Next Article in Journal
Solid-State Fermentation Engineering of Traditional Chinese Fermented Food
Next Article in Special Issue
How Do Greeks Feel about Eating Insects? A Study of Consumer Perceptions and Preferences
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Physical Separation with Ultrasound Application on Brewers’ Spent Grain to Obtain Powders for Potential Application in Foodstuffs
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Sustainable Food Production and Consumption in the European Union
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Psychological Changes in Green Food Consumption in the Digital Context: Exploring the Role of Green Online Interactions from a Comprehensive Perspective

Foods 2024, 13(18), 3001; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183001
by Siyuan Zhang 1,†, Shiwei Xu 1,†, Yilei Ren 2,3,* and Jing Wang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Foods 2024, 13(18), 3001; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13183001
Submission received: 23 August 2024 / Revised: 15 September 2024 / Accepted: 19 September 2024 / Published: 22 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Food Consumption and Sustainable Development)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The whole introduction is very much contextualised to the experience and evidence of a well-defined part of the globe, China. It would be very important to also try to include concepts from the literature of other continents, precisely to detail the specificity of China in this context.

This is important also in the conclusion part. 


Some minors:

 

Line 34: strong sentence about the realtion between green food and safety. Can we put some reference here?

 

Line 52: right, but try to explore also the concept of “Self Sphere”. this concept tries to show that yes behaviour is strongly influenced by the external environment but there is an internal part that determines free will.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript is interesting, I would especially like to congratulate the very didactic figures: figure 1, 2 and figure 3 (and in #3, the manner of showing the strength of correlation with Heatmap was remarkable), but I have a few considerations:

1- I didn't find the description of the sample size calculation, I think it would be really important, as well as making sure that all the people were from the same region);

2- I noticed that people under the age of 18 responded, which is worrying. There are some social media that prevent this public from responding. How was the authorisation from the ethics committee? Did it allow this public to respond?

3- The SPSS version is 22.0. Please check, it seems to be very old. The current version is 29.0

4-In table 4, footnote the acronyms (e.g. GFI, CFI, etc.).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop