Next Article in Journal
Biological Activities of p-Hydroxycinnamic Acids in Maintaining Gut Barrier Integrity and Function
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Peanut Protein Treated with Alkaline Protease and Flavorzyme on BALB/c Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Comparison of the Effect of Flour Particle Size and Content of Damaged Starch on Rice and Buckwheat Slurry, Dough, and Bread Characteristics
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Physiochemical and Sensory Properties of Bread Fortified with Wheat Bran and Whey Protein Isolates

Foods 2023, 12(13), 2635; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132635
by Jaromír Pořízka 1,*, Zuzana Slavíková 1, Karolína Bidmonová 1, Miroslava Vymětalová 2 and Pavel Diviš 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Foods 2023, 12(13), 2635; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132635
Submission received: 29 May 2023 / Revised: 27 June 2023 / Accepted: 1 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies on Food Physical Characterization)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study aims to investigate the effects of wheat bran protein isolates and whey protein isolates on physiochemical and sensory properties of pastry. The statement appears to be confusing in prepared samples or analyzed samples, and the statement is unclear and incomplete in the result section. And what the most importance is that I did not find any novel point in this study. 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

This manuscript is full of errors and irregularities in English. I recommend checking it carefully before submitting it again. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

thank you for taking a time to review our manuscript. Your comments were very helpful to improve quality of our manuscript. Your comments and recomendations have been taken into account in the revised version of the article and are commented on point by point in the attached file. 

Thank you very much

sincerely

Jaromír Pořízka and author team

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript seems interesting and needs to be revised considerably.

Comments for author File: Comments.doc

English should be checked again.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

thank you for taking a time to review our manuscript. Your comments were very helpful to improve quality of our manuscript. Your comments and recomendations have been taken into account in the revised version of the article and are commented on point by point in the attached file. 

Thank you very much

sincerely

Jaromír Pořízka and author team

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Please check the minor editing of English language. 

Accept in present form.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript can be accepted.

Improved.

Back to TopTop