Effects of Stocking and Transport Conditions on Physicochemical Properties of Meat and Acute-Phase Proteins in Cattle
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethical Note
2.1.1. Housing and Management
2.1.2. Animals, Transport, and Treatment
2.1.3. Blood Sampling
2.1.4. Slaughtering Procedure
2.1.5. Muscle Sampling and Storage
2.1.6. Color
2.1.7. Muscle pH
2.1.8. Water Holding Capacity
2.1.9. Shear Force
2.1.10. Muscle Glycogen
2.1.11. Malondialdehyde Assay (MDA)
2.1.12. Acute Phase Proteins
2.1.13. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Meat Color Values (L*, a*, and b* H*)
3.1.1. Muscle pH
3.1.2. Muscle Glycogen
3.1.3. Water Holding Capacity
3.1.4. Shear Force
3.1.5. Meat Lipid Oxidation
3.1.6. Acute Phase Proteins
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Warriss, P. The handling of cattle pre-slaughter and its effects on carcass and meat quality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990, 28, 171–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adenkola, A.Y.; Ayo, J.; Sackey, A.K.B.; Adelaiye, A.B. Haematological and serum biochemical changes in pigs administered with ascorbic acid and transported by road for four hours during the harmattan season. J. Cell Anim. Biol. 2009, 3, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, C. Lowering Stress in Transported Goats; Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food—Livestock Technology Branch: Guelph, ON, Canada, 2002.
- Grandin, T. Livestock Handling and Transport, 2nd ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Gosálvez, L.; Averós, X.; Valdelvira, J.; Herranz, A. Influence of season, distance and mixed loads on the physical and carcass integrity of pigs transported to slaughter. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazzone, G.; Vignola, G.; Giammarco, M.; Manetta, A.; Lambertini, L. Effects of loading methods on rabbit welfare and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jolley, P.D. Rabbit transport and its effects on meat quality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990, 28, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warriss, P.D. Meat Science: An Introductory Text; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- La Lama, G.C.M.-D.; Monge, P.; Villarroel, M.; Olleta, J.L.; García-Belenguer, S.; María, G.A. Effects of road type during transport on lamb welfare and meat quality in dry hot climates. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2011, 43, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van De Water, G.; Verjans, F.; Geers, R. The effect of short distance transport under commercial conditions on the physiology of slaughter calves; pH and colour profiles of veal. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 82, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndazo, S.M.; Joseph, O.A.; Minka, N.S.; Ayo, J.O. Effects of transportation positions and orientations on muscular damage of goats transported by road for 12 h during the hot-dry conditions. J. Veter. Med. Anim. Health 2014, 6, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gregory, N.G. Animal Welfare and Meat Science; CABI Pub.: Wallingford, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- De la Fuente, J.; Sánchez, M.; Pérez, C.; Lauzurica, S.; Vieira, C.; De Chávarri, E.G.; Díaz, M. Physiological response and carcass and meat quality of suckling lambs in relation to transport time and stocking density during transport by road. Animal 2010, 4, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ospina-Rojas, I.; Murakami, A.E.; Eyng, C.; Nunes, R.; Duarte, C.; Vargas, M. Commercially available amino acid supplementation of low-protein diets for broiler chickens with different ratios of digestible glycine+serine:lysine. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 3148–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Sanchez, M.; Vieira-Aller, C.; De-La-Fuente-Vazquez, J.; Perez-Marcos, C.; Lauzurica-Gomez, S.; Gonzalez-De-Chavarri, E.; Diaz-Diaz-Chiron, M.T. Effect of season and stocking density during transport on carcass and meat quality of suckling lambs. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2013, 11, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gade, P.B.; Christensen, L. Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in Danish slaughter pigs. Meat Sci. 1998, 48, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.H.; Woo, J.H.; Lee, C.Y. Effects of Stocking Density and Transportation Time of Market Pigs on Their Behaviour, Plasma Concentrations of Glucose and Stress-associated Enzymes and Carcass Quality. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 17, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambertini, L.; Vignola, G.; Badiani, A.; Zaghini, G.; Formigoni, A. The effect of journey time and stocking density during transport on carcass and meat quality in rabbits. Meat Sci. 2006, 72, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knowles, T.G. A review of the road transport of cattle. Veter. Rec. 1999, 144, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broom, D.M. Transport stress in cattle and sheep with details of physiological, ethological and other indicators. DTW. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 2003, 110, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
- Earley, B.; O’Riordan, E.G. Effects of transporting bulls at different space allowances on physiological, haematological, and immunological responses to a 12-h journey by road. Ir. J. Agric. Food Res. 2006, 45, 39–50. [Google Scholar]
- Fazio, E.; Medica, P.; Alberghina, D.; Cavaleri, S.; Ferlazzo, A. Effect of Long-distance Road Transport on Thyroid and Adrenal Function and Haematocrit Values in Limousin Cattle: Influence of Body Weight Decrease. Veter. Res. Commun. 2005, 29, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarrant, P.; Kenny, F.; Harrington, D.; Murphy, M. Long distance transportation of steers to slaughter: Effect of stocking density on physiology, behaviour and carcass quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1992, 30, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Werner, M.; Hepp, C.; Soto, C.; Gallardo, P.; Bustamante, H.; Gallo, C. Effects of a long distance transport and subsequent recovery in recently weaned crossbred beef calves in Southern Chile. Livest. Sci. 2013, 152, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Standards Malaysia. MS 1500: Halal Food—Production, Preparation, Handling, and Storage—General Guidelines (Second Revision); Department of Standards Malaysia: Cyberjaya, Malaysia, 2009; p. 2.
- Idrus, Z.; Abubakar, A.A.; Sazili, A.Q.; Meng, G.Y.; Imlan, J.C.; Kaka, U.; Sabow, A.B.; Awad, E.A.; Othman, A.H.; Raghazali, R.; et al. The Effects of Sea and Road Transport on Physiological and Electroencephalographic Responses in Brahman Crossbred Heifers. Animal 2019, 9, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laws of Malaysia Act 772 Animal Welfare. 2015. Available online: http://extwprglegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/mal176896.pdf (accessed on 11 December 2020).
- Malaysian Meteorological Department. Available online: http://www.met.gov.my (accessed on 25 August 2017).
- AMSA. AMSA Meat Color Measurement Guidelines; American Meat Science Association (AMSA): Champaign, IL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hunt, M.C. Meat Colour Measurements; Meat Conference of the American Meat Science Association; Purdue University: Lafayette, IN, USA, 1980; pp. 41–46. [Google Scholar]
- MacDougall, D.B. Changes in the color and opacity of meat. Food Chem. 1982, 9, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sazili, A.; Parr, T.; Sensky, P.; Jones, S.W.; Bardsley, R.; Buttery, P. The relationship between slow and fast myosin heavy chain content, calpastatin and meat tenderness in different ovine skeletal muscles. Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Honikel, K.O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pryor, W.A. The antioxidant nutrients and disease prevention--what do we know and what do we need to find out? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991, 53, 391S–393S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, S.M.; Frei, B. Mechanisms of copper- and iron-dependent oxidative modification of human low density lipoprotein. J. Lipid Res. 1993, 34, 1745–1753. [Google Scholar]
- Mercier, Y.; Gatellier, P.; Viau, M.; Remignon, H.; Renerre, M. Effect of dietary fat and vitamin E on color stability and on lipid and protein oxidation in turkey meat during storage. Meat Sci. 1998, 48, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS. SAS/STAT Software, Version 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Ma, Q.; Tang, M.; Ji, C. Development of breast muscle and meat quality in Arbor Acres broilers, Jingxing 100 crossbred chickens and Beijing fatty chickens. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramírez, R.; Cava, R. The crossbreeding of different Duroc lines with the Iberian pig affects colour and oxidative stability of meat during storage. Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, J.A.; Patarata, L.; Martins, C. Influence of ultimate pH on bovine meat tenderness during ageing. Meat Sci. 1999, 52, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Honkavaara, M.; Rintasalo, E.; Ylönen, J.; Pudas, T. Meat quality and transport stress of cattle. DTW. Dtsch. tierarztliche Wochenschr. 2003, 110, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
- MacDougall, D.B.; Jones, S.J. Translucency and colour defects of dark-cutting meat and their detection. In The Problem of Dark-Cutting in Beef; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1981; pp. 328–343. [Google Scholar]
- Ponnampalam, E.N.; Hopkins, D.L.; Bruce, H.; Li, D.; Baldi, G.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. Causes and Contributing Factors to “Dark Cutting” Meat: Current Trends and Future Directions: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 400–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hughes, J.; Kearney, G.; Warner, R.D. Improving beef meat colour scores at carcass grading. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2014, 54, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murray, A.C. Factors affecting beef colour at time of grading. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1989, 69, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalle Zotte, A.; Parigi Bini, R.; Xiccato, G.; Simionato, S. Proprieta Tecnologiche e Sensoriali della Carne di Coniglio. Rev. Conigliocultura 1995, 6, 39. [Google Scholar]
- Huff-Lonergan, E.; Lonergan, S.M. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 2005, 71, 194–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lafuente, R.; López, M.; Blackshaw, J.; Mach, N.; Bach, A.; Velarde, A.; Muchenje, V. Effects of lairage temperature and holding time on pig behaviour and carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2013, 96, 116–129. [Google Scholar]
- Kadim, I.; Mahgoub, O.; Al-Kindi, A.; Al-Marzooqi, W.; Al-Saqri, N. Effects of transportation at high ambient temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality characteristics of three breeds of Omani goats. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watanabe, A.; Daly, C.; Devine, C. The effects of the ultimate pH of meat on tenderness changes during ageing. Meat Sci. 1996, 42, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarroel, M.; María, G.; Sanudo, C.; Olleta, J.; Gebresenbet, G. Effect of transport time on sensorial aspects of beef meat quality. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekiz, B.; Ekiz, E.E.; Koçak, Ö.; Yalcintan, H.; Yilmaz, A. Effect of pre-slaughter management regarding transportation and time in lairage on certain stress parameters, carcass and meat quality characteristics in Kivircik lambs. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goll, D.E.; Dayton, W.R.; Singh, I.; Robson, R.M. Studies of the alpha-actinin/actin interaction in the Z-disk by using calpain. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 8501–8510. [Google Scholar]
- Koohmaraie, M. The role of Ca2+-dependent proteases (calpains) in post mortem proteolysis and meat tenderness. Biochimie 1992, 74, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geesink, G.H.; Kuchay, S.; Chishti, A.H.; Koohmaraie, M. μ-Calpain is essential for postmortem proteolysis of muscle proteins1,2. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 84, 2834–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maddock, K.R.; Huff-Lonergan, E.; Rowe, L.J.; Lonergan, S.M. Effect of pH and ionic strength on μ- and m-calpain inhibition by calpastatin1. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 83, 1370–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gregory, N.G.; Grandin, T. Animal Welfare and Meat Science; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Devine, C.E.; Chrystall, B.B. High ultimate pH in sheep. In Dark-Cutting in Cattle and Sheep Proceedings of an Australian Workshop; Australian Meat & Livestock Research and Development Corporation: Sydney, Australia, 1989; pp. 55–65. [Google Scholar]
- Warriss, P.D. Choosing appropriate space allowances for slaughter pigs transported by road: A review. Veter. Rec. 1998, 142, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferguson, D.; Warner, R. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wythes, J.R.; Arthur, R.J.; Thompson, P.J.M.; Williams, G.E.; Bond, J.H. Effects of transporting cows various distances on live weight, carcass traits and muscle pH. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1981, 21, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, M.; Palacio, J.; Santolaria, M.; Aceña, M.; Chacón, G.; Gascón, M.; Calvo, J.; Zaragoza, P.; Beltran, J.; García-Belenguer, S. Effect of transport time on welfare and meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci. 2002, 61, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dantzer, R.; Mormede, P. Le Stress en Élevage Intensif. Actualités Scientifiques et Agronomiques de l’INRA; Masson: Paris, France, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Broom, D.M. Welfare assessment and welfare problem areas during handling and transport. In Livestock Handling and Transport; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2009; pp. 43–61. [Google Scholar]
- Zulkifli, I.; Bahyuddin, N.; Wan, C.Y.; Farjam, A.S.; Sazili, A.Q.; Rajion, M.A.; Goh, Y.M. Physiological responses in goats subjected to road transportation under the hot, humid tropical conditions. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12, 840–844. [Google Scholar]
- Insausti, K.; Beriain, M.J.; Purroy, A.; Albertí, P.; Gorraiz, C.; Alzueta, M.J. Shelf life of beef from local Spanish cattle breeds stored under modified atmosphere. Meat Sci. 2001, 57, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faustman, C.; Sun, Q.; Mancini, R.; Suman, S.P. Myoglobin and lipid oxidation interactions: Mechanistic bases and control. Meat Sci. 2010, 86, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santé-Lhoutellier, V.; Engel, E.; Gatellier, P. Assessment of the influence of diet on lamb meat oxidation. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakrys, P.; Hogan, S.A.; O’Sullivan, M.; Allen, P.; Kerry, J.P. Effects of oxygen concentration on the sensory evaluation and quality indicators of beef muscle packed under modified atmosphere. Meat Sci. 2008, 79, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Falowo, A.B.; Fayemi, P.O.; Muchenje, V. Natural antioxidants against lipid–protein oxidative deterioration in meat and meat products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2014, 64, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morzel, M.; Gatellier, P.; Sayd, T.; Renerre, M.; Laville, E. Chemical oxidation decreases proteolytic susceptibility of skeletal muscle myofibrillar proteins. Meat Sci. 2006, 73, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Yue, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.; Wu, S.; Yan, H.; Qi, G. Transport stress in broilers: I. Blood metabolism, glycolytic potential, and meat quality. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 2033–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faustman, C.; Naveena, B.M.; Shuang, Y.; Tatiyaborworntham, N. Ch. 1. Oxidation and protection in red meat. In Oxidation in Foods and Beverages and Antioxidant Applications; Vol 2: Management in Different Industry Sectors; Decker, E.A., Elias, R., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Ltd.: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Earley, B.; Murray, M. The effect of road and sea transport on inflammatory, adrenocortical, metabolic and behavioural responses of weanling heifers. BMC Veter. Res. 2010, 6, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grandin, T. The design and construction of facilities for handling cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1997, 49, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cray, C.; Zaias, J.; Altman, N.H. Acute Phase Response in Animals: A Review. Comp. Med. 2009, 59, 517–526. [Google Scholar]
- Earley, B.; Sporer, B.; Gupta, S.; Pang, W.; Ting, S. Biologic response of animals to husbandry stress with implications for biomedical models. Open Access Anim. Physiol. 2010, 25, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Color Coordinate | Ageing (Day) | Long Distance (850 km) | Medium Distance (450 km) | Level of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | Distance | Stocking | Distance × Stocking | ||
No of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||
Lightness (L) | ||||||||||
1 | 35.20 ± 0.86 bx | 31.82 ± 1.84 dz | 35.79 ± 0.85 b | 36.94 ± 0.59 ax | 33.49 ± 0.84 cy | 35.51 ± 1.82 b | 0.1263 | 0.0003 | 0.0135 | |
7 | 34.83 ± 1.98 cy | 37.12 ± 1.61 abx | 37.60 ± 2.18 a | 36.58 ± 1.24 bx | 37.83 ± 1.45 ax | 36.80 ± 1.09 b | 0.1276 | <0.0001 | 0.0014 | |
14 | 33.17 ± 0.23 z | 33.61 ± 0.36 y | 33.42 ± 0.96 | 34.14 ± 0.73 y | 33.14 ± 0.76 y | 33.69 ± 1.20 | 0.3150 | 0.1112 | 0.1555 | |
p value | 0.0170 | 0.0078 | 0.7568 | 0.0008 | 0.0470 | 0.1615 | ||||
Redness (a) | ||||||||||
1 | 15.14 ± 0.23 dx | 18.88 ± 0.24 ax | 14.95 ± 0.24 e | 15.71 ± 0.30 cx | 15.94 ± 0.27 c | 17.57 ± 0.47 b | 0.0002 | 0.0128 | <0.0001 | |
7 | 13.85 ± 0.34 by | 14.16 ± 0.91 by | 14.96 ± 0.85 a | 12.07 ± 0.70 cy | 12.60 ± 0.79 c | 14.26 ± 2.85 b | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.1100 | |
14 | 14.15 ± 0.33 y | 15.16 ± 0.56 y | 13.03 ± 0.92 | 14.46 ± 0.29 x | 15.18 ± 0.70 | 14.95 ± 0.80 | 0.1868 | 0.1042 | 0.1090 | |
p value | <0.0001 | 0.0242 | <0.0001 | 0.0182 | 0.1889 | 0.4005 | ||||
Yellowness (b) | ||||||||||
1 | 17.86 ± 0.78 ax | 16.95 ± 0.66 ay | 15.43 ± 0.54 ey | 16.52 ± 0.47 by | 16.41 ± 0.28 b | 16.31± 0.35 bcz | 0.6466 | 0.0109 | <0.0001 | |
7 | 16.01 ± 0.24 dy | 19.03 ± 0.51 ax | 17.70 ± 0.70 cx | 19.10 ± 0.48 ax | 15.92 ± 0.51 d | 18.19 ± 0.71 bx | 0.0003 | 0.0055 | <0.0001 | |
14 | 15.92 ± 0.51 dy | 16.50 ± 0.83 cy | 16.86 ± 0.41 cby | 18.23 ± 0.81 ax | 6.94 ± 0.58 cb | 17.05 ± 0.48 by | 0.0003 | 0.0508 | <0.0001 | |
p value | 0.0005 | 0.0487 | 0.0029 | 0.0043 | 0.6393 | 0.0075 | ||||
Chroma (H) | ||||||||||
1 | 28.29 ± 0.49 ax | 27.49 ± 0.39 bx | 21.49 ± 0.59 ey | 22.82 ± 0.96 d | 22.88 ± 0.64 d | 26.12 ± 0.51 c | 0.0056 | 0.0022 | <0.0001 | |
7 | 21.18±0.38 cy | 23.78 ± 0.54 ay | 23.44 ± 0.66 ax | 22.63 ± 0.32 b | 20.11 ± 0.43 d | 23.42 ± 0.78 a | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
14 | 20.58 ± 0.91 dy | 22.41 ± 0.85 by | 21.34 ± 0.71 cy | 23.28 ± 0.41 a | 22.81 ± 0.90 ab | 22.68 ± 0.55 b | 0.0085 | 0.1238 | <0.0001 | |
p value | <0.0001 | 0.0317 | <0.0001 | 0.7260 | 0.3162 | 0.1619 |
Parameters | Ageing (Day) | Long Distance (850 km) | Medium Distance (450 km) | Level of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | Distance | Stocking | Distance × Stocking | ||
No of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||
Glycogen (mg/kg meat) | ||||||||||
0 | 1.411 ± 0.002 fw | 1.464 ± 0.002 ew | 1.539 ± 0.002 dw | 1.655 ± 0.001 cw | 1.67 ± 0.001 bw | 1.753 ± 0.001 aw | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.1100 | |
1 | 0.776 ± 0.001 dx | 0.799 ± 0.001 cx | 0.808 ± 0.001 cx | 0.826 ± 0.001 bx | 0.825 ± 0.002 bx | 0.837 ± 0.001 ax | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0553 | |
7 | 0.675 ± 0.001 cy | 0.687 ± 0.001 cy | 0.698 ± 0.001 cy | 0.702 ± 0.001 cy | 0.710 ± 0.001 by | 0.731 ± 0.001 ay | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.2257 | |
14 | 0.341 ± 0.001 cz | 0.347 ± 0.001 cz | 0.356 ± 0.002 bz | 0.356 ± 0.001 bz | 0.356 ± 0.001 bz | 0.376 ± 0.002 az | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.1822 | |
p value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||||
pH (unit) | ||||||||||
0 | 6.66 ± 0.01 ax | 6.47 ± 0.02 bx | 6.38 ± 0.02 bx | 6.26 ± 0.02 bx | 5.85 ± 0.03 cx | 5.80 ± 0.04 cx | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.2849 | |
1 | 5.62 ± 0.01 az | 5.54 ± 0.01 bz | 5.43 ± 0.01 cz | 5.59 ± 0.01 abz | 5.53 ± 0.01 by | 5.36 ± 0.02 cz | 0.1865 | <0.0001 | 0.5737 | |
7 | 5.75 ± 0.02 az | 5.65 ± 0.01 bz | 5.60 ± 0.02 bz | 5.59 ± 0.01 bz | 5.60 ± 0.02 by | 5.52 ± 0.01 cy | 0.0048 | 0.0336 | 0.3826 | |
14 | 6.12 ± 0.01 ay | 6.05 ± 0.02 by | 6.00 ± 0.01 by | 5.87 ± 0.01 cy | 5.85 ± 0.01 cx | 5.76 ± 0.01 dx | <0.0001 | 0.0743 | 0.8832 | |
p value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Parameters | Ageing (Day) | Long Distance (850 km) | Medium Distance (450 km) | Level of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | Distance | Stocking | Distance × Stocking | ||
No of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||||
Cooking loss (%) | ||||||||||
1 | 31.84 ± 0.64 dc | 30.76 ± 0.44 dc | 32.28 ± 1.08 d | 34.79 ± 0.67 abx | 35.54 ± 0.68 a | 33.28 ± 0.36 bcy | 0.0003 | 0.2286 | 0.1190 | |
7 | 31.21 ± 0.21 c | 30.56 ± 0.19 c | 29.16 ± 0.87 d | 32.44 ± 0.16 by | 36.34 ± 0.33 a | 36.61 ± 0.38 ax | <0.0001 | 0.0005 | <0.0001 | |
14 | 28.27 ± 0.72 e | 32.27 ± 0.46 c | 32.12 ± 0.65 c | 30.03 ± 0.28 dz | 33.66 ± 0.43 b | 34.18 ± 0.20 ay | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
p value | 0.0552 | 0.1701 | 0.2595 | 0.0005 | 0.0779 | 0.0048 | ||||
Shear force (kg) | ||||||||||
1 | 2.36 ± 0.06 bc | 1.82 ± 0.02 dy | 2.91 ± 0.02 ax | 2.00 ± 0.02 cz | 2.18 ± 0.04 c | 2.52 ± 0.03 b | 0.0583 | 0.1800 | <0.0001 | |
7 | 2.43 ± 0.09 bc | 2.57 ± 0.10 bcx | 2.76 ± 0.07 ax | 2.29 ± 0.05 cxy | 2.47 ± 0.06 bc | 241 ± 0.05 bc | <0.0001 | 0.0030 | 0.1527 | |
14 | 2.18 ± 0.01 cd | 2.27 ± 0.05 cx | 2.14 ± 0.07 dy | 2.56 ± 0.06 ax | 2.15 ± 0.01 d | 2.57 ± 0.03 a | 0.0018 | 0.0143 | 0.0209 | |
p value | 0.1620 | 0.0019 | 0.0006 | 0.0113 | 0.5555 | 0.8159 |
Ageing (Day) | Long Distance (850 km) | Medium Distance (450 km) | Level of Significance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | High-SD (600 kg/m2) | Medium-SD (400 kg/m2) | Low-SD (200 kg/m2) | Distance | Stocking | Distance × Stocking | |
No of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||
0 | 0.077 ± 0.001 az | 0.076 ± 0.001 az | 0.053 ± 0.004 bz | 0.053 ± 0.004 bz | 0.051 ± 0.002 bz | 0.050 ± 0.011 bz | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
1 | 0.114 ± 0.003 ay | 0.111 ± 0.001 aby | 0.109 ± 0.002 by | 0.063 ± 0.008 dz | 0.060 ± 0.008 cdz | 0.057 ± 0.008 dz | <0.0001 | 0.0205 | 0.8322 |
7 | 0.131 ± 0.006 ay | 0.121 ± 0.002 by | 0.113 ± 0.002 cy | 0.109 ± 0.002 dy | 0.104 ± 0.002 edy | 0.102 ± 0.002 ey | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
14 | 1.453 ± 0.007 ax | 1.333 ± 0.005 bx | 1.205 ± 0.009 dz | 1.240 ± 0.007 cx | 1.160 ± 0.007 ex | 1.100 ± 0.006 ex | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0750 |
p value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Parameters | AGP |
---|---|
Main Effects | |
Handling | |
Preload | 77.81 ± 0.63 c |
Unload | 179.44 ± 2.78 a |
Slaughter | 169.83 ± 1.37 b |
Density | |
200 kg | 134.30 ± 4.87 c |
400 kg | 141.85 ± 5.63 b |
600 kg | 150.98 ± 6.42 a |
Distance | |
450 km | 135.72 ± 4.05 b |
850 km | 149.01 ± 5.14 a |
p-value | |
Handling | <0.0001 |
Density | <0.0001 |
Distance | <0.0001 |
Handling*Density | <0.0001 |
Handling*Distance | <0.0001 |
Distance*Density | 0.2100 |
Parameter | AGP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Handling | |||
Density | Preload | Unload | Slaughter |
200 kg | 77.69 ± 0.87 bx | 162.83 ± 2.98 az | 162.26 ± 1.20 ay |
400 kg | 77.79 ± 1.26 cx | 180.92 ± 4.29 ay | 166.82 ± 1.49 by |
600 kg | 77.95 ± 1.77 cx | 194.54 ± 4.73 ax | 180.42 ± 2.42 bx |
Parameter | AGP | ||
---|---|---|---|
Handling | |||
Distance | Preload | Unload | Slaughter |
450 km | 78.01 ± 0.84 bx | 164.56 ± 5.70 axy | 164.42 ± 1.35 ay |
850 km | 77.38 ± 1.56 bx | 194.30 ± 4.96 ax | 175.24 ± 2.01 ax |
Parameters | SAA |
---|---|
Main effects | |
Handling | |
Preload | 75.87 ± 0.85 c |
Unload | 145.41 ± 3.69 b |
Slaughter | 166.43 ± 5.66 a |
Density | |
200 kg | 110.38 ± 3.72 c |
400 kg | 126.94 ± 5.13 b |
600 kg | 150.38 ± 7.62 a |
Distance | |
450 km | 115.24 ± 3.70 b |
850 km | 143.23 ± 5.58 a |
p-value | |
Handling | <0.0001 |
Density | <0.0001 |
Distance | <0.0001 |
Handling*Density | <0.0001 |
Handling*Distance | <0.0001 |
Distance*Density | <0.0001 |
Parameter | SAA | ||
---|---|---|---|
Handling | |||
Density | Preload | Unload | Slaughter |
200 kg | 76.29 ± 1.64 cx | 112.78 ± 4.24 bz | 142.08 ± 3.61 az |
400 kg | 75.36 ± 1.51 cx | 140.86 ± 6.60 by | 164.59 ± 3.50 ay |
600 kg | 75.95 ± 1.27 cx | 182.59 ± 11.31 bx | 192.61 ± 6.70 ax |
Parameter | SAA | ||
---|---|---|---|
Handling | |||
Distance | Preload | Unload | Slaughter |
450 km | 75.97 ± 1.32 cx | 122.64 ± 6.50 by | 147.11 ± 2.70 ay |
850 km | 75.77 ± 1.08 cx | 168.17 ± 6.63 bx | 185.75 ± 5.15 ax |
Parameter | SAA | ||
---|---|---|---|
Density (kg/sqm) | |||
Distance (km) | 200 kg | 400 kg | 600 kg |
450 km | 99.64 ± 3.61 by | 119.03 ± 6.14 ax | 127.05 ± 7.99 ay |
850 km | 121.13 ± 3.61 bx | 134.85 ± 5.13 bx | 173.72 ± 11.87 ax |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abubakar, A.A.; Zulkifli, I.; Goh, Y.M.; Kaka, U.; Sabow, A.B.; Imlan, J.C.; Awad, E.A.; Othman, A.H.; Raghazli, R.; Mitin, H.; et al. Effects of Stocking and Transport Conditions on Physicochemical Properties of Meat and Acute-Phase Proteins in Cattle. Foods 2021, 10, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020252
Abubakar AA, Zulkifli I, Goh YM, Kaka U, Sabow AB, Imlan JC, Awad EA, Othman AH, Raghazli R, Mitin H, et al. Effects of Stocking and Transport Conditions on Physicochemical Properties of Meat and Acute-Phase Proteins in Cattle. Foods. 2021; 10(2):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020252
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbubakar, Ahmed A., Idrus Zulkifli, Yong M. Goh, Ubedullah Kaka, Azad B. Sabow, Jurhamid C. Imlan, Elmutaz A. Awad, Azalea H. Othman, Razlina Raghazli, Helen Mitin, and et al. 2021. "Effects of Stocking and Transport Conditions on Physicochemical Properties of Meat and Acute-Phase Proteins in Cattle" Foods 10, no. 2: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020252