Next Article in Journal
Detection and Location of Model-Plant Mismatch in Multiple Input Multiple Output Systems under Model Predictive Controller Using Granger Causality Method
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of a Single Blade Incidence Angle Offset on Adjacent Blades in a Linear Cascade
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Equivalent Circuit Establishments of a GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistor and 635 nm Laser Diode for a Short-Pulsed Rising Current Simulation

1
Undergraduate Program of Vehicle and Energy Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 10610, Taiwan
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City 10607, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(11), 1975; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111975
Submission received: 11 August 2021 / Revised: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 22 October 2021 / Published: 4 November 2021

Abstract

:
In this paper, a dynamic operational linear regulator (DOLR) based on a GaN high-electron-mobility transistor (HEMT) and wide-bandwidth operational amplifier was developed and implemented. The driving current could be regulated and controlled by the DOLR for 632 nm laser diodes. The constant-current mode for the continuous-wave laser and the pulse-width modulation (PWM) mode for the short-pulsed laser were realizable using this DOLR. This study focused on the rising-edge time change on the laser driving current when the DOLR was operated under the high-frequency PWM mode, because the parasitic components on the GaN HEMT, laser diodes, printed circuit board, and power wires could influence the current’s dynamic behavior. Therefore, the equivalent circuit models of the laser diode and GaN HEMT were applied to establish a DOLR simulation circuit in order to observe the rising-edge time change on the laser driving current. A DOLR prototype was achieved, and so experimental waveform measurements could be implemented to verify the DOLR simulation and operation.

1. Introduction

GaN semiconductor devices can implement higher-frequency operation than conventional Si-based semiconductor devices because two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) can be formed inside GaN semiconductor devices. Two-dimensional electron gas has high electron mobility, which accelerates electronic conduction in lateral GaN semiconductor devices. Because of the epitaxial growth of GaN layers on Si, SiC, or sapphire substrates, the electric field occurs on the surface of a lateral active layer. Therefore, laterally configured GaN semiconductor devices can withstand a rating voltage of <650 V; however, a new cascode GaN-FET (field-effect transistor) raised the withstand voltage to 900 V [1,2].
“Laser” is a word formed from the initial letters of “light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation”. According to the various materials used for configuration, lasers can be classified as semiconductor lasers, fiber lasers, gas lasers, or solid-state lasers. Figure 1 illustrates a simple semiconductor laser configuration. In Figure 1, the active layer of the laser semiconductor is the second p-type semiconductor, which is placed in between the first p-type and n-type semiconductors. The first p-type semiconductor can be regarded as the positive (+) electrode, while the bottom of the n-type semiconductor can be regarded as the negative (−) electrode. When the positive/negative electrodes apply the electric field, the active layer can be excited to emit a stream of light that can be amplified by mirror surfaces to enhance emitting a laser beam [3]. When a power source is applied to the positive/negative electrodes and the laser semiconductor is in forward-bias operation, the electrons from the n-type semiconductor are injected into the second p-type semiconductor, and the wide bandgap of the heteroisolation junction between the first and second p-type semiconductors can restrict the amount of electron compounding in the active layer; as a result of the carrier confinement, the population inversion probabilities can be increased to promote high-intensity light emission [4].
Semiconductor lasers are equipped with several excellent characteristics, such as monochromaticity, high directionality, high coherence, and high energy density. Diode lasers with wavelengths of 635 nm have been applied to noncontact treatments such as photodynamic therapy groups for toluidine blue and the stability of orthodontic mini-implants [5,6].
Table 1 lists relevant studies on optoelectronic semiconductors with linear regulators. In the literature [7,8,9,10], light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were typically used as the light source, and bipolar junction transistors (BJT) and metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFET) were used as the linear regulators. Only in [11] was a GaN HEMT used. In addition, in [11], a dimming function was implemented using pulse-width modulation (PWM) with a frequency of <2 kHz.
Optical output power adjustment for a laser diode (LD) is similar to illumination dimming for LEDs. Therefore, in this study, high-frequency PWM and constant-current modes were implemented to adjust the optical output power of a laser diode; the PWM frequency was adjustable to 200 kHz, while the minimum short-pulsed time was 2 µs to reach the maximum operating current.
LEDs associated with GaN materials have many benefits, such as high luminous efficiency, low energy consumption, long operation lifetime, and broad spectral range. Hence, GaN-based LEDs have been applied usefully in disinfection, automotive front lighting, solid-state lighting, and full-color displays [12,13,14,15]. Moreover, combinations of GaN devices and laser diodes have been used in a few practical applications, such as photoconductive semiconductor switches, light detection and ranging (LIDAR) systems, and plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy systems [16,17,18].

2. Equivalent Circuits of Laser Diode and GaN HEMT

2.1. Laser Diode

A laser diode with a wavelength of 635 nm (model number: HL63193MG, Oclaro Inc., San Jose, CA, United States) was used in this study, the specifications of which are listed in Table 2 [19].
The physical configuration and equivalent circuit (EC) of the laser diode are illustrated in Figure 2. In Figure 2a, Tld1 and Tld2 are the metal terminals. The outside of the physical configuration could connect with the power source to drive the laser chip. The inside of the physical configuration here included the p-contact, n-contact, bonding wires, active layer, and substrate.
In Figure 2b, the equivalent circuit of the laser diode is depicted. It had package and chip parasitic components. The package parasitic components included the bonding wire resistance Rpld, bonding wire inductance Lpld, and extracted submount capacitance Cpld. The chip parasitic components included the intrinsic diode Dcld, chip resistance Rcld, and chip electrode capacitance Ccld [20,21]; the diode property is presented using Dcld.

2.2. GaN HEMT

The GaN HEMT device used was a GS61004B (GaN Systems Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada); Table 3 lists its specifications.
The physical configuration and equivalent circuit of the GaN HEMT are illustrated in Figure 3. A particular package (flat no-lead package) was developed and used for the GaN HEMT from the design of GaN Systems Inc; using this physical package, the intrinsic parasitic inductance was reduced. Figure 3a illustrates the physical package configuration, and Figure 3b is the GaN HEMT equivalent circuit. The electrical components included a substrate, Si substrate, GaN buffer layer, two-dimensional electron gas channel, AlGaN buffer layer, p-GaN contact, gate, drain, source electrodes, the bottom of the chip package, and contact pads [22,23].
The equivalent circuit of the GaN HEMT had intrinsic and extrinsic parts, as shown in Figure 3b [24,25,26,27]. The intrinsic part components included the resistances (Rgs and Rds), capacitance (Cds), and dependent current source (gmvg); gm is the transconductance value, and vg is the across voltage on Cgs. The extrinsic part components include the inductances (Lpd, Lpg, and Lps), capacitances (Cpd and Cpg), and resistances (Rpd, Rpg, and Rps).
Because of the air–bridge source connection, the pad connection, electrode, and cross capacitance formed the Cpd and Cpg. The parasitic resistances (Rpd, Rpg, and Rps) represent the contact resistance and semiconductor bulk resistance on the drain, gate, and source terminals. The parasitic inductances (Lpd, Lpg, and Lps) are at the GaN HEMT with contact pads on the bottom of the chip packages.
The gate electrode and drain-source channel formed the parallel-plate capacitance Cgs. The drain and source electrodes were installed along the two-dimensional electron gas channel, which formed Cds and Cgd. Rds is a channel resistance between the drain and source terminals.

3. Dynamic Operational Linear Regulator

Figure 4 is the circuit block diagram of the DOLR based on the GaN HEMT controlling the 635 nm-wavelength laser diode. The DOLR included the operational amplifier (OP), current buffer, GaN HEMT, current detection resistance (Rcs), and the differential amplifier. The control circuit of the DOLR included the microcontroller unit (MCU), voltage buffer, integral circuit, GaN HEMT off switch (GHOS), and GHOS driver; the three laser diodes (La1, La2, and La3) could be controlled by the DOLR.
PWM ports 1 and 2 of the MCU output two signals (Vpwm1 and Vpwm2). The integral circuit could transfer the PWM voltage Vpwm2 to become a direct-current (DC) voltage. Via the voltage buffer preventing the loading effect, that DC voltage can be regarded as a reference voltage Viref for stabilizing the laser diode operating current Irld. The OP could compare the differential amplifier output voltage (Vda) with Viref to control the GaN HEMT. In order to enhance the driving ability of the OP output for Vop, the current buffer was used for the GaN HEMT turning-on operation. Then, the operating current of La1 to La3 could be controlled by the DOLR.
The drain–source channel resistance of the GaN HEMT could be regulated by the DOLR to control the drain terminal current. In addition, a short-pulsed current can be fulfilled from a high-frequency’s Vpwm1. Therefore, the high-bandwidth component must be used for the differential amplifier and current buffer.
The driving ability of Vpwm1 could be enhanced by the GHOS driver, as Vpwm1 synchronizing with Vghos could control the GHOS turning on/off to further manipulate the GaN HEMT. When Vghos was at the high-voltage level, the GHOS was turned on; then, the gate terminal of the GaN HEMT would become the low-voltage level, which is less than the threshold voltage, resulting in the GaN HEMT turning off. When Vghos was the low-voltage level, the GHOS could be turned off; then, the gate terminal of the GaN HEMT would become a high-voltage level, because the OP output voltage Vop through the current buffer could control the GaN HEMT. Meanwhile, the DOLR could be controlled to regulate Irld.

3.1. DOLR Device List

Table 4 lists the practical devices used for the DOLR shown in Figure 3.

3.2. DOLR Specification

The DOLR’s specifications are listed in Table 5.

3.3. Simulation Circuit

The circuit simulation software POWERSIM (Powersim Inc., Rockville, MD, United States) was used. Based on Figure 4 and considering the parasitic components, the circuit block diagram of the simulation circuit is illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5 depicts the parasitic components from the printed circuit board and power source. Lpcb1, Lpcb2, Lpcb3, and Lpcb4 are the parasitic wire inductances; Rpcb1, Rpcb2, Rpcb3, and Rpcb3 are parasitic wire resistances; Lpcb1 and Rpcb1 are on the printed circuit board between Tg_g and the current buffer; Lpcb2 and Rpcb2 are on the printed circuit board between Tg_g and the GHOS; Lpcb3 and Rpcb3 are on the printed circuit board between Tg_s and Rcs; and Lpcb4 and Rpcb4 are on the printed circuit board between Tg_d and the third laser diode equivalent circuit of the cathode terminal Tk3.
The parasitic wire inductance and resistance on the power cable of the DOLR supply power (Vsp) were also considered. The parasitic wire inductance and resistance on the printed circuit board are Lpw and Rpw, respectively; the parasitic inductance from the Vsp is the Lpp. Lpw, Rpw, and Lpp were connected in series between Vsp and the anode terminal (Ta1) of the first laser diode equivalent circuit.

3.4. Parameter Considerations and Calculations for GaN HEMT

Because the physical package of the GaN HEMT (GS61004B) used a new preplated Au configuration rather than the conventional bonding wire, the parasitic inductances between the three electrodes (gate, source, and drain) and contact pads [28,29] were reduced. From [29,30], these parameter values were referenced, including Lpd = 1.3 nH, Lpg = 1.2 nH, and Lps = 0.45 nH; moreover, Rpd = Rpg = Rps = 1 mΩ was assumed. According to the GS61004B specification list in Table 3, Rgs = 0.9 Ω, Rds = 27 mΩ, Cgs = 295 pF, Cgd = 6.2 pF, and Cds = 133.8 pF.
The parameter gm was the rate of change from the drain-to-source current ids (Figure 3b) and gate-to-source voltage Vgs [31,32]. gm was calculated and expressed as
g m = Δ i d s / Δ v g s
From the GS61004B datasheet [22], the ids and vgs values were found on the device’s characteristic curve; therefore, both (4 V, 61 A) and (3 V, 39 A) could be substituted into (1) to obtain gm = 22 S.
From [17,18], Cpd and Cpg were tiny, at approximately 10−15 F; therefore, this study assumed Cpd = Cpg = 1 pF.

3.5. Parasitic Components on Printed Circuit Board

In this study, the copper wire on the printed circuit board was regarded as a rectangular conductor to evaluate the resistance and inductance values. From [33], the inductance of a rectangular conductor can be calculated and expressed as
L p c b = 0 . 2 m × l × { ln [ 2 l / ( w + h ) ] + [ 2 . 35 m × ( w + h ) / l ] + 0 . 5 }
where l, w, and h, represent the length, width, and thickness of the rectangular conductor, respectively. The length, width, and thickness units are millimeters (mm); the inductance Lpcb unit is the microhenry (μH). In this paper, the copper conductor thickness was 0.035 mm. Moreover, the parasitic resistance of the copper conductor on the printed circuit board can be calculated and expressed as
Rpcb = Rpw = ξ × l/A
where ξ represents the resistivity (in the present study, ξ = 1.73 × 10−5 Ω-mm at 20 °C) and A is the cross-sectional area of the copper conductor (A = w × h).
In the GaN HEMT turning-on loop (Figure 5), the parasitic components on the printed circuit board were Lpcb1 and Rpcb1. In the GaN HEMT turning-off loop, the parasitic components on the printed circuit board were Lpcb2 and Rpcb2. Because the copper wire in the GaN HEMT turning-on loop had a length of 49.5 mm and a width of 1.5 mm, substituting the length = 49.5 mm and the width = 1.5 mm into (2) and (3) led to Rpcb1 = 16 mΩ and Lpcb1 = 46.2 nH. Moreover, because the copper wire in the GaN HEMT turning-off loop had a length of 42 mm and a width of 1.5 mm, substituting the length = 42 mm and the width = 1.5 mm into (2) and (3) led to Rpcb2 = 13.2 mΩ and Lpcb2 = 37.5 nH.
A copper wire between Tg_s and Rcs on the printed circuit board had a length of 27.3 mm and a width of 5.5 mm; substituting the length = 27.3 mm and width = 5.5 mm into (2) and (3) led to Lpcb3 = 15.9 nH and Rpcb3 = 2.5 mΩ. Moreover, the practical Rcs was 100 mΩ.
The copper wire between the Tg_d and the third laser diode equivalent circuit on the printed circuit board had a length of 1 mm and a width of 1 mm; substituting length = 1 mm and width = 1 mm into (2) and (3) led to Lpcb4 = 8.9 nH and Rpcb4 = 6.1 mΩ.
The power wire was connected to the first laser diode equivalent circuit with Vcc. Because the power wire can be regarded as a cylindrical conductor, according to [33,34], its parasitic inductance can be calculated and expressed as
L p w = 2 l w × { ln [ ( 2 l w / d ) × ( 1 + 1 + ( d / 2 l w ) 2 ] 1 + ( d / 2 l w ) 2 + ( β / 4 ) + ( d / 2 l w )
where lw and d represent the length and diameter of the power wire (cm); β represents the relative permeability of copper (β was set to 1 in this paper), and the units of Lpw are nanohenries (nH). In this study, the power wire had lw = 20 cm and d = 0.2 cm; substituting lw = 20 cm and d = 0.2 cm into (3) and (4), Lpw = 209.9 nH and Rpw = 2.7 mΩ can be obtained. Moreover, the parasitic inductance Lpp inside Vcc was also considered, and Lpp was set as 1.2 μH.

4. Circuit Simulation and Experiment

The simulation circuit using the PSIM is shown in Figure 6. The simulation results are presented in Figure 7. In Figure 7, Vpwm1 is the GHOS operating signal, Viref is the reference voltage for the constant-current operation, Vgs is the gate-to-source voltage of the GaN HEMT, and Irld is the operating current for the three laser diodes.
In the present study, Vpwm1 was zero, which represented no PWM signal. When Viref was 0.4 V, the Vgs of the DOLR could be controlled to regulate Irld and maintain it at 0.4 A, as shown in Figure 7a. When Viref was 0.8 V, the Vgs of the DOLR could be controlled to regulate Irld and maintain it at 0.8 A, as shown in Figure 7b. Figure 7 displays results for a simulation of the constant-current mode operation of the DOLR.
Figure 8 shows results for the simulation the PWM-mode operation of the DOLR. The frequency of Vpwm1 was 200 kHz, Viref was 0.8 V, and Irld spent 2.2 µs rising to the rated operating current at 0.8 A. In Figure 8a–c, the short-pulsed times of Irld were 2.25, 3, and 4 µs, respectively.
In accordance with Figure 4, critical experimental waveforms are presented in Figure 9and Figure 10, including Vpwm1, Viref, Vgs, and Irld.
In the experimental waveform shown in Figure 9a, when the microcontroller unit stopped outputting the PWM signal from the PWM port 1, Vpwm1 was a low voltage level. When Viref was set at 0.4 V, Vgs could be regulated to control the GaN HEMT; hence, Irld was operated in the constant current of 0.4 A. In the experimental waveform shown in Figure 9b, Vpwm1 was also at a low voltage level; however, Viref was set at 0.8 V, Vgs could be regulated to control the GaN HEMT, and Irld could be operated in the constant current of 0.8 A.
In the experimental waveform shown in Figure 10, the PWM mode was implemented for the laser diodes. Irld could be operated in different PWMs. Because the microcontroller unit outputted the PWM signal from the PWM port 1, Vpwm1 became a pulse signal, and both Vgs and Irld followed the change of Vpwm1. Viref was set at 0.8 V, and the rising time of Irld was 2 µs to reach the maximum operating 0.8 A. In Figure 10a–c, the duty cycle ratios of the PWMs were 40% (2 µs/5 µs), 60% (3 µs/5 µs), and 80% (4 µs/5 µs), respectively.
The DOLR prototype driving the three 635 nm laser diodes is shown in Figure 11.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a GaN HEMT was incorporated with wide-bandwidth operational amplifiers to achieve a DOLR. Three 635 nm laser diodes were controlled by the DOLR; therefore, the laser diodes could be operated in the PWM mode to achieve a short-pulsed laser or in the constant-current mode to achieve a continuous-wave laser. In order to understand the operating current changes in laser diodes, this study used the equivalent circuits of the laser diode and GaN HEMT to simulate DOLR operations and observe the critical waveforms. From the simulations and experimental results, it was concluded that the operating current of the laser diode was influenced by critical factors including the device parasitic components and PCB layout. Using the developed DOLR prototype, three 635 nm laser diodes were controlled to achieve short-pulsed and continuous-wave lasers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.-J.P. and C.-H.L.; Methodology, K.-J.P.; Validation, K.-J.P.; Formal Analysis, K.-J.P.; Investigation, K.-J.P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, K.-J.P.; Writing—Review and Editing, K.-J.P. and C.-H.L.; Supervision, K.-J.P.; Project Administration, K.-J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grant numbers: MOST 1102221E003007, MOST 110-2221-E-011-081, and MOST 1082221E003028–MY2).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data presented in the article are stored according to institutional requirements and, as such, are not available online. However, all data used in this Manuscript can be made available upon request to the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, for supplying a research fund. Moreover, this article was subsidized by the National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU), Taiwan. Furthermore, the authors sincerely appreciate the great support from the Taiwan Building 302 Technology Center from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the 303 Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, J.; Gu, L.; Ye, Z.; Kargarrazi, S.; Rivas-Davila, J. Cascode GaN/SiC: A wide-bandgap heterogenous power device for high-frequency applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2020, 35, 6340–6349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lyu, G.; Wang, Y.; Wei, J.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, K. A normally-off copackaged SiC-JFET/GaN-HEMT cascode device for high-voltage and high-frequency applications. IEEE Trans. Power Elect. 2020, 35, 9669–9679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Keyence Inc. Laser Technical Guide; Application Note of Keyence Inc.: Itasca, IL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. USHIO Inc. Chip Structure and Lasing Modes; USHIO Opto Semiconductor: Tokyo, Japan, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Flieger, R.; Gedrange, T.; Grzech-Le’sniak, K.; Dominiak, M.; Matys, J. Low-level laser therapy with a 635 nm diode laser affects orthodontic mini-implants stability: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Tenore, G.; Palaia, G.; Migliau, G.; Mohsen, A.; Rocchetti, F.; Gaimari, G.; Impellizzeri, A.; Salapata, Y.; Berlutti, F.; Polimeni, A.; et al. Evaluation of photodynamic therapy using a diode laser 635 nm as an adjunct to conventional chemo-mechanical endodontic procedures against enterococcus faecalis biofilm: Ex-vivo study. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lohaus, L.; Rossius, A.; Dietrich, S.; Wunderlich, R.; Heinen, S. A dimmable LED driver with resistive DAC feedback control for adaptive voltage regulation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2015, 51, 3254–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, P.; Hsu, Y.; Hsu, S. Drain-voltage balance and phase-shifted PWM control schemes for high-efficiency parallel-string dimmable LED drivers. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2018, 65, 6168–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meraj, M.; Rahman, S.; Iqbal, A.; Ben-Brahim, L. High brightness and high voltage dimmable LED driver for advanced lighting system. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 95643–95652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martinez, H.; Saberkari, A. Linear-assisted DC/DC regulator-based current source for LED drivers. Electron. Lett. 2020, 52, 437–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lin, T.; Hsia, C. Integrated linear regulator for GaN-based gate driver applications. In Proceedings of the International Future Energy Electronics Conference (IFEEC), Singapore, 25–28 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu, H.; Tang, B.; Wan, H.; Sun, H.; Zhou, S.; Dai, J.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.; Guo, L. Boosted ultraviolet electroluminescence of InGaN/AlGaN quantum structures grown on high-index contrast patterned sapphire with silica array. Nano Energy 2020, 69, 104427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, S.; Liu, X.; Yan, H.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y.; Liu, S. Highly efficient GaN-based high-power flip-chip light-emitting diodes. Opt. Express 2019, 27, A669–A692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, S.; Liu, X.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, Z.; Gui, C.; Liu, S. Numerical and experimental investigation of GaN-based flip-chip light-emitting diodes with highly reflective Ag/TiW and ITO/DBR Ohmic contacts. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 26615–26627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, S.; Hu, H.; Liu, X.; Liu, M.; Ding, X.; Gui, C.; Liu, S.; Guo, L. Comparative study of GaN-based ultraviolet LEDs grown on different-sized patterned sapphire substrates with sputtered AlN nucleation layer. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 56, 111001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gaddy, M.; Kuryatkov, V.; Wilson, N.; Neuber, A.; Ness, R.; Nikishin, S. GaN-based PCSS with high breakdown fields. Electronics 2021, 10, 1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Z.; Yan, Y.; Shu, J.; Liu, K.; Qiu, J. Modulated high power and narrow pulse width laser drive circuit for lidar system. Electronics 2021, 10, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siekacz, M.; Muziol, G.; Turski, H.; Hajdel, M.; Zak, M.; Chlipala, M.; Sawicka, M.; Nowakowski-Szkudlarek, K.; Feduniewicz-Zmuda, A.; Smalc-Koziorowska, J.; et al. Vertical integration of nitride laser diodes and light emitting diodes by tunnel junctions. Electronics 2020, 9, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. OSRAM Opto Semi. Inc. Visible Laser Diodes; Datasheet of OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc.: Regensburg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu, N.; Chen, C.; Pun, E.; Chung, P. Extraction of intrinsic response from s-parameters of laser diodes. IEEE Photonics Lett. 2005, 17, 744–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, C.; Zhu, N.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y. Characterization of parasitics in to-packaged high-speed laser modules. IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag. 2007, 30, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. GaN Systems Inc. GS61004B 100V Enhancement Mode GaN Transistor; Datasheet of GaN Systems Inc.: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cova, P.; Delmonte, N.; Santoro, D. Power GaN FET boards thermal and electromagnetic optimization by FE modeling. Microelectron. Reliab. 2019, 100–101, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Essaadali, R.; Jarndal, A.; Kouki, A.; Ghannouchi, F. A new GaN HEMT equivalent circuit modeling technique based on x-parameters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2016, 64, 2758–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Avolio, G.; Raffo, A.; Angelov, I.; Crupi, G.; Caddemi, A.; Vannini, G.; Schreurs, D. Small-versus large-signal extraction of charge models of microwave FETs. IEEE Trans. Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2014, 24, 394–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Angelov, I.; Zirath, H.; Rorsman, N. A new empirical nonlinear model for HEMT and MESFET devices. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1992, 40, 2258–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dambrine, G.; Cappy, A.; Heliodore, F.; Playez, E. A new method for determining the FET small-signal equivalent circuit. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 1998, 36, 1151–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roberts, J. GaN Systems GS61004B GaN HEMT Complete Teardown Report 2018. ResearchAndMarkets.com. Available online: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180619005593/en/GaN-Systems-GS61004B-GaN-HEMT-Complete-Teardown (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  29. Barbarini, E. GaN Systems GS61004B 100V 45A GaN Transistor Power Semiconductor Report. System Plus Consulting. Available online: https://s3.i-micronews.com/uploads/2019/02/Yole_SP18391_GaN_Systems_GS61004B_sample_System_Plus_Consulting.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  30. Texas Instruments Inc. LMG1025-Q1: Gate Resistance Values Suggestion. System Plus Consulting. Available online: https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management/f/196/t/928978 (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  31. Bouchour, A.; Dherbécourt, P.; Oualkadi, A.; Latry, O. Parasitic elements extraction of the GaN HEMT packaged power transistors based on s-parameter measurements. In Proceedings of the ISAECT2020, Marrakech, Morocco, 25–27 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lakhdhar, H. Reliability Assessment of GaN HEMTs on Si Substrate with Ultra-Short Gate Dedicated to Power Applications at Frequency above 40 GHz. Ph.D. Thesis, University de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ardizzoni, J. A Practical Guide to High-Speed Printed-Circuit-Board Layout. Analog Dialogue 2005, 39, 1–6. Available online: https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/articles/high-speed-printed-circuit-board-layout.html (accessed on 3 July 2021).
  34. Wire Self Inductance Calculator. Available online: https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/wire-self-inductance-calculator/ (accessed on 3 July 2021).
Figure 1. Semiconductor laser configuration.
Figure 1. Semiconductor laser configuration.
Processes 09 01975 g001
Figure 2. Physical configuration and electrical equivalent circuit of semiconductor laser: (a) physical package diagram; (b) equivalent circuit and parasitic components.
Figure 2. Physical configuration and electrical equivalent circuit of semiconductor laser: (a) physical package diagram; (b) equivalent circuit and parasitic components.
Processes 09 01975 g002aProcesses 09 01975 g002b
Figure 3. Physical configuration package and electrical equivalent circuit of GaN HEMT: (a) physical GaNPX package; (b) equivalent circuit.
Figure 3. Physical configuration package and electrical equivalent circuit of GaN HEMT: (a) physical GaNPX package; (b) equivalent circuit.
Processes 09 01975 g003
Figure 4. Circuit block diagram of DOLR.
Figure 4. Circuit block diagram of DOLR.
Processes 09 01975 g004
Figure 5. Circuit block diagram of DOLR simulation.
Figure 5. Circuit block diagram of DOLR simulation.
Processes 09 01975 g005
Figure 6. Simulation circuit of DOLR.
Figure 6. Simulation circuit of DOLR.
Processes 09 01975 g006
Figure 7. Simulations of the DOLR operating in constant-current mode. Irld was equal to: (a) 0.4 A; (b) 0.8 A.
Figure 7. Simulations of the DOLR operating in constant-current mode. Irld was equal to: (a) 0.4 A; (b) 0.8 A.
Processes 09 01975 g007aProcesses 09 01975 g007b
Figure 8. Simulations of PWM-mode operation of the DOLR. The short-pulsed times of Irld were: (a) 2.25 µs; (b) 3 µs; (c) 4 µs.
Figure 8. Simulations of PWM-mode operation of the DOLR. The short-pulsed times of Irld were: (a) 2.25 µs; (b) 3 µs; (c) 4 µs.
Processes 09 01975 g008aProcesses 09 01975 g008b
Figure 9. Irld operated in constant currents of: (a) 0.4 A; (b) 0.8 A.
Figure 9. Irld operated in constant currents of: (a) 0.4 A; (b) 0.8 A.
Processes 09 01975 g009
Figure 10. Experimental waveforms for different PWM duty cycle ratios: (a) 40%; (b) 60%; (c) 80%.
Figure 10. Experimental waveforms for different PWM duty cycle ratios: (a) 40%; (b) 60%; (c) 80%.
Processes 09 01975 g010aProcesses 09 01975 g010b
Figure 11. A DOLR prototype driving three 635 nm laser diodes.
Figure 11. A DOLR prototype driving three 635 nm laser diodes.
Processes 09 01975 g011
Table 1. Crucial technology of linear regulators.
Table 1. Crucial technology of linear regulators.
Citation[7][8][9][10][11]This Study
Light sourceLEDLEDLEDLEDNot mentioned (NM)Laser diode
TransistorMOSFETMOSFETBJTBJTGaN
HEMT
GaN
HEMT
Dimming methodPWMPWMPWMPWMUndescribedUndescribed
Optical power
adjustment
NMNMNMNMNMPWM and
constant-current
PWM frequency (Hz)1k0.4k2kNMNM200k
Minimum
short-pulsed time
NMNMNMNMNM2 µs
Table 2. Laser diode specifications.
Table 2. Laser diode specifications.
DescriptionSpecification
Device packageTO−52
Wavelength range632 to 643 nm
Operating voltage range2.2 to 2.6 V
Maximum operating current1 A
Optical output power700 mW (at −10 to 30 °C and 1 A)
Table 3. GaN HEMT device specifications.
Table 3. GaN HEMT device specifications.
ParameterSpecificationUnit
PackageGaNPX package
Drain–source withstand voltage100V
Turning-on drain–source resistance16
Drain–source threshold voltage1.7V
Internal gate resistance0.9Ω
Input capacitance (Ciss)260pF
Output capacitance (Coss)110pF
Reverse transfer capacitance (Crss)5pF
Table 4. DOLR component list.
Table 4. DOLR component list.
ComponentModel Number
Microcontroller unitS9S12G48F1MLC: NXP Semiconductors, AG Eindhoven, Netherlands
Voltage bufferLM258: Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, TX, United States
Integral circuitResistors and capacitors using surface mount devices
OP, current buffer anddifferential amplifierLT1818CS8#TRPBF: Analog Devices, Wilmington, Massachusetts, United States
GHOS and its driverTPS2819: Texas Instruments Inc., Dallas, TX, United States
PD84002: STMicroelectronics, Geneve, Switzerland
GaN HEMTGS61004B
Current detection resistanceWSLT2512R1000FEA: Vishay Intertechnology Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States
Table 5. DOLR specifications.
Table 5. DOLR specifications.
DescriptionCircuit SymbolRange
Three laser diode operating voltagesVrld6.6 V
Laser diode operating currentIrld0–0.8 A
DOLR supply powerVsp7 V
PWM signal 1Vpwm15 V, 0 to 100%, 200 kHz
PWM signal 2Vpwm25 V, 5 V, 0 to 100%, 10 kHz
Reference voltageViref0 to 0.8 V
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pai, K.-J.; Lin, C.-H. Equivalent Circuit Establishments of a GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistor and 635 nm Laser Diode for a Short-Pulsed Rising Current Simulation. Processes 2021, 9, 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111975

AMA Style

Pai K-J, Lin C-H. Equivalent Circuit Establishments of a GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistor and 635 nm Laser Diode for a Short-Pulsed Rising Current Simulation. Processes. 2021; 9(11):1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pai, Kai-Jun, and Chang-Hua Lin. 2021. "Equivalent Circuit Establishments of a GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistor and 635 nm Laser Diode for a Short-Pulsed Rising Current Simulation" Processes 9, no. 11: 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop