Next Article in Journal
Efficient Simulation of Chromatographic Processes Using the Conservation Element/Solution Element Method
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution and Physical Characteristics of a Raceway Based on a Transient Eulerian Multiphase Flow Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Brooks and Corey Capillary Pressure Model Revisited from Pore Network Simulations of Capillarity-Controlled Invasion Percolation Process

1
Thermal Process Engineering, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
2
Chemical Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz 5-71993, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(10), 1318; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101318
Submission received: 22 September 2020 / Revised: 7 October 2020 / Accepted: 13 October 2020 / Published: 20 October 2020

Abstract

:
Relating the macroscopic properties of porous media such as capillary pressure with saturation is an on-going problem in many fields, but examining their correlations with microstructural traits of the porous medium is a challenging task due to the heterogeneity of the solid matrix and the limitations of laboratory instruments. Considering a capillarity-controlled invasion percolation process, we examined the macroscopic properties as functions of matrix saturation and pore structure by applying the throat and pore network model. We obtained a relationship of the capillary pressure with the effective saturation from systematic pore network simulations. Then, we revisited and identified the microstructure parameters in the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model. The wetting phase residual saturation is related to the ratio of standard deviation to the mean radius, the ratio of pore radius to the throat length, and pore connectivity. The size distribution index in the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model should be more reasonably considered as a meniscus size distribution index rather than a pore size distribution index, relating this parameter with the invasion process and the structural properties. The size distribution index is associated with pore connectivity and the ratio of standard deviation to mean radius ( σ 0 / r ¯ ), increasing with the decline of σ 0 / r ¯ but the same for networks with same σ 0 / r ¯ . The identified parameters of the Brooks and Corey model might be further utilized for correlations with other transport properties such as permeability.

1. Introduction

Invasion percolation (IP), introduced by Wilkinson and Willemsen [1], provides a realistic description of the slow biphasic fluid displacement processes in porous materials. IP is relevant to various applications (such as secondary oil recovery) and was generally used to model a drainage process during which a wetting fluid is displaced by a non-wetting fluid [2]. IP was also used to model imbibition, where a wetting fluid invades a porous medium originally saturated by a non-wetting fluid [3]. Moreover, the IP algorithm was adapted to describe immiscible displacement in drying porous media [4].
Invasion percolation is driven by the capillary pressure Pc, which can be modeled with the normalized or effective wetting phase saturation as proposed by Brooks and Corey [5]:
S e = 1   ( P c P e )
S e = ( P e P c ) λ   ( P c P e )
where entry pressure Pe and Se denote the entry pressure and effective saturation, respectively. The scaling parameter λ denotes the pore size distribution index, which must be determined experimentally for each porous medium. The entry pressure (Pe) describes the minimum air pressure that needs to act on the liquid phase prevailing in the medium to allow the air to invade the porous medium. Se is a linear function of saturation S and is related to the residual saturation Sr (or, in the context of drying porous media, irreducible saturation), defined as:
S e = S S r 1 S r
The irreducible saturation Sr defines the amount of liquid that the medium with a given pore structure can retain. This liquid is held in the medium by capillary forces and cannot be removed by the capillary pressure.
To investigate whether the irreducible saturation is correlated with the microstructure of porous media, it may be worth making an analogy between the irreducible saturation in the capillarity-controlled invasion process and the mercury entrapment in porosimetry as these processes share common principles. In porosimetry, mercury cannot be retracted from a large pore unless a meniscus appears at one end of that pore so that mercury can penetrate to the surface. Thus, if a large pore is embedded in a network of fine pores, it remains full unless some fine pores evacuate at some lower extrusion pressure—this effect is referred to as shielding effect [6,7]. Portsmouth and Gladden [8] remarked that there is a characteristic entrapment of mercury for a network comprising Gaussian pore size distribution, which depends on the ratio of the standard deviation of the distribution to the mean pore radius—this ratio defines the shape of pore size distribution (PSD). Furthermore, Conner and Lane [9] performed analyses and have concluded that higher connectivity can yield lower entrapment of mercury. Other researchers have also disclosed the fact that topology of the medium and spatial correlations between pores and throats can influence porosimetry results [8,10,11]).
Nevertheless, the irreducible saturation does not have the same correlations with microstructural features as the mercury entrapment. Isolated mercury from the bulk of the network is forced to move if the Laplace equation is fulfilled along with the continuous decreasing of the non-wetting phase pressure. That is to say, the mercury in sites surrounded with narrow void spaces is trapped in the medium when the Laplace equation is not satisfied. However, this situation is different in capillarity-controlled invasion processes. For instance, in slow isothermal drying an isolated liquid cluster is considered as stationary when the liquid in this cluster cannot move into neighbor clusters by improving the capillary pressure that acts on the network, but the liquid can continuously be reduced by evaporation so that the moisture is transported through the vapor phase. Neglecting evaporation at the isolated clusters would mean that the liquid in the isolated clusters is not reducible because these clusters are surrounded by the gas phase saturated with vapor. In such situation, the residual saturation in the network represents the saturation for which liquid can be transferred by the capillary pressure out of the porous medium. Thus, mercury porosimetry can provide information on the geometry and topology within the porous medium, but the irreducible saturation indicates a transport property.
In addition to the irreducible saturation, the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model also requires the entry pressure Pe (or bubbling pressure). The entry pressure, as defined by White et al. [12] is the capillary pressure at the inflection point on the capillary pressure–saturation (Pc-S) curve, where the value of dPc/dS is a minimum at high saturation. Early numerical studies conducted at the pore scale show that the entry pressure depends on the interplay of the pore geometry and wettability of the porous medium (see, e.g., [13] and references therein). Furthermore, on the basis of pore-scale simulations, Raeini et al. [14] suggested that the entry pressure increases as the pore body to pore throat contraction ratio increases. Ferrari and Lunati [15] assumed perfect water-wet conditions, similar to Raeini et al. [14] but contrary to Rabbani et al. [13], and conducted two-phase flow numerical simulations. The results of which indicate that the entry pressure is marginally dependent on the viscosity ratio and capillary number.
The pore size distribution index of the network is also an essential parameter of the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model, which represents the heterogeneity of the porous medium. The heterogeneity can be characterized using a fractal model, which reflects the relationship between the number of pores and pore radii. Kewen [16] reported that the pore size distribution index increases with a decrease in the fractal dimension of the porous medium. Overall, many researchers reported the pore size distribution index as a specific value to express the fractal nature of pores in a porous medium under the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model [16,17]. However, the heterogeneity of the porous medium is poorly captured in this parameter. As can be seen from the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model, the pore size distribution index correlates the capillary pressure with the saturation. By contrast, the capillary pressure depends on the meniscus size distribution in the liquid cluster. Thus, it is worth reconsidering whether the pore size distribution index (as an index for network heterogeneity) can estimate the capillary pressure.
The Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model (Equations (1)–(3)) has been widely utilized for several decades in petroleum and other industries [18,19]. The fact that this model has a solid theoretical base has already been proven by using the fractal approach to porous media [16]. However, this model stands at the macroscopic level and thus neglects micro-scale morphological and topological information of a porous medium such as the heterogeneity of the pore size distribution and randomness in pore connectivity. Therefore, it is interesting to revisit the macroscopic parameters in the empirical equation of the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model and reveal the internal correlation of these parameters with the heterogeneity of porous media.
Experimental identification of relations between the macroscopic parameters (i.e., Sr, Pe, and λ) and the pore structure is not straightforward due to the difficulty in accessing the geometrical features of the porous medium. Another possibility is to utilize the opportunities offered by discrete mesoscale models, namely pore network models (PNMs). In pore network modeling, the void space of a porous medium is approximated by a network of connected throats and pores (herein called throat-pore model, TPM) and transport phenomena are described by unidirectional approximations at the level of individual throats and pores. Uses of PNMs for the computation of macroscopic parameters (such as permeability, relative permeability and capillary pressure curve) have already been elucidated in numerous previous studies (e.g., [20,21,22,23]) as well as in recent literature (e.g., [4,24,25,26,27,28]). Nevertheless, none of those works have systematically investigated the impact of pore structure on the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model parameters.
The objective of the present paper is to study the effect of network heterogeneity (i.e., mean throat/pore radius, throat/pore size distribution, and pore coordination number) on the parameters of the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model using TPM. The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, we introduce the TPM algorithm, which is based on the invasion percolation procedure with trapping, to calculate the capillary pressure, the entry capillary pressure, and the irreducible saturation. In Section 3, we present the correlation of these parameters with network heterogeneity. Moreover, we calculate the pore size distribution index through the reversed Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model, and reveal its relationship with the porous medium properties (morphology and topology). The paper ends with a summary and conclusions.

2. Model Description

The pore network model is constructed on a regular three-dimensional grid of spherical pores connected by cylindrical throats. The network size in the present work is 25 × 25 × 25. The connectivity of the network is arbitrarily varied from three to eight. Pores and throats are randomly distributed in the network by means of Gaussian probability distribution function. Figure 1 shows the throat/pore radius distribution in a network with throat mean radius 250 μm and standard deviation 25 μm. The pore radii are chosen such that the pore radius is larger or equal to the largest radius of neighbor throats. The center distance between two pores is fixed at 1000 µm. The throat length is calculated according to the radii of the two end pores.
It is assumed that all throats and pores are initially filled with free capillary water. A gas reservoir is located at the top of the network (inlet). At the bottom, the network is connected to a water reservoir (outlet) (Figure 2). Air invades from the top of the network by IP algorithm. Periodic boundary conditions are applied to the lateral faces of the network. The effects of gravity and liquid viscosity are neglected in this study. Thus, capillary forces completely control the fluid configurations.
Network representation by the throat-pore model means that the invasion process happens at menisci throats and pores. Only the invasion process at throats is however considered in the throat-node model, assuming perfect water-wet conditions (contact angle is 0°) [4,24,29,30]. The liquid transition between pore and throat is neglected in the current work. Once a throat meniscus reaches the entrance of a pore, perfect piston-like meniscus movement is also assumed in the pore invasion step, whereby thermodynamic equilibrium is considered. This is because Tsakiroglou and Payatakes [10] illustrated that mercury menisci could reach equilibrium not only at the entrance to the throat but also at the entrance to the pore. Here, we assumed that the pore radius is larger (or equal) than the radii of the neighbor throats, leading to smaller capillary pressure required for the air to invade into the pore. The Young–Laplace equation is traditionally used to estimate capillary pressure in menisci throats or pores:
P c = 2 σ r c o s θ
where θ is the equilibrium contact angle, σ (N/m) and r (m) stand for the liquid surface tension, the radius of the meniscus (where the throat radius is used for the meniscus throat, and the pore radius is assumed for the meniscus pore), respectively. The capillarity-controlled invasion percolation algorithm implemented here follows the original invasion percolation procedure proposed by Wilkinson and Willemsen [1]:
(1)
Initially, all the pores and throats are completely filled with water. Neglecting pressure difference due to liquid head, the liquid pressure in the network and the liquid reservoir are set to zero for simplicity, without affecting the final capillary–pressure relationship. The air pressure necessary for any of the interior throats to be displaced with air is computed. We use Equation (5) to find the pressure difference between air and water necessary for a meniscus to penetrate the throat:
P c = 2 σ r c o s θ
where P c (Pa) is the capillary pressure, P g (Pa) is the gas pressure and P l (Pa) denotes the liquid pressure. Thus, the capillary pressure is equal to the gas pressure.
The pores at the inlet reservoir do not contain liquid (Figure 2). Thus, the network initially has a meniscus in a throat with radius equal to the radius of that throat. Once a single throat gets unfilled of liquid, it forms a meniscus pore. The radius of the meniscus in the pore is considered as the radius of this pore due to the assumed pore body shape. Therefore, if a throat is unfilled of water, the adjacent downstream pore is also unfilled completely at the same time, creating new menisci at the other throat entrances (filled with water) attached to that pore body. Accordingly, the water phase in the attached throats becomes disintegrated at that pore.
(2)
For the menisci that have been formed in the previous step, the capillary threshold is calculated by Equation (4). The meniscus throats with the smallest capillary thresholds are detected.
(3)
The air pressure is increased to the smallest capillary threshold calculated in step 2 (called entry pressure Pe) to invade accessible throats with that threshold and create meniscus throats.
(4)
Once a meniscus pore is invaded, it forms the active capillary thresholds at neighbor throats, which still contain liquid. When a meniscus throat is invaded, it forms a new active meniscus pore. Hence, the newly formed menisci (meniscus throats/pores) are identified, along with calculating their capillary threshold pressures.
(5)
The network saturation is calculated by integrating all residual liquid volume in the network and dividing it by the total void space volume. The smallest capillary threshold pressure is then assigned to the gas pressure. This is one data point in the capillary pressure–saturation curve.
(6)
Due to the random radius distribution of throats/pores, the initially backbone liquid cluster may be divided into several liquid clusters (may be isolated from the bottom reservoir). We account for the number of liquid clusters by a variant of the Hoshen–Kopelman algorithm [31]. The invasion percolation happens simultaneously in each cluster, which is still connected to the liquid reservoir according to step 3. If the invading pressure is greater than the capillary threshold of any of them, they are also invaded.
(7)
This algorithm is repeated from steps 2 to 6 until the clusters get isolated from the liquid reservoir, which is connected to the network bottom. This means all the pores at the bottom layer are unfilled of water. The remaining liquid in the network is considered as the irreducible saturation.
The Monte Carlo method with 40 realizations is used to reduce the uncertainty of the reported parameters.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Wetting Phase Residual Saturation ( S r )

The wetting phase residual saturation shares the physical characteristics of mercury entrapment. In this regard, studies are reported in Section 1, which indicates that the mercury entrapment varies with the width of the pore size distribution as well as with the connectivity of the network. With this background, we simulated networks with different ranges of the mean radius, various widths of the pore size distribution as well as different averaged connectivity of pores. Figure 3 shows the wetting phase residual saturation as function of structural characteristics of the pore network structure exposed to the capillarity-controlled invasion percolation (IP) process.
A similar level of S r is observed in Figure 3a for the networks with an identical value of σ 0 / r ¯ = 0.1 and two different values of r ¯ = 10 µm and 100 µm. This may infer that S r is independent of the pore size. By contrast, different morphologies at σ 0 / r ¯ = 0.1 show that S r decreases with increase in the ratio of r ¯ p / L ¯ t (Figure 3a), the ratio r ¯ p / L ¯ t indicates the role of spherical pore volume in the capillary invasion process, corresponding to the ratio of the spherical pore volume over the volume of the cylindrical throat.
To study whether irreducible saturation has characteristics that are dependent on the shape of PSD, the value of the ratio of standard deviation over the mean radius ( σ 0 / r ¯ ) is also systematically varied. Figure 3a shows that S r decreases with increasing σ 0 / r ¯ . This result is contradictory with the results obtained by Portsmouth and Gladden [8], who reported the mercury entrapment increases when expanding the TSD. One should keep in mind that S r in the current work corresponds to that of a drying process that takes place under capillarity-controlled IP. When gas invades the network, the liquid phase splits up into several regions with different sizes, the so-called liquid clusters that consist of at least one nonempty throat connected to one nonempty pore, or even forms single liquid throats/pores surrounded by air, namely single menisci. The isolated clusters and single menisci, which are separated from the bottom reservoir, cannot be drained to the bottom reservoir by invasion percolation. The remaining liquid in these isolated clusters and single menisci could be removed by evaporation when a vapor pressure gradient is present in the porous medium. However, in the capillarity-controlled period of drying, the porous medium is saturated with vapor, which leads to the liquid in isolated clusters and single menisci being trapped in the porous medium. Thus, the isolated menisci clusters and single menisci are not of interest in the current work. Comparing the liquid before and after invasion in Figure 4, it can be seen that the majority of remaining liquid is trapped in throats with radii smaller than the mean radius. The mercury extrusion algorithm is different from the IP algorithm, which can partially describe the drying process since the trapped mercury could be reshaped by refilling the neighboring throats/pores, meeting the demands of the Laplace/Washburn equation [8]. Trapped mercury in the porous medium could express the shielding effect, being surrounded by the smallest throats in the network. The pore radius is assumed larger than the radius of neighbor throats, so that the pore could be trapped by the smaller throats. Therefore, the probability of mercury entrapment is enhanced by expanding the TSD. This might explain why values of S r simulated for the capillarity-controlled invasion process are contradictory with observations on the mercury entrapment from porosimetry. Regarding drying, Lai et al. [32] tested the irreducible saturation for six rock samples, showing that it decreases with increasing spread of TSD/PSD. Their observation indirectly validates our simulations.
The wetting phase residual saturation shows a positive linear correlation with the averaged pore connectivity in the network (Figure 3b). In each network, throats are randomly plugged, and the averaged connectivity is calculated by averaging the connectivities of all pores in the network. The pore connectivity affects the porosity of the network, as the porosity ( ε ) increases with plugging more throats onto a pore, which means that the void space increases during this procedure. Here, porosity is calculated as ε = V v o i d V t o t a l , where V v o i d is the void space of the porous medium and V t o t a l is the total volume of the porous medium.
Figure 4 depicts the volume distributions of liquid-filled throats and pores in a network at the initial stage (S = 1) and at the final stage ( S = S r ) with different r ¯ p / L ¯ t . At r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.01 , the pores contain a very small amount of liquid that can be neglected when compared with liquid stored in the throats (Figure 4a). The spherical pore volume contribution increases with increasing pore radius (from Figure 4a–d). By comparing the liquid-filled volumes before and after the invasion, the fraction of invaded pores is seen to be larger than that of invaded throats. This could demonstrate that the pores play a significant role when they store a large fraction of liquid volume in the porous medium. The effect of throat length has been reported by Sok et al. [33] based on stochastically generated networks with coordination number distribution (Z = 4) specified from Fontainebleau sandstone sample, showing that increasing the throat length leads to a contrary effect on the residual saturation.
Moreover, the porosity of network is calculated by dividing all void space volume by the total space volume that is assumed as constant, leading to an increase along with the pore connectivity. Such additional volume might overcome the effect of pore connectivity. Thus, normalized wetting phase residual saturation is proposed as the ratio of the wetting phase residual saturation to the unity of the porous porosity. Figure 5 exhibits the relation of wetting phase residual saturation within networks containing the same void space but possessing various pore connectivity. This is inversely proportional to the pore connectivity, which agrees with experimental observations by Ojha et al. [34]. Increasing pore connectivity provides more pathways for the liquid to expel the network. With increased pore connectivity, more throat menisci are formed in the network once one liquid pore has completely been invaded. As a result, it enhances the IP as more throat menisci provide more options for air invasion. Such observations can be supported by the percolation theory (see, e.g., [35,36]).
The residual saturation reported in the current work might be questioned for higher values than those reported by Sok et al. [33] and Ferreira et al. [37]. This discrepancy can partly be due to the fact that the present work does not account for the film effect. In fact, liquid films play a crucial role in the wetting phase residual saturation [37], because they reduce the resistance for liquid transport and thereby enhance the liquid hydraulic connectivity [38]. Another reason might be that the spread of size distributions in the present network simulations is smaller than in real porous media. Sok et al. [33] reported a pore volume range from 1 × 10−5 mm3 to 1 × 10−2 mm3 based on the structure of Fontainebleau sandstone. The enlarged TSD/PSD could decrease the irreducible saturation (see Figure 3).

3.2. The Entry Pressure (Pe)

In this section, we show that TSD and PSD play critical roles in entry pressure. Figure 6 shows the relation of entry pressure Pe and mean capillary pressure (Pc,mean) with the porous medium properties. The entry pressure is computed using the algorithm described in Section 2. The mean capillary pressure is calculated by the Young–Laplace equation (Equation (4)), averaging the throat and pore radii in the network with perfect wetting assumption. Here, the mean capillary pressure Pc,mean is a reference capillary pressure.
The networks in Figure 6a are generated for a constant standard deviation of the TSD/PSD and six different mean values of the TSD/PSD. As can be seen, Pe is close to the Pc,mean when the ratio 1/ r ¯ is small. A small value of the ratio standard deviation (i.e., 5 µm) to the mean radius means that the standard deviation has a weak impact on the radius distribution so that the network can be viewed as morphologically uniform. Figure 6b clearly indicates that the entry pressure is inversely proportional to the standard deviation. Networks with a wider distribution are more easily invaded by the air since the probability of having a larger meniscus at the interface is higher. Figure 6c shows that the entry pressure is not related to the connectivity for network coordination numbers smaller than 6. The entry pressure increases with connectivity slightly up to Z = 6, but decreases drastically at Z = 8. The reason might be that network structure is completely altered from cubic (Z = 3 to 6) to the octahedral (Z = 8). For the cubic based networks (Z = 3 to 6), the vertical surface throats are not altered and surface pores are connected with only one throat. However, three throats are connected with each surface pore for the octahedron network. As a result, the air more easily invades the octahedrons network, leading to a lower value of entry pressure. As a final remark in this section, one can note that the mean capillary pressure varies linearly with the ratio 1/ r ¯ but it remains uniform for various values of σ 0 and Z.

3.3. Evaluating Capillary Pressure-Effective Saturation

Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the variations of capillary pressure-effective saturation at various morphologies obtained from the pore network modeling (Section 2). Three microstructural parameters of the network are discussed: (1) mean throat/pore radius ( r ¯ ) (Figure 7), (2) standard deviation in PSD and TSD ( σ 0 ) (Figure 8), (3) pore connectivity (Z) (Figure 8). They all affect the capillary-saturation profile of a porous medium in the capillarity-controlled IP.
As can be seen in Figure 7, the capillary pressure strongly depends on the mean radius. With increasing mean radius, the value of capillary pressure decreases. This behavior is expected as the capillary pressure is inversely proportional to the mean radius according to the Young–Laplace equation (Equation (4)). Since the capillary pressure in the Brooks and Corey model is presented as a function of effective saturation, the saturation is converted into effective saturation (Se) using Equation (3). One can see that the overall behavior of the capillary pressure-effective saturation profiles obtained in this work agrees with the experimental measurements by Hilpert and Miller [39] and simulation observations by Sweijen et al. [40].
The role of two other structural parameters in the behavior of capillary pressure-saturation is presented in Figure 8. As shown, the capillary pressure is almost stable against the effective saturation for the network with a narrow pore size distribution. This might be the reason that narrow TSP/PSD confines radii in a small range. It can also be seen that the capillary pressure decreases with the increase in standard deviation when the mean radius is fixed. Figure 8b shows that the entry pressure (again, the minimum value of dPc/dSe when Se = 1) is almost the same for the networks with connectivity from three to six. The capillary pressure decreases with increasing pore connectivity. The reason is that a pore connected with more throats offers more selections for air invasion, allowing the capillary pressure to decline.

3.4. Evaluating the Pore Size Distribution Index (λ) Based on the Capillary Pressure-Effective Saturation

As we could obtain the capillary pressure-saturation profile, the irreducible saturation, and the entry pressure from the pore network simulations, we can evaluate the pore size distribution index by revisiting the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model.
Figure 9 shows that this evaluation results in a nonlinear profile rather than in a specific value. This infers that the pore size distribution index λ depends on the progress of the process (or the effective saturation). Now, it might be questioned whether the profile has a physical meaning. To address this question, first it should be noted that the pore size distribution index λ is a fitting parameter in the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model. A specific value of this parameter is classically determined by fitting to experimental data of capillary pressure for minimal statistical deviation. Brooks and Corey used this value to express the heterogeneity of a porous medium. However, the primary factor in controlling the capillary pressure is menisci radii distribution. The distribution of the menisci throats/pores radii becomes narrower during, for example, a drying process that follows invasion percolation rules. Additionally, the Brooks and Corey model correlates the capillary pressure with effective saturation. Effective saturation should though be understood as saturation that is controlled by the capillary pressure. In other words, effective saturation in the current work should only indicate saturation in the major clusters that are connected with the bottom reservoir. The isolated clusters and the single menisci should thus not be included in the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model. However, the smallest radius of throats/pores tends to be located in isolated clusters and single menisci (Figure 4). This means that the pore size distribution index of the entire network might not be a reasonable quantity for correlating the effective saturation with the capillary pressure.
Since the capillary pressure relies on the radii of menisci, which are still active at a certain effective saturation, an index that would represent the distribution of such menisci would be more accurate for the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model. Figure 10 is one example of the meniscus size distribution (the normalized meniscus size distribution) during the invasion process. At the initial moment, the standard deviation of menisci equals the standard deviation as assumed for the whole network. The standard deviation of menisci drops dramatically as the large throats are easily invaded, which corresponds to the strong rise of the capillary pressure in the high saturation range (Se ~ 1). Then, the menisci size distribution becomes gradually narrow with decreasing effective saturation along the invasion process. Finally, a sharp decline in the spread of the meniscus size distribution is observed when the effective saturation approaches zero (Se ~ 0). Kewen [16] found that the pore size distribution index increases with the decline in the fractal dimension (the heterogeneity) of the network. Figure 9 shows that the index is close to zero in the high saturation range, where the heterogeneity of the menisci is maximum. With ongoing invasion, the distribution of menisci becomes narrower, leading to a decline in the heterogeneity of the menisci. Thus, the index increases slowly during this period. The menisci radii are almost the same when Se ~ 0, meaning that the heterogeneity of the menisci is then minimum. Figure 9 also demonstrates the index soaring at the lower limit of effective saturation. Therefore, it would be more reasonable to consider the index as a meniscus size distribution index in the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model.
Figure 9 reveals the correlation of the conventionally defined meniscus size distribution index with the structural properties of the porous medium. The meniscus size distribution index is a function of the ratio σ 0 / r ¯ and pore connectivity. Figure 9a shows that almost the same profiles are observed for networks with identical σ 0 / r ¯ and the same connectivity. The index λ escalates with the decline of σ 0 / r ¯ (Figure 9b), which also agrees with Kewen [16]. The index λ is not sensitive upon pore connectivity. It increases when widening the pore connectivity from Z = 3 to Z = 6, but drops again for a pore connectivity of 8. This is similar to the behavior of entry pressure shown in Figure 6.

4. Summary and Conclusions

In this paper, we explored the influence of the morphology and topology of pore network on the macroscopic parameters (wetting phase residual saturation or irreducible saturation S r , entry pressure Pe, and the index parameter λ ) of the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model. For this purpose, pore network simulations were carried out for the limiting case of the capillarity-controlled invasion percolation process. This limiting case is relevant in processes such as drainage or slow early-stage drying.
According to our pore network simulation results, the irreducible saturation S r is not a function of the network pore/throat size but depends on the ratio standard deviation/mean radius ( σ 0 / r ¯ ), the ratio pore radius/throat length ( r p / L t ), and the pore connectivity (Z). The entry pressure Pe depends on the largest meniscus radius in the network. It is close to the mean capillary pressure for a network with narrow size distribution, and constant for a constant value of σ 0 / r ¯ . The entry pressure decreases with expanding pore size distribution, as well as at pore connectivity above six. The pore size distribution index λ in the Brooks and Corey capillary pressure model is easier to correlate with the meniscus size distribution profile, which depends on the invasion process and the structural properties. Profiles of the distribution index λ are related to the ratio σ 0 / r ¯ . They are the same for networks with the same σ 0 / r ¯ and are shifted upwards with the decline of σ 0 / r ¯ . Pore connectivity also plays a role in the distribution index. Moreover, the pore network simulations of the capillary pressure have led to results that are compatible with measurements of capillary pressure–effective saturation relationship conducted with water for porous media [39,40].
The capillary pressure profile can be further linked to the transport properties of two-phase flow, i.e., the relative permeability by Darcy’s law. Srikiatden and Roberts [23], as well as Joekar-Niasar and Hassanizadeh [41] pointed out that the nonlinear properties, i.e., capillary pressure-saturation and permeability-saturation, are critical for realistic modeling of two (or multi)-phase flow in porous media. Thus, evaluating the transition from the parameter of the capillary pressure-effective saturation profile to the profile of relative permeability over effective saturation could be a future research direction.
One should keep in mind that the present study only considered invasion percolation in the capillary controlled regime. This regime corresponds to situations where capillary pressures are very large compared to the average viscous pressure drops due to the fluid flow. However, the gravity force, liquid viscosity, as well as the secondary capillary structures (rings, films, etc.) can play significant roles in biphasic fluid displacement processes such as drying [40,41,42,43,44]. Additionally, correlating more microstructure aspects of the porous medium with the macroscopic parameters deserves to be considered for further investigation. Moreover, pore network simulations presented in this work deserve to be appraised by experimental results on a real object, e.g., a three-dimensional printed structure.

Author Contributions

X.L.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing—original draft. A.K.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resource, Supervision, Writing—review & editing. H.A.: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—review & editing. E.T.: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financed by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Graduate School 1554 “Micro-Macro-Interactions in Structured Media and Particulate Systems.”

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

Llength, m
L ¯ t mean throat length, m
Pccapillary pressure, Pa
Pc,meanmean capillary pressure, Pa
Peentry pressure, Pa
Pggas pressure, Pa
Plliquid pressure, Pa
rradius, m
r ¯ mean radius, m
Ssaturation
Seeffective saturation
Srirreducible saturation
Vvolume, m3
Zconnectivity
Greek symbols
εnetwork porosity
θ equilibrium contact angle, °
σ 0standard distribution, m
σ mstandard distribution of meniscus, m
σ surface tension, N/m
λsize distribution index
Subscripts/superscripts
tthroat
ppore
Abbreviations
IPinvasion percolation
PNMspore network models
PSDpore size distribution
TSDthroat size distribution

References

  1. Wilkinson, D.; Willemsen, J.F. Invasion percolation: A new form of percolation theory. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1983, 16, 3365–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chandler, R.; Koplik, J.; Lerman, K.; Willemsen, J.F. Capillary displacement and percolation in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 1982, 119, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mason, G.; Mellor, D.W. Simulation of Drainage and Imbibition in a Random Packing of Equal Spheres. J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 1995, 176, 214–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Prat, M. Percolation model of drying under isothermal conditions in porous media. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 1993, 19, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brooks, R.H.; Corey, A.T. Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. J. Irr. Drain. Div. 1966, 92, 61–88. [Google Scholar]
  6. Conner, W.C., Jr.; Blanco, C.; Coyne, K.; Neil, J.; Pajares, J. Analysis of the morphology of high surface area solids: Studies of agglomeration and the determination of shape. J. Catal. 1987, 106, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Conner, W.; Lane, A.; Ng, K.; Goldblatt, M. Measurement of the morphology of high surface area solids: Porosimetry of agglomerated particles. J. Catal. 1983, 83, 336–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Portsmouth, R.; Gladden, L. Determination of pore connectivity by mercury porosimetry. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 46, 3023–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Conner, W.; Lane, A.M. Measurement of the morphology of high surface area solids: Effect of network structure on the simulation of porosimetry. J. Catal. 1984, 89, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsakiroglou, C.D.; Payatakes, A.C. Effects of pore-size correlations on mercury porosimetry curves. J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 1991, 146, 479–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Knackstedt, M.A.; Sheppard, A.; Sahimi, M. Pore network modelling of two-phase flow in porous rock: The effect of correlated heterogeneity. Adv. Water Resour. 2001, 24, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. White, N.F.; Duke, H.R.; Sunada, D.K.; Corey, A.T. Physics of desaturation in porous materials. J. Irr. Drain. Div. 1996, 96, 165–191. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rabbani, H.S.; Joekar-Niasar, V.; Shokri, N. Effects of intermediate wettability on entry capillary pressure in angular pores. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 473, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Raeini, A.Q.; Blunt, M.J.; Bijeljic, B. Modelling two-phase flow in porous media at the pore scale using the volume-of-fluid method. J. Comput. Phys. 2012, 231, 5653–5668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferrari, A.; Lunati, I. Direct numerical simulations of interface dynamics to link capillary pressure and total surface energy. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 57, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kewen, L. Theoretical development of the Brooks-Corey capillary pressure model from fractal modeling of porous media. In Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Fourteenth Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, USA, 17–21 April 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moseley, W.A.; Dhir, V.K. Capillary pressure-saturation relations in porous media including the effect of wettability. J. Hydrol. 1996, 178, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kjosavik, A.; Ringen, J.; Skjaeveland, S. Relative Permeability Correlation for Mixed-Wet Reservoirs. SPE J. 2002, 7, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Papatzacos, P.; Skjæveland, S.M. Relative permeability from capillary pressure. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Antonio, TX, USA, 29 September–2 October 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oren, P.-E.; Bakke, S.; Arntzen, O. Extending Predictive Capabilities to Network Models. SPE J. 1998, 3, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lerdahl, T.R.; Oren, P.-E.; Bakke, S. A Predictive Network Model for Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media. SPE Impr. Oil Recov. Symp. 2000, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blunt, M.J.; Jackson, M.D.; Piri, M.; Valvatne, P.H. Detailed physics, predictive capabilities and macroscopic consequences for pore-network models of multiphase flow. Adv. Water Resour. 2002, 25, 1069–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Joekar-Niasar, V.; Hassanizadeh, S.M.; Leijnse, A. Insights into the Relationships Among Capillary Pressure, Saturation, Interfacial Area and Relative Permeability Using Pore-Network Modeling. Transp. Por. Med. 2007, 74, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Moghaddam, A.A.; Kharaghani, A.; Tsotsas, E.; Prat, M. A pore network study of evaporation from the surface of a drying non-hygroscopic porous medium. AIChE J. 2017, 64, 1435–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moghaddam, A.A.; Kharaghani, A.; Tsotsas, E.; Prat, M. Kinematics in a slowly drying porous medium: Reconciliation of pore network simulations and continuum modeling. Phys. Fluids 2017, 29, 022102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lu, X.; Kharaghani, A.; Tsotsas, E. Transport parameters of macroscopic continuum model determined from discrete pore network simulations of drying porous media: Throat-node vs. throat-pore configurations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 223, 115723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmad, F.; Talbi, M.; Prat, M.; Tsotsas, E.; Kharaghani, A. Non-local equilibrium continuum modeling of partially saturated drying porous media: Comparison with pore network simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 228, 115957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moghaddam, A.A.; Prat, M.; Tsotsas, E.; Kharaghani, A. Evaporation in Capillary Porous Media at the Perfect Piston-Like Invasion Limit: Evidence of Nonlocal Equilibrium Effects. Water Resour. Res. 2017, 53, 10433–10449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Metzger, T.; Irawan, A.; Tsotsas, E. Influence of pore structure on drying kinetics: A pore network study. AIChE J. 2007, 53, 3029–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cieplak, M.; Robbins, M.O. Influence of contact angle on quasistatic fluid invasion of porous media. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 11508–11521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Metzger, T.; Irawan, A.; Tsotsas, E. Remarks on the paper “Extension of Hoshen–Kopelman algorithm to non-lattice environments” by A. Al-Futaisi and T.W. Patzek, Physica A 321 (2003) 665–678. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2006, 363, 558–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fengpeng, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W.; Dong, H.; Kong, F.; Jiang, Z. Investigation of Pore Characteristics and Irreducible Water Saturation of Tight Reservoir Using Experimental and Theoretical Methods. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 3368–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sok, R.M.; Knackstedt, M.A.; Sheppard, A.P.; Pinczewski, W.; Lindquist, W.; Venkatarangan, A.; Paterson, L. Direct and Stochastic Generation of Network Models from Tomographic Images; Effect of Topology on Residual Saturations. Transp. Por. Media 2002, 46, 345–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ojha, S.P.; Misra, S.; Tinni, A.; Sondergeld, C.H.; Rai, C. Estimation of Pore-Network Characteristics and Irreducible Saturations in Wolfcamp and Eagle Ford Shales Using Low-Pressure-Nitrogen-Adsorption/Desorption-Isotherm Measurements. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 2018, 21, 373–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stauffer, D.; Aharony, A. Introduction to Percolation Theory; Informa UK Limited: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  36. Hunt, A. Pressure Saturation Curves and the Critical Volume Fraction for Percolation. In Percolation Theory for Flow in Porous Media; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 121–143. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ferreira, F.C.; Booth, R.; Oliveira, R.; Bize-Forest, N.; Boyd, A.; Souza, A.; Carneiro, G.; Mesquita, P. Modelling Irreducible Water Saturation in Heterogeneous Rocks from Pore-Size Distribution. In Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 7–10 November 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prat, M. Recent advances in pore-scale models for drying of porous media. Chem. Eng. J. 2002, 86, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hilpert, M.; Miller, C.T. Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 2001, 24, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sweijen, T.; Aslannejad, H.; Hassanizadeh, S.M. Capillary pressure–saturation relationships for porous granular materials: Pore morphology method vs. pore unit assembly method. Adv. Water Resour. 2017, 107, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Srikiatden, J.; Roberts, J.S. Moisture Transfer in Solid Food Materials: A Review of Mechanisms, Models, and Measurements. Int. J. Food Prop. 2007, 10, 739–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yiotis, A.G.; Salin, D.; Tajer, E.S.; Yortsos, Y.C. Drying in porous media with gravity-stabilized fronts: Experimental results. Phys. Rev. E 2012, 86, 026310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, Y.; Kharaghani, A.; Metzger, T.; Tsotsas, E. Pore Network Drying Model for Particle Aggregates: Assessment by X-Ray Microtomography. Dry. Technol. 2012, 30, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Prat, M. On the influence of pore shape, contact angle and film flows on drying of capillary porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2007, 50, 1455–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pore and throat radius distribution for the random network with throat mean radius 250 µm and the standard deviation 25 µm. The pore radius is assumed larger or at least equal with the largest radius of neighbor throats.
Figure 1. Pore and throat radius distribution for the random network with throat mean radius 250 µm and the standard deviation 25 µm. The pore radius is assumed larger or at least equal with the largest radius of neighbor throats.
Processes 08 01318 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of the pore network used for capillarity-controlled invasion percolation (IP) simulations. The pore network is connected to air reservoir at the top and liquid reservoir at the bottom. Throats/pores filled with liquid are shown in black, whereas gas throats/pores are shown in white.
Figure 2. Schematic of the pore network used for capillarity-controlled invasion percolation (IP) simulations. The pore network is connected to air reservoir at the top and liquid reservoir at the bottom. Throats/pores filled with liquid are shown in black, whereas gas throats/pores are shown in white.
Processes 08 01318 g002
Figure 3. Residual saturation as a function of (a) ratio of the standard deviation of throat size distribution (TSD) over mean throat radius. Data denoted by (‘o’) have been obtained for the networks with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 1/10 (µm), 2/20 (µm), 5.2/11.8 (µm), 9.1/14.6 (µm). Other data have been recorded: ‘Δ’ with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 10/100 (µm), ‘□’ with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 20/200 (µm) and ‘◊’ with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The center distance between two pores was L = 1000 µm. r ¯ p is the mean radius of pores in the network. Throat length (Lt) is calculated based on neighbor pores and averaged throat length ( L ¯ t) is averaged over all throats in the network. The connectivity (Z) was 6; (b) connectivity at constant ratio   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The connectivity presents the averaged connectivity of pores for the whole network. The simulation values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Figure 3. Residual saturation as a function of (a) ratio of the standard deviation of throat size distribution (TSD) over mean throat radius. Data denoted by (‘o’) have been obtained for the networks with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 1/10 (µm), 2/20 (µm), 5.2/11.8 (µm), 9.1/14.6 (µm). Other data have been recorded: ‘Δ’ with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 10/100 (µm), ‘□’ with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 20/200 (µm) and ‘◊’ with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The center distance between two pores was L = 1000 µm. r ¯ p is the mean radius of pores in the network. Throat length (Lt) is calculated based on neighbor pores and averaged throat length ( L ¯ t) is averaged over all throats in the network. The connectivity (Z) was 6; (b) connectivity at constant ratio   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The connectivity presents the averaged connectivity of pores for the whole network. The simulation values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Processes 08 01318 g003
Figure 4. The volume distribution of liquid-filled throats and pores in the network at the beginning of the capillarity-controlled IP process and at S r for a single simulation: (a)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 1/10 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.01 (b)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 10/100 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.15 (c)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 20/200 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.42 and (d)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.66 . The network connectivity is 6.
Figure 4. The volume distribution of liquid-filled throats and pores in the network at the beginning of the capillarity-controlled IP process and at S r for a single simulation: (a)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 1/10 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.01 (b)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 10/100 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.15 (c)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 20/200 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.42 and (d)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm), r ¯ p / L ¯ t = 0.66 . The network connectivity is 6.
Processes 08 01318 g004
Figure 5. The function S r / ε against pore connectivity at constant σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The connectivity presents the average of whole pore connectivity for the whole network. Simulated values have been averaged over 40 realizations.
Figure 5. The function S r / ε against pore connectivity at constant σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The connectivity presents the average of whole pore connectivity for the whole network. Simulated values have been averaged over 40 realizations.
Processes 08 01318 g005
Figure 6. Relationship of entry pressure (Pe) and mean capillary pressure (Pc,mean) with specific properties of the porous medium: (a) influence of mean radius with identical standard deviation (5 µm) and a connectivity of 6; (b) influence of standard deviation with constant mean radius (250 µm) and a connectivity of 6; (c) influence of connectivity with the constant ratio σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). Simulation results have been averaged over 40 realizations.
Figure 6. Relationship of entry pressure (Pe) and mean capillary pressure (Pc,mean) with specific properties of the porous medium: (a) influence of mean radius with identical standard deviation (5 µm) and a connectivity of 6; (b) influence of standard deviation with constant mean radius (250 µm) and a connectivity of 6; (c) influence of connectivity with the constant ratio σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). Simulation results have been averaged over 40 realizations.
Processes 08 01318 g006
Figure 7. Influence of the mean radius on capillary pressure profile with effective saturation: (a) σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/50 (µm), (b)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/150 (µm) and (c)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/250 (µm). The network connectivity is 6. The simulation values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Figure 7. Influence of the mean radius on capillary pressure profile with effective saturation: (a) σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/50 (µm), (b)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/150 (µm) and (c)   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/250 (µm). The network connectivity is 6. The simulation values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Processes 08 01318 g007
Figure 8. The capillary pressure profile with effective saturation, influenced by (a) the standard deviation at constant pore connectivity (Z = 6) and (b) the pore connectivity with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The simulation values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Figure 8. The capillary pressure profile with effective saturation, influenced by (a) the standard deviation at constant pore connectivity (Z = 6) and (b) the pore connectivity with σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The simulation values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Processes 08 01318 g008
Figure 9. The exponent λ related with (a) and (b) the ratio of standard deviation over the mean radius σ 0 / r ¯ with pore connectivity Z = 6, and (c) pore connectivity at   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Figure 9. The exponent λ related with (a) and (b) the ratio of standard deviation over the mean radius σ 0 / r ¯ with pore connectivity Z = 6, and (c) pore connectivity at   σ 0 / r   ¯ = 25/250 (µm). The values are averaged over 40 realizations.
Processes 08 01318 g009
Figure 10. The ratio of standard deviation of the meniscus throat/pore radius distribution (σm) to the given standard deviation of the radius size distribution of the network (σ0) changes with effective network saturation; ( σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/50 (µm), Z = 6).
Figure 10. The ratio of standard deviation of the meniscus throat/pore radius distribution (σm) to the given standard deviation of the radius size distribution of the network (σ0) changes with effective network saturation; ( σ 0 / r   ¯ = 5/50 (µm), Z = 6).
Processes 08 01318 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, X.; Kharaghani, A.; Adloo, H.; Tsotsas, E. The Brooks and Corey Capillary Pressure Model Revisited from Pore Network Simulations of Capillarity-Controlled Invasion Percolation Process. Processes 2020, 8, 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101318

AMA Style

Lu X, Kharaghani A, Adloo H, Tsotsas E. The Brooks and Corey Capillary Pressure Model Revisited from Pore Network Simulations of Capillarity-Controlled Invasion Percolation Process. Processes. 2020; 8(10):1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Xiang, Abdolreza Kharaghani, Hadi Adloo, and Evangelos Tsotsas. 2020. "The Brooks and Corey Capillary Pressure Model Revisited from Pore Network Simulations of Capillarity-Controlled Invasion Percolation Process" Processes 8, no. 10: 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop