Next Article in Journal
Metal Hydride Hydrogen Storage (Compression) Units Operating at Near-Atmospheric Pressure of the Feed H2
Previous Article in Journal
Phase Formation of Co and Cr Co-Doped Bismuth Niobate with Pyrochlore Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Nanostructured Materials as Electrodes in Energy Storage Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
2
Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
3
Key Laboratory of Liquid-Solid Structural Evolution and Processing of Materials of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2023, 11(7), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070289
Submission received: 11 May 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 6 July 2023

Abstract

:
Although lithium-ion battery (LIB) technology has prevailed for years, the growing pressure and increased cost of lithium sources urge the rapid development of other promising energy storage devices. As a low-cost alternative, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) with similar properties of electrochemical reaction have caught researchers’ attention. Nevertheless, great challenges of inferior reversible capacity and poor lifespan induced by the bigger ionic radius of sodium ions still exist. To solve these problems, improvements to anode materials prove to be an effective way. Herein, the latest research on promising anodes in SIBs is summarized, and the further prospects are also illustrated.

1. Introduction

Given the growing concerns about environmental pollution and energy shortages, renewable and clean energy, for instance, solar, wind, and tidal energy, has been regarded as the most prominent alternative candidate to solve future survival issues. Nowadays, the intermittent period problem still hinders the full utilization of these new energy sources, which cause extreme pressure on electrical energy storage systems (EES) [1,2,3]. Moreover, the current transportation systems, which are usually powered by fossil issues, would be more promising if they were replaced by electrically driven devices. Batteries, especially lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with intriguing eco-friendly features and a high conversion efficiency, have occupied the industry market over the past decades [4]. However, due to the increased demand for LIBs, the availability of lithium sources has decreased, and the cost of lithium has inevitably risen [5]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore new energy storage techniques to meet this urgent need in the near future.
Inspired by the similar electrochemical reaction mechanisms to LIBs, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), which are another promising power technology, could also be applied as energy storage devices for both large-scale energy storage and smart grid applications [6]. In addition, SIBs also exhibit outstanding merits in contrast to lithium, thanks to their high abundance and low cost of sodium sources. As reported for a 7 kW/11.5 kWh LMO-synthetic graphite battery, 3.8% of the cost for electrode materials (USD 1022) as well as 1.3% of the total cost for complete battery (USD 2981) could be achieved if the same amount of lithium was replaced by sodium [7]. However, a larger ionic radius of 1.02 Å for Na+ (0.76 Å for Li+) usually leads to slower reaction kinetics, which causes an inferior reversible capacity and a poor rate capability [8]. Anode materials, which are one of the key components in LIBs, still exhibit their importance in promoting the development of SIBs. There are three mechanisms that can store lithium ions, including intercalation/de-intercalation, the conversion method, and the alloying/de-alloying reaction [9]. Although many kinds of materials are suitable for serving the positive electrodes of SIBs, by contrast, there seem to be few available anode candidates. Similarly to Li anodes in LIBs, Na foil is not an advisable option for SIBs due to their high reactivity, dendrite formation, and instability in most organic electrolytes. And its melting point is as low as 97.7 °C, causing a safety risk for SIBs as well. So far, several main types of anode materials have been under investigation, including (1) carbonaceous materials, (2) metal oxides, (3) alloys, (4) sulfides and phosphates, (5) organic compounds, and (6) 2D materials. Thus, this review will summarize the recent research progress on SIB anodes and the corresponding electrochemical behaviors in detail.

2. Anode Materials

2.1. Carbon

2.1.1. Graphite

Carbonaceous-based anode materials have been commonly applied in LIBs for decades [10]. Graphite, when applied in LIBs, is capable of releasing a high theoretical reversible capability (372 mA h g−1). However, unlike the application in LIBs, Na+ can hardly electrochemically intercalate into graphite layers because of its larger radius, so it is accepted that graphite does not exhibit a desirable intercalation ability for Na+. Theoretical calculations reveal that a critical minimum distance of 0.37 nm between the graphitic layers is essential to achieve facile Na+ transfer [11], but graphite provides an insufficient interlayer spacing of 0.34 nm. Thus, the common graphite is not as competent as a SIB anode without further modification.
One effective method to improve the sodium storage performance of graphite is to increase the interlayer spacing. Figure 1a schematically depicts the Na+ storage in graphite-based anodes [12]. Wen et al. adopted a two-step oxidation–reduction process to easily fabricate expanded graphite. The interlayer space could be manipulated easily via this simple method, and the modified graphite exhibited an interlayer distance of 0.43 nm. The structural robustness observed via in situ TEM indicates that the interlayer change was reproducible during the multiple charge/discharge processes (Figure 1b). Thus, the expanded graphite could reach a high specific capacity of 284 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1 and 184 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 (Figure 1c), and undergo 2000 cycles at 20 mA g−1 (Figure 1d).
The other common way to push Na+ into a graphite interlayer depends on the co-intercalation phenomenon of Na+ in some specific solvents. In terms of LIBs, LixC6 (0 < x ≤ 1), also called graphite intercalation compounds (GICs), is the main product after Li+ intercalation. Even though K+ has a larger radius than Na+, it is capable of inserting into graphite and reversibly extracting from graphite by forming K-GICs (C8) in K-ion batteries (KIBs) [13]. However, the weak Na+‒graphene cation‒π interaction leads to difficult Na+ storage in graphite, namely NaxC (x ≈ 0), and no stable Na-C binary compounds have been identified so far. Nevertheless, with the assistance of ether-based solvents, graphite could reversibly accommodate Na+ [14], and it is a more effective approach to adopt graphite as an SIB anode than functionalizing graphite. The intercalation of solvated Na+ could be illustrated as the following equation (also applied to other alkali metals) [15]: Cn + e + Na+ + y (solv.) ⇄ Na+(solv.)yCn, in which Cn is n carbon atoms in the graphite lattice and solv. represents the solvent molecule. The ether-based solvents, especially linear ether, containing multiple O atoms are able to capture one Na+ ion promptly, leading to further and stronger solvation of Na+ ions [16].
Kim and coworkers carried out a series of investigations on the co-intercalation phenomenon of alkali ions to compare the graphite electrode utilized in KIBs, LIBs, and SIBs [17]. Half-cells with 1 M MCF3SO3 (M = Li, Na, or K) in diethylene glycol dimethyl ether (DEGDME) electrolyte were used to examine the electrochemical properties. Of particular interest, the potentials of over 1 V for K+ and Li+ are quite different from that in conventional KIBs (0.2 V vs. K/K+) or LIBs (0.1 V vs. Li/Li+), indicating significant dissimilar reaction mechanisms. From the plots of voltage vs. NHE, regardless of the ionization energy, the average voltage is proportional to the ion size, implying that Na and K are more likely to insert into graphite than Li, which is in contrast with what is usually believed. Moreover, the calculated interlayer distance of each intermediate phase reveals an increasing value in the order of Li, Na, and K. The larger solvated ion graphite compound results in reduced repulsion between negatively charged graphene layers in the discharged state as well as a higher alkali ion storage potential.
The study using 2H solid-state NMR indicated that in Na-iglyme-GICs complexes, two diglyme molecules coordinate to each Na+ ion weakly via the central oxygen atom in diglyme and rotate around an axis along O-Na at an ambient temperature [18]. Furthermore, first-principle molecular dynamics simulations also evidenced that Na+ ions are able to insert into graphite easily with the aid of diglyme electrolyte [19]. For Na+−diglyme co-intercalation, the diglyme-graphene van der Waals interaction played an important role in stabilizing the mechanical integrity by enhancing the coupling strength between graphene interlayers, and the fully solvated Na+ ions could diffuse in/out the graphite interlayers with ease. Thus, the fast Na+ movement contributed to an even higher Na+−diglyme conductivity, which was almost five orders of magnitude higher than that of the Li counterpart.
Understanding the co-intercalation behavior of Na+ in the presence of ether-based electrolytes and fabricating SIB full cells with desirable electrochemical reactions is feasible. A full cell consisting of Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 positive electrodes and natural graphite anodes with a weight ratio of 1.5: 1.0 was under evaluation [20]. The graphite//1 M NaPF6 in DEGDME//Na1.5VPO4.8F0.7 cell delivered a specific capacity of over 100 mA h g−1anode and 41 mA h g−1electrode at 0.1 A g−1, and the average discharge voltage occurred at around 2.92 V, corresponding to an energy density of ≈120 W h kg−1. After cycling 250 cycles at 0.5 A g−1, 70% of the initial discharge capacity was still maintained. Hasa addressed an optimized SIB full battery with a graphite anode [21]. The graphite anode was activated in a half-cell (1 M TEGDME-NaClO4) to eliminate the initial irreversible specific capacity. The electrochemical performance of graphite//1 M NaClO4 in TEGDME //Na0.7CoO2 full SIB was tested between 3.7 and 0.5 V. A specific capacity of 80 mA h g−1 was delivered upon 100 cycles at 175 mA g−1 and the stable long cycling life reached more than 1200 cycles, even at 1750 mA g−1.

2.1.2. Non-Graphite Carbon

Hard carbon, an important kind of non-graphite carbon, usually synthesizes at high temperatures of over 1000 °C [22]. Stevens and coworkers have reported pioneering work on the electrochemical behavior of hard carbon in SIBs [23]. They used glucose as a carbon precursor, carbonized it at 1000 °C for the assessment, and then obtained hard carbon that delivered a reversible specific capacity of ca. 300 mA h g−1. As for the potential profiles, the sloping region below 1 V is related to Na ion intercalation between graphene sheets, and the following voltage intercalation reaction platform below 100 mV is induced by Na ions filling in the pores. It is found that a similar reaction mechanism to that of LIBs occurs during Na+ insertion. The random stacking of carbon fragments with a lateral extent of about 40 Å causes small regions where some of the layers are parallel to each other and act as a house of cards. Recently, Z. Lu’s group reported the extra sodiation behavior of hard carbon [24]. They claimed that excess sodium storage sites with stable C-N• and C-C• radicals would be provided by introducing pyridine N during cycling. Various in situ and ex situ characterizations further verified that extra sodiation sites come from the electrostatic interaction at low potentials. Finally, the hard carbon with pyridine N doping reveals outstanding high specific capacity of 434 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1 together with a high capacity retention of 98.7% after 5000 cycles. Thus, it appears that hard carbon is very suitable for rechargeable SIBs.
Notable, all the modification methods adopted in LIBs are applied to SIBs, mostly including heteroatom doping and morphology design [25]. Doping with light-weight atoms (such as B, N, P, and S) is conductive to modifying the local bonding environment, expanding the interlayer distance, and improving the electron distribution on the carbon surface, thus contributing to the enhancement of electronic and ionic transfer [26]. Recently, C. Liu’s team prepared a sulfur-doped camphor tree-derived HC anode [27]. Successful S doping could lead to increased interlayer spacing and facilitate the intercalation/deintercalation of Na+ ions. Thus, the Na half-cell exhibited a discharge-specific capacity of 616.7 mA h g−1 with an ICE of 66.61%. Additionally, a reversible specific capacity of 145.6 mA h g−1 over 500 cycles at 2000 mA g−1 was achieved.
In addition, high-performance batteries obtained by modifying structures are easily attainable [28]. For example, 1D carbon nanofibers fabricated by electrospinning followed by thermal annealing demonstrated a specific capacity of 248 mA h g−1 after 100 cycles at 100 mA g−1 with 91% capacity retention [29]. Bio-based carbon fibers derived from polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-humic acid (HA) exhibited a specific capacity of 249.6 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 over 100 cycles and 81.7 mA h g−1 at 1 A g−1 [30]. The S and N co-doped hollow carbon spheres denoted a specific capacity of 110 mA h g−1 at 10 A g−1, and only 0.0195 mA h g−1 per cycle faded over 2000 cycles [31].
When served as a negative electrode in a full battery, hard carbon is the best choice, owing to its high capacity, low working potential, and stable long-term cycling properties. The full batteries consisting of NaCrO2 cathodes and hard carbon anodes exhibited an excellent performance even at 10 A g−1 [32], and the Na3+xV2(PO4)2F3/hard carbon system could deliver an energy density of 265 W h kg−1 [33]. Since hard carbon suffers from a high initial irreversible capacity, pre-sodiation is necessary. Pretreatment of an anode helps to extract the maximal capacity and retain structural stability. Llave et al. studied the effect of pretreated anodes in full SIBs and LIBs. The superior capacities of pretreated hard carbon compared to the untreated ones, either in SIBs or in LIBs, demonstrate the significance of the pretreatment for obtaining maximal capacity in the full cells [34]. Similarly, when adopting P2/P3/O2-Na0.76Mn0.5Ni0.3Fe0.1Mg0.1O2 as the cathode, the well-balanced cells with hard carbon anodes, which have been subjected to pre-activation, displayed an energy density of about 240 W h kg−1cathode+anode at 0.1 C, while the non-presodiated anodes delivered a lower specific discharge energy of 210 W h kg−1 at the same current density [35].
For years, the most common way to obtain hard carbons has been by pyrolyzing different precursors such as organic polymers, hydrocarbons, and saccharides [36,37]. In the last few years, biomass wastes, such as diverse plant peels [38,39,40,41], prawn shells [42], natural cotton [43], coconut oil [44], and oatmeal [45], have been explored as anodes in SIBs as a kind of renewable source. Since over a million tons of these materials are discarded without any utilization, taking advantage of them facilitates reductions in waste and lowers the cost of energy storage packs. Wu et al. prepared hard carbon derived from wild apples [46], which underwent a simple drying process in an oven and a subsequent strict dehydration process in the presence of phosphoric acid. The aim of adding phosphoric acid as an activation agent was to form porous carbon with a high specific surface area. The hard carbon//1M NaClO4 in EC/PC//P2-NaxNi0.22Co0.11Mn0.66O2 cell revealed a stable cycling performance with a high specific capacity of 250 mA h g−1 after cycling 100 times between 3.95 and 0.5 V at 0.1 C, as well as 220 mA h g−1 at 1 C and 183 mA h g−1 at 2 C. They claimed that the observed increasing cell polarization was mainly due to the un-optimized P2-NaxNi0.22Co0.11Mn0.66O2 positive electrode, and that the biomass carbon was a potential material suitable for anode materials. Apart from hard carbons, some soft carbons, including anthracite and pitch, have been reported as well. [47,48]
In brief, carbonaceous materials with nontoxicity, abundance, and a satisfactory capacity in the range of 200–500 mA h g−1 are good options for anodes of SIBs. By means of increasing the interlayer distance or the co-intercalation effect, graphite could successfully achieve the insertion/exaction of Na+ and deliver a desirable discharge capacity. Usually, amorphous carbon with large porosity provides higher capacity than graphite because of the favorable sodium storage in surface defects. However, it should be noted that the initial Coulombic efficiency is too low for carbonaceous materials, and activation in a half-cell to remove the initial irreversible capacity prior to applying in full cells is favorable to compensate for partial sodium loss. How to improve the initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) is the key job in the next study. Converting biomass wastes to carbon as raw materials for batteries not only achieves resource recycling but also benefits the environment. Thus, there is great potential for carbon’s commercialization with further enhanced electrochemical performance.

2.2. Metal Oxides

2.2.1. Titanium-Based Oxides

Among the diverse kinds of metal oxides for SIB anodes, titanium-based oxides based on intercalation reactions are the most studied candidates, mainly including Li4Ti5O12 (LTO), TiO2, and Na-Ti-O composites.
LTO has been regarded as an anode material for LIBs for many years due to its merits of non-toxicity, safety, and low cost. Especially, the negligible structural change is especially attractive, not only for LIBs but also for SIBs [49,50]. Compared with LTO, TiO2 has the distinct advantage of being much lower in cost due to the absence of Li. According to the different arrangements of TiO6 octahedra, TiO2 could be classified into four polymorphisms: anatase, rutile, bronze (TiO2-B), and brookite. The anatase phase has been found to be more active than rutile because of the inherent 2D channels, and TiO2-B reveals the highest practical capacity in the family of TiO2 because of its strong storage capability to store 1 Li+ per Ti. Even though TiO2 exhibits stable long-cycling properties, the low theoretical discharge-specific capacity of 335 mA h g−1 and inherent poor electrical conductivity are still big challenges. Meanwhile, the high potential of 1.75 V vs. Li/Li+ requires a cathode with a high voltage once used in full batteries. Xiong et al. fabricated an amorphous TiO2 nanotube (TiO2NT) to behave as an SIB anode in 2011 [51]. The TiO2NT was directly grown on the Ti current collector, avoiding the complexity of adding binders and additives during cell assembly. Coupled with the Na1.0Li0.2Ni0.25Mn0.75Oδ cathode, the obtained full cell, which was tested in a voltage window of 1.0–2.6 V, exhibited a discharge-specific capacity of about 80 mA h g−1 at 11 mA g−1 with an operation voltage of 1.8 V.
In order to improve the intrinsic low conductivity, nanoscale TiO2 with diverse morphologies and modifications by coating and doping are required [52,53]. Yolk–shell TiO2@C presented a specific capacity of 210 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1, and 136 mA h g−1 was retained after 2000 cycles at 20 C [54]. Ti0.94Nb0.06O2 thick-film anodes exhibited a reversible capacity of 160 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1 upon the 50th cycle as an anode for SIBs [55]. He et al. fabricated Fe-doped cauliflower-like rutile TiO2 for Na storage [56]. The Fe doping not only enhanced the conductivities, but also created more oxygen vacancies and lowered the sodiation energy barrier. This TiO2-based electrode exhibited outstanding cycling stability, maintaining a specific capacity of 127.3 mA h g−1 over 3000 cycles at 1680 mA g−1.
The sodium storage mechanism occurring in anatase could be explored using high-energy X-ray diffraction [57]. In Figure 2a, the pristine anatase TiO2 was in good order, with Na accommodating in 3a Wyckoff sites and Ti occupying in 3b. After full sodiation, the 3a sites were filled with 43% Na and 57% Ti, and 39% Na and Ti took up part of the 3b sites. The chemical formula could be expressed as (Na0.43Ti0.57)3a(V0.22Na0.39Ti0.39)3bO2, (V is vacancy), highlighting the strong structural disorder derived from cationic intermixing. Compared with NaTiO2, a contraction of the c parameters occurred in this situation. Upon desodiation, the structure was no longer a layered compound but a local structure similar to the anatase TiO2.
In the consideration of anodes for batteries, a low-operation voltage is preferable in order to achieve a high energy density for practical utilization. Na-Ti-O composites with different Na/Ti ratios, such as NaTiO2, Na2Ti6O13, and Na4Ti5O12, especially Na2Ti3O7, have been widely studied [58,59,60,61]. The first proposal for the application of Na2Ti3O7 in SIB was put forward by Senguttuvan et al. in 2011 [62]. It exhibits a low average voltage potential of about 0.3 V, which is only a little higher than that for carbon and NaPb alloys (as shown in Figure 2b). Na2Ti3O7 could accommodate 2 Na+ reversibly (2 Na + Na2Ti3O7 ⇄ Na4Ti3O7) with full sodiation and achieve a specific capacity of 200 mA h g−1 at C/25. Detailed studies with the aid of analysis of electrochemical behavior and DFT calculations found that the inserted Na4Ti3O7 phase is mechanically and dynamically stable, indicating that the insertion reaction is fully reversible between Na2Ti3O7 and Na4Ti3O7 [63]. Surface modification as well as novel morphologies could provide assistance to enhance the performance of Na2Ti3O7 [64,65,66]. For instance, Na2Ti3O7 with 3D hierarchical flower-like stable microstructures was synthesized by the hydrothermal process [67]. Interlaced 2D Na2Ti3O7 nanosheets closely interlinked with each other to form carnation-shaped 3D Na2Ti3O7 (Figure 2c,d). The layered 3D microstructures with a high surface area and effective pore size demonstrated an impressive long-term cycling life (Figure 2e), retaining a specific capacity of 85 mA h g−1 at 400 mA g−1 even after 1100 cycles (80% of initial specific capacity). At 800 mA g−1, a discharge-specific capacity of 73.8 mA h g−1 was still obtained, indicating the enhanced rate capability.
Different from the generally accepted Na2Ti3O7 ⇄ Na4Ti3O7 mechanism, a fresh Na2Ti3O7 ⇄ Na3−xTi3O7 pathway delivering a redox voltage of 0.2 V vs. Na/Na+ was unveiled by Rudola et al. [68]. The distinct voltage step implied that an intermediate phase formed between Na2Ti3O7 and deep discharged Na4Ti3O7 between 2.5 and 0.01 V. In the discharge process, the ex situ XRD results clearly illustrated that the intermediate Na3−xTi3O7 formed at first (from A to C) and then gradually decreased (from D to E), and only Na4Ti3O7 existed at the fully discharged state. With this route, Na+ storage along the lower discharge plateau underwent a two-phase reaction in nature. Thus, simply limiting the cut-off voltage around 0.155 V (which was called shadow discharge) made the cell exhibit different electrochemical properties. The discharge/charge voltages are 0.24/0.22 vs. Na/Na+ other than 0.47/0.44 V in deeper discharge.
Figure 2. (a) Structural relationship between the pristine tetragonal and sodiated rhombohedral phases along the (100) direction of anatase TiO2. Reproduced with permission of [57]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (b) Voltage capacity plot of various materials for potential electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Reproduced with permission of [62], Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society. (c) Low-magnification SEM images; (d) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) image as well as (e) the long cycle performance measured at a current density of 400 mA g−1 of Na2Ti3O7 nanostructures. Reproduced with permission of [67]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. (a) Structural relationship between the pristine tetragonal and sodiated rhombohedral phases along the (100) direction of anatase TiO2. Reproduced with permission of [57]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society. (b) Voltage capacity plot of various materials for potential electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Reproduced with permission of [62], Copyright 2011, American Chemical Society. (c) Low-magnification SEM images; (d) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) image as well as (e) the long cycle performance measured at a current density of 400 mA g−1 of Na2Ti3O7 nanostructures. Reproduced with permission of [67]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Inorganics 11 00289 g002

2.2.2. Other Conversion-Type Oxides

Compared with Ti-based anodes, the sodium storage process of other transition metal oxides (TMOs) is usually based on a conversion mechanism, which delivers much higher capacities. Nevertheless, the drawbacks of a large volume variation during charging/discharging and inherent sluggish electron transport would lead to an unsatisfactory reversible capacity. Analogously, a lot of well-known anodes for LIBs already utilized in SIBs still demonstrate attractive performances in SIBs. Hariharan et al. first reported α-MoO3 anode materials for sodium storage in 2013 [69]. The rocking chair MoO3/Na3V2(PO4)3 full cell revealed a plateau at about 1.4 V, and the obtained initial discharge-specific capacity was 164 mA h g−1, based on anode weight. Moreover, coupled with a carbon-coated Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode, the average voltage of a V2O5/Na3V2(PO4)3 full cell occurs at 2.5 V, and the specific capacity of 113 mA h g−1anode could be maintained after cycling 200 times at 100 mA g−1 [70]. With the adoption of a carbon-Fe3O4/Na2FeP2O7 configuration, the full cell also delivered a satisfactory specific capacity of nearly 100 mA h g−1 and a distinct voltage platform of about 2.28 V, which equals an energy density of 203 W h kg−1 [71]. In addition, other components in batteries also influence the practical capacity of full batteries, including the electrode’s formula, balance, binders, and electrolytes [72,73].
Similar to the situation of LIBs, although Ti-based materials have the merit of good structural stability, their relatively low specific capacity of about 100–200 mA h g−1 is generally far less than their theoretical capacities. In contrast, the remarkable advantage of TMOs is their high theoretical capacity. But, further exploration of the approach to alleviating the large volume variations should be highlighted due to the poor cycling performance.

2.3. Intermetallic Compounds

Electrodes based on Si, Ge, and Pb, which deliver high reactivity in LIBs, have a smaller or no specific capacity for SIBs, while Sn reacts with Na to reversibly form Sn-Na intermetallic phases and display electrochemical redox reactions [74]. It could alloy with up to 3.75 Na to acquire a theoretical specific capacity of 847 mA h g−1 and an average voltage around 0.3 V [75]. But the key problem is that the fast capacity fading resulted from the inherent severe volume change of 420% (as shown in Figure 3a [76]). One approach to relieve the volume variation is to insert Sn nanoparticles in a highly conductive matrix that mostly consists of carbonaceous material [77]. A novel Sn/N-doped carbon microcage was prepared by a facile spray-drying strategy [78]. The authors adopted ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as the carbon and nitrogen source, and NaCl acted as the pore generator. With its delicate design, the Sn/C composite exhibited an open-framework structure, and the buffer matrix could alleviate stress while accommodating for volume changes during cycling. Oh et al. assembled an Sn-C/Na(Ni0.5Mn0.5)O2 full cell, which operated reversibly around 2.8 V within 1.5–4.0 V at 24 mA g−1 [79]. Another porous carbon nanocage (PCNCs-Sn) encapsulating with Sn nanoparticles was developed by template-assisted CVD and an in situ reduction route [80]. This anode exhibited a good high-rate capacity of 188 mA h g−1 at 2560 mA g−1 (about 3 C) and superior cycling performance even after 1000 cycles at 2560 mA g−1 in a half-cell. The novel carbon nanocages and well-preserved porous structure effectively inhibited the volume variation, and the weak bonds formed between graphitic carbon and the discharge product (Na15Sn4) also maintained the superior conductivity, reducing the pulverization. After coupling PCNCs-Sn with the P2-Na0.80Li0.12Ni0.22Mn0.66O2 cathode, the advanced full SIB could sustain a red-light-emitting diode (LED) working for two days.
Reducing Sn particle size is also effective for alleviating the strain. For example, the porous Sn anode prepared via a phase-inversion technique enabled the free expansion of Sn particles [81]. Electrode degradation was inhibited to some extent, improving long-term cycling stability. Correspondingly, the Sn electrode delivered a reversible capacity of more than 519 mA h g−1 after 500 cycles. However, along with the adequate free space for volume change offered by the nanostructure, a low density and high irreversible capacity also come out.
In addition, significant differences would occur when using different electrolytes, which are decided by the different properties of the formed SEI film. Zhang has attempted to apply different electrolytes for SIBs with micro-sized Sn particles as the anode [82]. They found that the surface is smoother in glyme-based electrolytes than carbonate-based ones. And the micro-sized Sn//1 M NaPF6 in DGME//Na3V2(PO4)3/C full battery displayed a gravimetric energy density of 200 W h kg−1 and a volumetric energy density of 703 W h L−1, which is much higher than that with 1 M NaPF6 in the EC/DMC electrolyte. The result highlights the benefit of using Sn as an anode.
Sb with a high theoretical specific capacity of 660 mA h g−1 is another attractive anode candidate when fully sodiated to Na3Sb [83]. By directly using commercially available Sb powders or beads as the raw materials, Sb/graphite was obtained by a simple ball-milling process [84]. The full cells constructed by the Sb/graphite anode and Na1.72Mn0.72Fe(CN)6 cathode presented a markedly reduced polarization. Normalized by the active mass of Na1.72Mn0.72Fe(CN)6, the full cell delivered initial discharge/charge capacities of 115/155 mA h g−1 with the corresponding Coulombic efficiency of 74% (Figure 3b,c). Zhang reported a kind of Sb/rGO paper electrode with no utilization of the binder, conducting additives, or metal current collectors [85]. Coupled with the Na3V2(PO4)3/rGO paper cathode, the reversible specific capacity of the full cell could achieve 400 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 100 cycles. The idea of all free-standing electrodes offers giant potential for bendable electrodes in the field of smart electronics, especially wearable devices.
Figure 3. (a) Structural evolution process of Sn nanoparticles during sodiation. Reproduced with permission of [76]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. (b) Specific desodiation capacity and Coulombic efficiency at 0.1–20 C and (c) galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of Sb/graphite/Na1.72Mn0.72Fe(CN)6 full cells. Reproduced with permission of [84]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (a) Structural evolution process of Sn nanoparticles during sodiation. Reproduced with permission of [76]. Copyright 2012, American Chemical Society. (b) Specific desodiation capacity and Coulombic efficiency at 0.1–20 C and (c) galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles of Sb/graphite/Na1.72Mn0.72Fe(CN)6 full cells. Reproduced with permission of [84]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society.
Inorganics 11 00289 g003
Apart from hybridizing with carbon materials, oxygen-deficient TiO2 (TiO2−x) offers another opportunity to exert a positive influence on the performance of Sb anodes [86]. The double-walled Sb@TiO2−x nanotubes combined the merits of outstanding structural stability of TiO2−x and satisfactory capacity of Sb, leading to outstanding electrochemical properties, both in LIBs and SIBs. In a Sb@TiO2−x//Na3V2(PO4)3-C full cell, the potential was about 2.5 V; when cycled at 660 mA g−1anode after 100 cycles, a specific capacity of 350 mA h g−1anode was maintained. The energy density was 151 W h kg−1 at 21 W kg−1, or 61 W h kg−1 at 1.83 kW kg−1. Other intermetallic compounds, such as transition metal selenides could also be explored as viable SIB anodes [87,88]. The intermetallic compounds are suitable choices for the commercial application of SIBs due to the combination of their respective merits in the whole material, including their high capacity and low working potential.

2.4. Sulfides and Phosphates

Transition metal chalcogenides have raised some concerns because of their two-dimensional layered structure analogous to graphite and the high capacities induced by multiple electrons involved in the conversion reaction. However, several general issues still hinder their application. First, the majority of transition metal chalcogenides suffer from poor electrical conductivity, requiring composites with other high-conductive materials such as carbon. Second, the typical conversion mechanism triggers large volume variation during repeated sodiation/desodiation, deteriorating the cycling performance [89]. Third, the discharge products of sodium sulfide tend to dissolve in most electrolytes, leading to a significant mass loss of active materials. Furthermore, the limited interlayer distance between the adjacent layers also blocks the Na+ insertion without further modification.
MoS2 with a high theoretical specific capacity of 670 mAh g−1 is of particular interest [90,91]. Despite the fast Na+ diffusion in 2D permeable channels, the poor conductivity, aggregation, and the inadequate interlayer distance of MoS2 monolayers are still to be solved [92]. Atomic interface engineering was carried out to modify the layered MoS2 with smart morphology [93]. A hierarchical MoS2/carbon nanotube superstructure consisting of MoS2 and inserted carbon layers was prepared by a one-pot solvothermal synthesis; the interlayer distance between adjacent MoS2 layers was enlarged to 0.986 nm, which is larger than 0.615 nm of the bulk pure MoS2. Although the interlayer distance between MoS2 and the inserted carbon layer was only 0.495 nm, the carbon layers were not continuous according to the calculation. By virtue of conductive carbon and enlarged interface spacing for easier Na+ diffusion, the half-cell of the MoS2/carbon sandwiched structure achieved an initial discharge-specific capacity of 620 mAh g−1 with a first cycle Coulombic efficiency of 84%. As early as 1979, Whittingham’s group proposed that MoS3 could react with sodium to form Na4MoS3 [94]. Ye et al. verified that amorphous MoS3 seems to be better than crystalline MoS2 in electrochemical performance [95]. Compared with the well-studied 2D layered MoS2, the amorphous MoS3 is composed of 1D Mo chains bridged by sulfide and disulfide ligands [96], which reaches a 25% higher theoretical capacity. This structure is conductive to the rapid Na+ diffusion, and the amorphous nature requires a much lower activation energy barrier during the structural rearrangement; thus, an improved electrochemical performance of about 615 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1 and 235 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1 was achieved. Furthermore, after pairing the amorphous MoS3 anode with the Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode, the full cells tested between 0.1–3.0 V exhibited an average voltage of ≈1.8 V, and a reversible specific capacity of 520 mAh g−1 was retained at 50 mA g−1. Even after 100 cycles, the delivered specific capacities were 415 and 376 mAh g−1 at 500 and 1000 mA g−1, respectively.
Ni-based sulfides with disparate Ni/S ratios such as NiS, NiS2, Ni3S2, Ni3S4, Ni7S6, and Ni9S8 are also attractive due to the high electrochemical activity of nickel ion and the strong reducibility of sulfur ion [97,98,99]. The theoretical specific capacity of NiS2 is as high as 879 mAh g−1. Like other transition metal chalcogenide anodes, NiS2 also undergoes severe volume expansion and structure collapse during cycling. The introduction of graphene nanosheets played an important role in alleviating volume change, serving as a conductive matrix for NiS2 and relieving the aggregation of NiS2 nanoparticles [100]. Qin et al. also introduced rGO into Ni3S2 [101], and the Ni3S2 content tended to decrease while tiny Ni7S6 appeared along with the increased content of rGO in the Ni3S2/rGO composite, which was likely due to the different nucleation processes with and without rGO. The cell exhibited a reversible specific capacity of 391.6 mAh g−1 at 100 mA g−1 after 50 cycles. Apart from the Mo- and Ni-based sulfides mentioned above, there are also diverse transition metal chalcogenides including Sb2S3, ZnS, SiS, V5S8, SnS2, WSx, and so on [102,103,104].
Titanium phosphates NaTi2(PO4)3 (NTP) with a theoretical specific capacity of 133 mAh g−1 and voltage potential of 2.1 V vs. Na+/Na are excellent anode candidates in large-scale applications [105]. Similar to other NASICON-type materials, it has the distinct merit of high Na+ conductivity. NTP@C nanocomposites prepared by the facile sol–gel method deliver outstanding Na+ storage and cycling stability [106]. The highly crystalline NTP particles (15–50 nm in size) were covered by a dense carbon layer of about 7 nm in thickness followed by embedding inside the carbon matrix. By widening the cutoff voltage to 0.01–3V, an extra platform appeared at around 0.4 V, which originated from a further reduction from Ti3+ to Ti2+. Remarkably, a capacity of about 68% still retained even cycling over 10,000 times at 4 A g−1, denoting an ultralong cycle life. In addition, the NTP/C anode synthesized by Jiang et al. delivered an outstanding reversible specific capacity of 108 mAh g−1 even at 100 C, and a specific capacity of 83 mAh g−1 was retained, even lasting for over 6000 cycles at 50 C. [107]. These results clearly prove that NTP@C nanocomposites possess a stable structure that could bear repeated sodiation/desodiation, suitable for devices, especially those requiring a long lifespan. Therefore, coupling with Na3V2(PO4)3/C cathode [108], the full cell released a discharge-specific capacity of 128 mAh g−1anode at 0.1 C, and excellent rate performances, retaining a specific capacity of 88 mAh g−1 at 50 C. After 1000 cycles at 10 C, 80% of the initial capacity is retained, indicating the high cycling stability. However, the relatively higher working potential of 2.1 V would reduce the whole energy density of full cells. In addition, Na3V2(PO4)3 (NVP) is able to act as a bipolar electrode material in symmetric full batteries.

2.5. Organic Compounds

Compared with inorganic electrodes, organic compounds are appealing due to their low cost, flexible designability, and sustainability [109]. Most of the present organic electrodes are carbonyl derivatives, typically Na2C8H4O4, and the others reported in recent years include biomolecular-based and Schiff-based compounds [110,111].
The first application of organic compounds in batteries was proposed by Armand, using di-lithium terephthalate Li2C8H4O4 with two carboxyl groups as the anode for LIBs [112], which exhibited a low potential of 0.8 V with 2.3 Li insertion per unit. Then, Na2C8H4O4, as the analogue of Li2C8H4O4, conjugated carboxylate organic molecules containing carbon–oxygen double bonds (C=O) undergo a reversible conversion between C=O and C-O in the Na ion embedding/escaping process, was introduced into a Na+ ion system [113]. The discharge/charge profiles of Na2C8H4O4 between 0.1 and 2 V reveal that Na insertion voltage occurs at 0.29 V vs. Na+/Na and a reversible specific capacity of 250 mAh g−1 accompanying a two electron transfer. Moreover, the pioneering work by Zhu et al. employed 2, 5-dihydroxy-1 and 4-benzoquinone (Na2C6H2O4) (Na2DBQ) as negative electrodes for SIBs [113]. Na2DBQ was synthesized by a substitution reaction between H2DBQ and sodium methylate in DMSO. The two carbonyl groups in Na2DBQ are redox centers that are able to absorb two sodium ions, delivering a high theoretical specific capacity of 291 mA h g−1. The as-prepared Na2DBQ could reach a practical specific capacity of 265 mAh g−1 at 0.1 C. By increasing the current density to 5 C, the specific capacity of 160 mA h g−1 is retained. Remarkably, the specific capacity stabilized around 181 mAh g−1, even after 300 cycles at 1 C. To further understand the mechanism of organic carbonyl compounds, Na2C6H2O4 was selected to test the sodium storage behavior [114,115]. It was found that the inorganic Na-O polyhedral layer offers channels for Na+ diffusion, and the organic p-stacked benzene layer facilitates rapid electron transfer.
Natural-derived redox biomolecules are deemed good candidates in view of their advantages of biodegradablity, abundance, being lightweight, and being easily processed. For example, since juglone could stem from waste walnut epicarp, the aluminum pouch full SIB with juglone/rGO film anode and Na3V2(PO4)3/C electrode delivered a reversible discharge-specific capacity of 80 mA h g−1 with well-defined redox working potentials of 1.3/1.85 V [116].

2.6. 2D Materials

Two-dimensional (2D) materials demonstrating novel structural architectures could exert an important influence on sodium-ion diffusion by providing abundant ion transport channels and a low activation barrier. Moreover, the outstanding mechanical properties together with the unique flexibility endow it with high endurance to both stress and strain, which makes it very suitable for the application as electrode materials with high capacities (Figure 4a) [117]. Currently, various materials have been explored, including transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes), black phosphorus, as well as transition metal oxides (TMOs) [118,119]. Typically, transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) as one of the burgeoning anode materials exhibit excellent electrical conductivity and surface hydrophilicity [120]. For example, an optimized hybrid electrode composed of antimony/MXene has been obtained by delicate designs on synthesis parameters [121]. The homogeneous distribution of antimony and MXene jointly contributes to a high reversible specific capacity of 450 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 with a capacity retention of around 96% after 100 cycles, as well as 365 mA h g−1 at 4 A g−1. Moreover, thermodynamically stable black phosphorus (BP) with good electric conductivity (about 300 S m−1) exhibits a double-layer structure with a channel size of 0.308 nm, which is conductive to the access for lithium ions transport. And its theoretical specific capacity could achieve as high as 2596 mA h g−1 [122]. However, volume variation during cycling would cause the structural pulverization of BP, and the easy dispersion in the electrolyte leads to the loss of electronic contact with the current collector, resulting in severe capacity fading. To solve this critical issue, a core–shell heterostructure composed of red and black phosphorus on a 3D N-doped graphene framework could be synthesized by the one-pot solvothermal method [123]. The extremely high electronic conductivity together with the low sodium-ion diffusion barrier leads to an ultra-high areal capacity of 3.46 mA h cm−2, corresponding to a reversible specific capacity as high as 1440.2 mA h g−1 at 0.05 A g−1. And the capacity retention could be retained at 89.3% even after 1200 cycles at a high current density of 10 A g−1.
In addition, preparing hybrid 2D materials is another effective way to improve the electrochemical performance of BP. For instance, H. Liu et al. bridged covalently functionalized BP on graphene to achieve significantly enhanced reversible performance [124]. Benefiting from the excellent electrical connection provided by chemical bonds between the rGO slice and modified BP nanosheet, the BP-based composite anode is able to release a specific capacity of 1472 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 50 cycles as well as 650 mA h g−1 at 1 A g−1 after 200 cycles (Figure 4b,c). Moreover, the combination of black phosphorus quantum dots (BPQDs) and Ti3C2 nanosheets (TNSs) exhibits an enhanced electronic conductivity, and the stress during cycling could be relived significantly, resulting in stable and satisfactory sodium storage performance [125]. Meanwhile, a high pseudocapacitive value induced by P-O-Ti interfacial bonds could also be obtained. Very recently, a MXene-MoS2 heterostructure prepared by T. Wang and co-workers combined the merits of high electronic conductivity, excellent structural stability, as well as reduced ion diffusion length [126]. And the final composite, as an anode for SIBs, delivered 315 mA h g−1 at 0.2 A g−1 and 220 mA h g−1 after 1000 cycles at 2.0 A g−1.

3. Prospect

Due to their abundance on the earth, their low cost, and similar intercalation mechanisms with LIBs, SIBs appear to be a very competent substitution for LIBs. However, as evidenced from the reported literature, the electrochemical performance, especially the reversible specific capacity, cannot keep up with that of LIBs. Searching for better electrode materials and carefully designing balanced electrodes indicate their great importance. In this review, the current categories of anode materials and the electrochemical performance for both half and full cells have been summarized. Although the specific capacity and energy density have been greatly enhanced, some issues should also be paid attention to, as follows: (1) The transport of both ions and electrons needs to be further improved for all the anode materials to improve the reaction kinetics. (2) Adopting cost-effective methods to obtain appropriate anode materials is more favorable to the commercialization of SIBs, but this is still a challenge since the novel morphology and multi-step modifications progress usually requires a long period and expensive devices. (3) Safety still acts as the key focus of attention. Correspondingly, the application of SIBs at extreme working conditions, especially at high and low temperatures, should pay close attention to the modification of electrolytes with non-inflammability and wide voltage windows, except for the design of unique structures of anode materials. Therefore, it is believed that there is still a long way to go to push SIBs into mature markets before solving the above-mentioned issues.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.B. and T.L.; methodology, X.B.; validation, T.L. and N.W.; visualization, N.W. and G.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.B.; funding acquisition, T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. ZR2022QE181).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. ZR2022QE181).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zuo, W.; Innocenti, A.; Zarrabeitia, M.; Bresser, D.; Yang, Y.; Passerini, S. Layered Oxide Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Storage Mechanism, Electrochemistry, and Techno-Economics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jing, J.; Li, Q.; Li, C.; Yang, Z.; Yu, G.; Bai, X.; Li, T. Synchronous Modification to Realize Micron-Siox Anode with Durable and Superior Electrochemical Performance for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 627, 157293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, T.; Huang, M.; Bai, X.; Wang, Y.-X. Metal–Air Batteries: A Review on Current Status and Future Applications. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2023, 33, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, G.; Jing, J.; Li, C.; Li, Q.; Yang, Z.; Yao, S.; Li, T.; Bai, X. A Review on Recent Progress of Non-Stoichiometric Siox Anodes Based on Lithium Ion Batteries. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2023, 33, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, Y.; Luan, D.; Lou, X.W. Recent Advances on mixed metal sulfides for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2002976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Luo, M.; Yu, H.; Hu, F.; Liu, T.; Cheng, X.; Zheng, R.; Bai, Y.; Shui, M.; Shu, J. Metal Selenides for High Performance Sodium Ion Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122557. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vaalma, C.; Buchholz, D.; Weil, M.; Passerini, S. A Cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 18013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, K.; Liu, C.; Mi, L.; Chou, S.; Chen, W.; Shen, C. Recent progress on the alloy-based anode for sodium-ion batteries and potassium-ion batteries. Small 2021, 17, 1903194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, L.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, J.; Shao, Z.; Guo, Z. Recent progress on sodium ion batteries: Potential high-performance anodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2310–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wasalathilake, K.C.; Li, H.; Xu, L.; Yan, C. Recent Advances in Graphene Based Materials as Anode Materials in Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 42, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cao, Y.; Xiao, L.; Sushko, M.L.; Wang, W.; Schwenzer, B.; Xiao, J.; Nie, Z.; Saraf, L.V.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J. Sodium ion insertion in hollow carbon nanowires for battery applications. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3783–3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wen, Y.; He, K.; Zhu, Y.; Han, F.; Xu, Y.; Matsuda, I.; Ishii, Y.; Cumings, J.; Wang, C. Expanded graphite as superior anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Li, X.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Yu, C.; Ji, Z.; Pan, L.; Mai, W. Graphite Anode for Potassium Ion Batteries: Current Status and Perspective. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, 5, 458–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Subramanyan, K.; Lee, Y.-S.; Aravindan, V. Highly Promoted Solvent-Co-Intercalation Process in Pencil Graphite Anode and Na3V2(PO4)3 Cathode in Full-Cell Na-Ion Battery. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 632, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jache, B.; Adelhelm, P. Use of Graphite as a Highly Reversible Electrode with Superior Cycle Life for Sodium-Ion Batteries by Making Use of Co-Intercalation Phenomena. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10169–10173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yoon, G.; Kim, H.; Park, I.; Kang, K. Conditions for Reversible Na Intercalation in Graphite: Theoretical Studies on the Interplay among Guest Ions, Solvent, and Graphite Host. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, H.; Yoon, G.; Lim, K.; Kang, K. A Comparative Study of Graphite Electrodes Using the Co-Intercalation Phenomenon for Rechargeable Li, Na and K Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12618–12621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Gotoh, K.; Maruyama, H.; Miyatou, T.; Mizuno, M.; Urita, K.; Ishida, H. Structure and Dynamic Behavior of Sodium–Diglyme Complex in the Graphite Anode of Sodium Ion Battery by 2H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 28152–28156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jung, S.C.; Kang, Y.-J.; Han, Y.-K. Origin of Excellent Rate and Cycle Performance of Na+-Solvent Cointercalated Graphite vs. Poor Performance of Li+-Solvent Case. Nano Energy 2017, 34, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, H.; Hong, J.; Park, Y.U.; Kim, J.; Hwang, I.; Kang, K. Sodium Storage Behavior in Natural Graphite Using Ether-Based Electrolyte Systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasa, I.; Dou, X.; Buchholz, D.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Hassoun, J.; Passerini, S.; Scrosati, B. A Sodium-Ion Battery Exploiting Layered Oxide Cathode, Graphite Anode and Glyme-Based Electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2016, 310, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Jia, Y.; Dong, X.; Xiao, J.; Tao, Y.; Yang, Q.H. Reconfiguring Hard Carbons with Emerging Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Perspective. Adv. Mater. 2023, 2212186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stevens, D.; Dahn, J. High Capacity Anode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gan, Q.; Qin, N.; Gu, S.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Liao, K.; Zhang, K.; Lu, L.; Xu, Z.; Lu, Z. Extra Sodiation Sites in Hard Carbon for High Performance Sodium Ion Batteries. Small Methods 2021, 5, 2100580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jin, Q.; Wang, K.; Feng, P.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, S.; Jiang, K. Surface-Dominated Storage of Heteroatoms-Doping Hard Carbon for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 27, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, S.; Lu, X.; Zhang, K.; Xu, J.; Sun, Z. Nitrogen/Phosphorus Dual-Doped Hard Carbon Anode with High Initial Coulombic Efficiency for Superior Sodium Storage. Batter. Supercaps 2023, 6, e202200427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aristote, N.T.; Liu, C.; Deng, X.; Liu, H.; Gao, J.; Deng, W.; Hou, H.; Ji, X. Sulfur-Doping Biomass Based Hard Carbon as High Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 923, 116769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Ling, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Fan, T.E.; Wang, H.; Xiao, J.; Li, X.; Qu, B. Boosting Fast Sodium Ion Storage by Synergistic Effect of Heterointerface Engineering and Nitrogen Doping Porous Carbon Nanofibers. Small 2022, 18, 2107514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhao, P.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.-Y. Electrochemical Performance of Fulvic Acid-Based Electrospun Hard Carbon Nanofibers as Promising Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 334, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, P.-Y.; Yu, B.-J.; Sun, S.; Guo, Y.; Chang, Z.-Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.-Y. High-Performance Anode of Sodium Ion Battery from Polyacrylonitrile/Humic Acid Composite Electrospun Carbon Fibers. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 232, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ye, J.; Zang, J.; Tian, Z.; Zheng, M.; Dong, Q. Sulfur and Nitrogen Co-Doped Hollow Carbon Spheres for Sodium-Ion Batteries with Superior Cyclic and Rate Performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 13223–13227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, C.-Y.; Park, J.-S.; Jung, H.-G.; Chung, K.-Y.; Aurbach, D.; Sun, Y.-K.; Myung, S.-T. NaCrO2 Cathode for High-Rate Sodium-Ion Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2019–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dugas, R.; Zhang, B.; Rozier, P.; Tarascon, J. Optimization of Na-Ion Battery Systems Based on Polyanionic or Layered Positive Electrodes and Carbon Anodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A867–A874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. De la Llave, E.; Borgel, V.; Park, K.-J.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Sun, Y.-K.; Hartmann, P.; Chesneau, F.-F.; Aurbach, D. Comparison between Na-Ion and Li-Ion Cells: Understanding the Critical Role of the Cathodes Stability and the Anodes Pretreatment on the Cells Behavior. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 1867–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Keller, M.; Vaalma, C.; Buchholz, D.; Passerini, S. Development and Characterization of High-Performance Sodium-Ion Cells Based on Layered Oxide and Hard Carbon. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 1124–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, P.; Tang, W.; Wu, F.-F.; Zhang, C.; Luo, H.-Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.-G. Recent Progress in Plant-Derived Hard Carbon Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Review. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 1019–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, L.; Tang, C.; Bi, Z.; Song, M.; Fan, Y.; Yan, C.; Li, X.; Su, F.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, C. Hard Carbon Anodes for Next-Generation Li-Ion Batteries: Review and Perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xiang, J.; Lv, W.; Mu, C.; Zhao, J.; Wang, B. Activated Hard Carbon from Orange Peel for Lithium/Sodium Ion Battery Anode with Long Cycle Life. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 701, 870–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, L.; Hui, W.; Xu, Z.; Huang, J.; Zheng, P.; Li, J.; Sun, Q. Rape Seed Shuck Derived-Lamellar Hard Carbon as Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 632–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lv, W.; Wen, F.; Xiang, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Tian, Y. Peanut Shell Derived Hard Carbon as Ultralong Cycling Anodes for Lithium and Sodium Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Selvamani, V.; Ravikumar, R.; Suryanarayanan, V.; Velayutham, D.; Gopukumar, S. Garlic Peel Derived High Capacity Hierarchical N-Doped Porous Carbon Anode for Sodium/Lithium Ion Cell. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Elizabeth, I.; Singh, B.P.; Trikha, S.; Gopukumar, S. Bio-Derived Hierarchically Macro-Meso-Micro Porous Carbon Anode for Lithium/Sodium Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 329, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Hu, Y.S.; Titirici, M.M.; Chen, L.; Huang, X. Hard Carbon Microtubes Made from Renewable Cotton as High-Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gaddam, R.R.; Yang, D.; Narayan, R.; Raju, K.; Kumar, N.A.; Zhao, X. Biomass Derived Carbon Nanoparticle as Anodes for High Performance Sodium and Lithium Ion Batteries. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yan, D.; Yu, C.; Zhang, X.; Qin, W.; Lu, T.; Hu, B.; Li, H.; Pan, L. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Microspheres Derived from Oatmeal as High Capacity and Superior Long Life Anode Material for Sodium Ion Battery. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 191, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, L.; Buchholz, D.; Vaalma, C.; Giffin, G.A.; Passerini, S. Apple-Biowaste-Derived Hard Carbon as a Powerful Anode Material for Na-Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem 2016, 3, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, H.; Sun, N.; Wang, Y.; Soomro, R.A.; Xu, B. One Stone Two Birds: Pitch Assisted Microcrystalline Regulation and Defect Engineering in Coal-Based Carbon Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 56, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jiang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Kang, W.; Xing, B.; Jiang, H.; Huang, G.; Zhang, C.; Cao, Y. Anthracite-Based Reduced Graphene Oxide/Antimony Composites as Anode Materials for High Performance Sodium Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 925, 166631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, J.; Chang, X.; Huang, T.; Wang, B.; Zheng, H.; Luo, Q.; Peng, D.-L.; Wei, Q. Surface-Controlled Sodium-Ion Storage Mechanism of Li4Ti5O12 Anode. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 54, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ezhyeh, Z.N.; Khodaei, M.; Torabi, F. Review on Doping Strategy in Li4Ti5O12 as an Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 7105–7141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiong, H.; Slater, M.D.; Balasubramanian, M.; Johnson, C.S.; Rajh, T. Amorphous TiO2 Nanotube Anode for Rechargeable Sodium Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2560–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zou, D.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Weng, J.; Duan, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, P. Insights into the Storage Mechanism of Novel Mesoporous Hollow TiO2−x/C Nanofibers as a High-Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Carbon 2022, 194, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lv, D.; Wang, D.; Wang, N.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Song, K.; Yang, J.; Qian, Y. Nitrogen and Fluorine Co-Doped TiO2/Carbon Microspheres for Advanced Anodes in Sodium-Ion Batteries: High Volumetric Capacity, Superior Power Density and Large Areal Capacity. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 68, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Qiu, S.; Xiao, L.; Ai, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y. Yolk-Shell TiO2@C Nanocomposite as High-Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Usui, H.; Yoshioka, S.; Wasada, K.; Shimizu, M.; Sakaguchi, H. Nb-Doped Rutile TiO2: A Potential Anode Material for Na-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 6567–6573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. He, H.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, F.; Tang, Y.; Guo, J.; Shao, M.; Wang, H. Iron-Doped Cauliflower-Like Rutile TiO2 with Superior Sodium Storage Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6093–6103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, W.; Fukunishi, M.; Morgan, B.J.; Borkiewicz, O.J.; Chapman, K.W.; Pralong, V.; Maignan, A.; Lebedev, O.I.; Ma, J.; Groult, H. A Reversible Phase Transition for Sodium Insertion in Anatase TiO2. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 1836–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Delmas, C.; Carlier, D.; Guignard, M. The Layered Oxides in Lithium and Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Solid-State Chemistry Approach. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2001201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pak, Y.-C.; Rim, C.-H.; Hwang, S.-G.; Ri, K.-C.; Yu, C.-J. Defect Formation and Ambivalent Effects on Electrochemical Performance in Layered Sodium Titanate Na2Ti3O7. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 3420–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kumari, P.; Li, Y.; Boston, R. An Ionic Liquid Synthesis Route for Mixed-Phase Sodium Titanate (Na2Ti3O7 and Na2Ti6O13) Rods as an Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Nanoscale 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lai, Q.S.; Mu, J.J.; Liu, Z.M.; Zhao, L.K.; Gao, X.W.; Yang, D.R.; Chen, H.; Luo, W.B. Tunnel-Type Na2Ti6O13@Carbon Nanowires as Anode Materials for Low-Temperature Sodium-Ion Batteries. Batter. Supercaps 2023, 6, e202200549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Senguttuvan, P.; Rousse, G.; Seznec, V.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Palacin, M.R. Na2Ti3O7: Lowest Voltage Ever Reported Oxide Insertion Electrode for Sodium Ion Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4109–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nava-Avendaño, J.; Morales-García, A.; Ponrouch, A.; Rousse, G.; Frontera, C.; Senguttuvan, P.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Arroyo-de Dompablo, M.; Palacín, M. Taking Steps Forward in Understanding the Electrochemical Behavior of Na2Ti3O7. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 22280–22286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Costa, S.I.; Choi, Y.S.; Fielding, A.J.; Naylor, A.J.; Griffin, J.M.; Sofer, Z.; Scanlon, D.O.; Tapia-Ruiz, N. Surface Engineering Strategy Using Urea to Improve the Rate Performance of Na2Ti3O7 in Na-Ion Batteries. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 3875–3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, H.; Xu, D.; Qiu, R.; Tang, S.; Li, S.; Wang, R.; He, B.; Gong, Y.; Fan, H.J. Aligned Arrays of Na2Ti3O7 Nanobelts and Nanowires on Carbon Nanofiber as High-Rate and Long-Cycling Anodes for Sodium-Ion Hybrid Capacitors. Small Struct. 2021, 2, 2000073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mukherjee, A.; Das, D.; Banerjee, S.; Majumder, S.B. Synthesis and Electrochemical Performance of in-Situ and Ex-Situ Carbon-Coated Na2Ti3O7, as a Promising Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Electrochem. Sci. Adv. 2022, e2100118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Anwer, S.; Huang, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Wang, Z.; Chen, R.; Zhang, J.; Wu, F. Nature-Inspired Na2Ti3O7 Nanosheets-Formed Three-Dimensional Microflowers Architecture as a High-Performance Anode Material for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 11669–11677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rudola, A.; Sharma, N.; Balaya, P. Introducing a 0.2 V Sodium-Ion Battery Anode: The Na2Ti3O7 to Na3−xTi3O7 Pathway. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 61, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hariharan, S.; Saravanan, K.; Balaya, P. A-MoO3: A High Performance Anode Material for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 31, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Moretti, A.; Secchiaroli, M.; Buchholz, D.; Giuli, G.; Marassi, R.; Passerini, S. Exploring the Low Voltage Behavior of V2O5 Aerogel as Intercalation Host for Sodium Ion Battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A2723–A2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ming, J.; Ming, H.; Yang, W.; Kwak, W.-J.; Park, J.-B.; Zheng, J.; Sun, Y.-K. A Sustainable Iron-Based Sodium Ion Battery of Porous Carbon–Fe3O4/Na2FeP2O7 with High Performance. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 8793–8800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kumar, P.R.; Jung, Y.H.; Bharathi, K.K.; Lim, C.H.; Kim, D.K. High Capacity and Low Cost Spinel Fe3O4 for the Na-Ion Battery Negative Electrode Materials. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 146, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Oh, S.-M.; Myung, S.-T.; Yoon, C.S.; Lu, J.; Hassoun, J.; Scrosati, B.; Amine, K.; Sun, Y.-K. Advanced Na [Ni0.25Fe0.5Mn0.25]O2/C–Fe3O4 Sodium-Ion Batteries Using Ems Electrolyte for Energy Storage. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1620–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tan, M.; Han, S.; Li, Z.; Cui, H.; Lei, D.; Wang, C. Compact Sn/C Composite Realizes Long-Life Sodium-Ion Batteries. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 3804–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Qiao, S.; Zhou, Q.; Ma, M.; Liu, H.K.; Dou, S.X.; Chong, S. Advanced Anode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 11220–11252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, J.W.; Liu, X.H.; Mao, S.X.; Huang, J.Y. Microstructural Evolution of Tin Nanoparticles During in Situ Sodium Insertion and Extraction. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5897–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhu, S.; Huang, A.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y. MOF-Derived Porous Carbon Nanofibers Wrapping Sn Nanoparticles as Flexible Anodes for Lithium/Sodium Ion Batteries. Nanotechnology 2021, 32, 165401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ying, H.; Zhang, S.; Meng, Z.; Sun, Z.; Han, W.-Q. Ultrasmall Sn Nanodots Embedded inside N-Doped Carbon Microcages as High-Performance Lithium and Sodium Ion Battery Anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 8334–8342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Oh, S.-M.; Myung, S.-T.; Jang, M.-W.; Scrosati, B.; Hassoun, J.; Sun, Y.-K. An Advanced Sodium-Ion Rechargeable Battery Based on a Tin–Carbon Anode and a Layered Oxide Framework Cathode. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 3827–3833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, S.; Ao, Z.; Sun, B.; Xie, X.; Wang, G. Porous Carbon Nanocages Encapsulated with Tin Nanoparticles for High Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2016, 5, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kim, C.; Lee, K.-Y.; Kim, I.; Park, J.; Cho, G.; Kim, K.-W.; Ahn, J.-H.; Ahn, H.-J. Long-Term Cycling Stability of Porous Sn Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 317, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, B.; Rousse, G.; Foix, D.; Dugas, R.; Corte, D.A.D.; Tarascon, J.M. Microsized Sn as Advanced Anodes in Glyme-Based Electrolyte for Na-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9824–9830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Yang, J.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Notten, P.H.; Ma, H.; Liu, Z.; Wang, C.; Wang, G. Novel Hybrid of Amorphous Sb/N-Doped Layered Carbon for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 407, 127169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhao, X.; Vail, S.A.; Lu, Y.; Song, J.; Pan, W.; Evans, D.R.; Lee, J.-J. Antimony/Graphitic Carbon Composite Anode for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 13871–13878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, Z.; Huang, Y.; Hu, X. Flexible and Binder-Free Electrodes of Sb/rGO and Na3V2 (PO4)3/rGO Nanocomposites for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Small 2015, 11, 3822–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, N.; Bai, Z.; Qian, Y.; Yang, J. Double-Walled Sb@TiO2−x Nanotubes as a Superior High-Rate and Ultralong-Lifespan Anode Material for Na-Ion and Li-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4126–4133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhang, L.; Dong, H.; Wei, H.; Ang, E.H.; Yang, J.; Miao, X.; Geng, H.; Zuo, X. Interface and Structure Engineering of Bimetallic Selenides toward High-Performance Sodium-Ion Half/Full Batteries. J. Power Sources 2021, 506, 230216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Qian, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Yu, J. Nickel-Cobalt Selenide@N-Doped Carbon Towards High-Performance Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Energy Storage 2022, 51, 104522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hu, X.; Qiu, M.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, J.; Chen, J.; Zhan, H.; Wen, Z. Interface and Structure Engineering of Tin-Based Chalcogenide Anodes for Durable and Fast-Charging Sodium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mate. 2022, 12, 2202318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. He, X.; Wang, R.; Yin, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Huang, S. 1T-MoS2 Monolayer as a Promising Anode Material for (Li/Na/Mg)-Ion Batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 584, 152537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lim, H.; Yu, S.; Choi, W.; Kim, S.-O. Hierarchically Designed Nitrogen-Doped MoS2/Silicon Oxycarbide Nanoscale Heterostructure as High-Performance Sodium-Ion Battery Anode. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 7409–7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lv, W.; Lian, G.; Golberg, D.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Ding, Y. A MoS2/Carbon Hybrid Anode for High-Performance Li-Ion Batteries at Low Temperature. Nano Energy 2020, 70, 104550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Shi, Z.-T.; Kang, W.; Xu, J.; Sun, Y.-W.; Jiang, M.; Ng, T.-W.; Xue, H.-T.; Denis, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lee, C.-S. Hierarchical Nanotubes Assembled from MoS2-Carbon Monolayer Sandwiched Superstructure Nanosheets for High-Performance Sodium Ion Batteries. Nano Energy 2016, 22, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Jacobson, A.; Chianelli, R.; Rich, S.; Whittingham, M. Amorphous Molybdenum Trisulfide: A New Lithium Battery Cathode. Mater. Res. Bull. 1979, 14, 1437–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ye, H.; Wang, L.; Deng, S.; Zeng, X.; Nie, K.; Duchesne, P.N.; Wang, B.; Liu, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, F. Amorphous MoS3 Infiltrated with Carbon Nanotubes as an Advanced Anode Material of Sodium-Ion Batteries with Large Gravimetric, Areal, and Volumetric Capacities. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hibble, S.J.; Wood, G.B. Modeling the Structure of Amorphous MoS3: A Neutron Diffraction and Reverse Monte Carlo Study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dogrusoz, M.; Devic, T.; Ahsen, A.Ş.; Demir-Cakan, R. A Gallic Acid Based Metal Organic Framework Derived Nis/C Anode for Sodium Ion Batteries. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2021, 5, 3363–3372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fan, M.-P.; Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-M.; Huang, Z.-X.; Wu, W.-L.; Wang, P.; Ke, X.; Sun, S.-H.; Shi, Z.-C. NiS2 Nanosheet Arrays on Stainless Steel Foil as Binder-Free Anode for High-Power Sodium-Ion Batteries. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sadan, M.K.; Jeon, M.; Yun, J.; Song, E.; Cho, K.-K.; Ahn, J.-H.; Ahn, H.-J. Ultrafast Sodium-Ion Storage in an Interconnected Ni/Ni3S2 Nanocomposite with Long-Term Cycling Performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 909, 164705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Cai, J.; Chen, X.; Duan, X.; Yang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, H.; Liu, Z.; Peng, F. Porous NiS2 Nanosheets Anchored on Reduced Graphene Oxide as High-Rate and Long-Life Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta. 2023, 462, 142705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Qin, W.; Chen, T.; Lu, T.; Chua, D.H.; Pan, L. Layered Nickel Sulfide-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites Synthesized Via Microwave-Assisted Method as High Performance Anode Materials of Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 302, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhao, W.; Li, M.; Qi, Y.; Tao, Y.; Shi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, J. Ultrasound Sonochemical Synthesis of Amorphous Sb2S3-Graphene Composites for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 586, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, H.; Luo, J.; Han, D.; Liu, A.; Zhou, M.; Huang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Hou, Z.; Yin, H. Layer-by-Layer Hetero-Carbon Modifying Zns Nanocubes Anode with Improved Long-Term Life for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 18421–18431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tang, L.B.; Li, P.Y.; Cui, R.D.; Peng, T.; Wei, H.X.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Yan, C.; Mao, J.; Dai, K.H. Adjusting Crystal Orientation to Promote Sodium-Ion Transport in V5S8@Graphene Anode Materials for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. Small Methods 2023, 7, 2201387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. He, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, L.; Jiang, R.; Yuan, C. Boosting Sodium-Storage Behaviors of Nasicon-Type NaTi2(PO4)3 Anode by Synergistic Modulations in Both Materials and Electrolytes Towards Aqueous Na-Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 447, 142128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, D.; Liu, Q.; Chen, C.; Li, M.; Meng, X.; Bie, X.; Wei, Y.; Huang, Y.; Du, F.; Wang, C. Nasicon-Structured NaTi2(PO4)3@C Nanocomposite as the Low Operation-Voltage Anode Material for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 2238–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jiang, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, M.; Zeng, L.; Gu, L.; Yu, Y. Highly Reversible and Ultrafast Sodium Storage in NaTi2(PO4)3 Nanoparticles Embedded in Nanocarbon Networks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 8, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Fang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Qian, J.; Cao, Y.; Ai, X.; Huang, Y.; Yang, H. 3D Graphene Decorated NaTi2(PO4)3 Microspheres as a Superior High-Rate and Ultracycle-Stable Anode Material for Sodium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xu, Y.; Zhou, M.; Lei, Y. Organic Materials for Rechargeable Sodium-Ion Batteries. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lin, X.-M.; Han, C.; Yang, X.-T.; Lin, J.-S.; Yang, W.-Q.; Guo, H.-X.; Wang, Y.-H.; Dong, J.-C.; Li, J.-F. In Situ Tracking of the Lithiation and Sodiation Process of Disodium Terephthalate as Anodes for Rechargeable Batteries by Raman Spectroscopy. Nano Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, J.; Mu, Y. A Schiff Based P-Phenylenediimine Polymer as High Capacity Anode Materials for Stable Lithium Ion Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 450, 142276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Armand, M.; Grugeon, S.; Vezin, H.; Laruelle, S.; Ribière, P.; Poizot, P.; Tarascon, J.-M. Conjugated Dicarboxylate Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhu, Z.; Li, H.; Liang, J.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. The Disodium Salt of 2,5-Dihydroxy-1,4-Benzoquinone as Anode Material for Rechargeable Sodium Ion Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1446–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wu, X.; Jin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Mu, L.; Hu, Y.-S.; Li, H.; Chen, X.; Armand, M.; Chen, L. Unraveling the Storage Mechanism in Organic Carbonyl Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, e1500330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Zhao, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.S.; Li, H.; Zhou, Z.; Armand, M.; Chen, L. Disodium Terephthalate (Na2C8H4O4) as High Performance Anode Material for Low-Cost Room-Temperature Sodium-Ion Battery. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 962–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, H.; Hu, P.; Yang, J.; Gong, G.; Guo, L.; Chen, X. Renewable-Juglone-Based High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2348–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Rojaee, R.; Shahbazian-Yassar, R. Two-Dimensional Materials to Address the Lithium Battery Challenges. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 2628–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xiao, Z.; Wang, R.; Jiang, D.; Qian, Z.; Li, Y.; Yang, K.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, Z.; Wu, F. Recent Developments of Two-Dimensional Anode Materials and Their Composites in Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 7440–7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yuan, M.; Zheng, X.; Xu, J.; Ni, Q.; Luo, L.; Cai, Z.; Sun, Z.; Lin, L.; Sun, G. A Review of the Structural Design of Anode Materials in Sodium-Ion Batteries Based on MXenes and Their Composites. Batteries 2023, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Aslam, M.K.; AlGarni, T.S.; Javed, M.S.; Shah, S.S.A.; Hussain, S.; Xu, M. 2D MXene Materials for Sodium Ion Batteries: A Review on Energy Storage. J. Energy Storage 2021, 37, 102478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Arnold, S.; Gentile, A.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Marchionna, S.; Ruffo, R.; Presser, V. Design of High-Performance Antimony/Mxene Hybrid Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 10569–10585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Q.; Lang, P.; Yuan, N.; Tang, J. Fabrication and Applications of 2D Black Phosphorus in Catalyst, Sensing and Electrochemical Energy Storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 850, 156580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ma, X.; Ji, C.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Xiong, X. Red@Black Phosphorus Core–Shell Heterostructure with Superior Air Stability for High-Rate and Durable Sodium-Ion Battery. Mater. Today 2022, 59, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liu, H.; Tao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, C.; Zhou, P.; Liu, H.; Chen, R.; Wang, S. Bridging Covalently Functionalized Black Phosphorus on Graphene for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Battery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36849–36856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Meng, R.; Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Zu, L.; Peng, C.; Zheng, L.; Zheng, L.; Chen, Z.; Liu, G.; Chen, B.; et al. Black Phosphorus Quantum Dot/Ti3C2 Mxene Nanosheet Composites for Efficient Electrochemical Lithium/Sodium-Ion Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, T.; Yao, K.; Hua, Y.; Shankar, E.G.; Shanthappa, R.; Yu, J.S. Rational Design of Mxene-MoS2 Heterostructure with Rapid Ion Transport Rate as an Advanced Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of sodium storage and (b) in situ TEM investigation of sodium storage mechanism in graphite-based materials. (c) Rate capability test and (d) long-term cycling stability at 100 mA g−1 of expanded graphite. Reproduced with permission [12]. Copyright 2014, Springer Nature.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of sodium storage and (b) in situ TEM investigation of sodium storage mechanism in graphite-based materials. (c) Rate capability test and (d) long-term cycling stability at 100 mA g−1 of expanded graphite. Reproduced with permission [12]. Copyright 2014, Springer Nature.
Inorganics 11 00289 g001
Figure 4. (a) The advantages of 2D materials applied in energy storage devices. Reproduced with permission of [117]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) Specific capability of 4-nitrobenzenediazonium modified black phosphorus chemically bonded with reduced graphene oxide hybrid (4-RBP) and black phosphorus bonding with RGO (RBP) at current density of 0.1 A g−1. (c) Specific capability and Coulombic efficiency of 4-nitrobenzenediazonium modified black phosphorus chemically bonded with reduced graphene oxide hybrid (4-RBP). Reproduced with permission of [124]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. (a) The advantages of 2D materials applied in energy storage devices. Reproduced with permission of [117]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. (b) Specific capability of 4-nitrobenzenediazonium modified black phosphorus chemically bonded with reduced graphene oxide hybrid (4-RBP) and black phosphorus bonding with RGO (RBP) at current density of 0.1 A g−1. (c) Specific capability and Coulombic efficiency of 4-nitrobenzenediazonium modified black phosphorus chemically bonded with reduced graphene oxide hybrid (4-RBP). Reproduced with permission of [124]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Inorganics 11 00289 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, X.; Wu, N.; Yu, G.; Li, T. Recent Advances in Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Inorganics 2023, 11, 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070289

AMA Style

Bai X, Wu N, Yu G, Li T. Recent Advances in Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Inorganics. 2023; 11(7):289. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070289

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Xue, Nannan Wu, Gengchen Yu, and Tao Li. 2023. "Recent Advances in Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries" Inorganics 11, no. 7: 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070289

APA Style

Bai, X., Wu, N., Yu, G., & Li, T. (2023). Recent Advances in Anode Materials for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Inorganics, 11(7), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics11070289

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop