Next Article in Journal
Tutorial Action and Emotional Development of Students as Elements of Improved Development and Preventing Problems Related with Coexistence and Social Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
The Development of a BMI-Guided Shape Morphing Technique and the Effects of an Individualized Figure Rating Scale on Self-Perception of Body Size
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students’ Outcomes

by
Katherine Dowling
* and
Margaret M. Barry
Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91TK33 Galway, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2020, 10(2), 595-614; https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020044
Submission received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 / Published: 22 May 2020

Abstract

School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs can be effective in producing positive outcomes for students. However, when the implementation quality is poor, these programs often lose their effectiveness and fail to produce the expected positive outcomes. The current study evaluates a school-based SEL program for 15–18-year-olds in Ireland by determining the impact of implementation quality on program outcomes. The study also examines the effects on outcomes of different implementation dimensions including Dosage, Adherence, Quality of Delivery, and Participant Responsiveness. Employing a cluster randomized controlled trial design, this study collected student outcome data (n = 675) from 32 disadvantaged schools across three time points (pre-, post-, 12-month follow-up) and compared these data across three treatment groups (high-implementation, low-implementation, and control). Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to determine the relationships between the implementation data and student outcome data longitudinally. The findings revealed that the positive effects of the program were only observed with the high-, but not the low-implementation group (reduced suppression of emotions (p = 0.049); reduced avoidance coping (p = 0.006); increased social support coping (p = 0.009); reduced levels of stress (p = 0.035) and depressive symptoms (p = 0.025). The comparison of implementation dimensions revealed that only Quality of Delivery had a significant effect on all of the tested outcomes. This study highlights the importance of high-quality implementation in producing positive outcomes and supports the need to evaluate implementation using multiple dimensions.
Keywords: social and emotional learning; school-based programs; implementation quality; randomized controlled trial; mental health and well-being social and emotional learning; school-based programs; implementation quality; randomized controlled trial; mental health and well-being

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dowling, K.; Barry, M.M. The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students’ Outcomes. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2020, 10, 595-614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020044

AMA Style

Dowling K, Barry MM. The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students’ Outcomes. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 2020; 10(2):595-614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020044

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dowling, Katherine, and Margaret M. Barry. 2020. "The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students’ Outcomes" European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 10, no. 2: 595-614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020044

APA Style

Dowling, K., & Barry, M. M. (2020). The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students’ Outcomes. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(2), 595-614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020044

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop