Next Article in Journal
Ballota saxatilis from Jordan: Evaluation of Essential Oil Composition and Phytochemical Profiling of Crude Extracts and Their In-Vitro Antioxidant Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Flavonol-Glycoside and Rare Triterpenoid Derivatives Isolated from Leaves of Combretum glutinosum Perr. Ex Dc. with In Vitro Cytotoxic Activity
Previous Article in Journal
The State of Critical and Strategic Metals Recovery and the Role of Nuclear Techniques in the Separation Technologies Development: Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Galactolipids from Launaea capitata (Spreng.) Dandy with In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Activities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Separations
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/separations10020113
separations-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Removal of Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution by Novel Lycopersicon esculentum Peel and Brassica botrytis Leaves Adsorbents

by
Israf Ud Din
1,*,
Qadeer Ullah Shah
2,
Syed Tasleem
2,
Abdul Naeem
3,
Abdulrahman I. Alharthi
1 and
Mshari Ayad Alotaibi
1
1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 16278, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat 26000, Pakistan
3
National Centre of Excellence in Physical Chemistry, University of Peshawar, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2023, 10(2), 113; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10020113
Submission received: 17 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 6 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction, Purification and Structure Elucidation of Active Natural Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The current work reports adsorption of Ni(II) using Brassica botrytis leaves (BBL), Brassica botrytis leaves-activated carbon (BBL-AC), Lycopersicon esculentum peel (LEP) and Lycopersicon esculentum peel-activated carbon (LEP-AC). The adsorption of Ni(II) was tested in batch experiments by varying different parameters such as pH, initial metal ion concentration, temperature, adsorbent dosage, and contact time. Thermodynamics and kinetics investigations were performed for Ni removal. The adsorption of Ni(II) was improved by incorporation of activated carbon to the parental Brassica botrytis leaves and Lycopersicon esculentum peel adsorbents. The studies revealed 40 min of equilibrium time for Ni(II) adsorption by different adsorbents. Adsorption of Ni was drastically declined by temperature with a minimum adsorption of 53% observed for BBL. Similarly, solution pH also played a vital role in Ni(II) adsorption by different adsorbents. A 95% adsorption of Ni was recorded in the case of LEP-AC at pH 7. The study concluded with the application of Lycopersicon esculentum peel and Brassica botrytis leaves as active adsorbents for Ni(II) adsorption from aqueous solution.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Given the rising proliferation of industry, environmental contamination has recently become a larger worry [1]. The natural environment is threatened by pollutants of all kinds, but heavy metal ions are particularly dangerous because they cannot biodegrade [2,3,4,5]. In terms of its use in smelting, mining dyeing processes, and battery manufacture, nickel is regarded as a versatile metal [6]. On the other hand, Ni(II) has been reported to have serious health hazards. Nickel carbonyl is classified as a carcinogen that can easily be absorbed by human skin [7]. A 30 mg/L exposure level of nickel carbonyl for a duration of 30 min is recorded as being lethal [8]. Similarly, higher Ni concentration has been documented in nose, ligaments and bone [9,10]. Likewise, the carcinogenic nature of Ni(II) at high exposure level have also been reported by Amit and Minocha [11]. Keeping in view the above facts, the removal of Ni(II) from aqueous solutions has become a subject of upmost importance. Many techniques, such as chemical precipitation, ion exchange and membrane filtration, have been applied for Ni(II) removal from aqueous solution [12]. However, the adsorption technique, owing to its ease of operation, low cost and the availability of adsorbents, is considered an attractive alternative for Ni(II) removal.
A wide range of adsorbents have been investigated for Ni(II) adsorption from aqueous solutions. Khelifi et al. applied physico-chemically modified sewage sludge for the removal of Ni from aqueous solution [13]. Their study concluded that activated carbon synthesized from the sewage sludge is a beneficial adsorbent for Ni(II) adsorption. Recently, Jordanian natural zeolite has been used as an adsorbent for Ni removal from water [14]. The adsorption capacity of Ni(II) was shown to be high and well-controlled using a chemisorption process that followed the pseudo-second order kinetic model. The dye removal process is both spontaneous and exothermic. The Freundlich isotherm was chosen as the best model out of the three options presented. Another study conducted by Pahlavanzadeh et al. reported zeolite as a cation-exchange adsorbent for Ni(II) adsorption from aqueous solution [15]. In this study, Zn electrodes were found to successfully remove nickel from wastewater by a simple configuration of the electrocoagulation process.
A comparative study between zeolite and modified zeolite revealed that modified zeolite adsorbed 95% Ni(II) from aqueous solution, which accounts for 20% more than adsorbed by the common zeolite. Likewise, bio char has been reported to adsorb Ni from aqueous solution where the adsorption efficiency was affected by the type of feed stock [15,16]. The results demonstrate that willow wood bio char adsorbs Ni(II) by making a complex with –OH and C=O, while cattle manure bio char was recorded to have a low adsorption profile as compared with its feedstock. Lycopersicon esculentum is a globally significant vegetable with an overall production of 126 million tons in 2005. It is a superb wellspring of numerous supplements and auxiliary metabolites that are essential for human wellbeing; mineral matter, vitamins C and E, B-carotene, lycopene, flavonoids, natural acids, phenolics and chlorophyll. Lycopersicon esculentum peel (LEP), with a quasi-spherical morphology has been utilized for different applications [17,18,19,20]. Similarly, Brassica botrytis leaves (BBL) have also been reported in the literature for a variety of applications [21,22,23]. Keeping in mind their enriched profiles, LEP and BBL have been investigated for Ni(II) adsorption from aqueous solution. Similarly, activated carbon, being a widely used adsorbent, has also been incorporated with these two parent adsorbents to further investigate the performance of adsorbents and elaborate the future potential of these materials. The significance of the current work is application of LEP and BBL alone and their incorporation with activated carbon to study the adsorption of Ni metal.
The aim and objective of the current work is the application of Lycopersicon esculentum peel (LEP), Lycopersicon esculentum peel doped with activated carbon (LEP-AC), Brassica botrytis leaves (BBL) and Brassica botrytis leaves doped with activated carbon (BBL-AC) for Ni removal. Furthermore, adsorption studies were undertaken with different reaction parameters to investigate their adsorption capacities with regards to Ni(II) uptake from aqueous solutions.

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample Collection and Adsorption Studies

Samples were collected as solid wastes. The collected material were washed by tap and distilled water several times to remove heavy metal contents. These collected materials were converted into small, round pieces of about 1–2 cm and were then dried in sunlight and then in an oven at 383 K until they reached a constant weight, which was obtained in 48 h. Then, the dried material was ground to a fine powder and was sieved through 600 µ size. Adsorbents were dried and digested in acids before their application. All four adsorbents were tested for their adsorption of Ni from water solutions of 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 ppm solutions of Ni at different reaction parameters. The Ni concentrations were measured by an inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) technique. In the current work, a Thermo Scientific iCAP 7000 series ICP spectrometer with model 7400 was used.

2.2. Instruments and Materials

HCl purchased from MERCK Germany and HNO3 purchased from Riedel-DeHaan were used in the current work. Nickel sulfide purchased from Riedel-DeHaan was utilized as nickel salt. The 10% HNO3 solution was used for washing the glassware, which was followed by washing with distilled water. The two adsorbents, LEP and BBL, were washed with distilled water. Then, they were converted to round pieces of 1–2 cm in size, dried in the open air followed by drying in an oven at 383 K [24,25]. The process of drying was continued for about 48 h to obtain a stable weight. The dried adsorbents were fine ground in order to pass through sieved mesh of 600 µ size.
The dried adsorbents were placed in a crucible and heated in a furnace for 4 h at 823 K. Then, they were cooled in a desiccator to attain room temperature. The adsorbent samples were dissolved in 6 M HNO3 solution and diluted with distilled water.
The adsorbents were placed in a 250 mL flask and mixed with 8 mL of concentrated HCL and 3 mL concentrated HNO3. The mixture was tightly enclosed for 24 h. Afterward, the tightly closed mixture was heated to reduce the total volume content to 1 mL. The mixture was then filtered into a volumetric flask and diluted to the desired volume.
To incorporate the activated carbon, the known amount of adsorbent was mixed with activated carbon and the same procedure was repeated as mentioned above. Finally, the parent adsorbents and modified adsorbents with activated carbons were investigated for their Ni(II) adsorption.

2.3. Equilibrium Adsorption Isotherms

The link between the adsorbate and adsorbent’s equilibrium was best explained using sorption isotherms. The relationship between the mass of adsorbents and the mass of the components of the adsorbate was described using biosorption isotherms. The analysis of the environment of the adsorption process was carried out by Freundlich isotherms. This kind of isotherm model involves surfaces with diverse binding sites and interactions between sorbed species. The Freundlich equation makes it obvious that the sorption energy will decrease after the sorption center of the adsorbents is complete. The Freundlich equilibrium constants are often calculated from the plots of log Qeq versus log Ceq. The value of n indicates the degree of nonlinearity: if n 1, adsorption is a chemical process; if n = 1, adsorption is linear. Adsorption is a physical process if n is greater than 1.
qe =Kf Ce 1/n
where;
qe: amount adsorbed per unit weight of adsorbent at equilibrium (mg/g), (mol/g).
Ce: equilibrium concentration of adsorbate in solution after adsorption (mg/g), (mol/L).
Kf: empirical Freundlich constant or capacity factor (mg/g), (mol/g).
1/n: Freundlich exponent.
log qe = log Kf + 1/n × log Ce.
Such a plot yields a straight line with a slope equal to 1/n and an intercept equal to log Kf.

2.4. Biosorption Kinetics

Predicting biosorption rate is crucial since it provides details for developing batch biosorption systems. The sorption kinetics are crucial to the process of purifying wastewater because they provide important insights into the reaction’s routes and the most effective mechanisms. Ho’s pseudo second-order kinetics were carried out.
The pseudo second order kinetic model as proposed by Ho and McKay is expressed as follows:
t/qt = 1/k2qe2 +1/qe × t
where;
qe: amount of metal adsorbed at equilibrium time (mg/g), (mol/g)
qt: amount of metal adsorbed at any time (mg/g), (mol/g)
k2: pseudo second order rate constant (g/mg.min), (g/mol.min).

2.5. Adsorption Studies

Batch experiments were performed to study the Ni(II) adsorption by different adsorbents. The adsorption process was studied at different initial metal ion concentrations namely, 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 ppm with different reaction parameters such as adsorbent dosage, pH, temperature, and contact time. The adsorption of Ni was evaluated by varying one parameter while keeping all other parameters constant. The details of adsorption parameters are included in the obtained graphs during the adsorption studies. The amount of metal removed from the solution by the adsorbent was calculated by using the following formula;
Q = V (Ci − Cf)/S
Q = Metal ion uptake capacity, Ci = initial metal ion concentration of the solution before the sorption analysis (mg/L), Cf = final metal ion concentration of the solution after the sorption analysis (mg/L), S = dry weight of adsorbents in grams and V = volume of the solution.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Adsorption Studies

Ni(II) ion adsorbs onto Lycopersicon esculentum peel and its activated carbons, as well as Brassica botrytis leaves and its activated carbon, according to a Freundlich adsorption isotherm (Figure 1) associated with data in Table 1. Reem et al. studied removal of Ni(II) ions from aqueous solutions by using analcime and found the Freundlich adsorption isotherm to be the best fitted adsorption isotherm for Ni removal.

3.2. Kinetics Studies

Ho’s pseudo second-order kinetics were carried out to investigate the kinetics of Ni removal. As depicted by Figure 2, the removal of Ni was governed by Ho’s pseudo second-order kinetics. Similar observations were also recorded by R.K. Shah et al. [26].
The kinetic parameters for the adsorption of Ni(II) ion on different adsorbents are included in Table 2. The tabulated data indicate that the Ni adsorption follows pseudo second-order kinetics as confirmed by R2 values.

3.3. Effect of Initial Metal Ion Concentration

The percentage of adsorption was affected by the alteration in metal concentrations. As depicted by Figure 3, the percent adsorption was decreased by increasing the metal concentration [27]. This is understandable as more active adsorption sites are available for metal at lower concentration. By increasing the metal concentrations, the active adsorbent sites are saturated and, consequently, the percent adsorption is decreased. The comparative study of the LEP and BBL absorbents for Ni adoption revealed that BBL is a more active adsorbent as compared with the LEP counterpart. Furthermore, as is evident from the figure, the incorporation of activated carbon to both parent LEP and BBL adsorbents enhanced the percentage uptake of Ni(II).
This indicates the promoting role of activated carbon in Ni(II) adsorption from the aqueous solution. Such observations have also been recorded in the literature [28,29].

3.4. Effect of Adsorbent Dosage

The variation in adsorbent dosage also affected the percent adsorption in the current case. As shown by Figure 4, irrespective of the adsorbent, when the adsorbent dosage was increased the percent adsorption was increased in all cases. The increase in percent adsorption as a consequence of increasing adsorbent dosage can be justified by the fact that total number of active adsorption sites are increased by increasing adsorbent dosage. Therefore, the resultant pattern in increasing adsorption percentage is justified by adsorbent dosage.
Although the percentage adsorption was enhanced in all cases, the results could be improved further by incorporating activated carbon adsorbents as compared with their parent adsorbents. This trend has also been observed in the literature [30].

3.5. Effect of Temperature

The adsorption process was altered by variation in temperatures in the studied zone of 293–343 K. As displayed in Figure 5, the percent adsorption was adversely affected by magnification in adsorption temperature in line with the literature [31]. This observation confirms the exothermic nature of the Ni (II) adsorption over all studied adsorbents.
Furthermore, the influence of adsorption temperature investigations also demonstrated the promoting role of activated carbon by showing an almost 10% increase in Ni(II) percent adsorption over the adsorbent incorporating activated carbon as compared with parent adsorbents. The enhanced performance of activated carbon-incorporated adsorbent could be justified by the potentially greater surface area associated with activated carbon.

3.6. Effect of pH

The effect of pH on Ni(II) adsorption by different adsorbents can be visualized by Figure 6. As evident from the figure, percent adsorption was incremented by increasing the magnitude of pH. This trend of increasing adsorption by increasing pH could be apprehended by fact that the concentration of H+ ion is higher at lower pH, with the adsorbent surface positively charged. This way, the interaction between positively charged metal and positively charged adsorbent is minimized. However, when the pH of the solution is increased the concentration of H+ decreases, making the surface negative charged and consequently favoring the interaction of positively charged metal and negatively charged adsorbent. Therefore, the percentage adsorption was increased by increasing pH and the optimum magnitude of pH was recorded for Ni adsorption over all the studied adsorbents.
However, a further rise in pH the percentage decreased the adsorption. This decline in percentage adsorption through increasing pH could be justified by the precipitation phenomenon due to the relevant hydroxides. The comparative studies of the Ni adsorption at different pH also revealed the promoting role of activated carbon when it is incorporated with the parent adsorbents.

3.7. Effect of Contact Time

As with all other parameters, the adsorption was also influenced by variation in contact time. As displayed by Figure 7, the percentage adsorption was found to be linearly increased by increasing the contact time. A sharp increase in percentage adsorption was recorded from the beginning of the contact time until around 40 min of contact time. Nevertheless, the percentage adsorption was observed to be almost constant with a further increase in contact time. This trend could be justified by the fact that the rate of adsorption is faster in the beginning of the adsorption process, as more active adsorption sites are available. However, with the passage of time, since the number of active adsorption sites are decreased, the rate of adsorption is decreased. In the current case, the percent adsorption was increased until an equilibrium time of 40 min was reached for Ni(II) adsorption. The slight variation was recorded in terms of equilibrium time for each adsorbent as demonstrated by the figure. The observed trend of increasing adsorption with increasing contact time is in line with the literature [32].

4. Conclusions

The parent and activated carbon incorporated Lycopersicon esculentum peel and Brassica botrytis leaves were investigated for their ability to remove Ni(II) from aqueous solution. The overall performance determined the promoting role of activated carbon incorporation as compared with their parent counterpart. Adsorption efficiency declined with increasing Ni concentration in water and reaction temperature. However, this was incremented by adsorbent concentration, reaction pH and contact time. The work concluded that adsorption of Ni(II) was influenced by different reaction parameters. However, in each case, adsorbent that incorporated activated carbon showed better results for NI(II) adsorption. Thermodynamics and kinetics investigations revealed that adsorption studies were governed by Freundlich adsorption isotherm and second-order kinetics, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.U.D., Q.U.S., S.T., A.N., A.I.A. and M.A.A.; methodology, I.U.D., Q.U.S., S.T. and A.N.; validation, I.U.D., Q.U.S., S.T., A.N., A.I.A. and M.A.A., data curation, Q.U.S. and S.T.; writing—Q.U.S., S.T., A.N.; writing—review and editing, I.U.D., A.I.A. and M.A.A.; project administration, I.U.D., Q.U.S. and S.T.; funding acquisition, I.U.D. and M.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded through the project number (IF-PSAU-2021/01/18703).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (IF-PSAU-2021/01/18703).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Research Highlights

  • ✓ Lycopersicon esculentum peel and Brassica botrytis leaves were used as adsorbents.
  • ✓ Activated carbon was incorporated in Lycopersicon esculentum peel and Brassica botrytis leaves.
  • ✓ Ni adsorption was improved by AC incorporation.
  • ✓ Ni adsorption was effected by reaction parameters.

References

  1. Din, I.; Shaharun, M.; Naeem, A.; Alotaibi, M.; Alharthi, A.; Nasir, Q. Effect of reaction conditions on the activity of novel carbon nanofiber-based Cu/ZrO2 catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol, Comptes Rendus. Chimie 2020, 23, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sultana, Q.; Naeem, A.; Mahmood, T.; Din, I.; Saeed, T.; Khan, N.; Ahmad, T. Sorption Studies of Chromate by Iron Oxide from Drinking Water. Z. Phys. Chem. 2019, 235, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chai, W.S.; Cheun, J.Y.; Kumar, P.S.; Mubashir, M.; Majeed, Z.; Banat, F.; Ho, S.-H.; Show, P.L. A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sami, U.; Al-Sehemi, A.G.; Mubashir, M.; Mukhtar, A.; Saqib, S.; Bustam, M.A.; Cheng, C.K.; Ibrahim, M.; Show, P.L. Adsorption behavior of mercury over hydrated lime: Experimental investigation and adsorption process characteristic study. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129504. [Google Scholar]
  5. Babar, M.; Munir, H.M.S.; Nawaz, A.; Ramzan, N.; Azhar, U.; Sagir, M.; Tahir, M.S.; Ikhlaq, A.; Mubashir, M.; Khoo, K.S.; et al. Comparative study of ozonation and ozonation catalyzed by Fe-loaded biochar as catalyst to remove methylene blue from aqueous solution. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liang, T.; Goudari, S.; Chen, C. A simple and versatile nickel platform for the generation of branched high molecular weight polyolefins. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El-Sadaawy, M.; Abdelwahab, O. Adsorptive removal of nickel from aqueous solutions by activated carbons from doum seed (Hyphaenethebaica) coat. Alex. Eng. J. 2014, 53, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vieira, M.; Neto, A.; Gimenes, M.; Da Silva, M. Sorption kinetics and equilibrium for the removal of nickel ions from aqueous phase on calcined Bofe bentonite clay. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boujelben, N.; Bouzid, J.; Elouear, Z. Adsorption of nickel and copper onto natural iron oxide- coated sand from aqueous solutions: Study in single and binary systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katsou, E.; Malamis, S.; Haralambous, K.; Loizidou, M. Use of ultrafiltration membranes and aluminosilicate minerals for nickel removal from industrial wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360, 234–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhatnagar, A.; Minocha, A. Biosorption optimization of nickel removal from water using Punica granatum peel waste. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 76, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khosravi, Y.; Zamani, A.; Parizanganeh, A.; Yaftian, M. Assessment of spatial distribution pattern of heavy metals surrounding a lead and zinc production plant in Zanjan Province, Iran. Geoderma Reg. 2018, 12, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khelifi, O.; Nacef, M.; Affoune, A. Nickel (II) adsorption from aqueous solutions by physico-chemically modified sewage sludge. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (IJCCE) 2018, 37, 73–87. [Google Scholar]
  14. Al-Abbad, E.A.; Al Dwairi, R.A. Removal of nickel (II) ions from water by Jordan natural zeolite as sorbent material. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2021, 25, 101233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shaker, O.; Safwat, S.; Matta, M. Nickel removal from wastewater using electrocoagulation process with zinc electrodes under various operating conditions: Performance investigation, mechanism exploration, and cost analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pahlavanzadeh, H.; Motamedi, M. Adsorption of nickel, Ni(II), in aqueous solution by modified zeolite as a cation-exchange adsorbent. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2019, 65, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, S.; Kwak, J.-H.; Islam, M.; Naeth, M.; El-Din, M.G.; Chang, S. Biochar surface complexation and Ni(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) adsorption in aqueous solutions depend on feedstock type. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 712, 136538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garrafa-Galvez, H.; Nava, O.; Soto-Robles, C.; Vilchis-Nestor, A.; Castro-Beltrán, A.; Luque, P. Green synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticle using Lycopersicon esculentum peel extract. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1197, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Silva-Vera, W.; Avendaño-Muñoz, N.; Nuñez, H.; Ramírez, C.; Almonacid, S.; Simpson, R. CO2 laser drilling coupled with moderate electric fields for enhancement of the mass transfer phenomenon in a tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) peeling process. J. Food Eng. 2020, 276, 109870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giuseppina, T.; Daniela, D.; Marianna, P.; Rosa, C.; Barbara, N.; Annarita, P. Natural products from tomato peels (Lycopersicon esculentum variety “Hybrid Rome”): New challenges and new opportunities of application: Chemical, biotechnological and pharmacological. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 131, S26–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhatt, S.; Singh, B.; Gupta, M. Antioxidant and prebiotic potential of Murraya koenigii and Brassica oleracea var. botrytis leaves as food ingredient. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Collado-González, J.; Piñero, M.; Otálora, G.; López-Marín, J.; del Amor, F. Exogenous spermidine modifies nutritional and bioactive constituents of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) florets under heat stress. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 277, 109818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kumar, V.; Thakur, R.; Kumar, P. Assessment of heavy metals uptake by cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) grown in integrated industrial effluent irrigated soils: A prediction modeling study. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 257, 108682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Din, I.; Alotaibi, M.; Alharthi, A. Green synthesis of methanol over zeolite based Cu nano-catalysts, effect of Mg promoter. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 16, 100264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saeed, T.; Naeem, A.; Mahmood, T.; Ahmad, Z.; Farooq, M.; Farida; Din, I.; Khan, I. Comparative study for removal of cationic dye from aqueous solutions by manganese oxide and manganese oxide composite. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 18, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shah, R.K.; Naglah, A.M.; Al-Omar, M.A.; Almehizia, A.A.; AlReshaidan, S.; Subaihi, A.; Alharbi, A.; Hameed, A.M.; Alkabli, J.; Fetoh, M.E.; et al. Efficient removal of Ni(II) ions from aqueous solutions using analcime modified with dimethylglyoxime composite. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Najim, T.; Elais, N.; Dawood, A. Adsorption of Copper and Iron Using Low Cost Material as Adsorbent. E-J. Chem. 2009, 6, 682568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. El-Sayed, G.O.; Dessouki, H.A.; Ibrahim, S.S. Biosorption Of Ni(II) And Cd (II) Ions From Aqueous Solutions Onto Rice Straw. Chem. Sci. J. 2010, 2010, CSJ-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Naeem, A.; Din, I.; Saeed, T.; Alotaibi, M.; Alharthi, A.; Habib, A.; Malik, T. Synthesis, characterization and adsorption studies of h-BN crystal for efficient removal of Cd2+ from aqueous solution. Ceram. Int. 2020, 47, 4749–4757. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gorzin, F.; Bahri Rasht Abadi, M.M. Adsorption of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution by adsorbent prepared from paper mill sludge: Kinetics and thermodynamics studies. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 149–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kubilay, Ş.; Gürkan, R.; Savran, A.; Şahan, T. Removal of Cu(II), Zn(II) and Co(II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto natural bentonite. Adsorption 2007, 13, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ifijen, I.H.; Itua, A.B.; Maliki, M.; Ize-Iyamu, C.O.; Omorogbe, S.O.; Aigbodion, A.I.; Ikhuoria, E.U. The removal of nickel and lead ions from aqueous solutions using green synthesized silica microparticles. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Separations 10 00113 g001 550
Figure 1. Freundlich adsorption isotherm for adsorption of Ni(II).
Figure 1. Freundlich adsorption isotherm for adsorption of Ni(II).
Separations 10 00113 g001
Separations 10 00113 g002 550
Figure 2. Ho’s pseudo second-order kinetics of Ni removal.
Figure 2. Ho’s pseudo second-order kinetics of Ni removal.
Separations 10 00113 g002
Separations 10 00113 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. metal concentration.
Figure 3. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. metal concentration.
Separations 10 00113 g003
Separations 10 00113 g004 550
Figure 4. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. adsorbent dosage.
Figure 4. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. adsorbent dosage.
Separations 10 00113 g004
Separations 10 00113 g005 550
Figure 5. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. temperature.
Figure 5. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. temperature.
Separations 10 00113 g005
Separations 10 00113 g006 550
Figure 6. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. pH.
Figure 6. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. pH.
Separations 10 00113 g006
Separations 10 00113 g007 550
Figure 7. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. contact time.
Figure 7. Percentage adsorption of Ni(II) by (a) LEP, (b) BBL, (c) LEP-AC and (d) BBL-AC vs. contact time.
Separations 10 00113 g007
Table
Table 1. Freundlich parameters for the adsorption of Ni(II) ion on different adsorbents.
Table 1. Freundlich parameters for the adsorption of Ni(II) ion on different adsorbents.
AdsorbentsKf
(mg/g)		1/nnR2
LYCOPERSICON
ESCULENTUM PEEL		0.0483.3010.3020.977
LYCOPERSICON
ESCULENTUM PEEL (AC)		0.3362.2960.4350.992
BRASSICA BOTRYTIS LEAVES0.2605.4190.1980.965
BRASSICA BOTRYTIS LEAVES(AC)0.3104.5750.2480.937
Table
Table 2. Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of Ni(II) ion on different adsorbents.
Table 2. Kinetic parameters for the adsorption of Ni(II) ion on different adsorbents.
AdsorbentsKe
(mg/g)		K2 g.mg−1.min−1R2
LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM PEEL19.5850.0020.938
LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM PEEL (AC)18.5750.0130.999
BRASSICA BOTRYTIS LEAVES18.7560.0210.939
BRASSICA BOTRYTIS LEAVES(AC)19.9440.0240.941
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Din, I.U.; Shah, Q.U.; Tasleem, S.; Naeem, A.; I. Alharthi, A.; Ayad Alotaibi, M. Removal of Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution by Novel Lycopersicon esculentum Peel and Brassica botrytis Leaves Adsorbents. Separations 2023, 10, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10020113

AMA Style

Din IU, Shah QU, Tasleem S, Naeem A, I. Alharthi A, Ayad Alotaibi M. Removal of Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution by Novel Lycopersicon esculentum Peel and Brassica botrytis Leaves Adsorbents. Separations. 2023; 10(2):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10020113

Chicago/Turabian Style

Din, Israf Ud, Qadeer Ullah Shah, Syed Tasleem, Abdul Naeem, Abdulrahman I. Alharthi, and Mshari Ayad Alotaibi. 2023. "Removal of Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution by Novel Lycopersicon esculentum Peel and Brassica botrytis Leaves Adsorbents" Separations 10, no. 2: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10020113

APA Style

Din, I. U., Shah, Q. U., Tasleem, S., Naeem, A., I. Alharthi, A., & Ayad Alotaibi, M. (2023). Removal of Ni(II) from Aqueous Solution by Novel Lycopersicon esculentum Peel and Brassica botrytis Leaves Adsorbents. Separations, 10(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10020113

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop