Next Article in Journal
The 5P3/2→6PJ(J=1/2,3/2) Electric Dipole Forbidden Transitions in Rubidium
Next Article in Special Issue
Image Enhancement Method for Photoacoustic Imaging of Deep Brain Tissue
Previous Article in Journal
The Flatness Error Evaluation of Metal Workpieces Based on Line Laser Scanning Digital Imaging Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optogenetic Generation of Neural Firing Patterns with Temporal Shaping of Light Pulses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Optical Neuroimaging in Delirium

by
Shixie Jiang
1,*,
Philip A. Efron
2,
Esther S. Oh
3,4,5 and
Steven T. DeKosky
6
1
Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
2
Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
3
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
4
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
5
Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
6
Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Photonics 2023, 10(12), 1334; https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121334
Submission received: 28 October 2023 / Revised: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 30 November 2023 / Published: 1 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Neurophotonics and Its Future Perspectives)

Abstract

:
Delirium persists as the most common neuropsychiatric syndrome among medically ill hospitalized patients, yet its neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. The development of neuroimaging biomarkers has been difficult primarily due to the complexities of imaging patients experiencing delirium. Optical imaging techniques, including near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and diffuse optical tomography (DOT), offer promising avenues for investigating delirium’s pathophysiology. These modalities uniquely stand out for delirium exploration due to their blend of spatiotemporal resolution, bedside applicability, cost-effectiveness, and potential for real-time monitoring. In this review, we examine the emergence of optical imaging modalities and their pioneering utility in delirium research. With further investment and research efforts, they will become instrumental in our understanding of delirium’s pathophysiology and the development of preventive, predictive, and therapeutic strategies.

1. Introduction

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by an acute or subacute onset and fluctuating course, with disruptions in attention, arousal, multiple cognitive domains, psychomotor state, emotions, and the sleep–wake cycle [1]. It can be precipitated by any type of medical insult (e.g., infections, sepsis, stroke, organ failure) [2]. The pathophysiology is complex and not fully understood, with hypotheses based on derangements in various neurotransmitters, inflammation, oxidative stress, cerebral autoregulation, and functional network dysconnectivity [3]. It is exceedingly common in the medically ill, especially the elderly, and may be present in up to 50% of hospitalized patients over the age of 65 years, with rates as high as 83% in the intensive care unit [4,5]. It is associated with a higher risk of mortality, institutionalization, and incident dementias [6,7,8]. The estimated annual healthcare cost associated with delirium in the United States ranges from USD 143 billion to USD 150 billion [9]. Currently, there exists no definitive treatment for delirium, and treatment of underlying medical problem(s) driving the episode of delirium is most important [1]. In order to truly advance our approaches to preventing and treating delirium, improving our ability to study underlying neural mechanisms is critical.
Previous structural neuroimaging studies using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revealed that delirium is associated with grey matter volume loss and white matter hyperintensities and tract disruption in various brain regions [10,11,12]. However, these findings are not generalizable nor considered unique to delirium given their non-specific results, heterogeneous cohorts, and limited sample sizes. Advanced functional imaging studies have reported prominent hypoactivity in several cortical regions and dysconnectivity within the default mode and central executive networks [13,14]. Areas within the frontal and cingulate cortex appear to be most implicated in delirium, with subcortical structures such as the thalamus and caudate involved as well due to their role, along with the ascending reticular activating system, in regulating arousal [15,16,17]. Notably, these studies have relied on functional MRI (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET); however, their sample sizes are even smaller than many structural imaging studies. Moreover, PET requires fasting and an extended uptake period prior to imaging, which is not realistic for many delirious patients. With all MRI, CT, and PET modalities, the major limitations are lack of portability and diminished patient tolerability given their acutely ill status and severity of psychomotor and cognitive impairment. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been widely implemented given its portability; however, its use is limited to detection and basic regional and network analyses due to its low spatial resolution [18]. One proposed solution to the challenge of delirium neuroimaging has arisen with the advent of optical imaging techniques.

Optical Imaging

In 1977, Frans Jöbsis pioneered the feasibility of measuring changes in blood and tissue oxygenation within the brain of a living organism using near-infrared (NIR) light [19]. Since then, optical neuroimaging has evolved into a diverse field of research with numerous basic science, translational, and clinical studies capitalizing on light’s unique features for brain imaging. NIR light can provide crucial functional imaging data by detecting intrinsic alterations in absorption, fluorescence, or scattering. Additionally, a wide range of exogenous contrast media can be employed to gather additional information [20]. Commonly measured chromophores include oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin, cytochromes, and metabolites, all capturing indicators of brain functional activation akin to traditional functional imaging methods [21]. Optical imaging presents several advantages over standard functional imaging techniques, such as real-time capabilities, minimized subject movement constraints, a broader selection of contrast agents, absence of ionizing radiation, reduced costs, and enhanced portability [20]. For the study of delirium, two important optical imaging techniques that should be investigated are functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and diffuse optical tomography (DOT).
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is grounded in the fundamental principles of NIR spectroscopy, and the descriptor “functional” was ascribed following its inaugural application in early human studies [22,23]. fNIRS can concurrently assess changes in the optical characteristics of the human cortex from multiple measurement sites, with outcomes visualized as a topographical map or image covering a specific region. This technique capitalizes on the transparency of human tissues to NIR light within the spectral range of 650–1000 nm, where chromophores (e.g., hemoglobin in small blood vessels) effectively absorb or scatter NIR light [24]. Through quantifying oxyhemoglobin increments and concurrent deoxyhemoglobin reductions, fNIRS captures immediate indicators of heightened local arteriolar vasodilation, leading to increased local cerebral blood flow and volume in targeted regions. This hemodynamic response reflects neurovascular coupling, serving as a proxy for neuronal activity in the brain [25]. Numerous companies offer multi-channeled fNIRS devices at a fraction of the cost of an fMRI machine. Due to their compact interface and user-friendly setup, these devices are easily operated and switched from one patient to another [26].
Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) represents a contemporary noninvasive NIR-based method akin to the analogy between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In contrast to the two-dimensional topographical approach of fNIRS, DOT employs multiple near-infrared wavelengths and overlapping channels, accompanied by diverse source–detector distances for data collection [27]. This enables the quantification of hemodynamic responses at varying brain depths and the creation of high-resolution three-dimensional images [28]. Consequently, DOT offers a compelling alternative for three-dimensional functional neuroimaging, even in comparison to fMRI. While both modalities target blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signals, the distinction lies in fMRI’s reliance on predominantly measuring de-oxyhemoglobin [29]. Additionally, DOT’s capacity to concurrently capture all hemoglobin signal types facilitates the differentiation of timing, localization, and neurovascular coupling magnitude, enhancing the depiction of dynamic brain changes beyond fMRI capabilities [30,31,32]. Much like fNIRS, DOT is cost-effective, portable, and mobile, and the advent of wearable DOT systems with increasingly adaptable interfaces is on the horizon [33,34,35,36,37].

2. Optical Imaging in Delirium

To date, NIRS has been used in several delirium studies with a focus on intensive care unit (ICU) populations and sepsis as the primary etiology of delirium. Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection [38]. It is exceedingly common in the ICU, with rates as high as 39.3% based on pooled global data [39]. The pathophysiology of sepsis-associated delirium is not well understood; however, impairment in cerebral oxygenation, perfusion, and autoregulation is hypothesized as a major contributor [40]. As such, NIRS has played a pivotal role in preliminary studies investigating this mechanism underlying delirium related to sepsis in the ICU. Table 1 provides a summary of the available studies that have implemented NIRS in the study of delirium.
In 2008, Pfister et al. were the first to demonstrate the potential for the application of optical imaging in the exploration of delirium pathophysiology [41]. A total of 23 patients were enrolled, with 16 included for final analysis and 12 diagnosed with delirium based on the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) [5] assessments. A tissue oxygenation index (TOI) was used as a surrogate marker for cerebral oxygenation, captured by bilateral NIRS over the frontal to frontoparietal area for one hour within 48 h of ICU admission. No conclusive differences in TOI were found between delirious and non-delirious patients. Interestingly, blood flow velocity and regulatory changes captured by separate transcranial Doppler ultrasounds did demonstrate significant differences in the two groups. The authors offered several explanations, including sample size, limited optode placement (two channels), and lack of simultaneous Doppler measurements with NIRS.
Three subsequent pilot studies from other groups were able to further elucidate this potential mechanism related to sepsis and delirium. Funk et al. applied a similar protocol with 15 patients enrolled, and 7 were reported to be CAM-ICU positive for delirium [42]. Bilateral frontal NIRS was applied to measure tissue oxygen saturation (cut-off of 65%) for 24–48 h within 12 h of ICU admission. Their study reinforced a lack of relationship between tissue oxygen saturation and incidence of delirium; however, the authors questioned whether their cut-off was truly sensitive for delirium and expressed concerns regarding cerebral edema confounding their results given the status of their patients. Conversely, Wood et al. conducted an initial study using single forehead NIRS in 10 patients (5 screened as delirious) [43]. Non-delirious patients were found to have a higher level of brain tissue oxygenation (BtO2) compared to delirious patients. Compared to the previous studies, Wood et al. extended the observation time by performing continuous NIRS monitoring for the first 72 h of sepsis onset and suggested that the timing of NIRS measurements (during the initial resuscitative phase) may be important given fluctuations in tissue oxygenation related to delirium. These results were confirmed by Vasko et al. in a study comparing cerebral oxygenation between 15 septic patients and 10 age- and sex-matched controls [44]. Bilateral frontal NIRS demonstrated significantly lower oxygenation saturation levels in septic and delirious patients.
The first large prospective cohort study that focused on using NIRS for monitoring the development of delirium was conducted by Wood et al. in their follow-up trial (The Cerebral Oxygenation and Neurological outcomes Following CriticAL illness (CONFOCAL) study) [45]. A total of 88 adult patients in the ICU were enrolled and monitored with a single forehead NIRS sensor for the first 24 h of their admission. Patients were screened daily for delirium, with 30 days set as the maximum enrollment period. Their analyses reinforced and extended their pilot results, demonstrating a significant negative association between BtO2 and the proportion of ICU time spent delirious. BtO2 was also found to be an independent predictor of delirium, irrespective of other confounders. An important secondary outcome reported that BtO2 levels possessed no relationship with peripheral hemodynamic parameters, suggesting an independent mechanism of cerebral autoregulation. A subsequent study based on CONFOCAL data focused on cerebral autoregulation, specifically by measuring the cerebral oximetry index (COx) [46]. COx was defined as a time-varying correlation coefficient between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and NIRS-derived BtO2, with positive values reflecting dysfunctional cerebral autoregulation. Single forehead sensor NIRS measurements were obtained from 40 patients, and COx values were computed from the first 72 h of their ICU admission. Their results showed that the duration of cerebral autoregulation dysfunction within this early resuscitative phase of their ICU stay was an independent risk factor for the development of delirium. Optimization of MAP values to preserve the COx was suggested as a future research direction.
Based on the results of CONFOCAL, Rosenblatt et al. published a case series exploring the relationship between the optimization of MAP based on COx values and delirium severity [47]. Six patients with sepsis-induced delirium underwent 12 h of bilateral frontal NIRS monitoring during the first 48 h of their admission. Delirium severity was estimated based on the Glascow Coma Scale [48] scores. Hourly COx measurements were found to be consistently higher in delirious patients with lower GCS scores. Additionally, high individual variability in MAP values was demonstrated, suggesting a necessity to perform continuous monitoring that is personalized for each patient. Thus, the authors asserted that the universal MAP goal of ≥65 mm Hg in sepsis [49] may not apply to every individual and should be individually optimized.
In terms of advanced functional neuroimaging studies, there are few studies, including one published fNIRS study and one preliminary DOT study. Yoshimura et al. (2017) conducted a trial with 58 patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and 28 healthy controls [50]. A total of 50 of the 58 patients with ESLD were recruited from a clinic, and 12 were diagnosed with delirium. Delirium severity was measured with the Delirium Rating Scale—Revised 98 (DRS-R98). A 52-channel fNIRS device (wavelengths 695 and 830 nm) measured hemoglobin values in the bilateral prefrontal cortical region. Subjects were instructed to perform a modified version of a Verbal Fluency Task (VFT) during fNIRS measurements. Their results demonstrated significantly reduced oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) in delirious patients and patients with ESLD compared to controls; however, those with delirium exhibited the lowest values. No correlation was observed between DRS-R98 scores and oxy-Hb during the VFT. These findings demonstrated a potential optical imaging biomarker for delirium, although no follow-up study has been reported yet.
Table 1. Summary of published studies using optical neuroimaging in delirium.
Table 1. Summary of published studies using optical neuroimaging in delirium.
ReferenceClinical SettingSample SizeDelirium EtiologyOptical Imaging TechniqueImaging Site(s)Results
Pfister et al., 2008 [41]ICU23 (12 delirious)SepsisNIRSBilateral frontal to frontoparietal No difference in TOI between delirious and non-delirious patients; however, blood flow velocity measured by Doppler did differ
Funk et al., 2016 [42] ICU15 (7 delirious)SepsisNIRSBilateral frontalNo difference in TOI between delirious and non-delirious patients
Wood et al., 2016 [43]ICU10 (5 delirious)SepsisNIRSSingle frontal (forehead)Non-delirious patients demonstrated a higher frequency of BtO2 compared to delirious patients
Vasko et al., 2014 [44] ICU and clinic15 delirious; 10 controlsSepsisNIRSBilateral frontal Delirious and septic patients exhibited a lower BtO2 compared to controls
Wood et al., 2017 [45] ICU88 (19 delirious)SepsisNIRSSingle frontal (forehead)Significant negative association between BtO2 and proportion of time spent delirious
Lee et al., 2019 [46] ICU40 (24 delirious)SepsisNIRSSingle frontal (forehead)Duration and level of COx correlates with prediction of delirium
Rosenblatt et al., 2020 [47]ICU6 delirious SepsisNIRSBilateral frontalCOx measurements higher in more severe delirium
Yoshimura et al., 2017 [50] Clinic58 with ESLD (12 delirious); 29 controlsESLDfNIRSBilateral prefrontal cortexSignificantly reduced oxy-Hb values in ESLD, and even more so in those with ESLD and delirium, compared to controls
Jiang et al., 2022 [51]ICU and general wards5 delirious; 5 matched controlsHeterogeneousDOTBilateral prefrontal cortexSignificantly reduced oxy-Hb and total Hb during delirium and even post-resolution of delirium compared to controls. Lower total Hb correlated with higher severity of delirium
Abbreviations: ICU = intensive care unit; NIRS = near-infrared spectroscopy; TOI = tissue oxygenation index; BtO2 = brain tissue oxygenation; COx = cerebral oximetry index; ESLD = end stage liver disease; Hb = hemoglobin; oxy-Hb = oxygenated hemoglobin; NIRS = near-infrared spectroscopy; fNIRS = functional near-infrared spectroscopy; DOT = diffuse optical tomography.
For DOT, our group has published preliminary results in a small cohort of delirious subjects (n = 5) and age/gender/handedness/admission setting-matched non-delirious subjects (n = 5) [51]. We built a custom 48-channel DOT device with a lighter mesh and lower-density optical fibers in order to enable its use at bedside in hospitalized delirious patients. Patients were recruited from the ICU and general wards of a single tertiary academic hospital. The DOT interface was centered on the bilateral prefrontal cortex, with a focus on the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. The Months Backwards Test was conducted during imaging, given its validation as a test of attention, working memory, executive function, and processing speed in delirium and dementias [52]. Subjects were imaged at the time of their initial delirium episode and again after the resolution of delirium. DRS-R98 scores were also conducted at these two time points. Our results demonstrated significantly lower total and oxygenated hemoglobin values during delirium and even remained low after the resolution of delirium when compared to their matched controls. As such, the three-dimensional and bedside capabilities of DOT may prove to be a critical tool in the validation of optical neuroimaging biomarkers in delirium and to potentially study the longer-term cognitive decline that occurs post-delirium.

3. Challenges and Limitations

While optical imaging holds substantial promise in the context of delirium, several hurdles must be addressed to propel the advancement of these methodologies.
The complexity and multifaceted nature of the depth sensitivity and penetration limits of NIR light constitute an intricate and difficult topic. These attributes are contingent upon numerous factors inherent in NIRS applications, encompassing the technology, parameters, and neuroanatomical characteristics of the subjects or tissues under examination. These elements all possess significant influence over the physical characteristics of light absorption and scattering within the brain, with distinct depths exhibiting dynamic coefficient variations necessitating specific computations [25,26]. The feasible imaging depth, particularly with commercial NIRS devices, is typically estimated to be within the 2–3 cm range beneath the scalp surface [53,54,55]. When higher wavelengths (808 nm or beyond) are employed, reports indicate the potential for imaging at depths of 4–5 cm [56,57,58]. DOT, with its advanced signal properties and sophisticated software interface, consistently demonstrates the capability to produce images at these greater depths, in contrast to fNIRS [27,59,60]. Furthermore, recent experiments involving time- or frequency-domain detection modes show promise in alleviating some of the depth sensitivity constraints inherent to the conventional continuous-wave design [61]. Nevertheless, this issue undeniably constrains the utility of NIR light for imaging deeper brain structures, which holds some significance for completely understanding delirium. For instance, subcortical structures such as the thalamus and caudate have been proposed to contribute to disturbances of arousal, given their association with the ascending reticular activating system [15,17].
A prevalent challenge shared by all functional neuroimaging methods is their susceptibility to motion artifacts. The subtle nature of changes in blood oxygenation and blood flow linked to neural activity relative to motion-induced signal alterations creates difficulties in interpreting hemodynamic responses within specific regions [62]. Such artifacts can diminish image quality, leading to skewed statistical analyses and erroneous conclusions [63]. During optical neuroimaging procedures, motion that occurs between the optical fiber and the subject’s scalp can adversely impact image acquisition, causing decoupling and fluctuations in the recorded optical signal [64]. The most common motion artifact manifests as a brief, high-amplitude intensity change, promptly subsiding after the motion ceases. In the case of fMRI, whole datasets can become unusable, depending on the magnitude of motion during data acquisition when this type of artifact occurs. However, when using NIRS or DOT, temporary, unaffected data segments can still be captured and effectively utilized for analysis, given their higher tolerance for head and scalp motion, primarily due to differences in interface design [65]. This tolerance is likely attributable to algorithm variations and the use of mesh-based headgear with customized optode–scalp distances, as opposed to fMRI’s fixed and rigid design. Conventional techniques for mitigating excessive motion artifacts include meticulous optode array design, minimizing subject motion through visual fixation, reducing stimuli, ensuring comfortable positioning, and employing advanced post-processing methods [27]. Newer computational methods for reducing motion artifacts, outside of traditional filters and channel regression, also exist and include temporal derivative distribution repair, transient artifact reduction algorithms, and dual-stage median filters [66]. For applications in delirium, optical imaging holds promise in investigating hyperactive delirium or delirious agitation, given the decreased sensitivity to motion artifacts. All previous studies have predominantly focused on hypoactive delirium as patients with agitation are unlikely to tolerate prolonged neuroimaging scans. The pathophysiology and underlying neural mechanisms may differ immensely between types of delirium, and these disruptions remain a worthy area of investigation for NIRS and DOT.

4. Future Directions

The majority of available studies have focused on NIRS and not fNIRS or DOT. This distinction is important as NIRS typically involves a limited number of channels; thus, it is only able to acquire data from a portion of the region of interest. Only one- or two-channel NIRS placed over the forehead was used in all of the reported sepsis-induced delirium studies. As such, the cerebral oxygenation and functional activity captured only represented a very limited area of the frontal cortex. With the denser optode arrays of fNIRS and DOT, larger regions of the brain can be assessed simultaneously, and connectivity analyses can be conducted, similar to fMRI approaches [67,68]. Network analyses are critical for advancing our research in delirium, as it is unlikely that only the frontal lobe is dysregulated. Based on previous EEG, fMRI, and PET studies, the parietal and temporal lobes can be involved as well [16,17,18]. For instance, given the prominent disruption of attention in all types of delirium, mapping functional dysconnectivity for this symptom alone involves multiple areas: the medical prefrontal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, anterior inferior parietal lobule, and precuneus [69]. Utilizing such an approach would open a frontier for further subtyping of delirium, predictive modeling based on abnormal networks, and targeted clinical interventions potentially based on personalized mapping. Whole cortex fNIRS and DOT interfaces have recently been created that would be ideal for studying all of these regions and network connectivity in delirium. These devices involve over 100 channels and have been reported to still be lightweight and portable for human studies [33,70,71].
In terms of clinical analyses, neuroimaging studies in delirium have also been limited as they almost exclusively focus on hypoactive delirium. These patients exhibit significant psychomotor slowing and, thus, are chosen most likely due to ease of imaging. Hyperactive (“agitated”) delirium involves serious agitation and inability to tolerate even routine medical care, let alone imaging in an MRI or CT machine [1]. The pathophysiology and brain regions involved may very well be different between delirium subtypes; however, this has remained unexplored in imaging biomarker studies due to a lack of patient tolerability in hyperactive delirium.
Optical imaging is advantageous for investigating hyperactive delirium further for several reasons. The bedside capabilities of these devices allow for naturalistic studies and bypass logistical requirements regarding transportation for imaging and tolerability concerns. However, it should be noted that in severe cases, standard optical imaging devices utilizing fiber optics would still suffer from significant motion artifacts. Modern techniques have developed fiberless technology, which refers to interfaces built with cabled systems, flex-rigid printed circuit boards, and modular systems. The number of channels is more limited than fiber-based arrays, but several devices have been created with zero tethering and validated for advanced functional data acquisition [70]. Such truly wireless devices would be ideal for not only studying hyperactive delirium but also for examining how certain interventions, such as physical and occupation therapy exercises, may improve delirium outcomes as researchers would be able to conduct functional analyses during activity. This would potentially allow for further refinement and personalization of delirium treatments.
In addition to the study of delirium in adults, the application of optical imaging in the pediatric population may hold promise as well. Delirium develops in approximately 25% of children admitted to the pediatric ICU [72]. The neuropsychiatric symptoms that occur in older children can appear similar to those observed in adults; however, the symptoms and diagnosis of delirium in neonates are more difficult. Validated screening tools are not as accurate compared to their adult counterparts [73]. The use of fNIRS or DOT is an attractive option for the study of delirium in neonates, in particular, given their smaller skull and brain morphology, thus allowing for ease of administration and whole brain imaging interfaces at lower expenses. Only two published pilot studies have evaluated the use of NIRS in children with emergence delirium (related to anesthesia), but not in ICU delirium or other common hospital-derived subtypes. Their preliminary results reinforce the conceptual innovation of optical imaging in this specific delirium population, given oxygenation deficit differences between children with and without delirium [74,75].
Finally, the development of other types of optical imaging biomarkers may play an essential role in delirium pathophysiology. The overwhelming majority of optical neuroimaging investigations concerning delirium have relied on absorption-based methodologies to gauge hemoglobin as the primary focal chromophore. However, there exist other chromophores with potential applicability in assessing functional brain activity. Cytochrome c oxidase (COx) is a noteworthy example, serving as the ultimate enzyme in the mitochondria’s electron transport chain. It is responsible for preserving the transmembrane proton gradient crucial for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, the chief source of cellular energy [76]. Interestingly, mitochondrial dysfunction has been associated with sepsis-induced organ failure in previous studies [77]. Moreover, mitochondria have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of neurodegeneration [78,79]. Based on this evidence, a 2019 study by Samuels et al. demonstrated that variations in mitochondrial DNA were associated with development and protection from delirium in certain ethnic groups [80]. Their results propose an entirely novel avenue for the application of fNIRS and DOT for correlating COx activity with delirium propagation, especially given the role of mitochondria in regulating oxygenation.

5. Conclusions

Substantial efforts are required to ameliorate the adverse outcomes associated with delirium. Optical neuroimaging techniques are highly promising tools for the study of delirium and the development of approaches for expanding our knowledge of pathophysiology and clinical approaches to delirium. What sets them apart in this context is their unique combination of high resolution, portability, real-time capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Currently, no other method offers all these attributes simultaneously, particularly when it comes to imaging delirious patients. An increasing body of initial research reports emphasizes the successful application of NIRS, fNIRS, and DOT in delirium. With further investment and research efforts, the significance of these methods is poised to become pivotal for enhancing our understanding of delirium’s pathophysiology and the development of preventive, predictive, and therapeutic strategies.

Author Contributions

S.J. conceived and drafted the manuscript; P.A.E., E.S.O. and S.T.D. provided supervision and contributed revisions to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maldonado, J.R. Acute Brain Failure: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Sequelae of Delirium. Crit. Care Clin. 2017, 33, 461–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Maldonado, J.R. Neuropathogenesis of delirium: Review of current etiologic theories and common pathways. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2013, 21, 1190–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Maldonado, J.R. Delirium pathophysiology: An updated hypothesis of the etiology of acute brain failure. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2018, 33, 1428–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Inouye, S.K.; Westendorp, R.G.J.; Saczynski, J.S. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet 2014, 383, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ely, E.W.; Inouye, S.K.; Bernard, G.R.; Gordon, S.; Francis, J.; May, L.; Truman, B.; Speroff, T.; Gautam, S.; Margolin, R.; et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: Validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA 2001, 286, 2703–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Goldberg, T.E.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Jung, E.; Swanson, A.; Ing, C.; Garcia, P.S.; Whittington, R.A.; Moitra, V. Association of Delirium with Long-term Cognitive Decline: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2020, 77, 1373–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Leighton, S.P.; Herron, J.W.; Jackson, E.; Sheridan, M.; Deligianni, F.; Cavanagh, J. Delirium and the risk of developing dementia: A cohort study of 12 949 patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2022, 93, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kunicki, Z.J.; Ngo, L.H.; Marcantonio, E.R.; Tommet, D.; Feng, Y.; Fong, T.G.; Schmitt, E.M.; Travison, T.G.; Jones, R.N.; Inouye, S.K. Six-Year Cognitive Trajectory in Older Adults Following Major Surgery and Delirium. JAMA Intern. Med. 2023, 183, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leslie, D.L.; Inouye, S.K. The importance of delirium: Economic and societal costs. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2011, 59 (Suppl. S2), S241–S243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kant, I.M.J.; de Bresser, J.; van Montfort, S.J.T.; Witkamp, T.D.; Walraad, B.; Spies, C.D.; Hendrikse, J.; van Dellen, E.; Slooter, A.J.C.; BioCog consortium. Postoperative delirium is associated with grey matter brain volume loss. Brain Commun. 2023, 5, fcad013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hatano, Y.; Narumoto, J.; Shibata, K.; Matsuoka, T.; Taniguchi, S.; Hata, Y.; Yamada, K.; Yaku, H.; Fukui, K. White-matter hyperintensities predict delirium after cardiac surgery. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2013, 21, 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morandi, A.; Rogers, B.P.; Gunther, M.L.; Merkle, K.; Pandharipande, P.; Girard, T.D.; Jackson, J.C.; Thompson, J.; Shintani, A.K.; Geevarghese, S.; et al. The relationship between delirium duration, white matter integrity, and cognitive impairment in intensive care unit survivors as determined by diffusion tensor imaging: The VISIONS prospective cohort magnetic resonance imaging study. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 2182–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. van Montfort, S.J.T.; van Dellen, E.; Stam, C.J.; Ahmad, A.H.; Mentink, L.J.; Kraan, C.W.; Zalesky, A.; Slooter, A.J.C. Brain network disintegration as a final common pathway for delirium: A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage Clin. 2019, 23, 101809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nitchingham, A.; Kumar, V.; Shenkin, S.; Ferguson, K.J.; Caplan, G.A. A systematic review of neuroimaging in delirium: Predictors, correlates and consequences. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2018, 33, 1458–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Choi, S.-H.; Lee, H.; Chung, T.-S.; Park, K.-M.; Jung, Y.-C.; Kim, S.I.; Kim, J.-J. Neural network functional connectivity during and after an episode of delirium. Am. J. Psychiatry 2012, 169, 498–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oh, J.; Shin, J.E.; Yang, K.H.; Kyeong, S.; Lee, W.S.; Chung, T.-S.; Kim, J.-J. Cortical and subcortical changes in resting-state functional connectivity before and during an episode of postoperative delirium. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2019, 53, 794–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nitchingham, A.; Pereira, J.V.-B.; Wegner, E.A.; Oxenham, V.; Close, J.; Caplan, G.A. Regional cerebral hypometabolism on 18F-FDG PET/CT scan in delirium is independent of acute illness and dementia. Alzheimers Dement. J. Alzheimers Assoc. 2023, 19, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wiegand, T.L.T.; Rémi, J.; Dimitriadis, K. Electroencephalography in delirium assessment: A scoping review. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jöbsis, F.F. Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cerebral and myocardial oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters. Science 1977, 198, 1264–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hillman, E.M.C. Optical brain imaging in vivo: Techniques and applications from animal to man. J. Biomed. Opt. 2007, 12, 051402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Morone, K.A.; Neimat, J.S.; Roe, A.W.; Friedman, R.M. Review of functional and clinical relevance of intrinsic signal optical imaging in human brain mapping. Neurophotonics 2017, 4, 031220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Okada, F.; Tokumitsu, Y.; Hoshi, Y.; Tamura, M. Gender- and handedness-related differences of forebrain oxygenation and hemodynamics. Brain Res. 1993, 601, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hoshi, Y.; Tamura, M. Detection of dynamic changes in cerebral oxygenation coupled to neuronal function during mental work in man. Neurosci. Lett. 1993, 150, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Delpy, D.T.; Cope, M. Quantification in tissue near-infrared spectroscopy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1997, 352, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elwell, C.E.; Cooper, C.E. Making light work: Illuminating the future of biomedical optics. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2011, 369, 4358–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrari, M.; Quaresima, V. A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. NeuroImage 2012, 63, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, H. Diffuse Optical Tomography; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1-4398-4758-9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoshi, Y.; Yamada, Y. Overview of diffuse optical tomography and its clinical applications. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016, 21, 091312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Obata, T.; Liu, T.T.; Miller, K.L.; Luh, W.M.; Wong, E.C.; Frank, L.R.; Buxton, R.B. Discrepancies between BOLD and flow dynamics in primary and supplementary motor areas: Application of the balloon model to the interpretation of BOLD transients. NeuroImage 2004, 21, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Culver, J.P.; Durduran, T.; Furuya, D.; Cheung, C.; Greenberg, J.H.; Yodh, A.G. Diffuse optical tomography of cerebral blood flow, oxygenation, and metabolism in rat during focal ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. Off. J. Int. Soc. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23, 911–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wolf, M.; Wolf, U.; Toronov, V.; Michalos, A.; Paunescu, L.A.; Choi, J.H.; Gratton, E. Different time evolution of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin concentration changes in the visual and motor cortices during functional stimulation: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. NeuroImage 2002, 16, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Culver, J.P.; Siegel, A.M.; Franceschini, M.A.; Mandeville, J.B.; Boas, D.A. Evidence that cerebral blood volume can provide brain activation maps with better spatial resolution than deoxygenated hemoglobin. NeuroImage 2005, 27, 947–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vidal-Rosas, E.E.; Zhao, H.; Nixon-Hill, R.W.; Smith, G.; Dunne, L.; Powell, S.; Cooper, R.J.; Everdell, N.L. Evaluating a new generation of wearable high-density diffuse optical tomography technology via retinotopic mapping of the adult visual cortex. Neurophotonics 2021, 8, 025002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, S.; Carpenter, L.L.; Jiang, H. Optical neuroimaging: Advancing transcranial magnetic stimulation treatments of psychiatric disorders. Vis. Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art 2022, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jiang, S.; Huang, J.; Yang, H.; Wagoner, R.; Kozel, F.A.; Currier, G.; Jiang, H. Neuroimaging of depression with diffuse optical tomography during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, J.; Jiang, S.; Wagoner, R.; Yang, H.; Currier, G.; Jiang, H. Three-dimensional optical imaging of brain activation during transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. X-ray Sci. Technol. 2021, 29, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ban, H.Y.; Barrett, G.M.; Borisevich, A.; Chaturvedi, A.; Dahle, J.L.; Dehghani, H.; Dubois, J.; Field, R.M.; Gopalakrishnan, V.; Gundran, A.; et al. Kernel Flow: A high channel count scalable time-domain functional near-infrared spectroscopy system. J. Biomed. Opt. 2022, 27, 074710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.-D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sakr, Y.; Jaschinski, U.; Wittebole, X.; Szakmany, T.; Lipman, J.; Ñamendys-Silva, S.A.; Martin-Loeches, I.; Leone, M.; Lupu, M.-N.; Vincent, J.-L.; et al. Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, ofy313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tokuda, R.; Nakamura, K.; Takatani, Y.; Tanaka, C.; Kondo, Y.; Ohbe, H.; Kamijo, H.; Otake, K.; Nakamura, A.; Ishikura, H.; et al. Sepsis-Associated Delirium: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pfister, D.; Siegemund, M.; Dell-Kuster, S.; Smielewski, P.; Rüegg, S.; Strebel, S.P.; Marsch, S.C.U.; Pargger, H.; Steiner, L.A. Cerebral perfusion in sepsis-associated delirium. Crit. Care Lond. Engl. 2008, 12, R63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Funk, D.J.; Kumar, A.; Klar, G. Decreases in cerebral saturation in patients with septic shock are associated with increased risk of death: A prospective observational single center study. J. Intensive Care 2016, 4, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wood, M.; Song, A.; Maslove, D.; Ferri, C.; Howes, D.; Muscedere, J.; Boyd, J.G. Brain Tissue Oxygenation in Patients with Septic Shock: A Feasibility Study. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 43, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vaskó, A.; Siró, P.; László, I.; Szatmári, S.; Molnár, L.; Fülesdi, B.; Molnár, C. Assessment of cerebral tissue oxygen saturation in septic patients during acetazolamide provocation—A near infrared spectroscopy study. Acta Physiol. Hung. 2014, 101, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cerebral Oxygenation and Neurological Outcomes Following Critical Illness (CONFOCAL) Research Group; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Wood, M.D.; Maslove, D.M.; Muscedere, J.G.; Day, A.G.; Gordon Boyd, J. Low brain tissue oxygenation contributes to the development of delirium in critically ill patients: A prospective observational study. J. Crit. Care 2017, 41, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, K.F.; Wood, M.D.; Maslove, D.M.; Muscedere, J.G.; Boyd, J.G. Dysfunctional cerebral autoregulation is associated with delirium in critically ill adults. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 2512–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rosenblatt, K.; Walker, K.A.; Goodson, C.; Olson, E.; Maher, D.; Brown, C.H.; Nyquist, P. Cerebral Autoregulation-Guided Optimal Blood Pressure in Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: A Case Series. J. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 35, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Teasdale, G.; Jennett, B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974, 2, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dellinger, R.P.; Levy, M.M.; Rhodes, A.; Annane, D.; Gerlach, H.; Opal, S.M.; Sevransky, J.E.; Sprung, C.L.; Douglas, I.S.; Jaeschke, R.; et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock 2012. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 41, 580–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yoshimura, A.; Goodson, C.; Johns, J.T.; Towe, M.M.; Irvine, E.S.; Rendradjaja, N.A.; Max, L.K.; LaFlam, A.; Ledford, E.C.; Probert, J.; et al. Altered cortical brain activity in end stage liver disease assessed by multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy: Associations with delirium. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, S. WEBB FELLOW: Portable Three-dimensional Functional Neuroimaging of Delirium Using Diffuse Optical Tomography. J. Acad. Consult.-Liaison Psychiatry 2022, 63, S92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meagher, J.; Leonard, M.; Donoghue, L.; O’Regan, N.; Timmons, S.; Exton, C.; Cullen, W.; Dunne, C.; Adamis, D.; Maclullich, A.J.; et al. Months backward test: A review of its use in clinical studies. World J. Psychiatry 2015, 5, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Strangman, G.E.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z. Scalp and skull influence on near infrared photon propagation in the Colin27 brain template. NeuroImage 2014, 85 Pt 1, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Okada, E.; Delpy, D.T. Near-infrared light propagation in an adult head model. II. Effect of superficial tissue thickness on the sensitivity of the near-infrared spectroscopy signal. Appl. Opt. 2003, 42, 2915–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hamblin, M.R. Shining light on the head: Photobiomodulation for brain disorders. BBA Clin. 2016, 6, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tedford, C.E.; DeLapp, S.; Jacques, S.; Anders, J. Quantitative analysis of transcranial and intraparenchymal light penetration in human cadaver brain tissue. Lasers Surg. Med. 2015, 47, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pitzschke, A.; Lovisa, B.; Seydoux, O.; Zellweger, M.; Pfleiderer, M.; Tardy, Y.; Wagnières, G. Red and NIR light dosimetry in the human deep brain. Phys. Med. Biol. 2015, 60, 2921–2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yaroslavsky, A.N.; Schulze, P.C.; Yaroslavsky, I.V.; Schober, R.; Ulrich, F.; Schwarzmaier, H.J. Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range. Phys. Med. Biol. 2002, 47, 2059–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Habermehl, C.; Holtze, S.; Steinbrink, J.; Koch, S.P.; Obrig, H.; Mehnert, J.; Schmitz, C.H. Somatosensory activation of two fingers can be discriminated with ultrahigh-density diffuse optical tomography. NeuroImage 2012, 59, 3201–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Eggebrecht, A.T.; Ferradal, S.L.; Robichaux-Viehoever, A.; Hassanpour, M.S.; Dehghani, H.; Snyder, A.Z.; Hershey, T.; Culver, J.P. Mapping distributed brain function and networks with diffuse optical tomography. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lange, F.; Tachtsidis, I. Clinical Brain Monitoring with Time Domain NIRS: A Review and Future Perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Havsteen, I.; Ohlhues, A.; Madsen, K.H.; Nybing, J.D.; Christensen, H.; Christensen, A. Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Van Dijk, K.R.A.; Sabuncu, M.R.; Buckner, R.L. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. NeuroImage 2012, 59, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Brigadoi, S.; Ceccherini, L.; Cutini, S.; Scarpa, F.; Scatturin, P.; Selb, J.; Gagnon, L.; Boas, D.A.; Cooper, R.J. Motion artifacts in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: A comparison of motion correction techniques applied to real cognitive data. NeuroImage 2014, 85, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Scarapicchia, V.; Brown, C.; Mayo, C.; Gawryluk, J.R. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Insights from Combined Recording Studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Huang, R.; Hong, K.-S.; Yang, D.; Huang, G. Motion artifacts removal and evaluation techniques for functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals: A review. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 878750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. White, B.R.; Snyder, A.Z.; Cohen, A.L.; Petersen, S.E.; Raichle, M.E.; Schlaggar, B.L.; Culver, J.P. Resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain revealed with diffuse optical tomography. NeuroImage 2009, 47, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Eggebrecht, A.T.; White, B.R.; Ferradal, S.L.; Chen, C.; Zhan, Y.; Snyder, A.Z.; Dehghani, H.; Culver, J.P. A quantitative spatial comparison of high-density diffuse optical tomography and fMRI cortical mapping. NeuroImage 2012, 61, 1120–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Williams, L.M. Precision psychiatry: A neural circuit taxonomy for depression and anxiety. Lancet Psychiatry 2016, 3, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, H.; Cooper, R.J. Review of recent progress toward a fiberless, whole-scalp diffuse optical tomography system. Neurophotonics 2018, 5, 011012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Khan, A.F.; Zhang, F.; Yuan, H.; Ding, L. Brain-wide functional diffuse optical tomography of resting state networks. J. Neural Eng. 2021, 18, 046069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Traube, C.; Silver, G.; Reeder, R.W.; Doyle, H.; Hegel, E.; Wolfe, H.A.; Schneller, C.; Chung, M.G.; Dervan, L.A.; DiGennaro, J.L.; et al. Delirium in Critically Ill Children: An International Point Prevalence Study. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 45, 584–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pandharipande, P.P.; Ely, E.W.; Arora, R.C.; Balas, M.C.; Boustani, M.A.; La Calle, G.H.; Cunningham, C.; Devlin, J.W.; Elefante, J.; Han, J.H.; et al. The intensive care delirium research agenda: A multinational, interprofessional perspective. Intensive Care Med. 2017, 43, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, L.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Li, G. Reduced regional cerebral oxygen saturation increases risk for emergence delirium in pediatric patients. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1117455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Shanmugam, N.; Verma, R.; Sarkar, S.; Khanna, P.; Sinha, R.; Kashyap, L.; Shende, D.R.; Ray, B.R.; Anand, R.K.; Maitra, S.; et al. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy guided mapping of frontal cortex, a novel modality for assessing emergence delirium in children: A prospective observational study. Paediatr. Anaesth. 2023, 33, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wikström, M.; Krab, K.; Sharma, V. Oxygen Activation and Energy Conservation by Cytochrome c Oxidase. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2469–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Singer, M. The role of mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis-induced multi-organ failure. Virulence 2014, 5, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, W.; Zhao, F.; Ma, X.; Perry, G.; Zhu, X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: Recent advances. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, Y.; Xu, E.; Musich, P.R.; Lin, F. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and the potential countermeasure. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2019, 25, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Samuels, D.C.; Hulgan, T.; Fessel, J.P.; Billings, F.T.; Thompson, J.L.; Chandrasekhar, R.; Girard, T.D. Mitochondrial DNA Haplogroups and Delirium During Sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 47, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, S.; Efron, P.A.; Oh, E.S.; DeKosky, S.T. Optical Neuroimaging in Delirium. Photonics 2023, 10, 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121334

AMA Style

Jiang S, Efron PA, Oh ES, DeKosky ST. Optical Neuroimaging in Delirium. Photonics. 2023; 10(12):1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Shixie, Philip A. Efron, Esther S. Oh, and Steven T. DeKosky. 2023. "Optical Neuroimaging in Delirium" Photonics 10, no. 12: 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121334

APA Style

Jiang, S., Efron, P. A., Oh, E. S., & DeKosky, S. T. (2023). Optical Neuroimaging in Delirium. Photonics, 10(12), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop