Next Article in Journal
Food Preservation in the Industrial Revolution Epoch: Innovative High Pressure Processing (HPP, HPT) for the 21st-Century Sustainable Society
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption on Human Health: An Update of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
Research Progress of Machine Learning in Extending and Regulating the Shelf Life of Fruits and Vegetables
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health Benefits of Vegetarian Diets: An Insight into the Main Topics
 
 
Commentary
Peer-Review Record

Slovenia’s Food-Based Dietary Guidelines 2024: Eating for Health and the Planet

Foods 2024, 13(19), 3026; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13193026
by Zlatko Fras 1,2, Borut Jug 1,3, Boštjan Jakše 4,*, Samo Kreft 5, Nina Mikec 6, Žiga Malek 7,8, Martina Bavec 9, Ana Vovk 10, Ana Frelih-Larsen 11 and Nataša Fidler Mis 12
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Foods 2024, 13(19), 3026; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13193026
Submission received: 13 August 2024 / Revised: 17 September 2024 / Accepted: 21 September 2024 / Published: 24 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Choice, Nutrition, and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

The commentary on development of the process of FBDG n Slovenia is well and clearly written, providing sufficient information on the steps taken to develop national dietary guidelines with environmental consideration. Well done, no further comments.

Author Response

In the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Editor,

Although the article does not have the standard structure of a research, the topic is very important from the point of view of food, health, environmental issues and sustainability. Slovenia took the initiative to renew the FDBG considering the aspects that concern the world population and the papaer describes the steps involved in this process.

Author Response

In the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Review for the manuscript

 

Slovenia’s Food-Based Dietary Guidelines 2024. Eating for Health and The Planet

 

Dear Editor,

Thank you for the invitation to review for FOODS. Please find below my comments and suggestions.

 

TITLE

          It is adequate.

 

ABSTRACT

In this section, in lines 34-35 we find: " …and the National Institute of Public Health of Slovenia in Slovenia to present the 34 first scientific draft of the SLO FBDG for external international peer review".

I suggest: …and the National Institute of Public Health of Slovenia to present the 34 first scientific draft of the SLO FBDG for external international peer review

          In lines 34-39 it is possible to read that “The meeting included invited lectures from world-leading experts to present healthy diets from sustainable food systems, integrate climate and sustainability aspects into the new SLO FBDG, and discussed the findings with the Slovenian core working group, extended working group of the SLO FBDG and invited 38 experts. The final version of SLO FBDG is expected to be released by the end of 2024.”

I also suggest including the results of the discussions that were held in this section. What actions were taken or planned based on these meetings?

 

KEYWORDS

The chosen keywords are Keywords: dietary guidelines; food-based; nutrition; diet; environ

ment; food system; Slovenia. I suggest including among them “Food Guide Pyramid”.

 

INTRODUCTION

In this section, I suggest to

1-    Include more and new references. Please show how this manuscript is important and innovative based on the current publications that the authors can find in PUBEMD, Google Scholar, Embase, etc.

2-    The aim of the study is not clear.

 

3-    In topic 2. May Expert meeting main objectives:

 

I do not see the need to cite the conference titles and the names of the scientists who participated in the lectures. Is it necessary to include this topic?

 

METHODS

          NA

 

CONCLUSIONS and FUTURE DIRECTIONS

          These sections are important to be carefully addressed; please revise

However, I suggest including the limitations of this review. Please build a sentence deeply discussing the future perspectives for this project.

Please include the limitations of this study.

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Only minor.

Author Response

In the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,
Thank you for taking my suggestions into account.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Dear Doctor,
I believe that the manuscript can be published.

With best regards,

Sandra M. Barbalho

Back to TopTop