydroquinone in plant oil. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 132898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wu, X.; Yan, L.; Qin, R.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, M.; Hou, J. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of Bi2O2CO3/Bi4O5Br2/reduced graphene oxide Z-schemehe terojunction via a one-pot room-temperature synthesis. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 138, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zou, J.; Zhang, Q. Advances and Frontiers in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Electronics. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2102860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yuan, C.; Lv, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fei, Q.; Xiao, D.; Yin, H.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Three-dimensional nanoporous heterojunction of CdS/np-rGO for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Carbon 2023, 206, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Krishna Saraswat, S.; Ahmed Mustafa, M.; Kamil Ghadir, G.; Kaur, M.; Guamán Lozada, D.F.; Hasen shuhata alubiady, M.; Muzahem Al-Ani, A.; Alshahrani, M.Y.; Kadhem Abid, M.; Salih Jumaa, S.; et al. Carbon quantum dots: A comprehensive review of green Synthesis, characterization and investigation their applications in bioimaging. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 162, 112279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Patil, R.; Kumar, N.; Matsagar, B.; Wu, K.C.W.; Salunkhe, R.R.; Dutta, S. An improved Hummers method derived graphene oxide wrapped ZIF-8 polyhedron derived porous heterostructure for symmetric supercapacitor performance. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Li, H.H.; Murugesan, A.; Shoaib, M.; Sheng, W.; Chen, Q.S. Functionalized metal-organic frameworks with biomolecules for sensing and detection applications of food contaminants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 26, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, Z.P.; Zhou, R.Y.; Ke, L.J.; Li, J.B.; Jayan, H.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Zou, X.B.; Guo, Z.M. Development of multifunctional metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-based nanofiller materials in food packaging: A comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 154, 104771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Zhu, A.; Ali, S.; Jiao, T.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q. Facile synthesis of fluorescence-SERS dual-probe nanocomposites for ultrasensitive detection of sulfur-containing gases in water and beer samples. Food Chem. 2023, 420, 136095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Shi, Y.; Li, W.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhai, X.; Shen, T.; Shi, J.; He, Y.; et al. A novel sustainable biomass-based fluorescent probe for sensitive detection of salicylic acid in rice. Food Chem. 2024, 434, 137260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, X.N.; Jiang, Y.J.; Zhu, M.C.; Xu, Y.W.; Guo, Z.M.; Shi, J.Y.; Han, E.; Zou, X.B.; Wang, D. Electrochemical DNA sensor for inorganic mercury(II) ion at attomolar level in dairy product using Cu(II)-anchored metal-organic framework as mimetic catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 383, 123182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Xu, K.; Zhang, S.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, G.; Tang, Y.; Pang, H. Recent progress of MOF-functionalized nanocomposites: From structure to properties. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 323, 103050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Qian, W.; Lei, F.; Chen, Z.; Wu, X.; Lin, Y.; Wang, F. Recent advances in MOF-based nanozymes: Synthesis, activities, and bioapplications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 263, 116593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Zhang, X.A.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, X.Y.; Hu, X.T.; Huang, X.W.; Yin, L.M.; Huang, Q.L.; Wen, Y.B.; Li, B.; Shi, J.Y.; et al. Switchable aptamer-fueled colorimetric sensing toward agricultural fipronil exposure sensitized with affiliative metal-organic framework. Food Chem. 2023, 407, 135115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Shi, Y.H.; Rong, X.S.; Chen, C.; Wu, M.; Takai, Y.; Qiu, X.C.; Wang, C.C.; Shimasaki, Y.; Oshima, Y. Effects of ZIF-8 Nanoparticles on the Survival, Development, and Locomotor Activity of Early-life-stages of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 2021, 66, 211–216. [Google Scholar]
  162. Kang, L.X.; Liang, Q.F.; Abdul, Q.; Rashid, A.; Ren, X.F.; Ma, H.L. Preparation technology and preservation mechanism of γ-CD-MOFs biaological packaging film loaded with curcumin. Food Chem. 2023, 420, 136142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhang, L.; He, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, Z. Highly sensitive ratiometric fluorescence detection of tetracycline residues in food samples based on Eu/Zr-MOF. Food Chem. 2024, 436, 137717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Tang, X.; Zhao, S.; Wu, J.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, K.; Zou, Z.; Xiong, X. Construction of rose flower-like NiCo-LDH electrode derived from bimetallic MOF for highly sensitive electrochemical sensing of hydrazine in food samples. Food Chem. 2023, 427, 136648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Liu, C.; Lin, L.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.; Huang, R.; Chen, W.; Li, S.; Wan, J.; Zou, J.; Yu, C. Site-specific growth of MOF-on-MOF heterostructures with controllable nano-architectures: Beyond the combination of MOF analogues. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 3680–3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Qin, Y.Y.; Yu, H.D.; Chen, K.J.; Cui, R.; Cao, J.X.; Wang, Z.X.; Zhang, Z.H.; Soteyome, T. Effects of chitosan/eugenol-loaded IRMOF-3 nanoparticles composite films on reactive oxygen species metabolism and microbial community dynamics in postharvest strawberries. Food Biosci. 2025, 63, 105652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Akhade, S.A.; Singh, N.; Gutiérrez, O.Y.; Lopez-Ruiz, J.; Wang, H.; Holladay, J.D.; Liu, Y.; Karkamkar, A.; Weber, R.S.; Padmaperuma, A.B.; et al. Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation of Biomass-Derived Organics: A Review. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 11370–11419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Howarth, A.J.; Liu, Y.; Li, P.; Li, Z.; Wang, T.C.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K. Chemical, thermal and mechanical stabilities of metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 15018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zou, M.; Dong, M.; Zhao, T. Advances in Metal-Organic Frameworks MIL-101(Cr). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Gu, X.-W.; Wu, E.; Wang, J.-X.; Wen, H.-M.; Chen, B.; Li, B.; Qian, G. Programmed fluorine binding engineering in anion-pillared metal-organic framework for record trace acetylene capture from ethylene. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadh0135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Loiseau, T.; Serre, C.; Huguenard, C.; Fink, G.; Taulelle, F.; Henry, M.; Bataille, T.; Férey, G. A rationale for the large breathing of the porous aluminum terephthalate (MIL-53) upon hydration. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1373–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Wang, S.; Liang, N.; Hu, X.; Li, W.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, X.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zou, X.; Shi, J. Carbon dots and covalent organic frameworks based FRET immunosensor for sensitive detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Food Chem. 2024, 447, 138663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Huang, A.-J.; Dong, X.-X.; Tan, S.; Chen, K.; Zhang, M.; Li, B.; Deng, H.; He, F.; Ni, H.; Wang, H.; et al. A covalent organic framework-derived pretreatment for pesticides in vegetables and fruits. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1472174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xia, J.J.; Liu, F.; Yan, L.S.; Suo, H.B.; Qian, J.Y.; Zou, B. Simultaneous determination of tert-butylhydroquinone, butylated hydroxyanisole and phenol in plant oil by metalloporphyrin-based covalent organic framework electrochemical sensor. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 122, 105486. [Google Scholar]
  175. Li, T.; Pan, Y.; Shao, B.; Zhang, X.; Wu, T.; He, Q.; He, M.; Ge, L.; Zhou, L.; Liu, S.; et al. Covalent–Organic Framework (COF)-Core–Shell Composites: Classification, Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2304990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhu, Y.; Chen, L.; Pan, J.; Jiang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, K. Recent advances in COF-derived carbon materials: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2025, 148, 101373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Gao, L.; Li, Y.; Liao, Y.; Meng, J.; Cui, Y.; Li, Z.; et al. Interface interaction modulates charge transfer in flower-like In2S3 nanosheets/COF composite for efficient solar-to-H2O2 conversion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 358, 130374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Niu, L.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Z.; Wu, F.; Lei, Q.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Liang, W.; Wang, X. Solid-solid synthesis of covalent organic framework as a support for growth of controllable ultrafine Au nanoparticles. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zou, J.; Liang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y.; Pan, F.; et al. Electrochemical Interfacial Polymerization toward Ultrathin COF Membranes for Brine Desalination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202219084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Sun, N.; Jin, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, B.; Wang, R.; Wu, H.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, J. Photoresponsive Covalent Organic Frameworks with Diarylethene Switch for Tunable Singlet Oxygen Generation. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 1956–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Essalhi, M.; Mahmoud, E.-H.; Tayeb, A.; Al-Qahtani, R.A.; Farooqi, A.S.; Abdelnaby, M. Structural design of covalent organic frameworks and their recent advancements in carbon capture applications: A review. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2025, 14, 100370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Dai, S.; Zhao, C.; Ma, C.; Wei, L.; Zhu, M.; Chong, S.Y.; Yang, H.; Liu, L.; et al. Reconstructed covalent organic frameworks. Nature 2022, 604, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Li, X.; Ji, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Huo, F.; Zhang, W. Construction of functional covalent organic framework films by modulator and solvent induced polymerization. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Anjana, P.N.; Pulikkal, A.K. Synthesis, derivation, and applications of imine-linked covalent organic frameworks: A comprehensive review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2025, 387, 11356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Kusaka, S.; Negita, K.; Usadi, A.K.; Calabro, D.C.; Baugh, L.S.; Wang, Y.; Zou, X.; Huang, Z.; et al. Covalent organic framework atropisomers with multiple gas-triggered structural flexibilities. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xia, J.; Li, Z.; Ding, Y.; Shah, L.A.; Zhao, H.; Ye, D.; Zhang, J. Construction and Application of Nanozyme Sensor Arrays. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 8221–8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Chen, Z.J.; Huang, A.J.; Dong, X.X.; Zhang, Y.F.; Zhu, L.; Luo, L.; Xu, Z.L.; Wang, H.W. A simple and sensitive fluoroimmunoassay based on the nanobody-alkaline phosphatase fusion protein for the rapid detection of fenitrothion. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 1320931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Hu, X.T.; Shi, J.Y.; Shi, Y.Q.; Zou, X.B.; Arslan, M.; Zhang, W.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Xu, Y.W. Use of a smartphone for visual detection of melamine in milk based on Au@Carbon quantum dots nanocomposites. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Li, Y.Q.; Luo, S.L.; Sun, L.; Kong, D.Z.; Sheng, J.G.; Wang, K.; Dong, C.W. A Green, Simple, and Rapid Detection for Amaranth in Candy Samples Based on the Fluorescence Quenching of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 1658–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Wang, P.Y.; Li, H.H.; Hassan, M.M.; Guo, Z.M.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Chen, Q.S. Fabricating an Acetylcholinesterase Modulated UCNPs-Cu2+ Fluorescence Biosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Organophosphorus Pesticides-Diazinon in Food. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 4071–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Dong, X.X.; Huang, A.; He, L.L.; Cai, C.Y.; You, T.Y. Recent advances in foodborne pathogen detection using photoelectrochemical biosensors: From photoactive material to sensing strategy. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2024, 8, 1432555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Mu, M.; Wen, S.; Hu, S.; Zhao, B.; Song, W. Putting surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy to work for nanozyme research: Methods, materials and applications. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 152, 116603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.C.; Yin, L.M.; Picchetti, P.; Yang, T.X.; Zhou, R.Y.; Zhao, C.P.; Xue, S.S.; Zhang, Z.P.; Zou, X.B.; et al. Competitive binding strategy for reliable signal-off surface enhanced Raman scattering sensing in protecting apples from patulin without external interference. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 139, 107052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Jiang, L.; Wei, W.Y.; Liu, S.S.; Haruna, S.A.; Zareef, M.; Ahmad, W.; Hassan, M.M.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. A tailorable and recyclable TiO2 NFSF/Ti@Ag NPs SERS substrate fabricated by a facile method and its applications in prohibited fish drugs detection. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 2890–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Hassan, M.M.; Li, H.H.; Ahmad, W.; Zareef, M.; Wang, J.J.; Xie, S.C.; Wang, P.Y.; Ouyang, Q.; Wang, S.Y.; Chen, Q.S. Au@Ag nanostructure based SERS substrate for simultaneous determination of pesticides residue in tea via solid phase extraction coupled multivariate calibration. LWT 2019, 105, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Dang, P.; Liu, X.; Ju, H.; Wu, J. Intensive and Persistent Chemiluminescence System Based on Nano-/Bioenzymes with Local Tandem Catalysis and Surface Diffusion. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 5517–5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Gao, S.P.; Yang, W.H.; Zheng, X.Y.; Wang, T.X.; Zhang, D.; Zou, X.B. Advances of nanobody-based immunosensors for detecting food contaminants. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 156, 104871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Kang, W.; Lin, H.; Yao-Say Solomon Adade, S.; Wang, Z.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q. Advanced sensing of volatile organic compounds in the fermentation of kombucha tea extract enabled by nano-colorimetric sensor array based on density functional theory. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lin, H.; Lin, J.J.; Man, Z.X.; Jin, H.J.; Kutsanedzie, F.Y.H.; Chen, Q.S. Development of Colorimetric Detection of 2,4,5-Trimethyloxazole in Volatile Organic Compounds Based on Porphyrin Complexes for Vinegar Storage Time Discrimination. Food Anal. Methods 2020, 13, 2192–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Jiang, H.; Lin, H.; Lin, J.J.; Adade, S.; Chen, Q.S.; Xue, Z.L.; Chan, C.M. Non-destructive detection of multi-component heavy metals in corn oil using nano-modified colorimetric sensor combined with near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Control 2022, 133, 108640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Yu, S.S.; Huang, X.Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.N.; Jiao, X.Y.; Chang, X.H.; Tian, X.Y.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, X.R. Characterization of the volatile flavor profiles of black garlic using nanomaterial-based colorimetric sensor array, HS-SPME-GC/MS coupled with chemometrics strategies. Food Chem. 2024, 458, 140213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Zhang, Z.P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.J.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Gomez, P.L.; Alzamora, S.M.; Zou, X.B.; Guo, Z.M. Enhanced composite Co-MOF-derived sodium carboxymethyl cellulose visual films for real-time and in situ monitoring fresh-cut apple freshness. Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 157, 10475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Han, F.K.; Huang, X.Y.; Teye, E. Novel prediction of heavy metal residues in fish using a low-cost optical electronic tongue system based on colorimetric sensors array. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e12983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Lin, H.; Yan, S.; Song, B.T.; Wang, Z.; Sun, L. Discrimination of aged rice using colorimetric sensor array combined with volatile organic compounds. J. Food Process Eng. 2019, 42, e13037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Zhu, W.R.; Li, L.B.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, X.D.; Hao, N.; Guo, Y.S.; Wang, K. A colorimetric biosensor for simultaneous ochratoxin A and aflatoxins B1 detection in agricultural products. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, N.F.; Dong, S.B.; Huang, M.L.; Yang, L.Q.; Wu, X.Y.; Liu, Z.J.; Jiang, J.H.; Zou, Y.M. Plasmonic ELISA Based on Nanospherical Brush-Induced Signal Amplification for the Ultrasensitive Naked-Eye Simultaneous Detection of the Typical Tetrabromobisphenol A Derivative and Byproduct. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2996–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Wang, X.Y.; Zhai, X.D.; Zou, X.B.; Li, Z.H.; Shi, J.Y.; Yang, Z.K.; Sun, Y.; Arslan, M.; Chen, Z.Y.; Xiao, J.B. Novel hydrophobic colorimetric films based on ethylcellulose/castor oil/anthocyanins for pork freshness monitoring. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 164, 113631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Li, H.H.; Bei, Q.Y.; Li, B.S.; Haruna, S.A.; Marimuthu, M.; Hassan, M.; Ding, Z.; Chen, Q.S. A novel enzymatic biosensor for CIP in food based on UCNPs and colorimetric strategy of potassium titanium oxalate. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 125, 105827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Wahia, H.; Zhou, C.S.; Sarpong, F.; Mustapha, A.T.; Liu, S.L.; Yu, X.J.; Li, C. Simultaneous optimization of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris reduction, pectin methylesterase inactivation, and bioactive compounds enhancement affected by thermosonication in orange juice. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Hao, D.N.; Tu, X.H.; Zhang, X.X.; Guo, S.Y.; Sun, L.G.; Li, J.L.; Wang, D.Y.; Xu, W.M.; Li, P.P. Effects of proteases inactivation on textural quality of yellow-feathered chicken meat and the possible mechanism based on myofibrillar protein. Food Control 2024, 166, 110731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Cao, H.W.; Wang, X.X.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Yu, Z.Q.; Battino, M.; El-Seedi, H.; Guan, X. Mechanistic insights into the changes of enzyme activity in food processing under microwave irradiation. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 2465–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Lu, Y.Z.; Wang, F.Y.; Luo, H.; He, W.W.; Li, D.J.; Bao, Y.H.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhou, C.S. Changes in phytochemical profiles, relevant enzyme activity and antioxidant capacity of different germinated maize varieties. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wang, Y.; Shoaib, M.; Wang, J.Y.; Lin, H.; Chen, Q.S.; Ouyang, Q. A novel ZIF-8 mediated nanocomposite colorimetric sensor array for rapid identification of matcha grades, validated by density functional theory. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2025, 137, 106864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Li, H.H.; Hu, W.W.; Hassan, M.M.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Chen, Q.S. A facile and sensitive SERS-based biosensor for colormetric detection of acetamiprid in green tea based on unmodified gold nanoparticles. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Li, Z.H.; Zhou, X.C.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Huang, X.W.; Tahir, H.E. Preparation of conducting polyaniline/protoporphyrin composites and their application for sensing VOCs. Food Chem. 2019, 276, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Suo, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, R.; Shen, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Wei, M.; He, B.; Jin, H. A bifunctional MXene@PtPd NPs cascade DNAzyme-mediated fluorescence/colorimetric dual-mode biosensor for Pb2+ determination. Food Chem. 2025, 464, 141845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Ge, J.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, H.; Deng, R.; Li, Z.; Yang, Y. Smartphone-assisted colorimetric sensor based on single-atom Cu–C–N nanozyme for mercury (II) ions detection. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 37, 102037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Lin, H.; Chen, Z.Y.; Adade, S.; Yang, W.J.; Chen, Q.S. Detection of Maize Mold Based on a Nanocomposite Colorimetric Sensor Array under Different Substrates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 11164–11173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Wu, F.; Wang, H.; Lv, J.; Shi, X.; Wu, L.; Niu, X. Colorimetric sensor array based on Au2Pt nanozymes for antioxidant nutrition quality evaluation in food. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 236, 115417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Li, F.; Jiang, J.; Peng, H.; Li, C.; Li, B.; He, J. Platinum nanozyme catalyzed multichannel colorimetric sensor array for identification and detection of pesticides. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 369, 132334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Li, R.; He, X.; Javed, R.; Cai, J.; Cao, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, Q.; Ye, D.; Zhao, H. Switching on-off-on colorimetric sensor based on Fe-N/S-C single-atom nanozyme for ultrasensitive and multimodal detection of Hg2+. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 834, 155428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Razavi, M.; Barras, A.; Ifires, M.; Swaidan, A.; Khoshkam, M.; Szunerits, S.; Kompany-Zareh, M.; Boukherroub, R. Colorimetric assay for the detection of dopamine using bismuth ferrite oxide (Bi2Fe4O9) nanoparticles as an efficient peroxidase-mimic nanozyme. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 613, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Gai, P.; Pu, L.; Wang, C.; Zhu, D.; Li, F. CeO2@NC nanozyme with robust dephosphorylation ability of phosphotriester: A simple colorimetric assay for rapid and selective detection of paraoxon. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 220, 114841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Shi, B.; Zhang, X.; Li, W.; Liang, N.; Hu, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, D.; Zou, X.; Shi, J. An intrinsic dual-emitting fluorescence sensing toward tetracycline with self-calibration model based on luminescent lanthanide-functionalized metal-organic frameworks. Food Chem. 2023, 400, 133995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Gu, H.Y.; Dong, Y.N.; Lv, R.Q.; Huang, X.Y.; Chen, Q.S. Rapid quantification of acid value in frying oil using iron tetraphenylporphyrin fluorescent sensor coupled with density functional theory and multivariate analysis. Food Qual. Saf. 2022, 6, fyac046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Hassan, M.M.; Xu, Y.; Zareef, M.; Li, H.H.; Rong, Y.W.; Chen, Q.S. Recent advances of nanomaterial-based optical sensor for the detection of benzimidazole fungicides in food: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 2851–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Sharma, A.S.; Marimuthu, M.; Varghese, A.W.; Wu, J.Z.; Xu, J.; Luo, X.F.; Devaraj, S.; Lan, Y.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. A review of biomolecules conjugated lanthanide up-conversion nanoparticles-based fluorescence probes in food safety and quality monitoring applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 6129–6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Fang, X.C.; Liu, T.T.; Xue, C.; Xue, G.J.; Wu, M.Y.; Liu, P.Y.; Hammock, B.D.; Lai, W.H.; Peng, J.; Zhang, C.Z. Competitive ratiometric fluorescent lateral flow immunoassay based on dual emission signal for sensitive detection of chlorothalonil. Food Chem. 2024, 433, 137200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Song, W.J.; Zhai, X.D.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Xue, Y.H.; Sun, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhang, J.J.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; et al. A ratiometric fluorescence amine sensor based on carbon quantum dot-loaded electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride film for visual monitoring of food freshness. Food Chem. 2024, 434, 137423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Zhang, X.Y.; Yu, X.Z.; Wang, J.Y.; Wang, Q.; Meng, H.; Wang, Z.H. One-Step Core/Multishell Quantum Dots-Based Fluoroimmunoassay for Screening of Deoxynivalenol in Maize. Food Anal. Methods 2018, 11, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Yin, M.M.; Wang, W.J.; Wei, J.; Chen, X.M.; Chen, Q.S.; Chen, X.; Oyama, M. Novel dual-emissive fluorescent immunoassay for synchronous monitoring of okadaic acid and saxitoxin in shellfish. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Sun, Y.; Zhai, X.D.; Zou, X.B.; Shi, J.Y.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H. A Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on Silicon Quantum Dots and Silver Nanoclusters for Beef Freshness Monitoring. Foods 2023, 12, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Wang, C.Q.; Gu, C.D.; Zhao, X.; Yu, S.S.; Zhang, X.R.; Xu, F.Y.; Ding, L.J.; Huang, X.Y.; Qian, J. Self-designed portable dual-mode fluorescence device with custom python-based analysis software for rapid detection via dual-color FRET aptasensor with IoT capabilities. Food Chem. 2024, 457, 140190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Sun, H.; Su, X. Fluorescence sensing strategy for xanthine assay based on gold nanoclusters and nanozyme. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 358, 131488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Li, J.; Li, L.; Bi, X.; Liu, X.; Luo, L.; You, T. Fluorescence/colorimetry dual-mode sensing strategy for mercury ion detection based on the quenching effect and nanozyme activity of porous cerium oxide nanorod. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 360, 131483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Bi, X.Y.; Li, L.B.; Liu, X.H.; Luo, L.J.; Cheng, Z.L.; Sun, J.Y.; Cai, Z.B.; Liu, J.M.; You, T.Y. Inner filter effect-modulated ratiometric fluorescence aptasensor based on competition strategy for zearalenone detection in cereal crops: Using mitoxantrone as quencher of CdTe QDs@SiO2. Food Chem. 2021, 349, 129170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Zhao, X.-E.; Zuo, Y.-N.; Xia, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhu, S.; Xu, G. Multifunctional NH2-Cu-MOF based ratiometric fluorescence assay for discriminating catechol from its isomers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 371, 132548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Liao, X.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Chen, Y. Boric acid functionalized Fe3O4@CeO2/Tb-MOF as a luminescent nanozyme for fluorescence detection and degradation of caffeic acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 264, 116637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Okeke, E.S.; Ezeorba, T.P.C.; Okoye, C.O.; Chen, Y.; Mao, G.; Feng, W.; Wu, X. Analytical detection methods for azo dyes: A focus on comparative limitations and prospects of bio-sensing and electrochemical nano-detection. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 114, 104778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Zhang, W.; Liu, C.; Liu, F.H.; Zou, X.B.; Xu, Y.W.; Xu, X.C. A smart-phone-based electrochemical platform with programmable solid-state-microwave flow digestion for determination of heavy metals in liquid food. Food Chem. 2020, 303, 125378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Gao, L.Y.; Li, Z.H.; Wei, X.O.; Hao, M.Y.; Song, W.J.; Zou, X.B.; Huang, X.W. A cell-based electrochemical biosensor for the detection of capsaicin. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2024, 18, 9341–9352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Liu, Z.J.; Wang, L.; Liu, P.F.; Zhao, K.R.; Ye, S.Y.; Liang, G.X. Rapid, ultrasensitive and non-enzyme electrochemiluminescence detection of hydrogen peroxide in food based on the ssDNA/g-C3N4 nanosheets hybrid. Food Chem. 2021, 357, 129753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Zhou, W.S.; Li, C.H.; Sun, C.; Yang, X.D. Simultaneously determination of trace Cd2+ and Pb2+ based on L-cysteine/graphene modified glassy carbon electrode. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Xu, Y.W.; Zhang, W.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Li, Z.H.; Zhu, Y.D. Microfabricated interdigitated Au electrode for voltammetric determination of lead and cadmium in Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Food Chem. 2016, 201, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Lai, J.J.; Ding, L.J.; Liu, Y.; Fan, C.H.; You, F.H.; Wei, J.; Qian, J.; Wang, K. A miniaturized organic photoelectrochemical transistor aptasensor based on nanorod arrays toward high-sensitive T-2 toxin detection in milk samples. Food Chem. 2023, 423, 136285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Wang, F.; Zhu, Y.; Qian, L.; Yin, Y.H.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Dai, Y.T.; Zhang, T.; Yang, D.Y.; Qiu, F.X. Lamellar Ti3C2MXene composite decorated with platinum-doped MoS2 nanosheets as electrochemical sensing functional platform for highly sensitive analysis of organophosphorus pesticides. Food Chem. 2024, 459, 140379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Wang, M.; He, B.; Xie, L.; Cao, X.; Ren, W.; Suo, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wei, M.; Jin, H. MOF-derived Mn, N Co-doped Co-C nanomaterials and exo I-driven dual signal amplification for sensitive detection of florfenicol using an electrochemical aptasensor. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 501, 157782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Xu, X.; Xu, D.; Lu, S.; Zhou, X.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Z. Atomically dispersed recognition unit for selective in vivo photoelectrochemical medicine detection. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Qin, C.C.; Guo, W.L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.C.; Qiu, J.; Peng, J.B. A Novel Electrochemical Sensor Based on Graphene Oxide Decorated with Silver Nanoparticles-Molecular Imprinted Polymers for Determination of Sunset Yellow in Soft Drinks. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 2293–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Xu, Y.W.; Zhang, W.; Shi, J.Y.; Zou, X.B.; Li, Y.X.; Tahir, H.E.; Huang, X.W.; Li, Z.H.; Zhai, X.D.; Hu, X.T. Electrodeposition of gold nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide on an electrode for fast and sensitive determination of methylmercury in fish. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Wu, J.; Yang, Q.; Li, Q.; Li, H.; Li, F. Two-Dimensional MnO2 Nanozyme-Mediated Homogeneous Electrochemical Detection of Organophosphate Pesticides without the Interference of H2O2 and Color. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 4084–4091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Wei, X.; Guo, J.; Lian, H.; Sun, X.; Liu, B. Cobalt metal-organic framework modified carbon cloth/paper hybrid electrochemical button-sensor for nonenzymatic glucose diagnostics. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Wang, G.; Liu, J.; Dong, H.; Geng, L.; Sun, J.; Liu, J.; Dong, J.; Guo, Y.; Sun, X. A dual-mode biosensor featuring single-atom Fe nanozyme for multi-pesticide detection in vegetables. Food Chem. 2024, 437, 137882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. He, Q.; Wang, B.; Liu, J.; Li, G.; Long, Y.; Zhang, G.; Liu, H. Nickel/nitrogen-doped carbon nanocomposites: Synthesis and electrochemical sensor for determination of p-nitrophenol in local environment. Environ. Res. 2022, 214, 114007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Wang, W.; Zhao, Z.; Lei, Q.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhuiykov, S.; Zhang, W.; Hu, J. Constructing and electrochemical performance of AuNPs decorated MIL-53 (Fe, Ni) MOFs–derived nanostructures for highly sensitive hydrazine detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 596, 153573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Sun, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, L.; Shi, B.; Sun, Y.; Shi, J.; Battino, M.; Wang, G.; Wang, W.; Zou, X. A novel strategy based on dynamic surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy (D-SERS) for the discrimination and quantification of hydroxyl-sanshools in the pericarps of genus Zanthoxylum. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 183, 114940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Yang, Z.; Zhu, A.; Adade, S.Y.-S.S.; Ali, S.; Chen, Q.; Wei, J.; Chen, X.; Jiao, T.; Chen, Q. Ag@Au core–shell nanoparticle-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering coupled with chemometrics for rapid determination of chloramphenicol residue in fish. Food Chem. 2024, 438, 138026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Guo, Z.M.; Chen, P.; Yosri, N.; Chen, Q.S.; Elseedi, H.R.; Zou, X.B.; Yang, H.S. Detection of Heavy Metals in Food and Agricultural Products by Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 1440–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Hassan, M.M.; Zareef, M.; Jiao, T.H.; Liu, S.S.; Xu, Y.; Viswadevarayalu, A.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Signal optimized rough silver nanoparticle for rapid SERS sensing of pesticide residues in tea. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Wei, W.Y.; Hassan, M.M.; Wu, J.Z.; Mu, X.F.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Competitive Ratiometric Aptasensing with Core-Internal Standard- Shell Structure Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S.; Ouyang, Q.; Zhao, J.W. Fabricating a Novel Raman Spectroscopy-Based Aptasensor for Rapidly Sensing Salmonella typhimurium. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 3032–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Zhu, J.J.; Agyekum, A.A.; Kutsanedzie, F.Y.H.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S.; Ouyang, Q.; Jiang, H. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of chlorpyrifos residues in tea by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) combined with chemometric models. LWT 2018, 97, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Chen, Z.Y.; Sun, Y.; Shi, J.Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.A.; Huang, X.W.; Zou, X.B.; Li, Z.H.; Wei, R.C. Facile synthesis of Au@Ag core-shell nanorod with bimetallic synergistic effect for SERS detection of thiabendazole in fruit juice. Food Chem. 2022, 370, 131276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Sun, Y.; Zhang, N.; Han, C.; Chen, Z.Y.; Zhai, X.D.; Li, Z.H.; Zheng, K.Y.; Zhu, J.F.; Wang, X.; Zou, X.B.; et al. Competitive immunosensor for sensitive and optical anti-interference detection of imidacloprid by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Food Chem. 2021, 358, 129898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Yosri, N.; Gao, S.P.; Zhou, R.Y.; Wang, C.; Zou, X.B.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Guo, Z.M. Innovative quantum dots-based SERS for ultrasensitive reporting of contaminants in food: Fundamental concepts and practical implementations. Food Chem. 2025, 467, 142395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Zhai, W.L.; You, T.Y.; Ouyang, X.H.; Wang, M. Recent progress in mycotoxins detection based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2021, 20, 1887–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. He, P.H.; Hassan, M.M.; Yang, W.J.; Shi, Z.X.; Zhou, X.Y.; Xu, Y.; Ouyang, Q.; Chen, Q.S. Rapid and stable detection of three main mycotoxins in rice using SERS optimized AgNPs@K30 coupled multivariate calibration. Food Chem. 2023, 398, 133883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Adade, S.; Lin, H.; Johnson, N.A.N.; Nunekpeku, X.; Aheto, J.H.; Ekumah, J.N.; Kwadzokpui, B.A.; Teye, E.; Ahmad, W.; Chen, Q.S. Advanced food contaminant detection through multi-source data fusion: Strategies, applications, and future perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 156, 104851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Aheto, J.H.; Huang, X.Y.; Tian, X.Y.; Zhang, X.R.; Zhang, W.H.; Yu, S.S. Activated carbon@silver nanoparticles conjugates as SERS substrate for capturing malathion analyte molecules for SERS detection. J. Food Saf. 2023, 43, 13072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Adade, S.; Lin, H.; Johnson, N.A.N.; Sun, Q.Q.; Nunekpeku, X.; Ahmad, W.; Kwadzokpui, B.A.; Ekumah, J.N.; Chen, Q.S. Rapid qualitative and quantitative analysis of benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF) in shrimp using SERS-based sensor coupled with chemometric models. Food Chem. 2024, 454, 139836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Aheto, J.H.; Huang, X.Y.; Wang, C.Q.; Tian, X.Y.; Yi, R.; Wang, Y.N. Fabrication and evaluation of chitosan modified filter paper for chlorpyrifos detection in wheat by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 7323–7330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Xi, H.; Gu, H.; Han, Y.; You, T.; Wu, P.; Liu, Q.; Zheng, L.; Liu, S.; Fu, Q.; Chen, W.; et al. Peroxidase-like single Fe atoms anchored on Ti3C2Tx MXene as surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate for the simultaneous discrimination of multiple antioxidants. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 10053–10060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Chen, Q.; Yao, L.; Yao, B.; Meng, X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, Z.; Chen, W. Low-cost signal enhanced colorimetric and SERS dual-mode paper sensor for rapid and ultrasensitive screening of mercury ions in tea. Food Chem. 2025, 463, 141375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Xu, G.; Guo, N.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, T.; Song, P.; Xia, L. A sensitive surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering sensor with bifunctional negatively charged gold nanoparticles for the determination of Cr(VI). Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 830, 154598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Shaikh, N.; Som, N.N.; Jha, P.K.; Pamidimukkala, P. Chitosan supported silver nanostructures as surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor: Spectroscopic and density functional theory insights. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Zhu, Z.; Han, K.; Feng, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, A.; Wang, T.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, W. Biomimetic Ag/ZnO@PDMS Hybrid Nanorod Array-Mediated Photo-induced Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Sensor for Quantitative and Visualized Analysis of Microplastics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 36988–36998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  277. Zhang, B.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Fu, X.; Du, D. A sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassay based on immunomagnetic beads for quantitative detection of zearalenone. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021, 247, 2171–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Zhang, B.; Liu, W.; Liu, Z.; Fu, X.; Du, D. Establishment of a Chemiluminescence Immunoassay Combined with Immunomagnetic Beads for Rapid Analysis of Ochratoxin A. J. Aoac Int. 2022, 105, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Zhou, J.W.; Zou, X.M.; Song, S.H.; Chen, G.H. Quantum Dots Applied to Methodology on Detection of Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1307–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Zeng, K.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wei, D.L.; Huang, Z.; Cheng, S.Z.; Chen, J.Q. Chemiluminescence imaging immunoassay for multiple aminoglycoside antibiotics in cow milk. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Qiu, Y.L.; Li, P.; Liu, B.B.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Tao, T.T.; Xu, J.L.; Hammock, B.D.; Liu, X.J.; Guan, R.F.; et al. Phage-displayed nanobody based double antibody sandwich chemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of Cry2A toxin in cereals. Food Agric. Immunol. 2019, 30, 924–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Chang, J.; Yu, L.; Hou, T.; Hu, R.; Li, F. Direct and Specific Detection of Glyphosate Using a Phosphatase-like Nanozyme-Mediated Chemiluminescence Strategy. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 4479–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; He, J.; Wang, M.; Huang, H.; Nie, G.; Ding, H.; Yan, X. Rapid and sensitive detection of Epstein-Barr virus antibodies in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by chemiluminescence strips based on iron-porphyrin single atom nanozyme. Nano Res. 2023, 17, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Dong, Z.; Xia, S.; Alboull, A.M.A.; Mostafa, I.M.; Abdussalam, A.; Zhang, W.; Han, S.; Xu, G. Bimetallic CoMoO4 Nanozymes Enhanced Luminol Chemiluminescence for the Detection of Dopamine. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 2983–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Martínez-Pérez-Cejuela, H.; Calabretta, M.M.; Michelini, E. Chemiluminescence “Add-and-Measure” Sensing Paper Based on the Prussian Blue/Metal–Organic Framework MIL-101 Nanozyme for Rapid Hydrogen Peroxide Detection. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 16561–16569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Jia, Y.; Zhao, S.; Qu, Q.; Yang, L. Nano-channel confined biomimetic nanozyme/bioenzyme cascade reaction for long-lasting and intensive chemiluminescence. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 202, 114020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  287. Xu, Y.; Kutsanedzie, F.Y.H.; Hassan, M.; Zhu, J.J.; Ahmad, W.; Li, H.H.; Chen, Q.S. Mesoporous silica supported orderly-spaced gold nanoparticles SERS-based sensor for pesticides detection in food. Food Chem. 2020, 315, 126300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Guo, Z.; Gao, L.; Yin, L.; Arslan, M.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Zou, X. Novel mesoporous silica surface loaded gold nanocomposites SERS aptasensor for sensitive detection of zearalenone. Food Chem. 2023, 403, 134384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Ma, S.; Pan, L.G.; You, T.; Wang, K. g-C3N4/Fe3O4 Nanocomposites as Adsorbents Analyzed by UPLC-MS/MS for Highly Sensitive Simultaneous Determination of 27 Mycotoxins in Maize: Aiming at Increasing Purification Efficiency and Reducing Time. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 4874–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Liang, N.; Hu, X.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, J.; et al. A dual-signal fluorescent sensor based on MoS2 and CdTe quantum dots for tetracycline detection in milk. Food Chem. 2022, 378, 132076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Chen, X.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Bi, N.; Gou, J.; Zhu, T.; Jia, L. A novel intelligently integrated MOF-based ratio fluorescence sensor for ultra-sensitive monitoring of TC in water and food samples. Food Chem. 2023, 405, 134899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Liang, N.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, W.; Guo, Z.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, R.; Shen, T.; Zou, X.; et al. Ratiometric Sensing for Ultratrace Tetracycline Using Electrochemically Active Metal–Organic Frameworks as Response Signals. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 7584–7592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The timeline for the development of nanozymes [40].
Figure 1. The timeline for the development of nanozymes [40].
Foods 14 02580 g001
Figure 2. Catalytic kinetic activity of MOFs toward substrates: (A) Schematic diagram (Catalytic kinetic activity of ZiF-67 (a,d), unwashed MIP@MOF (b,e), washed MIP@MOF (c,f) as the substrates) [70] and (B) Mechanism diagram [69].
Figure 2. Catalytic kinetic activity of MOFs toward substrates: (A) Schematic diagram (Catalytic kinetic activity of ZiF-67 (a,d), unwashed MIP@MOF (b,e), washed MIP@MOF (c,f) as the substrates) [70] and (B) Mechanism diagram [69].
Foods 14 02580 g002
Figure 3. (A) Gold nanoparticle assembly guided by DNA origami templates [89]; (B) Etching to synthesize Pt nanocubes: (a) Schematic illustration for the growth process of PdAuNRs and (b) the compared route for other PdAu nanostructure [90]; (C) Selective deposition to form Pd-Au bimetallic nanocrystals [91]; (D) Electrochemical directional opportunity to form three-dimensional rhodium nanoframeworks [93].
Figure 3. (A) Gold nanoparticle assembly guided by DNA origami templates [89]; (B) Etching to synthesize Pt nanocubes: (a) Schematic illustration for the growth process of PdAuNRs and (b) the compared route for other PdAu nanostructure [90]; (C) Selective deposition to form Pd-Au bimetallic nanocrystals [91]; (D) Electrochemical directional opportunity to form three-dimensional rhodium nanoframeworks [93].
Foods 14 02580 g003
Figure 4. (A) Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles by pulsed laser ablation [111]; (B) Synthesis of Pt/TiO2 nanoparticles by hydrothermal/solvothermal method [113]; (C) Synthesis of OM-CeO2@C nanozymes by pyrolysis of MOFs precursors [114].
Figure 4. (A) Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles by pulsed laser ablation [111]; (B) Synthesis of Pt/TiO2 nanoparticles by hydrothermal/solvothermal method [113]; (C) Synthesis of OM-CeO2@C nanozymes by pyrolysis of MOFs precursors [114].
Foods 14 02580 g004
Figure 5. (A) Eu/Zr-MOF@TC [163] and (B) RF-Nico-LDH [164] synthesized by the hydrothermal method.
Figure 5. (A) Eu/Zr-MOF@TC [163] and (B) RF-Nico-LDH [164] synthesized by the hydrothermal method.
Foods 14 02580 g005
Figure 6. (A) Synthesis of In2S3/TpBpy COFs by solvothermal method [177]; (B) Synthesis of COFs at room temperature by ball milling [178]; (C) Preparation of ultrathin COF films by liquid–liquid interfacial self-assembly [179]; (D) Synthesis of photoresponsive COFs [180].
Figure 6. (A) Synthesis of In2S3/TpBpy COFs by solvothermal method [177]; (B) Synthesis of COFs at room temperature by ball milling [178]; (C) Preparation of ultrathin COF films by liquid–liquid interfacial self-assembly [179]; (D) Synthesis of photoresponsive COFs [180].
Foods 14 02580 g006
Figure 7. (A) Schematic diagram of antioxidant detection using Au2Pt bimetallic nanozyme arrays [219]; (B) Practical detection of pesticides using the inhibitory/enhancing effects of Pt NPs nanozymes (UV–vis absorbance spectra of the TMB-Pt NPs chromogenic system under different conditions for figures a, b, c, and d) [220]; (C) Schematic diagram of pesticide detection using the inhibitory/enhancing effects of Pt NPs nanozymes [221]; (D) Practical detection of organophosphorus pesticides using CeO2@NC nanozymes ((a) UV/Vis spectra change with various concentrations of paraoxon. (b) Standard curve for paraoxon detection. (c) Comparison of UV absorbance of different pesticides.(d) UV absorbance of paraoxon and parathion) [223].
Figure 7. (A) Schematic diagram of antioxidant detection using Au2Pt bimetallic nanozyme arrays [219]; (B) Practical detection of pesticides using the inhibitory/enhancing effects of Pt NPs nanozymes (UV–vis absorbance spectra of the TMB-Pt NPs chromogenic system under different conditions for figures a, b, c, and d) [220]; (C) Schematic diagram of pesticide detection using the inhibitory/enhancing effects of Pt NPs nanozymes [221]; (D) Practical detection of organophosphorus pesticides using CeO2@NC nanozymes ((a) UV/Vis spectra change with various concentrations of paraoxon. (b) Standard curve for paraoxon detection. (c) Comparison of UV absorbance of different pesticides.(d) UV absorbance of paraoxon and parathion) [223].
Foods 14 02580 g007
Figure 8. (A) Schematic diagram of xanthine detection using an ultrabright lysozyme-functionalized fluorescent probe ((a) Fabrication of MT-LZ@GNCs. (b) Fluorescence sensing strategy of MT-LZ@GNCs/Fe/C NS) [234]; (B) Schematic diagram of catechol detection by NH2-Cu-MOF ratiometric fluorescence [237]; (C) Schematic diagram of the degradation mechanism for Fe3O4@CeO2/Tb-MOF magnetic fluorescent nanozyme detection [238].
Figure 8. (A) Schematic diagram of xanthine detection using an ultrabright lysozyme-functionalized fluorescent probe ((a) Fabrication of MT-LZ@GNCs. (b) Fluorescence sensing strategy of MT-LZ@GNCs/Fe/C NS) [234]; (B) Schematic diagram of catechol detection by NH2-Cu-MOF ratiometric fluorescence [237]; (C) Schematic diagram of the degradation mechanism for Fe3O4@CeO2/Tb-MOF magnetic fluorescent nanozyme detection [238].
Foods 14 02580 g008
Figure 9. (A) Detection of organophosphorus pesticides using MnO2 nanosheet-based homogeneous electrochemical sensors [251]; (B) Construction of smartphone-assisted dual-mode biosensors using SA-Fe-NZ [253]; (C) Detection of p-nitrophenol using Ni-NCs/PEI composites [254]; (D) Detection of hydrazine by electrodepositing gold nanoparticles on MIL-53 (Fe, Ni) MOF-derived nanostructures [255].
Figure 9. (A) Detection of organophosphorus pesticides using MnO2 nanosheet-based homogeneous electrochemical sensors [251]; (B) Construction of smartphone-assisted dual-mode biosensors using SA-Fe-NZ [253]; (C) Detection of p-nitrophenol using Ni-NCs/PEI composites [254]; (D) Detection of hydrazine by electrodepositing gold nanoparticles on MIL-53 (Fe, Ni) MOF-derived nanostructures [255].
Foods 14 02580 g009
Figure 10. (A) Detection of antioxidants using Fe-SA/Ti3C2Tx nanozyme-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [272]; (B) Dual-mode paper sensor based on AuNPs/4-MPy for Hg2+ detection [273]; (C) Detection of Cr (VI) by dual-functional AuNPs-catalyzed oxidation of TMB [274]; (D) Detection of microplastics using biomimetic Ag/ZnO nanorod arrays [276].
Figure 10. (A) Detection of antioxidants using Fe-SA/Ti3C2Tx nanozyme-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [272]; (B) Dual-mode paper sensor based on AuNPs/4-MPy for Hg2+ detection [273]; (C) Detection of Cr (VI) by dual-functional AuNPs-catalyzed oxidation of TMB [274]; (D) Detection of microplastics using biomimetic Ag/ZnO nanorod arrays [276].
Foods 14 02580 g010
Table 1. Comparison between natural enzymes [56,57,58,59] and nanozymes [60,61,62].
Table 1. Comparison between natural enzymes [56,57,58,59] and nanozymes [60,61,62].
CharacteristicsNatural EnzymesNanozymes
High catalytic activity
High Substrate Selectivity×
Good Biocompatibility
Broad Biocatalytic Scope
Genetic/Protein Engineering×
High Cost×
Limited Stability×
Difficult Long-Term Storage×
Recyclability×
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, R.; Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Q.; El-Mesery, H.S.; Lu, W.; Dai, X.; Xu, R. Advances in Nanozyme Catalysis for Food Safety Detection: A Comprehensive Review on Progress and Challenges. Foods 2025, 14, 2580. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152580

AMA Style

Yang R, Liu Z, Chen H, Zhang X, Sun Q, El-Mesery HS, Lu W, Dai X, Xu R. Advances in Nanozyme Catalysis for Food Safety Detection: A Comprehensive Review on Progress and Challenges. Foods. 2025; 14(15):2580. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Renqing, Zeyan Liu, Haili Chen, Xinai Zhang, Qing Sun, Hany S. El-Mesery, Wenjie Lu, Xiaoli Dai, and Rongjin Xu. 2025. "Advances in Nanozyme Catalysis for Food Safety Detection: A Comprehensive Review on Progress and Challenges" Foods 14, no. 15: 2580. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152580

APA Style

Yang, R., Liu, Z., Chen, H., Zhang, X., Sun, Q., El-Mesery, H. S., Lu, W., Dai, X., & Xu, R. (2025). Advances in Nanozyme Catalysis for Food Safety Detection: A Comprehensive Review on Progress and Challenges. Foods, 14(15), 2580. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14152580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop