Next Article in Journal
Application of Aqueous Saline Process to Extract Silkworm Pupae Oil (Bombyx mori): Process Optimization and Composition Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
An Evaluation of a Virtual Food Safety Program for Low-Income Families: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Testing of Bacillus cereus Chromogenic Agar Media for Improved Detection in Milk and Other Food Samples
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Is Safe and How Much Does It Matter? Food Vendors’ and Consumers’ Views on Food Safety in Urban Nigeria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Knowledge, Practices, and Risk Perception Associated with Foodborne Illnesses among Females Living in Dubai, United Arab Emirates

1
Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
2
Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
3
Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
4
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
5
School of Business Administration, Al Dar University College, Dubai P.O. Box 35529, United Arab Emirates
6
College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(3), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030290
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 4 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Safety and Behavior Change)

Abstract

:
Foodborne illnesses are a widespread and growing public health concern worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge, practices, and risk perception pertaining to food safety among females living in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE). A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was undertaken consisting of 827 female participants between January to April 2020. The study showed that the overall food safety risk perception was below satisfactory (53.3%). The highest score was seen in the “recognition of foodborne illnesses” aspect (76.7%). The participants were aware of “personal hygiene and cleaning” (61.7%), “cross-contamination prevention” (62.5%), “food purchasing” (60.0%), and “storage of frozen foods” (55.6%). The participants had a low level of knowledge pertaining to “food cooking” (26.0%) and “risk of microbiological infection” (13.3%). There was a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) association between knowledge and practices of respondents with employment status, age, and educational levels. In conclusion, the female respondents might act as vehicles for the spread of foodborne illnesses. To reduce this risk, providing food safety awareness programs to this portion of the population is paramount.

1. Introduction

Foodborne illnesses are caused due to the consumption of contaminated food or drink. Foodborne outbreaks could result in significant economic losses and are a global public health concern [1,2,3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), globally, more than 91 million cases of foodborne outbreaks and 420,000 deaths are associated with foodborne diseases each year [2].
The contamination of food could occur during food preparation, handling, due to improper storage conditions, and lack of personal hygiene [2,4]. The microbiological contaminants causing foodborne illnesses could be bacterial, viral, or parasitic in nature [5]. The most common foodborne pathogens include (but are not limited to) Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Noroviruses, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, and their toxins [6]. The typical clinical presentation of a foodborne illness is usually in the form of gastroenteritis. The severity of the disease varies from case to case; however, in advanced stages, it may result in meningitis, incurable disabilities, and cancer [5]. Considering their substantial impact, countries all over the world are making great efforts to reduce the impact of foodborne outbreaks [7].
Foodborne outbreaks associated with food prepared at homes are usually underestimated because of lower reportage [8]. Studies indicated that around 87% of foodborne illnesses could be attributed to food prepared at home [9,10]. In Arab culture, females usually take care of the kitchen work at home. Many previous studies have observed that the food safety knowledge amongst the females in these countries is low [9,11,12,13,14]. A study conducted in Saudi Arabia indicated 45.3% of the respondents were not aware of the proper food holding temperature [11]. In another study conducted in the region, only 49.8% of the women reported having adequate food safety knowledge scores regarding utensils and equipment [12]. Meanwhile, the mean food safety knowledge score in Jordanian women was 33.9% [14]. A study conducted only in one emirate (Sharjah) of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) indicated only half the respondents were knowledgeable about food safety and followed good practices [13].
Dubai is another emirate in the country. The Food Safety Department of Dubai Municipality stringently imposes internationally accepted comprehensive systems to ensure food safety and disease control at the retail level [15]. However, it has limited command at the domestic level. Thereby, this study aimed to investigate the knowledge and practices pertaining to food safety amongst females living in Dubai (UAE).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted over the period ranging from 3 January to 4 April 2020. A total of 827 females from different nationalities living in Dubai, UAE, participated in the study. The sample size was calculated based on the formula normally used in cross-sectional studies [16]. The participants exceeded the minimum calculated requirement (n = 385).

2.2. Questionnaire Design

The questionnaire was adapted from previously conducted studies [9,11,14,17,18]. The first section of the questionnaire was composed of demographic characteristics followed by seven aspects pertaining to food safety knowledge and practices. The demographic characteristics questions included variables pertaining to employment, marital status, age, and education level. The food safety questions could be broadly classified into “food purchase” (4 questions), “storage of frozen foods” (9 questions), “cross-contamination prevention” (4 questions), “personal hygiene and cleaning” (6 questions), “cooking practices” (5 questions), “recognition of foodborne illnesses” (3 questions), and “risk of microbiological infection” (6 questions).

2.3. Pilot Study

The questionnaire was formulated in two languages, Arabic and English. To avoid self-reported bias, the questions were revised to ensure that they were clear and short; they took 10–15 min to answer.
The survey was piloted via face-to-face interviews with 15 volunteers to assess the questions’ clarity and appropriateness. Furthermore, the questionnaire was verified by four academic faculty members who acknowledged that the survey questions were clear, appropriate, easy to understand, and measurable. The questionnaire was reliable regarding the overall internal reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.70).

2.4. Sample Collection

The Health Promotion Department at the Supreme Council for Family Affairs aided in disseminating the questionnaire. Women living in the emirate of Dubai were also approached via Facebook and WhatsApp in a snowball fashion. The respondents were informed regarding the objectives of the study and their right to withdraw from the study at any time. Only respondents above the age of 18 were considered eligible to take part in the study. All respondents were asked to sign a consent form prior to the commencement of the questionnaire. All responses were treated in a confidential and anonymous manner.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 23, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics tests were conducted to analyze the demographic characteristics of the participants. Categorical variables were described in percentages. The knowledge and practices of participants’ responses were measured using “I know”, “I don’t know”, and “Not sure”. A score of (1) was given for every correct response, while a score of (0) was given to a wrong answer, ‘I don’t know’, and ‘Not sure’ responses.
One-way ANOVA using Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test was used to test the association between the food safety score, age, and education level of the participants. An independent–samples t-test was used to test the association between the food safety score, employment, and marital status. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Participants Demographic Characteristics

A total of 827 female respondents living in Dubai (UAE) participated in the study (Table 1). The sample consisted of 664 (80.3%) married women and 163 (19.7%) single females. More than half of the females (58.5%) were either employed in the private or governmental sector. The age of the participants ranged from 18–65 years. Less than half of the participants (44.9%) were between the age of 34–51 years. With regards to the education level, 49% had completed a bachelor’s degree, 28.5% possessed a postgraduate degree, and 22.5% had finished elementary or high school.

3.2. Overall Score of Food Safety Knowledge and Practices

Food safety knowledge and practice scores of the tested seven aspects and the overall score are presented in Table 2. The results indicated that the overall food safety knowledge and practice score among women in Dubai was 19.7 ± 0.1, corresponding to 53%. A box and whisker plot shows the distribution of food safety knowledge and practices score percentage (Figure 1). None of the respondents scored above 90%. The percentage of respondents who scored 21–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, 61–70, 71–80, and 81–90 was 5.2, 13.9, 15.2, 41.7, 16.1, 6.0, and 1.7%, respectively.
The WHO has developed “5 keys”, which explain in detail the various actions through which food safety can be enhanced. The recommendations include general cleanliness, separation of raw and cooked products, thorough cooking, storage of food at safe temperatures, and the use of safe water and raw materials [19]. The questions in this study have also been designed to revolve around this concept.
Overall, two-thirds of the participants in this study exhibited good knowledge and correct practices (score ≥ 60%) in “recognizing foodborne illnesses”, “personal hygiene and cleaning”, “cross-contamination prevention”, and “food purchasing” aspects.
The current study findings were in line with the observations in Egypt [9] and Saudi Arabia [12]. It was observed that participants in this study had low knowledge and poor practices in terms of “cooking practices” and “risk for microbiological infection”. A similar observation was made in Saudi Arabia [12], Sharjah [13], and Italy [20]. These results indicate the need for food safety program development committees in the UAE to give more attention to females at the household level.

3.2.1. Food Purchasing

A score of 2.4 ± 0.3 out of 4.0 (60.0%) was recorded for the “food purchasing” aspect (Table 2). More than half (64%) of the participants knew that the purchase of frozen foods should be towards the end of the shopping trip (Table 3). The current study results were in line with a study conducted in Jordan by Osaili et al. [14], where 74% of female students reported that the safest time to buy refrigerated food was towards the end of shopping time. They were also in accordance with a study by Farahat et al. [12] in Saudi Arabia, where 70.8% of the respondents bought perishable food items towards the end of the shopping trip. Perishable items such as milk and meat need low storage temperature to prevent rapid bacterial growth [21,22].
Although more than half of the participants reported they read the information pertaining to the food product (58.4%), a mere 22.9% read the entire information (Table 3). Reading food labels is recommended as this would result in the consumer paying attention to the expiry dates [23]. A study conducted in Khartoum (Sudan) and Bulgaria reported 77.6 and 50.1% of the respondents had a habit of reading food labels [24,25]. The majority of the respondents (93.2%) stated that they needed less than 1 h to reach home after shopping (Table 3). This is similar to another study where 97.0% of the respondents stated that they reached home within a span of two hours [13].

3.2.2. Storage of Frozen Foods

A score of 5.0 ± 0.2 (55.6%) out of 9.0 was reported for the “storage of frozen foods” aspect (Table 2). Table 4 show that 97.9% of the female respondents in Dubai stored perishable foods in the freezer or refrigerator immediately after arriving home. The majority (79.7%) recorded storing salads and appetizers in the fridge after preparation. For leftovers, 71.6% of the respondents recorded immediate storage in the refrigerator. A survey conducted on women in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, showed a similar finding where 96.4% of the respondents placed perishable foods in the fridge or freezers immediately after arrival [11]. About 71% kept salad immediately in the fridge after preparation, while another 75.6% transferred leftovers immediately to the fridge [11]. In another study conducted on Italian women, only 49.9% reported keeping leftovers in the refrigerator immediately after meals [20].
Awareness regarding appropriate freezing and refrigeration temperatures is crucial in reducing the risk of food poisoning. In our study, more than 75% of the females did not know the correct operating temperatures of the refrigerator and freezer. Upon being enquired about the effect of fridge temperature on microbial growth, less than half (43%) answered that it slows down the reproduction of microorganisms. These results were similar to the observation of Alsayeqh et al. [11], where only 34.5 and 12.3% of females in Saudi Arabia knew the correct operating temperatures of the refrigerator and freezer, respectively. Another study conducted by Osaili et al. [14] reported that only 34 and 21% of the female university students in Jordan possessed the correct knowledge pertaining to the operating temperatures of refrigerators and freezers, respectively. This lack of knowledge is concerning as the climate in the UAE is extremely hot (with temperatures reaching up to 56°C in the summer). Not knowing/keeping a check on the correct operating temperatures of the freezer and refrigerator could result in rapid food spoilage and microbial growth. Almost half of our respondents wrongly stated that cold temperatures could kill microbes in food. In a study conducted by Alsayeqh [11], 18.5% of the respondents in Saudi Arabia agreed to the same.
The safest thawing method is by keeping the frozen meat/poultry in the fridge was agreed upon by 23.8% of the females. While regarding food storage instructions outside the home (e.g., picnics), the majority of the participants (75%) reported using an icebox to store food. Since the ideal temperature for the growth of pathogenic microorganisms commonly found in food ranges from 21 to 52 °C, meats and other frozen products need to be kept for thawing in the fridge [26]. This is expected to reduce microbial proliferation and toxin production. In a study conducted by Alsayeqh [11], about 23% of women in Saudi Arabia, where climate conditions are very similar to that in UAE, did not possess the knowledge that thawing frozen foods or keeping perishable food outside the fridge could lead to food poisoning.
The females in our study had fairly good knowledge regarding the storage period of an opened bottle of milk. More than half (62.8%) recorded storing opened milk bottle in the fridge and consuming it within 3–4 days after opening. This result was similar to that reported by Alsayeqh [11] for women in Saudi Arabia, where 74.1% of the respondents reported keeping an open bottle of milk in the refrigerator but not being aware of the correct shelf life.

3.2.3. Cross-Contamination Prevention

The food safety knowledge and practice score of the “cross-contamination prevention” aspect among women in Dubai was 2.5 ± 0.2 out of 4.0 (62.5%) (Table 2). As can be seen in Table 5, most of the females (96.5%) recorded having separate sets of cutting boards and knives for vegetables and meat. An excellent percentage (93.1%) recorded washing cutting boards with hot water and soap after every use.
In another study, 54% of the restaurant workers in Jordan reported washing cutting boards were used to cut raw meat or poultry with hot water prior to chopping vegetables [27]. Similarly, 61.6% of female students in a study conducted by Osaili et al. [14] indicated that they washed the cutting board with hot soapy water before chopping the vegetables.
In this study, 64.2% of the women reported storing food in the refrigerator separately as per the type of food and not based on space availability. Storing food separately in the refrigerator is important to avoid cross-contamination [28]. This finding was similar to the observation amongst women in Saudi Arabia (63%) [11] and Trinidad (81.5%) [26].
In this study, 51% of the participants were fully aware that it was best to use single-use paper towels to dry hands after washing them. This practice is important as cloth hand towels may contain different types of enteric bacteria such as E. coli and coliforms [29]. This knowledge level was higher than that reported amongst women in Alexandria University (14%) [9] and amongst adult consumers in Turkey (10.6%) [30].

3.2.4. Personal Hygiene and Cleaning

The food safety knowledge and practice score of the “personal hygiene and cleaning” aspect was 3.7 ± 0.2 out of 6.0, corresponding to 61.7% (Table 2). Most of the participants (82.2%) reported washing the sink after every use (Table 6). Two-thirds of the respondents (64.1%) knew that a used kitchen sponge would be an ideal breeding ground for bacteria. Less than half (49.2%) reported cleaning kitchen counters with hot water and a disinfectant. To avoid foodborne illnesses, the kitchen sink must be cleaned with hot water, soap, and then a disinfectant after every use [8,31]. The kitchen sponges need to be changed on a regular basis as they could act as a vehicle for cross-contamination [32]. Unclean kitchen sponges have been reported to contain a high number of pathogenic bacteria such as Campylobacter spp., Enterobacter cloacae, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Salmonella spp., Acinetobacter, Moraxella, and Staphylococcus spp. [32]. A study conducted on Lebanese food handlers showed that 86.8% of them washed the kitchen sink with hot water, soap, and then a disinfectant [33].
Around 54% of the respondents spent about 20 s or more washing hands with soap and water. More than half (57.9%) knew that washing hands during each stage of the food preparation process is not necessary. Washing hands before preparing food reduces the risk of food poisoning, as contaminated hands of a food handler can spread microbes to food [34]. Our finding is similar to that reported by Jevšnik et al. [35], where 57.1% of the interviewed females had adequate knowledge about correct hand-washing procedures. However, our finding is better than that reported by Fawzi and Shama [9], where only 20% of Egyptian female respondents reported washing hands with warm water and soap. In the current study, 61.2% of the respondents knew that fruits and vegetables should be washed under running tap water. This result was similar to women in Saudi Arabia (63%) [11]. Raw fruits and vegetables could act as vehicles for foodborne pathogenic transmission to humans [36].

3.2.5. Cooking Practices

A food safety knowledge and practice score of 1.3 ± 0.2 out of 5.0, corresponding to 26.0%, was observed in the “cooking practices” aspect (Table 2). Inappropriate cooking temperatures and duration coupled with lack of thermometer measurements can lead to foodborne illnesses [37]. The percentage of females who were deficient in this knowledge in our study (26.0%) was similar to that reported for women from Saudi Arabia (35.5%) [11].
As shown in Table 7, half (50.1%) of the respondents knew the correct way of reheating food. Similarly, in Mainland China and Slovenia, the percentage was reported to be around 52 and 60%, respectively [38,39]. On the other hand, in the current study, a very low percentage of the participants (22.9%) knew that the internal temperature of food should be measured with the help of a thermometer. Only 8.3% of the participants followed the recommended time and temperature for cooking. Previous studies indicated that only 28.4 and 8.2% had knowledge about the use of a thermometer during cooking [11,14]. This study found that 23.6% of the females had the knowledge that heat kills microbes but does not guarantee food safety as some bacterial toxins are resistant to high temperatures [40]. In comparison, a study conducted on Taif University students (Saudi Arabia) showed that 50% knew the effect of heat on microbes [41]. About a quarter (22.9%) of the respondents agreed that raw milk is unsafe to drink. A study conducted by Alsayeqh [11] reported the agreement percentage to be 21.5%, respectively.

3.2.6. Recognition of Foodborne Illnesses

Compared to other segments, the food safety knowledge score recorded in this domain was the highest (2.3 ± 0.3 out of 3.0, 76.7%) (Table 2). As can be seen in Table 8, a good percentage (87.7%) of females knew that diseases could be transmitted through food. The majority (79.9%) of the participants recognized the main symptoms of food poisoning, with more than half (66.1%) having the knowledge that bacteria and viruses were the main causal agents of food poisoning. Foods stored at inappropriate temperatures for long durations or foods handled in an inappropriate manner can result in contamination with bacteria and viruses. These microorganisms can colonize in the human gut and can cause gastrointestinal disturbances such as diarrhea and vomiting. The bacteria may also release toxins that can survive the harsh acidic pH of the stomach. Depending on the type of toxin and the immune status of the consumer, the consequences of the toxin ingestion may lead to fatality. In a previous study, 91.6, 82.0, and 67.8% of the respondents were aware that diseases could be transmitted via food, the various symptoms of food poisoning and the causal agents of food poisoning (bacteria and viruses), respectively [13].

3.2.7. Risk of Microbiological Infection

The knowledge in this segment was less as compared to the other aspects (Table 2). The knowledge score was 0.8 ± 0.2 out of 6.0, corresponding to 13.3%. As can be seen in Table 9, 51.6% knew that food should be cooked well and exposed to heat to be free of Salmonella spp. A small percentage (7.9%) knew that Staphylococcus bacteria—associated infection could be due to the ingestion of food prepared with the bare hands and then left at room temperature, while only 10.3% were aware that Botulism is associated with canned food. On a similar note, 11.7% of the females knew that Listeria infection is associated with hot dogs, white cheeses and meat sandwiches. A similar percentage (12.3%) knew that E. coli infection is associated with raw or undercooked beef. A mere 4.0% knew that illnesses due to raw or undercooked poultry are associated with Campylobacter spp.
As per the Ministry of Health in Dubai, the most common foodborne diseases reported are amoebic dysentery, bacillary dysentery, typhoid/paratyphoid fever, hepatitis A, giardiasis, shigellosis, and salmonellosis [42]. Poor knowledge of the respondents regarding the most common food associated pathogens was revealed in our findings. A similar observation was reported for Italian consumers where only 56.3% had knowledge regarding foodborne Salmonella spp. associated infection [20]. Furthermore, poor knowledge levels were also reported among consumers in Ballsbridge, Dublin, and Ireland, such that only 45.2 and 19.2% of the participants knew the types of food associated with Salmonella spp. and E. coli infection, respectively [18]. Higher knowledge levels were reported in an Italian study where 86.3% knew information about Salmonella spp. and 51.6% had sufficient information on C. botulinum [20].

3.3. Association between Total Food Safety Knowledge, Practice Score, and Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Females in Dubai, UAE

Table 10 demonstrate the relationship between overall food safety knowledge and practice score of females and their demographical data. In this study, it was observed that a statistical difference existed in the overall food safety knowledge and practice scores of employed and unemployed females (p-value < 0.05). Employed women recorded a higher score (20.5 ± 0.1) than unemployed females (18.6 ± 0.1). This is similar to the observations of Farahat et al. [12], where working females showed a higher foods safety knowledge and practice score than non-working women. This study indicated that older and educated females had higher (p-value < 0.05) overall knowledge and practice scores. Females holding a postgraduate degree were observed to have a higher knowledge and practice score (20.9 ± 0.1). The age group of 52–65 years was observed to have a higher food safety knowledge and practice score (22.5 ± 0.2) than other examined groups. This is similar to observations in previous studies [12,13,20]. In addition, Ayaz et al. [43] highlighted that knowledge and practices among Saudi Arabia women were improved with the level of education. No statistically significant difference in the score (p-value ≥ 0.05) existed between married and single females (Table 10), similar to the study conducted by Osaili et al. [44].

4. Conclusions

In this study, a low level of food safety knowledge and inadequate correct practice regarding food safety was observed amongst women in Dubai (UAE). Educating females regarding appropriate food handling/cooking practices and engaging them in food safety workshops is essential. Tools such as the WHO “5 keys”, which give illustrative explanations about cleanliness, the prevention of cross-contamination, and temperature use, can be used for educational purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.Q.S. and T.M.O.; methodology, B.Q.S., T.M.O. and S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, B.Q.S., T.M.O. and A.O.A.; writing—review and editing, T.M.O., S.T., A.O.A. and F.H.; supervision/project administration, B.Q.S. and T.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the University of Sharjah Ethics Committee (Reference No: REC-20-3-04-04).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the participants to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge University of Sharjah and Jordan University of Science and Technology. The authors would like to acknowledge all who participated in the study and the Health Promotion Department at the Supreme Council For Family Affairs for aiding in questionnaire distribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Complex Food Chain Increases Food Safety Risks. 2015. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/press-releases/2015/03/complexfood-chain-increases-food-safetyrisks (accessed on 19 December 2021).
  2. WHO. WHO Estimates of the Global Burden of Foodborne Diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007–2015. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/199350/9789241565165_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 19 December 2021).
  3. Trepka, M.J.; Newman, F.L.; Dixon, Z.; Huffman, F.G. Food safety practices among pregnant women and mothers in the women, infants, and children program, Miami, Florida. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 1230–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hussain, M.A.; Dawson, C.O. Economic impact of food safety outbreaks on food businesses. Foods 2013, 2, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hardstaff, J.L.; Clough, H.E.; Lutje, V.; McIntyre, K.M.; Harris, J.P.; Garner, P.; O’Brien, S.J. Foodborne and food-handler norovirus outbreaks: A systematic review. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bintsis, T. Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 529–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kirk, M.D.; Pires, S.M.; Black, R.E.; Caipo, M.; Crump, J.A.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Döpfer, D.; Fazil, A.; Fischer-Walker, C.L.; Hald, T. World Health Organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: A data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001921. [Google Scholar]
  8. Redmond, E.C.; Griffith, C.J. The importance of hygiene in the domestic kitchen: Implications for preparation and storage of food and infant formula. Perspect. Public Health 2009, 129, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fawzi, M.; Shama, M.E. Food safety knowledge and practices among women working in Alexandria University, Egypt. Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2009, 84, 17–95. [Google Scholar]
  10. Redmond, E.C.; Griffith, C.J. Consumer food handling in the home: A review of food safety studies. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 130–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alsayeqh, A.F. Foodborne disease risk factors among women in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Food Control 2015, 50, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Farahat, M.F.; El-Shafie, M.M.; Waly, M.I. Food safety knowledge and practices among Saudi women. Food Control 2015, 47, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saeed, B.Q.; Osaili, T.M.; Taha, S. Foodborne diseases risk factors associated with food safety knowledge and practices of women in Sharjah-United Arab Emirate. Food Control 2021, 125, 108024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Osaili, T.M.; Obeidat, B.A.; Jamous, D.O.A.; Bawadi, H.A. Food safety knowledge and practices among college female students in north of Jordan. Food Control 2011, 22, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Taha, S.; Osaili, T.M.; Vij, A.; Albloush, A.; Nassoura, A. Structural modelling of relationships between food safety knowledge, attitude, commitment and behavior of food handlers in restaurants in Jebel Ali Free Zone, Dubai, UAE. Food Control 2020, 118, 107431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pourhoseingholi, M.A.; Vahedi, M.; Rahimzadeh, M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2013, 6, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Jevšnik, M.; Hoyer, S.; Raspor, P. Food safety knowledge and practices among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Slovenia. Food Control 2008, 19, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kennedy, J.; Gibney, S.; Nolan, A.; O’Brien, S.; McMahon, M.A.S.; McDowell, D.; Fanning, S.; Wall, P.G. Identification of critical points during domestic food preparation: An observational study. Br. Food J. 2011, 113, 766–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. WHO. 5 Keys to Safer Food. Available online: https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/consumer/manual_keys.pdf (accessed on 31 December 2021).
  20. Angelillo, I.F.; Foresta, M.R.; Scozzafava, C.; Pavia, M. Consumers and foodborne diseases: Knowledge, attitudes and reported behavior in one region of Italy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 64, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aung, M.M.; Chang, Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control 2014, 39, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marklinder, I.; Eriksson, M.K. Best-before date—Food storage temperatures recorded by Swedish students. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 1764–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Terpstra, M.J.; Steenbekkers, L.P.A.; De Maertelaere, N.C.M.; Nijhuis, S. Food storage and disposal: Consumer practices and knowledge. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stratev, D.; Odeyemi, O.A.; Pavlov, A.; Kyuchukova, R.; Fatehi, F.; Bamidele, F.A. Food safety knowledge and hygiene practices among veterinary medicine students at Trakia University, Bulgaria. J. Infect. Public Health 2017, 10, 778–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mohammed, S.G.S. Food safety knowledge among women in selected areas in Khartoum City. Int. J. Sci. Res. India Online ISSN 2013, 2, 2319–7064. [Google Scholar]
  26. Badrie, N.; Gobin, A.; Dookeran, S.; Duncan, R. Consumer awareness and perception to food safety hazards in Trinidad, West Indies. Food Control 2006, 17, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Osaili, T.M.; Jamous, D.O.A.; Obeidat, B.A.; Bawadi, H.A.; Tayyem, R.F.; Subih, H.S. Food safety knowledge among food workers in restaurants in Jordan. Food Control 2013, 31, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahon, D.; Cowan, C.; Henchion, M.; Fanning, M. Food-handling practices of Irish beef consumers. J. Food Saf. 2006, 26, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koenig, D.W. Occurrence in Kitchen Hand Towels. Food Prot. Trends 2014, 34, 312–317. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sanlier, N. The knowledge and practice of food safety by young and adult consumers. Food Control 2009, 20, 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hillers, V.N.; Medeiros, L.; Kendall, P.; Chen, G.; Dimascola, S. Consumer food-handling behaviors associated with prevention of 13 foodborne illnesses. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1893–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Osaili, T.M.; Obaid, R.S.; Alowais, K.; Almahmood, R.; Almansoori, M.; Alayadhi, N.; Alowais, N.; Waheed, K.; Dhanasekaran, D.K.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A. Microbiological quality of kitchens sponges used in university student dormitories. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hassan, H.F.; Dimassi, H.; Karam, Z.N. Self-reported food safety knowledge and practices of Lebanese food handlers in Lebanese households. Br. Food J. 2018, 518–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Baş, M.; Ersun, A.Ş.; Kıvanç, G. The evaluation of food hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food handlers’ in food businesses in Turkey. Food Control 2006, 17, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jevšnik, M.; Hlebec, V.; Raspor, P. Consumers’ awareness of food safety from shopping to eating. Food Control 2008, 19, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berger, C.N.; Sodha, S.V.; Shaw, R.K.; Griffin, P.M.; Pink, D.; Hand, P.; Frankel, G. Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 2385–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Elshahat, S.; Woodside, J.V.; McKinley, M.C. Meat thermometer usage amongst European and North American consumers: A scoping review. Food Control 2019, 106, 1–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gong, S.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Bai, L. Knowledge of food safety and handling in households: A survey of food handlers in Mainland China. Food Control 2016, 64, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ovca, A.; Jevšnik, M.; Raspor, P. Food safety awareness, knowledge and practices among students in Slovenia. Food Control 2014, 42, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jay, J.M.; Loessner, M.J.; Golden, D.A. Modern Food Microbiology; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2008; ISBN 0387234136. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sharif, L.; Al-Malki, T. Knowledge, attitude and practice of Taif University students on food poisoning. Food Control 2010, 21, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. DHA Communicable Disease Notification Policy. Available online: https://www.dha.gov.ae/Documents/HRD/RegulationsandStandards/Polocies/CommunicableDiseaseNotificationPolicyFinal.pdf (accessed on 19 December 2021).
  43. Ayaz, W.O.; Priyadarshini, A.; Jaiswal, A.K. Food safety knowledge and practices among Saudi mothers. Foods 2018, 7, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Osaili, T.M.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Krasneh, H.D.A. Food safety knowledge among foodservice staff at the universities in Jordan. Food Control 2018, 89, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of food safety knowledge and practices score percentage.
Figure 1. Distribution of food safety knowledge and practices score percentage.
Foods 11 00290 g001
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of the participating females in Dubai, UAE (n = 827).
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of the participating females in Dubai, UAE (n = 827).
Demographic VariablesFrequencyPercentage %
Marital statusMarried66480.3
Single16319.7
EmploymentEmployed484 58.5
Unemployed34341.5
Age18–24 years10813.1
25–33 years22026.6
34–51 years37144.9
52–65 years12815.5
EducationPrimary708.5
High school/Diploma11614.0
Undergraduate40549.0
Postgraduate 23628.5
Table 2. Food safety knowledge and practices score (Mean ± SD) and percentages of correct answers of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 2. Food safety knowledge and practices score (Mean ± SD) and percentages of correct answers of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsMean Knowledge Scores (SD)Possible Range of ScoresPercentage of Correct Responses
(1)
Food purchasing
2.4 ± 0.30–460.0
(2)
Storage of frozen foods
5. 0± 0.20–955.6
(3)
Cross-contamination prevention
2.5 ± 0.20–462.5
(4)
Personal hygiene and cleaning
3.7 ± 0.20–661.7
(5)
Cooking practices
1.3 ± 0.20–526.0
(6)
Recognizing of foodborne illness
2.3 ± 0.30–376.7
(7)
Risk of microbiological infection
0.8 ± 0.20–613.3
Total knowledge score19.7 ± 0.10–3753.2
Table 3. Correct responses * to the “Food purchasing” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 3. Correct responses * to the “Food purchasing” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
During shopping, when do you purchase refrigerated and cold foods?
At the end of shopping time
52964.0
(2)
Do you read the label on food products during shopping?
Yes
483 58.4
(3)
What do you read on food labeling?
All information: storage instructions; ingredients; expiry date.
18922.9
(4)
(How much time does it take to return home after shopping?
Less than 1 h
77193.2
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 4. Correct responses * to the “Storage of frozen foods” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 4. Correct responses * to the “Storage of frozen foods” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
Where do you store meat, poultry, or fish after arriving home?
Put it immediately in refrigerator or freezer
81097.9
(2)
What do you do with salads or appetizers after preparation?
Put them immediately in the refrigerator
65979.7
(3)
What do you do with food leftover?
Put it immediately in the refrigerator
592 71.6
(4)
The appropriate refrigerator temperature is?
1–4 °C
20725.0
(5)
The appropriate freezer temperature is?
At least −18 °C
178 21.5
(6)
What is the effect of the cold temperature of the fridge on microbes?
Delays microbial growth in food
35643.0
(7)
How do you defrost frozen meat or poultry?
Keep it in the refrigerator
19723.8
(8)
Do you use your icebox (cooler) when you go for a picnic?
Yes
62075.0
(9)
What do you do with opened milk bottle?
Keep in the refrigerator and consume within three days
51962.8
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 5. Correct responses * to the “Cross-contamination prevention” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 5. Correct responses * to the “Cross-contamination prevention” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
What would you do if you wanted to cut vegetables after cutting raw meat or poultry?
Use a cutting board and knives set for meat and another set for vegetables
79896.5
(2)
When should the cutting board and knives be washed?
After every use
77093.1
(3)
How do you store foods in the refrigerator?
Separate foods according to type
53164.2
(4)
How would you dry your hands?
Disposable tissues
421 50.9
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 6. Correct responses * to the “Personal hygiene and cleaning” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 6. Correct responses * to the “Personal hygiene and cleaning” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
When should the kitchen sink be washed?
After every use
68082.2
(2)
Are kitchen sponges contaminated with a high number of bacteria?
Yes
53064.1
(3)
Should kitchen counters be washed with hot water, soap then disinfected?
Yes
407 49.2
(4)
For how long should hand-washing with soap and water last?
20 s or more
44854.2
(5)
On which of the following occasions, hand washing is not necessary?
After every stage of food preparation
47957.9
(6)
How do you wash vegetables and fruits?
With tap water
50661.2
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 7. Correct responses * to “Food Cooking” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 7. Correct responses * to “Food Cooking” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
How do you heat food leftover?
Heat it until boiling
41450.1
(2)
Is using a thermometer is the safest way to know if meat is cooked enough:
Yes
18922.9
(3)
How do you know if food is cooked enough?
By cooking according to the recommended time and temperature
698.3
(4)
What is the impact of heat on microorganisms?
Kills microorganisms but does not guarantee food safety
19523.6
(5)
Is it safe to drink raw milk?
No
18922.9
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 8. Correct responses * to the “Recognizing of foodborne illness” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 8. Correct responses * to the “Recognizing of foodborne illness” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
Do you think that diseases can be transmitted through food?
Yes
72587.7
(2)
Identify which one of the following is not a common symptom of food poisoning:
Joint pain
66179.9
(3)
Are bacteria and viruses the main cause of food poisoning:
Yes
54766.1
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 9. Correct responses * to the “Risk for microbiological infection” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 9. Correct responses * to the “Risk for microbiological infection” aspect of females in Dubai, UAE.
Food Safety AspectsTotal Responses (n)Correct Responses (%)
(1)
Salmonella bacteria can cause food poisoning. How can a food be made safe if it has Salmonella in it?
Cook it thoroughly
42751.6
(2)
Staph (Staphylococcus) bacteria are most likely associated with which food?
Food prepared with the bare hands and then left at room temperature
657.9
(3)
Botulism is a disease that is most likely associated with which food?
Canned foods
8510.3
(4)
Listeria bacteria are most likely associated with which food?
Deli meats, hot dogs and white cheeses
9711.7
(5)
Harmful E. coli bacteria are most likely associated with which food?
Raw or undercooked beef
10212.3
(6)
Campylobacter bacteria are most likely associated with which food?
Raw or undercooked poultry
334.0
* Statement in bold color is the correct answer.
Table 10. Association between overall food safety knowledge and practices score and descriptive characteristics of females in Dubai, UAE.
Table 10. Association between overall food safety knowledge and practices score and descriptive characteristics of females in Dubai, UAE.
VariableTotal Knowledge Score (Mean)Total Knowledge Score (%)p-Value
Employment
Employed20.5 a55.4 0.000 *
Unemployed0.18 b55.2
Education
Primary12.1 b32.70.000 *
High school/Diploma20.0 a54.0
Undergraduate20.2 a54.7
Postgraduate 20.9 a56.4
Age
18–24 years18.5 b49.90.000 *
25–33 years19.7 b53.4
34–51 years19.8 b53.4
52–65 years 22.5 a60.7
Marital Status
Married19.552.80.059
Single20.355.0
* Means with different letters in the same column are significantly different at <0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osaili, T.M.; Saeed, B.Q.; Taha, S.; Omar Adrees, A.; Hasan, F. Knowledge, Practices, and Risk Perception Associated with Foodborne Illnesses among Females Living in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Foods 2022, 11, 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030290

AMA Style

Osaili TM, Saeed BQ, Taha S, Omar Adrees A, Hasan F. Knowledge, Practices, and Risk Perception Associated with Foodborne Illnesses among Females Living in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Foods. 2022; 11(3):290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030290

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osaili, Tareq M., Balsam Qubais Saeed, Sadi Taha, Ahmed Omar Adrees, and Fayeza Hasan. 2022. "Knowledge, Practices, and Risk Perception Associated with Foodborne Illnesses among Females Living in Dubai, United Arab Emirates" Foods 11, no. 3: 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030290

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop