Next Article in Journal
Convolutional Neural Network-Based Fiber Optic Channel Emulator and Its Application to Fiber-Longitudinal Power Profile Estimation
Previous Article in Journal
First Real-Time 221.9 Pb/S∙Km Transmission Capability Demonstration Using Commercial 138-Gbaud 400 Gb/S Backbone OTN System over Field-Deployed Seven-Core Fiber Cable with Multiple Fusion Splicing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study of an Efficient, High Power and Tunable Continuous-Wave CO2 Laser
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Power KTiOAsO4 Optical Parametric Oscillator at 300 Hz

1
School of Information Science and Engineering, and Key Laboratory of Laser & Infrared System (Shandong University), Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
2
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Laser Technology and Application, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2025, 12(3), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030270
Submission received: 24 January 2025 / Revised: 12 March 2025 / Accepted: 13 March 2025 / Published: 15 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Infrared Lasers and Applications)

Abstract

:
A high-power and high-repetition KTiOAsO4 (KTA) optical parametric oscillator (OPO) was established in this study, with the adoption of plane-parallel and ring cavities. The pump was a high-power Nd:YAG master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) system with a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 300 Hz, and the corresponding beam quality factors were Mx2 = 3.4 and My2 = 3.2. In the plane-parallel cavity experiment, powers of 51.1 W (170 mJ) and 15.9 W (53 mJ) in the signal and idler were obtained, respectively. In terms of the average power of 1 μm of a pumped KTA OPO, to our knowledge, this is the highest average power for KTA OPO. The ring cavity was constructed to achieve lasers with both high power and beam quality. The output powers of the ring cavities for the signal and idler were 33.9 W (113 mJ) and 8.7 W (29 mJ), respectively, and the corresponding beam quality factors of the signal were Mx2 = 5.3 and My2 = 7.9. The 300 Hz 100 mJ class 1.54 μm laser with a beam quality factor of less than 10 is an ideal eye-safe light detection and ranging (LiDAR) source.

1. Introduction

The eye-safe infrared wavelength of around 1.5 μm [1,2] and the mid-infrared spectral region of 3–5 μm both exhibit high atmosphere transmittance, making them suitable for various applications, including ranging, radar, remote sensing, medicine, the military, etc. [3,4,5]. The direct generation of such wavelengths, e.g., Er-doped lasers [6], is usually a difficult process for obtaining a high energy output. Therefore, OPO is a key method for generating such lasers through nonlinear frequency conversion [7], offering excellent output power and spectral characteristics [8,9].
Several nonlinear crystals can be used in OPO, such as periodically poled LiNbO3 (PPLN), ZnGeP2 (ZGP), KTiOPO4 (KTP), and KTiOAsO4 (KTA) [10,11,12]. However, PPLN is limited by its thickness, making it difficult to generate laser pulses with high energy. For ZGP crystals, mature 1 μm Nd-based lasers are not suitable tools for reaching a high average output power due to their strong crystal absorption. ZGP could obtain a high output power or energy [10,13], but it generally uses 2 μm lasers as pumps, which are relatively immature and limit further improvements in energy. Although KTP has a high damage threshold, large nonlinear coefficient, and wide acceptance angle, its mid-infrared output is low due to its absorption peak at 3.4 μm [14]. As an isomorph of KTP, KTA has the advantages of a wider transparency range, a higher nonlinear coefficient, and better physical and chemical properties, making it more suitable for generating high-power and high-repetition infrared lasers. In as early as 1994, G.A. Rines et al. used KTP as an OPO crystal to obtain a 450 mJ 1.57 μm laser with a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of 10 Hz [15]. However, the average power was only 4.5 W, and mid-infrared lasers could not be attained due to the strong absorptance of KTP in the mid-infrared spectral region. In 1998, M.S. Webb et al. demonstrated a sustained average signal power of 33 W at 1534.7 nm, equivalent to a pulse energy of 330 mJ [16]. The beam quality and idler laser were not mentioned. To obtain idler light output at the same time, in 2010, J. Liu et al. utilized a Y-cut KTA OPO pumped with a Nd:YAG laser to generate a 151 mJ eye-safe laser at 1.505 μm and 53 mJ mid-IR at 3.632 μm [17]. The average powers of the signal and idler were relatively low, only 1.5 W and 0.5 W, respectively, owing to the 10 Hz repetition rate. In 2013, with an X-cut KTA, outputs of 33.8 mJ and 89.7 mJ at 3.46 μm and 1.54 μm were achieved by Q. Liu et al., respectively [18]. For the Nd:YAG master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) system, as the pump operated at a repetition rate of 100 Hz, the average power of the signal and idler did not exceed 10 W. In 2021, J. Meng constructed a 100 Hz, high-energy KTA crystal-based OPO system and achieved 178 mJ and 64 mJ signals at 1.53 μm and 3.47 μm, respectively, with a PRF of 100 Hz [19]. Such KTA OPOs with a high pulse energy usually operate at repetition rates below 100 Hz; thus, the average power was maintained at a low level.
In this work, we pumped KTA OPO with a 300 Hz Nd:YAG MOPA laser system to simultaneously achieve high-power short-infrared and mid-infrared laser outputs. For the KTA OPO with a plane-parallel cavity, the output powers at 1.536 μm and 3.467 μm were 51.1 W and 15.9 W, respectively, with corresponding beam quality factors of Mx2 = 38 and My2 = 40 for the signal. To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest reported signal and idler powers for a KTA OPO at high repetition rates, and such a high-infrared laser output is rare in pulsed KTA OPO operation. For the KTA OPO with a ring cavity, the signal and idler output powers were reduced to 33.9 W and 8.7 W, respectively; however, the beam quality factors for the signal significantly improved to Mx2 = 5.3 and My2 = 7.9.

2. Experimental Setup

Figure 1 shows the experimental setup of the high-power KTA OPO system. The pump source was a 300 Hz, 1064 nm Nd:YAG MOPA system, consisting of a side-pumped Nd:YAG laser oscillator and three-stage amplifiers. The Nd:YAG crystal, 808 nm laser diode arrays, and heat sink were integrated into a commercial module. All the Nd:YAG modules were side-pumped using 808 nm laser diode arrays, which were operated in a quasi-continuous wave (QCW) mode with a pulse width and PRF of 250 μs and 300 Hz, respectively. For the OPO, a plane-parallel cavity was used to enhance efficiency, while a ring cavity was employed to improve the beam quality.
The master oscillator of the Nd:YAG MOPA system operated at a PRF of 300 Hz, Q-switched with a KD*P electro-optic modulator (EOM). To ensure that the cavity was stable and compact, the oscillator utilized a convex–concave resonator, with the concave mirror acting as the output coupler (OC), featuring a transmittance of 60% at 1.064 μm. The convex mirror (HR) was coated for high reflectance at 1064 nm. Considering the effect of the thermal lens, the selected radii of the convex and concave mirrors (HR) were 500 mm and 1000 mm, respectively. The EOM was placed on the side of the convex mirror, but not close to the convex lens, to prevent damage being caused by the small beam spot around the convex mirror. The corresponding Q-switch delay was set at 220 μs. A 0.6% Nd-doped side-pumped Nd:YAG module with a rod diameter of 3 mm and length of 78 mm was positioned close to the output mirror so that the laser rod could be fully utilized because the fundamental-mode radius near the output mirror was slightly smaller than the crystal diameter and varied very little over the entire rod length. In addition, this design ensured that the laser operation was insensitive to pump-induced lens fluctuations, thus providing a fine seed with near-fundamental-mode oscillation for subsequent amplifications.
The amplifiers of the MOPA system increased the laser power to several hundred watts. Every stage comprised two diode side-pumped Nd:YAG modules with a 90° quartz rotator placed between them to compensate for the thermally induced birefringence. The sizes of the Nd:YAG rods increased progressively across the stages: φ5 × 112 mm, φ8 × 146 mm, and φ12 × 167 mm. The module’s peak pump powers of the three amplification stages were 6 kW, 10 kW, and 10 kW, respectively. In addition, the end face of each crystal rod had parallel cutting angles of 2° to reduce the negative effects of self-excited oscillation.
The diameter of the output laser beam of the MOPA system was controlled to 9 mm before entering the KTA OPO. Additionally, the OPO pump power was changed using a polarization beam splitter (PBS) and HWP at the maximum output power, which ensured a consistent beam quality, pulse width, beam diameter, and directivity. The X-cut KTA can operate with the non-critical phase matching (NCPM) scheme, which offers a wide acceptance angle without walk-off and permits the use of a longer KTA crystal. Finally, an X-cut KTA (θ = 90°,φ = 0°) crystal with a size of 10 mm × 10 mm × 33 (length) mm without coating was selected. The OPO cavity configurations used in this study are shown in Figure 1. The input mirror (IC1) of the plane-parallel cavity was coated with high transparency (HT) at 1.064 μm and high reflection at 1.5–1.6 μm, while the output mirror (OC1) was coated with 50% reflectivity at 1.5–1.6 μm and HT at 1.064 μm and 3.3–3.5 μm. The cavity length was as short as possible so that the OPO efficiency could be higher. As for the ring cavity, the two reflective mirrors M1 and M2 were the same as the input mirror (IC2), coated with HT at 1.064 μm and high reflection at 1.5–1.6 μm, and the output mirror (OC2) had 50% transmittance at 1.4–1.65 μm and high transmittance at 1.064 μm and 3.3–3.5 μm. The ring cavity length was 280 mm due to cavity structure limitations. Moreover, all mirrors had flat surfaces.

3. Results and Discussion

The average output power of the Nd:YAG oscillator is shown in Figure 2a. The maximum output power was 3.0 W with a beam quality of Mx2 = 1.06, My2 = 1.06, as shown in Figure 2b, and the inset shows the beam profile of the Nd:YAG oscillator, which indicates that the oscillator operated in a near-fundamental-mode state. The performance of the three-stage single-pass amplifiers of the Nd:YAG MOPA system is shown in Figure 2c. From the curves in Figure 2c, a total output power of 212 W with a pulse width and PRF of 14.1 ns and 300 Hz was finally achieved, respectively. The beam quality factors at the maximum output power were Mx2 = 3.4, My2 = 3.2, as depicted in Figure 2d, and the corresponding beam profile is shown in the inset.
The output laser of the Nd:YAG MOPA system was then collimated to a diameter of 9 mm using a beam expander to match the size of the KTA crystal. Although the pump power density is much lower than the KTA crystal damage threshold (600 MW/cm2), a repetition rate of 300 Hz induced significant thermal effects, leading to severe wavefront distortions when the pump beam diameter was reduced and amplifying the destructiveness of localized hot spots. Therefore, the beam size was maintained at a large diameter to prevent crystal damage. The KTA crystal was installed into copper blocks and water-cooled at approximately 20 °C with a temperature control accuracy of 0.1 °C. For plane-parallel cavity, the cavity length was kept as short as possible to lower the threshold and it was ultimately set to 70 mm due to the limitation of the long crystal heat sink and the size of the mirror frame. Despite the sensitivity of the plane cavity to disturbances, its compact architecture and low diffraction losses make it useful in high-power OPO applications. Finally, two dichroic mirrors were employed to separate the pump, signal and idler, allowing precise power measurement. The pump threshold of OPO was about 30.9 W, and the output powers of the signal and idler are shown in Figure 3a1. When the pump power reached 207 W, the average power of the signal and idler was 51.1 W (170 mJ) and 15.9 W (53 mJ), corresponding to a conversion efficiency of 24.7% and 7.7%, respectively, as shown in Figure 3b1. As the pump increased, the increase in the conversion efficiency gradually slowed down. The results represented a compromise between the conflicting goals of a high conversion efficiency and large beam radius. The OPO efficiency was sacrificed in exchange for more pump injections and stable operation at high-energy output levels, while simultaneously avoiding damage to crystals and other optical devices. To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest average output powers for the 1 μm pumped KTA OPO (signal + idler). As shown in Figure 3c1, the M2 factors of the signal were Mx2 = 38 and My2 = 40, and the inset shows the corresponding beam profile. The large pump spot size helps to avoid crystal damage but can lead to a higher OPO threshold and degraded beam quality. The Fresnel number was several hundreds and much larger than the number of approximately 0.5–2.0 when the resonator operated in the TEM00 mode. Thus, the mode discrimination of the plane-parallel cavity was insufficient and many mode patterns existed, leading to a poor beam quality. For applications such as LiDAR, the poor beam quality increased the scattering and divergence of the laser beam, reducing the system’s ranging accuracy and distance. Therefore, a complex beam expansion system was designed and applied to ranging systems, where the laser beam was expanded and reshaped to 150 mm in diameter, in order to reduce the beam divergence and propagation distortion.
Additionally, although the single-pass pumping operation resulted in a conversion efficiency lower than the highest reported values of double-pass pumping, we aimed to avoid the damage caused to components by the increased power density in the standing wave cavity during double-pass pumping.
Though plane-parallel resonators can achieve high-power laser output, certain applications require lasers with both high power and beam quality. Thus, a ring resonator with a cavity length of 280 mm was established to balance power and beam quality. The OPO pump threshold increased to 50.0 W. According to the models in [20,21], the pump wave is assumed to comprise a Gaussian spatial intensity distribution. The coupled wave equations can be solved using Runge–Kutta algorithms. It is possible to vary the parameters of the pump beam and the OPO in the numerical model. The calculated pump thresholds of the plane-parallel and ring cavities were 34.5 W and 52.5 W, respectively, which reflects the increased threshold of the ring cavity. The maximum output power dropped to 33.9 W (113 mJ) and 8.7 W (29 mJ) for the signal and idler, respectively, as shown in Figure 3a2, when the pump was 162.0 W, corresponding to a conversion efficiency of 20.9% and 5.4%, as shown in Figure 3b2. The M2 factors of the signal at the maximum output were Mx2 = 5.9 and My2 = 7.3, and the beam quality measurement and corresponding beam profile are shown in Figure 3c2. If the pump increased further, the mirror IC would be damaged, and the output decreased rapidly as the damage area expanded. Although the mirrors used in the two cavities were bought from the same company and customized to meet an identical damage threshold, the IC of the ring cavity was obviously easier to damage; this could occur in the coating process, resulting in a lower damage threshold for the IC of the ring cavity. Limited by damage to the mirror, the maximum conversion efficiency of the ring cavity in the experiment was lower than that of the plane-parallel cavity, but, at the same pump-power-to-threshold ratio, the conversion efficiencies of the two cavities were similar. For example, when the pump power was about three times the threshold, the signal conversion efficiency of both cavities was about 20%. Thus, the ring cavity efficiency could still be improved, provided that the damage problem can be properly addressed.
As observed from the insets of Figure 3c1,c2, the signal of the ring cavity had a better spatial intensity distribution than that of the plane-parallel cavity, and the beam quality significantly improved. This is due to the fact that the plane-parallel cavity exhibits a larger Fresnel number, and the ring cavity helps suppress competition from higher-order modes, leading to a better spatial distribution and beam quality. The improved beam quality of the ring cavity made it an ideal laser radiation for illumination and ranging at long distances. It is worth mentioning that the rotated-image singly resonant twisted rectangle (RISTRA) cavity, a type of non-planar ring cavity, has an additional 90° image rotation compared with the planar ring cavity and is effective in improving the beam quality of the critical-phase-matching OPO [22,23]. The case of non-critical phase matching without walk-off, e.g., the KTA OPO in our experiment, is worth exploring, and the RISTRA cavity may be a better alternative to the planar ring cavity. In future experiments, the role of seed injection technology in improving the beam quality and conversion efficiency will be explored, with attempts to combine it with non-planar ring cavities to achieve a stable OPO output with a high beam quality.
For the OPO ring cavity, the spectral characteristics of the pump, signal, and idler were measured using high-precision spectrometers (AQ6370D and AQ6377, YOKOGAWA, Tokyo, Japan), and the central wavelengths were 1064.5 nm, 1535.9 nm, and 3467.3 nm, respectively, as shown in Figure 4. The corresponding linewidths were 0.15 nm, 0.3 nm, and 1.5 nm.
Finally, the pulse shapes were recorded using an indium gallium arsenide detector (Thorlabs PDA10CF-EC, for pump and signal), an MIR detector (MIP-10–100M-F-M4, Vigo, for idler), and an oscilloscope (Tektronix MSO64B), as shown in Figure 5. When the ring cavity OPO operated at the maximum power, the pulse widths of the signal and idler were 11.9 ns and 14.4 ns, respectively. The signal pulse duration was slightly shorter than the pump, while the idler showed a broader pulse width owing to the different detector parameters.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a high-repetition and high-power KTA OPO were obtained using plane-parallel and ring cavities. For the plane-parallel cavity, powers of 51.1 W and 15.9 W for the signal and idler were obtained, respectively; these were the highest average power for KTA OPO, but the beam quality was poor. For the ring cavity, the signal output reached 33.9 W, corresponding to beam qualities of Mx2 = 5.9 and My2 = 7.3, and the idler light output reached 8.7 W. For long-range laser ranging and LiDAR applications, pulsed laser sources must balance the energy output and beam quality. The developed 1.5 μm pulsed laser source, operating at 300 Hz with a pulse energy over 100 mJ and a beam quality factor M2 less than 10, demonstrates an optimal solution that fulfills the operational requirements of these applications. In addition, future efforts could focus on shaping the pump beam and optimizing the OPO cavity. The uniform and smooth pump distribution obtained by beam shaping could alleviate damage to the OPO optical elements and thermal problems; thus, a higher output power and conversion efficiency can be achieved. As for the cavity design, it is reported that those like the unstable and non-planar ring cavities can effectively improve the OPO beam quality, which will be explored in the future, so that the performance of high-power infrared lasers in practical applications could be significantly improved. Moreover, improving idler performance is also a future direction of development because the mid-infrared laser, where the idler is located, has attracted more attention in recent years. The KTA OPO and OPA combination may alleviate the current difficulties faced by high-energy KTA OPO, making its performance in the mid-infrared range close to or even comparable to ZGP [10,13].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L. and Z.L.; methodology, G.L.; software, T.L.; validation, J.M.; formal analysis, T.L. and J.M.; investigation, T.L.; resources, G.L.; data curation, G.L.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L.; writing—review and editing, J.M. and G.L.; visualization, G.L.; supervision, G.L. and Z.L.; project administration, G.L. and Z.L.; funding acquisition, G.L. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 62405162; Natural Science Foundation of Shan-dong Province grant numbers ZR2022QF087 and ZR2024QF205); Founding for Qilu Young Scholars from Shandong University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data in this study are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, P.F.; Zhang, F.; Li, K.; Cao, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.C.; Yan, B.Z.; Bai, Z.X.; Yu, Y.; Lv, Z.; et al. Research progress of high-frequency and high-energy solid state lasers at 1.6 μm (invited). Infrared Laser Eng. 2023, 52, 20230403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhong, K.; Yao, J.Q.; Wang, Y.Y.; Xu, D.G.; Wang, P. Comparison of eye-safe KTA OPOs pumped by Nd:YVO4 and Nd:YLF lasers. Opt. Laser Technol. 2011, 43, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, T.; Wu, C.; Yu, Y.; Dai, T.; Chen, F.; Pan, Q. Development Progress of 3–5 μm Mid-Infrared Lasers: OPO, Solid-State and Fiber Laser. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, Q.B.; Liu, H.J.; Huang, N.; Ruan, C.; Zhu, S.L.; Zhao, W. High energy and high efficiency 3.4 μm extracavity KTA optical parametric oscillator. Laser Phys. Lett. 2011, 8, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhong, K.; Yao, J.Q.; Xu, D.G.; Wang, J.L.; Li, J.S.; Wang, P. High-pulse-energy high-efficiency mid-infrared generation based on KTA optical parametric oscillator. Appl. Phys. B 2010, 100, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, S.; Wang, Q.; Song, R.; Hou, F.; Gao, M.; Gao, C. Laser diode pumped high-energy single-frequency Er:YAG laser with hundreds of nanoseconds pulse duration. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2020, 18, 031401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manuel, M. Investagation of OPO Cavities for High Average Power Generation in the Mid-Infrared. Ph.D. Thesis, Aix-Marseille Universitè, Marseille, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris, S.E. Tunable Optical Parametric Oscillators. Proc. IEEE 1969, 57, 2096–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, J.; Li, C.; Cong, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; Liu, G.; Liu, Z. Beam quality improvement of the high-energy KTA-OPO based on a confocal unstable cavity with Gaussian reflectivity mirror. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2023, 21, 051401. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ju, Y.L.; Yao, B.Q.; Qi, S. High power 1.57-μm OPO pumped by MOPA with SBS. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2005, 3, 358–360. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, G.; Mi, S.; Yang, K.; Wei, D.; Li, J.; Yao, B.; Yang, C.; Dai, T.; Duan, X.; Tian, L.; et al. 161 W middle infrared ZnGeP2 MOPA system pumped by 300 W-class Ho:YAG MOPA system. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sheng, Q.; Ding, X.; Shi, C.; Yin, S.; Li, B.; Shang, C.; Yu, X.; Wen, W.; Yao, J. Continuous-wave mid-infrared intra-cavity singly resonant PPLN-OPO under 880 nm in-band pumping. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 8041–8046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Haakestad, M.W.; Fonnum, H.; Lippert, E. Mid-infrared source with 0.2 J pulse energy based on nonlinear conversion of Q-switched pulses in ZnGeP2. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 8556–8564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hansson, G.; Karlsson, H.; Wang, S.; Laurell, F. Transmission Measurements in KTP and Isomorphic Compounds. Appl. Opt. 2000, 39, 5058–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rines, G.A.; Rines, D.M.; Moulton, P.F. Efficient, high-energy, KTP optical parametric oscillators pumped with 1 micron Nd-lasers. In Proceedings of the Advanced Solid State Lasers, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 1994. Available online: https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=assl-1994-PO9 (accessed on 1 March 2025). [CrossRef]
  16. Webb, M.S.; Moulton, P.F.; Kasinski, J.J.; Burnham, R.L.; Loiacono, G.; Stolzenberger, R. High-average-power KTiOAsO4 optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 1161–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, J.; Liu, Q.; Huang, L.; Gong, M. High energy eye-safe and mid-infrared optical parametric oscillator. Laser Phys. Lett. 2010, 7, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Gong, M. 100Hz high energy KTiOAsO4 optical parametric oscillator. Infrared Phys. Technol. 2013, 61, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meng, J.; Cong, Z.H.; Zhao, Z.G.; Wang, S.; Qi, Y.X.; Zhang, X.Y.; Liu, Z.J. 100 Hz High-Energy KTA Dual-Wavelength Optical Parametric Oscillator. Chin. J. Lasers-Zhongguo Jiguang 2021, 48, 1201009. [Google Scholar]
  20. Anstett, G.; Nittmann, M.; Wallenstein, R. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of the spatio-temporal dynamics of the light-pulses in nanosecond optical parametric oscillators. Appl. Phys. B 2004, 79, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smith, A.V.; Gehr, R.J.; Bowers, M.S. Numerical models of broad-bandwidth nanosecond optical parametric oscillators. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schellhorn, M.; Spindler, G.; Eichhorn, M. Improvement of the beam quality of a high-pulse-energy mid-infrared fractional-image-rotation-enhancement ZnGeP2 optical parametric oscillator. Opt. Lett. 2017, 42, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Piotrowski, M.; Medina, M.A.; Spindler, G.; Schellhorn, M.; Hildenbrand-Dhollande, A. Beam Quality Enhancement in High Power mid-IR ZGP OPO Sources: A Focus on Thermal Lens Build-up. In Proceedings of the Laser Congress 2020 (ASSL, LAC), Washington, DC, USA, 3–16 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup of the KTA OPO system. HR, high reflection; BP, beam polarizer; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; ISO, isolator; IC, input coupler; OC, output coupler.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup of the KTA OPO system. HR, high reflection; BP, beam polarizer; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; QWP, quarter-wave plate; ISO, isolator; IC, input coupler; OC, output coupler.
Photonics 12 00270 g001
Figure 2. (a) Output power of the oscillator versus the pump current; (b) beam quality of the oscillator at maximum output power; (c) output power of amplifiers versus the pump current; (d) beam quality of the third-stage amplifiers at the maximum output power.
Figure 2. (a) Output power of the oscillator versus the pump current; (b) beam quality of the oscillator at maximum output power; (c) output power of amplifiers versus the pump current; (d) beam quality of the third-stage amplifiers at the maximum output power.
Photonics 12 00270 g002
Figure 3. (a1) Output powers of the signal and idler of the plane-parallel cavity versus pump power; (b1) conversion efficiency of the plane-parallel cavity over the pump-power-to-threshold ratio; (c1) beam quality of signal at maximum output power. (a2) signal and idler output powers of ring cavity. (b2) conversion efficiency of the ring cavity. (c2) signal beam quality of the ring cavity at the maximum output power. Ppump, pump power; Pthreshold, threshold power.
Figure 3. (a1) Output powers of the signal and idler of the plane-parallel cavity versus pump power; (b1) conversion efficiency of the plane-parallel cavity over the pump-power-to-threshold ratio; (c1) beam quality of signal at maximum output power. (a2) signal and idler output powers of ring cavity. (b2) conversion efficiency of the ring cavity. (c2) signal beam quality of the ring cavity at the maximum output power. Ppump, pump power; Pthreshold, threshold power.
Photonics 12 00270 g003
Figure 4. Spectral measurement of the X-cut KTA OPO: (a) spectrum of the pump; (b) spectrum of the signal; (c) spectrum of the Idler.
Figure 4. Spectral measurement of the X-cut KTA OPO: (a) spectrum of the pump; (b) spectrum of the signal; (c) spectrum of the Idler.
Photonics 12 00270 g004
Figure 5. Pulse shapes of the ring cavity OPO. (a) temporal profile of the signal; (b) temporal profile of the idler.
Figure 5. Pulse shapes of the ring cavity OPO. (a) temporal profile of the signal; (b) temporal profile of the idler.
Photonics 12 00270 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, T.; Meng, J.; Liu, G.; Liu, Z. High-Power KTiOAsO4 Optical Parametric Oscillator at 300 Hz. Photonics 2025, 12, 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030270

AMA Style

Li T, Meng J, Liu G, Liu Z. High-Power KTiOAsO4 Optical Parametric Oscillator at 300 Hz. Photonics. 2025; 12(3):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Tao, Jun Meng, Gaoyou Liu, and Zhaojun Liu. 2025. "High-Power KTiOAsO4 Optical Parametric Oscillator at 300 Hz" Photonics 12, no. 3: 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030270

APA Style

Li, T., Meng, J., Liu, G., & Liu, Z. (2025). High-Power KTiOAsO4 Optical Parametric Oscillator at 300 Hz. Photonics, 12(3), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030270

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop