Next Article in Journal
Effect of Organic and Conventional Production Methods on Fruit Yield and Nutritional Quality Parameters in Three Traditional Cretan Grape Varieties: Results from a Farm Survey
Next Article in Special Issue
Edible Mushrooms as a Natural Source of Food Ingredient/Additive Replacer
Previous Article in Journal
Generating New Snack Food Texture Ideas Using Sensory and Consumer Research Tools: A Case Study of the Japanese and South Korean Snack Food Markets
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Possibility of Reduction of Synthetic Preservative E 250 in Canned Pork
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemical Characterization and Evaluation of Bioactive Properties of Tisanes Prepared from Promising Medicinal and Aromatic Plants

by
Beatriz H. Paschoalinotto
1,2,
Maria Inês Dias
1,*,
José Pinela
1,
Tânia C.S.P. Pires
1,
Maria José Alves
1,
Andrei Mocan
3,4,
Ricardo C. Calhelha
1,
Lillian Barros
1,*,
Rafael P. Ineu
2 and
Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira
1
1
Centro de Investigação de Montanha (CIMO), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5300-253 Bragança, Portugal
2
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Campo Mourão (UTFPR-CM), Campo Mourão 87301-899, Brazil
3
Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babeș Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Laboratory of Chromatography, Institute of Advanced Horticulture Research of Transylvania, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(2), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020475
Submission received: 26 January 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Natural Additives)

Abstract

:
The chemical composition and biological properties correlation in several medicinal and aromatic plants is still underexplored, especially in its most common form of consumption as tisane. The present study aims to characterize the organic acids and vitamin E composition of five tisanes and their extracts by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to a diode-array detector (HPLC-DAD) and HPLC coupled to a fluorescence detector techniques, respectively, and the phenolic composition by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS (mass spectrometry by electrospray ionization). It also focuses on their bioactive properties, namely antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, anti-tyrosinase, and anti-diabetic activities. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed in order to understand the correlation between the chemical composition and bioactive properties of the tisanes. The tisane 5 (T5) composed by lemon thyme, tutsan, cloves, and cinnamon, was the most promising mixture, presenting the lowest values for the lipid peroxidation inhibition, anti-inflammatory, and anti-diabetic activity. It also presented the highest concentration of phenolic acids (caffeoylquinic acids derivatives), and flavan-3-ols (catechin derivatives). Only the dry plants presented tocopherols. For the antihemolytic, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activity, T2 and T4 (with lemon thyme) were highlighted as the best herbal mixtures. The PCA proved to be a valid tool to select the most promising tisane according to the bioactivity. These results suggest that the studied tisanes can be source of high added-value bioactive compounds with health-promoting effects and potential for application in the food and nutraceutical industries, among others.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Currently, there is a growing interest in medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) due to the various benefits they provide to consumers’ health. MAPs, as natural sources of several bioactive compounds, have medicinal properties with great potential to be applied for the treatment of several diseases [1]. Their most common form of consumption is as tisane, or popularly known as herbal teas or infusions [2].
The active roles of several MAPs upon disease prevention, control, or reduction have been attributed to the antioxidant features of lypossoluble constituents (such as vitamins A and E), water-soluble components (such as vitamin C and organic acids), and phenolic compounds [3,4,5,6]. The antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds is mainly due to their redox properties, which allow them to act as reducing agents and hydrogen donators [7]. The characterization of phenolic compounds responsible for the different beneficial properties identified is of great interest for the food and nutraceutical industries, focusing on numerous applications, such as replacement of artificial antioxidants, development of food supplements, or nutraceuticals, among others [8,9].
There are several studies indicating that mixtures of MAPs are potentially more bioactive when compared to isolated plants [9,10]. However, the therapeutic properties that tisanes prepared from MAPs mixtures may exhibit are still under-explored. In this context, the present study describes the chemical composition in terms of phenolic compounds, organic acids, and tocopherols (vitamin E) of five tisanes prepared from mixtures of distinct MAPs. Furthermore, the antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, anti-tyrosinase, and antidiabetic activities of the five tisanes were also evaluated and correlated with the presence of the several families of phenolic compounds found. The results obtained could add value to these tisanes with the potential to be applied in different industrial sectors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples and Tisanes Preparations

Five tisane samples (Figure 1) were kindly provided by the “Cantinho das Aromáticas” Company, Canidelo—Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal, in their commercial form (dried and packed in plastic wrappers). Tisane one (T1) was composed by Cymbopogon citratus (D.C.) Stapf, Ocimum basilicum “Cinnamon”, and Gomphrena sp.; tisane two (T2) had Thymus x citriodorus (Pers.) Schreb, Thymus mastichina L., Lavandula angustifolia Mill, and Gomphrena globosa L.; tisane three (T3) was composed by Agastache foeniculum (Pursh) Kuntze, Mentha x piperita L., and Mentha spicata L.; tisane four (T4) had Rosmarinus officinalis L., Ocimum basilicum L., Thymus x citriodorus (Pers.) Schreb, Calendula officinalis L., and Mentha x piperita L.; finally, tisane five (T5) was composed by Hypericum androsaemum L., Thymus x citriodorus (Pers.) Schreb, Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume, and Syzygium aromaticum L. The MAPs that make up the tisanes were produced following the principles of organic production (certified by ECOCERT, Leiria, Portugal) and do not contain caffeine (information provided by the company). Some of the biological activities that the studied plants exhibits are described in Table 1. The dried samples were reduced to a fine homogeneous powder (~20 mesh) and stored in a cool dry place. The tisanes were prepared by adding 2 g of each dried sample to 50 mL of boiling distilled water (100 °C), allowing them to stand for 5 min at room temperature and then filtering them through a filter paper. The obtained tisanes were frozen and lyophilized, then stored in a dry place at room temperature and protected from light before further analysis.

2.2. Phytochemical Characterization

2.2.1. Phenolic Compounds

The lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in water to obtain a solution of 5 mg/mL and to determine the phenolic profiles by chromatographic analysis using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UPLC (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) [26]. Detection was carried out with a diode array detector (DAD) using 280 nm, 330 nm, and 370 nm as the preferred wavelengths and connected in line with a Linear Ion Trap LTQ XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source and working in negative mode. Data acquisition was carried out with an Xcalibur® data system (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA, USA). The phenolic compounds were identified through the available standard compounds and by using literature information regarding the fragmentation pattern. Quantification was performed using 5-level calibration curves obtained from available commercial standard compounds: apigenin-6-C-glucoside (y = 107,025x + 61,531, R2 = 0.9989, LOD = 0.19 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.63 µg/mL); apigenin-7-O-glucoside (y = 10,683x − 45,794, R2 = 0.996, LOD = 0.10 μg/mL; LOQ = 0.53 μg/mL); caffeic acid (y = 388,345x + 406,369, R2 = 0.9939, Limit of detection (LOD) = 0.78 μg/mL; Limit of quantification (LOQ) =1.97 μg/mL); catequin (y = 84,950x – 23,200, R2 = 0.999, LOD = 0.17 μg/mL; LOQ = 0.68 μg/mL); chlorogenic acid (y = 168,823x − 161,172, R2 = 0.9999, LOD = 0.20 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.68 µg/mL); cinnamic acid (y = 1 × 106x − 222,204, R2 = 0.9993, LOD = 0.33 µg/mL and LOQ = 1.19 µg/mL); ferulic acid (y = 633,126x − 185,462, R2 = 0.999, LOD = 0.20 μg/mL; 1.01 μg/mL); naringenin (y = 18,433x + 78,903, R2 = 0.9998, LOD = 0.17 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.81 µg/mL); p-coumaric acid (y = 301,950x + 6966.7, R2 = 0.9999, LOD = 0.68 μg/mL and LOQ = 1.61 μg/mL); quercetin-3-O-glucoside (y = 34,843x − 160,173, R2 = 0.9998, LOD = 0.21 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.71 µg/mL); quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (y = 13,343x + 76,751, R2 = 0.9998, LOD = 0.14 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.45 µg/mL); rosmarinic acid (y = 191,291x − 652,903, R2 = 0.999, LOD = 0.15 µg/mL; LOQ = 0.68 µg/mL); and syringic acid (y = 376,056x + 141,329, R2 = 0.9995, LOD = 0.23 µg/mL and LOQ = 0.72 µg/mL). The results were expressed in mg/g of extract.

2.2.2. Organic Acids and Tocopherols (Vitamin E)

The organic acids were analyzed by ultra-fast liquid chromatography coupled to a photodiode array detector programmed to record at 215 nm as the preferred wavelength (UFLC-PDA; Shimadzu Coperation, Kyoto, Japan) [27]. The identification and quantification of the individual organic acids was performed by comparison to authentic standards and by comparison of the peak area in the programmed wavelength. Standard calibration curves for organic acids quantification: oxalic acid (y = 9 × 106x + 45,973, R2 = 0.9901, LOD = 12.55 µg/mL; LOQ = 41.82 µg/mL); quinic acid (y = 610,607x + 46,061, R2 = 0.9995, LOD = 24.18 µg/mL; LOQ = 80.61 µg/mL); malic acid (y = 912,441x + 92,665, R2 = 0.999, LOD = 35.76 µg/mL; LOQ = 119.18 µg/mL); and fumaric acid (y = 154,862x + 1 × 106, R2 = 0.9977, LOD = 0.08 μg/mL; LOQ = 0.26 μg/mL). The results were expressed in g per 100 g of dry weight for dry plants and in mg per 100 mL of infusion preparations.
Tocopherols were determined using HPLC coupled to a fluorescence detector (FP-2020; Jasco, Easton, MD, USA) programmed for excitation at 290 nm and emission at 330 nm [12]. The identification was performed by chromatographic comparisons with authentic standards, while the quantification was based on the fluorescence signal response of each standard, using the internal standard (tocol) method and by using calibration curves obtained from commercial standards of each compound. The results were expressed in g per 100 g of dry weight for dry plants and in mg per 100 mL for infusion preparations.

2.3. Evaluation of Bioactive Properties

2.3.1. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity was evaluated through the lipid peroxidation inhibition using porcine brain cell homogenates by using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay [28] and oxidative hemolysis inhibition assay (OxHLIA) [29]. The lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in water to obtain stock solution of 0.3 mg/mL, which were further diluted to obtain a range of seven concentrations below the stock solution for the TBARS assay. For OxHLIA, the lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in PBS, while water was used for complete hemolysis and PBS solution as the control. The results were expressed as IC50 values (µg/mL), with the sample concentration providing 50% of lipid peroxidation inhibition or extract concentration required to keep 50% of the erythrocyte population intact for Δt of 120 and 180 min, respectively. Trolox was used as a positive control.

2.3.2. Antimicrobial Activity

The lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in water to obtain a stock solution of 20 mg/mL, while the samples were serially diluted obtain the concentration ranges (20 at 0.15 mg/mL). The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using five Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Morganella morganii, and three Gram-positive bacteria: Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) were performed using the colorimetric assay of p- iodonitrotetrazolium [30]. Three negative controls were prepared (one with Mueller Hinton Broth/ Tryptic Soy Broth (MHB)/(TSB), another one with the extract, and the third with medium, antibiotic, and bacteria). One positive control was prepared with MHB/TSB and each inoculum. Ampicillin and Imipenem were used for all Gram-negative bacteria tested and Listeria monocytogenes. Ampicillin and vancomycin were selected for Enterococcus faecalis and MRSA.

2.3.3. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The anti-inflammatory potential was evaluated by producing nitric oxide formed in the mouse macrophage-like cell line RAW 264. 7 [28]. The lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in water to obtain stock solutions of 8 mg/mL, which were further diluted to obtain a range of six concentrations below the stock solution. For the determination of nitric oxide, a Griess Reagent System kit was used, which contains sulphanilamide, N-(1-napthyl)ethylenediamine hydrochloride (NED), and nitrite solutions. A reference curve of nitrite (sodium nitrite 100 mM to 1.6 mM; y = 0.0063x + 0.1368; R2 = 0.9989) was prepared in a 96-well plate. The nitric oxide produced was determined by measuring the absorbance at 540 nm (microplate reader ELX800 Biotek), and by comparison with the standard calibration curve. The results were expressed in IC50 values (µg/mL), which correspond to the sample concentration providing 50% of inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) production. Dexamethasone was used as a positive control.

2.3.4. Cytotoxic and Hepatotoxic Activity

The lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in water to obtain stock solution of 8 mg/mL, which were further diluted to obtain a range of six concentrations below the stock solution. HepG2 (hepatocellular carcinoma), NCI-H460 (non-small cell lung carcinoma), HeLa (cervical carcinoma), and MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma) were used as human tumor cell lines. Non-tumor cells were also tested; a cell culture (named as PLP2) was prepared from a freshly harvested porcine liver obtained from a local slaughterhouse, according to a procedure established by the authors. Sulforhodamine B assay was performed according to a procedure previously described by the authors [28]. Ellipticine was used as a positive control and the results were expressed in GI50 values (µg/mL), which correspond to the sample concentration providing 50% of inhibition of cell growth.

2.3.5. Anti-Tyrosinase Activity

The tyrosinase inhibitory activity of each lyophilized herbal tea extract was determined using the SPECTROstar Nano Multi-Detection Microplate Reader and 96-well plates (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) [31]. Absorbance was measured at 475 nm, and results are expressed as IC50 or percentage of inhibition (when the sample is not active enough to calculate an IC50 value for the tested concentration of 8 mg/mL) using the following calculation formula: % I = ((AB) − (CD))/((AB)) × 100. Kojic acid solution (0.10 mg/mL) was used as a positive control.

2.3.6. Antidiabetic Activity

The capacity of inhibition α-glucosidase (from yeast and rat) was measured in a 96-well microplate reader [32,33]. The lyophilized tisane extracts were re-dissolved in water to obtain a stock solution of 8 mg/mL. Acarbose was used as a positive control. The results were expressed as IC50 values (µg/mL) or percentages of inhibition (when the sample is not active enough to calculate an IC50 value for the tested concentration of 8 mg/mL) using the following calculation formula: Inhibition (%) = ((Abscontrol − Absort)/Abscontrol) × 100.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

For each extract and its infusion, all the assays were carried out in triplicate. The results were expressed as mean values and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD test with p = 0.05 (except for the analysis of anti-inflammatory activity results, in which a Student’s t-test was used, with α = 0.05) using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). For the PCA analysis, a categorical principal component analysis (CATPCA) with optimal scaling was used to explore the joint relationships between the five tisanes in study and their phenolic composition and bioactive capacity. The number of plotted dimensions (two) was chosen in order to allow meaningful interpretations and was assessed by the respective eigenvalues (should be greater than one), the Cronbach’s alpha (must be positive) and the total percentage of variance (should be as higher as possible) explained by the selected data.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phenolic Compounds

The five tisanes presented a very distinct phenolic compounds profile (Table 2). However, it was possible to group the identified phenolic compounds into five different families: phenolic acids, isoflavones, flavanones, flavonoids, and flavan-3-ols, and quantify them accordingly, as is shown in Table 3.
Twenty-nine phenolic acids (caftaric acid, syringic, coutaric, p-coumaric, fertaric, caffeic, chicoric, rosmarinic acids, and their derivatives), 21 flavonoids (C-glycosylated apigenin derivatives and O-glycosylated kaempherol, luteolin, quercetin, isorhamnetin, chrysoeriol, apigenin, and diosmetin derivatives), four isoflavones (O-glycosylated calycosin and derivatives), three flavanones (O-glycosylated eriodictyol derivatives), two flava-3-ols (B-type (epi)catechin trimer and tetramer), and three non-phenolic compounds (medioresinol derivatives and oleanolic acid derivative), were tentatively identified in the tisanes samples studied. Two unknown compounds were also found in tisanes T3 and T5.
As previously stated, the tentative identification of the phenolic and non-phenolic compounds was performed comparing the DAD-MS results with available commercial standards and by comparison with data reported in the literature. Table 2 provides a description of the methodology used for the identification of each compound in which bibliographic references report the chromatographic data of the compound in question in detail, for valid identification. An effort was also performed to try to reconcile the references with the individual plant matrices present in each sample; however, it was not possible to achieve this for many of the compounds. The bibliographic references that have plant matrices in common to those studied in the present work were Miguel et al. [50] and Pires et al. [38], who studied the flowers of marigold; Rita et al. [51] and Roriz et al. [52] presented the phenolic profile of lemongrass, lemon thyme [51], and G. globosa [52]; Pereira et al. [53] studied the phenolic profile of pepper mint and Ribeiro et al. [45] studied the phenolic profile of rosemary. All of these bibliographic references were also used for identification of many of the phenolic compounds reported herein.
Regarding the concentrations (mg/g of extract) of the various families of compounds in each tisane (Table 3), it was found with regard to flavonoids, the vast majority of compounds were glycosylated derivatives of luteolin (peaks 21, 31, 34, 35, 44, 46, and 52), preceded by glycosylated quercetin derivatives (peaks 25, 26, 30, 33, and 41), except for T3 samples. The highest concentration of glycosylated derivatives of luteolin and quercetin were found in T2/T4 samples (peak 34) and T2 (24), respectively. The glycosylated derivatives of kaempherol were only identified in tisane T2 (peak 20, kaempherol-O-diglucuronide) and in trace amounts. Regarding the glycosylated derivative of isorhamnetin, it was exclusively identified in T4 sample (peak 28, isorhamnetin-O-di-deoxyhexosyl-hexoside). There are several references regarding the bioactive properties of this family of phenolic compounds, the most relevant of which are its anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and antioxidant properties [54].
The glycosylated derivatives of eriodictyol were the only flavanones tentatively identified in the tisanes samples (except in the T1 sample, where were not flavanones identified). The highest concentration of total flavanones was found for T4 samples (7.876 mg/g of extract, due to the presence of the peaks 24 and 27) as shown in Table 3.

3.2. Organic Acids and Tocopherols

The results for the characterization of organic acids and tocopherols in mixtures of dried tisanes (extracts) and infusions preparations are shown in Table 4.
The content and composition in organic acids and tocopherols vary according to the typology of different plant tissues, since the production of these compounds depends on the edaphoclimatic conditions of plant growth, namely light, salinity, and temperature [46,53]. Regarding the organic acid content, it was noted that the composition is very similar in all tisane samples, both in dry extracts and in infusion preparations, with oxalic, quinic, malic, and fumaric acids being identified. However, T1 samples (dry extract and infusion preparation) presented the highest concentrations of these compounds (4.59 g/100 g dry weight and 234 mg/100 mL, respectively), mainly due to the presence of oxalic acid. Sample T5 presented the lowest levels of organic acids, all of them in the trace form. Fumaric acid presented the lowest expression of all identified organic acids and was only detected in the T5 tisane.
Regarding the tocopherol composition (Table 3), as expected, these molecules were identified only in the dry extracts, and no isoforms were detected in the infusion preparations. These molecules are fat soluble and their extraction with water is inefficient, having a low affinity with this type of extraction solvent [55]. Therefore, it can be stated that tisanes from extracts of the MAP mixtures studied are not sources of tocopherols (vitamin E). Concerning the dry extracts, only two isoforms (α and γ) were detected, with the γ-tocopherol isoform being the most outstanding. The total content of tocopherols varied significantly among all tisane samples, with T1 extract presenting a higher amount of α-tocopherol (12.2 mg/100 g of dry weight), and T5 extract presenting a higher amount of γ-tocopherol (109 mg/100 g dry weight), which significantly affected its total content. Consequently, T5 tisane revealed the highest concentration of total tocopherols (112 mg/100 g dry weight).
In C. Citratus, oxalic, malic, ascorbic, succinic, and fumaric acids have already been described by Roriz [10], but in the tisane where this plant is present, ascorbic, succinic and fumaric acids have not been detected, possibly due to competitiveness in the face of the other two plants that are present in T1 samples (O. basilicum “Cinnamon” and Gomphrena sp.). Oxalic and malic acids have also been previously described in Gomphrena sp. by Liberal et al. [15].
Oxalic acid was the compound identified in the vast majority of aqueous extracts and preparations (except for T4 tisane extract and T3 and T4 aqueous preparation). This organic acid has the ability to inhibit the lipase enzyme and, consequently, to reduce the occurrence of physiological problems such as type II diabetes [56]. On the other hand, quinic acid is considered as a powerful antioxidant, having a stronger performance than the synthetic antioxidant BHT (butylated hydroxyl toluene) [57]. Regarding malic acid, it participates in the Krebs cycle and therefore has an essential role in human metabolism, having also been shown to have a bactericidal effect [58,59]. The use of organic acids in the food industry is a sustainable and natural alternative and can be used as a preservative, antioxidant, flavoring and acidifier [58], and their presence in tisanes may confer bioactive properties on a daily intake basis.
Vitamin E is composed of four isoforms (α—alpha, β—beta, γ—gamma, and δ—delta), and its most biologically active isoform is α-tocopherol, therefore the most necessary in the human diet. The isoform α is responsible for 50% of the attributed antioxidant action, while the isoform β has 25–50% and the isoforms γ and δ has between 10–35% [60].
Two of the plants that make up the T1 tisane have already been studied individually regarding their composition in tocopherols. In 2014, Roriz [10] reported the presence of the isoforms α and γ tocopherol in C. citratus, with α-tocopherol being the isoform present in the highest concentration. In turn, Liberal et al. [15] identified the same isoforms for Gomphrena sp., with γ-tocopherol being the most abundant isoform. On the third plant that makes up the T1 tisane (O. basilicum “Cinnamon”), there is no data regarding the composition in tocopherols. In the study carried out by Roriz [10], antagonistic effects were described in mixtures of MAPs as being responsible for differentiating the content in bioactive compounds, namely tocopherols and organic acids, depending on the concentration of the plants. This may explain the differences in relation to the C. citratus plant, since its concentration in T1 tisane may possibly be insignificant and therefore the same composition and content in tocopherols and organic acids was not obtained when compared with the literature.
Regarding the T5 tisane, Ramadan, Asker, and Tadros [60] identified the four isoforms of tocopherol (α, β, γ and δ) in the essential oil of Syzygium aromaticum (cloves) in expressive quantities, with the isoform α- the predominant. In 2015, Gandomani et al. [61] reported an increase in the levels of α-tocopherol in egg yolk when supplementary powder from the sprout of the S. aromaticum plant was added, thus indicating the major contribution of the isoform in this species. For H. androsaemum, it was not possible to find published data related to the content in tocopherols. However, Hosni, Msaâda, Taârit, and Marzouk [62] reported the isoforms α, γ, and δ-tocopherol in four species belonging to the genus Hypericum and identified δ-tocopherol as the most abundant isoform, although its amount presented great variations depending on the species. It was also not possible to find data regarding the content of tocopherols in T. citrodorus; however, this plant also belongs to the order Lamiales, which predominantly presents the isoforms α and γ, as previously mentioned. According to the national reference of food composition, the National Institute Dr. Ricardo Jorge [63], cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) has 0.1 g of total tocopherol for every 100 g of edible part. Thus, the dried extracts from the tisanes can be considered as sources of this type of bioactive compounds and, therefore, can be used in various applications, namely nutraceuticals.

3.3. Evaluation of Bioactive Properties

3.3.1. Antioxidant Activity

The results of the antioxidant activity assays are described in Table 5 and are expressed as IC50 (μg/mL). In the OxHLIA assay, IC50 values were given at two-time intervals (Δt), since natural extracts contain different antioxidant molecules capable of interacting with each other and favoring the protection of cell membranes at different time periods. The five tisanes samples tested showed antioxidant capacity for both assays performed. All showed significant differences, except T3 and T4 tisanes for the TBARS assay, probably because they have a common plant (Mentha x piperita L.) in the composition of their respective extracts that contributed to this activity, as described by Pereira et al. [53]. For the OxHLIA assay, the tisane that presented the best antioxidant activity, and consequently the best antihemolytic action, was the T2 sample, at 120 and 180 min, with an IC50 of 17.8 μg/mL and 30.3 μg/mL, respectively. This result suggests that the compounds present in tisane T2 can reduce hemolytic action by 50% for 120 min and extend for an additional 60 min. For TBARS, the most active tisane was the T5 sample with an IC50 of 5.07 μg/mL, that is the minimum concentration capable of inhibiting 50% of lipid peroxidation. In both assays performed, the lowest activity was shown by the T1 sample.
The IC50 obtained for both assays was lower than the standards used, as shown in Table 5, making these tisanes promising sources of compounds with antioxidant capacity. Similar results were observed for herbal tea plants that have common plants, such as tisanes T2, T5, and T3 with lemon thyme (T. citriodorus).
In the OxHLIA assay, the antioxidant activity was found in the following order: T2 > T3 > T5 in 120 min and T2 > T5 > T3 in 180 min. The inversion of bioactivity presented between T3 and T5 for the times of 120 and 180 min is probably due to the fact that these two herbal teas have different antioxidant molecules depending on the other plants that make up the mixture of herbal teas (in T3 with anise and mint, and in T5 with St. John’s wort, cinnamon and cloves). In the TBARS test, the results of antioxidant activity were ordered as follows: T5 > T2 > T3 = T4, since T3 and T4 have one plant in common (peppermint).
The mechanisms of antioxidant activity related to cells are believed to be through the capture of free radicals and the alteration of cell membrane properties, often due to phenolic compounds, in particular, flavonoids. Some of these compounds can be incorporated into the hydrophobic core of the membrane bilayer, causing a reduction in the fluidity and stability of the membrane. The reduction in fluidity can limit the diffusion of free radicals and improve the antioxidant efficacy of flavonoids; however, how the solubility of these compounds affects the stability of the cell membrane remains uncertain [64].
Therefore, the conviction of the antioxidant activity of plant matrices related to the composition and quantity of phenolic compounds is reinforced. The presence of phenolic acids confers the ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation in pig brain tissues (TBARS), as they exhibit a high antioxidant activity, being grouped into benzoic acids (such as synergic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, and gallic acids) and cinnamic acids (as an example: p-coumaric, ferulic, and caffeic acids), and it can also bond with each other or with other compounds to form potential structures, such as chlorogenic acid (a combination of caffeic acid and quinic acid). The antioxidant potential of phenolic compounds is strongly correlated with the number of hydroxyl groups attached to the aromatic rings. In addition, hydroxyl groups in the ortho and para position increase the anti-oxidative and anti-radical activity of phenolic acids [64].

3.3.2. Antimicrobial Activity

Data on antimicrobial activity based on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) are shown in Table 5. The highest antimicrobial potential for Gram-positive bacteria was showed by tisane T3 (values of 5 to 10 mg/mL for minimal inhibition), except for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for which the most active herbal tea was sample T2. In general, tisane T2 was the only one that had a minimum inhibitory concentration of 20 mg/mL for Gram-negative bacteria, while for the other tisanes (T1, T3, T4, and T5) higher concentrations would have required 20 mg/mL to inhibit the growth of this type of bacteria. The tisane T5 was found to be the lowest potential tisane because it exhibited the highest MIC and MBC values. All tisanes (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) inhibits the bacterial growth of some of the bacteria tested, but none has bactericidal activity.
The antimicrobial activity of aqueous extracts is promising, since organic extracts may present cytotoxicity to the human organism. However, the concentration required for the activity presented by the herbal tea tested in the present study is still relatively high when compared to the same organic extracts [45,46].
Cushnie and Lamb [65] described the antimicrobial capacity of flavonols/flavones (apigenin, naringenin, luteoline, isoflavones, flavanones, quercetin, and their glycosylated derivatives), as these types of molecules show activity against several bacterial strains. This statement agrees with the results obtained in the present work, since the T3 tisane sample presented higher antibacterial capacity for Gram-positive bacteria and, in turn, showed a higher concentration of flavonols/flavones.

3.3.3. Anti-Inflammatory Activity

The results for the anti-inflammatory activity are shown in Table 5. Only two tisanes showed anti-inflammatory action, namely T5 and T4, and the first showed higher activity with an IC50 of 345 μg/mL. The other three tisanes (T1, T2, and T3) presented concentrations above 400 μg/mL, not revealing anti-inflammatory properties.
It was already described in the literature that the individual plants that make up the tisanes mixtures have anti-inflammatory activity, such as C. citratus [10], G. globosa [15,66], T. mastichina [67], Mentha x piperita [19], R. officinalis [23,68], O. basilicum [20], C. officinalis [12], H. androsaemum [16], and Syzygium aromaticum [69]. However, in most cases extracts are obtained using organic solvents.
Jabeur et al. [16] reported the inhibition of nitric oxide production by H. androsaemum hydroethanolic extract (plant present in tisane T5), indicating an anti-inflammatory action for the same trial performed in the present study and it was correlated with the significant amount of chlorogenic acid derivatives present in the extract. These results are in agreement with the results obtained in this study, since in T5 the trans forms of neochlorogenic acid (3-O-caffeoylquinic acid), cis and trans cryptochlorogenic (4-O-caffeoylquinic), and cis and trans forms of chlorogenic acid (5-O-caffeoylquinic) were significantly quantified.
There are other compounds present in tisane T5, which are also attributed to the bioactive property in question, such as luteolin. According to Sung and Lee [70], this flavonoid also exhibits anti-inflammatory properties by suppressing nitric oxide production. Regarding the T4 sample, apigenin, luteolin, coumaric acid, and quercetin were identified as potentially anti-inflammatory compounds, which were referred to above. Although samples T2 and T3 contain some of these compounds as chlorogenic acid, luteolin, and apigenin, these tisanes were not promising sources of anti-inflammatory activity, possibly due to the occurrence of synergistic reactions between the various compounds identified and the low concentration of the compounds referred to as anti-inflammatory potentials when compared to T4 and T5. Therefore, the MAP mixtures present in T4 and T5 have positive effects against inflammatory diseases, although relatively high concentrations are required.

3.3.4. Cytotoxic and Hepatotoxic Activity

The results for the four human tumor cell lines and primary culture of non-tumor pig cells are shown in Table 5. The highest cytotoxic capacity was observed for lung carcinoma tumor cell line (NCl H460). The T4 sample was the tisane with the highest cytotoxic potential, as the lowest GI50 values were observed for three of the four tumor cell lines tested: lung carcinoma (248 μg/mL), cervical adenocarcinoma (HeLa, 253 μg/mL), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2, 264 μg/mL), respectively. For the MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinoma) cell line, the most cytotoxic tisane was T5 with GI50 = 285 μg/mL. The tisane T2 did not show cytotoxic potential for any of the tumor cell lines tested, although it has in its composition lemon thyme (T. citriodorus), which is also present in T4 and T5 extracts, thus reinforcing the important need for further studies on the synergistic and antagonistic effects on mixtures of MAPs in tisanes preparations marketed. The hepatotoxicity was also evaluated for all the samples (Table 4), and a concentration higher than 400 µg/mL was observed in all tisanes, which means that no sample revealed toxicity against PLP2 cells.
The literature describes the cytotoxicity of the individual plants present in the tisane T4. Pereira et al. [53] observed promising effects in the methanolic extract of peppermint (M. piperita) for the same tumor cell lines. For the marigold sample (C. officinalis), it was described by Miguel et al. [50] that this shows cytotoxic activity for the same lines with values greater than 250 μg/mL. The aqueous extract of rosemary did not show antiproliferative effects against tumor cell lines when studied by Gonçalves et al. [71], exposing that the anticancer effects attributed to this plant come from diterpenes [72], which were not identified in the tisane T4. However, the cytotoxic capacity shown by this herbal tea may be related to the other plants belonging to the mixture.

3.3.5. Anti-Tyrosinase Activity

The results of the anti-tyrosinase activity assay based on the inhibition of the tyrosinase enzyme from mushrooms are described in Table 5. The results were expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the enzyme action at a maximum concentration of 8 mg/mL (maximum concentration tested). All samples of herbal teas (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) did not show inhibition capacity of the tyrosinase enzyme at the maximum tested concentration of 8 mg/mL.
Tisanes are not able to specifically inhibit this enzyme from mushrooms. Tyrosinase is an enzyme that contains copper and is widely distributed in microorganisms, animals and plants. Tyrosinase from mushrooms has now become popular because it is widely available [73] and is able to inhibit the formation of neuromelanin associated with the development of Parkinson’s (PD) [74]. The inhibition of this enzyme is one of the main strategies for the treatment of hyperpigmentation, since several dermatological disorders, such as melasma, age spots, and actinic damage, result from the accumulation of an excessive level of epidermal pigmentation, and, therefore, compounds tyrosinase inhibitors have become increasingly important to be incorporated into cosmetic products [72,73,74]. Currently, new sources are sought, preferably natural ones, which are capable of inhibiting tyrosinase, since the inhibitor compounds most commonly used by the industry have many limitations, such as low activity and high cytotoxicity [75].

3.3.6. Antidiabetic Activity

Data on antidiabetic activity based on inhibition of α-glucosidase of fungal and animal origin are shown in Table 5. The α-glucosidase inhibitors are an important class of antidiabetic drugs that prevent the sudden increase in hyperglycemia after meals [76]. The tisanes T1 and T3 did not present a minimum inhibition concentration of 50% of fungal α-glucosidase, therefore, the percentage inhibition was calculated as previously mentioned and demonstrated the ability to inhibit the action of α-glucosidase by 41% and 43%, respectively. The tisane T5 showed the best antidiabetic activity for fungal origin and the only one that presented satisfactory concentration for inhibition of 50% of the enzyme of animal origin. The tisanes T1, T2, T3, and T4 were not sufficiently active for animal activity at the maximum tested concentration of 8 mg/mL.
No data were found for antidiabetic activity for the plants that make up the tisane T5; however, Adisakwattana et al. [77] described the inhibitory activity of potent α-glucosidase for Orthosiphon aristatus belonging to the Lamiaceae family, which corresponds to the same family of T. citriodorus (lemon thyme) present in tisane T5. Among polyphenols, chlorogenic acid has received much attention for several biological activities including excellent inhibition of α-amylase and type II diabetes-linked α-glucosidase [78]. This is in accordance with the present study, since in the T5 sample, the most abundant compounds are chlorogenic acids (CGA) and derivatives.

3.4. Selecting the Most Promisssing Tisane

A principal component analysis was performed in order to better understand the correlations between the phenolic and non-phenolic compounds composition with the bioactive properties in the five studied tisanes samples. The biplot illustrated by Figure 2, joints the relations between precisely the five tisanes (object scores) and their phenolic composition and bioactive properties (component loadings). The first two-dimensions (first: Cronbach’s α, 0.917; eigenvalue, 7.308; second: Cronbach’s α, 0.864; eigenvalue, 5.359) account for most of the total variance (40.8% and 26.1%, respectively).
The first dimension was effective in separating the tisanes samples while taking into account their content in phenolic and non-phenolic compounds; the second dimension was effective in separating the tisanes by their antioxidant and cytotoxic activity, but was particularly effective in the separation of samples by their antidiabetic yeast activity and antimicrobial action against L. monocytogenes and E. faecalis.
T3 sample is positively correlated with the family of compounds TF (total flavonoids), ToC (total other compounds), and TPC (total phenolic compounds), meaning that this sample present the highest concentrations, while being negatively correlated with the bacterial strains L. monocytogenes and E. faecalis (presenting the lowest MIC values, and for that manner the highest antibacterial activity against this strains). TPA (total phenolic acids) is strongly correlated with the T5 sample and is moderately correlated with T2 samples; these two samples’ negative correlation with the vast majority of the bioactive activities studied means lower IC50, GI50, and MIC values, and therefore indicates higher bioactive potential.

4. Conclusions

Comparatively the phenolic composition of tisanes and phenolic acids were the family of compounds that stood out the most (primarily in the T5 sample), due to the presence of chlorogenic acid and rosmarinic acid and their derivatives, both qualitative and quantitative (with the exception of the T3 sample in which there were higher levels of flavonoids). In turn, the family of flavonoids also stood out in all of them, due to the presence of glycosylated derivatives of apigenin, kaempherol, quercetin, luteolin, diosmetin, and calycosin. It was also possible to identify flavanones (glycosylated derivatives of eriodictyol), flavan-3-ols (derived from (epi)catechin) and still other types of no-phenolic compounds (two lignans and a pentacyclc triterpenoid).
With the study of the composition in organic acids and tocopherols, it was found that oxalic acid had higher levels for all samples and it is the T1 sample that revealed the highest total content of organic acids in the dry extract and aqueous preparation. Regarding tocopherols, it was found that in the aqueous preparation of tisanes, no isoform was detected due to the lipid character of this molecule and γ-tocopherol was the most abundant isoform in the dry extract, mainly in T5 sample.
Regarding the results obtained for the various bioactivities studied, it is again the T5 tisane sample that stands out, revealing the highest capacity for the inhibition of lipid peroxidation in the TBARS assay, better cytotoxic potential against the MCF-7 cell line, higher anti-inflammatory activity, and anti-diabetic activity with the inhibition of α-glucosidase of fungal and animal origin (having been the only one to reveal activity for the enzyme of animal origin). For the oxidative hemolysis inhibition test, the T2 sample stands out, revealing the lowest IC50 values for 120 and 180 min. However, the T4 sample is the one that revealed the greatest cytotoxic potential for three cell lines, since it presented lower GI50 values. Regarding antimicrobial activity, the T3 sample showed the lowest MIC values for Gram-positive bacteria. It should be noted that no sample revealed hepatotoxicity against the non-tumor line of pig liver cells. Furthermore, none of the samples showed anti-tyrosinase activity at the maximum tested concentration of 8 mg/mL and for Gram-negative bacteria, the vast majority tisanes did not show very promising results, as they presented MIC and MBC results higher than the maximum tested concentration (20 mg/mL).
The presence of lemon thyme in several of the mixtures of MAPs in tisanes may enhance the most promising results for bioactive activities, since it is present in tisanes with the best evaluated biological properties. The three tisanes in which the lemon thyme makes up the mixture are T2, T4, and T5, which are precisely those that stand out with the highest biological properties. The correlations presented by the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reinforce the correlation between the presence of phenolic and non-phenolic compounds in the five tisanes and its bioactivities.
The antioxidant action of polyphenols presents in tisanes has sparked interest in the food industry as possible natural substitutes for current artificial antioxidants. In addition to their recognized bioactive potential, they also have the ability to inhibit oxidative changes that occur in food. Several groups of polyphenols (anthocyanins, flavanones, and isoflavones) are currently used in industry as components of nutraceuticals and functional foods. The interest within the pharmaceutical industry is to find natural products obtained from plants in relation to the current artificial compounds available for the treatment of different health problems. The development of resistance to antimicrobials, the reappearance of infectious diseases, high production costs, and limited useful life of therapeutic agents are important factors that have encouraged interest in drugs that include derivatives of plant extracts.
Studies like the one proposed with this work are extremely important to chemically characterize the plants commonly used in traditional medicine, adding value to them as sources of molecules that can later be applied in a wide range of industrial sectors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.H.P., M.I.D., J.P., T.C.S.P.P., and A.M.; methodology, L.B., M.J.A., R.C.C., and A.M.; validation, L.B., M.I.D., and R.P.I.; formal analysis, M.I.D. and B.H.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.D., B.H.P., and J.P.; writing—review and editing, L.B., M.I.D., R.P.I., and I.C.F.R.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) and FEDER under Programme PT2020 for financial support to CIMO (UID/AGR/00690/2019); the national funding by FCT, P.I., through the institutional scientific employment program-contract for L. Barros and M.I. Dias contracts, and through the individual scientific employment program-contract for J. Pinela contract (CEECIND/01011/2018); to FEDER-Interreg España-Portugal programme through the project TRANSCoLAB 0612_TRANS_CO_LAB_2_P. This work was also funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Regional Operational Program North 2020, within the scope of Project GreenHealth—Digital strategies in biological assets to improve well-being and promote green health, Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000042; and within the scope of the project “BIOMA—Bioeconomy integrated solutions for the mobilization of the Agro-food market” (POCI-01-0247-FEDER-046112), by “BIOMA” Consortium, through the Incentive System to Research and Technological development, within the Portugal2020 Competitiveness and Internationalization Operational Program. The authors also give thanks to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia (451-03-68/2020-14/200007). The authors are also grateful to the Cantinho das Aromáticas company for providing the tisane samples.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pereira, E.; Antonio, A.L.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Barros, L.; Bento, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Gamma irradiation as a practical alternative to preserve the chemical and bioactive wholesomeness of widely used aromatic plants. Food Res. Int. 2015, 67, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Pohl, P.; Dzimitrowicz, A.; Jedryczko, D.; Szymczycha-Madeja, A.; Welna, M.; Jamroz, P. The determination of elements in herbal teas and medicinal plant formulations and their tisanes. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 130, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Carocho, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. A review on antioxidants, prooxidants and related controversy: Natural and synthetic compounds, screening and analysis methodologies and future perspectives. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Balasundram, N.; Sundram, K.; Samman, S. Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Carvalho, A.M.; Sánchez-Mata, M.C.; Cámara, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Tardío, J. Mediterranean non-cultivated vegetables as dietary sources of compounds with antioxidant and biological activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 55, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Parr, A.J.; Bolwell, G.P. Phenols in the plant and in man. The potential for possible nutritional enhancement of the diet by modifying the phenols content or profile. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 985–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pawlaczyk, I.; Czerchawski, L.; Pilecki, W.; Lamer-Zarawska, E.; Gancarz, R. Polyphenolic-polysaccharide compounds from selected medicinal plants of Asteraceae and Rosaceae families: Chemical characterization and blood anticoagulant activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 77, 568–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dufresne, C.J.; Farnworth, E.R. A review of latest research findings on the health promotion properties of tea. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2001, 12, 404–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Espín, J.C.; García-Conesa, M.T.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Nutraceuticals: Facts and fiction. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 2986–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Roriz, C.L.; Barros, L.; Carvalho, A.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Scientific validation of synergistic antioxidant effects in commercialised mixtures of Cymbopogon citratus and Pterospartum tridentatum or Gomphrena globosa for infusions preparation. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Estrada-Reyes, R.; Aguirre Hernández, E.; García-Argáez, A.; Soto Hernández, M.; Linares, E.; Bye, R.; Heinze, G.; Martínez-Vázquez, M. Comparative chemical composition of Agastache mexicana subsp. mexicana and A. mexicana subsp. xolocotziana. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2004, 32, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Matić, I.Z.; Juranić, Z.; Šavikin, K.; Zdunić, G.; Nadvinski, N.; Goddevac, D. Chamomile and marigold tea: Chemical characterization and evaluation of anticancer activity. Phyther. Res. 2013, 27, 852–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Husain, I.; Ahmad, R.; Chandra, A.; Raza, S.T.; Shukla, Y.; Mahdi, F. Phytochemical characterization and biological activity evaluation of ethanolic extract of Cinnamomum zeylanicum. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 219, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ilyas, M.; Tarnam, A.; Begum, N. Biological potential and phytopharmacological screening of Gomphrena species. Glob. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 3, 58–66. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liberal, Â.; Calhelha, R.C.; Pereira, C.; Adega, F.; Barros, L.; Dueñas, M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Abreu, R.M.V.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. A comparison of the bioactivity and phytochemical profile of three different cultivars of globe amaranth: Red, white, and pink. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Jabeur, I.; Tobaldini, F.; Martins, N.; Barros, L.; Martins, I.; Calhelha, R.C.; Henriques, M.; Silva, S.; Achour, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; et al. Bioactive properties and functional constituents of Hypericum androsaemum L.: A focus on the phenolic profile. Food Res. Int. 2016, 89, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhou, M.; Xing, H.H.; Ma, H.Y.; Zhou, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, G.P.; Hu, W.Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, X.M.; Hu, Q.F. Three new isobenzofurans from Lavandula angustifolia and their bioactivities. Phytochem. Lett. 2017, 19, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chrysargyris, A.; Nikolaidou, E.; Stamatakis, A.; Tzortzakis, N. Vegetative, physiological, nutritional and antioxidant behavior of spearmint (Mentha spicata L.) in response to different nitrogen supply in hydroponics. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2017, 6, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kapp, K.; Hakala, E.; Orav, A.; Pohjala, L.; Vuorela, P.; Püssa, T.; Vuorela, H.; Raal, A. Commercial peppermint (Mentha×piperita L.) teas: Antichlamydial effect and polyphenolic composition. Food Res. Int. 2013, 53, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Flanigan, P.M.; Niemeyer, E.D. Effect of cultivar on phenolic levels, anthocyanin composition, and antioxidant properties in purple basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Food Chem. 2014, 164, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Javanmardi, J.; Stushnoff, C.; Locke, E.; Vivanco, J.M. Antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of Iranian Ocimum accessions. Food Chem. 2003, 83, 547–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kwee, E.M.; Niemeyer, E.D. Variations in phenolic composition and antioxidant properties among 15 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) cultivars. Food Chem. 2011, 128, 1044–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Almeida Gonçalves, G.; De Sá-Nakanishi, A.B.; Comar, J.F.; Bracht, L.; Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Peralta, R.M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Bracht, A. Water soluble compounds of: Rosmarinus officinalis L. improve the oxidative and inflammatory states of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 2328–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pereira, O.R.; Peres, A.M.; Silva, A.M.S.; Domingues, M.R.M.; Cardoso, S.M. Simultaneous characterization and quantification of phenolic compounds in Thymus x citriodorus using a validated HPLC-UV and ESI-MS combined method. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pereira, C.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. A Comparison of the nutritional contribution of thirty-nine aromatic plants used as condiments and/or herbal infusions. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2015, 70, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bessada, S.M.F.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P. Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of Coleostephus myconis (L.) Rchb.f.: An underexploited and highly disseminated species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 89, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Barros, L.; Pereira, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Optimized Analysis of Organic Acids in Edible Mushrooms from Portugal by Ultra Fast Liquid Chromatography and Photodiode Array Detection. Food Anal. Methods 2013, 6, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Souilem, F.; Fernandes, Â.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Barros, L.; Skhiri, F.; Martins, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Wild mushrooms and their mycelia as sources of bioactive compounds: Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic properties. Food Chem. 2017, 230, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lockowandt, L.; Pinela, J.; Roriz, C.L.; Pereira, C.; Abreu, R.M.V.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Barros, L.; Bredol, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical features and bioactivities of cornflower (Centaurea cyanus L.) capitula: The blue flowers and the unexplored non-edible part. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 128, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pires, T.C.S.P.; Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Alves, M.J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of dried Portuguese apple variety (Malus domestica Borkh. cv Bravo de Esmolfe). Food Chem. 2018, 240, 701–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Zengin, G.; Menghini, L.; Malatesta, L.; De Luca, E.; Bellagamba, G.; Uysal, S.; Aktumsek, A.; Locatelli, M. Comparative study of biological activities and multicomponent pattern of two wild Turkish species: Asphodeline anatolica and Potentilla speciosa. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Spínola, V.; Castilho, P.C. Evaluation of Asteraceae herbal extracts in the management of diabetes and obesity. Contribution of caffeoylquinic acids on the inhibition of digestive enzymes activity and formation of advanced glycation end-products (in vitro). Phytochemistry 2017, 143, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Les, F.; Venditti, A.; Cásedas, G.; Frezza, C.; Guiso, M.; Sciubba, F.; Serafini, M.; Bianco, A.; Valero, M.S.; López, V. Everlasting flower (Helichrysum stoechas Moench) as a potential source of bioactive molecules with antiproliferative, antioxidant, antidiabetic and neuroprotective properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 108, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khoza, B.S.; Gbashi, S.; Steenkamp, P.A.; Njobeh, P.B.; Madala, N.E. Identification of hydroxylcinnamoyl tartaric acid esters in Bidens pilosa by UPLC-tandem mass spectrometry. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 103, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Clifford, M.N.; Zheng, W.; Kuhnert, N. Profiling the chlorogenic acids of aster by HPLC–MSn. Phytochem. Anal. 2006, 17, 384–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Clifford, M.N.; Johnston, K.L.; Knight, S.; Kuhnert, N. Hierarchical scheme for LC-MSnidentification of chlorogenic acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2900–2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Souilem, F.; Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Harzallah-Skhiri, F.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profile and bioactive properties of carissa macrocarpa (Eckl.) A.DC.: An in vitro comparative study between leaves, stems, and flowers. Molecules 2019, 24, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Pires, T.C.S.P.; Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Edible flowers as sources of phenolic compounds with bioactive potential. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 580–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ozarowski, M.; Mikolajczak, P.L.; Bogacz, A.; Gryszczynska, A.; Kujawska, M.; Jodynis-Liebert, J.; Piasecka, A.; Napieczynska, H.; Szulc, M.; Kujawski, R.; et al. Rosmarinus officinalis L. leaf extract improves memory impairment and affects acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase activities in rat brain. Fitoterapia 2013, 91, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pacifico, S.; Galasso, S.; Piccolella, S.; Kretschmer, N.; Pan, S.P.; Nocera, P.; Lettieri, A.; Bauer, R.; Monaco, P. Winter wild fennel leaves as a source of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant polyphenols. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tahir, N.I.; Shaari, K.; Abas, F.; Parveez, G.K.A.; Ishak, Z.; Ramli, U.S. Characterization of apigenin and luteolin derivatives from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Leaf using LC-ESI-MS/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11201–11210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dias, M.I.; Barros, L.; Fernandes, I.P.; Ruphuy, G.; Oliveira, M.B.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. A bioactive formulation based on Fragaria vesca L. vegetative parts: Chemical characterisation and application in κ-carrageenan gelatin. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 16, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Majdi, C.; Pereira, C.; Dias, M.I.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Frih, B.; Charrouf, Z.; Barros, L.; Amaral, J.S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phytochemical characterization and bioactive properties of cinnamon basil (Ocimum basilicum cv. ‘cinnamon’) and lemon basil (ocimum x citriodorum). Antioxidants 2020, 9, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ziani, B.E.C.; Heleno, S.A.; Bachari, K.; Dias, M.I.; Alves, M.J.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic compounds characterization by LC-DAD- ESI/MSn and bioactive properties of Thymus algeriensis Boiss. & Reut. and Ephedra alata Decne. Food Res. Int. 2019, 116, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ribeiro, A.; Caleja, C.; Barros, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Rosemary extracts in functional foods: Extraction, chemical characterization and incorporation of free and microencapsulated forms in cottage cheese. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 2185–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Rita, I.; Pereira, C.; Barros, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Mentha spicata L. infusions as sources of antioxidant phenolic compounds: Emerging reserve lots with special harvest requirements. Food Funct. 2016, 7, 4188–4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jaiswal, R.; Kiprotich, J.; Kuhnert, N. Determination of the hydroxycinnamate profile of 12 members of the Asteraceae family. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 781–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Kiss, A.K. Determination of the phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of Salvia viridis L. Shoots: A comparison of aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts. Molecules 2018, 23, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Xu, H.; Zhao, C.F.; Tian, G.G.; Qian, L.R.; Yu, L.J. Characterization of active constituents in Pyracantha fortuneana fruit extract and their effects on hyperlipidaemia, obesity, and oxidative stress in rodents. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 22, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Miguel, M.G.; Cruz, C.; Faleiro, L.; Simoes, M.T.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G. Foeniculum vulgare essential oils: Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rita, I.; Pereira, C.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Exploring reserve lots of Cymbopogon citratus, Aloysia citrodora and Thymus × citriodorus as improved sources of phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 2018, 257, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Roriz, C.L.; Barros, L.; Carvalho, A.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Pterospartum tridentatum, Gomphrena globosa and Cymbopogon citratus: A phytochemical study focused on antioxidant compounds. Food Res. Int. 2014, 62, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pereira, E.; Pimenta, A.I.; Calhelha, R.C.; Antonio, A.L.; Barros, L.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Verde, S.C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Infusions of gamma irradiated Aloysia citrodora L. and Mentha x piperita L.: Effects on phenolic composition, cytotoxicity, antibacterial and virucidal activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 97, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Manthey, J.A.; Guthrie, N. Antiproliferative activities of citrus flavonoids against six human cancer cell lines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5837–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ferreira, I.; Barros, L.; Abreu, R. Antioxidants in Wild Mushrooms. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 1543–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Liu, J. Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid: Research perspectives. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 100, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hung, T.M.; Na, M.K.; Thuong, P.T.; Su, N.D.; Sok, D.E.; Song, K.S.; Seong, Y.H.; Bae, K.H. Antioxidant activity of caffeoyl quinic acid derivatives from the roots of Dipsacus asper Wall. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Raybaudi-Massilia, R.M.; Mosqueda-Melgar, J.; Martín-Belloso, O. Antimicrobial activity of malic acid against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in apple, pear and melon juices. Food Control 2009, 20, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Carocho, M.; Barros, L.; Antonio, A.L.; Barreira, J.C.M.; Bento, A.; Kaluska, I.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Analysis of organic acids in electron beam irradiated chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.): Effects of radiation dose and storage time. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 55, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ramadan, K.S.; Khalil, O.A.; Danial, E.N.; Alnahdi, H.S.; Ayaz, N.O. Hypoglycemic and hepatoprotective activity of Rosmarinus officinalis extract in diabetic rats. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 69, 779–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Taheri Gandomani, V.; Mahdavi, A.H.; Rahmani, H.R.; Riasi, A.; Jahanian, E. Effects of different levels of clove bud (Syzygium aromaticum) on performance, intestinal microbial colonization, jejunal morphology, and immunocompetence of laying hens fed different n-6 to n-3 ratios. Livest. Sci. 2014, 167, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hosni, K.; Msaâda, K.; Taârit, M.B.; Marzouk, B. Fatty acid composition and tocopherol content in four Tunisian Hypericum species: Hypericum perforatum, Hypericum tomentosum, Hypericum perfoliatum and Hypericum ericoides Ssp. Roberti. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, S2736–S2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IP; Instituto Nacional de Estatística, IP. INSA-Inquérito Nacional de Saúde; Instituto Nacional de Estatística: Lisboa, Portugal, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  64. Chen, Y.; Deuster, P. Comparison of quercetin and dihydroquercetin: Antioxidant-independent actions on erythrocyte and platelet membrane. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2009, 182, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cushnie, T.P.T.; Lamb, A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Silva, L.R.; Valentão, P.; Faria, J.; Ferreres, F.; Sousa, C.; Gil-Izquierdo, A.; Pinho, B.R.; Andrade, P.B. Phytochemical investigations and biological potential screening with cellular and non-cellular models of globe amaranth (Gomphrena globosaL.) inflorescences. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Méndez-Tovar, I.; Sponza, S.; Asensio-S-Manzanera, M.C.; Novak, J. Contribution of the main polyphenols of Thymus mastichina subsp: Mastichina to its antioxidant properties. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 66, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Andrade, J.M.; Faustino, C.; Garcia, C.; Ladeiras, D.; Reis, C.P.; Rijo, P. Rosmarinus officinalis L.: An update review of its phytochemistry and biological activity. Futur. Sci. OA 2018, 4, FSO283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ryu, B.; Kim, H.M.; Woo, J.H.; Choi, J.H.; Jang, D.S. A new acetophenone glycoside from the flower buds of Syzygium aromaticum (cloves). Fitoterapia 2016, 115, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sung, J.; Lee, J. Anti-inflammatory activity of butein and luteolin through suppression of NFκB activation and induction of heme oxygenase-1. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Correa, V.G.; Gonçalves, G.A.; de Sá-Nakanishi, A.B.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barros, L.; Dias, M.I.; Koehnlein, E.A.; de Souza, C.G.M.; Bracht, A.; Peralta, R.M. Effects of in vitro digestion and in vitro colonic fermentation on stability and functional properties of yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis A. St. Hil.) beverages. Food Chem. 2017, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Petiwala, S.M.; Johnson, J.J. Diterpenes from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis): Defining their potential for anti-cancer activity. Cancer Lett. 2015, 367, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Seo, S.Y.; Sharma, V.K.; Sharma, N. Mushroom tyrosinase: Recent prospects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2837–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Miyazawa, M.; Tamura, N. Inhibitory compound of tyrosinase activity from the sprout of Polygonum hydropiper L. (Benitade). Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 595–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Nerya, O.; Musa, R.; Khatib, S.; Tamir, S.; Vaya, J. Chalcones as potent tyrosinase inhibitors: The effect of hydroxyl positions and numbers. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kumar, D.; Ghosh, R.; Pal, B.C. α-Glucosidase inhibitory terpenoids from Potentilla fulgens and their quantitative estimation by validated HPLC method. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Adisakwattana, S.; Jiphimai, P.; Prutanopajai, P.; Chanathong, B.; Sapwarobol, S.; Ariyapitipan, T. Evaluation of α-glucosidase, α-amylase and protein glycation inhibitory activities of edible plants. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2010, 61, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Oboh, G.; Agunloye, O.M.; Adefegha, S.A.; Akinyemi, A.J.; Ademiluyi, A.O. Caffeic and chlorogenic acids inhibit key enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes (in vitro): A comparative study. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 26, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Description of the medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) that constituted the five samples tisanes.
Figure 1. Description of the medicinal and aromatic plants (MAPs) that constituted the five samples tisanes.
Foods 10 00475 g001aFoods 10 00475 g001b
Figure 2. Biplot of object scores (plant tisanes, blue dots) and component loadings (families of phenolic compounds and some bioactive properties, black dots) from CATPCA. The first two dimensions (first: Cronbach’s α, 0.917; eigenvalue, 7.308; second: Cronbach’s α, 0.864; eigenvalue, 5.359) account for most of the variance.
Figure 2. Biplot of object scores (plant tisanes, blue dots) and component loadings (families of phenolic compounds and some bioactive properties, black dots) from CATPCA. The first two dimensions (first: Cronbach’s α, 0.917; eigenvalue, 7.308; second: Cronbach’s α, 0.864; eigenvalue, 5.359) account for most of the variance.
Foods 10 00475 g002
Table 1. Applicability, common uses, and biological properties of the MAPs that constituted the five samples tisanes.
Table 1. Applicability, common uses, and biological properties of the MAPs that constituted the five samples tisanes.
PlantFamilyApplicability/Common UsesBioactive PropertiesRef.
Agastache foeniculum (Pursh) KuntzeLamiaceaeMedicine Antimicrobial[11]
Calendula officinalis L.AsteraceaeCosmetic, medicinal, food, and colorantAnti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antimicrobial[12]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum BlumeLauraceaeFoodAntitumor and antidiabetics[13]
Cymbopogon citratus (D.C.) StapfPoaceaeCosmetic, pharmaceutical, and infusion Antioxidant, intestinal anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antidiabetics [10]
Gomphrena globosa L.AmaranthaceaeInfusionAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetics [14]
Gomphrena sp.AmaranthaceaeBioactive and infusion Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antitumor [15]
Hypericum androsaemum L.HypericaceaeMedicine Anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antiviral[16]
Lavandula angustifolia Mill.LamiaceaePerfumery, cosmetics, and medicineAntimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, and cytotoxic[17]
Mentha spicata L.LamiaceaeFood, pharmaceutical, perfumery, confectioneryAntioxidant, antimicrobial, and neuroprotective effects[18]
Mentha x piperita L.LamiaceaeFood, infusionAntioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory[19]
Ocimum basilicum L.LamiaceaeFoodAnti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and neuroprotective effects[20]
Ocimum basilicum "Cinnamon”LabiataeFlavoring agent and essential oilAntioxidant and antimicrobial[21,22]
Rosmarinus officinalis L.LamiaceaeCulinary and medicineAntioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and anti-diabetic[23]
Syzygium aromaticum L.MyrtaceaeMedicine Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-tumor[23]
Thymus mastichina L.LamiaceaeFood, cosmetics, and infusionAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antifungal[23]
Thymus x citriodorus (Pers.) SchrebLamiaceaeFood, infusionAntimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant[24,25]
Table 2. Retention time (Rt), wavelengths of maximum absorption in the visible region (λmax), mass spectral data, and tentative identification of phenolic and non-phenolic compounds found in the tisanes prepared from five MAP mixtures (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5).
Table 2. Retention time (Rt), wavelengths of maximum absorption in the visible region (λmax), mass spectral data, and tentative identification of phenolic and non-phenolic compounds found in the tisanes prepared from five MAP mixtures (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5).
PeakRt (min)λmax (nm)[M-H] (m/z)MS2 (m/z)Tentative IdentificationReference/Method Used for Identification
14.75263/325311179(72),149(100),135(5)Caftaric acid[33]
24.79324353191(100),179(49),173(10),135(12)3-O-Caffeoylquinic acidDAD/MS [34,35]
35.5280359197(100),153(8),113(5)Syringic acid hexoside[36]
45.81312295163(100),149(5),119(5)Coutaric acid[33]
56.31264325163(100),119(18)p-Coumaric acid hexoside[37]
66.62324353191(80),179(9),173(100),135(5)cis 4-O-Caffeoylquinic acid[34,35]
76.67290/321325193(100),149(5),134(5)Fertaric acid[33]
87.06285611449(100),287(13)Eriodictyol-O-dihexoside[33]
97.11324353191(100),179(5),173(5),135(5)trans 4-O-Caffeoylquinic acid[34,35]
107.87325353191(100),179(9),173(5),135(5)cis 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid[34,35]
118.41281387369(25),207(100),163(41),119(5)Medioresinol[38,39]
128.54321353191(100),179(12),173(5),135(5)trans 5-O-Caffeoylquinic acid[34,35]
139.95325593473(100),383(13),353(21),325(5)Apigenin-C-hexoside-C-hexoside[40]
1410.05322179135(100)Caffeic acidDAD/MS
1511.1281865739(83),713(50),695(100),577(77),425(12),407(10),289(5),287(12)Type B (epi)-catechin trimer[41]
1611.44279325163(100),145(5),119(8)p-Coumaric acid hexoside[37]
1712.122831153865(37),577(12),561(5),289(5),287(5)Type B (epi)-catechin tetramer[41]
1812.22327473311(100),293(98),179(61),149(80),135(5)cis Chicoric acid[42]
1912.3327473311(100),293(95),179(50),149(55),135(5)trans Chicoric acid[42]
2012.59324637461(100),285(15)Kaempherol-O-diglucuronideDAD/MS
2113.46346637285(100)Luteolin-O-diglucuronideDAD/MS
2214.47330555537(100),493(12),359(10),179(5),161(5)Salvianolic acid K isomer[43]
2314.5285/325537493(100),359(34),313(13),295(4),269(3),197(5),179(5)Lithospermic acid A[44]
2415.16284595287(100)Eriodictyol-O-deoxyhexosyl-hexoside[45]
2515.18341477301(100)Quercetin-O-glucuronide[46]
2615.8344463301(100)Quercetin-3-O-glucosideDAD/MS
2715.99282463287(100)Eriodictyol-O-glucuronideDAD/MS
2816.96342769315(100)Isorhamnetin-O-di-deoxyhexosyl-hexoside[46]
2917.37322521359(100),197(45),179(40),161(15),135(5)Rosmarinic acid hexoside[44]
3017.69343609301(100)Quercetin-3-O-rutinosideDAD/MS
3117.98345593285(100)Luteolin-O-deoxyhexosyl-hexoside[45]
3218.02346593285(100)Luteolin-7-O-rutinosideDAD/MS
3318.07348477301(100)Quercetin-O-glucuronide[46]
3418.38347461285(100)Luteolin-7-O-glucosideDAD/MS
3518.93347461285(100)Luteolin-O-glucuronide[46]
3618.57280717519(100),475(20),339(7),321(5)Salvianolic acid B[44]
3718.96281/327487325(90),307(51),293(100),193(5),179(12)Feruloylcaffeoyl tartaric acid[38]
3819.2347521359(100),197(44),179(38),161(14),135(5)Rosmarinic acid hexoside[44]
3919.29282/323719539(24),521(17),339(100),197(10),179(5),161(5),135(5)Sagerinic acid[44]
4019.85337717537(40),519(100),493(5),359(10),339(5),321(5),295(5),197(5),179(5)Salvianolic acid B isomer[44]
4120.17340549505(100),301(10)Quercetin-O-malonylhexosideDAD/MS
4221.92330359197(29),179(36),161(100),135(5)Rosmarinic acidDAD/MS
4322.25325555537(5),511(8),493(45),311(100),197(5),179(5),161(5),135(5)Salvianolic acid K[43]
4423.92340533489(100),285(10)Luteolin-O-malonylhexosideDAD/MS
4524.05341549387(100),369(21),207(50),163(41),119(5)Medioresinol caffeate[38,39]
4624.71333461285(100)Luteolin-O-glucuronide[46]
4725.51335475299(100),285(5)methylluteolin-O-hexuronide (chrysoeriol hexuronide)[47]
4825.85331717537(10),519(100),493(5),359(5),339(21),321(50),295(9),197(5),179(5)Salvianolic acid B isomer[44]
4925.97324537493(100),359(10),313(6),295(6),269(5),197(5),179(5)Lithospermic acid A[44]
5028.17330517473(20),269(100)Apigenin-O-malonylhexosideDAD/MS
5129.02331503285(100)Luteolin-O-malonylpentosideDAD/MS
5229.71341547503(50),299(100)Diosmetin-O-malonylhexosideDAD/MS
5330.17284/329537493(100),439(51),197(24),179(6),359(20)Lithospermic acid A isomer 2[44]
5430.48280/339493359(100),313(15),295(9),269(7),197(5),179(5)Salvianolic acid A[45]
5530.84330503285(100)Luteolin-O-malonylpentosideDAD/MS
5633268/331677659(21),451(100),367(10),225(20)Unkwown-
5734.19290791773(100),678(11),546(2),451(35),337(2),225(11)Oleanolic acid derivative[48]
5835.77268/3331063771(100),283(50),269(10)Unkwown-
5936.87338589545(100),299(5)Diosmetin-malonyl methyl hexosideDAD/MS
6038.08269/329283269(100)Calycosin[49]
6140.01269/329573283(100)Calycosin derivativeDAD/MS
6240.36268/329533283(100)Calycosin derivativeDAD/MS
6341.83268/330573283(100)Calycosin derivativeDAD/MS
Table 3. Quantification (mg/g of extract) of the phenolic and non-phenolic compounds present in tisanes prepared from five MAP mixtures (mean ± SD).
Table 3. Quantification (mg/g of extract) of the phenolic and non-phenolic compounds present in tisanes prepared from five MAP mixtures (mean ± SD).
PeakT1T2T3T4T5t-Students Test
p-Value
1 A0.41 ± 0.01ndndndnd-
2 Bndndndnd3.13 ± 0.14-
3 Cnd0.163 ± 0.002ndndnd-
4 D0.143 ± 0.001ndnd0.151 ± 0.002nd0.001
5 End0.863 ± 0.01nd0.29 ± 0.01nd<0.001
6 Bndnd0.69 ± 0.02nd0.63 ± 0.03<0.001
7 F0.172 ± 0.002ndndndnd-
8 Gnd0.086 ± 0.004nd0.115 ± 0.004nd-
9 Bndnd1.19 ± 0.02nd30.88 ± 1.17<0.001
10 Bndndndnd3.66 ± 0.01-
11 Dnd0.215 ± 0.004ndndnd-
12 Bndndndnd2.07 ± 0.06-
13 Hnd1.016 ± 0.003 and0.606 ± 0.002 b0.442 ± 0.001 c-
14 A0.1303 ± 0.002nd0.15 ± 0.01ndnd0.001
15 Indndndnd1.65 ± 0.03-
16 End1.07 ± 0.03ndndnd-
17 Indndndnd1.98 ± 0.76-
18 A2.69 ± 0.05ndnd0.263 ± 0.004nd<0.001
19 A0.82 ± 0.01ndnd0.49 ± 0.02nd<0.001
20 Jndtrndndnd-
21 Jndnd2.47 ± 0.042.27 ± 0.08nd<0.001
22 K2.33 ± 0.01ndnd1.29 ± 0.01nd<0.001
23 Kndnd0.747 ± 0.004ndnd-
24 Gndnd6.49 ± 0.235.77 ± 0.12nd<0.001
25 Jnd1.52 ± 0.03ndnd0.90 ± 0.01<0.001
26 Lnd4.58 ± 0.18ndndnd-
27 Gndndnd1.996 ± 0.0033.17 ± 0.07-
28 Jndndnd1.19 ± 0.01nd-
29 Knd1.99 ± 0.01ndndnd-
30 J0.23 ± 0.003ndnd1.59 ± 0.01nd-
31 Jndndnd3.533 ± 0.003nd-
32 Jndnd5.91 ± 0.02ndnd-
33 Jndndndnd2.29 ± 0.01-
34 Lnd8.73 ± 0.11 d7.05 ± 0.13 c10.08 ± 0.22 b15.92 ± 0.34 a-
35 Lnd3.17 ± 0.04ndnd8.09 ± 0.25<0.001
36 K0.61 ± 0.01ndndndnd-
37 F0.107 ± 0.004ndndndnd-
38 Knd6.12 ± 0.121.23 ± 0.02ndnd<0.001
39 K0.828 ± 0.013 cndnd1.84 ± 0.05 a1.55 ± 0.07 b-
40 Kndnd1.71 ± 0.071.79 ± 0.01nd<0.001
41 J1.19 ± 0.05ndndndnd-
42 K10.84 ± 0.14 d20.78 ± 0.34 b22.65 ± 0.33 a20.66 ± 0.26 b19.9 ± 0.13 c-
43 Knd9.60 ± 0.39ndndnd-
44 Jndnd0.278 ± 0.005ndnd-
45 Dndnd3.16 ± 0.02ndnd-
46 Jndnd1.19 ± 0.040.88 ± 0.03nd<0.001
47 Jnd0.68 ± 0.01ndndnd-
48 Kndnd3.34 ± 0.025.46 ± 0.19nd-
49 K6.84 ± 0.09 andnd1.14 ± 0.03 c5.61 ± 0.09 b-
50 Mndnd1.03 ± 0.01ndnd-
51 Jndndnd0.40 ± 0.02nd-
52 Gndnd36.04 ± 0.05ndnd-
53 Kndndnd0.95 ± 0.01nd-
54 K2.59 ± 0.03ndndnd0.87 ± 0.01<0.001
55 Jndndnd0.080 ± 0.001nd-
56ndndnqndnd-
57ndndndndnq-
58ndndnqndnd-
59 Gndnd0.026 ± 0.001ndnd-
60 Kndnd1.07 ± 0.06ndnd-
61 Kndnd0.25 ± 0.01ndnd-
62 Kndnd7.28 ± 0.13ndnd-
63 Kndnd9.22 ± 0.21ndnd-
TPA28.51 ± 0.28 e40.59 ± 0.13 b31.73 ± 0.23 d34.34 ± 0.10 c68.30 ± 0.78 a-
TiFndnd17.81 ± 0.14ndnd-
TFand0.086 ± 0.004 d6.495 ± 0.23 b7.88 ± 0.12 a3.17 ± 0.07 c-
TFo1.42 ± 0.05 e19.7 ± 0.3 d53.98 ± 0.08 a20.58 ± 0.19 c27.66 ± 0.08 b-
TF3Ondndndnd3.64 ± 0.04-
TOCnd0.215 ± 0.0043.16 ± 0.02ndnd<0.001
TPC29.93 ± 0.34 e60.58 ± 0.45 d113.19 ± 0.68 a62.79 ± 0.41 c102.78 ± 0.84 b-
nd—not detected; tr—traces; nq—non quantifiable. TPA—Total Phenolic acids; TiF—Total isoflavones; TFa—Total flavanones: TFo—Total flavonoids; TF3O—Total flavan-3-ol; TOC—Total other compounds; TPC—Total phenolic compounds. Standard calibration curves used for quantification in each peak: A—caffeic acid; B—chlorogenic acid; C—syringic acid; D—cinnamic; E—p-coumaric acid; F—ferulic acid; G—naringenin; H—apigenin-6-C-glucoside; I—catequin; J—quercetin-3-O-rutinoside; K—rosmarinic acid; L—quercetin-3-O-glucoside; and M—apigenin-7-O-glucoside. ANOVA analysis—In each row different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Characterization of organic acids and tocopherols in mixtures of dried tisanes (extracts) and infusions preparations (mean ± SD).
Table 4. Characterization of organic acids and tocopherols in mixtures of dried tisanes (extracts) and infusions preparations (mean ± SD).
ExtractsInfusion Preparations
T1T2T3T4T5T1T2T3T4T5
Organic acids (g/100 g·dw)(mg/100 mL)
Oxalic acid2.47 ± 0.01 a0.38 ± 0.002 d1.30 ± 0.02 b0.79 ± 0.01 ctr98 ± 1 a6.9 ± 0.1 d16.8 ± 0.3 c21.1 ± 0.5 btr
Quinic acid1.65 ± 0.07 a0.10 ± 0.04 d1.00 ± 0.08 c1.33 ± 0.09 bnd69 ± 1 a2.8 ± 0.1 d28 ± 1 c33 ± 1 bnd
Malic acid0.48 ± 0.03 a0.36 ± 0.02 d0.41 ± 0.01 c0.43 ± 0.01 btr68 ± 1 a11.5 ± 0.3 b11 ± 1 b10.5 ± 0.1 ctr
Fumaric acidndndndndtrndndndndtr
Sum4.59 ± 0.09 a0.83 ± 0.07 d2.71 ± 0.08 b2.54 ± 0.09 ctr234 ± 3 a21.2 ± 0.4 d56 ± 2 c65 ± 1 btr
Tocopherols(mg/100 g·dw)(mg/100 mL)
α-Tocopherol12.2 ± 0.9 a3.3 ± 0.3 c0.87 ± 0.01 e3.5 ± 0.2 b2.3 ± 0.1 dndndndndnd
γ-Tocopherol35.8 ± 0.4 bnd4.71 ± 0.01 d11.2 ± 0.3 c109 ± 5 andndndndnd
Sum48.0 ± 0.6 b3.3 ± 0.3 e5.58 ± 0.01 d14.7 ± 0.3 c112 ± 5 andndndndnd
dw—dry weight basis; nd—not detected; tr—traces. ANOVA analysis—In each row different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Bioactive properties of the five tisanes prepared from five MAP mixtures (mean ± SD).
Table 5. Bioactive properties of the five tisanes prepared from five MAP mixtures (mean ± SD).
T1T2T3T4T5
Antioxidant Activity
(IC50 values, μg mL) A
OxHLIA
Δt = 120
27.9 ± 0.2 a17.8 ± 0.2 e22.0 ± 0.2 d25.2 ± 0.3 b23.4 ± 0.3 c
Δt = 18045.3 ± 0.3 a30.3 ± 0.3 e36.5 ± 0.2 c37.3 ± 0.2 b34.4 ± 0.7 d
TBARS inhibition13.2 ± 0.3 a7.4 ± 0.1 c9.7 ± 0.3 b9.8 ± 0.1 b5.07 ± 0.04 d
Antimicrobial activity
(mg/mL) B
MICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBCMICMBC
Gram-negative bacteria
Escherichia coli20>2020>20>20>20>20>2020>20
Klebsiella pneumoniae20>2020>20>20>20>20>20>20>20
Morganella morganii>20>2020>20>20>20>20>20>20>20
Proteus mirabilis>20>20>20>20>20>20>20>20>20>20
Pseudomonas aeruginosa>20>2020>20>20>20>20>20>20>20
Gram-positive bacteria
Enterococcus faecalis10>2020>205>2010>20>20>20
Listeria monocytogenes5>20>20>205>2020>20>20>20
MRSA10>202.5>2010>205>2010>20
Anti-inflammatory activity
(IC50 values µg/mL) C
RAW 264.7>400>400>400354 ± 6 *345 ± 9 *
Cytotoxicity Activity
(GI50 values µg/mL) D
HepG2311 ± 9 a>400299 ± 9 b264 ± 15 c316 ± 13 a
NCI H460257 ± 9 b>400>400248 ± 10 c317 ± 8 a
HeLa294 ± 14 b>400>400253 ± 8 c313 ± 5 a
MCF7320 ± 3 a>400>400308 ± 13 b285 ± 10 c
Hepatotoxicity
(GI50 values µg/mL) D
PLP2>400>400>400>400>400
Anti-tyrosinase
(IC50 values mg/mL or PI at 8 mg/mL) E
Mushroom tyrosinase inhibition>8>8>8>8>8
Antidiabetic activity
(IC50 values µg/mL or PI at 8 mg/mL) F
Mammalian α-glucosidase inhibition>8>8>8>837 ± 6
Yeast α-glucosidase inhibition41% ± 4%1.19 ± 0.0243% ± 3%6.9 ± 0.40.054 ± 0.003
A Trolox IC50 values: 5.8 ± 0,6 μg/mL (TBARS), 41 ± 3 μg/mL (OxHLIA 120 min) and 64 ± 2 μg/mL (OxHLIA 180 min); B Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid (E. Coli ≤ 8/4, S; K. pneumoniae ≤ 8/4, S; K. pneumoniae ESBL ≥ 32, R; M. morganii > 16/8, R); E Amikacin (E. Coli ESBL 16, I); F Vancomycin (E. faecalis, MRSA, and MSSA ≤ 2, S); G Ampicillin (L. monocytogenes ≤ 0.2, S). S—susceptible; I—intermediate; R—resistant. This classification was made according to the interpretative breakpoints suggested by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST); C Dexamethaxone IC50 value: 16 ± 1 μg/mL; D Ellipticine GI50 values: 1.1 ± 0.2 μg/mL (HepG2), 1.03 ± 0.09 μg/mL (NCI-H460), 1.91 ± 0.06 μg/mL (HeLa), 0.91 ± 0.04 μg/mL (MCF-7), and 3.2 ± 0.7 μg/mL (PLP2); E Kojic acid IC50 values: 0.078 ± 0.001 μg/mL; F Acarbose IC50 values: 0.83 ± 0.02 μg/mL (yeast) and 0.86 ± 0.01 μg/mL (rat). In each row and for the different extraction procedure, different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05). * p-value resulting from the Student t test: <0.001. MIC—minimum inhibitory concentration. MBC—minimum bactericidal concentration.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paschoalinotto, B.H.; Dias, M.I.; Pinela, J.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Alves, M.J.; Mocan, A.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barros, L.; Ineu, R.P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phytochemical Characterization and Evaluation of Bioactive Properties of Tisanes Prepared from Promising Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Foods 2021, 10, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020475

AMA Style

Paschoalinotto BH, Dias MI, Pinela J, Pires TCSP, Alves MJ, Mocan A, Calhelha RC, Barros L, Ineu RP, Ferreira ICFR. Phytochemical Characterization and Evaluation of Bioactive Properties of Tisanes Prepared from Promising Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Foods. 2021; 10(2):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paschoalinotto, Beatriz H., Maria Inês Dias, José Pinela, Tânia C.S.P. Pires, Maria José Alves, Andrei Mocan, Ricardo C. Calhelha, Lillian Barros, Rafael P. Ineu, and Isabel C.F.R. Ferreira. 2021. "Phytochemical Characterization and Evaluation of Bioactive Properties of Tisanes Prepared from Promising Medicinal and Aromatic Plants" Foods 10, no. 2: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop