Next Article in Journal
Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Dentistry–A Comprehensive Review of Literature
Previous Article in Journal
3D Assessment of Endodontic Lesions with a Low-Dose CBCT Protocol
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Polymers for Aligner Manufacturing: In Vitro Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision

1
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2
Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02115, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Dent. J. 2020, 8(2), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052
Submission received: 5 March 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 15 May 2020 / Published: 20 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Ceramics and Metal-Free Materials in The Digital Workflow)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface topography and the precision measurements of different intraoral and extraoral digital scanners. A reference model of a maxillary arch with four implant analogs was prepared and scanned by three intraoral and two extraoral scanners. The reference model was scanned fifteen times with each digital scanning system, investigating the surface topography and precision measurements for the same-arch and cross-arch measurements. The data was exported to 3D inspection and mesh-processing software (GOM Inspect, Braunschweig, Germany). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey method for pairwise comparisons. The effect of parameters on generating the surface topography was analyzed by Univariate Linear Regression Analysis. Of the scanner systems evaluated, iTero (IT) exhibited the most number of triangulation points, followed by Trios 3 Shape (TR) and Straumann Cares (SC). There were no significant differences observed in the surface topography when comparing flat and contoured surfaces, the anterior and posterior position, and interproximal areas. For the precision measurement in the same quadrant, no statistical difference was noted between intra- and extraoral scanners. However, the extraoral scanners showed substantially higher precision measurements for the cross-arch measurement. Surface topography did not correlate to precision. Rather, precision correlated with the scanning mechanism. For a quadrant scanning, both intraoral and extraoral scanners are recommended, but extraoral scanners are recommended for a full-arch scanning.
Keywords: digital dentistry; digital impression; surface topography; precision; accuracy digital dentistry; digital impression; surface topography; precision; accuracy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, S.J.; Kim, S.-W.; Lee, J.J.; Cheong, C.W. Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision. Dent. J. 2020, 8, 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052

AMA Style

Lee SJ, Kim S-W, Lee JJ, Cheong CW. Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision. Dentistry Journal. 2020; 8(2):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Sang J., Soo-Woo Kim, Joshua J. Lee, and Chan W. Cheong. 2020. "Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision" Dentistry Journal 8, no. 2: 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052

APA Style

Lee, S. J., Kim, S.-W., Lee, J. J., & Cheong, C. W. (2020). Comparison of Intraoral and Extraoral Digital Scanners: Evaluation of Surface Topography and Precision. Dentistry Journal, 8(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020052

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop