Next Article in Journal
Mapping the Greek Wine Supply Chain: A Proposed Research Framework
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling and Optimization of Process Parameters for Nutritional Enhancement in Enzymatic Milled Rice by Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)
Previous Article in Journal
Food and Nutrition Related Concerns Post Lockdown during COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Association with Dietary Behaviors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Allelic Variation at Glutenin Loci (Glu-1, Glu-2 and Glu-3) in a Worldwide Durum Wheat Collection and Its Effect on Quality Attributes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Different Pilot-Scale Milling Methods on Bioactive Components and End-Use Properties of Whole Wheat Flour

1
National Wheat Improvement Centre, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) China Office, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
3
Grain Technology Center, Buhler (Wuxi) Commercial Co., LTD., Wuxi 214142, Jiangsu, China
4
Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Foods 2021, 10(11), 2857; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112857
Submission received: 8 October 2021 / Revised: 22 October 2021 / Accepted: 5 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021

Abstract

:
The health benefits from consumption of whole wheat products are widely recognized. This study investigated the effects of different pilot-scale milling methods on physicochemical properties, bioactive components, Chinese steamed bread (CSB), and Chinese leavened pancakes (CLP) qualities of whole wheat flour (WWF). The results indicated that WWF-1 from the reconstitution of brans processed by a hammer mill had the best CSB and CLP quality overall. WWF from entire grain grinding by a jet mill (65 Hz) contained the highest concentration of bioactive components including dietary fibers (DF) and phenolic acids. A finer particle size did not necessarily result in a higher content of phenolic antioxidants in WWF. DF contents and damaged starch were negatively correlated with CSB and CLP quality. Compromised reduced quality observed in CLP made from WWF indicated its potentially higher acceptance as a whole-grain product.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is among the most widely planted cereal crops [1]. Consumption of whole-grain products has been associated with reduced risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and some types of cancer [2,3]. The health benefits of whole-grain products can be partially attributed to their contents of dietary fiber (DF) and phytochemicals, such as phenolic acids and phytosterols [4,5]. Phenolic acids have promising antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities [6,7].The content of phenolic compounds is becoming another parameter evaluating the quality of the whole wheat flour [8,9]. Although whole-wheat flour (WWF) can provide high amounts of DF and other bioactive components, products made from it remain under-utilized globally. This can be partially attributed to poorer sensory properties, a shorter shelf life, and a higher risk of rancidity [10,11]. The proper use of enzymes, emulsifiers, and hydrocolloids can improve the sensory properties of the whole wheat products [12]. However, the common whole-wheat improvers, such as diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono- and diglycerides (DATEM) and sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL), cannot pass the clean label test which may limit their application in food industry in the future. Different milling techniques can also influence the technical and end-use properties of WWF, possibly by modifying its particle sizes and chemical composition [13]. A good amount of study have indicated the effects of bran particle sizes on the quality of WWF [14,15,16,17,18]. Obviously, different bran particle sizes come from different milling methods including different types of the mills and rotor speeds. Therefore, it is necessary to develop proper milling methods to produce WWF products with enhanced sensory properties. Currently, most commercial WWF is produced using roller mills. The roller mill separates the endosperm fraction from the coarse bran and germ fraction. Coarse brans are usually micronized and then re-mixed with the endosperm for the production of WWF. Hammer mills (HM) and jet mills (JM) can be used for bran micronization [19]. WWF can also be prepared by direct pulverization of entire wheat grains using jet mills without separation and reconstitution of the components [19,20]. However, this method may result in a higher content of damaged starch. It is important to investigate the effects of this entire grain grinding method on the quality of the resulting WWF.
Chinese steamed bread (CSB) is a traditional fermented and steamed food in China with distinctive cultural features across the country [21]. It is a staple food in northern China with increasing popularity beyond [22]. There are many significant differences between CSB and western-style baked bread owing to the different production procedures. For instance, the lower processing temperature (100 °C) for CSB might permit higher preservation of diverse endogenous nutrients and reduce the production of toxic Maillard reaction products, such as acrylamide and furans [23]. Further, the general ingredients of CSB only include flour, water, and yeast. The absence of added sugar, oil, and salt renders CSB additional health benefits. Chinese leavened pancake (CLP) is another popular wheat product consumed as a staple food in some parts of China. However, previous literature on the quality of CLP made from WWF is not available. Compared to western-style whole wheat bread, factors affecting quality of whole wheat CSB and CLP are under-investigated. It was reported that finer particle sizes increased the specific volume and improved the crumb texture of CSB [15]. Bran dietary fibers and phenolics also influenced the CSB quality. As for the effect of milling process, to our knowledge, there was only one study whole results suggested that CSB from bran reconstitution had larger loaf volume, but the entire grain grinding improved the color of the CSB [19]. More studies are needed to gain further understanding on the quality of CSB and CLP. Furthermore, the effects of different milling methods on the bioactive components, such as dietary fiber and phenolic acids of WWF, are also not thoroughly investigated. Due to their potential health benefits [24,25], the content of total phenolics is becoming another factor determining wheat market preference [26]. In addition, previous studies were conducted using lab-scale mills. Information at pilot-scale level is very limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically investigate the effects of different pilot-scale milling methods on bioactive components (including dietary fiber and phenolic acids), physicochemical properties of WWF, as well as its effect on CSB and CLP quality. The outcome of the study provides useful information for the quality improvement of WWF products and contributes to the facilitation of high-DF food consumption in enhancing health benefits for consumers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Wheat Grains and Chemicals

A sound grain mixture (1:1) of wheat cultivars Zhongmai 578 (1000 kg) and Zhongmai 175 (1000 kg) was used for preparation of WWF. Zhongmai 578 (farinograph stability time = 23.6 min, wet gluten = 34.2%) is an important cultivar in the Yellow-Huai river winter wheat region of China. Zhongmai 175 (farinograph stability time = 2.0 min, wet gluten = 27.4%) is the most widely grown cultivar in the northern China plain winter wheat region. General chemicals, HPLC grade water, HPLC grade acetonitrile, and analytical standards (including vanillic acid, syringic acid, para-coumaric acid, trans-ferulic acid, and sinapic acid) were purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The instant dry yeast was purchased from Lesaffre (Marcq-en-Barœul, France). The colza oil was purchased from Luhua Group Co., Ltd. (Yantai, China).

2.2. Pilot-Scale Milling Methods for Producing Whole Wheat Flour

After cleaning and tempering to 16.0% moisture for 28 h, the mixed grain sample of 2000 kg was milled on a Buhler roller mill located at Buhler Commercial Co. Ltd. (Wuxi, China). The mill was equipped with four break sections (B1, B2, B3, B4) and four reduction sections (R1, R2, R3, R4). During the process, a portion of crushed wheat from B1 stream (200 kg) were taken out, divided equally into two parts and then directly pulverized by jet mill (AHFL, Buhler Commercial Co. Ltd., Wuxi, China) with the rotor speeds of 45 Hz (JM-45 Hz) and 65 Hz (JM-65 Hz). The WWF from JM-45 Hz and JM-65 Hz were designated as WWF-4 and WWF-5, respectively. The other grains of 1800 kg went through the whole roller mill process and the yield of the refined flour was 72%. The bran and germ fractions from the roller mill were collected, equally divided into three parts, and then micronized using a hammer mill (AHZCφ1 mm, Buhler Commercial Co. Ltd., Wuxi, China) and a jet mill (AHFL, Buhler Commercial Co. Ltd., Wuxi, China) with the rotor speeds of 45 Hz (JM-45 Hz) and 65 Hz (JM-65 Hz), respectively. The micronized wheat bran was remixed with the refined flour at a ratio of 28:72 (bran of 28 kg, refined flour of 72 kg) to obtain WWF samples designated as WWF-1 (bran micronized by HM), WWF-2 (bran micronized by JM45-Hz), and WWF-3 (bran micronized by JM-65 Hz). For each WWF, two batches were prepared. (Supplementary Document, Table S1).

2.3. Analysis of Particle Size Distribution

Particle size distribution was determined using an on-line particle analyzer (MYTA, Buhler, Switzerland) equipped with a dry sample delivery and measurement system that combined laser diffraction and image processing. The system was equipped with a series of sieves with particle sizes ranging from 10 to 5000 µm. During the measurement, the percentage of flours passing through the certain sieve size was determined. Mean particle sizes (MPS) were determined as:
MPS = ∑ sieve average particle size (μm) × percentage of particles that pass through the sieve (Through X%). Original data are provided in the Supplementary Documents.

2.4. Analysis of Chemical Composition

Starch damage was determined using a rapid method with a SDmatic analyzer (Chopin Technologies, Paris, France) according to AACC International Approved Method 76-33.01 [27]. The method measured the amount of iodine absorbed by the tested sample in a liquid suspension. Higher content of damaged starch led to more fixed iodine. Protein content was recorded with a Foss-Tecator 1241 (Foss, Högänas, Sweden) NIR analyzer. Contents of soluble dietary fiber (SDF) and insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) were analyzed according to the Chinese national standard method GB 5009.88-2014 [28] which was very similar to the AACC approved method 32-07.01 [29]. Briefly, the flour was treated by sequentialenzymatic hydrolysis using heat-stable alpha-amylase, protease, and amyloglucosidase. IDF was filtered, and the residue was washed with warm distilled water and weighed. For SDF, the filtrate and water washing from the above step were precipitated with 95% ethanol, and the residue was then filtered, dried, and weighed. Determination of fatty acids contents followed Chinese national standard GB/T 5510-2011 [30]. Briefly, the free fatty acids were extracted with benzene and titrated with KOH solution.

2.5. Phenolic Acid Composition of Whole Wheat Flour

The phenolic acids in WWF were extracted according to a method reported previously [31] with some modifications. Briefly, WWF (1 g) was hydrolyzed with 2 M of NaOH (10 mL) for 4 h under nitrogen protection in darkness. The mixture was then acidified to pH 1 using 6 M of HCl and extracted three times with ethyl acetate. The combined extract was evaporated to dryness and re-dissolved in HPLC grade methanol (2 mL). The final extract was filtered through a 0.22-µm filter and analyzed within 12 h.
A UPLC-PDA system from Waters Corporation (Milford, MA, USA) equipped with an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (2.1 mm × 50 mm) column was used to analyze phenolic acids following a previously reported gradient protocol [32] with some modifications. Briefly, mobile phase A comprised HPLC-grade water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and mobile phase B was HPLC-grade acetonitrile with 0.1% TFA. The PDA detector was set to record the spectra information from 210 nm to 400 nm and also the absorption at 280 nm. The flow rate of the mobile phase was kept at 0.4 mL/min and the percentage of mobile phase B was kept at 6% from 0–1.0 min, which then increased linearly to 14% from 1.0 min to 3.0 min and increased linearly to 18% from 3.0 min to 5.5 min. The column was re-equilibrated for 2 min between each injection. Phenolic acids were identified by comparison with the retention time of analytical standards and quantified using external calibration curves using the absorbance at 280 nm. Cis-ferulic acid was identified according to a previous study [31] and tentatively quantified according to the calibration of trans-ferulic acid since the analytical standard of cis-ferulic acid was not available.

2.6. Analysis of Dough Properties

Dough rheological properties were determined by Farinograph and Extensograph (Brabender, Duisburg, Germany), following the AACC International Approved Methods 54-21.02 [33] and 54-10.01 [34], respectively. Water absorption (%), dough development time (min), and stability (min) were measured by Farinograph. Dough energy (cm2), extensibility (mm), and maximum resistance (BU) were determined by Extensograph.

2.7. Preparation and Sensory Evaluation of Chinese Steamed Bread

CSB was prepared and evaluated according to a previous study [35], with minor modifications. In brief, WWF (100 g) was mixed with yeast (2 g) and water for two minutes in a National mixer (National MFG. Co, Lincoln, NL, USA). The mixer speed was set at 90 rpm and the water addition was set at 80% of optimal water absorption (%) pre-determined by Farinograph analysis in preliminary tests. For example, if the optimal water absorption was determined as 70% by the Farinograph, we would use 56% as the optimal water level for CSB making. Fairnograph is the technique developed for western-style bread making use of refined flours. The dough was then sheeted by passing through a pair of rollers for 10 times. After each pass, the sheeted dough was folded along the side and rotated through 90°. The dough piece was then rounded five times with a suitably sized bowl. The rounded dough was proofed for 20 min in a fermentation cabinet (35 °C, 85% RH) and steamed for 25 min in a steamer initially containing cold water.
The CSB score was a weighted value based on specific volume (20), skin color (10), smoothness (10), shape (10), structure (15), and stress relaxation (35), according to the method proposed previously. Specific volume, skin color, and stress relaxation were based on objective measurements with sufficient details provided in the Supplementary Documents. Specific volume indicated the loaf volume and weight ratio of CSB. Loaf volume was determined by the rapeseed displacement method, according to AACC Approved Method 10-05.01. Skin color was measured with a Minolta CR 310 chromameter (Minolta Camera, Osaka, Japan). Skin color score was calculated according to the method reported previously [36]. Stress relaxation was measured with a TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, Godalming, UK). Briefly, after 15 min of steaming, two slices (3 cm thick) were cut from the center of the CSB. Each slice was placed on a flat metal plate and compressed twice to 50% of its original thickness at a speed of 1.0 mm/s with a cylindrical P35 probe. The calculation and scoring of stress relaxation was conducted according to a previous report [36]. The smoothness, shape, and structure of steamed bread were scored subjectively by five trained panelists. A high score for smoothness was given for very smooth skin; freedom of wrinkles, dimples, blisters, or gelatinized spots; and a round shape and fine crumb structure combined with uniform porosity contributed to high scores for shape and structure, respectively.

2.8. Preparation and Sensory Evaluation of Chinese Leavened Pancakes

To prepare CLP, WWF (100 g) was mixed with 120 mL of water (35 °C), 5 g sugar, 1 g of salt, 2 g of yeast, and 16 g of colza oil in a National mixer for 1.5 min (National MFG. Co, Lincoln, NE, USA). The mixer speed was set at 90 rpm. The dough was proofed for 1 h in a fermentation cabinet (35 °C, 85% RH). The fermented dough was gently kneaded by hand to form a rounded piece with a smooth upper surface. The rounded piece was flattened using a rolling pin to produce a 1-cm-thick dough sheet and then rested for 15 min at room temperature. The dough sheet was finally cooked for 8 min in an electric baking pan (MC-JS 3406, Midea Life Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Foshan, China). To our knowledge, there is not an international method on sensory evaluation of CLP. In this study, the weighted CLP score included appearance (20), inner structure (20), stress relaxation (35), stickiness (15), and taste and flavor (10). Stress relaxation was measured with a TA-XT2i texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, Godalming, UK) according to the same method as CSB. Appearance, inner structure, stickiness, and taste and flavor of CLP were scored subjectively by five trained panelists. A high score for appearance was given to pale yellow skin, round shape, and freedom of large black spots. A fine crumb with uniform porosity and non-sticking contributed to high scores for inner structure and stickiness, respectively. Freedom from bad smell and a rich wheat flavor related to high scores for taste and flavor.

2.9. Short-Term Storage Quality of Chinese Steamed Bread

Texture profiles of CSB from WWF were determined after storage for 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h at room temperature using a TA-XT2i texture analyzer. Briefly, two slices (3 cm thick) were cut from the center of the CSB. Each slice was placed on a flat metal plate and compressed twice to 50% of its original thickness at a speed of 1.0 mm/s with a cylindrical P35 probe. Firmness and resilience were recorded.

2.10. Statistical Analyses

For chemical analyses, such as determination of phenolic acid composition, the results were reported as mean values from three replicates. For dough property parameters, the results were reported as mean values from two replicates. Evaluation of CSB and CLP were conducted by five trained panelists and reported as mean scores from the five panelists. The results were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Results were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (AVONA) and Turkey’s test using SAS software, version 9.3 (Cary, NC, USA). p < 0.05 was considered as significantly different.

3. Results and Discussions

The quality of wheat flour is evaluated according to their chemical composition including protein content, damaged starch, and bioactive components (such as phenolic acids and dietary fibers). Dough rheological properties can be evaluated with a farinograph and an extensograph. Particle size is an important factor affecting the end-use properties of whole wheat flour.

3.1. Particle Sizes and Chemical Compositions of Whole Wheat Flours

Particle size distribution is an important parameter affecting end-use quality of whole wheat flour [17]. Particle size distributions of WWFs from different milling process are plotted in Figure S1 in the Supplementary Documents. Mean particle sizes (MPS) for WWF-5 were 236 µm, 146 µm, 124 µm, 191 µm and 146 µm, respectively. The jet milling was more effective than the hammer milling in reducing bran particle size. Chemical compositions of the WWFs are presented in Table 1. WWF-3 and WWF-5 from the JM-65 Hz contained higher contents of total dietary fibers (TDF) and damaged starch than the other WWFs. The higher content of damaged starch can be attributed to the higher rotor speed. Interestingly, there was a strong positive correlation between the content of damaged starch content and total DF (R2 = 0.7974). WWF-5 had a significantly lower (p < 0.05) protein content than other WWFs. WWF-3 contained the highest content of fatty acids, a factor that can lead to rancidity of food products during storage [37].

3.2. Phenolic Acid Compositions of Whole Wheat Flour

Phenolic acids are a major type of bioactive phytochemical in whole wheat [38,39]. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of phenolic acid are widely recognized [40,41]. Vanillic acid, syringic acid, para-coumaric acid, trans-ferulic acid, sinapic acid, and cis-ferulic acid were isolated and quantified. A typical UPLC spectra was presented in Figure 1. The retention time for vanillic acid, syringic acid, para-coumaric acid, trans-ferulic acid, sinapic acid, and cis-ferulic acid were 1.60, 1.84, 2.20, 2.95, 3.20, and 3.55, respectively. Trans-ferulic acid was the predominant phenolic acid (Table 2).
WWF-1 and WWF-2 contained similar concentrations of trans-ferulic acids (720.16 and 742.15 µg/g, respectively), but their particle sizes were significantly different (p < 0.05). Although WWF-3 and WWF-5 were both processed by the JM-65 Hz mill, they had comparable particle size distributions and dietary fiber contents; WWF-3 contained the lowest (534.90 µg/g) and WWF-5 contained the highest (1002.11 µg/g) concentrations of trans-ferulic acid. The high rotor speed of the JM-65 Hz on wheat bran in the bran reconstitution method (WWF-3) led to significant loss of trans-ferulic acid during processing. This suggests that, in the entire grain grinding method using the JM-65 Hz mill (WWF-5), the starchy endosperm physically prevents the loss of ferulic acid during reduction in particle size. As a result, WWF-5 contained the highest concentration of trans-ferulic acid. Similarly, WWF-5 also contained a higher content of vanillic acid, syringic acid, and para-coumaric acid than WWF-4. This explanation is partially supported by the fact that WWF-4 prepared by entire grain grinding using the JM 45 Hz mill had a significantly lower (p < 0.05) concentration of trans-ferulic acid than WWF-5. This was probably due to smaller particle size in WWF-5 that enhanced the extractability of phenolic acids as generally reductions in particle size enhance the extractability of phenolic acids.
Previous studies reported that reductions in bran particle size led to enhanced antioxidant capacity of wheat samples [42,43]. However, those results were obtained by in vitro methods, such as total phenolic content (TPC) and 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays. The non-specificity and limitations of those methods, which could lead to incorrect data interpretations, were recognized in recent years [44,45]. Our analysis using a UPLC instrument on phenolic acids, i.e., the major antioxidants in WWF, indicated that a reduction in particle size does not necessarily lead to enhanced phenolic acid concentration. Different milling strategies, types of mills, and rotor speeds can produce WWFs with similar particles size but significantly different phenolic acid compositions. In summary, the milling method had a great impact on phenolic acid compositions of WWF and improved its availability with grain grinding using a JM-65 Hz procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the high variation of total dietary fibers (1.6-fold) and ferulic acid content (1.9-fold) of WWF from different milling methods.

3.3. Rheological Properties of Doughs Made from Whole Wheat Flour

The effects of different milling methods on dough properties of WWF are shown in Table 3. WWF-5 had the highest water absorption (73.0%) and WWF-4 had the lowest (64.8%). This could be explained by the high DF and damaged starch contents in WWF-5, leading to higher water affinity and hydration properties [46,47,48]. Dough from WWF-4 exhibited significantly shorter (p < 0.05) development time than other WWF doughs. Generally, moderate development time is considered a favorable dough property. Stability time is an essential factor in evaluating dough properties. Dough from WWF-1 had the longest stability time. This can be attributed to its lowest contents of DF and damaged starch. Dough from WWF-5 had the shortest stability time due to the high content of damaged starch and DF that can lead to the formation of a weakened gluten network [49]. WWF-4 and WWF-5 from entire grain milling involved significantly less energy than the recombined WWF–3. Extensibility is another important parameter for the preparation of western-style bread. Higher extensibility is considered as a favorable dough property. Generally, entire grain milling also had negative effects on extensibility of WWF. To conclude, different milling methods had significant effects on dough rheological properties of WWF. WWF from bran reconstitution, especially WWF-1 from HM, exhibited better dough properties than WWF from entire grain grinding.

3.4. Sensory Properties of Chinese Steamed Bread and Chinese Leavened Pancakes

The CSB quality evaluations from the different WWFs presented in Table 4 and illustrated in Figure 2A,B showed that the CSB from WWF-4 had the highest total score (59), although that score was not significantly higher from the CSB score from WWF-1 (57) and WWF-2 (58). WWF-4 exhibited inferior dough properties compared to WWF-1 and WWF-2 in terms of stability, energy, and extensibility, suggesting that inferior dough properties may not affect the quality of final products. WWF-3 showed a significantly higher score than WWF-5, probably attributable to the higher damaged starch and DF contents of WWF-5 interfering with the formation of the gluten network [14,50]. Compared to CSB from WWF-1 and WWF-4, CSB from WWF-2, WWF-3, and WWF-5 received higher scores in smoothness but lower scores in specific volume. This could be due to the relatively smaller particle sizes of WWF-2, WWF-3, and WWF-5 [19]. All CSBs from WWF obtained a 0 score color as the white color is currently an essential factor that influences acceptance by consumers [21].
The scores were reported as mean values from five panelists. Within each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Sensory qualities of CLP prepared from the different flours are summarized in Table 5, and Figure 2C,D illustrates the appearance of CLP and its internal structures, respectively. CLP from WWF-1 received the highest total score (70) followed by CLP from WWF-4 (66) and WWF-2 (63). All CLP showed flat and tidy surfaces, except for that from WWF-5, which showed broken edges and very low specific volume. This was likely caused by higher DF and damaged contents [14,18].
CSB made from refined flour received a score of 93 which was 34 points higher than CSB from WWF-4 with a score of 59. In contrast, CLP from refined flour received a score of 87 which was only 17 points higher than CLP from WWF-1 with a score of 70. This result indicated a potentially higher consumer acceptance for whole-grain CLP products. Whole-grain CLP can be a promising contributor for increased whole-grain consumption in the future due to its favorable sensory properties.

3.5. Correlation of Sensory Quality and Chemical Composition

The general effects of damaged starch and DFs on sensory properties of whole-grain products have been extensively documented. However, to our knowledge, correlations between sensory properties and damaged starch and DF have not been widely investigated, possibly due to the lack of a comprehensive scoring system for evaluation of sensory properties. In this study, total scores for sensory evaluation as well as DF and damaged starch contents were obtained, thus paving the way for correlation analysis between certain components and end-use quality (Supplementary Document, Figure S2). Negative correlations were found between (a) the CSB score and damaged starch (R2 = 0.7553); (b) the CSB score and total dietary fiber (R2 = 0.8931); (c) the CLP score and damaged starch (R2 = 0.9623); and (d) the CLP score and total dietary fiber (R2 = 0.8375). These correlations clearly demonstrate that end-use quality of WWFs can be enhanced by reduced damaged starch content.

3.6. Storage Quality of CSB

Changes on texture profiles, including hardness and resilience, were measured at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h storage at room temperature to assess the storage properties of CSB (Supplementary Document, Figure S3). A lower value of hardness is considered as a favorable property. At 0 h, CSB from WWF-1 had the lowest hardness (4240.5 g) while CSB from WWF-5 had the higher hardness (11,040.8 g). After 72 h of storage, the hardness of CSB from WWF-1 and WWF-5 increased to 10,519.7 g and 17,068.0 g, respectively. Generally, as shown in Figure S3A, the final hardness (72 h) of all samples showed a consistent relationship with initial hardness (0 h) as CSB from WWF-3 and WWF-5 had both high initial and final hardness, whereas that from WWF-1 had both low initial and final hardness. Compared to WWF-1 (236 µm) and WWF-4 (191 µm), WWFs with finer particle sizes, i.e., WWF-3 (124 µm) and WWF-5 (146 µm), led to the CSB products with higher hardness values. The increase in hardness during storage is probably due to recrystallization of amorphously melted starch [49]. The lower hardness of WWF-1 might result from the coarse bran particles slowing down the formation of double helix starch and retrogradation [51].
Changes in resilience are presented in Figure S3B. Resilience reflects how well a CSB slice can restore to the original height after application of pressure. A higher resilience value is generally considered preferable. CSB from WWF-1 had the highest initial resilience of 0.44, followed by CSB from WWF-4 (0.41). WWF-3 and WWF-5 had lower initial resilience, at 0.35 and 0.34, respectively. After 72 h, WWF-3 and WWF-5 maintained relatively higher resilience, at 0.24 and 0.23, respectively, while the resilience of WWF-1 and WWF-4 decreased to 0.19 and 0.19, respectively. This observation was possibly due to the fact that the degree of change in resilience is positively related to the original CSB volume [52]. Therefore, the resilience of CSB from WWF-1, WWF-2, and WWF-4 with larger original volumes decreased more dramatically than that from WWF-3 and WWF-5, both of which contained slightly higher contents of soluble dietary fiber (SDF) than other WWFs (Table 1). Rezaei et al. [53] reported that a moderately enhanced content of SDF improves the elasticity of the gluten–starch matrix and reduces starch retrogradation. The resilience of CSB from WWF-1 was comparable to that of CSB from WWF-3 and WWF-5, especially during storage of 0–48 h. By combing the data of hardness and resilience, it can be concluded that CSB from WWF-1 processed by hammer mill had the best overall storage quality over 0 to 72 h.

4. Conclusions

This study used five different pilot-scale milling methods to prepare whole-wheat flour.
The different milling methods had significant effects on physiochemical properties, bioactive components, and end-use properties of the WWFs. Particle size distribution was important for the quality of CSB and CLP. The content of damaged starch and dietary fiber was negatively correlated with an evaluation score of CSB and CLP. WWF-1 constituted from total bran reconstitution processed by a hammer mill exhibited best end-use properties, especially for Chinese leavened pancakes. WWF-5 from the entire grain ground by JM-65 Hz had the highest content of bioactive dietary fiber and phenolic acids, rendering its superiority in nutraceutical values. CSB from WWF-1 by total bran reconstitution using the hammer mill had the best short-term storage property. In general, WWF with better end-use properties can be obtained by the milling processes, resulting in appropriate particle size distributions and a low content of damaged starch. Although DF and phenolic acids had negative effects on sensory property of WWF, their health-promoting effects must be recognized. Different milling methods can result in WWF with significantly different contents of phenolic acids and dietary fibers. Further studies will be worthwhile for developing novel techniques that produce whole-wheat products with both high consumer acceptance and superior nutraceutical value.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods10112857/s1, Table S1. Different milling methods used for preparing WWF, Figure S1. Particle size distributions of WWFs, Figure S2. Correlation analyses of sensory quality and chemical composition, Figure S3. Storage quality of CSB.

Author Contributions

W.T.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing the original drafts, writing, review & editing; J.T.: sample preparation, formal analysis, writing the original draft; X.Z.: investigation, sample preparation; P.F.M.: investigation, methodology; Y.L.: writing, review & editing; Z.H.: writing, review & editing, funding acquisition; Y.Z.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing, review & editing, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFE0202300) and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of CAAS (CAAS-XTCX20190025-2 and CAAS-XTCX2018020-7).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to R.A. McIntosh, Plant Breeding Institute, the University of Sydney, for reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Bakke, A.; Vickers, Z. Consumer Liking of Refined and Whole Wheat Breads. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, S473–S480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jonnalagadda, S.S.; Harnack, L.; Hai Liu, R.; McKeown, N.; Seal, C.; Liu, S.; Fahey, G.C. Putting the Whole Grain Puzzle Together: Health Benefits Associated with Whole Grains—Summary of American Society for Nutrition 2010 Satellite Symposium. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 1011S–1022S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Sang, S.; Idehen, E.; Zhao, Y.; Chu, Y. Emerging Science on Whole Grain Intake and Inflammation. Nutr. Rev. 2020, 78, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Okarter, N.; Liu, C.-S.; Sorrells, M.E.; Liu, R.H. Phytochemical Content and Antioxidant Activity of Six Diverse Varieties of Whole Wheat. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tian, W.; Hu, R.; Chen, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, Y. Potential Bioaccessibility of Phenolic Acids in Whole Wheat Products during In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion and Probiotic Fermentation. Food Chem. 2021, 362, 130135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Călinoiu, L.F.; Vodnar, D.C. Whole Grains and Phenolic Acids: A Review on Bioactivity, Functionality, Health Benefits and Bioavailability. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Călinoiu, L.F.; Cătoi, A.-F.; Vodnar, D.C. Solid-State Yeast Fermented Wheat and Oat Bran as A Route for Delivery of Antioxidants. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Tian, W.; Chen, G.; Gui, Y.; Zhang, G.; Li, Y. Rapid Quantification of Total Phenolics and Ferulic Acid in Whole Wheat Using UV–Vis Spectrophotometry. Food Control 2021, 123, 107691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shewry, P.R.; Charmet, G.; Branlard, G.; Lafiandra, D.; Gergely, S.; Salgó, A.; Saulnier, L.; Bedő, Z.; Mills, E.N.C.; Ward, J.L. Developing New Types of Wheat with Enhanced Health Benefits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 25, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heiniö, R.L.; Noort, M.W.J.; Katina, K.; Alam, S.A.; Sozer, N.; de Kock, H.L.; Hersleth, M.; Poutanen, K. Sensory Characteristics of Wholegrain and Bran-Rich Cereal Foods—A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 47, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Li, M.; Ho, K.K.H.Y.; Hayes, M.; Ferruzzi, M.G. The Roles of Food Processing in Translation of Dietary Guidance for Whole Grains, Fruits, and Vegetables. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 10, 569–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tebben, L.; Shen, Y.; Li, Y. Improvers and Functional Ingredients in Whole Wheat Bread: A Review of Their Effects on Dough Properties and Bread Quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 81, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gómez, M.; Gutkoski, L.C.; Bravo-Núñez, Á. Understanding Whole-Wheat Flour and Its Effect in Breads: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3241–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Noort, M.W.J.; van Haaster, D.; Hemery, Y.; Schols, H.A.; Hamer, R.J. The Effect of Particle Size of Wheat Bran Fractions on Bread Quality—Evidence for Fibre–Protein Interactions. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 52, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, N.; Hou, G.G.; Dubat, A. Effects of Flour Particle Size on the Quality Attributes of Reconstituted Whole-Wheat Flour and Chinese Southern-Type Steamed Bread. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 82, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Coda, R.; Kärki, I.; Nordlund, E.; Heiniö, R.-L.; Poutanen, K.; Katina, K. Influence of Particle Size on Bioprocess Induced Changes on Technological Functionality of Wheat Bran. Food Microbiol. 2014, 37, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Protonotariou, S.; Stergiou, P.; Christaki, M.; Mandala, I.G. Physical Properties and Sensory Evaluation of Bread Containing Micronized Whole Wheat Flour. Food Chem. 2020, 318, 126497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, S.; Jin, X.; Gao, J.; Qiu, Z.; Ying, J.; Wang, Y.; Dong, Z.; Zhou, W. Impact of Wheat Bran Micronization on Dough Properties and Bread Quality: Part I—Bran Functionality and Dough Properties. Food Chem. 2021, 353, 129407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, C.; Liu, L.; Li, L.; Hao, C.; Zheng, X.; Bian, K.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X. Effects of Different Milling Processes on Whole Wheat Flour Quality and Performance in Steamed Bread Making. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guan, E.; Yang, Y.; Pang, J.; Zhang, T.; Li, M.; Bian, K. Ultrafine Grinding of Wheat Flour: Effect of Flour/Starch Granule Profiles and Particle Size Distribution on Falling Number and Pasting Properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 2581–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zhu, F. Influence of Ingredients and Chemical Components on the Quality of Chinese Steamed Bread. Food Chem. 2014, 163, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, S.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X.; Tian, S.; Liu, C.; Li, L.; Ding, Y. Improvement of the Quality of Steamed Bread by Supplementation of Wheat Germ from Milling Process. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 60, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Su, D.; Ding, C.; Li, L.; Su, D.; Zheng, X. Effect of Endoxylanases on Dough Properties and Making Performance of Chinese Steamed Bread. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 220, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tian, W.; Ehmke, L.; Miller, R.; Li, Y. Changes in Bread Quality, Antioxidant Activity, and Phenolic Acid Composition of Wheats During Early-Stage Germination. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luna-Vital, D.; Luzardo-Ocampo, I.; Cuellar-Nuñez, M.L.; Loarca-Piña, G.; Gonzalez de Mejia, E. Maize Extract Rich in Ferulic Acid and Anthocyanins Prevents High-Fat-Induced Obesity in Mice by Modulating SIRT1, AMPK and IL-6 Associated Metabolic and Inflammatory Pathways. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2020, 79, 108343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tian, W.; Chen, G.; Zhang, G.; Wang, D.; Tilley, M.; Li, Y. Rapid Determination of Total Phenolic Content of Whole Wheat Flour Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics. Food Chem. 2021, 344, 128633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition—AACC Method 76-33.01. Damaged Starch—Amperometric Method by SDmatic. Available online: https://www.cerealsgrains.org/resources/Methods/Pages/76Starch.aspx (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  28. GB 5009.88-2014. Available online: https://www.chinesestandard.net/China/Chinese.aspx/GB5009.88-2014 (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  29. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition—AACC Method 32-07.01. Soluble, Insoluble, and Total Dietary Fiber in Foods and Food Products. Available online: https://www.cerealsgrains.org/resources/Methods/Pages/32Fiber.aspx (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  30. GB/T 5510-2011. Available online: http://www.gb-gbt.cn/PDF.aspx/GBT5510-2011 (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  31. Tian, W.; Wilson, T.L.; Chen, G.; Guttieri, M.J.; Nelson, N.O.; Fritz, A.; Smith, G.; Li, Y. Effects of Environment, Nitrogen, and Sulfur on Total Phenolic Content and Phenolic Acid Composition of Winter Wheat Grain. Cereal Chem. 2021, 98, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, W.; Chen, G.; Tilley, M.; Li, Y. Changes in Phenolic Profiles and Antioxidant Activities during the Whole Wheat Bread-Making Process. Food Chem. 2021, 345, 128851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition—AACC Method 54-21.02. Rheological Behavior of Flour by Farinograph: Constant Flour Weight Procedure. Available online: https://www.cerealsgrains.org/resources/Methods/Pages/54PhysicalDoughTests.aspx (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  34. AACC Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th Edition—AACC Method 54-10.01. Extensigraph Method, General. Available online: https://www.cerealsgrains.org/resources/Methods/Pages/54PhysicalDoughTests.aspx (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  35. Chen, F.; He, Z.; Chen, D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, X. Influence of Puroindoline Alleles on Milling Performance and Qualities of Chinese Noodles, Steamed Bread and Pan Bread in Spring Wheats. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 45, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, S.; Quail, K.; Moss, R.; Best, J. Objective Methods for the Quality Assessment of Northern-Style Chinese Steamed Bread. J. Cereal Sci. 1995, 21, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Brier, N.; Delcour, J.A. Pearling Affects the Lipid Content and Composition and Lipase Activity Levels of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Roller Milling Fractions. Cereal Chem. 2017, 94, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Adom, K.K.; Sorrells, M.E.; Liu, R.H. Phytochemical Profiles and Antioxidant Activity of Wheat Varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7825–7834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tian, W.; Li, Y. Phenolic Acid Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Hard Red Winter Wheat Varieties. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, R.H. Whole Grain Phytochemicals and Health. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 46, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sang, S.; Landberg, R. The Chemistry behind Health Effects of Whole Grains. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1770074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Brewer, L.R.; Kubola, J.; Siriamornpun, S.; Herald, T.J.; Shi, Y.-C. Wheat Bran Particle Size Influence on Phytochemical Extractability and Antioxidant Properties. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rosa, N.N.; Barron, C.; Gaiani, C.; Dufour, C.; Micard, V. Ultra-Fine Grinding Increases the Antioxidant Capacity of Wheat Bran. J. Cereal Sci. 2013, 57, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Granato, D.; Shahidi, F.; Wrolstad, R.; Kilmartin, P.; Melton, L.D.; Hidalgo, F.J.; Miyashita, K.; van Camp, J.; Alasalvar, C.; Ismail, A.B.; et al. Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolics and Flavonoids Contents: Should We Ban in Vitro Screening Methods? Food Chem. 2018, 264, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Harnly, J. Antioxidant Methods. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 64, 145–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sanz Penella, J.M.; Collar, C.; Haros, M. Effect of Wheat Bran and Enzyme Addition on Dough Functional Performance and Phytic Acid Levels in Bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Okusu, H.; Otsubo, S.; Dexter, J. Wheat Milling and Flour Quality Analysis for Noodles in Japan. In Asian Noodles; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; pp. 57–73. ISBN 9780470179222. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosell, C.M.; Santos, E.; Collar, C. Mixing Properties of Fibre-Enriched Wheat Bread Doughs: A Response Surface Methodology Study. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 223, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, X.; Xu, Y.; Wang, N.; Zhou, Y. Effects of Superfine Grinding of Bran on the Properties of Dough and Qualities of Steamed Bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 81, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, C.-C.; Yang, Z.; Guo, X.-N.; Zhu, K.-X. Effects of Insoluble Dietary Fiber and Ferulic Acid on the Quality of Steamed Bread and Gluten Aggregation Properties. Food Chem. 2021, 364, 130444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Palacios, H.R.; Schwarz, P.B.; D’Appolonia, B.L. Effect of α-Amylases from Different Sources on the Retrogradation and Recrystallization of Concentrated Wheat Starch Gels: Relationship to Bread Staling. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5978–5986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, W.; Brennan, M.; Serventi, L.; Brennan, C. Effect of Wheat Bran on Dough Rheology and Final Quality of Chinese Steamed Bread. Cereal Chem. J. 2017, 94, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rezaei, S.; Najafi, M.A.; Haddadi, T. Effect of Fermentation Process, Wheat Bran Size and Replacement Level on Some Characteristics of Wheat Bran, Dough, and High-Fiber Tafton Bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2019, 85, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A typical UPLC spectra of the tested sample at 280 nm.
Figure 1. A typical UPLC spectra of the tested sample at 280 nm.
Foods 10 02857 g001
Figure 2. Appearance of CSB (A), internal structures of CSB (B), appearance of CLP (C) and internal structures of CLP (D) produced from different whole wheat flours. CSB: Chinese steamed bread; CLP: Chinese leavened pancakes. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Figure 2. Appearance of CSB (A), internal structures of CSB (B), appearance of CLP (C) and internal structures of CLP (D) produced from different whole wheat flours. CSB: Chinese steamed bread; CLP: Chinese leavened pancakes. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Foods 10 02857 g002
Table 1. Chemical composition of WWFs obtained from different milling methods.
Table 1. Chemical composition of WWFs obtained from different milling methods.
SampleSDF
(g/100 g)
IDF
(g/100 g)
TDF
(g/100 g)
Fatty Acids
(mg/100 g)
Damaged
Starch (%)
Protein
(%)
WWF-17.35 ± 0.16c1.50 ± 0.24b8.85 ± 0.07c45.3 ± 2.26c4.12 ± 0.06e14.6 ± 0.06bc
WWF-27.27 ± 0.02c1.73 ± 0.02ab9.00 ± 0.05c53.9 ± 2.61b5.06 ± 0.01c15.0 ± 0.04a
WWF-38.64 ± 0.30b2.12 ± 0.12a10.76 ± 0.17b64.4 ± 2.85a5.71 ± 0.07b14.8 ± 0.14ab
WWF-46.18 ± 0.28d1.28 ± 0.14b7.46 ± 0.27d42.1 ± 2.10c4.56 ± 0.08d14.1 ± 0.11d
WWF-510.24 ± 0.40a2.03 ± 0.05a12.27 ± 0.45a53.0 ± 1.98b6.35 ± 0.01a13.5 ± 0.07e
The results were reported as mean values from three replicates. Within each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). WWF: whole-wheat flour; SDF: soluble dietary fiber; IDF: insoluble dietary fiber; TDF: total dietary fiber. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Table 2. Phenolic acid composition of WWFs obtained by different milling methods.
Table 2. Phenolic acid composition of WWFs obtained by different milling methods.
SampleVanillic Acid (µg/g)Syringic Acid (µg/g)para-Coumaric Acid (µg/g)trans-Ferulic Acid (µg/g)Sinapic Acid (µg/g)cis-Ferulic Acid (µg/g)
WWF-129.57 ± 0.80b17.20 ± 0.68b18.50 ± 0.81ab720.16 ± 4.58bc77.47 ± 1.22abc75.08 ± 0.63b
WWF-231.22 ± 0.83ab16.76 ± 0.87bc17.82 ± 0.89ab742.15 ± 14.62b80.97 ± 2.10a73.48 ± 1.40b
WWF-330.18 ± 1.54b14.47 ± 0.53c13.30 ± 0.65c534.90 ± 6.83d78.49 ± 2.18ab50.81 ± 1.41c
WWF-427.72 ± 1.43b14.75 ± 0.99bc15.81 ± 0.57bc647.33 ± 23.64c70.65 ± 2.94c65.77 ± 1.81b
WWF-534.35 ± 3.97a19.64 ± 2.46a19.87 ± 4.37a1002.11 ± 101.04a73.57 ± 6.81bc111.25 ± 16.03a
The results were reported as mean values from three replicates. Within each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). WWF: whole-wheat flour. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Table 3. Dough rheological properties of WWF obtained by different milling methods.
Table 3. Dough rheological properties of WWF obtained by different milling methods.
SampleWater Absorption
(%)
Development time (min)Stability
(min)
Energy
(cm2)
Extensibility
(mm)
Maximum
Resistance (BU)
WWF-168.4 ± 0.1c4.7 ± 0.0b6.0 ± 0.1a47.0 ± 0.3b132.9 ± 0.5b229.8 ± 1.8b
WWF-269.8 ± 0.1b4.9 ± 0.0ab4.7 ± 0.0b52.8 ± 0.2a140.0 ± 0.8a249.0 ± 3.9a
WWF-368.0 ± 0.1c5.1 ± 0.1a4.8 ± 0.1b49.0 ± 0.3b142.1 ± 0.9a227.6 ± 2.3b
WWF-464.8 ± 0.3d3.8 ± 0.1c3.8 ± 0.1c39.5 ± 0.3c133.6 ± 0.5b193.0 ± 1.9c
WWF-573.0 ± 0.3a4.8 ± 0.1b2.1 ± 0.0d38.3 ± 0.3c105.9 ± 0.4c243.8 ± 3.1a
The results were reported as mean values from two replicates. Within each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). WWF: whole-wheat flour. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Table 4. Sensory evaluation for Chinese steamed bread produced from WWF obtained by different milling methods.
Table 4. Sensory evaluation for Chinese steamed bread produced from WWF obtained by different milling methods.
SampleSpecific Volume
(20)
Stress Relaxation (35)Skin Color
(10)
Smoothness
(10)
Shape
(10)
Structure
(15)
Total Score
(100)
WWF-114a21a0a5d8a9b57a
WWF-214a19b0a7b7b11a57a
WWF-39b19b0a8a7b9b52b
WWF-414a21a0a6c7b11a59a
WWF-59b13c0a7b5c8c42c
RF20339981493
The scores were reported as mean values from five panelists. Within each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). WWF: whole-wheat flour, RF: refined flour. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Table 5. Sensory evaluation of Chinese leavened pancakes produced from WWF obtained by different milling methods.
Table 5. Sensory evaluation of Chinese leavened pancakes produced from WWF obtained by different milling methods.
SampleAppearance
(20)
Stress Relaxation (35)Structure
(20)
Stickiness
(15)
Taste and Flavor (10)Total Score
(100)
WWF-116a20c16a13a5b70a
WWF-214b20c14b11bc4c63b
WWF-312c20c12c8d3d55c
WWF-416a20c14b10c6a66b
WWF-56d20c10d7d2e45d
RF18321612987
The scores were reported as mean values from five panelists. Within each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). WWF: whole-wheat flour, RF: refined flour. WWF-1: total reconstitution of brans grinded by hammer mill; WWF-2: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz. WWF-3: total reconstitution of brans grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz; WWF-4: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 45 Hz; WWF-5: entire grains grinded by jet mill at 65 Hz.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, W.; Tong, J.; Zhu, X.; Martin, P.F.; Li, Y.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y. Effects of Different Pilot-Scale Milling Methods on Bioactive Components and End-Use Properties of Whole Wheat Flour. Foods 2021, 10, 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112857

AMA Style

Tian W, Tong J, Zhu X, Martin PF, Li Y, He Z, Zhang Y. Effects of Different Pilot-Scale Milling Methods on Bioactive Components and End-Use Properties of Whole Wheat Flour. Foods. 2021; 10(11):2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Wenfei, Jingyang Tong, Xiaoyue Zhu, Philipp Fritschi Martin, Yonghui Li, Zhonghu He, and Yan Zhang. 2021. "Effects of Different Pilot-Scale Milling Methods on Bioactive Components and End-Use Properties of Whole Wheat Flour" Foods 10, no. 11: 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112857

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop