From Local Crafts to Market Niches: The Marketing Potential of Artisanal Foods in Ukraine
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- The current state of the market of artisanal agricultural foods in Ukraine was studied. Descriptive and graphical methods were used to examine the development of the artisanal agricultural food market in Ukraine. This study relied on data from an open-access database [22], focusing on officially registered business entities. Additionally, a qualitative analysis of available company profiles and reported activities was conducted to identify key patterns, regional characteristics, and product types.
- The main types of artisanal agricultural foods in Ukraine were identified, individual industries and production areas were selected and ranked, and Ukrainian regions were ranked based on the production of certain artisanal foods. The share of each area in the total sales of artisanal agricultural foods was determined based on the number of producers of artisanal products and the types of products in a particular region.
- The potential for developing the artisanal and agricultural foods market in Ukraine was determined. Descriptive and graphical research methods were used to analyze the potential for expanding the market for artisanal and agricultural foods in Ukraine. The information base for this analysis was data from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine in the context of livestock and crop production, as well as the relevant statistical information necessary for the study of aggregate groupings. Information available on groupings of farms by number of farm animals as of 1 January 2022 was used. Additionally, the following information was used: ratio of farms to households; sales of farm animals for slaughter and milk production by households based on region, as a percentage of the total; and ratio of the volume of produced products to purchased products (fruits, berries, and grapes, including canned and dried products) by households in 2021, as a percentage of the annual balance of products by region.
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Morais, L. Craft, rural revitalization, and transnationalism preliminary findings concerning three case studies in shimane, shizuoka, and Tochigi, Japan. In The Twelfth International Convention of Asia Scholars (ICAS 12), Kyoto, Japan, 24 August 2022; Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, X.; Walker, S.; Hernandez-Pardo, R.; Evans, M. Craft and sustainability: Potential for design intervention in crafts in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Des. J. 2017, 20 (Suppl. S1), 2919–2934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakshana, S.; Sriram, V.; Muktha, K.; Magesh Kumar, B. Community Crafts Hub: Fostering Local Economic Growth Through Artisan Empowerment. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2024, 12, 816–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckley, C.D. Craft Traditions (for Oxford Handbook of Cultural Evolution); Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cipollaro, M.; Fabbrizzi, S.; Sottini, V.A.; Fabbri, B.; Menghini, S. Linking sustainability, embeddedness and marketing strategies: A study on the craft beer sector in Italy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prados-Peña, M.B.; Gálvez-Sánchez, F.J.; García-López, A. Moving toward sustainable development: Social, economic and environmental value as antecedents of purchase intention in the sustainable crafts sector. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 31, 3024–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arroyo, C.G.; Knollenberg, W.; Barbieri, C. Inputs and outputs of craft beverage tourism: The destination resources acceleration framework. Ann. Tour. Res. 2021, 86, 103102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanungo, P.; Sethi, N.; Biswal, P. Socio-economic condition, welfare schemes, and occupational structure of ‘pattachitra’ artisans in Odisha, India. Creat. Ind. J. 2021, 14, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deconinck, K.; Swinnen, J. The size of terroir: A theoretical note on economics and politics of geographical indications. J. Agric. Econ. 2021, 72, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, S. Sustainable Lifestyle: A Path towards Environmental Sustainability and Sustainable Development. Manag. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafi, M.; Szopik-Depczyńska, K.; Cheba, K.; Ciliberto, C.; Depczyński, R.; Ioppolo, G. Innovation in traditional handicraft companies towards sustainable development. A systematic literature review. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2022, 28, 1589–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehnem, S.; Piekas, A.; Dal Magro, C.B.; Fabris, J.; Leite, A. Public policies, management strategies, and the sustainable and competitive management model in handicrafts. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opendatabot Web Platform. (n.d.). Available online: https://opendatabot.ua (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Swar, B.N.; Pandit, A. A Comprehensive Analysis of Consumer Preferences, Trends, and Implications Regarding Food Packaging and Consumer Behaviour. SSRN 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biryukova, T.V.; Ashmarina, T.I.; Yagudaeva, N.A.; Sergeyeva, N.V.; Enkina, C.V. Shaping Buying Behavior with Regard to Food Selection and Consumption. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Sustainable Development and Green Economy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salazar-Ordóñez, M.; Rodríguez-Entrena, M. Hybridizing Consumer Behavioural Approaches on Agrifood Markets: Attitudes, Judgements and Choices. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 17, 0109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bravo, I.; Colamatteo, I.; Balzano, S.; Cappelli, L.; Iannucci, E. Consumer Behaviour Regarding Certified Food. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, S. Some Consumers Confused About Organic. Baking Business. 2025. Available online: https://www.bakingbusiness.com/articles/63474-some-consumers-confused-about-organic (accessed on 30 May 2025).
- Reitsamer, B.F.; Brunner-Sperdin, A. It’s All about the Brand: Place Brand Credibility, Place Attachment, and Consumer Loyalty. J. Brand Manag. 2021, 28, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkissoon, H. Perceived Visitor Impacts of Cultural Heritage Tourism: The Role of Place Attachment in Memorable Visitor Experiences. In Handbook on the Tourist Experience; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2022; pp. 166–175. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H. Consumer Behavior and Environmental Sustainability in Tourism and Hospitality: A Review of Theories, Concepts, and Latest Research. In Sustainable Consumer Behaviour and the Environment; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalinichenko, L.L. Problems of craft activity development in Ukraine. Econ. Time Realities 2022, 5, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carolan, M. More-than-active food citizens: A longitudinal and comparative study of alternative and conventional eaters. Rural. Sociol. 2017, 82, 197–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weiler, A.M. Seeing the workers for the trees: Exalted and devalued manual labour in the Pacific Northwest craft cider industry. Agric. Hum. 2022, 39, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radic, I.; Carrà, G.; Peri, I. Potential for European small-scale producers of olive oil in the market based on consumers’ preferences. Calitatea 2015, 16, 187. [Google Scholar]
- Pépin, A.; Morel, K.; van der Werf, M.G. Conventionalised vs. agroecological practices on organic vegetable farms: Investigating the influence of farm structure in a bifurcation perspective. Agric. Systems. 2021, 190, 103129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pop, C.; Scripnic, E.; Lăpuşneanu, D.M. Analysis of the implementation of quality schemes of food products in the European union. Lucr. Științifice-Univ. Științe Agric. Med. Vet. Ser. Zooteh. 2017, 67, 114–118. [Google Scholar]
- Osadchuk, I.; Bolila, S.; Kyrychenko, N. The development of craft organic family farming as a direction for overcoming rural unemployment. Eff. Econ. 2020, 4, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco-Penedo, I.; Sjöström, K.; Jones, P.; Krieger, M.; Duval, J.; van Soest, F.; Sundrum, A.; Emanuelson, U. Structural characteristics of organic dairy farms in four European countries and their association with the implementation of animal health plans. Agric. Syst. 2019, 173, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arbolino, R.; Carlucci, F.; De Simone, L.; Ioppolo, G.; Yigitcanlar, T. The policy diffusion of environmental performance in the European countries. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 89, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law of Ukraine No. 2740-VIII-VR. On the Basic Principles and Requirements for Organic Production, Circulation and Labeling of Organic Products. 2019. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2496-19#Text (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Krasnorutskyy, O. Branding and craft technologies of agricultural farms: A strategic aspect. Bull. Khmelnytsky Natl. Univ. 2023, 2, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bozhko, N.; Tyshhenko, V.; Pasichnyj, V.; Klymenko, V. Prospects for Craft Production of Combined Meat Products. 2020. Available online: https://repo.snau.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/8426/1/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B8%20%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%84%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%20%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Strashynsjka, L.V. Current Trends in the Domestic Beer Market. Available online: https://dspace.nuft.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/31767/1/01.07.20-17.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Denysenko, M.P.; Melnyk, A.O.; Zinoruk, L.V. Branding as a factor of increasing the efficiency of the enterprise. Eff. Econ. 2019, 11, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Authentic Tastes of Ivano-Frankivsk Region. A Gastronomic Guide. 2021. Available online: https://www.if.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/24/documentu-2021/gastronomichniy-putivnik-if.pdf (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Belber, B.G.; Duman, D. Sürdürülebilir turizmde geleneksel el sanatları ürünlerinin rolü ve önemi: Hatay ilinde bir araştırma. Türk Tur. Araştırmaları Derg. 2023, 7, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babajanc, O. Craft Winemaking—Time Is Running Out. The Issue Needs to Be Addressed Urgently. AgroONE, 65. 2021. Available online: https://www.agroone.info/publication/kraftove-vinorobstvo-chas-vzhe-splivaie-pitannja-potrebuie-terminovogo-virishennja/ (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Official Website of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Available online: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (accessed on 19 April 2025).
- Danko, Y.; Nifatova, O. Agro-sphere determinants of green branding: Eco-consumption, loyalty, and price premium. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2022, 9, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danko, Y.; Nifatova, O.; Orel, V.; Zhmailov, V.; Lutska, T. Research of factors of development of agriculture in Ukraine: Methodical approach on the basis of econometric modeling. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2022, 20, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karakula, Ö. The effects of tourism on traditional craftsmanship for the sustainable development of historic environments. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 8, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolodjazhna, V. Marketing analysis of the domestic market of craft agricultural products. Bull. Sumy Natl. Agrar. Univ. 2023, 1, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rytkönen, P.; Bonow, M.; Girard, C.; Tunon, H. Bringing the Consumer Back in—The Motives, Perceptions, and Values behind Consumers and Rural Tourists’ Decision to Buy Local and Localized Artisan Food—A Swedish Example. Agriculture 2018, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallegos Erazo, F.A.; Jaramillo Pincay, D.N.; Jaramillo Pincay, F.M. The Consumer and Their Purchasing Behavior: Case of Food Products Reported by the ARCSA in Ecuador. Rev. Científica Sapientia Technol. 2024, 5, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Difference | Description |
---|---|
Organic agricultural products | |
Production methods | Organic agricultural products are grown or produced in accordance with specific guidelines and rules set by organic certification bodies. These rules typically prohibit the use of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and irradiation. Organic farmers favor the use of natural fertilizers, crop rotation, biological pest control, and sustainable farming practices. |
Certification | Organic agricultural products can be certified by authorized organizations that confirm that they meet established organic standards. Certification requires adherence to strict rules, periodic inspections, and documentation to ensure compliance. Products labeled as “organic” must meet the criteria set by the certification body. |
Focus on the environment | Organic agriculture places a strong emphasis on environmental sustainability and minimizing the impact on ecosystems. It aims to maintain soil health and biodiversity, and conserve natural resources. Organic agriculture strives to work in harmony with nature, reducing dependence on synthetic inputs and promoting ecological balance. |
Regulatory and legal frameworks | Organic agricultural production is governed by specific rules and standards set by government agencies or private organizations. These regulations define permitted practices, labeling requirements, and certification guidelines. The certification process involves regular inspections and audits to ensure compliance with organic standards. |
Artisanal agricultural products | |
Artisanal production | Artisanal agricultural products emphasize traditional, artisanal, or small-scale production methods. Craft producers often use time-honored technologies while preserving traditional knowledge and heritage. They emphasize attention to detail, craftsmanship, and quality of the final product. |
Quality and uniqueness | Artisanal agricultural products are known for their special qualities, flavors, and characteristics that result from specific production methods and attention to detail. Artisanal producers can focus on specialty crops, traditional varieties, or unique flavors, emphasizing the expertise and creativity involved in the production process. |
Market niche | Artisanal agricultural products cater to a niche market that values authenticity, uniqueness, and support for local producers. Artisanal products often have a strong connection to a particular region, culture, or tradition. Consumers looking for artisanal agricultural products are willing to pay a premium for the craftsmanship, history of the product, and the special experience it offers. |
A diverse range of products | Artisanal agricultural products cover a wide range of foods and beverages, including cheeses, meat products, bread, beer, wine, chocolate, etc. The artisanal production approach can be applied to different sectors of agriculture, with a focus on quality, taste, and the human factor involved in the production process. |
Products | Number of Livestock per Enterprise | Number of Enterprises | Number of Livestock | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Units | Percentage of Total Enterprises | Thsd. Heads | Percentage of the Total Number | ||
Cattle | to 50 | 437 | 24.4 | 8.8 | 0.9 |
Cows | to 50 | 536 | 31.8 | 9.4 | 2.2 |
Pigs | to 100 | 404 | 31.2 | 17.7 | 0.5 |
Sheep and goats | to 50 | 166 | 32.4 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
Poultry | to 4999 | 100 | 31.6 | 114.5 | 0.1 |
Product Name | Enterprises | Including Private Farms | Households | Ratio of Enterprises to Households, % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meat from farm animals, total, thousand tons | 1720.4 | 86.4 | 717.9 | 70.6 | / | 29.4 |
beef and veal | 77.9 | 7.2 | 232.6 | 25.1 | / | 74.9 |
pork | 431.9 | 24.0 | 292.1 | 59.7 | / | 40.3 |
lamb and goat | 1.2 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 9.8 | / | 90.2 |
poultry meat | 1208.5 | 55.2 | 165.0 | 88.0 | / | 12.0 |
rabbit | 0.7 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 6.4 | / | 93.6 |
horse meat | 0.2 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.8 | / | 97.2 |
All types of milk, thousand tons | 2767.7 | 243.9 | 5946.2 | 31.8 | / | 68.2 |
All types of eggs, million units | 7012.8 | 144.2 | 7058.5 | 49.8 | / | 50.2 |
All types of wool, tons | 151 | 42 | 1346 | 10.1 | / | 89.9 |
Honey, tons | 685 | 121 | 67,873 | 1.0 | / | 99.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Danko, Y.; Kolodiazhna, V.; Nifatova, O.; Halynska, A.; Bliumska-Danko, K.; Kovbasa, O.; Turchyn, L. From Local Crafts to Market Niches: The Marketing Potential of Artisanal Foods in Ukraine. Foods 2025, 14, 2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132249
Danko Y, Kolodiazhna V, Nifatova O, Halynska A, Bliumska-Danko K, Kovbasa O, Turchyn L. From Local Crafts to Market Niches: The Marketing Potential of Artisanal Foods in Ukraine. Foods. 2025; 14(13):2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132249
Chicago/Turabian StyleDanko, Yuriy, Viktoriya Kolodiazhna, Olena Nifatova, Anhelina Halynska, Kseniia Bliumska-Danko, Oleksandr Kovbasa, and Liuba Turchyn. 2025. "From Local Crafts to Market Niches: The Marketing Potential of Artisanal Foods in Ukraine" Foods 14, no. 13: 2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132249
APA StyleDanko, Y., Kolodiazhna, V., Nifatova, O., Halynska, A., Bliumska-Danko, K., Kovbasa, O., & Turchyn, L. (2025). From Local Crafts to Market Niches: The Marketing Potential of Artisanal Foods in Ukraine. Foods, 14(13), 2249. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132249