Next Article in Journal
Wheat Germ and Lipid Oxidation: An Open Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Profile and Health Benefits of Ganoderma lucidum “Lingzhi, Reishi, or Mannentake” as Functional Foods: Current Scenario and Future Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Increased NADPH Supply Enhances Glycolysis Metabolic Flux and L-methionine Production in Corynebacterium glutamicum

1
School of Biological Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
2
School of Food Science and Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China
3
Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioresources Utilization, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China
4
Engineering Research Center of Health Food Design & Nutrition Regulation, School of Chemical Engineering and Energy Technology, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(7), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071031
Submission received: 13 February 2022 / Revised: 19 March 2022 / Accepted: 31 March 2022 / Published: 1 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Food Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Corynebacterium glutamicum is an important strain for the industrial production of amino acids, but the fermentation of L-methionine has not been realized. The purpose of this study is to clarify the effect of reducing power NADPH on L-methionine synthesis. Site-directed mutagenesis of zwf and gnd genes in pentose phosphate pathway relieved feedback inhibition, increased NADPH supply by 151.8%, and increased L-methionine production by 28.3%; Heterologous expression of gapC gene to introduce NADP+ dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase increased NADPH supply by 75.0% and L-methionine production by 48.7%; Heterologous expression of pntAB gene to introduce membrane-integral nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase increased NADPH by 89.2% and L-methionine production by 35.9%. Finally, the engineering strain YM6 with a high NADPH supply was constructed, which increased the NADPH supply by 348.2% and the L-methionine production by 64.1%. The analysis of metabolic flux showed that YM6 significantly increased the glycolytic flux, including the metabolic flux of metabolites such as glycosyldehyde-3-phosphate, dihydroxyacetate phosphate, 3-phosphoglycate and pyruvate, and the significant increase of L-methionine flux also confirmed the increase of its synthesis. This study provides a research basis for the systematic metabolic engineering construction of L-methionine high-yield engineering strains.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

L-methionine is one of the eight essential amino acids that cannot be synthesized in human and animal bodies and is widely used in food, medicine, feed, and other industries [1,2,3]. However, L-methionine is still synthesized by chemical methods at present, and industrial microbial fermentation has not been realized [4]. The chemical synthesis of methionine mainly adopts the acrolein method [5]. Many harmful substances are produced in the synthesis process, and the synthetic product is DL-methionine, which needs further chiral resolution by aminoacylase [6]. In addition to the direct production of L-methionine, the microbial fermentation method also avoids the use of organic compounds that are unfavorable to the environment. The large-scale fermentation production of industrial amino acids such as glutamate and lysine has matured, providing the possibility for the industrial fermentation production of L-methionine.
Corynebacterium glutamicum is the main producer of the amino acid fermentation industry in the world, such as glutamate, lysine, and threonine [7]. In order to realize the industrialized fermentation production of L-methionine, its production cost is required to be comparable to that of chemical synthesis, but the current yield is far from meeting the requirements. After systematic metabolic engineering, the current maximum production of L-methionine can only reach about 6 g/L [8,9]. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the regulation mechanism of L-methionine and find new metabolic engineering targets. One of the reasons why L-methionine is more difficult to synthesize by C. glutamicum compared with other amino acids is that the structure of L-methionine contains sulfur atoms, and the inorganic sulfur source needs to be reduced before it can be used for L-methionine synthesis, which requires more reducing power [10]. NADPH plays a major reducing role in cells. It takes 1 mol and 4 mol of NADPH to produce 1 mol of L- glutamate and L-lysine, respectively [11], while the NADPH is required to produce 1 mol of L-methionine is 8 mol [9]. Therefore, overproduction of L-methionine requires more NADPH supply.
In C. glutamicum, NADPH is mainly derived from the two-step dehydrogenation reaction in the pentose phosphate pathway, that is, the step of generating gluconolactone-6-phosphate from glucose-6-phosphate and the step of generating ribulose-5-phosphate from 6-phosphogluconate (Figure 1). However, too much NADPH will inhibit the above two reactions, so enzyme modification to remove the feedback inhibition is an important step to increase the intracellular NADPH content [12]. In the reaction of synthesizing 3-phosphoglycerate from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase belongs to the NAD+-dependent type and cannot synthesize NADPH. Heterologous expression of gapC from Clostridium acetobutylicum can introduce NADP+-dependent glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, thereby increasing NADPH supply [13]. In addition, the heterologous expression of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase in E. coli can also promote the conversion of NADP+ to NADPH [14]. Therefore, this work used the above methods to study the effect of increased NADPH supply on L-methionine synthesis in C. glutamicum and studied the change of central carbon metabolism after increased NADPH supply through 13C metabolic flux analysis, to provide some theoretical reference for the construction of L-methionine engineering strains.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

E. coli Top10 and C. glutamicum ATCC13032 strains were routinely cultured on LB medium (yeast extract 5 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L). LBHIS medium (yeast extract 2.5 g/L, peptone 5 g/L, NaCl 5 g/L, brain heart infusion broth 18.5 g/L, glycine 91 g/L) and LBS medium (LB medium supplemented with 10 g/L sucrose) were used for two screens after transformation of C. glutamicum. Epo medium (yeast extract 5 g/L, peptone 10 g/L, NaCl 10 g/L, Glucose 5 g/L, glycine 25 g/L, Isoniazid 4 g/L) was used for the preparation of competent cells of C. glutamicum. CGXII minimal medium [15] for L-methionine fermentation. Solid media were supplemented with 2% agar powder. E. coli was incubated at 37 °C, and C. glutamicum was incubated at 30 °C. Appropriate concentrations of antibiotics were added as needed during the incubation. The microbial strains and plasmids used in this study and their properties are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Primers and Plasmids

The primer sequences used in this experiment are shown in Table 2. Plasmid pK18mobsacB and pLY4 were used in this work [9,16] and are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Site-Directed Mutation of zwf and gnd Gene

The Fast Mutagenesis System (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for site-directed mutation, and the protocols were described as follows briefly. Using primers zwf-F/gnd-F and zwf-R/gnd-R, the zwf/gnd gene was amplified from the genome of C. glutamicum. After digestion with HindIII/EroRI and ligation, the zwf/gnd gene was ligated to pK18mobsacB to obtain pK18mobsacB-zwf/pK18mobsacB-gnd. The recombinant plasmid (1–10 ng) was used as the template for PCR reaction with mutation primers (zwf-TBF and zwf-TBR/gnd-TBF and gnd-TBR) to amplify the recombinant plasmid. 10 μL of the PCR product was taken for electrophoretic detection. 1 μL of DMT enzyme was added to the remaining PCR product, mixed thoroughly, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. 10 μL of the digested product was taken for the transformation of DMT receptor cells for the final screening of the mutant plasmid. The mutant plasmid was sent to BGI Genomics (Beijing) for sequencing. The construction process of the plasmid was shown in Figure 2a.

2.4. Construction of Expression Vectors pLY-4-gapC and pLY-4-pntAB

Using C. acetobutylicum/E. coli genome as the template, gapc/pntAB gene was amplified by PCR with the primers gapc-F and gapc-R/pntAB-F and pntAB-R. The plasmid pLY-4 and the gapc/pntAB gene were digested with BamHI, ligated, and transformed into E. coli Top10. The transformants were screened and the plasmid pLY-4-gapC/pLY-4-pntAB was obtained. The construction process of the plasmid was shown in Figure 2b.

2.5. Transformation Method

Molecular cloning and transformation of E. coli Top10 cells were performed using standard procedures [17]. The electroshock transformation method of the receptor cells of C. glutamicum was based on the method established by van der Rest et al., with slight modifications [18]. Take a tube of C. glutamicum receptor cells, add 10 μL of recombinant plasmid, and mix thoroughly. The above bacterial solution was transferred to a pre-cooled shock cup on ice for 5 min and shocked twice consecutively at 1800 V for 5 ms. 1mL of pre-warmed LBHIS liquid medium was quickly added to the shock cup and placed in a 46 °C water bath for 6 min of heat excitation, followed by 30 °C, 180 rpm shaking to recover the culture for 2 h. The above bacterial solution was collected by centrifugation at 5000× g and coated with LBHIS solid plates containing 25 μg/mL of kanamycin (for site-directed mutation) or chloramphenicol (for heterologous expression) and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days to screen the transformants.

2.6. Determination of NADPH

About 1 × 106 cells were collected and washed with PBS buffer three times, then ground with liquid nitrogen to break the cell walls. Intracellular NADPH content was determined using the NADP+/NADPH Detection Kit of Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

2.7. Determination of L-methionine

The content of L-methionine was determined by a special chromatographic column system for amino acid analysis (including a column, a guard column, an amino acid kit, and amino acid standard; Dalian Elite Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; e2695, Waters, USA). After 5 mL of the fermentation broth was centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min, the supernatant was added with 5% trichloroacetic acid, mixed well, and left to stand for precipitation, and the supernatant was taken and filtered with a 0.45 μm membrane. 1 mL of derivatization reagent in the amino acid kit was added to 2 mL of the filtered sample in a brown bottle and maintained in the dark at 60 °C for 1 h. After the reaction was cooled to room temperature, the equilibrium buffer in the amino acid kit was added to 10 mL and left for 15 min. After filtering with a 0.45 μm membrane, the sample was ready for HPLC detection [19].

2.8. Gene Expression Analysis

After centrifugation at 10,000× g for 5 min, the cells were collected and fully ground with liquid nitrogen. RNAiso plus (Takara Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for total RNA extraction, and the operation was carried out according to the method in the manual. Transcript ® Green one-step qRT PCR Supermix (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for qRT-PCR. The relative expression was calculated by the 2△△ct method.

2.9. 13C-Metabolic Flux Ratio of Metabolites from the Labeled Glucose

The 13C labeling experiments were combined with GC-MS chromatographic information to analyze the 13C labeling status of intracellular intermediate metabolites, thereby systematically quantifying the relative magnitude of individual metabolic fluxes and their distribution changes within cells.
Wild-type C. glutamicum 13,032 and C. glutamicum YM6 were cultured to OD600 = 0.8 using 13C-labeled glucose (D-Glucose-13C6, 99%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Tewksbury, Massachusetts, USA) as the sole carbon source in CGXII medium. The cells were collected by centrifugation at 10,000× g, 4 °C for 10 min, and quenched by rapid immersion in liquid nitrogen for 30 s. After thawing on ice, the residual culture medium was washed with PBS buffer, and then the PBS buffer was removed by centrifugation at 1000× g, 4 °C, for 10 min. The cells were resuspended with 600 μL of 50% cold methanol solution and internal standard and inserted into dry ice for 30 min, then thawed at 4 °C. 400 μL of chloroform was added to the sample, shaken for 30 s, and centrifuged at 12,000× g and 4 °C for 10 min. The upper layer of the solution was freeze-dried. After that, 70 μL of pyridine was added, mixed well, and reacted at 80 °C for 20 min. 30 μL of derivatization reagent (TBDMS) was continued to be added and then derivatized at 80 °C for 1 h. After centrifuging at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was transferred to the test vial of GC-MS for testing. A Shimadzu QP-2010 Ultra GC-MS was programmed with an injection temperature of 250 °C injections and injected with 1 µL of the sample. GC oven temperature started at 110 °C for 4 min, rising to 230 °C at 3 °C/min and to 280 °C at 20 °C/min with a final hold at this temperature for 2 min. GC flow rate with helium carrier gas was 50 cm/s. The GC column used was a 20 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm Rxi-5 ms. GC-MS interface temperature was 300 °C and (electron impact) ion source temperature was set at 200 °C, with 70 V ionization voltage. The mass spectrometer was set to scan m/z range 50–800, with a 1 kV detector.

2.10. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

For GC-MS data, peak maps and isotopic information of metabolites from GC-MS were collected, and then Matlab flux-8, a professional metabolic flow analysis software based on Matlab foundation, was used to analyze the isotopic information of obtained metabolites, and the isotopic distribution information of each compound was directly calculated with the 13C flux ratio of each metabolite from the labeled carbon source in the extracellular and intracellular pathways to further compare the changes in the experimental and control groups.
All experiments consisted of three replicates. The results were expressed as the means ± SD, and analyses were based on one-way ANOVA, followed by the Fisher PLSD post hoc test if differences were significant. The limit of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Modification of Pentose Phosphate Pathway to Increase NADPH Supplement

The pentose phosphate pathway is the major intracellular metabolic pathway for the production of reducing NADPH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (encoded by the zwf gene), and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (encoded by the gnd gene) are the key enzymes this pathway. In this study, G at site 727 of zwf gene was mutated to A, and T at site 1083 of gnd gene was mutated to C to release the feedback inhibition of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase respectively, thereby increasing intracellular NADPH supply. Plasmid pK18mobsacB-zwffbr and pK18mobsacB-gndfbr were transformed into C. glutamicum 13032, and C. glutamicum YM1 and YM2 were obtained, respectively. The plasmid pK18mobsacB-gndfbr was transformed into C. glutamicum YM1 to obtain C. glutamicum YM3. In order to determine whether C. glutamicum YM1, YM2, and YM3 have changed the intracellular NADPH level, the intracellular NADPH contents of the original strain C. glutamicum and the mutant strains were measured (Table 3). Compared with the wild-type strain, the NADPH content of C. glutamicum YM1, YM2, and YM3 was increased by 67.9%, 57.1%, and 151.8%, and the L-methionine production was increased by 13.53%, 16.32%, and 28.3%, respectively. The simultaneous site-directed mutation of zwf and gnd resulted in a large increase in NADPH content, but no significant increase in L-methionine production compared with mutation of one gene alone. In addition, through gene expression analysis, it was found that the expression of zwf and gnd genes in C. glutamicum YM1, YM2, and YM3 did not change compared with the wild-type strain, indicating that the increase of NADPH content by site-directed mutation did not change the gene expression but relieved the feedback inhibition of the enzyme.

3.2. Heterologous Expression of gapC and pntAB

The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (encoded by the gene gapC) in C. acetobutylicum is primarily NADP+-dependent, which catalyzes glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and NADP+ to form 3-phospho-D-glyceroyl phosphate and NADPH. Due to the lack of NADP+-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in C. glutamicum, heterologous expression of gapC can increase the intracellular NADPH supply. The membrane-integral nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase (encoded by the gene pntAB) in E. coli can drive the reduction of NADP+ to NADPH via the oxidation of NADH to NAD+. As C. glutamicum does not possess such an enzyme, the expression of pntAB is helpful to increase the supply of NADPH. We heterologously expressed gapc and pntAB genes in C. glutamicum 13,032, respectively, to obtain strains C. glutamicum YM4 and YM5. As seen in Table 3, the expression of both genes significantly increased NADPH supply and L-methionine synthesis. The L-methionine production in C. glutamicum YM4 and YM5 reached 0.58 g/L and 0.53 g/L, which were 48.7% and 35.9% higher than those in the wild-type strain, respectively. Further gene expression analysis revealed that the increase in NADPH was caused by heterologous expression of gapC or pntAB, but not the zwf or gnd genes (Figure 3).

3.3. Construction and Fermentation Characteristics of C. glutamicum YM6

C. glutamicum YM6 was obtained by expressing the gapC gene on the basis of C. glutamicum YM3. As seen in Table 3, the NADPH content of C. glutamicum YM6 was 2.51 nmol/106 cell, which was 78.0% higher than that of C. glutamicum YM3, and 348.2% higher than that of the wild-type strain. Meanwhile, the L-methionine yield of C. glutamicum YM6 reached 0.64 g/L, which was 28.0% higher than that of C. glutamicum YM3 and 64.1% higher than that of the wild-type strain. Figure 4 showed the fermentation characteristics of C. glutamicum YM6 and C. glutamicum 13,032, including glucose consumption, biomass accumulation, and L-methionine production. In the cell growth, the accumulation of biomass in C. glutamicum YM6 was inhibited (from 15.86 g/L to 13.96 g/L), showing the characteristics of a long lag phase and a short logarithmic phase. This reduced the cell yield YX/S by 13.3% (from 0.52 g/g to 0.45 g/g) compared with the wild-type strain but increased the maximum specific growth rate μmax by 84.6% (from 0.039 h−1 to 0.072 h−1). In L-methionine production, the product yield YP/S of C. glutamicum YM6 was 0.021 g/g, while that of the wild-type strain was 0.013 g/g.

3.4. Metabolic Flux Ratio Analysis of C. glutamicum YM6

The 13C labeling state of the intracellular intermediate metabolites was analyzed by the 13C labeling experiment and GC-MS chromatographic information, to calculate the relative changes in the 13C flux ratio of metabolites of the intracellular metabolic pathways. As shown in Figure 5a, comparing C. glutamicum 13,032, the flux ratio of multiple metabolites in the glycolytic pathway was significantly increased in C. glutamicum YM6, such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, dihydroxyacetone phosphate, 3-phosphoglycerate, and pyruvate. The L-methionine flux ratio increased significantly, indicating that more glucose entered the L-methionine pathway. Through PC component analysis (Figure 5b), the difference in 13C flux ratio components between the two groups was compared, and it was found that the metabolic flux distribution characteristics of the two groups could be separated independently by component classification, indicating that significant metabolic remodeling occurred in C. glutamicum YM6 after modification.

4. Discussion

In the past few decades, although researchers have done a lot of work in the breeding and selection of L-methionine-producing strains, they still cannot meet the needs of industrial production [8,9]. This may be related to the synthesis of L-methionine, which is a sulfur-containing amino acid that is regulated by sulfur metabolism. The +6-valent sulfate group needs to be reduced to −2-valent sulfide before it can be used to synthesize amino acids. Studies have used reduced methanethiol and dimethyl disulfide as the only sulfur source and found that C. glutamicum was able to grow. However, due to a limited supply of sulfur for cysteine synthesis and the toxicity of high concentration sulfide, the specific growth rate of cells decreased significantly [20]. Therefore, as the main source of reducing power in biosynthesis, NADPH is a key to sulfate reduction. Engineering NADPH synthesis pathways have been widely used in amino acid biosynthesis. Wang et al., constructed a high intracellular NADPH level of the C. glutamicum strain, compared with the starting strain, the production of L-lysine was increased by 1.86-fold, and the production of L-leucine was increased by 1.4-fold [12]. In this study, strain YM6 with site-directed mutation of zwf and gnd, as well as heterologous expression of gapC showed an increased intracellular NADPH level (increased by 448.2%). The production of L-methionine in YM6 increased by 64.1%, however, it showed a low dry cell weight. This may be caused by heterologous expression or an imbalance of the redox state. Unbalanced NADPH may inhibit the yield of products [21].
Since NADPH is the main source of reducing power in biosynthesis, and its deficiency has become a major limiting factor in the production of amino acids such as lysine, how to increase the supply of intracellular NADPH to meet the production demand has become a focus of research [12,22]. In addition, because NADPH is involved in many enzymatic reactions in intracellular biosynthetic pathways, an unsustainable supply of NADPH not only directly affects the biosynthesis of amino acids but also affects cellular functions and cell survival [22]. In L-methionine biosynthesis, the unsustainable supply of NADPH is particularly serious, because 8 mol of NADPH is required to synthesize 1 mol of L-methionine, which is much more than that required for the synthesis of other amino acids [10]. The main source of NADPH in C. glutamicum is the pentose phosphate pathway, and zwf and gnd are key genes providing NADPH [23]. Therefore, many researchers have used overexpression, promoter modification, and site-directed mutation to increase PPP pathway flux and NADPH supply [14,24]. To allow more carbon flux to enter the PPP pathway and thus provide more NADPH, a good option would be to relieve the feedback inhibition of G6PDH. Studies have shown that mutating the G at 727 of the zwf gene to an A could reduce sensitivity against inhibition by ATP, phosphoenolpyruvate, and fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, which can increase intracellular NADPH and effectively increase the production of L-lysine [25,26]. Ser-361→Phe mutation in gnd reduced allosteric inhibition by intracellular metabolites, such as fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate, ATP, and NADPH [27]. In addition, since there is only NAD+-dependent glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase in C. glutamicum, the addition of NADP+-dependent glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase from C. acetobutyricum can increase the NADPH generation pathway, resulting in an increase in the intracellular NADPH supply [13]. Expression of pntAB from E. coli can directly reduce the accumulation of intracellular NADH and increase the supply of NADPH [14].
In the study, it was found that the simultaneous mutation of zwf and gnd (strain YM3) can greatly increase the NADPH supply but compared with the single mutation (strain YM1 or YM2), L-methionine production did not increase significantly. Heterologous expression of both gapC and pntAB significantly increased L-methionine production. But strain YM6 only increased L-methionine production by 28% compared to YM3, while NADPH supply increased by 78%. These results all indicate that increasing the supply of NADPH does increase the production of L-methionine, but the excess NADPH is also used for the synthesis of metabolites such as other amino acids. Therefore, while increasing the supply of NADPH, systematic metabolic engineering is necessary for the construction of L-methionine engineered strains. In addition, NADPH imbalance sometimes affects product synthesis [28], rational control of NADPH levels may help to increase L-methionine synthesis.
Fermentation analysis showed that increased NADPH supply significantly increased the conversion rate of glucose to L-methionine, suggesting that the central carbon metabolic flux may be reconstructed. Previous studies have shown that zwf and gnd gene mutations significantly enhance PPP pathway flux [25,27,29], so we further studied the changes in metabolites flux ratio in glycolysis and TCA pathway. Overall, the C. glutamicum YM6 glycolytic flux was significantly increased compared to the wild-type strain, while the flux of TCA did not change significantly. Among them, GAP and DHAP changed the most, which may be caused by the increased flux of the PPP pathway. GAP and DHAP, two natural triose phosphate, serve as metabolic hubs linking glycolysis and PPP pathways [30]. At the same time, as substrates for the reaction catalyzed by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, they also provide the possibility for the synthesis of more NADPH. Pyruvate is an important precursor of L-methionine synthesis, and its flux ratio increase is beneficial to L-methionine synthesis. The significant increase of alanine flux further indicates that excess NADPH will also be used for the synthesis of other amino acids. Increasing NADPH supply significantly increased the metabolic flux of glycolysis and had a positive effect on the synthesis of L-methionine.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the NADPH supply in C. glutamicum was increased by modifying the PPP pathway and heterologously expressing gapC and pntAB, thereby increasing the synthesis of L-methionine. In the constructed engineering strain YM6, the NADPH content reaches 2.51 nmol/106 cell, which is 448.2% of the starting strain, and the L-methionine production reaches 0.64 g/L, which is 64.1% higher than that of the starting strain. Further 13C metabolic flux ratio analysis found that the flux ratio of G3P, DHAP, pyruvate, and other metabolites in glycolysis was significantly increased, which may provide a target for the efficient synthesis of L-methionine. However, the promotion of L-methionine production by simply increasing NADPH is limited, and systematic metabolic engineering is further work.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L. and Y.L. (Ying Li); methodology, X.S.; software, Y.L. (Yue Liu); validation, Y.L. (Yue Liu), and B.L.; formal analysis, M.Y.; investigation, M.Y.; resources, X.S.; data curation, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. (Ying Li); visualization, B.L.; supervision, L.W.; project administration, J.W.; funding acquisition, J.W. and Y.L. (Ying Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31701587), Dalian Science and Technology Bureau (2019RQ099), the Department of Education of Liaoning Province (J2020097), and Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioresources Utilization (Dalian Minzu University), Ministry of Education, China (KF2022007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise researchers’ privacy/consent.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Xue, J.J.; Xie, M.; Tang, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Hou, S.S. Effects of excess DL-and L-methionine on growth performance of starter Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 946–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sanderson, S.M.; Gao, X.; Dai, Z.; Locasale, J.W. Methionine metabolism in health and cancer: A nexus of diet and precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2019, 19, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, Y.; Qian, J.; Li, B.; Lu, M.; Le, G.; Xie, Y. Metabolomics based on 1H-NMR reveal the regulatory mechanisms of dietary methionine restriction on splenic metabolic dysfunction in obese mice. Foods 2021, 10, 2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shim, J.; Shin, Y.; Lee, I.; Kim, S.Y. L-Methionine Production. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 159, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Faroon, O.; Roney, N.; Taylor, J.; Ashizawa, A.; Lumpkin, M.H.; Plewak, D.J. Acrolein health effects. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2008, 24, 447–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, Y.; Wang, S.; Song, Z.; Gao, R. Immobilization of an L-aminoacylase-producing strain of Aspergillus oryzae into gelatin pellets and its application in the resolution of D, L-methionine. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2002, 35, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Becker, J.; Gießelmann, G.; Hoffmann, S.L.; Wittmann, C. Corynebacterium glutamicum for Sustainable Bioproduction: From Metabolic Physiology to Systems Metabolic Engineering. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 162, 217–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qin, T.; Hu, X.; Hu, J.; Wang, X. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum strain ATCC13032 to produce L-methionine. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2015, 62, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Cong, H.; Liu, B.; Song, J.; Sun, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Q. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for methionine production by removing feedback inhibition and increasing NADPH level. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2016, 109, 1185–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Krömer, J.O.; Wittmann, C.; Schröder, H.; Heinzle, E. Metabolic pathway analysis for rational design of L-methionine production by Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab. Eng. 2006, 8, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Becker, J.; Klopprogge, C.; Zelder, O.; Heinzle, E.; Wittmann, C. Amplified expression of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase in Corynebacterium glutamicum increases in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway and lysine production on different carbon sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8587–8596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, L.; Yu, H.; Xu, J.; Ruan, H.; Zhang, W. Deciphering the crucial roles of AraC-type transcriptional regulator Cgl2680 on NADPH metabolism and L-lysine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jiang, L.Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, J.Z. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for increasing the production of L-ornithine by increasing NADPH availability. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhan, M.; Kan, B.; Dong, J.; Xu, G.; Han, R.; Ni, Y. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for improved L-arginine synthesis by enhancing NADPH supply. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Keilhauer, C.; Eggeling, L.; Sahm, H. Isoleucine synthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum: Molecular analysis of the ilvB-ilvN-ilvC operon. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 5595–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, Y.; Ai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Fei, J.; Liu, B.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Zhao, Q.; Song, J. A novel expression vector for Corynebacterium glutamicum with an auxotrophy complementation system. Plasmid 2020, 107, 102476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Green, M.R.; Sambrook, J. Cloning and transformation with plasmid vectors. In Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Van der Rest, M.E.; Lange, C.; Molenaar, D. A heat shock following electroporation induces highly efficient transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with xenogeneic plasmid DNA. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 52, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, S.; Feng, S.; Sun, Y.; Tang, T.; Han, J.; Wang, F.; Li, T. Determination of sulfur amino acids in feedstuffs by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with pre-column derivatization. Chin. J. Chromatogr. 2011, 29, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bolten, C.J.; Schröder, H.; Dickschat, J.; Wittmann, C. Towards methionine overproduction in Corynebacterium glutamicum--methanethiol and dimethyldisulfide as reduced sulfur sources. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 1196–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Khosla, C.; Keasling, J.D. Metabolic engineering for drug discovery and development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, J.Z.; Yang, H.K.; Zhang, W.G. NADPH metabolism: A survey of its theoretical characteristics and manipulation strategies in amino acid biosynthesis. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 1061–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hung, H.C.; Kuo, C.C.; Tsai, L.C.; Yuan, H.S.; Chou, W.Y.; Chang, G.G.; Tong, L. Structural studies of the pigeon cytosolic NADP (+)-dependent malic enzyme. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Xu, W.; Yao, J.; Liu, L.; Ma, X.; Li, W.; Sun, X.; Wang, Y. Improving squalene production by enhancing the NADPH/NADP (+) ratio, modifying the isoprenoid-feeding module and blocking the menaquinone pathway in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Becker, J.; Klopprogge, C.; Herold, A.; Zelder, O.; Bolten, C.J.; Wittmann, C. Metabolic flux engineering of L-lysine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum—Over expression and modification of G6P dehydrogenase. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 132, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moritz, B.; Striegel, K.; de Graaf, A.A.; Sahm, H. Kinetic properties of the glucose-6-phosphate and 6 phosphogluconate dehydrogenases from Corynebacterium glutamicum and their application for predicting pentose phosphate pathway flux in vivo. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 3442–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ohnishi, J.; Katahira, R.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Kakita, S.; Ikeda, M. A novel gnd mutation leading to increased L-lysine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 242, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Yukawa, T.; Bamba, T.; Guirimand, G.; Matsuda, M.; Hasunuma, T.; Kondo, A. Optimization of 1,2,4-butanetriol production from xylose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering of NADH/NADPH balance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2021, 118, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, W.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Shi, F.; Wang, X. Enhancing pentose phosphate pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum to improve l-isoleucine production. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2016, 63, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Richard, J.P. Restoring a metabolic pathway. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Central metabolic pathways and NADPH generation reactions in L-methionine production. The genes represented in blue color are modified in this study. Abbreviations: Glu, glucose; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; F1,6BP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr, pyruvate; AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; GL6P, gluconolactone-6-phosphate; 6PG, 6-phosphogluconate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; OAA, oxaloacetate; Cit, citrate; ICT, isocitrate; a-KG, a-ketoglutarate; Suc, succinate; Mal, malate; Asp, aspartate; Asd, aspartate semialdehyde; HomoSer, homoserine; HomoCys, homocysteine; Met, methionine.
Figure 1. Central metabolic pathways and NADPH generation reactions in L-methionine production. The genes represented in blue color are modified in this study. Abbreviations: Glu, glucose; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; F1,6BP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr, pyruvate; AcCoA, acetyl coenzyme A; GL6P, gluconolactone-6-phosphate; 6PG, 6-phosphogluconate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; OAA, oxaloacetate; Cit, citrate; ICT, isocitrate; a-KG, a-ketoglutarate; Suc, succinate; Mal, malate; Asp, aspartate; Asd, aspartate semialdehyde; HomoSer, homoserine; HomoCys, homocysteine; Met, methionine.
Foods 11 01031 g001
Figure 2. Plasmid construction. (a) Site-directed mutation plasmids of gnd and zwf; (b) Heterologous expression plasmid of gapC and pntAB.
Figure 2. Plasmid construction. (a) Site-directed mutation plasmids of gnd and zwf; (b) Heterologous expression plasmid of gapC and pntAB.
Foods 11 01031 g002
Figure 3. Expression of gapC in strain YM4 (a) and pntAB in strain YM5 (b). The 2−10 of the 16S rDNA gene expression level in each strain was set as 1.
Figure 3. Expression of gapC in strain YM4 (a) and pntAB in strain YM5 (b). The 2−10 of the 16S rDNA gene expression level in each strain was set as 1.
Foods 11 01031 g003
Figure 4. Dry cell weight (a), glucose consumption (b), and methionine production (c) during batch fermentation of C. glutamicum strains ATCC13032 (represented by squares) and YM6 (represented by circles).
Figure 4. Dry cell weight (a), glucose consumption (b), and methionine production (c) during batch fermentation of C. glutamicum strains ATCC13032 (represented by squares) and YM6 (represented by circles).
Foods 11 01031 g004
Figure 5. (a) Differences in 13C flux ratio between strain YM6 (orange) and the wild-type strain (green) in glycolytic. * indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), ** indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.01). (b) Comparative analysis of the 13C flux ratio component differences between the strain YM6 (green) and the wild-type strain (pink) using principal component analysis.
Figure 5. (a) Differences in 13C flux ratio between strain YM6 (orange) and the wild-type strain (green) in glycolytic. * indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05), ** indicates a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.01). (b) Comparative analysis of the 13C flux ratio component differences between the strain YM6 (green) and the wild-type strain (pink) using principal component analysis.
Foods 11 01031 g005
Table 1. The Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Table 1. The Strains and plasmids used in this study.
Strains or PlasmidsRelevant CharacteristicsSource
E. coli Top10Wild typeTakara
Clostrdium acetobutylicum ATCC824Wild typeATCC
C. glutamicun ATCC13032Wild typeATCC
C. glutamicun YM1C. glutamicum ATCC13032 chromosome with zwffbr geneThis study
C. glutamicun YM2C. glutamicum ATCC13032 chromosome with gndfbr geneThis study
C. glutamicun YM3C. glutamicum ATCC13032 chromosome with zwffbr and gndfbr geneThis study
C. glutamicun YM4C. glutamicum ATCC13032 chromosome with gapC geneThis study
C. glutamicun YM5C. glutamicum ATCC13032 chromosome with pntAB geneThis study
C. glutamicun YM6C. glutamicum YM3 chromosome with gapC geneThis study
pK18mobsacBpK18mobsacB non-replicating suicide plasmid[9]
pLY-4E. coli -C. glutamicun shuttle expression vector[16]
pK18mobsacB-zwffbrpK18mobsacB carrying mutant zwf (G727A)This study
pK18mobsacB-gndfbrpK18mobsacB carrying mutant gnd(T1083C)This study
pLY-4-gapCpLY-4 carrying gapC geneThis study
pLY-4-pntABpLY-4-pntAB carrying pntAB geneThis study
Table 2. Primers used in this study.
Table 2. Primers used in this study.
NameSequence (5′—3′)Intention
zwf-FCACAAGCTTATGGTGATCTTCGGTGTCACTGGamplification of zwf gene
zwf-RTATAAGCTTTTATGGCCTGCGCCAGGTGT
gnd-FCACGAATTCTTAAGCTTCAACCTCGGAGC′amplification of gnd gene
gnd-RGTGGAATTCATGCCGTCAAGTACGATCAA
pntAB-FCGAGGATCCATGCGAATTGGCATACCAAGamplification of pntAB gene
pntAB-RTCGGGATCCTTACAGAGCTTTCAGGATTG
gapC-FCGAGGATCCATGGCAAAGATAGCTATTAATGamplification of gapC gene
gapC-RTCGGGATCCCTATTTTGCTATTTTTGCA
zwf-TBFACGTCCAGATCACCATGACTGAAGATATTGGmutation of zwf gene
zwf-TBRTCATGGTGATCTGGACGTGGTCAACGTA
gnd-TBFCGAGATCAAGGCTGGCCCCGACGAGAAmutation of gnd gene
gnd-TBRGGCCAGCCTTGATCTCGTCGAAGCCCT
gndYZ-FATCGAAATCACCGCAGAGGTTCvalidation of mutant zwf gene
gndYZ-RGGAAGGAGCCATCCTTGTCGAT
zwfYZ-FATGATGCAGCTTTCGACAACCTvalidation of mutant gnd gene
zwfYZ-RGATCTCTAAGGTACAAGCCGC
zwfRT-FTTGACCACGTCCAGATCACCATGqRT-PCR of zwf gene
zwfRT-RAGAGAGCACCTTGATCTTTTCTGC
gndRT-FGTTCTCTCCCAGGTGGATGCTGqRT-PCR of gnd gene
gndRT-RAAGTGCTTCCAGATCGGTGAGG
pntABRT-FCACCAACGCGATTTCAGGGATqRT-PCR of pntAB gene
pntABRT-RACCCCTTAATTTTTGCGGAAC
gapCRT-FGCATCATGCACAACTAACTGCTTAGqRT-PCR of gapC gene
gapCRT-RTGGCTTATAGCTTTAGCAGCAC
Table 3. NADPH content and L-methionine production in different strains.
Table 3. NADPH content and L-methionine production in different strains.
StrainsNADPH (nmol/106 cell)L-methionine (g/L)
C. glutamicum 130320.56 ± 0.010.39 ± 0.02
C. glutamicum YM10.94 ± 0.020.45 ± 0.03
C. glutamicum YM20.88 ± 0.020.46 ± 0.03
C. glutamicum YM31.41 ± 0.030.50 ± 0.04
C. glutamicum YM40.98 ± 0.020.58 ± 0.03
C. glutamicum YM51.06 ± 0.020.53 ± 0.01
C. glutamicum YM62.51 ± 0.020.64 ± 0.04
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, B.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, M.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Increased NADPH Supply Enhances Glycolysis Metabolic Flux and L-methionine Production in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Foods 2022, 11, 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071031

AMA Style

Liu B, Sun X, Liu Y, Yang M, Wang L, Li Y, Wang J. Increased NADPH Supply Enhances Glycolysis Metabolic Flux and L-methionine Production in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Foods. 2022; 11(7):1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Bingnan, Xinyu Sun, Yue Liu, Mengmeng Yang, Liang Wang, Ying Li, and Jihui Wang. 2022. "Increased NADPH Supply Enhances Glycolysis Metabolic Flux and L-methionine Production in Corynebacterium glutamicum" Foods 11, no. 7: 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11071031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop