Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Various Procedures for Extracting Doxorubicin from Animal Tissue Samples
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a New Method to Estimate the Water Purification Efficiency of Bulk-Supported Nanosorbents under Realistic Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Facile Preparation of Phenyboronic-Acid-Functionalized Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles for the Selective Adsorption of Ortho-Dihydroxy-Containing Compounds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elaboration of Highly Modified Stainless Steel/Lead Dioxide Anodes for Enhanced Electrochemical Degradation of Ampicillin in Water

by
Yasmine Ben Osman
1,2,3,4,
Samar Hajjar-Garreau
3,4,
Dominique Berling
3,4 and
Hanene Akrout
1,*
1
Laboratory of Wastewaters and Environment, Center of Water Researches and Technologies (CERTE) Technopark of Borj Cedria, PB 273, Soliman 8020, Tunisia
2
National Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (INSAT), University of Carthage, BP 676, Tunis 1080, Tunisia
3
CNRS, IS2M UMR 7361, Université de Haute-Alsace, 68100 Mulhouse, France
4
CNRS, UMR 7361, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Separations 2023, 10(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10010005
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 11 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 22 December 2022

Abstract

:
Lead dioxide-based electrodes have shown a great performance in the electrochemical treatment of organic wastewater. In the present study, modified PbO2 anodes supported on stainless steel (SS) with a titanium oxide interlayer such as SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10% Boron (B) were prepared by the sol–gel spin-coating technique. The morphological and structural properties of the prepared electrodes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was found that the SS/TiO2/PbO2-10% B anode led to a rougher active surface, larger specific surface area, and therefore stronger ability to generate powerful oxidizing agents. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements showed that the modified PbO2 anodes displayed a lower charge transfer resistance Rct. The influence of the introduction of a TiO2 intermediate layer and the boron doping of a PbO2 active surface layer on the electrochemical degradation of ampicillin (AMP) antibiotic have been investigated by chemical oxygen demand measurements and HPLC analysis. Although HPLC analysis showed that the degradation process of AMP with SS/PbO2 was slightly faster than the modified PbO2 anodes, the results revealed that SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B was the most efficient and economical anode toward the pollutant degradation due to its physico-chemical properties. At the end of the electrolysis, the chemical oxygen demand (COD), the average current efficiency (ACE) and the energy consumption (EC) reached, respectively, 69.23%, 60.30% and 0.056 kWh (g COD)−1, making SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B a promising anode for the degradation of ampicillin antibiotic in aqueous solutions.

1. Introduction

The presence of antibiotics in the aqueous ecosystem represents nowadays an emerging concern since it can be a real threat on human health, aquatic life, and plants [1]. The main sources of the pharmaceuticals detected in the environment are domestic sewage, hospital effluents and pharmaceutical manufacturing companies [2]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an effective treatment to remove these emerging organic pollutants from wastewaters in order to prevent their presence in natural water receptors.
Over the last few decades, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) were proposed as the most promising technologies for antibiotic removal from the environment since the conventional methods are no more efficient. Anodic oxidation (AO) stands out among the most promising AOPs to treat refractory pharmaceutical compounds owing to its simple, safe, economic and environmentally compatible technology [3,4,5,6].
The AO process is based on the degradation of persistent organic pollutants with highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (   O H ) produced at the anode surface [7,8,9]. The efficiency of the generated hydroxyl radicals depends mainly on the anode materials in terms of composition and morphology [10,11]. Lead dioxide (PbO2) is among the widely used anodes for wastewater treatment thanks to its high electrical conductivity, good stability, low cost and long service lifetime [8,12,13]. However, the fragile binding force and the low stability of PbO2 coating may lead to lead ions leaching during the electrolysis process, or it could even peel off of the coating from the substrate surface, affecting therefore the lifetime of the electrode and limiting its practical application [14].
Therefore, further improvements are required to enhance the electrode efficiency for organic pollutants degradation. Over the past decades, research focused on PbO2 coating modification and its subsequent effects on the active layer performance [15,16,17,18].
Conventional PbO2 anodes were modified by the introduction of a conductive intermediate layer which contributed to prolonging the service life, minimizing the lead ions leaching and improving the oxidation effectiveness and current efficiency of lead dioxide electrodes [19,20,21]. For example, silicon dioxide (SiOx) thin film was used by Elaissaoui et al. as an interlayer in order to improve the SS/PbO2 anode efficiency and stability for dye removal [22]. Duan and co-workers reported that the deposition of a carbon nanotube interlayer increased the service lifetime and promoted the oxidation capacity of pure PbO2 electrodes for 4-chlorophenol degradation [23].Tin dioxide (SnO2) is also among the added metal oxides allowed to reach high degradation rates [24,25] as well as manganese dioxide (MnO2) [26] and titanium dioxide (TiO2) [27,28,29] interlayers used to improve the electrochemical oxidation treatments of refractory organic wastewater, respectively, by strengthening the bonding between the substrate and the active outer layer which increases, therefore, the anode’s electrical conductivity.
Furthermore, doping the PbO2 layer has also been extensively adopted as an effective modification method to promote the electrocatalytic characteristics and improve the stability of PbO2-based electrodes [19]. Several elements such as indium [30], cobalt [31], copper [32] and aluminum [33] were used as dopants to enhance the oxidizing power of lead dioxide anode since dopant introduction provides a larger active surface area, higher oxygen evolution potential, and lower charge transfer resistance [8,15].
However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports about PbO2 anodes modified by boron (B). Only boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrodes were used, in recent years, and considered as an optimal electrode material for the electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants in the wastewater system thanks to their physical and chemical properties [34,35] and the distribution of sp2 carbon impurities on the anode surface that influences the electrocatalytic properties [36].
The aim of the current research is to improve the electrocatalytic activity and stability of the PbO2 electrode by (i) the introduction of a TiO2 inner layer between the stainless steel substrate and the outer coating and (ii) the combination of the high activity of boron and the lead oxide in order to develop SS/TiO2/PbO2-B anode using sol–gel spin coating. This study aligns with the overall goal of the InTheMED project aiming to develop and to implement low-cost sustainable remediation strategies. The main purposes of this work were (i) to remove residual antibiotics from wastewater, (ii) to contribute to increasing the safe reuse of treated effluent and (iii) to preserve the MED aquifers to mitigate anthropogenic threats in changing climate.
The physicochemical and morphological properties of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-B electrodes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The understanding of electric properties was performed by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements (EIS) and compared with those of the conventional SS/PbO2 anodes. Ampicillin (AMP) was selected as a pharmaceutical pollutant model since it is one of the most commonly detected antibiotics in wastewater in several countries [37]. According to recent studies, AMP was detected in Kenya [38] and Czech Republic wastewater at a concentration of 28.09 ng/L [39], and also, concentrations ranging from 0.012 to 32.57 μg/mL were reported in Pakistan [40]. The electrocatalytic activity of the developed anodes was investigated during the anodic oxidation of AMP in synthetic wastewater. The mineralization of the organic matter and the concentration of ampicillin were, respectively, evaluated by chemical oxygen demand and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Titanium isopropoxyde (TTIP, Ti(OCH(CH3)2)4, Sigma-Aldrich, 97% purity) was used as a precursor for TiO2 interlayer deposition. Lead(II) acetate trihydrate (Pb(C2H3O2)2, Assay ≥ 99%,379.33 g mol−1), methacrylic acid (MAA: H2C=C(CH3)COOH, Assay ≥ 99%, 86.09 g mol−1), hydrochlorhydric acid (HCl, 37%, 36.46 g mol−1) and 1-propanol (CH3CH2CH2OH, Assay ≥ 99.7%, 60.10 g mol−1) were used for PbO2 deposition. Boric acid (H3BO3, Sigma-Aldrich, ≥99.5% purity, 61.83 g mol−1) was used as dopant. Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, 142.04 g mol−1, LOBA chemie) was used as supporting electrolyte during the electrochemical measurements and the degradation experiment. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4, 136.086 g mol−1) and methanol (HPLC grade) were used for chromatographic analysis. Acetone (CH3COCH3, 58.01 g mol−1) was used to clean the substrates. Ampicillin antibiotic (C16H18N3NaO4S, FLUKA Chemie, 371.39 g mol−1) was used as an organic pollutant.

2.2. Preparation of Modified PbO2 Electrodes

Stainless steel-AISI 304 plates were used as substrates. The electrodes were, first, polished with abrasive paper with different roughness ranging from 320 to 1200, degreased in acetone for 10 min using an ultrasonic bath (Ultrasonic Batch-FALC), rinsed with distilled water and finally dried under nitrogen flow.
The PbO2 electrodes were prepared by the sol–gel spin-coating technique. Concerning the titanium oxide interlayer, TiO2 sol gel solution was prepared by mixing 2 mL of methacrylic acid and 1 ml of titanium isopropoxyde for 5 min; then, 0.5 mL of propanol was added to the mixture and stirred for 10 min. Finally, 0.9 mL of 0.37 M HCl was added, and the solution was stirred for 1 h. The TiO2 interlayer was spin coated at 1000 rpm during one minute and annealed at 600 °C for 1 h in order to evaporate the solvents.
The PbO2 solution was synthesized by dissolving 1.28 g of lead acetate in methacrylic acid, 1-propanol and 0.37 M HCl. The solution was stirred for 1 h. For the boron (B)-doped anode, 0.023 g of boric acid (H3BO3) was added with 10% mass percentage during the first step of Pb precursor solution formulation. The B doping rate was chosen based on the work of Boukhchina et al. [41]. Small droplets of the un-doped and doped PbO2 were deposited on a TiO2 layer that was then spun at 2000 rpm for 60 s. Five thin films of PbO2 were deposited layer by layer to obtain a final thickness around 1000 nm, and the coating was finally dried at 200 °C for 24 h on a hot plate as described in Figure 1. In order to obtain the optimized thickness of the TiO2 and PbO2 layer, the rotation speed, the number of the deposited layers and the annealing temperature were varied, and the thicknesses of the films were measured after each test in order to determine the appropriate parameters [42].

2.3. Electrode Characterizations

2.3.1. Electrode Morphology and Composition

The morphology of the deposited films was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI quantum 400 FEG Electron Microscope). An energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) is included in this instrument for elemental analysis. The composition and chemical state of the modified PbO2 anodes were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS) analysis. The XPS analysis was performed via a VG Scienta SES 2002 spectrometer equipped with a monochromatized Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV) and hemispherical analyzer. The analyzed surface area was 24 mm2. The high-resolution spectra and wide scan were recorded with a pass energy of 100 eV and 500 eV.

2.3.2. Electrochemical Properties

The electrochemical behaviors of PbO2 anodes were characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). EIS measurements were carried out in a conventional three-electrode cell system containing 0.1 M Na2SO4 using a VoltaLab PGZ301 potentiostat. PbO2 anodes were used as the working electrodes, platinum wire was used as the counter electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode was used as the reference electrode. Impedance spectra were recorded in a frequency range varying from 100 kHz to 100 mHz. The experimental data were fitted using ZsimpWin 3.2 software.

2.4. Anodic Oxidation of Ampicillin

2.4.1. Electrolysis

The electrochemical degradation of AMP was carried out in a glass reactor containing 105 mg L−1 of ampicillin and 0.1 M of Na2SO4 used as a supporting electrolyte at pH = 4. The SS/PbO2, SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes were prepared and used as anodes with an effective area of 4 cm2. An SS plate with the same size was used as the cathode and was supported vertically and parallel to the working anode. The solution was magnetically stirred by a magnetic stirrer during the electrolysis process, and the anodic oxidation of ampicillin was performed under galvanostatic mode at a constant current density of 50 mA cm−2 for 5 h (Figure 2).

2.4.2. Analytical Methods and Evaluation of Degradation Efficiency

The concentration of AMP was determined at different instants during the electrolysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). HPLC analysis was carried out using an Agilent technology instrument 1260 infinity II equipped with a thermo-scientific LC18 column Zorbax eclipse XDB (250 mm × 4.6 mm× 5 µm) used as stationary phase and coupled with a diode strip detector set at the detection wavelength of ampicillin (λ =204 nm). The mobile phase is a mixture of methanol: 0.05 M KH2PO4 (40:60 v/v) flowing through the column at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The mobile phase was filtered through 0.45 μm Millipore filter. The injection volume of AMP was 20 µL.
To assess the mineralization of AMP in solution, the Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) was determined using the reactor digestion method based on oxidizing the organic matter present in water with an excess of potassium dichromate. The quantity of potassium dichromate used in the reaction is equivalent to the oxygen used to oxidize the organic matter of wastewater. This measurement is carried out according to the French water quality standard protocol (NF T 90-101), and the COD is expressed in mg L−1 [43]. The COD removal rate is calculated from the following equation:
COD   removal % = COD 0 COD t COD 0 × 100
where COD 0 and COD t are, respectively, the COD of initial concentration and the COD at given time t.
The average current efficiency (ACE) representing the proportion of the generated radicals serving to oxidize the AMP is determined from COD values (in g O 2  L−1) using this expression [44]:
ACE % = ( COD 0 COD t ) × F × V 8 × I × t × 100  
where F is the Faraday constant (96,487 C mol−1), V is the solution volume (L), 8 is the oxygen equivalent mass (g eq−1), I is the applied current (A), and t is the electrolysis time (s).
The electric energy needed to degrade AMP at a given time “t” was estimated by calculating the energy consumption per amount of degraded COD ( kWh g   COD 1 ) according to the following formula [45]:
EC kWh g   COD 1 = I × E × t COD   × V
where I (0.2 A) is the applied current flowing between the anode and cathode, E is the average cell voltage, t is the electrolysis time, ΔCOD is the decay in COD (mg L−1), and V is the volume of the treated solution (L).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological and Structural Characterization of the Anodes Surface

3.1.1. SEM and EDX Analysis

Figure 3 shows SEM micrographs of PbO2 coating before and after the addition of the TiO2 interlayer, respectively, in Figure 3a,b. The boron doping of the outer layer is represented in Figure 3c. The addition of the TiO2 interlayer affects significantly the coating morphology. We notice as depicted in Figure 3b that the anode surface with the TiO2 interlayer became rougher compared to the SS/PbO2 (Figure 3a) directly coated anode surface, which looks more homogeneous and uniform. In comparison with the undoped PbO2 coating, the incorporation of boron into the PbO2 coating (Figure 3c) led to a rougher and a more heterogeneous surface covered with small-sized lead dioxide particles. The rough structure obtained with SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes increases the active surface area which provides more active sites for electrochemical reactions and facilitates, thus, the degradation of the pollutant [13,46].
According to EDX images of SS/TiO2/PbO2 anode in a cross-section (Figure 4), the anode was developed on a silicon substrate, since it is easily breakable compared to the SS substrate. The cross-section images allowed us to check the TiO2 intermediate layer and the PbO2 outer layer thicknesses corresponding, respectively, to (112 ± 25) nm and (1000 ± 25) nm after heat treatment.
EDX analysis was carried out to determine the chemical composition of the anodes. From the EDX element mappings of Si/TiO2/PbO2 (Figure 4) and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B (Figure 5) electrodes, we notice that lead (Pb), titanium (Ti) and oxygen (O) are the main detected elements. The homogeneous distribution of Ti and O confirms that the intermediate layer of TiO2 covers the entire surface of the stainless steel substrate and the Pb distributed in the form of small crystals over the anode surface demonstrates the successful deposition of the PbO2 active layer.

3.1.2. XPS Analysis

To further study the elementary composition and the chemical environment of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes, the electrodes surfaces were investigated by XPS.
The XPS spectrum presented in Figure 6a reveals that Pb and O are the main elements present on the surface of both electrodes and are associated to the PbO2 film. The detected carbon (C) is attributed to the anode surface pollution. Since the PbO2 layer is too thick, the Ti of the intermediate layer does not appear in the XPS spectrum. The boron present in SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anode is also not observed because of the small relative sensitivity factor (RSF) cross-section of the B1s orbital (B1s = 0.486). In order to quantify the chemical nature of the elements present, high-resolution XPS spectra of Pb and O were measured, and the main results are summarized in Table 1.
It can be seen from Figure 6b that the XPS spectrum of the Pb 4f core-level peak is formed by two contributions: the Pb 4f 5/2 and the Pb 4f 7/2 located, respectively, at 143.48 eV and 138.87 eV with a spin-orbit coupling of 4.9 eV. The Pb 4f 7/2 can be attributed to Pb 2+ present in the lead oxide phase (Pb3O4) [47]. The XPS spectrum of O1s (Figure 5c) is deconvolved into three peaks relative to the three chemical states of oxygen in the coating. The main peak, centered at an energy of 531.59 eV, corresponds to organic oxygen (O1s organic), the second peak centered at an energy of 531.10 eV corresponds to defective O/-OH oxygen (O1s defective), and the third peak at 529.52 eV is relative to the lattice oxygen (O1s lattice) [14,15]. The O1s lattice could be assigned to strong oxygen binding (Pb-O bond) derived from the PbO2 active layer [28,48,49]. The high binding energy of the organic oxygen is attributed to the adsorbed hydroxyl oxygen. The high content of O1s organic improves the catalytic performance of the electrode by providing more adsorbed reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn facilitates the degradation efficiency of the pollutant [50,51]. The percentage of O1s organic for the SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anode (17.37%) is higher than that for the SS/TiO2/PbO2 anode (16.07%), indicating therefore that the doped PbO2 coating has a higher electrocatalytic activity toward the degradation of the organic pollutant than the un-doped coating.
Table 1 shows the atomic percentage of different chemical elements present on the surface before and after doping. The obtained results reveal, on the one hand, a slight shift in the binding energies of the O1s lattice and Pb 4f 7/2 peaks toward low energies. On the other hand, we notice after doping the layers of 10% B an increase in the atomic percentage of the O1s lattice and a decrease in the atomic percentage of the O1s defective. We also observe a decrease in the ratio between the atomic percentage of O1s lattice/O1s defective and Pb 4f 7/2/O1s defective. This means that defective (lacunar) oxide structures have been transformed into lattice oxide by the incorporation of boron into the defective structure of PbO2. Therefore, the changes at the O1s lattice peak are associated to the presence of boron dopant in lead dioxide lattice, which proves that boron atoms have been introduced into the active layer. Concerning the Pb 4f 7/2 core-level peak, the changes are attributed to the sensitivity of the lead atom to the chemical environment after the insertion of the dopant.

3.2. EIS Measurements and Fitting

EIS measurements were performed to further investigate the effect of the TiO2 interlayer and B dopant on the electrochemical properties of PbO2 anodes. The EIS parameters listed in Table 2 were obtained from the collected experimental data fitted with the equivalent circuit (Figure 7) where Rs corresponds to the solution resistance, and (Rcoating, Qcoating) and (Rct, Qdl) characterize, respectively, the properties of the coating and the charge transfer process at the interface electrode/electrolyte. The Warburg impedance (W) is assigned to the diffusion of charged species [12].
It can be seen from the Nyquist plots displayed in Figure 8 that SS/PbO2 (Figure 8a) and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B (Figure 8c) electrodes present straight lines while SS/TiO2/PbO2 impedance spectra (Figure 8b) present a straight line with the appearance of a semi-circular shape at a high-frequency range attributed to the fast charge transfer at the anode interface [52]. The EIS responses shown in Table 2 indicate a significant difference in Rct and Rcoating values. The Rct of SS/TiO2/PbO2 (3.76 × 104 Ω cm2) and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B (5.64 × 104 Ω cm2) anodes are smaller than the Rct of SS/PbO2 (3.18 × 106 Ω cm2) anode, and this is mainly explained by the compact structure and the small size of the crystalline particles of the B-doped PbO2 coating demonstrated earlier with the SEM micrographs as well as by the improvement of the electronic conductivity with the B doping [46,53,54]. Therefore, we can say that the reduced charge transfer resistance induced by the introduction of an intermediate layer and by the B doping allows a faster electrochemical reaction rate [27] and could contribute to a lower power waste and a better current efficiency during the anodic oxidation process [15].
Concerning the R coating, the resistance increased from 68.48 to 435.9 Ω cm2 with, respectively, SS/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes. This result implies that the modified lead dioxide coating exhibits a better adhesion to the SS substrate by minimizing the transfer charge through the defects of coating. The intermediate layer contributed to strengthening the bonding between the electrode active layer and the substrate, which is reflected in the obtained values of coating resistance [55]. This high coating resistance leads to a lower punctual dissolution of the active layer and thus a longer lifetime of the developed anode [28].

3.3. Electrochemical Oxidation Performance of Electrodes

3.3.1. AMP Removal

In order to evaluate the electrocatalytic oxidation performance of the prepared anodes, HPLC analysis was carried out to identify AMP concentration during the electrochemical treatment, and COD removal rates were calculated at the end of the treatment since the COD is an indicator of the mineralization rate of organic matter including the initial polluting molecule as well as the by-products generated during the treatment.
As shown in Figure 9, the AMP concentration decreased gradually as the electrochemical oxidation reaction proceeded, suggesting that SS/PbO2 SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes exhibit efficient anode materials for the electrochemical degradation of AMP. Although the SS/PbO2 anode showed the fastest degradation kinetics, it can be clearly seen that this anode had the lowest COD removal rate (30.77%) after 5 h of electrolysis compared to SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes which reached, respectively, 61.54% and 69.23%. Therefore, we can conclude that the addition of a TiO2 intermediate layer and B doping of the PbO2 active layer resulted in a better degradation of total organic compounds including ampicillin and the by-products that could be generated during the electrochemical treatment.
Since the electrochemical degradation process efficiency is mainly ascribed to the   O H radicals produced on the anode surface, the enhanced mineralization rate of the organic matter obtained with SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes could be explained by their strong hydroxyl radical generation ability [30,41]. This high hydroxyl radicals rate is attributed to the new physico-chemical properties of the electrode after the introduction of TiO2 oxide film and the B doping of the outer layer. The small charge transfer resistance obtained with the modified PbO2 anodes, demonstrated by impedance spectroscopy measurements, increased the conductivity of the coating and accelerated the charge transfer, which in turn promoted the water oxidation and the resultant   O H radicals generation [51]. The highest COD removal rate at the end of the electrolysis is reached by the B-doped PbO2 electrode, and this is ascribed to the morphological difference at the electrode active layer [30,52]. The compact structure of the SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anode (Figure 3c) formed by PbO2 small particles provides a large active surface and therefore more active sites to generate more   O H radicals [24]. In addition to the crystal structure modification, B doping increases the conductivity by inducing sp2 carbon impurities which influence the mineralization performance of the anode and enhance the electrogeneration of hydroxyl radicals   O H formed from water discharge on its surface [36,53].
H 2 O   O H + H + + e
The Fenton method is among the various advanced oxidation processes used to eliminate ampicillin where the antibiotic is completely eliminated within 2 min [56]. However, comparing to anodic oxidation, the pH solution is a parameter that affects Fenton reaction and may lead to ineffective Fenton oxidation in addition to the problem of iron sludge pollution treatment [57]. Concerning the anodic oxidation method, several anode materials were used for ampicillin degradation such as Ru-Ir-TiO2 [58], Ti/TiO2/PbO2 [27] or boron-doped diamond [59] anodes where the pharmaceutical pollutant was totally eliminated after a short time of electrolysis. Despite the superior performance of these electrodes, they remain relatively expensive compared to the more affordable cost of the stainless steel substrate used in this study.

3.3.2. Average Current Efficiency and Energy Evaluation

An evaluation of the efficiency of the treatment method in terms of average efficiency of the applied current (ACE) and consumed energy (EC) was also carried out in order to estimate the energy cost of the proposed optimized treatment.
The evolution trend of COD removal rate with the different anodes at the end of electrolysis is similar to that of the average current efficiency. As expected, the ACE values of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B were 53.60% and 60.30%, respectively, which were higher than those of the traditional SS/PbO2 anode. These results are explained by the difference in the reactivity of the hydroxyl radicals electrogenerated on the anodes surfaces, which is influenced by the anode material [60].
The evolution of EC presented in Figure 10 shows that the consumed electric energy was about two times lower in the presence of the TiO2 interlayer and B dopant. The EC values decreased from 0.125 to 0.056 kWh (g COD)−1 with, respectively, SS/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes. This decrease is due essentially to the high COD removal rate achieved with SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B during the last hour of treatment, since the higher the anode material electrocatalytic activity, the faster the electron transfer rate, and consequently, a large number of hydroxyl radicals can be generated. This leads to the lower energy consumption and lower energy cost of the electrochemical treatment process which represents, thus, a great advantage from an economic perspective [61,62].

4. Conclusions

In this paper, a B-doped SS/TiO2/PbO2 anode was prepared on a stainless steel substrate by the sol–gel spin-coating method in order to study the electrochemical activity of the electrode toward the electrochemical degradation of a pharmaceutical pollutant.
Based on the morphological and structural characterization, we can say that the introduction of the TiO2 inner layer and B doping of the PbO2 outer layer provided a higher specific surface area which led to larger electrochemical active sites and promoted, consequently, the anodic oxidation reaction. In electrochemical measurements, the SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anode exhibited a smaller charge transfer resistance compared to the traditional SS/PbO2 anode leading, therefore, to a higher hydroxyl radical generation capacity and a better electrochemical oxidation performance. The electrocatalytic degradation of AMP in aqueous solutions using modified PbO2 anodes was investigated. The SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrode had the highest oxidation ability with a widely higher COD removal efficiency (69.23%) than the SS/PbO2 electrode (30.77%). Thus, the introduction of the TiO2 intermediate layer and boron doping of the active layer represent two attractive methods to enhance the electrocatalytic activity and minimize the energy consumption of the PbO2-based anode during the electrochemical treatment, making the SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrode a promising anode for real applications in wastewater organic pollutants removal.

Author Contributions

Y.B.O.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—original draft. S.H.-G.: XPS measurement and analysis. D.B.: supervision, writing—review and editing. H.A.: supervision, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Campus France (project PHC Utique 19G1202/41785XE) and the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research as part of a Tunisian national project. This paper is supported by the PRIMA programme under grant agreement No1923, project InTheMED. The PRIMA programme is supported by the European Union. Separations 10 00005 i001

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Majumder, A.; Gupta, B.; Gupta, A.K. Pharmaceutically Active Compounds in Aqueous Environment: A Status, Toxicity and Insights of Remediation. Environ. Res. 2019, 176, 108542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Olvera-Vargas, H.; Gore-Datar, N.; Garcia-Rodriguez, O.; Mutnuri, S.; Lefebvre, O. Electro-Fenton Treatment of Real Pharmaceutical Wastewater Paired with a BDD Anode: Reaction Mechanisms and Respective Contribution of Homogenneous and Heterogenous [Rad]OH. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moreira, F.C.; Boaventura, R.A.R.; Brillas, E.; Vilar, V.J.P. Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes: A Review on Their Application to Synthetic and Real Wastewaters. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 202, 217–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Titchou, F.E.; Zazou, H.; Afanga, H.; Gaayda, J.E.; Ait Akbour, R.; Nidheesh, P.V.; Hamdani, M. An Overview on the Elimination of Organic Contaminants from Aqueous Systems Using Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 41, 102040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garcia-Segura, S.; Keller, J.; Brillas, E.; Radjenovic, J. Removal of Organic Contaminants from Secondary Effluent by Anodic Oxidation with a Boron-Doped Diamond Anode as Tertiary Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 283, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ben Osman, Y.; Le Meins, J.-M.; Bousselmi, L.; Akrout, H.; Berling, D. Effect of Electrode Shape and Deposition Technique on Electrochemical Treatment of Ampicillin in Water. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sopaj, F.; Rodrigo, M.A.; Oturan, N.; Podvorica, F.I.; Pinson, J.; Oturan, M.A. Influence of the Anode Materials on the Electrochemical Oxidation Efficiency. Application to Oxidative Degradation of the Pharmaceutical Amoxicillin. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 262, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Liang, J.; Yue, L.; Li, T.; Luo, Y.; Liu, Q.; Lu, S.; Asiri, A.M.; Gong, Z.; et al. Anodic Oxidation for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants: Anode Materials, Operating Conditions and Mechanisms. A Mini Review. Electrochem. commun. 2021, 123, 106912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qiao, J.; Xiong, Y. Electrochemical Oxidation Technology: A Review of Its Application in High-Efficiency Treatment of Wastewater Containing Persistent Organic Pollutants. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 44, 102308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nurhayati, E. A Brief Review on Electro-Generated Hydroxyl Radical for Organic Wastewater Mineralization. J. Sains Teknol. Lingkung. 2012, 4, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kapałka, A.; Baltruschat, H.; Comninellis, C. Electrochemical Oxidation of Organic Compounds Induced by Electro-Generated Free Hydroxyl Radicals on BDD Electrodes. In Synthetic Diamond Films: Preparation, Electrochemistry, Characterization, and Applications; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elaissaoui, I.; Akrout, H.; Bousselmi, L. Interface Behavior of PbO2 on Pure Lead and Stainless Steel as Anode for Dye Degradation. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 16161–16176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zheng, R.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J. Application of Lead Oxide Electrodes in Wastewater Treatment: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fu, X.; Han, Y.; Xu, H.; Su, Z.; Liu, L. Electrochemical Study of a Novel High-Efficiency PbO2 Anode Based on a Cerium-Graphene Oxide Co-Doping Strategy: Electrodeposition Mechanism, Parameter Optimization, and Degradation Pathways. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 422, 126890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, N.; Wei, J.; Gu, Z.; Sun, H.; Guo, Y.; Zong, J.; Li, X.; Ni, P.; Han, E. Electrocatalysis Degradation of Coal Tar Wastewater Using a Novel Hydrophobic Benzalacetone Modified Lead Dioxide Electrode. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Li, M.; Li, D.; Wen, Q.; Chen, Z. Electrochemical Pretreatment of Coal Gasification Wastewater with Bi-Doped PbO2 Electrode: Preparation of Anode, Efficiency and Mechanism. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Feng, J.; Lan, H.; Tao, Q.; Chen, W.; Dai, Q. Electrochemical Oxidation of a Typical PPCP Wastewater with a Novel High-Efficiency PbO2 Anode Based on NCNSs and Ce Co-Modification: Parameter Optimization and Degradation Mechanism. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 916, 116305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, M.; Dai, Q.; Lei, L.; Ma, C.; Wang, D. Long Life Modified Lead Dioxide Anode for Organic Wastewater Treatment: Electrochemical Characteristics and Degradation Mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Hao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Chai, S.; Han, G.; Xu, H.; Lu, J.; Dang, Y.; Sun, X.; et al. Electrocatalysis Enhancement of α, β-PbO2 Nanocrystals Induced via Rare Earth Er(III) Doping Strategy: Principle, Degradation Application and Electrocatalytic Mechanism. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 333, 135535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fazlinezhad, S.; Jafarzadeh, K.; Shooshtari Gugtapeh, H.; Mirali, S.M. Characterization and Electrochemical Properties of Stable Ni2+ and F- Co-Doped PbO2 Coating on Titanium Substrate. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 909, 116145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Baoying, L.V.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, D. Fabrication and Electrochemical Treatment Application of a Novel Lead Dioxide Anode with Superhydrophobic Surfaces, High Oxygen Evolution Potential, and Oxidation Capability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1754–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Elaissaoui, I.; Akrout, H.; Grassini, S.; Fulginiti, D.; Bousselmi, L. Role of SiOx Interlayer in the Electrochemical Degradation of Amaranth Dye Using SS/PbO2 Anodes. Mater. Des. 2016, 110, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duan, X.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Chang, L.; Yang, C. Fabrication and Characterization of a Novel PbO2 Electrode with a CNT Interlayer. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 28927–28936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, H.; Niu, J.; Ding, S.; Zhang, L. Electrochemical Degradation of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) by Ti/SnO2-Sb, Ti/SnO2-Sb/PbO2 and Ti/SnO2-Sb/MnO2 Anodes. Water Res. 2012, 46, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xing, X.; Ni, J.; Zhu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Xia, J. Maximization of Current Efficiency for Organic Pollutants Oxidation at BDD, Ti/SnO2-Sb/PbO2, and Ti/SnO2-Sb Anodes. Chemosphere 2018, 205, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, C.B.; Lu, Y.X.; Wang, F.; Niu, H.; Yu, L.H.; Xue, J.Q. Influence of a MnO2-WC Interlayer on the Stability and Electrocatalytic Activity of Titanium-Based PbO2 Anodes. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 331, 135381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boukhchina, S.; Akrout, H.; Berling, D.; Bousselmi, L. Highly Efficient Modified Lead Oxide Electrode Using a Spin Coating/Electrodeposition Mode on Titanium for Electrochemical Treatment of Pharmaceutical Pollutant. Chemosphere 2019, 221, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, L.; Xue, J.; Zhang, L.; Tang, C.; Guo, Y. Fabrication of a Stable Ti/Pb-TiOxNWs/PbO2 Anode and Its Application in Benzoquinone Degradation. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 368, 137532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, Y.; Jin, K.; Li, H.; Qian, H.; Wang, H.; Zhao, L. A Novel Anode with Anticorrosive Coating for Efficient Degradation of Toluene. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xia, Y.; Bian, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhou, W.; Wang, L.; Fan, S.; Xiong, P.; Zhan, T.; Dai, Q.; Chen, J. Effect of Indium Doping on the PbO2 Electrode for the Enhanced Electrochemical Oxidation of Aspirin: An Electrode Comparative Study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 237, 116321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dai, Q.; Zhou, J.; Weng, M.; Luo, X.; Feng, D.; Chen, J. Electrochemical Oxidation Metronidazole with Co Modified PbO2 Electrode: Degradation and Mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 166, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bian, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhan, T.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W.; Dai, Q.; Chen, J. Electrochemical Removal of Amoxicillin Using a Cu Doped PbO2 Electrode: Electrode Characterization, Operational Parameters Optimization and Degradation Mechanism. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 762–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, J.; Xia, Y.; Dai, Q. Electrochemical Degradation of Chloramphenicol with a Novel Al Doped PbO2 Electrode: Performance, Kinetics and Degradation Mechanism. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 165, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. He, Y.; Lin, H.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, W.; Li, H.; Huang, W. Recent Developments and Advances in Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes for Electrochemical Oxidation of Organic Pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 212, 802–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carolina Espinoza, L.; Candia-Onfray, C.; Vidal, J.; Salazar, R. Influence of the Chemical Nature of Boron-Doped Diamond Anodes on Wastewater Treatments. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2021, 25, 100963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Garcia-segura, S.; Vieira, E.; Martínez-huitle, C.A. Role of Sp 3/Sp 2 Ratio on the Electrocatalytic Properties of Boron-Doped Diamond Electrodes: A Mini Review. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 59, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rodriguez-Mozaz, S.; Vaz-Moreira, I.; Varela Della Giustina, S.; Llorca, M.; Barceló, D.; Schubert, S.; Berendonk, T.U.; Michael-Kordatou, I.; Fatta-Kassinos, D.; Martinez, J.L.; et al. Antibiotic Residues in Final Effluents of European Wastewater Treatment Plants and Their Impact on the Aquatic Environment. Environ. Int. 2020, 140, 105733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boge, E.A.; Nyongesa, P.; Okoth, P.; Sifuna, A.W. Biofilms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Escherichia Coli Recovered from Wastewater Treatment Plants in Kakamega Municipality, Kenya. Egypt. J. Microbiol. 2021, 56, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stachurová, T.; Piková, H.; Bartas, M.; Semerád, J.; Svobodová, K.; Malachová, K. Beta-Lactam Resistance Development during the Treatment Processes of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zafar, R.; Bashir, S.; Nabi, D.; Arshad, M. Occurrence and Quantification of Prevalent Antibiotics in Wastewater Samples from Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 142596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boukhchina, S. Elaboration Des Anodes Par Différentes Méthodes de Déposition et Leur Application Dans La Dépollution Des Eaux Usées Par Voie Électrochimique. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Carthage, Carthage, Tunisie, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ben Osman, Y. Traitement Électrochimique Des Eaux Usées Chargées En Polluants Émergents Utilisant Des Anodes Innovantes à Coût Maîtrisé. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, France, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  43. AFNOR Norme Française NF T 90-101 (Février 2001): Qualité de l’eau: Détermination de La Demande Chimique En Oxygène (DCO); AFNOR: Paris, France, 2001.
  44. Elaissaoui, I.; Akrout, H.; Bousselmi, L. Electrochemical Degradation of Dye on Lead Dioxide Electrodeposited on Stainless Steel: Effect of Cyclic Voltammetry Parameters. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 22120–22132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghazouani, M.; Akrout, H.; Bousselmi, L. Nitrate and Carbon Matter Removals from Real Effluents Using Si/BDD Electrode. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9895–9906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, C.; Shang, S.; Li, X. yan Fabrication of Sulfur-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Array as a Conductive Interlayer of PbO2 Anode for Efficient Electrochemical Oxidation of Organic Pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 258, 118035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, K.S.; O’Leary, T.J.; Winograd, N. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectra of Lead Oxides. Anal. Chem. 1973, 45, 2214–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Velichenko, A.B.; Amadelli, R.; Zucchini, G.L.; Girenko, D.V.; Danilov, F.I. Electrosynthesis and Physicochemical Properties of Fe-Doped Lead Dioxide Electrocatalysts. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 4341–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Ma, J.; Li, J. Investigation on Electrochemical Properties of Cerium Doped Lead Dioxide Anode and Application for Elimination of Nitrophenol. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 1352–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Feng, J.; Tao, Q.; Lan, H.; Xia, Y.; Dai, Q. Electrochemical Oxidation of Sulfamethoxazole by Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanosheets Composite PbO2 Electrode: Kinetics and Mechanism. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, S.; Hao, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, R.; Dang, Y.; Zhu, J.J. Promoting the Electrocatalytic Performance of PbO2 Nanocrystals via Incorporation of Y2O3 Nanoparticles: Degradation Application and Electrocatalytic Mechanism. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 369, 137671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wei, F.; Liao, D.; Lin, Y.; Hu, C.; Ju, J.; Chen, Y.; Feng, D. Electrochemical Degradation of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate (ROC) Using the Electrodeposited Ti/TiO2-NTs/PbO2 Electrode. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 258, 118056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bogdanowicz, R.; Fabiańska, A.; Golunski, L.; Sobaszek, M.; Gnyba, M.; Ryl, J.; Darowicki, K.; Ossowski, T.; Janssens, S.D.; Haenen, K.; et al. Influence of the Boron Doping Level on the Electrochemical Oxidation of the Azo Dyes at Si/BDD Thin Film Electrodes. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2013, 39, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. dos Santos, A.J.; Fortunato, G.V.; Kronka, M.S.; Vernasqui, L.G.; Ferreira, N.G.; Lanza, M.R.V. Electrochemical Oxidation of Ciprofloxacin in Different Aqueous Matrices Using Synthesized Boron-Doped Micro and Nano-Diamond Anodes. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, Z.; Cai, J.; Song, G.; Tian, Y.; Zhou, M. Anodic Oxidation of Organic Pollutants: Anode Fabrication, Process Hybrid and Environmental Applications. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 26, 100659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Elmolla, E.S.; Chaudhuri, M. Degradation of the Antibiotics Amoxicillin, Ampicillin and Cloxacillin in Aqueous Solution by the Photo-Fenton Process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172, 1476–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiang, Y.; Ran, J.; Mao, K.; Yang, X.; Zhong, L.; Yang, C.; Feng, X.; Zhang, H. Recent Progress in Fenton/Fenton-like Reactions for the Removal of Antibiotics in Aqueous Environments. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 236, 113464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wirzal, M.D.H.; Yusoff, A.R.M.; Zima, J.; Barek, J. Degradation of Ampicillin and Penicillin G Using Anodic Oxidation. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 8978–8988. [Google Scholar]
  59. Frontistis, Z.; Mantzavinos, D.; Meriç, S. Degradation of Antibiotic Ampicillin on Boron-Doped Diamond Anode Using the Combined Electrochemical Oxidation—Sodium Persulfate Process. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 223, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Panizza, M.; Cerisola, G. Influence of Anode Material on the Electrochemical Oxidation of 2-Naphthol: Part 2. Bulk Electrolysis Experiments. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 3221–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ghazouani, M.; Akrout, H.; Jellali, S.; Bousselmi, L. Comparative Study of Electrochemical Hybrid Systems for the Treatment of Real Wastewaters from Agri-Food Activities. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 647, 1651–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, H.; Guo, J.; Xia, M.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Methods for Landfill Leachate Treatment: A Review on Electrocoagulation and Electrooxidation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation process of undoped and B doped SS/TiO2/PbO2 anode.
Figure 1. Preparation process of undoped and B doped SS/TiO2/PbO2 anode.
Separations 10 00005 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the electrolysis experimental setup.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the electrolysis experimental setup.
Separations 10 00005 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) SS/PbO2, (b) SS/TiO2/PbO2 and (c) SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes surface.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of (a) SS/PbO2, (b) SS/TiO2/PbO2 and (c) SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes surface.
Separations 10 00005 g003
Figure 4. EDX analysis of Si/TiO2/PbO2 electrode in cross-section.
Figure 4. EDX analysis of Si/TiO2/PbO2 electrode in cross-section.
Separations 10 00005 g004
Figure 5. EDX images of SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrode in top view.
Figure 5. EDX images of SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrode in top view.
Separations 10 00005 g005
Figure 6. XPS spectrum of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes: (a) Wide scan spectrum, (b) O 1s Core-level spectrum, and (c) Pb 4f core-level spectrum.
Figure 6. XPS spectrum of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes: (a) Wide scan spectrum, (b) O 1s Core-level spectrum, and (c) Pb 4f core-level spectrum.
Separations 10 00005 g006
Figure 7. Schematic representation of equivalent circuit components used for modeling EIS data.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of equivalent circuit components used for modeling EIS data.
Separations 10 00005 g007
Figure 8. Nyquist impedance plots of (a) SS/PbO2, (b) SS/TiO2/PbO2 and (c) SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes in 0.1 M Na2SO4 solution.
Figure 8. Nyquist impedance plots of (a) SS/PbO2, (b) SS/TiO2/PbO2 and (c) SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes in 0.1 M Na2SO4 solution.
Separations 10 00005 g008
Figure 9. Evolution of ampicillin concentration during the electrochemical oxidation (a) and COD removal rate at the end of the treatment with the different PbO2 anodes (b). Experimental conditions: C AMP = 105 mg L−1, j = 50 mA cm−2, [Na2SO4] = 0.1 M.
Figure 9. Evolution of ampicillin concentration during the electrochemical oxidation (a) and COD removal rate at the end of the treatment with the different PbO2 anodes (b). Experimental conditions: C AMP = 105 mg L−1, j = 50 mA cm−2, [Na2SO4] = 0.1 M.
Separations 10 00005 g009
Figure 10. Evaluation of the average current efficiency (ACE) and the energy consumed (EC) at the end of the AMP electrolysis using SS/PbO2, SS/TiO2/PbO2 and B-doped SS/TiO2/PbO2 anodes.
Figure 10. Evaluation of the average current efficiency (ACE) and the energy consumed (EC) at the end of the AMP electrolysis using SS/PbO2, SS/TiO2/PbO2 and B-doped SS/TiO2/PbO2 anodes.
Separations 10 00005 g010
Table 1. XPS data of different chemical states of O and Pb elements on the surface of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes.
Table 1. XPS data of different chemical states of O and Pb elements on the surface of SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B electrodes.
ElectrodeBinding Energy (eV)O1s Organic
(Atom%)
O1s Lattice
(Atom%)
O1s Defective (Atom%)O1s Lattice/O1s Defective (Atom%)Pb4f7/2/O1s Defective (Atom%)
O1s LatticePb4f7/2
SS/TiO2/PbO2 529.69138.8716.074.444.061.093.70
SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B529.52138.7117.374.983.631.374.32
Table 2. EIS parameters obtained from fitting the electrical equivalent circuit on the experimental data of SS/PbO2, SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes.
Table 2. EIS parameters obtained from fitting the electrical equivalent circuit on the experimental data of SS/PbO2, SS/TiO2/PbO2 and SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B anodes.
SS/PbO2SS/TiO2/PbO2SS/TiO2/PbO2-10%B
Rs (Ω cm2)480.664.71104.5
Q coating (S sn cm−2)5.80 × 10−64.59 × 10−622.8 × 10−6
n10.590.68
R coating (Ω cm2)68.48659435.9
Qdl (S sn cm−2)16.8 × 10−686.6 × 10−674.3 × 10−6
n0.860.620.65
Rct (Ω cm2)3.18 × 1063.76 × 1045.64 × 104
W4.01 × 10−61.02 × 104-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ben Osman, Y.; Hajjar-Garreau, S.; Berling, D.; Akrout, H. Elaboration of Highly Modified Stainless Steel/Lead Dioxide Anodes for Enhanced Electrochemical Degradation of Ampicillin in Water. Separations 2023, 10, 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10010005

AMA Style

Ben Osman Y, Hajjar-Garreau S, Berling D, Akrout H. Elaboration of Highly Modified Stainless Steel/Lead Dioxide Anodes for Enhanced Electrochemical Degradation of Ampicillin in Water. Separations. 2023; 10(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10010005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ben Osman, Yasmine, Samar Hajjar-Garreau, Dominique Berling, and Hanene Akrout. 2023. "Elaboration of Highly Modified Stainless Steel/Lead Dioxide Anodes for Enhanced Electrochemical Degradation of Ampicillin in Water" Separations 10, no. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10010005

APA Style

Ben Osman, Y., Hajjar-Garreau, S., Berling, D., & Akrout, H. (2023). Elaboration of Highly Modified Stainless Steel/Lead Dioxide Anodes for Enhanced Electrochemical Degradation of Ampicillin in Water. Separations, 10(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations10010005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop