Next Article in Journal
Nonlinear-Optical Processing of OAM Light States in a Few-Mode Fiber
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Biomass-Derived Chitosan for Colorimetric pH Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

All-Fiber Linear Polarized LP11 Mode Laser Based on Mode-Selective Polarization-Maintaining Fiber Bragg Gratings

1
Institute of Applied Electronics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
2
National Key Laboratory of Advanced Lasers and High Power Microwaves, Mianyang 621900, China
3
Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100088, China
4
School of Materials of Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2025, 12(3), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030232
Submission received: 31 January 2025 / Revised: 20 February 2025 / Accepted: 27 February 2025 / Published: 4 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Lasers, Light Sources and Sensors)

Abstract

:
We present a reliable and all-fiberized single-polarization, high-order mode fiber laser. The experimental setup employed polarization-maintaining ytterbium-doped fibers and a combination of different fiber Bragg gratings to achieve high mode purity and stable output. The system achieved a maximum output power of 3.8 W, a polarization extinction ratio (PER) of 96.7%, and a mode purity of 95.32% for the LP11 mode. Furthermore, the laser demonstrated notable stability; during a 120 min stability test, the standard deviation of the output power was measured at 0.15%, while the standard deviation of the polarization extinction ratio (PER) was 0.07%. This work offers a reliable solution for the generation of stable, high-purity LP11 mode lasers.

1. Introduction

In recent years, high-order transverse mode laser outputs have garnered significant attention due to their unique polarization, amplitude, and phase characteristics, particularly in applications involving the mode-division multiplexing technique [1], material processing [2], power scaling [3], the generation of vortex beams [4], cylindrical vector beams [5], and annular beams [6]. Currently, numerous methods have been proposed for generating single high-order transverse mode lasers, which can be categorized into three main types: traditional bulk optical schemes, hybrid schemes combining bulk optics with fiber optics, and all-fiber schemes. These methods primarily utilize devices such as spatial light modulators [7], spatial phase plates [8], mode converters [9,10], fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) [11,12,13], polarization controllers [14], and coherent polarization beam combining [15] to achieve the desired outcomes. The bulky spatial light modulator eliminates its applicability to compact all-fiber lasers. Polarization-dependent elements (segmented delay devices, photonic crystal gratings, birefringent crystals, spatially varying wave plates, etc.) can also be used for the selective excitation of specific higher-order modes. However, they not only have bulky configurations, but also have poor scalability for general modes. The fiber Bragg grating mode selection method has high stability, but the grating itself is difficult to engrave and has high production costs. Although the offset splicing coupling mode selection method has relatively low efficiency, its structure is the simplest and most direct.
In conventional few-mode fibers, it is commonly believed that only a limited number of low-order modes, such as LP01 and LP11, are supported based on the weak guidance approximation. However, due to differences in polarization, these fibers can support more modes. As a result, even in typical two-mode fibers, at least six different fiber modes are supported. These modes are associated with slightly different propagation speeds, and when multiple modes coexist within the same fiber, the intensity distribution of higher-order modes across the fiber’s cross-section varies along its length. Furthermore, these modes may be influenced by changes in the surrounding environment. Small environmental variations can induce minor phase shifts between nearly identical eigenmodes, further contributing to changes in the cross-sectional intensity distribution of higher-order modes. This environmental sensitivity limits the practical applications of higher-order modes in certain fiber devices. At present, for high-order transverse modes of linear polarization, the output polarization is controlled by using fiber polarization controllers [5,16]. Although this method can obtain high-order transverse modes with linear polarization, it still poses certain challenges to the stability of the output. This limits their practical application in fiber optic devices [17,18].
In conclusion, to address the issue of unstable output of linearly polarized LP11 mode, we propose a linearly polarized LP11 mode fiber laser based on a polarization-maintaining fiber Bragg grating (PM-FBG) with an output power of 3.8 W. This laser achieves the conversion from LP01 to LP11 mode and maintains stable transmission of linearly polarized LP11 mode. First, the conversion from LP01 to LP11 mode was achieved through misaligned splicing. Then, by utilizing a customized pair of polarization-maintaining FBGs, the fiber laser was designed to output only a specific single-polarization mode, thus preserving the spatial stability of the LP11 mode. In the experiment, a polarization extinction ratio (PER) of 96.7% and a mode purity of 95.32% were achieved, realizing a fully fiber-based structure for single-polarization high-order transverse mode output. Moreover, the use of an all-PM fiber structure eliminated the need for a fiber polarization controller (PC), ensuring the laser’s excellent stability.

2. Experimental Setup

The experimental setup for the cladding-pumped single-polarization LP11 mode Yb-doped fiber laser (YDFL) is illustrated in Figure 1. A laser diode (LD) is spliced to the pump port of a (1 + 1) × 1 polarization-maintaining (PM) combiner. The total pump power is 25 W, with core and cladding diameters of the PM combiner being 10 μm and 125 μm, respectively. A 15 m long 20/400 PM Yb-doped fiber is used as the gain fiber, which has an absorption coefficient of 1.5 dBm−1 at 976 nm. The numerical aperture (NA) of the gain fiber is 0.065. To match the reflection peak of the LP01 mode, and ensure the output of the LP11 mode, two different types of PM fibers are employed to inscribe fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) in this experiment: a PM single-mode fiber inscribing the PMFBG and a PM few-mode fiber inscribing the PMFMFBG. These two types of gratings form the laser cavity. By rotating the axis by 90° during fusion splicing, the slow-axis alignment of the spectrum on the polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber Bragg grating (PMFMFBG) is achieved, ensuring the formation and output of linearly polarized beams. Subsequently, the LP01 mode is converted to the LP11 mode through offset splicing. Finally, the PMFMFBG is utilized as the output coupler for the linearly polarized LP11 mode within the laser cavity, while most of the LP01 mode is reflected back. The cladding power stripper (CPS) is created by chemically etching irregular pits on the cladding surface of the fiber, resulting in the leakage of the laser at the etched interface due to the failure to meet the total internal reflection conditions. Additionally, a 7° split angle was implemented at the fiber output end to prevent end-face reflection.
Based on the principle of polarization mode selection using polarization-maintaining (PM) gratings, this design involves specially configured grating parameters and a unique splicing technique. This ensures that the reflection spectra of the grating pair overlap only in one polarization direction, allowing only a single-polarization mode to oscillate within the resonator, thereby achieving linearly polarized laser output. The reflection spectrum of the PM fiber grating consists of the fast- and slow-axis reflection spectra, with the wavelength difference between these reflections determined by the birefringence coefficient of the PM fiber. The reflection wavelength difference can be expressed as follows [19]:
Δ λ = 2 B Λ
where B represents the birefringence coefficient, and Λ denotes the grating period. For PM fiber Bragg grating (PMFBG), the value of B is 3 × 10−4, and the value of Λ is 368 nm, so the value of Δ λ is calculated to be 0.221 nm. For PM few-mode fiber Bragg grating (PMFMFBG), the value of B is 4 × 10−4, and the value of Λ is 368 nm, so the value of Δ λ is calculated to be 0.294 nm. In LP01 mode, the fast-axis transmission peak of the PMFBG is aligned with the slow-axis reflection peak of the PMFMFBG to ensure linear polarization output within the laser cavity. Furthermore, since both FBGs exhibit high reflectivity for the LP01 mode, they effectively filter out the output of the fundamental mode LP01, thus guaranteeing high mode purity for the resulting linearly polarized LP11 mode. The presence of the fundamental mode is one of the critical factors influencing the output power and polarization purity. A broadband light source is utilized to measure the transmission spectrum of the PMFBG and the reflection spectrum of the PMFMFBG, as shown in Figure 2. Both the transmission and reflection peaks correspond to the fundamental mode, i.e., the LP01 mode.
The reflectance measurement for the LP01 mode at the PMFBG is 96.9%, while at the PMFMFBG, it is 90.2%. According to the normalized frequency V = ( 2 π a N A ) λ , the calculations are as follows: At a wavelength of 1064 nm, the PM single-mode fiber has a core diameter of 10 μm, a cladding diameter of 125 μm, and a numerical aperture ( N A ) of 0.08. The normalized frequency V is calculated to be 2.36, indicating that this fiber can support only the fundamental mode. The PM few-mode fiber has a core diameter of 20 μm, a cladding diameter of 400 μm, and a numerical aperture ( N A ) of 0.065. The calculated normalized frequency V is 3.84. In the weak guiding approximation, only the LP01 and LP11 modes can propagate in this fiber. The corresponding basic parameters are shown in Table 1. For the generation of LP11 mode, this experiment adopts the method of offsetting and splicing two PM few-mode fibers.
The so-called offset splice point (OSS), as shown in Figure 3b, is designed to excite the second-order transverse modes in few-mode fibers. The coupling efficiency of the inherent modes at both ends of the waveguide depends on the mode field distributions and overlap area of both the exciting light and the excited light. This can be expressed using the following formula [20]:
η j = P j P i = | S E t e i j * d S | S | E t | 2 d S
In this context, e i j represents the normalized mode distribution within the fiber, while E t indicates the mode field distribution of the exciting light at the receiving fiber’s end face. When the waveguide structures of the exciting and excited light are consistent, the light field distribution in the excited light’s waveguide completely integrates with that of the exciting light, resembling the stable transmission of guided modes in a complete fiber waveguide. To excite higher-order mode fields, it is essential to break the consistency and symmetry between the two. The primary implementation method involves offset incidence excitation. The direction of offset can be either perpendicular to the direction of the boron rod or along the direction of the boron rod, which is referred to as the direction perpendicular to the boron rod in this article. To determine the optimal offset distance for effectively exciting the LP11 mode, the relationship between the mode ratio and offset distance was calculated using the Beam Propagation Method (BPM), as shown in Figure 3a. The ratio is introduced as α = E L P 11 / E L P 01 , where E L P 11 and E L P 01 represent the intensities of the LP11 and LP01 modes in the two-mode fiber (TMF), respectively. When the ratio α reaches its maximum, an optimal offset distance exists. The calculations indicate that the best offset distance is 14.8 µm, at which point α achieves a maximum value of 2.84. In the actual operation process, set the fiber fusion splicer to fusion mode, input the information of the two ends of the fiber, and then change the axis alignment method to manual and adjust it to 14.8 µm. Finally, set the discharge power to 519 bit and the discharge time to 6000 ms. Furthermore, the combined intensity of the LP11 and LP01 modes is only 0.192 times the initial strength, which is a significant reason for the comparatively low output power slope efficiency.

3. Results and Discussion

The output characteristics were measured and recorded. As shown in Figure 4, at a pump power of 20.9 W, the maximum output power reached 3.8 W, with a slope efficiency of approximately 18.4%. The main reason for low efficiency is the significant loss at the offset splicing point, and a small part of the reason is the loss of fiber fusion splicing point. By reducing the splicing loss of different fibers, further optimization can be achieved. The output beam profile at maximum output power is illustrated in the inset of Figure 4a. The beam profile was monitored using a CCD camera, and a typical LP11 mode with two lobes was obtained at maximum output power, with its mode purity measured using the fiber bending method [5], yielding a value of approximately 95.32%. To measure the polarization extinction ratio (PER) of the output beam, a half-wave plate and a polarization beam splitter (PBS), as shown in Figure 5, were employed as linear polarizers. When the angle between the optical axis of the half-wave plate and the polarization direction is θ , the polarization direction of the output light rotates by 2 θ . When it is consistent with the P-polarization direction of PBS, the maximum transmitted light intensity is denoted as I P , and when it is consistent with the S-polarization direction of PBS, the minimum transmitted light intensity is denoted as I S . Calculate PER using the formula P E R = ( I P / ( I P + I S ) ) 100 % . The PER of the output beam at different output powers is presented in Figure 4b. At the highest output power, the polarization extinction ratio (PER) was found to be as high as 96.7%. It is worth noting that compared to the no-polarization-maintaining fibers used in other studies [5], this study verified the possibility of generating a linearly polarized LP11 mode through a polarization-maintaining fiber system using a fully polarization-maintaining fiber system, and achieved watt-level output and high PER results, providing a strong foundation for subsequent power amplification.
To confirm the stability of the single-polarization LP11 mode output laser, we conducted a stability test over a period of 120 min in an environment with a temperature of 23 degrees Celsius and a relative humidity of around 50%, recording the output power using a power meter and the polarization extinction ratio (PER) using a half-wave plate and a polarization beam splitter (PBS) every minute. The relationship between output power, PER, and time is illustrated in Figure 6. The standard deviation for the output power was 0.15%, while the standard deviation for the PER was 0.06%, indicating that the laser exhibits excellent stability. For clarity, the slow-axis direction of the PMFMFBG is defined as the x-polarization direction, while the fast-axis direction is designated as the y-polarization direction. The output power diagrams for both x-polarization and y-polarization are illustrated in Figure 7. We observed that the PER did not reach a particularly high value. Upon analysis, this is attributed to the presence of four fusion splice points between polarization-maintaining fibers within the laser system, including one offset splicing point and one splice point between polarization-maintaining fibers of different specifications. The fusion splice errors introduced by these four points contribute to the reduction in the PER of the output laser.
Finally, spectral measurements were conducted using a spectrometer. At the maximum output power of 3.8 W, as shown in Figure 8, the center wavelength at full-width half maximum (FWHM) was measured to be 1063.96 nm with a spectral bandwidth of 0.32 nm. Furthermore, the spectral data indicated that any remaining pump light was completely filtered out by the CPS.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have designed a fiber mode conversion device and demonstrated an all-fiber, linearly polarized LP11 mode laser system. At a maximum output power of 3.8 W, we achieved a mode purity of 95.32% and a polarization extinction ratio (PER) of 96.7% for the LP11 mode laser. These results demonstrate the feasibility of the single-polarization LP11 mode laser system utilizing polarization-maintaining fiber devices and polarization-maintaining fiber Bragg gratings. This provides a reliable and stable source of single-polarization, higher-order mode fiber laser for practical applications. It can also serve as a seed source for an all-fiber LP11 amplifier, enabling further power scaling while maintaining high mode purity and polarization stability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.M. and W.P.; methodology, Q.Z., X.S. and H.W.; validation, L.J. and F.L.; data curation, Q.Z.; visualization, Q.Z.; supervision, C.T.; project administration, H.L.; funding acquisition, Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.L. and W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3606400).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Richardson, D.J.; Fini, J.M.; Nelson, L.E. Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres. Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanner, N.; Huot, N.; Audouard, E.; Larat, C.; Huignard, J.-P. Direct ultrafast laser micro-structuring of materials using programmable beam shaping. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2007, 45, 737–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramachandran, S.; Fini, J.M.; Mermelstein, M.; Nicholson, J.W.; Ghalmi, S.; Yan, M.F. Ultra-large effective-area, higher-order mode fibers: A new strategy for high-power lasers. Laser Photonics Rev. 2008, 2, 429–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, T.; Wang, F.; Shi, F.; Pang, F.; Huang, S.; Wang, T.; Zeng, X. Generation of Femtosecond Optical Vortex Beams in All-Fiber Mode-Locked Fiber Laser Using Mode Selective Coupler. J. Light. Technol. 2017, 35, 2161–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, B.; Wang, A.; Xu, L.; Gu, C.; Lin, Z.; Ming, H.; Zhan, Q. Low-threshold single-wavelength all-fiber laser generating cylindrical vector beams using a few-mode fiber Bragg grating. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 464–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, B.; Wu, Q.; Tang, Y.; Fan, J.; Chen, X.; Sun, Y. Design of an optical system for generating annular-focused beams using a conical mirror and a parabolic cylindrical mirror. Optik 2023, 281, 170625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Forbes, A.; Dudley, A.; McLaren, M. Creation and detection of optical modes with spatial light modulators. Adv. Opt. Photonics 2016, 8, 200–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Spilman, A.K.; Brown, T.G. Stress birefringent, space-variant wave plates for vortex illumination. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wang, T.; Shi, F.; Huang, Y.; Wen, J.; Luo, Z.; Pang, F.; Wang, T.; Zeng, X. High-order mode direct oscillation of few-mode fiber laser for high-quality cylindrical vector beams. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 11850–11858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, F.; Shi, F.; Wang, T.; Pang, F.; Wang, T.; Zeng, X. Method of Generating Femtosecond Cylindrical Vector Beams Using Broadband Mode Converter. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2017, 29, 747–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, T.; Chen, S.-P.; Hou, J. Selective transverse mode operation of an all-fiber laser with a mode-selective fiber Bragg grating pair. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 5692–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhu, Q.; Shi, J.; Hu, H.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z.; Xing, Y.-B.; Li, J.; Yan, D.; Li, C. High-power polarization-maintaining LP11-mode fiber laser based on long-period fiber grating for precise welding. Opt. Express 2024, 32, 8862–8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Hu, G. High-order mode fiber laser based on few-mode fiber gratings. Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 155, 108416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, L.; Leng, J.; Zhou, P.; Guo, S.; Lü, H.; Cheng, X. Adaptive mode control of a few-mode fiber by real-time mode decomposition. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 28082–28090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ma, P.; Zhou, P.; Ma, Y.; Wang, X.; Su, R.; Liu, Z. Generation of azimuthally and radially polarized beams by coherent polarization beam combination. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 2658–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Du, X.; Zhang, H.; Ma, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, P.; Liu, Z. Spatial mode switchable fiber laser based on FM-FBG and random distributed feedback. Laser Phys. 2015, 25, 95102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, J.; Mo, Q.; Fu, S.; Tang, M.; Shum, P.; Liu, D. Design and fabrication of elliptical-core few-mode fiber for MIMO-less data transmission. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 3058–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mo, Q.; Hong, Z.; Yu, D.; Fu, S.; Wang, L.; Oh, K.; Tang, M.; Liu, D. All-fiber spatial rotation manipulation for radially asymmetric modes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chu, P.; Sammut, R. Analytical method for calculation of stresses and material birefringence in polarization-maintaining optical fiber. J. Light. Technol. 1984, 2, 650–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Snyder, A.W.; Love, J.D. Optical Waveguide Theory; Chapman and Hall: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the fiber laser design, showing the polarization-maintaining fiber Bragg grating (PMFBG), polarization-maintaining multiplexing pump combiner (PMMPC), polarization-maintaining ytterbium-doped fiber (PMYDF), the offset splicing point (OSS) indicated by the red dot, the polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber grating (PMFMFBG), and the polarization-maintaining cladding power stripper (PMCPS). The polarization-maintaining single-mode fiber is represented by the black line on the left, while the polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber is denoted by the blue line on the right.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the fiber laser design, showing the polarization-maintaining fiber Bragg grating (PMFBG), polarization-maintaining multiplexing pump combiner (PMMPC), polarization-maintaining ytterbium-doped fiber (PMYDF), the offset splicing point (OSS) indicated by the red dot, the polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber grating (PMFMFBG), and the polarization-maintaining cladding power stripper (PMCPS). The polarization-maintaining single-mode fiber is represented by the black line on the left, while the polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber is denoted by the blue line on the right.
Photonics 12 00232 g001
Figure 2. Transmission spectrum of polarization-maintaining fiber Bragg gratings and reflection spectrum of polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber Bragg gratings.
Figure 2. Transmission spectrum of polarization-maintaining fiber Bragg gratings and reflection spectrum of polarization-maintaining few-mode fiber Bragg gratings.
Photonics 12 00232 g002
Figure 3. (a) Energy distribution ratios of LP01 and LP11 modes, as well as the value of α , at different offset distances. (b) Schematic diagram of offset splicing of two optical fibers.
Figure 3. (a) Energy distribution ratios of LP01 and LP11 modes, as well as the value of α , at different offset distances. (b) Schematic diagram of offset splicing of two optical fibers.
Photonics 12 00232 g003
Figure 4. (a) Output power characteristics of the LP11 mode fiber laser, where the inset illustrates the schematic diagram of two optical fibers offset and spliced under a microscope, as well as the output beam profile at maximum power. (b) Relationship between PER and output power for LP11 mode, where the inset illustrates the polarization direction of the output spot.
Figure 4. (a) Output power characteristics of the LP11 mode fiber laser, where the inset illustrates the schematic diagram of two optical fibers offset and spliced under a microscope, as well as the output beam profile at maximum power. (b) Relationship between PER and output power for LP11 mode, where the inset illustrates the polarization direction of the output spot.
Photonics 12 00232 g004
Figure 5. Optical path diagram for measuring the polarization extinction ratio (PER). PBS, polarization beam splitter.
Figure 5. Optical path diagram for measuring the polarization extinction ratio (PER). PBS, polarization beam splitter.
Photonics 12 00232 g005
Figure 6. (a) Long-term stability of laser power over 120 min. (b) Long-term stability of PER over 120 min.
Figure 6. (a) Long-term stability of laser power over 120 min. (b) Long-term stability of PER over 120 min.
Photonics 12 00232 g006
Figure 7. The long-term stability of the output power for both x-polarization and y-polarization over 120 min.
Figure 7. The long-term stability of the output power for both x-polarization and y-polarization over 120 min.
Photonics 12 00232 g007
Figure 8. Output spectrum of the LP11 mode fiber laser.
Figure 8. Output spectrum of the LP11 mode fiber laser.
Photonics 12 00232 g008
Table 1. Basic parameters of the selected FBG.
Table 1. Basic parameters of the selected FBG.
FBGFiber
Type
Core
Diameter
λ NAV
Number
PMFBG10/12510 μm1064 nm0.082.36
PMFMFBG20/40020 μm1064 nm0.0653.84
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Peng, W.; Shi, X.; Jiang, L.; Lin, F.; Ma, Y.; Tang, C. All-Fiber Linear Polarized LP11 Mode Laser Based on Mode-Selective Polarization-Maintaining Fiber Bragg Gratings. Photonics 2025, 12, 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030232

AMA Style

Zhang Q, Liu H, Wang H, Peng W, Shi X, Jiang L, Lin F, Ma Y, Tang C. All-Fiber Linear Polarized LP11 Mode Laser Based on Mode-Selective Polarization-Maintaining Fiber Bragg Gratings. Photonics. 2025; 12(3):232. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Qianwen, Hang Liu, Hongyu Wang, Wanjing Peng, Xinlei Shi, Le Jiang, Fangxin Lin, Yi Ma, and Chun Tang. 2025. "All-Fiber Linear Polarized LP11 Mode Laser Based on Mode-Selective Polarization-Maintaining Fiber Bragg Gratings" Photonics 12, no. 3: 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030232

APA Style

Zhang, Q., Liu, H., Wang, H., Peng, W., Shi, X., Jiang, L., Lin, F., Ma, Y., & Tang, C. (2025). All-Fiber Linear Polarized LP11 Mode Laser Based on Mode-Selective Polarization-Maintaining Fiber Bragg Gratings. Photonics, 12(3), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12030232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop