Next Article in Journal
Hybrid Deep Learning Models for Predicting Student Academic Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Multiple-Feature Construction for Image Segmentation Based on Genetic Programming
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of ALE Method Implementation in Time Integration Schemes for Pile Penetration Modeling

by
Ihab Bendida Bourokba
1,*,
Abdelmadjid Berga
1,
Patrick Staubach
2 and
Nazihe Terfaya
1
1
FIMAS Laboratory, University of Tahri Mohammed, Bechar 08000, Algeria
2
Chair of Geotechnics, Bauhaus Universität Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Math. Comput. Appl. 2025, 30(3), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30030058
Submission received: 26 March 2025 / Revised: 16 May 2025 / Accepted: 19 May 2025 / Published: 22 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)

Abstract

This study investigates the full penetration simulation of piles from the ground surface, focusing on frictional contact modeling without mesh distortion. To overcome issues related to mesh distortion and improve solution convergence, the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) adaptive mesh technique was implemented within both explicit and implicit time integration schemes. The numerical model was validated against field experiments conducted at Bothkennar, Scotland, using the Imperial College instrumented displacement pile (ICP) in soft clay, where the soil behavior was effectively represented using the modified Cam-Clay model and the Mohr–Coulomb model. The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the ALE method performance in handling mesh distortion; analyze the effects of soil–pile interface friction, pile dimensions, and various dilation angles on pile resistance; and compare the effectiveness of explicit and implicit time integration schemes in terms of stability, computational efficiency, and solution accuracy. The ALE method effectively modeled pile penetration in Bothkennar clay, validating the numerical model against field experiments. Comparative analysis revealed the explicit time integration method as more robust and computationally efficient, particularly for complex soil–pile interactions with higher friction coefficients.
Keywords: pile penetration; contact and friction; ALE method; finite element method; cohesive soil; explicit and implicit schemes pile penetration; contact and friction; ALE method; finite element method; cohesive soil; explicit and implicit schemes

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bourokba, I.B.; Berga, A.; Staubach, P.; Terfaya, N. Comparative Analysis of ALE Method Implementation in Time Integration Schemes for Pile Penetration Modeling. Math. Comput. Appl. 2025, 30, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30030058

AMA Style

Bourokba IB, Berga A, Staubach P, Terfaya N. Comparative Analysis of ALE Method Implementation in Time Integration Schemes for Pile Penetration Modeling. Mathematical and Computational Applications. 2025; 30(3):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30030058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bourokba, Ihab Bendida, Abdelmadjid Berga, Patrick Staubach, and Nazihe Terfaya. 2025. "Comparative Analysis of ALE Method Implementation in Time Integration Schemes for Pile Penetration Modeling" Mathematical and Computational Applications 30, no. 3: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30030058

APA Style

Bourokba, I. B., Berga, A., Staubach, P., & Terfaya, N. (2025). Comparative Analysis of ALE Method Implementation in Time Integration Schemes for Pile Penetration Modeling. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 30(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca30030058

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop