Consumer Sentiments and Emotions in New Seafood Product Concept Development: A Co-Creation Approach Using Online Discussion Rooms in Croatia, Italy and Spain
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Consumer Engagement in New Food Product Development
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Product Concepts
- Current favorable sustainability conditions of Adriatic fish species and potential for their exploitation;
- Potential for the processing innovation uptake of the new product concepts;
- Potential for their value creation and market penetration.
3.2. Participant Recruitment
3.3. Online Discussion Rooms
- A warm-up debate about participants’ consumption, dietary, and cooking habits with regard to seafood, followed by a brief discussion on fish and fish product sustainability to gain a deeper understanding of people’s awareness and perceptions of this sector.
- A second section where participants discussed their first impressions, opinions, perceptions, and attitudes toward the first product concept—i.e., sardine fillets.
- A third section where participants discussed their first impressions, opinions, perceptions, and attitudes toward the second product concept—i.e., sea burgers.
3.4. Data Analysis
3.4.1. Topic Modeling
3.4.2. Sentiment Analysis
3.4.3. Emotion Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Theme 1: Attitudes toward Seafood
4.1.1. Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Results
4.1.2. Emotion Analysis Results
4.2. Theme 2: Sardine Fillets
4.2.1. Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Results
4.2.2. Emotion Analysis Results
4.3. Theme 3: Sea Burgers
4.3.1. Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Results
4.3.2. Emotion Analysis Results
5. Discussion
5.1. Implications for Practice
5.2. Limitations and Future Research Directions
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- EUMOFA. The EU Fish Market, 2021 ed.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxemburg, 2021; ISBN 978-92-76-28905-0. [Google Scholar]
- OECD. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020–2029; OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook; FAO: Rome, Italy; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020; ISBN 978-92-64-31767-3. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Towards Blue Transformation; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; ISBN 978-92-5-136364-5. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. The State of Mediterranean and Black Sea Fisheries 2022; General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean: Rome, Italy, 2022; ISBN 978-92-5-137370-5. [Google Scholar]
- Piroddi, C.; Coll, M.; Liquete, C.; Macias, D.; Greer, K.; Buszowski, J.; Steenbeek, J.; Danovaro, R.; Christensen, V. Historical Changes of the Mediterranean Sea Ecosystem: Modelling the Role and Impact of Primary Productivity and Fisheries Changes over Time. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guiné, R.P.F.; Florença, S.G.; Barroca, M.J.; Anjos, O. The Link between the Consumer and the Innovations in Food Product Development. Foods 2020, 9, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carlucci, D.; Nocella, G.; De Devitiis, B.; Viscecchia, R.; Bimbo, F.; Nardone, G. Consumer Purchasing Behaviour towards Fish and Seafood Products. Patterns and Insights from a Sample of International Studies. Appetite 2015, 84, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marinac Pupavac, S.; Kenðel Jovanović, G.; Linšak, Ž.; Glad, M.; Traven, L.; Pavičić Žeželj, S. The Influence on Fish and Seafood Consumption, and the Attitudes and Reasons for Its Consumption in the Croatian Population. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 945186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinders, M.J.; Banovi’, M.; Guerrero, L.; Krystallis, A. Consumer Perceptions of Farmed Fish: A Cross-National Segmentation in Five European Countries. BFJ 2016, 118, 2581–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, D.; Lawley, M. The Role of Habit, Childhood Consumption, Familiarity, and Attitudes Across Seafood Consumption Segments in Australia. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2014, 20, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morrissey, M.; DeWitt, C. Value-Added Seafood. In Seafood Processing; Boziaris, I.S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2013; pp. 343–358. ISBN 978-1-118-34617-4. [Google Scholar]
- Thong, N.T.; Solgaard, H.S. Consumer’s Food Motives and Seafood Consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 56, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galati, A.; Miret-Pastor, L.; Siggia, D.; Crescimanno, M.; Fiore, M. Determinants Affecting Consumers’ Attention to Fish Eco-Labels in Purchase Decisions: A Cross-Country Study. BFJ 2022, 124, 2993–3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peiró-Signes, A.; Miret-Pastor, L.; Galati, A.; Segarra-Oña, M. Consumer Demand for Environmental, Social, and Ethical Information in Fishery and Aquaculture Product Labels. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 948437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menozzi, D.; Nguyen, T.T.; Sogari, G.; Taskov, D.; Lucas, S.; Castro-Rial, J.L.S.; Mora, C. Consumers’ Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Myrland, Ø.; Trondsen, T.; Johnston, R.S.; Lund, E. Determinants of Seafood Consumption in Norway: Lifestyle, Revealed Preferences, and Barriers to Consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2000, 11, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaviglio, A.; Demartini, E.; Mauracher, C.; Pirani, A. Consumer Perception of Different Species and Presentation Forms of Fish: An Empirical Analysis in Italy. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 36, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Symmank, C. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Food Product Attributes in Consumer and Sensory Research: Literature Review and Quantification of the Findings. Manag. Rev. Q. 2019, 69, 39–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Mas, L.; Claret, A.; Stancu, V.; Brunsø, K.; Peral, I.; Santa Cruz, E.; Krystallis, A.; Guerrero, L. Making Full Use of Qualitative Data to Generate New Fish Product Ideas through Co-Creation with Consumers: A Methodological Approach. Foods 2022, 11, 2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horvat, A.; Granato, G.; Fogliano, V.; Luning, P.A. Understanding Consumer Data Use in New Product Development and the Product Life Cycle in European Food Firms—An Empirical Study. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 76, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stancu, V.; Brunsø, K.; Krystallis, A.; Guerrero, L.; Santa Cruz, E.; Peral, I. European Consumer Segments with a High Potential for Accepting New Innovative Fish Products Based on Their Food-Related Lifestyle. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 99, 104560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosmina, M.; Demartini, E.; Gaviglio, A.; Mauracher, C.; Prestamburgo, S.; Trevisan, G. Italian Consumers’ Attitudes towards Small Pelagic Fish. New Medit 2012, 11, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
- Guillen, J.; Franquesa, R. Price Transmission and Volatility along the Spanish Fresh Fish Market Chain. New Medit 2015, 14, 4–11. [Google Scholar]
- Tomic, M.; Kovacicek, T.; Matulic, D. Attitudes as Basis for Segmenting Croatian Fresh Fish Consumers. New Medit 2016, 15, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
- Moors, E.H.M.; Donders, R.; Verduijn, S. Understanding Consumer Needs and Preferences in New Product Development: The Case of Functional Food Innovations; Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) Working Paper Series 09-03; Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; p. 28. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper, R.G. Perspective: The Stage-Gate Idea-to-Launch Process—Update, What’s New, and NexGen Systems. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2008, 25, 213–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, H.; Johnson, J.L.; Mariadoss, B.J.; Cullen, J.B. Supplier and Customer Involvement in New Product Development Stages: Implications for New Product Innovation Outcomes. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2018, 15, 1850004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Kleef, E.; Van Trijp, H.C.M.; Luning, P. Consumer Research in the Early Stages of New Product Development: A Critical Review of Methods and Techniques. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16, 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banović, M.; Krystallis, A.; Guerrero, L.; Reinders, M.J. Consumers as Co-Creators of New Product Ideas: An Application of Projective and Creative Research Techniques. Food Res. Int. 2016, 87, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altintzoglou, T.; Einarsdottir, G.; Valsdottir, T.; Schelvis, R.; Skåra, T.; Luten, J. A Voice-of-Consumer Approach in Development of New Seafood Product Concepts. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2010, 19, 130–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Devitiis, B.; Carlucci, D.; Nocella, G.; Viscecchia, R.; Bimbo, F.; Nardone, G. Insights for the Development of a Functional Fish Product: Drivers and Barriers, Acceptance, and Communication of Health Benefits. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2018, 27, 430–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, E.; Bogue, J.; Repar, L. Market-Oriented Product Development of Novel Sustainably Sourced Seafood Product Concepts: Consumers’ Preferences for a Different Kettle of Fish Cake. BFJ 2022, 124, 4072–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, F.; Duarte, A.M.; Mendes, S.; Borges, P.; Magalhães, E.; Pinto, F.R.; Barroso, S.; Neves, A.; Sequeira, V.; Vieira, A.R.; et al. Adding Value to Bycatch Fish Species Captured in the Portuguese Coast—Development of New Food Products. Foods 2020, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiene, D. Online Discussions: A Survey of Their Advantages and Disadvantages Vis-a-Vis Face-to-Face Discussions. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia 2000, 9, 371–384. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, K.; Berton, L. Topic Detection and Sentiment Analysis in Twitter Content Related to COVID-19 from Brazil and the USA. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 101, 107057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farkhod, A.; Abdusalomov, A.; Makhmudov, F.; Cho, Y.I. LDA-Based Topic Modeling Sentiment Analysis Using Topic/Document/Sentence (TDS) Model. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parveen, N.; Santhi, M.V.B.T.; Ramani Burra, L.; Pellakuri, V.; Pellakuri, H. Women’s e-Commerce Clothing Sentiment Analysis by Probabilistic Model LDA Using R-SPARK. Mater. Today Proc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; Jordan, M.I. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022. [Google Scholar]
- McCallum, A.K. MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. Available online: https://mimno.github.io/Mallet/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Sbalchiero, S.; Eder, M. Topic Modeling, Long Texts and the Best Number of Topics. Some Problems and Solutions. Qual. Quant. 2020, 54, 1095–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konrad, M. Topic Model Evaluation in Python with Tmtoolkit. WZB Data Science Blog, 9 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, J.; Boyd-Graber, J.; Gerrish, S.; Wang, C.; Blei, D.M. Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7 December 2009; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- D’Andrea, A.; Ferri, F.; Grifoni, P.; Guzzo, T. Approaches, Tools and Applications for Sentiment Analysis Implementation. IJCA 2015, 125, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Microsoft Azure Cognitive Services 2022. Available online: http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/cognitive-services/text-analytics/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Plutchik, R. The Nature of Emotions: Human Emotions Have Deep Evolutionary Roots, a Fact That May Explain Their Complexity and Provide Tools for Clinical Practice. Am. Sci. 2001, 89, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welivita, A.; Pu, P. A Taxonomy of Empathetic Response Intents in Human Social Conversations. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 8–13 December 2020; pp. 4886–4899. [Google Scholar]
- Mueller Loose, S.; Peschel, A.; Grebitus, C. Quantifying Effects of Convenience and Product Packaging on Consumer Preferences and Market Share of Seafood Products: The Case of Oysters. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altintzoglou, T.; Birch Hansen, K.; Valsdottir, T.; Øyvind Odland, J.; Martinsdóttir, E.; Brunsø, K.; Luten, J. Translating Barriers into Potential Improvements: The Case of New Healthy Seafood Product Development. J. Consum. Mark. 2010, 27, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, S.O.; Scholderer, J.; Brunsø, K.; Verbeke, W. Exploring the Relationship between Convenience and Fish Consumption: A Cross-Cultural Study. Appetite 2007, 49, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidi, A.; Sacchi, G.; Cavallo, C.; Cicia, G.; Di Monaco, R.; Puleo, S.; Del Giudice, T. Drivers of Fish Choice: An Exploratory Analysis in Mediterranean Countries. Agric. Econ. 2022, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spada, A.; Conte, A.; Danza, A.; Del Nobile, M.A. Decision Factors for Consumer Acceptability of New Fish-Based Products Enriched with Vegetables. MOJ Food Process. Technol. 2016, 3, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kitz, R.; Walker, T.; Charlebois, S.; Music, J. Food Packaging during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Consumer Perceptions. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2022, 46, 434–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rathod, N.B.; Elabed, N.; Özogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M.; Galanakis, C.M.; Aljaloud, S.O.; Ibrahim, S.A. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Seafood Safety and Human Health. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 875164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verbeke, W.; Sioen, I.; Pieniak, Z.; Van Camp, J.; De Henauw, S. Consumer Perception versus Scientific Evidence about Health Benefits and Safety Risks from Fish Consumption. Public Health Nutr. 2005, 8, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klincewicz, K.; Debska, K. Limits of Co-Creation: Evidence from a Large-Scale Empirical Study of Food Consumers. In Proceedings of the ESA Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 31 August–3 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
Product Concept | Product Description |
---|---|
Sardine fillets | Sardine fillets packaged in a modified atmosphere (MAP) and presented in trays with cling film. 200 g, 2–3 servings. Preserved at a temperature between 1° and 4° C, their conservation is prolonged from 8 days, the approximate life of a conventional product, to 12 days (+50%) maintaining its stable quality characteristics (e.g., microbiological aspects, color, etc.). |
Sea burgers | Sea burgers made of white fish and crustaceans (e.g., mullets and shrimps) vacuum packed under high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and presented in trays with cling film. 500 g, 2–3 servings. Preserved at a temperature between 1 and 4 °C, their conservation is prolonged from about 5 days, typical of a conventional product, up to 30 days while maintaining their stable quality characteristics (e.g., microbiological aspects, color, etc.). Furthermore, within 7 days of the HHP treatment, the burger can be eaten raw (as a ready-to-eat tartare). |
Themes | Stimuli for Discussion |
---|---|
1. Attitudes toward seafood | Where do you usually buy/eat sea fish? What are the most important features of the seafood you buy/eat? On which occasions do you usually eat seafood? Who prepares it? How is it prepared? What do we mean by “sustainable seafood”? What signs can tell you that a seafood product is “sustainable”? |
2. Product concept A— Sardine fillets 3. Product concept B— Sea burgers | Product A/B description. What are the first three adjectives that came to your mind to describe this product? What are your first impressions (positive or negative) about the product? On which occasions would you like to eat this product? How does it compare with other similar products already existing on the market? How likely are you to buy it? |
Topic ID | Key Terms | Topic Label | Overall Sentiment | Number of Chat Texts | Chat Text |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
topic_4 | fish, prepare, usually, eat | Habitual consumption | 0.78 | 249 | “I usually eat seafood with my family or in a restaurant. Depending on the recipe, I prepare the dishes myself with the help of other members. Sometimes I like to create new recipes; sometimes I enjoy traditional recipes.” |
topic_2 | fish, sea, oil, garlic | Cooking | 0.73 | 116 | “I usually cook bigger fish, like sea bream. We do not like it too complicated; we just season it a little and serve it with good homemade olive oil, parsley, and onions (garlic).” |
topic_1 | fish, buy, fresh, usually | Freshness | 0.71 | 332 | “We buy seafood from local fishermen and at the fish market, from acquaintances who recommend what fish to buy. The most important thing is that it is fresh.” |
topic_3 | packaging, fish, product, sustainability | Sustainable packaging | 0.67 | 163 | “In my opinion, there is a link between sustainability and the packaging of fish. Even the packaging must be sustainable; it must be disposed of without polluting the environment, perhaps using biodegradable plastic.” |
topic_0 | fish, sustainable, fishing, sea | Sustainable fish and fishing | 0.66 | 185 | “Fishing must be done in a sustainable way, without depleting the fisheries and guaranteeing the future of the species. We must all get involved in the fight to use respectful fishing gear and avoid depleting species.” |
Total chat texts | 1.045 |
Cooking | Habitual Consumption | Sustainable Fish and Fishing | Freshness | Sustainable Packaging | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotions | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion _count | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count |
anticipation | 100.0% | 116 | 115.7% | 288 | 49.2% | 91 | 22.9% | 76 | 38.0% | 62 |
joy | 87.9% | 102 | 82.7% | 206 | 38.4% | 71 | 18.7% | 62 | 38.0% | 62 |
trust | 106.9% | 124 | 87.6% | 218 | 120.5% | 223 | 52.4% | 174 | 68.7% | 112 |
Topic ID | Key Terms | Topic Label | Overall Sentiment | Number of Chat Texts | Chat Text |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
topic_2 | product, healthy, description, fish | Healthiness | 0.87 | 128 | “Fast, healthy, delicious. It struck me that I would consume more fish. The product description is understandable. I like it.” |
topic_1 | product, buy, price, fish | Price | 0.76 | 178 | “Yes, the price will also be important, because in order to eat with that, even with two at home, you have to buy several packages!” |
topic_0 | product, fish, loins, time | Convenience | 0.75 | 133 | “I consider the loins to be more practical when it comes to cooking because they are more versatile than using whole fish.” |
topic_3 | sardines, anchovies, eat, fish | Species | 0.73 | 110 | “Anchovies seem very strong to me and I much prefer clean sardines.” |
Total chat texts | 549 |
Convenience | Healthiness | Price | Species | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotions | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count |
anticipation | 56.40% | 75 | 150.80% | 193 | 115.70% | 206 | 50.90% | 56 |
joy | 49.60% | 66 | 99.20% | 127 | 57.30% | 102 | 48.20% | 53 |
trust | 84.20% | 112 | 136.70% | 175 | 75.30% | 134 | 85.50% | 94 |
Topic ID | Key Terms | Topic Label | Overall Sentiment | Number of Chat Texts | Chat Text |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
topic_4 | fish, product, raw, burger | Raw fish | 0.85 | 114 | “The word burger automatically puts me off, but if it involves fish and shrimp, then it’s okay. I’d still give it a try. I like fish stored in a more traditional way. It looks more natural, nicer. I would eat a raw burger because I do like that when the appropriate storage rules are adopted.” |
topic_0 | product, fish, buy, eat | Willingness to buy/eat | 0.76 | 86 | “I tried the tuna burgers; they were brilliant for me. I like the idea. I would definitely try it. If I had to say something to a friend about the product, I’d probably say if you’re in the mood for fish and do want to pay that much for a fish, buy these fish burgers” |
topic_2 | product, dinner, fish, consume | Eating time | 0.76 | 173 | “The most appropriate time to consume it I think will be at night during dinner since it is an ideal product to cook when you have no idea about what to prepare at that time.” |
topic_3 | fish, shrimp, prawns, prefer | Species | 0.71 | 128 | “On whether prawns or shrimp, much better prawns for my taste, they are less strong.” |
Total chat texts | 591 |
Species | Eating Time | Raw Fish | Willingness to Buy/Eat | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotions | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count | % on texts | emotion_ count |
anticipation | 29.70% | 38 | 72.80% | 126 | 91.20% | 104 | 130.20% | 112 |
joy | 27.30% | 35 | 43.40% | 75 | 78.90% | 90 | 94.20% | 81 |
trust | 53.10% | 68 | 67.60% | 117 | 99.10% | 113 | 104.70% | 90 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Verza, M.; Camanzi, L.; Rota, C.; Cerjak, M.; Mulazzani, L.; Malorgio, G. Consumer Sentiments and Emotions in New Seafood Product Concept Development: A Co-Creation Approach Using Online Discussion Rooms in Croatia, Italy and Spain. Foods 2023, 12, 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12081729
Verza M, Camanzi L, Rota C, Cerjak M, Mulazzani L, Malorgio G. Consumer Sentiments and Emotions in New Seafood Product Concept Development: A Co-Creation Approach Using Online Discussion Rooms in Croatia, Italy and Spain. Foods. 2023; 12(8):1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12081729
Chicago/Turabian StyleVerza, Marta, Luca Camanzi, Cosimo Rota, Marija Cerjak, Luca Mulazzani, and Giulio Malorgio. 2023. "Consumer Sentiments and Emotions in New Seafood Product Concept Development: A Co-Creation Approach Using Online Discussion Rooms in Croatia, Italy and Spain" Foods 12, no. 8: 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12081729
APA StyleVerza, M., Camanzi, L., Rota, C., Cerjak, M., Mulazzani, L., & Malorgio, G. (2023). Consumer Sentiments and Emotions in New Seafood Product Concept Development: A Co-Creation Approach Using Online Discussion Rooms in Croatia, Italy and Spain. Foods, 12(8), 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12081729