Next Article in Journal
A Bibliometric Analysis of Cannabis Publications: Six Decades of Research and a Gap on Studies with the Plant
Previous Article in Journal
Communicating Science through Comics: A Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-Authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations
Article Menu
Issue 3 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Publications 2018, 6(3), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030039

A Correlation Analysis of Normalized Indicators of Citation

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow 117198, Russia
Received: 31 July 2018 / Revised: 9 September 2018 / Accepted: 11 September 2018 / Published: 13 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bibliometrics, Measurements and Research Evaluation)
Full-Text   |   PDF [3244 KB, uploaded 13 September 2018]   |  
  |   Review Reports

Abstract

Recently, more and more countries are entering the global race for university competitiveness. On the one hand, global rankings are a convenient tool for quantitative analysis. On the other hand, their indicators are often difficult to quickly calculate and they often contradict each other. The author of this paper hoped to use widely available indicators for a quick analysis of the University’s publication strategy and opted for the normalized citation indicators available in the SciVal analytical tool, namely, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) and Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI). The author demonstrated the possibility of applying the correlation analysis to the impact indicators of a document and a journal on a sample of social and humanitarian fields at Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (PFUR, “RUDN” in Russian). A dot diagram of university (or country) documents was used to form a two-factor matrix (SNIP and FWCI) that was further divided into four quadrants. Such an analysis illustrated the present situation in that discipline. An analysis of the RUDN university publications revealed problems and prospects in the development of social sciences and humanities. A serious problem observed was that high-quality results were often published in low-impact journals that narrowed the results’ potential audience and, accordingly, the number of citations. A particular attention was paid to the application of the results in practice. View Full-Text
Keywords: normalized indicators; correlation analysis; Source Normalized Impact per Paper; SNIP; Field-Weighted Citation Impact; FWCI normalized indicators; correlation analysis; Source Normalized Impact per Paper; SNIP; Field-Weighted Citation Impact; FWCI
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kochetkov, D.M. A Correlation Analysis of Normalized Indicators of Citation. Publications 2018, 6, 39.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Publications EISSN 2304-6775 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top