Next Article in Journal
Process Hygiene Criterion for Campylobacter and Number of Campylobacter Enteritis Cases in Northwest Germany
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing the Techno-Functional Properties of Lentil Protein Isolate Dispersions Using In-Line High-Shear Rotor-Stator Mixing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Deep Impact: Shifts of Native Cultivable Microbial Communities on Fresh Lettuce after Treatment with Plasma-Treated Water

1
Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Felix-Hausdorff-Strasse 2, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
2
Institute of Microbiology, Center for Functional Genomics of Microbes, University of Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(2), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13020282
Submission received: 23 November 2023 / Revised: 18 December 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2024 / Published: 16 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Food Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

:
Foods consumed raw, such as lettuce, can host food-borne human-pathogenic bacteria. In the worst-case, these diseases cause to death. To limit illness and industrial losses, one innovative sanitation method is non-thermal plasma, which offers an extremely efficient reduction of living microbial biomass. Unfortunately, the total viable count (TVC), one of the most common methods for quantifying antimicrobial effects, provides no detailed insights into the composition of the surviving microbial community after treatment. To address this information gap, different special agars were used to investigate the reduction efficiency of plasma-treated water (PTW) on different native cultivable microorganisms. All tested cultivable microbial groups were reduced using PTW. Gram-negative bacteria showed a reduction of 3.81 log10, and Gram-positive bacteria showed a reduction of 3.49 log10. Fungi were reduced by 3.89 log10. These results were further validated using a live/dead assay. MALDI-ToF (matrix-assisted laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight)-based determination was used for a diversified overview. The results demonstrated that Gram-negative bacteria were strongly reduced. Interestingly, Gram-positive bacteria and fungi were reduced by nearly equal amounts, but could still recover from PTW treatment. MALDI-ToF mainly identified Pseudomonas spp. and groups of Bacillus on the tested lettuce. These results indicate that the PTW treatment could efficiently achieve a ubiquitous, spectrum-wide reduction of microbial life.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Microbial communities are highly adapted and regulated to their environment so that some communities can exist only in specific areas [1]. The entirety of a microbial life and its genomes (bacteria, archaea, mold and yeast eukaryotes, and viruses) at a given location and time is described using the term microbiome [2,3,4].
Likewise, plants also create a specific environment for microbial communities [5]. Therefore, their microbiomes are particularly diverse and offer many ecological niches that are occupied with a wide variety of organisms [5,6]. Plants have plant-specific communities, which could be influenced by habitat-specific shifts [7]. Plants host a large variety of microbes on and inside their tissues in a lifestyle range from mutualistic to communalistic and pathogenic [8,9,10]. Unfortunately, the interaction between a plant’s microbiome and its fitness is currently unknown in most cases [11].
The phyllosphere is a primary interface of the plant with the environment [12]. The phyllosphere is home to bacteria and fungi that interact with the plant and together form a holobiont [13]. The term ‘holobiont’ describes the whole living thing being of a biological system (eukaryotic host together with a plurality of microorganisms (Figure 1)) [14].
Lettuce-like endive (Cichorium endivia L.) and other leafy greens are very popular plant-based foods and can be sources of vitamins and nutrients for the human diet [15,16]. Because lettuce is usually consumed raw, a high degree of food safety must be achieved without damaging the plant tissue too much in order for the raw product to be purchased by consumers [16,17].
Commonly, the phyllosphere of lettuce can host 105–107 colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of lettuce fresh weight, and it is where bacteria are the most abundant colonizers [15,18]. In the 1990s alone, 12% of illnesses were food associated [19]. Examples of this are infections with Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli, which can be found on lettuce too [18,20,21].
In addition, members of the native microbial community can also cause food to spoil. The yearly harvest and market loss of vegetables in Germany alone is about 1.1 million tons, with losses of 30% considered normal [19]. Furthermore, there are specific spoilage-associated bacteria like Pseudomonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae, which decrease the shelf life of packed lettuce [22,23]. Therefore, reducing the total microbial count on food is the method of choice [24,25,26].
There is a high variance of sanitation methods used to process a clean and safe lettuce: conventional methods use pure water, or chlorine dioxide, and ultraviolet rays are used as additives to clean and cycle the wash water, as clean water is vital to reduce the bacterial load on vegetables [27,28,29].
An innovative and alternative method for food sanitation may be the use of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma [30,31]. In general, physical plasma describes a gas-particle mixture of ions, free electrons, and many neutral atoms or molecules which fulfill the roles of charge-free carriers [32,33]. The usage of non-thermal but warm plasma in direct application is limited to heat-resistant materials and cannot be used directly for lettuce sanitation [30]. However, indirect sanitation of lettuce via physical plasma is possible using plasma-treated water instead of pure tap water.
The MidiPLexc is a microwave-driven plasma torch, which works with compressed air as the working gas [31]. This plasma torch generates a complex cocktail of reactive species in the plasma-processed air (PPA) [34]. The PPA components in turn react with other mediums like water and generate plasma-treated water (PTW). The MidiPLexc mainly generates nitric oxide (NO*), nitrogen dioxide (NO2*), and probably also hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), as well as other metastable radical nitrite/oxide species (RNOS) [19]. For air at atmospheric pressure, the maximum nitric oxide concentration of 5.2% is achieved at about 3500 K [35]. The maximum concentration of NO2 is achieved at about the same temperature and is more than three orders lower. Other nitrogen oxides are negligible. At this temperature only, atomic oxygen is available in high concentrations of about 12%, which is similar to its molecular concentration. Only nitric acid (HNO3) could thus far be verified in the PTW [33]. Tap water includes nitrite, which is a stable reservoir that can be converted to NO* and other bioactive nitrogen species [36,37]. Several studies showed the reduction of the total viable count (TVC) on food after PTW treatment [19,30,31,33,38].
However, there are still many issues that require further investigation. The aim of this work is to provide further insight into the structure of the cultivable lettuce microbiome and the impact of PTW on it. Our core hypothesis is that the treatment with physical plasma will have a reductive effect on the native lettuce microbiome. In this study, we use proliferation assay (TVC), live/dead assay and matrix-assisted-laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF) analysis of randomly selected colonies at different time points to analyze the effect of PTW on the microbial communities of lettuce, especially endive (Cichorium endivia L.). To ensure that no higher nitrate concentrations accumulate in the lettuce during PTW treatment, the anion and cation balance of the lettuce was analyzed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. PTW Generation with Microwave Discharge

The MidiPLexc is an in-house-invented microwave-operated plasma system that operates under atmospheric pressure (2).
It is a further development of the in-house invention MiniMIP [39], which was operated with compressed air instead of noble gases (MiniMIP = argon, helium). Its use is for indirect plasma treatment of materials that would not survive direct plasma treatment due to the high temperatures involved. The plasma treatment is called “indirect” because the plasma effluent does not directly hit the medium to be treated, but only the compressed air is directly treated with the effluent. The resulting chemical compounds, which are sometimes reactive, then encounter the sample to be treated. The MidiPLexc (Figure 2) was operated with a forward power of 50 W at 2.45 GHz. The reflection from the plasma source was below 2.0 W. The gas flow amounted to 5.0 SLM and had a set point of 1.5 SLM. In parallel, the plasma aggregate was constantly cooled with compressed air via another inflow hose. The gas temperature of the effluent was about 1000 K. The distance between the plasma source and the water surface was approx. 23.5 cm. Plasma-treated water (PTW) was generated under constant mixing (300 rpm) with a PCE-MSR 100 magnetic stirrer (PCE Instruments; Meschede, Germany. For 90 min, 100 mL of tap water was exposed to constantly generated PPA. After the 90 min treatment, pH and conductivity were measured to validate the freshly generated PTW. The PTW was stored at 4 °C in the fridge until use.

2.2. PTW Treatment of Bite-Sized Endive Pieces

For treatments, 25 g of lettuce pieces were put into a 1000 mL bottle. In parallel to each PTW treatment, a control was performed with tap water (TW) and untreated lettuce as well. One hundred mL of PTW was added to the lettuce pieces, and the treatment time started immediately. The bottle was shaken throughout at 250 rpm using Ecotron laboratoy shaker (Infors HT; Bottmingen, Switzerland). After 1, 4, 7, and 10 min of PTW treatment, 5 g of lettuce and 20 mL of the PTW were removed. During the TW treatment, a sample was only removed after 10 min. The removed PTW was discarded, and the lettuce sample was blended with 20 mL of phosphate-buffered solution (PBS, pH 7.2 after Sorensen) for 30 s. Finally, 1 mL of the obtained supernatant was removed and used for further tests.

2.3. Lettuce Conditions

In this study, the lettuce studied was endive (Cichorium endivia L.). The endive was planted and harvested in May 2022 (Sand 1 Knick; between Jagsthausen and Heilbronn, Southwest Germany) on an open field. The harvested lettuce heads were stored cold and sent overnight at cool temperatures (5–8 °C) to Greifswald, Germany. In Greifswald, the lettuce heads were stored at 4 °C until use (max. for 1 week). For the experiments, the lettuce was cut into bite-sized pieces (~3 cm × 3 cm), which were finally used.

2.4. Proliferation Assay Based on Total Viable Count (CFU/mL)

For the first definitions of the treatment times, plate count agar (PCA) was used as a standard medium. After the treatment times had been defined, the impact of PTW on different groups of the microbial community was tested with special agars (Table 1).
After the PTW treatment (as well the untreated lettuce and the TW treatment) of the lettuce, the resulting 1 mL supernatant was blended and used for different assays. For the proliferation assay, 100 µL of it was diluted with 900 µL as the minimum required dilution (MRD; 8.5 g/L NaCl and 1.0 g/L tryptone). Thus, the sample was diluted stepwise up to 10−5 of the original concentration. The six dilutions 100–10−5 were plated on the different agars using the Miles and Misra method with some adaptation [40] In brief, a 10 µL spot was spread using horizontal tilting of the agar plate. Subsequently, an incubation at room temperature (except EA, which was incubated at 37 °C) for 5 days took place. On days 2, 3, 4, and 5, the colonies on the agar plates were counted manually, and, finally, the CFU/mL was calculated. In addition, the unused PTW and TW, as well as the PBS were plated out as the control for contaminations.

2.5. Live/Dead Assay

For the detection of damaged cell walls, the ratio of two different fluorescent dyes (SYTO9 and propidium iodide (PI)) was measured. After PTW treatment, the ratio of SYTO9 (green)/PI (red), labeled G/R ratio, was detected using a LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). The kit was used according to the instructions. For this, 9 µL of propidium iodide (PI) and 9 µL of SYTO9 mixture were added to 3 mL of ultrapure water. Then, 100 µL of the mixture was added to a 96-well plate followed by 100 µL of sample. Afterwards, the 96-well plate was incubated for 15 min in the dark at room temperature, while undergoing shaking at 80 rpm with the multi-functional orbital shaker PSU-20i (Biosan, Riga, Latvia). After incubation, the fluorescence signal of each well was detected using a Varioskan-Flash® Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) plate reader (Thermo scientific, Dreieich, Germany) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm for SYTO9 and 630 nm for PI fluorescence. To calculate the ratio G/R, the green absorbance value was divided by the red absorbance value. Finally, the ratio G/R of the treated and control samples was put into a percentage ratio.
Liquid microbial samples were analyzed at different PTW-treatment times (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, and 600 s). A G/R ratio was measured. Untreated samples (0 s) were used as 100% standard.

2.6. MALDI-ToF Analysis of Culturable Microbial Colonies

MALDI-ToF (matrix-associated-laser-deionization/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry) analysis was used as a tool to gather first insights into the cultivable microbial community composition on endive.
After each treatment time, 2–5 colonies on PCA were selected randomly and transferred to new PCA plates. Isolates were cultivated at room temperature. The isolate transfers were repeated several times and isolates were checked visually for purity. Some isolates did not grow after a few repeated transfers. Finally, 51 isolates were sent to the RIPAC-LABOR GmbH (Potsdam, Germany) for MALDI-ToF analyses (SHIMADZU AXIMA Assurance iDplus™). For microbial identification, the software AnagnosTec SARAMIS was used.

2.7. Ion Chromatography (IC) of the Lettuce Samples

All tested lettuce samples were freshly prepared and used on the same day (storage at 7 °C). Samples were only used once and were not reused.
For sample preparation, 5 g of lettuce was shredded and mixed with 50 mL of 70 °C heated water. After 15 min of incubation, the samples were filtered with folded qualitative filter paper (size 185 mm, slow filtration rate, particle retention 2–3 µm (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany)). As the next step, the pre-filtered samples were filtered with 0.2 µm filter (Filtropur S 0.2, Sarstedt AG & Co. KG, Nümbrecht, Germany). As the final step, the double-filtered samples were diluted 1:10 with ultrapure water (GenPure Pro Barnstead, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany).
Ion chromatographic (IC) measurements were performed to determine the anion (nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), bromide (Br), sulphate (SO42−), chloride (Cl), carbonate, phosphate (PO43−)), and cation (sodium, magnesium, potassium, ammonium, calcium) concentrations in the distilled water and PTW. Measurements were performed with a Dionex ICS 6000 system (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) equipped with a conductivity detector. The system was controlled using Dionex Chromeleon Version 7.1.3.1541. Ion separation was performed via an anion-exchange column (Dionex IonPac AS 18, Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany), a guard column (Dionex IonPac AG 18, Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany), and a cation-exchange column (Dionex IonPac CS 16) with another guard column (Dionex IonPac CG 16). The 23 mM KOH cartridge (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) was used in combination with ultrapure water (GenPure Pro Barnstead, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) as the eluent for the anion analysis. As eluent for cation analysis was used a combination of a 40 mM methane sulfonic acid (MSA) cartridge (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) and ultrapure water. The injection of samples was performed using a partial-loop injection method. Volumes of 5 μL (anions) and 10 µL (cations) were used. Each lettuce sample was diluted 1:10, except for the distilled water, which was undiluted.
Thirty min was the runtime for each measurement and had an eluent flow of 0.25 mL/min (anions) and 0.36 mL/min (cations). The lettuce samples were stored in the autosampler at 10 °C (±5 °C).
The experiments were repeated twice with n = 3, resulting in n = 6. The identification and quantification of the different anions based on the Dionex 7-ion standard solution (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). They were diluted with ultrapure water in samples of 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, and 1:128. Only the carbonate standard was treated different. All anions, except carbonate, were measured at the same eluent flow with 21 mM KOH. The carbonate was quantified with a 999 mg/L (±15 mg/L) standard (Sigma-Aldrich, Laramie, WY, USA) diluted in 50 mg/L steps from 500 to 150 mg/L with ultrapure water. The dilution steps were measured at 0.25 mL/min eluent flow and 23 mM KOH.
As a cation standard, a manually prepared mixed standard from magnesium, ammonium, potassium, and calcium was used(Sigma-Aldrich (Merck), Darmstadt, Germany). The cation standards had a concentration of 100 mg/L each. The mixed standard was then 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, and 1:32, diluted with ultrapure water, and measured with 40 mM MSA, and a 0.36 mL/min eluent flow. The sodium standard was prepared from sodium chloride ≥ 99%, Ph. Eur., USP (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) solved in ultrapure water with a concentration of 100 mg/L and ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, and 1:32 diluted with ultrapure water. The sodium standard was then measured under the same conditions.
The concentrations of all measured ions were calculated using either the linear-regression function (all ions but ammonium) (1) or polynomial fitting (second-order polynom) (2) of the measured standards.
c = ( A   ±     y i n t e r c e p t )   x s l o p e
A = α c 2 + β c + γ
c = 4   α γ + 4 α A + β 2 + β 2 α   a n d   α 0
c = 4 α γ + 4   α A + β ² β 2   α   a n d   α 0
c = A γ β   a n d   α = 0   a n d   β 0
where A is the integrated area under the conductivity peak over the retention time of the detected anion, xslope is the slope of the regression function, and yintercept is the interception of the y-axis of the regression function.

2.8. Statistical Tests for Differences in the TVC

A Kruskal–Wallis test with n = 9 and α = 0.05 was carried out using Origin Pro 2022b to determine whether a significant difference in the TVC was detected between the five treatments and the control for each agar. In addition, a Dunn’s post hoc analysis was carried out to determine which treatments had a significant difference. The α for the Dunn’s analysis had to be adjusted due to multiple tests. The Bonferroni method was chosen to adjust the α. Therefore, the total α of 0.05 was divided by the number of pairwise comparisons k (2–4).
α a d j u s t e d = α k
with   k = # g r o u p s     ( # g r o u p s 1 ) 2
such   that   α a d j u s t e d = 0.05 6 × 5   2   0.0033333

3. Results

3.1. Proliferation Assay of PTW-Treated and TW-Treated Lettuce

To gain insight into the influence of PTW in comparison to pure tap water on the different parts of the native microbial communities on lettuce, different agars were used (Figure 3). The groups were represented as fastidious microorganisms (MOs) (PCA), non-fastidious MOs (MM), Gram-negative (MCA) and Gram-positive (CNA) bacteria, yeasts and fungi (S4), sporulating bacteria (GYEA), and coliforms at cultivation temperatures of room temperature (RT) (KVGL) and 37 °C (ENDO). Total-viable-cell counts (TVC; CFU/mL) were calculated.

3.1.1. Proliferation Assay of Full Medium (PCA) and Shortage Medium (MM)

The concentration of TVCPCA_controls increased until day 5 of incubation. The TVCPCA_60s were decreased by 0.68 log10. Over the period of 5 days, the TVCPCA_60s were nearly stable. The TVCPCA_240s dropped in comparison to the TVC of shorter PTW-treatment times. After 5 days of incubation, the TVCPCA_240s was comparable to day 2. The TVCPCA_420s decreased more than the TVCPCA_240s, but increased slightly at longer incubation times. The TVCPCA_600s (3.08 log10) was reduced to the same level as TVCPCA_420s (3.08 log10). In contrast, the TVCPCA_600s_TW was used as a counterexample to TVCPCA_600s. Therefore, the TVCPCA_600s_TW (1.21 log10) was only decreased to the level of TVCPCA_240s (1.56 log10). At all PTW-treatment times, a small increase in countable TVC was detectable with increasing incubation times.
Interestingly, the TVCMM showed an analogous reduction over the different PTW-treatment times. The TVCMM_controls was slightly higher than the TVCPCA_controls. The TVCMM_60s after day 2 did not increase until day 5. The TVCMM_240s was lower than TVCMM_60s. The TVCMM_420s (3.07 log10) decreased similar to TVCPCA_420s (3.11 log10). With a longer cultivation of up to 5 days, the TVCMM_420s did not rise. For both the TVCMM_420s and TVCMM_600s, similar reductions compared to PCA were obtained. Additionally, the TVCMM_600s_TW resulted in a reduction (1.21 log10). However, this was much lower than the reduction of TVCMM_600s (3.10 log10).

3.1.2. TVC-Assay of Special Agars for Gram-Negative (MCA), Gram-Positive (CNA), and Yeast and Fungi (S4)

To check the three major groups of microorganisms (Gram-positive, Gram-negative, as well as yeasts and fungi), three different agars were used. For Gram-negative bacteria, MCA was used, while CNA was used for Gram-positive bacteria and S4 for yeasts and fungi.
The TVCMCA_controls was stable at the incubation days 2 to 5. The TVCCNA_controls were slightly lower than the TVCMCA_controls on day 2. The TVCCNA_controls rose at day 3 and maintained this concentration until day 5. The TVCS4_controls were at the same level as the TVCCNA_controls.
The TVC60s was stable for MCA after day 2 of incubation. TVCCNA was at the same level on day 2. TVCS4 was slightly higher at day 2. Only for TVCCNA_60s, the CFU/mL rose with increasing days of incubation. The TVC240s was decreased significantly on all three special agars with the PTW treatment (1.67 log10 (MCA); 2.31 log10 (CNA); and 1.59 log10 (S4)). The TVCMCA_240s was relatively stable, while both the TVCCNA_240s and TVCS4_240s increased until day 5 of incubation. A 420 s PTW treatment reduced the TVC on all three agars significantly (3.86 (MCA); 3.55 (CNA); and 3.63 (S4)). Similar to the TVCPCA and TVCMM, the TVCMCA, TVCCNA, and TVCS4 were on the same agar species after a 420 s and 600 s PTW treatment. The TVCMCA_600s nearly went below the detection limit. The TVCCNA_600s was also close to the detection limit at day 2. However, with longer incubation times the TVCCNA_600s rose. The TVCS4_600s rose minimally over the incubation time.
The 600 s water treatment (1.48 log10 (MCA) and 1.58 log10 (S4)) achieved a reduction of the CFU/mL comparable to TVC240s (1.67 (MCA) and 1.59 log10 (S4)) for two of three agars at day 2 after treatment. While TVCMCA_600s_TW was stable, TVCCNA_600s_TW increased, as well as TVCS4_600s_TW.

3.1.3. Proliferation Assay of Special Agar for Sporulating Bacteria (GYEA)

The GYEA should serve as a special agar for sporulating bacteria like Bacillus and Streptomyces. The CFU/mL, after all PTW-treatment times and the TW treatment which were recorded at day 2 after treatment, were stable over the different days of incubation. The TVCGYEA_controls were at a comparable level to TVCMM_controls. The TVCGYEA_60s decreased (0.52 log10). The TVCGYEA_240s dropped (1.65 log10), which was similar to the other agars. The TVCGYEA_420s was reduced to the same level as TVCGYEA_600s (3.23 log10 and 3.38 log10). However, TVCGYEA_420s and TVCGYEA_600s increased with longer incubation times. The TVC of the counterexample TVCGYEA_600s_TW was reduced similar to TVCGYEA240s.

3.1.4. Proliferation Assay of the Special Agars for Coliform Bacteria (KVGL and ENDO)

The agars KVGL and ENDO were both used as special agars to detect changes of the CFU/mL of coliform bacteria. KVGL was incubated at room temperature and ENDO at 37 °C. The TVCKVGL_controls, TVCKVGL_60s (0.48 log10), TVCKVGL_240s (1.63 log10), and TVCKVGL_600s_TW (1.64 log10) underwent a stable reduction, until day 2, which were comparable to TVCMCA. A mild increase of CFU/mL over the increased incubation times was only detectable at longer PTW-treatment times.
The TVCENDO showed generally higher TVC at different PTW-treatment times compared to TVCKVGL. The TVCENDO_controls were a similar level to the TVCKVGL_controls. TVCENDO_60s was reduced likewise. The TVCENDO_240s was lowered (1.53 log10) compared to TVCKVGL_60s. The TVCENDO_420s and TVCENDO_600s had nearly the same level of reduction (3.40 log10 and 3.25 log10) and showed an increase of TVC until day 5 of incubation. In addition, TVCKVGL_600s_TW and TVCENDO_600s_TW were nearly on the same level.

3.2. The Detected Live/Dead-Ratio after Different PTW-Treatment Times

The G/R-ratio was measured after different PTW-treatment times (Figure 4).
A reduction of the G/R of 32.9 ± 5.6% was achieved after 1 min of PTW treatment. With a PTW treatment of 4 min, the G/R ratio was reduced by 38.4 ± 4.0%. Longer treatments resulted in a G/R-ratio reduction of 46.8 ± 4.5% (7 min) and 49.2 ± 2.2% (10 min), respectively.
The strongest decrease in the G/R ratio compared to the control was observed after a 1 min PTW treatment (>30% reduction). With longer PTW-treatment times, the reduction efficiency continued to increase. However, the reduction with longer PTW-treatment times was not as efficient as the first interval (0–1 min).

3.3. Detection of Bacterial Groups Using MALDI-ToF Analysis

Isolates of different PTW-treatment times were used for MALDI-ToF analysis. Fifty-one isolates were sent for determination after repeated plating and incubation (PCA; room temperature).
The MALDI-ToF results (Figure 5) showed that Pseudomonas spp. comprised the majority of the TVCPCA. Pseudomonas spp. comprised approximately 37.0% of all hits. None of the Pseudomonas isolates could be analyzed down to species level. The second-largest group (19.6%) were the ‘unknown’ isolates that had no hits in the reference MALDI-ToF database. The third-biggest group was the Bacillus group (13.6%). This group was divided into the Bacillus pumilus group (5.8%) and Bacillus cereus group (7.8%). However, isolates of both Bacillus groups could not be analyzed down to the species level.
In most of the PTW-treatment times, the genus of Pseudomonas was most detected. Only at the PTW-treatment time of 4 min was Peribacillus spp. detected at a higher percentage. Here, Pseudomonas followed with the second-highest detection percentage.
Isolates of controls included the two bacterial strains Serratia plymuthica and Brevundimonas versicularis, in addition to Pseudomonas spp. and some unidentified microorganisms. After one minute of PTW treatment, only Pseudomonas spp. was determinable. At 4 min of PTW treatment, the microorganisms of the Bacillus cereus group, Flavobacterium spp. and Solibacrillus silvestris, were also abundant on PCA.
After 7 min of treatment, the microorganisms Priestia spp., Flavobacterium spp., and Solibacillus silverstris were present, in addition to Pseudomonas spp. At the longest treatment time of 10 min, the two groups of Bacillus (B. cereus group and B. pumilus group) together were the second-most-dominant bacterial genus. Less frequently represented were the microorganisms Microbacterium testaceum, Priestia spp., and Peribacillus spp.

3.4. Characterization of the Anion and Cation Content of Lettuce after Washing with PTW or Tap Water with Ion Chromatography

Samples of PTW-treated and tap-water-treated lettuce were analyzed using ion chromatography to detect the concentrations of anions and cations (Figure 6).
Some of the anion and cation concentrations were influenced by the different washing techniques. On the side of the cations, concentrations of the sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium were reduced slightly after the PTW washing. Sodium was the tested cation with the highest concentration (~1900 mg/L), followed by potassium (~1600 mg/L), calcium (~550 mg/L), ammonium (~100 mg/L), and magnesium (~95 mg/L). This order has not been changed despite reduction. The PTW washing seems not to influence the ammonium concentration in the lettuce. The washing with conventional tap water showed nearly the same influence on the cation concentrations in the lettuce as the PTW washing.
In contrast to the cation household, the influence of the PTW and tap washing showed a different influence to the anion household. In descending order of concentration, carbonate (~4900 mg/L) was the most-concentrated anion, followed by sulfate (~2300 mg/L), nitrate and bromide, at nearly the same level (~1200 mg/L), chloride (1100 mg/L), and phosphate (~450 mg/L). Nitrite was not detectable. After the PTW washing, the concentration of carbonate was up to 10% higher than before. The concentrations of sulfate (−10%) and bromide (−25%) were lower after the PTW washing. The tap water washing resulted in a lowering of carbonate, bromide, sulfate, and phosphate.

4. Discussion

The goal of the presented work was to establish an innovative way for gentle fresh-cut-lettuce sanitation. Further studies showed that physical plasma has a reductive effect on microbial cells [19,30,31,33,38]. Our hypothesis was that PTW has a cell-wall-independent, non-selective reductive effect on microbial cells. The methods used confirmed that it was possible to show that all tested microbial groups were reduced in their TVC and viability. Our results suggest that treatment with PTW results in a uniform reduction of the microbial biomass, thus confirming our hypothesis regarding reduction. Interestingly, Gram-positive bacteria and fungi seem to recover better from treatment.
Proliferation assays were completed with different special agar types to investigate the impact of PTW on different cultivable microbial groups. Tests with full and minimal medium showed that the samples showed no significant differences within these microbial groups. It is always possible that some microorganisms may only grow under specific conditions which were not met in the experimental design. Lettuce contains a multispecies complexity of native microbial communities. In most cases, it is challenging to identify this with visual inspection, particularly if some microorganisms were replaced with others on the specific agar.
Therefore, the special agars for Gram-negative bacteria (MCA), Gram-positive bacteria (CNA), and yeasts and fungi (S4) were used to analyze the influence of PTW treatments on the three different microbial groups. The three tested microbial groups showed different susceptibilities to PTW. Gram-negative bacteria seem to be highly influenced by the PTW treatment and appear not to recover following it. In contrast to the large reductions in Gram-negative bacteria, the yeasts and fungi as well as the Gram-positive bacteria seem to cope with the PTW treatment.
The differences in the observed survival rate of the investigated microbial groups may be explained by their different resistance capacities against the antimicrobial active and reactive species, as well as the low pH of the PTW. The higher sensitivity of Gram-negative bacteria is likely based on their bacterial envelope structure. Gram-negative bacteria have a thin peptide glycan layer in the periplasmic space between the inner and outer membrane, which make the envelope resistant to physical and chemical stresses [41]. However, Chislett et al. showed that RNS i.e., HNO2 can react with and destroy Gram-negative envelopes, lysed cells, and it reacts with intracellular components [42]. Additionally, aerobic Gram-negative bacteria have evolved diverse defense strategies against oxidative stresses [43]. If the redox stress is overwhelming the defense capacities, RNOS could reach the intracellular space and may destroy the cellular machinery. Because of the high human health impact of coliform bacteria, these Gram-negative bacteria were tested further. However, the same dynamics for coliform bacteria were observed as for the total Gram-negative bacteria on MCA.
Gram-positive bacteria have a much thicker cell wall compared to Gram-negative [44]. This bacterial group has only one inner membrane but a strongly formed peptidoglycan layer [45]. This thick layer is thought to protect the cellular machinery under harsh conditions [46].
Therefore, it was unexpected to detect comparable reductions between bacteria on CNA (Gram-positive) and MCA (Gram-negative). However, increased incubation time of bacteria on CNA after PTW treatment resulted in increased TVC. One reason for this could be their ability to form endospores under non-optimal growth conditions. A large number of Gram-positive bacteria can also form endospores, with which they gain a high defense capacity against different stressors, including low water content and downregulated cell cycles [47]. Investigations by other scientists with microwave-driven physical plasma modified air (PPA) and Bacillus athropheus endospores resulted in a reduction of 3 log10 CFU/mL [48]. Therefore, sporicidal plasma reagents may reduce endospores as well as vegetative Gram-positive bacteria. On the other hand, survival of single cells may allow them to regrow under better conditions. These assumptions were also underlined by the obtained results of TVC on GYEA, which was used as special agar for sporulating bacteria like Streptomyces or Bacillus. TVCGYEA showed nearly the same dynamics as TVCCNA in the presented studies. Beside protective envelope structures and spore-forming capacity, acid-defense systems were described for Gram-positive bacteria. These may be efflux pumps, repair molecules, and alkali production [49,50]. Yeast and fungi also have strong envelopes with selective permeable barriers to protect them against environmental stresses [51]. In the presented research, the TVCS4 decreased with longer PTW-treatment times, which was in line with the results for the other investigated microbiological groups. In addition, comparable to TVCCNA (Gram-positive bacteria), the TVCS4 increased with longer incubation times after the PTW treatment. However, this regrowth was not as strong as that detected for the Gram-positive bacteria. Another study with plasma gas as the antimicrobial sanitation method showed comparable reduction dynamics [52,53]. Nevertheless, the regrowth was notable and should not be neglected. Another point may be that yeasts and fungi have longer growth rates than bacteria, which could explain the later increase of the TVCS4 after longer incubation times. Longer regrowth times compared to bacterial cells after plasma treatments were also shown in the studies of Mann et al. (2015) [54].
With the usage of the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit, reductions of living cells were detectable based on cell envelope integrity. With longer PTW-treatment times, a lowering of intact cell envelopes was detected. However, the reduction of ≤50% was not as high as the reduction of the TVC (≥99.99% ≙ ≥4 log10). At first glance, these results seem to be contrary to each other. However, they may be an indication of a possible “viable but noncultivable” (VBNC) status in the case of bacteria [55].
VBNC means that microbial cells are still alive, but have temporarily reduced their metabolism to maintenance levels [56]. Stopping building their metabolism leads to the loss of their ability to grow on culture media [57,58]. Presumably, they were affected so strongly by PTW treatment (protein and membrane degradations) that the cells are primarily involved in the rebuilding of their machinery, which uses their lipid and carbohydrate metabolism as an energy source [59,60]. Hence why, while repairing, microorganisms do not start cell division and may appear as non-proliferative on the agar [59]. This may result in bias for cultivation-dependent investigations. To gather better insights on the metabolic activity of bacteria and other microorganisms, analyses based on metabolic activity like XTT assays or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays should be conducted in future research.
The MALDI-ToF results showed a high detection rate of Pseudomonas spp. over all treatment times. Different strains of Pseudomonas have been described on plants [61,62]. Some of them are harmful and others beneficial for plant life [63,64]. However, a more specific differentiation of the single Pseudomonas spp. was not possible using MALDI-ToF analysis. Therefore, it could not be concluded that the PTW treatment would only kill the harmful pseudomonades. It is more likely that the PTW treatment would affect all pseudomonades in the same range. This could also be concluded for all microorganisms on the fresh-cut endive. Interestingly, members of Bacillus groups seem to be more resistant to longer PTW-treatment times than the Pseudomonas group. This is to be expected, due to the higher survival rates of Gram-positive bacteria in the performed special-agar-based experiments. Among the strains of B. cereus and B. pumilus, some human pathogens may occur. These strains can cause diarrhea by emitting heat-resistant enterotoxin [65,66]. Therefore, even after longer PTW-treatment times, the potential of human pathogen occurrence may be reduced but not completely removed. Another interesting result was the absence of fungi in the MALDI-ToF detections, which remained in contrary to the TVC results. Whether this result was a coincidence or based on the database of the MALDI-ToF cannot be answered clearly in retrospect.
Although coliform bacteria were detected on special agars, none could be detected using MALDI-ToF. It is likely that, as the amounts of coliform were reduced compared to other microbial groups on the PCA, they may not have been selected with the random picking of colonies. However, many studies showed that coliform could be present on ready-to-eat vegetables [67,68]. As coliforms are potential human pathogens, they are a bacterial group of special interest and have also been used as indicator organisms for fecal contamination of water and food [69]. Future investigations may be focused in more detail on human pathogens, including coliforms.
An important point of interest is the reduction of potentially harmful chemical compounds in foods. Some studies show potential health risks connected with nitrite/nitrate explosion [70,71]. In the gastrointestinal tract food-based nitrates could be formed into nitrites and nitrogen acids, which could react with amines forming potentially carcinogenic nitrosamines [72].
The tested MidiPLexc produced RNOS, which reduced the microbial load [33,73]. To be sure that no high potential for harmful nitrate or nitrite concentrations remained in the lettuce after the PTW-treatment cation and anion concentrations in the lettuce were tested. It seems that the cation and anion household were influenced slightly by the PTW-treatment. While no nitrite was detectable in all of the lettuce samples, the nitrate concentration (unwashed ~1250 mg/L) was higher after the PTW treatment (~1500 mg/L (+25%)). Interestingly, the nitrate concentration was increased, also, after the tap-water treatment (~1600 mg/L (+33%)). It seems that the increasing nitrate level was based more on the water utilized than on the plasma treatment. According to EU Regulation No. 1258/2011, the maximum values for nitrate for fresh lettuce from the open field are 4000 mg NO3/kg FW between October and March and 3000 mg NO3/kg FW between April and September (http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/915/2023-08-10 accessed on 1 December 2023). Overall, the nitrate concentrations of the treated lettuce are below the acceptable threshold of the EU regulations.
Another benefit of the PTW is that it has, aside from nitrate, no remaining disinfection byproducts like chlorides which made the wastewater more ecofriendly than, for example, chlorinated water [74].

5. Conclusions

The PTW treatment inactivated a wide spectrum of microorganisms on fresh-cut endive. The developed cultivable microbial spectrum of endive (Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi, molds, and spore formations) was as expected and is comparable to that in the existing literature. A clear reduction of TVC and the lethal effects on membrane integrity were achieved for all of the tested microbial groups. This widespread reduction efficiency could help to provide safe food for customers and could finally contribute to public health and disease prevention.
These microbial reductions were dependent on the microbes’ cultivability and known defense mechanisms (Gram-negative bacteria > molds/fungi > Gram-positive bacteria). However, as the experiments did not investigate the metabolic activity of lettuce-occurring microorganisms, VBNC status for bacteria could not be excluded. The possible changes in the metabolic activity of the surface microorganisms is a fascinating field of research for the future.
The non-selective or less-selective inactivation ability of PTW was unexpected. On the one hand, this could mean that it is difficult to separate plant-protecting commensals from plant and human pathogens. On the other hand, it indicates the broad application potential of the innovative plasma technology against microbial food spoilage. The development of microbial resistance and susceptibility, as observed with antibiotic substances, does not appear to occur, as the modes of action are broadly diversified.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.S.; formal analysis, H.W. and R.W.; investigation, H.W.; data curation, H.W.; writing—original draft, H.W. and R.W.; writing—review and editing, T.U. and U.S.; supervision, T.U. and U.S.; project administration, U.S.; funding acquisition, J.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by the Federal Republic of Germany, Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, under the program “SPLASH”, and funding reference: 2816IP005, as well as the Federal Ministry of Education and Research under the program “PlaVir”, grant number 03COV05A. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or composition of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ongoing work.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge all the anonymous reviewers and Anna Burns for the linguistic and proofreading support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Edlund, A.; Yang, Y.; Yooseph, S.; He, X.; Shi, W.; McLean, J.S. Uncovering complex microbiome activities via metatranscriptomics during 24 hours of oral biofilm assembly and maturation. Microbiome 2018, 6, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Hamady, M.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Knight, R.; Gordon, J.I. The human microbiome project. Nature 2007, 449, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ursell, L.K.; Metcalf, J.L.; Parfrey, L.W.; Knight, R. Defining the human microbiome. Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70 (Suppl. S1), S38–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amon, P.; Sanderson, I. What is the microbiome? Arch. Dis. Child.-Educ. Pract. 2017, 102, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Der Heijden, M.G.; Hartmann, M. Networking in the plant microbiome. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, H.; Brettell, L.E.; Singh, B. Linking the phyllosphere microbiome to plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Köberl, M.; Erschen, S.; Etemadi, M.; White, R.A.; El-Arabi, T.F.; Berg, G. Deciphering the microbiome shift during fermentation of medicinal plants. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lyu, D.; Zajonc, J.; Pagé, A.; Tanney, C.A.; Shah, A.; Monjezi, N.; Msimbira, L.A.; Antar, M.; Nazari, M.; Backer, R. Plant holobiont theory: The phytomicrobiome plays a central role in evolution and success. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leveau, J.H. A brief from the leaf: Latest research to inform our understanding of the phyllosphere microbiome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 49, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ritpitakphong, U.; Falquet, L.; Vimoltust, A.; Berger, A.; Métraux, J.P.; L’Haridon, F. The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen. New Phytol. 2016, 210, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schlaeppi, K.; Bulgarelli, D. The plant microbiome at work. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015, 28, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Thapa, S.; Prasanna, R. Prospecting the characteristics and significance of the phyllosphere microbiome. Ann. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cernava, T.; Chen, X.; Krug, L.; Li, H.; Yang, M.; Berg, G. The tea leaf microbiome shows specific responses to chemical pesticides and biocontrol applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 667, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gordon, J.; Knowlton, N.; Relman, D.A.; Rohwer, F.; Youle, M. Superorganisms and holobionts. Microbe 2013, 8, 152–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erlacher, A.; Cardinale, M.; Grube, M.; Berg, G. Biotic stress shifted structure and abundance of Enterobacteriaceae in the lettuce microbiome. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cardinale, M.; Grube, M.; Erlacher, A.; Quehenberger, J.; Berg, G. Bacterial networks and co-occurrence relationships in the lettuce root microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schnabel, U.; Handorf, O.; Winter, H.; Weihe, T.; Weit, C.; Schäfer, J.; Stachowiak, J.; Boehm, D.; Below, H.; Bourke, P. The effect of plasma treated water unit processes on the food quality characteristics of fresh-cut endive. Front. Nutr. 2021, 7, 627483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Williams, T.R.; Moyne, A.L.; Harris, L.J.; Marco, M.L. Season, irrigation, leaf age, and Escherichia coli inoculation influence the bacterial diversity in the lettuce phyllosphere. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schnabel, U.; Niquet, R.; Krohmann, U.; Winter, J.; Schlüter, O.; Weltmann, K.D.; Ehlbeck, J. Decontamination of microbiologically contaminated specimen by direct and indirect plasma treatment. Plasma Process. Polym. 2012, 9, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McManamon, O.; Scollard, J.; Schmalenberger, A. Inoculation density is affecting growth conditions of Listeria monocytogenes on fresh cut lettuce. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abadias, M.; Usall, J.; Oliveira, M.; Alegre, I.; Viñas, I. Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) for reducing microbial contamination on minimally-processed vegetables. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 123, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lopez-Velasco, G.; Welbaum, G.E.; Boyer, R.R.; Mane, S.P.; Ponder, M.A. Changes in spinach phylloepiphytic bacteria communities following minimal processing and refrigerated storage described using pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 110, 1203–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gram, L.; Ravn, L.; Rasch, M.; Bruhn, J.B.; Christensen, A.B.; Givskov, M. Food spoilage—Interactions between food spoilage bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 78, 79–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rose, D.; Bianchini, A.; Martinez, B.; Flores, R. Methods for reducing microbial contamination of wheat flour and effects on functionality. Cereal Foods World 2012, 57, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Feng, H.; Luo, Y. Microbial reduction and storage quality of fresh-cut cilantro washed with acidic electrolyzed water and aqueous ozone. Food Res. Int. 2004, 37, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pirovani, M.; Piagentini, A.; Güemes, D.; Arkwright, S. Reduction of chlorine concentration and microbial load during washing-disinfection of shredded lettuce. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Klaiber, R.G.; Baur, S.; Wolf, G.; Hammes, W.P.; Carle, R. Quality of minimally processed carrots as affected by warm water washing and chlorination. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2005, 6, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Delaquis, P.J.; Fukumoto, L.R.; Toivonen, P.M.; Cliff, M.A. Implications of wash water chlorination and temperature for the microbiological and sensory properties of fresh-cut iceberg lettuce. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2004, 31, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Najafi, M.B.H.; Khodaparast, M.H. Efficacy of ozone to reduce microbial populations in date fruits. Food Control 2009, 20, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ehlbeck, J.; Schnabel, U.; Polak, M.; Winter, J.; Von Woedtke, T.; Brandenburg, R.; Von dem Hagen, T.; Weltmann, K. Low temperature atmospheric pressure plasma sources for microbial decontamination. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2010, 44, 013002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Handorf, O.; Pauker, V.I.; Schnabel, U.; Weihe, T.; Freund, E.; Bekeschus, S.; Riedel, K.; Ehlbeck, J. Characterization of Antimicrobial Effects of Plasma-Treated Water (PTW) Produced by Microwave-Induced Plasma (MidiPLexc) on Pseudomonas fluorescens Biofilms. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kogelschatz, U. Atmospheric-pressure plasma technology. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2004, 46, B63–B75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Handorf, O.; Below, H.; Schnabel, U.; Riedel, K.; Ehlbeck, J. Investigation of the chemical composition of plasma-treated water by MidiPLexc and its antimicrobial effect onL. monocytogenesandPseudomonas fluorescensmonospecies suspension cultures. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2020, 53, 305204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schmidt-Bleker, A.; Winter, J.; Bösel, A.; Reuter, S.; Weltmann, K.-D. On the plasma chemistry of a cold atmospheric argon plasma jet with shielding gas device. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 015005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ammann, P.; Timmins, R. Chemical reactions during rapid quenching of oxygen-nitrogen mixtures from very high temperatures. AIChE J. 1966, 12, 956–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shiva, S. Nitrite: A physiological store of nitric oxide and modulator of mitochondrial function. Redox Biol. 2013, 1, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stock, H. Prüfbericht 23-1116-001. In Untersuchung Nach Trinkwasserverordnung; Stadtwerke Greifswald: Greifswald, Germany, 2023; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  38. Weihe, T.; Schnabel, U.; Winter, H.; Möller, T.; Stachowiak, J.; Neumann, S.; Schlüter, O.; Ehlbeck, J. Reduce and refine: Plasma treated water vs conventional disinfectants for conveyor-belt cleaning in sustainable food-production lines. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 223304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jovićević, S.; Ivković, M.; Pavlović, Z.; Konjević, N. Parametric study of an atmospheric pressure microwave-induced plasma of the mini MIP torch—I. Two-dimensional spatially resolved electron-number density measurements. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2000, 55, 1879–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miles, A.A.; Misra, S.; Irwin, J. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Epidemiol. Infect. 1938, 38, 732–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Beveridge, T.J. Structures of gram-negative cell walls and their derived membrane vesicles. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4725–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chislett, M.; Guo, J.; Bond, P.L.; Wang, Y.; Donose, B.C.; Yuan, Z. Reactive nitrogen species from free nitrous acid (FNA) cause cell lysis. Water Res. 2022, 217, 118401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. van der Heijden, J.; Vogt, S.L.; Reynolds, L.A.; Peña-Díaz, J.; Tupin, A.; Aussel, L.; Finlay, B.B. Exploring the redox balance inside gram-negative bacteria with redox-sensitive GFP. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 91, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shockman, G.D.; Barren, J.F. Structure, function, and assembly of cell walls of gram-positive bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1983, 37, 501–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schäffer, C.; Messner, P. The structure of secondary cell wall polymers: How Gram-positive bacteria stick their cell walls together. Microbiology 2005, 151, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Silhavy, T.J.; Kahne, D.; Walker, S. The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a000414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nicholson, W.L.; Fajardo-Cavazos, P.; Rebeil, R.; Slieman, T.A.; Riesenman, P.J.; Law, J.F.; Xue, Y. Bacterial endospores and their significance in stress resistance. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 2002, 81, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schnabel, U.; Andrasch, M.; Weltmann, K.D.; Ehlbeck, J. Inactivation of vegetative microorganisms and Bacillus atrophaeus endospores by reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Plasma Process. Polym. 2014, 11, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C. Surviving the acid test: Responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 429–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aeschlimann, J.R. The role of multidrug efflux pumps in the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacteria: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2003, 23, 916–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stratford, M. Another brick in the wall? Recent developments concerning the yeast cell envelope. Yeast 1994, 10, 1741–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Winter, H.; Wagner, R.; Yao, Y.; Ehlbeck, J.; Schnabel, U. Influence of plasma-treated air on surface microbial communities on freshly harvested lettuce. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023, 7, 100649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Özdemir, E.; Başaran, P.; Kartal, S.; Akan, T. Cold plasma application to fresh green leafy vegetables: Impact on microbiology and product quality. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 4484–4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mann, M.S.; Schnabel, U.; Weihe, T.; Weltmann, K.-D.; von Woedtke, T. A reference technique to compare the antimicrobial properties of atmospheric pressure plasma sources. Plasma Med. 2015, 5, 27–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Oliver, J.D. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu, J.; Yang, L.; Kjellerup, B.V.; Xu, Z. Viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state, an underestimated and controversial microbial survival strategy. Trends Microbiol. 2023, 31, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schottroff, F.; Fröhling, A.; Zunabovic-Pichler, M.; Krottenthaler, A.; Schlüter, O.; Jäger, H. Sublethal injury and viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state in microorganisms during preservation of food and biological materials by non-thermal processes. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Salma, M.; Rousseaux, S.; Sequeira-Le Grand, A.; Divol, B.; Alexandre, H. Characterization of the viable but nonculturable (VBNC) state in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Trevors, J. Viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria: Gene expression in planktonic and biofilm cells. J. Microbiol. Methods 2011, 86, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schnabel, U.; Handorf, O.; Yarova, K.; Zessin, B.; Zechlin, S.; Sydow, D.; Zellmer, E.; Stachowiak, J.; Andrasch, M.; Below, H. Plasma-treated air and water—Assessment of synergistic antimicrobial effects for sanitation of food processing surfaces and environment. Foods 2019, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Takeuchi, K.; Matute, C.M.; Hassan, A.N.; Frank, J.F. Comparison of the attachment of Escherichia coli O157: H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Pseudomonas fluorescens to lettuce leaves. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 1433–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cipriano, M.A.; Lupatini, M.; Lopes-Santos, L.; da Silva, M.J.; Roesch, L.F.; Destefano, S.A.; Freitas, S.S.; Kuramae, E.E. Lettuce and rhizosphere microbiome responses to growth promoting Pseudomonas species under field conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Grogan, R.; Misaghi, I.; Kimble, K.; Greathead, A.; Ririe, D.; Bardin, R. Varnish spot, destructive disease of lettuce in California caused by Pseudomonas cichorii. Phytopathology 1977, 67, 957–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Starkey, M.; Rahme, L.G. Modeling Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis in plant hosts. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hansen, B.M.; Hendriksen, N.B. Detection of enterotoxic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis strains by PCR analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Leong, S.S.; Korel, F.; King, J.H. Bacillus cereus: A review of “fried rice syndrome” causative agents. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 185, 106418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cerna-Cortes, J.F.; Leon-Montes, N.; Cortes-Cueto, A.L.; Salas-Rangel, L.P.; Helguera-Repetto, A.C.; Lopez-Hernandez, D.; Rivera-Gutierrez, S.; Fernandez-Rendon, E.; Gonzalez-y-Merchand, J.A. Microbiological quality of ready-to-eat vegetables collected in Mexico City: Occurrence of aerobic-mesophilic bacteria, fecal coliforms, and potentially pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 789508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Falomir, M.P.; Gozalbo, D.; Rico, H. Coliform bacteria in fresh vegetables: From cultivated lands to consumers. Curr. Res. Technol. Educ. Top. Appl. Microbiol. Microb. Biotechnol. 2010, 2, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar]
  69. Martin, N.H.; Trmčić, A.; Hsieh, T.-H.; Boor, K.J.; Wiedmann, M. The evolving role of coliforms as indicators of unhygienic processing conditions in dairy foods. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bahadoran, Z.; Mirmiran, P.; Ghasemi, A.; Kabir, A.; Azizi, F.; Hadaegh, F. Is dietary nitrate/nitrite exposure a risk factor for development of thyroid abnormality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nitric Oxide 2015, 47, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Quijano, L.; Yusà, V.; Font, G.; McAllister, C.; Torres, C.; Pardo, O. Risk assessment and monitoring programme of nitrates through vegetables in the Region of Valencia (Spain). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 100, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hosseini, M.-J.; Dezhangah, S.; Esmi, F.; Gharavi-Nakhjavani, M.S.; Hashempour-Baltork, F.; Alizadeh, A.M. A worldwide systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of nitrate and nitrite in vegetables and fruits. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 257, 114934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Handorf, O.; Pauker, V.I.; Weihe, T.; Schafer, J.; Freund, E.; Schnabel, U.; Bekeschus, S.; Riedel, K.; Ehlbeck, J. Plasma-Treated Water Affects Listeria monocytogenes Vitality and Biofilm Structure. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 652481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, J.; Su, P.; Chen, H.; Qiao, M.; Yang, B.; Zhao, X. Impact of reactive oxygen species on cell activity and structural integrity of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in electrochemical disinfection system. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustration of possible holobiontic organisms.
Figure 1. Illustration of possible holobiontic organisms.
Foods 13 00282 g001
Figure 2. Structure of the plasma system.
Figure 2. Structure of the plasma system.
Foods 13 00282 g002
Figure 3. The influence of PTW treatment on different cultivable microbial groups. This figure shows the different TVC in CFU/mL of 5 g lettuce on different agars (PCA, MM, MCA, CNA, S4, ENDO, GYEA and KVGL) after different plasma-treatment times (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, 600 s, and 600 with tap water (TW)) for native lettuce microbial communities. The plates were incubated for 5 days, and the TVC were counted on days 2–5. * depicts significant differences between two treatments (tested with Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc analysis, p-value < 0.0033).
Figure 3. The influence of PTW treatment on different cultivable microbial groups. This figure shows the different TVC in CFU/mL of 5 g lettuce on different agars (PCA, MM, MCA, CNA, S4, ENDO, GYEA and KVGL) after different plasma-treatment times (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, 600 s, and 600 with tap water (TW)) for native lettuce microbial communities. The plates were incubated for 5 days, and the TVC were counted on days 2–5. * depicts significant differences between two treatments (tested with Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoc analysis, p-value < 0.0033).
Foods 13 00282 g003
Figure 4. The G/R ratios of PTW-treated samples. Different PTW-treatment times were used (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, and 600 s). The points of different treatment times are connected with a visual line.
Figure 4. The G/R ratios of PTW-treated samples. Different PTW-treatment times were used (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, and 600 s). The points of different treatment times are connected with a visual line.
Foods 13 00282 g004
Figure 5. Different MALDI-ToF database hits of 51 randomly picked colonies of TVC (native lettuce microbial communities) on PCA of 5 g of lettuce treated with PTW at different treatment times (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, 600 s). The plates were incubated for 5 days. After incubation, single colonies were picked randomly. These colonies were isolated on fresh PCA plates, transferred several times, and re-cultivated on fresh PCA. Finally, the isolates were sent for external analyses and identification of the colonies.Only five species of all isolates could be identified completely using MALDI-ToF analyses. All completely identified isolates were bacteria species: Serratia plymuthica, two strains of Solibacillus silvestris, Micrpbacterium testaceum, and Brevundimonas vesicularis. Further identified groups were Priestia spp., Peribacillus spp., and Flavobacterium spp.
Figure 5. Different MALDI-ToF database hits of 51 randomly picked colonies of TVC (native lettuce microbial communities) on PCA of 5 g of lettuce treated with PTW at different treatment times (0 s as control, 60 s, 240 s, 420 s, 600 s). The plates were incubated for 5 days. After incubation, single colonies were picked randomly. These colonies were isolated on fresh PCA plates, transferred several times, and re-cultivated on fresh PCA. Finally, the isolates were sent for external analyses and identification of the colonies.Only five species of all isolates could be identified completely using MALDI-ToF analyses. All completely identified isolates were bacteria species: Serratia plymuthica, two strains of Solibacillus silvestris, Micrpbacterium testaceum, and Brevundimonas vesicularis. Further identified groups were Priestia spp., Peribacillus spp., and Flavobacterium spp.
Foods 13 00282 g005
Figure 6. Cation (a,b) and anion (c,d) concentrations in PTW- and tap-water-treated lettuce samples. Depicted is the comparison of unwashed lettuce and PTW-washed lettuce (a,c) as well as the comparison of unwashed lettuce against tap-water washed lettuce (b,d).
Figure 6. Cation (a,b) and anion (c,d) concentrations in PTW- and tap-water-treated lettuce samples. Depicted is the comparison of unwashed lettuce and PTW-washed lettuce (a,c) as well as the comparison of unwashed lettuce against tap-water washed lettuce (b,d).
Foods 13 00282 g006
Table 1. Compositions of the different agars.
Table 1. Compositions of the different agars.
Agar TypeCultivable
Microbial Groups
Agar CompositionCompany
Plate count agar (PCA)Full-medium agar23.5 g/LCarl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany)
Standard count agar (MM)Minimal-medium agar25 g/LCarl Roth (Germany)
MacConkey agar (MCA)Special agar for Gram-negative bacteria50 g/LCarl Roth (Germany)
PCA with collistinesulfate and nalidixinacid (CNA)Special agar for
Gram-positive bacteria
PCA
After autoclaving: 10 mg/L collistinsulfat
15 mg/L nalidixinacid
PCA; Carl Roth (Germany)
Collistinsulfat; Carl Roth (Germany)
nalidixinacid; Carl Roth (Germany)
Sabouraud agar with 4% dextrose (S4)Special agar for yeasts and molds 65 g/LMerck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany)
Glycerol yeast extract agar (GYEA)Special agar composition for sporulating bacteria15 g/L agar-agar
5 g/L glycerol
2 g/L yeast extract
1 g/L di-potassium phosphate
Agar-argar, Kobe I; Carl Roth (Germany)
Glycerol; TH Geyer (Renningen, Germany)
Yeast extract; Carl Roth (Germany)
Di-potassium-phosphate; Carl Roth (Germany)
Crystal violet bile lactose agar (CVBLA)Special agar for coliforms (room temperature)41.5 g/LCarl Roth (Germany)
Endo agar (ENDO)Special agar for coliforms
(37 °C)
36 g/L Endo agar base agar
5 mL/L ethanolic fuchsin solution
Endo agar base, Carl Roth (Germany)
Fuchsin, Carl Roth (Germany)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Winter, H.; Wagner, R.; Ehlbeck, J.; Urich, T.; Schnabel, U. Deep Impact: Shifts of Native Cultivable Microbial Communities on Fresh Lettuce after Treatment with Plasma-Treated Water. Foods 2024, 13, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13020282

AMA Style

Winter H, Wagner R, Ehlbeck J, Urich T, Schnabel U. Deep Impact: Shifts of Native Cultivable Microbial Communities on Fresh Lettuce after Treatment with Plasma-Treated Water. Foods. 2024; 13(2):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13020282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Winter, Hauke, Robert Wagner, Jörg Ehlbeck, Tim Urich, and Uta Schnabel. 2024. "Deep Impact: Shifts of Native Cultivable Microbial Communities on Fresh Lettuce after Treatment with Plasma-Treated Water" Foods 13, no. 2: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13020282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop