Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study by HPTLC of Selected Capparis spinosa Samples (Buds and Leaves) from the Cycladic Islands in Greece
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Environmental Humidity on Instant Coffee Stability: Defining Moisture Thresholds for Quality Degradation and Shelf Life Prediction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Fruits in the Serbian Market by LC-MS/MS

1
Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
A Bio Tech Lab d.o.o., 21208 Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
3
Technical School “Pavle Savić”, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
4
Faculty for Food Technology, Food Safety and Ecology, University of Donja Gorica, Donja Gorica, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro
5
Faculty of Technology Zvornik, University of East Sarajevo, 75400 Zvornik, Bosnia and Herzegovina
6
Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2025, 14(10), 1828; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101828
Submission received: 2 May 2025 / Revised: 13 May 2025 / Accepted: 15 May 2025 / Published: 21 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Food Toxicology)

Abstract

:
The concentrations of pesticide residues were determined in 2164 samples of 46 fruit species, collected over a 4-year period. Fruits originated from 59 countries, including Serbia (N = 199). Pesticide residues were determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) after extraction using a modified QuEChERS protocol. A total of 173 pesticide residues were detected. Of the fruit samples, 62.57% had pesticide residues at or above 0.01 mg/kg, and 4.67% exceeded the maximum residue limits (MRLs) set by the Serbian regulation. MRL values were most often exceeded in pomegranate and citrus fruits (grapefruit and mandarin). The most frequently found pesticide was imazalil (detected in 624 samples, 28.84%), with the highest concentration (93.870 mg/kg) found in a grapefruit sample. Multiple pesticides were detected in 50.92% of the fruit samples, and two grapefruit samples contained up to 44 pesticide residues.

1. Introduction

Pesticides play a significant role in food production. They help to protect crops and grow more yields; their use can also increase the number of times each year a crop can be grown on the same land. Pesticides are used to protect crops against insects, weeds, fungi, and other pests. Since they are designed to be biologically active, pesticides are potentially toxic to humans and can have both acute and chronic health effects, depending on the quantity and ways in which a person is exposed [1,2,3,4,5]. People who are both directly and indirectly exposed to pesticides may suffer acute toxic effects, including suicide attempts, mass poisonings from contaminated food, chemical accidents in the industry, and occupational exposure in the agricultural industry, as well as a number of serious chronic diseases, including cancer, asthma, diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, leukemia, and cognitive impairment. For example, pesticide use causes three million poisonings, 220,000 deaths, and about 750,000 chronic illnesses every year worldwide, most of them occurring in developing countries [6,7]. For this reason, pesticide residue levels in food are regulated by national and European legislation. These comprehensive legislative frameworks define rules for the approval of active substances, their uses in plant protection products, and their permissible residues in food. To ensure a high level of consumer protection, legal limits, or so-called ‘maximum residue levels’ (MRLs), are established in Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 [8]. European Union harmonized MRLs are set for more than 1300 pesticides, covering 378 food products/food groups [9]. This regulation is being continuously amended by several Regulations and Commission Regulations to update the commodities included and their residue levels, based on the most recent knowledge from the Member States, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and the European Commission. In Serbia, the regulation on the “maximum residue levels of pesticides in food” has changed a few times over the past 10 years [10,11,12], with the aim of aligning national legislation with EU regulation. The latest Serbian Regulation [13] on the “maximum residue levels of pesticides in food” is fully harmonized with the European Union Regulations.
There have been many surveys of pesticide residues in fruits/food recently [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. A summary of the studies published in the available literature dealing with pesticide residues in fruit (from 2010 onwards) is presented in Supplementary Material S1, Table S1. The overall conclusion of these studies is that there is a widespread pesticide presence currently in fruits/food in general. The pesticides are frequently detected above the limit of quantification (LOQ); however, MRL is seldom exceeded. Some pesticide residues were detected at concentrations above their MRLs. In addition, pesticides that are found in these studies are banned and/or unauthorized in many countries because of their high toxicity. Therefore, pesticide residue control is an important activity intended to prevent, reduce, or eliminate chemical hazards in food.
Pesticide residue determination using analytical methods involves the main steps such as sample preparation (homogenization, extraction, and clean-up), separation, detection, and data analysis [5]. The extraction procedure is a crucial part of analytical methods and has a great influence on the correct quantification of pesticide residues. The most common extraction methods are liquid–liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) extraction, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [5]. The QuEChERS sample preparation technique is extensively used for the multiclass or multiresidues analysis of different types of pesticides mainly in agriculture/foodstuff/fruit/vegetable [5,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,74]. Numerous detection methods have been developed over the past two decades for the determination of pesticide residues in food samples. The conventional analytical methods are gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with various detectors [electron capture detector (GC-ECD), flame photometric detector (GC-FPD), nitrogen phosphorus detector (GC-NPD), and flame ionization detector (GC-FID); UV detection (HPLC-UV), fluorescence detector (HPLC-FD), and diode-array detector (HPLC-DAD)]. Moreover, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a widely utilized method for multi-pesticide residue analysis. MS (and tandem mass spectrometry—MS/MS) detection system presents high sensitivity and selectivity without derivatization. Identification and confirmation can be conducted in a single step when applied to LC [5,14,15,16,17,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,29,30,32,33,35,36,37,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,74].
The objective of this study was to investigate the concentrations of pesticide residues in fruits, which are collected as a part of the national monitoring programme for pesticide residues in Serbia, and to compare these levels with maximum residue levels established by the Serbian Regulation [10,11,12].

2. Materials and Methods

Over a 4-year period (2016–2019), concentrations of pesticide residues were determined in 2164 samples of fresh fruits. The analyses were conducted by an accredited state laboratory (A Bio Tech Lab).
Primary samples of each fruit were taken from eight different packages, and six fruits were taken randomly from each package. The following parts of the fruit were used for homogenization: whole product with the stem (currants); whole product after removal of the stem (apple, apricot, avocado, banana, carambola, cashew, clementine, date palm, fig, grapefruit, Japanese apple, kiwi, kumquat, lemon, lime, lychee, mandarin, mango, orange, passion fruit, peach, peach (nectarine), pear, pitaya, plum, pomegranate, pomelo, quince, sour cherry, sweet cherry); whole product with the shell (chestnut); whole product after removal of the shell (almond, Brazil nut, coconut, hazelnut, peanut, pistachio, walnut); whole product after removal of the crown (pineapple); whole product after removal of the caps, crown, and stems (aronia, blackberry, blueberry, grape, raspberry, strawberry) [8,10,11,12,13].
The method for sample preparation and analysis of the concentrations of pesticide residues in the collected fruits was conducted as described in detail in Kecojević et al. [74]. This method uses a modified QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, Safe) protocol without a clean-up step, based on the sample dilution approach, followed by liquid chromatography coupled with the tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Control spike samples were prepared using the following procedure. After grinding and homogenization, 10 g fruit samples were measured into 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes (PP tubes). Then, 100 μL of internal standard and an appropriate solution of the stock pesticide standard were added so that the final concentrations were 5 and 50 μg/kg for the fruit samples. A total of 10 mL of extraction solvent (ACN) was added to the samples. After homogenization by hand shaking (1 min), QuEChERS Mix I (a mixture of 4 g magnesium sulphate, 1 g sodium chloride, 0.5 g disodium hydrogen citratesesquihydrate, and 1 g sodium citrate dihydrate) was added. The whole content of the tube was hand shaken for another 1 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 3000 rpm. Then, 500 μL of the solution was transferred into a vial, and 500 μL MP-A and 10 μL of 5% formic acid in ACN were added. Prior to the analysis, all extracts were filtrated through 0.45 μm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters. Pesticides were analysed using Thermo Scientific UHPLC (ultra-high performance liquid chromatography) system, Dionex UltiMate 3000, coupled with an MS detector triple-quadrupole Thermo Scientific TSQ Quantum Access Max (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with electrospray ionization. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive mode with the following parameters: spray voltage 5.0 kV, vaporizer temperature 280 °C, ion transfer tube temperature 300 °C, auxiliary gas (nitrogen) pressure 15 arb. units, and sheath gas pressure 55 arb. units. The collision gas was argon (pressure set at 1.5 mTor). A selected reaction monitoring (SRM-EZ) method was applied. Chromatographic separation was carried out with reverse-phase Thermo Scientific Hypersil Gold aQ, (100 mm 2.1 mm, i.d. 1.9 μm) analytical column, under following gradient profile: 0–2.1 min, 95% MP-A; 2.1–25.0 min, 95–5% MP-A; 25.0–35.0 min, 5% MP-A; 35.0–35.1 min, 5–95% MP A; 35.1–40.8 min, 95% MP-A. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.3 mL/min, the injection volume was 6 μL, and the column oven temperature was 40 °C. All samples were filtrated through 0.45 μm PTFE membrane filters before chromatographic analysis.
The results were evaluated according to the reporting limit (RL) and MRLs established by Serbian regulation. The LOQ for all pesticide residues was 0.005 mg/kg (LOQ for cabbage, Kecojević et al. [74]), while the reporting limit (RL) was 0.01 mg/kg. Generally, Serbian, as well as EU, MRLs for pesticide residues in fruits are in the range of 0.01–10 mg/kg, depending on the compound. Only for a few pesticides are MRLs up to 15 and 20 mg/kg.

3. Results and Discussion

Detailed characteristics like common name, country of origin, and number of samples (without and with pesticide residues) of the analysed samples are shown in Table 1. All pesticide residues at or above the reporting limit (RL ≥ 0.01 mg/kg) are presented.
In this study, a total of 2164 samples of fresh fruits were analysed for pesticide residue. The number and percentage of samples collected per year are shown in Figure 1. The origin of the samples is shown in Figure 2. Evaluation of the obtained results for the 2164 different fruit samples (Table 1) showed that 62.57% (1354 out of 2164 samples) contained pesticide residues (RL ≥ 0.01 mg/kg), while 37.43% (810 out of 2164 samples) contained no pesticide residues (RL < 0.01 mg/kg). All samples of aronia (N = 1), Brazil nut (N = 2), carambola (N = 2), cashew (N = 1), chestnut (N = 2), fig (N = 1), lychee (N = 1), passion fruit (N = 1), pistachio (N = 1), pitaya (N = 2), and quince (N = 1) were pesticide-free. The detection rates (when the sample size “N” is greater than 30) of pesticide residues in peach (nectarine) (N = 36), pineapple (N = 41), strawberry (N = 46), kiwi (N = 50), peach (N = 56), pomegranate (N = 66), pear (N = 95), grapefruit (N = 115), grape (N = 152), banana (N = 168), mandarin (N = 194) lemon (N = 217), orange (N = 324), and apple (N = 351) samples were 36.11%, 73.17%, 76.09%, 34.00%, 42.86%, 63.64%, 71.58%, 88.70%, 34.87%, 58.33%, 69.07%, 80.65%, 69.75%, and 64.10%, respectively. All pesticide residues detected in almond (N = 6), apricot (N = 15), aronia (N = 1), banana (N = 168), blackberry (N = 2), blueberry (N = 5), Brazil nut (N = 2), carambola (N = 2), cashew (N = 1), chestnut (N = 2), clementine (N = 16), coconut (N = 1), currants (N = 2), date palm (N = 8), fig (N = 1), hazelnut (N = 5), Japanese apple (N = 9), kiwi (N = 50), kumquat (N = 4), lychee (N = 1), mango (N = 24), passion fruit (N = 1), peach (N = 56), peach (nectarine) (N = 36), peanut (N = 8), pistachio (N = 1), pitaya (N = 2), plum (N = 26), pomelo (N = 12), quince (N = 1), raspberry (N = 8), strawberry (N = 46), sweet cherry (N = 20), and walnut (N = 6) were below or at the MRLs. The MRLs for pesticide residues were exceeded in 101 out of the 2164 (4.67%) samples: apple (12 out of the 351 samples, 3.42%; Bosnia and Herzegovina: N = 2, North Macedonia: N = 2, Poland: N = 3, Serbia: N = 5), avocado (1 out of the 19 samples, 5.26%; Peru: N = 1), grapefruit (21 out of the 115 samples, 18.26%; South Africa: N = 4; Turkey: N = 17), grapes (2 out of the 152 samples, 1.32%; North Macedonia: N = 2), lemon (4 out of the 217 samples, 1.84%; Argentina: N = 1, Turkey: N = 2), lime (4 out of the 28 samples, 14.29%; Guatemala: N = 1, Mexico: N = 2, The Netherlands: N = 1), mandarin (14 out of the 194 samples, 7.22%; Spain: N = 2, Swaziland: N = 1, Turkey: N = 11), orange (7 out of the 324 samples, 2.16%; Spain: N = 1, Turkey: N = 6), pear (6 out of the 95 samples, 6.32%; Poland: N = 2, Serbia: N = 4), pineapple (3 out of the 41 samples, 7.32%; Colombia: N = 1, Costa Rica: N = 2), pomegranate (26 out of the 66 samples, 39.39%; Turkey: N = 26), and sour cherry (1 out of the 14 samples, 7.14%; Serbia: N = 1).
The frequency of the detected pesticide residues in 2164 fruit samples is shown in Table 2. A total of 173 pesticide residues (distributed as follows: 49.13% insecticides, 35.84% fungicides, and 15.03% herbicides) were detected in all the fruit samples. Imazalil, thiabendazole, pyrimethanil, imidacloprid, carbendazim, acetamiprid, boscalid, fludioxonil, chlorpyrifos, prochloraz, pyriproxyfen, tebuconazole, propiconazole, prothioconazole, azoxystrobrin, methoxyfenozide, and pyraclostrobin were the pesticide residues most frequently found (occurrence in more than 90 analysed samples, >4%) and were detected in 624 (28.84%), 337 (15.57%), 245 (11.32%), 213 (9.84%), 185 (8.55%), 171 (7.90%), 154 (7.12%), 154 (7.12%), 145 (6.70%), 143 (6.61%), 138 (6.38%), 116 (5.36%), 113 (5.22%), 97 (4.48%), 96 (4.44%), 94 (4.34%), and 93 (4.30%) samples, respectively. Of the 173 pesticide residues, 64 (36.99%) of them were detected at least once in fruit samples at levels higher than MRLs. A total of 309 pesticide residues (133 in pomegranate, 43.04%; 95 in grapefruit, 30.74%; 33 in mandarin, 10.68%; 13 in apples, 4.21%; 11 in orange, 3.56%; 7 in pear, 2.27%; 5 in lime, 1.62%; 4 in lemon, 1.29%; 3 in pineapple, 0.97%; 2 in grape, 0.65%; 2 in sour cherry, 0.65; 1 in avocado, 0.32%) were found in the 101 fruit samples containing residues above MRLs. The other 109 (63.01%) pesticide residues did not exceed their MRL values. The most frequent pesticide residues found to exceed the MRL were butoxycarboxim (100%, 5 out of 5 samples), carbofuran (100%, 1 out of 1 sample), deltamethrin (60.00%, 12 out of 20 samples), fenvalerate (60.78%, 31 out of 51 samples), formothion (58.82%, 10 out of 17 samples), iprodione (66.67%, 2 out of 3 samples), mepanipyrim (61.54%, 8 out of 13 samples), mepronil (100%, 1 out of 1 sample), nuariomol (66.67%, 2 out of 3 samples), oxamyl (100%, 10 out of 10 samples), piperonyl-butoxide (50.00%, 1 out of 2 samples), pirimiphos-methyl (83.33%, 10 out of 12 samples), promecarb (71.43%, 5 out of 7 samples), prometryn (75.00%, 3 out of 4 samples), sulfentrazone (50.00%, 2 out of 4 samples), tebuthiuron (63.64%, 7 out of 11 samples), terbutryn (50.00%, 3 out of 6 samples), and tricyclazole (100%, 3 out of 3 samples). Among the most detected pesticide residues, imazalil was found at the highest concentration (93.349 mg/kg, 18.67 times higher than MRL) in grapefruit.
Pesticide residues in fruit samples were reported in many countries. The following presents the available results on pesticide residues in fruits where the levels exceeded the MRLs and where the number of investigated samples was equal to or higher than 50, using a multi-residue analytical method. Abdallah et al. [14] performed 42 pesticide residue analyses (10 of which were detected) on 200 date samples collected from different large markets in the Al-Qassim region in Saudi Arabia and reported that 15 samples (7.5%) exceeded the MRLs. The acetamiprid, carbendazim, carbofuran, difenoconazole, indoxacarb, malathion, and oxadiazon residues exceeded the MRLs. The results revealed that the carbofuran, imidacloprid, acetamiprid, and difenoconazole residues were the most frequently detected pesticides. In Lebanon, Abou Zeid et al. [15] analysed 76 pesticide residues (19 of which were detected) in 128 loqaut samples gathered from markets between 2017 and 2019. The authors reported that pesticide concentration exceeded the MRLs in 39.84% of the samples. In a Turkish study [16] on lemon samples (N = 100), including 355 pesticide residues (16 of which were detected), 29% of the samples exceeded the MRLs. The buprofezin, chlorpyrifos-methyl, and metamitron residues exceeded the MRLs. The most frequently detected pesticides in lemon fruits were chlorpyrifos-methyl, metamitron, buprofezin, pyriproxyfen, and malathion. In another Turkish study, Bakırcı et al. [17] analysed a total of 1423 fruits and vegetables (573 samples of fruits and 850 samples of vegetables) from the Aegean region of Turkey. The samples were analysed to determine the concentrations of 186 pesticide residues (80 of which were detected). These researchers found that 8.4% of the fruit samples contained pesticide residues above the MRLs. Acetamiprid, chlorpyriphos, and carbendazim were the most detected pesticide residues. El Hawari et al. [18] examined 212 apple samples in Lebanon during 2012–2016. Apple samples were tested for up to 39 pesticide residues. They found that 61% of pesticide residues were higher than the MRLs. MRL exceedances were detected for chlorpyrifos, methidathion, and lambda-cyhalothrin. The most frequently detected pesticide residues were chlorpyrifos, methidathion, cypermethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, myclobutanil, and diazinon. Further, El-Mageed et al. [19] examined 5381 fruit samples and 4343 vegetable samples in the United Arab Emirates (monitoring programme during 2019). Out of the 343 pesticides tested (93 of which were detected), 34 pesticides were found above the MRLs. The MRLs were exceeded in 5.43% of the fruit samples. The most commonly detected pesticides in the fruit samples that exceeded the established MRLs were bifenazate, spirodiclofen, carbendazim, and acetamiprid. Gad Alla et al. [20] carried out a survey of 177 samples of fruits collected from Egyptian markets from July to December 2010. The results indicated that 17.5% of the samples contained residues above the MRLs. Of the 215 pesticides scanned, 51 pesticides were detected. The most detected pesticide groups were pyrethroids, followed by organophosphates, benzimidazoles, neonicotinoid, carbamates, and triazoles. Organophosphates were the most violated group, followed by pyrethroids. Golge and Kabak [21] determined 172 pesticide residues (16 of which were detected) in 280 table grape samples, collected in four provinces of Turkey from August to October 2016. Residues above the MRLs were found in 20.4% of the samples. The most prevalent pesticide residues were azoxystrobin, chlorpyrifos, boscalid, and cyprodinil. Two pesticides (carbendazim and chlorpyrifos) exceeded MRLs in the tested samples. In a study by Li et al. [22], 142 pesticide residues (18 of which were detected) were detected in 245 strawberry samples gathered from markets in Beijing, China, from June 2017 to May 2018. Two pesticides (carbofuran and dimethomorph) exceeded the MRLs in the tested samples (1.63%). Carbendazim, pyrimethanil, and azoxystrobin were the most frequently detected pesticides in strawberry samples. A study by Li et al. [23] focused on pesticide contamination of citrus fruits (N = 2922) from China (monitoring programme from 2013 to 2018). MRL exceedances were recorded in 111 (3.8%) citrus fruit samples. Out of the 106 pesticides tested, 40 pesticides were found, eight of which (bifenthrin, carbofuran, cyhalothrin, difenoconazole, fenpyroximate, isocarbophos, profenofos, and triazophos) had residues that violated the MRLs. The most frequently detected pesticides were chlorpyrifos, prochloraz, carbendazim, profenofos, and acetamiprid. Likudis et al. [24] conducted a study during 2011–2012 analyzing the residues of pesticides in samples of Greek apples (N = 80). A total of 12 pesticide residues were detected out of the 51 active substances that were investigated. The highest detection rates were observed for chlorpyrifos, quinalphos, and parathion. Only 2 of the 80 investigated samples (2.5%) contained pesticide residues (parathion-methyl) in levels exceeding the MRLs. Osaili et al. [25] evaluated the pesticide residues in imported fruits (N = 4513) collected from Dubai ports (United Arab Emirates) between 2018 to 2020 during a monitoring campaign. Out of 262 pesticide reference standards that were analysed, a total of 81 pesticides were present in fruit samples. A total of 26.8% of samples contained pesticide residues above the MRLs. Chlorpyrifos, carbendazim, cypermethrin, and azoxystrobin were the most frequently detected pesticides above the MRLs. Radulović et al. [26] investigated the occurrence of pesticide residues on citrus fruits imported to Serbia (February 2022). The analysis of 76 citrus fruit samples revealed the presence of 23 different pesticides. The MRL values of pesticide residues were exceeded in 21 samples (28%). The most detected pesticides were imazalil, azoxystrobin, dimethomorph, boscalid, pyrimethanil, and thiabendazole. The MRL values of the pesticide residues were exceeded for azinphos-methyl, chlorpyrifos, dimethomorph, fluazifop, imazalil, picoxystrobin, prochloraz, and propiconazole. In Poland, Sójka et al. [27] determined 177 pesticide residues in 121 samples of fresh and frozen strawberries from the 2012 harvest season. The MRL exceedances were recorded in five (4.13%) samples. Pyraclostrobin was the most commonly detected pesticide, followed by cyprodinil, fludioxonil, and boscalid. In Mexico, Suárez-Jacobo et al. [28] diagnosed pesticide residues in oranges from Nuevo Leon (May 2014). The results showed the presence of 15 pesticide residues out of 93 analysed compounds. Of the 100 samples analysed, 11 samples exceeded the MRLs. The pesticides above the MRLs were chlorpyrifos-ethyl, dimethoate, formalathion, and methidation. The pesticide residues most frequently found were spirodiclofen, chlorpyrifos-ethyl, and malathion. Wang et al. [29] assayed pesticide residues in litchi from China during the period from May 2019 to August 2020. A total of 37 pesticide residues (23 of which were detected) were monitored in 268 litchi samples. Out of the 268 samples collected, 53 samples (19.8%) contained pesticide concentrations that exceeded the MRLs. Pesticides with the highest exceedance rates included pyraclostrobin, lambda-cyhalothrin, beta-cypermethrin, carbendazim, chlorpyrifos, difenoconazole, cyazofamid, and azoxystrobin. Pyraclostrobin was the most commonly detected pesticide, followed by chlorpyrifos, difenoconazole, and beta-cypermethrin. Pesticide residues in bayberry samples (N = 157) were reported by Yang et al. [30]. A monitoring survey was carried out in China during 2013–2014. A total of 23 pesticides were detected among the 44 pesticides analysed. Only 2.5% of the samples contained pesticide residues (acetamiprid) above the MRL. The most frequently detected pesticide was carbendazim. A study by Yang et al. [31] focused on pesticide contamination of minor fruit (starfruits and Indian jujubes; N = 87), collected from Xiamen, China. Of the total 50 pesticides analysed, 19 residues were found. These researchers found that 67.8% of the samples exceeded the MRLs in minor fruits. The most frequently detected pesticides were carbendazim, followed by imidacloprid, chlorbenzuron, chlorpyrifos, pyridaben, and thiophanate-methyl. Acetamiprid, carbendazim, chlorantraniliprole, chlorpyrifos, diflubenzuron, fenpropathrin, imidacloprid, thiophanate-methyl, and triazophos residues exceeded the MRLs. Pesticide residues in kumquat fruits from China were investigated by Zhang et al. [32] from 2016 to 2020. Among the 573 samples of kumquat, 30 of the 89 targeted pesticides were accumulatively detected. The residues in 9.4% of the samples were higher than the MRLs. The highest detection rates were found for tebuconazole and spirodiclofen, followed by profenofos, cyhalothrin, difenoconazole, imidacloprid, thiophanate-methyl, chlorpyrifos, prochloraz, propargite, carbendazol, and hexythiazox. The residue levels of seven pesticides (avermectin, bifenthrin, difenoconazole, methidathion, profenofos, spirodiclofen, and triazophos) in the kumquat samples surpassed the MRLs. Bouagga et al. [45] conducted a study during 2015–2017, analysing the residues of pesticides in 64 table grape samples from different regions of Tunisia. The presence of 96 pesticides was assessed. A total of 94% of the samples exceeded the MRLs for at least one compound (bifenthrin, carbendazim, carbofuran, chlorpyrifos, deltamethrin, dimethoate, fluazinam, flusilazole, malathion, omethoate, thiacloprid, thiophanate-methyl, tetradifon, and triadimefon). In Egypt, El-Sheikh et al. [46] analysed a total of 120 fruits and vegetables (54 samples of fruits and 66 samples of vegetables) from markets in Sharkia Governorate during the period from July 2020 to June 2021. It was found that 35 out of 90 pesticide residues (38.9%) detected in fruits exceeded the MRLs. Li et al. [47] presented the results from a 2-year monitoring survey (2013–2014) aimed at investigating the presence of pesticide residues in Chinese pears. A total of 43 out of 104 pesticides were detected in 310 samples, of which 2.6% exceeded the MRLs. Acetamiprid, carbendazim, and cyhalothrin were the most frequently detected pesticides. Residues of cyfluthrin, difenoconazole, omethoate, profenofos, pyrimethanil, and tebuconazole exceeded the MRLs. Liu et al. [48] investigated the levels of pesticides in four fruits (Miaoxi yellow peach, lanxi loquat, qingyuan sweet spring tangelo, and Haining pear) in Zhengjiang Province, China, between 2020 and 2021. In this study, 68 pesticides were analysed, of which 25 were detected in the 68 samples. In one Haining pear sample (1.47%), the residue, prochloraz, exceeded the MRL. Pyraclostrobin, prochloraz, carbendazim, and acetamiprid had the highest detection rates in the four fruits. Łozowicka et al. [49] investigated the residue levels of 130 pesticides in raspberry samples (N = 184) from northeastern Poland producers over seven years (2005–2011). Among the 130 analysed pesticides, 18 active substances were found. Pesticide residues exceeding the MRLs were found in 29.3% of samples. Pyrimethalin, fenhexamid, cyprodinil, boscalid, and procymidone were the most frequently detected pesticides. MRL exceedances were found for chlorothalonil, fenazaquin, and procymidone. In another Polish study, Łozowicka et al. [50] focused on pesticide contamination of 392 fruit samples collected from May 2010 to October 2012. Out of 160 pesticides tested, 31 pesticides were found above the limit of detection. In 5.9% of samples, pesticide residues exceeded the MRLs. Dithiocarbamate, captan, cyprodinil, and boscalid were the pesticides most frequently found. The most frequently detected pesticide above the permissible limits were dithiocarbamates, fenazaquin, fenitrothion, esfenwalerate, and flusilazole. Bempah and Donkor [54] analysed a total of 320 fruit samples from the Ghana markets in the Accra Metropolis for almost a year (from September 2007 to June 2008). A total of 16 pesticides (mainly organochlorines) were monitored. The researchers found that 38.6% of the samples contained pesticide residues (endrin aldehyde, heptachlor, lindane, methoxychlor, and p,p’-DDT) above MRLs. In Spain, Berrada et al. [55] investigated pesticide residues in market fruits from one Valencian cooperative. A total of 41 pesticides were monitored. Of the 429 samples, 3.7% of the collected samples exceeded the MRLs. The most frequent residues were dithiocarbamates, fenthion, malathion, chorothalonil, chlorpyrifos, and methidathion. A market-based survey was carried out to evaluate levels of 26 pesticides in fruits in the Hyderabad region, Pakistan, during the period of October 2010–April 2011 [56]. Out of 131 samples analysed, 53 (40.5%) were contaminated with pesticide residues, while only 3 (2.3%) samples exceeded the MRLs for chlorpyrifos. The most frequently detected pesticide was chlorpyrifos, followed by endosulfan sulfate and dieldrin. A total of 312 peach samples were collected from the major producing regions in nine provinces of China from 2013 to 2015 by Li et al. [57]. Out of 105 pesticides analysed, 39 were found. Residues in 3.2% of the monitored samples exceeded their MRLs, involving eight pesticides (carbendazim, cyhalothrin, cypermethrin, difenoconazole, deltamethrin, fenbuconazole, flusilazole, and isazofos). The most frequently detected pesticide was carbendazim, followed by cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, acetamiprid, cypermethrin, imidacloprid, difenoconazole, tebuconazole, and pyridaben. In a separate study on raspberry samples, Łozowicka et al. [58] evaluated the residues of 140 pesticides (17 of which were detected) in analysed samples from northeastern Poland (2005–2010). Of the 128 samples, 27 (21.1%) raspberry samples exceeded the MRLs. Pyrimethanil, fenhexamid, cyprodinil, procymidone, and boscalid were the most frequently detected. The levels of detected pesticide residues exceeded the MRLs, only in the cases of chlorothalonil, dithiocarbamates, fenazaquin, and procymidone. Further, in a separate study on apple samples (n = 212), Łozowicka et al. [59] discussed the occurrence of 127 active substances of pesticides (19 of which were detected). The study showed that 7% of the samples from northeastern Poland contained pesticide residues (cyprodinil, dimethoate, diazinon, fenitrothion, flusilazole, and pirimethanil) above the MRLs. Captan, myclobutanil, penconazole, carbendazim, and dithianon were the most commonly used fungicides, while chlorpiryfos, thiachloprid, and fenoxycarb dominated among the insecticides. Also in Poland, Matyaszek et al. [60] determined the incidence of pesticide residues in berries (N = 250) harvested from southeastern Poland in 2009–2011. Of the 148 pesticides tested, 126 were detected. MRLs were exceeded in 4% (cypermetrine) of the samples. The most commonly found active substances included the following: pyrimethanil, dithiocarbamates, procymidone, cypermetrine, cyprodinil, and difenoconazole. Parveen et al. [61] screened 120 samples of fruits for 25 different pesticides during 2008–2009 in Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 22% of samples contained residues of pesticides above the MRLs. Wołejko et al. [62] determined the residues of pesticides in raw and processed berries (N = 170) from Poland (2011). The study included 160 pesticides, of which 29 were detected. In 14.7% of the samples, residues were found above the MRLs. Nine pesticides (acetamiprid, carbendazim, cypermethrin, difenoconazole, dithiocarbamates, esfenvalerate, fenazaquin, flusilazole, and procymidone) exceeding MRL were observed. Boscalid, dithiocarbamates, cyprodinil, carbendazim, pyrimethanil, pyraclostrobin, iprodione, and difenoconazole were the most detected pesticide residues. Zhang et al. [63] developed a multi-residue method for the analysis of 284 pesticides in five local fruit cultivars in Shanghai, China. A total of 58 pesticide residues were detected. The authors reported that pesticide concentration exceeded the MRLs in 5% of the total tested samples (N = 260). The levels of fluopyram residues in 13 samples exceeded the MRL. Thus, the percentage of pesticide residues in fruit samples exceeding the MRL ranged from 1.47% to 94% across various studies.
In addition, pesticide residues above the MRLs were detected in several countries when fruits and vegetables were tested simultaneously. Pesticide residues exceeding the MRLs were detected in fruits and vegetables in the following studies: Algharibeh and AlFararjeh [33] in Jordan (N = 158; 22%), Gondo et al. [34] in Botswana (N = 83; 13%), Hjorth et al. [35] in Nordic countries (N = 724; 8.4%; fruits and vegetables from South America—a Nordic project, monitoring programme), Ibrahim et al. [36] in Egypt (N = 175; 42%), Jallow et al. [37] in Kuwait (N = 150; 21%), Mac Loughlin et al. [38] in Argentina (N = 135; 36.3%), Mebdoua et al. [39] in Algeria (N = 160; 12.5%), Mutengwe et al. [40] in South Africa (N = 53; 1.9%), Poulsen et al. [41] in Denmark [N = 17,309—fruit and vegetable (70%); 2.6% (most frequently in fruit), monitoring programme], Skretteberg et al. [42] in Nordic countries (N = 721; 12%; fruits and vegetables from Southeast Asia—a Nordic project, monitoring programme), Soydan et al. [43] in Turkey (N = 3044; 11.6%), Toptanci et al. [44] in Turkey (N = 493; 29.2%), Jardim and Caldas in Brazil [51] (N = 13,556; 2.7%; Brazilian monitoring programme), Mert et al. [52] in the UK (N = 25,822; 4.0%; monitoring programme), Park et al. [53] in Korea (N = 1146; 1.0%), Al-Shamary et al. [64] in Qatar (N = 127; 62.2%), Bempah et al. [65] in Ghana (N = 350; 19.0%), Chen et al. [66] in China (N = 3009; 11.7%; monitoring programme), Knežević et al. [67] in Croatia (N = 866; 5.3%), Luo et al. [68] in China (N = 3307; 1.0%), Mutengwe et al. [69] in South Africa (N = 199; 1.0%), Mutengwe et al. [70] in South Africa (N = 37,838; 0.32%; monitoring programme), Patiño et al. [71] in Colombia (N = 100; 41.0%), Sivaperumal et al. [72] in India (N = 286; 16.4%), and Szpyrka et al. [73] in Poland (N = 1026; 1.8%). Thus, the percentage of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetable samples exceeding the MRL ranged from 0.32% to 62.2% across various studies. Moreover, the use of banned/withdrawn/non-authorized/restricted/non-registered/non-recommended active ingredients was identified in fruits and vegetables from many different countries [14,15,16,19,20,21,23,24,26,29,30,31,32,33,34,37,38,40,45,48,49,50,51,57,58,59,60,62,69,70,71,73].
In order to enhance the level of food safety for the benefit of consumer protection, the European Union established the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) in 197. Members of the network use RASFF to notify each other about dangerous health hazards such as heavy metals, pathogenic microorganisms, and pesticide residues. Moreover, RASFF reported pesticides as the third most widely known hazard category [4]. For the same reason, EFSA publishes an annual report on pesticide residues in all food commodities in the European Union every year, based on the results of a surveillance programme involving all Member States [75,76,77,78].
An overview of the number of residue residues per sample is shown in Table 3a,b.
Many samples contained several pesticide residues. A total of 5078 individual pesticide residues were found in the 1354 fruit samples containing residues. Of the 2164 samples analysed, a single pesticide residue was detected in 252 (11.65%) samples, while two, three, four, five, and six pesticide residues were detected in 278 (12.85%), 227 (10.49%), 203 (9.38%), 145 (6.70%), and 103 (4.76%) samples, respectively. Seven or more pesticide residues were detected in 6.75% of the samples. The highest number of pesticide residues was found in two samples of grapefruit, each containing 44 pesticide residues.
In the previously cited studies, multiple pesticide residues (more than two pesticides per sample) were found in most fruit samples: 17.9% in loquats from Lebanon [15], 21.0% in lemons from Turkey [16], 20.0% in fruits from Turkey [17], 22.6% in apples from Lebanon [18], 39.0% in fruits from Egypt [20], 37.1% in table grapes from Turkey [21], 15.9% in strawberry from China [22], 70.0% in citrus fruits from China [23], 82.9% in citrus fruits from Serbia [26], 96.6% in litchies from China [29], 45.6% in Bayberry from China [30], 55.2% in minor fruit from China [31], 80.8% in Kumquats from China [32], 100% in table grapes from Tunisia [45], 69.7% in pears from China [47], 19.1% in fruits from China [48], 37.5% in raspberries from Poland [49], 30.1% in fruits Poland [50], 14.9% in fruits from Spain [55], 76.3% in peaches from China [57], 37.5% in raspberries from Poland [58], 51 and 34.1% in berries from Poland [60,62], and 56.2% in fruits from China [63]. In addition, multiple pesticide residues were found in fruits from the United Arab Emirates [25], Mexico [28], Egypt [46], Poland [59], and Pakistan [61].

4. Conclusions

In this study, pesticide residues were determined in 2164 samples of the most popularly consumed fruits in Serbia (during 2016–2019). There were 1354 (62.57%) samples contaminated with pesticide residues, of which 101 (4.67%) samples exceeded the MRLs. Among the 101 fruit samples with MRL exceedances, pomegranate was the fruit with the highest number of MRL exceedances (26 samples, 25.74%), followed by grapefruit with 21 samples (20.79%), mandarin with 14 samples (13.86%), apple with 12 samples (11.88%), orange with 7 samples (6.93%), pear with 6 samples (5.94%), lemon and lime with 4 samples each (3.96%), pineapple with 3 samples (2.97%), grapes with 2 samples (1.98%), and avocado and sour cherry with 1 sample each (0.99%). Pomegranate, grapefruit, and mandarin showed the highest number of samples with multiple pesticide residues above the MRLs. These results highlight the need to continuously monitor pesticide residues in fruits in order to fully protect public health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods14101828/s1. Supplementary Material S1, Table S1: Summary of studies dealing with detection of pesticide residue in fresh fruits/food of plant origin.

Author Contributions

Methodology, validation, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, I.K. and D.M.; Conceptualization, supervision, project administration, data curation, writing—original draft preparation—review and editing, V.T.; Methodology, validation, investigation, data curation, B.B., M.L. and A.J.; Formal analysis, investigation, data curation, M.T., A.M. and S.S.; Supervision, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, D.V. and V.Đ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation, Republic of Serbia, under grant numbers 451-03-136/2025-03/200134 and 451-03-137/2025-03/200134. It was also funded by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development, Republic of Montenegro, through the programme “Centre of Excellence (CoE) for digitalization of microbial food safety risk assessment and quality parameters for accurate food authenticity certification (FoodHub), under grant number 01-3660/2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Pesticide Residues in Food. 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/pesticide-residues-in-food (accessed on 14 April 2024).
  2. Rani, L.; Thapa, K.; Kanojia, N.; Sharma, N.; Singh, S.; Grewal, A.S.; Srivastav, A.L.; Kaushal, J. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmad, M.F.; Ali Ahmad, F.; Alsayegh, A.A.; Zeyaullah, M.; AlShahrani, A.M.; Muzammil, K.; Ali Saati, A.; Wahab, S.; Elbendary, E.Y.; Kambal, N.; et al. Pesticides impacts on human health and the environment with their mechanisms of action and possible countermeasures. Heliyon 2024, 10, e29128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Eissa, F.; Zidan, N.E.-H.; Sebaei, A.S.; Mohamed, M.E.B. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables: Analysis and risk assessment of EU RASFF notifications between 1999 and 2022. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 134, 106556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Samsidara, A.; Siddiqueea, S.; Shaaranib, S.M. A review of extraction, analytical and advanced methods for determination of pesticides in environment and foodstuffs. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2018, 71, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tudi, M.; Ruan, D.H.; Wang, L.; Lyu, J.; Sadler, R.; Connell, D.; Chu, C.; Phung, D.T. Agriculture development, pesticide application and its impact on the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tudi, M.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Lyu, J.; Yang, L.; Tong, S.; Yu, Q.J.; Ruan, H.D.; Atabila, A.; et al. Exposure routes and health risks associated with pesticide application. Toxins 2022, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 February 2005 on maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin and amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC. Off. J. EU 2005, L70, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  9. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific report of EFSA: The 2021 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J. 2023, 21, 7939. [Google Scholar]
  10. Serbian Regulation. Rulebook on the Maximum Allowed Quantities of Residues of Plant Protection Products in Food and Feed and on food and Feed for Which the Maximum Permitted Quantities of Residues of Plant Protection Product. Off. Gaz. RS 2014, 29. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Serbian Regulation. Rulebook on the Maximum Allowed Quantities of Residues of Plant Protection Products in Food and Feed and on Food and Feed for Which the Maximum Permitted Quantities of Residues of Plant Protection Product. Off. Gaz. RS 2018, 22. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Serbian Regulation. Rulebook on the Maximum Allowed Quantities of Residues of Plant Protection Products in Food and Feed. Off. Gaz. RS 2020, 132. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Serbian Regulation. Rulebook on the Maximum Allowed Quantities of Residues of Plant Protection Products in food and feed. Off. Gaz. RS 2022, 91. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Abdallah, O.I.; Alamer, S.S.; Alrasheed, A.M. Monitoring pesticide residues in dates marketed in Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia using a QuEChERS methodology and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2018, 32, e4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Abou Zeid, M.I.; Awad, M.K.; Melki, K.C.; Jawdah, Y.A.; Jammoul, A.M. Pesticides residues on Loquat: A minor crop in Lebanon. Food Control 2021, 130, 108297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aslantas, S.; Golge, O.; González-Curbelo, M.Á.; Kabak, B. Determination of 355 pesticides in lemon and lemon juice by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS. Foods 2023, 12, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bakırcı, G.T.; Acay, D.B.Y.; Bakırcı, F.; Ötleş, S. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from the Aegean region, Turkey. Food Chem. 2014, 160, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. El Hawari, K.; Mokh, S.; Al Iskandarani, M.; Halloum, W.; Jaber, F. Pesticide residues in Lebanese apples and health risk assessment. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2019, 12, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. El-Mageed, N.M.A.; Abu-Abdoun, I.I.; Janaan, A.S. Monitoring of pesticide residues in imported fruits and vegetables in United Arab Emirates during 2019 (2020). Int. Res. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 21, 239–260. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gad Alla, S.A.; Almaz, M.M.; Thabet, W.M.; Nabil, M.M. Evaluation of pesticide residues in some Egyptian fruits. Int. J. Environ. 2015, 4, 87–97. [Google Scholar]
  21. Golge, O.; Kabak, B. Pesticide residues in table grapes and exposure assessment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1701–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, J.; Chen, W.; Deng, K.; Liu, S.; Li, B.; Li, Y. Monitoring and dietary exposure assessment of pesticide residues in strawberry in Beijing, China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2022, 15, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, C.; Cui, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, A.; Liang, G.; Jiao, B. Occurrence, temporal variation, quality and safety assessment of pesticide residues on citrus fruits in China. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Likudis, Z.; Costarelli, V.; Vitoratos, A.; Apostolopoulos, C. Pesticide residues in Greek apples with protected geographical indication or designation of origin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2014, 39, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Osaili, T.M.; Al Sallagi, M.S.; Dhanasekaran, D.K.; Bani Odeh, W.A.M.; Al Ali, H.J.; Al Ali, A.A.S.A.; Ismail, L.C.; Mehri, K.O.A.L.; Pisharath, V.A.; Holley, R.; et al. Pesticide residues in fresh fruits imported into the United Arab Emirates. Heliyon 2022, 8, e11946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Radulović, J.; Lučić, M.; Nešić, A.; Onjia, A. Multivariate assessment and risk ranking of pesticide residues in citrus fruits. Foods 2023, 12, 2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sójka, M.; Miszczak, A.; Sikorski, P.; Zagibajło, K.; Karlińska, E.; Kosmala, M. Pesticide residue levels in strawberry processing by-products that are rich in ellagitannins and an assessment of their dietary risk to consumers. NFS J. 2015, 1, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Suárez-Jacobo, A.; Alcantar-Rosales, V.M.; Alonso-Segura, D.; Heras-Ramírez, M.; E-De La Rosa, D.; Lugo-Melchor, O.; Gaspar-Ramirez, O. Pesticide residues in orange fruit from citrus orchards in Nuevo Leon State, Mexico. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2017, 10, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, S.; Zeng, X.; Wang, X.; Chang, H.; Sun, H.; Liu, Y. A survey of multiple pesticide residues on litchi: A special fruit. Microchem. J. 2022, 175, 107175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, G.; Wang, W.; Liang, S.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Q.; Qian, Y. Pesticide residues in bayberry (Myrica rubra) and probabilistic risk assessment for consumers in Zhejiang, China. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, X.; Luo, J.; Duan, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, C. Simultaneous analysis of multiple pesticide residues in minor fruits by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/hybrid quadrupole time-of-fight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018, 241, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Jiao, B.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, C.; Cui, Y.; He, Y.; Li, J. Determination, quality, and health assessment of pesticide residues in kumquat in China. Foods 2023, 12, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Algharibeh, G.R.; Al Fararjeh, M.S. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables in Jordan using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2019, 12, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gondo, T.F.; Kamakama, M.; Oatametse, B.; Samu, T.; Bogopa, J.; Keikotlhaile, B.M. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from the southern part of Botswana. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2021, 14, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hjorth, K.; Johansen, K.; Holen, B.; Andersson, A.; Christensen, H.B.; Siivinen, K.; Toome, M. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from South America—A Nordic project. Food Control 2011, 22, 1701–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibrahim, M.A.; Belal, M.H.; Abdallah, I.S.; El-Sawi, S.A.M. Monitoring and risk assessment of pesticide residues in some locally produced vegetables and fruits. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022, 65, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jallow, M.F.A.; Awadh, D.G.; Albaho, M.S.; Devi, V.Y.; Ahmad, N. Monitoring of pesticide residues in commonly used fruits and vegetables in Kuwait. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mac Loughlin, T.M.; Peluso, M.L.; Etchegoyen, M.A.; Alonso, L.L.; de Castro, M.C.; Percudani, M.C.; Marino, D.J.G. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables of the argentine domestic market: Occurrence and quality. Food Control 2018, 93, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mebdoua, S.; Lazali, M.; Ounane, S.M.; Tellah, S.; Nabi, F.; Ounane, G. Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Algeria. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2017, 10, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mutengwe, M.T.; Aneck-Hahn, N.H.; Korsten, L.; van Zijl, M.C.; de Jager, C. Pesticide residues and estrogenic activity in fruit and vegetables sampled from major fresh produce markets in South Africa. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2016, 33, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Poulsen, M.E.; Andersen, J.H.; Petersen, A.; Jensen, B.H. Results from the Danish monitoring programme for pesticide residues from the period 2004–2011. Food Control 2017, 74, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Skretteberg, L.G.; Lyrån, B.; Holen, B.; Jansson, A.; Fohgelberg, P.; Siivinen, K.; Andersen, J.H.; Jensen, B.H. Pesticide residues in food of plant origin from Southeast Asia—A Nordic project. Food Control 2015, 51, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Soydan, D.K.; Turgut, N.; Yalçın, M.; Turgut, C.; Karakuş, P.B.K. Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from the Aegean region of Turkey and assessment of risk to consumers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 27511–27519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Toptanci, İ.; Kiralan, M.; Ramadan, M.F. Levels of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables in the Turkish domestic markets. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 39451–39457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bouagga, A.; Chaabane, H.; Toumi, K.; Hamdane, A.M.; Nasraoui, B.; Joly, L. Pesticide residues in Tunisian table grapes and associated risk for consumer’s health. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2019, 12, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. El-Sheikh, E.-S.A.; Ramadan, M.M.; El-Sobki, A.E.; Shalaby, A.A.; McCoy, M.R.; Hamed, I.A.; Ashour, M.-B.; Hammock, B.D. Pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits from farmer markets and associated dietary risks. Molecules 2022, 27, 8072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Z.; Nie, J.; Yan, Z.; Xu, G.; Li, H.; Kuang, L.; Pan, L.; Xie, H.; Wang, C.; Liu, C.; et al. Risk assessment and ranking of pesticide residues in Chinese pears. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 2328–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Y.; Bei, K.; Zheng, W.; Yu, G.; Sun, C. Pesticide residues risk assessment and quality evaluation of four characteristic fruits in Zhejiang Province, China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1124094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Łozowicka, B.; Kaczyński, P.; Jankowska, M.; Rutkowska, E.; Hrynko, I.; Paritowa, A. Pesticide residues in raspberries and their risk assessment. Int. Food Res. J. 2014, 21, 663–672. [Google Scholar]
  50. Łozowicka, B.; Kaczyński, P.; Rutkowska, E.; Jankowska, M.; Hrynko, I. Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruit from Poland and health risk assessment. Agric. Sci. 2013, 4, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jardim, A.N.O.; Caldas, E.D. Brazilian monitoring programs for pesticide residues in food—Results from 2001 to 2010. Food Control 2012, 25, 607–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mert, A.; Qi, A.; Bygrave, A.; Stotz, H.U. Trends of pesticide residues in foods imported to the United Kingdom from 2000 to 2020. Food Control 2022, 133, 108616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Park, B.K.; Kwon, S.H.; Yeom, M.S.; Joo, K.S.; Heo, M.J. Detection of pesticide residues and risk assessment from the local fruits and vegetables in Incheon, Korea. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bempah, C.K.; Donkor, A.K. Pesticide residues in fruits at the market level in Accra Metropolis, Ghana, a preliminary study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 175, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Berrada, H.; Fernández, M.; Ruiz, M.J.; Moltó, J.C.; Mañes, J.; Font, G. Surveillance of pesticide residues in fruits from Valencia during twenty months (2004/05). Food Control 2010, 21, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Latif, Y.; Sherazi, S.T.H.; Bhanger, M.I. Monitoring of pesticide residues in commonly used fruits in Hyderabad region, Pakistan. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2011, 2, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, Z.; Nie, J.; Yan, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Lan, F.; Huang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, X.; Li, A. A monitoring survey and dietary risk assessment for pesticide residues on peaches in China. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 97, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Łozowicka, B.; Kaczyński, P.; Jankowska, M.; Rutkowska, E.; Hrynko, I. Pesticide residues in raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) and dietary risk assessment. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2012, 5, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Łozowicka, B.; Kaczyński, P. Pesticide residues in apples (2005–2010). Arch. Environ. Prot. 2011, 37, 43–54. [Google Scholar]
  60. Matyaszek, A.; Szpyrka, E.; Podbielska, M.; Słowik-Borowiec, M.; Kurdziel, A. Pesticide residues in berries harvested from south-eastern Poland (2009–2011). Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2013, 64, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  61. Parveen, Z.R.; Iqbal, S.; Khuhro, M.I.; Bhutto, M.A.; Ahmed, M. Monitoring of multiple pesticide residues in some fruits in Karachi, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2011, 43, 1915–1918. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wołejko, E.; Łozowicka, B.; Kaczyński, P. Pesticide residues in berries fruits and juices and the potential risk for consumers. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 3804–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, Y.D.; Si, W.S.; Chen, L.; Shen, G.Q.; Bai, B.; Zhou, C.Y. Determination and dietary risk assessment of 284 pesticide residues in local fruit cultivars in Shanghai, China. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Al-Shamary, N.M.; Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Al-Shaikh, I.; Al-Meer, S.H.; Ahmad, T.A. Evaluation of pesticide residues of organochlorine in vegetables and fruits in Qatar: Statistical analysis. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bempah, C.K.; Buah-Kwofie, A.; Denutsui, D.; Asomaning, J.; Tutu, A.O. Monitoring of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables and related health risk assessment in Kumasi metropolis, Ghana. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 3, 761–771. [Google Scholar]
  66. Chen, C.; Qian, Y.; Chen, Q.; Tao, C.; Li, C.; Li, Y. Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from Xiamen, China. Food Control 2011, 22, 1114–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Knežević, Z.; Serdar, M.; Ahel, M. Risk assessment of the intake of pesticides in Croatian diet. Food Control 2012, 23, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Luo, X.; Zeng, X.; Wei, D.; Ma, C.; Li, J.; Guo, X.; Cheng, L.; Mao, Z. Pesticide residues in common fruits and vegetables in Henan Province, China. Food Addit. Contam. Part B Surveill. 2023, 16, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mutengwe, M.T.; Chidamba, L.; Korsten, L. Monitoring pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables at two of the biggest fresh produce markets in Africa. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 1938–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mutengwe, M.T.; Chidamba, L.; Korsten, L. Pesticide residue monitoring on South African fresh produce exported over a 6-year period. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 1759–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Patiño, M.; Valencia-Guerrero, M.F.; Barbosa-Ángel, E.S.; Martínez-Cordón, M.J.; Donado-Godoy, P. Evaluation of chemical and microbiological contaminants in fresh fruits and vegetables from peasant markets in Cundinamarca, Colombia. J. Food Prot. 2020, 83, 1726–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sivaperumal, P.; Anand, P.; Riddhi, L. Rapid determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables, using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2015, 168, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Szpyrka, E.; Kurdziel, A.; Matyaszek, A.; Podbielska, M.; Rupar, J.; Słowik-Borowiec, M. Evaluation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables from the region of south-eastern Poland. Food Control 2015, 48, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kecojević, I.; Đekić, S.; Lazović, M.; Mrkajić, D.; Baošić, R.; Lolić, A. Evaluation of LC-MS/MS methodology for determination of 179 multi-class pesticides in cabbage and rice by modified QuEChERS extraction. Food Control 2021, 123, 107693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific report of EFSA: The 2016 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J. 2018, 16, 5348. [Google Scholar]
  76. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific report of EFSA: The 2017 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J. 2019, 17, 5743. [Google Scholar]
  77. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific report of EFSA: The 2018 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J. 2020, 18, 6057. [Google Scholar]
  78. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific report of EFSA: The 2019 European Union report on pesticide residues in food. EFSA J. 2021, 19, 6491. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Number and percentage of samples analysed in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Figure 1. Number and percentage of samples analysed in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Foods 14 01828 g001
Figure 2. Origin of samples analysed in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Figure 2. Origin of samples analysed in 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Foods 14 01828 g002
Table 1. Characteristics of the analysed fruit samples and number of fruit samples without and with pesticide residues.
Table 1. Characteristics of the analysed fruit samples and number of fruit samples without and with pesticide residues.
Name of the Fruit SamplesCountry of OriginNo. of SamplesNo. of Samples Without Residues (<0.01 mg/kg)%No. of Samples with Residues At or Above 0.01 mg/kg%No. of Samples with Residues Above the MRL%
AlmondSpain (N = 1), United States of America (N = 5)6583.33116.6700
AppleAlbania (N = 11), Austria (N = 3), Bosnia and Herzegovina (N = 3), Bulgaria (N = 1), Chile (N = 1), Croatia (N = 13), France (N = 1), Greece (N = 4), Hungary (N = 3), Italy (N = 32), North Macedonia (N = 12), Poland (N = 171), Serbia (N = 88), Slovenia (N = 2), The Netherlands (N = 4), Turkey (N = 2)35112635.9022564.10123.42
ApricotBulgaria (N = 1), Greece (N = 4), Italy (N = 2), Serbia (N = 6), Spain (N = 2)151066.67533.3300
AroniaSerbia (N = 1)111000000
AvocadoChile (N = 1), Colombia (N = 2), Israel (N = 1), Kenya (N = 4), Peru (N = 6), South Africa (N = 1), Tanzania (N = 2), Turkey (N = 1), Zimbabwe (N = 1)191263.16736.8415.26
BananaBrazil (N = 2), Colombia (N = 41), Costa Rica (N = 35), Dominican Republic (N = 1), Ecuador (N = 47), Ghana (N = 1), Guatemala (N = 8), Honduras (N = 7), Italy (N = 1), Mexico (N = 19), Panama (N = 6)1687041.679858.3300
BlackberrySerbia (N = 2)2150.00150.0000
BlueberryArgentina (N = 1), Serbia (N = 1), Spain (N = 1), Peru (N = 1), The Netherlands (N = 1)5480.00120.0000
Brazil nutBolivia (N = 2)221000000
CarambolaMalesia (N = 2)221000000
CashewVietnam (N = 1)111000000
ChestnutChina (N = 1), Serbia (N = 1)221000000
ClementineEgypt (N = 1), Italy (N = 5), Spain (N = 7), Turkey (N = 3)16850.00850.0000
CoconutIvory Coast (N = 1)100110000
CurrantsThe Netherlands (N = 2)20 210000
Date palmIran (N = 7), Israel (N = 1)8675.00225.0000
FigTurkey (N = 1)111000000
GrapefruitCyprus (N = 2), Greece (N = 3), Israel (N = 1), Mexico (N = 2), South Africa (N = 33), Swaziland (N = 1), Turkey (N = 71), Zimbabwe (N = 2)1151311.3010288.702118.26
GrapeBosnia and Herzegovina (N = 2), Chile (N = 1), Greece (N = 1), India (N = 2), Italy (N = 18), North Macedonia (N = 111), Serbia (N = 8), South Africa (N = 1), Turkey (N = 8)1529965.135334.8721.32
HazelnutCroatia (N = 3), Georgia (N = 1), Turkey (N = 1)5480.00120.0000
Japanese appleAlbania (N = 1), Spain (N = 8)9888.89111.1100
KiwiChile (N = 7), Greece (N = 21), Italy (N = 16), New Zealand (N = 4), North Macedonia (N = 2)503366.001734.0000
KumquatIsrael (N = 1), Italy (N = 2), South Africa (N = 1)4250.00250.0000
LemonArgentina (N = 45), Egypt (N = 1), Greece (N = 12), Italy (N = 2), South Africa (N = 15), Spain (N = 32), Turkey (N = 107), Uruguay (N = 3)2174219.3517580.6541.84
LimeBrazil (N = 1), China (N = 1), Guatemala (N = 2), Mexico (N = 21), South Africa (N = 1), The Netherlands (N = 1), Turkey (N = 1)28414.292485.71414.29
LycheeChile (N = 1)111000000
MandarinAlbania (N = 4), Croatia (N = 14), Cyprus (N = 4), Egypt (N = 2), Greece (N = 42), Italy (N = 3), Morocco (N = 1), Spain (N = 12), Swaziland (N = 1), Turkey (N = 111)1946030.9313469.07147.22
MangoBrazil (N = 9), Burkina Faso (N = 1), Dominican Republic (N = 1), Israel (N = 1), Ivory Coast (N = 1), Mali (N = 2), Peru (N = 7), Senegal (N = 2)241562.50937.5000
OrangeEgypt (N = 32), Greece (N = 125), Morocco (N = 9), Italy (N = 3), South Africa (N = 46), Spain (N = 38), The Netherlands (N = 1), Turkey (N = 55), Uruguay (N = 3), Zimbabwe (N = 12)3249830.2522669.7572.16
Passion fruitSouth Africa (N = 1)111000000
PeachFrance (N = 1), Greece (N = 32), Italy (N = 3), Serbia (N = 13), Spain (N = 7)563257.142442.8600
Peach (nectarine)Albania (N = 2), Belgium (N = 1), Greece (N = 14), Italy (N = 4), North Macedonia (N = 3), Serbia (N = 5), Spain (N = 7)362363.891336.1100
PeanutArgentina (N = 4), China (N = 4)8787.50112.5000
PearArgentina (N = 2), Belgium (N = 6), Bosnia and Herzegovina (N = 2), China (N = 3), Greece (N = 2), Italy (N = 9), Poland (N = 9), Serbia (N = 30), South Africa (N = 4), Spain (N = 3), The Netherlands (N = 24), Turkey (N = 1)952728.426871.5866.32
PineappleColombia (N = 13), Costa Rica (N = 25), Ecuador (N = 1), Italy (N = 1), Ivory Coast (N = 1)411126.833073.1737.32
PistachioTurkey (N = 1)111000000
PitayaThailand (N = 1), Vietnam (N = 1)221000000
PlumAlbania (N = 3), Greece (N = 3), Italy (N = 2), Moldova (N = 1), North Macedonia (N = 3), Serbia (N = 14)261557.691142.3100
PomegranateArgentina (N = 2), Egypt (N = 1), Greece (N = 7), Peru (N = 6), Turkey (N = 50)662436.364263.642639.39
PomeloChina (N = 12)12433.33866.6700
QuinceGreece (N = 1)111000000
RaspberryMorocco (N = 2), Serbia (N = 3), Spain (N = 2), The Netherlands (N = 1)8450.00450.0000
Sour cherryHungary (N = 8), Serbia (N = 6)14857.14642.8617.14
StrawberryAlbania (N = 8), Germany (N = 1), Greece (N = 13), Poland (N = 3), Serbia (N = 15), Spain (N = 5), Turkey (N = 1)461123.913576.0900
Sweet cherryGreece (N = 6), Hungary (N = 1), Italy (N = 1), North Macedonia (N = 1), Poland (N = 1), Romania (N = 3), Serbia (N = 6), Spain (N = 1)20420.001680.0000
WalnutBulgaria (N = 2), Russia (N = 2), Ukraine (N = 1), United States of America (N = 1)6583.33116.6700
Table 2. The frequency of the detected pesticide residues and their concentrations in fruit samples.
Table 2. The frequency of the detected pesticide residues and their concentrations in fruit samples.
Pesticide Name
(N = 173)
Types of
Pesticide
Frequency of Detection in 2164 Samples%No. of Samples with Residues Above MRL%Range
Min–Max
(mg/kg)
2-PhenylphenolFungicide442.03000.010–7.028
AbamectinInsecticide20.09000.010
AcephateInsecticide50.23000.010–0.011
AcetamipridInsecticide1717.9021 (apple; grapefruit, N = 2; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 17)12.210.010–1.418
AcetochlorHerbicide20.09000.010
Acibenzolar-S-methylFungicide311.434 (grapefruit, N = 3; mandarin)12.900.010–0.114
AcrinathrinInsecticide20.09000.011–0.020
AldicarbInsecticide271.25000.010–0.018
Aldicarb sulfoneInsecticide20.09000.010
AmetrynHerbicide120.55000.010
AmitrazInsecticide582.685 (pomegranate)90.010–1.339
AtrazineHerbicide100.46000.010–0.018
Azinphos-ethylInsecticide60.281 (grapefruit)16.670.010–0.982
Azinphos-methylInsecticide70.32000.010–0.042
AzoxystrobinFungicide964.44000.010–0.717
BendiocarbInsecticide30.14000.010
BifenazateInsecticide60.28000.011–0.020
BifenthrinInsecticide180.83000.010–0.081
BiphenylFungicide10.05000.010
BitertanolFungicide50.231 (avocado)20.000.012–0.152
BoscalidFungicide1547.121 (pomegranate)0.650.010–2.989
BuprofezinInsecticide793.65000.010–0.589
ButachlorHerbicide10.05000.012
ButoxycarboximInsecticide50.235 (grapefruit, N = 2; pomegranate, N = 3)1000.034–0.037
CarbarylInsecticide291.34000.010
CarbendazimFungicide1858.5515 (apple, N = 3; grapefruit; lemon; orange, N = 2; pear, n = 2; pomegranate, N = 6)8.060.010–2.670
CarbofuranInsecticide10.051 (mandarin)1000.033
CarboxinFungicide20.09000.010
Carfentrazone-ethylHerbicide60.28000.010–0.012
ChlorantraniliproleInsecticide241.11000.010–0.121
ChlorothalonilFungicide50.231 (grape)20.000.010–12.500
ChlorotoluronHerbicide221.028 (grapefruit, N = 2; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 5)36.360.010–0.928
ChlorprophamHerbicide20.09000.010
ChlorpyrifosInsecticide1456.7010 (grapefruit, N = 8; grape; pomegranate)6.900.010–2.338
Chlorpyrifos-methylInsecticide271.251 (grapefruit)3.700.011–0.944
ClethodimHerbicide10.05000.010
ClofentezineInsecticide50.23000.011–0.084
ClothianidinInsecticide130.60000.010–0.045
CyazofamidFungicide30.14000.054–0.111
CyfluthrinInsecticide10.05000.012
CymoxanilFungicide80.37000.010–0.023
CypermethrinInsecticide100.462 (pomegranate)18.180.011–0.301
CyproconazoleFungicide20.09000.010–0.016
CyprodinilFungicide381.767 (mandarin; pomegranate, N = 6)18.420.011–0.606
DeltamethrinInsecticide200.9212 (grapefruit; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 10)60.000.010–0.326
DiazinonInsecticide30.14000.010
DicrotophosInsecticide10.05000.010
DifenoconazoleFungicide301.392 (pomegranate)6.670.010–0.174
DiflubenzuronInsecticide80.372 (pear)25.000.010–0.073
DimethoateInsecticide80.371 (apple)12.500.010–0.047
DimethomorphFungicide653.001 (grapefruit)1.540.010–0.737
DimoxystrobinFungicide80.37000.010
DinotefuranInsecticide100.461 (pomegranate)10.000.010–0.038
DiphenylamineFungicide10.05000.010
EmamectinInsecticide20.090 0.020–0.044
Emamectin B1aInsecticide40.18000.010–0.025
Emamectin B1bInsecticide50.231 (pear)20.000.010–0.016
EprinomectinInsecticide20.09000.010
EthiofencarbInsecticide120.553 (grapefruit)25.000.010–0.069
EthirimolFungicide50.23000.010–0.038
EthofumesateHerbicide200.92000.010–0.038
EtofenproxInsecticide10.05000.141
EtoxazoleInsecticide190.881 (pomegranate)5.260.010–0.024
FamoxadoneFungicide30.14000.040–0.292
FenamidoneFungicide10.05000.042
FenamiphosInsecticide30.14000.012–0.016
FenazaquinInsecticide30.14000.010
FenbuconazoleFungicide40.18000.010–0.033
FenhexamidFungicide180.83000.010–0.645
FenoxycarbInsecticide10.05000.013
FenpropimorphFungicide70.32000.010–0.067
FenpyroximateInsecticide50.23000.010–0.047
FenthionInsecticide10.05000.010
FenuronHerbicide20.09000.010
FenvalerateInsecticide512.3631 (lemon; mandarin, N = 9; orange, N = 3; pomegranate, N = 18)60.780.010–1.247
FlonicamidInsecticide90.42000.010–0.086
Fluazifop-butylHerbicide10.05000.010
FludioxonilFungicide1547.122 (pear; pineapple)1.300.010–5.984
FlufenacetHerbicide30.14000.021–0.035
FlufenoxuronInsecticide20.09000.015–0.032
FluopyramFungicide20.09000.068–0.152
FluoxastrobinFungicide40.18000.010–0.018
FlutolanilFungicide20.09000.010
FlutriafolFungicide70.32000.013–0.039
FormothionInsecticide170.7910 (apple, N = 8; mandarin, N = 2)58.820.010–0.396
HexaconazoleFungicide50.23000.010
HexythiazoxInsecticide50.23000.013–0.032
ImazalilFungicide62428.8410 (grapefruit, N = 3; lemon, N = 2; mandarin, N = 2; orange, N = 2; pomegranate)1.600.010–93.349
ImidaclopridInsecticide2139.84000.010–0.327
IndoxacarbInsecticide241.114 (pomegranate)16.670.010–0.080
IpconazoleFungicide10.05000.010
IprodioneFungicide30.142 (orange)66.670.019–0.551
IprovalicarbFungicide20.09000.011–0.050
IsoprocarbInsecticide10.05000.010
IsoproturonHerbicide10.05000.010
KetoconazoleFungicide190.88000.010
Kresoxim-methylFungicide40.18000.013–0.047
Lambda-cyhalothrinInsecticide80.37000.010–0.098
LufenuronInsecticide602.772 (grapefruit; pomegranate)3.330.011–0.787
MalaoxonInsecticide30.14000.058–1.067
MalathionInsecticide221.02000.010–0.707
MandipropamidFungicide40.18000.038–0.655
MepanipyrimFungicide130.608 (grapefruit, N = 3; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 4)61.540.010–0.103
MepronilFungicide10.051 (grapefruit)1000.026
MetaflumizoneInsecticide30.14000.010–0.050
MetalaxylFungicide311.43000.010–0.580
Metalaxyl-MFungicide100.46000.010–0.347
MethabenzthiazuronHerbicide50.23000.010
MethamidophosInsecticide361.6615 (grapefruit, N = 3; mandarin; orange; pear; pomegranate, N = 9)41.670.010–2.048
MethidathionInsecticide10.05000.012
MethiocarbInsecticide120.55000.010–0.176
MethomylInsecticide522.403 (grapefruit)5.770.010–0.593
MethoxyfenozideInsecticide944.34000.010–1.129
MetobromuronHerbicide50.232 (grapefruit)40.000.010–0.598
MetrafenoneFungicide10.05000.051
MetribuzinHerbicide421.942 (grapefruit)4.760.010–0.335
MonocrotophosInsecticide30.14000.010
MyclobutanilFungicide341.57000.011–0.290
NitenpyramInsecticide10.05000.010
NovaluronInsecticide70.322 (mandarin; orange)28.570.010–0.013
NuarimolFungicide30.142 (grapefruit; mandarin)66.670.010–0.043
OmethoateInsecticide40.181 (sour cherry)25.000.010–0.060
OxadixylFungicide130.606 (grapefruit, N = 4; mandarin; pomegranate)46.150.010–0.595
OxamylInsecticide100.4610 (grapefruit; lime, N = 4; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 4)1000.038–3.161
PenconazoleFungicide180.83000.011–0.175
PermethrinInsecticide10.05000.020
PhenmediphamHerbicide10.05000.010
PhosmetInsecticide100.46000.010–0.284
PicoxystrobinFungicide431.9919 (grapefruit, N = 16; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 2)44.190.010–2.439
Piperonyl-butoxideInsecticide20.091 (pineapple)50.000.010–0.130
PirimicarbInsecticide321.48000.010–0.110
Pirimiphos-methylInsecticide120.5510 (grapefruit, N = 3; mandarin, N = 2; pomegranate, N = 5)83.330.010–0.480
ProchlorazFungicide1436.612 (pomegranate; sour cherry)1.400.010–3.905
PromecarbInsecticide70.325 (grapefruit, N = 2; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 2)71.430.010–0.039
PrometonHerbicide40.18000.010
PrometrynHerbicide40.183 (grapefruit)75.000.010–0.106
PropargiteInsecticide40.181 (grapefruit)25.000.010–0.316
ProphamHerbicide592.733 (lime; pomegranate, N = 2)5.080.010–0.085
PropiconazoleFungicide1135.223 (pomegranate)2.650.010–3.143
PropoxurInsecticide321.482 (pomegranate)6.250.010–0.127
ProthioconazoleFungicide974.485 (grapefruit, N = 3; mandarin, N = 2)5.150.010–0.586
PymetrozineInsecticide20.09000.010–0.019
PyracarbolidFungicide50.231 (grapefruit)20.000.012–0.017
PyraclostrobinFungicide934.30000.010–0.153
PyridabenInsecticide231.06000.010–0.135
PyrimethanilFungicide24511.322 (pomegranate)0.820.010–6.633
PyriproxyfenInsecticide1386.38000.010–0.150
Quizalofop-p-ethylHerbicide10.05000.034
SiduronHerbicide10.05000.010
Spinetoram BInsecticide20.09000.014–0.017
SpirodiclofenInsecticide160.74000.010–0.195
SpiromesifenInsecticide291.349 (grapefruit, N = 3; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 5)31.030.010–0.464
SpirotetramatInsecticide140.65000.010–0.226
SpiroxamineFungicide90.42000.010–0.181
SulfentrazoneHerbicide40.182 (grapefruit)50.000.010–0.026
TebuconazoleFungicide1165.361 (pineapple)0.860.010–1.000
TebufenozideInsecticide341.57000.010–0.051
TebufenpyradInsecticide90.42000.010–0.061
TebuthiuronHerbicide110.517 (grapefruit, N = 2; mandarin; pomegranate, N = 4)63.640.010–0.079
TeflubenzuronInsecticide502.31000.010–0.025
TerbutrynHerbicide60.283 (grapefruit)50.000.010–0.044
TetraconazoleFungicide170.79000.010–0.065
ThiabendazoleFungicide33715.57000.010–4.814
ThiaclopridInsecticide632.912 (grapefruit; pomegranate)3.170.010–0.154
ThiamethoxamInsecticide160.74000.010–0.034
Thiophanate-methylFungicide321.48000.010–0.683
TriadimefonHerbicide10.05000.016
TriadimenolFungicide30.14000.010–0.028
TricyclazoleFungicide30.143 (grapefruit)1000.049–0.074
TrifloxystrobinFungicide241.112 (pomegranate)8.330.010–0.144
TriflumuronInsecticide20.09000.022–0.048
TriticonazoleFungicide30.14000.010
ZoxamideFungicide70.323 (grapefruit)42.860.014–1.094
MRL, maximum residue level.
Table 3. (a) Number of pesticide residues in an individual sample. (b) Number of pesticide residues in an individual sample.
Table 3. (a) Number of pesticide residues in an individual sample. (b) Number of pesticide residues in an individual sample.
(a)
No. of pesticide residues01234567891011
No. of samples81025227822720314510365341972
%37.4311.6512.8510.499.386.704.763.001.570.880.320.09
No. of samples with residues above the MRL07 (7 with 1)17 (13 with 1;
4 with 2)
10 (7 with 1;
3 with 2)
12 (4 with 1;
6 with 2; 1 with 3; 1 with 4)
8 (3 with 1;
2 with 2; 2 with 3; 1 with 5)
15 (7 with 1;
6 with 2; 1 with 3; 1 with 4)
7 (3 with 1;
1 with 2; 2 with 3; 1 with 5)
8 (3 with 1;
3 with 2; 1 with 3; 1 with 4)
5 (3 with 1;
1 with 2; 1 with 4)
1 (1 with 1)0
(b)
No. of pesticide residues121315172629303133363944
No. of samples441111111112
%0.180.180.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.050.09
No. of samples with residues above the MRL2 (1 with 1;
1 with 2)
0001 (1 with 16)1 (1 with 17)1 (1 with 11)1 (1 with 17)1 (1 with 18)1 (1 with 16)1 (1 with 20)1 (1 with 19;
1 with 22)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kecojević, I.; Mrkajić, D.; Tomović, V.; Bajić, B.; Lazović, M.; Joksimović, A.; Tomović, M.; Martinović, A.; Vujadinović, D.; Stefanović, S.; et al. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Fruits in the Serbian Market by LC-MS/MS. Foods 2025, 14, 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101828

AMA Style

Kecojević I, Mrkajić D, Tomović V, Bajić B, Lazović M, Joksimović A, Tomović M, Martinović A, Vujadinović D, Stefanović S, et al. Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Fruits in the Serbian Market by LC-MS/MS. Foods. 2025; 14(10):1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101828

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kecojević, Isidora, Danica Mrkajić, Vladimir Tomović, Biljana Bajić, Milana Lazović, Ana Joksimović, Mila Tomović, Aleksandra Martinović, Dragan Vujadinović, Srđan Stefanović, and et al. 2025. "Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Fruits in the Serbian Market by LC-MS/MS" Foods 14, no. 10: 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101828

APA Style

Kecojević, I., Mrkajić, D., Tomović, V., Bajić, B., Lazović, M., Joksimović, A., Tomović, M., Martinović, A., Vujadinović, D., Stefanović, S., & Đorđević, V. (2025). Determination of Pesticide Residues in Fresh Fruits in the Serbian Market by LC-MS/MS. Foods, 14(10), 1828. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14101828

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop