Next Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Garlic Skin Based on Metabolomics Analysis in the Meat Quality of Black Goats
Previous Article in Journal
Application and Possible Mechanism of Microbial Fermentation and Enzyme Catalysis in Regulation of Food Flavour
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Connection Between Socioeconomic Factors and Dietary Habits of Children with Down Syndrome in Croatia

by
Maja Ergović Ravančić
1,
Valentina Obradović
1,* and
Jadranka Vraneković
2
1
Faculty of Tourism and Rural Development in Požega, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vukovarska 17, 34000 Požega, Croatia
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, B. Branchetta 20, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(11), 1910; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14111910
Submission received: 22 April 2025 / Revised: 20 May 2025 / Accepted: 26 May 2025 / Published: 28 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Children with Down syndrome often face significant feeding difficulties and health comorbidities that may contribute to undernutrition or obesity. This study assessed dietary habits and nutritional status among 104 children with Down syndrome in Croatia, representing 11.5% of this population. Results showed that over 30% of children aged 1 to 15 were overweight. Over 60% never consumed whole grain bread, while more than 50% avoided fish, nuts, or seeds. Despite rural families more frequently producing their own food (meat p = 0.009; fruits/vegetables p = 0.035), no significant improvement was observed in the children’s diets compared to their urban counterparts. Urban children consumed milk (p = 0.008) and fermented dairy (p = 0.005) more often. Children of university-educated mothers had higher vegetable (p = 0.031), meat (p = 0.025), olive oil (p = 0.003), and nut (p = 0.029) consumption, and a lower intake of processed meats (p = 0.008) and salty snacks (p = 0.040). Families spending less than 50% of income on food also showed significantly healthier dietary patterns. Feeding difficulties in children with Down syndrome are commonly associated with sensory sensitivities, oral-motor impairments, and comorbid medical conditions. These challenges are often intensified by parental anxiety, delayed introduction of diverse foods, and inadequate professional support. Collectively, these factors contribute to selective eating, poor nutrient intake, and disordered eating behaviors. This study underscores the need for individualized nutritional interventions that address the unique physiological and sensory requirements of both children and adults with Down syndrome. Effective strategies should extend beyond general dietary recommendations to include early exposure to a variety of food textures, specialized feeding support, and the management of coexisting health conditions. Family education and engagement play a crucial role in achieving positive nutritional outcomes. Empowering parents and caregivers—especially those in socioeconomically disadvantaged or rural communities—can facilitate the alignment of food accessibility with healthy dietary practices. The findings of this research offer valuable guidance for the development and implementation of national strategies aimed at enhancing the nutrition and long-term health of individuals with Down syndrome.

1. Introduction

Down syndrome is a genetic disorder caused by the presence of a partial or complete extra copy of chromosome 21 [1]. The global prevalence of Down syndrome is approximately 1 in 1000–1100 live births [2]. It is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability, accounting for approximately 15% of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Trisomy 21 leads to the overexpression of more than 500 genes and their corresponding proteins, which are involved in regulating numerous neuronal processes, including transcription, translation, synaptic plasticity, and neuronal cell development [3].
Down syndrome is characterized by a range of phenotypic features, including a small chin, upward slanting eyes, hypotonia, a flat nasal bridge, a large gap between the first and second toes, unique fingerprint patterns, short fingers, a single palmar crease, and a protruding tongue due to a small oral cavity and macroglossia [4,5]. In addition to these features, individuals with Down syndrome often present with associated health conditions such as congenital heart defects, hearing and vision impairments, thyroid dysfunction, gastrointestinal issues, cognitive impairments [6,7,8], central nervous system anomalies [9,10], obstructive sleep apnea, and generalized muscle hypotonia [11].
Feeding difficulties are common in infants, children, and adolescents with Down syndrome, potentially resulting in protein-energy malnutrition and/or inadequate fluid intake. Older children often struggle with foods that are hard in texture, have mixed consistencies (e.g., cereal in milk), require more chewing (e.g., meat), or demand sensory tolerance (e.g., raw vegetables, unpeeled fruits, or minimally processed meats and fish) [12,13]. Neurodevelopmental disorders and developmental delays frequently contribute to oral motor dysfunction and swallowing difficulties, which in turn impact the ability of children to consume a variety of food textures [14,15,16,17]. Despite increasing recognition of feeding and swallowing challenges in individuals with Down syndrome across the lifespan, this issue and the interventions targeting it remain under-researched [18].
Feeding children with Down syndrome is further complicated by oral sensory processing issues, which affect their response to intraoral stimuli. This often results in extreme food selectivity and reduced acceptance of certain flavors [16]. Such sensory challenges, combined with anatomical and physiological differences and frequent dental or occlusal anomalies, increase the likelihood of feeding difficulties [19,20]. Food texture is often the most influential sensory characteristic affecting food preferences [14,21,22]. Early dietary intervention is essential to reduce or prevent aversions to specific textures, as exposure to a variety of textures at a young age may promote acceptance of more complex textures later in life [22].
Children and adults with Down syndrome experience health and metabolic challenges throughout their lives, which differ from the general population and are often underrecognized, preventing timely and appropriate interventions. One common issue is excessive body weight and obesity, particularly in adulthood [23]. Altered body composition characterized by shorter limbs, longer torso, and hypotonia contributes to this increased risk of obesity [24].
Previous research indicate that the prevalence of overweight and obesity among individuals with Down syndrome ranges from 23% to 70%, with a marked increase in weight gain often occurring after the age of two [12,25,26]. The high prevalence of disordered eating in individuals with intellectual disabilities, including those with Down syndrome, is largely attributed to a lack of understanding of proper nutrition, as well as a dependence on caregivers who may not be adequately informed about healthy dietary practices [27]. Research has shown that inappropriate mealtime behaviors can hinder weight management. Individuals with Down syndrome frequently exhibit food selectivity, engage in continuous eating in the presence of food regardless of hunger, swallow without sufficient chewing, and consume large quantities of food or calorie-dense beverages in short periods [12,28,29].
While general nutritional guidelines for health and improved quality of life in individuals with Down syndrome mirror those for the general population, they require additional monitoring due to genetic and physiological differences. Nutritional recommendations must consider comorbid conditions that influence dietary needs [30]. Effective nutritional strategies involve a comprehensive approach encompassing diet, physical activity, and educational interventions [31]. These efforts should focus on empowering families who spend the most time with the child to lead the process. Studies have shown that active family involvement plays a key role in achieving positive outcomes in weight management [32]. Research on nutritional challenges in children and adolescents with Down syndrome remains limited. Existing studies often have small sample sizes, wide age ranges, and insufficient descriptions of participants’ health statuses. Although general health challenges in individuals with Down syndrome are well documented, their links to nutritional issues are not yet thoroughly explored. A greater focus on dietary habits is crucial for improving health and quality of life. The distinct clinical features of Down syndrome have significant nutritional implications and must be systematically addressed. Therefore, clinical screening for feeding difficulties and comprehensive nutritional assessments are essential [33]. Mothers’ work hours are likely to affect their time allocation towards activities related to children’s diet, activity, and well-being [34]. Although maternal employment offers numerous benefits, research indicates an association between maternal employment and increased risk of childhood obesity, particularly when mothers work longer hours or are employed full-time. Elements of the family environment that support healthy eating, such as the availability of nutritious foods at home, regular family meals, and parental support for children’s healthy eating habits, may be compromised when mothers are employed outside the home. Studies have shown that employed mothers are more likely to purchase pre-prepared foods, including fast food and take-out, consume meals outside the home, and report a reduction in the frequency of shared family meals [35]. Additionally, a correlation was observed between household income and the availability of healthy food in families with young children [36].
Taking all of the above into account, it has been observed that, in the Republic of Croatia, there is a lack of research addressing the impact of various socioeconomic and health-related factors on the dietary habits of children with Down syndrome. In order to lay the groundwork for the development of effective national strategies to promote healthy eating habits, it is first necessary to identify whether certain subgroups within this already vulnerable population are particularly at risk of not receiving a nutritionally balanced diet. Therefore, this study aims to assess the dietary habits and nutritional status of children with Down syndrome in Croatia, representing a significant portion of this population. Specifically, we seek to identify the impact of socioeconomic factors, such as maternal education, family income, and place of residence (urban vs. rural), on dietary behaviors. Our hypothesis is that children with Down syndrome from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and rural areas exhibit poorer dietary patterns compared to their urban and higher socioeconomic status counterparts. Furthermore, we aim to emphasize the necessity of individualized nutritional interventions that address the unique physiological and sensory challenges faced by this population. By generating comprehensive, population-based data, this research intends to inform and support the development of effective national strategies to improve nutrition and long-term health outcomes for children with Down syndrome in Croatia.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted during the first half of 2023 using an online questionnaire administered via Microsoft Forms (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). The survey targeted parents and caregivers of children with Down syndrome, aged between 6 months and 19 years, residing in the Republic of Croatia. Respondents were reached through social media groups that provide support to families of people with Down syndrome. Participation in the study was anonymous and voluntary. All participants were fully informed about the voluntary nature of their involvement and were advised of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without consequence.
A total of 104 respondents, comprising parents and caregivers of children with Down syndrome aged between 6 months and 19 years, completed the survey, as presented in Figure 1. Of the children represented, 72 were male and 32 were female.
According to the most recent census conducted in 2021, the Republic of Croatia has a population of 3,871,833. The total number of individuals with Down syndrome, as reported by Croatian Institute for Public Health, is 2055, with 906 of them being children and adolescents up to 19 years of age [37]. Based on these figures, the present survey captured approximately 11.5% of the population of children with Down syndrome in the Republic of Croatia.
The initial section of the survey comprised questions regarding the child’s age, gender, place of residence, body weight, height, and overall health status. This was followed by items assessing the parents’ level of education, employment status, the monthly financial expenditure on food, as well as the family’s grocery shopping habits. In addition, information on the family’s place of residence (urban or rural) was collected, allowing for comparisons based on geographic location. These variables were included to explore the potential statistical significance of various family-related factors on the dietary habits of children with Down syndrome. This included the distinction between urban and rural areas, enabling further analysis of whether the child’s dietary habits varied according to their living environment.
In the third section, parents were asked to report the frequency with which their child consumed specific food items. A total of 28 food items, varying in origin and nutritional value, were included in this part of the survey.

Data Analysis

Categorical data were summarized using absolute and relative frequencies. To assess differences in categorical variables between groups, the chi-square test was initially employed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). However, due to the presence of small expected frequencies (less than 5 or, in some cases, less than 1), the application of the chi-square test was inappropriate in many instances. Consequently, we reported results of the chi-square test in the discussion section only where its use was justified and yielded statistically significant differences between groups. Given the limitations of the chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test was subsequently applied on a row-by-row basis using the “all others” comparison principle. In addition, Fisher’s exact test with Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 permutations, was conducted at a 95% confidence level using R version 4.4.3 for Windows (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). For Monte Carlo simulation, rows containing only zero values were excluded from the analysis prior to computation.

3. Results and Discussion

Given the limited availability of research and practical resources on the nutritional habits of children with Down syndrome in Croatia, the results in this study are presented in greater detail. This approach was chosen to ensure that the findings are accessible not only to researchers but also to parents, therapists, and other non-expert stakeholders who play a key role in managing the daily nutrition of these children. In many cases, families are left to navigate dietary challenges with insufficient professional support, which highlights the importance of providing clear and comprehensive data to inform real-life decisions and raise public awareness on this important but underrepresented issue.

3.1. Nutritional and Health Status of Children with Down Syndrome

A total of 25 of 104 children were born prematurely. The average birth weight was 2889.9 ± 821.3 g. When considering only full-term births, the average weight was 3146.64 ± 665.03 g, while the average weight of preterm infants was 2476 ± 693.43 g. The lowest recorded weight was 782 g, and the highest was 3750 g.
Table 1 presents respondents’ weight-for-age percentile, according to growth charts for children with Down syndrome [38]. Growth charts provide valuable insights by offering a general overview of the development of children with Down syndrome. However, these specific charts have certain limitations when compared to charts based on reference populations. These charts should be used as guidelines rather than definitive assessments, as the reference groups on which they are based typically consist of individuals with Down syndrome from specific geographic locations where the measurements were conducted [39,40].
A Swedish study revealed that European individuals with Down syndrome tend to be taller and have lower body mass index than their American counterparts, though high rates of overweight were found in both groups. While short stature is common, growth varies widely due to genetic, hereditary, and comorbid factors, highlighting the need for a holistic assessment of each child [41].
According to Table 1 the average percentile values across all age groups align with the recommended standards for the respective ages. However, the presented results indicate that some children are undernourished, specifically, girls up to the age of 3 and boys up to the age of 7. Nevertheless, a more significant health concern is the presence of overweight and obese children. Although none of the children aged 16 to 19 years had percentiles above the 85th, the small sample size within this age group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding the extent of the issue. Unfortunately, already after the first year of life, over 17% of girls and 16% of boys develop excess body weight. When the proportions of overweight and obese boys are combined for age groups ranging from 1 to 15 years, the figures reach approximately 30% or more. This highlights the critical importance of proper nutrition for children with Down syndrome.
The age range of the children included in the study was from 1 to 19 years. Health-related data, including diagnoses and ongoing treatments, were obtained through parent-reported information based on previously issued medical reports and official diagnoses by healthcare professionals.
According to the results of our research, 39 children are undergoing continuous therapy for a period longer than 3 months, with 26 reporting the use of synthetic thyroid hormone treatments for thyroid disorders, followed by medications for alleviating allergy symptoms, antiepileptic drugs, and medications for managing mental health disorders in individual cases. Among the prematurely born children (n = 25), only three reported no congenital health issues, while the remaining participants indicated the presence of various medical conditions, including congenital heart defects (atrial septal defect (ASD), ventricular septal defect (VSD), congenital anomalies, atrioventricular canal, tetralogy of Fallot, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)) (n = 11), visual impairments (n = 6), brain injuries (n = 5), hypothyroidism/hyperthyroidism (n = 5), as well as other conditions such as leukemia, leukopenia, congenital gastrointestinal anomalies, hearing impairments, and psychiatric disorders. In the group of full-term children (n = 79), only twelve were reported to have no health problems. The rest presented with conditions such as congenital heart defects (n = 31), hypothyroidism/hyperthyroidism (n = 18), visual impairments (n = 19), hearing impairments (n = 14), and, in several cases, gastrointestinal anomalies and brain injuries. Chronic constipation was reported in both groups (n = 12), underscoring the importance of careful dietary management in daily nutrition.
Infants with Down syndrome can generally be breastfed successfully. However, a certain proportion of children may experience feeding difficulties due to the syndrome itself. These challenges may be related to anatomical differences in the digestive system, underdeveloped oral-motor skills, and the presence of hypotonia. Previous studies have shown that 84.6% of mothers cited their child’s sucking difficulties as the reason for not initiating or for discontinuing breastfeeding [16,42,43,44,45]. In addition to physical challenges, emotional factors have also been found to influence the decision to stop breastfeeding. Receiving a diagnosis of Down syndrome can be emotionally overwhelming for parents and may lead to stress, shock, and sadness, all of which can impact breastfeeding outcomes [46]. In our study, 50 children with Down syndrome were breastfed, while 54 were not.
The development of independent feeding skills in children with Down syndrome tends to progress more slowly than in typically developing children. However, the age at which solid foods are introduced is generally similar. A study [47] showed that 46% of children with Down syndrome were introduced to solid foods between 6 and 9 months of age, while 38% began between 9 and 12 months.
Feeding difficulties during the transition to solid foods often continue from early infancy and are primarily related to oral-motor challenges. These include a prolonged sucking reflex, uncoordinated or irregular chewing patterns, and poor bolus control [5,33]. Feeding problems are estimated to occur in approximately 50% to 80% of children with Down syndrome, compared to about 25% of typically developing children. For this reason, children with Down syndrome are often introduced to complementary foods later than typically developing children and World Health Organization recommendations [2]. This delay is attributed to factors such as medical complications, parental anxiety, and developmental delays. Parents of children with Down syndrome have been found to have more cautious and controlled feeding practices compared to those of typically developing children. This includes increased concerns about choking risks and the child’s weight, potentially leading to restrictive feeding behaviors [48].
According to our research, 8 out of 25 preterm infants experience feeding difficulties, primarily characterized by refusal to chew and eat solid food particles. Among the 79 full-term children, 19 also exhibit feeding problems, most commonly in the form of refusal to chew solid foods, as well as rejection of specific types of food, most often meat, fruit, or vegetables, or the rejection of certain food textures, such as crunchy or dry foods.

3.2. Analysis of Respondents’ Grocery Shopping Habits in Relation to Place of Residence

According to the definition provided by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Croatia, a city is a unit of local government that serves as the administrative center of a county and includes any settlement with more than 10,000 inhabitants, representing an urban, historical, natural, economic, and social entity [49]. Forty-five participants from this survey were from rural areas (less than 10,000 inhabitants), and 59 participants were from urban areas (more than 10,000 inhabitants).
The participants were asked to indicate where they most frequently purchase fresh meat, fruits and vegetables, and other food items. They were given the option to provide multiple responses (except in the case of other food items). The results are presented separately for individual responses as well as for responses that included multiple selections (Table 2).
As expected, there is a significant difference in shopping habits between urban and rural residents, primarily in the purchase of fresh meat. Statistically significant (p = 0.009) higher proportion of rural residents produce their own meat, while urban residents mostly purchase meat in retail chains (p = 0.034; p = 0.019 for single answers). Rural residents also tend to produce their own fruit and vegetables more than urban residents (p = 0.035). Regarding other food, urban residents buy it more often in large retail chains while rural residents buy it more often in small stores (p = 0.051).
Other studies have also confirmed significant differences in food purchasing behavior between rural and urban populations, influenced by factors such as the availability of stores, socioeconomic status, and accessibility of transportation [50]. The main findings highlighted that urban residents primarily shop at large grocery stores and supermarkets, benefiting from greater proximity and a wider variety of food options [51]. Rural shoppers often rely on small shops and buy food with a higher energy value than urban households [52]. In addition, home-based food production is more prevalent in rural areas; for example, in Brazil, 31% of rural households engage in home-based food production, compared to a much lower percentage in urban areas [53].

3.3. Dietary Habits of Children with Down Syndrome

3.3.1. Analysis of Respondents’ Dietary Habits in Relation to Gender and Place of Residence

As previously stated, parents were asked to indicate how frequently their children with Down syndrome consume specific food items. A total of 28 different foods can be categorized into several groups: carbohydrate-rich foods, milk and dairy products, fruits and vegetables, protein-rich foods (meat/fish/eggs), oils and fats, nuts and seeds, unhealthy options such as sweets and snacks, and, finally, liquids. Table 3 presents the results according to the gender and place of residence of the participants.
A study conducted by Colić-Barić et al. [54] aimed to compare the nutrient intake and dietary behavior of urban and rural school children in Croatia. Using a quantified Food Frequency Questionnaire, data were collected from 315 urban and 163 rural children, with an average age of 12.5 and 12.6 years, respectively. The findings revealed that the consumption of fast food, soft drinks, and alcohol was more prevalent among urban children, but also that urban children had more adequate energy and nutrient intake.
Another study conducted in Croatia included 105 urban and 205 rural school-aged children. The results showed a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity among children in rural areas compared to children in urban areas. It was found that children from rural areas consume fewer fruits and vegetables and have a higher intake of sweet and fatty foods [55]. In a cross-sectional study’s data of 123,100 children aged 6–9 years across 19 countries participating in the World Health Organization European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (2015–2017), parents completed food-frequency questionnaires to assess children’s consumption patterns. The study found significant variability among countries regarding daily fruit and vegetable intake and soft drink consumption. In less than one-third of the countries, children attending rural schools had higher odds of not consuming fruits or vegetables daily and consuming soft drinks more than three times a week compared to their urban counterparts. The study emphasized the need for population-based interventions and policy strategies to improve access to healthy foods and promote healthy eating behaviors among children [56].

Carbohydrate-Rich Foods Consumption

When examining carbohydrate-rich foods, approximately half of both female and male with Down syndrome consume white bread five times a week or more frequently, i.e., on a daily basis (53.13% of female and 48.6% of male participants), while 28% of female and 38.89% of male participants report never consuming it. Conversely, 62.5% of both male and female participants report never consuming whole grain or brown bread. Participants from rural areas reported significantly more frequent consumption of white bread two or more times a day compared to those from urban areas (p = 0.043). Moreover, as many as 71% of rural participants stated that they never consume whole grain (black) bread. These findings suggest that white bread remains a staple in the diets of a substantial proportion of the sample. From a nutritional standpoint, this is concerning given that white bread is often low in fiber and essential micronutrients compared to whole grain alternatives. Whole grains are a valuable source of vitamin E and B vitamins, as well as minerals such as copper, selenium, zinc, iron, magnesium, and phosphorus, all of which are present in significant concentrations. Additionally, whole grains contain important phytochemicals, including phenolic acids and lignans, plant-based phytoestrogens that have been positively associated with maintaining cardiovascular health [57].
Our results showed that the majority of participants consume pasta, rice, or potatoes once or twice a week (generally between 70% and 80%), while whole grains are consumed five times a week or more by 46.88% of female and 43.05% of male participants. Children from urban areas tend to consume whole grain once a day or five times a week (44.07%) more often than children from rural areas (22.22%). Approximately one-third of both female and male groups report never consuming whole grains.
Thyroid dysfunction is the most common endocrine disorder associated with Down syndrome, with an estimated prevalence of 4–8% in newborns [58], as also confirmed by the participants in our survey. The consumption of whole grain products has a highly beneficial effect on plasma levels of free thyroxine (fT4), the biologically active form of the thyroid hormone T4. Unlike refined white flour products, which contain approximately five times the amount of simple carbohydrates, whole grains retain their outer bran layer, which is removed during the refining process. This outer layer is rich in dietary fiber and contains significant amounts of phytochemicals, antioxidants, and essential minerals such as selenium, iron, and zinc, all of which contribute to healthy thyroid function [59].

Milk and Dairy Products Consumption

As shown, there are no statistically significant differences in dietary habits between genders, with the exception of the consumption of fermented dairy products up to five times per week. In this case, girls show a statistically significantly higher preference for these products (37.50% girls, compared to 16.67% boys, p = 0.025).
Approximately half of the participants in both gender groups consume milk five times a week or more frequently, while 34.38% of female and 37.50% of male participants report never consuming milk. Further research would be necessary to explore the reasons for milk avoidance, especially considering that only one participant reported a cow’s milk allergy in the initial questionnaire. Unjustified elimination of foods should not be practiced in children with Down syndrome unless there is a clear medical indication. Studies have shown that some parents of children with Down syndrome restrict certain nutrients from their children’s diets without valid reasons. A notable example is the elimination of lactose. Research by Białek-Dratwa et al. [30] found that while only 19% of children were diagnosed with lactose intolerance, dietary restrictions were applied in 28.7% of cases without a confirmed diagnosis. A lactose-free diet is entirely unjustified in the absence of allergy, intolerance, or other metabolic or gastrointestinal disorders. Moreover, such unnecessary dietary restrictions can lead to the suppression of lactase enzyme production over time, which may, in turn, induce lactose intolerance [30].
A slightly lower percentage is observed in the case of fermented dairy product avoidance (15.6% of female and 23.6% of male participants), while nearly 44% of participants in both groups reported never consuming cheese. A significantly higher number of urban children consume milk once a day (p = 0.008), while a significantly higher number of rural children avoid milk (51.11% vs. 25.42%, p = 0.008). When examining the consumption of fermented dairy products, children from urban areas are more likely to consume them daily, i.e., five times per week or more, whereas children from rural areas more frequently consume these products only once a week (p = 0.005).
In general, cheese is consumed infrequently across all observed groups. Over 40% of participants reported not consuming cheese at all, while between 30% and 40% consume it once or twice per week.

Fruit and Vegetables Consumption

A total of 75% of female and 62.5% of male participants consume fruit on daily basis. On the other hand, in lower frequency categories like once or twice a week and never, male participants dominate (19.44% of male and 9.38% of female). There are observable differences in fruit consumption frequencies between males and females, meaning that fruit is generally more consumed by female participants, but none of these differences are statistically significant. In contrast to fruit, male participants consume vegetables more frequently on a daily basis (58.34% of males vs. 50% of females). Conversely, a higher proportion of female participants reported never consuming vegetables, 12.5% compared to 5.56% of males. As previously mentioned, families from rural areas produce more of their own fruit and vegetables compared to families from urban areas, who predominantly purchase them from grocery chains. However, this did not reflect in their consumption habits, as no statistically significant differences were found in the consumption of fruits and vegetables between these two groups.
Children with Down syndrome often show a preference for simple carbohydrates and foods that are easy to chew and swallow. This frequently leads to the rejection of fresh fruits and vegetables from their diet [27]. Possible reasons for this include a lack of parental knowledge about the benefits of proper nutrition, as well as the child’s aversion to the taste or texture of certain fruits and vegetables. A study by Białek-Dratwa et al. [30] confirmed that fruit and vegetable consumption is insufficient in the diets of children with Down syndrome. These findings are consistent with the results of our research. A comparative review of six studies of the eating habits of people with Down syndrome showed that people with Down syndrome tend to consume small amounts of vegetables and fruits, which leads to a reduced intake of fiber, antioxidants, and folic acid. This nutritional deficiency may contribute to a higher risk of non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, lipid metabolism disorders, and neurodegenerative conditions, which are already prevalent in this population due to genetic and metabolic factors. In addition, a diet low in vegetables can worsen common problems like constipation and being overweight, further compromising overall health [60].

Protein-Rich Food Consumption

Animal-derived proteins, such as those found in dairy products, eggs, poultry, and fish, are complete sources of protein that also provide essential vitamin B12, a deficiency of which can lead to macrocytic anemia [44]. Furthermore, the consumption of meat (including poultry and fish) enhances the absorption of both heme and non-heme iron in the same meal, as meat exerts a reducing effect on iron during digestion, thereby improving its bioavailability [61].
Male participants consume meat five times per week or more frequently than female participants (76.39% vs. 65.63%). This difference is most pronounced in the highest frequency category, two or more times per day, where no female participants reported such consumption, while 11.11% of male participants did. A p-value of 0.056 indicates a borderline statistical significance for this difference.
Research by Gruszka and Włodarek [60] indicated that individuals with Down syndrome most frequently select meat among protein-rich foods. Meat is an excellent source of complete proteins, iron, and vitamin B12, nutrients essential for the proper functioning of the human body. Given that vitamin B12 deficiency has been reported in individuals with Down syndrome, moderate meat consumption may be beneficial to their health. Among meat options, chicken, turkey, rabbit, lamb, and veal are considered the most nutritionally valuable. When consuming pork, it is advisable to select lean cuts such as the loin, due to the high saturated fat content found in fattier portions [44]. However, excessive intake of meat and consequently, saturated and omega-6 fatty acids may increase the risk of developing various health conditions, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
Low-frequency meat consumption (once a week) is more common among female participants, whereas approximately the same proportion of males and females, around 6%, reported never consuming meat. Similarly to fruits, although participants from rural areas more frequently produce their own meat rather than purchasing it, this did not result in a difference in the frequency of meat consumption between these rural and urban groups. Regarding processed meat products such as salami, sausages, and similar items, 78.13% of female and 75% of male participants reported consuming them once a week or less, suggesting relatively high awareness about the health implications of these products. No participants from rural areas consume processed meats two or more times per day, in contrast to 6.78% of participants from urban areas. However, a slightly higher percentage of urban residents never consume these products (52.54%), compared to participants from rural areas (46.67%), but observed differences do not reach statistical significance.
Unfortunately, 50% of female and 41.67% of male participants reported never consuming fish. When combined with those who consume it only once a week, the total reaches approximately 96% for both genders, which reflects a concerningly low level of fish intake. The same applies to the category of rural versus urban residence, with no differences observed between the groups. The reasons for such infrequent fish consumption may be varied and multifactorial. Fish is the richest natural source of omega-3 fatty acids and also provides high-quality protein, vitamins, and essential minerals. It is recommended that fish be consumed at least one to two times per week [62]. Despite their crucial functional role in brain tissue, the intake of omega-3 fatty acids is often inadequate among children and adults with Down syndrome. Essential fatty acids serve as precursors for biologically active compounds involved in inflammation and immune responses. They support neuronal development, synaptic membrane formation, signal processing, and neurotransmission. In addition, these fatty acids regulate gene expression in the brain [63,64]. Research using mouse models of Down syndrome has shown that fish oil, rich in omega-3 fatty acids, combined with other nutraceuticals, can moderately suppress the expression of the regulator calcineurin 1. These findings support the hypothesis that fish oil may serve as an effective and affordable intervention for genetically defined conditions, including cognitive impairments [62].
Egg consumption among participants in our study is also quite low, and the majority of both genders and both places of residence consume eggs once a week/rarely. Enriching the daily diet with eggs is beneficial to health, as eggs are a nutritionally balanced food, offering a favorable ratio of nutrients relative to their energy value. Research by Magenis et al. [44] involving 195 individuals with Down syndrome also revealed insufficient egg consumption among the majority of participants. This may be attributed to a lack of awareness regarding the health benefits of this nutrient-dense food. The same study revealed that while protein consumption was relatively frequent, it remained inadequate for more than half of the participants.

Oils and Fats, Nuts and Seeds Consumption

Approximately 90% of participants reported never consuming coconut oil, which is expected given the regional dietary patterns. However, it is concerning that around 46% of both male and female participants, over 51% of children from rural and 42% from urban areas never consume olive oil. Olive oil is consumed five times per week or more frequently by 37.50% of female and 40.28% of male participants. In general, the high frequencies of olive oil consumption among participants from urban areas are reported more often, although these differences are not statistically significant when compared to those from rural areas.
Unsaturated fatty acids, especially those found in cold-pressed oils, fish, and nuts, play a key role in reducing oxidative stress and contribute to the cognitive development of people with Down syndrome. Regular consumption of dietary sources rich in unsaturated fatty acids is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease and obesity, both of which are common comorbidities in this population. Therefore, it is recommended to replace saturated and trans fats with vegetable oils and foods rich in unsaturated fats, as part of a comprehensive nutritional strategy aimed at preserving and improving the general health of people with Down syndrome [30].
Consumption of refined oils and saturated fats in high frequencies is reported by 40.63% of female and 30.56% of male participants. Additionally, participants from urban areas consume these products slightly more frequently, five times a week or more (38.98%), compared to participants from rural areas (26.67%). However, consumption once a week is more common among rural participants, although none of the observed frequencies reached statistical significance.
Over 80% of participants (gender and residence category) consume butter either once a week or never, which can be seen as a positive finding. Nevertheless, further education on the importance of unsaturated fatty acids, particularly for brain development and cognitive function, is needed. In this context, the consumption of nuts and seeds, foods of exceptionally high nutritional value, should also be considered. They are rich sources of unsaturated fats, dietary fiber, and essential minerals. Nuts are rich in tocopherol (vitamin E), phenolic compounds, and selenium nutrients with potent antioxidant properties. Given that oxidative stress is associated with both the development and the accelerated aging process observed in individuals with Down syndrome, regular nut consumption holds particular importance for this population. Several studies have shown that their regular intake may reduce the risk of certain diseases and also contribute to improving cognitive development [65,66].
Unfortunately, over 50% of participants in our study, of both genders, reported never consuming nuts, while more than 30% consume nuts only once a week, and just over 20% consume seeds with the same frequency. In addition, 68% of children from rural areas and 54% from urban areas avoid seeds. Research by Białek-Dratwa et al. [30] also revealed insufficient consumption of nuts by the majority (72.31%) of children and adults with Down syndrome, without any medically justified reason.

Fast Food, Sweets, and Snack Consumption

Children with Down syndrome often have increased carbohydrate and caloric intake, with a tendency to consume high-energy foods such as pasta, bread, sweets, and sugary beverages. Conversely, their intake of essential nutrients like calcium, certain B vitamins, and water is often insufficient [44].
In addition, among those with sensory processing difficulties, particularly texture sensitivity, there may be a preference for foods that are soluble, crunchy, or salty. These sensory-driven preferences can lead to a more limited diet, increased snacking, and a higher risk of nutritional deficiencies [18].
It is encouraging that over 80% of participants in our study of all genders and places of residence reported never consuming fast food, and only 15% consume this type of food once a week. Notably, female participants never reported consuming fast food more frequently than once a week, whereas among male participants, one individual from a rural area reported consuming it two or more times per day and once per day.
Approximately 15–20% of participants of both genders reported daily consumption of sweets and snack foods, whereas 30–40% indicated that they never consume such items. An exception was observed among female participants, 25% of whom reported complete avoidance of sweets. Children from rural areas eat sweets and snacks more frequently than children from urban areas, but no statistically significant difference was confirmed.

Liquids Consumption

When comparing the consumption of various beverages, water was most frequently reported as being consumed two or more times per day. In contrast, only 5–12% of respondents of both genders reported consuming tea, natural juices, or carbonated beverages with the same frequency (two or more times a day), with carbonated drinks being the least frequently consumed in this category (5–6%). Carbonated drinks are more often avoided by rural children (84.44%) than by urban children (77.97%), but both numbers are high and do not exhibit a statistical difference. A concerning finding is that 50% of female and 41.67% of male respondents reported never consuming natural juices, with similar percentages for both rural and urban places of residence. However, more children from rural areas (17.78%) than from urban areas (6.78%) consume natural juice twice a day. These beverages could represent a valuable source of vitamins and minerals, particularly for children who experience difficulties chewing solid food or who refuse to eat fruit, as noted by parents in the initial survey. Furthermore, 53% of female and 69.44% of male respondents stated that they never consume tea. Consumption of carbonated beverages five times a week or more often was reported by only two female and 10 male participants. Interestingly, 20% of participants from rural areas never consume water, compared to 1.69% of participants from urban areas (p = 0.002). A deficit in water consumption has been observed in individuals with Down syndrome, with parental influence playing a significant role in shaping their children’s hydration habits. Since many children dislike the “tastelessness” of water and often refuse to drink it, parents may resort to offering juices or other flavored beverages that are more appealing to the child, often without considering the potential long-term health consequences of such choices. Alternative sources of hydration, such as unsweetened tea or vegetable juice, can be beneficial as they not only contribute to fluid intake but also provide additional vitamins and minerals [30]. Children are particularly vulnerable to dehydration due to their higher body surface area-to-volume ratio, which makes them more sensitive to environmental temperature changes. Moreover, especially at a young age, children’s access to fluids is largely dependent on their parents or caregivers, which may limit their overall intake. Inadequate water consumption in children can also negatively impact cognitive performance. Studies conducted across European countries have shown that over 80% of children consume less water than the recommended daily intake [67,68].

3.3.2. Analysis of Respondents’ Dietary Habits in Relation to Parental Educational Attainment

Table 4 illustrates the relationship between parental educational attainment and the dietary habits of the respondents. A total of 55 mothers and 72 fathers have completed secondary education, while 49 mothers and 32 fathers hold a university degree. It is evident that the mother’s level of education has a substantially greater impact on children’s dietary habits compared to the father’s educational level. This finding is consistent with the fact that, in the Republic of Croatia, the mother is still predominantly responsible for meal planning and preparation within the household, regardless of education and employment.
There is strong evidence of an association between the educational attainment of parents, particularly mothers, and children’s eating behavior. The INPACT study conducted in the Netherlands found that children of mothers with higher levels of education consumed more fruit and vegetables and were more likely to eat breakfast regularly. These associations were mediated by factors within the home food environment, including parental dietary practices and the availability of healthy food options [69]. Similarly, results from the IDEFICS study, which included children from eight European countries, found that lower parental education was associated with increased consumption of foods high in sugar and fat, such as French fries and sugar-sweetened beverages. In contrast, higher parental educational attainment was positively correlated with higher intakes of fruit, vegetables, and wholemeal bread [70].

Carbohydrate-Rich Foods Consumption

Within the food rich in carbohydrates, it is evident that children of mothers with secondary education consume white bread on a daily basis at a statistically significantly (p = 0.032) higher rate (30.91%) compared to children of mothers with a university degree (12.24%). This finding suggests that maternal educational attainment plays a key role in shaping children’s dietary habits, with those having lower levels of education more likely to provide highly refined carbohydrate-rich foods such as white bread. Additionally, it can be observed that a higher proportion of children whose mothers have completed secondary education never or rarely consume whole grain bread and cereals. This further reinforces the idea that the education level of the mother may influence not only the choice of foods but also the variety and nutritional quality of the diet provided to children. Conversely, a higher proportion of children whose mothers and fathers hold a university degree reported never consuming white bread, although these differences were not found to be statistically significant. This suggests that while higher parental education may lead to healthier dietary choices, these habits may not be as pronounced in the consumption of specific foods such as white bread. It is important to note that while the statistical significance is not present in some cases, the trends observed indicate potential areas for further investigation, particularly in terms of parental influence and socio-economic factors related to education.
Although children of mothers with secondary education consume potatoes five times a week or more frequently, more often than children of mothers with university education, this difference is not statistically significant. However, children of mothers with university education consume potatoes significantly more often once a week compared to children of mothers with secondary education (87.76% vs. 67.27%, p = 0.019). Children of mothers with higher education tend to consume fewer carbohydrate-rich foods, such as white bread and potatoes. This may be attributed to several factors. Firstly, mothers with higher education are generally more aware of the impact of nutrition on health, leading them to choose healthier, more balanced diets for their children. Additionally, higher educational attainment is often linked to higher socio-economic status, which may provide better access to healthier food options.

Milk and Dairy Products Consumption

Milk is consumed on a daily basis significantly more by children whose parents have completed secondary education, with a statistically significant difference observed among fathers for the frequency of consumption two or more times per day (p = 0.002). In contrast, for mothers, this frequency showed borderline significance (p = 0.062). On the other hand, children whose parents hold university degrees consume milk significantly more often, five times a week, with this finding also statistically confirmed for mothers (p = 0.048). The level of paternal education generally demonstrates a statistically significant impact on milk consumption. A high frequency of consuming fermented dairy products on a daily basis is more commonly observed among children of mothers with secondary education, although this difference is not statistically significant. However, children of mothers with higher education consume these products significantly more frequently on a weekly basis (p = 0.018). As previously stated, many participants do not consume cheese, and there is not any statistical difference between groups in the case of parents’ education level.

Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Children of parents with higher educational attainment are more likely to consume fruit two or more times per day, as well as vegetables. However, these differences do not reach statistical significance. The same can be observed for vegetable consumption once per day and five times per week. A borderline statistical significance is in the case of vegetable consumption once per week (16.36% of children of mothers with secondary education versus 4.08% of children of mothers with higher education), with a p-value of 0.056, and in the case of non-consumption of vegetables, with a p-value of 0.063 (12.73% of children of mothers with secondary education versus 2.04% of children of mothers with higher education). Globally, mothers’ education is statistically confirmed as significant on vegetable consumption by Fisher’s test with Monte Carlo simulation (p = 0.031) and by chi-square test (p = 0.033), while fathers’ education level does not exhibit statistical significance.

Protein-Rich Food Consumption

Parental education, both maternal and paternal, significantly influences the consumption of meat and processed meat products. Children of highly educated parents are more likely to consume meat at least five times per week. A statistically significant difference was observed for the frequency of consumption up to five times per week (p = 0.028) among mothers. When examining the frequency of consumption once per week, the results were reversed, with children of mothers (p = 0.026) and fathers with secondary education displaying higher frequencies of consumption, as well as for the rare or never consumption category. In contrast, the pattern for processed meat products differs from that of meat. Daily consumption of processed meat products is more common among children of parents with secondary education, while avoidance of such products is more frequent among children of highly educated parents. This finding is consistent with the previously established pattern that the level of education correlates with socio-economic status, influencing purchasing decisions, particularly in terms of more expensive meats and less expensive processed meat products. A statistically significant global difference in the consumption of processed meat products was confirmed according to educational level, both for mothers (p = 0.008) and fathers (p = 0.046). Interestingly, for fathers, no individual consumption frequency showed statistical significance; however, a global effect was confirmed as a result of cumulative effects, where small associations across multiple rows collectively yielded a significant overall result.
Although no statistically significant differences were observed in fish consumption between groups based on parental education level, and overall results indicate equally low consumption in both categories and observed groups when it comes to daily intake, it is nevertheless evident that fish is more frequently consumed five times per week and once per week by children of university educated mothers and fathers. Conversely, never consuming fish is more common among children of parents with secondary education. Regarding egg consumption, intake five times per week is notably higher among children of highly educated mothers. While the difference does not reach conventional levels of statistical significance, it approaches the threshold (14.29% vs. 3.64%, p = 0.08), indicating a potential trend worth further investigation.

Oils and Fats, Nuts and Seeds Consumption

The influence of maternal education on the consumption of olive oil is statistically significant at the global level (p = 0.003), confirmed by Fisher’s test and the chi-square test. Mother’s education is also significant for specific consumption frequencies—up to five times per week (p = 0.005) and never (p = 0.0008). Paternal education also demonstrates global significance (p = 0.039). Children whose parents have a university level education tend to consume olive oil more frequently, while those whose parents have completed only secondary education are more likely to never consume it. A similar pattern can be observed in the consumption of nuts and seeds, which is statistically confirmed in the case of exclusion of nuts from the diet (p = 0.029). This practice is more prevalent among mothers with secondary education (62.27%) compared to those with higher education (44.90%). Consistent with previously stated regarding the consumption of higher-cost products, a higher level of education among both mothers and fathers is associated with more frequent inclusion of olive oil in children’s diets. Conversely, lower educational attainment corresponds with more frequent exclusion of olive oil from the diet. A similar trend is observed for coconut oil, although its use is generally rare across both groups. Nevertheless, paternal education was found to have a statistically significant global impact on the frequency of coconut oil consumption (p = 0.014).
No clear pattern or statistical significance was observed in the comparison of refined oil and saturated fat consumption. However, in the case of butter, a trend can be noted whereby children of highly educated mothers and fathers consume butter more frequently, while its exclusion from the diet is more common among children of parents with secondary education. Nevertheless, these differences do not reach statistical significance.

Fast Food, Sweets, and Snack Consumption

Higher consumption of fast food, sweets, and salty snacks is observed among children whose mothers and fathers have secondary education. However, a statistically significant difference was confirmed only in specific cases: for the never consumption frequency of sweets among mothers, where 44.90% of children of highly educated mothers never consume sweets compared to 25.45% of children of mothers with secondary education; as well as for the global consumption of salty snacks (p = 0.040), confirmed by chi-square and Fisher’s test and for the frequency of consumption two or more times per day (p = 0.028) of salty snacks.

Liquids Consumption

Children of highly educated parents consume carbonated beverages more frequently across all consumption categories, although no statistically significant differences were found between the groups. Natural juice consumption once per week is more common among children of highly educated mothers and fathers, while daily consumption, two or more times per day, is more frequent among children of highly educated fathers and mothers with secondary education, similar to the children from rural areas. However, these differences are not statistically significant, nor are those observed for tea and water consumption. Nevertheless, 12.73% of mothers with lower educational attainment reported that their children never consume water, compared to 6.12% of mothers with higher education, with a similar trend observed among fathers.

3.3.3. Analysis of Respondents’ Dietary Habits in Relation to Mother’s Employment Status and Monthly Financial Expenditure on Food

Table 5 represents the relationship between mother’s employment status as well as share of food expenditures in family income on the dietary habits of the respondents
A total of 39 mothers were unemployed, while 65 were employed. The influence of fathers’ employment status was not analyzed in this context, as only 5 out of the 104 fathers were unemployed.

Carbohydrate-Rich Foods Consumption

Daily consumption of white bread was more prevalent among children of unemployed mothers (58.97%) compared to those whose mothers were employed (30.77%). A similar pattern was observed among children from households in which monthly food expenditure exceeded 50% of total income. A statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of consuming white bread two or more times per day in relation to maternal employment status (p = 0.009) and monthly food expenditures (p = 0.035), with unemployment and higher food expenditures being associated with increased consumption of white bread. The global influence of mothers’ employment status was confirmed statistically by Fisher’s test (p = 0.01) and the chi-square test. When examining the frequencies of less frequent consumption (once a week or never), higher percentages were found among children of employed mothers and children from households that spend less than 50% of their income on food.
The trend is reversed in the case of consuming dark/whole grain bread, where maternal employment and a lower proportion of food expenditures in monthly family income are associated with higher consumption of this type of bread, although the difference is not statistically significant. Additionally, the consumption of whole grains five times a week is statistically significantly more frequent in families where food expenditures do not exceed 50% of monthly income (p = 0.049), while daily consumption of whole grains shows the opposite trend. A higher frequency of consumption of potatoes, pasta, and rice (five times a week or more) is observed among children of unemployed mothers and those from families with higher food expenditures within the household budget, whereas a lower frequency of consumption shows the opposite trend. This finding was statistically confirmed globally for potato consumption (p = 0.019), and for the impact of family food expenditures on the frequency of rice consumption once or twice a week. Among families with food expenditures less than 50%, 79.71% of children consume rice once a week, whereas among families with higher expenditures, only 57.14% of children consume rice once a week. The observed trend supports the notion that a mother’s employment status and the family’s income may impact not only the selection of foods but also the diversity and nutritional value of the diet offered to children.
Evidence from studies conducted in Australia, the United States, and Japan highlights the complex relationship between maternal employment, household income, and children’s dietary behaviors. In Australia, lower household income and maternal employment of 21–35 h per week were linked to greater consumption of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods among children [36]. A U.S. study similarly found that increased maternal work hours were associated with higher intake of unhealthy foods, lower intake of healthy foods, greater screen time, and elevated BMI, particularly among children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds [34]. In Japan, longer maternal working hours were associated with higher intake of white rice and increased body mass index in children, though no significant associations were found with vegetable or sweetened beverage intake. The study emphasized the influence of factors such as nutrition knowledge, dietary attitudes, and family environment on children’s eating habits [71]. Collectively, these findings suggest that both structural and psychosocial factors must be considered when addressing childhood nutrition and health.

Milk and Dairy Products Consumption

Unemployment of mothers and higher food expenditures within the family budget support the higher frequencies of milk consumption, although no statistically significant differences between groups were observed. However, children of unemployed mothers consume fermented dairy products twice a day significantly more often (p = 0.006) than children of unemployed mothers (20.51% vs. 3.08%). A correlation between mothers’ employment status and the consumption of fermented dairy products has also been statistically confirmed by Fisher’s test (p = 0.04) and the chi-square test.
Lower socio-economic status (unemployment and high financial expenditures on food within family income) is associated with high frequencies of milk consumption, as well as fermented dairy products. This trend has also been noted in relation to the parents’ level of education, as previously discussed in Table 4.
As previously mentioned, cheese is generally consumed by the majority of respondents only once a week or less frequently or is entirely avoided. However, a pattern can be observed where children of unemployed mothers consume cheese more frequently, about once a day, while children of employed mothers consume it five times a week. Nevertheless, no statistically significant differences were found in any consumption frequency.

Fruits and Vegetables Consumption

Children of unemployed mothers and those from lower-income families consume fruit two or more times per day more frequently than children of employed mothers and those from higher-income households. However, this difference is not statistically significant. On the other hand, daily fruit consumption, as well as consumption five times per week, is more common among children of employed mothers and in families that allocate less than 50% of their monthly income to food, with the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.032). Additionally, low frequencies of fruit and vegetable consumption are more frequently observed among children of unemployed mothers and in families whose monthly food expenditures exceed 50% of their income.

Protein-Rich Food Consumption

The consumption of meat and processed meat products at least twice daily is more prevalent among children of unemployed mothers and families that allocate a larger proportion of their monthly income to food. However, when considering the frequency of meat consumption once per day or five times per week, a higher intake is observed among children of employed mothers and those from families spending less than 50% of their monthly income on food (p = 0.0002). Fish consumption is generally low across both categories (mother’s employment and share of food costs in family income) and all groups; however, it is higher among children of employed mothers and families that allocate less than 50% of their monthly income to food. The highest frequency of meat and processed meat consumption, twice per day, is observed among children of unemployed mothers; this same group records the lowest fish intake. These two patterns appear to be interrelated, suggesting that while families may consume substantial amounts of protein-rich foods, fish, an important source not only of high-quality proteins but also of essential micronutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, is more closely associated with higher socioeconomic status.
Maternal employment status has a statistically significant effect on egg consumption (p = 0.02), with higher consumption frequencies, once per week or more, being more common among children of unemployed mothers. Conversely, lower consumption frequency of eggs, specifically once per week, is significantly more prevalent among children of employed mothers (p = 0.015).

Oil, Fat, Nut, and Seed Consumption

When examining individual consumption frequencies of olive oil, a statistically significant difference was observed for the frequency two or more times per day (p = 0.043) corresponding to 10.77% of children of employed mothers, who reported consuming olive oil at this specific frequency, while none of the children of unemployed mothers reported the same. Although other individual frequency categories did not reach statistical significance, children of employed mothers tended to consume olive oil more frequently, at five times per week. In contrast, once per day, once per week, and never consumption frequencies were more common among children of unemployed mothers. Overall, lower consumption frequencies were more prevalent in the group of unemployed mothers.
Very few participants reported consuming coconut oil; however, the majority of those who do consume it belong to the group of children of employed mothers and families that allocate less than 50% of their monthly budget to food. Although no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, a clear trend of higher consumption of refined oils and saturated fats was noted among children of unemployed mothers and families whose monthly food expenditures exceed 50% of their total income. Maternal employment status also had a statistically significant effect on butter consumption (p = 0.02). However, when examining specific frequency categories of butter intake, children of employed mothers consumed butter significantly more often than children of unemployed mothers in the frequency category up to five times per week (15.38% vs. 0%). Conversely, in the once per week frequency category, butter consumption was more prevalent among children of unemployed mothers (38.46% vs. 21.54%).
Family financial expenditure on food (p = 0.001) as well as maternal employment status (p = 0.01) have a significant impact on the consumption of nuts. This effect is further supported by significant differences in specific frequencies, including once per day (p = 0.012) and never frequencies (p = 0.008) within the maternal employment status, and once per week (p = 0.004) and never (p = 0.0008) within the category of monthly food expenditures. The trend observed is that high frequencies of nuts consumption are more prevalent among children of employed mothers and families whose monthly food expenditures do not exceed 50% of their income, whereas avoidance of consumption is more common among children of unemployed mothers and families whose monthly food expenditures exceed 50% of their income. A similar trend is evident in seed consumption, although no statistically significant differences were found between the groups under observation.

Fast Food, Sweets, and Snack Consumption

Only two respondents consume fast food on a daily basis, at least once per day, and both belong to the group of children of unemployed mothers. This is contrary to the expectation that such a diet would be more frequently adopted by employed mothers, who have less time to prepare meals. However, the small sample size within this frequency limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions. A study examining German families found that maternal employment was linked to reduced time spent by mothers on meal preparation and less time spent eating with their children at home. Conversely, maternal employment was associated with increased time spent on joint meals away from home. These changes in time allocation may influence children’s dietary habits [72].
When examining consumption habits for other food items in this food category, the employment status of mothers was found to have a statistically significant effect on the consumption of salty snacks (p = 0.016), specifically in the frequency category of two or more times a day (p = 0.002). In this category, 15.38% of children of unemployed mothers consumed snacks, whereas no children of employed mothers reported consuming snacks at this frequency. Low-frequency consumption of snacks was more common among children of employed mothers. Similarly, among children from families where monthly food expenditures exceed 50% of monthly income, a statistically significantly more often consumption was observed for those consuming snacks once per day (p = 0.035). Additionally, sweets were consumed significantly more often by children of unemployed mothers in the frequency of two or more times per day (p = 0.05). Thus, maternal unemployment does not appear to contribute to a greater focus on healthier dietary options, but rather to the opposite effect.

Liquids Consumption

Monthly family financial expenditures on food influence the frequency of water consumption borderline significantly (p = 0.058), with a significant difference observed in the individual frequency category of “once per week” (p = 0.036). Specifically, 8.57% of children from families whose monthly food expenditures exceed 50% of their income consume water only once per week, while no children from families whose food expenditures are below 50% of their income report consuming water at this frequency. The majority of children across all categories consume water two or more times per day (over 70%), although high frequencies of consumption are more prevalent among children of employed mothers and children from families where monthly food expenditures do not exceed 50% of income.
Tea consumption at high frequencies predominates among children of unemployed mothers, but further inquiry is needed regarding the type of tea and methods of sweetening to draw a definitive conclusion about the benefits of tea consumption for children in this study. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups, as was the case with natural juices and carbonated beverages. However, the consumption of natural juices is higher among children from families whose food expenditures account for less than 50% of their income and among children of employed mothers, likely due to the cost of such beverages. Carbonated drinks are more frequently avoided by children of employed mothers and families with higher incomes, whereas high-frequency consumption of carbonated drinks is somewhat more common among children of unemployed mothers and families with lower incomes, although no statistically significant difference was found between the groups.
In summary, this study highlights the multifaceted nutritional challenges faced by children with Down syndrome, including a notable prevalence of overweight and obesity alongside feeding difficulties and comorbidities such as congenital heart defects, hypothyroidism, and gastrointestinal anomalies. Feeding problems, such as delayed chewing, refusal of certain food textures, and oral-motor dysfunction, were common and often influenced by both medical and emotional factors. Many parents face considerable stress and uncertainty, which can lead to cautious or restrictive feeding practices.
These findings underscore the urgent need for tailored nutritional guidance, early intervention, and coordinated support involving healthcare providers, educators, and policymakers. Empowering parents and caregivers through targeted education and practical strategies, focusing on safe feeding techniques, oral-motor skill development, and positive mealtime experiences, is essential to improve dietary habits and overall health outcomes in this vulnerable population. Raising public awareness and integrating specialized support into existing health and educational systems will help bridge current gaps and foster a more nutritionally supportive environment for children with Down syndrome.

4. Conclusions

This study highlights the significant impact of socioeconomic factors and place of residence on the dietary habits and nutritional status of children with Down syndrome. Children from lower socioeconomic backgrounds—particularly those with unemployed or less-educated mothers and families spending over 50% of their income on food—demonstrated poorer dietary patterns, including higher consumption of refined carbohydrates and lower intake of nutrient-dense foods such as whole grains, fish, and vegetables.
Although rural families often produce their own food, this did not translate into healthier dietary habits, indicating that food access alone is insufficient without appropriate nutritional knowledge. Urban residence and higher maternal education were associated with more favorable dietary behaviors.
The findings underscore the need for targeted nutritional interventions and education, particularly in rural and low-income households. Addressing these socioeconomic disparities is essential for improving dietary quality and long-term health outcomes in children with Down syndrome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.R. and V.O.; methodology, M.E.R. and V.O.; software, V.O.; validation, M.E.R., V.O. and J.V.; formal analysis, V.O.; investigation, M.E.R. and V.O.; resources, M.E.R.; data curation, M.E.R. and V.O.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.R., V.O. and J.V.; writing—review and editing, M.E.R. and V.O.; visualization, M.E.R. and V.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Tourism and Rural Development in Požega, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek (classification code: 602-06/25-01/7, number 2177-1-20-01/11-25-3, 13 February 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Franceschetti, S.; Tofani, M.; Mazzafoglia, S.; Pizza, F.; Capuano, E.; Raponi, M.; Della Bella, G.; Cerchiari, A. Assessment and Rehabilitation Intervention of Feeding and Swallowing Skills in Children with Down Syndrome Using the Global Intensive Feeding Therapy (GIFT). Children 2024, 11, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ruparelia, A.; Mobley, W.C. Down Syndrome. In Neurobiology of Brain Disorders; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 59–77. ISBN 978-0-12-398270-4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mégarbané, A.; Ravel, A.; Mircher, C.; Sturtz, F.; Grattau, Y.; Rethoré, M.-O.; Delabar, J.-M.; Mobley, W.C. The 50th Anniversary of the Discovery of Trisomy 21: The Past, Present, and Future of Research and Treatment of Down Syndrome. Genet. Med. 2009, 11, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Van Dijk, M.; Lipke-Steenbeek, W. Measuring Feeding Difficulties in Toddlers with Down Syndrome. Appetite 2018, 126, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bull, M.J.; The Committee on Genetics. Health Supervision for Children With Down Syndrome. Pediatrics 2011, 128, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mentis, A.F. Epigenomic Engineering for Down Syndrome. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 71, 323–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Olmos-Serrano, J.L.; Kang, H.J.; Tyler, W.A.; Silbereis, J.C.; Cheng, F.; Zhu, Y.; Pletikos, M.; Jankovic-Rapan, L.; Cramer, N.P.; Galdzicki, Z.; et al. Down Syndrome Developmental Brain Transcriptome Reveals Defective Oligodendrocyte Differentiation and Myelination. Neuron 2016, 89, 1208–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cenini, G.; Fiorini, A.; Sultana, R.; Perluigi, M.; Cai, J.; Klein, J.B.; Head, E.; Butterfield, D.A. An Investigation of the Molecular Mechanisms Engaged before and after the Development of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathology in Down Syndrome: A Proteomics Approach. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 76, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haydar, T.F.; Reeves, R.H. Trisomy 21 and Early Brain Development. Trends Neurosci. 2012, 35, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roizen, N.J.; Magyar, C.I.; Kuschner, E.S.; Sulkes, S.B.; Druschel, C.; Van Wijngaarden, E.; Rodgers, L.; Diehl, A.; Lowry, R.; Hyman, S.L. A Community Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Problems in 440 Children with Down Syndrome in New York State. J. Pediatr. 2014, 164, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roccatello, G.; Cocchi, G.; Dimastromatteo, R.T.; Cavallo, A.; Biserni, G.B.; Selicati, M.; Forchielli, M.L. Eating and Lifestyle Habits in Youth With Down Syndrome Attending a Care Program: An Exploratory Lesson for Future Improvements. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 641112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ptomey, L.T.; Oreskovic, N.M.; Hendrix, J.A.; Nichols, D.; Agiovlasitis, S. Weight Management Recommendations for Youth with Down Syndrome: Expert Recommendations. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 10, 1064108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Field, D.; Garland, M.; Williams, K. Correlates of Specific Childhood Feeding Problems. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2003, 39, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Neill, A.C.; Richter, G.T. Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Children with Down Syndrome. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2013, 149, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jackson, A.; Maybee, J.; Moran, M.K.; Wolter-Warmerdam, K.; Hickey, F. Clinical Characteristics of Dysphagia in Children with Down Syndrome. Dysphagia 2016, 31, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Narawane, A.; Eng, J.; Rappazzo, C.; Sfeir, J.; King, K.; Musso, M.F.; Ongkasuwan, J. Airway Protection & Patterns of Dysphagia in Infants with down Syndrome: Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study Findings & Correlations. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020, 132, 109908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ross, C.F.; Bernhard, C.B.; Surette, V.; Hasted, A.; Wakeling, I.; Smith-Simpson, S. Eating Behaviors in Children with Down Syndrome: Results of a Home-use Test. J. Texture Stud. 2022, 53, 629–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anil, M.A.; Shabnam, S.; Narayanan, S. Feeding and Swallowing Difficulties in Children with Down Syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2019, 63, 992–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Assery, M.K.; Albusaily, H.S.; Pani, S.C.; Aldossary, M.S. Bite Force and Occlusal Patterns in the Mixed Dentition of Children with Down Syndrome. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ross, C.F.; Bernhard, C.B.; Smith-Simpson, S. Parent-reported Ease of Eating Foods of Different Textures in Young Children with Down Syndrome. J. Texture Stud. 2019, 50, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Surette, V.A.; Bernhard, C.B.; Smith-Simpson, S.; Ross, C.F. Development of a Home-use Method for the Evaluation of Food Products by Children with and without Down Syndrome. J. Texture Stud. 2021, 52, 424–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wong, C.; Dwyer, J.; Holland, M. Overcoming Weight Problems in Adults With Down Syndrome. Nutr. Today 2014, 49, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hsieh, K.; Rimmer, J.H.; Heller, T. Obesity and Associated Factors in Adults with Intellectual Disability. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2014, 58, 851–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bandini, L.G.; Fleming, R.K.; Scampini, R.; Gleason, J.; Must, A. Is Body Mass Index a Useful Measure of Excess Body Fatness in Adolescents and Young Adults with Down Syndrome? J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2013, 57, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bertapelli, F.; Pitetti, K.; Agiovlasitis, S.; Guerra-Junior, G. Overweight and Obesity in Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome—Prevalence, Determinants, Consequences, and Interventions: A Literature Review. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2016, 57, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Skrzypek, M.; Koch, W.; Goral, K.; Soczyńska, K.; Poźniak, O.; Cichoń, K.; Przybysz, O.; Czop, M. Analysis of the Diet Quality and Nutritional State of Children, Youth and Young Adults with an Intellectual Disability: A Multiple Case Study. Preliminary Polish Results. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Osaili, T.M.; Attlee, A.; Naveed, H.; Maklai, H.; Mahmoud, M.; Hamadeh, N.; Asif, T.; Hasan, H.; Obaid, R.S. Physical Status and Parent-Child Feeding Behaviours in Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome in The United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Seiverling, L.; Hendy, H.M.; Williams, K. The Screening Tool of Feeding Problems Applied to Children (STEP-CHILD): Psychometric Characteristics and Associations with Child and Parent Variables. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2011, 32, 1122–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Białek-Dratwa, A.; Żur, S.; Wilemska-Kucharzewska, K.; Szczepańska, E.; Kowalski, O. Nutrition as Prevention of Diet-Related Diseases—A Cross-Sectional Study among Children and Young Adults with Down Syndrome. Children 2022, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belleri, P.; Mazzuca, G.; Pietrobelli, A.; Zampieri, N.; Piacentini, G.; Zaffanello, M.; Pecoraro, L. The Role of Diet and Physical Activity in Obesity and Overweight in Children with Down Syndrome in Developed Countries. Children 2024, 11, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mura Paroche, M.; Caton, S.J.; Vereijken, C.M.J.L.; Weenen, H.; Houston-Price, C. How Infants and Young Children Learn About Food: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nordstrøm, M.; Retterstøl, K.; Hope, S.; Kolset, S.O. Nutritional Challenges in Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Datar, A.; Nicosia, N.; Shier, V. Maternal Work and Children’s Diet, Activity, and Obesity. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014, 107, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bauer, K.W.; Hearst, M.O.; Escoto, K.; Berge, J.M.; Neumark-Sztainer, D. Parental Employment and Work-Family Stress: Associations with Family Food Environments. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012, 75, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mauch, C.E.; Wycherley, T.P.; Bell, L.K.; Laws, R.A.; Byrne, R.; Golley, R.K. Parental Work Hours and Household Income as Determinants of Unhealthy Food and Beverage Intake in Young Australian Children. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 2125–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Croatian Institute for Public Health. Report on Persons with Disabilities in the Republic of Croatia; Croatian Institute for Public Health: Zagreb, Croatia, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  38. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC Growth Charts; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2024.
  39. Bertapelli, F.; Agiovlasitis, S.; Machado, M.R.; Do Val Roso, R.; Guerra-Junior, G. Growth Charts for Brazilian Children with Down Syndrome: Birth to 20 Years of Age. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 27, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bertapelli, F.; Machado, M.R.; Roso, R.D.V.; Guerra-Júnior, G. Body Mass Index Reference Charts for Individuals with Down Syndrome Aged 2–18 Years. J. Pediatr. 2017, 93, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Myrelid, A.; Gustafsson, J.; Ollars, B.; Annerén, G. Growth Charts for Down’s Syndrome from Birth to 18 Years of Age. Arch. Dis. Child. 2002, 87, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lewis, E.; Kritzinger, A. Parental Experiences of Feeding Problems in Their Infants with Down Syndrome. Downs Syndr. Res. Pract. 2004, 9, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Medlen, J.E.G. The Down Syndrome Nutrition Handbook: A Guide to Promoting Healthy Lifestyles, 2nd ed.; Phronesis Publishing, LLC.: Portland, OR, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-9786118-0-4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Magenis, M.L.; Machado, A.G.; Bongiolo, A.M.; Silva, M.A.D.; Castro, K.; Perry, I.D.S. Dietary Practices of Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. 2018, 22, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ravel, A.; Mircher, C.; Rebillat, A.-S.; Cieuta-Walti, C.; Megarbane, A. Feeding Problems and Gastrointestinal Diseases in Down Syndrome. Arch. Pédiatrie 2020, 27, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pisacane, A.; Toscano, E.; Pirri, I.; Continisio, P.; Andria, G.; Zoli, B.; Strisciuglio, P.; Concolino, D.; Piccione, M.; Giudice, C.L.; et al. Down Syndrome and Breastfeeding. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 92, 1479–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Al-Sarheed, M. Feeding Habits of Children with Down’s Syndrome Living in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2005, 52, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hielscher, L.; Irvine, K.; Ludlow, A.K.; Rogers, S.; Mengoni, S.E. A Scoping Review of the Complementary Feeding Practices and Early Eating Experiences of Children With Down Syndrome. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2023, 48, 914–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Croatia. Available online: https://mpudt.gov.hr/sustav-lokalne-i-podrucne-regionalne-samouprave/22979?lang=hr (accessed on 2 April 2025).
  50. Dean, W.R.; Sharkey, J.R. Rural and Urban Differences in the Associations between Characteristics of the Community Food Environment and Fruit and Vegetable Intake. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2011, 43, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kegler, M.C.; Prakash, R.; Hermstad, A.; Anderson, K.; Haardörfer, R.; Raskind, I.G. Food Acquisition Practices, Body Mass Index, and Dietary Outcomes by Level of Rurality. J. Rural Health 2022, 38, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lacko, A.; Ng, S.W.; Popkin, B. Urban vs. Rural Socioeconomic Differences in the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases by Store Type. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vasconcelos, T.M.D.; Pereira, K.S.F.; Tahim, J.C.; Sichieri, R.; Bezerra, I.N. Places to Purchase Food in Urban and Rural Areas of Brazil. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2024, 27, e240047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Colić-Barić, I.; Kajfež, R.; Šatalić, Z.; Cvjetić, S. Comparison of Dietary Habits in the Urban and Rural Croatian Schoolchildren. Eur. J. Nutr. 2004, 43, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sila, S.; Pavić, A.M.; Hojsak, I.; Ilić, A.; Pavić, I.; Kolaček, S. Comparison of Obesity Prevalence and Dietary Intake in School-Aged Children Living in Rural and Urban Area of Croatia. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 23, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Heinen, M.M.; Bel-Serrat, S.; Kelleher, C.C.; Buoncristiano, M.; Spinelli, A.; Nardone, P.; Milanović, S.M.; Rito, A.I.; Bosi, A.T.B.; Gutiérrrez-González, E.; et al. Urban and Rural Differences in Frequency of Fruit, Vegetable, and Soft Drink Consumption among 6–9-year-old Children from 19 Countries from the WHO European Region. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22, e13207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Erkkilä, A.T.; Herrington, D.M.; Mozaffarian, D.; Lichtenstein, A.H. Cereal Fiber and Whole-Grain Intake Are Associated with Reduced Progression of Coronary-Artery Atherosclerosis in Postmenopausal Women with Coronary Artery Disease. Am. Heart J. 2005, 150, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Amr, N.H. Thyroid Disorders in Subjects with Down Syndrome: An Update. Acta Biomed. Atenei Parm. 2018, 89, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brdar, D.; Gunjača, I.; Pleić, N.; Torlak, V.; Knežević, P.; Punda, A.; Polašek, O.; Hayward, C.; Zemunik, T. The Effect of Food Groups and Nutrients on Thyroid Hormone Levels in Healthy Individuals. Nutrition 2021, 91–92, 111394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gruszka, J.; Włodarek, D. General Dietary Recommendations for People with Down Syndrome. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Damodaran, S.; Parkin, K.L.; Fennema, O.R. Fennema’s Food Chemistry, 4th ed.; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-1-62870-571-3. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zmijewski, P.A.; Gao, L.Y.; Saxena, A.R.; Chavannes, N.K.; Hushmendy, S.F.; Bhoiwala, D.L.; Crawford, D.R. Fish Oil Improves Gene Targets of Down Syndrome in C57BL and BALB/c Mice. Nutr. Res. 2015, 35, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bourre, J.M. Roles of Unsaturated Fatty Acids (Especially Omega-3 Fatty Acids) in the Brain at Various Ages and during Ageing. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2004, 8, 163–174. [Google Scholar]
  64. Schuchardt, J.P.; Huss, M.; Stauss-Grabo, M.; Hahn, A. Significance of Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) for the Development and Behaviour of Children. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2010, 169, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lott, I.T. Antioxidants in Down Syndrome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Basis Dis. 2012, 1822, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rizvi, S.; Raza, S.T.; Ahmed, F.; Ahmad, A.; Abbas, S.; Mahdi, F. The Role of Vitamin e in Human Health and Some Diseases. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2014, 14, e157–e165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Edmonds, C.J.; Burford, D. Should Children Drink More Water? Appetite 2009, 52, 776–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Suh, H.; Kavouras, S.A. Water Intake and Hydration State in Children. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 475–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Van Ansem, W.J.; Schrijvers, C.T.; Rodenburg, G.; Van De Mheen, D. Maternal Educational Level and Children’s Healthy Eating Behaviour: Role of the Home Food Environment (Cross-Sectional Results from the INPACT Study). Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2014, 11, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Fernández-Alvira, J.M.; Mouratidou, T.; Bammann, K.; Hebestreit, A.; Barba, G.; Sieri, S.; Reisch, L.; Eiben, G.; Hadjigeorgiou, C.; Kovacs, E.; et al. Parental Education and Frequency of Food Consumption in European Children: The IDEFICS Study. Public Health Nutr. 2013, 16, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mori, S.; Asakura, K.; Sasaki, S.; Nishiwaki, Y. Relationship between Maternal Employment Status and Children’s Food Intake in Japan. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021, 26, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Möser, A.; Chen, S.E.; Jilcott, S.B.; Nayga, R.M. Associations between Maternal Employment and Time Spent in Nutrition-Related Behaviours among German Children and Mothers. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 1256–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Age of the children with Down syndrome.
Figure 1. Age of the children with Down syndrome.
Foods 14 01910 g001
Table 1. Respondents weight-for-age percentile according to growth charts for children with Down syndrome [38].
Table 1. Respondents weight-for-age percentile according to growth charts for children with Down syndrome [38].
Agen (F)Average Percentile Weight-for-Age Fn (F) < 5th Percentilen (F) 85th
–94th Percentile
n (F) > 95th
Percentile
n (M)Average Percentile Weight-for-Age Mn (M) < 5th Percentilen (M) 85th
–94th Percentile
n (M) > 95th Percentile
6–11 months18000065001 (16.7%)0
1–3 years17561 (5.9%)3 (17.6%)024613 (12.5%)4 (16.7%)4 (16.7%)
4–7 years56201 (20%)023692 (8.7%)5 (21.7%)3 (13.1%)
8–15 years67502 (33.3%)0176203 (17.6%)2 (11.8%)
16–19 years348000252000
n—number of participants; F—female; M—male.
Table 2. The relationship between urban and rural living environments and grocery shopping habits.
Table 2. The relationship between urban and rural living environments and grocery shopping habits.
Single Answers OnlyAll Answers
QuestionAnswerUrban (n = 59)Rural (n = 45)pp GlobalUrban (n = 59)Rural (n = 45)pp Global
Where do you most often buy fresh fruits and vegetables?At the local market1460.1760.29333140.070.084
In large retail chains12101.00022170.849
Directly from the manufacturer211.0001260.61
I don’t buy. We produce ourselves8120.11317220.035
Where do you most often buy fresh meat?At the local market880.5890.05219110.5290.015
In large retail chains2170.01928110.034
Directly from the manufacturer13120.63721190.448
I don’t buy. We produce ourselves490.0675130.009
Where do you most often buy other food?In small specialty stores8140.0510.051
In large retail chains51310.051
Statistical significance p < 0.05.
Table 3. Dietary habits of respondents in relation to gender and place of residence.
Table 3. Dietary habits of respondents in relation to gender and place of residence.
Question GenderPlace of Residence
How Often Does Your Child with Down Syndrome Consume:Frequency of ConsumptionF (n = 32)M
(n = 72)
F (%)M
(%)
pp GlobalU
(n = 59)
R
(n = 45)
U (%)R (%)pp Global
White/semi-white breadTwo or more times a day61418.7519.441.0000.79771311.8628.890.0430.162
Once a day81525.0020.830.62015825.4217.780.475
Up to five times a week369.388.331.0006310.176.670.729
Once or twice a week6918.7512.500.55011418.648.890.260
Rarely/never92828.1338.890.380201733.9037.780.686
Black/wholemeal breadTwo or more times a day339.384.170.3700.810518.472.220.2310.295
Once a day286.2511.110.720558.4711.110.743
Up to five times a week256.256.941.000436.786.671.000
Once or twice a week51115.6315.281.00012420.348.890.169
Rarely/never204562.5062.501.000333255.9371.110.153
Whole grains such as barley, oats, etc., in the form of grains, groats, or flourTwo or more times a day286.2511.110.7200.807466.7813.330.3230.225
Once a day111734.3823.610.34020833.9017.780.078
Up to five times a week266.258.331.0006210.174.440.461
Once or twice a week61718.7523.610.800121120.3424.440.641
Rarely/never112434.3833.331.000171828.8140.000.296
PotatoesTwo or more times a day123.132.781.0000.291030.006.670.0780.069
once a day030.004.170.550030.006.670.078
Up to five times a week070.009.720.100436.786.671.000
Once or twice a week275384.3873.610.310493183.0568.890.104
Rarely/never4712.509.720.7306510.1711.111.000
PastaTwo or more times a day113.131.390.5200.839020.004.440.1850.105
Once a day020.002.781.000020.004.440.185
Up to five times a week123.132.781.000305.080.000.256
Once or twice a week225368.7573.610.640443174.5868.890.659
Rarely/never81425.0019.440.600121020.3422.220.814
RiceTwo or more times a day030.004.170.5500.841121.694.440.5770.650
Once a day216.251.390.220121.694.440.577
Up to five times a week000.000.00n/a000.000.00n/a
Once or twice a week235271.8872.221.000453076.2766.670.378
Rarely/never71621.8822.221.000121120.3424.440.641
MilkTwo or more times a day51115.6315.281.0000.8399715.2515.561.0000.022
Once a day61618.7522.220.80018430.518.890.008
Up to five times a week51015.6313.890.7708713.5615.560.786
Once or twice a week5815.6311.110.5309415.258.890.384
Rarely/never112734.3837.500.830152325.4251.110.008
Fermented dairy products (yogurt, cream, kefir, etc.)Two or more times a day286.2511.110.7200.076558.4711.110.7430.053
Once a day42112.5029.170.084131222.0326.670.647
Up to five times a week121237.5016.670.025101416.9531.110.104
Once or twice a week91428.1319.440.44019432.208.890.005
Rarely/never51715.6323.610.440121020.3422.220.814
CheeseTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.516000.000.00n/a0.306
Once a day266.258.331.000446.788.890.724
Up to five times a week183.1311.110.270365.0813.330.171
Once or twice a week152646.8836.110.390271445.7631.110.158
Rarely/never143243.7544.441.000252142.3746.670.694
FruitTwo or more times a day82125.0029.170.8100.607141523.7333.330.3780.484
Once a day162450.0033.330.130261444.0731.110.314
Up to five times a week51315.6318.061.00010816.9517.781.000
Once or twice a week296.2512.500.5007411.868.890.753
Rarely/never153.136.940.660243.398.890.399
VegetablesTwo or more times a day41312.5018.060.5750.74871011.8622.220.1870.309
Once a day122937.5040.280.831261544.0733.330.314
Up to five times a week91828.1325.000.810171028.8122.220.504
Once or twice a week389.3811.111.000476.7815.560.201
Rarely/never4412.505.560.247538.476.671.000
MeatTwo or more times a day080.0011.110.0560.263446.788.890.7240.583
Once a day91828.1325.000.810151225.4226.671.000
Up to five times a week122937.5040.280.831271445.7631.110.158
Once or twice a week91228.1316.670.195101116.9524.440.460
Rarely/never256.256.941.000345.088.890.463
Meat products (salami, hot dogs, pâté, etc.)Two or more times a day133.134.171.0000.989406.780.000.1310.225
Once a day369.388.331.000548.478.891.000
Up to five times a week399.3812.500.751486.7817.780.121
Once or twice a week91828.1325.000.810151225.4226.671.000
Rarely/never163650.0050.001.000312152.5446.670.694
EggsTwo or more times a day020.002.781.0000.790020.004.440.1850.548
Once a day143.135.561.000233.396.670.650
Up to five times a week276.259.720.718548.478.891.000
Once or twice a week193359.3845.830.288302250.8548.891.000
Rarely/never102631.2536.110.663221437.2931.110.540
FishTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.788000.000.00n/a0.929
once a day000.000.00n/a000.000.00n/a
Up to five times a week123.132.781.000213.392.221.000
Once or twice a week154046.8855.560.524322354.2451.110.844
Rarely/never163050.0041.670.522252142.3746.670.694
Olive oilTwo or more times a day163.138.330.4300.829345.088.890.4630.730
Once a day51315.6318.061.00011718.6415.560.796
Up to five times a week61018.7513.890.56011518.6411.110.412
Once or twice a week51015.6313.890.7709615.2513.331.000
Rarely/never153346.8845.831.000252342.3751.110.430
Coconut oilTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.456000.000.00n/a0.469
Once a day010.001.391.000010.002.220.433
Up to five times a week020.002.781.000203.390.000.504
Once or twice a week4412.505.562.320446.788.890.724
rarely/never286587.5090.280.430534089.8388.891.000
Refined oils and saturated fats (sunflower oil, canola oil, lard, etc.)Two or more times a day020.002.781.0000.554111.692.221.0000.239
Once a day6918.7512.500.54612320.346.670.055
Up to five times a week71121.8815.280.41310816.9517.781.000
Once or twice a week81925.0026.391.000121520.3433.330.176
Rarely/never113134.3843.060.517241840.6840.001.000
ButterTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.267000.000.00n/a0.487
Once a day246.255.561.000335.086.671.000
Up to five times a week286.2511.110.7208213.564.440.181
Once or twice a week131640.6322.220.062161327.1228.891.000
Rarely/never154446.8861.110.202322754.2460.000.690
Fast food (burgers, pizza, etc.)Two or more times a day010.001.391.0001.000010.002.220.4330.641
Once a day010.001.391.000010.002.220.433
Up to five times a week010.001.391.000101.690.001.000
Once or twice a week51115.6315.281.0009715.2515.561.000
Rarely/never275884.3880.560.786493683.0580.000.799
Sweets (biscuits, cakes, chocolate, etc.)Two or more times a day216.251.390.2230.186121.694.440.5770.341
Once a day3129.3816.670.3847811.8617.780.414
Up to five times a week7721.889.720.1218613.5613.331.000
Once or twice a week122437.5033.330.824181830.5140.000.406
Rarely/never82825.0038.890.188251142.3724.440.064
Salty snacks (crackers, pretzels, chips, flips, popcorn, etc.)Two or more times a day246.255.561.0000.920243.398.890.3990.615
Once a day51015.6313.890.7727811.8617.780.414
Up to five times a week5715.639.720.5077511.8611.111.000
Once or twice a week102631.2536.110.663231338.9828.890.306
Rarely/never102531.2534.720.824201533.9033.331.000
Nuts (walnuts, almonds, hazelnuts, etc.)Two or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.214000.000.00n/a0.490
Once a day193.1312.500.169558.4711.110.743
Up to five times a week103.130.000.308010.002.220.433
Once or twice a week122237.5030.560.504221237.2926.670.295
Rarely/never184156.2556.941.000322754.2460.000.690
Seeds (chia, pumpkin, flax, sesame, etc.)Two or more times a day010.001.391.0000.174101.690.001.0000.452
Once a day369.388.331.000548.478.891.000
Up to five times a week5215.632.780.286436.786.671.000
Once or twice a week71721.8823.611.00017728.8115.560.159
Rarely/never174653.1363.890.696323154.2468.890.158
Carbonated drinks and syrupsTwo or more times a day246.255.561.0000.550426.784.440.6960.961
Once a day030.004.170.550213.392.221.000
Up to five times a week030.004.170.550213.392.221.000
Once or twice a week266.258.331.000538.476.671.000
Rarely/never285687.5077.780.290463877.9784.440.460
Natural juices (squeezed from fruit or purchased without added sugar, etc.)Two or more times a day399.3812.500.7500.940486.7817.780.1210.485
Once a day4912.5012.501.0008513.5611.110.773
Up to five times a week379.389.721.000558.4711.110.743
Once or twice a week61718.7523.610.80014923.7320.000.812
Rarely/never163050.0041.670.520281847.4640.000.551
TeaTwo or more times a day4512.506.940.6200.323456.7811.110.4960.557
Once a day339.384.170.545243.398.890.399
Up to five times a week399.3812.501.0006610.1713.330.759
Once or twice a week5515.636.940.6507311.866.670.509
Rarely/never175053.1369.440.566402767.8060.000.418
WaterTwo or more times a day285487.5075.000.7390.164503284.7571.110.1450.006
Once a day060.008.330.455518.472.220.231
Up to five times a week030.004.171.000213.392.221.000
Once or twice a week216.251.390.400121.694.440.577
Rarely/never286.2511.110.628191.6920.000.002
F—female, M—male, U—urban, R—rural; statistical significance p < 0.05.
Table 4. Dietary habits of respondents in relation to education level of parents.
Table 4. Dietary habits of respondents in relation to education level of parents.
Question Mother’s Level of EducationFather’s Level of Education
How Often Does Your Child with Down Syndrome ConsumeFrequency of ConsumptionHS (n = 55)UD (n = 49)HS (%)UD
(%)
pp GlobalHS (n = 72)UD (n = 32)HS (%)UD (%)pp Global
White/semi-white breadTwo or more times a day12821.8216.330.6190.10513718.0621.880.7880.482
Once a day17630.9112.240.03218525.0015.630.321
Up to five times a week365.4512.240.3018111.113.130.269
Once or twice a week6910.9118.370.4039612.5018.750.546
Rarely/never172030.9140.820.312241333.3340.630.511
Black/wholemeal breadTwo or more times a day427.274.080.6810.631608.330.000.1740.575
Once a day6410.918.160.746739.729.381.000
Up to five times a week345.458.160.704526.946.251.000
Once or twice a week61010.9120.410.27610613.8918.750.562
Rarely/never362965.4559.180.548442161.1165.630.827
Whole grains such as barley, oats, etc., in the form of grains, groats, or flourTwo or more times a day559.0910.201.0000.882739.729.381.0000.691
Once a day141425.4528.570.82621729.1721.880.483
Up to five times a week355.4510.200.471445.5612.500.247
Once or twice a week131023.6420.410.81417623.6118.750.798
Rarely/never201536.3630.610.678231231.9437.500.655
PotatoesTwo or more times a day213.642.041.0000.125304.170.000.5510.216
Once a day305.450.000.245304.170.000.551
Up to five times a week529.094.080.443435.569.380.673
Once or twice a week374367.2787.760.019522872.2287.500.130
Rarely/never8314.556.120.21010113.893.130.166
PastaTwo or more times a day111.822.041.0000.467202.780.001.0000.561
Once a day203.640.000.497202.780.001.000
Up to five times a week121.824.080.600121.396.250.223
Once or twice a week423376.3667.350.382522372.2271.881.000
Rarely/never91316.3626.530.23615720.8321.881.000
RiceTwo or more times a day213.642.041.0000.261304.170.000.5510.519
Once a day030.006.120.101212.783.131.000
Up to five times a week000.000.00n/a000.000.00n/a
Once or twice a week393670.9173.470.829492668.0681.250.236
Rarely/never14925.4518.370.48018525.0015.630.321
MilkTwo or more times a day12421.828.160.0620.06316022.220.000.0020.009
Once a day14825.4516.330.33716622.2218.750.798
Up to five times a week4117.2722.450.0488711.1121.880.224
Once or twice a week7612.7312.241.00010313.899.380.750
Rarely/never182032.7340.820.421221630.5650.000.078
Fermented dairy products (yogurt, cream, kefir, etc.)Two or more times a day8214.554.080.0980.0678211.116.250.7200.947
Once a day16929.0918.370.25318725.0021.880.808
Up to five times a week131123.6422.451.00016822.2225.000.803
Once or twice a week71612.7332.650.01815820.8325.000.620
Rarely/never111120.0022.450.81315720.8321.881.000
CheeseTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.625000.000.00n/a0.345
Once a day6210.914.080.276536.949.380.699
Up to five times a week457.2710.200.732455.5615.630.129
Once or twice a week212038.1840.820.842291240.2837.500.831
Rarely/never242243.6444.901.000341247.2237.500.398
FruitTwo or more times a day141525.4530.610.6630.58720927.7828.131.0000.625
Once a day211938.1838.781.000301041.6731.250.385
Up to five times a week10818.1816.331.00011715.2821.880.413
Once or twice a week8314.556.120.210749.7212.500.734
Rarely/never243.648.160.417425.566.251.000
VegetablesTwo or more times a day61110.9122.450.1830.03111615.2818.750.780.207
Once a day212038.1840.820.842281338.8940.631.000
Up to five times a week121521.8230.610.373161122.2234.380.362
Once or twice a week9216.364.080.0569212.506.250.503
Rarely/never7112.732.040.0638011.110.000.102
MeatTwo or more times a day447.278.161.0000.025445.5612.500.2670.119
Once a day131423.6428.570.65619826.3925.001.000
Up to five times a week162529.0951.020.028251634.7250.000.433
Once or twice a week16529.0910.200.02617423.6112.500.428
Rarely/never6110.912.040.117709.720.000.190
Meat products (salami, hot dogs, pâté, etc.)Two or more times a day223.644.081.0000.008131.399.380.0990.046
Once a day6310.916.120.4959012.500.000.059
Up to five times a week11120.002.040.00510213.896.250.505
Once or twice a week161129.0922.450.506171023.6131.250.644
Rarely/never203236.3665.310.006351748.6153.130.856
EggsTwo or more times a day111.822.041.0000.298202.780.001.0000.417
Once a day325.454.081.000232.789.380.325
Up to five times a week273.6414.290.080546.9412.500.463
Once or twice a week272549.0951.021.000381452.7843.750.711
Rarely/never221440.0028.570.302251134.7234.381.000
FishTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.359000.000.00n/a0.172
Once a day000.000.00n/a000.000.00n/a
Up to five times a week121.824.080.628121.396.250.236
Once or twice a week262947.2759.180.529361950.0059.380.721
Rarely/never281850.9136.730.372351148.6134.380.439
Olive oilTwo or more times a day345.458.160.7040.003344.1712.500.2110.039
Once a day9916.3618.370.80111715.2821.880.586
Up to five times a week3135.4526.530.0059712.5021.880.390
Once or twice a week6910.9118.370.4039612.5018.750.556
Rarely/never341461.8228.570.000840855.5625.000.076
Coconut oilTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.210000.000.00n/a0.014
Once a day010.002.040.471010.003.130.314
Up to five times a week020.004.080.22020.006.250.101
Once or twice a week355.4510.200.471445.5612.500.267
Rarely/never524194.5583.670.109682594.4478.130.637
Refined oils and saturated fats (sunflower oil, canola oil, lard, etc.)Two or more times a day111.822.041.0000.623111.393.130.5280.736
Once a day6910.9118.370.4039612.5018.750.556
Up to five times a week12621.8212.240.29913518.0615.631.000
Once or twice a week151227.2724.490.82518925.0028.130.818
Rarely/never212138.1842.860.691311143.0634.380.69
ButterTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.507000.000.00n/a0.051
Once a day335.456.121.000334.179.380.38
Up to five times a week375.4514.290.185465.5618.750.081
Once or twice a week161329.0926.530.829191026.3931.250.822
Rarely/never332660.0053.060.554461363.8940.630.276
Fast food (burgers, pizza, etc.)Two or more times a day101.820.001.0000.492101.390.001.0000.923
Once a day101.820.001.000101.390.001.000
Up to five times a week101.820.001.000101.390.001.000
Once or twice a week10618.1812.240.4312416.6712.500.774
Rarely/never424376.3687.760.203572879.1787.500.756
Sweets (biscuits, cakes, chocolate, etc.)Two or more times a day305.450.000.2450.159212.783.131.0000.304
Once a day10518.1810.200.27811415.2812.501.000
Up to five times a week8614.5512.240.7818611.1118.750.353
Once or twice a week201636.3632.650.83729740.2821.880.078
Rarely/never142225.4544.900.042221430.5643.750.264
Salty snacks (crackers, pretzels, chips, flips, popcorn, etc.)Two or more times a day6010.910.000.0280.040516.943.130.6640.318
Once a day11420.008.160.10111415.2812.501.000
Up to five times a week6610.9112.241.00011115.283.130.099
Once or twice a week162029.0940.820.223241233.3337.500.824
Rarely/never161929.0938.780.306211429.1743.750.179
Nuts (walnuts, almonds, hazelnuts, etc.)Two or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.090000.000.00n/a0.375
Once a day467.2712.240.511556.9415.630.277
Up to five times a week010.002.040.471101.390.001.000
Once or twice a week142025.4540.820.142231131.9434.380.824
Rarely/never372267.2744.900.029431659.7250.000.396
Seeds (chia, pumpkin, flax, sesame, etc.)Two or more times a day010.002.040.4710.562010.003.130.3080.465
Once a day457.2710.200.7328111.113.130.269
Up to five times a week345.458.160.704526.946.251.000
Once or twice a week111320.0026.530.48916822.2225.000.803
Rarely/never372667.2753.060.162432059.7262.500.831
Carbonated drinks and syrupsTwo or more times a day427.274.080.6810.713425.566.251.0000.981
Once a day121.824.080.300212.783.131.000
Up to five times a week121.824.080.600212.783.131.000
Once or twice a week355.4510.200.471536.949.380.699
Rarely/never463883.6477.550.464592581.9478.130.788
Natural juices (squeezed from fruit or purchased without added sugar, etc.)Two or more times a day8414.558.160.3690.223759.7215.630.5070.837
Once a day7612.7312.241.0009412.5012.501.000
Up to five times a week8214.554.080.098739.729.381.000
Once or twice a week91416.3628.570.16015820.8325.000.62
Rarely/never232341.8246.940.693341247.2237.500.398
TeaTwo or more times a day7212.734.080.1670.4488111.113.130.2690.700
Once a day427.274.080.681425.566.251.000
Up to five times a week7512.7310.200.7659312.509.380.751
Once or twice a week467.2712.240.511648.3312.500.493
Rarely/never333460.0069.390.412452262.5068.750.658
WaterTwo or more times a day394370.9187.760.0530.259552776.3984.380.4420.261
Once a day427.274.080.681425.566.251.000
Up to five times a week213.642.041.000121.396.250.223
Once or twice a week305.450.000.245304.170.000.551
Rarely/never7312.736.120.3289112.503.130.169
HS—completed high school, UD—completed university degree (bachelor’s; master’s; PhD), statistical significance p < 0.05.
Table 5. Dietary habits of respondents in relation to mother’s employment status and share of food costs in family income.
Table 5. Dietary habits of respondents in relation to mother’s employment status and share of food costs in family income.
Question Mother’s Employment StatusShare of Food Costs in Family Income
How Often Does Your Child with Down Syndrome ConsumeFrequency of ConsumptionUE
(n = 39)
E
(n = 65)
UE (%)E (%)pp Global>50%
(n = 35)
<50%
(n = 69)
>50% (%)<50% (%)pp Global
White/semi-white breadTwo or more times a day13733.3310.770.0090.00511931.4313.040.0350.255
Once a day101325.6420.000.62681522.8621.741.000
Up to five times a week275.1310.770.478275.7110.140.714
Once or twice a week1142.5621.540.00841111.4315.940.769
Rarely/never132433.3336.920.833102728.5739.130.386
Black/wholemeal breadTwo or more times a day337.694.620.6690.602338.574.350.4020.192
Once a day377.6910.770.740285.7111.590.489
Up to five times a week162.569.230.252255.717.251.000
Once or twice a week51112.8216.920.7802145.7120.290.082
Rarely/never273869.2358.460.302263974.2956.520.090
Whole grains such as barley, oats, etc., in the form of grains, groats, or flourTwo or more times a day4610.269.231.0000.646378.5710.141.0000.155
Once a day121630.7724.620.503111731.4324.640.489
Up to five times a week172.5610.770.253080.0011.590.049
Once or twice a week81520.5123.080.81261717.1424.640.460
Rarely/never142135.9032.310.831152042.8628.990.190
PotatoesTwo or more times a day307.690.000.0500.019122.862.901.0000.479
Once a day215.131.540.555215.711.450.261
Up to five times a week4310.264.620.421348.575.800.685
Once or twice a week245661.5486.150.007245668.5781.160.217
Rarely/never6515.387.690.3235614.298.700.501
PastaTwo or more times a day205.130.000.1380.093020.002.900.5490.330
Once a day112.561.541.000205.710.000.111
Up to five times a week030.004.620.290122.862.901.000
Once or twice a week255064.1076.920.180245168.5773.910.645
Rarely/never111128.2116.920.21781422.8620.290.802
RiceTwo or more times a day215.131.540.5540.085215.711.450.2610.064
Once a day307.690.000.050215.711.450.261
Up to five times a week000.000.00n/a000.000.00n/a
Once or twice a week264966.6775.380.372205557.1479.710.021
Rarely/never81520.5123.080.812111231.4317.390.134
MilkTwo or more times a day7917.9513.850.5860.9727920.0013.040.3950.709
Once a day81420.5121.541.00091325.7118.840.452
Up to five times a week6915.3813.851.00041111.4315.940.769
Once or twice a week5812.8212.311.0003108.5714.490.536
Rarely/never132533.3338.460.676122634.2937.680.831
Fermented dairy products (yogurt, cream, kefir, etc.)Two or more times a day8220.513.080.0060.042378.5710.141.0000.255
Once a day61915.3829.230.155101528.5721.740.473
Up to five times a week91523.0823.081.00061817.1426.090.338
Once or twice a week71617.9524.620.47451814.2926.090.216
Rarely/never91323.0820.000.805111131.4315.940.08
CheeseTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.366000.000.00n/a0.106
Once a day4410.266.150.4695314.294.350.115
Up to five times a week182.5612.310.148368.578.701.000
Once or twice a week162541.0338.460.83893225.7146.380.056
Rarely/never182846.1543.080.839182851.4340.580.305
FruitTwo or more times a day131633.3324.620.3720.633101928.5727.541.0000.060
Once a day122830.7743.080.29883222.8646.380.032
Up to five times a week61215.3818.460.79371120.0015.940.596
Once or twice a week5612.829.230.7436517.147.250.176
Rarely/never337.694.620.6694211.432.900.176
VegetablesTwo or more times a day61115.3816.921.0000.10451214.2917.390.7850.308
Once a day122930.7744.620.214142740.0039.131.000
Up to five times a week91823.0827.690.65162117.1430.430.164
Once or twice a week8320.514.620.0186517.147.250.176
Rarely/never4410.266.150.4694411.435.800.438
MeatTwo or more times a day5312.824.620.1480.116358.577.251.0000.002
Once a day101725.6426.151.000141340.0018.840.032
Up to five times a week113028.2146.150.09753614.2952.170.002
Once or twice a week81320.5120.001.00081322.8618.840.616
Rarely/never5212.823.080.1005214.292.900.041
Meat products (salami, hot dogs, pâté, etc.)Two or more times a day317.691.540.1470.233225.712.900.6010.244
Once a day367.699.231.0005414.295.800.16
Up to five times a week6615.389.230.3596617.148.700.212
Once or twice a week121530.7723.080.48981922.8627.540.645
Rarely/never153738.4656.920.105143840.0055.070.213
EggsTwo or more times a day205.130.000.1380.020205.710.000.1110.020
Once a day4110.261.540.064328.572.900.332
Up to five times a week4510.267.690.725090.0013.040.027
Once or twice a week133933.3360.000.015163645.7152.170.678
Rarely/never162041.0330.770.297142240.0031.880.513
FishTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.129000.000.00n/a0.202
Once a day000.000.00n/a000.000.00n/a
Up to five times a week122.563.081.000030.004.350.549
Once or twice a week163941.0360.000.070163945.7156.520.308
Rarely/never222456.4136.920.067192754.2939.130.151
Olive oilTwo or more times a day070.0010.770.0430.120348.575.800.6850.858
Once a day9923.0813.850.28661217.1417.391.000
Up to five times a week41210.2618.460.40041211.4317.390.569
Once or twice a week7817.9512.310.56541111.4315.940.769
Rarely/never192948.7244.620.691183051.4343.480.533
Coconut oilTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.142000.000.00n/a0.555
Once a day102.560.000.375010.001.451.000
Up to five times a week020.003.080.527112.861.451.000
Once or twice a week172.5610.770.253172.8610.140.262
Rarely/never375694.8786.150.202336094.2986.960.327
Refined oils and saturated fats (sunflower oil, canola oil, lard, etc.)Two or more times a day112.561.541.0000.970112.861.451.0000.823
Once a day6915.3813.851.0006917.1413.040.568
Up to five times a week61215.3818.460.79361217.1417.391.000
Once or twice a week111628.2124.620.81872020.0028.990.356
Rarely/never152738.4641.540.838152742.8639.130.833
ButterTwo or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.017000.000.00n/a0.089
Once a day337.694.620.6694211.432.900.176
Up to five times a week0100.0015.380.012285.7111.590.489
Once or twice a week151438.4621.540.07362317.1433.330.106
Rarely/never213853.8558.460.686233665.7152.170.214
Fast food (burgers, pizza, etc.)Two or more times a day102.560.000.3750.420102.860.000.3370.464
Once a day102.560.000.375010.001.451.000
Up to five times a week010.001.541.000010.001.451.000
Once or twice a week51112.8216.920.7807920.0013.040.395
Rarely/never325382.0581.541.000275877.1484.060.427
Sweets (biscuits, cakes, chocolate, etc.)Two or more times a day307.690.000.0500.198122.862.901.0000.951
Once a day6915.3813.851.0006917.1413.040.568
Up to five times a week41010.2615.380.56141011.4314.490.769
Once or twice a week152138.4632.310.531112531.4336.230.669
Rarely/never112528.2138.460.395132337.1433.330.828
Salty snacks (crackers, pretzels, chips, flips, popcorn, etc.)Two or more times a day6015.380.000.0020.016245.715.801.0000.077
Once a day7817.9512.310.5659625.718.700.035
Up to five times a week4810.2612.311.0001112.8615.940.056
Once or twice a week102625.6440.000.201112531.4336.230.669
Rarely/never122330.7735.380.673122334.2933.331.000
Nuts (walnuts, almonds, hazelnuts, etc.)Two or more times a day000.000.00n/a0.014000.000.00n/a0.001
Once a day0100.0015.380.012192.8613.040.159
Up to five times a week102.560.000.375102.860.000.337
Once or twice a week92523.0838.460.13252914.2942.030.004
Rarely/never293074.3646.150.008283180.0044.930.0008
Seeds (chia, pumpkin, flax, sesame, etc.)Two or more times a day010.001.541.0000.204010.001.451.0000.524
Once a day5412.826.150.290368.578.701.000
Up to five times a week162.569.230.251162.868.700.419
Once or twice a week61815.3827.690.22961817.1426.090.338
Rarely/never273669.2355.380.214253871.4355.070.138
Carbonated drinks and syrupsTwo or more times a day337.694.620.6690.2345114.291.450.0160.078
Once a day030.004.620.290215.711.450.261
Up to five times a week215.131.540.555122.862.901.000
Once or twice a week5312.824.620.148265.718.700.714
Rarely/never295574.3684.620.210255971.4385.510.114
Natural juices (squeezed from fruit, or purchased without added sugar, etc.)Two or more times a day4810.2612.311.0000.6644811.4311.591.0000.650
Once a day5812.8212.311.0004911.4313.041.000
Up to five times a week6415.386.150.170285.7111.590.489
Once or twice a week81520.5123.080.81261717.1424.640.460
Rarely/never163041.0346.150.685192754.2939.130.151
TeaTwo or more times a day5412.826.150.2900.273368.578.701.0000.503
Once a day337.694.620.669338.574.350.402
Up to five times a week4810.2612.311.0004811.4311.591.000
Once or twice a week192.5613.850.086192.8613.040.159
Rarely/never264166.6763.080.833244368.5762.320.665
WaterTwo or more times a day285471.7983.080.2170.387265674.2981.160.4520.058
Once a day245.136.151.000152.867.250.661
Up to five times a week122.563.081.000030.004.350.549
Once or twice a week215.131.540.555308.570.000.036
Rarely/never6415.386.150.175514.297.250.298
UE—unemployed, E—employed, statistical significance p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ergović Ravančić, M.; Obradović, V.; Vraneković, J. The Connection Between Socioeconomic Factors and Dietary Habits of Children with Down Syndrome in Croatia. Foods 2025, 14, 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14111910

AMA Style

Ergović Ravančić M, Obradović V, Vraneković J. The Connection Between Socioeconomic Factors and Dietary Habits of Children with Down Syndrome in Croatia. Foods. 2025; 14(11):1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14111910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ergović Ravančić, Maja, Valentina Obradović, and Jadranka Vraneković. 2025. "The Connection Between Socioeconomic Factors and Dietary Habits of Children with Down Syndrome in Croatia" Foods 14, no. 11: 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14111910

APA Style

Ergović Ravančić, M., Obradović, V., & Vraneković, J. (2025). The Connection Between Socioeconomic Factors and Dietary Habits of Children with Down Syndrome in Croatia. Foods, 14(11), 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14111910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop